<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/6sq2TaYn" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>New Books in Political Science</title>
    <description>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: ⁠newbooksnetwork.com⁠

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: ⁠https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/⁠

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</description>
    <copyright>New Books Network</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: ⁠newbooksnetwork.com⁠

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: ⁠https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/⁠

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/c3014373-19d9-4555-a6a8-e5b8e97c934c/3000x3000/af9ef2afee05125bb265ca99804e6c8a.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/6sq2TaYn</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>New Books Network</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Science">
      <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec6f754c-bcac-461f-95d0-a8a6954a56fc</guid>
      <title>Why Voters Support Politicians Who Undermine Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many citizens continue to support politicians who undermine democracy? And why have nationalist appeals become such a powerful tool for democratic backsliding? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Filip Milačić about his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009734738" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Abandoning Democracy for the Nation</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>(Cambridge UP, 2026). Drawing on evidence from Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Israel and Turkey, Milačić argues that democratic erosion is often driven not simply by populism or polarization, but by political leaders convincing citizens that the nation itself is under threat. The discussion explores why democratically minded voters sometimes accept attacks on democratic institutions, whether this argument travels beyond the cases in the book, and what lessons it offers for those seeking to defend democracy.</p><p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Milacic-Transcript.docx#asset:474467" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><p>Guest:</p><p><a href="https://democracyinstitute.ceu.edu/people/filip-milacic" rel="noopener noreferrer">Filip Milačić</a> is a Senior Researcher for Democracy and Society at the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung's Democracy of the Future officein Vienna, visiting professor at the Central European University and a Research Affiliate at CEU's Democracy Institute. His research focuses on nationalism, democratic backsliding and resistance, political identity and party politics, with a particular emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. He is the author of Abandoning Democracy for the Nation, a new book exploring the relationship between nationalism and democratic erosion. Through his academic research and policy work, Milačić examines the forces shaping the future of democracy and the challenges facing democratic societies today.</p><p>Presenter:</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many citizens continue to support politicians who undermine democracy? And why have nationalist appeals become such a powerful tool for democratic backsliding? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Filip Milačić about his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009734738" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Abandoning Democracy for the Nation</i></a><i>&nbsp;</i>(Cambridge UP, 2026). Drawing on evidence from Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Israel and Turkey, Milačić argues that democratic erosion is often driven not simply by populism or polarization, but by political leaders convincing citizens that the nation itself is under threat. The discussion explores why democratically minded voters sometimes accept attacks on democratic institutions, whether this argument travels beyond the cases in the book, and what lessons it offers for those seeking to defend democracy.</p><p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Milacic-Transcript.docx#asset:474467" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p><p>Guest:</p><p><a href="https://democracyinstitute.ceu.edu/people/filip-milacic" rel="noopener noreferrer">Filip Milačić</a> is a Senior Researcher for Democracy and Society at the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung's Democracy of the Future officein Vienna, visiting professor at the Central European University and a Research Affiliate at CEU's Democracy Institute. His research focuses on nationalism, democratic backsliding and resistance, political identity and party politics, with a particular emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. He is the author of Abandoning Democracy for the Nation, a new book exploring the relationship between nationalism and democratic erosion. Through his academic research and policy work, Milačić examines the forces shaping the future of democracy and the challenges facing democratic societies today.</p><p>Presenter:</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33072687" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/bcf91301-88ac-4dc1-a2bc-84906ccb0bac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=bcf91301-88ac-4dc1-a2bc-84906ccb0bac&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=9735f1d0-3b79-45dd-9d9a-f39d0465e108&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Voters Support Politicians Who Undermine Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do so many citizens continue to support politicians who undermine democracy? And why have nationalist appeals become such a powerful tool for democratic backsliding? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Filip Milačić about his new book, Abandoning Democracy for the Nation ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026). Drawing on evidence from Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Israel and Turkey, Milačić argues that democratic erosion is often driven not simply by populism or polarization, but by political leaders convincing citizens that the nation itself is under threat. The discussion explores why democratically minded voters sometimes accept attacks on democratic institutions, whether this argument travels beyond the cases in the book, and what lessons it offers for those seeking to defend democracy.   </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do so many citizens continue to support politicians who undermine democracy? And why have nationalist appeals become such a powerful tool for democratic backsliding? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Filip Milačić about his new book, Abandoning Democracy for the Nation ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026). Drawing on evidence from Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Israel and Turkey, Milačić argues that democratic erosion is often driven not simply by populism or polarization, but by political leaders convincing citizens that the nation itself is under threat. The discussion explores why democratically minded voters sometimes accept attacks on democratic institutions, whether this argument travels beyond the cases in the book, and what lessons it offers for those seeking to defend democracy.   </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c90a6ee-2c57-4cc5-9fc8-b33f6d32a6ef</guid>
      <title>Nora Fisher-Onar, &quot;Contesting Pluralism(s): Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108838702" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Contesting Pluralism(s):&nbsp;﻿﻿Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond&nbsp;</i></a>﻿(Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges a widespread tendency to limit studies of Turkish - and Muslim - politics to 'Islamist vs. secularist' or 'Islam vs. democracy' debates. Instead, Nora Fisher-Onar's innovative argument centers on coalitions for and against pluralism. Retelling Turkey's story from the late Ottoman Empire to the present as a tale of pluralizing vs. anti-pluralist coalitions, this book offers an alternative explanation for major outcomes from elections and coup d'etats to revolutions. Here, cross-camp alliances pit those who are willing to coexist with 'Other(s)' against those who champion a unitary, national project in which everyone speaks, believes, looks, and loves as they do. Drawing on a rich array of primary and secondary data, Fisher-Onar introduces an analytical framework for capturing causal complexity in political contestation. This study rejects Orientalist exceptionalism, rereading the relationship between political religion, pluralism, and populism via a framework that travels across and beyond the Muslim-majority world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108838702" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Contesting Pluralism(s):&nbsp;﻿﻿Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond&nbsp;</i></a>﻿(Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges a widespread tendency to limit studies of Turkish - and Muslim - politics to 'Islamist vs. secularist' or 'Islam vs. democracy' debates. Instead, Nora Fisher-Onar's innovative argument centers on coalitions for and against pluralism. Retelling Turkey's story from the late Ottoman Empire to the present as a tale of pluralizing vs. anti-pluralist coalitions, this book offers an alternative explanation for major outcomes from elections and coup d'etats to revolutions. Here, cross-camp alliances pit those who are willing to coexist with 'Other(s)' against those who champion a unitary, national project in which everyone speaks, believes, looks, and loves as they do. Drawing on a rich array of primary and secondary data, Fisher-Onar introduces an analytical framework for capturing causal complexity in political contestation. This study rejects Orientalist exceptionalism, rereading the relationship between political religion, pluralism, and populism via a framework that travels across and beyond the Muslim-majority world.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65672165" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/bca00b64-97d8-493c-baff-b760fff82d31/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=bca00b64-97d8-493c-baff-b760fff82d31&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=dc286d49-91cc-4fd0-9fab-55be269d40f6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nora Fisher-Onar, &quot;Contesting Pluralism(s): Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Contesting Pluralism(s): ﻿﻿Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges a widespread tendency to limit studies of Turkish - and Muslim - politics to &apos;Islamist vs. secularist&apos; or &apos;Islam vs. democracy&apos; debates. Instead, Nora Fisher-Onar&apos;s innovative argument centers on coalitions for and against plur </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Contesting Pluralism(s): ﻿﻿Islamism, Liberalism and Nationalism in Turkey and Beyond ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2024) challenges a widespread tendency to limit studies of Turkish - and Muslim - politics to &apos;Islamist vs. secularist&apos; or &apos;Islam vs. democracy&apos; debates. Instead, Nora Fisher-Onar&apos;s innovative argument centers on coalitions for and against plur </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02a4639c-abce-11f1-af21-8fb1c754c015</guid>
      <title>Voices from North Korea: Refugees Tell Their Stories</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>n this podcast, North Korean refugees who visited the University of Bradford share their harrowing experiences of life in North Korea, escape, and the challenges of building new lives in freedom. They are supported by Freedom Speakers International (FSI), a Seoul-based non-profit that helps North Korean refugees rebuild their lives through personalised English education, mentoring and public-speaking opportunities. Crucially, FSI enables refugees to tell their own stories in their own voices.</p>
<p>Their testimony reveals the human cost of repression in North Korea while highlighting the importance of the humanitarian work undertaken by FSI: helping refugees develop the skills and confidence to pursue their ambitions, rebuild their independence and ensure that their experiences are heard internationally.</p>
<p>Freedom Speakers International (FSI) is a Seoul-based non-profit organisation dedicated to supporting North Korean refugees as they rebuild their lives after escape from North Korea. Founded in 2013 by Casey Lartigue Jr. and Eunkoo Lee, it began as Teach North Korean Refugees and has developed into an organisation focused on empowering refugees through education, mentoring and public speaking opportunities.</p>
<p>FSI provides North Korean refugees with tuition-free, individualised English and public-speaking mentorship. This is particularly important because many refugees arrive in South Korea having experienced severe disruption to their education and face significant disadvantages in employment and higher education, where English proficiency can be important. FSI works with refugees according to their own objectives, helping them improve their language skills, confidence and ability to participate fully in South Korean and international society.</p>
<p>An especially important part of FSI's work is enabling North Korean refugees who wish to do so to tell their own stories. Through its public-speaking programme, its “I Am From North Korea” English Speech Contest and its Keynote Speaker Network, FSI gives refugees opportunities to communicate their experiences directly to international audiences rather than having others speak on their behalf. Its speaker network now includes more than 30 speakers.</p>
<p>The humanitarian importance of this work extends well beyond language teaching. North Korean refugees have often endured repression, traumatic journeys of escape, separation from their families and the considerable difficulties of adapting to an unfamiliar society. Effective resettlement therefore requires more than providing physical safety. It also means helping people recover independence, confidence and the ability to determine their own futures. FSI's personalised model is particularly valuable because it treats refugees not simply as recipients of assistance but as individuals with their own ambitions, experiences and voices. Its work helps turn escape from persecution into the possibility of a genuinely independent life.</p>
<p>At the same time, by enabling refugees to speak about North Korea from personal experience, FSI performs a wider human-rights function. First-hand testimony preserves awareness of conditions inside North Korea and ensures that the experiences of those who have escaped remain part of international discussion. Supporting North Korean refugees in finding their own voices is therefore both an important humanitarian activity and a contribution to the broader defence of human dignity and freedom.</p>
<p>﻿Christoph Bluth is Professor of International Relations and Security at the University of Bradford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Sep 2026 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n this podcast, North Korean refugees who visited the University of Bradford share their harrowing experiences of life in North Korea, escape, and the challenges of building new lives in freedom. They are supported by Freedom Speakers International (FSI), a Seoul-based non-profit that helps North Korean refugees rebuild their lives through personalised English education, mentoring and public-speaking opportunities. Crucially, FSI enables refugees to tell their own stories in their own voices.</p>
<p>Their testimony reveals the human cost of repression in North Korea while highlighting the importance of the humanitarian work undertaken by FSI: helping refugees develop the skills and confidence to pursue their ambitions, rebuild their independence and ensure that their experiences are heard internationally.</p>
<p>Freedom Speakers International (FSI) is a Seoul-based non-profit organisation dedicated to supporting North Korean refugees as they rebuild their lives after escape from North Korea. Founded in 2013 by Casey Lartigue Jr. and Eunkoo Lee, it began as Teach North Korean Refugees and has developed into an organisation focused on empowering refugees through education, mentoring and public speaking opportunities.</p>
<p>FSI provides North Korean refugees with tuition-free, individualised English and public-speaking mentorship. This is particularly important because many refugees arrive in South Korea having experienced severe disruption to their education and face significant disadvantages in employment and higher education, where English proficiency can be important. FSI works with refugees according to their own objectives, helping them improve their language skills, confidence and ability to participate fully in South Korean and international society.</p>
<p>An especially important part of FSI's work is enabling North Korean refugees who wish to do so to tell their own stories. Through its public-speaking programme, its “I Am From North Korea” English Speech Contest and its Keynote Speaker Network, FSI gives refugees opportunities to communicate their experiences directly to international audiences rather than having others speak on their behalf. Its speaker network now includes more than 30 speakers.</p>
<p>The humanitarian importance of this work extends well beyond language teaching. North Korean refugees have often endured repression, traumatic journeys of escape, separation from their families and the considerable difficulties of adapting to an unfamiliar society. Effective resettlement therefore requires more than providing physical safety. It also means helping people recover independence, confidence and the ability to determine their own futures. FSI's personalised model is particularly valuable because it treats refugees not simply as recipients of assistance but as individuals with their own ambitions, experiences and voices. Its work helps turn escape from persecution into the possibility of a genuinely independent life.</p>
<p>At the same time, by enabling refugees to speak about North Korea from personal experience, FSI performs a wider human-rights function. First-hand testimony preserves awareness of conditions inside North Korea and ensures that the experiences of those who have escaped remain part of international discussion. Supporting North Korean refugees in finding their own voices is therefore both an important humanitarian activity and a contribution to the broader defence of human dignity and freedom.</p>
<p>﻿Christoph Bluth is Professor of International Relations and Security at the University of Bradford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38263812" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/982daf33-6cdd-4408-ae28-f6658fbcaf8f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=982daf33-6cdd-4408-ae28-f6658fbcaf8f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Voices from North Korea: Refugees Tell Their Stories</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>n this podcast, North Korean refugees who visited the University of Bradford share their harrowing experiences of life in North Korea, escape, and the challenges of building new lives in freedom. They are supported by Freedom Speakers International (FSI), a Seoul-based non-profit that helps North Korean refugees rebuild their lives through personalised English education, mentoring and public-speaking opportunities. Crucially, FSI enables refugees to tell their own stories in their own voices.

Their testimony reveals the human cost of repression in North Korea while highlighting the importance of the humanitarian work undertaken by FSI: helping refugees develop the skills and confidence to pursue their ambitions, rebuild their independence and ensure that their experiences are heard internationally.

Freedom Speakers International (FSI) is a Seoul-based non-profit organisation dedicated to supporting North Korean refugees as they rebuild their lives after escape from North Korea. Founded in 2013 by Casey Lartigue Jr. and Eunkoo Lee, it began as Teach North Korean Refugees and has developed into an organisation focused on empowering refugees through education, mentoring and public speaking opportunities.

FSI provides North Korean refugees with tuition-free, individualised English and public-speaking mentorship. This is particularly important because many refugees arrive in South Korea having experienced severe disruption to their education and face significant disadvantages in employment and higher education, where English proficiency can be important. FSI works with refugees according to their own objectives, helping them improve their language skills, confidence and ability to participate fully in South Korean and international society.

An especially important part of FSI&apos;s work is enabling North Korean refugees who wish to do so to tell their own stories. Through its public-speaking programme, its “I Am From North Korea” English Speech Contest and its Keynote Speaker Network, FSI gives refugees opportunities to communicate their experiences directly to international audiences rather than having others speak on their behalf. Its speaker network now includes more than 30 speakers.

The humanitarian importance of this work extends well beyond language teaching. North Korean refugees have often endured repression, traumatic journeys of escape, separation from their families and the considerable difficulties of adapting to an unfamiliar society. Effective resettlement therefore requires more than providing physical safety. It also means helping people recover independence, confidence and the ability to determine their own futures. FSI&apos;s personalised model is particularly valuable because it treats refugees not simply as recipients of assistance but as individuals with their own ambitions, experiences and voices. Its work helps turn escape from persecution into the possibility of a genuinely independent life.

At the same time, by enabling refugees to speak about North Korea from personal experience, FSI performs a wider human-rights function. First-hand testimony preserves awareness of conditions inside North Korea and ensures that the experiences of those who have escaped remain part of international discussion. Supporting North Korean refugees in finding their own voices is therefore both an important humanitarian activity and a contribution to the broader defence of human dignity and freedom.

﻿Christoph Bluth is Professor of International Relations and Security at the University of Bradford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>n this podcast, North Korean refugees who visited the University of Bradford share their harrowing experiences of life in North Korea, escape, and the challenges of building new lives in freedom. They are supported by Freedom Speakers International (FSI), a Seoul-based non-profit that helps North Korean refugees rebuild their lives through personalised English education, mentoring and public-speaking opportunities. Crucially, FSI enables refugees to tell their own stories in their own voices.

Their testimony reveals the human cost of repression in North Korea while highlighting the importance of the humanitarian work undertaken by FSI: helping refugees develop the skills and confidence to pursue their ambitions, rebuild their independence and ensure that their experiences are heard internationally.

Freedom Speakers International (FSI) is a Seoul-based non-profit organisation dedicated to supporting North Korean refugees as they rebuild their lives after escape from North Korea. Founded in 2013 by Casey Lartigue Jr. and Eunkoo Lee, it began as Teach North Korean Refugees and has developed into an organisation focused on empowering refugees through education, mentoring and public speaking opportunities.

FSI provides North Korean refugees with tuition-free, individualised English and public-speaking mentorship. This is particularly important because many refugees arrive in South Korea having experienced severe disruption to their education and face significant disadvantages in employment and higher education, where English proficiency can be important. FSI works with refugees according to their own objectives, helping them improve their language skills, confidence and ability to participate fully in South Korean and international society.

An especially important part of FSI&apos;s work is enabling North Korean refugees who wish to do so to tell their own stories. Through its public-speaking programme, its “I Am From North Korea” English Speech Contest and its Keynote Speaker Network, FSI gives refugees opportunities to communicate their experiences directly to international audiences rather than having others speak on their behalf. Its speaker network now includes more than 30 speakers.

The humanitarian importance of this work extends well beyond language teaching. North Korean refugees have often endured repression, traumatic journeys of escape, separation from their families and the considerable difficulties of adapting to an unfamiliar society. Effective resettlement therefore requires more than providing physical safety. It also means helping people recover independence, confidence and the ability to determine their own futures. FSI&apos;s personalised model is particularly valuable because it treats refugees not simply as recipients of assistance but as individuals with their own ambitions, experiences and voices. Its work helps turn escape from persecution into the possibility of a genuinely independent life.

At the same time, by enabling refugees to speak about North Korea from personal experience, FSI performs a wider human-rights function. First-hand testimony preserves awareness of conditions inside North Korea and ensures that the experiences of those who have escaped remain part of international discussion. Supporting North Korean refugees in finding their own voices is therefore both an important humanitarian activity and a contribution to the broader defence of human dignity and freedom.

﻿Christoph Bluth is Professor of International Relations and Security at the University of Bradford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>999</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f19d5058-a5d4-11f1-a6b5-3b78be944856</guid>
      <title>Robert Shum, &quot;Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032245755">Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032245755">Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24682750" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c703c5d2-e538-45e8-837d-98ab6818b4f2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c703c5d2-e538-45e8-837d-98ab6818b4f2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Shum, &quot;Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy?: Climate and Energy Politics between Crisis and Decarbonization (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) tackles a critical question. Why has the world struggled so much to coordinate policy to address climate change, despite political and scientific consensus? Despite landmark agreements and expanding knowledge, emissions have fallen unevenly and progress has repeatedly stalled or reversed. Democracy or Carbon Oligarchy? explains that failure by focusing on domestic politics: how institutions distribute power, how interest groups exploit “access points,” and why countries with similar wealth and technology diverge. Moving beyond arguments about mere political will, it situates energy and climate outcomes within the institutional architectures of industrialized oil super-producers: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Norway. Shum advances a neopluralist theory of climate politics, arguing that policy is shaped by the strategic capture of institutional venues by carbon-intensive interests. He shows how separation of powers, federalism, party systems, and electoral rules configure opportunities for a de facto carbon oligarchy. By mapping where binding decisions are made and who can reach them, the book offers a generalizable framework for diagnosing blockages, explaining cross-national variation, and identifying leverage points for sustaining ambitious climate policy over time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>998</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2cd184f2-a5d3-11f1-812a-ab37fe9c2ac2</guid>
      <title>Meghan Garrity, &quot;Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the twentieth century, governments around the world have expelled, en masse, more than 30 million people. Yet despite its prevalence, mass expulsion remains an understudied phenomenon as scholarly attention has been directed toward the gravest atrocities—genocide and mass killing—or toward forced migration more broadly.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197829066">Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Meghan Garrity examines why and how governments expel, providing a systematic, cross-regional account of mass expulsion over the longue durée. Using the original Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion (GSME) dataset, the book explains when and where expulsion occurs, who is targeted, and what regimes are most likely to expel. The book identifies two overarching categories of mass expulsion—security and economic—and develops a typology of four corresponding types: counter-irredentist, counter-subversive, reprisal, and nativist. It advances a theory of mass expulsion that traces the decision-making process, showing how key structural, proximate, precipitating, and intervening factors combine to shape the conditions under which governments expel or are restrained. Evidence is drawn from archival research conducted at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the League of Nations archives in Geneva, Switzerland.<br />This research contributes to the fields of international peace and security, political violence, and forced migration. Conceptually, it fills a gap in the literature by systematically examining mass expulsion as a distinct eliminationist policy aimed at the intentional removal of ethnic groups. Theoretically, it extends existing explanations beyond war and security threats, highlighting an entire class of expulsions targeting perceived economic threats. The book deepens our understanding of critical atrocity restraints, demonstrating the importance of alliances, the “homeland” state of the target group, and international organizations. These restraints generate core policy recommendations that seek to spur greater attention to deterring mass expulsion as a priority for atrocity prevention.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the twentieth century, governments around the world have expelled, en masse, more than 30 million people. Yet despite its prevalence, mass expulsion remains an understudied phenomenon as scholarly attention has been directed toward the gravest atrocities—genocide and mass killing—or toward forced migration more broadly.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197829066">Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Meghan Garrity examines why and how governments expel, providing a systematic, cross-regional account of mass expulsion over the longue durée. Using the original Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion (GSME) dataset, the book explains when and where expulsion occurs, who is targeted, and what regimes are most likely to expel. The book identifies two overarching categories of mass expulsion—security and economic—and develops a typology of four corresponding types: counter-irredentist, counter-subversive, reprisal, and nativist. It advances a theory of mass expulsion that traces the decision-making process, showing how key structural, proximate, precipitating, and intervening factors combine to shape the conditions under which governments expel or are restrained. Evidence is drawn from archival research conducted at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the League of Nations archives in Geneva, Switzerland.<br />This research contributes to the fields of international peace and security, political violence, and forced migration. Conceptually, it fills a gap in the literature by systematically examining mass expulsion as a distinct eliminationist policy aimed at the intentional removal of ethnic groups. Theoretically, it extends existing explanations beyond war and security threats, highlighting an entire class of expulsions targeting perceived economic threats. The book deepens our understanding of critical atrocity restraints, demonstrating the importance of alliances, the “homeland” state of the target group, and international organizations. These restraints generate core policy recommendations that seek to spur greater attention to deterring mass expulsion as a priority for atrocity prevention.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39095766" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/db3efa13-21e7-4690-b1ba-b86d741f89e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=db3efa13-21e7-4690-b1ba-b86d741f89e2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Meghan Garrity, &quot;Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the beginning of the twentieth century, governments around the world have expelled, en masse, more than 30 million people. Yet despite its prevalence, mass expulsion remains an understudied phenomenon as scholarly attention has been directed toward the gravest atrocities—genocide and mass killing—or toward forced migration more broadly.

Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Meghan Garrity examines why and how governments expel, providing a systematic, cross-regional account of mass expulsion over the longue durée. Using the original Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion (GSME) dataset, the book explains when and where expulsion occurs, who is targeted, and what regimes are most likely to expel. The book identifies two overarching categories of mass expulsion—security and economic—and develops a typology of four corresponding types: counter-irredentist, counter-subversive, reprisal, and nativist. It advances a theory of mass expulsion that traces the decision-making process, showing how key structural, proximate, precipitating, and intervening factors combine to shape the conditions under which governments expel or are restrained. Evidence is drawn from archival research conducted at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the League of Nations archives in Geneva, Switzerland.This research contributes to the fields of international peace and security, political violence, and forced migration. Conceptually, it fills a gap in the literature by systematically examining mass expulsion as a distinct eliminationist policy aimed at the intentional removal of ethnic groups. Theoretically, it extends existing explanations beyond war and security threats, highlighting an entire class of expulsions targeting perceived economic threats. The book deepens our understanding of critical atrocity restraints, demonstrating the importance of alliances, the “homeland” state of the target group, and international organizations. These restraints generate core policy recommendations that seek to spur greater attention to deterring mass expulsion as a priority for atrocity prevention.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the beginning of the twentieth century, governments around the world have expelled, en masse, more than 30 million people. Yet despite its prevalence, mass expulsion remains an understudied phenomenon as scholarly attention has been directed toward the gravest atrocities—genocide and mass killing—or toward forced migration more broadly.

Mass Expulsion: The Politics of Forced Population Removal (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Meghan Garrity examines why and how governments expel, providing a systematic, cross-regional account of mass expulsion over the longue durée. Using the original Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion (GSME) dataset, the book explains when and where expulsion occurs, who is targeted, and what regimes are most likely to expel. The book identifies two overarching categories of mass expulsion—security and economic—and develops a typology of four corresponding types: counter-irredentist, counter-subversive, reprisal, and nativist. It advances a theory of mass expulsion that traces the decision-making process, showing how key structural, proximate, precipitating, and intervening factors combine to shape the conditions under which governments expel or are restrained. Evidence is drawn from archival research conducted at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and the League of Nations archives in Geneva, Switzerland.This research contributes to the fields of international peace and security, political violence, and forced migration. Conceptually, it fills a gap in the literature by systematically examining mass expulsion as a distinct eliminationist policy aimed at the intentional removal of ethnic groups. Theoretically, it extends existing explanations beyond war and security threats, highlighting an entire class of expulsions targeting perceived economic threats. The book deepens our understanding of critical atrocity restraints, demonstrating the importance of alliances, the “homeland” state of the target group, and international organizations. These restraints generate core policy recommendations that seek to spur greater attention to deterring mass expulsion as a priority for atrocity prevention.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>997</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">28c5195c-a694-11f1-82f3-7725d6db004c</guid>
      <title>Jieun Baek,  &quot;Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What do the people closest to power really think about the system they serve? That’s perhaps one of the most important questions one could ask about North Korea, still one of the world’s least understood countries. </p>
<p>Today, we’re joined by Jieun Baek, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300272284">Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness</a><em> </em>(Yale UP, 2026).<em><strong> </strong></em>She draws on in-depth interviews with North Korean elite escapees—from senior party cadres and diplomats to military officers and wealthy, politically connected figures—to explore a group often assumed to be secure, influential, and loyal.</p>
<p>She finds that even those with access to better housing, education, overseas postings, and material comforts remain subject to a political system in which one misstep can have devastating consequences—not only for themselves, but for their families.  We talk about what it means to be an elite in North Korea, why some people defect while others stay, and what elite grievances can and can’t tell us about the country’s future.</p>
<p>Jieun Baek is an author and scholar specializing in authoritarian governance, regime stability, elite political behavior, and information access in closed societies, with a particular focus on North Korea and Burma. Her research draws on more than fifteen years of fieldwork and sustained engagement with hard-to-reach populations, including defectors, dissidents, diplomats, former officials, and individuals operating within and across tightly controlled political systems. She is also the author of <em>North Korea’s Hidden Revolution: How the Information Underground Is Transforming a Closed Society </em>(Yale University Press: 2016). </p>
<p>She can be found on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jieunbaek/">LinkedIn</a> and <a href="https://www.instagram.com/jieunbaek412">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"><em> The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/privileged-but-powerless-by-jieun-baek/"><em>Privileged But Powerless</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"><em> @BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em> @nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the people closest to power really think about the system they serve? That’s perhaps one of the most important questions one could ask about North Korea, still one of the world’s least understood countries. </p>
<p>Today, we’re joined by Jieun Baek, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300272284">Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness</a><em> </em>(Yale UP, 2026).<em><strong> </strong></em>She draws on in-depth interviews with North Korean elite escapees—from senior party cadres and diplomats to military officers and wealthy, politically connected figures—to explore a group often assumed to be secure, influential, and loyal.</p>
<p>She finds that even those with access to better housing, education, overseas postings, and material comforts remain subject to a political system in which one misstep can have devastating consequences—not only for themselves, but for their families.  We talk about what it means to be an elite in North Korea, why some people defect while others stay, and what elite grievances can and can’t tell us about the country’s future.</p>
<p>Jieun Baek is an author and scholar specializing in authoritarian governance, regime stability, elite political behavior, and information access in closed societies, with a particular focus on North Korea and Burma. Her research draws on more than fifteen years of fieldwork and sustained engagement with hard-to-reach populations, including defectors, dissidents, diplomats, former officials, and individuals operating within and across tightly controlled political systems. She is also the author of <em>North Korea’s Hidden Revolution: How the Information Underground Is Transforming a Closed Society </em>(Yale University Press: 2016). </p>
<p>She can be found on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jieunbaek/">LinkedIn</a> and <a href="https://www.instagram.com/jieunbaek412">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"><em> The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/privileged-but-powerless-by-jieun-baek/"><em>Privileged But Powerless</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"><em> @BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em> @nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48065393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5f15f476-5628-45c4-9340-075808d229bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5f15f476-5628-45c4-9340-075808d229bd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jieun Baek,  &quot;Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What do the people closest to power really think about the system they serve? That’s perhaps one of the most important questions one could ask about North Korea, still one of the world’s least understood countries. 

Today, we’re joined by Jieun Baek, author of Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness (Yale UP, 2026). She draws on in-depth interviews with North Korean elite escapees—from senior party cadres and diplomats to military officers and wealthy, politically connected figures—to explore a group often assumed to be secure, influential, and loyal.

She finds that even those with access to better housing, education, overseas postings, and material comforts remain subject to a political system in which one misstep can have devastating consequences—not only for themselves, but for their families.  We talk about what it means to be an elite in North Korea, why some people defect while others stay, and what elite grievances can and can’t tell us about the country’s future.

Jieun Baek is an author and scholar specializing in authoritarian governance, regime stability, elite political behavior, and information access in closed societies, with a particular focus on North Korea and Burma. Her research draws on more than fifteen years of fieldwork and sustained engagement with hard-to-reach populations, including defectors, dissidents, diplomats, former officials, and individuals operating within and across tightly controlled political systems. She is also the author of North Korea’s Hidden Revolution: How the Information Underground Is Transforming a Closed Society (Yale University Press: 2016). 

She can be found on LinkedIn and Instagram.

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Privileged But Powerless. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What do the people closest to power really think about the system they serve? That’s perhaps one of the most important questions one could ask about North Korea, still one of the world’s least understood countries. 

Today, we’re joined by Jieun Baek, author of Privileged But Powerless: How North Korean Elite Grievances Reveal the Regime’s Greatest Weakness (Yale UP, 2026). She draws on in-depth interviews with North Korean elite escapees—from senior party cadres and diplomats to military officers and wealthy, politically connected figures—to explore a group often assumed to be secure, influential, and loyal.

She finds that even those with access to better housing, education, overseas postings, and material comforts remain subject to a political system in which one misstep can have devastating consequences—not only for themselves, but for their families.  We talk about what it means to be an elite in North Korea, why some people defect while others stay, and what elite grievances can and can’t tell us about the country’s future.

Jieun Baek is an author and scholar specializing in authoritarian governance, regime stability, elite political behavior, and information access in closed societies, with a particular focus on North Korea and Burma. Her research draws on more than fifteen years of fieldwork and sustained engagement with hard-to-reach populations, including defectors, dissidents, diplomats, former officials, and individuals operating within and across tightly controlled political systems. She is also the author of North Korea’s Hidden Revolution: How the Information Underground Is Transforming a Closed Society (Yale University Press: 2016). 

She can be found on LinkedIn and Instagram.

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Privileged But Powerless. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>996</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b5f412a-a320-11f1-9976-3fefdcad16ba</guid>
      <title>Nikhil Kalyanpur, &quot;Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788185"><em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets</em></a>
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today's global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
"outsourcing" of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. "Losers" of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, "winners" respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals' offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.</p>
<p>﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, <em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy</em> lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788185"><em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets</em></a>
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today's global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
"outsourcing" of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. "Losers" of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, "winners" respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals' offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.</p>
<p>﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, <em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy</em> lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28466512" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2e90733a-6539-4f9d-b7dc-d9ac6f423754/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2e90733a-6539-4f9d-b7dc-d9ac6f423754&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nikhil Kalyanpur, &quot;Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today&apos;s global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
&quot;outsourcing&quot; of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.

﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. &quot;Losers&quot; of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, &quot;winners&quot; respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals&apos; offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.

﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, Legal Weapons of the Wealthy lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today&apos;s global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
&quot;outsourcing&quot; of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.

﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. &quot;Losers&quot; of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, &quot;winners&quot; respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals&apos; offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.

﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, Legal Weapons of the Wealthy lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>995</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2849612-a272-11f1-a1b6-db016468f97b</guid>
      <title>Michael Diniscia and Ellyn M Toscano eds. &quot;Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The idea of civility goes back to classical Rome and the ways in 
which citizens engaged one another within the republic. The term itself 
is often used in a number of different ways, reflecting expected 
behavior, particularly in public spaces, and as a mechanism to manage 
human interaction. But civility and the use of this idea often shape 
hierarchical relationships within society and within politics and may 
define who is to be included within the polis and who may be excluded. 
Thus, the conversations that led to the new book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479842162"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a>,
 interrogated the idea of civility in many of its facets and did not 
necessarily settle on a simple definition or means of implementing 
civility within contemporary society. Michael DiNiscia, Director of 
Research and Strategic Initiatives at New York University’s Brademas 
Center, and Ellyn Toscano, Director of the Hawthorndon Foundation, 
edited this valuable exploration of the idea of civility within 
democracy. In so doing, they brought together academics, politicians and
 former politicians, activists, artists, and individuals from the 
foundation world to discuss this controversial idea of civility, 
unpacking the term, the way it is used, and how society may consider 
civility within the realm of politics and public life. </p>
<p>I had the pleasure of discussing <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound</em></a>
with Michael DiNiscia and Hussein Rashid, one of the contributing 
authors. Our conversation covered the content of the book, tracing the 
sections that include philosophy and political theory, democratic 
institutions and politics, social justice and protest, media engagement,
 and lessons from arts and culture. The chapters are fascinating and 
accessible. As a reader, you feel as though you are part of the ongoing 
conversation with the various authors, since the chapters are in 
dialogue with each other and with the reader, without coming to a 
consensus on the role and capacity of civility within democratic society
 but with many paths to consider. The impetus for this book, and for 
focusing on the idea of civility, grew out of the events of January 6, 
2021, and an overarching question about whether the United States could 
return to a state of civility in our politics, after we had witnessed 
the violent insurrection that attempted to stymie the constitutional 
process of tallying Electoral College votes. <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a> brings many voices together to, in a way, respond to this violence, this incivility that had been demonstrated by a group of American 
citizens. </p>
<p>The various contributing authors to <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound</em></a>
take up the theory and practice of civility, trying to determine what it
 actually means and the rules around civility and political engagement. 
Across the chapters we find that there is a paradox around civility, 
around who is asked to “remain civil” and who gets to define what 
civility means. Civility may well reside within power relationships and 
dynamics, with rules applied to some groups or individuals and not to 
others. Invoking civility may well surface inequalities and the unequal 
places and footing of those engaging in politics and society. This is 
particularly important to consider in context of American democracy, and
 the unequal distribution of power and state violence inherent in the 
American state. <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a> prompts the reader to consider how democratic engagement works and how we are to participate in attempts at self-rule. </p>
<p>We discussed the <a href="https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/first-america">First America</a> podcast during the conversation. Here is a link to the podcast website: <a href="https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/first-america">First America Podcast</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>
(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of civility goes back to classical Rome and the ways in 
which citizens engaged one another within the republic. The term itself 
is often used in a number of different ways, reflecting expected 
behavior, particularly in public spaces, and as a mechanism to manage 
human interaction. But civility and the use of this idea often shape 
hierarchical relationships within society and within politics and may 
define who is to be included within the polis and who may be excluded. 
Thus, the conversations that led to the new book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479842162"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a>,
 interrogated the idea of civility in many of its facets and did not 
necessarily settle on a simple definition or means of implementing 
civility within contemporary society. Michael DiNiscia, Director of 
Research and Strategic Initiatives at New York University’s Brademas 
Center, and Ellyn Toscano, Director of the Hawthorndon Foundation, 
edited this valuable exploration of the idea of civility within 
democracy. In so doing, they brought together academics, politicians and
 former politicians, activists, artists, and individuals from the 
foundation world to discuss this controversial idea of civility, 
unpacking the term, the way it is used, and how society may consider 
civility within the realm of politics and public life. </p>
<p>I had the pleasure of discussing <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound</em></a>
with Michael DiNiscia and Hussein Rashid, one of the contributing 
authors. Our conversation covered the content of the book, tracing the 
sections that include philosophy and political theory, democratic 
institutions and politics, social justice and protest, media engagement,
 and lessons from arts and culture. The chapters are fascinating and 
accessible. As a reader, you feel as though you are part of the ongoing 
conversation with the various authors, since the chapters are in 
dialogue with each other and with the reader, without coming to a 
consensus on the role and capacity of civility within democratic society
 but with many paths to consider. The impetus for this book, and for 
focusing on the idea of civility, grew out of the events of January 6, 
2021, and an overarching question about whether the United States could 
return to a state of civility in our politics, after we had witnessed 
the violent insurrection that attempted to stymie the constitutional 
process of tallying Electoral College votes. <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a> brings many voices together to, in a way, respond to this violence, this incivility that had been demonstrated by a group of American 
citizens. </p>
<p>The various contributing authors to <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound</em></a>
take up the theory and practice of civility, trying to determine what it
 actually means and the rules around civility and political engagement. 
Across the chapters we find that there is a paradox around civility, 
around who is asked to “remain civil” and who gets to define what 
civility means. Civility may well reside within power relationships and 
dynamics, with rules applied to some groups or individuals and not to 
others. Invoking civility may well surface inequalities and the unequal 
places and footing of those engaging in politics and society. This is 
particularly important to consider in context of American democracy, and
 the unequal distribution of power and state violence inherent in the 
American state. <a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479840519/civility-unbound/"><em>Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value</em></a> prompts the reader to consider how democratic engagement works and how we are to participate in attempts at self-rule. </p>
<p>We discussed the <a href="https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/first-america">First America</a> podcast during the conversation. Here is a link to the podcast website: <a href="https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/first-america">First America Podcast</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>
(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56376936" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c8cbcd24-7d70-4f5d-b9ca-272833a4ba7d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c8cbcd24-7d70-4f5d-b9ca-272833a4ba7d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Diniscia and Ellyn M Toscano eds. &quot;Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The idea of civility goes back to classical Rome and the ways in 
which citizens engaged one another within the republic. The term itself 
is often used in a number of different ways, reflecting expected 
behavior, particularly in public spaces, and as a mechanism to manage 
human interaction. But civility and the use of this idea often shape 
hierarchical relationships within society and within politics and may 
define who is to be included within the polis and who may be excluded. 
Thus, the conversations that led to the new book, Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value,
 interrogated the idea of civility in many of its facets and did not 
necessarily settle on a simple definition or means of implementing 
civility within contemporary society. Michael DiNiscia, Director of 
Research and Strategic Initiatives at New York University’s Brademas 
Center, and Ellyn Toscano, Director of the Hawthorndon Foundation, 
edited this valuable exploration of the idea of civility within 
democracy. In so doing, they brought together academics, politicians and
 former politicians, activists, artists, and individuals from the 
foundation world to discuss this controversial idea of civility, 
unpacking the term, the way it is used, and how society may consider 
civility within the realm of politics and public life. 

I had the pleasure of discussing Civility Unbound
with Michael DiNiscia and Hussein Rashid, one of the contributing 
authors. Our conversation covered the content of the book, tracing the 
sections that include philosophy and political theory, democratic 
institutions and politics, social justice and protest, media engagement,
 and lessons from arts and culture. The chapters are fascinating and 
accessible. As a reader, you feel as though you are part of the ongoing 
conversation with the various authors, since the chapters are in 
dialogue with each other and with the reader, without coming to a 
consensus on the role and capacity of civility within democratic society
 but with many paths to consider. The impetus for this book, and for 
focusing on the idea of civility, grew out of the events of January 6, 
2021, and an overarching question about whether the United States could 
return to a state of civility in our politics, after we had witnessed 
the violent insurrection that attempted to stymie the constitutional 
process of tallying Electoral College votes. Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value brings many voices together to, in a way, respond to this violence, this incivility that had been demonstrated by a group of American 
citizens. 

The various contributing authors to Civility Unbound
take up the theory and practice of civility, trying to determine what it
 actually means and the rules around civility and political engagement. 
Across the chapters we find that there is a paradox around civility, 
around who is asked to “remain civil” and who gets to define what 
civility means. Civility may well reside within power relationships and 
dynamics, with rules applied to some groups or individuals and not to 
others. Invoking civility may well surface inequalities and the unequal 
places and footing of those engaging in politics and society. This is 
particularly important to consider in context of American democracy, and
 the unequal distribution of power and state violence inherent in the 
American state. Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value prompts the reader to consider how democratic engagement works and how we are to participate in attempts at self-rule. 

We discussed the First America podcast during the conversation. Here is a link to the podcast website: First America Podcast

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The idea of civility goes back to classical Rome and the ways in 
which citizens engaged one another within the republic. The term itself 
is often used in a number of different ways, reflecting expected 
behavior, particularly in public spaces, and as a mechanism to manage 
human interaction. But civility and the use of this idea often shape 
hierarchical relationships within society and within politics and may 
define who is to be included within the polis and who may be excluded. 
Thus, the conversations that led to the new book, Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value,
 interrogated the idea of civility in many of its facets and did not 
necessarily settle on a simple definition or means of implementing 
civility within contemporary society. Michael DiNiscia, Director of 
Research and Strategic Initiatives at New York University’s Brademas 
Center, and Ellyn Toscano, Director of the Hawthorndon Foundation, 
edited this valuable exploration of the idea of civility within 
democracy. In so doing, they brought together academics, politicians and
 former politicians, activists, artists, and individuals from the 
foundation world to discuss this controversial idea of civility, 
unpacking the term, the way it is used, and how society may consider 
civility within the realm of politics and public life. 

I had the pleasure of discussing Civility Unbound
with Michael DiNiscia and Hussein Rashid, one of the contributing 
authors. Our conversation covered the content of the book, tracing the 
sections that include philosophy and political theory, democratic 
institutions and politics, social justice and protest, media engagement,
 and lessons from arts and culture. The chapters are fascinating and 
accessible. As a reader, you feel as though you are part of the ongoing 
conversation with the various authors, since the chapters are in 
dialogue with each other and with the reader, without coming to a 
consensus on the role and capacity of civility within democratic society
 but with many paths to consider. The impetus for this book, and for 
focusing on the idea of civility, grew out of the events of January 6, 
2021, and an overarching question about whether the United States could 
return to a state of civility in our politics, after we had witnessed 
the violent insurrection that attempted to stymie the constitutional 
process of tallying Electoral College votes. Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value brings many voices together to, in a way, respond to this violence, this incivility that had been demonstrated by a group of American 
citizens. 

The various contributing authors to Civility Unbound
take up the theory and practice of civility, trying to determine what it
 actually means and the rules around civility and political engagement. 
Across the chapters we find that there is a paradox around civility, 
around who is asked to “remain civil” and who gets to define what 
civility means. Civility may well reside within power relationships and 
dynamics, with rules applied to some groups or individuals and not to 
others. Invoking civility may well surface inequalities and the unequal 
places and footing of those engaging in politics and society. This is 
particularly important to consider in context of American democracy, and
 the unequal distribution of power and state violence inherent in the 
American state. Civility Unbound: Contesting a Democratic Value prompts the reader to consider how democratic engagement works and how we are to participate in attempts at self-rule. 

We discussed the First America podcast during the conversation. Here is a link to the podcast website: First America Podcast

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>994</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">745ea0d6-a513-11f1-8d3c-13ab7339aa0f</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Quong, &quot;Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215648">Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice</a> (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?</p>
<p>Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215648">Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice</a> (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?</p>
<p>Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57758935" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0445b7c6-4622-4891-903f-fd3858ef0365/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0445b7c6-4622-4891-903f-fd3858ef0365&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Quong, &quot;Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?

Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?

Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>993</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f43a2dee-a693-11f1-a9d5-9bf04b2d4fba</guid>
      <title>The Political Philosophy of Mark Twain: On His Absurd, Noble Americans with Ivan Kenneally</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?</p>
<p>To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to <a href="https://x.com/IvanKenneally"><em>The New Atlantis</em></a> and <a href="https://firstthings.com/archive/?_author=ivan-kenneally"><em>First Things</em></a>, among other publications, he wrote an <a href="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/mark-twains-absurd-noble-america">essay</a> for <em>The Hedgehog Review</em> on modern reactions to Twain’s <em>Adventures of Huckleberry Finn</em> (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.</p>
<p>We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir <em>Life on the Mississippi, </em>contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <em>Madison’s Notes</em> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?</p>
<p>To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to <a href="https://x.com/IvanKenneally"><em>The New Atlantis</em></a> and <a href="https://firstthings.com/archive/?_author=ivan-kenneally"><em>First Things</em></a>, among other publications, he wrote an <a href="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/mark-twains-absurd-noble-america">essay</a> for <em>The Hedgehog Review</em> on modern reactions to Twain’s <em>Adventures of Huckleberry Finn</em> (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.</p>
<p>We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir <em>Life on the Mississippi, </em>contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <em>Madison’s Notes</em> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59751619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1d7f6c40-5070-4554-a4bb-2c97d642ec6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1d7f6c40-5070-4554-a4bb-2c97d642ec6c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Political Philosophy of Mark Twain: On His Absurd, Noble Americans with Ivan Kenneally</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?

To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to The New Atlantis and First Things, among other publications, he wrote an essay for The Hedgehog Review on modern reactions to Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.

We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir Life on the Mississippi, contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While many know that Mark Twain created some of the most famous characters in literature—Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, Jim and Puddn’head Wilson—too few have understood that the Missouri author wasn’t only America’s greatest humorist, but also one of its most subtle political thinkers. But what was the political philosophy of the elusive and ironic Mark Twain for his new democratic America?

To help answer that question, as we continue Season 6, I have as our guest Ivan Kenneally. A contributor to The New Atlantis and First Things, among other publications, he wrote an essay for The Hedgehog Review on modern reactions to Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), titled: “Mark Twain’s Absurd, Noble America,” which we will be discussing today.

We also talk about the travels of the two runaways Huck and Jim, along with their many disguises and rouses, how Americans like Tom Sawyer read European literature too dogmatically, the conmen Twain depicts in the Duke and Dauphin, technical versus tacit knowledge in his memoir Life on the Mississippi, contemporary interest in Twain from Ron Chernow and Percival Everett, the nature of irony as well as the poverty of modern comedy, and what philosophers and comedians alike can learn from the Missouri author and philosopher.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>992</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4432ac8a-a069-11f1-a8fe-9bf70aec0a15</guid>
      <title>Richard Ned Lebow, &quot;Why Nations Still Fight&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on an original data set of interventions and wars from 1945 to the current day, as well as numerous short case studies, Richard Ned Lebow offers a novel account of their origins and outcomes - one that emphasises miscalculation, failure to conduct meaningful risk assessments, and cultural and political arrogance.</p>
<p>A successive work to Why Nations Fight (2010), in this book ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009701082">Why Nations Still Fight </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) he explains why initiators routinely lose militarily and politically when they resort to force, as well as accounting for why the great powers, in particular, have not learned from their failures.</p>
<p>Lebow offers both type- and region-specific forecasts for the future likelihood of interventions and wars.</p>
<p>His account reveals the inapplicability of theories nested in the realist and rationalist paradigms to the study of war.</p>
<p>He argues what is needed instead is an "irrationalist" theory, and he takes the initial steps in this direction.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on an original data set of interventions and wars from 1945 to the current day, as well as numerous short case studies, Richard Ned Lebow offers a novel account of their origins and outcomes - one that emphasises miscalculation, failure to conduct meaningful risk assessments, and cultural and political arrogance.</p>
<p>A successive work to Why Nations Fight (2010), in this book ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009701082">Why Nations Still Fight </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) he explains why initiators routinely lose militarily and politically when they resort to force, as well as accounting for why the great powers, in particular, have not learned from their failures.</p>
<p>Lebow offers both type- and region-specific forecasts for the future likelihood of interventions and wars.</p>
<p>His account reveals the inapplicability of theories nested in the realist and rationalist paradigms to the study of war.</p>
<p>He argues what is needed instead is an "irrationalist" theory, and he takes the initial steps in this direction.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68050930" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1623bbee-192b-4151-a09d-dc0bb7b36281/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1623bbee-192b-4151-a09d-dc0bb7b36281&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard Ned Lebow, &quot;Why Nations Still Fight&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Drawing on an original data set of interventions and wars from 1945 to the current day, as well as numerous short case studies, Richard Ned Lebow offers a novel account of their origins and outcomes - one that emphasises miscalculation, failure to conduct meaningful risk assessments, and cultural and political arrogance.

A successive work to Why Nations Fight (2010), in this book ﻿Why Nations Still Fight (Cambridge UP, 2026) he explains why initiators routinely lose militarily and politically when they resort to force, as well as accounting for why the great powers, in particular, have not learned from their failures.

Lebow offers both type- and region-specific forecasts for the future likelihood of interventions and wars.

His account reveals the inapplicability of theories nested in the realist and rationalist paradigms to the study of war.

He argues what is needed instead is an &quot;irrationalist&quot; theory, and he takes the initial steps in this direction.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Drawing on an original data set of interventions and wars from 1945 to the current day, as well as numerous short case studies, Richard Ned Lebow offers a novel account of their origins and outcomes - one that emphasises miscalculation, failure to conduct meaningful risk assessments, and cultural and political arrogance.

A successive work to Why Nations Fight (2010), in this book ﻿Why Nations Still Fight (Cambridge UP, 2026) he explains why initiators routinely lose militarily and politically when they resort to force, as well as accounting for why the great powers, in particular, have not learned from their failures.

Lebow offers both type- and region-specific forecasts for the future likelihood of interventions and wars.

His account reveals the inapplicability of theories nested in the realist and rationalist paradigms to the study of war.

He argues what is needed instead is an &quot;irrationalist&quot; theory, and he takes the initial steps in this direction.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>991</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64ac7516-9d87-11f1-ac99-a7f88c176b94</guid>
      <title>Srirupa Roy, &quot;The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Defying the dire predictions that attended its birth as an 
independent nation-state in 1947, the Indian republic is more than 
seventy-five years old. And yet, it is a place where criticisms of 
actually existing democracy are intense and strident. In recent years, 
the trope of victimized people suffering at the hands of a predatory 
elite and political dysfunction has reaped rewards. The populist 
language of redemptive outsiders pledging to combat a corrupt system has
 been harnessed in successful electoral campaigns, like the majoritarian
 regime of Narendra Modi.</p>
<p>Tracking the shift from postcolonial nation-building to 
democracy-rebuilding, Srirupa Roy shows how the political outsider came 
to be a valorized figure of late-twentieth century Indian democracy, 
tasked with the urgent mission of curing a broken democratic system—what
 Roy terms "curative democracy." Drawing attention to an ambivalent 
political field that folds together authoritarian and democratic forms 
and ideas, ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503637986"><em>The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism</em></a><em> </em>(Stanford University Press, 2024) argues
 that the long 1970s were a crucial turning point in Indian politics, 
when democracy was suspended by the declaration of a national emergency 
and then subsequently restored. By tracing the crooked line that 
connects the ideals of curative democracy and the political outsider to 
the populist antipolitics and strongman authoritarian rule in present 
times, this book revisits democracy <em>from</em> India, and asks what the Indian experience tells us about the trajectory of global democratic politics.</p>
<p>Dhiren Swain is a MIPA PhD Candidate, affiliated to The University of
 Melbourne and IIT Madras. His current research focuses on the Urban 
Policies and Community Politics in India and South Asia.  </p>
<p>He can be reached at <a href="mailto:kishoredhiren8@gmail.com">kishoredhiren8@gmail.com</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Defying the dire predictions that attended its birth as an 
independent nation-state in 1947, the Indian republic is more than 
seventy-five years old. And yet, it is a place where criticisms of 
actually existing democracy are intense and strident. In recent years, 
the trope of victimized people suffering at the hands of a predatory 
elite and political dysfunction has reaped rewards. The populist 
language of redemptive outsiders pledging to combat a corrupt system has
 been harnessed in successful electoral campaigns, like the majoritarian
 regime of Narendra Modi.</p>
<p>Tracking the shift from postcolonial nation-building to 
democracy-rebuilding, Srirupa Roy shows how the political outsider came 
to be a valorized figure of late-twentieth century Indian democracy, 
tasked with the urgent mission of curing a broken democratic system—what
 Roy terms "curative democracy." Drawing attention to an ambivalent 
political field that folds together authoritarian and democratic forms 
and ideas, ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503637986"><em>The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism</em></a><em> </em>(Stanford University Press, 2024) argues
 that the long 1970s were a crucial turning point in Indian politics, 
when democracy was suspended by the declaration of a national emergency 
and then subsequently restored. By tracing the crooked line that 
connects the ideals of curative democracy and the political outsider to 
the populist antipolitics and strongman authoritarian rule in present 
times, this book revisits democracy <em>from</em> India, and asks what the Indian experience tells us about the trajectory of global democratic politics.</p>
<p>Dhiren Swain is a MIPA PhD Candidate, affiliated to The University of
 Melbourne and IIT Madras. His current research focuses on the Urban 
Policies and Community Politics in India and South Asia.  </p>
<p>He can be reached at <a href="mailto:kishoredhiren8@gmail.com">kishoredhiren8@gmail.com</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50137172" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aa6b20b1-626e-405a-8a7d-841628d158ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aa6b20b1-626e-405a-8a7d-841628d158ce&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Srirupa Roy, &quot;The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Defying the dire predictions that attended its birth as an 
independent nation-state in 1947, the Indian republic is more than 
seventy-five years old. And yet, it is a place where criticisms of 
actually existing democracy are intense and strident. In recent years, 
the trope of victimized people suffering at the hands of a predatory 
elite and political dysfunction has reaped rewards. The populist 
language of redemptive outsiders pledging to combat a corrupt system has
 been harnessed in successful electoral campaigns, like the majoritarian
 regime of Narendra Modi.

Tracking the shift from postcolonial nation-building to 
democracy-rebuilding, Srirupa Roy shows how the political outsider came 
to be a valorized figure of late-twentieth century Indian democracy, 
tasked with the urgent mission of curing a broken democratic system—what
 Roy terms &quot;curative democracy.&quot; Drawing attention to an ambivalent 
political field that folds together authoritarian and democratic forms 
and ideas, ﻿The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism (Stanford University Press, 2024) argues
 that the long 1970s were a crucial turning point in Indian politics, 
when democracy was suspended by the declaration of a national emergency 
and then subsequently restored. By tracing the crooked line that 
connects the ideals of curative democracy and the political outsider to 
the populist antipolitics and strongman authoritarian rule in present 
times, this book revisits democracy from India, and asks what the Indian experience tells us about the trajectory of global democratic politics.

Dhiren Swain is a MIPA PhD Candidate, affiliated to The University of
 Melbourne and IIT Madras. His current research focuses on the Urban 
Policies and Community Politics in India and South Asia.  

He can be reached at kishoredhiren8@gmail.com
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Defying the dire predictions that attended its birth as an 
independent nation-state in 1947, the Indian republic is more than 
seventy-five years old. And yet, it is a place where criticisms of 
actually existing democracy are intense and strident. In recent years, 
the trope of victimized people suffering at the hands of a predatory 
elite and political dysfunction has reaped rewards. The populist 
language of redemptive outsiders pledging to combat a corrupt system has
 been harnessed in successful electoral campaigns, like the majoritarian
 regime of Narendra Modi.

Tracking the shift from postcolonial nation-building to 
democracy-rebuilding, Srirupa Roy shows how the political outsider came 
to be a valorized figure of late-twentieth century Indian democracy, 
tasked with the urgent mission of curing a broken democratic system—what
 Roy terms &quot;curative democracy.&quot; Drawing attention to an ambivalent 
political field that folds together authoritarian and democratic forms 
and ideas, ﻿The Political Outsider: Indian Democracy and the Lineages of Populism (Stanford University Press, 2024) argues
 that the long 1970s were a crucial turning point in Indian politics, 
when democracy was suspended by the declaration of a national emergency 
and then subsequently restored. By tracing the crooked line that 
connects the ideals of curative democracy and the political outsider to 
the populist antipolitics and strongman authoritarian rule in present 
times, this book revisits democracy from India, and asks what the Indian experience tells us about the trajectory of global democratic politics.

Dhiren Swain is a MIPA PhD Candidate, affiliated to The University of
 Melbourne and IIT Madras. His current research focuses on the Urban 
Policies and Community Politics in India and South Asia.  

He can be reached at kishoredhiren8@gmail.com
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>990</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">072921c2-9d8d-11f1-b0ca-af96991ad57a</guid>
      <title>Catherine Reyes-Housholder, &quot;How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927090"><em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em></a><em> </em>(Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, <em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em>
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927090"><em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em></a><em> </em>(Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, <em>How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America</em>
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53675598" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/71ae649d-f876-4a1b-b78e-e444c58a57c6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=71ae649d-f876-4a1b-b78e-e444c58a57c6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Catherine Reyes-Housholder, &quot;How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.

﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Between 1990 and 2020, women candidates won only 6% of the world’s presidential races. How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) explains the factors, strategies, and perceptions
 that help (or hinder) women to democratically access their country’s 
highest political office. Dr. Catherine Reyes-Housholder introduces a 
theory of gendered incentives and perceived potential to reveal why a 
political party would break with tradition and nominate a woman. She 
also shows how citizens respond when women candidates are running in 
incumbent parties or competing to displace those in power.

﻿Drawing on comparative research on the presidency and gender, How Women Win Presidential Elections in Latin America
 examines the successful campaigns of Michelle Bachelet in Chile and 
Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, as well as why Blanca Ovelar lost her 
presidential race in Paraguay. Dr. Reyes-Housholder’s findings indicate
 that voter sexism is not a major factor; however, women do not triumph 
in these elections in the same ways that men do. Rather, the central 
unknown factor behind women’s victories is how they become candidates of
 major parties—and gender profoundly influences who parties nominate.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>989</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8537816-9cfa-11f1-a118-f7fc914e79ff</guid>
      <title>Paul Johnson, &quot;Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is a widespread sense throughout the developed world that 
progress towards a better society has stalled. Many countries, including
 the UK, have experienced persistent economic stagnation accompanied by 
declining trust in institutions. Governments are struggling to respond 
not only to traditional economic problems but also to newer challenges 
posed by climate change, migration and technological change. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691283555"><em>Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next</em></a> (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), written by Paul Johnson and coauthors, drawing
 on the findings of the six-year IFS Deaton Review, connects these 
conditions to inequality—inequality not just of income and wealth but of
 health, political participation and opportunity. It not only offers a 
detailed analysis of the different forms of inequalities but also an 
in-depth consideration of why inequalities matter, how they have changed
 and what can, or should, be done about them.</p>
<p>The book explains 
the enduring effects of early life experiences and education and 
examines the trends in employment and earnings over recent decades. It 
argues that economic stagnation since the financial crises of 2008–2009 
has exposed inequalities originating in the 1980s. Not only have incomes
 stagnated, but so has progress towards reducing health inequalities and
 dealing with inequalities across gender, ethnicity, geography, age and 
educational level. The combination of earnings inequality and economic 
stagnation has led to the growing importance of wealth, the increasing 
concentration of economic power in an older generation and a decline in 
social mobility. Economic inequalities have also resulted directly in 
dangerous differences between regions and in political power across 
groups.</p>
<p>The need to address inequality has never been more urgent. <em>Challenging Inequalities </em>offers
 a road map for how we have arrived at such a perilous spot—and how we 
can change course to achieve better outcomes for all.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/29295">Paul Johnson</a>
 is provost of the Queen’s College, University of Oxford, and former 
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). He is the author of 
the <em>Sunday</em> <em>Times</em> bestseller <em>Follow the Money.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a widespread sense throughout the developed world that 
progress towards a better society has stalled. Many countries, including
 the UK, have experienced persistent economic stagnation accompanied by 
declining trust in institutions. Governments are struggling to respond 
not only to traditional economic problems but also to newer challenges 
posed by climate change, migration and technological change. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691283555"><em>Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next</em></a> (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), written by Paul Johnson and coauthors, drawing
 on the findings of the six-year IFS Deaton Review, connects these 
conditions to inequality—inequality not just of income and wealth but of
 health, political participation and opportunity. It not only offers a 
detailed analysis of the different forms of inequalities but also an 
in-depth consideration of why inequalities matter, how they have changed
 and what can, or should, be done about them.</p>
<p>The book explains 
the enduring effects of early life experiences and education and 
examines the trends in employment and earnings over recent decades. It 
argues that economic stagnation since the financial crises of 2008–2009 
has exposed inequalities originating in the 1980s. Not only have incomes
 stagnated, but so has progress towards reducing health inequalities and
 dealing with inequalities across gender, ethnicity, geography, age and 
educational level. The combination of earnings inequality and economic 
stagnation has led to the growing importance of wealth, the increasing 
concentration of economic power in an older generation and a decline in 
social mobility. Economic inequalities have also resulted directly in 
dangerous differences between regions and in political power across 
groups.</p>
<p>The need to address inequality has never been more urgent. <em>Challenging Inequalities </em>offers
 a road map for how we have arrived at such a perilous spot—and how we 
can change course to achieve better outcomes for all.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/29295">Paul Johnson</a>
 is provost of the Queen’s College, University of Oxford, and former 
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). He is the author of 
the <em>Sunday</em> <em>Times</em> bestseller <em>Follow the Money.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48655201" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/25f37b18-1711-4b89-9cb9-2978d383d928/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=25f37b18-1711-4b89-9cb9-2978d383d928&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Johnson, &quot;Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is a widespread sense throughout the developed world that 
progress towards a better society has stalled. Many countries, including
 the UK, have experienced persistent economic stagnation accompanied by 
declining trust in institutions. Governments are struggling to respond 
not only to traditional economic problems but also to newer challenges 
posed by climate change, migration and technological change. Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), written by Paul Johnson and coauthors, drawing
 on the findings of the six-year IFS Deaton Review, connects these 
conditions to inequality—inequality not just of income and wealth but of
 health, political participation and opportunity. It not only offers a 
detailed analysis of the different forms of inequalities but also an 
in-depth consideration of why inequalities matter, how they have changed
 and what can, or should, be done about them.

The book explains 
the enduring effects of early life experiences and education and 
examines the trends in employment and earnings over recent decades. It 
argues that economic stagnation since the financial crises of 2008–2009 
has exposed inequalities originating in the 1980s. Not only have incomes
 stagnated, but so has progress towards reducing health inequalities and
 dealing with inequalities across gender, ethnicity, geography, age and 
educational level. The combination of earnings inequality and economic 
stagnation has led to the growing importance of wealth, the increasing 
concentration of economic power in an older generation and a decline in 
social mobility. Economic inequalities have also resulted directly in 
dangerous differences between regions and in political power across 
groups.

The need to address inequality has never been more urgent. Challenging Inequalities offers
 a road map for how we have arrived at such a perilous spot—and how we 
can change course to achieve better outcomes for all.

Paul Johnson
 is provost of the Queen’s College, University of Oxford, and former 
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). He is the author of 
the Sunday Times bestseller Follow the Money.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is a widespread sense throughout the developed world that 
progress towards a better society has stalled. Many countries, including
 the UK, have experienced persistent economic stagnation accompanied by 
declining trust in institutions. Governments are struggling to respond 
not only to traditional economic problems but also to newer challenges 
posed by climate change, migration and technological change. Challenging Inequalities: How We Got Stuck and Where We Go Next (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), written by Paul Johnson and coauthors, drawing
 on the findings of the six-year IFS Deaton Review, connects these 
conditions to inequality—inequality not just of income and wealth but of
 health, political participation and opportunity. It not only offers a 
detailed analysis of the different forms of inequalities but also an 
in-depth consideration of why inequalities matter, how they have changed
 and what can, or should, be done about them.

The book explains 
the enduring effects of early life experiences and education and 
examines the trends in employment and earnings over recent decades. It 
argues that economic stagnation since the financial crises of 2008–2009 
has exposed inequalities originating in the 1980s. Not only have incomes
 stagnated, but so has progress towards reducing health inequalities and
 dealing with inequalities across gender, ethnicity, geography, age and 
educational level. The combination of earnings inequality and economic 
stagnation has led to the growing importance of wealth, the increasing 
concentration of economic power in an older generation and a decline in 
social mobility. Economic inequalities have also resulted directly in 
dangerous differences between regions and in political power across 
groups.

The need to address inequality has never been more urgent. Challenging Inequalities offers
 a road map for how we have arrived at such a perilous spot—and how we 
can change course to achieve better outcomes for all.

Paul Johnson
 is provost of the Queen’s College, University of Oxford, and former 
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). He is the author of 
the Sunday Times bestseller Follow the Money.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>988</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e775bba-9f90-11f1-918c-7fdc56c2a204</guid>
      <title>After Putin: A Discussion with Political Scientist Julian G. Waller</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Russian leader Vladimir Putin, at 73 years old, is still very much alive, yet the “After Putin” conversation is an active one inside and outside of Russia. What <em>could</em> come next and how to think about that question? My guest is Julian G. Waller, a political scientist at George Washington University and author of a recent <em>Foreign Affairs </em>article “After Putin: Russia’s Coming Succession Crisis.” In our discussion, Waller anchors the “After Putin” question in historical context, as to how succession played out after Stalin’s death in the 1953. And we talk about how the current political environment in Moscow, shaped by Putin’s protracted war in Ukraine, is informing the “After Putin” discussion. Could a revolutionary scenario play out? How bodily safe is Putin? Waller is author of <em>Autocrats Can't Always Get What They Want: State Institutions and Autonomy under Authoritarianism</em> (University of Michigan Press, 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian leader Vladimir Putin, at 73 years old, is still very much alive, yet the “After Putin” conversation is an active one inside and outside of Russia. What <em>could</em> come next and how to think about that question? My guest is Julian G. Waller, a political scientist at George Washington University and author of a recent <em>Foreign Affairs </em>article “After Putin: Russia’s Coming Succession Crisis.” In our discussion, Waller anchors the “After Putin” question in historical context, as to how succession played out after Stalin’s death in the 1953. And we talk about how the current political environment in Moscow, shaped by Putin’s protracted war in Ukraine, is informing the “After Putin” discussion. Could a revolutionary scenario play out? How bodily safe is Putin? Waller is author of <em>Autocrats Can't Always Get What They Want: State Institutions and Autonomy under Authoritarianism</em> (University of Michigan Press, 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49322267" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/22ca994f-29a2-4ac7-8643-e353565a2066/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=22ca994f-29a2-4ac7-8643-e353565a2066&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>After Putin: A Discussion with Political Scientist Julian G. Waller</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Russian leader Vladimir Putin, at 73 years old, is still very much alive, yet the “After Putin” conversation is an active one inside and outside of Russia. What could come next and how to think about that question? My guest is Julian G. Waller, a political scientist at George Washington University and author of a recent Foreign Affairs article “After Putin: Russia’s Coming Succession Crisis.” In our discussion, Waller anchors the “After Putin” question in historical context, as to how succession played out after Stalin’s death in the 1953. And we talk about how the current political environment in Moscow, shaped by Putin’s protracted war in Ukraine, is informing the “After Putin” discussion. Could a revolutionary scenario play out? How bodily safe is Putin? Waller is author of Autocrats Can&apos;t Always Get What They Want: State Institutions and Autonomy under Authoritarianism (University of Michigan Press, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Russian leader Vladimir Putin, at 73 years old, is still very much alive, yet the “After Putin” conversation is an active one inside and outside of Russia. What could come next and how to think about that question? My guest is Julian G. Waller, a political scientist at George Washington University and author of a recent Foreign Affairs article “After Putin: Russia’s Coming Succession Crisis.” In our discussion, Waller anchors the “After Putin” question in historical context, as to how succession played out after Stalin’s death in the 1953. And we talk about how the current political environment in Moscow, shaped by Putin’s protracted war in Ukraine, is informing the “After Putin” discussion. Could a revolutionary scenario play out? How bodily safe is Putin? Waller is author of Autocrats Can&apos;t Always Get What They Want: State Institutions and Autonomy under Authoritarianism (University of Michigan Press, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>987</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">295ac9b6-9bdb-11f1-9303-8b35aa0cdf90</guid>
      <title>Edward Goldring, &quot;Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501787560"><em>Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive</em></a>
 (Cornell University Press, 2026) by Dr. Edward Goldring delves into one
 of the key tactics that autocrats deploy to maintain power: the removal
 of individuals from within the regime.</p>
<p>﻿From Kim Jong Un's
 execution of his uncle to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's removal of over a 
hundred Turkish generals, purges bear significant consequences for the 
survival and endurance of autocrats. Yet much remains unknown about why 
dictators use purges and whether they achieve their intended effects.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on an original global dataset on civilian and military elite purges in 
dictatorships in addition to case studies spanning North and South Korea
 as well as Turkey, Dr. Goldring examines the logic behind purges and 
their consequences. He shows that dictators purge to consolidate power, 
punish disloyalty, and scapegoat elites to alleviate popular threats. 
But even as purges help dictators consolidate power early in their 
tenure, purges actually weaken
 their position when they have been in power for a long time, prompting 
pushback. In the face of an increasing global shift toward authoritarian
 norms, <em>Purges</em> offers critical insight into how autocrats maintain—and sometimes lose—power.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501787560"><em>Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive</em></a>
 (Cornell University Press, 2026) by Dr. Edward Goldring delves into one
 of the key tactics that autocrats deploy to maintain power: the removal
 of individuals from within the regime.</p>
<p>﻿From Kim Jong Un's
 execution of his uncle to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's removal of over a 
hundred Turkish generals, purges bear significant consequences for the 
survival and endurance of autocrats. Yet much remains unknown about why 
dictators use purges and whether they achieve their intended effects.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on an original global dataset on civilian and military elite purges in 
dictatorships in addition to case studies spanning North and South Korea
 as well as Turkey, Dr. Goldring examines the logic behind purges and 
their consequences. He shows that dictators purge to consolidate power, 
punish disloyalty, and scapegoat elites to alleviate popular threats. 
But even as purges help dictators consolidate power early in their 
tenure, purges actually weaken
 their position when they have been in power for a long time, prompting 
pushback. In the face of an increasing global shift toward authoritarian
 norms, <em>Purges</em> offers critical insight into how autocrats maintain—and sometimes lose—power.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35647692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b478c276-3fdb-4d30-8829-b0a85014404c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b478c276-3fdb-4d30-8829-b0a85014404c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Edward Goldring, &quot;Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive
 (Cornell University Press, 2026) by Dr. Edward Goldring delves into one
 of the key tactics that autocrats deploy to maintain power: the removal
 of individuals from within the regime.

﻿From Kim Jong Un&apos;s
 execution of his uncle to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan&apos;s removal of over a 
hundred Turkish generals, purges bear significant consequences for the 
survival and endurance of autocrats. Yet much remains unknown about why 
dictators use purges and whether they achieve their intended effects.

﻿Drawing
 on an original global dataset on civilian and military elite purges in 
dictatorships in addition to case studies spanning North and South Korea
 as well as Turkey, Dr. Goldring examines the logic behind purges and 
their consequences. He shows that dictators purge to consolidate power, 
punish disloyalty, and scapegoat elites to alleviate popular threats. 
But even as purges help dictators consolidate power early in their 
tenure, purges actually weaken
 their position when they have been in power for a long time, prompting 
pushback. In the face of an increasing global shift toward authoritarian
 norms, Purges offers critical insight into how autocrats maintain—and sometimes lose—power.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Purges: How Dictators Fight to Survive
 (Cornell University Press, 2026) by Dr. Edward Goldring delves into one
 of the key tactics that autocrats deploy to maintain power: the removal
 of individuals from within the regime.

﻿From Kim Jong Un&apos;s
 execution of his uncle to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan&apos;s removal of over a 
hundred Turkish generals, purges bear significant consequences for the 
survival and endurance of autocrats. Yet much remains unknown about why 
dictators use purges and whether they achieve their intended effects.

﻿Drawing
 on an original global dataset on civilian and military elite purges in 
dictatorships in addition to case studies spanning North and South Korea
 as well as Turkey, Dr. Goldring examines the logic behind purges and 
their consequences. He shows that dictators purge to consolidate power, 
punish disloyalty, and scapegoat elites to alleviate popular threats. 
But even as purges help dictators consolidate power early in their 
tenure, purges actually weaken
 their position when they have been in power for a long time, prompting 
pushback. In the face of an increasing global shift toward authoritarian
 norms, Purges offers critical insight into how autocrats maintain—and sometimes lose—power.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>986</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df9dc888-9a8f-11f1-b2c0-9b1f4b6687a8</guid>
      <title>Mark Leonard, &quot;Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail&quot; (Polity Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>"Expansive visions. Universal institutions. Ideas of progress. It
 was on the back of these that the West surged ahead and built a global 
order. I was born into that world. But my children have entered a world 
of Un-order."</em></p>
<p>We live in an explosive world. Trump is blowing up political order. 
Xi Jinping is scrambling the economy. And Putin is redrawing the map of 
Europe. At a time when every crisis bleeds into the next — from 
pandemics and wars to climate shocks and AI revolutions — the old rules 
of global order are collapsing. Mark Leonard reveals how geopolitics is 
being rewritten in an age of "Un-Order," where no one agrees on the 
rules, and even the concept of order itself is up for debate. Drawing on
 years of conversations with leaders and thinkers from Beijing to 
Washington, Leonard argues that we are witnessing a new divide in 
international politics between the grand "architects" who try to build a
 stable global system and the nimble "artisans" who adapt, improvise, 
and survive amidst disruption. China, he shows, has embraced the 
"artisan's" mindset while Europe and the West cling to the fading 
certainties of the "architects". Part analysis, part manifesto, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509575220">⁠<em>Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail</em>⁠</a> (Polity Press, 2026) offers
 a bold new framework for understanding power in the twenty-first 
century — and a call for leaders to stop defending yesterday's world and
 start learning how to thrive in tomorrow's.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Leonard is co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the first pan-European think–tank.</p>
<p>﻿Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"Expansive visions. Universal institutions. Ideas of progress. It
 was on the back of these that the West surged ahead and built a global 
order. I was born into that world. But my children have entered a world 
of Un-order."</em></p>
<p>We live in an explosive world. Trump is blowing up political order. 
Xi Jinping is scrambling the economy. And Putin is redrawing the map of 
Europe. At a time when every crisis bleeds into the next — from 
pandemics and wars to climate shocks and AI revolutions — the old rules 
of global order are collapsing. Mark Leonard reveals how geopolitics is 
being rewritten in an age of "Un-Order," where no one agrees on the 
rules, and even the concept of order itself is up for debate. Drawing on
 years of conversations with leaders and thinkers from Beijing to 
Washington, Leonard argues that we are witnessing a new divide in 
international politics between the grand "architects" who try to build a
 stable global system and the nimble "artisans" who adapt, improvise, 
and survive amidst disruption. China, he shows, has embraced the 
"artisan's" mindset while Europe and the West cling to the fading 
certainties of the "architects". Part analysis, part manifesto, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509575220">⁠<em>Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail</em>⁠</a> (Polity Press, 2026) offers
 a bold new framework for understanding power in the twenty-first 
century — and a call for leaders to stop defending yesterday's world and
 start learning how to thrive in tomorrow's.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Leonard is co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the first pan-European think–tank.</p>
<p>﻿Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57705068" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0ca934ff-4b6e-4cb5-b2be-518ec6d3a13b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0ca934ff-4b6e-4cb5-b2be-518ec6d3a13b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Leonard, &quot;Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail&quot; (Polity Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Expansive visions. Universal institutions. Ideas of progress. It
 was on the back of these that the West surged ahead and built a global 
order. I was born into that world. But my children have entered a world 
of Un-order.&quot;

We live in an explosive world. Trump is blowing up political order. 
Xi Jinping is scrambling the economy. And Putin is redrawing the map of 
Europe. At a time when every crisis bleeds into the next — from 
pandemics and wars to climate shocks and AI revolutions — the old rules 
of global order are collapsing. Mark Leonard reveals how geopolitics is 
being rewritten in an age of &quot;Un-Order,&quot; where no one agrees on the 
rules, and even the concept of order itself is up for debate. Drawing on
 years of conversations with leaders and thinkers from Beijing to 
Washington, Leonard argues that we are witnessing a new divide in 
international politics between the grand &quot;architects&quot; who try to build a
 stable global system and the nimble &quot;artisans&quot; who adapt, improvise, 
and survive amidst disruption. China, he shows, has embraced the 
&quot;artisan&apos;s&quot; mindset while Europe and the West cling to the fading 
certainties of the &quot;architects&quot;. Part analysis, part manifesto, ⁠Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail⁠ (Polity Press, 2026) offers
 a bold new framework for understanding power in the twenty-first 
century — and a call for leaders to stop defending yesterday&apos;s world and
 start learning how to thrive in tomorrow&apos;s.

﻿Mark Leonard is co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the first pan-European think–tank.

﻿Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Expansive visions. Universal institutions. Ideas of progress. It
 was on the back of these that the West surged ahead and built a global 
order. I was born into that world. But my children have entered a world 
of Un-order.&quot;

We live in an explosive world. Trump is blowing up political order. 
Xi Jinping is scrambling the economy. And Putin is redrawing the map of 
Europe. At a time when every crisis bleeds into the next — from 
pandemics and wars to climate shocks and AI revolutions — the old rules 
of global order are collapsing. Mark Leonard reveals how geopolitics is 
being rewritten in an age of &quot;Un-Order,&quot; where no one agrees on the 
rules, and even the concept of order itself is up for debate. Drawing on
 years of conversations with leaders and thinkers from Beijing to 
Washington, Leonard argues that we are witnessing a new divide in 
international politics between the grand &quot;architects&quot; who try to build a
 stable global system and the nimble &quot;artisans&quot; who adapt, improvise, 
and survive amidst disruption. China, he shows, has embraced the 
&quot;artisan&apos;s&quot; mindset while Europe and the West cling to the fading 
certainties of the &quot;architects&quot;. Part analysis, part manifesto, ⁠Surviving Chaos: Geopolitics When the Rules Fail⁠ (Polity Press, 2026) offers
 a bold new framework for understanding power in the twenty-first 
century — and a call for leaders to stop defending yesterday&apos;s world and
 start learning how to thrive in tomorrow&apos;s.

﻿Mark Leonard is co-founder and director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the first pan-European think–tank.

﻿Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>985</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbb50a02-9799-11f1-a6d5-236619d1fde7</guid>
      <title>Seth Masket, &quot;The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009601139">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a> <em>﻿</em>(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB">Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF">The Elephants in the Room</a> focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a> analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.</p>
<p>One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.</p>
<p>Seth Masket, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB">Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020</a>, Cambridge University Press, 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/">The Tattered Cover Bookstore</a> in Denver, CO has copies of <a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/products/9781009601139?_pos=2&amp;_sid=da45e01e1&amp;_ss=r">The Elephants in the Room</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009601139">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a> <em>﻿</em>(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB">Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF">The Elephants in the Room</a> focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/elephants-in-the-room/8FE569EDD4526D7085BA1E63D022DEAF">The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders</a> analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.</p>
<p>One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.</p>
<p>Seth Masket, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/learning-loss-democrats-20162020?format=HB">Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020</a>, Cambridge University Press, 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/">The Tattered Cover Bookstore</a> in Denver, CO has copies of <a href="https://www.tatteredcover.com/products/9781009601139?_pos=2&amp;_sid=da45e01e1&amp;_ss=r">The Elephants in the Room</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43543574" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/16645155-f07e-4f13-8fb0-9197135ba713/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=16645155-f07e-4f13-8fb0-9197135ba713&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Seth Masket, &quot;The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020 (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. The Elephants in the Room focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.

One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.

Seth Masket, Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020, Cambridge University Press, 2020.

The Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, CO has copies of The Elephants in the Room.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Seth Masket’s new book, The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders ﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026) is a companion book to his earlier work, Learning from Loss: The Democrats, 2016-2020 (Cambridge University Press, 2020). In researching both these works, Masket spends time with party leaders throughout the United States, discussing the loss at the presidential level (for Democrats in 2016, for Republicans in 2020) and seeking to understand what the lessons might be for each party from their electoral loss. The Elephants in the Room focuses in on the idea and trajectory of nominating Donald Trump for the third time in as many election cycles, as the local party leaders of the Republican Party considered what to do in the lead up to the 2024 election cycle. Masket is able to regularly survey Republican Party chairs (state chairs, local chairs, county chairs) during the period leading to the 2024 nomination cycle. He also interviewed many of these same chairs, especially the ones in New Hampshire, Iowa, Nevada, and other early primary states. The Elephants in the Room: How Trump Voters Seized the Party from Republican Leaders analyzes the thinking among these party leaders—not necessarily at the national level, but certainly long-standing and engaged local-level leaders—and their concern that nominating Trump again would lead to another presidential election loss for the GOP.

One of the key points Masket makes both in the book and in our conversation is that these leaders had built, over time, a political party that they could no longer lead. These leaders are also distinct from the voters themselves, who may be adherents to the party, but are not part of the political party in the same way. Thus, the voters were much more interested in and attracted to the populism that has long lurked within American politics, and, of late, Republican politics, while the partisan leaders were not nearly as drawn to this strain of politics. We discuss the recent history of populist politics in the GOP, with Pat Buchanan’s 1992 presidential run and convention speech as a key point within the historical trajectory. Trump, in 2015, entered partisan politics building on this already existing faction within the GOP. This is part of the post-2020 election framing, but Masket makes an important point in how the Republican Party differed from the Democrats in learning from a loss at the presidential level. For the Republicans, it was very difficult to learn much from the results of the 2020 election because so few Republicans were or are willing to acknowledge that Trump actually lost the 2020 election. It is quite difficult to learn a lesson from an event that didn’t happen.

Seth Masket, Learning from Loss: The Democrats 2016-2020, Cambridge University Press, 2020.

The Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, CO has copies of The Elephants in the Room.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>984</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8dc6a1ba-96e8-11f1-a040-5756a57f91ae</guid>
      <title>Deborah Mayersen, &quot;Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has never been a more promising time for genocide prevention. More resources and research are being focused on prevention than ever before. Yet we still lack vital knowledge as to the most effective ways to stabilise and reduce the risk of genocide in current at-risk societies. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009692977">Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) offers a compelling new approach: to understand how to prevent genocide, we need to examine societies in which genocide has been prevented. It is in these societies - in which a demonstrably high risk of genocide was present, but in which genocide did not occur - that we can potentially find key factors that promote resilience to genocide. The volume explores six such case studies, spanning three continents and seven decades. Through careful analysis it identifies eleven factors that have contributed to preventing genocide in multiple cases, and which have the potential to inform current approaches to prevention. Collectively, these offer a new, evidence-based approach to preventing genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has never been a more promising time for genocide prevention. More resources and research are being focused on prevention than ever before. Yet we still lack vital knowledge as to the most effective ways to stabilise and reduce the risk of genocide in current at-risk societies. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009692977">Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) offers a compelling new approach: to understand how to prevent genocide, we need to examine societies in which genocide has been prevented. It is in these societies - in which a demonstrably high risk of genocide was present, but in which genocide did not occur - that we can potentially find key factors that promote resilience to genocide. The volume explores six such case studies, spanning three continents and seven decades. Through careful analysis it identifies eleven factors that have contributed to preventing genocide in multiple cases, and which have the potential to inform current approaches to prevention. Collectively, these offer a new, evidence-based approach to preventing genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63093190" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/32d1a404-59cc-497a-bb0b-afefb6a4d524/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=32d1a404-59cc-497a-bb0b-afefb6a4d524&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Deborah Mayersen, &quot;Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There has never been a more promising time for genocide prevention. More resources and research are being focused on prevention than ever before. Yet we still lack vital knowledge as to the most effective ways to stabilise and reduce the risk of genocide in current at-risk societies. Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach (Cambridge UP, 2026) offers a compelling new approach: to understand how to prevent genocide, we need to examine societies in which genocide has been prevented. It is in these societies - in which a demonstrably high risk of genocide was present, but in which genocide did not occur - that we can potentially find key factors that promote resilience to genocide. The volume explores six such case studies, spanning three continents and seven decades. Through careful analysis it identifies eleven factors that have contributed to preventing genocide in multiple cases, and which have the potential to inform current approaches to prevention. Collectively, these offer a new, evidence-based approach to preventing genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There has never been a more promising time for genocide prevention. More resources and research are being focused on prevention than ever before. Yet we still lack vital knowledge as to the most effective ways to stabilise and reduce the risk of genocide in current at-risk societies. Genocide Prevention: An Evidence-Based Approach (Cambridge UP, 2026) offers a compelling new approach: to understand how to prevent genocide, we need to examine societies in which genocide has been prevented. It is in these societies - in which a demonstrably high risk of genocide was present, but in which genocide did not occur - that we can potentially find key factors that promote resilience to genocide. The volume explores six such case studies, spanning three continents and seven decades. Through careful analysis it identifies eleven factors that have contributed to preventing genocide in multiple cases, and which have the potential to inform current approaches to prevention. Collectively, these offer a new, evidence-based approach to preventing genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>983</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3fe921d6-965f-11f1-9b98-e3d125366a58</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Tynan, &quot;Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia&quot; (NewSouth, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781761170218"><u><em>Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia</em></u></a><u><em>﻿</em></u>
 (NewSouth, 2026) tells the shocking story of the two British atomic 
weapons test series held at Western Australia's Monte Bello Islands in 
1952 and 1956. Operation Hurricane and Operation Mosaic took place at a 
rugged archipelago 100 kilometres off the Pilbara coast, and each of the
 three bombs sent fallout over vast distances across the country. One of
 the tests, Mosaic G2 in June 1956, the largest nuclear weapon test ever
 held in Australia, sparked panic at the time that it had been a nuclear
 accident. In both the Mosaic tests, the crew of a British ship was 
deliberately positioned in the path of fallout. The biodiverse natural 
environment of the islands was left contaminated and has never been 
cleaned up.</p>
<p>The book explores the politics, the secrecy and the controversies, 
including the true nature of Mosaic G2 and its role in the clandestine 
development of the British hydrogen bomb.</p>
<p><a href="https://unsw.press/authors/elizabeth-tynan/">Elizabeth Tynan</a>﻿
 is professor in the Graduate Research School at James Cook University, 
Townsville. She is a prominent writer and researcher of the era of 
British atomic testing in Australia. Her book <em>Atomic Thunder: The Maralinga Story </em>(NewSouth,
 2016) won the Prime Minister's Literary Award (Australian History) and 
the CHASS Australia Book Prize in 2017. Her follow-up book <em>The Secret of Emu Field: Britain's Forgotten Atomic Tests in Australia</em> was published by NewSouth in 2022.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781761170218"><u><em>Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia</em></u></a><u><em>﻿</em></u>
 (NewSouth, 2026) tells the shocking story of the two British atomic 
weapons test series held at Western Australia's Monte Bello Islands in 
1952 and 1956. Operation Hurricane and Operation Mosaic took place at a 
rugged archipelago 100 kilometres off the Pilbara coast, and each of the
 three bombs sent fallout over vast distances across the country. One of
 the tests, Mosaic G2 in June 1956, the largest nuclear weapon test ever
 held in Australia, sparked panic at the time that it had been a nuclear
 accident. In both the Mosaic tests, the crew of a British ship was 
deliberately positioned in the path of fallout. The biodiverse natural 
environment of the islands was left contaminated and has never been 
cleaned up.</p>
<p>The book explores the politics, the secrecy and the controversies, 
including the true nature of Mosaic G2 and its role in the clandestine 
development of the British hydrogen bomb.</p>
<p><a href="https://unsw.press/authors/elizabeth-tynan/">Elizabeth Tynan</a>﻿
 is professor in the Graduate Research School at James Cook University, 
Townsville. She is a prominent writer and researcher of the era of 
British atomic testing in Australia. Her book <em>Atomic Thunder: The Maralinga Story </em>(NewSouth,
 2016) won the Prime Minister's Literary Award (Australian History) and 
the CHASS Australia Book Prize in 2017. Her follow-up book <em>The Secret of Emu Field: Britain's Forgotten Atomic Tests in Australia</em> was published by NewSouth in 2022.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55378185" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a1121257-60be-438a-9cb8-624cf4f04ef8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a1121257-60be-438a-9cb8-624cf4f04ef8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Tynan, &quot;Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia&quot; (NewSouth, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia﻿
 (NewSouth, 2026) tells the shocking story of the two British atomic 
weapons test series held at Western Australia&apos;s Monte Bello Islands in 
1952 and 1956. Operation Hurricane and Operation Mosaic took place at a 
rugged archipelago 100 kilometres off the Pilbara coast, and each of the
 three bombs sent fallout over vast distances across the country. One of
 the tests, Mosaic G2 in June 1956, the largest nuclear weapon test ever
 held in Australia, sparked panic at the time that it had been a nuclear
 accident. In both the Mosaic tests, the crew of a British ship was 
deliberately positioned in the path of fallout. The biodiverse natural 
environment of the islands was left contaminated and has never been 
cleaned up.

The book explores the politics, the secrecy and the controversies, 
including the true nature of Mosaic G2 and its role in the clandestine 
development of the British hydrogen bomb.

Elizabeth Tynan﻿
 is professor in the Graduate Research School at James Cook University, 
Townsville. She is a prominent writer and researcher of the era of 
British atomic testing in Australia. Her book Atomic Thunder: The Maralinga Story (NewSouth,
 2016) won the Prime Minister&apos;s Literary Award (Australian History) and 
the CHASS Australia Book Prize in 2017. Her follow-up book The Secret of Emu Field: Britain&apos;s Forgotten Atomic Tests in Australia was published by NewSouth in 2022.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nuclear Archipelago: Secrets, Power and the Biggest Atomic Blast in Australia﻿
 (NewSouth, 2026) tells the shocking story of the two British atomic 
weapons test series held at Western Australia&apos;s Monte Bello Islands in 
1952 and 1956. Operation Hurricane and Operation Mosaic took place at a 
rugged archipelago 100 kilometres off the Pilbara coast, and each of the
 three bombs sent fallout over vast distances across the country. One of
 the tests, Mosaic G2 in June 1956, the largest nuclear weapon test ever
 held in Australia, sparked panic at the time that it had been a nuclear
 accident. In both the Mosaic tests, the crew of a British ship was 
deliberately positioned in the path of fallout. The biodiverse natural 
environment of the islands was left contaminated and has never been 
cleaned up.

The book explores the politics, the secrecy and the controversies, 
including the true nature of Mosaic G2 and its role in the clandestine 
development of the British hydrogen bomb.

Elizabeth Tynan﻿
 is professor in the Graduate Research School at James Cook University, 
Townsville. She is a prominent writer and researcher of the era of 
British atomic testing in Australia. Her book Atomic Thunder: The Maralinga Story (NewSouth,
 2016) won the Prime Minister&apos;s Literary Award (Australian History) and 
the CHASS Australia Book Prize in 2017. Her follow-up book The Secret of Emu Field: Britain&apos;s Forgotten Atomic Tests in Australia was published by NewSouth in 2022.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>982</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5e4fd9c-94e7-11f1-b19b-3b02e3e7df9d</guid>
      <title>Matias E. Margulis, &quot;Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503633520"><em>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security</em></a>
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as "shadow 
negotiators" engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).</p>
<p>﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503633520"><em>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security</em></a>
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as "shadow 
negotiators" engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).</p>
<p>﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48189066" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/16683014-f95e-40f0-b45f-ec5f0fd7d519/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=16683014-f95e-40f0-b45f-ec5f0fd7d519&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matias E. Margulis, &quot;Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as &quot;shadow 
negotiators&quot; engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).

﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as &quot;shadow 
negotiators&quot; engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).

﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>981</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d706bf78-9557-11f1-938b-4f6bbe534698</guid>
      <title>Hossam el-Hamalawy, &quot;Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi&apos;s New Republic ﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804297605">Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi's New Republic</a><em> </em>﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026) is a rare and comprehensive examination of the structures, hierarchies, and methods of the military, police, and intelligence agencies. Drawing on meticulous research, it reveals the strategies deployed to suppress the revolutionary wave, from propaganda and surveillance to mass arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. El-Hamalawy traces the power dynamics within these institutions to show how their uneasy unity was both a response to the revolution and a determinant of its eventual fate.</p>
<p>Hossam el-Hamalawy is a journalist and socialist from Cairo, who was among the organisers of the 2011 uprising. He has been involved in the labour movement and the fight against police brutality in Egypt. He holds a PhD in political science from Freie Universität Berlin and is the recipient of the 2011 Anna Politkovskaya Journalism Award. He publishes a weekly newsletter on Egyptian politics at <a href="http://3arabawy.substack.com/">3arabawy.substack.com</a>.<br /></p>
<p>Alec Fiorini is a PhD student at Queen Mary University London's Centre for Labour, Sustainability and Global Production (CLaSP) researching the political economy of nitrogen fertilizer supply chains.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804297605">Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi's New Republic</a><em> </em>﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026) is a rare and comprehensive examination of the structures, hierarchies, and methods of the military, police, and intelligence agencies. Drawing on meticulous research, it reveals the strategies deployed to suppress the revolutionary wave, from propaganda and surveillance to mass arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. El-Hamalawy traces the power dynamics within these institutions to show how their uneasy unity was both a response to the revolution and a determinant of its eventual fate.</p>
<p>Hossam el-Hamalawy is a journalist and socialist from Cairo, who was among the organisers of the 2011 uprising. He has been involved in the labour movement and the fight against police brutality in Egypt. He holds a PhD in political science from Freie Universität Berlin and is the recipient of the 2011 Anna Politkovskaya Journalism Award. He publishes a weekly newsletter on Egyptian politics at <a href="http://3arabawy.substack.com/">3arabawy.substack.com</a>.<br /></p>
<p>Alec Fiorini is a PhD student at Queen Mary University London's Centre for Labour, Sustainability and Global Production (CLaSP) researching the political economy of nitrogen fertilizer supply chains.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="91645427" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/28de3606-aaf6-4900-b065-89529b4a9057/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=28de3606-aaf6-4900-b065-89529b4a9057&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hossam el-Hamalawy, &quot;Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi&apos;s New Republic ﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:35:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi&apos;s New Republic ﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026) is a rare and comprehensive examination of the structures, hierarchies, and methods of the military, police, and intelligence agencies. Drawing on meticulous research, it reveals the strategies deployed to suppress the revolutionary wave, from propaganda and surveillance to mass arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. El-Hamalawy traces the power dynamics within these institutions to show how their uneasy unity was both a response to the revolution and a determinant of its eventual fate.

Hossam el-Hamalawy is a journalist and socialist from Cairo, who was among the organisers of the 2011 uprising. He has been involved in the labour movement and the fight against police brutality in Egypt. He holds a PhD in political science from Freie Universität Berlin and is the recipient of the 2011 Anna Politkovskaya Journalism Award. He publishes a weekly newsletter on Egyptian politics at 3arabawy.substack.com.

Alec Fiorini is a PhD student at Queen Mary University London&apos;s Centre for Labour, Sustainability and Global Production (CLaSP) researching the political economy of nitrogen fertilizer supply chains.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Counterrevolution in Egypt: Sisi&apos;s New Republic ﻿(﻿Verso Books, 2026) is a rare and comprehensive examination of the structures, hierarchies, and methods of the military, police, and intelligence agencies. Drawing on meticulous research, it reveals the strategies deployed to suppress the revolutionary wave, from propaganda and surveillance to mass arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. El-Hamalawy traces the power dynamics within these institutions to show how their uneasy unity was both a response to the revolution and a determinant of its eventual fate.

Hossam el-Hamalawy is a journalist and socialist from Cairo, who was among the organisers of the 2011 uprising. He has been involved in the labour movement and the fight against police brutality in Egypt. He holds a PhD in political science from Freie Universität Berlin and is the recipient of the 2011 Anna Politkovskaya Journalism Award. He publishes a weekly newsletter on Egyptian politics at 3arabawy.substack.com.

Alec Fiorini is a PhD student at Queen Mary University London&apos;s Centre for Labour, Sustainability and Global Production (CLaSP) researching the political economy of nitrogen fertilizer supply chains.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>980</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">393c9bf8-96df-11f1-b2d9-c71d87360e64</guid>
      <title>Eric Hoffer&apos;s &quot;The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements&quot; (1951): A Discussion with Jay Garfinkel</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A stevedore on the San Francisco docks in the 1940s, who eventually taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Eric Hoffer wrote philosophical treatises in his spare time while living in the railroad yards.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780060505912"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780060505912">The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements</a>—the first and most famous of his books—was made into a bestseller when President Eisenhower cited it during one of the earliest television press conferences.</p>
<p>Called a “brilliant and original inquiry” and “a genuine contribution to our social thought” by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., this landmark in the field of social psychology is completely relevant and essential for understanding the world today. It delivers a visionary, highly provocative look into the mind of the fanatic and a penetrating study of how an individual becomes one.</p>
<p>When it was first published in 1951. the New Yorker wrote, <em>“Its theme is political fanaticism, with which it deals severely and brilliantly.” </em>The Wall Street Journal agreed, calling <em>The True Believer </em>the famous bestseller with “<em>concise insight into what drives the mind of the fanatic and the dynamics of a mass movement</em>” by the legendary San Francisco longshoreman.</p>
<p>This episode was originally published on April 10, 2024.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A stevedore on the San Francisco docks in the 1940s, who eventually taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Eric Hoffer wrote philosophical treatises in his spare time while living in the railroad yards.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780060505912"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780060505912">The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements</a>—the first and most famous of his books—was made into a bestseller when President Eisenhower cited it during one of the earliest television press conferences.</p>
<p>Called a “brilliant and original inquiry” and “a genuine contribution to our social thought” by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., this landmark in the field of social psychology is completely relevant and essential for understanding the world today. It delivers a visionary, highly provocative look into the mind of the fanatic and a penetrating study of how an individual becomes one.</p>
<p>When it was first published in 1951. the New Yorker wrote, <em>“Its theme is political fanaticism, with which it deals severely and brilliantly.” </em>The Wall Street Journal agreed, calling <em>The True Believer </em>the famous bestseller with “<em>concise insight into what drives the mind of the fanatic and the dynamics of a mass movement</em>” by the legendary San Francisco longshoreman.</p>
<p>This episode was originally published on April 10, 2024.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28342136" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/41c5c5bd-9f2d-48a2-81a9-4f42e37c3beb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=41c5c5bd-9f2d-48a2-81a9-4f42e37c3beb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Hoffer&apos;s &quot;The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements&quot; (1951): A Discussion with Jay Garfinkel</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A stevedore on the San Francisco docks in the 1940s, who eventually taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Eric Hoffer wrote philosophical treatises in his spare time while living in the railroad yards. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements—the first and most famous of his books—was made into a bestseller when President Eisenhower cited it during one of the earliest television press conferences.

Called a “brilliant and original inquiry” and “a genuine contribution to our social thought” by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., this landmark in the field of social psychology is completely relevant and essential for understanding the world today. It delivers a visionary, highly provocative look into the mind of the fanatic and a penetrating study of how an individual becomes one.

When it was first published in 1951. the New Yorker wrote, “Its theme is political fanaticism, with which it deals severely and brilliantly.” The Wall Street Journal agreed, calling The True Believer the famous bestseller with “concise insight into what drives the mind of the fanatic and the dynamics of a mass movement” by the legendary San Francisco longshoreman.

This episode was originally published on April 10, 2024.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A stevedore on the San Francisco docks in the 1940s, who eventually taught at the University of California at Berkeley, Eric Hoffer wrote philosophical treatises in his spare time while living in the railroad yards. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements—the first and most famous of his books—was made into a bestseller when President Eisenhower cited it during one of the earliest television press conferences.

Called a “brilliant and original inquiry” and “a genuine contribution to our social thought” by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., this landmark in the field of social psychology is completely relevant and essential for understanding the world today. It delivers a visionary, highly provocative look into the mind of the fanatic and a penetrating study of how an individual becomes one.

When it was first published in 1951. the New Yorker wrote, “Its theme is political fanaticism, with which it deals severely and brilliantly.” The Wall Street Journal agreed, calling The True Believer the famous bestseller with “concise insight into what drives the mind of the fanatic and the dynamics of a mass movement” by the legendary San Francisco longshoreman.

This episode was originally published on April 10, 2024.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26786056-9554-11f1-b885-af0b41f08a6d</guid>
      <title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book. <em>Really good</em>. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a> is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a> is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em> (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book. <em>Really good</em>. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a> is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a> is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em> (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58715554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e764a254-2428-42b0-8038-dfc8d2f2b2ed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e764a254-2428-42b0-8038-dfc8d2f2b2ed&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).

Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.

Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).

Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.

Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>978</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e70eaadc-945a-11f1-98fe-576c6967f96b</guid>
      <title>Dalit Studies with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana and Sanal Mohan</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode featured a conversation with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan, three scholars in the burgeoning field of Dalit Studies. We began with the significance of the 1990s as a point of departure for new work in this field and segued to the interventions made by their two edited volumes published in 2016 and 2025. We discussed the paths opened up by earlier radical historiographical paradigms, such as Subaltern Studies, which nonetheless failed to address the caste question. The guests noted three key emphases of contemporary Dalit Studies: one, centering Dalit historical agency and intellectual production; two, decentering the binary of colonialism and nationalism, and illuminating the colonial period as a complex terrain of maneuver; and three, foregrounding the importance of “the Dalit social” as a field of variegated power irreducible to the state. We ended with a discussion of the heterogeneity of Dalit sociopolitical formations, what makes “Dalit” cohere as a category, and future directions for the field of Dalit Studies.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/TCP-Episode-13-transcript.docx#asset:469219@1:url">transcript here</a></p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Ramnarayan Rawat and K. Satyanarayana eds. <em>Dalit Studies</em> (Duke University Press, 2016)</p>
<p>Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan eds. <em>Dalit Journeys for Dignity: Religion, Freedom, and Caste</em> (SUNY Press, 2025)</p>
<p>Rajni Kothari, “Rise of the Dalits and the Renewed Debate on Caste.” In <em>State and</em></p>
<p><em>Politics in India</em>, edited by Partha Chatterjee, 439–58 (New Delhi: Oxford University</p>
<p>Press, 1998).</p>
<p>Gopal Guru, “The Language of Dalit-Bahujan Political Discourse.” In <em>Dalit Identity and</em></p>
<p><em>Politics</em>, edited by Ghanshyam Shah, 96–107 (New Delhi: Sage, 2001).</p>
<p>Baburao Bagul, <em>Dalit Sahitya ajache Kranti Vidynana</em> (Nagpur: Buddhist Publishing</p>
<p>House, 1978).</p>
<p>Belcchi: village in Patna district of Bihar where eight Dalits and three Backward Caste men were killed by members of the landowning Kurmi caste in 1977.</p>
<p>Keezhvenmani: hamlet in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu where upper caste landlords burnt alive 44 Dalit agricultural laborers in 1968.</p>
<p>Karamchedu: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Kamma landholding caste murdered six Dalit men, raped three Dalit women, and displaced hundreds of Dalit families in 1985.</p>
<p>Vempenta: village in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh where, in response to the killing of a village official by the People’s War Group, landholders killed more than thirty Dalits and burned more than 100 of their houses in 1998.</p>
<p>Chundur: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Reddy landholding caste killed eight Dalit men in 1991.</p>
<p>Mandal Commission:</p>
<p>Divya Cherian, <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/merchants-of-virtue/paper">Merchants of Virtue</a></p>
<p>B.R. Ambedkar, <a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOopnSikAMZu3oy7zrmLWJGSV6ze2mmIXfwPFswLpB6PJlJHFE2kK">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Phule: Jyotirao Phule was an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.</p>
<p>NTR: Indian actor and politician who served as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh for four terms between 1983 and 1995.</p>
<p>Mahad Satyagraha: mass mobilization by B.R. Ambedkar to claim Dalit access to a public water tank in Mahad, Maharashtra.</p>
<p>Ayyankali: Indian social reformer and lawmaker who worked for the advancemetnt of Dalits in the princely state of Travancore.</p>
<p>Ad Dharm: an anticaste movement in the 1920s that claimed a distinct identity for Dalits separate from Hinduism and Sikhism.</p>
<p>Adi Hindu Mahasabha: sociopolitical organization founded in 1923 by Dalit leader Swami Achhutanand in Uttar Pradesh that claimed for Dalits the identity of originary Hindus.</p>
<p>IITs: the Indian Institutes of Technology</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode featured a conversation with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan, three scholars in the burgeoning field of Dalit Studies. We began with the significance of the 1990s as a point of departure for new work in this field and segued to the interventions made by their two edited volumes published in 2016 and 2025. We discussed the paths opened up by earlier radical historiographical paradigms, such as Subaltern Studies, which nonetheless failed to address the caste question. The guests noted three key emphases of contemporary Dalit Studies: one, centering Dalit historical agency and intellectual production; two, decentering the binary of colonialism and nationalism, and illuminating the colonial period as a complex terrain of maneuver; and three, foregrounding the importance of “the Dalit social” as a field of variegated power irreducible to the state. We ended with a discussion of the heterogeneity of Dalit sociopolitical formations, what makes “Dalit” cohere as a category, and future directions for the field of Dalit Studies.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/TCP-Episode-13-transcript.docx#asset:469219@1:url">transcript here</a></p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Ramnarayan Rawat and K. Satyanarayana eds. <em>Dalit Studies</em> (Duke University Press, 2016)</p>
<p>Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan eds. <em>Dalit Journeys for Dignity: Religion, Freedom, and Caste</em> (SUNY Press, 2025)</p>
<p>Rajni Kothari, “Rise of the Dalits and the Renewed Debate on Caste.” In <em>State and</em></p>
<p><em>Politics in India</em>, edited by Partha Chatterjee, 439–58 (New Delhi: Oxford University</p>
<p>Press, 1998).</p>
<p>Gopal Guru, “The Language of Dalit-Bahujan Political Discourse.” In <em>Dalit Identity and</em></p>
<p><em>Politics</em>, edited by Ghanshyam Shah, 96–107 (New Delhi: Sage, 2001).</p>
<p>Baburao Bagul, <em>Dalit Sahitya ajache Kranti Vidynana</em> (Nagpur: Buddhist Publishing</p>
<p>House, 1978).</p>
<p>Belcchi: village in Patna district of Bihar where eight Dalits and three Backward Caste men were killed by members of the landowning Kurmi caste in 1977.</p>
<p>Keezhvenmani: hamlet in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu where upper caste landlords burnt alive 44 Dalit agricultural laborers in 1968.</p>
<p>Karamchedu: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Kamma landholding caste murdered six Dalit men, raped three Dalit women, and displaced hundreds of Dalit families in 1985.</p>
<p>Vempenta: village in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh where, in response to the killing of a village official by the People’s War Group, landholders killed more than thirty Dalits and burned more than 100 of their houses in 1998.</p>
<p>Chundur: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Reddy landholding caste killed eight Dalit men in 1991.</p>
<p>Mandal Commission:</p>
<p>Divya Cherian, <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/merchants-of-virtue/paper">Merchants of Virtue</a></p>
<p>B.R. Ambedkar, <a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOopnSikAMZu3oy7zrmLWJGSV6ze2mmIXfwPFswLpB6PJlJHFE2kK">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Phule: Jyotirao Phule was an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.</p>
<p>NTR: Indian actor and politician who served as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh for four terms between 1983 and 1995.</p>
<p>Mahad Satyagraha: mass mobilization by B.R. Ambedkar to claim Dalit access to a public water tank in Mahad, Maharashtra.</p>
<p>Ayyankali: Indian social reformer and lawmaker who worked for the advancemetnt of Dalits in the princely state of Travancore.</p>
<p>Ad Dharm: an anticaste movement in the 1920s that claimed a distinct identity for Dalits separate from Hinduism and Sikhism.</p>
<p>Adi Hindu Mahasabha: sociopolitical organization founded in 1923 by Dalit leader Swami Achhutanand in Uttar Pradesh that claimed for Dalits the identity of originary Hindus.</p>
<p>IITs: the Indian Institutes of Technology</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63521811" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d9edade0-847b-44c9-96ea-f219341923de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d9edade0-847b-44c9-96ea-f219341923de&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dalit Studies with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana and Sanal Mohan</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode featured a conversation with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan, three scholars in the burgeoning field of Dalit Studies. We began with the significance of the 1990s as a point of departure for new work in this field and segued to the interventions made by their two edited volumes published in 2016 and 2025. We discussed the paths opened up by earlier radical historiographical paradigms, such as Subaltern Studies, which nonetheless failed to address the caste question. The guests noted three key emphases of contemporary Dalit Studies: one, centering Dalit historical agency and intellectual production; two, decentering the binary of colonialism and nationalism, and illuminating the colonial period as a complex terrain of maneuver; and three, foregrounding the importance of “the Dalit social” as a field of variegated power irreducible to the state. We ended with a discussion of the heterogeneity of Dalit sociopolitical formations, what makes “Dalit” cohere as a category, and future directions for the field of Dalit Studies.

Read the transcript here

References

Ramnarayan Rawat and K. Satyanarayana eds. Dalit Studies (Duke University Press, 2016)

Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan eds. Dalit Journeys for Dignity: Religion, Freedom, and Caste (SUNY Press, 2025)

Rajni Kothari, “Rise of the Dalits and the Renewed Debate on Caste.” In State and

Politics in India, edited by Partha Chatterjee, 439–58 (New Delhi: Oxford University

Press, 1998).

Gopal Guru, “The Language of Dalit-Bahujan Political Discourse.” In Dalit Identity and

Politics, edited by Ghanshyam Shah, 96–107 (New Delhi: Sage, 2001).

Baburao Bagul, Dalit Sahitya ajache Kranti Vidynana (Nagpur: Buddhist Publishing

House, 1978).

Belcchi: village in Patna district of Bihar where eight Dalits and three Backward Caste men were killed by members of the landowning Kurmi caste in 1977.

Keezhvenmani: hamlet in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu where upper caste landlords burnt alive 44 Dalit agricultural laborers in 1968.

Karamchedu: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Kamma landholding caste murdered six Dalit men, raped three Dalit women, and displaced hundreds of Dalit families in 1985.

Vempenta: village in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh where, in response to the killing of a village official by the People’s War Group, landholders killed more than thirty Dalits and burned more than 100 of their houses in 1998.

Chundur: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Reddy landholding caste killed eight Dalit men in 1991.

Mandal Commission:

Divya Cherian, Merchants of Virtue

B.R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste

Phule: Jyotirao Phule was an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.

NTR: Indian actor and politician who served as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh for four terms between 1983 and 1995.

Mahad Satyagraha: mass mobilization by B.R. Ambedkar to claim Dalit access to a public water tank in Mahad, Maharashtra.

Ayyankali: Indian social reformer and lawmaker who worked for the advancemetnt of Dalits in the princely state of Travancore.

Ad Dharm: an anticaste movement in the 1920s that claimed a distinct identity for Dalits separate from Hinduism and Sikhism.

Adi Hindu Mahasabha: sociopolitical organization founded in 1923 by Dalit leader Swami Achhutanand in Uttar Pradesh that claimed for Dalits the identity of originary Hindus.

IITs: the Indian Institutes of Technology
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode featured a conversation with Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan, three scholars in the burgeoning field of Dalit Studies. We began with the significance of the 1990s as a point of departure for new work in this field and segued to the interventions made by their two edited volumes published in 2016 and 2025. We discussed the paths opened up by earlier radical historiographical paradigms, such as Subaltern Studies, which nonetheless failed to address the caste question. The guests noted three key emphases of contemporary Dalit Studies: one, centering Dalit historical agency and intellectual production; two, decentering the binary of colonialism and nationalism, and illuminating the colonial period as a complex terrain of maneuver; and three, foregrounding the importance of “the Dalit social” as a field of variegated power irreducible to the state. We ended with a discussion of the heterogeneity of Dalit sociopolitical formations, what makes “Dalit” cohere as a category, and future directions for the field of Dalit Studies.

Read the transcript here

References

Ramnarayan Rawat and K. Satyanarayana eds. Dalit Studies (Duke University Press, 2016)

Ramnarayan Rawat, K. Satyanarayana, and Sanal Mohan eds. Dalit Journeys for Dignity: Religion, Freedom, and Caste (SUNY Press, 2025)

Rajni Kothari, “Rise of the Dalits and the Renewed Debate on Caste.” In State and

Politics in India, edited by Partha Chatterjee, 439–58 (New Delhi: Oxford University

Press, 1998).

Gopal Guru, “The Language of Dalit-Bahujan Political Discourse.” In Dalit Identity and

Politics, edited by Ghanshyam Shah, 96–107 (New Delhi: Sage, 2001).

Baburao Bagul, Dalit Sahitya ajache Kranti Vidynana (Nagpur: Buddhist Publishing

House, 1978).

Belcchi: village in Patna district of Bihar where eight Dalits and three Backward Caste men were killed by members of the landowning Kurmi caste in 1977.

Keezhvenmani: hamlet in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu where upper caste landlords burnt alive 44 Dalit agricultural laborers in 1968.

Karamchedu: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Kamma landholding caste murdered six Dalit men, raped three Dalit women, and displaced hundreds of Dalit families in 1985.

Vempenta: village in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh where, in response to the killing of a village official by the People’s War Group, landholders killed more than thirty Dalits and burned more than 100 of their houses in 1998.

Chundur: village in Bapatla district of Andhra Pradesh where members of the Reddy landholding caste killed eight Dalit men in 1991.

Mandal Commission:

Divya Cherian, Merchants of Virtue

B.R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste

Phule: Jyotirao Phule was an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.

NTR: Indian actor and politician who served as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh for four terms between 1983 and 1995.

Mahad Satyagraha: mass mobilization by B.R. Ambedkar to claim Dalit access to a public water tank in Mahad, Maharashtra.

Ayyankali: Indian social reformer and lawmaker who worked for the advancemetnt of Dalits in the princely state of Travancore.

Ad Dharm: an anticaste movement in the 1920s that claimed a distinct identity for Dalits separate from Hinduism and Sikhism.

Adi Hindu Mahasabha: sociopolitical organization founded in 1923 by Dalit leader Swami Achhutanand in Uttar Pradesh that claimed for Dalits the identity of originary Hindus.

IITs: the Indian Institutes of Technology
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>977</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d6292b4-9088-11f1-9a28-07841ba3bf77</guid>
      <title>Beyond Free Speech: Why AI Governance Demands Freedom of Thought</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Are we driving our technology, or is it starting to drive us? In this thought-provoking conversation, Eli Karetny sits down with researcher and author Eduardo Albrecht to explore the invisible, rapidly encroaching frontier of AI governance and data surveillance.Moving far beyond traditional debates about data privacy, Albrecht warns of a near future where the state and corporate partners bypass human speech entirely, relying instead on "sentiment detection" to ascribe thoughts and make decisions that impact our physical lives. Together, they trace the historical trajectory of control—from early fingerprinting and eugenics to modern biometrics and neural implants—and challenge the modern illusion of state efficiency at the expense of human agency.Tune in for a deep dive into the two fundamental rights required to safeguard the future of democracy: absolute transparency over our data, and an evolving, radical defense of our collective freedom of thought.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we driving our technology, or is it starting to drive us? In this thought-provoking conversation, Eli Karetny sits down with researcher and author Eduardo Albrecht to explore the invisible, rapidly encroaching frontier of AI governance and data surveillance.Moving far beyond traditional debates about data privacy, Albrecht warns of a near future where the state and corporate partners bypass human speech entirely, relying instead on "sentiment detection" to ascribe thoughts and make decisions that impact our physical lives. Together, they trace the historical trajectory of control—from early fingerprinting and eugenics to modern biometrics and neural implants—and challenge the modern illusion of state efficiency at the expense of human agency.Tune in for a deep dive into the two fundamental rights required to safeguard the future of democracy: absolute transparency over our data, and an evolving, radical defense of our collective freedom of thought.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54311024" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/51f36dde-7059-4f87-8529-efb5e589c6e4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=51f36dde-7059-4f87-8529-efb5e589c6e4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Beyond Free Speech: Why AI Governance Demands Freedom of Thought</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are we driving our technology, or is it starting to drive us? In this thought-provoking conversation, Eli Karetny sits down with researcher and author Eduardo Albrecht to explore the invisible, rapidly encroaching frontier of AI governance and data surveillance.Moving far beyond traditional debates about data privacy, Albrecht warns of a near future where the state and corporate partners bypass human speech entirely, relying instead on &quot;sentiment detection&quot; to ascribe thoughts and make decisions that impact our physical lives. Together, they trace the historical trajectory of control—from early fingerprinting and eugenics to modern biometrics and neural implants—and challenge the modern illusion of state efficiency at the expense of human agency.Tune in for a deep dive into the two fundamental rights required to safeguard the future of democracy: absolute transparency over our data, and an evolving, radical defense of our collective freedom of thought.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are we driving our technology, or is it starting to drive us? In this thought-provoking conversation, Eli Karetny sits down with researcher and author Eduardo Albrecht to explore the invisible, rapidly encroaching frontier of AI governance and data surveillance.Moving far beyond traditional debates about data privacy, Albrecht warns of a near future where the state and corporate partners bypass human speech entirely, relying instead on &quot;sentiment detection&quot; to ascribe thoughts and make decisions that impact our physical lives. Together, they trace the historical trajectory of control—from early fingerprinting and eugenics to modern biometrics and neural implants—and challenge the modern illusion of state efficiency at the expense of human agency.Tune in for a deep dive into the two fundamental rights required to safeguard the future of democracy: absolute transparency over our data, and an evolving, radical defense of our collective freedom of thought.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>976</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3595a646-91e6-11f1-870a-878b7bd8fd5b</guid>
      <title>Ka-ming Wu, &quot;Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations&quot; (Leiden UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789087285098"><em>Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations</em></a> (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines
 how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban 
spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight 
surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens 
connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and 
leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research,
 Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that 
not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces 
and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural 
rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities 
and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history.</p>
<p>The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice 
through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural 
status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, 
mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism 
within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, 
its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state
 control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the 
infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China 
studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access 
in contemporary China.</p>
<p>NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham’s <em>Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism</em>
(Verso, 2010).</p>
<p>Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and 
Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy 
appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China 
Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is 
interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, 
anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the 
author of <em>Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism</em>
(UIP 2015) and the co-author of <em>Living with Waste</em> (CUP 2017).</p>
<p>Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of 
Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his
 scholarship and research interests can be found <a href="https://liberalarts.tulane.edu/anthropology/people/graduate-students/yadong-li">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789087285098"><em>Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations</em></a> (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines
 how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban 
spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight 
surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens 
connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and 
leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research,
 Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that 
not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces 
and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural 
rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities 
and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history.</p>
<p>The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice 
through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural 
status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, 
mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism 
within the context of China's hosting of multiple international events, 
its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state
 control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the 
infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China 
studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access 
in contemporary China.</p>
<p>NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham’s <em>Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism</em>
(Verso, 2010).</p>
<p>Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and 
Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy 
appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China 
Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is 
interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, 
anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the 
author of <em>Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism</em>
(UIP 2015) and the co-author of <em>Living with Waste</em> (CUP 2017).</p>
<p>Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of 
Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his
 scholarship and research interests can be found <a href="https://liberalarts.tulane.edu/anthropology/people/graduate-students/yadong-li">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51635005" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0dd9624e-9274-487f-bd4f-c6c0c888557a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0dd9624e-9274-487f-bd4f-c6c0c888557a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ka-ming Wu, &quot;Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations&quot; (Leiden UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines
 how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban 
spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight 
surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens 
connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and 
leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research,
 Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that 
not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces 
and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural 
rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities 
and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history.

The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice 
through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural 
status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, 
mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism 
within the context of China&apos;s hosting of multiple international events, 
its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state
 control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the 
infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China 
studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access 
in contemporary China.

NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham’s Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism
(Verso, 2010).

Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and 
Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy 
appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China 
Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is 
interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, 
anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the 
author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism
(UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017).

Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of 
Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his
 scholarship and research interests can be found here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Infrastructural Urbanism in Contemporary China: Volunteering, Infrastructures and Civic Imaginations (Leiden University Press, 2026) examines
 how Chinese citizens negotiate their everyday experiences with urban 
spaces, improved city infrastructure, and an increasingly tight 
surveillance regime through volunteering. This book asks how citizens 
connect to city spaces where facilities for transit, culture, and 
leisure have been substantially upgraded. Drawing on extensive research,
 Ka-ming Wu investigates how citizens conduct volunteer activities that 
not only promote party-state campaigns and engage with new urban spaces 
and services, but also experiment with political, social, and cultural 
rights, including advocating for the rights of people with disabilities 
and promoting unofficial interpretations of national history.

The book argues that volunteering has become an urban practice 
through which citizens navigate existing hierarchies of urban and rural 
status, gender, age, and ability, while contesting top-down, 
mega-event-driven urbanization. It situates Chinese everyday urbanism 
within the context of China&apos;s hosting of multiple international events, 
its expanding public and digital infrastructures, heightened party-state
 control, and burgeoning digital activism. The book contributes to the 
infrastructural turn in urban anthropology and the field of China 
studies, offering a new understanding of urban rights and public access 
in contemporary China.

NOTE: The book Ka-ming Wu mentioned in the interview is Stephen Graham’s Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism
(Verso, 2010).

Wu Ka-ming is Associate Professor in the Department of Cultural and 
Religious Studies at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, with courtesy 
appointments in the Department of Anthropology and the Centre for China 
Studies. Trained as a cultural anthropologist, her work is 
interdisciplinary, situated at the intersection of cultural studies, 
anthropology, China studies, and environmental humanities. She is the 
author of Reinventing Chinese Tradition: The Cultural Politics of Late Socialism
(UIP 2015) and the co-author of Living with Waste (CUP 2017).

Yadong Li is an anthropologist-in-training. He is a PhD candidate of 
Socio-cultural Anthropology at Tulane University. More details about his
 scholarship and research interests can be found here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>975</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9edd3ba-9013-11f1-9d21-e3180e88710a</guid>
      <title>Giulio Boccaletti, &quot;The Environmental Republic: Why Citizens Will Save the World&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Republicanism is arguably the most powerful political idea in 
history, an extraordinary feat of human imagination that balances 
individual liberty with collective responsibility. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262000"><em>The Environmental Republic﻿: </em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262000"><em>Why Citizens Will Save the World</em></a><em>﻿ </em>﻿(Princeton
 University Press, 2026) reclaims this idea as the path to sustaining 
our life together on a changing planet, reframing our relationship to 
the environment not as a constraint on liberty but as its republican 
foundation.<br />
Giulio Boccaletti﻿ argues that we must renew our commitment to freedom 
and civic responsibility through popular sovereignty. He presents the 
environmental republic as a necessary alternative to blind faith in 
technocratic management, the shallow moralizing and apocalyptic rhetoric
 of some activists, and the disingenuous skepticism of vested interests.
 Our environmental challenges are not simply about “agreeing on the 
facts” or living within technical limitations—they reflect a deeper 
failure of political institutions. Drawing on the history of ideas and 
real-world examples, Boccaletti presents a political framework that 
places our relationship to our surroundings at the heart of how we 
exercise our voice, coordinate collective action, and define development
 itself.<br />
Offering hope in an anxious age of rising authoritarianism and widespread pessimism, <em>The Environmental Republic</em>
 challenges the false choice between environmental protection and human 
freedom, showing how place-based institutions can deliver both 
sustainability and human development through true self-governance.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/29177">Giulio Boccaletti</a><strong>﻿</strong>
 is an author whose writings on natural resources security have been 
translated into several languages. He has held international leadership 
positions in the private and not-for-profit sectors. He is the 
scientific director of the Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, 
one of Europe’s largest research institutions focused on Earth science 
and transition economics, and cofounder of Chloris Geospatial, a 
space-tech company specializing in Earth observations. His books include
 <em>Water: A Biography</em>, and his work has been featured in acclaimed PBS series such as <em>H2O: The Molecule That Made Us</em>, <em>Human Footprint</em>, and <em>The Future of Nature</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicanism is arguably the most powerful political idea in 
history, an extraordinary feat of human imagination that balances 
individual liberty with collective responsibility. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262000"><em>The Environmental Republic﻿: </em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691262000"><em>Why Citizens Will Save the World</em></a><em>﻿ </em>﻿(Princeton
 University Press, 2026) reclaims this idea as the path to sustaining 
our life together on a changing planet, reframing our relationship to 
the environment not as a constraint on liberty but as its republican 
foundation.<br />
Giulio Boccaletti﻿ argues that we must renew our commitment to freedom 
and civic responsibility through popular sovereignty. He presents the 
environmental republic as a necessary alternative to blind faith in 
technocratic management, the shallow moralizing and apocalyptic rhetoric
 of some activists, and the disingenuous skepticism of vested interests.
 Our environmental challenges are not simply about “agreeing on the 
facts” or living within technical limitations—they reflect a deeper 
failure of political institutions. Drawing on the history of ideas and 
real-world examples, Boccaletti presents a political framework that 
places our relationship to our surroundings at the heart of how we 
exercise our voice, coordinate collective action, and define development
 itself.<br />
Offering hope in an anxious age of rising authoritarianism and widespread pessimism, <em>The Environmental Republic</em>
 challenges the false choice between environmental protection and human 
freedom, showing how place-based institutions can deliver both 
sustainability and human development through true self-governance.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/taxonomy/term/29177">Giulio Boccaletti</a><strong>﻿</strong>
 is an author whose writings on natural resources security have been 
translated into several languages. He has held international leadership 
positions in the private and not-for-profit sectors. He is the 
scientific director of the Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, 
one of Europe’s largest research institutions focused on Earth science 
and transition economics, and cofounder of Chloris Geospatial, a 
space-tech company specializing in Earth observations. His books include
 <em>Water: A Biography</em>, and his work has been featured in acclaimed PBS series such as <em>H2O: The Molecule That Made Us</em>, <em>Human Footprint</em>, and <em>The Future of Nature</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77598672" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/04b57531-04e5-426f-9d17-ad6d886ad8e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=04b57531-04e5-426f-9d17-ad6d886ad8e5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Giulio Boccaletti, &quot;The Environmental Republic: Why Citizens Will Save the World&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Republicanism is arguably the most powerful political idea in 
history, an extraordinary feat of human imagination that balances 
individual liberty with collective responsibility. The Environmental Republic﻿: Why Citizens Will Save the World﻿ ﻿(Princeton
 University Press, 2026) reclaims this idea as the path to sustaining 
our life together on a changing planet, reframing our relationship to 
the environment not as a constraint on liberty but as its republican 
foundation.
Giulio Boccaletti﻿ argues that we must renew our commitment to freedom 
and civic responsibility through popular sovereignty. He presents the 
environmental republic as a necessary alternative to blind faith in 
technocratic management, the shallow moralizing and apocalyptic rhetoric
 of some activists, and the disingenuous skepticism of vested interests.
 Our environmental challenges are not simply about “agreeing on the 
facts” or living within technical limitations—they reflect a deeper 
failure of political institutions. Drawing on the history of ideas and 
real-world examples, Boccaletti presents a political framework that 
places our relationship to our surroundings at the heart of how we 
exercise our voice, coordinate collective action, and define development
 itself.
Offering hope in an anxious age of rising authoritarianism and widespread pessimism, The Environmental Republic
 challenges the false choice between environmental protection and human 
freedom, showing how place-based institutions can deliver both 
sustainability and human development through true self-governance.

Giulio Boccaletti﻿
 is an author whose writings on natural resources security have been 
translated into several languages. He has held international leadership 
positions in the private and not-for-profit sectors. He is the 
scientific director of the Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, 
one of Europe’s largest research institutions focused on Earth science 
and transition economics, and cofounder of Chloris Geospatial, a 
space-tech company specializing in Earth observations. His books include
 Water: A Biography, and his work has been featured in acclaimed PBS series such as H2O: The Molecule That Made Us, Human Footprint, and The Future of Nature.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Republicanism is arguably the most powerful political idea in 
history, an extraordinary feat of human imagination that balances 
individual liberty with collective responsibility. The Environmental Republic﻿: Why Citizens Will Save the World﻿ ﻿(Princeton
 University Press, 2026) reclaims this idea as the path to sustaining 
our life together on a changing planet, reframing our relationship to 
the environment not as a constraint on liberty but as its republican 
foundation.
Giulio Boccaletti﻿ argues that we must renew our commitment to freedom 
and civic responsibility through popular sovereignty. He presents the 
environmental republic as a necessary alternative to blind faith in 
technocratic management, the shallow moralizing and apocalyptic rhetoric
 of some activists, and the disingenuous skepticism of vested interests.
 Our environmental challenges are not simply about “agreeing on the 
facts” or living within technical limitations—they reflect a deeper 
failure of political institutions. Drawing on the history of ideas and 
real-world examples, Boccaletti presents a political framework that 
places our relationship to our surroundings at the heart of how we 
exercise our voice, coordinate collective action, and define development
 itself.
Offering hope in an anxious age of rising authoritarianism and widespread pessimism, The Environmental Republic
 challenges the false choice between environmental protection and human 
freedom, showing how place-based institutions can deliver both 
sustainability and human development through true self-governance.

Giulio Boccaletti﻿
 is an author whose writings on natural resources security have been 
translated into several languages. He has held international leadership 
positions in the private and not-for-profit sectors. He is the 
scientific director of the Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, 
one of Europe’s largest research institutions focused on Earth science 
and transition economics, and cofounder of Chloris Geospatial, a 
space-tech company specializing in Earth observations. His books include
 Water: A Biography, and his work has been featured in acclaimed PBS series such as H2O: The Molecule That Made Us, Human Footprint, and The Future of Nature.

Morteza Hajizadeh
 is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New 
Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; 
Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 
18th
and 19th Century British Literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>974</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c03df4a0-8f17-11f1-8b6c-4b42a54eb32f</guid>
      <title>Georgia Kernell, &quot;Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009514699"><em>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness </em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party's level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don't necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the "secret garden" of party organisation. ﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://x.com/barua_satyaki">Satyaki Barua</a> is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009514699"><em>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness </em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party's level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don't necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the "secret garden" of party organisation. ﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://x.com/barua_satyaki">Satyaki Barua</a> is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46197292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fbde5e40-3e50-4962-a7d4-523721b2a460/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fbde5e40-3e50-4962-a7d4-523721b2a460&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Georgia Kernell, &quot;Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party&apos;s level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don&apos;t necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the &quot;secret garden&quot; of party organisation. ﻿

Satyaki Barua is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Inside Parties: How Party Rules Shape Membership and Responsiveness (Cambridge UP, 2025) by Georgia Kernell examines how party rules determine how parties select candidates, nominate leaders, and set policy goals. Most research on party organisation pays very little attention to what happens within political parties; this book addresses this gap by examining how internal party rules and procedures shape party membership and political responsiveness. Drawing on an original dataset of party statutes covering 65 political parties across 20 parliamentary democracies, the book offers one of the most comprehensive studies of party organisation to date. The book develops a formal model of party membership and tests these hypotheses using cross-national surveys, member studies, experiments, and computer simulations of projected vote shares. The book finds that a party&apos;s level of decentralisation - the degree to which it incorporates rank and file members into decision making - determines which voters it best represents. Decentralised parties may attract more members to campaign for the party, but they do so at the cost of adopting more extreme positions that pull them away from moderate voters. The book challenges our understanding of inner-party democracy, it reveals that Parties that are more internally democratic don&apos;t necessarily end up being more representative or responsive to the electorate as a whole. This novel and comprehensive research is an indispensable resource not only for party scholars but also for anyone working on comparative politics and multi-method research. And for anyone who wants to sneak a peek into the &quot;secret garden&quot; of party organisation. ﻿

Satyaki Barua is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of Hyderabad. His research focuses on party organisation, party institutionalisation, and political mobilisation, particularly examining the interactions between the state, society, and political parties in India and South Asia. Outside of academia, Satyaki enjoys watching and discussing movies, as well as practising Hindustani classical music.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>973</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b06df68-8bde-11f1-8ea6-931cd3397a6c</guid>
      <title>Monalisa Adhikari, &quot;A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788123">A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management </a>(Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Monalisa Adhikari shows how rising powers like India and China are reshaping global peace governance. Over recent decades, both countries have deepened engagement with institutions built on liberal principles, including those related to peacebuilding. Their growing role raises critical questions about how their approaches diverge from liberal models and their impact on the domestic politics of conflict-affected states.</p>
<p>Focusing on India and China's involvement in peace processes in Nepal and Myanmar, Dr. Adhikari demonstrates that these powers advance distinctive, state-centered programs that privilege regional stakeholders, stability, development, and pragmatism. Operating under conditions of "negotiated coexistence" with liberal peacebuilders, their initiatives neither fully align with nor openly contest existing actors, limiting cooperation while avoiding confrontation. This pluralized form of international engagement enables domestic elites to resist external pressures, producing hybrid peace orders that incorporate some liberal elements yet remain largely at the status quo—and often illiberal.</p>
<p>Rich with archival and interview evidence, <em>A Post-Liberal Peace</em> sheds light on alternative forms of peacebuilding and their on-the-ground effects in an increasingly multipolar world.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788123">A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management </a>(Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Monalisa Adhikari shows how rising powers like India and China are reshaping global peace governance. Over recent decades, both countries have deepened engagement with institutions built on liberal principles, including those related to peacebuilding. Their growing role raises critical questions about how their approaches diverge from liberal models and their impact on the domestic politics of conflict-affected states.</p>
<p>Focusing on India and China's involvement in peace processes in Nepal and Myanmar, Dr. Adhikari demonstrates that these powers advance distinctive, state-centered programs that privilege regional stakeholders, stability, development, and pragmatism. Operating under conditions of "negotiated coexistence" with liberal peacebuilders, their initiatives neither fully align with nor openly contest existing actors, limiting cooperation while avoiding confrontation. This pluralized form of international engagement enables domestic elites to resist external pressures, producing hybrid peace orders that incorporate some liberal elements yet remain largely at the status quo—and often illiberal.</p>
<p>Rich with archival and interview evidence, <em>A Post-Liberal Peace</em> sheds light on alternative forms of peacebuilding and their on-the-ground effects in an increasingly multipolar world.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58569303" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d0286ac9-6824-492e-b330-f99efd22e2dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d0286ac9-6824-492e-b330-f99efd22e2dc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Monalisa Adhikari, &quot;A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management (Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Monalisa Adhikari shows how rising powers like India and China are reshaping global peace governance. Over recent decades, both countries have deepened engagement with institutions built on liberal principles, including those related to peacebuilding. Their growing role raises critical questions about how their approaches diverge from liberal models and their impact on the domestic politics of conflict-affected states.

Focusing on India and China&apos;s involvement in peace processes in Nepal and Myanmar, Dr. Adhikari demonstrates that these powers advance distinctive, state-centered programs that privilege regional stakeholders, stability, development, and pragmatism. Operating under conditions of &quot;negotiated coexistence&quot; with liberal peacebuilders, their initiatives neither fully align with nor openly contest existing actors, limiting cooperation while avoiding confrontation. This pluralized form of international engagement enables domestic elites to resist external pressures, producing hybrid peace orders that incorporate some liberal elements yet remain largely at the status quo—and often illiberal.

Rich with archival and interview evidence, A Post-Liberal Peace sheds light on alternative forms of peacebuilding and their on-the-ground effects in an increasingly multipolar world.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In A Post-Liberal Peace: How Emergent Powers Are Reshaping Global Conflict Management (Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Monalisa Adhikari shows how rising powers like India and China are reshaping global peace governance. Over recent decades, both countries have deepened engagement with institutions built on liberal principles, including those related to peacebuilding. Their growing role raises critical questions about how their approaches diverge from liberal models and their impact on the domestic politics of conflict-affected states.

Focusing on India and China&apos;s involvement in peace processes in Nepal and Myanmar, Dr. Adhikari demonstrates that these powers advance distinctive, state-centered programs that privilege regional stakeholders, stability, development, and pragmatism. Operating under conditions of &quot;negotiated coexistence&quot; with liberal peacebuilders, their initiatives neither fully align with nor openly contest existing actors, limiting cooperation while avoiding confrontation. This pluralized form of international engagement enables domestic elites to resist external pressures, producing hybrid peace orders that incorporate some liberal elements yet remain largely at the status quo—and often illiberal.

Rich with archival and interview evidence, A Post-Liberal Peace sheds light on alternative forms of peacebuilding and their on-the-ground effects in an increasingly multipolar world.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>972</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83a484c0-8bdc-11f1-ba37-172d1cdc9e08</guid>
      <title>Luca Anceschi, &quot;Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789048562190">Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion</a> (Routledge, 2026) examines how the authoritarian regimes of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan exploited the Covid-19 pandemic to consolidate their political control over Central Asia. Through restrictive policies and strategic manipulation, these governments reshaped the region's politics and societies during 2020-2022.</p>
<p>This volume offers readers an insight into three key areas where Central Asia's pandemic power grab was most visible: mobility control, whereby restrictive legislation limited freedom of movement and suppressed dissent; authoritarian information flows, whereby COVID-19-related measures aligned media and digital information to government messaging, further curtailing freedom of expression; and the international politics of the pandemic, whereby the regimes capitalised on global instability to strengthen their kleptocratic hold over Central Asia's politics and society. This book provides a detailed analysis of these strategies, offering a compelling exploration of how crises can be used to entrench authoritarianism.</p>
<p>It is ideal for scholars, students, and professionals in political science, international relations, and Central Asian Studies. The book is also valuable to readers interested in understanding the intersection between public health crises and authoritarian governance.</p>
<p>The Open Access version of this book, available <a href="http://www.taylorfrancis.com/">here</a> has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.</p>
<p>Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on activism, social movements and state-society relations in the Post-Soviet space.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789048562190">Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion</a> (Routledge, 2026) examines how the authoritarian regimes of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan exploited the Covid-19 pandemic to consolidate their political control over Central Asia. Through restrictive policies and strategic manipulation, these governments reshaped the region's politics and societies during 2020-2022.</p>
<p>This volume offers readers an insight into three key areas where Central Asia's pandemic power grab was most visible: mobility control, whereby restrictive legislation limited freedom of movement and suppressed dissent; authoritarian information flows, whereby COVID-19-related measures aligned media and digital information to government messaging, further curtailing freedom of expression; and the international politics of the pandemic, whereby the regimes capitalised on global instability to strengthen their kleptocratic hold over Central Asia's politics and society. This book provides a detailed analysis of these strategies, offering a compelling exploration of how crises can be used to entrench authoritarianism.</p>
<p>It is ideal for scholars, students, and professionals in political science, international relations, and Central Asian Studies. The book is also valuable to readers interested in understanding the intersection between public health crises and authoritarian governance.</p>
<p>The Open Access version of this book, available <a href="http://www.taylorfrancis.com/">here</a> has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.</p>
<p>Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on activism, social movements and state-society relations in the Post-Soviet space.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56647371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/11f39f4f-146b-4e41-9c3e-8459a22ca05c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=11f39f4f-146b-4e41-9c3e-8459a22ca05c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luca Anceschi, &quot;Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion (Routledge, 2026) examines how the authoritarian regimes of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan exploited the Covid-19 pandemic to consolidate their political control over Central Asia. Through restrictive policies and strategic manipulation, these governments reshaped the region&apos;s politics and societies during 2020-2022.

This volume offers readers an insight into three key areas where Central Asia&apos;s pandemic power grab was most visible: mobility control, whereby restrictive legislation limited freedom of movement and suppressed dissent; authoritarian information flows, whereby COVID-19-related measures aligned media and digital information to government messaging, further curtailing freedom of expression; and the international politics of the pandemic, whereby the regimes capitalised on global instability to strengthen their kleptocratic hold over Central Asia&apos;s politics and society. This book provides a detailed analysis of these strategies, offering a compelling exploration of how crises can be used to entrench authoritarianism.

It is ideal for scholars, students, and professionals in political science, international relations, and Central Asian Studies. The book is also valuable to readers interested in understanding the intersection between public health crises and authoritarian governance.

The Open Access version of this book, available here has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on activism, social movements and state-society relations in the Post-Soviet space.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pandemic Politics in Central Asia: Authoritarian Contagion (Routledge, 2026) examines how the authoritarian regimes of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan exploited the Covid-19 pandemic to consolidate their political control over Central Asia. Through restrictive policies and strategic manipulation, these governments reshaped the region&apos;s politics and societies during 2020-2022.

This volume offers readers an insight into three key areas where Central Asia&apos;s pandemic power grab was most visible: mobility control, whereby restrictive legislation limited freedom of movement and suppressed dissent; authoritarian information flows, whereby COVID-19-related measures aligned media and digital information to government messaging, further curtailing freedom of expression; and the international politics of the pandemic, whereby the regimes capitalised on global instability to strengthen their kleptocratic hold over Central Asia&apos;s politics and society. This book provides a detailed analysis of these strategies, offering a compelling exploration of how crises can be used to entrench authoritarianism.

It is ideal for scholars, students, and professionals in political science, international relations, and Central Asian Studies. The book is also valuable to readers interested in understanding the intersection between public health crises and authoritarian governance.

The Open Access version of this book, available here has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on activism, social movements and state-society relations in the Post-Soviet space.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>971</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b0bd3dc-8c82-11f1-aee5-5bb100c30f43</guid>
      <title>The Resurgence of War and the Collapse of Arms Control</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the nuclear guardrails were dismantled. What arms control actually did (risk management, predictability, geography), how it unravelled from the 2000s onward, and why its collapse matters more now as we see a resurgence of strategic instability and armed conflict.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the nuclear guardrails were dismantled. What arms control actually did (risk management, predictability, geography), how it unravelled from the 2000s onward, and why its collapse matters more now as we see a resurgence of strategic instability and armed conflict.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31427260" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/88c9faa7-6f54-4151-a0fd-c88d2bce82aa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=88c9faa7-6f54-4151-a0fd-c88d2bce82aa&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Resurgence of War and the Collapse of Arms Control</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the nuclear guardrails were dismantled. What arms control actually did (risk management, predictability, geography), how it unravelled from the 2000s onward, and why its collapse matters more now as we see a resurgence of strategic instability and armed conflict.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the nuclear guardrails were dismantled. What arms control actually did (risk management, predictability, geography), how it unravelled from the 2000s onward, and why its collapse matters more now as we see a resurgence of strategic instability and armed conflict.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>970</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c9970ac-8a53-11f1-a390-ff9c6200cd34</guid>
      <title>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman, &quot;The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024&quot; (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman has a new book out that focuses on the reality of women running for president in the United States, and the fictional representations of this idea that we have seen over the past hundred years. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781666906622">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026) takes up a number of different and intriguing examples of this idea, a woman serving as president, and unpacks the various narratives to help us understand what popular culture may be communicating about this concept and what those narratives may be teaching the audience (viewers or readers). Taylor Kollman comes at her research from a variety of perspectives, including Media Studies, Women’s Studies, Feminist Studies, and American Studies. This makes the research particularly rich – since it explores these ideas from a host of analytical viewpoints, helping the reader to consider different genres (television, film, literature) and different approaches. Undergirding all of this is an interrogation of the idea of women and power, which is a controversial concept for many voters, even if it remains unacknowledged.</p>
<p>Taylor Kollman goes through the decades, with a focus on examples of female presidents in a variety of different cultural artifacts. In tracing this concept through almost a hundred years of different narratives, the research highlights some interesting themes, including the accidental way in which women become president within the fictional framework. One of the points Taylor Kollman makes is that, in all the different genres and contexts, there seems to be something wrong with this idea of a woman as president. Often the characters are presented as deceptive, evil, corrupt, illegitimate, or they are seen as incapable of doing the job and are often torn between work and homelife/family life. In tracing these examples, Taylor Kollman also provides the reader with an understanding of the different iterations (waves) of feminism and feminist thought, as well as noting the various backlashes to feminism. <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/fictional-female-presidency-in-film-television-and-literature-9781666906622/">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature</a> takes the reader through a host of different examples, fleshing out these feminist and backlash imaginary spaces that focus on women and power.</p>
<p>Another part of the equation, that is often overlooked in the research on this topic, is that there are fewer female film and television producers, directors, and showrunners, thus often constraining the opportunity to present these ideas of woman and power. This also influences the narratives that come before audiences, since women are not generally “trusted” in the same way that men are to helm major film releases with multi-million dollar budgets. This is another form of reality influencing the imaginary, but in a less expected way. <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/fictional-female-presidency-in-film-television-and-literature-9781666906622/">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024</a> takes the reader from <em>Betty Boop for President</em> to Allison Janney as President Grace Penn in <em>The Diplomat </em>and many other fascinating examples of fictional portrayals of women as president of the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman has a new book out that focuses on the reality of women running for president in the United States, and the fictional representations of this idea that we have seen over the past hundred years. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781666906622">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026) takes up a number of different and intriguing examples of this idea, a woman serving as president, and unpacks the various narratives to help us understand what popular culture may be communicating about this concept and what those narratives may be teaching the audience (viewers or readers). Taylor Kollman comes at her research from a variety of perspectives, including Media Studies, Women’s Studies, Feminist Studies, and American Studies. This makes the research particularly rich – since it explores these ideas from a host of analytical viewpoints, helping the reader to consider different genres (television, film, literature) and different approaches. Undergirding all of this is an interrogation of the idea of women and power, which is a controversial concept for many voters, even if it remains unacknowledged.</p>
<p>Taylor Kollman goes through the decades, with a focus on examples of female presidents in a variety of different cultural artifacts. In tracing this concept through almost a hundred years of different narratives, the research highlights some interesting themes, including the accidental way in which women become president within the fictional framework. One of the points Taylor Kollman makes is that, in all the different genres and contexts, there seems to be something wrong with this idea of a woman as president. Often the characters are presented as deceptive, evil, corrupt, illegitimate, or they are seen as incapable of doing the job and are often torn between work and homelife/family life. In tracing these examples, Taylor Kollman also provides the reader with an understanding of the different iterations (waves) of feminism and feminist thought, as well as noting the various backlashes to feminism. <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/fictional-female-presidency-in-film-television-and-literature-9781666906622/">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature</a> takes the reader through a host of different examples, fleshing out these feminist and backlash imaginary spaces that focus on women and power.</p>
<p>Another part of the equation, that is often overlooked in the research on this topic, is that there are fewer female film and television producers, directors, and showrunners, thus often constraining the opportunity to present these ideas of woman and power. This also influences the narratives that come before audiences, since women are not generally “trusted” in the same way that men are to helm major film releases with multi-million dollar budgets. This is another form of reality influencing the imaginary, but in a less expected way. <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/fictional-female-presidency-in-film-television-and-literature-9781666906622/">The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024</a> takes the reader from <em>Betty Boop for President</em> to Allison Janney as President Grace Penn in <em>The Diplomat </em>and many other fascinating examples of fictional portrayals of women as president of the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45613500" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d64d0d30-35cd-44f4-93a2-2f36a0ca3ed8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d64d0d30-35cd-44f4-93a2-2f36a0ca3ed8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman, &quot;The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024&quot; (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman has a new book out that focuses on the reality of women running for president in the United States, and the fictional representations of this idea that we have seen over the past hundred years. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024 (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026) takes up a number of different and intriguing examples of this idea, a woman serving as president, and unpacks the various narratives to help us understand what popular culture may be communicating about this concept and what those narratives may be teaching the audience (viewers or readers). Taylor Kollman comes at her research from a variety of perspectives, including Media Studies, Women’s Studies, Feminist Studies, and American Studies. This makes the research particularly rich – since it explores these ideas from a host of analytical viewpoints, helping the reader to consider different genres (television, film, literature) and different approaches. Undergirding all of this is an interrogation of the idea of women and power, which is a controversial concept for many voters, even if it remains unacknowledged.

Taylor Kollman goes through the decades, with a focus on examples of female presidents in a variety of different cultural artifacts. In tracing this concept through almost a hundred years of different narratives, the research highlights some interesting themes, including the accidental way in which women become president within the fictional framework. One of the points Taylor Kollman makes is that, in all the different genres and contexts, there seems to be something wrong with this idea of a woman as president. Often the characters are presented as deceptive, evil, corrupt, illegitimate, or they are seen as incapable of doing the job and are often torn between work and homelife/family life. In tracing these examples, Taylor Kollman also provides the reader with an understanding of the different iterations (waves) of feminism and feminist thought, as well as noting the various backlashes to feminism. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature takes the reader through a host of different examples, fleshing out these feminist and backlash imaginary spaces that focus on women and power.

Another part of the equation, that is often overlooked in the research on this topic, is that there are fewer female film and television producers, directors, and showrunners, thus often constraining the opportunity to present these ideas of woman and power. This also influences the narratives that come before audiences, since women are not generally “trusted” in the same way that men are to helm major film releases with multi-million dollar budgets. This is another form of reality influencing the imaginary, but in a less expected way. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024 takes the reader from Betty Boop for President to Allison Janney as President Grace Penn in The Diplomat and many other fascinating examples of fictional portrayals of women as president of the United States.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kathleen W. Taylor Kollman has a new book out that focuses on the reality of women running for president in the United States, and the fictional representations of this idea that we have seen over the past hundred years. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024 (Bloomsbury Academic, 2026) takes up a number of different and intriguing examples of this idea, a woman serving as president, and unpacks the various narratives to help us understand what popular culture may be communicating about this concept and what those narratives may be teaching the audience (viewers or readers). Taylor Kollman comes at her research from a variety of perspectives, including Media Studies, Women’s Studies, Feminist Studies, and American Studies. This makes the research particularly rich – since it explores these ideas from a host of analytical viewpoints, helping the reader to consider different genres (television, film, literature) and different approaches. Undergirding all of this is an interrogation of the idea of women and power, which is a controversial concept for many voters, even if it remains unacknowledged.

Taylor Kollman goes through the decades, with a focus on examples of female presidents in a variety of different cultural artifacts. In tracing this concept through almost a hundred years of different narratives, the research highlights some interesting themes, including the accidental way in which women become president within the fictional framework. One of the points Taylor Kollman makes is that, in all the different genres and contexts, there seems to be something wrong with this idea of a woman as president. Often the characters are presented as deceptive, evil, corrupt, illegitimate, or they are seen as incapable of doing the job and are often torn between work and homelife/family life. In tracing these examples, Taylor Kollman also provides the reader with an understanding of the different iterations (waves) of feminism and feminist thought, as well as noting the various backlashes to feminism. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature takes the reader through a host of different examples, fleshing out these feminist and backlash imaginary spaces that focus on women and power.

Another part of the equation, that is often overlooked in the research on this topic, is that there are fewer female film and television producers, directors, and showrunners, thus often constraining the opportunity to present these ideas of woman and power. This also influences the narratives that come before audiences, since women are not generally “trusted” in the same way that men are to helm major film releases with multi-million dollar budgets. This is another form of reality influencing the imaginary, but in a less expected way. The Fictional Female Presidency in Film, Television, and Literature: Representations from 1932 to 2024 takes the reader from Betty Boop for President to Allison Janney as President Grace Penn in The Diplomat and many other fascinating examples of fictional portrayals of women as president of the United States.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>969</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a6f3146-8995-11f1-93f9-4309708fb426</guid>
      <title>The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism in Asia and Beyond</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do authoritarian regimes silence critics across borders? And what are the repressive tools and strategies that authoritarian regimes use transnationally? In this episode we are joined by Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan and Karin Zackari to discuss the role of digital surveillance, emotional blackmail, enforced family isolation, psychological harassment, and the imprisonment of relatives on fabricated charges by Asian authoritarian regimes seeking to control populations and narratives across borders.</p>
<p>You can read more about the research discussed in this episode in the book <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-04940-7"><em>The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism</em></a>, published by Springer.</p>
<p>Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asian Studies at the University of Oslo.</p>
<p>Mubashar Hasan is an Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University.</p>
<p>Karin Zackari Associate Senior Researcher at the School of Global Studies at the University of Gothenburg.</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology and the Director of the Centre for South Asian Democracy at the University of Oslo.</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do authoritarian regimes silence critics across borders? And what are the repressive tools and strategies that authoritarian regimes use transnationally? In this episode we are joined by Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan and Karin Zackari to discuss the role of digital surveillance, emotional blackmail, enforced family isolation, psychological harassment, and the imprisonment of relatives on fabricated charges by Asian authoritarian regimes seeking to control populations and narratives across borders.</p>
<p>You can read more about the research discussed in this episode in the book <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-04940-7"><em>The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism</em></a>, published by Springer.</p>
<p>Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asian Studies at the University of Oslo.</p>
<p>Mubashar Hasan is an Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University.</p>
<p>Karin Zackari Associate Senior Researcher at the School of Global Studies at the University of Gothenburg.</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology and the Director of the Centre for South Asian Democracy at the University of Oslo.</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30359392" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/acd952f2-c435-44d3-a5e5-f11b164ba57c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=acd952f2-c435-44d3-a5e5-f11b164ba57c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism in Asia and Beyond</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do authoritarian regimes silence critics across borders? And what are the repressive tools and strategies that authoritarian regimes use transnationally? In this episode we are joined by Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan and Karin Zackari to discuss the role of digital surveillance, emotional blackmail, enforced family isolation, psychological harassment, and the imprisonment of relatives on fabricated charges by Asian authoritarian regimes seeking to control populations and narratives across borders.

You can read more about the research discussed in this episode in the book The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism, published by Springer.

Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asian Studies at the University of Oslo.

Mubashar Hasan is an Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University.

Karin Zackari Associate Senior Researcher at the School of Global Studies at the University of Gothenburg.

Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology and the Director of the Centre for South Asian Democracy at the University of Oslo.

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).

We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do authoritarian regimes silence critics across borders? And what are the repressive tools and strategies that authoritarian regimes use transnationally? In this episode we are joined by Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan and Karin Zackari to discuss the role of digital surveillance, emotional blackmail, enforced family isolation, psychological harassment, and the imprisonment of relatives on fabricated charges by Asian authoritarian regimes seeking to control populations and narratives across borders.

You can read more about the research discussed in this episode in the book The Long Reach of the Strong Arm: Evolving Forms of Transnational Authoritarianism, published by Springer.

Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asian Studies at the University of Oslo.

Mubashar Hasan is an Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University.

Karin Zackari Associate Senior Researcher at the School of Global Studies at the University of Gothenburg.

Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology and the Director of the Centre for South Asian Democracy at the University of Oslo.

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).

We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>968</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d4b68ba-89be-11f1-9af2-d3fddd0c440a</guid>
      <title>Adam Y. Liu, &quot;Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China&apos;s Banking Explosion&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Authoritarian Markets</em> explores the political foundations of China's banking boom and its far-reaching impact on the Chinese economy.</p>
<p>﻿In
 1978 China had no commercial banks. Today it commands the world's 
largest banking system, with assets equal to 40 percent of global GDP. 
In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501787621"><em>Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China's Banking Explosion</em></a>
 (Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Adam Y. Liu argues that this rise
 was not the product of market reforms but of political bargains and 
bureaucratic mobilization.</p>
<p>﻿In
 the 1990s, Beijing issued bank licenses as bargaining chips—securing 
cooperation from local governments as it pushed through painful reforms.
 The result was a sprawling, competitive banking market built not in spite of authoritarian rule but because of it.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on interviews, spatial data, census records, surveys, and experiments, 
Dr. Liu reveals how local state banks became both engines of China's 
growth and incubators of its current economic risks. Eye-opening and 
persuasive, <em>Authoritarian Markets</em> offers fresh insight into the political logic of market development in China and authoritarian states worldwide.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Authoritarian Markets</em> explores the political foundations of China's banking boom and its far-reaching impact on the Chinese economy.</p>
<p>﻿In
 1978 China had no commercial banks. Today it commands the world's 
largest banking system, with assets equal to 40 percent of global GDP. 
In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501787621"><em>Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China's Banking Explosion</em></a>
 (Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Adam Y. Liu argues that this rise
 was not the product of market reforms but of political bargains and 
bureaucratic mobilization.</p>
<p>﻿In
 the 1990s, Beijing issued bank licenses as bargaining chips—securing 
cooperation from local governments as it pushed through painful reforms.
 The result was a sprawling, competitive banking market built not in spite of authoritarian rule but because of it.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on interviews, spatial data, census records, surveys, and experiments, 
Dr. Liu reveals how local state banks became both engines of China's 
growth and incubators of its current economic risks. Eye-opening and 
persuasive, <em>Authoritarian Markets</em> offers fresh insight into the political logic of market development in China and authoritarian states worldwide.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56391445" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b2be190f-60c7-44a7-8a19-6d7e22d2ddb8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b2be190f-60c7-44a7-8a19-6d7e22d2ddb8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam Y. Liu, &quot;Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China&apos;s Banking Explosion&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Authoritarian Markets explores the political foundations of China&apos;s banking boom and its far-reaching impact on the Chinese economy.

﻿In
 1978 China had no commercial banks. Today it commands the world&apos;s 
largest banking system, with assets equal to 40 percent of global GDP. 
In Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China&apos;s Banking Explosion
 (Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Adam Y. Liu argues that this rise
 was not the product of market reforms but of political bargains and 
bureaucratic mobilization.

﻿In
 the 1990s, Beijing issued bank licenses as bargaining chips—securing 
cooperation from local governments as it pushed through painful reforms.
 The result was a sprawling, competitive banking market built not in spite of authoritarian rule but because of it.

﻿Drawing
 on interviews, spatial data, census records, surveys, and experiments, 
Dr. Liu reveals how local state banks became both engines of China&apos;s 
growth and incubators of its current economic risks. Eye-opening and 
persuasive, Authoritarian Markets offers fresh insight into the political logic of market development in China and authoritarian states worldwide.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Authoritarian Markets explores the political foundations of China&apos;s banking boom and its far-reaching impact on the Chinese economy.

﻿In
 1978 China had no commercial banks. Today it commands the world&apos;s 
largest banking system, with assets equal to 40 percent of global GDP. 
In Authoritarian Markets: The Politics of China&apos;s Banking Explosion
 (Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Adam Y. Liu argues that this rise
 was not the product of market reforms but of political bargains and 
bureaucratic mobilization.

﻿In
 the 1990s, Beijing issued bank licenses as bargaining chips—securing 
cooperation from local governments as it pushed through painful reforms.
 The result was a sprawling, competitive banking market built not in spite of authoritarian rule but because of it.

﻿Drawing
 on interviews, spatial data, census records, surveys, and experiments, 
Dr. Liu reveals how local state banks became both engines of China&apos;s 
growth and incubators of its current economic risks. Eye-opening and 
persuasive, Authoritarian Markets offers fresh insight into the political logic of market development in China and authoritarian states worldwide.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>967</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95da358c-86ae-11f1-a728-57fa287eae81</guid>
      <title>Galina Bogatova, &quot;Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032122506"><em>Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms</em></a>
 (Palgrave Macillan, 2026) by Dr. Galina Bogatova unpacks the hidden 
imperial logic behind Russia’s dominance over its neighbors,
 revealing how the Kremlin weaponizes "familial system" myths to justify
 control, including its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. From the Tsarist
 empire to Putin’s digital propaganda, Dr. Bogatova examines how Russia 
portrays itself as a disciplining “father,” a self-sacrificing “mother,”
 or an “elder brother” to post-Soviet states, protecting, subjugating, 
and manipulating them in the name of unity. </p>
<p>﻿﻿Blending
 psychology, discourse analysis, and historical inquiry, this 
groundbreaking book exposes how language sanitizes oppression, 
legitimizes conquest, and sustains imperial ambitions. A 
thought-provoking exploration of power, ideology, and resistance, it 
offers a fresh perspective on Russia’s enduring influence over its 
former empire.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032122506"><em>Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms</em></a>
 (Palgrave Macillan, 2026) by Dr. Galina Bogatova unpacks the hidden 
imperial logic behind Russia’s dominance over its neighbors,
 revealing how the Kremlin weaponizes "familial system" myths to justify
 control, including its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. From the Tsarist
 empire to Putin’s digital propaganda, Dr. Bogatova examines how Russia 
portrays itself as a disciplining “father,” a self-sacrificing “mother,”
 or an “elder brother” to post-Soviet states, protecting, subjugating, 
and manipulating them in the name of unity. </p>
<p>﻿﻿Blending
 psychology, discourse analysis, and historical inquiry, this 
groundbreaking book exposes how language sanitizes oppression, 
legitimizes conquest, and sustains imperial ambitions. A 
thought-provoking exploration of power, ideology, and resistance, it 
offers a fresh perspective on Russia’s enduring influence over its 
former empire.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34495836" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cb8381cd-1479-455c-9cc0-ceb599f7b92c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cb8381cd-1479-455c-9cc0-ceb599f7b92c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Galina Bogatova, &quot;Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms
 (Palgrave Macillan, 2026) by Dr. Galina Bogatova unpacks the hidden 
imperial logic behind Russia’s dominance over its neighbors,
 revealing how the Kremlin weaponizes &quot;familial system&quot; myths to justify
 control, including its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. From the Tsarist
 empire to Putin’s digital propaganda, Dr. Bogatova examines how Russia 
portrays itself as a disciplining “father,” a self-sacrificing “mother,”
 or an “elder brother” to post-Soviet states, protecting, subjugating, 
and manipulating them in the name of unity. 

﻿﻿Blending
 psychology, discourse analysis, and historical inquiry, this 
groundbreaking book exposes how language sanitizes oppression, 
legitimizes conquest, and sustains imperial ambitions. A 
thought-provoking exploration of power, ideology, and resistance, it 
offers a fresh perspective on Russia’s enduring influence over its 
former empire.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Casting War As Love: Russian Colonialism in Familial Terms
 (Palgrave Macillan, 2026) by Dr. Galina Bogatova unpacks the hidden 
imperial logic behind Russia’s dominance over its neighbors,
 revealing how the Kremlin weaponizes &quot;familial system&quot; myths to justify
 control, including its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. From the Tsarist
 empire to Putin’s digital propaganda, Dr. Bogatova examines how Russia 
portrays itself as a disciplining “father,” a self-sacrificing “mother,”
 or an “elder brother” to post-Soviet states, protecting, subjugating, 
and manipulating them in the name of unity. 

﻿﻿Blending
 psychology, discourse analysis, and historical inquiry, this 
groundbreaking book exposes how language sanitizes oppression, 
legitimizes conquest, and sustains imperial ambitions. A 
thought-provoking exploration of power, ideology, and resistance, it 
offers a fresh perspective on Russia’s enduring influence over its 
former empire.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>966</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fd23f83a-86af-11f1-8e84-43abeeaa9a28</guid>
      <title>Building A Freedom Infrastructure in the Age of Networked Control</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Host Licia Cianetti talks to Venezuelan democracy activist and co-founder of the World Liberty Congress Leopoldo López. As part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> they discuss Leopoldo’s recent article on <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracy-in-an-age-of-networked-control/">Democracy in an Age of Networked Control</a>. They discuss the technological challenges that democracy activists worldwide face today, and how some activists are rethinking their use of technology to elude the infrastructure of control and create new infrastructures for freedom.</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p>Leopoldo López is a Venezuelan democracy activist and the cofounder of the World Liberty Congress, which is a global network that connects democracy advocates and leaders from across the world. From 2014 to 2020 he was imprisoned for leading peaceful protests and civil resistance against the regime of Nicolás Maduro. Currently he is a Fellow at the Wilson Center.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR. She is the Principal Investigator of an upcoming research project on “<a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101286676">Resisting Inter-Scalar Authoritarian Networks and Coalitions</a>” (funded by the EU under Horizon Europe grant no. 101286676).</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Lopez-Transcript.docx#asset:466121@1">here</a></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Host Licia Cianetti talks to Venezuelan democracy activist and co-founder of the World Liberty Congress Leopoldo López. As part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> they discuss Leopoldo’s recent article on <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracy-in-an-age-of-networked-control/">Democracy in an Age of Networked Control</a>. They discuss the technological challenges that democracy activists worldwide face today, and how some activists are rethinking their use of technology to elude the infrastructure of control and create new infrastructures for freedom.</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p>Leopoldo López is a Venezuelan democracy activist and the cofounder of the World Liberty Congress, which is a global network that connects democracy advocates and leaders from across the world. From 2014 to 2020 he was imprisoned for leading peaceful protests and civil resistance against the regime of Nicolás Maduro. Currently he is a Fellow at the Wilson Center.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR. She is the Principal Investigator of an upcoming research project on “<a href="https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101286676">Resisting Inter-Scalar Authoritarian Networks and Coalitions</a>” (funded by the EU under Horizon Europe grant no. 101286676).</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Lopez-Transcript.docx#asset:466121@1">here</a></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33167745" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e8c27eb6-9dcb-4d4f-a33f-67d0a0cec896/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e8c27eb6-9dcb-4d4f-a33f-67d0a0cec896&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Building A Freedom Infrastructure in the Age of Networked Control</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Host Licia Cianetti talks to Venezuelan democracy activist and co-founder of the World Liberty Congress Leopoldo López. As part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy they discuss Leopoldo’s recent article on Democracy in an Age of Networked Control. They discuss the technological challenges that democracy activists worldwide face today, and how some activists are rethinking their use of technology to elude the infrastructure of control and create new infrastructures for freedom.

Guest:

Leopoldo López is a Venezuelan democracy activist and the cofounder of the World Liberty Congress, which is a global network that connects democracy advocates and leaders from across the world. From 2014 to 2020 he was imprisoned for leading peaceful protests and civil resistance against the regime of Nicolás Maduro. Currently he is a Fellow at the Wilson Center.

Presenter:

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR. She is the Principal Investigator of an upcoming research project on “Resisting Inter-Scalar Authoritarian Networks and Coalitions” (funded by the EU under Horizon Europe grant no. 101286676).

Transcript here

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Host Licia Cianetti talks to Venezuelan democracy activist and co-founder of the World Liberty Congress Leopoldo López. As part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy they discuss Leopoldo’s recent article on Democracy in an Age of Networked Control. They discuss the technological challenges that democracy activists worldwide face today, and how some activists are rethinking their use of technology to elude the infrastructure of control and create new infrastructures for freedom.

Guest:

Leopoldo López is a Venezuelan democracy activist and the cofounder of the World Liberty Congress, which is a global network that connects democracy advocates and leaders from across the world. From 2014 to 2020 he was imprisoned for leading peaceful protests and civil resistance against the regime of Nicolás Maduro. Currently he is a Fellow at the Wilson Center.

Presenter:

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR. She is the Principal Investigator of an upcoming research project on “Resisting Inter-Scalar Authoritarian Networks and Coalitions” (funded by the EU under Horizon Europe grant no. 101286676).

Transcript here

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>965</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc87811c-851f-11f1-8a6a-477e917cdf60</guid>
      <title>Dana Burchardt, &quot;The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509992928"><em>The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework</em></a>
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.</p>
<p>﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509992928"><em>The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework</em></a>
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.</p>
<p>﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50685023" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f8f7a44b-c2dc-4e2b-966a-2afd923625ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f8f7a44b-c2dc-4e2b-966a-2afd923625ce&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dana Burchardt, &quot;The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.

﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.

﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.

﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.

﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.

﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.

﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>964</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a701ce6-853d-11f1-8314-5778d6e16084</guid>
      <title>Julia R. Azari, &quot;Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftn1">[*]</a> book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246956">Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a> focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a><em> </em>are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.</p>
<p>Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.</p>
<p>In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a> is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftnref1">[*]</a> The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftn1">[*]</a> book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246956">Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a> focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a><em> </em>are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.</p>
<p>Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.</p>
<p>In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History</a> is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/427031-backlash-presidents?site=default#_ftnref1">[*]</a> The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691246956/backlash-presidents?srsltid=AfmBOorkXM2VbsS8fIZ8RaZFJgXrk0cW4injVmpS56SAC-da363UIg0d">Backlash Presidents</a> the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38320087" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/17d7c87b-f354-4fda-b801-bd566bdf5a6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=17d7c87b-f354-4fda-b801-bd566bdf5a6c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia R. Azari, &quot;Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning[*] book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in Backlash Presidents are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. Backlash Presidents traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.

Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.

In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.

Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿

[*] The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded Backlash Presidents the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Julia Azari, Professor of Political Science at Marquette University, has a new, award-winning[*] book centering on the connection between race and the American presidency, specifically in the reaction to presidents who made progress on the issue of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History focuses on four different periods in American political history and a number of different presidential administrations including: Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Donald J. Trump. Race and the American presidency are not usually topics that are looped together, and this is also part of the point that Azari is making in the book, since presidents often try to elide racial politics and policy issues. Race is also not usually connected to presidential impeachments, but this is yet another key point that Azari raises, connecting racial progress, the backlash responses, and the subsequent impeachments. In noting these connections, Azari threads examples over time where presidents directly confronted race in American politics, working towards more racial equality, and how these efforts also prompt a backlash response. The key case studies in Backlash Presidents are Abraham Lincoln, the Emancipation Proclamation and the Civil War in the 1860s, Lyndon Johnson’s efforts in the 1960s in regard to the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, as well as anti-poverty legislation, and finally Barack Obama as the first Black president of the United States, which was both symbolic and structural. Backlash Presidents traces not only the progress made during these administrations, but also the responses that followed in the subsequent administrations. It is these next administrations, of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Donald Trump, where each of these presidents were either impeached or were about to be impeached, and how this dynamic pulls together a variety of different threads to help us to understand presidential politics, institutional development, and American political history all in context of the question of race.

Azari’s research is connected to the idea of political time, but with the important addition of pulling out the problem of race in the United States. Backlash Presidents contributes to our thinking about not only the time and context of presidents and their administrations, but also to thinking about what it is that presidents do to politics itself. Part of this analysis also interrogates populism, positioning these movements within the context of racial backlash, while also building out the understanding of the president’s position within his own party, especially during these fraught periods. In each of the key examples, Azari highlights the ways in which Johnson, Nixon, and Trump were outsiders to what was going on inside their parties—in each case the Republican Party at the time—and how these shifting partisan foundations opened up different kinds of vulnerabilities for these presidents.

In each of the case studies, there is also the discussion of the role that the U.S. Congress plays, since they are the actors who move towards impeaching and trying the president. Members of the House of Representatives need to move beyond constraints in order to impeach a president, and in these instances, they have concluded that the president is not correct in some basic and meaningful way, that the president is not upholding his oath of office, and is also undermining the forward movement on race and racial equality.

Backlash Presidents: From Transformation to Reactionary Leaders in American History is a deeply researched analysis, with important historical context and details to help flesh out the particular time period under consideration. The examination is further complicated and built out with important understandings of party politics in the United States, and how president fits into their political party, or may be seen as an outsider. Racial dynamics in the United States undergirds the entire theory, and helps us see the tensions within partisan politics, presidential politics, and American democracy.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿

[*] The Presidents and Executive Politics Section of the American Political Science Association awarded Backlash Presidents the 2025 Richard E. Neustadt Best Book Award, given for the best book on executive politics published during the year.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>963</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6471670c-8480-11f1-9262-8f23f8a186b8</guid>
      <title>Michael Patrick Cullinane, &quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781640126893">Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet</a> (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), <a href="https://www.michaelpatrickcullinane.com/">Michael Patrick Cullinane</a> explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.</p>
<p>Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.</p>
<p>For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781640126893">Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet</a> (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), <a href="https://www.michaelpatrickcullinane.com/">Michael Patrick Cullinane</a> explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.</p>
<p>Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.</p>
<p>For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50805387" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5c44838f-306e-4c06-bb8f-6ba1d7d53e98/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5c44838f-306e-4c06-bb8f-6ba1d7d53e98&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Patrick Cullinane, &quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.

In Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), Michael Patrick Cullinane explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.

Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.

For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his final days in office in 1909, Theodore Roosevelt invited dozens of friends to the White House for lunch. They had never met as a group, but they had one thing in common: Each played tennis with the president and advised on policy matters. Roosevelt half-joked that the public would never know how much these tennis partners did to make his administration a success. Journalists dismissively called them the “Tennis Cabinet,” making light of their contribution, but Roosevelt knew otherwise.

In Theodore Roosevelt and the Tennis Court Cabinet (Potomac Books, an Imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2026), Michael Patrick Cullinane explains that the inner circle led the administration’s campaigns against corporate greed, investigated public health violations, and formulated consumer protections. They founded environmental conservation policies, prosecuted civil rights violations, and implemented bureaucratic efficiencies that saved the government billions. Roosevelt’s tennis mates shaped the nation’s diplomacy, ending wars and promoting American interests abroad.

Never had a more eclectic group advised a U.S. president. The Tennis Cabinet included legendary frontier lawman Seth Bullock and the starched-shirt corporate lawyer Henry Stimson, who served in five presidential administrations. Texas wolf wrangler Jack Abernathy played with stuffy bureaucrats like Labor Commissioner Charles Patrick Neill and social activist James Bronson Reynolds. The French ambassador Jean Jules Jusserand spun yarns with football hero George Washington Woodruff and Roosevelt’s college friend and banker Robert Bacon. James Garfield, namesake son of a martyred president, sipped mint juleps with Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody. And J. P. Morgan’s silver-spooned son-in-law Herbert Satterlee kept company with rugged soldier Luther “Yellowstone” Kelly.

For all their differences, these men shared a desire to help the president transform the nation from a parochial nineteenth-century republic into an imperial and industrial global power. They have escaped the attention of reporters and historians only because of Roosevelt’s towering celebrity. Turning away from Roosevelt as the singular force behind his administration, it is possible to see how the contributions of his Tennis Cabinet quietly sowed the seeds of the American Century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>962</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a082c3d0-8480-11f1-b88d-97c92489682b</guid>
      <title>Kurt Warner, &quot;False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy&quot; (Vernon Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881900847">False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy</a><em> </em>(Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.</p>
<p>The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.</p>
<p>A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.</p>
<p>The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.</p>
<p>Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. 'False Idols' connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. 'False Idols' asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.</p>
<p>Key Themes and Context:</p>
<p>“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.</p>
<p>The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.</p>
<p>Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.</p>
<p>Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of 'False Idols' focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.</p>
<p>The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/">Vernon Press</a> – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership</p>
<p>Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dessyvassileva/">Dessy Vassileva</a><em>, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881900847">False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy</a><em> </em>(Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.</p>
<p>The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.</p>
<p>A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.</p>
<p>The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.</p>
<p>Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. 'False Idols' connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.</p>
<p>Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. 'False Idols' asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.</p>
<p>Key Themes and Context:</p>
<p>“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.</p>
<p>The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.</p>
<p>Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.</p>
<p>Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of 'False Idols' focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.</p>
<p>The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/">Vernon Press</a> – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership</p>
<p>Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dessyvassileva/">Dessy Vassileva</a><em>, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36830705" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6eb4c035-81b4-485c-8099-196d519a64a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6eb4c035-81b4-485c-8099-196d519a64a3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kurt Warner, &quot;False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy&quot; (Vernon Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy (Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.

The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.

A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.

The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.

Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. &apos;False Idols&apos; connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.

Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. &apos;False Idols&apos; asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.

Key Themes and Context:

“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.

The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.

Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.

Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of &apos;False Idols&apos; focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.

The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.

Vernon Press – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership

Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.

Dessy Vassileva, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>False Idols: How Diversion is Destroying Democracy (Vernon Press, 2024) examines how modern forms of diversion shape civic life and weaken democratic responsibility. Drawing on the ancient Roman idea of “bread and circuses,” Kurt Warner explores how contemporary society is saturated with distractions that keep citizens focused on what is immediate, pleasurable, profitable, or spectacular, rather than on what is politically and socially meaningful.

The conversation introduces listeners to the book’s central concern: how celebrity culture, consumerism, economic pressures, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games can become “false idols.” These forces do not merely entertain us; they influence how we think, what we value, and how we understand our responsibilities to one another.

A key point of discussion is the book’s comparison between ancient Rome and the contemporary United States. Warner uses “bread and circuses” to consider how societies become complacent when citizens are absorbed by basic needs and entertainment while civic duty fades into the background.

The episode also explores the book’s opening narrative, which follows an ordinary man, Chris, through a day filled with advertising, media, branding, and social pressure. This scene illustrates one of the book’s central arguments: distraction is often woven into everyday life before people have noticed its influence.

Warner’s background in psychotherapy adds an important dimension to the discussion. &apos;False Idols&apos; connects personal awareness with civic awareness, asking how people can recognize the forces directing their attention and reclaim the ability to think critically.

Ultimately, this episode invites listeners to reflect on the relationship between attention and democracy. &apos;False Idols&apos; asks what it would mean to wake up from the collective daze of distraction and choose more meaningful forms of civic, ethical, and social engagement.

Key Themes and Context:

“Bread and circuses” in the modern world - ﻿One of the book’s central ideas is that Juvenal’s famous phrase “bread and circuses” remains relevant today. Warner uses it to examine how entertainment, consumption, and everyday distraction can draw citizens away from civic responsibility.

The many forms of diversion- ﻿The book considers a wide range of modern distractions, including celebrity worship, money, sports, politics, art, music, literature, the internet, social media, and video games. Together, these examples show how distraction can operate across culture, politics, economics, and everyday life.

Democracy and civic duty - ﻿At the heart of the book is a concern with democracy. Warner argues that distraction becomes dangerous when it weakens civic engagement and allows people to avoid the difficult work of political and ethical responsibility.

Critical thinking as resistance - ﻿The later chapters of &apos;False Idols&apos; focus on critical thinking as a way of resisting manipulation and recovering agency. The book invites readers to examine not only what they consume, but also how their attention, values, and judgments are shaped.

The psychological dimension of distraction - ﻿Warner’s background in psychotherapy informs the book’s attention to emotion, avoidance, and self-awareness. Distraction is presented not only as a social or political problem, but also as something that affects how individuals relate to themselves and others.

Vernon Press – Bridging Scholarly Ideas and Global Readership

Vernon Press stands out as a bilingual independent publisher of scholarly books in the humanities and social sciences. Their mission is crucial — to provide a home for ideas of international importance and to embrace scholarship from underrepresented voices and perspectives. Through its diverse catalog, Vernon Press engages with global readers, contributing to academic and public discourse.

Dessy Vassileva, the Marketing &amp; Design expert at Vernon Press, brings a 360º multidisciplinary approach to her work at Vernon Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>961</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d911d754-812e-11f1-be9c-c7e4b847cb78</guid>
      <title>US 250: A Conversation with Peter John Loewen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.</p>
<p>In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.</p>
<p>In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49873332" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5d21b5f0-b0eb-40d8-a78c-171e5ba0957e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5d21b5f0-b0eb-40d8-a78c-171e5ba0957e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>US 250: A Conversation with Peter John Loewen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.

In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Peter John Loewen to reflect on the 250th anniversary of US independence. They discuss the ways in which America’s unique founding moment has shaped democratic institutions and practice, and the paradox of America’s profound democratic experiment.

In this episode, Loewen describes his research on the representative nature of elected politicians – how they are similar to and different from ordinary people in their decision making. He also tackles questions of polarization and what happens when people have increased contact with other points of view. And the conversation wraps up with a discussion of higher education and democracy, and what role universities can play in shaping the next generation of democratic citizens.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>960</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c4e8cc4-8122-11f1-a61e-fbade91fc0b2</guid>
      <title>Ambrogio Caiani, &quot;Flirting with Evil: The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation&quot; (Apollo, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It's a shadowy, ornate world of cover-ups and hidden motives. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781800240513"><em>Flirting with Evil: ﻿The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation</em></a> (Apollo, 2026), Ambrogio Caiani lifts back the heavy velvet curtains of the﻿chancel and peers behind the locked mahogany doors of the Vatican to ﻿reveal the shocking truths that make up a century of Catholic ﻿corruption.</p>
<p>For
 many, Catholicism's flirtation with evil has ﻿become impossible to 
ignore: a pope courting Nazi officials and, ﻿horribly, turning a blind 
eye to the Holocaust; the Vatican becoming ﻿embroiled in a series of 
dodgy financial dealings; the child abuse ﻿continuously perpetrated by 
members of the clergy. Time and time again, ﻿Catholic figures have made 
terrible choices in private and preached in ﻿public about goodness and 
morality.</p>
<p>This is the first history ﻿that focuses exclusively on 
Catholicism throughout the twentieth ﻿century, sketching not only 
scandalous stories of corruption but also ﻿lively portrayals of 
Catholicism's key characters—from a beret-clad ﻿communist revolutionary 
priest to the bizarre morning routine of the ﻿pope who followed a daily 
cold bath with dry unbuttered toast. Caiani, a﻿ critical Catholic 
himself, takes a frank and sceptical look at the ﻿trajectory of global 
Catholicism and wrestles with vital questions about﻿ the future of the 
church. Taking in the wider socio-political contexts ﻿of a world at war 
and the accumulating momentum of social progress, this﻿ brilliant 
history traces the evolution of the Catholic church alongside﻿ the 
development of our modern society right up to the election of Pope ﻿Leo 
XIV in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a shadowy, ornate world of cover-ups and hidden motives. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781800240513"><em>Flirting with Evil: ﻿The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation</em></a> (Apollo, 2026), Ambrogio Caiani lifts back the heavy velvet curtains of the﻿chancel and peers behind the locked mahogany doors of the Vatican to ﻿reveal the shocking truths that make up a century of Catholic ﻿corruption.</p>
<p>For
 many, Catholicism's flirtation with evil has ﻿become impossible to 
ignore: a pope courting Nazi officials and, ﻿horribly, turning a blind 
eye to the Holocaust; the Vatican becoming ﻿embroiled in a series of 
dodgy financial dealings; the child abuse ﻿continuously perpetrated by 
members of the clergy. Time and time again, ﻿Catholic figures have made 
terrible choices in private and preached in ﻿public about goodness and 
morality.</p>
<p>This is the first history ﻿that focuses exclusively on 
Catholicism throughout the twentieth ﻿century, sketching not only 
scandalous stories of corruption but also ﻿lively portrayals of 
Catholicism's key characters—from a beret-clad ﻿communist revolutionary 
priest to the bizarre morning routine of the ﻿pope who followed a daily 
cold bath with dry unbuttered toast. Caiani, a﻿ critical Catholic 
himself, takes a frank and sceptical look at the ﻿trajectory of global 
Catholicism and wrestles with vital questions about﻿ the future of the 
church. Taking in the wider socio-political contexts ﻿of a world at war 
and the accumulating momentum of social progress, this﻿ brilliant 
history traces the evolution of the Catholic church alongside﻿ the 
development of our modern society right up to the election of Pope ﻿Leo 
XIV in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59534120" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3c3b7aff-553b-4ac6-b6c1-d88bdcd15168/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3c3b7aff-553b-4ac6-b6c1-d88bdcd15168&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ambrogio Caiani, &quot;Flirting with Evil: The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation&quot; (Apollo, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It&apos;s a shadowy, ornate world of cover-ups and hidden motives. In Flirting with Evil: ﻿The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation (Apollo, 2026), Ambrogio Caiani lifts back the heavy velvet curtains of the﻿chancel and peers behind the locked mahogany doors of the Vatican to ﻿reveal the shocking truths that make up a century of Catholic ﻿corruption.

For
 many, Catholicism&apos;s flirtation with evil has ﻿become impossible to 
ignore: a pope courting Nazi officials and, ﻿horribly, turning a blind 
eye to the Holocaust; the Vatican becoming ﻿embroiled in a series of 
dodgy financial dealings; the child abuse ﻿continuously perpetrated by 
members of the clergy. Time and time again, ﻿Catholic figures have made 
terrible choices in private and preached in ﻿public about goodness and 
morality.

This is the first history ﻿that focuses exclusively on 
Catholicism throughout the twentieth ﻿century, sketching not only 
scandalous stories of corruption but also ﻿lively portrayals of 
Catholicism&apos;s key characters—from a beret-clad ﻿communist revolutionary 
priest to the bizarre morning routine of the ﻿pope who followed a daily 
cold bath with dry unbuttered toast. Caiani, a﻿ critical Catholic 
himself, takes a frank and sceptical look at the ﻿trajectory of global 
Catholicism and wrestles with vital questions about﻿ the future of the 
church. Taking in the wider socio-political contexts ﻿of a world at war 
and the accumulating momentum of social progress, this﻿ brilliant 
history traces the evolution of the Catholic church alongside﻿ the 
development of our modern society right up to the election of Pope ﻿Leo 
XIV in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It&apos;s a shadowy, ornate world of cover-ups and hidden motives. In Flirting with Evil: ﻿The Catholic Church in the Age of Total War and Globalisation (Apollo, 2026), Ambrogio Caiani lifts back the heavy velvet curtains of the﻿chancel and peers behind the locked mahogany doors of the Vatican to ﻿reveal the shocking truths that make up a century of Catholic ﻿corruption.

For
 many, Catholicism&apos;s flirtation with evil has ﻿become impossible to 
ignore: a pope courting Nazi officials and, ﻿horribly, turning a blind 
eye to the Holocaust; the Vatican becoming ﻿embroiled in a series of 
dodgy financial dealings; the child abuse ﻿continuously perpetrated by 
members of the clergy. Time and time again, ﻿Catholic figures have made 
terrible choices in private and preached in ﻿public about goodness and 
morality.

This is the first history ﻿that focuses exclusively on 
Catholicism throughout the twentieth ﻿century, sketching not only 
scandalous stories of corruption but also ﻿lively portrayals of 
Catholicism&apos;s key characters—from a beret-clad ﻿communist revolutionary 
priest to the bizarre morning routine of the ﻿pope who followed a daily 
cold bath with dry unbuttered toast. Caiani, a﻿ critical Catholic 
himself, takes a frank and sceptical look at the ﻿trajectory of global 
Catholicism and wrestles with vital questions about﻿ the future of the 
church. Taking in the wider socio-political contexts ﻿of a world at war 
and the accumulating momentum of social progress, this﻿ brilliant 
history traces the evolution of the Catholic church alongside﻿ the 
development of our modern society right up to the election of Pope ﻿Leo 
XIV in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>959</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5f88f9e-8074-11f1-a982-338a6793ab64</guid>
      <title>Fenwick McKelvey, &quot;SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>﻿This book is available open access.</strong></p>
<p>For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053198"><em>SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers</em></a>
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>﻿This book is available open access.</strong></p>
<p>For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053198"><em>SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers</em></a>
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.</p>
<p>Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47706220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f2a68798-27bf-4541-8ed2-f1274b542e35/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f2a68798-27bf-4541-8ed2-f1274b542e35&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Fenwick McKelvey, &quot;SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This book is available open access.

For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.

Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This book is available open access.

For
 more than six decades, the public has been promised that computers will
 revolutionize politics, both nationally and internationally. In SimPolitics: America’s Quest to Solve Politics with Computers
 (MIT Press, 2026), Dr. Fenwick McKelvey traces the entwined history of 
politics and computers from the 1960s to the late 1980s. He shows how 
programmers, consultants, academics, political scientists, and peace 
activists all worked—sometimes in tandem, sometimes not—to build 
simulations to win campaigns, predict coups, forecast the future, and render politics as legible as a spreadsheet.

Drawing
 on novel archival and historical research, Dr. McKelvey recounts the 
history of efforts to simulate politics by building models of elections,
 voters, and international relations. Comparing attempts in the United 
States to simulate domestic electoral politics and international 
affairs, he reveals the unexamined connections and conflicts between the
 two projects. His book provides a helpful guide to taking stock of 
exaggerated claims that AI and technology will fix politics, while 
presenting the long history of such promised technological fixes.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>958</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fcc68e3a-7fd3-11f1-bc75-f7e739dc2238</guid>
      <title>Christopher M. Federico et al., &quot;The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813348">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a> (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.</p>
<p>In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a> is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a> reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a> explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a><em> </em>really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813348">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a> (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.</p>
<p>In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a> is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate</a> reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a> explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-authoritarian-divide-9780197813348?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">The Authoritarian Divide</a><em> </em>really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53460022" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a69ff010-0dd4-4fbd-a459-1f9bb3e32caf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a69ff010-0dd4-4fbd-a459-1f9bb3e32caf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christopher M. Federico et al., &quot;The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.

In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for The Authoritarian Divide is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.

The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.

The Authoritarian Divide explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. The Authoritarian Divide really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Christopher Federico, Stanley Feldman, and Christopher Weber have an important and fascinating new book from Oxford University Press focusing on understanding authoritarianism, especially in the American context. As experts in political psychology, the authors are keen to consider authoritarianism as a psychological concept, which is more about submitting to authority, as a kind of conformity, and less about a particular political regime structure. The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate (Oxford UP, 2026) ﻿is about trying to understand voters and how some of them are attracted to this idea or concept, and how this attraction then works itself out within the electorate and within our contemporary political moment.

In order to understand this theory of psychological authoritarianism, the authors trace the idea from origins in critical theory and pre-World War I European thinkers (Freud, Benjamin, etc.) who were examining the concepts of conformity vs. autonomy, and how these ideas functioned in political life. The authors also examined differing approaches to child-rearing, since this also reflects these same concepts of conformity and autonomy, but in how they are put into practice in bringing up children, either with more freedom or in a more rules bound approach. In using these measures, Federico, Feldman, and Weber also pulled together data from election surveys starting in the 1990s and moving forward that include questions that get at some of the same ideas. The authors also used experiments to test individual inclinations towards autonomy or uniformity. The thrust of voter’s choices was not about economics or specific public policy in these analyses, but around social issue differentiation and social context. The research for The Authoritarian Divide is complex and brings together a variety of different methodological approaches in order to examine this political divide, and to tease out the impact of psychological authoritarianism in American politics.

The Authoritarian Divide: Partisan Identity, Voting, and the Transformation of the American Electorate reveals that this inclination towards psychological authoritarianism is much more prevalent among white conservative voters than among other voting blocs in the United States. This has also led voters to sort themselves within the two parties accordingly, with far more of those who are inclined towards psychological authoritarianism moving into the Republican Party, and fewer moving into the Democratic Party. The result of this sorting has contributed to the rise in polarization within American politics over the past thirty years.

The Authoritarian Divide explains a lot about voter thinking and approaches to American politics over the past three decades. It helps to decipher the entrenched polarization because the examination is not about policy distinctions or issues, it is about how individual voters think and why they are inclined to think in particular ways about politics. The authors clearly assess the distinctions within the voting populace of the United States, and, in so doing, unpack different approaches to voting and vote choices in different sectors of the electorate. The Authoritarian Divide really helps us to understand our current political climate and to see how the rise of Donald Trump fits into a temporally longer era of American politics, partisan politics, racial politics, and the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>957</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40dcbd30-810d-11f1-932e-53176cace5bb</guid>
      <title>Luna Sabastian, &quot;Fascism in India: Race, Caste, and Hindutva&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Fascism swept the world in the 1920s and 1930s, but not only because of the seductive rhetoric of Mussolini, Hitler, and their collaborators. In India as well, a distinctive brand of fascist thought emerged—influenced by Euro-American ideologies but also departing from them in critical ways. The first systematic examination of this political philosophy, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674299436"><em>Fascism in India﻿: Race, Caste, and Hindutva </em></a>(Harvard UP, 2025) revises our sense of what fascism can be, while demonstrating that it is very much with us in the form of Hindutva, the ethnic-nationalist movement at the center of Indian politics today.<br />Luna Sabastian offers a novel interpretation of Hindutva, both its canonical formulation by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and its reinvention by Deendayal Upadhyaya after Indian independence. Sabastian shows how Hindutva generated ideas of Hindu race and religion that had the potential to erase Muslims not through genocide or ethnic cleansing but by means of violent absorption. Focusing on aggressive miscegenation, Indian fascists proposed a singular kind of racial project, eschewing notions of purity even while maintaining a starkly eliminationist objective. <em>Fascism in India</em> also grapples with Hindutva ideas of caste and its relation to race—particularly in comparison with Nazi uses of these concepts—and of sovereignty, which Indian fascists envisioned beyond the “blood and soil” narrative of the nation-state. Finally, Sabastian reflects on Hindutva’s reorientation toward Hindu piety after the creation of Pakistan effectively resolved India’s “Muslim problem.”<br />Bringing clarity to an ideology little understood in the West, <em>Fascism in India</em> is an eye-opening perspective on Hindutva and a profound meditation on the proliferation and evolution of right-wing thought.</p>
<p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/SachinNikarge">Sachin Nikarge</a> <em>has extensively worked in consultative capacity with prominent foreign/diplomatic missions across both ‘hard’ as well as ‘soft’ power domains.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Fascism swept the world in the 1920s and 1930s, but not only because of the seductive rhetoric of Mussolini, Hitler, and their collaborators. In India as well, a distinctive brand of fascist thought emerged—influenced by Euro-American ideologies but also departing from them in critical ways. The first systematic examination of this political philosophy, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674299436"><em>Fascism in India﻿: Race, Caste, and Hindutva </em></a>(Harvard UP, 2025) revises our sense of what fascism can be, while demonstrating that it is very much with us in the form of Hindutva, the ethnic-nationalist movement at the center of Indian politics today.<br />Luna Sabastian offers a novel interpretation of Hindutva, both its canonical formulation by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and its reinvention by Deendayal Upadhyaya after Indian independence. Sabastian shows how Hindutva generated ideas of Hindu race and religion that had the potential to erase Muslims not through genocide or ethnic cleansing but by means of violent absorption. Focusing on aggressive miscegenation, Indian fascists proposed a singular kind of racial project, eschewing notions of purity even while maintaining a starkly eliminationist objective. <em>Fascism in India</em> also grapples with Hindutva ideas of caste and its relation to race—particularly in comparison with Nazi uses of these concepts—and of sovereignty, which Indian fascists envisioned beyond the “blood and soil” narrative of the nation-state. Finally, Sabastian reflects on Hindutva’s reorientation toward Hindu piety after the creation of Pakistan effectively resolved India’s “Muslim problem.”<br />Bringing clarity to an ideology little understood in the West, <em>Fascism in India</em> is an eye-opening perspective on Hindutva and a profound meditation on the proliferation and evolution of right-wing thought.</p>
<p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/SachinNikarge">Sachin Nikarge</a> <em>has extensively worked in consultative capacity with prominent foreign/diplomatic missions across both ‘hard’ as well as ‘soft’ power domains.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32897423" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0fc81ae5-a97a-49db-9777-326090ed94e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0fc81ae5-a97a-49db-9777-326090ed94e2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luna Sabastian, &quot;Fascism in India: Race, Caste, and Hindutva&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fascism swept the world in the 1920s and 1930s, but not only because of the seductive rhetoric of Mussolini, Hitler, and their collaborators. In India as well, a distinctive brand of fascist thought emerged—influenced by Euro-American ideologies but also departing from them in critical ways. The first systematic examination of this political philosophy, Fascism in India﻿: Race, Caste, and Hindutva (Harvard UP, 2025) revises our sense of what fascism can be, while demonstrating that it is very much with us in the form of Hindutva, the ethnic-nationalist movement at the center of Indian politics today.Luna Sabastian offers a novel interpretation of Hindutva, both its canonical formulation by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and its reinvention by Deendayal Upadhyaya after Indian independence. Sabastian shows how Hindutva generated ideas of Hindu race and religion that had the potential to erase Muslims not through genocide or ethnic cleansing but by means of violent absorption. Focusing on aggressive miscegenation, Indian fascists proposed a singular kind of racial project, eschewing notions of purity even while maintaining a starkly eliminationist objective. Fascism in India also grapples with Hindutva ideas of caste and its relation to race—particularly in comparison with Nazi uses of these concepts—and of sovereignty, which Indian fascists envisioned beyond the “blood and soil” narrative of the nation-state. Finally, Sabastian reflects on Hindutva’s reorientation toward Hindu piety after the creation of Pakistan effectively resolved India’s “Muslim problem.”Bringing clarity to an ideology little understood in the West, Fascism in India is an eye-opening perspective on Hindutva and a profound meditation on the proliferation and evolution of right-wing thought.

Sachin Nikarge has extensively worked in consultative capacity with prominent foreign/diplomatic missions across both ‘hard’ as well as ‘soft’ power domains.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fascism swept the world in the 1920s and 1930s, but not only because of the seductive rhetoric of Mussolini, Hitler, and their collaborators. In India as well, a distinctive brand of fascist thought emerged—influenced by Euro-American ideologies but also departing from them in critical ways. The first systematic examination of this political philosophy, Fascism in India﻿: Race, Caste, and Hindutva (Harvard UP, 2025) revises our sense of what fascism can be, while demonstrating that it is very much with us in the form of Hindutva, the ethnic-nationalist movement at the center of Indian politics today.Luna Sabastian offers a novel interpretation of Hindutva, both its canonical formulation by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and its reinvention by Deendayal Upadhyaya after Indian independence. Sabastian shows how Hindutva generated ideas of Hindu race and religion that had the potential to erase Muslims not through genocide or ethnic cleansing but by means of violent absorption. Focusing on aggressive miscegenation, Indian fascists proposed a singular kind of racial project, eschewing notions of purity even while maintaining a starkly eliminationist objective. Fascism in India also grapples with Hindutva ideas of caste and its relation to race—particularly in comparison with Nazi uses of these concepts—and of sovereignty, which Indian fascists envisioned beyond the “blood and soil” narrative of the nation-state. Finally, Sabastian reflects on Hindutva’s reorientation toward Hindu piety after the creation of Pakistan effectively resolved India’s “Muslim problem.”Bringing clarity to an ideology little understood in the West, Fascism in India is an eye-opening perspective on Hindutva and a profound meditation on the proliferation and evolution of right-wing thought.

Sachin Nikarge has extensively worked in consultative capacity with prominent foreign/diplomatic missions across both ‘hard’ as well as ‘soft’ power domains.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>956</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eb371724-7d86-11f1-a24d-83277bb49d8f</guid>
      <title>The Emerging Anocracy: AI, Tech Oligarchs, and the Future of Democracy with Alexis Cruz</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an "anocracy"—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an "anocracy"—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55201986" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/65455031-dfb8-4401-8fde-619c7414c8b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=65455031-dfb8-4401-8fde-619c7414c8b7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Emerging Anocracy: AI, Tech Oligarchs, and the Future of Democracy with Alexis Cruz</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an &quot;anocracy&quot;—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny sits down with Alexis Cruz, founder of Enough Consulting and former strategic advisor for governance at Meta. Cruz explores how the proliferation of AI and digital platforms has shifted global politics into an &quot;anocracy&quot;—a precarious gray zone situated between traditional democracy and authoritarianism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>955</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e876d3dc-7d75-11f1-b643-47b9e0640fbd</guid>
      <title>Democratic Backsliding and Resistance: Poland’s Civil Society, Electoral Strategies, and Institutional Levers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Frances Cayton speaks with four experts on Polish politics about the success of Poland’s opposition coalition in 2023, and the headwinds that democracy continues to face today.</p>
<p>What challenges do parties and civil society face in building pro-democracy electoral coalitions? If victorious, how do these challenges affect post-election governance and efforts at pursuing democratic renewal? This episode brings together politicians, political scientists, and civil society leaders who each played a critical role in the 2023 elections to examine what made Poland’s pro-democracy mobilization possible, the gains the 2023 coalition has achieved since entering power, and the challenges it continues to face in pursuing democratic renewal.<br />This episode was originally recorded as a part of the Lessons from Global Democratic Resistance panel series. The series brings together frontline activists, civic leaders, institutional actors, and field‑informed scholars to examine how democratic actors have resisted, responded to, and learned from democratic backsliding across countries. The series aims to identify practical lessons and comparative insights for those defending democracy today and is organized in collaboration with the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University; Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania; the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame; the Democratic Futures Project at the University of Virginia; Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law; and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p>
<p>Mikołaj Cześnik, Director of the Institute of Social Science at SWPS University, Chairman of the Council of the Stefan Batory Foundation</p>
<p>Michał Wawrykiewicz, Member of the European Parliament (MEP). Co-Founder of the civic initiative Wolne Sady (Free Courts)</p>
<p>Marek Tatała, President and Co-Founder of the Economic Freedom Foundation</p>
<p>Dominika Lasota, Student and Activist in the Youth Climate Strike Poland, Co-Founder of Inicjatywa WSCHÓD</p>
<p><em>Frances Cayton is a PhD Candidate in Government at Cornell University. Her research focuses on questions surrounding democratic backsliding, civil society, and political communication.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Frances Cayton speaks with four experts on Polish politics about the success of Poland’s opposition coalition in 2023, and the headwinds that democracy continues to face today.</p>
<p>What challenges do parties and civil society face in building pro-democracy electoral coalitions? If victorious, how do these challenges affect post-election governance and efforts at pursuing democratic renewal? This episode brings together politicians, political scientists, and civil society leaders who each played a critical role in the 2023 elections to examine what made Poland’s pro-democracy mobilization possible, the gains the 2023 coalition has achieved since entering power, and the challenges it continues to face in pursuing democratic renewal.<br />This episode was originally recorded as a part of the Lessons from Global Democratic Resistance panel series. The series brings together frontline activists, civic leaders, institutional actors, and field‑informed scholars to examine how democratic actors have resisted, responded to, and learned from democratic backsliding across countries. The series aims to identify practical lessons and comparative insights for those defending democracy today and is organized in collaboration with the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University; Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania; the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame; the Democratic Futures Project at the University of Virginia; Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law; and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p>
<p>Mikołaj Cześnik, Director of the Institute of Social Science at SWPS University, Chairman of the Council of the Stefan Batory Foundation</p>
<p>Michał Wawrykiewicz, Member of the European Parliament (MEP). Co-Founder of the civic initiative Wolne Sady (Free Courts)</p>
<p>Marek Tatała, President and Co-Founder of the Economic Freedom Foundation</p>
<p>Dominika Lasota, Student and Activist in the Youth Climate Strike Poland, Co-Founder of Inicjatywa WSCHÓD</p>
<p><em>Frances Cayton is a PhD Candidate in Government at Cornell University. Her research focuses on questions surrounding democratic backsliding, civil society, and political communication.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64264170" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aa4a0249-a728-487e-9209-8cd4a498a631/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aa4a0249-a728-487e-9209-8cd4a498a631&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democratic Backsliding and Resistance: Poland’s Civil Society, Electoral Strategies, and Institutional Levers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Frances Cayton speaks with four experts on Polish politics about the success of Poland’s opposition coalition in 2023, and the headwinds that democracy continues to face today.

What challenges do parties and civil society face in building pro-democracy electoral coalitions? If victorious, how do these challenges affect post-election governance and efforts at pursuing democratic renewal? This episode brings together politicians, political scientists, and civil society leaders who each played a critical role in the 2023 elections to examine what made Poland’s pro-democracy mobilization possible, the gains the 2023 coalition has achieved since entering power, and the challenges it continues to face in pursuing democratic renewal.This episode was originally recorded as a part of the Lessons from Global Democratic Resistance panel series. The series brings together frontline activists, civic leaders, institutional actors, and field‑informed scholars to examine how democratic actors have resisted, responded to, and learned from democratic backsliding across countries. The series aims to identify practical lessons and comparative insights for those defending democracy today and is organized in collaboration with the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University; Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania; the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame; the Democratic Futures Project at the University of Virginia; Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law; and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Mikołaj Cześnik, Director of the Institute of Social Science at SWPS University, Chairman of the Council of the Stefan Batory Foundation

Michał Wawrykiewicz, Member of the European Parliament (MEP). Co-Founder of the civic initiative Wolne Sady (Free Courts)

Marek Tatała, President and Co-Founder of the Economic Freedom Foundation

Dominika Lasota, Student and Activist in the Youth Climate Strike Poland, Co-Founder of Inicjatywa WSCHÓD

Frances Cayton is a PhD Candidate in Government at Cornell University. Her research focuses on questions surrounding democratic backsliding, civil society, and political communication.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Frances Cayton speaks with four experts on Polish politics about the success of Poland’s opposition coalition in 2023, and the headwinds that democracy continues to face today.

What challenges do parties and civil society face in building pro-democracy electoral coalitions? If victorious, how do these challenges affect post-election governance and efforts at pursuing democratic renewal? This episode brings together politicians, political scientists, and civil society leaders who each played a critical role in the 2023 elections to examine what made Poland’s pro-democracy mobilization possible, the gains the 2023 coalition has achieved since entering power, and the challenges it continues to face in pursuing democratic renewal.This episode was originally recorded as a part of the Lessons from Global Democratic Resistance panel series. The series brings together frontline activists, civic leaders, institutional actors, and field‑informed scholars to examine how democratic actors have resisted, responded to, and learned from democratic backsliding across countries. The series aims to identify practical lessons and comparative insights for those defending democracy today and is organized in collaboration with the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University; Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania; the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame; the Democratic Futures Project at the University of Virginia; Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law; and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Mikołaj Cześnik, Director of the Institute of Social Science at SWPS University, Chairman of the Council of the Stefan Batory Foundation

Michał Wawrykiewicz, Member of the European Parliament (MEP). Co-Founder of the civic initiative Wolne Sady (Free Courts)

Marek Tatała, President and Co-Founder of the Economic Freedom Foundation

Dominika Lasota, Student and Activist in the Youth Climate Strike Poland, Co-Founder of Inicjatywa WSCHÓD

Frances Cayton is a PhD Candidate in Government at Cornell University. Her research focuses on questions surrounding democratic backsliding, civil society, and political communication.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>954</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94f7c49c-7b12-11f1-8033-73f7b4d41829</guid>
      <title>Dan Altman, &quot;Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/taking-territory-the-persistence-of-conquest-since-1945-dan-altman/ce9fa1b0ade53663?ean=9781501786624&amp;next=t"><em>Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2026) is an eye-opening account of why territorial conquest persists today.</p>
<p>﻿The end of World War II seemingly brought about a decline in territorial 
conquest. Many have argued that a strong territorial integrity norm in 
the postwar era explains this decline. Yet as Dan Altman shows, states 
have seized territory numerous times since 1945. Large-scale conquests 
have waned, but small, targeted seizures have persisted. The 
relationship between conquest and war has also shifted. While states 
attempting conquest before 1945 often initiated war and sought to occupy
 large territories, challengers today more often seize small regions and
 try to avoid war. This strategy, the fait accompli, has become the 
predominant mode of conquest.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on his original data, which
 include 175 conquest attempts between 1918 and 2024, Altman explains 
why conquest persists, what motivates it, when it turns violent, and 
when it succeeds. He shows how miscalculated fait accompli have sparked 
many post-1945 wars, and why the motives behind many territorial grabs 
are often about image, domestic politics, and the ambitions of military 
officers. Incisive and illuminating, <em>Taking Territory </em>cuts against what we think we know about post-1945 conquest to reveal its true causes and consequences.</p>
<p>﻿Our guest is <a href="https://dan-altman.weebly.com/">Dan Altman</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University. </p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1"><em>Volatile States in International Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/taking-territory-the-persistence-of-conquest-since-1945-dan-altman/ce9fa1b0ade53663?ean=9781501786624&amp;next=t"><em>Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2026) is an eye-opening account of why territorial conquest persists today.</p>
<p>﻿The end of World War II seemingly brought about a decline in territorial 
conquest. Many have argued that a strong territorial integrity norm in 
the postwar era explains this decline. Yet as Dan Altman shows, states 
have seized territory numerous times since 1945. Large-scale conquests 
have waned, but small, targeted seizures have persisted. The 
relationship between conquest and war has also shifted. While states 
attempting conquest before 1945 often initiated war and sought to occupy
 large territories, challengers today more often seize small regions and
 try to avoid war. This strategy, the fait accompli, has become the 
predominant mode of conquest.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on his original data, which
 include 175 conquest attempts between 1918 and 2024, Altman explains 
why conquest persists, what motivates it, when it turns violent, and 
when it succeeds. He shows how miscalculated fait accompli have sparked 
many post-1945 wars, and why the motives behind many territorial grabs 
are often about image, domestic politics, and the ambitions of military 
officers. Incisive and illuminating, <em>Taking Territory </em>cuts against what we think we know about post-1945 conquest to reveal its true causes and consequences.</p>
<p>﻿Our guest is <a href="https://dan-altman.weebly.com/">Dan Altman</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University. </p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1"><em>Volatile States in International Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28800569" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/94b852fd-e892-4cc6-beb4-adfb152c4f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=94b852fd-e892-4cc6-beb4-adfb152c4f68&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dan Altman, &quot;Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945 (Cornell University Press, 2026) is an eye-opening account of why territorial conquest persists today.

﻿The end of World War II seemingly brought about a decline in territorial 
conquest. Many have argued that a strong territorial integrity norm in 
the postwar era explains this decline. Yet as Dan Altman shows, states 
have seized territory numerous times since 1945. Large-scale conquests 
have waned, but small, targeted seizures have persisted. The 
relationship between conquest and war has also shifted. While states 
attempting conquest before 1945 often initiated war and sought to occupy
 large territories, challengers today more often seize small regions and
 try to avoid war. This strategy, the fait accompli, has become the 
predominant mode of conquest.

﻿Drawing on his original data, which
 include 175 conquest attempts between 1918 and 2024, Altman explains 
why conquest persists, what motivates it, when it turns violent, and 
when it succeeds. He shows how miscalculated fait accompli have sparked 
many post-1945 wars, and why the motives behind many territorial grabs 
are often about image, domestic politics, and the ambitions of military 
officers. Incisive and illuminating, Taking Territory cuts against what we think we know about post-1945 conquest to reveal its true causes and consequences.

﻿Our guest is Dan Altman, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University. 

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Taking Territory: The Persistence of Conquest Since 1945 (Cornell University Press, 2026) is an eye-opening account of why territorial conquest persists today.

﻿The end of World War II seemingly brought about a decline in territorial 
conquest. Many have argued that a strong territorial integrity norm in 
the postwar era explains this decline. Yet as Dan Altman shows, states 
have seized territory numerous times since 1945. Large-scale conquests 
have waned, but small, targeted seizures have persisted. The 
relationship between conquest and war has also shifted. While states 
attempting conquest before 1945 often initiated war and sought to occupy
 large territories, challengers today more often seize small regions and
 try to avoid war. This strategy, the fait accompli, has become the 
predominant mode of conquest.

﻿Drawing on his original data, which
 include 175 conquest attempts between 1918 and 2024, Altman explains 
why conquest persists, what motivates it, when it turns violent, and 
when it succeeds. He shows how miscalculated fait accompli have sparked 
many post-1945 wars, and why the motives behind many territorial grabs 
are often about image, domestic politics, and the ambitions of military 
officers. Incisive and illuminating, Taking Territory cuts against what we think we know about post-1945 conquest to reveal its true causes and consequences.

﻿Our guest is Dan Altman, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University. 

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>953</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1044a392-7b11-11f1-937f-533fb51f1865</guid>
      <title>Diana T. Kudaibergen, &quot;What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Power, Identity and Nation-Building&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In early 2022, protests rocked Kazakhstan. Initially peaceful demonstrations turned violent after brutal government crackdowns, leaving at least 238 dead during "Bloody January." Many feared the unrest might fracture the country along ethno-linguistic lines—yet ethnicity played little role. It was deep socio-economic grievances and anti-regime sentiment that brought people onto the streets. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197820704"><em>What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Central Asia</em> </a>(Oxford University Press, 2024), Diana T. Kudaibergen asks why. Building on unpublished archival materials and hundreds of interviews, she examines how Kazakhstan developed a relatively stable inter-ethnic framework where others fractured, how regime elites and ordinary citizens have pulled that identity in different directions, and how Moscow's 2022 invasion of 
Ukraine, and the Russian immigration it has prompted, is once again 
transforming what it means to call oneself Kazakhstani.﻿﻿</p>
<p>﻿Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a Master's in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within the Central Asia context. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early 2022, protests rocked Kazakhstan. Initially peaceful demonstrations turned violent after brutal government crackdowns, leaving at least 238 dead during "Bloody January." Many feared the unrest might fracture the country along ethno-linguistic lines—yet ethnicity played little role. It was deep socio-economic grievances and anti-regime sentiment that brought people onto the streets. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197820704"><em>What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Central Asia</em> </a>(Oxford University Press, 2024), Diana T. Kudaibergen asks why. Building on unpublished archival materials and hundreds of interviews, she examines how Kazakhstan developed a relatively stable inter-ethnic framework where others fractured, how regime elites and ordinary citizens have pulled that identity in different directions, and how Moscow's 2022 invasion of 
Ukraine, and the Russian immigration it has prompted, is once again 
transforming what it means to call oneself Kazakhstani.﻿﻿</p>
<p>﻿Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a Master's in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within the Central Asia context. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51654393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/89d20e8d-0ecc-467d-b49b-6aa825f438dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=89d20e8d-0ecc-467d-b49b-6aa825f438dc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Diana T. Kudaibergen, &quot;What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Power, Identity and Nation-Building&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In early 2022, protests rocked Kazakhstan. Initially peaceful demonstrations turned violent after brutal government crackdowns, leaving at least 238 dead during &quot;Bloody January.&quot; Many feared the unrest might fracture the country along ethno-linguistic lines—yet ethnicity played little role. It was deep socio-economic grievances and anti-regime sentiment that brought people onto the streets. In What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Central Asia (Oxford University Press, 2024), Diana T. Kudaibergen asks why. Building on unpublished archival materials and hundreds of interviews, she examines how Kazakhstan developed a relatively stable inter-ethnic framework where others fractured, how regime elites and ordinary citizens have pulled that identity in different directions, and how Moscow&apos;s 2022 invasion of 
Ukraine, and the Russian immigration it has prompted, is once again 
transforming what it means to call oneself Kazakhstani.﻿﻿

﻿Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a Master&apos;s in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within the Central Asia context. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In early 2022, protests rocked Kazakhstan. Initially peaceful demonstrations turned violent after brutal government crackdowns, leaving at least 238 dead during &quot;Bloody January.&quot; Many feared the unrest might fracture the country along ethno-linguistic lines—yet ethnicity played little role. It was deep socio-economic grievances and anti-regime sentiment that brought people onto the streets. In What Does It Mean to Be Kazakhstani?: Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Central Asia (Oxford University Press, 2024), Diana T. Kudaibergen asks why. Building on unpublished archival materials and hundreds of interviews, she examines how Kazakhstan developed a relatively stable inter-ethnic framework where others fractured, how regime elites and ordinary citizens have pulled that identity in different directions, and how Moscow&apos;s 2022 invasion of 
Ukraine, and the Russian immigration it has prompted, is once again 
transforming what it means to call oneself Kazakhstani.﻿﻿

﻿Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a Master&apos;s in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within the Central Asia context. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>952</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d80e38c8-7942-11f1-b113-5b7436d172de</guid>
      <title>Vignesh Rajahmani, &quot;The Dravidian Pathway: The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Politics of Transition in South India&quot; (Hurst Publishers, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In
 the rich political landscape of Tamil Nadu, few movements have had as 
profound and enduring an impact as the Dravidian movement. Vignesh 
Rajahmani’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265566"><em>The Dravidian Pathway</em></a> (Hurst
 Publishers, 2025) offers a compelling and detailed account of how the 
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) transformed a powerful socio-cultural 
and anti-caste movement into a highly successful electoral political 
force.</p>
<p>﻿Focusing on the pivotal decades of the mid-20th century, 
Rajahmani
 traces the strategic leadership of key figures including Periyar E.V. 
Ramasamy, C.N. Annadurai, M. Karunanidhi, and others. The book explores 
how the DMK skilfully synthesised
 anti-caste ideology, demands for linguistic pride and Tamil identity, 
socioeconomic reforms, and educational mobility. This synthesis not only
 resonated deeply with marginalised communities but also enabled the 
party to translate ideological commitments into concrete welfare 
policies and political power.</p>
<p>﻿<em>The Dravidian Pathway</em> is 
particularly valuable for its nuanced examination of the transition from
 movement to party, shedding light on the organisational innovations — 
such as the spread of reading rooms (<em>padippakams</em>)
 — that helped build a robust Dravidian public sphere in the 1950s and 
1960s. Rajahmani’s work provides fresh insights into one of modern 
India’s most distinctive and influential regional political traditions.</p>
<p>﻿This timely
 study is essential reading for anyone interested in South Indian 
politics, federalism, identity politics, and the enduring legacy of 
social justice movements in India.﻿﻿﻿﻿</p>
<p>Host:﻿ Dhiren Swain is a j﻿oint PhD Candidate in Urban Studies at The University of Melbourne and IIT Madras.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In
 the rich political landscape of Tamil Nadu, few movements have had as 
profound and enduring an impact as the Dravidian movement. Vignesh 
Rajahmani’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265566"><em>The Dravidian Pathway</em></a> (Hurst
 Publishers, 2025) offers a compelling and detailed account of how the 
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) transformed a powerful socio-cultural 
and anti-caste movement into a highly successful electoral political 
force.</p>
<p>﻿Focusing on the pivotal decades of the mid-20th century, 
Rajahmani
 traces the strategic leadership of key figures including Periyar E.V. 
Ramasamy, C.N. Annadurai, M. Karunanidhi, and others. The book explores 
how the DMK skilfully synthesised
 anti-caste ideology, demands for linguistic pride and Tamil identity, 
socioeconomic reforms, and educational mobility. This synthesis not only
 resonated deeply with marginalised communities but also enabled the 
party to translate ideological commitments into concrete welfare 
policies and political power.</p>
<p>﻿<em>The Dravidian Pathway</em> is 
particularly valuable for its nuanced examination of the transition from
 movement to party, shedding light on the organisational innovations — 
such as the spread of reading rooms (<em>padippakams</em>)
 — that helped build a robust Dravidian public sphere in the 1950s and 
1960s. Rajahmani’s work provides fresh insights into one of modern 
India’s most distinctive and influential regional political traditions.</p>
<p>﻿This timely
 study is essential reading for anyone interested in South Indian 
politics, federalism, identity politics, and the enduring legacy of 
social justice movements in India.﻿﻿﻿﻿</p>
<p>Host:﻿ Dhiren Swain is a j﻿oint PhD Candidate in Urban Studies at The University of Melbourne and IIT Madras.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49936096" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/44d58304-7fe3-496c-bced-ffa5c44e899b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=44d58304-7fe3-496c-bced-ffa5c44e899b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vignesh Rajahmani, &quot;The Dravidian Pathway: The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Politics of Transition in South India&quot; (Hurst Publishers, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In
 the rich political landscape of Tamil Nadu, few movements have had as 
profound and enduring an impact as the Dravidian movement. Vignesh 
Rajahmani’s The Dravidian Pathway (Hurst
 Publishers, 2025) offers a compelling and detailed account of how the 
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) transformed a powerful socio-cultural 
and anti-caste movement into a highly successful electoral political 
force.

﻿Focusing on the pivotal decades of the mid-20th century, 
Rajahmani
 traces the strategic leadership of key figures including Periyar E.V. 
Ramasamy, C.N. Annadurai, M. Karunanidhi, and others. The book explores 
how the DMK skilfully synthesised
 anti-caste ideology, demands for linguistic pride and Tamil identity, 
socioeconomic reforms, and educational mobility. This synthesis not only
 resonated deeply with marginalised communities but also enabled the 
party to translate ideological commitments into concrete welfare 
policies and political power.

﻿The Dravidian Pathway is 
particularly valuable for its nuanced examination of the transition from
 movement to party, shedding light on the organisational innovations — 
such as the spread of reading rooms (padippakams)
 — that helped build a robust Dravidian public sphere in the 1950s and 
1960s. Rajahmani’s work provides fresh insights into one of modern 
India’s most distinctive and influential regional political traditions.

﻿This timely
 study is essential reading for anyone interested in South Indian 
politics, federalism, identity politics, and the enduring legacy of 
social justice movements in India.﻿﻿﻿﻿

Host:﻿ Dhiren Swain is a j﻿oint PhD Candidate in Urban Studies at The University of Melbourne and IIT Madras.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In
 the rich political landscape of Tamil Nadu, few movements have had as 
profound and enduring an impact as the Dravidian movement. Vignesh 
Rajahmani’s The Dravidian Pathway (Hurst
 Publishers, 2025) offers a compelling and detailed account of how the 
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) transformed a powerful socio-cultural 
and anti-caste movement into a highly successful electoral political 
force.

﻿Focusing on the pivotal decades of the mid-20th century, 
Rajahmani
 traces the strategic leadership of key figures including Periyar E.V. 
Ramasamy, C.N. Annadurai, M. Karunanidhi, and others. The book explores 
how the DMK skilfully synthesised
 anti-caste ideology, demands for linguistic pride and Tamil identity, 
socioeconomic reforms, and educational mobility. This synthesis not only
 resonated deeply with marginalised communities but also enabled the 
party to translate ideological commitments into concrete welfare 
policies and political power.

﻿The Dravidian Pathway is 
particularly valuable for its nuanced examination of the transition from
 movement to party, shedding light on the organisational innovations — 
such as the spread of reading rooms (padippakams)
 — that helped build a robust Dravidian public sphere in the 1950s and 
1960s. Rajahmani’s work provides fresh insights into one of modern 
India’s most distinctive and influential regional political traditions.

﻿This timely
 study is essential reading for anyone interested in South Indian 
politics, federalism, identity politics, and the enduring legacy of 
social justice movements in India.﻿﻿﻿﻿

Host:﻿ Dhiren Swain is a j﻿oint PhD Candidate in Urban Studies at The University of Melbourne and IIT Madras.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>951</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac0accc4-7c02-11f1-889f-13e7f2ee1cc1</guid>
      <title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250">A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em> </em>(de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250">A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em> </em>(de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70519823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1d98ecda-c99c-4a0e-9cf0-1a87c9e7d04c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1d98ecda-c99c-4a0e-9cf0-1a87c9e7d04c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.

Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.

Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>950</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f5f002a-7964-11f1-9b53-5719c0c09221</guid>
      <title>Campaigning, Parties and the Digital in Contemporary Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Politics, parties and campaigning are all changing. AI, digital tools and the rapid spread of messages all mean that the conduct and content of politics are changing. In many respects, it feels like the only constant is change. But closer observation often illuminates a patchier picture with elements of change and elements that remain. Moreover, change can be more evolutionary than revolutionary, and the change is not always along the lines we might predict. So, how and in what ways is political campaigning changing? What role are digital tools playing? What do citizens want from their political parties, and what are they (or could be) doing to meet those desires and expectations? Join Tim Haughton and guest Kate Dommett for a discussion of campaigning, digital politics and political parties.</p>
<p><a href="https://sheffield.ac.uk/spir/people/academic/kate-dommett">Kate Dommett</a> is Professor of Digital Politics at the University of Sheffield. Among her many publications are <a href="https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526147523/"><em>The Reimagined Party: Democracy, change and the public</em></a>, published by Manchester University Press in 2020, and a co-authored book with Glenn Kefford &amp; Simon Kruschinski,<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/55322"> <em>Data Driven Campaigning and Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared</em></a>, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He is the author, <em>inter alia</em>, of <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-new-party-challenge-9780198812920?cc=gb&amp;lang=en&amp;"><em>The New Party Challenge</em></a> published by Oxford University Press in 2020 and <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/clicks-and-mortar-electoral-campaigning-in-the-21st-century/48DDAE572B50FE0C6237C6AB971E2896"><em>Clicks and Mortar: Electoral Campaigning in the 21st Century</em></a> published last year in<em> Government and Opposition.</em></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics, parties and campaigning are all changing. AI, digital tools and the rapid spread of messages all mean that the conduct and content of politics are changing. In many respects, it feels like the only constant is change. But closer observation often illuminates a patchier picture with elements of change and elements that remain. Moreover, change can be more evolutionary than revolutionary, and the change is not always along the lines we might predict. So, how and in what ways is political campaigning changing? What role are digital tools playing? What do citizens want from their political parties, and what are they (or could be) doing to meet those desires and expectations? Join Tim Haughton and guest Kate Dommett for a discussion of campaigning, digital politics and political parties.</p>
<p><a href="https://sheffield.ac.uk/spir/people/academic/kate-dommett">Kate Dommett</a> is Professor of Digital Politics at the University of Sheffield. Among her many publications are <a href="https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526147523/"><em>The Reimagined Party: Democracy, change and the public</em></a>, published by Manchester University Press in 2020, and a co-authored book with Glenn Kefford &amp; Simon Kruschinski,<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/55322"> <em>Data Driven Campaigning and Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared</em></a>, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He is the author, <em>inter alia</em>, of <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-new-party-challenge-9780198812920?cc=gb&amp;lang=en&amp;"><em>The New Party Challenge</em></a> published by Oxford University Press in 2020 and <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/clicks-and-mortar-electoral-campaigning-in-the-21st-century/48DDAE572B50FE0C6237C6AB971E2896"><em>Clicks and Mortar: Electoral Campaigning in the 21st Century</em></a> published last year in<em> Government and Opposition.</em></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50182573" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/291a0fec-3ce6-43b7-b656-30adfe268479/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=291a0fec-3ce6-43b7-b656-30adfe268479&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Campaigning, Parties and the Digital in Contemporary Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Politics, parties and campaigning are all changing. AI, digital tools and the rapid spread of messages all mean that the conduct and content of politics are changing. In many respects, it feels like the only constant is change. But closer observation often illuminates a patchier picture with elements of change and elements that remain. Moreover, change can be more evolutionary than revolutionary, and the change is not always along the lines we might predict. So, how and in what ways is political campaigning changing? What role are digital tools playing? What do citizens want from their political parties, and what are they (or could be) doing to meet those desires and expectations? Join Tim Haughton and guest Kate Dommett for a discussion of campaigning, digital politics and political parties.

Kate Dommett is Professor of Digital Politics at the University of Sheffield. Among her many publications are The Reimagined Party: Democracy, change and the public, published by Manchester University Press in 2020, and a co-authored book with Glenn Kefford &amp; Simon Kruschinski, Data Driven Campaigning and Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He is the author, inter alia, of The New Party Challenge published by Oxford University Press in 2020 and Clicks and Mortar: Electoral Campaigning in the 21st Century published last year in Government and Opposition.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Politics, parties and campaigning are all changing. AI, digital tools and the rapid spread of messages all mean that the conduct and content of politics are changing. In many respects, it feels like the only constant is change. But closer observation often illuminates a patchier picture with elements of change and elements that remain. Moreover, change can be more evolutionary than revolutionary, and the change is not always along the lines we might predict. So, how and in what ways is political campaigning changing? What role are digital tools playing? What do citizens want from their political parties, and what are they (or could be) doing to meet those desires and expectations? Join Tim Haughton and guest Kate Dommett for a discussion of campaigning, digital politics and political parties.

Kate Dommett is Professor of Digital Politics at the University of Sheffield. Among her many publications are The Reimagined Party: Democracy, change and the public, published by Manchester University Press in 2020, and a co-authored book with Glenn Kefford &amp; Simon Kruschinski, Data Driven Campaigning and Political Parties: Five Advanced Democracies Compared, published by Oxford University Press in 2024.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He is the author, inter alia, of The New Party Challenge published by Oxford University Press in 2020 and Clicks and Mortar: Electoral Campaigning in the 21st Century published last year in Government and Opposition.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>949</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d68befd8-7558-11f1-bedf-d36696133ff4</guid>
      <title>Martina Baradel, &quot;21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Once
 dominant and institutionalised, the Yakuza, one of Japan's best known 
criminal organisations, is now shrinking under the combined pressure of 
legal exclusion, social stigmatisation, and market regulation. Their 
membership has dropped from more than 80,000 in 2009 to fewer than 
20,000 in 2025. Yet their disappearance is far from complete. Based on 
extensive fieldwork with active and former members, police officers, 
lawyers, and journalists, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198876212"><em>21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime</em></a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2026), Dr. Martina Baradel examines how these
 organisations adapt to repression and explores what happens when a 
mafia begins to die.﻿</p>
<p><em>21st Century Yakuza</em>
 illuminates how Japan's model of regulatory saturation has dismantled 
the Yakuza's organisational capacity but left behind governance vacuums 
in markets the state struggles to control. This book demonstrates
 how the Yakuza persist through symbolic and residual forms of authority
 even as their formal power erodes, and how their decline has fragmented
 the criminal underworld. It traces the transformation of the Yakuza 
from territorially embedded brokers of governance to marginal actors in a
 more decentralised criminal landscape, including the delegation of 
trading activities to non-affiliated networks.</p>
<p>Through a sharp lens on criminal decline and adaptation, <em>21st Century Yakuza</em> offers a compelling portrait of a fading underworld and the new forms of disorder emerging
 in its wake. It is an essential read for anyone interested in the 
shifting boundaries of law, authority, and illicit power in contemporary
 Japan.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once
 dominant and institutionalised, the Yakuza, one of Japan's best known 
criminal organisations, is now shrinking under the combined pressure of 
legal exclusion, social stigmatisation, and market regulation. Their 
membership has dropped from more than 80,000 in 2009 to fewer than 
20,000 in 2025. Yet their disappearance is far from complete. Based on 
extensive fieldwork with active and former members, police officers, 
lawyers, and journalists, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198876212"><em>21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime</em></a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2026), Dr. Martina Baradel examines how these
 organisations adapt to repression and explores what happens when a 
mafia begins to die.﻿</p>
<p><em>21st Century Yakuza</em>
 illuminates how Japan's model of regulatory saturation has dismantled 
the Yakuza's organisational capacity but left behind governance vacuums 
in markets the state struggles to control. This book demonstrates
 how the Yakuza persist through symbolic and residual forms of authority
 even as their formal power erodes, and how their decline has fragmented
 the criminal underworld. It traces the transformation of the Yakuza 
from territorially embedded brokers of governance to marginal actors in a
 more decentralised criminal landscape, including the delegation of 
trading activities to non-affiliated networks.</p>
<p>Through a sharp lens on criminal decline and adaptation, <em>21st Century Yakuza</em> offers a compelling portrait of a fading underworld and the new forms of disorder emerging
 in its wake. It is an essential read for anyone interested in the 
shifting boundaries of law, authority, and illicit power in contemporary
 Japan.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57970691" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/33540b0b-dc35-45fc-a0c4-afc2048e239b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=33540b0b-dc35-45fc-a0c4-afc2048e239b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Martina Baradel, &quot;21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Once
 dominant and institutionalised, the Yakuza, one of Japan&apos;s best known 
criminal organisations, is now shrinking under the combined pressure of 
legal exclusion, social stigmatisation, and market regulation. Their 
membership has dropped from more than 80,000 in 2009 to fewer than 
20,000 in 2025. Yet their disappearance is far from complete. Based on 
extensive fieldwork with active and former members, police officers, 
lawyers, and journalists, in 21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime
 (Oxford University Press, 2026), Dr. Martina Baradel examines how these
 organisations adapt to repression and explores what happens when a 
mafia begins to die.﻿

21st Century Yakuza
 illuminates how Japan&apos;s model of regulatory saturation has dismantled 
the Yakuza&apos;s organisational capacity but left behind governance vacuums 
in markets the state struggles to control. This book demonstrates
 how the Yakuza persist through symbolic and residual forms of authority
 even as their formal power erodes, and how their decline has fragmented
 the criminal underworld. It traces the transformation of the Yakuza 
from territorially embedded brokers of governance to marginal actors in a
 more decentralised criminal landscape, including the delegation of 
trading activities to non-affiliated networks.

Through a sharp lens on criminal decline and adaptation, 21st Century Yakuza offers a compelling portrait of a fading underworld and the new forms of disorder emerging
 in its wake. It is an essential read for anyone interested in the 
shifting boundaries of law, authority, and illicit power in contemporary
 Japan.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Once
 dominant and institutionalised, the Yakuza, one of Japan&apos;s best known 
criminal organisations, is now shrinking under the combined pressure of 
legal exclusion, social stigmatisation, and market regulation. Their 
membership has dropped from more than 80,000 in 2009 to fewer than 
20,000 in 2025. Yet their disappearance is far from complete. Based on 
extensive fieldwork with active and former members, police officers, 
lawyers, and journalists, in 21st Century Yakuza: Death of Japanese Organised Crime
 (Oxford University Press, 2026), Dr. Martina Baradel examines how these
 organisations adapt to repression and explores what happens when a 
mafia begins to die.﻿

21st Century Yakuza
 illuminates how Japan&apos;s model of regulatory saturation has dismantled 
the Yakuza&apos;s organisational capacity but left behind governance vacuums 
in markets the state struggles to control. This book demonstrates
 how the Yakuza persist through symbolic and residual forms of authority
 even as their formal power erodes, and how their decline has fragmented
 the criminal underworld. It traces the transformation of the Yakuza 
from territorially embedded brokers of governance to marginal actors in a
 more decentralised criminal landscape, including the delegation of 
trading activities to non-affiliated networks.

Through a sharp lens on criminal decline and adaptation, 21st Century Yakuza offers a compelling portrait of a fading underworld and the new forms of disorder emerging
 in its wake. It is an essential read for anyone interested in the 
shifting boundaries of law, authority, and illicit power in contemporary
 Japan.

﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>948</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25d9773e-748e-11f1-8ce7-a3e2894ade0a</guid>
      <title>Carrie LeVan, &quot;Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Participation in official governmental institutions and activities 
has ﻿declined dramatically. Americans are less inclined to express trust
 in, ﻿or cooperate with, political leaders and each other to address 
society's﻿ most pressing problems. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479834419"><em>Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation</em></a><em> </em>﻿(<u>﻿</u>NYU
 ﻿Press, 2026), Carrie LeVan ﻿explores this growing crisis in civic 
engagement, arguing that where we ﻿live—and the people who live around 
us—may be to blame.</p>
<p>Drawing﻿ on national surveys, census data, and spatial analysis, LeVan ﻿demonstrates how neighborhood design can dramatically impact political ﻿participation, including people's desire and ability to vote in local, ﻿state, and national elections. She argues that the suburbs, which ﻿isolate residents, require driving, and are zoned for single-use, do not﻿ provide an effective infrastructure for civic engagement. However, ﻿cities, which are often designed to be walkable, more interactive, and ﻿are zoned for mixed-use, provide a supportive environment where people ﻿and politics can thrive.</p>
<p>Ultimately, LeVan underscores how ﻿neighborhoods that support interaction, competition, collective ﻿action—and even conflict—can support greater civic engagement and ﻿political participation. <em>Neighborhoods Matter </em>highlights the ﻿connection between politics, people, and place, calling for good ﻿suburban and urban design that can support a vibrant and engaging civic ﻿life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Participation in official governmental institutions and activities 
has ﻿declined dramatically. Americans are less inclined to express trust
 in, ﻿or cooperate with, political leaders and each other to address 
society's﻿ most pressing problems. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479834419"><em>Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation</em></a><em> </em>﻿(<u>﻿</u>NYU
 ﻿Press, 2026), Carrie LeVan ﻿explores this growing crisis in civic 
engagement, arguing that where we ﻿live—and the people who live around 
us—may be to blame.</p>
<p>Drawing﻿ on national surveys, census data, and spatial analysis, LeVan ﻿demonstrates how neighborhood design can dramatically impact political ﻿participation, including people's desire and ability to vote in local, ﻿state, and national elections. She argues that the suburbs, which ﻿isolate residents, require driving, and are zoned for single-use, do not﻿ provide an effective infrastructure for civic engagement. However, ﻿cities, which are often designed to be walkable, more interactive, and ﻿are zoned for mixed-use, provide a supportive environment where people ﻿and politics can thrive.</p>
<p>Ultimately, LeVan underscores how ﻿neighborhoods that support interaction, competition, collective ﻿action—and even conflict—can support greater civic engagement and ﻿political participation. <em>Neighborhoods Matter </em>highlights the ﻿connection between politics, people, and place, calling for good ﻿suburban and urban design that can support a vibrant and engaging civic ﻿life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54408817" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5fc3ba21-a74f-4921-b372-927c1b72c01d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5fc3ba21-a74f-4921-b372-927c1b72c01d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carrie LeVan, &quot;Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Participation in official governmental institutions and activities 
has ﻿declined dramatically. Americans are less inclined to express trust
 in, ﻿or cooperate with, political leaders and each other to address 
society&apos;s﻿ most pressing problems. In Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation ﻿(﻿NYU
 ﻿Press, 2026), Carrie LeVan ﻿explores this growing crisis in civic 
engagement, arguing that where we ﻿live—and the people who live around 
us—may be to blame.

Drawing﻿ on national surveys, census data, and spatial analysis, LeVan ﻿demonstrates how neighborhood design can dramatically impact political ﻿participation, including people&apos;s desire and ability to vote in local, ﻿state, and national elections. She argues that the suburbs, which ﻿isolate residents, require driving, and are zoned for single-use, do not﻿ provide an effective infrastructure for civic engagement. However, ﻿cities, which are often designed to be walkable, more interactive, and ﻿are zoned for mixed-use, provide a supportive environment where people ﻿and politics can thrive.

Ultimately, LeVan underscores how ﻿neighborhoods that support interaction, competition, collective ﻿action—and even conflict—can support greater civic engagement and ﻿political participation. Neighborhoods Matter highlights the ﻿connection between politics, people, and place, calling for good ﻿suburban and urban design that can support a vibrant and engaging civic ﻿life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Participation in official governmental institutions and activities 
has ﻿declined dramatically. Americans are less inclined to express trust
 in, ﻿or cooperate with, political leaders and each other to address 
society&apos;s﻿ most pressing problems. In Neighborhoods Matter: How Place and People Affect Political Participation ﻿(﻿NYU
 ﻿Press, 2026), Carrie LeVan ﻿explores this growing crisis in civic 
engagement, arguing that where we ﻿live—and the people who live around 
us—may be to blame.

Drawing﻿ on national surveys, census data, and spatial analysis, LeVan ﻿demonstrates how neighborhood design can dramatically impact political ﻿participation, including people&apos;s desire and ability to vote in local, ﻿state, and national elections. She argues that the suburbs, which ﻿isolate residents, require driving, and are zoned for single-use, do not﻿ provide an effective infrastructure for civic engagement. However, ﻿cities, which are often designed to be walkable, more interactive, and ﻿are zoned for mixed-use, provide a supportive environment where people ﻿and politics can thrive.

Ultimately, LeVan underscores how ﻿neighborhoods that support interaction, competition, collective ﻿action—and even conflict—can support greater civic engagement and ﻿political participation. Neighborhoods Matter highlights the ﻿connection between politics, people, and place, calling for good ﻿suburban and urban design that can support a vibrant and engaging civic ﻿life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>947</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86f62270-758c-11f1-b3c2-9f551f0e4705</guid>
      <title>Anna Terwiel offers A Moment of No to the Prison-Industrial Complex (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?</p>
<p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1480364">Anna Terwiel </a>joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, <a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517920401/prison-abolition-for-realists/"><em>Prison Abolition for Realists</em></a>, which charts a path away from <em>paranoid </em>(as documented by <a href="https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/sss/pdfs/Critique/sedgwick-paranoid-reading.pdf">Eve Sedgwick</a>) and <em>purity</em> politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses "abstract normative theorizing" with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.</p>
<p>Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their <a href="https://www.trincoll.edu/human-rights/trinity-prison-education-project/">Prison Education Project</a>. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_and_Punish">Discipline and Punish</a> (1975) and his activism with the <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-foucault-lexicon/prison-information-group-gip/8DD2C9B8C98CEEFBFC400FE820080C3C">Prisons Information Group</a>, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the <a href="https://p-nap.org/">Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project </a>in Illinois at Statesville Prison.</p>
<p>John (apropos of his <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902894">earlier work</a>) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among <a href="https://www.amazon.com/After-Chartism-Politics-1848-1874-Publications/dp/0521525985">late 19th century Chartists</a>, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for <em>remainders</em>, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reformist_reform">non-reformist reform</a>"; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_Prisons_Obsolete%3F">Are Prisons Obsolete</a> and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like <a href="https://incite-national.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/9261_anti-prisonbrochure.pdf">CARA in Seattle.</a> They discuss Sharon Dolovich's <a href="https://today.marquette.edu/2025/11/no-walking-away/">recent work on conditions for correctional officers</a>, and Anna explores the notion of a new "right to comfort" that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one's hugs.</p>
<p>Listen to and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rtb-174-transcript-terwiel-abolitionist_transcript.pdf">read </a>the episode here.</p>
<p>Also mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>Abolitionist work by <a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1664-we-do-this-til-we-free-us">Mariame Kaba</a>,</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Wilson_Gilmore">Ruth Wilson Gilmore</a> , e.g. <a href="https://archive.org/details/goldengulagpriso00gilm">Golden Gulag</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Recallable Books</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>Nils Christie, "<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636088">Conflicts as Property</a>."</li>
  <li>Ursula Le Guin, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dispossessed"><em>The Dispossessed.</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?</p>
<p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1480364">Anna Terwiel </a>joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, <a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517920401/prison-abolition-for-realists/"><em>Prison Abolition for Realists</em></a>, which charts a path away from <em>paranoid </em>(as documented by <a href="https://www.ias.edu/sites/default/files/sss/pdfs/Critique/sedgwick-paranoid-reading.pdf">Eve Sedgwick</a>) and <em>purity</em> politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses "abstract normative theorizing" with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.</p>
<p>Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their <a href="https://www.trincoll.edu/human-rights/trinity-prison-education-project/">Prison Education Project</a>. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_and_Punish">Discipline and Punish</a> (1975) and his activism with the <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-foucault-lexicon/prison-information-group-gip/8DD2C9B8C98CEEFBFC400FE820080C3C">Prisons Information Group</a>, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the <a href="https://p-nap.org/">Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project </a>in Illinois at Statesville Prison.</p>
<p>John (apropos of his <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902894">earlier work</a>) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among <a href="https://www.amazon.com/After-Chartism-Politics-1848-1874-Publications/dp/0521525985">late 19th century Chartists</a>, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for <em>remainders</em>, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reformist_reform">non-reformist reform</a>"; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_Prisons_Obsolete%3F">Are Prisons Obsolete</a> and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like <a href="https://incite-national.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/9261_anti-prisonbrochure.pdf">CARA in Seattle.</a> They discuss Sharon Dolovich's <a href="https://today.marquette.edu/2025/11/no-walking-away/">recent work on conditions for correctional officers</a>, and Anna explores the notion of a new "right to comfort" that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one's hugs.</p>
<p>Listen to and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/rtb-174-transcript-terwiel-abolitionist_transcript.pdf">read </a>the episode here.</p>
<p>Also mentioned in the episode</p>
<ul>
  <li>Abolitionist work by <a href="https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1664-we-do-this-til-we-free-us">Mariame Kaba</a>,</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Wilson_Gilmore">Ruth Wilson Gilmore</a> , e.g. <a href="https://archive.org/details/goldengulagpriso00gilm">Golden Gulag</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Recallable Books</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>Nils Christie, "<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636088">Conflicts as Property</a>."</li>
  <li>Ursula Le Guin, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dispossessed"><em>The Dispossessed.</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47294749" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b9a06a7b-4bcf-4b61-b06f-166b4b3f989c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b9a06a7b-4bcf-4b61-b06f-166b4b3f989c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna Terwiel offers A Moment of No to the Prison-Industrial Complex (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?

Anna Terwiel joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, Prison Abolition for Realists, which charts a path away from paranoid (as documented by Eve Sedgwick) and purity politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses &quot;abstract normative theorizing&quot; with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.

Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their Prison Education Project. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault&apos;s Discipline and Punish (1975) and his activism with the Prisons Information Group, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project in Illinois at Statesville Prison.

John (apropos of his earlier work) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among late 19th century Chartists, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for remainders, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of &quot;non-reformist reform&quot;; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis&apos;s Are Prisons Obsolete and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like CARA in Seattle. They discuss Sharon Dolovich&apos;s recent work on conditions for correctional officers, and Anna explores the notion of a new &quot;right to comfort&quot; that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one&apos;s hugs.

Listen to and read the episode here.

Also mentioned in the episode


  Abolitionist work by Mariame Kaba,

  
Ruth Wilson Gilmore , e.g. Golden Gulag



Recallable Books


  Nils Christie, &quot;Conflicts as Property.&quot;

  Ursula Le Guin, The Dispossessed.



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Punishment makes nobody safer, imprisonment only impoverishes us as a society. And yet, we lock up our own, more and more for worse and worse reasons. What might finally inspire us to run the equation another way, and come up with a different solution?

Anna Terwiel joined John to discuss her remarkable new book, Prison Abolition for Realists, which charts a path away from paranoid (as documented by Eve Sedgwick) and purity politics in favor of an abolitionism that fuses &quot;abstract normative theorizing&quot; with attainable worldly goals. One name for this is agonistic abolitionism; it offers, as Anna sees it a positive vision alongside its criticism of the status quo.

Anna is a professor of political science at Trinity College in Hartford, where she co-directs their Prison Education Project. She beings by tracing the impact of Michel Foucault&apos;s Discipline and Punish (1975) and his activism with the Prisons Information Group, and credits the influence, during her schooling, of the Prison and Neighborhood Arts/Education Project in Illinois at Statesville Prison.

John (apropos of his earlier work) mentions the failed pursuit of purity among late 19th century Chartists, while Anna makes the case not for perfect solutions but for remainders, a form of politics of the possible. They explore possibilities of &quot;non-reformist reform&quot;; Anna stresses the enduring importance of Angela Davis&apos;s Are Prisons Obsolete and her contribution to revolutionary black Marxist thought; and she praises local gender-based-violence organizations like CARA in Seattle. They discuss Sharon Dolovich&apos;s recent work on conditions for correctional officers, and Anna explores the notion of a new &quot;right to comfort&quot; that might take into account the current inhumanity of treatment inside prisons as regards profound but basic factors like ventilation and heat. As well as the right to a loved one&apos;s hugs.

Listen to and read the episode here.

Also mentioned in the episode


  Abolitionist work by Mariame Kaba,

  
Ruth Wilson Gilmore , e.g. Golden Gulag



Recallable Books


  Nils Christie, &quot;Conflicts as Property.&quot;

  Ursula Le Guin, The Dispossessed.



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>946</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee569f54-7595-11f1-b20d-5f6dcbe11b79</guid>
      <title>Thomas Paine at the Semiquincentennial: A Conversation with Gregory Claeys</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233420">Thomas Paine: Collected Writings</a> (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.<br /></p>
<p>Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233420">Thomas Paine: Collected Writings</a> (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.<br /></p>
<p>Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54771095" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/25570609-9622-4756-b8a4-0f823ad17a18/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=25570609-9622-4756-b8a4-0f823ad17a18&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Paine at the Semiquincentennial: A Conversation with Gregory Claeys</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Thomas Paine: Collected Writings (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.

Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Thomas Paine: Collected Writings (Princeton University Press, 2026) is the first major new edition of Paine’s works, bringing together all his writings in six breathtaking volumes that dramatically revise our previous understanding of his activities as a writer and his importance as a democratic theorist in the age of revolutions. It includes about 180 new letters and some two hundred works newly attributed to Paine, with twenty-nine works previously regarded as Paine’s being deattributed. Drawing on pioneering computerized text analysis that makes possible for the first time attributions of anonymous and pseudonymous texts, this collection includes in volumes 5–6 newly identified pamphlets and newspaper and journal contributions, and suggests that Paine was extremely active as a Grub Street oppositional Whig writer in the decade prior to the American Revolution. Many writings from the period of his residence in France (1792–1802) and his subsequent return to the United States are also restored to his published output. Paine emerges as a much more consistent and serious democratic theorist than is often assumed, whose contributions to revolutionary debates in America, Britain, and France were unparalleled in their time. This volume spans the years 1772 to 1782, a decade that witnessed a diverse output of writings from Paine, from editorials and magazine pieces to pamphlets and newspaper articles. The book includes the Forester Letters, the Crisis papers, the Deane Affair articles, and Common Sense, with Gregory Claeys’s general introduction and commentary by the editors providing invaluable historical context.

Gregory Claeys is professor emeritus of the history of political thought at Royal Holloway, University of London.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>945</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dcbfff14-7447-11f1-a74e-83624f44a90e</guid>
      <title>The Once and Future Republic: On Cicero, Locke, and the Making of America with Michael C. Hawley</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview <a href="https://www.michaelchawley.com/">Michael C. Hawley</a> to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.</p>
<p>Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, <a href="https://books.google.com/books/about/Natural_Law_Republicanism.html?id=9x6OzgEACAAJ"><em>Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero's Liberal Legacy</em></a> (2022). Now, he's working on a new one, <em>Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues</em>.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <em>Madison’s Notes</em> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview <a href="https://www.michaelchawley.com/">Michael C. Hawley</a> to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.</p>
<p>Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, <a href="https://books.google.com/books/about/Natural_Law_Republicanism.html?id=9x6OzgEACAAJ"><em>Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero's Liberal Legacy</em></a> (2022). Now, he's working on a new one, <em>Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues</em>.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <em>Madison’s Notes</em> is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “<a href="https://madisonsnotes.substack.com/">Madison’s Footnotes</a>.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76246982" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4c576639-6334-4f2c-a73f-f2de47b0e65e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4c576639-6334-4f2c-a73f-f2de47b0e65e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Once and Future Republic: On Cicero, Locke, and the Making of America with Michael C. Hawley</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview Michael C. Hawley to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.

Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero&apos;s Liberal Legacy (2022). Now, he&apos;s working on a new one, Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In preparation for the 250th anniversary of America’s founding, it would be wise to look back at the ancient thinkers and writers who helped inspire its early leaders. Perhaps the preeminent role model was the Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero. So here in Episode 11 of Season 5, I interview Michael C. Hawley to talk about the political philosophy of Cicero and his influence on the American Republic.

Michael Hawley is an assistant professor in the School of Civic Life and Leadership at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. A 2025-2026 Visiting Fellow with the James Madison Program, he wrote the book, Natural Law Republicanism: Cicero&apos;s Liberal Legacy (2022). Now, he&apos;s working on a new one, Preaching to the Choir: The Rhetoric of Prophets, Reformers, and Demagogues.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on the JMP substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>944</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0d2658e-74ef-11f1-918d-cf74a665fafe</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Schneer, &quot;Nine Days in May: The General Strike Of 1926&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In May, 1926, nearly three million British workers downed tools to support nearly one million of their countrymen, miners whose employers meant to lengthen their working day and cut their pay. This General Strike brought the country to a grinding halt - which, according to Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, represented a threat not merely to the nation but to the parliamentary system itself. For nine days, the world's best organized working class confronted the world's most powerful, and self-confident, government. And yet the outcome was never in doubt, for Britain's most important trade-union leaders thought as Baldwin did, although they kept saying they were engaged in a wages dispute only. Really, they feared winning even more than they feared losing.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192894533">Nine Days in May: The General Strike of 1926</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), award-winning author and historian Jonathan Schneer mines hitherto untapped archival sources to explain why and how the Strike came about, why and how it was waged and countered, why and how it ended. In addition to government reports and TUC reports, he uses reports of undercover agents and spies, "special" constables sworn in for the duration of the Strike, volunteer strike-breakers, Communist agitators, trade-union leaders and rank-and-file members of trade unions; also, of course, the papers of politicians of all parties.</p>
<p>This is a tale of Shakespearian dimensions, replete with tragic heroes and villains and buffoons and opportunists and double-dealers, and contending, evenly matched, forces - both of which meant to do their duty whatever the cost. There may never be another general strike in Britain, but the General Strike of 1926 was one for the ages, illuminating the human condition.</p>
<p>Jonathan Schneer is Professor Emeritus of History at the Georgia Institute of Technology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May, 1926, nearly three million British workers downed tools to support nearly one million of their countrymen, miners whose employers meant to lengthen their working day and cut their pay. This General Strike brought the country to a grinding halt - which, according to Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, represented a threat not merely to the nation but to the parliamentary system itself. For nine days, the world's best organized working class confronted the world's most powerful, and self-confident, government. And yet the outcome was never in doubt, for Britain's most important trade-union leaders thought as Baldwin did, although they kept saying they were engaged in a wages dispute only. Really, they feared winning even more than they feared losing.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192894533">Nine Days in May: The General Strike of 1926</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), award-winning author and historian Jonathan Schneer mines hitherto untapped archival sources to explain why and how the Strike came about, why and how it was waged and countered, why and how it ended. In addition to government reports and TUC reports, he uses reports of undercover agents and spies, "special" constables sworn in for the duration of the Strike, volunteer strike-breakers, Communist agitators, trade-union leaders and rank-and-file members of trade unions; also, of course, the papers of politicians of all parties.</p>
<p>This is a tale of Shakespearian dimensions, replete with tragic heroes and villains and buffoons and opportunists and double-dealers, and contending, evenly matched, forces - both of which meant to do their duty whatever the cost. There may never be another general strike in Britain, but the General Strike of 1926 was one for the ages, illuminating the human condition.</p>
<p>Jonathan Schneer is Professor Emeritus of History at the Georgia Institute of Technology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72718880" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9c293233-f7e9-4038-8582-bdcfece4786e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9c293233-f7e9-4038-8582-bdcfece4786e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Schneer, &quot;Nine Days in May: The General Strike Of 1926&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In May, 1926, nearly three million British workers downed tools to support nearly one million of their countrymen, miners whose employers meant to lengthen their working day and cut their pay. This General Strike brought the country to a grinding halt - which, according to Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, represented a threat not merely to the nation but to the parliamentary system itself. For nine days, the world&apos;s best organized working class confronted the world&apos;s most powerful, and self-confident, government. And yet the outcome was never in doubt, for Britain&apos;s most important trade-union leaders thought as Baldwin did, although they kept saying they were engaged in a wages dispute only. Really, they feared winning even more than they feared losing.

In Nine Days in May: The General Strike of 1926 (Oxford University Press, 2026), award-winning author and historian Jonathan Schneer mines hitherto untapped archival sources to explain why and how the Strike came about, why and how it was waged and countered, why and how it ended. In addition to government reports and TUC reports, he uses reports of undercover agents and spies, &quot;special&quot; constables sworn in for the duration of the Strike, volunteer strike-breakers, Communist agitators, trade-union leaders and rank-and-file members of trade unions; also, of course, the papers of politicians of all parties.

This is a tale of Shakespearian dimensions, replete with tragic heroes and villains and buffoons and opportunists and double-dealers, and contending, evenly matched, forces - both of which meant to do their duty whatever the cost. There may never be another general strike in Britain, but the General Strike of 1926 was one for the ages, illuminating the human condition.

Jonathan Schneer is Professor Emeritus of History at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In May, 1926, nearly three million British workers downed tools to support nearly one million of their countrymen, miners whose employers meant to lengthen their working day and cut their pay. This General Strike brought the country to a grinding halt - which, according to Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, represented a threat not merely to the nation but to the parliamentary system itself. For nine days, the world&apos;s best organized working class confronted the world&apos;s most powerful, and self-confident, government. And yet the outcome was never in doubt, for Britain&apos;s most important trade-union leaders thought as Baldwin did, although they kept saying they were engaged in a wages dispute only. Really, they feared winning even more than they feared losing.

In Nine Days in May: The General Strike of 1926 (Oxford University Press, 2026), award-winning author and historian Jonathan Schneer mines hitherto untapped archival sources to explain why and how the Strike came about, why and how it was waged and countered, why and how it ended. In addition to government reports and TUC reports, he uses reports of undercover agents and spies, &quot;special&quot; constables sworn in for the duration of the Strike, volunteer strike-breakers, Communist agitators, trade-union leaders and rank-and-file members of trade unions; also, of course, the papers of politicians of all parties.

This is a tale of Shakespearian dimensions, replete with tragic heroes and villains and buffoons and opportunists and double-dealers, and contending, evenly matched, forces - both of which meant to do their duty whatever the cost. There may never be another general strike in Britain, but the General Strike of 1926 was one for the ages, illuminating the human condition.

Jonathan Schneer is Professor Emeritus of History at the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>943</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eac95b42-706d-11f1-9736-3f1b1fa30bfe</guid>
      <title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26047106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/32be91b2-75f5-4634-9028-34e9d82b0fcd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=32be91b2-75f5-4634-9028-34e9d82b0fcd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.

The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,

Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.

Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.

The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,

Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.

Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>942</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa130332-6e10-11f1-9891-9b774fea5963</guid>
      <title>Cyanne E. Loyle, &quot;Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escaping-justice-impunity-for-state-crimes-in-the-age-of-accountability/f9e6ba5e13c30f05?ean=9781009584968&amp;next=t">Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability</a> (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.</p>
<p>Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.cyanneloyle.com/">Professor Cyanne Loyle</a>, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escaping-justice-impunity-for-state-crimes-in-the-age-of-accountability/f9e6ba5e13c30f05?ean=9781009584968&amp;next=t">Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability</a> (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.</p>
<p>Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.cyanneloyle.com/">Professor Cyanne Loyle</a>, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26098614" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9a28361b-366c-4f29-897d-0ff11093d5fa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9a28361b-366c-4f29-897d-0ff11093d5fa&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cyanne E. Loyle, &quot;Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?

Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.

Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.

Our guest is Professor Cyanne Loyle, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?

Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.

Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.

Our guest is Professor Cyanne Loyle, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>941</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c15c1f6-6e0e-11f1-b1fb-e33a7b86b721</guid>
      <title>Infrastructure, Nickel, and the Politics of Polyalignment in Indonesia</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia is often framed as a key arena of China-Japan-US competition in the Second Cold War. In this episode, we talk with Trissia Wijaya about her book on the political economy of Chinese and Japanese infrastructure financing in Indonesia. She challenges the view that it is simply an instrument of competition and instead situates infrastructure finance within Indonesia’s own development strategies. She shows how development assistance, commercial loans, export credits, and public-private partnerships are shaped by contestation among Chinese and Japanese capital, as well as Indonesian civil society, state actors, and labor. We also link these dynamics to the country’s changing industrial policy, from energy infrastructure to Nickel processing to the planned capital of Nusantara, asking how Indonesia uses strategies of polyalignment and foreign finance to pursue its own developmental ambitions.</p>
<p>—</p>
<p><a href="https://www.trissiawijaya.com/">Trissia Wijaya</a> is a McKenzie Research Fellow at the Asia Institute at the University of Melbourne. Prior to this role, she worked as a Senior Research Fellow at Asia-Japan Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, and taught at the College of Global Liberal Arts. She received her PhD in Politics from Murdoch University, Australia, and remains affiliated as an Honorary Research Fellow at the Indo-Pacific Research Centre there. She has also worked at the Asian Development Bank and UNDP Indonesia, cultivating an interest in the political economy of development and evidence-informed policymaking. Her research spans green infrastructure financing, industrial policy, and critical mineral development. She has conducted intensive fieldwork across Indonesia, Japan, and China.</p>
<p><a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-political-economy-of-japanese-and-chinese-infrastructure-financing-governance"><em>The Political Economy of Japanese and Chinese Infrastructure Financing Governance: Organizing Alliances, Institutions, and Ideology</em></a> (Bristol University Press 2025)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2025.2465514">Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War </a>in <em>Third World Quarterly</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644016.2024.2332129">An EV-fix for Indonesia: the green development-resource nationalist nexus</a> in <em>Environmental Policy</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia is often framed as a key arena of China-Japan-US competition in the Second Cold War. In this episode, we talk with Trissia Wijaya about her book on the political economy of Chinese and Japanese infrastructure financing in Indonesia. She challenges the view that it is simply an instrument of competition and instead situates infrastructure finance within Indonesia’s own development strategies. She shows how development assistance, commercial loans, export credits, and public-private partnerships are shaped by contestation among Chinese and Japanese capital, as well as Indonesian civil society, state actors, and labor. We also link these dynamics to the country’s changing industrial policy, from energy infrastructure to Nickel processing to the planned capital of Nusantara, asking how Indonesia uses strategies of polyalignment and foreign finance to pursue its own developmental ambitions.</p>
<p>—</p>
<p><a href="https://www.trissiawijaya.com/">Trissia Wijaya</a> is a McKenzie Research Fellow at the Asia Institute at the University of Melbourne. Prior to this role, she worked as a Senior Research Fellow at Asia-Japan Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, and taught at the College of Global Liberal Arts. She received her PhD in Politics from Murdoch University, Australia, and remains affiliated as an Honorary Research Fellow at the Indo-Pacific Research Centre there. She has also worked at the Asian Development Bank and UNDP Indonesia, cultivating an interest in the political economy of development and evidence-informed policymaking. Her research spans green infrastructure financing, industrial policy, and critical mineral development. She has conducted intensive fieldwork across Indonesia, Japan, and China.</p>
<p><a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/the-political-economy-of-japanese-and-chinese-infrastructure-financing-governance"><em>The Political Economy of Japanese and Chinese Infrastructure Financing Governance: Organizing Alliances, Institutions, and Ideology</em></a> (Bristol University Press 2025)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2025.2465514">Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War </a>in <em>Third World Quarterly</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644016.2024.2332129">An EV-fix for Indonesia: the green development-resource nationalist nexus</a> in <em>Environmental Policy</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39367922" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8506d1d6-7b10-433d-afdd-2fa928e7a2f1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8506d1d6-7b10-433d-afdd-2fa928e7a2f1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Infrastructure, Nickel, and the Politics of Polyalignment in Indonesia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Indonesia is often framed as a key arena of China-Japan-US competition in the Second Cold War. In this episode, we talk with Trissia Wijaya about her book on the political economy of Chinese and Japanese infrastructure financing in Indonesia. She challenges the view that it is simply an instrument of competition and instead situates infrastructure finance within Indonesia’s own development strategies. She shows how development assistance, commercial loans, export credits, and public-private partnerships are shaped by contestation among Chinese and Japanese capital, as well as Indonesian civil society, state actors, and labor. We also link these dynamics to the country’s changing industrial policy, from energy infrastructure to Nickel processing to the planned capital of Nusantara, asking how Indonesia uses strategies of polyalignment and foreign finance to pursue its own developmental ambitions.

—

Trissia Wijaya is a McKenzie Research Fellow at the Asia Institute at the University of Melbourne. Prior to this role, she worked as a Senior Research Fellow at Asia-Japan Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, and taught at the College of Global Liberal Arts. She received her PhD in Politics from Murdoch University, Australia, and remains affiliated as an Honorary Research Fellow at the Indo-Pacific Research Centre there. She has also worked at the Asian Development Bank and UNDP Indonesia, cultivating an interest in the political economy of development and evidence-informed policymaking. Her research spans green infrastructure financing, industrial policy, and critical mineral development. She has conducted intensive fieldwork across Indonesia, Japan, and China.

The Political Economy of Japanese and Chinese Infrastructure Financing Governance: Organizing Alliances, Institutions, and Ideology (Bristol University Press 2025)

Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War in Third World Quarterly

An EV-fix for Indonesia: the green development-resource nationalist nexus in Environmental Policy
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Indonesia is often framed as a key arena of China-Japan-US competition in the Second Cold War. In this episode, we talk with Trissia Wijaya about her book on the political economy of Chinese and Japanese infrastructure financing in Indonesia. She challenges the view that it is simply an instrument of competition and instead situates infrastructure finance within Indonesia’s own development strategies. She shows how development assistance, commercial loans, export credits, and public-private partnerships are shaped by contestation among Chinese and Japanese capital, as well as Indonesian civil society, state actors, and labor. We also link these dynamics to the country’s changing industrial policy, from energy infrastructure to Nickel processing to the planned capital of Nusantara, asking how Indonesia uses strategies of polyalignment and foreign finance to pursue its own developmental ambitions.

—

Trissia Wijaya is a McKenzie Research Fellow at the Asia Institute at the University of Melbourne. Prior to this role, she worked as a Senior Research Fellow at Asia-Japan Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, and taught at the College of Global Liberal Arts. She received her PhD in Politics from Murdoch University, Australia, and remains affiliated as an Honorary Research Fellow at the Indo-Pacific Research Centre there. She has also worked at the Asian Development Bank and UNDP Indonesia, cultivating an interest in the political economy of development and evidence-informed policymaking. Her research spans green infrastructure financing, industrial policy, and critical mineral development. She has conducted intensive fieldwork across Indonesia, Japan, and China.

The Political Economy of Japanese and Chinese Infrastructure Financing Governance: Organizing Alliances, Institutions, and Ideology (Bristol University Press 2025)

Indonesia, nickel, and the political economy of polyalignment in the Second Cold War in Third World Quarterly

An EV-fix for Indonesia: the green development-resource nationalist nexus in Environmental Policy
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>940</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fca06f6-6e57-11f1-810e-97713b8b6c8b</guid>
      <title>Why Democracy’s Troubles Should Come as No Surprise</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why have so many democracies become more polarized, unstable, and vulnerable to authoritarianism? And why did so many political observers fail to see it coming? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Sheri Berman, Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, about her recent article, “Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise”, and its powerful argument that democracy’s current troubles follow a familiar historical pattern. Drawing on classic theories of democratic stability, Berman explains how rising inequality, declining social mobility, polarization, and the erosion of cross-cutting cleavages have undermined even long-established democracies – and what policymakers can do in response. <em>This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.</em></p>
<p>﻿Read the <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Berman-Transcript.docx#asset:461263@1">transcript here</a></p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="https://polisci.barnard.edu/profiles/sheri-berman">Sheri Berman</a> is Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University. She is one of the leading scholars of democracy, liberalism, and political development, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on the historical foundations of democratic stability and crisis. Professor Berman’s recent article, <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracys-troubles-should-be-no-surprise/">Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise</a>, published in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, explores why rising inequality, polarization, and declining social mobility have left even long-established democracies increasingly vulnerable to instability and authoritarianism. A widely read commentator and public intellectual, Berman’s work bridges academic research and contemporary political debate.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have so many democracies become more polarized, unstable, and vulnerable to authoritarianism? And why did so many political observers fail to see it coming? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Sheri Berman, Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, about her recent article, “Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise”, and its powerful argument that democracy’s current troubles follow a familiar historical pattern. Drawing on classic theories of democratic stability, Berman explains how rising inequality, declining social mobility, polarization, and the erosion of cross-cutting cleavages have undermined even long-established democracies – and what policymakers can do in response. <em>This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.</em></p>
<p>﻿Read the <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Berman-Transcript.docx#asset:461263@1">transcript here</a></p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="https://polisci.barnard.edu/profiles/sheri-berman">Sheri Berman</a> is Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University. She is one of the leading scholars of democracy, liberalism, and political development, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on the historical foundations of democratic stability and crisis. Professor Berman’s recent article, <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/democracys-troubles-should-be-no-surprise/">Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise</a>, published in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, explores why rising inequality, polarization, and declining social mobility have left even long-established democracies increasingly vulnerable to instability and authoritarianism. A widely read commentator and public intellectual, Berman’s work bridges academic research and contemporary political debate.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25490532" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b0ef92f3-f13e-4d07-8add-e3dd4cc9db8d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b0ef92f3-f13e-4d07-8add-e3dd4cc9db8d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Democracy’s Troubles Should Come as No Surprise</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why have so many democracies become more polarized, unstable, and vulnerable to authoritarianism? And why did so many political observers fail to see it coming? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Sheri Berman, Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, about her recent article, “Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise”, and its powerful argument that democracy’s current troubles follow a familiar historical pattern. Drawing on classic theories of democratic stability, Berman explains how rising inequality, declining social mobility, polarization, and the erosion of cross-cutting cleavages have undermined even long-established democracies – and what policymakers can do in response. This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

﻿Read the transcript here

Guest:

Sheri Berman is Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University. She is one of the leading scholars of democracy, liberalism, and political development, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on the historical foundations of democratic stability and crisis. Professor Berman’s recent article, Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise, published in the Journal of Democracy, explores why rising inequality, polarization, and declining social mobility have left even long-established democracies increasingly vulnerable to instability and authoritarianism. A widely read commentator and public intellectual, Berman’s work bridges academic research and contemporary political debate.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why have so many democracies become more polarized, unstable, and vulnerable to authoritarianism? And why did so many political observers fail to see it coming? In this episode of the People, Power, Politics podcast, Nic Cheeseman talks to Sheri Berman, Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, about her recent article, “Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise”, and its powerful argument that democracy’s current troubles follow a familiar historical pattern. Drawing on classic theories of democratic stability, Berman explains how rising inequality, declining social mobility, polarization, and the erosion of cross-cutting cleavages have undermined even long-established democracies – and what policymakers can do in response. This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

﻿Read the transcript here

Guest:

Sheri Berman is Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University. She is one of the leading scholars of democracy, liberalism, and political development, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on the historical foundations of democratic stability and crisis. Professor Berman’s recent article, Democracy’s Troubles Should Be No Surprise, published in the Journal of Democracy, explores why rising inequality, polarization, and declining social mobility have left even long-established democracies increasingly vulnerable to instability and authoritarianism. A widely read commentator and public intellectual, Berman’s work bridges academic research and contemporary political debate.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>939</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f562f0b0-6bfc-11f1-b3d2-5b8d55ca81ee</guid>
      <title>Gareth Doherty, &quot;Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Landscape architecture is at a crossroads. The ability to draw upon 
interdisciplinary perspectives and generate insights from the combined 
vantage points of design, environmental studies, and the social sciences
 puts it in a prime position to address the most pressing issues of our 
time, such as climate change and social inequality. Its current reliance
 on digital and technological solutions, however, has increasingly 
caused landscape architects to lose sight of the ways in which humans 
actually use spaces. And while landscapes are designed all over the 
world, the discipline remains inordinately centered on the Global North.
 Dr. Gareth Doherty's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813952642"><em>Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design</em></a><em>﻿</em> (University of Virginia Press, 2025) alters
 that long-standing paradigm through real-life examples that provide 
tools for practitioners to engage more deeply with multidimensional, 
diverse landscapes and the communities that create, live in, and use 
them.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landscape architecture is at a crossroads. The ability to draw upon 
interdisciplinary perspectives and generate insights from the combined 
vantage points of design, environmental studies, and the social sciences
 puts it in a prime position to address the most pressing issues of our 
time, such as climate change and social inequality. Its current reliance
 on digital and technological solutions, however, has increasingly 
caused landscape architects to lose sight of the ways in which humans 
actually use spaces. And while landscapes are designed all over the 
world, the discipline remains inordinately centered on the Global North.
 Dr. Gareth Doherty's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780813952642"><em>Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design</em></a><em>﻿</em> (University of Virginia Press, 2025) alters
 that long-standing paradigm through real-life examples that provide 
tools for practitioners to engage more deeply with multidimensional, 
diverse landscapes and the communities that create, live in, and use 
them.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56507638" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ed578751-852c-416d-ae04-e9d32e172164/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ed578751-852c-416d-ae04-e9d32e172164&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gareth Doherty, &quot;Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Landscape architecture is at a crossroads. The ability to draw upon 
interdisciplinary perspectives and generate insights from the combined 
vantage points of design, environmental studies, and the social sciences
 puts it in a prime position to address the most pressing issues of our 
time, such as climate change and social inequality. Its current reliance
 on digital and technological solutions, however, has increasingly 
caused landscape architects to lose sight of the ways in which humans 
actually use spaces. And while landscapes are designed all over the 
world, the discipline remains inordinately centered on the Global North.
 Dr. Gareth Doherty&apos;s Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design﻿ (University of Virginia Press, 2025) alters
 that long-standing paradigm through real-life examples that provide 
tools for practitioners to engage more deeply with multidimensional, 
diverse landscapes and the communities that create, live in, and use 
them.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Landscape architecture is at a crossroads. The ability to draw upon 
interdisciplinary perspectives and generate insights from the combined 
vantage points of design, environmental studies, and the social sciences
 puts it in a prime position to address the most pressing issues of our 
time, such as climate change and social inequality. Its current reliance
 on digital and technological solutions, however, has increasingly 
caused landscape architects to lose sight of the ways in which humans 
actually use spaces. And while landscapes are designed all over the 
world, the discipline remains inordinately centered on the Global North.
 Dr. Gareth Doherty&apos;s Landscape Fieldwork: How Engaging the World Can Change Design﻿ (University of Virginia Press, 2025) alters
 that long-standing paradigm through real-life examples that provide 
tools for practitioners to engage more deeply with multidimensional, 
diverse landscapes and the communities that create, live in, and use 
them.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>938</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">913ae96c-6ae9-11f1-b79a-dfcf5bf906e5</guid>
      <title>Jeremy J. Holland, &quot;The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781041235675">The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy</a><em>﻿</em> (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.</p>
<p>Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.</p>
<p>As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781041235675">The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy</a><em>﻿</em> (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.</p>
<p>Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.</p>
<p>As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29548702" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/50000acc-f8f7-4aee-951e-87c0819feb7b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=50000acc-f8f7-4aee-951e-87c0819feb7b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy J. Holland, &quot;The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy﻿ (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.

Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.

As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Political Worldviews of American Social Movements: Partisan Politics and the Future of Democracy﻿ (Routledge, 2026) explores the political worldviews of progressive American social movements and how they play an increasingly important role in defining social problems, setting the national political agenda, and offering viable policy solutions.

Arguing that the liberal consensus that historically held the United States together politically has broken down, this book demonstrates how new forms of authoritarian and democratic populisms are being offered as alternatives to a rigged capitalist system by an unaccountable oligarchy. It utilises the method of frame analysis to elucidate the political worldview of particular, left-leaning social movements, exploring their historical backgrounds, organizing methods, social grievances, policy solutions, current actions, and future goals. It examines three movements concerned with economic issues, three organizing around identity, and three advocating for change in the domain of public safety. The last chapter focuses on the current political situation in the U.S. and potential futures of democracy. Bringing together lessons from U.S. history and the previous chapters, the book ends with a proposal for how to ensure more democratic and egalitarian outcomes in America as a whole.

As such, it offers an important reference for both academics and activists in the fields of sociology, political science, and policy analysis.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>937</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3a75e012-6bf9-11f1-b492-3bc22f850813</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Daly, &quot;The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>He’s been called the man academics love to hate. One time, when the 
author disclosed that he worked with Pipes, the colleague responded, “I 
will forgive you.” Love him or hate him, Richard Pipes (1923–2018), left
 an indelible mark on Russian and Soviet history in his long and 
remarkable life.
 This conversation delves into Pipes’ personal and intellectual 
biography, scholarly contributions, the role he played in shaping late 
Cold War policy and a generation of American historians of the Imperial 
and Soviet Russia. Have a listen to get a better sense of this humanist 
historian—described as both polemical and preeminently polite—who cast 
such a long shadow on academia in and beyond the Cold War. </p>
<p>Jonathan Daly is Professor of History at University of Illinois Chicago. In addition to <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645714"><em>The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2025)<em>, </em>he is the author of several monographs on Russian and Soviet history. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He’s been called the man academics love to hate. One time, when the 
author disclosed that he worked with Pipes, the colleague responded, “I 
will forgive you.” Love him or hate him, Richard Pipes (1923–2018), left
 an indelible mark on Russian and Soviet history in his long and 
remarkable life.
 This conversation delves into Pipes’ personal and intellectual 
biography, scholarly contributions, the role he played in shaping late 
Cold War policy and a generation of American historians of the Imperial 
and Soviet Russia. Have a listen to get a better sense of this humanist 
historian—described as both polemical and preeminently polite—who cast 
such a long shadow on academia in and beyond the Cold War. </p>
<p>Jonathan Daly is Professor of History at University of Illinois Chicago. In addition to <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645714"><em>The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2025)<em>, </em>he is the author of several monographs on Russian and Soviet history. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68920444" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f76021a2-e228-417a-915e-bd4aad04e542/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f76021a2-e228-417a-915e-bd4aad04e542&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Daly, &quot;The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>He’s been called the man academics love to hate. One time, when the 
author disclosed that he worked with Pipes, the colleague responded, “I 
will forgive you.” Love him or hate him, Richard Pipes (1923–2018), left
 an indelible mark on Russian and Soviet history in his long and 
remarkable life.
 This conversation delves into Pipes’ personal and intellectual 
biography, scholarly contributions, the role he played in shaping late 
Cold War policy and a generation of American historians of the Imperial 
and Soviet Russia. Have a listen to get a better sense of this humanist 
historian—described as both polemical and preeminently polite—who cast 
such a long shadow on academia in and beyond the Cold War. 

Jonathan Daly is Professor of History at University of Illinois Chicago. In addition to The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior (Stanford University Press, 2025), he is the author of several monographs on Russian and Soviet history. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>He’s been called the man academics love to hate. One time, when the 
author disclosed that he worked with Pipes, the colleague responded, “I 
will forgive you.” Love him or hate him, Richard Pipes (1923–2018), left
 an indelible mark on Russian and Soviet history in his long and 
remarkable life.
 This conversation delves into Pipes’ personal and intellectual 
biography, scholarly contributions, the role he played in shaping late 
Cold War policy and a generation of American historians of the Imperial 
and Soviet Russia. Have a listen to get a better sense of this humanist 
historian—described as both polemical and preeminently polite—who cast 
such a long shadow on academia in and beyond the Cold War. 

Jonathan Daly is Professor of History at University of Illinois Chicago. In addition to The Man Who Knew Russia: Richard Pipes, Humanist and Cold Warrior (Stanford University Press, 2025), he is the author of several monographs on Russian and Soviet history. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>936</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e96fb08-6a6a-11f1-a8ab-af54147b1e31</guid>
      <title>Alena Ledeneva, &quot;Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns&quot; (UCL Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p> Alena Ledeneva is Professor of Politics and Society at the 
University College London and a founder of the Global Informality 
Project. Her research focuses on informal practices, and she has written
 several Russia-focused books, including <em>Russia’s Economy of Favours, How Russia Really Works </em>and <em>Can Russia Modernise. </em>The Global Informality has also  published 3 volumes of its <em>Global Encyclopaedia of Informality. </em>Alena is here today to talk about her new book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781806550357"><em>Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns</em></a><em> </em>(UCL Press, 2026),<em> </em>which has been shortlisted for the 2026 Pushkin House Book Prize.</p>
<p>Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on 
activism, social movements and state-society relations in the 
Post-Soviet space. </p>
<p>Alena’s new book: art, music, text in a new UCL Press book in open access:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Russian Pendulum: <a href="https://uclpress.co.uk/book/russian-pendulum/">here</a>
</li>
  <li>The accompanying music: Delphian Records classical album The System Made Me Do It composed by Benjamin Woodgates: <a href="https://orcd.co/thesystemmademedoit">here</a>
</li>
  <li>And a brilliant review of the music: <a href="https://chimeo.com/article/Classical-Music-Benjamin-Woodgates-The-System-Made-Me-Do-It">here</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Plus, a nice mention in the BBC sounds for dark: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002vlhg?partner=uk.co.bbc&amp;origin=share-mobile">here</a></p>
<p>Enjoy the podcast!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Alena Ledeneva is Professor of Politics and Society at the 
University College London and a founder of the Global Informality 
Project. Her research focuses on informal practices, and she has written
 several Russia-focused books, including <em>Russia’s Economy of Favours, How Russia Really Works </em>and <em>Can Russia Modernise. </em>The Global Informality has also  published 3 volumes of its <em>Global Encyclopaedia of Informality. </em>Alena is here today to talk about her new book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781806550357"><em>Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns</em></a><em> </em>(UCL Press, 2026),<em> </em>which has been shortlisted for the 2026 Pushkin House Book Prize.</p>
<p>Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on 
activism, social movements and state-society relations in the 
Post-Soviet space. </p>
<p>Alena’s new book: art, music, text in a new UCL Press book in open access:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Russian Pendulum: <a href="https://uclpress.co.uk/book/russian-pendulum/">here</a>
</li>
  <li>The accompanying music: Delphian Records classical album The System Made Me Do It composed by Benjamin Woodgates: <a href="https://orcd.co/thesystemmademedoit">here</a>
</li>
  <li>And a brilliant review of the music: <a href="https://chimeo.com/article/Classical-Music-Benjamin-Woodgates-The-System-Made-Me-Do-It">here</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Plus, a nice mention in the BBC sounds for dark: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002vlhg?partner=uk.co.bbc&amp;origin=share-mobile">here</a></p>
<p>Enjoy the podcast!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72266292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1e502e28-4209-4467-85b0-4ef6355d6c22/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1e502e28-4209-4467-85b0-4ef6355d6c22&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alena Ledeneva, &quot;Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns&quot; (UCL Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Alena Ledeneva is Professor of Politics and Society at the 
University College London and a founder of the Global Informality 
Project. Her research focuses on informal practices, and she has written
 several Russia-focused books, including Russia’s Economy of Favours, How Russia Really Works and Can Russia Modernise. The Global Informality has also  published 3 volumes of its Global Encyclopaedia of Informality. Alena is here today to talk about her new book Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns (UCL Press, 2026), which has been shortlisted for the 2026 Pushkin House Book Prize.

Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on 
activism, social movements and state-society relations in the 
Post-Soviet space. 

Alena’s new book: art, music, text in a new UCL Press book in open access:


  Russian Pendulum: here


  The accompanying music: Delphian Records classical album The System Made Me Do It composed by Benjamin Woodgates: here


  And a brilliant review of the music: here



Plus, a nice mention in the BBC sounds for dark: here

Enjoy the podcast!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alena Ledeneva is Professor of Politics and Society at the 
University College London and a founder of the Global Informality 
Project. Her research focuses on informal practices, and she has written
 several Russia-focused books, including Russia’s Economy of Favours, How Russia Really Works and Can Russia Modernise. The Global Informality has also  published 3 volumes of its Global Encyclopaedia of Informality. Alena is here today to talk about her new book Russian Pendulum: Paradoxes, Practices and Patterns (UCL Press, 2026), which has been shortlisted for the 2026 Pushkin House Book Prize.

Adam Quinn is a Glasgow-based researcher whose work focuses on 
activism, social movements and state-society relations in the 
Post-Soviet space. 

Alena’s new book: art, music, text in a new UCL Press book in open access:


  Russian Pendulum: here


  The accompanying music: Delphian Records classical album The System Made Me Do It composed by Benjamin Woodgates: here


  And a brilliant review of the music: here



Plus, a nice mention in the BBC sounds for dark: here

Enjoy the podcast!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>935</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30766d1e-6a66-11f1-b210-0723cae45e78</guid>
      <title>Alex Boodrookas, &quot;Comrades Estranged: Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1975, Kuwaiti workers orchestrated arguably the most powerful 
citizen-led movement for noncitizen rights in the history of the Persian
 Gulf. Their efforts built on decades of wide-ranging struggle over the 
meanings and outlines of citizenship. During the twentieth century, 
anticolonial nationalists, pro-democracy reformers, feminists, and labor
 organizers joined forces to fight for a more equitable citizenship 
regime. In so doing, they won a remarkable series of victories: 
political independence, constitutional rights, and oil nationalization, 
reshaping not just Kuwait, but the global petroleum order. Comrades 
Estranged reframes the history of labor activism, citizenship, and 
decolonization in Persian Gulf by centering the history of social 
movements—especially organized labor. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646476"><em>Comrades Estranged: </em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646476"><em>Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2026), Alex
 Boodrookas traces how workers and their allies shaped the 
world-historic transformations witnessed across the region: the 
consolidation of British sovereignty, formation of autocratic states, 
inrush of hydrocarbon wealth, onset of decolonization, and rise of both 
mass migration and mass politics. But unions failed to incorporate 
noncitizens into their movement, and as Boodrookas argues, this fatally 
undermined the movements' strength. The contradictions of nationalist 
and internationalist visions proved insurmountable. <em>Comrades Estranged</em> thus sheds light on both the power, and the limits, of citizenship and the nation-state as the framework for political action.</p>
<p>Dr. <a href="https://www.msudenver.edu/faculty-staff/alex-boodrookas/">Alex Boodrookas</a> is Assistant Professor of History at Metropolitan State University of Denver.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. <a href="https://dubaimonsters.academia.edu/AhmedAlMaazmi">Ahmed AlMaazmi</a> is Assistant Professor of History at the United Arab Emirates University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1975, Kuwaiti workers orchestrated arguably the most powerful 
citizen-led movement for noncitizen rights in the history of the Persian
 Gulf. Their efforts built on decades of wide-ranging struggle over the 
meanings and outlines of citizenship. During the twentieth century, 
anticolonial nationalists, pro-democracy reformers, feminists, and labor
 organizers joined forces to fight for a more equitable citizenship 
regime. In so doing, they won a remarkable series of victories: 
political independence, constitutional rights, and oil nationalization, 
reshaping not just Kuwait, but the global petroleum order. Comrades 
Estranged reframes the history of labor activism, citizenship, and 
decolonization in Persian Gulf by centering the history of social 
movements—especially organized labor. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646476"><em>Comrades Estranged: </em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503646476"><em>Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2026), Alex
 Boodrookas traces how workers and their allies shaped the 
world-historic transformations witnessed across the region: the 
consolidation of British sovereignty, formation of autocratic states, 
inrush of hydrocarbon wealth, onset of decolonization, and rise of both 
mass migration and mass politics. But unions failed to incorporate 
noncitizens into their movement, and as Boodrookas argues, this fatally 
undermined the movements' strength. The contradictions of nationalist 
and internationalist visions proved insurmountable. <em>Comrades Estranged</em> thus sheds light on both the power, and the limits, of citizenship and the nation-state as the framework for political action.</p>
<p>Dr. <a href="https://www.msudenver.edu/faculty-staff/alex-boodrookas/">Alex Boodrookas</a> is Assistant Professor of History at Metropolitan State University of Denver.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. <a href="https://dubaimonsters.academia.edu/AhmedAlMaazmi">Ahmed AlMaazmi</a> is Assistant Professor of History at the United Arab Emirates University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47127700" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3dbe21cc-50a7-46ec-b25d-d69f7e45dd9c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3dbe21cc-50a7-46ec-b25d-d69f7e45dd9c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Boodrookas, &quot;Comrades Estranged: Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1975, Kuwaiti workers orchestrated arguably the most powerful 
citizen-led movement for noncitizen rights in the history of the Persian
 Gulf. Their efforts built on decades of wide-ranging struggle over the 
meanings and outlines of citizenship. During the twentieth century, 
anticolonial nationalists, pro-democracy reformers, feminists, and labor
 organizers joined forces to fight for a more equitable citizenship 
regime. In so doing, they won a remarkable series of victories: 
political independence, constitutional rights, and oil nationalization, 
reshaping not just Kuwait, but the global petroleum order. Comrades 
Estranged reframes the history of labor activism, citizenship, and 
decolonization in Persian Gulf by centering the history of social 
movements—especially organized labor. In Comrades Estranged: Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf (Stanford University Press, 2026), Alex
 Boodrookas traces how workers and their allies shaped the 
world-historic transformations witnessed across the region: the 
consolidation of British sovereignty, formation of autocratic states, 
inrush of hydrocarbon wealth, onset of decolonization, and rise of both 
mass migration and mass politics. But unions failed to incorporate 
noncitizens into their movement, and as Boodrookas argues, this fatally 
undermined the movements&apos; strength. The contradictions of nationalist 
and internationalist visions proved insurmountable. Comrades Estranged thus sheds light on both the power, and the limits, of citizenship and the nation-state as the framework for political action.

Dr. Alex Boodrookas is Assistant Professor of History at Metropolitan State University of Denver.

﻿Dr. Ahmed AlMaazmi is Assistant Professor of History at the United Arab Emirates University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1975, Kuwaiti workers orchestrated arguably the most powerful 
citizen-led movement for noncitizen rights in the history of the Persian
 Gulf. Their efforts built on decades of wide-ranging struggle over the 
meanings and outlines of citizenship. During the twentieth century, 
anticolonial nationalists, pro-democracy reformers, feminists, and labor
 organizers joined forces to fight for a more equitable citizenship 
regime. In so doing, they won a remarkable series of victories: 
political independence, constitutional rights, and oil nationalization, 
reshaping not just Kuwait, but the global petroleum order. Comrades 
Estranged reframes the history of labor activism, citizenship, and 
decolonization in Persian Gulf by centering the history of social 
movements—especially organized labor. In Comrades Estranged: Labor and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century Persian Gulf (Stanford University Press, 2026), Alex
 Boodrookas traces how workers and their allies shaped the 
world-historic transformations witnessed across the region: the 
consolidation of British sovereignty, formation of autocratic states, 
inrush of hydrocarbon wealth, onset of decolonization, and rise of both 
mass migration and mass politics. But unions failed to incorporate 
noncitizens into their movement, and as Boodrookas argues, this fatally 
undermined the movements&apos; strength. The contradictions of nationalist 
and internationalist visions proved insurmountable. Comrades Estranged thus sheds light on both the power, and the limits, of citizenship and the nation-state as the framework for political action.

Dr. Alex Boodrookas is Assistant Professor of History at Metropolitan State University of Denver.

﻿Dr. Ahmed AlMaazmi is Assistant Professor of History at the United Arab Emirates University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>934</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f7d4616-6969-11f1-9005-2b57f86ab394</guid>
      <title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089">Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</a><em>﻿</em> (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a> focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.</p>
<p>At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a> is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089">Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</a><em>﻿</em> (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a> focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.</p>
<p>At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a> is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42611571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d702baf1-73b7-4362-81c3-ee778058fd9f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d702baf1-73b7-4362-81c3-ee778058fd9f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants﻿ (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.

At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.

Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants﻿ (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.

At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.

Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>933</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4296d29a-695d-11f1-8b4f-2749d7d340cb</guid>
      <title>Legacy of the Ancient Greeks: On Classical and Modern Democracy with Josiah Ober</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor </em><a href="https://politicalscience.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober">Josiah Ober</a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the <a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028644/mass-and-elite-in-democratic-athens"><em>Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens</em></a> (1989), <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691140919/the-rise-and-fall-of-classical-greece"><em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em></a> (2015), and <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691218601/the-civic-bargain"><em>Civic Bargain</em></a> (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bargaining-for-democracy-a-conversation-with-josiah/id1515595812?i=1000629210163">previously a Madison’s Notes guest</a> in Season 3.</p>
<p>Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.</p>
<p>We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor </em><a href="https://politicalscience.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober">Josiah Ober</a><em>.</em></p>
<p>Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the <a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691028644/mass-and-elite-in-democratic-athens"><em>Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens</em></a> (1989), <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691140919/the-rise-and-fall-of-classical-greece"><em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em></a> (2015), and <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691218601/the-civic-bargain"><em>Civic Bargain</em></a> (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bargaining-for-democracy-a-conversation-with-josiah/id1515595812?i=1000629210163">previously a Madison’s Notes guest</a> in Season 3.</p>
<p>Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.</p>
<p>We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71213378" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6ac7123f-648c-4d80-ad81-09063013f7c2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6ac7123f-648c-4d80-ad81-09063013f7c2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Legacy of the Ancient Greeks: On Classical and Modern Democracy with Josiah Ober</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor Josiah Ober.

Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (1989), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece (2015), and Civic Bargain (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was previously a Madison’s Notes guest in Season 3.

Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.

We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American democracy is in a period of crisis, so it seems natural to look back to its origins. So here in Episode 10 of Season 5, I interview Professor Josiah Ober.

Having previously taught at Princeton University, Ober is a professor of political science, classics, and philosophy at Stanford University, the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative, as well as a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. The author of many books, including Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens (1989), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece (2015), and Civic Bargain (2023), co-written with Brook Manville, he was previously a Madison’s Notes guest in Season 3.

Drawing on his 2015 book, we discuss the history of ancient Greece and the political legacy of its classical period. Our conversation ranges from the Bronze Age Collapse and the age of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to the rise of the Greek city-state and decline of democratic Athens.

We discuss contingencies of the Peloponnesian war, the cases for and against Alcibiades, whether the polity flourished under Macedonian and Roman empires, the relationship of philosophy to civics, was Socrates guilty and how much did Plato invent about him, in what way the god Hermes symbolized Greek trade in the Mediterranean, if James Madison truly understood ancient history, and lastly Ober’s work with the growing civics programs in American higher education.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>932</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7ad5042e-6359-11f1-8b90-f3565123fc53</guid>
      <title>Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes, &quot;War at Arm&apos;s Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries.</p>
<p>Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today.</p>
<p>In their latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/war-at-arm-s-length-how-america-can-build-effective-partners-through-military-assistance/1ac563e534e8c262?ean=9780300278293&amp;next=t"><u><em>War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance</em></u></a> (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military 
assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed 
but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to 
leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. 
Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest 
alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of 
the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington’s
 ability to build militarily effective partners.</p>
<p>Our guests today are <a href="https://cissm.umd.edu/our-community/faculty-staff/richard-bennet"><u>Doctor Richard Bennet</u></a>, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/people/alexander-noyes/"><u>Doctor Alexander Noyes</u></a>, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home"><u>Eleonora Mattiacci</u></a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1"><u><em>Volatile States in International Politics</em></u></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries.</p>
<p>Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today.</p>
<p>In their latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/war-at-arm-s-length-how-america-can-build-effective-partners-through-military-assistance/1ac563e534e8c262?ean=9780300278293&amp;next=t"><u><em>War at Arm's Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance</em></u></a> (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military 
assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed 
but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to 
leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. 
Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest 
alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of 
the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington’s
 ability to build militarily effective partners.</p>
<p>Our guests today are <a href="https://cissm.umd.edu/our-community/faculty-staff/richard-bennet"><u>Doctor Richard Bennet</u></a>, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/people/alexander-noyes/"><u>Doctor Alexander Noyes</u></a>, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home"><u>Eleonora Mattiacci</u></a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1"><u><em>Volatile States in International Politics</em></u></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31668634" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/07aabc07-7158-4e53-8160-2b31f8b43e49/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=07aabc07-7158-4e53-8160-2b31f8b43e49&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes, &quot;War at Arm&apos;s Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries.

Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today.

In their latest book, War at Arm&apos;s Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military 
assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed 
but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to 
leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. 
Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest 
alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of 
the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington’s
 ability to build militarily effective partners.

Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An in-depth examination of how the United States can build more effective partner militaries.

Military assistance has a bad reputation. Large-scale attempts to build partner militaries in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam cost the United States billions of dollars and ended ignominiously, with the collapse of local forces as American troops withdrew. Arms transfers of sophisticated, American-made weapons often appear to do more harm than good. Yet military assistance and support—operating indirectly through partners—when done right, can deliver remarkable strategic results for the United States and its partners. Working effectively with partner militaries is one of the most pressing national security challenges for the United States today.

In their latest book, War at Arm&apos;s Length: How America Can Build Effective Partners Through Military Assistance (Yale University Press, 2026), Richard Bennet and Alexander Noyes offer a systematic look at military 
assistance in the twenty-first century, examining a frequently deployed 
but often misunderstood set of tools that allows the United States to 
leverage partner militaries to achieve national security objectives. 
Bennet and Noyes posit that two main factors—the degree of interest 
alignment on security issues and the level of institutional capacity of 
the receiving force—will be the most important variables in Washington’s
 ability to build militarily effective partners.

Our guests today are Doctor Richard Bennet, who is a senior research associate at the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, and Doctor Alexander Noyes, who is a fellow in the Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology at the Brookings Institution.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of Volatile States in International Politics (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>931</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">275b75f6-65fe-11f1-b4f2-178d1cb604f9</guid>
      <title>AI, Algocracy, and Democracy&apos;s Challenging Road Ahead with Andrew Sorota</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Like many people, I've been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I'm speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>Follow <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-sorota-490320179/">Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/11/opinion/ai-democracy-government-authoritarianism.html">﻿"This Is No Way to Rule a Country"</a> in the New York Times</p>
<p><a href="https://www.noemamag.com/rescuing-democracy-from-the-quiet-rule-of-ai/?utm_source=noemalinkedin&amp;utm_medium=noemasocial">﻿﻿"Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI"</a> in Noema</p>
<p>Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many people, I've been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I'm speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>Follow <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-sorota-490320179/">Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/11/opinion/ai-democracy-government-authoritarianism.html">﻿"This Is No Way to Rule a Country"</a> in the New York Times</p>
<p><a href="https://www.noemamag.com/rescuing-democracy-from-the-quiet-rule-of-ai/?utm_source=noemalinkedin&amp;utm_medium=noemasocial">﻿﻿"Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI"</a> in Noema</p>
<p>Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44150212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/35646624-1702-478b-b5ea-ae1037ba7ad2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=35646624-1702-478b-b5ea-ae1037ba7ad2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>AI, Algocracy, and Democracy&apos;s Challenging Road Ahead with Andrew Sorota</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Like many people, I&apos;ve been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I&apos;m speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.

Follow Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn

﻿&quot;This Is No Way to Rule a Country&quot; in the New York Times

﻿﻿&quot;Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI&quot; in Noema

Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Like many people, I&apos;ve been following the developments of AI, testing out new models and following the deluge of news stories about the fight for supremacy. Much has been written about the existential and economic risks posed by AI, but the political implications of superintelligent systems have often been sidelined. In the United States and elsewhere, AI companies steam ahead with little regulation or oversight. Meanwhile, politicians appear flatfooted and unsure about the best way to integrate AI into the government to make democracies stronger and more responsive to the needs and will of the people. AI will undeniably change how governments work, but how can we ensure that democracy and individual rights are safeguarded amidst the most transformative technological revolution in more than a century? Today I&apos;m speaking with Andrew Sorota, Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt. Andrew has written extensively about the relationship between democracy and artificial intelligence. His writing has appeared in outlets like the New York Times and Noema magazine. Andrew will dispel many myths about AI, where he looks to call bullshit on the idea that democracy is a system heading fast into the dustbin of history.

Follow Andrew Sorota on LinkedIn

﻿&quot;This Is No Way to Rule a Country&quot; in the New York Times

﻿﻿&quot;Rescuing Democracy From The Quiet Rule Of AI&quot; in Noema

Andrew Sorota is currently Head of Research for the Office of Eric Schmidt.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>930</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71c88bdc-6492-11f1-a372-3b7a18e00f5a</guid>
      <title>Karine Premont and Christopher J. Devine eds., &quot;Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472058099">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics</a> (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/hx11xj21b">Second in Command</a> is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.</p>
<p>We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics</a> is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045">https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045</a> It can, of course, also be purchased.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472058099">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics</a> (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/hx11xj21b">Second in Command</a> is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.</p>
<p>We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045">Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics</a> is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045">https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045</a> It can, of course, also be purchased.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37366307" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9ffa9662-1c8d-4486-b085-38835c466a9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9ffa9662-1c8d-4486-b085-38835c466a9e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Karine Premont and Christopher J. Devine eds., &quot;Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.

Second in Command is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.

We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.

Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045 It can, of course, also be purchased.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Karine Premont and Christopher Devine have a new edited volume focusing on the American Vice Presidency and analyzing not just the office and the officeholders, but also the role of vice presidential candidates in the campaigns for the presidency. Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Makes in Modern American Politics (U Michigan Press, 2026) is a fascinating exploration of the role and place of the vice president, the vice presidency, and the vice presidential running mate. Often this position and this job are dismissed—since the vice president has very few actual powers, besides his/her role as president of the Senate and tiebreaker in that body, and one of the certifiers of the Electoral College votes after an election. But in the contemporary political environment, vice presidents have grown in importance in terms of their role on the presidential ticket and in their role once elected to office.

Second in Command is split into two parts, the first section focusing on the vice president in office, while the second part examines the vice presidential candidate and the role of being a running mate to a presidential candidate. In our conversation we discuss the fact that the vice president is often considered to be the “appendix” of American government, created at the Constitutional Convention to break a tie in the Senate, should there be one, and to solve the problem coming out of the newly designed Electoral College where two votes needed to be cast for president. But over the past fifty years, there has been tremendous change in terms of the inhabitants in the office, their relationship to the president and the presidency, and their activities on the campaign trail. Vice Presidents have become general advisors to the president. This precedent was established between President Jimmy Carter and his vice president, Walter Mondale. And since the 1970s, this newly engaged position and role for the vice president have generally been in place, with different approaches from different presidents/vice presidential pairs. The idea of trying to “balance” the ticket is still part of the selection dynamic, but it is as important as the working relationship that presidents have pursued with their vice presidential pick.

We had a fascinating discussion of the history of the vice presidency as well as an analysis of the more modern dynamic. We talked about different parts of ticket balancing, since it is not necessarily about geography so much as constituent appeals: religious groups, gender, expertise/experience, and more.

Second in Command: Reevaluating the Role of Vice Presidents and Running Mates in Modern American Politics is available from the University of Michigan Press via open access. Here is the link: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14505045 It can, of course, also be purchased.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>929</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">698d5fcc-648f-11f1-9b51-4783ed68f72c</guid>
      <title>Robert Templer, &quot;The Shah&apos;s Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed (Hurst, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1971, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi threw a party to celebrate the 2,500-year anniversary of the Persian Empire. It was planned to be a massive party, with tents set up in the desert, and invitations sent to just about every world leader across both the Western and Soviet blocs.</p>
<p>Robert Templer writes about this celebration–and how it presaged the events of the Iranian Revolution of 1979–in his new book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265696"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265696">The Shah's Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed </a>(Hurst, 2026).</p>
<p>Robert Templer is a writer and former professor at the Central European University, where he also founded a research centre on post-conflict recovery. From 2011-2012, he was director of the Asia Programme at the International Crisis Group and has visited Iran on many occasions. He is the author of four books including the acclaimed <em>Shadows and Wind: A View of Modern Vietnam</em> and <em>A Basilisk Glance: Poisoners from Plato to Putin.</em>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1971, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi threw a party to celebrate the 2,500-year anniversary of the Persian Empire. It was planned to be a massive party, with tents set up in the desert, and invitations sent to just about every world leader across both the Western and Soviet blocs.</p>
<p>Robert Templer writes about this celebration–and how it presaged the events of the Iranian Revolution of 1979–in his new book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265696"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805265696">The Shah's Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed </a>(Hurst, 2026).</p>
<p>Robert Templer is a writer and former professor at the Central European University, where he also founded a research centre on post-conflict recovery. From 2011-2012, he was director of the Asia Programme at the International Crisis Group and has visited Iran on many occasions. He is the author of four books including the acclaimed <em>Shadows and Wind: A View of Modern Vietnam</em> and <em>A Basilisk Glance: Poisoners from Plato to Putin.</em>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40805428" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d8c004a1-cd9f-4bbe-93a7-158a98163a65/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d8c004a1-cd9f-4bbe-93a7-158a98163a65&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Templer, &quot;The Shah&apos;s Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed (Hurst, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1971, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi threw a party to celebrate the 2,500-year anniversary of the Persian Empire. It was planned to be a massive party, with tents set up in the desert, and invitations sent to just about every world leader across both the Western and Soviet blocs.

Robert Templer writes about this celebration–and how it presaged the events of the Iranian Revolution of 1979–in his new book The Shah&apos;s Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed (Hurst, 2026).

Robert Templer is a writer and former professor at the Central European University, where he also founded a research centre on post-conflict recovery. From 2011-2012, he was director of the Asia Programme at the International Crisis Group and has visited Iran on many occasions. He is the author of four books including the acclaimed Shadows and Wind: A View of Modern Vietnam and A Basilisk Glance: Poisoners from Plato to Putin.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1971, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi threw a party to celebrate the 2,500-year anniversary of the Persian Empire. It was planned to be a massive party, with tents set up in the desert, and invitations sent to just about every world leader across both the Western and Soviet blocs.

Robert Templer writes about this celebration–and how it presaged the events of the Iranian Revolution of 1979–in his new book The Shah&apos;s Party: And the Iranian Revolution That Followed (Hurst, 2026).

Robert Templer is a writer and former professor at the Central European University, where he also founded a research centre on post-conflict recovery. From 2011-2012, he was director of the Asia Programme at the International Crisis Group and has visited Iran on many occasions. He is the author of four books including the acclaimed Shadows and Wind: A View of Modern Vietnam and A Basilisk Glance: Poisoners from Plato to Putin.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>928</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10390dca-63ba-11f1-b1d0-1f04d5e42aa7</guid>
      <title>Arlene W. Saxonhouse, &quot;Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists&quot; (U Notre Dame Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Athenian Democracy provides innovative readings of ancient theorists to reveal both the complexity of democracy's achievements and its limits.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780268210717">Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists</a> ﻿(U Notre Dame Press, 2026), noted political scientist Arlene W. Saxonhouse offers fresh and provocative explorations of ancient political theorists, lending new insights about democracy's foundations and principles. These insights are more relevant than ever in a moment when the viability of democratic regimes is under scrutiny. Saxonhouse provides an in-depth discussion of the modern mythmakers (Hobbes, Paine, Hamilton, Mill, and Arendt, among others) who, in praising or excoriating Athenian democracy, have in fact distorted it to support their own assessments of democracy. She then offers detailed reinterpretations of the writings on democracy of four ancient theorists who had directly experienced life in the first democratic regime: Herodotus, Thucydides, Plato, and Aristotle.</p>
<p>Saxonhouse argues that the mythmaking that often attends our views of Athenian democracy—whether as a flawed, slaveholding regime that fostered factions and oppressed women or as an ideal regime of egalitarian and participatory democracy—blinds us to the deeper understanding of democracies that these ancient theorists can offer.</p>
<p>Arlene W. Saxonhouse is the Caroline Robbins Collegiate Professor of Political Science, Emerita, at the University of Michigan. She is the author of numerous books and articles dealing with ancient Greek political thought, including <em>Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens</em> and <em>Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Athenian Democracy provides innovative readings of ancient theorists to reveal both the complexity of democracy's achievements and its limits.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780268210717">Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists</a> ﻿(U Notre Dame Press, 2026), noted political scientist Arlene W. Saxonhouse offers fresh and provocative explorations of ancient political theorists, lending new insights about democracy's foundations and principles. These insights are more relevant than ever in a moment when the viability of democratic regimes is under scrutiny. Saxonhouse provides an in-depth discussion of the modern mythmakers (Hobbes, Paine, Hamilton, Mill, and Arendt, among others) who, in praising or excoriating Athenian democracy, have in fact distorted it to support their own assessments of democracy. She then offers detailed reinterpretations of the writings on democracy of four ancient theorists who had directly experienced life in the first democratic regime: Herodotus, Thucydides, Plato, and Aristotle.</p>
<p>Saxonhouse argues that the mythmaking that often attends our views of Athenian democracy—whether as a flawed, slaveholding regime that fostered factions and oppressed women or as an ideal regime of egalitarian and participatory democracy—blinds us to the deeper understanding of democracies that these ancient theorists can offer.</p>
<p>Arlene W. Saxonhouse is the Caroline Robbins Collegiate Professor of Political Science, Emerita, at the University of Michigan. She is the author of numerous books and articles dealing with ancient Greek political thought, including <em>Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens</em> and <em>Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54121368" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/14104213-4a1c-4b8e-8775-72af0511672a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=14104213-4a1c-4b8e-8775-72af0511672a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arlene W. Saxonhouse, &quot;Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists&quot; (U Notre Dame Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Athenian Democracy provides innovative readings of ancient theorists to reveal both the complexity of democracy&apos;s achievements and its limits.

In Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists ﻿(U Notre Dame Press, 2026), noted political scientist Arlene W. Saxonhouse offers fresh and provocative explorations of ancient political theorists, lending new insights about democracy&apos;s foundations and principles. These insights are more relevant than ever in a moment when the viability of democratic regimes is under scrutiny. Saxonhouse provides an in-depth discussion of the modern mythmakers (Hobbes, Paine, Hamilton, Mill, and Arendt, among others) who, in praising or excoriating Athenian democracy, have in fact distorted it to support their own assessments of democracy. She then offers detailed reinterpretations of the writings on democracy of four ancient theorists who had directly experienced life in the first democratic regime: Herodotus, Thucydides, Plato, and Aristotle.

Saxonhouse argues that the mythmaking that often attends our views of Athenian democracy—whether as a flawed, slaveholding regime that fostered factions and oppressed women or as an ideal regime of egalitarian and participatory democracy—blinds us to the deeper understanding of democracies that these ancient theorists can offer.

Arlene W. Saxonhouse is the Caroline Robbins Collegiate Professor of Political Science, Emerita, at the University of Michigan. She is the author of numerous books and articles dealing with ancient Greek political thought, including Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens and Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Athenian Democracy provides innovative readings of ancient theorists to reveal both the complexity of democracy&apos;s achievements and its limits.

In Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists ﻿(U Notre Dame Press, 2026), noted political scientist Arlene W. Saxonhouse offers fresh and provocative explorations of ancient political theorists, lending new insights about democracy&apos;s foundations and principles. These insights are more relevant than ever in a moment when the viability of democratic regimes is under scrutiny. Saxonhouse provides an in-depth discussion of the modern mythmakers (Hobbes, Paine, Hamilton, Mill, and Arendt, among others) who, in praising or excoriating Athenian democracy, have in fact distorted it to support their own assessments of democracy. She then offers detailed reinterpretations of the writings on democracy of four ancient theorists who had directly experienced life in the first democratic regime: Herodotus, Thucydides, Plato, and Aristotle.

Saxonhouse argues that the mythmaking that often attends our views of Athenian democracy—whether as a flawed, slaveholding regime that fostered factions and oppressed women or as an ideal regime of egalitarian and participatory democracy—blinds us to the deeper understanding of democracies that these ancient theorists can offer.

Arlene W. Saxonhouse is the Caroline Robbins Collegiate Professor of Political Science, Emerita, at the University of Michigan. She is the author of numerous books and articles dealing with ancient Greek political thought, including Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens and Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>927</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc6fa6be-646c-11f1-97ec-4361d47d5b2a</guid>
      <title>Brexit Britain: 10 Years on from the Referendum</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anniversaries provide opportunities to take stock and reflect. It is now ten years since voters in the United Kingdom cast their ballots in a referendum on whether the UK should Leave or Remain in the European Union. The subsequent decade has seen much churn and change in British politics. Join Tim Haughton and guests Maria Sobolewska, Charlotte Galpin and Monika Brusenbauch Meislova for a discussion of the causes, process and consequences of that decision made on 23 June 2016.</p>
<p><a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/maria.sobolewska/">Maria Sobolewska</a> is Professor of Political Science at the University of Manchester. Among her many publications is the book, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/brexitland/667A60CB4C315A755792074E79B20FBA"><em>Brexitland</em></a>, co-written with Rob Ford, which won the 2022 WJM Mackenzie Prize for the best book published in political science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.muni.cz/en/people/110589-monika-brusenbauch-meislova">Monika Brusenbauch Meislova</a> is Associate Professor in the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Masaryk University in Brno in the Czech Republic. Monika has published extensively on many aspects of Brexit in a host of academic journals including <em>Political Quarterly, British Politics, Journal of Legislative Studies, Europe-Asia Studies, the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, European Security and the Journal of Common Market Studies</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/galpin-charlotte">Charlotte Galpin</a> is Associate Professor in German and European Politics at the University of Birmingham. She has published widely on these aspects of Brexit, including in the <em>British Journal of Politics and International Relations</em>, the <em>International Feminist Journal of Politics, the Journal of Common Market Studies, </em>and<em> Social Movement Studies</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He has published articles on <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcms.12177">David Cameron’s referendum pledge</a> and a review article on Brexit, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/ruling-divisions-the-politics-of-brexit/9E66014A6701C5989B7FF3ABC0F01E4C"><em>Ruling Divisions</em></a>.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Brexit-episode-transcript.docx#asset:459190@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anniversaries provide opportunities to take stock and reflect. It is now ten years since voters in the United Kingdom cast their ballots in a referendum on whether the UK should Leave or Remain in the European Union. The subsequent decade has seen much churn and change in British politics. Join Tim Haughton and guests Maria Sobolewska, Charlotte Galpin and Monika Brusenbauch Meislova for a discussion of the causes, process and consequences of that decision made on 23 June 2016.</p>
<p><a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/maria.sobolewska/">Maria Sobolewska</a> is Professor of Political Science at the University of Manchester. Among her many publications is the book, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/brexitland/667A60CB4C315A755792074E79B20FBA"><em>Brexitland</em></a>, co-written with Rob Ford, which won the 2022 WJM Mackenzie Prize for the best book published in political science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.muni.cz/en/people/110589-monika-brusenbauch-meislova">Monika Brusenbauch Meislova</a> is Associate Professor in the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Masaryk University in Brno in the Czech Republic. Monika has published extensively on many aspects of Brexit in a host of academic journals including <em>Political Quarterly, British Politics, Journal of Legislative Studies, Europe-Asia Studies, the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, European Security and the Journal of Common Market Studies</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/galpin-charlotte">Charlotte Galpin</a> is Associate Professor in German and European Politics at the University of Birmingham. She has published widely on these aspects of Brexit, including in the <em>British Journal of Politics and International Relations</em>, the <em>International Feminist Journal of Politics, the Journal of Common Market Studies, </em>and<em> Social Movement Studies</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He has published articles on <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcms.12177">David Cameron’s referendum pledge</a> and a review article on Brexit, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/ruling-divisions-the-politics-of-brexit/9E66014A6701C5989B7FF3ABC0F01E4C"><em>Ruling Divisions</em></a>.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Brexit-episode-transcript.docx#asset:459190@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51443615" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7d314ce2-cfc4-48f2-8fd3-29aa71be347d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7d314ce2-cfc4-48f2-8fd3-29aa71be347d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brexit Britain: 10 Years on from the Referendum</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Anniversaries provide opportunities to take stock and reflect. It is now ten years since voters in the United Kingdom cast their ballots in a referendum on whether the UK should Leave or Remain in the European Union. The subsequent decade has seen much churn and change in British politics. Join Tim Haughton and guests Maria Sobolewska, Charlotte Galpin and Monika Brusenbauch Meislova for a discussion of the causes, process and consequences of that decision made on 23 June 2016.

Maria Sobolewska is Professor of Political Science at the University of Manchester. Among her many publications is the book, Brexitland, co-written with Rob Ford, which won the 2022 WJM Mackenzie Prize for the best book published in political science.

Monika Brusenbauch Meislova is Associate Professor in the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Masaryk University in Brno in the Czech Republic. Monika has published extensively on many aspects of Brexit in a host of academic journals including Political Quarterly, British Politics, Journal of Legislative Studies, Europe-Asia Studies, the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, European Security and the Journal of Common Market Studies.

Charlotte Galpin is Associate Professor in German and European Politics at the University of Birmingham. She has published widely on these aspects of Brexit, including in the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, the International Feminist Journal of Politics, the Journal of Common Market Studies, and Social Movement Studies.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He has published articles on David Cameron’s referendum pledge and a review article on Brexit, Ruling Divisions.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anniversaries provide opportunities to take stock and reflect. It is now ten years since voters in the United Kingdom cast their ballots in a referendum on whether the UK should Leave or Remain in the European Union. The subsequent decade has seen much churn and change in British politics. Join Tim Haughton and guests Maria Sobolewska, Charlotte Galpin and Monika Brusenbauch Meislova for a discussion of the causes, process and consequences of that decision made on 23 June 2016.

Maria Sobolewska is Professor of Political Science at the University of Manchester. Among her many publications is the book, Brexitland, co-written with Rob Ford, which won the 2022 WJM Mackenzie Prize for the best book published in political science.

Monika Brusenbauch Meislova is Associate Professor in the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Masaryk University in Brno in the Czech Republic. Monika has published extensively on many aspects of Brexit in a host of academic journals including Political Quarterly, British Politics, Journal of Legislative Studies, Europe-Asia Studies, the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, European Security and the Journal of Common Market Studies.

Charlotte Galpin is Associate Professor in German and European Politics at the University of Birmingham. She has published widely on these aspects of Brexit, including in the British Journal of Politics and International Relations, the International Feminist Journal of Politics, the Journal of Common Market Studies, and Social Movement Studies.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham. He has published articles on David Cameron’s referendum pledge and a review article on Brexit, Ruling Divisions.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>926</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e6de7e4-62ba-11f1-921a-0f4fba00b324</guid>
      <title>The Diasporic Hindu Right with Savera</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode features a conversation with Prachi and Ram, organizers with Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans and partners standing together in the fight against the rise of the transnational far right. After laying out Hindu supremacy as an ideology, we considered the different phases of consolidation of the Hindu right in the United States from its late 20th century orientation around homeland politics to its 21st century effort to forge a Hindu American identity, first through an alignment with U.S. civil rights organizations and then through a realignment with white supremacist forces. We delved more deeply into the role of caste within this formation, in particular the longstanding efforts of the Hindu right in both India and the U.S. to forge Hindu unity by opposing anticaste politics. This took us to a discussion of the Hindu right’s embrace of the pro-Israel lobby’s tactics, especially its weaponization of Hinduphobia as an echo of the weaponization of antisemitism, to battle criticisms of the Modi government in India, and the need to distinguish this from the real rise in both anti-Hindu and antisemitic sentiment. We ended with Savera’s efforts to forge a broad-based antiracist, left majority as a counterweight to the multiracial far right.</p>
<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/TCP-Episode-10-transcript.docx#asset:458781@1:url">Read the transcript</a></p>
<p><strong>Guests</strong></p>
<p>Prachi Patankar is a writer and activist based in New York. Her speaking and organizing is grounded in feminist, anti-caste, and solidarity commitments. Her writing has appeared in outlets including The Guardian, Indian Express, Al Jazeera, Women’s Studies Quarterly, and Jacobin. She has been interviewed in media including Democracy Now, Jewish Currents, and National Public Radio.</p>
<p>Ram Vishwanathan is an organizer with the Savera coalition based in New York City.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Savera, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">The Global VHP’s Trail of Violence</a>,” January 2024.</p>
<p>Savera, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">Cut From the Same Cloth: the VHP-A’s Ties To Its Indian Counterpart</a>,” April 2024.</p>
<p>Savera and Political Research Associates, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry As Minority Rights</a>,” October 2024.</p>
<p>Jyotiba Phule: an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.</p>
<p>Satyashodhak Sangh: a social reform society founded by Jyotiba Phule in Pune, Maharashtra in 1873 that addressed caste and gender injustices.</p>
<p>Golwalkar: M.S. Golwalkar was the second supreme leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing paramilitary organization that advanced the ideology of Hindu supremacy and mobilized around the transformation of India into a Hindu nation.</p>
<p>Pracharak: refers to a full-time organizer of the RSS.</p>
<p>Houston 2019: “Howdy Modi” was an event organized by the Texas India Forum to welcome Narendra Modi to Houston and featured a joint address by Modi and Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Ahmedabad 2020: designed as a reciprocal counterpart to Howdy Modi, “Namaste Trump” was an event organized to celebrate Donald Trump’s official state visit to India and hosted by Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.</p>
<p>Article 370: article of the Indian Constitution that granted a special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This status was abrogated by the Modi government in 2019.</p>
<p>CAA/NRC: the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) are policies introduced by the Modi government. The 2019 CAA fast-tracks the naturalization of populations identified as victims of persecution by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and explicitly excludes the eligibility of Muslims. The 2019 NRC aims to create an official record of legal citizens of India. Critics and human rights organizations argue that the policies together discriminate against Muslims. If a nationwide NRC is implemented, individuals who lack the required documentation to prove their citizenship could be excluded from the final registry. Because the CAA allows non-Muslims to claim citizenship if they fall through the cracks, Muslims left off the NRC list would face disproportionate risks of statelessness, detention, or deportation.</p>
<p>Edward Blum: a conservative legal strategist and the president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights and Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an organization that fought to overturn affirmative action on the grounds that it constitutes "reverse discrimination" against white and Asian applicants.</p>
<p><a href="https://americanstudies.yale.edu/people/daniel-hosang">Dan HoSang</a>: professor of American Studies at Yale University.</p>
<p>“Violent Majorities: Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism,” Recall this Book/New Books Network, Episodes <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/07/118-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-1-balmurli-natrajan-with-lori-allen-and-ajantha-subramanian/">118</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/14/119-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-2-natasha-roth-rowland-with-lori-ajantha/">119</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2024/01/04/120-violent-majorities-roundup-ajantha-lori-jp/">120</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/06/143-violent-majorities-2-1-peter-beinart-on-long-distance-israeli-ethnonationalism-la-as/">143</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/20/144-violent-majorities-2-2-subir-sinha-on-hindutva-as-long-distance-ethnonationalism/">144</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/03/06/145-violent-majorities-2-3-long-distance-ethnonationalism-roundup-la-as-jp/">145</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode features a conversation with Prachi and Ram, organizers with Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans and partners standing together in the fight against the rise of the transnational far right. After laying out Hindu supremacy as an ideology, we considered the different phases of consolidation of the Hindu right in the United States from its late 20th century orientation around homeland politics to its 21st century effort to forge a Hindu American identity, first through an alignment with U.S. civil rights organizations and then through a realignment with white supremacist forces. We delved more deeply into the role of caste within this formation, in particular the longstanding efforts of the Hindu right in both India and the U.S. to forge Hindu unity by opposing anticaste politics. This took us to a discussion of the Hindu right’s embrace of the pro-Israel lobby’s tactics, especially its weaponization of Hinduphobia as an echo of the weaponization of antisemitism, to battle criticisms of the Modi government in India, and the need to distinguish this from the real rise in both anti-Hindu and antisemitic sentiment. We ended with Savera’s efforts to forge a broad-based antiracist, left majority as a counterweight to the multiracial far right.</p>
<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/TCP-Episode-10-transcript.docx#asset:458781@1:url">Read the transcript</a></p>
<p><strong>Guests</strong></p>
<p>Prachi Patankar is a writer and activist based in New York. Her speaking and organizing is grounded in feminist, anti-caste, and solidarity commitments. Her writing has appeared in outlets including The Guardian, Indian Express, Al Jazeera, Women’s Studies Quarterly, and Jacobin. She has been interviewed in media including Democracy Now, Jewish Currents, and National Public Radio.</p>
<p>Ram Vishwanathan is an organizer with the Savera coalition based in New York City.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Savera, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">The Global VHP’s Trail of Violence</a>,” January 2024.</p>
<p>Savera, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">Cut From the Same Cloth: the VHP-A’s Ties To Its Indian Counterpart</a>,” April 2024.</p>
<p>Savera and Political Research Associates, “<a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/resources/reports/">HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry As Minority Rights</a>,” October 2024.</p>
<p>Jyotiba Phule: an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.</p>
<p>Satyashodhak Sangh: a social reform society founded by Jyotiba Phule in Pune, Maharashtra in 1873 that addressed caste and gender injustices.</p>
<p>Golwalkar: M.S. Golwalkar was the second supreme leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing paramilitary organization that advanced the ideology of Hindu supremacy and mobilized around the transformation of India into a Hindu nation.</p>
<p>Pracharak: refers to a full-time organizer of the RSS.</p>
<p>Houston 2019: “Howdy Modi” was an event organized by the Texas India Forum to welcome Narendra Modi to Houston and featured a joint address by Modi and Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Ahmedabad 2020: designed as a reciprocal counterpart to Howdy Modi, “Namaste Trump” was an event organized to celebrate Donald Trump’s official state visit to India and hosted by Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.</p>
<p>Article 370: article of the Indian Constitution that granted a special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This status was abrogated by the Modi government in 2019.</p>
<p>CAA/NRC: the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) are policies introduced by the Modi government. The 2019 CAA fast-tracks the naturalization of populations identified as victims of persecution by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and explicitly excludes the eligibility of Muslims. The 2019 NRC aims to create an official record of legal citizens of India. Critics and human rights organizations argue that the policies together discriminate against Muslims. If a nationwide NRC is implemented, individuals who lack the required documentation to prove their citizenship could be excluded from the final registry. Because the CAA allows non-Muslims to claim citizenship if they fall through the cracks, Muslims left off the NRC list would face disproportionate risks of statelessness, detention, or deportation.</p>
<p>Edward Blum: a conservative legal strategist and the president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights and Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an organization that fought to overturn affirmative action on the grounds that it constitutes "reverse discrimination" against white and Asian applicants.</p>
<p><a href="https://americanstudies.yale.edu/people/daniel-hosang">Dan HoSang</a>: professor of American Studies at Yale University.</p>
<p>“Violent Majorities: Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism,” Recall this Book/New Books Network, Episodes <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/07/118-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-1-balmurli-natrajan-with-lori-allen-and-ajantha-subramanian/">118</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/14/119-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-2-natasha-roth-rowland-with-lori-ajantha/">119</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2024/01/04/120-violent-majorities-roundup-ajantha-lori-jp/">120</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/06/143-violent-majorities-2-1-peter-beinart-on-long-distance-israeli-ethnonationalism-la-as/">143</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/20/144-violent-majorities-2-2-subir-sinha-on-hindutva-as-long-distance-ethnonationalism/">144</a>, <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/03/06/145-violent-majorities-2-3-long-distance-ethnonationalism-roundup-la-as-jp/">145</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71096602" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d479bc3d-f7f0-4b08-ae42-5b760402b478/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d479bc3d-f7f0-4b08-ae42-5b760402b478&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Diasporic Hindu Right with Savera</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode features a conversation with Prachi and Ram, organizers with Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans and partners standing together in the fight against the rise of the transnational far right. After laying out Hindu supremacy as an ideology, we considered the different phases of consolidation of the Hindu right in the United States from its late 20th century orientation around homeland politics to its 21st century effort to forge a Hindu American identity, first through an alignment with U.S. civil rights organizations and then through a realignment with white supremacist forces. We delved more deeply into the role of caste within this formation, in particular the longstanding efforts of the Hindu right in both India and the U.S. to forge Hindu unity by opposing anticaste politics. This took us to a discussion of the Hindu right’s embrace of the pro-Israel lobby’s tactics, especially its weaponization of Hinduphobia as an echo of the weaponization of antisemitism, to battle criticisms of the Modi government in India, and the need to distinguish this from the real rise in both anti-Hindu and antisemitic sentiment. We ended with Savera’s efforts to forge a broad-based antiracist, left majority as a counterweight to the multiracial far right.

Read the transcript

Guests

Prachi Patankar is a writer and activist based in New York. Her speaking and organizing is grounded in feminist, anti-caste, and solidarity commitments. Her writing has appeared in outlets including The Guardian, Indian Express, Al Jazeera, Women’s Studies Quarterly, and Jacobin. She has been interviewed in media including Democracy Now, Jewish Currents, and National Public Radio.

Ram Vishwanathan is an organizer with the Savera coalition based in New York City.

References

Savera, “The Global VHP’s Trail of Violence,” January 2024.

Savera, “Cut From the Same Cloth: the VHP-A’s Ties To Its Indian Counterpart,” April 2024.

Savera and Political Research Associates, “HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry As Minority Rights,” October 2024.

Jyotiba Phule: an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.

Satyashodhak Sangh: a social reform society founded by Jyotiba Phule in Pune, Maharashtra in 1873 that addressed caste and gender injustices.

Golwalkar: M.S. Golwalkar was the second supreme leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing paramilitary organization that advanced the ideology of Hindu supremacy and mobilized around the transformation of India into a Hindu nation.

Pracharak: refers to a full-time organizer of the RSS.

Houston 2019: “Howdy Modi” was an event organized by the Texas India Forum to welcome Narendra Modi to Houston and featured a joint address by Modi and Donald Trump.

Ahmedabad 2020: designed as a reciprocal counterpart to Howdy Modi, “Namaste Trump” was an event organized to celebrate Donald Trump’s official state visit to India and hosted by Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

Article 370: article of the Indian Constitution that granted a special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This status was abrogated by the Modi government in 2019.

CAA/NRC: the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) are policies introduced by the Modi government. The 2019 CAA fast-tracks the naturalization of populations identified as victims of persecution by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and explicitly excludes the eligibility of Muslims. The 2019 NRC aims to create an official record of legal citizens of India. Critics and human rights organizations argue that the policies together discriminate against Muslims. If a nationwide NRC is implemented, individuals who lack the required documentation to prove their citizenship could be excluded from the final registry. Because the CAA allows non-Muslims to claim citizenship if they fall through the cracks, Muslims left off the NRC list would face disproportionate risks of statelessness, detention, or deportation.

Edward Blum: a conservative legal strategist and the president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights and Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an organization that fought to overturn affirmative action on the grounds that it constitutes &quot;reverse discrimination&quot; against white and Asian applicants.

Dan HoSang: professor of American Studies at Yale University.

“Violent Majorities: Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism,” Recall this Book/New Books Network, Episodes 118, 119, 120, 143, 144, 145.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode features a conversation with Prachi and Ram, organizers with Savera, a multiracial, interfaith, anti-caste coalition of Indian Americans and partners standing together in the fight against the rise of the transnational far right. After laying out Hindu supremacy as an ideology, we considered the different phases of consolidation of the Hindu right in the United States from its late 20th century orientation around homeland politics to its 21st century effort to forge a Hindu American identity, first through an alignment with U.S. civil rights organizations and then through a realignment with white supremacist forces. We delved more deeply into the role of caste within this formation, in particular the longstanding efforts of the Hindu right in both India and the U.S. to forge Hindu unity by opposing anticaste politics. This took us to a discussion of the Hindu right’s embrace of the pro-Israel lobby’s tactics, especially its weaponization of Hinduphobia as an echo of the weaponization of antisemitism, to battle criticisms of the Modi government in India, and the need to distinguish this from the real rise in both anti-Hindu and antisemitic sentiment. We ended with Savera’s efforts to forge a broad-based antiracist, left majority as a counterweight to the multiracial far right.

Read the transcript

Guests

Prachi Patankar is a writer and activist based in New York. Her speaking and organizing is grounded in feminist, anti-caste, and solidarity commitments. Her writing has appeared in outlets including The Guardian, Indian Express, Al Jazeera, Women’s Studies Quarterly, and Jacobin. She has been interviewed in media including Democracy Now, Jewish Currents, and National Public Radio.

Ram Vishwanathan is an organizer with the Savera coalition based in New York City.

References

Savera, “The Global VHP’s Trail of Violence,” January 2024.

Savera, “Cut From the Same Cloth: the VHP-A’s Ties To Its Indian Counterpart,” April 2024.

Savera and Political Research Associates, “HAF Way to Supremacy: How the Hindu American Foundation Rebrands Bigotry As Minority Rights,” October 2024.

Jyotiba Phule: an anti-caste social reformer and writer from Maharashtra.

Satyashodhak Sangh: a social reform society founded by Jyotiba Phule in Pune, Maharashtra in 1873 that addressed caste and gender injustices.

Golwalkar: M.S. Golwalkar was the second supreme leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing paramilitary organization that advanced the ideology of Hindu supremacy and mobilized around the transformation of India into a Hindu nation.

Pracharak: refers to a full-time organizer of the RSS.

Houston 2019: “Howdy Modi” was an event organized by the Texas India Forum to welcome Narendra Modi to Houston and featured a joint address by Modi and Donald Trump.

Ahmedabad 2020: designed as a reciprocal counterpart to Howdy Modi, “Namaste Trump” was an event organized to celebrate Donald Trump’s official state visit to India and hosted by Narendra Modi in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

Article 370: article of the Indian Constitution that granted a special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. This status was abrogated by the Modi government in 2019.

CAA/NRC: the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) are policies introduced by the Modi government. The 2019 CAA fast-tracks the naturalization of populations identified as victims of persecution by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and explicitly excludes the eligibility of Muslims. The 2019 NRC aims to create an official record of legal citizens of India. Critics and human rights organizations argue that the policies together discriminate against Muslims. If a nationwide NRC is implemented, individuals who lack the required documentation to prove their citizenship could be excluded from the final registry. Because the CAA allows non-Muslims to claim citizenship if they fall through the cracks, Muslims left off the NRC list would face disproportionate risks of statelessness, detention, or deportation.

Edward Blum: a conservative legal strategist and the president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights and Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), an organization that fought to overturn affirmative action on the grounds that it constitutes &quot;reverse discrimination&quot; against white and Asian applicants.

Dan HoSang: professor of American Studies at Yale University.

“Violent Majorities: Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism,” Recall this Book/New Books Network, Episodes 118, 119, 120, 143, 144, 145.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>925</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67d346bc-62bc-11f1-8eaa-2f9b9fab3337</guid>
      <title>Margaret O’Mara on the Clintons, Tech, and Memory</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65264443" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aaa7d454-b8e0-40ff-b2b4-e35ce8151d39/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aaa7d454-b8e0-40ff-b2b4-e35ce8151d39&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Margaret O’Mara on the Clintons, Tech, and Memory</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We were joined by Professor Margaret O’Mara of the University of Washington, who had a front row seat to the Clinton campaign and went on to become an expert in the history of information technology and Silicon Valley.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>924</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">506d8c5a-6481-11f1-ad96-9b108160c4d5</guid>
      <title>Courtney Rickert McCaffrey et al., &quot;Geostrategy By Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in The New Era of Globalization&quot; (Disruption Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How should executives position a company for growth when the geopolitical future is so uncertain? Recent events in Ukraine and the Middle East and tightening restrictions on international trade and investment are reshaping the global business environment. History shows that any such era of change presents both challenges and opportunities. The authors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781633310735">⁠<em>Geostrategy by Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in the New Era of Globalization</em>⁠</a> (Disruption Books, 2024) use  examples, from historical global turning points to recent political disruptions, to illustrate how geostrategy is essential to surviving and succeeding in the next era of globalization.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should executives position a company for growth when the geopolitical future is so uncertain? Recent events in Ukraine and the Middle East and tightening restrictions on international trade and investment are reshaping the global business environment. History shows that any such era of change presents both challenges and opportunities. The authors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781633310735">⁠<em>Geostrategy by Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in the New Era of Globalization</em>⁠</a> (Disruption Books, 2024) use  examples, from historical global turning points to recent political disruptions, to illustrate how geostrategy is essential to surviving and succeeding in the next era of globalization.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62468116" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ce75af8d-2452-407b-a990-d8b9d1d279e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ce75af8d-2452-407b-a990-d8b9d1d279e7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Courtney Rickert McCaffrey et al., &quot;Geostrategy By Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in The New Era of Globalization&quot; (Disruption Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How should executives position a company for growth when the geopolitical future is so uncertain? Recent events in Ukraine and the Middle East and tightening restrictions on international trade and investment are reshaping the global business environment. History shows that any such era of change presents both challenges and opportunities. The authors of ⁠Geostrategy by Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in the New Era of Globalization⁠ (Disruption Books, 2024) use  examples, from historical global turning points to recent political disruptions, to illustrate how geostrategy is essential to surviving and succeeding in the next era of globalization.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How should executives position a company for growth when the geopolitical future is so uncertain? Recent events in Ukraine and the Middle East and tightening restrictions on international trade and investment are reshaping the global business environment. History shows that any such era of change presents both challenges and opportunities. The authors of ⁠Geostrategy by Design: How to Manage Geopolitical Risk in the New Era of Globalization⁠ (Disruption Books, 2024) use  examples, from historical global turning points to recent political disruptions, to illustrate how geostrategy is essential to surviving and succeeding in the next era of globalization.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>923</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58b65c76-5dcd-11f1-9a93-fbacdee2ff2b</guid>
      <title>Alex Law, &quot;The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment have often been claimed 
for sociology. But, what does it mean to say these thinkers were 
sociologists, or at the very least precursors to the subject? Does it, 
for example, mean that intellectuals of 18th Century Scotland
 had the same concerns as we do today? Alternatively, does it mean we 
should think of sociology as an elite discipline, developed by men who 
were attached to power, albeit with some often critical insights? In 
turn, if we accept these thinkers as doing something distinct, how can 
this sociologically be explained? These are the questions which animate 
Alex Law’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367491819"><em>The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2026). Structured around two sections, Sociology <em>and </em>the Scottish Enlightenment, as well as Sociology <em>of </em>the
 Scottish Enlightenment, Law sees these thinkers as thinking through 
what Elias would later call the civilising process. He so doing he 
explores how questions of state formation, violence and emerging 
commercial society structured their interest and how the particular 
position of Scotland, a stateless nation experiencing rebellion, 
provided the space for what he calls their ‘pre-sociology’.</p>
<p>In our podcast we discuss how Law’s attempt to see the Scottish 
Enlightenment thinks as concerned with the civilising process differs 
from other attempts to claim them for sociology, the legacy of the Act 
of Union for these writers and how one became a thinker in these times. 
We also discuss why Adam Smith is, for Law, an ‘ambivalent’ figure for 
sociology and what we can learn from these writers about the scope and 
historical insight sociology should have.</p>
<p>Your host, <a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/">Matt Dawson</a> is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5"><em>G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</em></a><em> </em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and co-editor of <a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb"><em>The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</em></a> (Anthem Press, 2026) along with other texts.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment have often been claimed 
for sociology. But, what does it mean to say these thinkers were 
sociologists, or at the very least precursors to the subject? Does it, 
for example, mean that intellectuals of 18th Century Scotland
 had the same concerns as we do today? Alternatively, does it mean we 
should think of sociology as an elite discipline, developed by men who 
were attached to power, albeit with some often critical insights? In 
turn, if we accept these thinkers as doing something distinct, how can 
this sociologically be explained? These are the questions which animate 
Alex Law’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367491819"><em>The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2026). Structured around two sections, Sociology <em>and </em>the Scottish Enlightenment, as well as Sociology <em>of </em>the
 Scottish Enlightenment, Law sees these thinkers as thinking through 
what Elias would later call the civilising process. He so doing he 
explores how questions of state formation, violence and emerging 
commercial society structured their interest and how the particular 
position of Scotland, a stateless nation experiencing rebellion, 
provided the space for what he calls their ‘pre-sociology’.</p>
<p>In our podcast we discuss how Law’s attempt to see the Scottish 
Enlightenment thinks as concerned with the civilising process differs 
from other attempts to claim them for sociology, the legacy of the Act 
of Union for these writers and how one became a thinker in these times. 
We also discuss why Adam Smith is, for Law, an ‘ambivalent’ figure for 
sociology and what we can learn from these writers about the scope and 
historical insight sociology should have.</p>
<p>Your host, <a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/mattdawson/">Matt Dawson</a> is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-75484-5"><em>G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation</em></a><em> </em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and co-editor of <a href="https://anthempress.com/books/the-anthem-companion-to-henri-lefebvre-hb"><em>The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre</em></a> (Anthem Press, 2026) along with other texts.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="84946070" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4d20d73c-9d2a-46ff-b794-51526d120f08/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4d20d73c-9d2a-46ff-b794-51526d120f08&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Law, &quot;The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment have often been claimed 
for sociology. But, what does it mean to say these thinkers were 
sociologists, or at the very least precursors to the subject? Does it, 
for example, mean that intellectuals of 18th Century Scotland
 had the same concerns as we do today? Alternatively, does it mean we 
should think of sociology as an elite discipline, developed by men who 
were attached to power, albeit with some often critical insights? In 
turn, if we accept these thinkers as doing something distinct, how can 
this sociologically be explained? These are the questions which animate 
Alex Law’s The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process (Routledge, 2026). Structured around two sections, Sociology and the Scottish Enlightenment, as well as Sociology of the
 Scottish Enlightenment, Law sees these thinkers as thinking through 
what Elias would later call the civilising process. He so doing he 
explores how questions of state formation, violence and emerging 
commercial society structured their interest and how the particular 
position of Scotland, a stateless nation experiencing rebellion, 
provided the space for what he calls their ‘pre-sociology’.

In our podcast we discuss how Law’s attempt to see the Scottish 
Enlightenment thinks as concerned with the civilising process differs 
from other attempts to claim them for sociology, the legacy of the Act 
of Union for these writers and how one became a thinker in these times. 
We also discuss why Adam Smith is, for Law, an ‘ambivalent’ figure for 
sociology and what we can learn from these writers about the scope and 
historical insight sociology should have.

Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (Anthem Press, 2026) along with other texts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment have often been claimed 
for sociology. But, what does it mean to say these thinkers were 
sociologists, or at the very least precursors to the subject? Does it, 
for example, mean that intellectuals of 18th Century Scotland
 had the same concerns as we do today? Alternatively, does it mean we 
should think of sociology as an elite discipline, developed by men who 
were attached to power, albeit with some often critical insights? In 
turn, if we accept these thinkers as doing something distinct, how can 
this sociologically be explained? These are the questions which animate 
Alex Law’s The Roots of Sociology: Scottish Enlightenment and the Civilising Process (Routledge, 2026). Structured around two sections, Sociology and the Scottish Enlightenment, as well as Sociology of the
 Scottish Enlightenment, Law sees these thinkers as thinking through 
what Elias would later call the civilising process. He so doing he 
explores how questions of state formation, violence and emerging 
commercial society structured their interest and how the particular 
position of Scotland, a stateless nation experiencing rebellion, 
provided the space for what he calls their ‘pre-sociology’.

In our podcast we discuss how Law’s attempt to see the Scottish 
Enlightenment thinks as concerned with the civilising process differs 
from other attempts to claim them for sociology, the legacy of the Act 
of Union for these writers and how one became a thinker in these times. 
We also discuss why Adam Smith is, for Law, an ‘ambivalent’ figure for 
sociology and what we can learn from these writers about the scope and 
historical insight sociology should have.

Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and co-editor of The Anthem Companion to Henri Lefebvre (Anthem Press, 2026) along with other texts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>922</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">307f5270-5b3a-11f1-a01b-673adb2b5bbc</guid>
      <title>The Predictable Shock of Brexit: Cultural Dissonance and the Rise of Populism with Iain Quinn</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Was Brexit really a sudden, populist shock, or was the writing on the wall for decades? This week on <em>International Horizons</em>, Eli Karetny sits down with award-winning cultural historian Prof. Iain Quinn to discuss his forthcoming book,<a href="https://www.lutterworth.com/product/cultural-dissonance-brexit-reconsidered/"> <em>Cultural Dissonance: Brexit Reconsidered</em></a>. Quinn dismantles the narrative that Leave voters were simply misled, arguing instead that the referendum was the inevitable boiling point of a deep, historical distrust in Westminster and the media. From the decline of serious policy debate to the modern reimagining of political parties like the GOP, this episode offers a profound new lens for understanding the ongoing democratic fragmentation in the West.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Brexit really a sudden, populist shock, or was the writing on the wall for decades? This week on <em>International Horizons</em>, Eli Karetny sits down with award-winning cultural historian Prof. Iain Quinn to discuss his forthcoming book,<a href="https://www.lutterworth.com/product/cultural-dissonance-brexit-reconsidered/"> <em>Cultural Dissonance: Brexit Reconsidered</em></a>. Quinn dismantles the narrative that Leave voters were simply misled, arguing instead that the referendum was the inevitable boiling point of a deep, historical distrust in Westminster and the media. From the decline of serious policy debate to the modern reimagining of political parties like the GOP, this episode offers a profound new lens for understanding the ongoing democratic fragmentation in the West.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29315249" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/14945e67-a41e-4252-abd6-6234acdeee0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=14945e67-a41e-4252-abd6-6234acdeee0a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Predictable Shock of Brexit: Cultural Dissonance and the Rise of Populism with Iain Quinn</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Was Brexit really a sudden, populist shock, or was the writing on the wall for decades? This week on International Horizons, Eli Karetny sits down with award-winning cultural historian Prof. Iain Quinn to discuss his forthcoming book, Cultural Dissonance: Brexit Reconsidered. Quinn dismantles the narrative that Leave voters were simply misled, arguing instead that the referendum was the inevitable boiling point of a deep, historical distrust in Westminster and the media. From the decline of serious policy debate to the modern reimagining of political parties like the GOP, this episode offers a profound new lens for understanding the ongoing democratic fragmentation in the West.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Was Brexit really a sudden, populist shock, or was the writing on the wall for decades? This week on International Horizons, Eli Karetny sits down with award-winning cultural historian Prof. Iain Quinn to discuss his forthcoming book, Cultural Dissonance: Brexit Reconsidered. Quinn dismantles the narrative that Leave voters were simply misled, arguing instead that the referendum was the inevitable boiling point of a deep, historical distrust in Westminster and the media. From the decline of serious policy debate to the modern reimagining of political parties like the GOP, this episode offers a profound new lens for understanding the ongoing democratic fragmentation in the West.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>921</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d39e0cac-5aaa-11f1-a69b-bbb6bc6f3b29</guid>
      <title>Gary Hoover, &quot;Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621"><em>﻿Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026)﻿, Gary Hoover asks the reader a simple question: Is our economy a ladder or a lottery? Are people able to control their position on the economic spectrum by their actions? Some argue that, in our market-based economy, if you play by certain rules and make certain choices, you'll achieve upward mobility no matter what economic position you were born into.</p>
<p>Drawing on his vast economic expertise, Hoover explores what this "social contract" requires of its citizens, and what it offers in return. Hoover shows how civil unrest is often directly related to broken society-level promises, exploring protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Arab Spring, and student debt forgiveness as case studies. He also predicts where future protests can be expected if results promised are not results delivered.﻿</p>
<p>This insightful and data-driven book tackles challenging issues around 
income inequality, health care, and artificial intelligence, and ultimately equips readers to answer these pressing questions: Is our social contract a ladder to higher economic standing, accessible to all no matter where they start? Or rather a lottery in which many will buy a ticket but only a few will find success? And how can we best align social promises with our lived economic realities?</p>
<p>﻿Gary Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p>﻿﻿Dr. Zachery Williams is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of African and African American Studies at LSU.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621"><em>﻿Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026)﻿, Gary Hoover asks the reader a simple question: Is our economy a ladder or a lottery? Are people able to control their position on the economic spectrum by their actions? Some argue that, in our market-based economy, if you play by certain rules and make certain choices, you'll achieve upward mobility no matter what economic position you were born into.</p>
<p>Drawing on his vast economic expertise, Hoover explores what this "social contract" requires of its citizens, and what it offers in return. Hoover shows how civil unrest is often directly related to broken society-level promises, exploring protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Arab Spring, and student debt forgiveness as case studies. He also predicts where future protests can be expected if results promised are not results delivered.﻿</p>
<p>This insightful and data-driven book tackles challenging issues around 
income inequality, health care, and artificial intelligence, and ultimately equips readers to answer these pressing questions: Is our social contract a ladder to higher economic standing, accessible to all no matter where they start? Or rather a lottery in which many will buy a ticket but only a few will find success? And how can we best align social promises with our lived economic realities?</p>
<p>﻿Gary Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p>﻿﻿Dr. Zachery Williams is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of African and African American Studies at LSU.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68783542" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f06ceaa2-a20f-405a-acb6-198b7a701b91/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f06ceaa2-a20f-405a-acb6-198b7a701b91&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary Hoover, &quot;Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In ﻿Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026)﻿, Gary Hoover asks the reader a simple question: Is our economy a ladder or a lottery? Are people able to control their position on the economic spectrum by their actions? Some argue that, in our market-based economy, if you play by certain rules and make certain choices, you&apos;ll achieve upward mobility no matter what economic position you were born into.

Drawing on his vast economic expertise, Hoover explores what this &quot;social contract&quot; requires of its citizens, and what it offers in return. Hoover shows how civil unrest is often directly related to broken society-level promises, exploring protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Arab Spring, and student debt forgiveness as case studies. He also predicts where future protests can be expected if results promised are not results delivered.﻿

This insightful and data-driven book tackles challenging issues around 
income inequality, health care, and artificial intelligence, and ultimately equips readers to answer these pressing questions: Is our social contract a ladder to higher economic standing, accessible to all no matter where they start? Or rather a lottery in which many will buy a ticket but only a few will find success? And how can we best align social promises with our lived economic realities?

﻿Gary Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.

﻿﻿Dr. Zachery Williams is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of African and African American Studies at LSU.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In ﻿Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026)﻿, Gary Hoover asks the reader a simple question: Is our economy a ladder or a lottery? Are people able to control their position on the economic spectrum by their actions? Some argue that, in our market-based economy, if you play by certain rules and make certain choices, you&apos;ll achieve upward mobility no matter what economic position you were born into.

Drawing on his vast economic expertise, Hoover explores what this &quot;social contract&quot; requires of its citizens, and what it offers in return. Hoover shows how civil unrest is often directly related to broken society-level promises, exploring protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street, the Tea Party, the Arab Spring, and student debt forgiveness as case studies. He also predicts where future protests can be expected if results promised are not results delivered.﻿

This insightful and data-driven book tackles challenging issues around 
income inequality, health care, and artificial intelligence, and ultimately equips readers to answer these pressing questions: Is our social contract a ladder to higher economic standing, accessible to all no matter where they start? Or rather a lottery in which many will buy a ticket but only a few will find success? And how can we best align social promises with our lived economic realities?

﻿Gary Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.

﻿﻿Dr. Zachery Williams is an Adjunct Professor in the Department of African and African American Studies at LSU.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>920</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d01e952-5a64-11f1-b8f0-5ff6ac6768e7</guid>
      <title>India’s 2026 State Elections and Indian Democracy?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Maya Tudor speaks with two keen observers of Indian politics, Gilles Verniers and Yamini Aiyar, about what India’s 2026 state elections reveal about the future of the world’s largest democracy.</p>
<p>Why did the incumbent government BJP make major gains in some states while struggling in others? Do competitive elections still mean democracy is entirely healthy? And why have places like Tamil Nadu and Kerala remained resistant to Hindu nationalist politics? This episode analyses one of the most important democratic stories in the world right now — and asks what state elections might tell us about India’s democracy more broadly.</p>
<p>Gilles Verniers, Centre for South Asia at Stanford University. ﻿Gilles Verniers’ work on Indian politics and elections <a href="https://csa.stanford.edu/people/gilles-verniers">here</a>﻿<br />﻿Yamini Aiyar, Visiting Professor of the Practice at the Watson School of International and Public Affairs, Brown University. ﻿Yamini Aiyar’s recent writing on democracy and electoral administration in India <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/">here</a>﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, Maya Tudor speaks with two keen observers of Indian politics, Gilles Verniers and Yamini Aiyar, about what India’s 2026 state elections reveal about the future of the world’s largest democracy.</p>
<p>Why did the incumbent government BJP make major gains in some states while struggling in others? Do competitive elections still mean democracy is entirely healthy? And why have places like Tamil Nadu and Kerala remained resistant to Hindu nationalist politics? This episode analyses one of the most important democratic stories in the world right now — and asks what state elections might tell us about India’s democracy more broadly.</p>
<p>Gilles Verniers, Centre for South Asia at Stanford University. ﻿Gilles Verniers’ work on Indian politics and elections <a href="https://csa.stanford.edu/people/gilles-verniers">here</a>﻿<br />﻿Yamini Aiyar, Visiting Professor of the Practice at the Watson School of International and Public Affairs, Brown University. ﻿Yamini Aiyar’s recent writing on democracy and electoral administration in India <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/">here</a>﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37569133" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/02e892e8-2bc9-4e8a-b845-5f084577024e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=02e892e8-2bc9-4e8a-b845-5f084577024e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>India’s 2026 State Elections and Indian Democracy?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Maya Tudor speaks with two keen observers of Indian politics, Gilles Verniers and Yamini Aiyar, about what India’s 2026 state elections reveal about the future of the world’s largest democracy.

Why did the incumbent government BJP make major gains in some states while struggling in others? Do competitive elections still mean democracy is entirely healthy? And why have places like Tamil Nadu and Kerala remained resistant to Hindu nationalist politics? This episode analyses one of the most important democratic stories in the world right now — and asks what state elections might tell us about India’s democracy more broadly.

Gilles Verniers, Centre for South Asia at Stanford University. ﻿Gilles Verniers’ work on Indian politics and elections here﻿﻿Yamini Aiyar, Visiting Professor of the Practice at the Watson School of International and Public Affairs, Brown University. ﻿Yamini Aiyar’s recent writing on democracy and electoral administration in India here﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, Maya Tudor speaks with two keen observers of Indian politics, Gilles Verniers and Yamini Aiyar, about what India’s 2026 state elections reveal about the future of the world’s largest democracy.

Why did the incumbent government BJP make major gains in some states while struggling in others? Do competitive elections still mean democracy is entirely healthy? And why have places like Tamil Nadu and Kerala remained resistant to Hindu nationalist politics? This episode analyses one of the most important democratic stories in the world right now — and asks what state elections might tell us about India’s democracy more broadly.

Gilles Verniers, Centre for South Asia at Stanford University. ﻿Gilles Verniers’ work on Indian politics and elections here﻿﻿Yamini Aiyar, Visiting Professor of the Practice at the Watson School of International and Public Affairs, Brown University. ﻿Yamini Aiyar’s recent writing on democracy and electoral administration in India here﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>919</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfbfb5b2-5a60-11f1-a690-b75fa981ed8d</guid>
      <title>H. A. Drake, &quot;The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197777374"><em>The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World </em>﻿</a>﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) is about four cornerstones of modern thought that were put in place by people living in the ancient Mediterranean world. It covers approximately 2,000 years in time (from ca. 1000 BCE to 1000 CE) and spatially moves from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia (roughly, modern Iraq), through Greece and Rome, to the new Germanic states growing in what is now western Europe.</p>
<p>The four ideas, as author H. A. Drake proposes, are monotheism, the idea that there is only one god, not many; individual rights, the idea that there is a limit to what the state can order us to do; naturalized citizenship, the idea that the full rights and privileges of citizenship can be extended to people who have no birthright to them; and creation of a standard by which to judge the performance of states. It is easy, now, to take these ideas for granted. For believers, it seems obvious that only a singular, omnipotent deity can account for the splendour of the universe. Similarly, the common notion that individuals can stand up for their rights, that citizenship can be freely given, or that governments ought to be held to a standard of justice for all, is often accompanied by the assumption that, at the time they were introduced, such ideas must have been immediately recognized as superior and gratefully accepted. The record is far more complicated, and that makes the story of their success far more interesting. By discussing these ideas in their historical context with clarity and wit, <em>The Wisdom of the Ancients</em> reminds readers how preposterous they were originally and how different our world would be if they had not taken hold.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197777374"><em>The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World </em>﻿</a>﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) is about four cornerstones of modern thought that were put in place by people living in the ancient Mediterranean world. It covers approximately 2,000 years in time (from ca. 1000 BCE to 1000 CE) and spatially moves from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia (roughly, modern Iraq), through Greece and Rome, to the new Germanic states growing in what is now western Europe.</p>
<p>The four ideas, as author H. A. Drake proposes, are monotheism, the idea that there is only one god, not many; individual rights, the idea that there is a limit to what the state can order us to do; naturalized citizenship, the idea that the full rights and privileges of citizenship can be extended to people who have no birthright to them; and creation of a standard by which to judge the performance of states. It is easy, now, to take these ideas for granted. For believers, it seems obvious that only a singular, omnipotent deity can account for the splendour of the universe. Similarly, the common notion that individuals can stand up for their rights, that citizenship can be freely given, or that governments ought to be held to a standard of justice for all, is often accompanied by the assumption that, at the time they were introduced, such ideas must have been immediately recognized as superior and gratefully accepted. The record is far more complicated, and that makes the story of their success far more interesting. By discussing these ideas in their historical context with clarity and wit, <em>The Wisdom of the Ancients</em> reminds readers how preposterous they were originally and how different our world would be if they had not taken hold.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="89682925" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ed966113-b51f-4832-983b-765d22459a21/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ed966113-b51f-4832-983b-765d22459a21&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>H. A. Drake, &quot;The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:33:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World ﻿﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) is about four cornerstones of modern thought that were put in place by people living in the ancient Mediterranean world. It covers approximately 2,000 years in time (from ca. 1000 BCE to 1000 CE) and spatially moves from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia (roughly, modern Iraq), through Greece and Rome, to the new Germanic states growing in what is now western Europe.

The four ideas, as author H. A. Drake proposes, are monotheism, the idea that there is only one god, not many; individual rights, the idea that there is a limit to what the state can order us to do; naturalized citizenship, the idea that the full rights and privileges of citizenship can be extended to people who have no birthright to them; and creation of a standard by which to judge the performance of states. It is easy, now, to take these ideas for granted. For believers, it seems obvious that only a singular, omnipotent deity can account for the splendour of the universe. Similarly, the common notion that individuals can stand up for their rights, that citizenship can be freely given, or that governments ought to be held to a standard of justice for all, is often accompanied by the assumption that, at the time they were introduced, such ideas must have been immediately recognized as superior and gratefully accepted. The record is far more complicated, and that makes the story of their success far more interesting. By discussing these ideas in their historical context with clarity and wit, The Wisdom of the Ancients reminds readers how preposterous they were originally and how different our world would be if they had not taken hold.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Wisdom of the Ancients: Four Ideas That Changed the World ﻿﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) is about four cornerstones of modern thought that were put in place by people living in the ancient Mediterranean world. It covers approximately 2,000 years in time (from ca. 1000 BCE to 1000 CE) and spatially moves from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia (roughly, modern Iraq), through Greece and Rome, to the new Germanic states growing in what is now western Europe.

The four ideas, as author H. A. Drake proposes, are monotheism, the idea that there is only one god, not many; individual rights, the idea that there is a limit to what the state can order us to do; naturalized citizenship, the idea that the full rights and privileges of citizenship can be extended to people who have no birthright to them; and creation of a standard by which to judge the performance of states. It is easy, now, to take these ideas for granted. For believers, it seems obvious that only a singular, omnipotent deity can account for the splendour of the universe. Similarly, the common notion that individuals can stand up for their rights, that citizenship can be freely given, or that governments ought to be held to a standard of justice for all, is often accompanied by the assumption that, at the time they were introduced, such ideas must have been immediately recognized as superior and gratefully accepted. The record is far more complicated, and that makes the story of their success far more interesting. By discussing these ideas in their historical context with clarity and wit, The Wisdom of the Ancients reminds readers how preposterous they were originally and how different our world would be if they had not taken hold.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>918</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10c9dea0-58ba-11f1-9069-37e3c63ecd5a</guid>
      <title>The Instigators</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063424876">The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them</a> (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.</p>
<p><em>The Instigators</em> is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.</p>
<p>Our guest is: <a href="https://atima-omara.com/about/">Atima Omara,</a> who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of <em>The Instigators.</em></p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the <em>Academic Life</em> podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url">We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance#entry:439509@1:url">Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-Presidents Black Wife</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leading-from-the-margins#entry:308703@1:url">Leading From The Margins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/black-woman-on-board#entry:343629@1:url">Black Woman On Board</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-to-help-girls-achieve#entry:39407@1:url">How Girls Achieve</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url">Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063424876">The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them</a> (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.</p>
<p><em>The Instigators</em> is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.</p>
<p>Our guest is: <a href="https://atima-omara.com/about/">Atima Omara,</a> who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of <em>The Instigators.</em></p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the <em>Academic Life</em> podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url">We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance#entry:439509@1:url">Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-Presidents Black Wife</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url">Never Caught</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leading-from-the-margins#entry:308703@1:url">Leading From The Margins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-detective-work-of-research-a-conversation-with-polly-e-bugros-mclean#entry:49426@1:url">Remembering Lucille</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/black-woman-on-board#entry:343629@1:url">Black Woman On Board</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-to-help-girls-achieve#entry:39407@1:url">How Girls Achieve</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stuck-how-money-media-and-violence-prevent-change-in-congress#entry:446275@1:url">Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49926896" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/bab10bf8-5244-459b-9a31-2cd884fc742a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=bab10bf8-5244-459b-9a31-2cd884fc742a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Instigators</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.

The Instigators is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.

Our guest is: Atima Omara, who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of The Instigators.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.

Playlist for listeners:


  We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance

  Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide

  The End of White Politics

  The Vice-Presidents Black Wife

  Never Caught

  Leading From The Margins

  Remembering Lucille

  Black Woman On Board

  How Girls Achieve

  Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress


Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Black women have always been the most relentless instigators for change—building a democracy for all. In The Instigators: How Black Women Have Been Essential to American Democracy (And What We Can Learn from Them (Harper, 2026), Atima Omara draws on her political knowledge and expertise, as well as history, to examine how they have responded to failed strategic decisions by movement leaders and the modern Democratic Party in previous elections as a context for the present. She also provides actionable recommendations to organizers, donors, candidates, strategists, political party leaders, that everyday people can use in their communities to build an inclusive democracy that endures beyond one election cycle.

The Instigators is at once an urgent political guide, historical exploration, and a poignant memoir that pulls from Omara’s two decades of work in Democratic politics and the progressive movement as an elected Democratic Party leader, movement organizer, former candidate, gubernatorial aide, campaign staff to candidates at the national, state, and local level; and now political strategist. Powerful, insightful, and practical, it is imperative reading for everyone eager to protect and rebuild our democracy and create a better tomorrow for all.

Our guest is: Atima Omara, who works and leads at the intersection of electoral politics and issue advocacy in the progressive movement. She is a political strategist, advocate, trainer, leader, and speaker with significant political, government, and non-profit experience, and she is a sought-after commentator and strategist. She is the author of The Instigators.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is a writing coach and developmental editor for academics. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.

Playlist for listeners:


  We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance

  Reproductive Justice: An Essential Guide

  The End of White Politics

  The Vice-Presidents Black Wife

  Never Caught

  Leading From The Margins

  Remembering Lucille

  Black Woman On Board

  How Girls Achieve

  Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress


Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>917</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e66cafc-580d-11f1-b9a0-df70a08aa23a</guid>
      <title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/">article</a> in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, <em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em> and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5">recent book</a> <em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/">article</a> in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, <em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em> and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5">recent book</a> <em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34702576" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a509b06d-3c72-4710-9ad2-e29b1196bc1d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a509b06d-3c72-4710-9ad2-e29b1196bc1d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.

Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.

Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.

Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.

Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>916</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bb9e5d4-5802-11f1-9f7e-6b3004f0cc5f</guid>
      <title>Billionaire Backlash: Can It Help Save Democracy?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, host Maya Tudor speaks with her colleague and fellow political scientist Pepper Culpepper about his new book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How It Could Save Democracy</a><em>, co-authored with Taeku Lee</em>. They explore how corporate scandals—from industry exposes to data privacy breaches—can become moments of democratic reckoning, mobilizing public outrage against concentrated corporate power. The conversation examines why scandals matter politically, the circumstances under which public backlash can still generate meaningful accountability, and what good populism is in an era of growing economic inequality and democratic strain.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>Bloomsbury <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/billionaire-backlash-9781399424110/">here</a></p>
<p>Journal of Democracy <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/when-populism-can-be-good/">here</a>﻿﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>Democracy Dialogues</em>, host Maya Tudor speaks with her colleague and fellow political scientist Pepper Culpepper about his new book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How It Could Save Democracy</a><em>, co-authored with Taeku Lee</em>. They explore how corporate scandals—from industry exposes to data privacy breaches—can become moments of democratic reckoning, mobilizing public outrage against concentrated corporate power. The conversation examines why scandals matter politically, the circumstances under which public backlash can still generate meaningful accountability, and what good populism is in an era of growing economic inequality and democratic strain.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>Bloomsbury <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/billionaire-backlash-9781399424110/">here</a></p>
<p>Journal of Democracy <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/when-populism-can-be-good/">here</a>﻿﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43132840" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/347eade8-2ff8-4c7b-9bf1-d76c40a694fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=347eade8-2ff8-4c7b-9bf1-d76c40a694fd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Billionaire Backlash: Can It Help Save Democracy?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with her colleague and fellow political scientist Pepper Culpepper about his new book Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How It Could Save Democracy, co-authored with Taeku Lee. They explore how corporate scandals—from industry exposes to data privacy breaches—can become moments of democratic reckoning, mobilizing public outrage against concentrated corporate power. The conversation examines why scandals matter politically, the circumstances under which public backlash can still generate meaningful accountability, and what good populism is in an era of growing economic inequality and democratic strain.

Links:

Bloomsbury here

Journal of Democracy here﻿﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with her colleague and fellow political scientist Pepper Culpepper about his new book Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How It Could Save Democracy, co-authored with Taeku Lee. They explore how corporate scandals—from industry exposes to data privacy breaches—can become moments of democratic reckoning, mobilizing public outrage against concentrated corporate power. The conversation examines why scandals matter politically, the circumstances under which public backlash can still generate meaningful accountability, and what good populism is in an era of growing economic inequality and democratic strain.

Links:

Bloomsbury here

Journal of Democracy here﻿﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>915</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">404065e4-580d-11f1-bde4-67136e8021c5</guid>
      <title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/">article</a> in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, <em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em> and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5">recent book</a> <em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-elected-leaders-subvert-democracy/">article</a> in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, <em>“Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,”</em> and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOor3LYjQcQ6O5cd0lIyChVSCCrz82lqOSUi3TjhgTJrI5kb_Bpa5">recent book</a> <em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.</p>
<p><a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Stokes-transcript.docx#asset:457629@1">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34702576" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e429f71a-0b15-44f6-a422-ccbe1463548d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e429f71a-0b15-44f6-a422-ccbe1463548d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.

Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.

Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think about threats to democracy, we often imagine dramatic breakdowns—military coups, constitutional crises, or sudden collapses. But today, a common danger is slower and less visible: democratic erosion driven by elected leaders themselves. Across different regions, presidents and prime ministers are weakening institutions, undermining accountability, and reshaping the rules of the game from within. Why is this happening now, and why do voters sometimes tolerate it?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Susan Stokes about her article in the Journal of Democracy, “Why Elected Leaders Subvert Democracy,” and what it reveals about the changing nature of democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century. Drawing on this work, as well as her recent book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2025), the conversation explores how rising inequality, shifting party systems, and deepening polarisation create openings for backsliding leaders, and how strategies such as “democratic trash talk” can erode public trust in institutions.

Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on democratic theory, distributive politics, and comparative political behaviour.

Temitayo Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and reshaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>914</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e220d94-575e-11f1-ba64-136e5aeca588</guid>
      <title>Julia F. Irwin, &quot;Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677231"><em>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century</em></a><em> </em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as "natural disasters"—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.</p><p>Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, <em>Catastrophic Diplomacy</em> demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.</p><p>Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, <em>Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening</em> (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677231"><em>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century</em></a><em> </em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as "natural disasters"—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.</p><p>Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, <em>Catastrophic Diplomacy</em> demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.</p><p>Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, <em>Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening</em> (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52819951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/29f369a0-36a9-4bd8-bf2a-878aa6fd096d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=29f369a0-36a9-4bd8-bf2a-878aa6fd096d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia F. Irwin, &quot;Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century (UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as &quot;natural disasters&quot;—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.
Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, Catastrophic Diplomacy demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.
Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Catastrophic Diplomacy: US Foreign Disaster Assistance in the American Century (UNC Press, 2023) offers a sweeping history of US foreign disaster assistance, highlighting its centrality to twentieth-century US foreign relations. Spanning over seventy years, from the dawn of the twentieth century to the mid-1970s, it examines how the US government, US military, and their partners in the American voluntary sector responded to major catastrophes around the world. Focusing on US responses to sudden disasters caused by earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods—crises commonly known as &quot;natural disasters&quot;—historian Julia F. Irwin highlights the complex and messy politics of emergency humanitarian relief.
Deftly weaving together diplomatic, environmental, military, and humanitarian histories, Irwin tracks the rise of US disaster aid as a tool of foreign policy, showing how and why the US foreign policy establishment first began contributing aid to survivors of international catastrophes. While the book focuses mainly on bilateral assistance efforts, it also assesses the broader international context in which the US government and its auxiliaries operated, situating their humanitarian responses against the aid efforts of other nations, empires, and international organizations. At its most fundamental level, Catastrophic Diplomacy demonstrates the importance of international disaster assistance—and humanitarian aid more broadly—to US foreign affairs.
Julia F. Irwin, PhD, Yale University, 2009, is professor of history at Louisiana State University. Her research focuses on the place of humanitarian aid in twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations. Her first book, Making the World Safe: The American Red Cross and a Nation’s Humanitarian Awakening (2013), is a history of U.S. international relief efforts during the World War I era; the dissertation on which it is based won the Betty M. Unterberger Dissertation Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93b7dd4a-5765-11f1-aa74-f3b8f2e85631</guid>
      <title>Oscar Winberg, &quot;Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, <em>All In The Family</em>, landed on American television screens. <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President</em></a> examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when <em>All in the Family</em> first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.</p>
<p>As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show <em>All in the Family</em> is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting <em>All in the Family</em>. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing <em>All in the Family </em>with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.</p>
<p>There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as <em>All in the Family</em> that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the <em>Mary Tyler Moore Show</em> to <em>M*A*S*H</em> to <em>Maude</em>. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in <em>All in the Family</em>, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.</p>
<p>In some sense, <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a> is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how <em>All in the Family</em> remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before <em>All in the Family</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a>. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, <em>All In The Family</em>, landed on American television screens. <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President</em></a> examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when <em>All in the Family</em> first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.</p>
<p>As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show <em>All in the Family</em> is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting <em>All in the Family</em>. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing <em>All in the Family </em>with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.</p>
<p>There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as <em>All in the Family</em> that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the <em>Mary Tyler Moore Show</em> to <em>M*A*S*H</em> to <em>Maude</em>. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in <em>All in the Family</em>, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.</p>
<p>In some sense, <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469690902/archie-bunker-for-president/"><em>Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics</em></a> is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how <em>All in the Family</em> remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before <em>All in the Family</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47113640" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6726d2f7-20f7-4f2f-990f-5a45ffa06373/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6726d2f7-20f7-4f2f-990f-5a45ffa06373&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Oscar Winberg, &quot;Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, All In The Family, landed on American television screens. Archie Bunker for President examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when All in the Family first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.

As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show All in the Family is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting All in the Family. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing All in the Family with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.

There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as All in the Family that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the Mary Tyler Moore Show to M*A*S*H to Maude. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in All in the Family, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.

In some sense, Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how All in the Family remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before All in the Family.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political historian Oscar Winberg has a fascinating new book titled Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics. This book weaves together quite a few different threads in examining the historical context in which the television show, All In The Family, landed on American television screens. Archie Bunker for President examines why this particular sitcom was a kind of inflection point within U.S. politics, within the media landscape at the time and moving forward, and how television production shifted and changed around this one particular television series. Winberg also lays out the path from the early 1970s, when All in the Family first aired, to our contemporary political moment, when celebrity and politics seem to be inescapably intertwined.

As Winberg notes in our conversation, television as an entity is inherently conservative, since the functional model was about appealing to the lowest common denominator so that advertisers would be willing to pay for time during shows. In order to reach the most viewers, at least in the age of network television, the television series needed to appeal to the largest market possible, and not “turn off” viewers. What happens in the late 1960s and early 1970s with the television show All in the Family is that this dynamic shifts, and the case is made that it isn’t about reaching the most people, but about reaching the people who have the means and inclination to purchase what the advertisers are selling. This is part of the pitch that Norman Lear makes, that CBS executive Bob Wood finally decides to gamble on by greenlighting All in the Family. The dynamic inside the show itself is to focus on politics: to have the characters within the series discuss different political issues, and engage with the impacts of these issues, from women’s rights and reproductive health to homosexuality to racism and the anti-war movement. In designing All in the Family with Archie Bunker (played by Carroll O’Conner) clearly defined as a conservative and as a bigot, and with Archie’s daughter, Gloria Stivic (played by Sally Struthers) and son in law, Mike Stivic (played by Rob Reiner), as liberals and politically active, the show embedded politics within the narrative. Edith Bunker, played by Jean Stapleton, was an enthusiastic supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was making its way through the ratification process while the series was airing, providing yet another avenue for political discussion within the show’s structure.

There were quite a few other shows that were developed at the same time as All in the Family that took up similarly political themes in iconic ways, from the Mary Tyler Moore Show to M*A*S*H to Maude. Political conversations were the fabric of these shows in much the same way as in All in the Family, where characters find themselves experiencing dimensions of politics in their lives and they discuss this with friends and family within the narrative construction. This also translated to Americans discussing these shows with each other at dinner, or at the “water cooler”, or at the beauty parlor or barbershop. Given the structure of television in the 1970s and 1980s, before cable and streaming services, options were more limited options, and many of these shows had great writers, actors, and showrunners. This was “appointment television” because there was no way to record or otherwise go back and watch the episode. Episodes were only available at their regularly scheduled time and day—which also meant that lots and lots of Americans were watching the same show at the same time.

In some sense, Archie Bunker for President: How One Television Show Remade American Politics is not only about how one television show remade American politics, but also about how All in the Family remade American television, opening up the networks to developing and airing television shows that integrate politics (of all kinds) into the narratives. There is still quite a lot of television, particularly network television, that is pitched to the broadest possible audience, but the narratives in police procedurals or hospital-centered series or sitcoms integrate different dimensions of politics into their storylines in ways that had not been done before All in the Family.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>810</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4360ab7a-54cb-11f1-8335-4fc65519f4d6</guid>
      <title>Erica Bornstein, &quot;A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India&apos;s Nonprofit Sector&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Erica Bornstein, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Oregon (and Divisional Associate Dean), has a new book that delves into the regulatory reforms within the nonprofit sector in India. These reforms transpired over more than a decade, and Bornstein spent extended time developing this ethnographic study of not only the changes, but the institutional structures that manage nonprofit organizations and how the various regulatory decisions are made. The research explores the ways in which these changes happened, exploring the various actors within the discussions, and evaluating the process of change within the nonprofit sector in India. <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector</em></a> (Stanford UP, 2025) is a deeply researched undertaking, paying attention not only to the shifts and changes that were happening in New Delhi, at the seat of the national government, but also in towns and communities in other parts of India, where similar dialogue and processes were also happening, and where the results of so many of these changes could be seen as they moved into implementation. In order to think through the analysis in <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules</em></a> we must also think about the nonprofit sector as a significant part of political structure in India (and elsewhere). As we discuss in our conversation, there are essentially three sectors, the government or the public sector, the private sector, and the nonprofit sector. Each sector is managed differently and operates towards different ends. But part of the role of the nonprofit sector is to provide capacity where the public sector may not be able to or is not able to fulfill demands.</p>
<p>This space, where the rules and regulations are being revised, reformed, and rewritten is where, in a very interesting way, democracy is happening. These are civil society organizations, embedded within the structure of political and economic outcomes, but distinct from both sectors. Since these groups are not aiming at making a profit, the regulatory regime is in a kind of counterpoint to capitalism, and thus in need of different kinds of rules regimes. This is where various stakeholders are coming together to negotiate with each as to how best to manage nonprofits, which are not all the same by any measure, and have different goals, different funding streams, different processes, and different policy formats. This makes the process of regulation complex, since there are constellations of parts that fall under differing kinds of management.</p>
<p>This undertaking, designing modes of regulation and policy processes, is not an exercise in creating red tape as much as it is designing processes to achieve important goals and capacities. Bornstein explains that writing policy of this kind, that writing laws is actually writing the future, or as she notes in the book, “writing the horizon”—writing <em>what will happen</em>. With this in mind, <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector</em></a> provides the reader with a fascinating exploration of how these organizations operate and how they can best be managed, especially with the aim of achieving benefits for individuals and society as a whole.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erica Bornstein, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Oregon (and Divisional Associate Dean), has a new book that delves into the regulatory reforms within the nonprofit sector in India. These reforms transpired over more than a decade, and Bornstein spent extended time developing this ethnographic study of not only the changes, but the institutional structures that manage nonprofit organizations and how the various regulatory decisions are made. The research explores the ways in which these changes happened, exploring the various actors within the discussions, and evaluating the process of change within the nonprofit sector in India. <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector</em></a> (Stanford UP, 2025) is a deeply researched undertaking, paying attention not only to the shifts and changes that were happening in New Delhi, at the seat of the national government, but also in towns and communities in other parts of India, where similar dialogue and processes were also happening, and where the results of so many of these changes could be seen as they moved into implementation. In order to think through the analysis in <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules</em></a> we must also think about the nonprofit sector as a significant part of political structure in India (and elsewhere). As we discuss in our conversation, there are essentially three sectors, the government or the public sector, the private sector, and the nonprofit sector. Each sector is managed differently and operates towards different ends. But part of the role of the nonprofit sector is to provide capacity where the public sector may not be able to or is not able to fulfill demands.</p>
<p>This space, where the rules and regulations are being revised, reformed, and rewritten is where, in a very interesting way, democracy is happening. These are civil society organizations, embedded within the structure of political and economic outcomes, but distinct from both sectors. Since these groups are not aiming at making a profit, the regulatory regime is in a kind of counterpoint to capitalism, and thus in need of different kinds of rules regimes. This is where various stakeholders are coming together to negotiate with each as to how best to manage nonprofits, which are not all the same by any measure, and have different goals, different funding streams, different processes, and different policy formats. This makes the process of regulation complex, since there are constellations of parts that fall under differing kinds of management.</p>
<p>This undertaking, designing modes of regulation and policy processes, is not an exercise in creating red tape as much as it is designing processes to achieve important goals and capacities. Bornstein explains that writing policy of this kind, that writing laws is actually writing the future, or as she notes in the book, “writing the horizon”—writing <em>what will happen</em>. With this in mind, <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/anthropology/revolution-rules"><em>A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector</em></a> provides the reader with a fascinating exploration of how these organizations operate and how they can best be managed, especially with the aim of achieving benefits for individuals and society as a whole.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37670445" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a4d06bf0-011c-473a-9814-1e1156b74f31/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a4d06bf0-011c-473a-9814-1e1156b74f31&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Erica Bornstein, &quot;A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India&apos;s Nonprofit Sector&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Erica Bornstein, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Oregon (and Divisional Associate Dean), has a new book that delves into the regulatory reforms within the nonprofit sector in India. These reforms transpired over more than a decade, and Bornstein spent extended time developing this ethnographic study of not only the changes, but the institutional structures that manage nonprofit organizations and how the various regulatory decisions are made. The research explores the ways in which these changes happened, exploring the various actors within the discussions, and evaluating the process of change within the nonprofit sector in India. A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector (Stanford UP, 2025) is a deeply researched undertaking, paying attention not only to the shifts and changes that were happening in New Delhi, at the seat of the national government, but also in towns and communities in other parts of India, where similar dialogue and processes were also happening, and where the results of so many of these changes could be seen as they moved into implementation. In order to think through the analysis in A Revolution of Rules we must also think about the nonprofit sector as a significant part of political structure in India (and elsewhere). As we discuss in our conversation, there are essentially three sectors, the government or the public sector, the private sector, and the nonprofit sector. Each sector is managed differently and operates towards different ends. But part of the role of the nonprofit sector is to provide capacity where the public sector may not be able to or is not able to fulfill demands.

This space, where the rules and regulations are being revised, reformed, and rewritten is where, in a very interesting way, democracy is happening. These are civil society organizations, embedded within the structure of political and economic outcomes, but distinct from both sectors. Since these groups are not aiming at making a profit, the regulatory regime is in a kind of counterpoint to capitalism, and thus in need of different kinds of rules regimes. This is where various stakeholders are coming together to negotiate with each as to how best to manage nonprofits, which are not all the same by any measure, and have different goals, different funding streams, different processes, and different policy formats. This makes the process of regulation complex, since there are constellations of parts that fall under differing kinds of management.

This undertaking, designing modes of regulation and policy processes, is not an exercise in creating red tape as much as it is designing processes to achieve important goals and capacities. Bornstein explains that writing policy of this kind, that writing laws is actually writing the future, or as she notes in the book, “writing the horizon”—writing what will happen. With this in mind, A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector provides the reader with a fascinating exploration of how these organizations operate and how they can best be managed, especially with the aim of achieving benefits for individuals and society as a whole.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Erica Bornstein, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Oregon (and Divisional Associate Dean), has a new book that delves into the regulatory reforms within the nonprofit sector in India. These reforms transpired over more than a decade, and Bornstein spent extended time developing this ethnographic study of not only the changes, but the institutional structures that manage nonprofit organizations and how the various regulatory decisions are made. The research explores the ways in which these changes happened, exploring the various actors within the discussions, and evaluating the process of change within the nonprofit sector in India. A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector (Stanford UP, 2025) is a deeply researched undertaking, paying attention not only to the shifts and changes that were happening in New Delhi, at the seat of the national government, but also in towns and communities in other parts of India, where similar dialogue and processes were also happening, and where the results of so many of these changes could be seen as they moved into implementation. In order to think through the analysis in A Revolution of Rules we must also think about the nonprofit sector as a significant part of political structure in India (and elsewhere). As we discuss in our conversation, there are essentially three sectors, the government or the public sector, the private sector, and the nonprofit sector. Each sector is managed differently and operates towards different ends. But part of the role of the nonprofit sector is to provide capacity where the public sector may not be able to or is not able to fulfill demands.

This space, where the rules and regulations are being revised, reformed, and rewritten is where, in a very interesting way, democracy is happening. These are civil society organizations, embedded within the structure of political and economic outcomes, but distinct from both sectors. Since these groups are not aiming at making a profit, the regulatory regime is in a kind of counterpoint to capitalism, and thus in need of different kinds of rules regimes. This is where various stakeholders are coming together to negotiate with each as to how best to manage nonprofits, which are not all the same by any measure, and have different goals, different funding streams, different processes, and different policy formats. This makes the process of regulation complex, since there are constellations of parts that fall under differing kinds of management.

This undertaking, designing modes of regulation and policy processes, is not an exercise in creating red tape as much as it is designing processes to achieve important goals and capacities. Bornstein explains that writing policy of this kind, that writing laws is actually writing the future, or as she notes in the book, “writing the horizon”—writing what will happen. With this in mind, A Revolution of Rules: The Regulatory Reform of India’s Nonprofit Sector provides the reader with a fascinating exploration of how these organizations operate and how they can best be managed, especially with the aim of achieving benefits for individuals and society as a whole.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>911</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b943efe-54bb-11f1-a87c-1bbc5b1ed355</guid>
      <title>Nathan K. Finney, &quot;Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501783777"><em>Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War</em>⁠</a> (Cornell University Press, 2025) explores how the expansion of the American state for the First World War reshaped the nature of governance. This wartime state expansion is examined through the creation, structure, activities, and impact of the Council of Defense 
system on the ability of the United States to mobilize for a significant conflict in a foreign land. ﻿</p>
<p>Dr. Nathan K. Finney focuses on North Carolina's Council of Defense to describe how the council was mediated by specific people at various levels of society and the results of their decisions. The result is a compelling story about how individuals drove dynamic and compelling regional and national events that propelled a massive national wartime mobilization. ﻿</p>
<p>Positioned between the national government and the people of North Carolina, the Council of Defense mediated the activities of public, private, and individual efforts in 
support of mobilization activities. Because of this intermediary positioning, the council was instrumental in expanding state capacity and capability for military and resource mobilization and supporting an increase in the nation's ability to mobilize for the war. ﻿</p>
<p>The council's intermediary role, however, also allowed those managing the state mobilization to prevent any significant challenge to the state's social and political structures, despite the dynamic changes wrought by the need to mobilize the nation for war. As a result, <em>Orchestrating Power</em> helps us understand the crucial decisions and developments of early 
twentieth-century America, showing why the country mobilized for war in the specific ways that it did. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher, whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/">⁠<em> book</em>⁠</a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher">⁠<em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em>⁠</a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501783777"><em>Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War</em>⁠</a> (Cornell University Press, 2025) explores how the expansion of the American state for the First World War reshaped the nature of governance. This wartime state expansion is examined through the creation, structure, activities, and impact of the Council of Defense 
system on the ability of the United States to mobilize for a significant conflict in a foreign land. ﻿</p>
<p>Dr. Nathan K. Finney focuses on North Carolina's Council of Defense to describe how the council was mediated by specific people at various levels of society and the results of their decisions. The result is a compelling story about how individuals drove dynamic and compelling regional and national events that propelled a massive national wartime mobilization. ﻿</p>
<p>Positioned between the national government and the people of North Carolina, the Council of Defense mediated the activities of public, private, and individual efforts in 
support of mobilization activities. Because of this intermediary positioning, the council was instrumental in expanding state capacity and capability for military and resource mobilization and supporting an increase in the nation's ability to mobilize for the war. ﻿</p>
<p>The council's intermediary role, however, also allowed those managing the state mobilization to prevent any significant challenge to the state's social and political structures, despite the dynamic changes wrought by the need to mobilize the nation for war. As a result, <em>Orchestrating Power</em> helps us understand the crucial decisions and developments of early 
twentieth-century America, showing why the country mobilized for war in the specific ways that it did. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher, whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/">⁠<em> book</em>⁠</a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher">⁠<em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em>⁠</a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30231941" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4dd0e4aa-ab0a-45a7-a0a9-9309ce49d22f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4dd0e4aa-ab0a-45a7-a0a9-9309ce49d22f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nathan K. Finney, &quot;Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War⁠ (Cornell University Press, 2025) explores how the expansion of the American state for the First World War reshaped the nature of governance. This wartime state expansion is examined through the creation, structure, activities, and impact of the Council of Defense 
system on the ability of the United States to mobilize for a significant conflict in a foreign land. ﻿

Dr. Nathan K. Finney focuses on North Carolina&apos;s Council of Defense to describe how the council was mediated by specific people at various levels of society and the results of their decisions. The result is a compelling story about how individuals drove dynamic and compelling regional and national events that propelled a massive national wartime mobilization. ﻿

Positioned between the national government and the people of North Carolina, the Council of Defense mediated the activities of public, private, and individual efforts in 
support of mobilization activities. Because of this intermediary positioning, the council was instrumental in expanding state capacity and capability for military and resource mobilization and supporting an increase in the nation&apos;s ability to mobilize for the war. ﻿

The council&apos;s intermediary role, however, also allowed those managing the state mobilization to prevent any significant challenge to the state&apos;s social and political structures, despite the dynamic changes wrought by the need to mobilize the nation for war. As a result, Orchestrating Power helps us understand the crucial decisions and developments of early 
twentieth-century America, showing why the country mobilized for war in the specific ways that it did. ﻿

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher, whose⁠ book⁠ focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on ⁠New Books with Miranda Melcher⁠, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Orchestrating Power: The American Associational State in the First World War⁠ (Cornell University Press, 2025) explores how the expansion of the American state for the First World War reshaped the nature of governance. This wartime state expansion is examined through the creation, structure, activities, and impact of the Council of Defense 
system on the ability of the United States to mobilize for a significant conflict in a foreign land. ﻿

Dr. Nathan K. Finney focuses on North Carolina&apos;s Council of Defense to describe how the council was mediated by specific people at various levels of society and the results of their decisions. The result is a compelling story about how individuals drove dynamic and compelling regional and national events that propelled a massive national wartime mobilization. ﻿

Positioned between the national government and the people of North Carolina, the Council of Defense mediated the activities of public, private, and individual efforts in 
support of mobilization activities. Because of this intermediary positioning, the council was instrumental in expanding state capacity and capability for military and resource mobilization and supporting an increase in the nation&apos;s ability to mobilize for the war. ﻿

The council&apos;s intermediary role, however, also allowed those managing the state mobilization to prevent any significant challenge to the state&apos;s social and political structures, despite the dynamic changes wrought by the need to mobilize the nation for war. As a result, Orchestrating Power helps us understand the crucial decisions and developments of early 
twentieth-century America, showing why the country mobilized for war in the specific ways that it did. ﻿

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher, whose⁠ book⁠ focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on ⁠New Books with Miranda Melcher⁠, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>910</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f17887be-53a9-11f1-8d12-5746fd6659aa</guid>
      <title>George Baylon Radics, &quot;Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the &apos;Lazy Native&apos; and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the first half of the twentieth century, the United States attempted to build a colony in the Philippines in its own image—one  fraught with racist notions of what it means to be civilized, developed, and worthy of self-rule. These imported notions of race and modernity left a profound imprint on the nation. More recently, we have seen a menacing rise of Islamic "terrorism," political polarization, populism,  xenophobia, and isolationism. Conventional wisdom has attributed this  rise to a "failed state" or economic insecurity and cultural backlash. </p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820375441">⁠<em>Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the "Lazy Native" and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines</em>⁠</a> (University of Georgia Press, 2026), however, Dr. George Baylon Radics explains this forgotten part of U.S. history with emotions as a driving force behind social action. The Philippines is currently experiencing the longest-running Muslim-Christian conflict in the modern world and an increasingly anti-Western populist government. By unpacking the role of emotions from the American colonial period to the present, <em>Emotional Filipinos</em> blurs the line between American colonizer and Muslim-Filipino "terrorist," highlighting the lasting effects of America's footprint in Southeast Asia. Radics humanizes this fraught history and reveals unexplored connections between past and present.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/">⁠<em>book</em>⁠</a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher">⁠<em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em>⁠</a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first half of the twentieth century, the United States attempted to build a colony in the Philippines in its own image—one  fraught with racist notions of what it means to be civilized, developed, and worthy of self-rule. These imported notions of race and modernity left a profound imprint on the nation. More recently, we have seen a menacing rise of Islamic "terrorism," political polarization, populism,  xenophobia, and isolationism. Conventional wisdom has attributed this  rise to a "failed state" or economic insecurity and cultural backlash. </p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780820375441">⁠<em>Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the "Lazy Native" and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines</em>⁠</a> (University of Georgia Press, 2026), however, Dr. George Baylon Radics explains this forgotten part of U.S. history with emotions as a driving force behind social action. The Philippines is currently experiencing the longest-running Muslim-Christian conflict in the modern world and an increasingly anti-Western populist government. By unpacking the role of emotions from the American colonial period to the present, <em>Emotional Filipinos</em> blurs the line between American colonizer and Muslim-Filipino "terrorist," highlighting the lasting effects of America's footprint in Southeast Asia. Radics humanizes this fraught history and reveals unexplored connections between past and present.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/">⁠<em>book</em>⁠</a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher">⁠<em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em>⁠</a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41288836" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e38dd476-d209-40ce-a5f5-ae3a084420ab/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e38dd476-d209-40ce-a5f5-ae3a084420ab&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>George Baylon Radics, &quot;Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the &apos;Lazy Native&apos; and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines&quot; (U Georgia Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the first half of the twentieth century, the United States attempted to build a colony in the Philippines in its own image—one  fraught with racist notions of what it means to be civilized, developed, and worthy of self-rule. These imported notions of race and modernity left a profound imprint on the nation. More recently, we have seen a menacing rise of Islamic &quot;terrorism,&quot; political polarization, populism,  xenophobia, and isolationism. Conventional wisdom has attributed this  rise to a &quot;failed state&quot; or economic insecurity and cultural backlash. 

In ⁠Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the &quot;Lazy Native&quot; and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines⁠ (University of Georgia Press, 2026), however, Dr. George Baylon Radics explains this forgotten part of U.S. history with emotions as a driving force behind social action. The Philippines is currently experiencing the longest-running Muslim-Christian conflict in the modern world and an increasingly anti-Western populist government. By unpacking the role of emotions from the American colonial period to the present, Emotional Filipinos blurs the line between American colonizer and Muslim-Filipino &quot;terrorist,&quot; highlighting the lasting effects of America&apos;s footprint in Southeast Asia. Radics humanizes this fraught history and reveals unexplored connections between past and present.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose ⁠book⁠ focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda&apos;s interviews on ⁠New Books with Miranda Melcher⁠, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first half of the twentieth century, the United States attempted to build a colony in the Philippines in its own image—one  fraught with racist notions of what it means to be civilized, developed, and worthy of self-rule. These imported notions of race and modernity left a profound imprint on the nation. More recently, we have seen a menacing rise of Islamic &quot;terrorism,&quot; political polarization, populism,  xenophobia, and isolationism. Conventional wisdom has attributed this  rise to a &quot;failed state&quot; or economic insecurity and cultural backlash. 

In ⁠Emotional Filipinos: The American Myth of the &quot;Lazy Native&quot; and Islamic Separatism in the Philippines⁠ (University of Georgia Press, 2026), however, Dr. George Baylon Radics explains this forgotten part of U.S. history with emotions as a driving force behind social action. The Philippines is currently experiencing the longest-running Muslim-Christian conflict in the modern world and an increasingly anti-Western populist government. By unpacking the role of emotions from the American colonial period to the present, Emotional Filipinos blurs the line between American colonizer and Muslim-Filipino &quot;terrorist,&quot; highlighting the lasting effects of America&apos;s footprint in Southeast Asia. Radics humanizes this fraught history and reveals unexplored connections between past and present.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose ⁠book⁠ focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda&apos;s interviews on ⁠New Books with Miranda Melcher⁠, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>909</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8f8eda22-53fd-11f1-8e9e-337dd56ed20c</guid>
      <title>Hugo Drochon, &quot;Elites and Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A central paradox of democracies is that they are always ruled by 
elites. What can democracy mean in this context? Today, it is often said
 that a populist revolt against elites is driving democratic politics 
throughout the West. But in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181554"><em>Elites and Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton
 University Press, 2026), Hugo Drochon argues that democracy is more 
accurately and usefully understood as a perpetual struggle among 
competing elites—between rising elites and ruling elites. Real political
 change comes from the interaction between social movements and elite 
political institutions such as parties. But, although true democracy—the
 rule of the people—may never be achieved, striving towards it can bring
 about worthwhile democratic results.</p>
<p>At the turn of the twentieth century, Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto, 
and Robert Michels put forward “elite” theories of democracy and gave us
 terms such as the “ruling class” and “elites” itself. Drawing on their 
work and tracing the history of democratic thought through figures such 
as Joseph Schumpeter, Robert Dahl, C. Wright Mills, and Raymond Aron, <em>Elites and Democracy</em> reveals that this fundamentally elitist basis of democracy—democracy understood as competition between elites—was there all along. The challenge is to think it anew.</p>
<p>Moving away from procedural or principled conceptions of democracy, <em>Elites and Democracy</em> develops a dynamic theory of democracy, one grounded in movement. With current politics defined by a populist backlash against elites, dynamic democracy offers the tools we urgently need to understand our contemporary predicament and to act upon it.</p>
<p>Hugo Drochon is an Associate Professor in Political Theory at the 
University of Nottingham. He is a historian of modern political thought,
 with interests in Nietzsche's politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th- and 19th-century British Literature.  </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A central paradox of democracies is that they are always ruled by 
elites. What can democracy mean in this context? Today, it is often said
 that a populist revolt against elites is driving democratic politics 
throughout the West. But in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181554"><em>Elites and Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton
 University Press, 2026), Hugo Drochon argues that democracy is more 
accurately and usefully understood as a perpetual struggle among 
competing elites—between rising elites and ruling elites. Real political
 change comes from the interaction between social movements and elite 
political institutions such as parties. But, although true democracy—the
 rule of the people—may never be achieved, striving towards it can bring
 about worthwhile democratic results.</p>
<p>At the turn of the twentieth century, Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto, 
and Robert Michels put forward “elite” theories of democracy and gave us
 terms such as the “ruling class” and “elites” itself. Drawing on their 
work and tracing the history of democratic thought through figures such 
as Joseph Schumpeter, Robert Dahl, C. Wright Mills, and Raymond Aron, <em>Elites and Democracy</em> reveals that this fundamentally elitist basis of democracy—democracy understood as competition between elites—was there all along. The challenge is to think it anew.</p>
<p>Moving away from procedural or principled conceptions of democracy, <em>Elites and Democracy</em> develops a dynamic theory of democracy, one grounded in movement. With current politics defined by a populist backlash against elites, dynamic democracy offers the tools we urgently need to understand our contemporary predicament and to act upon it.</p>
<p>Hugo Drochon is an Associate Professor in Political Theory at the 
University of Nottingham. He is a historian of modern political thought,
 with interests in Nietzsche's politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th- and 19th-century British Literature.  </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62220815" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/de854531-eefa-43c3-897a-9083466821c2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=de854531-eefa-43c3-897a-9083466821c2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hugo Drochon, &quot;Elites and Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A central paradox of democracies is that they are always ruled by 
elites. What can democracy mean in this context? Today, it is often said
 that a populist revolt against elites is driving democratic politics 
throughout the West. But in Elites and Democracy (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), Hugo Drochon argues that democracy is more 
accurately and usefully understood as a perpetual struggle among 
competing elites—between rising elites and ruling elites. Real political
 change comes from the interaction between social movements and elite 
political institutions such as parties. But, although true democracy—the
 rule of the people—may never be achieved, striving towards it can bring
 about worthwhile democratic results.

At the turn of the twentieth century, Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto, 
and Robert Michels put forward “elite” theories of democracy and gave us
 terms such as the “ruling class” and “elites” itself. Drawing on their 
work and tracing the history of democratic thought through figures such 
as Joseph Schumpeter, Robert Dahl, C. Wright Mills, and Raymond Aron, Elites and Democracy reveals that this fundamentally elitist basis of democracy—democracy understood as competition between elites—was there all along. The challenge is to think it anew.

Moving away from procedural or principled conceptions of democracy, Elites and Democracy develops a dynamic theory of democracy, one grounded in movement. With current politics defined by a populist backlash against elites, dynamic democracy offers the tools we urgently need to understand our contemporary predicament and to act upon it.

Hugo Drochon is an Associate Professor in Political Theory at the 
University of Nottingham. He is a historian of modern political thought,
 with interests in Nietzsche&apos;s politics.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th- and 19th-century British Literature.  
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A central paradox of democracies is that they are always ruled by 
elites. What can democracy mean in this context? Today, it is often said
 that a populist revolt against elites is driving democratic politics 
throughout the West. But in Elites and Democracy (Princeton
 University Press, 2026), Hugo Drochon argues that democracy is more 
accurately and usefully understood as a perpetual struggle among 
competing elites—between rising elites and ruling elites. Real political
 change comes from the interaction between social movements and elite 
political institutions such as parties. But, although true democracy—the
 rule of the people—may never be achieved, striving towards it can bring
 about worthwhile democratic results.

At the turn of the twentieth century, Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto, 
and Robert Michels put forward “elite” theories of democracy and gave us
 terms such as the “ruling class” and “elites” itself. Drawing on their 
work and tracing the history of democratic thought through figures such 
as Joseph Schumpeter, Robert Dahl, C. Wright Mills, and Raymond Aron, Elites and Democracy reveals that this fundamentally elitist basis of democracy—democracy understood as competition between elites—was there all along. The challenge is to think it anew.

Moving away from procedural or principled conceptions of democracy, Elites and Democracy develops a dynamic theory of democracy, one grounded in movement. With current politics defined by a populist backlash against elites, dynamic democracy offers the tools we urgently need to understand our contemporary predicament and to act upon it.

Hugo Drochon is an Associate Professor in Political Theory at the 
University of Nottingham. He is a historian of modern political thought,
 with interests in Nietzsche&apos;s politics.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th- and 19th-century British Literature.  
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>908</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">536e2f8c-544f-11f1-8717-57aac51a8518</guid>
      <title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor <a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: <a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a> (2012), and <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a> (2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his <a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/">recent</a> <a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf">articles</a> and <a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor <a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: <a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a> (2012), and <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a> (2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his <a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/">recent</a> <a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf">articles</a> and <a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59352675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d7441e9f-4ba5-43a4-8f78-1bfe0e9537fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d7441e9f-4ba5-43a4-8f78-1bfe0e9537fb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).

Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).

Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>907</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d417d24e-51e0-11f1-898f-03ec07275a02</guid>
      <title>Carlos Martins, &quot;Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini&quot; ﻿(Desassossego, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Carlos Martins joins the New Books Network to discuss his book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789899033900"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789899033900">Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini</a><em> </em>﻿(Desassossego, 2022) (in Portuguese ﻿<em>Fascismos: Para Além de Hitler e Mussolini),</em> a comparative study of fascist movements across Europe and beyond. Working from a rigorous definition of fascism based on its ideological content, Martins examines eight case studies, analysing these specific manifestations of fascism to identify what they had in common and what separated them.</p>
<p>In this conversation, we discuss the problem of defining fascism, the distinctions between fascism and populism and why Martins argues that not every dictatorship or radical right movement should automatically be classified as fascist. The discussion also turns to the Portuguese case, including the Estado Novo, National Syndicalism and the debate surrounding Salazarism’s relationship to European fascism.</p>
<p>At a moment when the word “fascism” is increasingly invoked in public debate, Martins makes the case for conceptual precision without losing sight of fascism’s historical adaptability and political force. The result is a wide-ranging conversation about ideology, political modernity and the uses, and misuses, of language.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos Martins joins the New Books Network to discuss his book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789899033900"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789899033900">Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini</a><em> </em>﻿(Desassossego, 2022) (in Portuguese ﻿<em>Fascismos: Para Além de Hitler e Mussolini),</em> a comparative study of fascist movements across Europe and beyond. Working from a rigorous definition of fascism based on its ideological content, Martins examines eight case studies, analysing these specific manifestations of fascism to identify what they had in common and what separated them.</p>
<p>In this conversation, we discuss the problem of defining fascism, the distinctions between fascism and populism and why Martins argues that not every dictatorship or radical right movement should automatically be classified as fascist. The discussion also turns to the Portuguese case, including the Estado Novo, National Syndicalism and the debate surrounding Salazarism’s relationship to European fascism.</p>
<p>At a moment when the word “fascism” is increasingly invoked in public debate, Martins makes the case for conceptual precision without losing sight of fascism’s historical adaptability and political force. The result is a wide-ranging conversation about ideology, political modernity and the uses, and misuses, of language.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74709785" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/facf3719-6f2c-458d-a8cd-40512237775f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=facf3719-6f2c-458d-a8cd-40512237775f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carlos Martins, &quot;Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini&quot; ﻿(Desassossego, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Carlos Martins joins the New Books Network to discuss his book Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini ﻿(Desassossego, 2022) (in Portuguese ﻿Fascismos: Para Além de Hitler e Mussolini), a comparative study of fascist movements across Europe and beyond. Working from a rigorous definition of fascism based on its ideological content, Martins examines eight case studies, analysing these specific manifestations of fascism to identify what they had in common and what separated them.

In this conversation, we discuss the problem of defining fascism, the distinctions between fascism and populism and why Martins argues that not every dictatorship or radical right movement should automatically be classified as fascist. The discussion also turns to the Portuguese case, including the Estado Novo, National Syndicalism and the debate surrounding Salazarism’s relationship to European fascism.

At a moment when the word “fascism” is increasingly invoked in public debate, Martins makes the case for conceptual precision without losing sight of fascism’s historical adaptability and political force. The result is a wide-ranging conversation about ideology, political modernity and the uses, and misuses, of language.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Carlos Martins joins the New Books Network to discuss his book Fascism: Beyond Hitler and Mussolini ﻿(Desassossego, 2022) (in Portuguese ﻿Fascismos: Para Além de Hitler e Mussolini), a comparative study of fascist movements across Europe and beyond. Working from a rigorous definition of fascism based on its ideological content, Martins examines eight case studies, analysing these specific manifestations of fascism to identify what they had in common and what separated them.

In this conversation, we discuss the problem of defining fascism, the distinctions between fascism and populism and why Martins argues that not every dictatorship or radical right movement should automatically be classified as fascist. The discussion also turns to the Portuguese case, including the Estado Novo, National Syndicalism and the debate surrounding Salazarism’s relationship to European fascism.

At a moment when the word “fascism” is increasingly invoked in public debate, Martins makes the case for conceptual precision without losing sight of fascism’s historical adaptability and political force. The result is a wide-ranging conversation about ideology, political modernity and the uses, and misuses, of language.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>906</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5ff0a016-512d-11f1-898e-4f416282898b</guid>
      <title>Inken Von Borzyskowski and Felicity Vabulas, &quot;Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change” (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?</p>
<p>Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited.<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/exit-from-international-organizations-felicity-vabulas/ca024f40dfca90d9?ean=9781009532327&amp;next=t">Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change</a><em> (</em>Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states' dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.</p>
<p>The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.</p>
<p>NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.</p>
<p>Our guests are <a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/felicity-vabulas/">Felicity Vabulas</a> who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and <a href="https://www.borzyskowski.net/">Professor Inken von Borzyskowski</a>, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?</p>
<p>Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited.<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/exit-from-international-organizations-felicity-vabulas/ca024f40dfca90d9?ean=9781009532327&amp;next=t">Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change</a><em> (</em>Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states' dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.</p>
<p>The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.</p>
<p>NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.</p>
<p>Our guests are <a href="https://seaver.pepperdine.edu/academics/faculty/felicity-vabulas/">Felicity Vabulas</a> who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and <a href="https://www.borzyskowski.net/">Professor Inken von Borzyskowski</a>, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55171806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/80c21abe-eaa5-491d-b090-b6856465d8bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=80c21abe-eaa5-491d-b090-b6856465d8bf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Inken Von Borzyskowski and Felicity Vabulas, &quot;Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change” (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?

Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited. Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change (Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states&apos; dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.

The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.

NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.

Our guests are Felicity Vabulas who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and Professor Inken von Borzyskowski, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do states exit international organizations (IOs)? How often does exit from IOs – including voluntary withdrawal and forced suspension – occur? What are the effects of leaving IOs for the exiting state?

Despite the importance of membership in IOs, a broader understanding of exit across states, organizations, and time has been limited. Exit from International Organizations: Costly Negotiation for Institutional Change (Cambridge UP, 2025) addresses these lacunae through a theoretically grounded and empirically systematic study of IO exit. Von Borzyskowski and Vabulas argue that there is a common logic to IO exit, which helps explain both its causes and consequences. By examining IO exit across 198 states, 534 IOs, and over a hundred years of history, they show that exit is driven by states&apos; dissatisfaction, preference divergence, and is a strategy to negotiate institutional change.

The book also demonstrates that exit is costly because it has reputational consequences for leaving states and significantly affects other forms of international cooperation.

NOTE: This book was just awarded the 2026 Chadwick Alger prize for best book in international organizations from the International Studies Association.

Our guests are Felicity Vabulas who is the Blanche E. Seaver Associate Professor of International Studies at Pepperdine University and Professor Inken von Borzyskowski, who is Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>905</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6dc3c74-4ea6-11f1-aff3-872176692769</guid>
      <title>Silvia Danielak, &quot;Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Roads, bridges, a renewable power plant, and an electricity grid: UN peacekeepers might be unusual infrastructure builders, but they’re certainly not unambitious. Since the beginning of the UN’s peacekeeping activities after the end of World War II, the Blue Helmets have cemented streets, constructed bridges, and dug wells in conflict zones. But how did the military arm of the world’s primary diplomatic forum become involved in such activities in its quest for peace, and with what consequences? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262553612">Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability</a> (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Silvia Danielak analyzes the turn to ever-more-complex infrastructure projects, from early road building via urban community projects to the commissioning of entire renewable power plants, in the context of an evolving understanding of peace “problems” and solutions. Tracing the global travel of policies, technologies, and expertise, Dr. Danielak investigates how the shift toward risk management, legacy, and climate security was driven by, and materialized in, conflict zones, shaping the very idea of peace.<br />The book critically engages with the UN’s ambition to insert itself in the sustainable development of the countries it seeks to assist, arguing that we need to consider peace operations’ spatial, urban, and material ways of engagement—especially in the face of mounting climate risks. Infrastructure is poised to take a more prominent position within peace operations, but a more nuanced understanding that recognizes its opportunities, as well as its potential for violence, is required.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roads, bridges, a renewable power plant, and an electricity grid: UN peacekeepers might be unusual infrastructure builders, but they’re certainly not unambitious. Since the beginning of the UN’s peacekeeping activities after the end of World War II, the Blue Helmets have cemented streets, constructed bridges, and dug wells in conflict zones. But how did the military arm of the world’s primary diplomatic forum become involved in such activities in its quest for peace, and with what consequences? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262553612">Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability</a> (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Silvia Danielak analyzes the turn to ever-more-complex infrastructure projects, from early road building via urban community projects to the commissioning of entire renewable power plants, in the context of an evolving understanding of peace “problems” and solutions. Tracing the global travel of policies, technologies, and expertise, Dr. Danielak investigates how the shift toward risk management, legacy, and climate security was driven by, and materialized in, conflict zones, shaping the very idea of peace.<br />The book critically engages with the UN’s ambition to insert itself in the sustainable development of the countries it seeks to assist, arguing that we need to consider peace operations’ spatial, urban, and material ways of engagement—especially in the face of mounting climate risks. Infrastructure is poised to take a more prominent position within peace operations, but a more nuanced understanding that recognizes its opportunities, as well as its potential for violence, is required.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30332931" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/43263cc1-685e-4df8-b239-2bedbb0a073b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=43263cc1-685e-4df8-b239-2bedbb0a073b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Silvia Danielak, &quot;Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Roads, bridges, a renewable power plant, and an electricity grid: UN peacekeepers might be unusual infrastructure builders, but they’re certainly not unambitious. Since the beginning of the UN’s peacekeeping activities after the end of World War II, the Blue Helmets have cemented streets, constructed bridges, and dug wells in conflict zones. But how did the military arm of the world’s primary diplomatic forum become involved in such activities in its quest for peace, and with what consequences? Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Silvia Danielak analyzes the turn to ever-more-complex infrastructure projects, from early road building via urban community projects to the commissioning of entire renewable power plants, in the context of an evolving understanding of peace “problems” and solutions. Tracing the global travel of policies, technologies, and expertise, Dr. Danielak investigates how the shift toward risk management, legacy, and climate security was driven by, and materialized in, conflict zones, shaping the very idea of peace.The book critically engages with the UN’s ambition to insert itself in the sustainable development of the countries it seeks to assist, arguing that we need to consider peace operations’ spatial, urban, and material ways of engagement—especially in the face of mounting climate risks. Infrastructure is poised to take a more prominent position within peace operations, but a more nuanced understanding that recognizes its opportunities, as well as its potential for violence, is required.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Roads, bridges, a renewable power plant, and an electricity grid: UN peacekeepers might be unusual infrastructure builders, but they’re certainly not unambitious. Since the beginning of the UN’s peacekeeping activities after the end of World War II, the Blue Helmets have cemented streets, constructed bridges, and dug wells in conflict zones. But how did the military arm of the world’s primary diplomatic forum become involved in such activities in its quest for peace, and with what consequences? Peace Infrastructures: How UN Peace Operations Build Roads, Bridges, and Solar Farms in the Pursuit of Sustainability (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Silvia Danielak analyzes the turn to ever-more-complex infrastructure projects, from early road building via urban community projects to the commissioning of entire renewable power plants, in the context of an evolving understanding of peace “problems” and solutions. Tracing the global travel of policies, technologies, and expertise, Dr. Danielak investigates how the shift toward risk management, legacy, and climate security was driven by, and materialized in, conflict zones, shaping the very idea of peace.The book critically engages with the UN’s ambition to insert itself in the sustainable development of the countries it seeks to assist, arguing that we need to consider peace operations’ spatial, urban, and material ways of engagement—especially in the face of mounting climate risks. Infrastructure is poised to take a more prominent position within peace operations, but a more nuanced understanding that recognizes its opportunities, as well as its potential for violence, is required.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>904</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5918008-4f4e-11f1-9fbd-afe73f55c5ab</guid>
      <title>Beyond Minorities: Power, Identity, and Conflict in the Middle East</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Helen Haas speaks with political scientist Sean Lee about the changing relationship between majorities and minorities in the Middle East, the collapse of the post-October 2023 regional order, and why questions of citizenship, identity, and political power remain at the centre of conflicts from Syria and Lebanon to Israel–Palestine.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Sean Lee, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the American University in Cairo, discusses the evolving relationship between majority and minority groups in the Middle East. He argues that the minority question is not simply about ethnic or religious groups themselves, but about how political power, history, and institutions shape the categories of majority and minority. These identities are not fixed; they change depending on political and historical circumstances.</p>
<p>Using examples from Syria, Lebanon, Israel–Palestine, and other regional conflicts, Lee explains how civil wars and political violence reshape social boundaries and reinforce divisions between communities. In Syria, for example, the post-war political transition has intensified tensions between Sunni Arab majorities and minority groups such as the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Lee also highlights how outside powers increasingly use minority groups as instruments in regional politics.</p>
<p>A major theme of the discussion is the breakdown of the liberal international order after October 2023. According to Lee, this has weakened international law and increased instability in the region. He suggests that unresolved questions about citizenship and equal rights, especially in Israel and Palestine, continue to fuel conflict and resistance.</p>
<p>Drawing comparisons beyond the Middle East, Lee argues that similar dynamics can be observed globally, particularly with the rise of ethnonationalism and populism. He concludes that long-term stability depends on moving away from systems based on ethnic or religious identity and toward citizenship-based political systems in which all individuals enjoy equal rights regardless of background.</p>
<p>Helen Haas is a Middle East researcher at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies and the Middle East Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu. Her research focuses on the diversity of Islam. She teaches Turkish and courses on Islamic history and culture, and works as an interpreter and translator of Turkish literature. She is the managing editor of the Usuteaduslik Ajakiri (Journal of Religion).</p>
<p>Sean Lee is an assistant professor of political science at The American University in Cairo. His research focuses on political violence and social movements in the Levant. He is currently completing a book manuscript on minoritized communities during the civil wars in Lebanon and Syria.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen Haas speaks with political scientist Sean Lee about the changing relationship between majorities and minorities in the Middle East, the collapse of the post-October 2023 regional order, and why questions of citizenship, identity, and political power remain at the centre of conflicts from Syria and Lebanon to Israel–Palestine.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Sean Lee, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the American University in Cairo, discusses the evolving relationship between majority and minority groups in the Middle East. He argues that the minority question is not simply about ethnic or religious groups themselves, but about how political power, history, and institutions shape the categories of majority and minority. These identities are not fixed; they change depending on political and historical circumstances.</p>
<p>Using examples from Syria, Lebanon, Israel–Palestine, and other regional conflicts, Lee explains how civil wars and political violence reshape social boundaries and reinforce divisions between communities. In Syria, for example, the post-war political transition has intensified tensions between Sunni Arab majorities and minority groups such as the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Lee also highlights how outside powers increasingly use minority groups as instruments in regional politics.</p>
<p>A major theme of the discussion is the breakdown of the liberal international order after October 2023. According to Lee, this has weakened international law and increased instability in the region. He suggests that unresolved questions about citizenship and equal rights, especially in Israel and Palestine, continue to fuel conflict and resistance.</p>
<p>Drawing comparisons beyond the Middle East, Lee argues that similar dynamics can be observed globally, particularly with the rise of ethnonationalism and populism. He concludes that long-term stability depends on moving away from systems based on ethnic or religious identity and toward citizenship-based political systems in which all individuals enjoy equal rights regardless of background.</p>
<p>Helen Haas is a Middle East researcher at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies and the Middle East Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu. Her research focuses on the diversity of Islam. She teaches Turkish and courses on Islamic history and culture, and works as an interpreter and translator of Turkish literature. She is the managing editor of the Usuteaduslik Ajakiri (Journal of Religion).</p>
<p>Sean Lee is an assistant professor of political science at The American University in Cairo. His research focuses on political violence and social movements in the Levant. He is currently completing a book manuscript on minoritized communities during the civil wars in Lebanon and Syria.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18309315" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/71cb7819-b66a-452c-a724-53cd19dd2b12/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=71cb7819-b66a-452c-a724-53cd19dd2b12&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Beyond Minorities: Power, Identity, and Conflict in the Middle East</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Helen Haas speaks with political scientist Sean Lee about the changing relationship between majorities and minorities in the Middle East, the collapse of the post-October 2023 regional order, and why questions of citizenship, identity, and political power remain at the centre of conflicts from Syria and Lebanon to Israel–Palestine.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Sean Lee, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the American University in Cairo, discusses the evolving relationship between majority and minority groups in the Middle East. He argues that the minority question is not simply about ethnic or religious groups themselves, but about how political power, history, and institutions shape the categories of majority and minority. These identities are not fixed; they change depending on political and historical circumstances.

Using examples from Syria, Lebanon, Israel–Palestine, and other regional conflicts, Lee explains how civil wars and political violence reshape social boundaries and reinforce divisions between communities. In Syria, for example, the post-war political transition has intensified tensions between Sunni Arab majorities and minority groups such as the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Lee also highlights how outside powers increasingly use minority groups as instruments in regional politics.

A major theme of the discussion is the breakdown of the liberal international order after October 2023. According to Lee, this has weakened international law and increased instability in the region. He suggests that unresolved questions about citizenship and equal rights, especially in Israel and Palestine, continue to fuel conflict and resistance.

Drawing comparisons beyond the Middle East, Lee argues that similar dynamics can be observed globally, particularly with the rise of ethnonationalism and populism. He concludes that long-term stability depends on moving away from systems based on ethnic or religious identity and toward citizenship-based political systems in which all individuals enjoy equal rights regardless of background.

Helen Haas is a Middle East researcher at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies and the Middle East Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu. Her research focuses on the diversity of Islam. She teaches Turkish and courses on Islamic history and culture, and works as an interpreter and translator of Turkish literature. She is the managing editor of the Usuteaduslik Ajakiri (Journal of Religion).

Sean Lee is an assistant professor of political science at The American University in Cairo. His research focuses on political violence and social movements in the Levant. He is currently completing a book manuscript on minoritized communities during the civil wars in Lebanon and Syria.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Helen Haas speaks with political scientist Sean Lee about the changing relationship between majorities and minorities in the Middle East, the collapse of the post-October 2023 regional order, and why questions of citizenship, identity, and political power remain at the centre of conflicts from Syria and Lebanon to Israel–Palestine.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Sean Lee, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the American University in Cairo, discusses the evolving relationship between majority and minority groups in the Middle East. He argues that the minority question is not simply about ethnic or religious groups themselves, but about how political power, history, and institutions shape the categories of majority and minority. These identities are not fixed; they change depending on political and historical circumstances.

Using examples from Syria, Lebanon, Israel–Palestine, and other regional conflicts, Lee explains how civil wars and political violence reshape social boundaries and reinforce divisions between communities. In Syria, for example, the post-war political transition has intensified tensions between Sunni Arab majorities and minority groups such as the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Lee also highlights how outside powers increasingly use minority groups as instruments in regional politics.

A major theme of the discussion is the breakdown of the liberal international order after October 2023. According to Lee, this has weakened international law and increased instability in the region. He suggests that unresolved questions about citizenship and equal rights, especially in Israel and Palestine, continue to fuel conflict and resistance.

Drawing comparisons beyond the Middle East, Lee argues that similar dynamics can be observed globally, particularly with the rise of ethnonationalism and populism. He concludes that long-term stability depends on moving away from systems based on ethnic or religious identity and toward citizenship-based political systems in which all individuals enjoy equal rights regardless of background.

Helen Haas is a Middle East researcher at the Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies and the Middle East Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu. Her research focuses on the diversity of Islam. She teaches Turkish and courses on Islamic history and culture, and works as an interpreter and translator of Turkish literature. She is the managing editor of the Usuteaduslik Ajakiri (Journal of Religion).

Sean Lee is an assistant professor of political science at The American University in Cairo. His research focuses on political violence and social movements in the Levant. He is currently completing a book manuscript on minoritized communities during the civil wars in Lebanon and Syria.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>903</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dbe77c44-4e9e-11f1-a579-538a1c41e8fe</guid>
      <title>Stephen F. Knott, &quot;Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700641284">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a> (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both <em>Federalist #1</em> and <em>Federalist #85</em>, wrapping the discussion of the new <em>Constitution</em> in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a> also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.</p>
<p>In the final part of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/">Conspirator in Chief,</a><em> </em>Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700641284">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a> (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both <em>Federalist #1</em> and <em>Federalist #85</em>, wrapping the discussion of the new <em>Constitution</em> in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/">Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency</a> also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.</p>
<p>In the final part of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700641284/">Conspirator in Chief,</a><em> </em>Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43975311" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a05133f6-84b4-4c9a-b191-06eab707eb90/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a05133f6-84b4-4c9a-b191-06eab707eb90&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen F. Knott, &quot;Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both Federalist #1 and Federalist #85, wrapping the discussion of the new Constitution in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.

Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.

In the final part of Conspirator in Chief, Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Steve Knott has a new book that focuses on conspiracy theories within the American presidency and often promulgated by the president himself. This is not, per se, a book about conspiracy theories in general, but about the narratives that presidents have used—that constitutes a kind of conspiracy thinking—to engage voters and push for particular policy ideas and outcomes. Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency (UP Kansas, 2025) spans the entire history of the United States, paying close attention to presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and finally Donald Trump. These particular presidents, both during their administrations and after, made use of conspiracies and/or demagogic rhetoric to encourage their supporters and to appeal to public fears. As Knott notes, Alexander Hamilton warns against this in both Federalist #1 and Federalist #85, wrapping the discussion of the new Constitution in concerns with regard to demagoguery. So many of the conspiracies that are pushed by presidents have at their base racism and an effort to fan the flames of racial fear and resentment. Jefferson, Jackson, Johnson, and Wilson all made use of racism as a part of their conspiracies.

Conspirator in Chief: The Long Tradition of Conspiracy Theories in the American Presidency also mines the deep vein of conspiracy theories around moneyed and elite interests, since many presidents cast these interests as predatory and “out to get” the average citizen. This is another constant approach among the presidents from the early days of the republic through to our contemporary “conspirator in chief” Donald Trump. Part of the way that presidents use these kinds of conspiracies is to set up a dichotomy of those who are with the president and those who are against the president, and this latter group is, inevitably, also opposed to the country as a whole and the way of life in the United States. Knott explains that this was the kind of rhetoric that both FDR and Truman used in their implementation of this kind of conspiratorial rhetoric. This also leans on national security as a point of contention, and that those in opposition to the president or the president’s policies are also potential threats to the republic. This is another dimension that Trump builds on in his use of this kind of rhetoric and division.

In the final part of Conspirator in Chief, Knott sketches out those presidents who go far in standing against this kind of language and these kinds of attacks. Included in this grouping are John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, William Howard Taft, and John F. Kennedy, among others. These individuals leaned into reason more than rumormongering, examining their own biases, and also pointing to the conspiracies that others were advocating. While we learn a great deal about demagogic presidents who stirred up conspiracies based in racism, fear, antisemitism, and classism, we also learn about those who operated differently, who tried to protect the country from such divisive rhetoric.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>902</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e5452fc-4e9b-11f1-a99b-47373e215844</guid>
      <title>T. V. Paul, &quot;The Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From a Distinguished International Relations Scholar comes <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197669990">The Unfinished Quest: India's Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi</a> (Oxford UP, 2024), an important book that looks at India's search for major power status. It is an unfinished quest with a long and winding road ahead. This is not to say that India's ambitions in world politics for greater peer recognition and institutional position is unattainable; but its current political class, bureaucratic elites, and intelligentsia must reorient India's statecraft. In this accessible and incisive book Unfinished Quest: India's Search for Major Power Status, T.V. Paul charts India's cumbersome path toward higher regional and global status, covering both the successes and failures it has experienced since the modern nation's founding in 1947. Paul focuses on the key motivations driving Indian leaders to enhance India's global status and power, but also on the many constraints that have hindered its progress. Paul's analysis of India's quest for status also sheds important light on the current geostrategic situation and serves as a new framework for understanding the China-India rivalry, as well as India's relative position in the broader Indo-Pacific theater.<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Distinguished International Relations Scholar comes <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197669990">The Unfinished Quest: India's Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi</a> (Oxford UP, 2024), an important book that looks at India's search for major power status. It is an unfinished quest with a long and winding road ahead. This is not to say that India's ambitions in world politics for greater peer recognition and institutional position is unattainable; but its current political class, bureaucratic elites, and intelligentsia must reorient India's statecraft. In this accessible and incisive book Unfinished Quest: India's Search for Major Power Status, T.V. Paul charts India's cumbersome path toward higher regional and global status, covering both the successes and failures it has experienced since the modern nation's founding in 1947. Paul focuses on the key motivations driving Indian leaders to enhance India's global status and power, but also on the many constraints that have hindered its progress. Paul's analysis of India's quest for status also sheds important light on the current geostrategic situation and serves as a new framework for understanding the China-India rivalry, as well as India's relative position in the broader Indo-Pacific theater.<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59504360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d9bb1da6-9f58-44b6-8aec-12fd01c22086/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d9bb1da6-9f58-44b6-8aec-12fd01c22086&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>T. V. Paul, &quot;The Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From a Distinguished International Relations Scholar comes The Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi (Oxford UP, 2024), an important book that looks at India&apos;s search for major power status. It is an unfinished quest with a long and winding road ahead. This is not to say that India&apos;s ambitions in world politics for greater peer recognition and institutional position is unattainable; but its current political class, bureaucratic elites, and intelligentsia must reorient India&apos;s statecraft. In this accessible and incisive book Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status, T.V. Paul charts India&apos;s cumbersome path toward higher regional and global status, covering both the successes and failures it has experienced since the modern nation&apos;s founding in 1947. Paul focuses on the key motivations driving Indian leaders to enhance India&apos;s global status and power, but also on the many constraints that have hindered its progress. Paul&apos;s analysis of India&apos;s quest for status also sheds important light on the current geostrategic situation and serves as a new framework for understanding the China-India rivalry, as well as India&apos;s relative position in the broader Indo-Pacific theater.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From a Distinguished International Relations Scholar comes The Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi (Oxford UP, 2024), an important book that looks at India&apos;s search for major power status. It is an unfinished quest with a long and winding road ahead. This is not to say that India&apos;s ambitions in world politics for greater peer recognition and institutional position is unattainable; but its current political class, bureaucratic elites, and intelligentsia must reorient India&apos;s statecraft. In this accessible and incisive book Unfinished Quest: India&apos;s Search for Major Power Status, T.V. Paul charts India&apos;s cumbersome path toward higher regional and global status, covering both the successes and failures it has experienced since the modern nation&apos;s founding in 1947. Paul focuses on the key motivations driving Indian leaders to enhance India&apos;s global status and power, but also on the many constraints that have hindered its progress. Paul&apos;s analysis of India&apos;s quest for status also sheds important light on the current geostrategic situation and serves as a new framework for understanding the China-India rivalry, as well as India&apos;s relative position in the broader Indo-Pacific theater.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>901</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af68da08-4ced-11f1-82fa-7357f3d18481</guid>
      <title>Chiara Libiseller, &quot;Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The field of Strategic Studies, which studies the use and threat of force for political purposes, has seen the repeated rise of concepts to dominate discourses and research agendas, only to eventually fall to the margins again. What explains this cyclical pattern? What are the consequences for our understanding of war?<br /><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198972365">Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies</a> (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Chiara Libiseller examines these questions by likening the coming and going of theories to fashions. While in vogue, fashionable concepts are used widely, becoming broader and vaguer until essentially stripped of meaning. At the same time, they are bestowed with authority and power that allows them to withstand criticism and marginalizes alternative perspectives. These characteristics severely affect the quality, depth, and diversity of research by narrowing and siloing the field of inquiry.<br />Tracing three concepts—revolution in military affairs, counterinsurgency, and hybrid warfare—through their fashion lifecycle, Dr. Libiseller demonstrates how fashionability affects the concepts themselves, related research, and the field more generally. Embedded within a discussion of the history and dynamics of Strategic Studies, the book calls for more reflexivity in the study of war and strategy.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The field of Strategic Studies, which studies the use and threat of force for political purposes, has seen the repeated rise of concepts to dominate discourses and research agendas, only to eventually fall to the margins again. What explains this cyclical pattern? What are the consequences for our understanding of war?<br /><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198972365">Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies</a> (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Chiara Libiseller examines these questions by likening the coming and going of theories to fashions. While in vogue, fashionable concepts are used widely, becoming broader and vaguer until essentially stripped of meaning. At the same time, they are bestowed with authority and power that allows them to withstand criticism and marginalizes alternative perspectives. These characteristics severely affect the quality, depth, and diversity of research by narrowing and siloing the field of inquiry.<br />Tracing three concepts—revolution in military affairs, counterinsurgency, and hybrid warfare—through their fashion lifecycle, Dr. Libiseller demonstrates how fashionability affects the concepts themselves, related research, and the field more generally. Embedded within a discussion of the history and dynamics of Strategic Studies, the book calls for more reflexivity in the study of war and strategy.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48646221" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/29b1bba4-28cf-42c6-92d6-5c4fd0c86eec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=29b1bba4-28cf-42c6-92d6-5c4fd0c86eec&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Chiara Libiseller, &quot;Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The field of Strategic Studies, which studies the use and threat of force for political purposes, has seen the repeated rise of concepts to dominate discourses and research agendas, only to eventually fall to the margins again. What explains this cyclical pattern? What are the consequences for our understanding of war?Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Chiara Libiseller examines these questions by likening the coming and going of theories to fashions. While in vogue, fashionable concepts are used widely, becoming broader and vaguer until essentially stripped of meaning. At the same time, they are bestowed with authority and power that allows them to withstand criticism and marginalizes alternative perspectives. These characteristics severely affect the quality, depth, and diversity of research by narrowing and siloing the field of inquiry.Tracing three concepts—revolution in military affairs, counterinsurgency, and hybrid warfare—through their fashion lifecycle, Dr. Libiseller demonstrates how fashionability affects the concepts themselves, related research, and the field more generally. Embedded within a discussion of the history and dynamics of Strategic Studies, the book calls for more reflexivity in the study of war and strategy.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The field of Strategic Studies, which studies the use and threat of force for political purposes, has seen the repeated rise of concepts to dominate discourses and research agendas, only to eventually fall to the margins again. What explains this cyclical pattern? What are the consequences for our understanding of war?Reconceptualizing War: The Rise and Fall of Fashionable Concepts in Strategic Studies (Oxford UP, 2026) by Dr. Chiara Libiseller examines these questions by likening the coming and going of theories to fashions. While in vogue, fashionable concepts are used widely, becoming broader and vaguer until essentially stripped of meaning. At the same time, they are bestowed with authority and power that allows them to withstand criticism and marginalizes alternative perspectives. These characteristics severely affect the quality, depth, and diversity of research by narrowing and siloing the field of inquiry.Tracing three concepts—revolution in military affairs, counterinsurgency, and hybrid warfare—through their fashion lifecycle, Dr. Libiseller demonstrates how fashionability affects the concepts themselves, related research, and the field more generally. Embedded within a discussion of the history and dynamics of Strategic Studies, the book calls for more reflexivity in the study of war and strategy.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>900</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9aba07f0-49da-11f1-8a07-7b02b4f98aeb</guid>
      <title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a> (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, <em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em> reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of <em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em> (Princeton) and <em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a> (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, <em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em> reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of <em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em> (Princeton) and <em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59425182" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5e950f07-43b1-47c4-a549-130eeace5482/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5e950f07-43b1-47c4-a549-130eeace5482&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined

The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.

Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.

Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.

Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.

Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined

The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.

Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.

Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.

Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.

Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>899</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81973414-49da-11f1-ad8a-773efcc6353b</guid>
      <title>Steffen Mau et al., &quot;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society&quot; (Policy Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529254037"> The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society</a> (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.</p>
<p>Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.</p>
<p>Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points' – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.</p>
<p>Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.</p>
<p>This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529254037"> The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society</a> (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.</p>
<p>Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.</p>
<p>Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points' – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.</p>
<p>Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.</p>
<p>This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55624900" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f6f94f19-c0cb-46de-b8eb-ca7ef0bf1fd1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f6f94f19-c0cb-46de-b8eb-ca7ef0bf1fd1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steffen Mau et al., &quot;The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society&quot; (Policy Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines, The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.

Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.

Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points&apos; – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.

Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.

This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s political debates are fiercely polarized. But looking beyond the headlines, The Trigger Points: Inequality and Political Polarization in Contemporary Society (Policy Press, 2026) shows that ordinary citizens hold much more nuanced, less divided views.

Drawing on rich survey data and group discussions, this work maps four major areas of conflict: migration, climate change, diversity, and economic justice.

Across these conflicts, most citizens take positions that are middle-of-the-road, contradictory, or undecided. It is only certain ‘trigger points&apos; – like gendered pronouns or refugee admissions – that predictably ignite tensions and deep disagreement.

Political entrepreneurs know this and weaponize trigger points for their agenda. Yet the real key to contemporary conflicts, the book argues, lies in social inequality.

This is a vital work that maps today’s political landscape without sensationalism, offering a fresh lens on public debate.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>898</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">207c91ee-490b-11f1-b563-abdb1d583e5b</guid>
      <title>Julia Bowes, &quot;Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267">Every Man's Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism</a> (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”<br />Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.<br />Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691289267">Every Man's Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism</a> (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”<br />Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.<br />Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34846412" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/78558615-fb4a-4d7a-9b73-3a8b1cb6f827/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=78558615-fb4a-4d7a-9b73-3a8b1cb6f827&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia Bowes, &quot;Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Parental rights” is a rallying cry for today’s American conservatives, signaling opposition to mandatory vaccination and “woke” public school curricula. In Every Man&apos;s Home a Castle: Parental Rights and the Makings of Modern Conservatism (Princeton UP, 2026), Dr. Julia Bowes traces the origins of the modern parental rights movement to the nineteenth century, when the introduction of compulsory schooling laws, child labor regulations, and vaccine requirements provoked a resistance rooted in the presumed right of white men to govern their homes. A wide-ranging coalition—including Irish Catholic immigrants in Illinois, Mormon enclaves in Utah, and Protestant clergy in Virginia—believed that the state had usurped the “natural rights” of parents and “invaded the home.”Dr. Bowes shows how, by the turn of the century, those disparate voices had coalesced into national conservative movements. Anti-vaccinationists, alternative medical practitioners, and parents who opposed compulsory school medical exams joined forces to form the National League for Medical Freedom. Deciding a case brought by conservative Catholic lawyers, the Supreme Court declared parental rights a “fundamental liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. And the Sentinels of the Republic, a conservative citizen’s lobby, mobilized a campaign to defeat the proposed federal Child Labor Amendment, bringing together pro-family and free-market politics with far-reaching consequences.Exploring the emergence of parental rights as an antistatist ideology through legal cases, legislative debates, and political movements, Dr. Bowes argues that the expansion of state power over children provoked such fierce opposition because the paternal rights of white men—considered the “rights-bearing” individuals of American democracy—were widely viewed as the mark and measure of their independence.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>897</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e08fc3b8-4837-11f1-bf25-773900c76870</guid>
      <title>J. Michael Cole, &quot;The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>J. Michael Cole is a Taipei-based security analyst and writer who has spent over two decades documenting Taiwan’s political and security landscape. A former analyst with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), he is a Research Fellow and Executive Editor with the Prospect Foundation in Taiwan, and advises various private and governmental actors. He is also a Senior Non-Resident Fellow with the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington, D.C., the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa, and the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Hub.</p>
<p>In this episode of the New Books Network, we chat with Cole about his latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509568062"><em>The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War</em> </a>(Polity, 2025).</p>
<p>Starting with the Sunflower Student Movement and rise of Xi Jinping, the book explores why the Taiwan Strait has become such a “tinderbox”, and surveys various tactics that the People’s Republic of China has used to destabilize Taiwan. With the Ukraine War’s shadow looming, Cole also examines the prospects of conflict between Taiwan and China, and discusses various means through which Taiwan and its liberal democratic allies can build resilience and interconnection.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.anthonykao.org/"><em>Anthony Kao</em></a><em> is a writer who intersects international affairs and cultural criticism. He founded/edits </em><a href="https://www.cinemaescapist.com/"><em>Cinema Escapist</em></a><em>—a publication exploring the sociopolitical context behind global film and television—and also writes for outlets like The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The Diplomat, and Eater.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Michael Cole is a Taipei-based security analyst and writer who has spent over two decades documenting Taiwan’s political and security landscape. A former analyst with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), he is a Research Fellow and Executive Editor with the Prospect Foundation in Taiwan, and advises various private and governmental actors. He is also a Senior Non-Resident Fellow with the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington, D.C., the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa, and the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Hub.</p>
<p>In this episode of the New Books Network, we chat with Cole about his latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509568062"><em>The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War</em> </a>(Polity, 2025).</p>
<p>Starting with the Sunflower Student Movement and rise of Xi Jinping, the book explores why the Taiwan Strait has become such a “tinderbox”, and surveys various tactics that the People’s Republic of China has used to destabilize Taiwan. With the Ukraine War’s shadow looming, Cole also examines the prospects of conflict between Taiwan and China, and discusses various means through which Taiwan and its liberal democratic allies can build resilience and interconnection.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.anthonykao.org/"><em>Anthony Kao</em></a><em> is a writer who intersects international affairs and cultural criticism. He founded/edits </em><a href="https://www.cinemaescapist.com/"><em>Cinema Escapist</em></a><em>—a publication exploring the sociopolitical context behind global film and television—and also writes for outlets like The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The Diplomat, and Eater.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49560976" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5b3a7eee-10e2-4911-bcb8-f2c5337473f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5b3a7eee-10e2-4911-bcb8-f2c5337473f0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>J. Michael Cole, &quot;The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>J. Michael Cole is a Taipei-based security analyst and writer who has spent over two decades documenting Taiwan’s political and security landscape. A former analyst with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), he is a Research Fellow and Executive Editor with the Prospect Foundation in Taiwan, and advises various private and governmental actors. He is also a Senior Non-Resident Fellow with the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington, D.C., the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa, and the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Hub.

In this episode of the New Books Network, we chat with Cole about his latest book, The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War (Polity, 2025).

Starting with the Sunflower Student Movement and rise of Xi Jinping, the book explores why the Taiwan Strait has become such a “tinderbox”, and surveys various tactics that the People’s Republic of China has used to destabilize Taiwan. With the Ukraine War’s shadow looming, Cole also examines the prospects of conflict between Taiwan and China, and discusses various means through which Taiwan and its liberal democratic allies can build resilience and interconnection.

Anthony Kao is a writer who intersects international affairs and cultural criticism. He founded/edits Cinema Escapist—a publication exploring the sociopolitical context behind global film and television—and also writes for outlets like The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The Diplomat, and Eater.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>J. Michael Cole is a Taipei-based security analyst and writer who has spent over two decades documenting Taiwan’s political and security landscape. A former analyst with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), he is a Research Fellow and Executive Editor with the Prospect Foundation in Taiwan, and advises various private and governmental actors. He is also a Senior Non-Resident Fellow with the Global Taiwan Institute in Washington, D.C., the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa, and the University of Nottingham’s Taiwan Hub.

In this episode of the New Books Network, we chat with Cole about his latest book, The Taiwan Tinderbox: The Island-Nation at the Centre of the New Cold War (Polity, 2025).

Starting with the Sunflower Student Movement and rise of Xi Jinping, the book explores why the Taiwan Strait has become such a “tinderbox”, and surveys various tactics that the People’s Republic of China has used to destabilize Taiwan. With the Ukraine War’s shadow looming, Cole also examines the prospects of conflict between Taiwan and China, and discusses various means through which Taiwan and its liberal democratic allies can build resilience and interconnection.

Anthony Kao is a writer who intersects international affairs and cultural criticism. He founded/edits Cinema Escapist—a publication exploring the sociopolitical context behind global film and television—and also writes for outlets like The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The Diplomat, and Eater.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>896</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a759aba-476d-11f1-a835-7b14d9364079</guid>
      <title>What Does the American Presidency Mean? A Conversation with Richard Holtzman</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/what-does-the-american-presidency-mean-the-need-for-interpretation-in-presidency-studies-richard-holtzman/4b316ecc0b646c4a?ean=9781032769158&amp;next=t"><em>What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies</em></a> is a timely and provocative new title for the <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a>. In it, <a href="https://www.bryant.edu/academics/faculty/holtzman-richard">Richard Holtzman</a> sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s <em>The Rhetorical Presidency </em>as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿</p>
<p>Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ubiquitous-presidency">Coe and Scacco</a> on <em>The Ubiquitous Presidency, </em>and <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/benjamin-wittes-unmaking-the-presidency-donald-trumps-war-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-office-fsg-2020">Hennessey and Wittes</a> talking about their <em>Unmaking the Presidency.</em>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/peace-is-every-step-the-path-of-mindfulness-in-everyday-life-thich-nhat-hanh/84a74a5bfd287fe4?ean=9780553351392&amp;next=t"><em>Peace is Every Step</em></a><em>, </em>and perhaps to conclude it, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/player-piano-a-novel-kurt-vonnegut/892d4f4fa0d5d381"><em>Player Piano</em></a> by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/what-does-the-american-presidency-mean-the-need-for-interpretation-in-presidency-studies-richard-holtzman/4b316ecc0b646c4a?ean=9781032769158&amp;next=t"><em>What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies</em></a> is a timely and provocative new title for the <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a>. In it, <a href="https://www.bryant.edu/academics/faculty/holtzman-richard">Richard Holtzman</a> sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s <em>The Rhetorical Presidency </em>as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿</p>
<p>Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ubiquitous-presidency">Coe and Scacco</a> on <em>The Ubiquitous Presidency, </em>and <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/benjamin-wittes-unmaking-the-presidency-donald-trumps-war-on-the-worlds-most-powerful-office-fsg-2020">Hennessey and Wittes</a> talking about their <em>Unmaking the Presidency.</em>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/peace-is-every-step-the-path-of-mindfulness-in-everyday-life-thich-nhat-hanh/84a74a5bfd287fe4?ean=9780553351392&amp;next=t"><em>Peace is Every Step</em></a><em>, </em>and perhaps to conclude it, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/player-piano-a-novel-kurt-vonnegut/892d4f4fa0d5d381"><em>Player Piano</em></a> by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47593465" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ce79e8f8-1b2a-476f-a341-850ff63efded/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ce79e8f8-1b2a-476f-a341-850ff63efded&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What Does the American Presidency Mean? A Conversation with Richard Holtzman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies is a timely and provocative new title for the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. In it, Richard Holtzman sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s The Rhetorical Presidency as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿

Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include Coe and Scacco on The Ubiquitous Presidency, and Hennessey and Wittes talking about their Unmaking the Presidency.﻿

Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s Peace is Every Step, and perhaps to conclude it, Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿

This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Coming in the thick of the second Trump term, What Does the American Presidency Mean? The Need for Interpretation in Presidency Studies is a timely and provocative new title for the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. In it, Richard Holtzman sets an agenda for interpretivist presidency research. Using Tulis’s The Rhetorical Presidency as a bridge between presidency studies and interpretive political science, the book succinctly outlines how by interpreting presidential words and symbols our understanding of the presidency is enriched, and causal-inferential studies of presidential behaviour, complemented. Though the book directly addresses researchers of the American presidency, as we discuss in this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, it holds lessons for researchers of executive power everywhere. ﻿

Presidency studies your thing? Other episodes on the New Books Network that might interest you include Coe and Scacco on The Ubiquitous Presidency, and Hennessey and Wittes talking about their Unmaking the Presidency.﻿

Looking for something to read? To start the day Rich suggests Thich Nhat Han’s Peace is Every Step, and perhaps to conclude it, Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut. ﻿

This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>895</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d74ac89c-4720-11f1-a098-9b2d6cc9f9e8</guid>
      <title>Siniša Malešević, &quot;Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While nationalism is a term that is often associated with instability, violence, extremism, terrorism, wars and even genocide, in fact most forms of nationalism are nonviolent. </p>
<p>Beyond politics, it is a set of discourses and practices that shape economic, social, legal, and cultural life all over the globe. </p>
<p>Siniša Malešević's <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/nationalism-as-a-way-of-life-the-rise-and-transformation-of-modern-subjectivities-sinisa-malesevic/b10d4f2b8c991521?ean=9781009570206&amp;next=t">Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities</a><em> </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2025) explores the global rise and transformation of nationalism and analyses the organisational, ideological, and micro-interactional mechanisms that have made it the dominant way of life in the twenty-first century. </p>
<p>In a series of case studies across time and space, the book zooms in on three key forms of lived experience: how nationalism operates as a multi-faceted meta-ideology, how national categories have become organisationally embedded in everyday practices and why nationalism has become the dominant form of modern subjectivity. </p>
<p>The book is aimed at readers interested in understanding how nation-states and nationalisms have attained such influence in contemporary world.</p>
<p><a href="https://people.ucd.ie/sinisa.malesevic">Siniša Malešević</a> is Professor of Comparative Historical Sociology at the University College, Dublin, and Senior Fellow at CNAM, Paris. He is the author of the award winning books <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/grounded-nationalisms-a-sociological-analysis-professor-sinisa-malesevic/d46337cf42620ff9?ean=9781108441247&amp;next=t">Grounded Nationalisms</a> (Cambridge, 2019) and <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/sociology/political-sociology/why-humans-fight-social-dynamics-close-range-violence?format=PB&amp;isbn=9781009162814">Why Humans Fight</a> (Cambridge, 2022). His work has been translated into fourteen languages.<br /><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for </em><a href="https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/">Comparative Civilizations Review</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While nationalism is a term that is often associated with instability, violence, extremism, terrorism, wars and even genocide, in fact most forms of nationalism are nonviolent. </p>
<p>Beyond politics, it is a set of discourses and practices that shape economic, social, legal, and cultural life all over the globe. </p>
<p>Siniša Malešević's <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/nationalism-as-a-way-of-life-the-rise-and-transformation-of-modern-subjectivities-sinisa-malesevic/b10d4f2b8c991521?ean=9781009570206&amp;next=t">Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities</a><em> </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2025) explores the global rise and transformation of nationalism and analyses the organisational, ideological, and micro-interactional mechanisms that have made it the dominant way of life in the twenty-first century. </p>
<p>In a series of case studies across time and space, the book zooms in on three key forms of lived experience: how nationalism operates as a multi-faceted meta-ideology, how national categories have become organisationally embedded in everyday practices and why nationalism has become the dominant form of modern subjectivity. </p>
<p>The book is aimed at readers interested in understanding how nation-states and nationalisms have attained such influence in contemporary world.</p>
<p><a href="https://people.ucd.ie/sinisa.malesevic">Siniša Malešević</a> is Professor of Comparative Historical Sociology at the University College, Dublin, and Senior Fellow at CNAM, Paris. He is the author of the award winning books <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/grounded-nationalisms-a-sociological-analysis-professor-sinisa-malesevic/d46337cf42620ff9?ean=9781108441247&amp;next=t">Grounded Nationalisms</a> (Cambridge, 2019) and <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/sociology/political-sociology/why-humans-fight-social-dynamics-close-range-violence?format=PB&amp;isbn=9781009162814">Why Humans Fight</a> (Cambridge, 2022). His work has been translated into fourteen languages.<br /><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for </em><a href="https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/">Comparative Civilizations Review</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59934812" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/17ed0f81-ad1f-4aa3-b1d1-a5c2059f086f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=17ed0f81-ad1f-4aa3-b1d1-a5c2059f086f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Siniša Malešević, &quot;Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While nationalism is a term that is often associated with instability, violence, extremism, terrorism, wars and even genocide, in fact most forms of nationalism are nonviolent. 

Beyond politics, it is a set of discourses and practices that shape economic, social, legal, and cultural life all over the globe. 

Siniša Malešević&apos;s Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities (Cambridge University Press, 2025) explores the global rise and transformation of nationalism and analyses the organisational, ideological, and micro-interactional mechanisms that have made it the dominant way of life in the twenty-first century. 

In a series of case studies across time and space, the book zooms in on three key forms of lived experience: how nationalism operates as a multi-faceted meta-ideology, how national categories have become organisationally embedded in everyday practices and why nationalism has become the dominant form of modern subjectivity. 

The book is aimed at readers interested in understanding how nation-states and nationalisms have attained such influence in contemporary world.

Siniša Malešević is Professor of Comparative Historical Sociology at the University College, Dublin, and Senior Fellow at CNAM, Paris. He is the author of the award winning books Grounded Nationalisms (Cambridge, 2019) and Why Humans Fight (Cambridge, 2022). His work has been translated into fourteen languages.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for Comparative Civilizations Review.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While nationalism is a term that is often associated with instability, violence, extremism, terrorism, wars and even genocide, in fact most forms of nationalism are nonviolent. 

Beyond politics, it is a set of discourses and practices that shape economic, social, legal, and cultural life all over the globe. 

Siniša Malešević&apos;s Nationalism as a Way of Life: The Rise and Transformation of Modern Subjectivities (Cambridge University Press, 2025) explores the global rise and transformation of nationalism and analyses the organisational, ideological, and micro-interactional mechanisms that have made it the dominant way of life in the twenty-first century. 

In a series of case studies across time and space, the book zooms in on three key forms of lived experience: how nationalism operates as a multi-faceted meta-ideology, how national categories have become organisationally embedded in everyday practices and why nationalism has become the dominant form of modern subjectivity. 

The book is aimed at readers interested in understanding how nation-states and nationalisms have attained such influence in contemporary world.

Siniša Malešević is Professor of Comparative Historical Sociology at the University College, Dublin, and Senior Fellow at CNAM, Paris. He is the author of the award winning books Grounded Nationalisms (Cambridge, 2019) and Why Humans Fight (Cambridge, 2022). His work has been translated into fourteen languages.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for Comparative Civilizations Review.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>894</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53a964a2-4523-11f1-94a2-4b7881fac9da</guid>
      <title>Arely M. Zimmerman, &quot;Contentious Citizenship: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816554614">﻿Contentious Citizenship﻿: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders</a> (U Arizona Press, 2026) reshapes how we understand belonging, identity, and political participation in the context of migration. Drawing on decades of Salvadoran activism from the 1980s solidarity movement to the post–civil war era, Arely M. Zimmerman offers a powerful ethnographic account of how migrants challenge exclusionary state practices and redefine citizenship on their own terms using transnational networks and revolutionary politics that transcend borders.<br />Drawing on nearly fifty interviews with activists who fled El Salvador, Zimmerman traces how political refugees carried with them strategies of resistance and community organizing that shaped social justice movements in the United States. The book addresses the political turmoil and grassroots mobilizations in El Salvador, the sanctuary movement of the 1980s, contemporary activism, and the impact of women’s strategies and forms of resistance.<br />Essential reading for scholars and students of migration, Central American studies, and political movements, <em>Contentious Citizenship</em> is a bold intervention into contemporary debates on identity, legality, and resistance. Zimmerman’s work honors the ingenuity and resilience of Salvadoran activists and invites readers to consider what it means to belong.</p>
<p>This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for the <a href="https://uapress.arizona.edu/">University of Arizona Press</a>. Her book, <a href="https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bison-books/9781496240415/the-quake-that-drained-the-desert/"><em>The Quake That Drained the Desert</em></a> (forthcoming in 2026) investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816554614">﻿Contentious Citizenship﻿: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders</a> (U Arizona Press, 2026) reshapes how we understand belonging, identity, and political participation in the context of migration. Drawing on decades of Salvadoran activism from the 1980s solidarity movement to the post–civil war era, Arely M. Zimmerman offers a powerful ethnographic account of how migrants challenge exclusionary state practices and redefine citizenship on their own terms using transnational networks and revolutionary politics that transcend borders.<br />Drawing on nearly fifty interviews with activists who fled El Salvador, Zimmerman traces how political refugees carried with them strategies of resistance and community organizing that shaped social justice movements in the United States. The book addresses the political turmoil and grassroots mobilizations in El Salvador, the sanctuary movement of the 1980s, contemporary activism, and the impact of women’s strategies and forms of resistance.<br />Essential reading for scholars and students of migration, Central American studies, and political movements, <em>Contentious Citizenship</em> is a bold intervention into contemporary debates on identity, legality, and resistance. Zimmerman’s work honors the ingenuity and resilience of Salvadoran activists and invites readers to consider what it means to belong.</p>
<p>This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for the <a href="https://uapress.arizona.edu/">University of Arizona Press</a>. Her book, <a href="https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bison-books/9781496240415/the-quake-that-drained-the-desert/"><em>The Quake That Drained the Desert</em></a> (forthcoming in 2026) investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20834376" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f52cfe57-66e2-4462-852f-4d36af2a5c89/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f52cfe57-66e2-4462-852f-4d36af2a5c89&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arely M. Zimmerman, &quot;Contentious Citizenship: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Contentious Citizenship﻿: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders (U Arizona Press, 2026) reshapes how we understand belonging, identity, and political participation in the context of migration. Drawing on decades of Salvadoran activism from the 1980s solidarity movement to the post–civil war era, Arely M. Zimmerman offers a powerful ethnographic account of how migrants challenge exclusionary state practices and redefine citizenship on their own terms using transnational networks and revolutionary politics that transcend borders.Drawing on nearly fifty interviews with activists who fled El Salvador, Zimmerman traces how political refugees carried with them strategies of resistance and community organizing that shaped social justice movements in the United States. The book addresses the political turmoil and grassroots mobilizations in El Salvador, the sanctuary movement of the 1980s, contemporary activism, and the impact of women’s strategies and forms of resistance.Essential reading for scholars and students of migration, Central American studies, and political movements, Contentious Citizenship is a bold intervention into contemporary debates on identity, legality, and resistance. Zimmerman’s work honors the ingenuity and resilience of Salvadoran activists and invites readers to consider what it means to belong.

This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for the University of Arizona Press. Her book, The Quake That Drained the Desert (forthcoming in 2026) investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Contentious Citizenship﻿: Salvadoran Activism and Belonging Across Borders (U Arizona Press, 2026) reshapes how we understand belonging, identity, and political participation in the context of migration. Drawing on decades of Salvadoran activism from the 1980s solidarity movement to the post–civil war era, Arely M. Zimmerman offers a powerful ethnographic account of how migrants challenge exclusionary state practices and redefine citizenship on their own terms using transnational networks and revolutionary politics that transcend borders.Drawing on nearly fifty interviews with activists who fled El Salvador, Zimmerman traces how political refugees carried with them strategies of resistance and community organizing that shaped social justice movements in the United States. The book addresses the political turmoil and grassroots mobilizations in El Salvador, the sanctuary movement of the 1980s, contemporary activism, and the impact of women’s strategies and forms of resistance.Essential reading for scholars and students of migration, Central American studies, and political movements, Contentious Citizenship is a bold intervention into contemporary debates on identity, legality, and resistance. Zimmerman’s work honors the ingenuity and resilience of Salvadoran activists and invites readers to consider what it means to belong.

This interview was conducted by Mary Reynolds, publicity manager for the University of Arizona Press. Her book, The Quake That Drained the Desert (forthcoming in 2026) investigates the 1887 borderlands earthquake that changed surface water and groundwater in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>893</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">939ee4d8-445b-11f1-bd87-477bf6ffff4c</guid>
      <title>Caroline Kuzemko, &quot;Climate Politics: Can&apos;t Live with It, Can&apos;t Mitigate without It&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>By exploring the dynamic relationships between politics, policymaking, and policy over time,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009455688">Climate Politics: Can't Live with It, Can't Mitigate without It</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) aims to explain why climate change mitigation is so political, and why politics is also indispensable in enacting real change. It argues that politics is poorly understood and often sidelined in research and policy circles, which is an omission that must be rectified, because the policies that we rely on to drive down greenhouse gas emissions are deeply inter-connected with political and social contexts. Incorporating insights from political economy, socio-technical transitions, and public policy, this book provides a framework for understanding the role of specific ideas, interests, and institutions in shaping and driving sustainable change. The chapters present examples at global, national, and local scales, spanning from the 1990s to 2020s. This volume will prove valuable for graduate students, researchers, and policymakers interested in the politics and policy of climate change. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By exploring the dynamic relationships between politics, policymaking, and policy over time,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009455688">Climate Politics: Can't Live with It, Can't Mitigate without It</a> (Cambridge UP, 2026) aims to explain why climate change mitigation is so political, and why politics is also indispensable in enacting real change. It argues that politics is poorly understood and often sidelined in research and policy circles, which is an omission that must be rectified, because the policies that we rely on to drive down greenhouse gas emissions are deeply inter-connected with political and social contexts. Incorporating insights from political economy, socio-technical transitions, and public policy, this book provides a framework for understanding the role of specific ideas, interests, and institutions in shaping and driving sustainable change. The chapters present examples at global, national, and local scales, spanning from the 1990s to 2020s. This volume will prove valuable for graduate students, researchers, and policymakers interested in the politics and policy of climate change. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36296672" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0ead87e6-32a3-433f-a505-875979525910/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0ead87e6-32a3-433f-a505-875979525910&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caroline Kuzemko, &quot;Climate Politics: Can&apos;t Live with It, Can&apos;t Mitigate without It&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>By exploring the dynamic relationships between politics, policymaking, and policy over time, Climate Politics: Can&apos;t Live with It, Can&apos;t Mitigate without It (Cambridge UP, 2026) aims to explain why climate change mitigation is so political, and why politics is also indispensable in enacting real change. It argues that politics is poorly understood and often sidelined in research and policy circles, which is an omission that must be rectified, because the policies that we rely on to drive down greenhouse gas emissions are deeply inter-connected with political and social contexts. Incorporating insights from political economy, socio-technical transitions, and public policy, this book provides a framework for understanding the role of specific ideas, interests, and institutions in shaping and driving sustainable change. The chapters present examples at global, national, and local scales, spanning from the 1990s to 2020s. This volume will prove valuable for graduate students, researchers, and policymakers interested in the politics and policy of climate change. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>By exploring the dynamic relationships between politics, policymaking, and policy over time, Climate Politics: Can&apos;t Live with It, Can&apos;t Mitigate without It (Cambridge UP, 2026) aims to explain why climate change mitigation is so political, and why politics is also indispensable in enacting real change. It argues that politics is poorly understood and often sidelined in research and policy circles, which is an omission that must be rectified, because the policies that we rely on to drive down greenhouse gas emissions are deeply inter-connected with political and social contexts. Incorporating insights from political economy, socio-technical transitions, and public policy, this book provides a framework for understanding the role of specific ideas, interests, and institutions in shaping and driving sustainable change. The chapters present examples at global, national, and local scales, spanning from the 1990s to 2020s. This volume will prove valuable for graduate students, researchers, and policymakers interested in the politics and policy of climate change. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>892</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">91509f3a-4444-11f1-b7d8-0b3f2b2c83a8</guid>
      <title>Miranda Yaver, &quot;Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Miranda Yaver’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009649810">Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States</a><em> </em>﻿﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026), has lots of examples and incidents that will seem quite familiar to anyone who has dealt with health insurance coverage in the United States. In a sense, this book speaks to everyone because we have all been in situations like the ones that Yaver hears about from her interviewees. We know what it is like to have a test or a scan or a prescription ordered by a medical professional for us only to have an insurance company tell us that we cannot have that test or scan or medicine. Yaver dives into this quagmire and unearths the constellations of causes and reasons why this is now the essential operating process for much of American health insurance. By unpacking these causes and reasons, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/coverage-denied-how-health-insurers-drive-inequality-united-states?format=HB">Coverage Denied</a><em> </em>clarifies so many of our experiences and helps us to think about the myriad ways in which health insurers and health insurance contribute to inequality in the United States, across a range of dimensions including race, socio-economic position, gender, sexuality, ability, and more.</p>
<p>Part of what Yaver’s research finds is that very few individuals appeal coverage denials with their insurance companies. The question becomes one of who is denied coverage or tests or prescriptions, and who is going to try to access the means for getting those denials reversed. This is part of the administrative burden that is not equally distributed, given different economic, disability, employment, and family situations. Thus, the appeals process is part of the driver of inequality in terms of healthcare and healthcare coverage. The findings also note that women are more likely to be denied coverage than are men, in part because women often make more use of healthcare than do men. But this inequity translates across minoritized groups, including those who are disabled and sick, of lower economic status, and/or are Black or Hispanic. Thus, the access to medical care is distributed unequally across a number of different vectors.</p>
<p>The denial of coverage, thus the denial of care, also leaves the medical professionals in a quandary as well, since they are unsure of what to prescribe and what is likely to actually happen for a patient. Thus, those trying to prescribe different kinds of care, be it tests or prescriptions or interventions, have little certainty that their patients will receive what the prescribing individual intends for them. While the initial reason behind coverage assessments and the requirement for prior authorization was cost containment, the results, at this point, are a system that often does not work for those who need medical assistance and for the medical professionals working with their patients. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/coverage-denied-how-health-insurers-drive-inequality-united-states?format=HB">Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States</a> is a patient-centered book in that it focuses on the experiences of patients as they try to work their way through this distorted and obtuse system, but it also brings in the perspective of medical providers because they are often equally lost in terms of knowing what kind of care their patients can and do receive.</p>
<p>This book is as must read for anyone who is interested in the way healthcare and health insurance operate in the United States, and why these issues, policies, and processes are often so confusing and confounding.</p>
<p><em>Coverage Denied</em> can be purchased at <a href="https://whitewhalebookstore.com/">The White Whale Bookstore</a> in Pittsburgh, PA.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University. She is co-host of </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a>. <em>She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miranda Yaver’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009649810">Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States</a><em> </em>﻿﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026), has lots of examples and incidents that will seem quite familiar to anyone who has dealt with health insurance coverage in the United States. In a sense, this book speaks to everyone because we have all been in situations like the ones that Yaver hears about from her interviewees. We know what it is like to have a test or a scan or a prescription ordered by a medical professional for us only to have an insurance company tell us that we cannot have that test or scan or medicine. Yaver dives into this quagmire and unearths the constellations of causes and reasons why this is now the essential operating process for much of American health insurance. By unpacking these causes and reasons, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/coverage-denied-how-health-insurers-drive-inequality-united-states?format=HB">Coverage Denied</a><em> </em>clarifies so many of our experiences and helps us to think about the myriad ways in which health insurers and health insurance contribute to inequality in the United States, across a range of dimensions including race, socio-economic position, gender, sexuality, ability, and more.</p>
<p>Part of what Yaver’s research finds is that very few individuals appeal coverage denials with their insurance companies. The question becomes one of who is denied coverage or tests or prescriptions, and who is going to try to access the means for getting those denials reversed. This is part of the administrative burden that is not equally distributed, given different economic, disability, employment, and family situations. Thus, the appeals process is part of the driver of inequality in terms of healthcare and healthcare coverage. The findings also note that women are more likely to be denied coverage than are men, in part because women often make more use of healthcare than do men. But this inequity translates across minoritized groups, including those who are disabled and sick, of lower economic status, and/or are Black or Hispanic. Thus, the access to medical care is distributed unequally across a number of different vectors.</p>
<p>The denial of coverage, thus the denial of care, also leaves the medical professionals in a quandary as well, since they are unsure of what to prescribe and what is likely to actually happen for a patient. Thus, those trying to prescribe different kinds of care, be it tests or prescriptions or interventions, have little certainty that their patients will receive what the prescribing individual intends for them. While the initial reason behind coverage assessments and the requirement for prior authorization was cost containment, the results, at this point, are a system that often does not work for those who need medical assistance and for the medical professionals working with their patients. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/coverage-denied-how-health-insurers-drive-inequality-united-states?format=HB">Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States</a> is a patient-centered book in that it focuses on the experiences of patients as they try to work their way through this distorted and obtuse system, but it also brings in the perspective of medical providers because they are often equally lost in terms of knowing what kind of care their patients can and do receive.</p>
<p>This book is as must read for anyone who is interested in the way healthcare and health insurance operate in the United States, and why these issues, policies, and processes are often so confusing and confounding.</p>
<p><em>Coverage Denied</em> can be purchased at <a href="https://whitewhalebookstore.com/">The White Whale Bookstore</a> in Pittsburgh, PA.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University. She is co-host of </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a>. <em>She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51201896" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/dffd75d8-18ea-411c-a6ff-24bf3b8d1583/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=dffd75d8-18ea-411c-a6ff-24bf3b8d1583&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Miranda Yaver, &quot;Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Miranda Yaver’s new book, Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States ﻿﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026), has lots of examples and incidents that will seem quite familiar to anyone who has dealt with health insurance coverage in the United States. In a sense, this book speaks to everyone because we have all been in situations like the ones that Yaver hears about from her interviewees. We know what it is like to have a test or a scan or a prescription ordered by a medical professional for us only to have an insurance company tell us that we cannot have that test or scan or medicine. Yaver dives into this quagmire and unearths the constellations of causes and reasons why this is now the essential operating process for much of American health insurance. By unpacking these causes and reasons, Coverage Denied clarifies so many of our experiences and helps us to think about the myriad ways in which health insurers and health insurance contribute to inequality in the United States, across a range of dimensions including race, socio-economic position, gender, sexuality, ability, and more.

Part of what Yaver’s research finds is that very few individuals appeal coverage denials with their insurance companies. The question becomes one of who is denied coverage or tests or prescriptions, and who is going to try to access the means for getting those denials reversed. This is part of the administrative burden that is not equally distributed, given different economic, disability, employment, and family situations. Thus, the appeals process is part of the driver of inequality in terms of healthcare and healthcare coverage. The findings also note that women are more likely to be denied coverage than are men, in part because women often make more use of healthcare than do men. But this inequity translates across minoritized groups, including those who are disabled and sick, of lower economic status, and/or are Black or Hispanic. Thus, the access to medical care is distributed unequally across a number of different vectors.

The denial of coverage, thus the denial of care, also leaves the medical professionals in a quandary as well, since they are unsure of what to prescribe and what is likely to actually happen for a patient. Thus, those trying to prescribe different kinds of care, be it tests or prescriptions or interventions, have little certainty that their patients will receive what the prescribing individual intends for them. While the initial reason behind coverage assessments and the requirement for prior authorization was cost containment, the results, at this point, are a system that often does not work for those who need medical assistance and for the medical professionals working with their patients. Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States is a patient-centered book in that it focuses on the experiences of patients as they try to work their way through this distorted and obtuse system, but it also brings in the perspective of medical providers because they are often equally lost in terms of knowing what kind of care their patients can and do receive.

This book is as must read for anyone who is interested in the way healthcare and health insurance operate in the United States, and why these issues, policies, and processes are often so confusing and confounding.

Coverage Denied can be purchased at The White Whale Bookstore in Pittsburgh, PA.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University. She is co-host of New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics. She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Miranda Yaver’s new book, Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States ﻿﻿(Cambridge UP, 2026), has lots of examples and incidents that will seem quite familiar to anyone who has dealt with health insurance coverage in the United States. In a sense, this book speaks to everyone because we have all been in situations like the ones that Yaver hears about from her interviewees. We know what it is like to have a test or a scan or a prescription ordered by a medical professional for us only to have an insurance company tell us that we cannot have that test or scan or medicine. Yaver dives into this quagmire and unearths the constellations of causes and reasons why this is now the essential operating process for much of American health insurance. By unpacking these causes and reasons, Coverage Denied clarifies so many of our experiences and helps us to think about the myriad ways in which health insurers and health insurance contribute to inequality in the United States, across a range of dimensions including race, socio-economic position, gender, sexuality, ability, and more.

Part of what Yaver’s research finds is that very few individuals appeal coverage denials with their insurance companies. The question becomes one of who is denied coverage or tests or prescriptions, and who is going to try to access the means for getting those denials reversed. This is part of the administrative burden that is not equally distributed, given different economic, disability, employment, and family situations. Thus, the appeals process is part of the driver of inequality in terms of healthcare and healthcare coverage. The findings also note that women are more likely to be denied coverage than are men, in part because women often make more use of healthcare than do men. But this inequity translates across minoritized groups, including those who are disabled and sick, of lower economic status, and/or are Black or Hispanic. Thus, the access to medical care is distributed unequally across a number of different vectors.

The denial of coverage, thus the denial of care, also leaves the medical professionals in a quandary as well, since they are unsure of what to prescribe and what is likely to actually happen for a patient. Thus, those trying to prescribe different kinds of care, be it tests or prescriptions or interventions, have little certainty that their patients will receive what the prescribing individual intends for them. While the initial reason behind coverage assessments and the requirement for prior authorization was cost containment, the results, at this point, are a system that often does not work for those who need medical assistance and for the medical professionals working with their patients. Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality in the United States is a patient-centered book in that it focuses on the experiences of patients as they try to work their way through this distorted and obtuse system, but it also brings in the perspective of medical providers because they are often equally lost in terms of knowing what kind of care their patients can and do receive.

This book is as must read for anyone who is interested in the way healthcare and health insurance operate in the United States, and why these issues, policies, and processes are often so confusing and confounding.

Coverage Denied can be purchased at The White Whale Bookstore in Pittsburgh, PA.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University. She is co-host of New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics. She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>891</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8a9fbea-4390-11f1-88d5-8b69fda69874</guid>
      <title>Who Is Democracy Actually For? People, Power, and the Fight Against Democratic Decline</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Esam Boraey speaks with Shandana Khan Mohmand and Marjoke Oosterom, democracy experts at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released Democracy Report “Where’s the Dēmos in Democracy? Building Democratic Futures and Resisting Autocracy.” At a moment when autocracies outnumber democracies for the first time in twenty years, this report argues that the democratic crisis is not simply an institutional one, it is a crisis of exclusion. For too long, efforts to build democracy have focused on formal institutions like legislatures, courts, and electoral commissions, while neglecting the people those institutions are supposed to serve. The report puts forward eight building blocks for recentering citizens in democratic life, from building active citizenship and supporting informal mobilization, to reclaiming digital agency and strengthening accountability mechanisms. Drawing on decades of research across the Global South, from Pakistan and Zimbabwe to Uganda, Brazil, and beyond, Shandana and Marjoke bring the report's findings to life with vivid examples of how ordinary people fight back against backsliding, reclaim civic space, and keep democratic values alive even under authoritarian pressure. The conversation also addresses the role of inequality in driving democratic decline, the double-edged nature of digital technology, the power of youth movements, and what the dismantling of USAID means for global democracy support.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Episode-9-Transcript.docx#asset:453770@1:url">here</a> and the report is <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/IDS_DEMOCRACY_FINAL.pdf#asset:454068@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Esam Boraey speaks with Shandana Khan Mohmand and Marjoke Oosterom, democracy experts at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released Democracy Report “Where’s the Dēmos in Democracy? Building Democratic Futures and Resisting Autocracy.” At a moment when autocracies outnumber democracies for the first time in twenty years, this report argues that the democratic crisis is not simply an institutional one, it is a crisis of exclusion. For too long, efforts to build democracy have focused on formal institutions like legislatures, courts, and electoral commissions, while neglecting the people those institutions are supposed to serve. The report puts forward eight building blocks for recentering citizens in democratic life, from building active citizenship and supporting informal mobilization, to reclaiming digital agency and strengthening accountability mechanisms. Drawing on decades of research across the Global South, from Pakistan and Zimbabwe to Uganda, Brazil, and beyond, Shandana and Marjoke bring the report's findings to life with vivid examples of how ordinary people fight back against backsliding, reclaim civic space, and keep democratic values alive even under authoritarian pressure. The conversation also addresses the role of inequality in driving democratic decline, the double-edged nature of digital technology, the power of youth movements, and what the dismantling of USAID means for global democracy support.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Episode-9-Transcript.docx#asset:453770@1:url">here</a> and the report is <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/IDS_DEMOCRACY_FINAL.pdf#asset:454068@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52476355" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9d413b73-31f8-413c-8c32-5b37f392b402/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9d413b73-31f8-413c-8c32-5b37f392b402&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Who Is Democracy Actually For? People, Power, and the Fight Against Democratic Decline</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Esam Boraey speaks with Shandana Khan Mohmand and Marjoke Oosterom, democracy experts at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released Democracy Report “Where’s the Dēmos in Democracy? Building Democratic Futures and Resisting Autocracy.” At a moment when autocracies outnumber democracies for the first time in twenty years, this report argues that the democratic crisis is not simply an institutional one, it is a crisis of exclusion. For too long, efforts to build democracy have focused on formal institutions like legislatures, courts, and electoral commissions, while neglecting the people those institutions are supposed to serve. The report puts forward eight building blocks for recentering citizens in democratic life, from building active citizenship and supporting informal mobilization, to reclaiming digital agency and strengthening accountability mechanisms. Drawing on decades of research across the Global South, from Pakistan and Zimbabwe to Uganda, Brazil, and beyond, Shandana and Marjoke bring the report&apos;s findings to life with vivid examples of how ordinary people fight back against backsliding, reclaim civic space, and keep democratic values alive even under authoritarian pressure. The conversation also addresses the role of inequality in driving democratic decline, the double-edged nature of digital technology, the power of youth movements, and what the dismantling of USAID means for global democracy support.

Transcript here and the report is here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Esam Boraey speaks with Shandana Khan Mohmand and Marjoke Oosterom, democracy experts at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released Democracy Report “Where’s the Dēmos in Democracy? Building Democratic Futures and Resisting Autocracy.” At a moment when autocracies outnumber democracies for the first time in twenty years, this report argues that the democratic crisis is not simply an institutional one, it is a crisis of exclusion. For too long, efforts to build democracy have focused on formal institutions like legislatures, courts, and electoral commissions, while neglecting the people those institutions are supposed to serve. The report puts forward eight building blocks for recentering citizens in democratic life, from building active citizenship and supporting informal mobilization, to reclaiming digital agency and strengthening accountability mechanisms. Drawing on decades of research across the Global South, from Pakistan and Zimbabwe to Uganda, Brazil, and beyond, Shandana and Marjoke bring the report&apos;s findings to life with vivid examples of how ordinary people fight back against backsliding, reclaim civic space, and keep democratic values alive even under authoritarian pressure. The conversation also addresses the role of inequality in driving democratic decline, the double-edged nature of digital technology, the power of youth movements, and what the dismantling of USAID means for global democracy support.

Transcript here and the report is here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>890</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4ad2f18-41a0-11f1-b1fa-a38cf30e335d</guid>
      <title>Assessing Global Democratic Health Amidst a Growing Shadow of Autocracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/FIW2026_final_digital%20%281%29.pdf">Freedom in the World 2026</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf">25 Years of Autocratization</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2026-03/FIW2026_final_digital%20%281%29.pdf">Freedom in the World 2026</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf">25 Years of Autocratization</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39382774" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1dfbf2f9-19e7-4ee8-97d3-009553cdfc1e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1dfbf2f9-19e7-4ee8-97d3-009553cdfc1e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Assessing Global Democratic Health Amidst a Growing Shadow of Autocracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.

Links:

Freedom in the World 2026

25 Years of Autocratization
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Maya Tudor speaks with two democracy experts at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Freedom House to understand the headlines from Freedom House’s 2026 Report, entitled the growing shadow of autocratization. We discuss the drivers behind the 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline and compare the similarities and differences between Freedom House and Varieties of Democracy reports. We conclude by anticipating what lies ahead, what our experts are looking to understand, and what everyday citizens can do to strengthen democracy.

Links:

Freedom in the World 2026

25 Years of Autocratization
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>889</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec82ed50-41d2-11f1-8185-5b95d74d8732</guid>
      <title>The British General Election of 2024: A Conversation with Robert Ford and Paula Surridge</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why and how did Labour win the 2024 election? In <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-95952-3?source=shoppingads&amp;locale=en-gb&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=18594397130&amp;gbraid=0AAAAADu685MhJkwcLhUsjq_CNG4lNE1iJ&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjwwJzPBhBREiwAJfHRnesyD2wZs1WwJE6Zm5b1GsuHd49kxVBxDBmy-lvjyvEwy49-gDSc5hoCVtsQAvD_BwE">The British General Election of 2024</a><em> </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/robfordmancs.bsky.social">Robert Ford</a>, a <a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/rob.ford">Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester</a>, <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/timbale.bsky.social">Tim Bale</a><a href="https://www.qmul.ac.uk/politics/staff/profiles/baletim.html">, Professor of Politics at Queen Mary, University of London</a>, <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/drjennings.bsky.social">Will Jennings</a>, <a href="https://www.southampton.ac.uk/people/5x8zrf/professor-will-jennings">Professor of Politics at the University of Southampton</a>, and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/psurridge.bsky.social">Paula Surridge</a>, <a href="https://www.bristol.ac.uk/people/person/Paula-Surridge-372a5da6-85db-4fb9-ab38-4cf0d0fbb126/">Professor of Politics at the University of Bristol</a> present a detailed analysis of the context, campaign and election result. Part of a long running series of books that offer definitive accounts of British elections, the book uses a range of methods, including examining of social, print and televisual media, fieldwork with individuals from the key political parties, and deep psephological analysis to both describe and explain the 2024 result. As accessible and engaging as it as academically rigorous, the book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand contemporary politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why and how did Labour win the 2024 election? In <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-95952-3?source=shoppingads&amp;locale=en-gb&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=18594397130&amp;gbraid=0AAAAADu685MhJkwcLhUsjq_CNG4lNE1iJ&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjwwJzPBhBREiwAJfHRnesyD2wZs1WwJE6Zm5b1GsuHd49kxVBxDBmy-lvjyvEwy49-gDSc5hoCVtsQAvD_BwE">The British General Election of 2024</a><em> </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/robfordmancs.bsky.social">Robert Ford</a>, a <a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/rob.ford">Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester</a>, <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/timbale.bsky.social">Tim Bale</a><a href="https://www.qmul.ac.uk/politics/staff/profiles/baletim.html">, Professor of Politics at Queen Mary, University of London</a>, <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/drjennings.bsky.social">Will Jennings</a>, <a href="https://www.southampton.ac.uk/people/5x8zrf/professor-will-jennings">Professor of Politics at the University of Southampton</a>, and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/psurridge.bsky.social">Paula Surridge</a>, <a href="https://www.bristol.ac.uk/people/person/Paula-Surridge-372a5da6-85db-4fb9-ab38-4cf0d0fbb126/">Professor of Politics at the University of Bristol</a> present a detailed analysis of the context, campaign and election result. Part of a long running series of books that offer definitive accounts of British elections, the book uses a range of methods, including examining of social, print and televisual media, fieldwork with individuals from the key political parties, and deep psephological analysis to both describe and explain the 2024 result. As accessible and engaging as it as academically rigorous, the book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand contemporary politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44469175" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f1903404-0987-43cd-8f04-24338b4f4f0c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f1903404-0987-43cd-8f04-24338b4f4f0c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The British General Election of 2024: A Conversation with Robert Ford and Paula Surridge</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why and how did Labour win the 2024 election? In The British General Election of 2024 Robert Ford, a Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester, Tim Bale, Professor of Politics at Queen Mary, University of London, Will Jennings, Professor of Politics at the University of Southampton, and Paula Surridge, Professor of Politics at the University of Bristol present a detailed analysis of the context, campaign and election result. Part of a long running series of books that offer definitive accounts of British elections, the book uses a range of methods, including examining of social, print and televisual media, fieldwork with individuals from the key political parties, and deep psephological analysis to both describe and explain the 2024 result. As accessible and engaging as it as academically rigorous, the book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand contemporary politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why and how did Labour win the 2024 election? In The British General Election of 2024 Robert Ford, a Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester, Tim Bale, Professor of Politics at Queen Mary, University of London, Will Jennings, Professor of Politics at the University of Southampton, and Paula Surridge, Professor of Politics at the University of Bristol present a detailed analysis of the context, campaign and election result. Part of a long running series of books that offer definitive accounts of British elections, the book uses a range of methods, including examining of social, print and televisual media, fieldwork with individuals from the key political parties, and deep psephological analysis to both describe and explain the 2024 result. As accessible and engaging as it as academically rigorous, the book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand contemporary politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>888</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad593fba-4198-11f1-9875-8b3860e86569</guid>
      <title>Caste and Race: Ambedkar and King with the Ambedkar King Study Circle</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.</p>
<p><strong>Guests:</strong></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as <em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<p>S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in the episode:</strong></p>
<p>B. R. Ambedkar, <a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOoo5DFcHtNLc91r1DLgDQBtziq_bG1mkNTQO6JopkeW9TVCPCJz4">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Martin Luther King Jr., <a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/where-do-we-go-here">“Where Do We Go from Here?”</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/">Savera</a> is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.</p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/the-hindu-supremacist-disinformation-campaign-against-the-caste-discrimination-litigation-in-us">“The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/caste-discrimination-hindu-american-foundation-us"> “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, “<a href="https://caravanmagazine.in/caste/cisco-haf-hindu-american-dalit-diaspora">Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing</a>”</p>
<p>Ajantha Subramanian, <a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674987883">The Caste of Merit</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.</p>
<p><strong>Guests:</strong></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as <em>The Wire</em>.</p>
<p>S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.</p>
<p><strong>Mentioned in the episode:</strong></p>
<p>B. R. Ambedkar, <a href="https://www.versobooks.com/products/75-annihilation-of-caste?srsltid=AfmBOoo5DFcHtNLc91r1DLgDQBtziq_bG1mkNTQO6JopkeW9TVCPCJz4">Annihilation of Caste</a></p>
<p>Martin Luther King Jr., <a href="https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/where-do-we-go-here">“Where Do We Go from Here?”</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wearesavera.org/">Savera</a> is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.</p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/the-hindu-supremacist-disinformation-campaign-against-the-caste-discrimination-litigation-in-us">“The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan,<a href="https://thewire.in/caste/caste-discrimination-hindu-american-foundation-us"> “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”</a></p>
<p>S. Karthikeyan, “<a href="https://caravanmagazine.in/caste/cisco-haf-hindu-american-dalit-diaspora">Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing</a>”</p>
<p>Ajantha Subramanian, <a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674987883">The Caste of Merit</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52926143" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8f732bcc-cc75-4fde-882a-7f6bd136db8f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8f732bcc-cc75-4fde-882a-7f6bd136db8f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caste and Race: Ambedkar and King with the Ambedkar King Study Circle</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.

Guests:

S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as The Wire.

S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.

Mentioned in the episode:

B. R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste

Martin Luther King Jr., “Where Do We Go from Here?”

Savera is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.

S. Karthikeyan, “The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”

S. Karthikeyan, “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”

S. Karthikeyan, “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing”

Ajantha Subramanian, The Caste of Merit
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode features S. Karthikeyan and S. Subbulakshmi, the Convenor and Secretary of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, an anti-caste organization based in Silicon Valley. Our conversation began with a discussion of the choice of B. R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King Jr. as the titular heads of the organization, then moved on to a conversation about its membership-based structure, the anti-caste struggles in which the AKSC has participated, and the significance of California in general, and the Silicon Valley in particular, as an epicenter of caste consolidation and anti-caste mobilization.

Guests:

S. Karthikeyan is an IT professional based in Silicon Valley and regular contributor to public outlets such as The Wire.

S. Subbulakshmi is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Stanford Centre on Longevity.

Mentioned in the episode:

B. R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste

Martin Luther King Jr., “Where Do We Go from Here?”

Savera is a multiracial, interfaith, anticaste coalition of organizations and activists.

S. Karthikeyan, “The Hindu Supremacist Disinformation Campaign Against the Caste Discrimination Litigation in US”

S. Karthikeyan, “How Protections Against Caste Discrimination Are Being Opposed in the US”

S. Karthikeyan, “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing”

Ajantha Subramanian, The Caste of Merit
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>887</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e7f2718-4016-11f1-98bd-ef86ef0ff108</guid>
      <title>Oil and Militancy in Nigeria: A Conversation with Noo Saro-Wiwa</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Noo Saro-Wiwa is an author and journalist. Born in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and raised in England, she attended King's College London and Columbia University in New York.​<br /></p>
<p>Her first book, <a href="https://granta.com/products/looking-for-transwonderland/"><em>Looking for Transwonderland: Travels in Nigeria</em></a> (Granta), was published to critical acclaim in 2012. It was selected as BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in 2012; named The Sunday Times Travel Book of the Year, 2012; shortlisted for the Author’s Club Dolman Travel Book of the Year in 2013; nominated by The Financial Times as one of the best travel books of 2012. <em>Looking for Transwonderland</em> has been translated into French and Italian, and was awarded the Albatros Travel Literature Prize in Italy in 2016.</p>
<p>Noo's second book, <a href="https://canongate.co.uk/books/4040-black-ghosts-a-journey-into-the-lives-of-africans-in-china/"><em>Black Ghosts </em>(Canongate, 2023) </a>explores the African community in China and was named Edward Stanford Travel Book of the Year in 2025.<br /></p>
<p>Her latest publication, <a href="https://globalreports.columbia.edu/books/the-burning-ground"><em>The Burning Ground: Oil and Militancy in Nigeria</em></a> (Columbia Global Reports) examines the social and environmental effects of the insurgency that arose in the oil-rich Niger Delta after the death of her father, the environmental activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. In the report, Noo highlights the undervalued role of women and meets individuals who are working towards sustainable development. It will be published in the US on 14th April 2026, and in the UK on 28th May 2026.<br /></p>
<p>Noo has also contributed to the following anthologies: <a href="https://www.ugogurl.com/books/go-girl-2/">Go Girl 2: The Black Woman’s Book of Travel and Adventure</a> (2024); <a href="https://www.influxpress.com/an-unreliable-guide-to-london/"><em>An Unreliable Guide to London</em> (Influx Press, 2016)</a>; <a href="https://unbound.com/books/a-country-of-refuge"><em>A Place of Refuge </em>(Unbound, 2016)</a>, an anthology of writing on asylum seekers; and <a href="https://www.amazon.it/felicit%C3%A0-degli-uomini-semplici/dp/889897017X"><em>La Felicità Degli Uomini Semplici</em>,</a> an Italian-language anthology based around football. ​​<br /></p>
<p>Noo is a staff writer for Condé Nast Traveller magazine, and she has contributed book reviews, travel, opinion and analysis articles for various publications including The Guardian newspaper, The Financial Times, The Times Literary Supplement, City AM, and Chatham House.<br /></p>
<p>She lives in London and supports Liverpool FC.</p>
<p><em>﻿Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noo Saro-Wiwa is an author and journalist. Born in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and raised in England, she attended King's College London and Columbia University in New York.​<br /></p>
<p>Her first book, <a href="https://granta.com/products/looking-for-transwonderland/"><em>Looking for Transwonderland: Travels in Nigeria</em></a> (Granta), was published to critical acclaim in 2012. It was selected as BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in 2012; named The Sunday Times Travel Book of the Year, 2012; shortlisted for the Author’s Club Dolman Travel Book of the Year in 2013; nominated by The Financial Times as one of the best travel books of 2012. <em>Looking for Transwonderland</em> has been translated into French and Italian, and was awarded the Albatros Travel Literature Prize in Italy in 2016.</p>
<p>Noo's second book, <a href="https://canongate.co.uk/books/4040-black-ghosts-a-journey-into-the-lives-of-africans-in-china/"><em>Black Ghosts </em>(Canongate, 2023) </a>explores the African community in China and was named Edward Stanford Travel Book of the Year in 2025.<br /></p>
<p>Her latest publication, <a href="https://globalreports.columbia.edu/books/the-burning-ground"><em>The Burning Ground: Oil and Militancy in Nigeria</em></a> (Columbia Global Reports) examines the social and environmental effects of the insurgency that arose in the oil-rich Niger Delta after the death of her father, the environmental activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. In the report, Noo highlights the undervalued role of women and meets individuals who are working towards sustainable development. It will be published in the US on 14th April 2026, and in the UK on 28th May 2026.<br /></p>
<p>Noo has also contributed to the following anthologies: <a href="https://www.ugogurl.com/books/go-girl-2/">Go Girl 2: The Black Woman’s Book of Travel and Adventure</a> (2024); <a href="https://www.influxpress.com/an-unreliable-guide-to-london/"><em>An Unreliable Guide to London</em> (Influx Press, 2016)</a>; <a href="https://unbound.com/books/a-country-of-refuge"><em>A Place of Refuge </em>(Unbound, 2016)</a>, an anthology of writing on asylum seekers; and <a href="https://www.amazon.it/felicit%C3%A0-degli-uomini-semplici/dp/889897017X"><em>La Felicità Degli Uomini Semplici</em>,</a> an Italian-language anthology based around football. ​​<br /></p>
<p>Noo is a staff writer for Condé Nast Traveller magazine, and she has contributed book reviews, travel, opinion and analysis articles for various publications including The Guardian newspaper, The Financial Times, The Times Literary Supplement, City AM, and Chatham House.<br /></p>
<p>She lives in London and supports Liverpool FC.</p>
<p><em>﻿Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36793857" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/74757882-af49-40f7-9171-b2977c13def3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=74757882-af49-40f7-9171-b2977c13def3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Oil and Militancy in Nigeria: A Conversation with Noo Saro-Wiwa</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Noo Saro-Wiwa is an author and journalist. Born in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and raised in England, she attended King&apos;s College London and Columbia University in New York.​

Her first book, Looking for Transwonderland: Travels in Nigeria (Granta), was published to critical acclaim in 2012. It was selected as BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in 2012; named The Sunday Times Travel Book of the Year, 2012; shortlisted for the Author’s Club Dolman Travel Book of the Year in 2013; nominated by The Financial Times as one of the best travel books of 2012. Looking for Transwonderland has been translated into French and Italian, and was awarded the Albatros Travel Literature Prize in Italy in 2016.

Noo&apos;s second book, Black Ghosts (Canongate, 2023) explores the African community in China and was named Edward Stanford Travel Book of the Year in 2025.

Her latest publication, The Burning Ground: Oil and Militancy in Nigeria (Columbia Global Reports) examines the social and environmental effects of the insurgency that arose in the oil-rich Niger Delta after the death of her father, the environmental activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. In the report, Noo highlights the undervalued role of women and meets individuals who are working towards sustainable development. It will be published in the US on 14th April 2026, and in the UK on 28th May 2026.

Noo has also contributed to the following anthologies: Go Girl 2: The Black Woman’s Book of Travel and Adventure (2024); An Unreliable Guide to London (Influx Press, 2016); A Place of Refuge (Unbound, 2016), an anthology of writing on asylum seekers; and La Felicità Degli Uomini Semplici, an Italian-language anthology based around football. ​​

Noo is a staff writer for Condé Nast Traveller magazine, and she has contributed book reviews, travel, opinion and analysis articles for various publications including The Guardian newspaper, The Financial Times, The Times Literary Supplement, City AM, and Chatham House.

She lives in London and supports Liverpool FC.

﻿Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Noo Saro-Wiwa is an author and journalist. Born in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, and raised in England, she attended King&apos;s College London and Columbia University in New York.​

Her first book, Looking for Transwonderland: Travels in Nigeria (Granta), was published to critical acclaim in 2012. It was selected as BBC Radio 4’s Book of the Week in 2012; named The Sunday Times Travel Book of the Year, 2012; shortlisted for the Author’s Club Dolman Travel Book of the Year in 2013; nominated by The Financial Times as one of the best travel books of 2012. Looking for Transwonderland has been translated into French and Italian, and was awarded the Albatros Travel Literature Prize in Italy in 2016.

Noo&apos;s second book, Black Ghosts (Canongate, 2023) explores the African community in China and was named Edward Stanford Travel Book of the Year in 2025.

Her latest publication, The Burning Ground: Oil and Militancy in Nigeria (Columbia Global Reports) examines the social and environmental effects of the insurgency that arose in the oil-rich Niger Delta after the death of her father, the environmental activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. In the report, Noo highlights the undervalued role of women and meets individuals who are working towards sustainable development. It will be published in the US on 14th April 2026, and in the UK on 28th May 2026.

Noo has also contributed to the following anthologies: Go Girl 2: The Black Woman’s Book of Travel and Adventure (2024); An Unreliable Guide to London (Influx Press, 2016); A Place of Refuge (Unbound, 2016), an anthology of writing on asylum seekers; and La Felicità Degli Uomini Semplici, an Italian-language anthology based around football. ​​

Noo is a staff writer for Condé Nast Traveller magazine, and she has contributed book reviews, travel, opinion and analysis articles for various publications including The Guardian newspaper, The Financial Times, The Times Literary Supplement, City AM, and Chatham House.

She lives in London and supports Liverpool FC.

﻿Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>886</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7bf6d9c-3e41-11f1-925e-3b0371182334</guid>
      <title>Nikki Luke, &quot;Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy</em> (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.<br />Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy</em> (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.<br />Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45991619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0346dd42-37fd-4beb-a735-375a20b2d6c2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0346dd42-37fd-4beb-a735-375a20b2d6c2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nikki Luke, &quot;Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a748280e-3f6b-11f1-a3bc-7b9be647d63b</guid>
      <title>How Bolsonaro was Convicted: The Role of the Judiciary During and After Autocratization</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/militarization-and-democracy-in-contemporary-brazil#entry:435180@1:url">here</a>), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-bring-authoritarians-to-justice/">How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice</a>” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Da-Ros-and-Gehrke-Transcript.docx#asset:453589@1">here</a></p>
<p>Guests:</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=vdDBvygAAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate">Luciano Da Ros</a> is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book <a href="https://www.rienner.com/title/Brazilian_Politics_on_Trial_Corruption_and_Reform_Under_Democracy"><em>Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy</em></a> (Lynne Rienner, 2022).</p>
<p><a href="https://manoelgehrke.com/">Manoel Gehrke</a> is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/militarization-and-democracy-in-contemporary-brazil#entry:435180@1:url">here</a>), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-bring-authoritarians-to-justice/">How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice</a>” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Da-Ros-and-Gehrke-Transcript.docx#asset:453589@1">here</a></p>
<p>Guests:</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=vdDBvygAAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate">Luciano Da Ros</a> is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book <a href="https://www.rienner.com/title/Brazilian_Politics_on_Trial_Corruption_and_Reform_Under_Democracy"><em>Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy</em></a> (Lynne Rienner, 2022).</p>
<p><a href="https://manoelgehrke.com/">Manoel Gehrke</a> is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34744649" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d3f43c96-145a-4e20-b849-1cc48323cd67/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d3f43c96-145a-4e20-b849-1cc48323cd67&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Bolsonaro was Convicted: The Role of the Judiciary During and After Autocratization</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, here), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.

Transcript here

Guests:

Luciano Da Ros is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy (Lynne Rienner, 2022).

Manoel Gehrke is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.

Presenter:

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, here), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.

Transcript here

Guests:

Luciano Da Ros is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy (Lynne Rienner, 2022).

Manoel Gehrke is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.

Presenter:

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>884</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6c77373c-3daa-11f1-9673-6301704dc3cd</guid>
      <title>Shameem Black, &quot;Flexible India: Yoga&apos;s Cultural and Political Tensions&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Yoga has offered the Indian state unprecedented opportunities for global, media-savvy political performance. Under Modi, it has promoted yoga tourism and staged mass yoga sessions, and Indian officials have proposed yoga as a national solution to a range of social problems, from reducing rape to curing cancer. But as yoga has gone global, its cultural meanings have spiraled far and wide. In <em>Flexible India: Yoga's Cultural and Political Tensions</em> (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Shameem Black travels into unexpected realms of popular culture in English from India, its diaspora, and the West to explore and critique yoga as an exercise in cultural power.</p>
<p>Drawing on her own experience and her readings of political spectacles, yoga murder mysteries, court cases, art installations, and digital media, Dr. Black shows how yoga’s imaginative power supports diverse political and cultural ends. Although many cultural practices in today’s India exemplify “culture wars” between liberal and conservative agendas, <em>Flexible India</em> argues that visions of yoga offer a “culture peace” that conceals, without resolving, such tensions. This flexibility allows states, corporations, and individuals to think of themselves as welcoming and tolerant while still, in many cases, supporting practices that make minority populations increasingly vulnerable. However, as Dr. Black shows, yoga can also be imagined in ways that offer new tools for critiquing hierarchical structures of power and race, Hindu nationalism, cultural appropriation, and self-help capitalism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoga has offered the Indian state unprecedented opportunities for global, media-savvy political performance. Under Modi, it has promoted yoga tourism and staged mass yoga sessions, and Indian officials have proposed yoga as a national solution to a range of social problems, from reducing rape to curing cancer. But as yoga has gone global, its cultural meanings have spiraled far and wide. In <em>Flexible India: Yoga's Cultural and Political Tensions</em> (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Shameem Black travels into unexpected realms of popular culture in English from India, its diaspora, and the West to explore and critique yoga as an exercise in cultural power.</p>
<p>Drawing on her own experience and her readings of political spectacles, yoga murder mysteries, court cases, art installations, and digital media, Dr. Black shows how yoga’s imaginative power supports diverse political and cultural ends. Although many cultural practices in today’s India exemplify “culture wars” between liberal and conservative agendas, <em>Flexible India</em> argues that visions of yoga offer a “culture peace” that conceals, without resolving, such tensions. This flexibility allows states, corporations, and individuals to think of themselves as welcoming and tolerant while still, in many cases, supporting practices that make minority populations increasingly vulnerable. However, as Dr. Black shows, yoga can also be imagined in ways that offer new tools for critiquing hierarchical structures of power and race, Hindu nationalism, cultural appropriation, and self-help capitalism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42189114" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5a3d7974-80a1-4600-84c9-e07353602c93/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5a3d7974-80a1-4600-84c9-e07353602c93&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Shameem Black, &quot;Flexible India: Yoga&apos;s Cultural and Political Tensions&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Yoga has offered the Indian state unprecedented opportunities for global, media-savvy political performance. Under Modi, it has promoted yoga tourism and staged mass yoga sessions, and Indian officials have proposed yoga as a national solution to a range of social problems, from reducing rape to curing cancer. But as yoga has gone global, its cultural meanings have spiraled far and wide. In Flexible India: Yoga&apos;s Cultural and Political Tensions (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Shameem Black travels into unexpected realms of popular culture in English from India, its diaspora, and the West to explore and critique yoga as an exercise in cultural power.

Drawing on her own experience and her readings of political spectacles, yoga murder mysteries, court cases, art installations, and digital media, Dr. Black shows how yoga’s imaginative power supports diverse political and cultural ends. Although many cultural practices in today’s India exemplify “culture wars” between liberal and conservative agendas, Flexible India argues that visions of yoga offer a “culture peace” that conceals, without resolving, such tensions. This flexibility allows states, corporations, and individuals to think of themselves as welcoming and tolerant while still, in many cases, supporting practices that make minority populations increasingly vulnerable. However, as Dr. Black shows, yoga can also be imagined in ways that offer new tools for critiquing hierarchical structures of power and race, Hindu nationalism, cultural appropriation, and self-help capitalism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Yoga has offered the Indian state unprecedented opportunities for global, media-savvy political performance. Under Modi, it has promoted yoga tourism and staged mass yoga sessions, and Indian officials have proposed yoga as a national solution to a range of social problems, from reducing rape to curing cancer. But as yoga has gone global, its cultural meanings have spiraled far and wide. In Flexible India: Yoga&apos;s Cultural and Political Tensions (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Shameem Black travels into unexpected realms of popular culture in English from India, its diaspora, and the West to explore and critique yoga as an exercise in cultural power.

Drawing on her own experience and her readings of political spectacles, yoga murder mysteries, court cases, art installations, and digital media, Dr. Black shows how yoga’s imaginative power supports diverse political and cultural ends. Although many cultural practices in today’s India exemplify “culture wars” between liberal and conservative agendas, Flexible India argues that visions of yoga offer a “culture peace” that conceals, without resolving, such tensions. This flexibility allows states, corporations, and individuals to think of themselves as welcoming and tolerant while still, in many cases, supporting practices that make minority populations increasingly vulnerable. However, as Dr. Black shows, yoga can also be imagined in ways that offer new tools for critiquing hierarchical structures of power and race, Hindu nationalism, cultural appropriation, and self-help capitalism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>883</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fb17016-3dd0-11f1-967c-7394cf8eb1c1</guid>
      <title>The Crisis of American Political Economy: On the New Conservative Policy Agenda with Chris Griswold</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. <a href="https://x.com/Chris_Griz">Chris Griswold</a>. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for <a href="https://americancompass.org/about/">American Compass</a>—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.</p>
<p>Recently, he contributed to the book, <a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-New-Conservatives/Oren-Cass/9798895150504"><em>The New Conservatives</em></a> (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. <a href="https://x.com/Chris_Griz">Chris Griswold</a>. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for <a href="https://americancompass.org/about/">American Compass</a>—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.</p>
<p>Recently, he contributed to the book, <a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-New-Conservatives/Oren-Cass/9798895150504"><em>The New Conservatives</em></a> (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton University’s <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new <a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71571415" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/17887d6b-0cad-488e-8b5b-f5b633bb468a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=17887d6b-0cad-488e-8b5b-f5b633bb468a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Crisis of American Political Economy: On the New Conservative Policy Agenda with Chris Griswold</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. Chris Griswold. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for American Compass—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.

Recently, he contributed to the book, The New Conservatives (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this sixth episode of Season 5, I interview Mr. Chris Griswold. An alum of Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary, he was formerly a senior advisor to then Senator Marco Rubio, and is currently the Policy Director for American Compass—a leading center-right public policy think-tank.

Recently, he contributed to the book, The New Conservatives (2025), an anthology edited by his colleague, Oren Cass, that re-articulates a conservative economic vision for the country. Drawing on it, we discuss the crisis of America’s political economy, from questions surrounding current AI, automation, and the end of free trade; political instability and populism; how economic policy can best serve American workers and families; and what makes us hopeful for the country’s future during its 250th anniversary.

Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>882</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">38bbec72-3d90-11f1-9e50-bfcb83293f18</guid>
      <title>The Information State: How is the State Surveilling and Manipulating us These Days?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny interviews Jacob Siegel, writer, Army veteran, and author of <em>The Information State</em>. Siegel traces how military information operations, post‑9/11 surveillance programs, and Silicon Valley’s rise converged to create a new public‑private regime of control over information, attention, and consent. He discusses the intellectual roots of technocratic governance from Francis Bacon and Leibniz through progressivism, World War I propaganda, and cybernetics, and explains how the “information state” differs from classical authoritarianism. Finally, Siegel reflects on Trumpism, the tech counter‑elite around figures like Elon Musk, and how AI may usher in a more “Pharaonic” and quasi‑spiritual form of politics beyond traditional expert‑driven technocracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny interviews Jacob Siegel, writer, Army veteran, and author of <em>The Information State</em>. Siegel traces how military information operations, post‑9/11 surveillance programs, and Silicon Valley’s rise converged to create a new public‑private regime of control over information, attention, and consent. He discusses the intellectual roots of technocratic governance from Francis Bacon and Leibniz through progressivism, World War I propaganda, and cybernetics, and explains how the “information state” differs from classical authoritarianism. Finally, Siegel reflects on Trumpism, the tech counter‑elite around figures like Elon Musk, and how AI may usher in a more “Pharaonic” and quasi‑spiritual form of politics beyond traditional expert‑driven technocracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50698524" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e10370dd-9650-4488-9eed-4d5b485dc8bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e10370dd-9650-4488-9eed-4d5b485dc8bd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Information State: How is the State Surveilling and Manipulating us These Days?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny interviews Jacob Siegel, writer, Army veteran, and author of The Information State. Siegel traces how military information operations, post‑9/11 surveillance programs, and Silicon Valley’s rise converged to create a new public‑private regime of control over information, attention, and consent. He discusses the intellectual roots of technocratic governance from Francis Bacon and Leibniz through progressivism, World War I propaganda, and cybernetics, and explains how the “information state” differs from classical authoritarianism. Finally, Siegel reflects on Trumpism, the tech counter‑elite around figures like Elon Musk, and how AI may usher in a more “Pharaonic” and quasi‑spiritual form of politics beyond traditional expert‑driven technocracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Acting Director Eli Karetny interviews Jacob Siegel, writer, Army veteran, and author of The Information State. Siegel traces how military information operations, post‑9/11 surveillance programs, and Silicon Valley’s rise converged to create a new public‑private regime of control over information, attention, and consent. He discusses the intellectual roots of technocratic governance from Francis Bacon and Leibniz through progressivism, World War I propaganda, and cybernetics, and explains how the “information state” differs from classical authoritarianism. Finally, Siegel reflects on Trumpism, the tech counter‑elite around figures like Elon Musk, and how AI may usher in a more “Pharaonic” and quasi‑spiritual form of politics beyond traditional expert‑driven technocracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>182</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81026e98-3c5a-11f1-a57c-abf5b5c69081</guid>
      <title>Stephen F. Jones, &quot;The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, the small nation of Georgia established its independence in May 1918. Its leaders surprised the world by creating the first social democratic state. Based on a combination of parliamentarianism and direct democracy, it was a representative government of the peasants and workers themselves, with ballots in their hands.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674046238">The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921</a> (Harvard University Press, 2026) is the definitive history of a government that should inspire social democrats today. Professor Stephen F. Jones chronicles how the founders of the new state navigated myriad challenges, including territorial threats from abroad, internal ethnic conflicts, and geopolitical rivalries between the imperial Ottomans, the British, and the Germans. In the midst of these existential challenges, Georgia’s social democrats set about writing a constitution to put the country on a distinctive path of genuine self-government—protecting democratic rights, promoting political pluralism, and championing equality. Professor Jones brings to life the passionate debates that shaped Georgia’s democracy during a moment of acute global instability.</p>
<p>The Democratic Republic of Georgia was strangled in its crib. Just four days after the constitution was ratified, the capital fell to the Red Army. Under Soviet rule, the republic was lost to history. Soviet scholars were forbidden to research this Georgian story, and Western scholars had little interest in a small and peripheral state that was independent for only three years. Recovering a forgotten experiment in democratic citizenship and statecraft, Dr. Jones reminds us of those audacious times when Georgians created and defended political freedom against the rise of Soviet communism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, the small nation of Georgia established its independence in May 1918. Its leaders surprised the world by creating the first social democratic state. Based on a combination of parliamentarianism and direct democracy, it was a representative government of the peasants and workers themselves, with ballots in their hands.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674046238">The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921</a> (Harvard University Press, 2026) is the definitive history of a government that should inspire social democrats today. Professor Stephen F. Jones chronicles how the founders of the new state navigated myriad challenges, including territorial threats from abroad, internal ethnic conflicts, and geopolitical rivalries between the imperial Ottomans, the British, and the Germans. In the midst of these existential challenges, Georgia’s social democrats set about writing a constitution to put the country on a distinctive path of genuine self-government—protecting democratic rights, promoting political pluralism, and championing equality. Professor Jones brings to life the passionate debates that shaped Georgia’s democracy during a moment of acute global instability.</p>
<p>The Democratic Republic of Georgia was strangled in its crib. Just four days after the constitution was ratified, the capital fell to the Red Army. Under Soviet rule, the republic was lost to history. Soviet scholars were forbidden to research this Georgian story, and Western scholars had little interest in a small and peripheral state that was independent for only three years. Recovering a forgotten experiment in democratic citizenship and statecraft, Dr. Jones reminds us of those audacious times when Georgians created and defended political freedom against the rise of Soviet communism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61605318" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f4141259-1d4a-4f15-bba3-cf1565e06a37/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f4141259-1d4a-4f15-bba3-cf1565e06a37&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen F. Jones, &quot;The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, the small nation of Georgia established its independence in May 1918. Its leaders surprised the world by creating the first social democratic state. Based on a combination of parliamentarianism and direct democracy, it was a representative government of the peasants and workers themselves, with ballots in their hands.

The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921 (Harvard University Press, 2026) is the definitive history of a government that should inspire social democrats today. Professor Stephen F. Jones chronicles how the founders of the new state navigated myriad challenges, including territorial threats from abroad, internal ethnic conflicts, and geopolitical rivalries between the imperial Ottomans, the British, and the Germans. In the midst of these existential challenges, Georgia’s social democrats set about writing a constitution to put the country on a distinctive path of genuine self-government—protecting democratic rights, promoting political pluralism, and championing equality. Professor Jones brings to life the passionate debates that shaped Georgia’s democracy during a moment of acute global instability.

The Democratic Republic of Georgia was strangled in its crib. Just four days after the constitution was ratified, the capital fell to the Red Army. Under Soviet rule, the republic was lost to history. Soviet scholars were forbidden to research this Georgian story, and Western scholars had little interest in a small and peripheral state that was independent for only three years. Recovering a forgotten experiment in democratic citizenship and statecraft, Dr. Jones reminds us of those audacious times when Georgians created and defended political freedom against the rise of Soviet communism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Following the collapse of the Russian Empire, the small nation of Georgia established its independence in May 1918. Its leaders surprised the world by creating the first social democratic state. Based on a combination of parliamentarianism and direct democracy, it was a representative government of the peasants and workers themselves, with ballots in their hands.

The First Social Democracy: The Democratic Republic of Georgia, 1918–1921 (Harvard University Press, 2026) is the definitive history of a government that should inspire social democrats today. Professor Stephen F. Jones chronicles how the founders of the new state navigated myriad challenges, including territorial threats from abroad, internal ethnic conflicts, and geopolitical rivalries between the imperial Ottomans, the British, and the Germans. In the midst of these existential challenges, Georgia’s social democrats set about writing a constitution to put the country on a distinctive path of genuine self-government—protecting democratic rights, promoting political pluralism, and championing equality. Professor Jones brings to life the passionate debates that shaped Georgia’s democracy during a moment of acute global instability.

The Democratic Republic of Georgia was strangled in its crib. Just four days after the constitution was ratified, the capital fell to the Red Army. Under Soviet rule, the republic was lost to history. Soviet scholars were forbidden to research this Georgian story, and Western scholars had little interest in a small and peripheral state that was independent for only three years. Recovering a forgotten experiment in democratic citizenship and statecraft, Dr. Jones reminds us of those audacious times when Georgians created and defended political freedom against the rise of Soviet communism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>880</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c1cfff4-3c25-11f1-b599-cf3c114707b2</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz, &quot;The Way Out: Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿The global refugee regime has shifted under our feet. Over the last forty years, international asylum practices have expanded to include the queer and trans displaced. At least thirty-seven countries now recognize LGBTIQ refugees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, with some states providing specialized support. Yet amid this expansion, backlash has intensified against refugee protection as well as the hard-earned rights of LGBTIQ people. In this disquieting context, the protection of LGBTIQ refugees remains partial and exclusionary.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520391765"><em>The Way Out: ﻿Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026) examines the complexities of queer and trans displacement around the world. Centering personal narratives of LGBTIQ refugees, the book exposes the shortcomings of an international protection regime that is unable to address the harms that drive displacement.</p>
<p>Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz's analysis of the stakes of queer and trans inclusion in accounts of displacement justice offers a vibrant example of theory brought to life.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿The global refugee regime has shifted under our feet. Over the last forty years, international asylum practices have expanded to include the queer and trans displaced. At least thirty-seven countries now recognize LGBTIQ refugees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, with some states providing specialized support. Yet amid this expansion, backlash has intensified against refugee protection as well as the hard-earned rights of LGBTIQ people. In this disquieting context, the protection of LGBTIQ refugees remains partial and exclusionary.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520391765"><em>The Way Out: ﻿Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026) examines the complexities of queer and trans displacement around the world. Centering personal narratives of LGBTIQ refugees, the book exposes the shortcomings of an international protection regime that is unable to address the harms that drive displacement.</p>
<p>Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz's analysis of the stakes of queer and trans inclusion in accounts of displacement justice offers a vibrant example of theory brought to life.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62189125" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/84360ddf-403a-4642-bebd-beebd8f9f407/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=84360ddf-403a-4642-bebd-beebd8f9f407&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz, &quot;The Way Out: Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The global refugee regime has shifted under our feet. Over the last forty years, international asylum practices have expanded to include the queer and trans displaced. At least thirty-seven countries now recognize LGBTIQ refugees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, with some states providing specialized support. Yet amid this expansion, backlash has intensified against refugee protection as well as the hard-earned rights of LGBTIQ people. In this disquieting context, the protection of LGBTIQ refugees remains partial and exclusionary.

The Way Out: ﻿Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge (University of California Press, 2026) examines the complexities of queer and trans displacement around the world. Centering personal narratives of LGBTIQ refugees, the book exposes the shortcomings of an international protection regime that is unable to address the harms that drive displacement.

Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz&apos;s analysis of the stakes of queer and trans inclusion in accounts of displacement justice offers a vibrant example of theory brought to life.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The global refugee regime has shifted under our feet. Over the last forty years, international asylum practices have expanded to include the queer and trans displaced. At least thirty-seven countries now recognize LGBTIQ refugees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, with some states providing specialized support. Yet amid this expansion, backlash has intensified against refugee protection as well as the hard-earned rights of LGBTIQ people. In this disquieting context, the protection of LGBTIQ refugees remains partial and exclusionary.

The Way Out: ﻿Justice in the Queer Search for Refuge (University of California Press, 2026) examines the complexities of queer and trans displacement around the world. Centering personal narratives of LGBTIQ refugees, the book exposes the shortcomings of an international protection regime that is unable to address the harms that drive displacement.

Rebecca Buxton and Samuel Ritholtz&apos;s analysis of the stakes of queer and trans inclusion in accounts of displacement justice offers a vibrant example of theory brought to life.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has been published in 2025 by Oxford University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>879</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40b63a74-3c2b-11f1-8214-b3e2b18f09b9</guid>
      <title>Ladder or Lottery? Gary Hoover on the Consequences of Broken Economic Promises</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621">Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</a> (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.</p>
<p>Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402621">Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead</a> (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.</p>
<p>Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71244690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/01589c62-cc65-43b0-9cb1-36cb94c50de3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=01589c62-cc65-43b0-9cb1-36cb94c50de3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ladder or Lottery? Gary Hoover on the Consequences of Broken Economic Promises</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.

Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.

Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I have the pleasure of speaking with Gary Hoover about his new book, Ladder or Lottery: Economic Promises and the Reality of Who Gets Ahead (University of California Press, 2026). Gary is Professor of Economics and Executive Director of the Murphy Institute at Tulane University. One of the most challenging aspects of life is that sometimes, despite our very best efforts, we still miss the mark. Life can feel like a lottery, where success comes down to luck or the privilege to have the resources to buy as many lottery tickets as possible. For some, life appears like a ladder. No matter where you start, all you need to do is climb to get to the top. These metaphors encapsulate the dilemmas explored by Gary in his important work, as he examines in a variety of case studies whether economic conditions look more like a ladder or more like a lottery. When enough people feel that the system is more like a lottery than a ladder, social order breaks down, protests erupt, and, on occasion, revolutions take place. To take on this weighty topic, I’m thrilled today to have Gary Hoover on the podcast.

Gary A. Hoover is Executive Director of the Murphy Institute, Professor of Economics, and Affiliate Professor of Law at Tulane University.

Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>878</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c618fd98-3968-11f1-a665-6fbda2ea0537</guid>
      <title>Jane Vaynman, &quot;Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do adversaries sometimes cooperate to restrain their military competition? Why do they design arms control agreements with intrusive verification in some cases but rely on minimal transparency in others? Amidst ongoing international competition, arms control remains rare despite potential mutual benefits, and agreements vary dramatically in their approaches to monitoring. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009486484">Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) reveals how uncertainty from domestic political changes, such as leadership transitions or social unrest, can enable arms control.</p>
<p>The book identifies two paths to agreement: during periods of uncertainty, states that previously relied on informal understandings hedge by establishing lightly monitored agreements, while those that anticipated deception take calculated risks through agreements with intensive verification.</p>
<p>Through comprehensive data analysis and rich case studies, Jane Vaynman challenges conventional wisdom about uncertainty in international relations while offering policymakers insights. As states confront challenges from nuclear competition to emerging technologies, understanding when arms control becomes viable is more vital than ever.<br />Our guest is Professor <a href="https://sais.jhu.edu/users/jvaynma1">Jane Vaynman</a>, an Assistant Professor of Strategic Studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do adversaries sometimes cooperate to restrain their military competition? Why do they design arms control agreements with intrusive verification in some cases but rely on minimal transparency in others? Amidst ongoing international competition, arms control remains rare despite potential mutual benefits, and agreements vary dramatically in their approaches to monitoring. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009486484">Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) reveals how uncertainty from domestic political changes, such as leadership transitions or social unrest, can enable arms control.</p>
<p>The book identifies two paths to agreement: during periods of uncertainty, states that previously relied on informal understandings hedge by establishing lightly monitored agreements, while those that anticipated deception take calculated risks through agreements with intensive verification.</p>
<p>Through comprehensive data analysis and rich case studies, Jane Vaynman challenges conventional wisdom about uncertainty in international relations while offering policymakers insights. As states confront challenges from nuclear competition to emerging technologies, understanding when arms control becomes viable is more vital than ever.<br />Our guest is Professor <a href="https://sais.jhu.edu/users/jvaynma1">Jane Vaynman</a>, an Assistant Professor of Strategic Studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35209775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d6596735-5e0e-4963-b66a-00bf5875b693/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d6596735-5e0e-4963-b66a-00bf5875b693&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jane Vaynman, &quot;Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do adversaries sometimes cooperate to restrain their military competition? Why do they design arms control agreements with intrusive verification in some cases but rely on minimal transparency in others? Amidst ongoing international competition, arms control remains rare despite potential mutual benefits, and agreements vary dramatically in their approaches to monitoring. Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control (Cambridge UP, 2026) reveals how uncertainty from domestic political changes, such as leadership transitions or social unrest, can enable arms control.

The book identifies two paths to agreement: during periods of uncertainty, states that previously relied on informal understandings hedge by establishing lightly monitored agreements, while those that anticipated deception take calculated risks through agreements with intensive verification.

Through comprehensive data analysis and rich case studies, Jane Vaynman challenges conventional wisdom about uncertainty in international relations while offering policymakers insights. As states confront challenges from nuclear competition to emerging technologies, understanding when arms control becomes viable is more vital than ever.Our guest is Professor Jane Vaynman, an Assistant Professor of Strategic Studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do adversaries sometimes cooperate to restrain their military competition? Why do they design arms control agreements with intrusive verification in some cases but rely on minimal transparency in others? Amidst ongoing international competition, arms control remains rare despite potential mutual benefits, and agreements vary dramatically in their approaches to monitoring. Enemies in Agreement: Political Volatility and the Design of Arms Control (Cambridge UP, 2026) reveals how uncertainty from domestic political changes, such as leadership transitions or social unrest, can enable arms control.

The book identifies two paths to agreement: during periods of uncertainty, states that previously relied on informal understandings hedge by establishing lightly monitored agreements, while those that anticipated deception take calculated risks through agreements with intensive verification.

Through comprehensive data analysis and rich case studies, Jane Vaynman challenges conventional wisdom about uncertainty in international relations while offering policymakers insights. As states confront challenges from nuclear competition to emerging technologies, understanding when arms control becomes viable is more vital than ever.Our guest is Professor Jane Vaynman, an Assistant Professor of Strategic Studies at the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>877</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d278f8ca-394c-11f1-9d83-8766190b0ae0</guid>
      <title>169* Hannah Arendt on Oases (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our Recall This Buck series began by speaking with Christine Desan of Harvard Law School about how key ideas—and the actual currency, physical coins and bills— underlying the modern monetary system get “invisibilized” with that system’s success, so that seeing money clearly is both harder and more vital. Today, illustrious Princeton historian Peter Brown narrates the … <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/07/30/42-recall-this-buck-2-peter-brown-on-wealth-charity-and-managerial-bishops-in-early-christianity-jp/">Continue reading "42 Recall This Buck 2: Peter Brown on wealth, charity and managerial bishops in early Christianity (JP)"</a></p>
<p><a href="https://elizabeth-ferry.com/">Elizabeth Ferry</a><em> is Professor of Anthropology at Brandeis University. Email: </em><a href="mailto:ferry@brandeis.edu">ferry@brandeis.edu</a><em>. </em><a href="https://www.brandeis.edu/english/faculty/plotz.html">John Plotz</a><em> is Barbara Mandel Professor of the Humanities at Brandeis University and co-founder of the </em><a href="https://sites.google.com/brandeis.edu/brandeisjusticeinitiative/home">Brandeis Educational Justice Initiative</a><em>. Email: </em><a href="mailto:plotz@brandeis.edu">plotz@brandeis.edu</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Recall This Buck series began by speaking with Christine Desan of Harvard Law School about how key ideas—and the actual currency, physical coins and bills— underlying the modern monetary system get “invisibilized” with that system’s success, so that seeing money clearly is both harder and more vital. Today, illustrious Princeton historian Peter Brown narrates the … <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/07/30/42-recall-this-buck-2-peter-brown-on-wealth-charity-and-managerial-bishops-in-early-christianity-jp/">Continue reading "42 Recall This Buck 2: Peter Brown on wealth, charity and managerial bishops in early Christianity (JP)"</a></p>
<p><a href="https://elizabeth-ferry.com/">Elizabeth Ferry</a><em> is Professor of Anthropology at Brandeis University. Email: </em><a href="mailto:ferry@brandeis.edu">ferry@brandeis.edu</a><em>. </em><a href="https://www.brandeis.edu/english/faculty/plotz.html">John Plotz</a><em> is Barbara Mandel Professor of the Humanities at Brandeis University and co-founder of the </em><a href="https://sites.google.com/brandeis.edu/brandeisjusticeinitiative/home">Brandeis Educational Justice Initiative</a><em>. Email: </em><a href="mailto:plotz@brandeis.edu">plotz@brandeis.edu</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27805229" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9d647e90-0ce6-420c-8fe6-9c1ef09236bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9d647e90-0ce6-420c-8fe6-9c1ef09236bf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>169* Hannah Arendt on Oases (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our Recall This Buck series began by speaking with Christine Desan of Harvard Law School about how key ideas—and the actual currency, physical coins and bills— underlying the modern monetary system get “invisibilized” with that system’s success, so that seeing money clearly is both harder and more vital. Today, illustrious Princeton historian Peter Brown narrates the … Continue reading &quot;42 Recall This Buck 2: Peter Brown on wealth, charity and managerial bishops in early Christianity (JP)&quot;

Elizabeth Ferry is Professor of Anthropology at Brandeis University. Email: ferry@brandeis.edu. John Plotz is Barbara Mandel Professor of the Humanities at Brandeis University and co-founder of the Brandeis Educational Justice Initiative. Email: plotz@brandeis.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our Recall This Buck series began by speaking with Christine Desan of Harvard Law School about how key ideas—and the actual currency, physical coins and bills— underlying the modern monetary system get “invisibilized” with that system’s success, so that seeing money clearly is both harder and more vital. Today, illustrious Princeton historian Peter Brown narrates the … Continue reading &quot;42 Recall This Buck 2: Peter Brown on wealth, charity and managerial bishops in early Christianity (JP)&quot;

Elizabeth Ferry is Professor of Anthropology at Brandeis University. Email: ferry@brandeis.edu. John Plotz is Barbara Mandel Professor of the Humanities at Brandeis University and co-founder of the Brandeis Educational Justice Initiative. Email: plotz@brandeis.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>876</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6cb962ba-3855-11f1-93f9-3f6e490d0c06</guid>
      <title>Alisa Kessel, &quot;Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.</p>
<p>Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftn1">[1]</a> The case study examples in <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and <em>OnlyFans</em> and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a> is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950">Susan Liebell </a><em>is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. </em></p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftnref1">[1]</a> Alisa Kessel. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.</p>
<p>Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftn1">[1]</a> The case study examples in <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies</a> include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and <em>OnlyFans</em> and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a> is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950">Susan Liebell </a><em>is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. </em></p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/436613-rape-fantasies?site=default#_ftnref1">[1]</a> Alisa Kessel. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rape-fantasies-9780197797822?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;">Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence</a>. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66673372" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8cc46b6f-0a09-4660-8f7b-02ec1c998555/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8cc46b6f-0a09-4660-8f7b-02ec1c998555&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alisa Kessel, &quot;Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. Rape Fantasies develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. Rape Fantasies traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.

Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”[1] The case study examples in Rape Fantasies include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and OnlyFans and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.

Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.

Susan Liebell is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.

Lilly J. Goren is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. 



[1] Alisa Kessel. Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political theorist Alisa Kessel (University of Puget Sound) has an important and impressive new book, Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Kessel’s research grew out of her work on questions of consent and how consent is embedded within the social contract structure. Initially the plan for the research was to critique this concept of “rape culture” which had found its way into popular discourse as well as academic work and was somewhat unclear in terms of application and understanding. Kessel notes in the book and in our conversations that her thinking about the idea of rape culture owes a great deal to black feminists who had been writing about and discussing the underlying issue at the heart of rape culture, which is not just about violence against women, but more broadly about the political, societal, and cultural dimensions of domination, victimhood, and human value. Rape Fantasies develops this understanding and provides fascinating examples of this intersectional concept. One of the key claims of the book is that sexual violence is not accidental, it is not necessarily based on physical urges that just cannot be controlled; it is, instead, based in the dynamic of political domination thus making rape itself a political act. Part of the unexamined problem with rape is that it is built around an entitlement to dominate, which also makes the threat of sexual violence a political act. Rape Fantasies traces this idea through a number of different case studies that unpack the dimensions of this threat of sexual violence in a variety of circumstances and situations, tied, inevitably, to the duality of domination and subordination or victimization, which is also wrapped up with questions of who is deserving of protection and who is not as deserving.

Kessel explains that in examining sexual violence, what she found was multifaceted reflections and refractions, since the issue and the individual’s experience with sexual violence are neither simple nor linear. And the examples and case studies that make up the thrust of the book present this multidimensional nature of sexual violence. This multifaceted thinking about sexual violence also integrates an intersectional analysis, drawing on work from indigenous studies, feminist and women’s studies, feminist theory, black feminism, political theory and other connected schools of thought. The interrogation of rape and rape culture, particular in context of the political valence, “occurs across multiple axes of oppression, including white supremacist, heteropatriarchal, cisgender, settler colonial, and capitalist axes.”[1] The case study examples in Rape Fantasies include bathroom bills across the states, the idea of the frontier and modes of extraction, consent contracts and consent apps, and OnlyFans and intimacy on demand. Each example is deeply researched and unpacked, providing the reader with historical, legal, political, economic, cultural, and societal analyses of these complex areas of domination and entitlement.

Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence is an expansive undertaking, bringing together theoretical frameworks from different schools of thought and analysis, threaded with important case studies that help the reader think deeply about this concept and how it is operationalized in our daily lives. Even if we are not aware of these narratives, they surround us and shape so much of our thinking about how the world works. And why sexual violence remains so persistent.

Susan Liebell is Professor Emerita of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.

Lilly J. Goren is a Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. 



[1] Alisa Kessel. Rape Fantasies: Rape Culture and the Persistence of Sexual Violence. Oxford University Press, 2025. p. 6.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>875</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f75e4a0e-37d1-11f1-9f7a-0fbc33f88ca7</guid>
      <title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process </a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process </a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48791554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6425ef02-e4f1-4879-ae6f-617c904c7a7e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6425ef02-e4f1-4879-ae6f-617c904c7a7e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.

By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.

Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.

By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.

Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>874</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a44fd9f4-37d1-11f1-9c83-7be46a96aa9f</guid>
      <title>Larry M. Bartels and Katherine J. Cramer, &quot;The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226845258"><em>The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation</em> </a>(U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.</p>
<p>Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226845258"><em>The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation</em> </a>(U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.</p>
<p>Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43360328" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a8d43608-ffc0-4f8b-b209-eda192a24a6c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a8d43608-ffc0-4f8b-b209-eda192a24a6c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Larry M. Bartels and Katherine J. Cramer, &quot;The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation (U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.

Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Few time periods have been as defined by waves of monumental social change as the United States during the 1960s. Even today, almost sixty years later, the era is often depicted as a triumph of social progress. Yet, as Dr. Larry M. Bartels and Dr. Katherine J. Cramer show in The Politics of Social Change: From the Sixties to the Present Through the Eyes of a Generation (U Chicago Press, 2026), it was Americans’ diverse reactions to the milestone events of the time—from the welcoming, to the fiercely resistant, to the largely oblivious—that planted the seeds of our current political turmoil.

Their masterful analysis draws on a unique historical resource: the longest-running systematic tracking of individual Americans’ political attitudes and behavior ever attempted. The study began in 1965 when researchers interviewed hundreds of high school students across the country and then periodically reinterviewed them over the next three decades. Bartels and Cramer supplement this historical record with in-depth interviews with dozens of the original students, painting a detailed picture of the generation’s individual and collective political development. By tracing the responses of the Class of ’65 to major events of their political lifetimes—including the Civil Rights and Women’s Rights movements, the Vietnam War, the shifting role of religion, escalating economic inequality, immigration, and the rise of Donald Trump—Dr. Bartels and Dr. Cramer shed new light on the evolution of public opinion and the unsteady progress of American democracy.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>873</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b382086-37cf-11f1-b09c-c35621e68c9f</guid>
      <title>Daniel A. Bell, &quot;Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel A. Bell joins the podcast to discuss his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691279800">Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future</a> ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026). This isn't your standard, dusty history — it’s a series of modernized dialogues that grew out of Bell’s own classroom at the University of Hong Kong. In this episode, Daniel tells us about the time he spent as an academic Dean at Shandong University, and where he saw firsthand how ancient Legalist ideas about strict punishment were making everyday life, and even faculty meals, feel rigid and 'joyless'. We talk about why he chose to write the book as a 'heavyweight match' between the descendants of thinkers like Confucius and Zhuangzi, and why he believes the ancient concept of 'harmony' is actually about celebrating differences rather than enforcing sameness. Whether we're talking about the 'fire exit' of modern divorce laws or the high stakes of corruption in Beijing, Daniel shows why these ancient voices are still the most relevant ones in the room.</p>
<p>The book is an entertaining introduction to ancient Chinese thinkers, and what they can teach us about today’s most pressing political questions in China and beyond. China’s most original, diverse, and fascinating political debates took place more than two millennia ago, but they have profoundly shaped Chinese political thinking and practice ever since and, remarkably, their influence on the country’s leaders is only growing today. Yet these timeless debates which are very likely to influence the answers to such questions as whether China should use military force to take control of Taiwan seem far too little understood in the West. In this enlightening and entertaining book, Professor Bell takes the greatest thinkers from China’s past — Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Shang Yang, Han Feizi, Zhuangzi, and Mozi—and puts them in dialogue with each other in modern settings.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel A. Bell joins the podcast to discuss his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691279800">Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future</a> ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026). This isn't your standard, dusty history — it’s a series of modernized dialogues that grew out of Bell’s own classroom at the University of Hong Kong. In this episode, Daniel tells us about the time he spent as an academic Dean at Shandong University, and where he saw firsthand how ancient Legalist ideas about strict punishment were making everyday life, and even faculty meals, feel rigid and 'joyless'. We talk about why he chose to write the book as a 'heavyweight match' between the descendants of thinkers like Confucius and Zhuangzi, and why he believes the ancient concept of 'harmony' is actually about celebrating differences rather than enforcing sameness. Whether we're talking about the 'fire exit' of modern divorce laws or the high stakes of corruption in Beijing, Daniel shows why these ancient voices are still the most relevant ones in the room.</p>
<p>The book is an entertaining introduction to ancient Chinese thinkers, and what they can teach us about today’s most pressing political questions in China and beyond. China’s most original, diverse, and fascinating political debates took place more than two millennia ago, but they have profoundly shaped Chinese political thinking and practice ever since and, remarkably, their influence on the country’s leaders is only growing today. Yet these timeless debates which are very likely to influence the answers to such questions as whether China should use military force to take control of Taiwan seem far too little understood in the West. In this enlightening and entertaining book, Professor Bell takes the greatest thinkers from China’s past — Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Shang Yang, Han Feizi, Zhuangzi, and Mozi—and puts them in dialogue with each other in modern settings.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62936863" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b7ee2160-6cd1-438e-b883-ea8b44445545/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b7ee2160-6cd1-438e-b883-ea8b44445545&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel A. Bell, &quot;Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Daniel A. Bell joins the podcast to discuss his new book, Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026). This isn&apos;t your standard, dusty history — it’s a series of modernized dialogues that grew out of Bell’s own classroom at the University of Hong Kong. In this episode, Daniel tells us about the time he spent as an academic Dean at Shandong University, and where he saw firsthand how ancient Legalist ideas about strict punishment were making everyday life, and even faculty meals, feel rigid and &apos;joyless&apos;. We talk about why he chose to write the book as a &apos;heavyweight match&apos; between the descendants of thinkers like Confucius and Zhuangzi, and why he believes the ancient concept of &apos;harmony&apos; is actually about celebrating differences rather than enforcing sameness. Whether we&apos;re talking about the &apos;fire exit&apos; of modern divorce laws or the high stakes of corruption in Beijing, Daniel shows why these ancient voices are still the most relevant ones in the room.

The book is an entertaining introduction to ancient Chinese thinkers, and what they can teach us about today’s most pressing political questions in China and beyond. China’s most original, diverse, and fascinating political debates took place more than two millennia ago, but they have profoundly shaped Chinese political thinking and practice ever since and, remarkably, their influence on the country’s leaders is only growing today. Yet these timeless debates which are very likely to influence the answers to such questions as whether China should use military force to take control of Taiwan seem far too little understood in the West. In this enlightening and entertaining book, Professor Bell takes the greatest thinkers from China’s past — Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Shang Yang, Han Feizi, Zhuangzi, and Mozi—and puts them in dialogue with each other in modern settings.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Daniel A. Bell joins the podcast to discuss his new book, Why Ancient Chinese Political Thought Matters: Four Dialogues on China’s Past, Present, and Future ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026). This isn&apos;t your standard, dusty history — it’s a series of modernized dialogues that grew out of Bell’s own classroom at the University of Hong Kong. In this episode, Daniel tells us about the time he spent as an academic Dean at Shandong University, and where he saw firsthand how ancient Legalist ideas about strict punishment were making everyday life, and even faculty meals, feel rigid and &apos;joyless&apos;. We talk about why he chose to write the book as a &apos;heavyweight match&apos; between the descendants of thinkers like Confucius and Zhuangzi, and why he believes the ancient concept of &apos;harmony&apos; is actually about celebrating differences rather than enforcing sameness. Whether we&apos;re talking about the &apos;fire exit&apos; of modern divorce laws or the high stakes of corruption in Beijing, Daniel shows why these ancient voices are still the most relevant ones in the room.

The book is an entertaining introduction to ancient Chinese thinkers, and what they can teach us about today’s most pressing political questions in China and beyond. China’s most original, diverse, and fascinating political debates took place more than two millennia ago, but they have profoundly shaped Chinese political thinking and practice ever since and, remarkably, their influence on the country’s leaders is only growing today. Yet these timeless debates which are very likely to influence the answers to such questions as whether China should use military force to take control of Taiwan seem far too little understood in the West. In this enlightening and entertaining book, Professor Bell takes the greatest thinkers from China’s past — Confucius, Mencius, Xunzi, Shang Yang, Han Feizi, Zhuangzi, and Mozi—and puts them in dialogue with each other in modern settings.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>872</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b0158ca-370e-11f1-b036-e33d9dc97f82</guid>
      <title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br />Lisa Siraganian’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a> (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br />At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s <em>Citizens United</em> ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a> <em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the </em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em> is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at </em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br />Lisa Siraganian’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a> (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br />At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s <em>Citizens United</em> ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a> <em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the </em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em> is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at </em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40350659" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/52e07e99-da00-48e5-9bdd-824b3a0f6db7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=52e07e99-da00-48e5-9bdd-824b3a0f6db7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.

Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).

Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.

Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).

Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>871</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57d4ae32-33e5-11f1-a223-03c664723329</guid>
      <title>The Green Transition and the Politics of Lithium Extraction</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lithium is necessary for the green transition but its mining comes with significant environmental and social harms. This is the conundrum at the core of decarbonisation, which host Licia Cianetti discusses with Thea Riofrancos. They talk about how Riofrancos’s book <a href="https://www.theariofrancos.com/extraction"><em>Extraction: The Frontiers of Green Capitalism</em></a> (published by W.W. Norton in 2025) helps us understand the local and global politics of lithium extraction and the lessons it holds for a more just green transition.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Riofrancos_Transcript.docx#asset:450994@1">here</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.theariofrancos.com/">Thea Riofrancos</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science at Providence College, Strategic Co-Director of the <a href="https://www.climateandcommunity.org/">Climate and Community Institute</a>, and a fellow at the <a href="https://www.tni.org/en">Transnational Institute</a>. She researches the politics of climate change and of resource extraction and is also the author of <em>Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador </em>(Duke University Press, 2020) and co-author of <em>A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal</em> (Verso Books, 2019)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lithium is necessary for the green transition but its mining comes with significant environmental and social harms. This is the conundrum at the core of decarbonisation, which host Licia Cianetti discusses with Thea Riofrancos. They talk about how Riofrancos’s book <a href="https://www.theariofrancos.com/extraction"><em>Extraction: The Frontiers of Green Capitalism</em></a> (published by W.W. Norton in 2025) helps us understand the local and global politics of lithium extraction and the lessons it holds for a more just green transition.</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Riofrancos_Transcript.docx#asset:450994@1">here</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.theariofrancos.com/">Thea Riofrancos</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science at Providence College, Strategic Co-Director of the <a href="https://www.climateandcommunity.org/">Climate and Community Institute</a>, and a fellow at the <a href="https://www.tni.org/en">Transnational Institute</a>. She researches the politics of climate change and of resource extraction and is also the author of <em>Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador </em>(Duke University Press, 2020) and co-author of <em>A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal</em> (Verso Books, 2019)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40464766" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3844aae5-7d06-4928-83b8-5eb87ac95bcd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3844aae5-7d06-4928-83b8-5eb87ac95bcd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Green Transition and the Politics of Lithium Extraction</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lithium is necessary for the green transition but its mining comes with significant environmental and social harms. This is the conundrum at the core of decarbonisation, which host Licia Cianetti discusses with Thea Riofrancos. They talk about how Riofrancos’s book Extraction: The Frontiers of Green Capitalism (published by W.W. Norton in 2025) helps us understand the local and global politics of lithium extraction and the lessons it holds for a more just green transition.

Transcript here

Thea Riofrancos is Associate Professor of Political Science at Providence College, Strategic Co-Director of the Climate and Community Institute, and a fellow at the Transnational Institute. She researches the politics of climate change and of resource extraction and is also the author of Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador (Duke University Press, 2020) and co-author of A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal (Verso Books, 2019)

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lithium is necessary for the green transition but its mining comes with significant environmental and social harms. This is the conundrum at the core of decarbonisation, which host Licia Cianetti discusses with Thea Riofrancos. They talk about how Riofrancos’s book Extraction: The Frontiers of Green Capitalism (published by W.W. Norton in 2025) helps us understand the local and global politics of lithium extraction and the lessons it holds for a more just green transition.

Transcript here

Thea Riofrancos is Associate Professor of Political Science at Providence College, Strategic Co-Director of the Climate and Community Institute, and a fellow at the Transnational Institute. She researches the politics of climate change and of resource extraction and is also the author of Resource Radicals: From Petro-Nationalism to Post-Extractivism in Ecuador (Duke University Press, 2020) and co-author of A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal (Verso Books, 2019)

Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>870</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0fb85034-330b-11f1-9df0-3f522efffe3d</guid>
      <title>Radio ReOrient 14.2: State of the Ummah: Authoritarianism and Resistance: Bangladesh and Pakistan, Hosted by SherAli Tahreen and Shehla Khan, with Tanzeen Doha and Salman Sayyid</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Radio ReOrient’ s occasional series <em>The State of the Ummah</em>, SherAli Tahreen, Shehla Khan, Tanzeen Doha, and Salman Sayyid unpack the intertwined stories of authoritarianism and resistance in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Moving beyond Orientalism, methodological nationalism, and Indological approaches, they explore Bangladesh’s relative success in overthrowing Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarian rule, while Pakistan continues to suffer under a Khaki-Kleptocratic regime, one example of whose many cruelties is the inhumane imprisonment of the deposed Prime Minister Imran Khan.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Radio ReOrient’ s occasional series <em>The State of the Ummah</em>, SherAli Tahreen, Shehla Khan, Tanzeen Doha, and Salman Sayyid unpack the intertwined stories of authoritarianism and resistance in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Moving beyond Orientalism, methodological nationalism, and Indological approaches, they explore Bangladesh’s relative success in overthrowing Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarian rule, while Pakistan continues to suffer under a Khaki-Kleptocratic regime, one example of whose many cruelties is the inhumane imprisonment of the deposed Prime Minister Imran Khan.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="82362382" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aeeb4945-43f8-485d-bd71-a281503002bb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aeeb4945-43f8-485d-bd71-a281503002bb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Radio ReOrient 14.2: State of the Ummah: Authoritarianism and Resistance: Bangladesh and Pakistan, Hosted by SherAli Tahreen and Shehla Khan, with Tanzeen Doha and Salman Sayyid</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:25:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Radio ReOrient’ s occasional series The State of the Ummah, SherAli Tahreen, Shehla Khan, Tanzeen Doha, and Salman Sayyid unpack the intertwined stories of authoritarianism and resistance in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Moving beyond Orientalism, methodological nationalism, and Indological approaches, they explore Bangladesh’s relative success in overthrowing Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarian rule, while Pakistan continues to suffer under a Khaki-Kleptocratic regime, one example of whose many cruelties is the inhumane imprisonment of the deposed Prime Minister Imran Khan.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Radio ReOrient’ s occasional series The State of the Ummah, SherAli Tahreen, Shehla Khan, Tanzeen Doha, and Salman Sayyid unpack the intertwined stories of authoritarianism and resistance in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Moving beyond Orientalism, methodological nationalism, and Indological approaches, they explore Bangladesh’s relative success in overthrowing Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarian rule, while Pakistan continues to suffer under a Khaki-Kleptocratic regime, one example of whose many cruelties is the inhumane imprisonment of the deposed Prime Minister Imran Khan.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>869</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9869a6c2-323d-11f1-ae1f-a3fb4c770941</guid>
      <title>Thorsten Gromes, &quot;Sustaining Peace After Civil War: Insights from 48 Recent Cases&quot; (Springer, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032117090">Sustaining Peace After Civil War﻿: Insights from 48 Recent Cases</a> (Springer, 2026) examines one of the most important questions in peace research: What leads to enduring peace after civil wars, and what leads to the resurgence of violence? For decades, intrastate conflicts have been the predominant form of armed conflict, and most recent civil wars were conflicts that recurred. The research presented in this book focuses on influenceable factors, first and foremost on the type of civil war termination and on the post-civil war order that is shaped by the distribution of military power between the former warring parties and the scale of political compromise. Moreover, it shows that the peacekeeping environment has a major influence on whether peace endures.The insights provided in this book are relevant for the academic community, and for decision-makers and practitioners involved in civilian or military efforts to establish and preserve peace.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.prif.org/en/ueber-uns/team/person/thorsten-gromes">Thorsten Gromes</a> is a Project Leader and Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt's (PRIF) Research Department Intra­state Conflicts. His research focuses on post-civil war societies and so-called humani­tarian military inter­ventions.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.prif.org/en/ueber-uns/team/person/sidney-michelini">Sidney Michelini</a> is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).</p>
<p>﻿Book Recommendations:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315632117/sixteen-million-one-patrick-regan">Sixteen Million One: Understanding Civil War</a> by Patrick M. Regan</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.barbarafwalter.com/how-civil-wars-start">How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them</a> by Barbara Walter</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/636263/why-we-fight-by-christopher-blattman/">Why We Fight: The Roots of War and the Paths to Peace</a> by Christopher Blattman</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032117090">Sustaining Peace After Civil War﻿: Insights from 48 Recent Cases</a> (Springer, 2026) examines one of the most important questions in peace research: What leads to enduring peace after civil wars, and what leads to the resurgence of violence? For decades, intrastate conflicts have been the predominant form of armed conflict, and most recent civil wars were conflicts that recurred. The research presented in this book focuses on influenceable factors, first and foremost on the type of civil war termination and on the post-civil war order that is shaped by the distribution of military power between the former warring parties and the scale of political compromise. Moreover, it shows that the peacekeeping environment has a major influence on whether peace endures.The insights provided in this book are relevant for the academic community, and for decision-makers and practitioners involved in civilian or military efforts to establish and preserve peace.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.prif.org/en/ueber-uns/team/person/thorsten-gromes">Thorsten Gromes</a> is a Project Leader and Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt's (PRIF) Research Department Intra­state Conflicts. His research focuses on post-civil war societies and so-called humani­tarian military inter­ventions.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.prif.org/en/ueber-uns/team/person/sidney-michelini">Sidney Michelini</a> is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).</p>
<p>﻿Book Recommendations:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315632117/sixteen-million-one-patrick-regan">Sixteen Million One: Understanding Civil War</a> by Patrick M. Regan</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.barbarafwalter.com/how-civil-wars-start">How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them</a> by Barbara Walter</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/636263/why-we-fight-by-christopher-blattman/">Why We Fight: The Roots of War and the Paths to Peace</a> by Christopher Blattman</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36920592" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1e7955d0-391e-4579-8bc9-0a2a77d7fc38/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1e7955d0-391e-4579-8bc9-0a2a77d7fc38&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thorsten Gromes, &quot;Sustaining Peace After Civil War: Insights from 48 Recent Cases&quot; (Springer, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sustaining Peace After Civil War﻿: Insights from 48 Recent Cases (Springer, 2026) examines one of the most important questions in peace research: What leads to enduring peace after civil wars, and what leads to the resurgence of violence? For decades, intrastate conflicts have been the predominant form of armed conflict, and most recent civil wars were conflicts that recurred. The research presented in this book focuses on influenceable factors, first and foremost on the type of civil war termination and on the post-civil war order that is shaped by the distribution of military power between the former warring parties and the scale of political compromise. Moreover, it shows that the peacekeeping environment has a major influence on whether peace endures.The insights provided in this book are relevant for the academic community, and for decision-makers and practitioners involved in civilian or military efforts to establish and preserve peace.

Thorsten Gromes is a Project Leader and Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt&apos;s (PRIF) Research Department Intra­state Conflicts. His research focuses on post-civil war societies and so-called humani­tarian military inter­ventions.

Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).

﻿Book Recommendations:


  
Sixteen Million One: Understanding Civil War by Patrick M. Regan

  
How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them by Barbara Walter

  
Why We Fight: The Roots of War and the Paths to Peace by Christopher Blattman


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sustaining Peace After Civil War﻿: Insights from 48 Recent Cases (Springer, 2026) examines one of the most important questions in peace research: What leads to enduring peace after civil wars, and what leads to the resurgence of violence? For decades, intrastate conflicts have been the predominant form of armed conflict, and most recent civil wars were conflicts that recurred. The research presented in this book focuses on influenceable factors, first and foremost on the type of civil war termination and on the post-civil war order that is shaped by the distribution of military power between the former warring parties and the scale of political compromise. Moreover, it shows that the peacekeeping environment has a major influence on whether peace endures.The insights provided in this book are relevant for the academic community, and for decision-makers and practitioners involved in civilian or military efforts to establish and preserve peace.

Thorsten Gromes is a Project Leader and Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt&apos;s (PRIF) Research Department Intra­state Conflicts. His research focuses on post-civil war societies and so-called humani­tarian military inter­ventions.

Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).

﻿Book Recommendations:


  
Sixteen Million One: Understanding Civil War by Patrick M. Regan

  
How Civil Wars Start and How to Stop Them by Barbara Walter

  
Why We Fight: The Roots of War and the Paths to Peace by Christopher Blattman


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>868</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62c9c36e-3182-11f1-9d8b-63cc74dff634</guid>
      <title>Andrew Thomas Park, &quot;Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009647779"><em>Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War</em> </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) Dr. Andrew Park tells the story of the rise and fall of the plebiscite, once seen as a promising democratic solution to international conflict which – more than once – became embroiled in controversy and war in the first half of the twentieth century. The book's central figure is the brilliant but largely forgotten American scholar Sarah Wambaugh, the leading expert on the plebiscite technique whose dramatic career took her to many of the world's political hotspots. The norms she developed for the technique continue to shape how self-determination and popular suffrage in international affairs are thought about and conducted today. In a world where borders are again being redrawn by force and democracy everywhere appears under strain, this book is a timely and compelling reminder that such events are not new.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009647779"><em>Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War</em> </a>(Cambridge UP, 2026) Dr. Andrew Park tells the story of the rise and fall of the plebiscite, once seen as a promising democratic solution to international conflict which – more than once – became embroiled in controversy and war in the first half of the twentieth century. The book's central figure is the brilliant but largely forgotten American scholar Sarah Wambaugh, the leading expert on the plebiscite technique whose dramatic career took her to many of the world's political hotspots. The norms she developed for the technique continue to shape how self-determination and popular suffrage in international affairs are thought about and conducted today. In a world where borders are again being redrawn by force and democracy everywhere appears under strain, this book is a timely and compelling reminder that such events are not new.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56954868" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5a44877c-b8ea-4b7e-b836-001b03983afc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5a44877c-b8ea-4b7e-b836-001b03983afc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Thomas Park, &quot;Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War (Cambridge UP, 2026) Dr. Andrew Park tells the story of the rise and fall of the plebiscite, once seen as a promising democratic solution to international conflict which – more than once – became embroiled in controversy and war in the first half of the twentieth century. The book&apos;s central figure is the brilliant but largely forgotten American scholar Sarah Wambaugh, the leading expert on the plebiscite technique whose dramatic career took her to many of the world&apos;s political hotspots. The norms she developed for the technique continue to shape how self-determination and popular suffrage in international affairs are thought about and conducted today. In a world where borders are again being redrawn by force and democracy everywhere appears under strain, this book is a timely and compelling reminder that such events are not new.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Sarah Wambaugh and the Plebiscite: The Turbulent History of a Democratic Alternative to War (Cambridge UP, 2026) Dr. Andrew Park tells the story of the rise and fall of the plebiscite, once seen as a promising democratic solution to international conflict which – more than once – became embroiled in controversy and war in the first half of the twentieth century. The book&apos;s central figure is the brilliant but largely forgotten American scholar Sarah Wambaugh, the leading expert on the plebiscite technique whose dramatic career took her to many of the world&apos;s political hotspots. The norms she developed for the technique continue to shape how self-determination and popular suffrage in international affairs are thought about and conducted today. In a world where borders are again being redrawn by force and democracy everywhere appears under strain, this book is a timely and compelling reminder that such events are not new.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>867</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8dfbe76e-313d-11f1-ac79-d7db834279be</guid>
      <title>Alex Diamond, &quot;Governing the Excluded: Rural Livelihoods Beyond Coca in Colombia&apos;s Peace Laboratory&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Colombian village of Briceño might, at first glimpse, look like many communities in the rural Global South. Many of the people living there rely on small-scale farming, even as a newly constructed hydroelectric dam threatens traditional livelihoods. Yet after decades where Briceño suffered from a bloody conflict, the village has more recently become central to the nation’s hopes for peace. In<em> Governing the Excluded</em>, sociologist Alex Diamond shares a closer look at Briceño and offers unique insight not only into the contemporary Colombian state but to how people across the Global South are struggling to maintain rural livelihoods amid economic dispossession.<br /><em>Governing the Excluded </em>describes a landmark peace process between the Colombian government and the radical FARC guerrillas from the perspective of Colombian farmers, drawing links between economic transformation, drug economies, and armed conflict. Exclusion from global markets for traditional crops like coffee first pushed farmers to grow coca, the raw material for cocaine. This ushered in an era of violent conflict for control of the illicit economy, while farmers continued to be priced out of legal markets. In exchange for peace and state protection, farmers ultimately agreed to sacrifice profitable coca. But with its disappearance, they now find themselves dependent on the state: for machinery to maintain the roads they need to get legal harvests to market, municipal jobs that are the only decent work available, and for public resources to subsidize food crops with razor-thin profit margins. Ongoing economic struggles in the legal sector make the state’s newfound authority tenuous, as some villagers replant coca, abandon the village for uncertain urban futures, or join a rearmed guerrilla group.<br />Informed by deep ethnographic research and firsthand stories from Briceño residents, <em>Governing the Excluded </em>shows that when it comes to the forces driving dispossession—be they international corporate megaprojects, global food prices, or national initiatives to replace coca cultivation—state authority goes only so far as its ability to sustain local livelihoods.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.snehanna.com/">Sneha Annavarapu</a><em> is Assistant Professor of Urban Studies at Yale-NUS College.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Colombian village of Briceño might, at first glimpse, look like many communities in the rural Global South. Many of the people living there rely on small-scale farming, even as a newly constructed hydroelectric dam threatens traditional livelihoods. Yet after decades where Briceño suffered from a bloody conflict, the village has more recently become central to the nation’s hopes for peace. In<em> Governing the Excluded</em>, sociologist Alex Diamond shares a closer look at Briceño and offers unique insight not only into the contemporary Colombian state but to how people across the Global South are struggling to maintain rural livelihoods amid economic dispossession.<br /><em>Governing the Excluded </em>describes a landmark peace process between the Colombian government and the radical FARC guerrillas from the perspective of Colombian farmers, drawing links between economic transformation, drug economies, and armed conflict. Exclusion from global markets for traditional crops like coffee first pushed farmers to grow coca, the raw material for cocaine. This ushered in an era of violent conflict for control of the illicit economy, while farmers continued to be priced out of legal markets. In exchange for peace and state protection, farmers ultimately agreed to sacrifice profitable coca. But with its disappearance, they now find themselves dependent on the state: for machinery to maintain the roads they need to get legal harvests to market, municipal jobs that are the only decent work available, and for public resources to subsidize food crops with razor-thin profit margins. Ongoing economic struggles in the legal sector make the state’s newfound authority tenuous, as some villagers replant coca, abandon the village for uncertain urban futures, or join a rearmed guerrilla group.<br />Informed by deep ethnographic research and firsthand stories from Briceño residents, <em>Governing the Excluded </em>shows that when it comes to the forces driving dispossession—be they international corporate megaprojects, global food prices, or national initiatives to replace coca cultivation—state authority goes only so far as its ability to sustain local livelihoods.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.snehanna.com/">Sneha Annavarapu</a><em> is Assistant Professor of Urban Studies at Yale-NUS College.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58124785" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ff513548-1588-4c03-a0c7-8dff4aef2b9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ff513548-1588-4c03-a0c7-8dff4aef2b9e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Diamond, &quot;Governing the Excluded: Rural Livelihoods Beyond Coca in Colombia&apos;s Peace Laboratory&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Colombian village of Briceño might, at first glimpse, look like many communities in the rural Global South. Many of the people living there rely on small-scale farming, even as a newly constructed hydroelectric dam threatens traditional livelihoods. Yet after decades where Briceño suffered from a bloody conflict, the village has more recently become central to the nation’s hopes for peace. In Governing the Excluded, sociologist Alex Diamond shares a closer look at Briceño and offers unique insight not only into the contemporary Colombian state but to how people across the Global South are struggling to maintain rural livelihoods amid economic dispossession.Governing the Excluded describes a landmark peace process between the Colombian government and the radical FARC guerrillas from the perspective of Colombian farmers, drawing links between economic transformation, drug economies, and armed conflict. Exclusion from global markets for traditional crops like coffee first pushed farmers to grow coca, the raw material for cocaine. This ushered in an era of violent conflict for control of the illicit economy, while farmers continued to be priced out of legal markets. In exchange for peace and state protection, farmers ultimately agreed to sacrifice profitable coca. But with its disappearance, they now find themselves dependent on the state: for machinery to maintain the roads they need to get legal harvests to market, municipal jobs that are the only decent work available, and for public resources to subsidize food crops with razor-thin profit margins. Ongoing economic struggles in the legal sector make the state’s newfound authority tenuous, as some villagers replant coca, abandon the village for uncertain urban futures, or join a rearmed guerrilla group.Informed by deep ethnographic research and firsthand stories from Briceño residents, Governing the Excluded shows that when it comes to the forces driving dispossession—be they international corporate megaprojects, global food prices, or national initiatives to replace coca cultivation—state authority goes only so far as its ability to sustain local livelihoods.

Sneha Annavarapu is Assistant Professor of Urban Studies at Yale-NUS College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Colombian village of Briceño might, at first glimpse, look like many communities in the rural Global South. Many of the people living there rely on small-scale farming, even as a newly constructed hydroelectric dam threatens traditional livelihoods. Yet after decades where Briceño suffered from a bloody conflict, the village has more recently become central to the nation’s hopes for peace. In Governing the Excluded, sociologist Alex Diamond shares a closer look at Briceño and offers unique insight not only into the contemporary Colombian state but to how people across the Global South are struggling to maintain rural livelihoods amid economic dispossession.Governing the Excluded describes a landmark peace process between the Colombian government and the radical FARC guerrillas from the perspective of Colombian farmers, drawing links between economic transformation, drug economies, and armed conflict. Exclusion from global markets for traditional crops like coffee first pushed farmers to grow coca, the raw material for cocaine. This ushered in an era of violent conflict for control of the illicit economy, while farmers continued to be priced out of legal markets. In exchange for peace and state protection, farmers ultimately agreed to sacrifice profitable coca. But with its disappearance, they now find themselves dependent on the state: for machinery to maintain the roads they need to get legal harvests to market, municipal jobs that are the only decent work available, and for public resources to subsidize food crops with razor-thin profit margins. Ongoing economic struggles in the legal sector make the state’s newfound authority tenuous, as some villagers replant coca, abandon the village for uncertain urban futures, or join a rearmed guerrilla group.Informed by deep ethnographic research and firsthand stories from Briceño residents, Governing the Excluded shows that when it comes to the forces driving dispossession—be they international corporate megaprojects, global food prices, or national initiatives to replace coca cultivation—state authority goes only so far as its ability to sustain local livelihoods.

Sneha Annavarapu is Assistant Professor of Urban Studies at Yale-NUS College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>866</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">77aed000-313a-11f1-91eb-6ffa575c470f</guid>
      <title>Ho-fung Hung, &quot;The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>"The contempt and naive idealization of China are two sides of the same coin. The latter cannot be an antidote to the former."</em><br /></p>
<p>So argues Ho-Fung Hung in the conclusion of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009559775">The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear</a><em> </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2026). For centuries, Western scholars portrayed China either as a land of superior morality, economy, and governance or as a formidable country of pagans that posed a global threat to Western values. Idealized images of China were used to shame rulers for their incompetence, while China was demonized as an external threat to cover up domestic political failures. In the twentieth century, the geopolitics of global capitalism have facilitated more nuanced perspectives, but the diversifying of knowledge about China is far from complete. In this thought-provoking study, Ho-fung Hung finds that both Western elites and China's authoritarian regime today continue to promote many Orientalist stereotypes to advance their economic interests and political projects. He shows how big-picture historical, social, and economic changes are inextricably linked to fluctuations in the realm of ideas. Only open debate can overcome extremes of fantasy and fear.</p>
<p>Ho-Fung Hung is Henry M. and Elizabeth P. Wiesenfeld Professor in Political Economy at the Sociology Department and the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"The contempt and naive idealization of China are two sides of the same coin. The latter cannot be an antidote to the former."</em><br /></p>
<p>So argues Ho-Fung Hung in the conclusion of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009559775">The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear</a><em> </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2026). For centuries, Western scholars portrayed China either as a land of superior morality, economy, and governance or as a formidable country of pagans that posed a global threat to Western values. Idealized images of China were used to shame rulers for their incompetence, while China was demonized as an external threat to cover up domestic political failures. In the twentieth century, the geopolitics of global capitalism have facilitated more nuanced perspectives, but the diversifying of knowledge about China is far from complete. In this thought-provoking study, Ho-fung Hung finds that both Western elites and China's authoritarian regime today continue to promote many Orientalist stereotypes to advance their economic interests and political projects. He shows how big-picture historical, social, and economic changes are inextricably linked to fluctuations in the realm of ideas. Only open debate can overcome extremes of fantasy and fear.</p>
<p>Ho-Fung Hung is Henry M. and Elizabeth P. Wiesenfeld Professor in Political Economy at the Sociology Department and the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68478934" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4ef99a04-4f51-44f3-9b25-a48072c6cfad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4ef99a04-4f51-44f3-9b25-a48072c6cfad&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ho-fung Hung, &quot;The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;The contempt and naive idealization of China are two sides of the same coin. The latter cannot be an antidote to the former.&quot;

So argues Ho-Fung Hung in the conclusion of The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear (Cambridge University Press, 2026). For centuries, Western scholars portrayed China either as a land of superior morality, economy, and governance or as a formidable country of pagans that posed a global threat to Western values. Idealized images of China were used to shame rulers for their incompetence, while China was demonized as an external threat to cover up domestic political failures. In the twentieth century, the geopolitics of global capitalism have facilitated more nuanced perspectives, but the diversifying of knowledge about China is far from complete. In this thought-provoking study, Ho-fung Hung finds that both Western elites and China&apos;s authoritarian regime today continue to promote many Orientalist stereotypes to advance their economic interests and political projects. He shows how big-picture historical, social, and economic changes are inextricably linked to fluctuations in the realm of ideas. Only open debate can overcome extremes of fantasy and fear.

Ho-Fung Hung is Henry M. and Elizabeth P. Wiesenfeld Professor in Political Economy at the Sociology Department and the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;The contempt and naive idealization of China are two sides of the same coin. The latter cannot be an antidote to the former.&quot;

So argues Ho-Fung Hung in the conclusion of The China Question: Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear (Cambridge University Press, 2026). For centuries, Western scholars portrayed China either as a land of superior morality, economy, and governance or as a formidable country of pagans that posed a global threat to Western values. Idealized images of China were used to shame rulers for their incompetence, while China was demonized as an external threat to cover up domestic political failures. In the twentieth century, the geopolitics of global capitalism have facilitated more nuanced perspectives, but the diversifying of knowledge about China is far from complete. In this thought-provoking study, Ho-fung Hung finds that both Western elites and China&apos;s authoritarian regime today continue to promote many Orientalist stereotypes to advance their economic interests and political projects. He shows how big-picture historical, social, and economic changes are inextricably linked to fluctuations in the realm of ideas. Only open debate can overcome extremes of fantasy and fear.

Ho-Fung Hung is Henry M. and Elizabeth P. Wiesenfeld Professor in Political Economy at the Sociology Department and the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>865</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb82da64-2f38-11f1-8442-3b68e22fe5bb</guid>
      <title>Marta Lorimer, &quot;Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How did the far right go from illegitimate fringe to contender for public office, and did Europe have anything to do with it? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198892366">Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) argues that European integration functioned as an ideological resource for far right parties looking for legitimation because it enabled them to refashion their political message in a more acceptable form, while maintaining the allegiance of their existing supporters.<br />Drawing on the qualitative analysis of over 400 documents produced by the Movimento Sociale Italiano/Alleanza Nazionale in Italy (1978-2009) and the Rassemblement National in France (1978-2019), Lorimer identifies the core concepts and discourses the parties used to talk about Europe, and the legitimation mechanisms associated with them. The book's narrative is developed through the analysis of four key concepts: the concept of identity, which enabled the parties to transnationalise their message and create a positive association between themselves and Europe; the concept of liberty, which made it possible for them to foster an image of actors holding uncontroversial positions; the concept of threat, which helped them promote the idea that 'desperate times call for desperate measures; and the concept of national interest, which helped them stress commitment to core principles in their ideology.<br />Ever since its re-emergence on the European political scene, scholars have sought to explain the mainstreaming of the far right. By understanding how the process of European integration facilitated its transition from the margins to the mainstream, this book adds one piece to the puzzle of far right legitimation.</p>
<p>Marta Lorimer is a Lecturer in Politics at the School of Law and Politics at Cardiff University, where she teaches on European politics and populism, and co-editor of the journal Political Research Exchange. Her research on far-right politics and European integration has been published widely, including in the Journal of European Public Policy and the Journal of Common Market Studies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did the far right go from illegitimate fringe to contender for public office, and did Europe have anything to do with it? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198892366">Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) argues that European integration functioned as an ideological resource for far right parties looking for legitimation because it enabled them to refashion their political message in a more acceptable form, while maintaining the allegiance of their existing supporters.<br />Drawing on the qualitative analysis of over 400 documents produced by the Movimento Sociale Italiano/Alleanza Nazionale in Italy (1978-2009) and the Rassemblement National in France (1978-2019), Lorimer identifies the core concepts and discourses the parties used to talk about Europe, and the legitimation mechanisms associated with them. The book's narrative is developed through the analysis of four key concepts: the concept of identity, which enabled the parties to transnationalise their message and create a positive association between themselves and Europe; the concept of liberty, which made it possible for them to foster an image of actors holding uncontroversial positions; the concept of threat, which helped them promote the idea that 'desperate times call for desperate measures; and the concept of national interest, which helped them stress commitment to core principles in their ideology.<br />Ever since its re-emergence on the European political scene, scholars have sought to explain the mainstreaming of the far right. By understanding how the process of European integration facilitated its transition from the margins to the mainstream, this book adds one piece to the puzzle of far right legitimation.</p>
<p>Marta Lorimer is a Lecturer in Politics at the School of Law and Politics at Cardiff University, where she teaches on European politics and populism, and co-editor of the journal Political Research Exchange. Her research on far-right politics and European integration has been published widely, including in the Journal of European Public Policy and the Journal of Common Market Studies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33196305" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ec26d56d-d0ee-4805-a4c1-60dc3aed8fc1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ec26d56d-d0ee-4805-a4c1-60dc3aed8fc1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marta Lorimer, &quot;Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How did the far right go from illegitimate fringe to contender for public office, and did Europe have anything to do with it? Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy (Oxford UP, 2024) argues that European integration functioned as an ideological resource for far right parties looking for legitimation because it enabled them to refashion their political message in a more acceptable form, while maintaining the allegiance of their existing supporters.Drawing on the qualitative analysis of over 400 documents produced by the Movimento Sociale Italiano/Alleanza Nazionale in Italy (1978-2009) and the Rassemblement National in France (1978-2019), Lorimer identifies the core concepts and discourses the parties used to talk about Europe, and the legitimation mechanisms associated with them. The book&apos;s narrative is developed through the analysis of four key concepts: the concept of identity, which enabled the parties to transnationalise their message and create a positive association between themselves and Europe; the concept of liberty, which made it possible for them to foster an image of actors holding uncontroversial positions; the concept of threat, which helped them promote the idea that &apos;desperate times call for desperate measures; and the concept of national interest, which helped them stress commitment to core principles in their ideology.Ever since its re-emergence on the European political scene, scholars have sought to explain the mainstreaming of the far right. By understanding how the process of European integration facilitated its transition from the margins to the mainstream, this book adds one piece to the puzzle of far right legitimation.

Marta Lorimer is a Lecturer in Politics at the School of Law and Politics at Cardiff University, where she teaches on European politics and populism, and co-editor of the journal Political Research Exchange. Her research on far-right politics and European integration has been published widely, including in the Journal of European Public Policy and the Journal of Common Market Studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How did the far right go from illegitimate fringe to contender for public office, and did Europe have anything to do with it? Europe As Ideological Resource: European Integration and Far Right Legitimation in France and Italy (Oxford UP, 2024) argues that European integration functioned as an ideological resource for far right parties looking for legitimation because it enabled them to refashion their political message in a more acceptable form, while maintaining the allegiance of their existing supporters.Drawing on the qualitative analysis of over 400 documents produced by the Movimento Sociale Italiano/Alleanza Nazionale in Italy (1978-2009) and the Rassemblement National in France (1978-2019), Lorimer identifies the core concepts and discourses the parties used to talk about Europe, and the legitimation mechanisms associated with them. The book&apos;s narrative is developed through the analysis of four key concepts: the concept of identity, which enabled the parties to transnationalise their message and create a positive association between themselves and Europe; the concept of liberty, which made it possible for them to foster an image of actors holding uncontroversial positions; the concept of threat, which helped them promote the idea that &apos;desperate times call for desperate measures; and the concept of national interest, which helped them stress commitment to core principles in their ideology.Ever since its re-emergence on the European political scene, scholars have sought to explain the mainstreaming of the far right. By understanding how the process of European integration facilitated its transition from the margins to the mainstream, this book adds one piece to the puzzle of far right legitimation.

Marta Lorimer is a Lecturer in Politics at the School of Law and Politics at Cardiff University, where she teaches on European politics and populism, and co-editor of the journal Political Research Exchange. Her research on far-right politics and European integration has been published widely, including in the Journal of European Public Policy and the Journal of Common Market Studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>864</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c2a0138-2f37-11f1-bddb-07220b1f4184</guid>
      <title>Hilary Matfess, &quot;After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>War offers opportunities for women to liberate their communities and build a better life for themselves. When women join rebel groups, they often take on new roles, cultivate new social networks, and develop new skills. These rebel women often gain the respect of rebel leaders, their comrades-in-arms, and the communities they're fighting for. When the guns are silenced, however, women have struggled to maintain the progress and prestige that they gained during war. Hilary Matfess investigates the gendered legacies of conflict and considers why it is so difficult for female veterans to defend the gains they made during war.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645622">After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions</a> (Stanford UP, 2026) by Dr. Hilary Matfess explores how both individual female veterans and former-rebel political parties balance the incentives to continue their wartime activities or moderate them to succeed in the postwar period. The particular balance struck—by party elites and by female veterans—shapes women's rights and representation after war. Drawing on cross-national statistics and in-depth qualitative case studies of rebel groups—from Ethiopia, Namibia, El Salvador, and Nepal—Dr. Matfess advances a theory to explain the postwar legacies of women's participation in rebellion at both the individual and the organizational levels. This book helps us understand why women that were once lauded as the backbone of the revolution are so frequently relegated to the backburner after war.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War offers opportunities for women to liberate their communities and build a better life for themselves. When women join rebel groups, they often take on new roles, cultivate new social networks, and develop new skills. These rebel women often gain the respect of rebel leaders, their comrades-in-arms, and the communities they're fighting for. When the guns are silenced, however, women have struggled to maintain the progress and prestige that they gained during war. Hilary Matfess investigates the gendered legacies of conflict and considers why it is so difficult for female veterans to defend the gains they made during war.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645622">After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions</a> (Stanford UP, 2026) by Dr. Hilary Matfess explores how both individual female veterans and former-rebel political parties balance the incentives to continue their wartime activities or moderate them to succeed in the postwar period. The particular balance struck—by party elites and by female veterans—shapes women's rights and representation after war. Drawing on cross-national statistics and in-depth qualitative case studies of rebel groups—from Ethiopia, Namibia, El Salvador, and Nepal—Dr. Matfess advances a theory to explain the postwar legacies of women's participation in rebellion at both the individual and the organizational levels. This book helps us understand why women that were once lauded as the backbone of the revolution are so frequently relegated to the backburner after war.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46674206" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/91ea5a45-73e3-41dd-ba7c-d4f3a31f5f07/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=91ea5a45-73e3-41dd-ba7c-d4f3a31f5f07&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hilary Matfess, &quot;After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>War offers opportunities for women to liberate their communities and build a better life for themselves. When women join rebel groups, they often take on new roles, cultivate new social networks, and develop new skills. These rebel women often gain the respect of rebel leaders, their comrades-in-arms, and the communities they&apos;re fighting for. When the guns are silenced, however, women have struggled to maintain the progress and prestige that they gained during war. Hilary Matfess investigates the gendered legacies of conflict and considers why it is so difficult for female veterans to defend the gains they made during war.

After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions (Stanford UP, 2026) by Dr. Hilary Matfess explores how both individual female veterans and former-rebel political parties balance the incentives to continue their wartime activities or moderate them to succeed in the postwar period. The particular balance struck—by party elites and by female veterans—shapes women&apos;s rights and representation after war. Drawing on cross-national statistics and in-depth qualitative case studies of rebel groups—from Ethiopia, Namibia, El Salvador, and Nepal—Dr. Matfess advances a theory to explain the postwar legacies of women&apos;s participation in rebellion at both the individual and the organizational levels. This book helps us understand why women that were once lauded as the backbone of the revolution are so frequently relegated to the backburner after war.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>War offers opportunities for women to liberate their communities and build a better life for themselves. When women join rebel groups, they often take on new roles, cultivate new social networks, and develop new skills. These rebel women often gain the respect of rebel leaders, their comrades-in-arms, and the communities they&apos;re fighting for. When the guns are silenced, however, women have struggled to maintain the progress and prestige that they gained during war. Hilary Matfess investigates the gendered legacies of conflict and considers why it is so difficult for female veterans to defend the gains they made during war.

After Liberation: Women and the Politics of Expectations in Rebel-to-Party Transitions (Stanford UP, 2026) by Dr. Hilary Matfess explores how both individual female veterans and former-rebel political parties balance the incentives to continue their wartime activities or moderate them to succeed in the postwar period. The particular balance struck—by party elites and by female veterans—shapes women&apos;s rights and representation after war. Drawing on cross-national statistics and in-depth qualitative case studies of rebel groups—from Ethiopia, Namibia, El Salvador, and Nepal—Dr. Matfess advances a theory to explain the postwar legacies of women&apos;s participation in rebellion at both the individual and the organizational levels. This book helps us understand why women that were once lauded as the backbone of the revolution are so frequently relegated to the backburner after war.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>863</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15dd56d8-2f34-11f1-9b1e-ab2e540ee2c9</guid>
      <title>Stephen Onyango Ouma, &quot;Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation&quot; (Brill, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I had a substantive conversation with Dr. Stephen Onyango Ouma, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004759886">Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation</a><em> </em>﻿(Brill, 2026). He explained that, despite achieving political independence, African countries still experience significant colonial and neo-colonial influences in their economies, education systems, cultures, and political structures.</p>
<p>The book argues that genuine liberation must include economic independence, epistemic freedom, cultural reclamation, and Pan-African unity. Dr Ouma highlights the importance of revitalising indigenous knowledge systems, strengthening regional cooperation, and addressing dependencies that limit Africa's ability to determine its own path.</p>
<p>We discussed topics ranging from the lasting mental effects of colonialism to the potential of the AfCFTA, the rise of youth activism, and the key role African women play in liberation movements. It was a thoughtful look at what decolonisation should mean today.</p>
<p>For those interested in African philosophy, global politics, or contemporary decolonial thought, this book and the accompanying interview offer valuable insights.</p>
<p><a href="https://vu.nl/en/research/scientists/amisah-bakuri">Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is</a> an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her work explores the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, especially within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a substantive conversation with Dr. Stephen Onyango Ouma, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004759886">Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation</a><em> </em>﻿(Brill, 2026). He explained that, despite achieving political independence, African countries still experience significant colonial and neo-colonial influences in their economies, education systems, cultures, and political structures.</p>
<p>The book argues that genuine liberation must include economic independence, epistemic freedom, cultural reclamation, and Pan-African unity. Dr Ouma highlights the importance of revitalising indigenous knowledge systems, strengthening regional cooperation, and addressing dependencies that limit Africa's ability to determine its own path.</p>
<p>We discussed topics ranging from the lasting mental effects of colonialism to the potential of the AfCFTA, the rise of youth activism, and the key role African women play in liberation movements. It was a thoughtful look at what decolonisation should mean today.</p>
<p>For those interested in African philosophy, global politics, or contemporary decolonial thought, this book and the accompanying interview offer valuable insights.</p>
<p><a href="https://vu.nl/en/research/scientists/amisah-bakuri">Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is</a> an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her work explores the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, especially within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60960574" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/305d84da-829c-4f3d-a18f-d51787e8d83c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=305d84da-829c-4f3d-a18f-d51787e8d83c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Onyango Ouma, &quot;Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation&quot; (Brill, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>I had a substantive conversation with Dr. Stephen Onyango Ouma, author of Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation ﻿(Brill, 2026). He explained that, despite achieving political independence, African countries still experience significant colonial and neo-colonial influences in their economies, education systems, cultures, and political structures.

The book argues that genuine liberation must include economic independence, epistemic freedom, cultural reclamation, and Pan-African unity. Dr Ouma highlights the importance of revitalising indigenous knowledge systems, strengthening regional cooperation, and addressing dependencies that limit Africa&apos;s ability to determine its own path.

We discussed topics ranging from the lasting mental effects of colonialism to the potential of the AfCFTA, the rise of youth activism, and the key role African women play in liberation movements. It was a thoughtful look at what decolonisation should mean today.

For those interested in African philosophy, global politics, or contemporary decolonial thought, this book and the accompanying interview offer valuable insights.

Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her work explores the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, especially within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>I had a substantive conversation with Dr. Stephen Onyango Ouma, author of Africa Unbound: Decolonial Pathways to Sovereignty and Liberation ﻿(Brill, 2026). He explained that, despite achieving political independence, African countries still experience significant colonial and neo-colonial influences in their economies, education systems, cultures, and political structures.

The book argues that genuine liberation must include economic independence, epistemic freedom, cultural reclamation, and Pan-African unity. Dr Ouma highlights the importance of revitalising indigenous knowledge systems, strengthening regional cooperation, and addressing dependencies that limit Africa&apos;s ability to determine its own path.

We discussed topics ranging from the lasting mental effects of colonialism to the potential of the AfCFTA, the rise of youth activism, and the key role African women play in liberation movements. It was a thoughtful look at what decolonisation should mean today.

For those interested in African philosophy, global politics, or contemporary decolonial thought, this book and the accompanying interview offer valuable insights.

Amisah Bakuri (PhD) is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Her work explores the intersections of religion, sexuality, gender, and migration, especially within African diasporic communities in the Netherlands.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>862</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f9517b6-2d86-11f1-8a02-2bbba61e286b</guid>
      <title>The Gen Z Revolution in Bangladesh and Its Fallout</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What role did Gen Z play in the popular uprising that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina regime in the summer of 2024? And what marks have the uprising left on democratic politics in Bangladesh? We discuss these questions with Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan, and Ishrat Hossain whose work on the 2024 July Revolution appeared in a special issue of <a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/jbds/27/2/jbds.27.issue-2.xml"><em>Journal of Bangladesh Studies</em></a> in early 2026. We also discuss what the Gen Z Revolution can tell us more generally about processes of autocratization, resistance and mass protests in the contemporary world, and about the conditions under which popular mobilization can succeed in dislodging autocratic governments.</p>
<p>Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo, Norway</p>
<p>Mubashar Hasan is Adjunct Research Fellow at the University of Western Sydney, Australia</p>
<p>Ishrat Hossain is an Associate at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo, Norway</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What role did Gen Z play in the popular uprising that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina regime in the summer of 2024? And what marks have the uprising left on democratic politics in Bangladesh? We discuss these questions with Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan, and Ishrat Hossain whose work on the 2024 July Revolution appeared in a special issue of <a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/jbds/27/2/jbds.27.issue-2.xml"><em>Journal of Bangladesh Studies</em></a> in early 2026. We also discuss what the Gen Z Revolution can tell us more generally about processes of autocratization, resistance and mass protests in the contemporary world, and about the conditions under which popular mobilization can succeed in dislodging autocratic governments.</p>
<p>Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo, Norway</p>
<p>Mubashar Hasan is Adjunct Research Fellow at the University of Western Sydney, Australia</p>
<p>Ishrat Hossain is an Associate at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo, Norway</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33501262" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1784e763-44f8-41a8-a2d9-b3e3a4b569f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1784e763-44f8-41a8-a2d9-b3e3a4b569f6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Gen Z Revolution in Bangladesh and Its Fallout</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What role did Gen Z play in the popular uprising that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina regime in the summer of 2024? And what marks have the uprising left on democratic politics in Bangladesh? We discuss these questions with Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan, and Ishrat Hossain whose work on the 2024 July Revolution appeared in a special issue of Journal of Bangladesh Studies in early 2026. We also discuss what the Gen Z Revolution can tell us more generally about processes of autocratization, resistance and mass protests in the contemporary world, and about the conditions under which popular mobilization can succeed in dislodging autocratic governments.

Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo, Norway

Mubashar Hasan is Adjunct Research Fellow at the University of Western Sydney, Australia

Ishrat Hossain is an Associate at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies

Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo, Norway
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What role did Gen Z play in the popular uprising that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina regime in the summer of 2024? And what marks have the uprising left on democratic politics in Bangladesh? We discuss these questions with Arild Engelsen Ruud, Mubashar Hasan, and Ishrat Hossain whose work on the 2024 July Revolution appeared in a special issue of Journal of Bangladesh Studies in early 2026. We also discuss what the Gen Z Revolution can tell us more generally about processes of autocratization, resistance and mass protests in the contemporary world, and about the conditions under which popular mobilization can succeed in dislodging autocratic governments.

Arild Engelsen Ruud is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo, Norway

Mubashar Hasan is Adjunct Research Fellow at the University of Western Sydney, Australia

Ishrat Hossain is an Associate at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies

Kenneth Bo Nielsen, your host, is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo, Norway
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>861</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0fa57f7e-2bc5-11f1-adb9-63e3d6bda6e4</guid>
      <title>Mark Pennington, &quot;Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by <strong>Mark Pennington</strong></p>
<p>This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from <em>within</em> the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.<br />Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' <em>dispositifs</em> in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral <em>dispositifs</em> that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.<br />Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism</p>
<p>Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by <strong>Mark Pennington</strong></p>
<p>This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from <em>within</em> the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.<br />Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' <em>dispositifs</em> in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral <em>dispositifs</em> that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.<br />Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism</p>
<p>Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55264931" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3335eb3a-5d6f-453c-9bff-355fde7fb5b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3335eb3a-5d6f-453c-9bff-355fde7fb5b8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Pennington, &quot;Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington

This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault&apos;s ideas and those of a neglected &apos;post-modern&apos; stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic &apos;scientism&apos; and &apos;expert rule&apos;; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of &apos;self-creation&apos; in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault&apos;s critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping &apos;bio-political&apos; or &apos;pastoral&apos; dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic &apos;creative destruction&apos; that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to &apos;monitor and correct&apos; multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism

Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King&apos;s College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King&apos;s he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington

This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault&apos;s ideas and those of a neglected &apos;post-modern&apos; stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic &apos;scientism&apos; and &apos;expert rule&apos;; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of &apos;self-creation&apos; in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault&apos;s critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping &apos;bio-political&apos; or &apos;pastoral&apos; dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic &apos;creative destruction&apos; that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to &apos;monitor and correct&apos; multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism

Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King&apos;s College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King&apos;s he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>860</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce33490c-297d-11f1-ab17-b3f50c44aa85</guid>
      <title>Mark Hlavacik, &quot;Willing Warriors: A New History of the Education Culture Wars&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. </p>
<p>On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. </p>
<p>In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of <em>Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform</em>.</p>
<p><em>﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. </p>
<p>On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. </p>
<p>In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.</p>
<p>﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of <em>Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform</em>.</p>
<p><em>﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28388470" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/720d001b-fba9-4ae5-8732-39520de5dfec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=720d001b-fba9-4ae5-8732-39520de5dfec&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Hlavacik, &quot;Willing Warriors: A New History of the Education Culture Wars&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. 

On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. 

In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.

﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform.

﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the rise of the culture wars afflicts the politics of education. 

On August 9, 2022, the Denton Independent School District held a meeting to address complaints about its libraries. Like so many districts in Texas and across the country, Denton had been responding to accusations that children had access to inappropriate books at school. During the public comment session, a local man stood up to the podium and read a sexually explicit passage from a book that he wanted removed from Denton’s school libraries. But beguiled by the prospect of securing a political win, he had confused the title of the lurid psychological thriller he read aloud with a young adult fiction series about mermaids. While his attempt to ban a book that was never in Denton’s school libraries in the first place received a few laughs, it also reflects a deeply serious and troubling culture of conflict that has taken over the politics of education and now divides people so completely as to make public education as a shared endeavor seem impossible. 

In Willing Warriors, Mark Hlavacik shows how the culture wars have redefined the politics of US schooling from the 1970s to the present through vivid accounts of public controversies featuring Allan Bloom, Oprah Winfrey, Lynne Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Betsy DeVos, Nikole Hannah-Jones, and others. Beginning in the 1970s, Hlavacik shows, efforts at innovation in schooling have increasingly been met by attempts to discredit them through exposé. As the culture wars have accelerated and exploded, this cycle of innovation and exposé has embroiled public schools in increasingly heated debates. He explains the dynamics that make curriculum controversies so intractable and confronts the delicate question of whether raucous public arguments are bad for education. With clarity and insight, Hlavacik reveals why bitter contests between educational ideologies not only add another burden for the schools, but also for the people—the willing warriors—who devote their lives to fighting for their betterment.

﻿Mark Hlavacik is assistant professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at Texas A&amp;M University. He is the author of Assigning Blame: The Rhetoric of Education Reform.

﻿Laura Beth Kelly is an associate professor of Educational Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>859</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9fdbe744-2996-11f1-a711-132bf9861e38</guid>
      <title>Thomas Hegghammer and Diego Gambetta eds., &quot;Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Time spent and words spent—what does each signal?</p>
<p>Deceptive mimicry—the manipulation of individual or group identity—includes passing off as a different individual, as a member of a group to which one does not belong, or, for a group, to ‘sign’ its action as another group. Mimicry exploits the reputation of the model it mimics to avoid capture (flight), to strike undetected at the enemy (fight), or to hide behind or besmirch the reputation of the model group (‘false-flag’ operations). </p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198739470">Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a theory and game-theoretic model of mimicry, an overview of its use through history, and a deep empirical exploration of its modern manifestations through several case studies by leading social scientists. The chapters cover mimicry in the context of the Northern Ireland conflict, terrorism campaigns in 1970s Italy, the height of the Iraq insurgency, the Rwandan genocide, the Naxalite rebellion in India, and jihadi discussion forums on the Internet.</p>
<p>Thomas Hegghammer is Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time spent and words spent—what does each signal?</p>
<p>Deceptive mimicry—the manipulation of individual or group identity—includes passing off as a different individual, as a member of a group to which one does not belong, or, for a group, to ‘sign’ its action as another group. Mimicry exploits the reputation of the model it mimics to avoid capture (flight), to strike undetected at the enemy (fight), or to hide behind or besmirch the reputation of the model group (‘false-flag’ operations). </p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198739470">Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a theory and game-theoretic model of mimicry, an overview of its use through history, and a deep empirical exploration of its modern manifestations through several case studies by leading social scientists. The chapters cover mimicry in the context of the Northern Ireland conflict, terrorism campaigns in 1970s Italy, the height of the Iraq insurgency, the Rwandan genocide, the Naxalite rebellion in India, and jihadi discussion forums on the Internet.</p>
<p>Thomas Hegghammer is Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58951180" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/dd7a566f-9528-4d34-b484-7af6d15f3ca4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=dd7a566f-9528-4d34-b484-7af6d15f3ca4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Hegghammer and Diego Gambetta eds., &quot;Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Time spent and words spent—what does each signal?

Deceptive mimicry—the manipulation of individual or group identity—includes passing off as a different individual, as a member of a group to which one does not belong, or, for a group, to ‘sign’ its action as another group. Mimicry exploits the reputation of the model it mimics to avoid capture (flight), to strike undetected at the enemy (fight), or to hide behind or besmirch the reputation of the model group (‘false-flag’ operations). 

Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a theory and game-theoretic model of mimicry, an overview of its use through history, and a deep empirical exploration of its modern manifestations through several case studies by leading social scientists. The chapters cover mimicry in the context of the Northern Ireland conflict, terrorism campaigns in 1970s Italy, the height of the Iraq insurgency, the Rwandan genocide, the Naxalite rebellion in India, and jihadi discussion forums on the Internet.

Thomas Hegghammer is Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Time spent and words spent—what does each signal?

Deceptive mimicry—the manipulation of individual or group identity—includes passing off as a different individual, as a member of a group to which one does not belong, or, for a group, to ‘sign’ its action as another group. Mimicry exploits the reputation of the model it mimics to avoid capture (flight), to strike undetected at the enemy (fight), or to hide behind or besmirch the reputation of the model group (‘false-flag’ operations). 

Fight, Flight, Mimic: Identity Mimicry in Conflict (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a theory and game-theoretic model of mimicry, an overview of its use through history, and a deep empirical exploration of its modern manifestations through several case studies by leading social scientists. The chapters cover mimicry in the context of the Northern Ireland conflict, terrorism campaigns in 1970s Italy, the height of the Iraq insurgency, the Rwandan genocide, the Naxalite rebellion in India, and jihadi discussion forums on the Internet.

Thomas Hegghammer is Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>858</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83b7894a-28df-11f1-bd10-43b4cb53e3e2</guid>
      <title>Sarah James, &quot;The Politics of Failed Policies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813614">The Politics of Failed Policies</a> (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197813614">The Politics of Failed Policies</a> (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25016236" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/80a2dc00-be23-4a2a-931e-65a47abc8b26/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=80a2dc00-be23-4a2a-931e-65a47abc8b26&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah James, &quot;The Politics of Failed Policies&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Politics of Failed Policies (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Politics of Failed Policies (Oxford UP, 2025) examines how the interplay of politics and data affects when failed policies get recognized. It shows how compelling data and analysis is an important political tool for highlighting failure. Importantly, the research demonstrates how data and analysis themselves are the products of political processes and reflections of those in power. Using case studies from education and juvenile criminal justice and tax policy, the book makes a theoretical contribution to the study of policymaking, state politics, and the role of knowledge and information in contemporary American politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>857</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de3af934-280c-11f1-aae4-3b282c8c7f13</guid>
      <title>Maya L. Kornberg, &quot;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress&quot; (JHU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580"> Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a> (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The "Watergate babies" of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿<br /></p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p><br />Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book <em>Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process</em> (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580"> Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a> (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The "Watergate babies" of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿<br /></p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p><br />Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book <em>Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process</em> (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44403653" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4cfeeda9-14d2-4fff-a7f5-a42f30728dae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4cfeeda9-14d2-4fff-a7f5-a42f30728dae&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Maya L. Kornberg, &quot;Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress&quot; (JHU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The &quot;Watergate babies&quot; of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿

Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—and what that reveals about American democracy. Congress, the central democratic institution in the United States, is hanging on by a thread. On January 6, 2021, a violent attack on the Capitol Building left five people dead, and threats and attacks against politicians are on the rise. In Stuck: How Money, Media, and Violence Prevent Change in Congress (JHU Press, 2026), Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change. The &quot;Watergate babies&quot; of 1974, the Contract with America conservatives of 1994, and the historic 2018 class fueled by backlash to Donald Trump all represent younger, more diverse, and less entrenched members who arrived in Washington energized and idealistic. Kornberg reveals the ways Congress has become increasingly inhospitable to change. Political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.﻿

Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

Maya Kornberg is Senior Fellow and Manager in the Elections and Government program at the NYU Brennan Center for Justice. Her first book Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process (Columbia University Press, 2023) was shortlisted for the 2025 WJM Mackenzie Book Prize.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>856</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b2112b2-280d-11f1-9452-cba57f4eeda8</guid>
      <title>Tom Wells, &quot;The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger's secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger's day and provide a sweeping view of his era.<br />Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon's National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.<br />Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon's recording system was dismantled in 1973. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190933340">The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations"</a><em> ﻿</em>(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger's role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.<br />The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration's illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger's opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.<br />A richly detailed collection of Kissinger's transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger's secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger's day and provide a sweeping view of his era.<br />Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon's National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.<br />Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon's recording system was dismantled in 1973. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190933340">The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations"</a><em> ﻿</em>(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger's role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.<br />The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration's illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger's opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.<br />A richly detailed collection of Kissinger's transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30895048" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7810f87b-bd23-45fd-b261-b20a28473501/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7810f87b-bd23-45fd-b261-b20a28473501&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Wells, &quot;The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger&apos;s secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger&apos;s day and provide a sweeping view of his era.Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon&apos;s National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon&apos;s recording system was dismantled in 1973. In The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger&apos;s phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger&apos;s role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration&apos;s illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger&apos;s opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.A richly detailed collection of Kissinger&apos;s transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A richly detailed collection of transcripts of Henry Kissinger&apos;s secretly recorded phone conversations from his time in the Nixon administration that touch on every important issue of Kissinger&apos;s day and provide a sweeping view of his era.Henry Kissinger is unquestionably one of the most consequential foreign policy makers in American history. A remarkably influential academic during his long tenure at Harvard, Kissinger became Richard Nixon&apos;s National Security Advisor in 1969 and Secretary of State in 1973.Like Nixon, Kissinger left a trail of secretly recorded evidence in his wake. Kissinger began taping in 1969, two years before Nixon did in 1971, and he continued taping for over three years after Nixon&apos;s recording system was dismantled in 1973. In The Kissinger Tapes: Inside His Secretly Recorded Phone Conversations&quot; ﻿(Oxford UP, 2026), Tom Wells draws on his expertise in the Nixon era to provide carefully selected, edited, and annotated transcripts of Kissinger&apos;s phone conversations, which chronologically highlight the most momentous crises and controversies of the era. They not only provide context and many revelations on Kissinger&apos;s role in numerous events but also throw his personality, character, and checkered record into sharp relief.The conversations cover a wide range of issues, including the Vietnam War, the India-Pakistan conflict, the opening to China, the Middle East, the Greek coup in Cyprus, the Nixon administration&apos;s illegal wiretapping, and the Watergate scandal. The transcripts reveal Kissinger&apos;s opinions and attitudes on important policy matters and his complex relationship with President Nixon, as well as the many battles he fought with other administration officials and his subtle manipulations of well-known journalists.A richly detailed collection of Kissinger&apos;s transcripts and commentary, this book provides a novel window into the Nixon administration and offers a genuinely unique perspective on one of the most important figures in modern American history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>855</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9b7e094-2711-11f1-9703-ab3fad9659d4</guid>
      <title>On Trump as a “World Historical Individual” with author John B. Judis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a <a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else">recent essay for </a><a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else">NOTUS</a><em>, </em>and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including <em>The Populist Explosion </em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2016).</p>
<p>John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic</p>
<p><em>Veteran journalist </em><em><strong>Paul Starobin </strong></em><em>is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of </em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/">The Atlantic</a><em>. His companion Substack newsletter, </em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/">America and Beyond,</a><em>” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em> (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a <a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else">recent essay for </a><a href="https://www.notus.org/perspectives/trump-as-alexander-the-great-a-theory-that-explains-iran-and-everything-else">NOTUS</a><em>, </em>and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including <em>The Populist Explosion </em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2016).</p>
<p>John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic</p>
<p><em>Veteran journalist </em><em><strong>Paul Starobin </strong></em><em>is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of </em><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/">The Atlantic</a><em>. His companion Substack newsletter, </em><a href="https://pstarobin.substack.com/">America and Beyond,</a><em>” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em> (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31673632" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fa352954-ab8b-491f-a53e-a220baae700d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fa352954-ab8b-491f-a53e-a220baae700d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Trump as a “World Historical Individual” with author John B. Judis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a recent essay for NOTUS, and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including The Populist Explosion (Columbia Global Reports, 2016).

John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic

Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. His companion Substack newsletter, America and Beyond,” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The philosopher G.W.F. Hegel “viewed history as consisting of stages punctuated by times of upheaval,” the author John B. Judis wrote in a recent essay for NOTUS, and “assigned to what he called ‘world-historical individuals’ a special role in spurring the transition from one era to another.” Trump, Judis posited, “is exactly such an individual,” comparable in this respect to Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon. In our conversation, we discuss this proposition—including the forces that brought Trump to this role and the bleak destiny that typically greets “world-historical individuals.” Judis is the author of a number of books, including The Populist Explosion (Columbia Global Reports, 2016).

John B. Judis is an author and American journalist, a contributing editor at Talking Points Memo, a former senior writer at the National Journal, and a former senior editor at The New Republic

Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. His companion Substack newsletter, America and Beyond,” offers commentary and insights on the podcast. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>854</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6eab83c0-275a-11f1-97f8-fbdfa6640fb0</guid>
      <title>How Authoritarians Exploit Gender</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Gender is becoming a central battleground in contemporary authoritarian politics, but how do autocrats manipulate these debates to their own advantage? Some regimes now pursue a <em>double strategy</em> of simultaneous “gender bashing” and “gender washing”: mobilising anti-gender rhetoric and “traditional values” to attack feminists and roll back equality, while at the same time promoting loyal women into prominent roles to project an image of modernity, reform, and inclusion at home and abroad. By combining repression with reputation laundering, they mask authoritarian practices and complicate the struggle for genuine gender equality. Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Elin Bjarnegård and Pär Zetterberg about their latest <em>Journal of Democracy</em> article and explore how this mix of gender bashing and gender washing is reshaping the fight for equal rights and democratic politics.</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.uu.se/en/contact-and-organisation/staff?query=N3-90&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com">Elin Bjarnegård</a> is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in gender and politics, political violence, and authoritarianism. Her research explores how gender norms shape political institutions and how formal and informal rules affect women’s political representation. She has written extensively on gendered power structures, clientelism, and the strategic manipulation of equality reforms. A leading scholar in the field, Bjarnegård’s work has been published in major academic journals and contributes to our understanding of how gender dynamics intersect with democratic decline and political reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.uu.se/en/contact-and-organisation/staff?query=N3-973&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com">Pär Zetterberg</a> is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in elections, political representation, and democratic institutions. His research examines gender quotas, electoral systems, and the conditions under which institutional reforms strengthen or undermine democratic accountability. He has published widely on women’s political representation and the effects of electoral rules on inclusion and governance. Through his academic and policy engagement, Zetterberg has advanced debates on how representation can both support and be instrumentalised within contemporary political systems.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Bjarnega%CC%8Ard-Zetterberg_Trancript.docx#asset:448534@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gender is becoming a central battleground in contemporary authoritarian politics, but how do autocrats manipulate these debates to their own advantage? Some regimes now pursue a <em>double strategy</em> of simultaneous “gender bashing” and “gender washing”: mobilising anti-gender rhetoric and “traditional values” to attack feminists and roll back equality, while at the same time promoting loyal women into prominent roles to project an image of modernity, reform, and inclusion at home and abroad. By combining repression with reputation laundering, they mask authoritarian practices and complicate the struggle for genuine gender equality. Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Elin Bjarnegård and Pär Zetterberg about their latest <em>Journal of Democracy</em> article and explore how this mix of gender bashing and gender washing is reshaping the fight for equal rights and democratic politics.</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.uu.se/en/contact-and-organisation/staff?query=N3-90&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com">Elin Bjarnegård</a> is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in gender and politics, political violence, and authoritarianism. Her research explores how gender norms shape political institutions and how formal and informal rules affect women’s political representation. She has written extensively on gendered power structures, clientelism, and the strategic manipulation of equality reforms. A leading scholar in the field, Bjarnegård’s work has been published in major academic journals and contributes to our understanding of how gender dynamics intersect with democratic decline and political reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.uu.se/en/contact-and-organisation/staff?query=N3-973&amp;utm_source=chatgpt.com">Pär Zetterberg</a> is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in elections, political representation, and democratic institutions. His research examines gender quotas, electoral systems, and the conditions under which institutional reforms strengthen or undermine democratic accountability. He has published widely on women’s political representation and the effects of electoral rules on inclusion and governance. Through his academic and policy engagement, Zetterberg has advanced debates on how representation can both support and be instrumentalised within contemporary political systems.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Bjarnega%CC%8Ard-Zetterberg_Trancript.docx#asset:448534@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22081017" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2983bfc0-478b-416a-b860-46bc9ecb05ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2983bfc0-478b-416a-b860-46bc9ecb05ac&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Authoritarians Exploit Gender</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Gender is becoming a central battleground in contemporary authoritarian politics, but how do autocrats manipulate these debates to their own advantage? Some regimes now pursue a double strategy of simultaneous “gender bashing” and “gender washing”: mobilising anti-gender rhetoric and “traditional values” to attack feminists and roll back equality, while at the same time promoting loyal women into prominent roles to project an image of modernity, reform, and inclusion at home and abroad. By combining repression with reputation laundering, they mask authoritarian practices and complicate the struggle for genuine gender equality. Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Elin Bjarnegård and Pär Zetterberg about their latest Journal of Democracy article and explore how this mix of gender bashing and gender washing is reshaping the fight for equal rights and democratic politics.

Guest:

Elin Bjarnegård is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in gender and politics, political violence, and authoritarianism. Her research explores how gender norms shape political institutions and how formal and informal rules affect women’s political representation. She has written extensively on gendered power structures, clientelism, and the strategic manipulation of equality reforms. A leading scholar in the field, Bjarnegård’s work has been published in major academic journals and contributes to our understanding of how gender dynamics intersect with democratic decline and political reform.

Pär Zetterberg is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in elections, political representation, and democratic institutions. His research examines gender quotas, electoral systems, and the conditions under which institutional reforms strengthen or undermine democratic accountability. He has published widely on women’s political representation and the effects of electoral rules on inclusion and governance. Through his academic and policy engagement, Zetterberg has advanced debates on how representation can both support and be instrumentalised within contemporary political systems.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Gender is becoming a central battleground in contemporary authoritarian politics, but how do autocrats manipulate these debates to their own advantage? Some regimes now pursue a double strategy of simultaneous “gender bashing” and “gender washing”: mobilising anti-gender rhetoric and “traditional values” to attack feminists and roll back equality, while at the same time promoting loyal women into prominent roles to project an image of modernity, reform, and inclusion at home and abroad. By combining repression with reputation laundering, they mask authoritarian practices and complicate the struggle for genuine gender equality. Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Elin Bjarnegård and Pär Zetterberg about their latest Journal of Democracy article and explore how this mix of gender bashing and gender washing is reshaping the fight for equal rights and democratic politics.

Guest:

Elin Bjarnegård is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in gender and politics, political violence, and authoritarianism. Her research explores how gender norms shape political institutions and how formal and informal rules affect women’s political representation. She has written extensively on gendered power structures, clientelism, and the strategic manipulation of equality reforms. A leading scholar in the field, Bjarnegård’s work has been published in major academic journals and contributes to our understanding of how gender dynamics intersect with democratic decline and political reform.

Pär Zetterberg is a Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University specialising in elections, political representation, and democratic institutions. His research examines gender quotas, electoral systems, and the conditions under which institutional reforms strengthen or undermine democratic accountability. He has published widely on women’s political representation and the effects of electoral rules on inclusion and governance. Through his academic and policy engagement, Zetterberg has advanced debates on how representation can both support and be instrumentalised within contemporary political systems.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>853</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d5b8e10-26e3-11f1-b6c7-2b3f7f40678a</guid>
      <title>Lucia Motolinia, &quot;Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do supposedly accountability-enhancing electoral reforms often fail in young democracies? How can legislators serve their constituents when parties control the necessary resources? <em>Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Lucia Motolinia sheds light on these questions and more by explaining how parties can use personal vote-seeking incentives in order to decrease intra-party dissent. Studying a unique electoral reform in Mexico, the book provides a detailed description of how institutional incentives can conflict. It draws on a variety of rich, original data sources on legislative behavior and organization in 20 Mexican states to develop a novel explanation of how electoral reforms can amplify competing institutional incentives. In settings where legislative rules and candidate selection procedures favor parties, legislators may lack the resources necessary to build voter support. If this is the case, party leaders can condition access to these resources on loyalty to the party's political agenda.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do supposedly accountability-enhancing electoral reforms often fail in young democracies? How can legislators serve their constituents when parties control the necessary resources? <em>Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Lucia Motolinia sheds light on these questions and more by explaining how parties can use personal vote-seeking incentives in order to decrease intra-party dissent. Studying a unique electoral reform in Mexico, the book provides a detailed description of how institutional incentives can conflict. It draws on a variety of rich, original data sources on legislative behavior and organization in 20 Mexican states to develop a novel explanation of how electoral reforms can amplify competing institutional incentives. In settings where legislative rules and candidate selection procedures favor parties, legislators may lack the resources necessary to build voter support. If this is the case, party leaders can condition access to these resources on loyalty to the party's political agenda.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24769646" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ed7eebf5-20dd-4378-8c5a-2c64b354f41b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ed7eebf5-20dd-4378-8c5a-2c64b354f41b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lucia Motolinia, &quot;Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do supposedly accountability-enhancing electoral reforms often fail in young democracies? How can legislators serve their constituents when parties control the necessary resources? Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Lucia Motolinia sheds light on these questions and more by explaining how parties can use personal vote-seeking incentives in order to decrease intra-party dissent. Studying a unique electoral reform in Mexico, the book provides a detailed description of how institutional incentives can conflict. It draws on a variety of rich, original data sources on legislative behavior and organization in 20 Mexican states to develop a novel explanation of how electoral reforms can amplify competing institutional incentives. In settings where legislative rules and candidate selection procedures favor parties, legislators may lack the resources necessary to build voter support. If this is the case, party leaders can condition access to these resources on loyalty to the party&apos;s political agenda.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do supposedly accountability-enhancing electoral reforms often fail in young democracies? How can legislators serve their constituents when parties control the necessary resources? Unity through Particularism: How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Lucia Motolinia sheds light on these questions and more by explaining how parties can use personal vote-seeking incentives in order to decrease intra-party dissent. Studying a unique electoral reform in Mexico, the book provides a detailed description of how institutional incentives can conflict. It draws on a variety of rich, original data sources on legislative behavior and organization in 20 Mexican states to develop a novel explanation of how electoral reforms can amplify competing institutional incentives. In settings where legislative rules and candidate selection procedures favor parties, legislators may lack the resources necessary to build voter support. If this is the case, party leaders can condition access to these resources on loyalty to the party&apos;s political agenda.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5136b78c-2454-11f1-a8b6-07d37bd364fe</guid>
      <title>A Year of Autocratization: Steep Declines in Democracy Registered in 2025 V-Dem Report</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Kenneth Roberts and Paul Friesen, democracy experts at Cornell University, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released V-Dem 2025 Report “ 25 Years of Autocratization.” Drawing on the survey’s global measure of changes in regime status across the world, we discuss the dramatic decline of democracy in the United States, and what dimensions are driving that erosion. We also discuss other big moves, from declines in India and Indonesia, to improvements in Poland and Guatemala. We conclude with an analysis of some signs of hope and what to anticipate in the year ahead for ongoing contestation in the US around democratic rights and institutional sites of contention.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>V-Dem Democracy Report 2025: ﻿<a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf">here</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Kenneth Roberts and Paul Friesen, democracy experts at Cornell University, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released V-Dem 2025 Report “ 25 Years of Autocratization.” Drawing on the survey’s global measure of changes in regime status across the world, we discuss the dramatic decline of democracy in the United States, and what dimensions are driving that erosion. We also discuss other big moves, from declines in India and Indonesia, to improvements in Poland and Guatemala. We conclude with an analysis of some signs of hope and what to anticipate in the year ahead for ongoing contestation in the US around democratic rights and institutional sites of contention.</p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p>V-Dem Democracy Report 2025: ﻿<a href="https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf">here</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39335589" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cbb3e981-9419-4b78-b84a-7566e93a4889/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cbb3e981-9419-4b78-b84a-7566e93a4889&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>A Year of Autocratization: Steep Declines in Democracy Registered in 2025 V-Dem Report</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Kenneth Roberts and Paul Friesen, democracy experts at Cornell University, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released V-Dem 2025 Report “ 25 Years of Autocratization.” Drawing on the survey’s global measure of changes in regime status across the world, we discuss the dramatic decline of democracy in the United States, and what dimensions are driving that erosion. We also discuss other big moves, from declines in India and Indonesia, to improvements in Poland and Guatemala. We conclude with an analysis of some signs of hope and what to anticipate in the year ahead for ongoing contestation in the US around democratic rights and institutional sites of contention.

Links:

V-Dem Democracy Report 2025: ﻿here﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl speaks with Kenneth Roberts and Paul Friesen, democracy experts at Cornell University, to unpack the takeaways of the newly released V-Dem 2025 Report “ 25 Years of Autocratization.” Drawing on the survey’s global measure of changes in regime status across the world, we discuss the dramatic decline of democracy in the United States, and what dimensions are driving that erosion. We also discuss other big moves, from declines in India and Indonesia, to improvements in Poland and Guatemala. We conclude with an analysis of some signs of hope and what to anticipate in the year ahead for ongoing contestation in the US around democratic rights and institutional sites of contention.

Links:

V-Dem Democracy Report 2025: ﻿here﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>851</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41f5391e-2473-11f1-a830-634654311478</guid>
      <title>Stephen G. Brooks, &quot;The Political Economy of Security&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-political-economy-of-security-stephen-g-brooks/2d856e2202f9305c?ean=9780691226590&amp;next=t">The Political Economy of Security</a> (Princeton University Press, 2026), Stephen Brooks provides a systematic empirical and theoretical examination of how economic factors influence security affairs. Empirically, he analyzes how various economic variables affect interstate war, terrorism, and civil war; in total, sixteen pathways are examined. </p>
<p>Brooks shows that the relationship between economic factors and conflict is complex and multifaceted; discrete economic factors—such as international trade, economic development, and globalized manufacturing, to name a few—are sometimes helpful for promoting peace and stability, but at other times are detrimental. Brooks also develops a stronger theoretical foundation for guiding future research on the economics-security interaction.</p>
<p>Drawing on Adam Smith, he provides a more complete range of answers to the three key conceptual questions analysts must consider: how economic goals relate to security goals; what economic factors to focus on; and how economic actors influence security policies.<br />Combining an innovative theoretical understanding with empirical rigor, Brooks’s account will reshape our understanding of the political economy of security.<br /></p>
<p>Our guest is Professor <a href="https://faculty-directory.dartmouth.edu/stephen-g-brooks">Stephen Brooks</a>, a Professor of Government at Dartmouth.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-political-economy-of-security-stephen-g-brooks/2d856e2202f9305c?ean=9780691226590&amp;next=t">The Political Economy of Security</a> (Princeton University Press, 2026), Stephen Brooks provides a systematic empirical and theoretical examination of how economic factors influence security affairs. Empirically, he analyzes how various economic variables affect interstate war, terrorism, and civil war; in total, sixteen pathways are examined. </p>
<p>Brooks shows that the relationship between economic factors and conflict is complex and multifaceted; discrete economic factors—such as international trade, economic development, and globalized manufacturing, to name a few—are sometimes helpful for promoting peace and stability, but at other times are detrimental. Brooks also develops a stronger theoretical foundation for guiding future research on the economics-security interaction.</p>
<p>Drawing on Adam Smith, he provides a more complete range of answers to the three key conceptual questions analysts must consider: how economic goals relate to security goals; what economic factors to focus on; and how economic actors influence security policies.<br />Combining an innovative theoretical understanding with empirical rigor, Brooks’s account will reshape our understanding of the political economy of security.<br /></p>
<p>Our guest is Professor <a href="https://faculty-directory.dartmouth.edu/stephen-g-brooks">Stephen Brooks</a>, a Professor of Government at Dartmouth.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45333985" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2201f40a-cb1e-405c-a4a3-447716f334e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2201f40a-cb1e-405c-a4a3-447716f334e2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen G. Brooks, &quot;The Political Economy of Security&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his new book, The Political Economy of Security (Princeton University Press, 2026), Stephen Brooks provides a systematic empirical and theoretical examination of how economic factors influence security affairs. Empirically, he analyzes how various economic variables affect interstate war, terrorism, and civil war; in total, sixteen pathways are examined. 

Brooks shows that the relationship between economic factors and conflict is complex and multifaceted; discrete economic factors—such as international trade, economic development, and globalized manufacturing, to name a few—are sometimes helpful for promoting peace and stability, but at other times are detrimental. Brooks also develops a stronger theoretical foundation for guiding future research on the economics-security interaction.

Drawing on Adam Smith, he provides a more complete range of answers to the three key conceptual questions analysts must consider: how economic goals relate to security goals; what economic factors to focus on; and how economic actors influence security policies.Combining an innovative theoretical understanding with empirical rigor, Brooks’s account will reshape our understanding of the political economy of security.

Our guest is Professor Stephen Brooks, a Professor of Government at Dartmouth.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his new book, The Political Economy of Security (Princeton University Press, 2026), Stephen Brooks provides a systematic empirical and theoretical examination of how economic factors influence security affairs. Empirically, he analyzes how various economic variables affect interstate war, terrorism, and civil war; in total, sixteen pathways are examined. 

Brooks shows that the relationship between economic factors and conflict is complex and multifaceted; discrete economic factors—such as international trade, economic development, and globalized manufacturing, to name a few—are sometimes helpful for promoting peace and stability, but at other times are detrimental. Brooks also develops a stronger theoretical foundation for guiding future research on the economics-security interaction.

Drawing on Adam Smith, he provides a more complete range of answers to the three key conceptual questions analysts must consider: how economic goals relate to security goals; what economic factors to focus on; and how economic actors influence security policies.Combining an innovative theoretical understanding with empirical rigor, Brooks’s account will reshape our understanding of the political economy of security.

Our guest is Professor Stephen Brooks, a Professor of Government at Dartmouth.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b8d7392-2353-11f1-8db3-2fc8a403cee9</guid>
      <title>Sidra Hamidi, &quot;After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state's capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009607155">After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state's nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.</p>
<p>By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state's capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009607155">After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state's nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.</p>
<p>By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50944411" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/eb226843-d24c-4b31-8df9-6ed442ef4332/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=eb226843-d24c-4b31-8df9-6ed442ef4332&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sidra Hamidi, &quot;After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state&apos;s capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state&apos;s nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.

By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state&apos;s capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state&apos;s nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.

By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>849</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec1709a2-22a4-11f1-97e2-0b5e8f66abd1</guid>
      <title>Piergiorgio Di Giminiani et al. eds., &quot;The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last thirty years, Latin America has undergone an unprecedented wave of reparations targeting victims of political violence during military regimes, Indigenous and Afro-Latin groups affected by historical processes of dispossession, and citizens suffering from environmental harm. Reparations prompt us to face uncomfortable pasts and in so doing, create conditions for imagination of multiple futures. In representing the experiences and hopes of those affected by political violence in El Salvador and Argentina, environmental harm in Guatemala and Peru, and colonial dispossession in Chile and Bolivia, reparations are built upon conflictive forms of future imagination, translation of harm and new forms of belonging to and beyond the nation state, which reifies as much as challenges state authority over the promises of actual repair. In today’s Latin American political debate, hopes for justice and democracy remain anchored to the question of the kinds of future that can be imagined through and after reparation. Piergiorgio Di Giminiani, Helene Risør, and Karine Vanthuyne discuss their edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978844384">The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging </a>(Rutgers UP, 2026)</p>
<p>Piergiorgio Di Giminiani is an associate professor in anthropology at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. He is the author of Sentient Lands: Indigeneity, Property, and Political Imagination in Neoliberal Chile and co-editor of Theorizing Relations in Indigenous South America.</p>
<p>Helene Risør is a teaching associate professor in anthropology and visiting research fellow at Copenhagen University. Professor Risør is also a senior researcher at the Millennium Institute for Research on Violence and Democracy based in Chile.</p>
<p>Professor Karine Vanthuyne is professor in Anthropology at the University of Ottawa. Professor Vanthuyne is the author of <em>La presence d’un passé de violences: mémoires et identités autochtones dans le Guatemala postgénocide</em>, as well as co-editor of <em>Power through Testimony: Residential schools in the age of reconciliation in Canada</em>.</p>
<p>Shodona Kettle is a PhD candidate at the Institute of the Americas, University College London. Her research explores demands for reparations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Website <a href="https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/americas/research/research-students/shodona-kettle">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last thirty years, Latin America has undergone an unprecedented wave of reparations targeting victims of political violence during military regimes, Indigenous and Afro-Latin groups affected by historical processes of dispossession, and citizens suffering from environmental harm. Reparations prompt us to face uncomfortable pasts and in so doing, create conditions for imagination of multiple futures. In representing the experiences and hopes of those affected by political violence in El Salvador and Argentina, environmental harm in Guatemala and Peru, and colonial dispossession in Chile and Bolivia, reparations are built upon conflictive forms of future imagination, translation of harm and new forms of belonging to and beyond the nation state, which reifies as much as challenges state authority over the promises of actual repair. In today’s Latin American political debate, hopes for justice and democracy remain anchored to the question of the kinds of future that can be imagined through and after reparation. Piergiorgio Di Giminiani, Helene Risør, and Karine Vanthuyne discuss their edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978844384">The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging </a>(Rutgers UP, 2026)</p>
<p>Piergiorgio Di Giminiani is an associate professor in anthropology at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. He is the author of Sentient Lands: Indigeneity, Property, and Political Imagination in Neoliberal Chile and co-editor of Theorizing Relations in Indigenous South America.</p>
<p>Helene Risør is a teaching associate professor in anthropology and visiting research fellow at Copenhagen University. Professor Risør is also a senior researcher at the Millennium Institute for Research on Violence and Democracy based in Chile.</p>
<p>Professor Karine Vanthuyne is professor in Anthropology at the University of Ottawa. Professor Vanthuyne is the author of <em>La presence d’un passé de violences: mémoires et identités autochtones dans le Guatemala postgénocide</em>, as well as co-editor of <em>Power through Testimony: Residential schools in the age of reconciliation in Canada</em>.</p>
<p>Shodona Kettle is a PhD candidate at the Institute of the Americas, University College London. Her research explores demands for reparations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Website <a href="https://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-historical-sciences/americas/research/research-students/shodona-kettle">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67178987" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e4acea0f-13bc-4231-9318-c0c278c4c8e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e4acea0f-13bc-4231-9318-c0c278c4c8e3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Piergiorgio Di Giminiani et al. eds., &quot;The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last thirty years, Latin America has undergone an unprecedented wave of reparations targeting victims of political violence during military regimes, Indigenous and Afro-Latin groups affected by historical processes of dispossession, and citizens suffering from environmental harm. Reparations prompt us to face uncomfortable pasts and in so doing, create conditions for imagination of multiple futures. In representing the experiences and hopes of those affected by political violence in El Salvador and Argentina, environmental harm in Guatemala and Peru, and colonial dispossession in Chile and Bolivia, reparations are built upon conflictive forms of future imagination, translation of harm and new forms of belonging to and beyond the nation state, which reifies as much as challenges state authority over the promises of actual repair. In today’s Latin American political debate, hopes for justice and democracy remain anchored to the question of the kinds of future that can be imagined through and after reparation. Piergiorgio Di Giminiani, Helene Risør, and Karine Vanthuyne discuss their edited volume, The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging (Rutgers UP, 2026)

Piergiorgio Di Giminiani is an associate professor in anthropology at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. He is the author of Sentient Lands: Indigeneity, Property, and Political Imagination in Neoliberal Chile and co-editor of Theorizing Relations in Indigenous South America.

Helene Risør is a teaching associate professor in anthropology and visiting research fellow at Copenhagen University. Professor Risør is also a senior researcher at the Millennium Institute for Research on Violence and Democracy based in Chile.

Professor Karine Vanthuyne is professor in Anthropology at the University of Ottawa. Professor Vanthuyne is the author of La presence d’un passé de violences: mémoires et identités autochtones dans le Guatemala postgénocide, as well as co-editor of Power through Testimony: Residential schools in the age of reconciliation in Canada.

Shodona Kettle is a PhD candidate at the Institute of the Americas, University College London. Her research explores demands for reparations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Website here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last thirty years, Latin America has undergone an unprecedented wave of reparations targeting victims of political violence during military regimes, Indigenous and Afro-Latin groups affected by historical processes of dispossession, and citizens suffering from environmental harm. Reparations prompt us to face uncomfortable pasts and in so doing, create conditions for imagination of multiple futures. In representing the experiences and hopes of those affected by political violence in El Salvador and Argentina, environmental harm in Guatemala and Peru, and colonial dispossession in Chile and Bolivia, reparations are built upon conflictive forms of future imagination, translation of harm and new forms of belonging to and beyond the nation state, which reifies as much as challenges state authority over the promises of actual repair. In today’s Latin American political debate, hopes for justice and democracy remain anchored to the question of the kinds of future that can be imagined through and after reparation. Piergiorgio Di Giminiani, Helene Risør, and Karine Vanthuyne discuss their edited volume, The Futures of Reparations in Latin America: Imagination, Translation, and Belonging (Rutgers UP, 2026)

Piergiorgio Di Giminiani is an associate professor in anthropology at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. He is the author of Sentient Lands: Indigeneity, Property, and Political Imagination in Neoliberal Chile and co-editor of Theorizing Relations in Indigenous South America.

Helene Risør is a teaching associate professor in anthropology and visiting research fellow at Copenhagen University. Professor Risør is also a senior researcher at the Millennium Institute for Research on Violence and Democracy based in Chile.

Professor Karine Vanthuyne is professor in Anthropology at the University of Ottawa. Professor Vanthuyne is the author of La presence d’un passé de violences: mémoires et identités autochtones dans le Guatemala postgénocide, as well as co-editor of Power through Testimony: Residential schools in the age of reconciliation in Canada.

Shodona Kettle is a PhD candidate at the Institute of the Americas, University College London. Her research explores demands for reparations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Website here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>848</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2f58da0-22a1-11f1-917c-1b1f9272b21a</guid>
      <title>Paul Kohlbry, &quot;Plots and Deeds: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The emancipatory potential and limits of land justice, when land is at once home, property, territory, and homeland.</p>
<p>Peasant farming was once an integral part of Palestine's agrarian fabric. But after military occupation of the West Bank in 1967, Israeli land confiscations and economic policies pushed rural cultivators into wage labor. In recent decades, Palestinian land titling and private developers have driven the slow transformation of agricultural land into real estate. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645103"><em>Plots and Deeds﻿: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine</em></a> (Stanford UP, 2026) Paul Kohlbry argues that we should see these changes as part of a larger process of agrarian annihilation, one in which state violence and market coercion together devastate the social, ecological, and economic relationships that make agrarian livelihoods possible.</p>
<p>Kohlbry tells the story of those who, refusing annihilation, struggle both for the return of land, and for their return to it. Through long-term engagements in the central highlands of the West Bank, Kohlbry shows how peasant practices and ethics matter for those fighting to rebuild collective attachments to rural places, and the surprising ways that property ownership has become a means of both land dispossession and defense. Going beyond accounts that treat the peasant as a tragic figure or a heroic national symbol, Kohlbry foregrounds the complexity of agrarian life to reveal the relationships between agrarian regeneration and political liberation—ultimately connecting Palestine within a global struggle for land justice.</p>
<p>Paul Kohlbry is Assistant Professor of Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The emancipatory potential and limits of land justice, when land is at once home, property, territory, and homeland.</p>
<p>Peasant farming was once an integral part of Palestine's agrarian fabric. But after military occupation of the West Bank in 1967, Israeli land confiscations and economic policies pushed rural cultivators into wage labor. In recent decades, Palestinian land titling and private developers have driven the slow transformation of agricultural land into real estate. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503645103"><em>Plots and Deeds﻿: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine</em></a> (Stanford UP, 2026) Paul Kohlbry argues that we should see these changes as part of a larger process of agrarian annihilation, one in which state violence and market coercion together devastate the social, ecological, and economic relationships that make agrarian livelihoods possible.</p>
<p>Kohlbry tells the story of those who, refusing annihilation, struggle both for the return of land, and for their return to it. Through long-term engagements in the central highlands of the West Bank, Kohlbry shows how peasant practices and ethics matter for those fighting to rebuild collective attachments to rural places, and the surprising ways that property ownership has become a means of both land dispossession and defense. Going beyond accounts that treat the peasant as a tragic figure or a heroic national symbol, Kohlbry foregrounds the complexity of agrarian life to reveal the relationships between agrarian regeneration and political liberation—ultimately connecting Palestine within a global struggle for land justice.</p>
<p>Paul Kohlbry is Assistant Professor of Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63861411" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/02ac9ff7-3fa2-4da0-95b8-d3005df483ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=02ac9ff7-3fa2-4da0-95b8-d3005df483ae&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Kohlbry, &quot;Plots and Deeds: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine&quot; (Stanford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The emancipatory potential and limits of land justice, when land is at once home, property, territory, and homeland.

Peasant farming was once an integral part of Palestine&apos;s agrarian fabric. But after military occupation of the West Bank in 1967, Israeli land confiscations and economic policies pushed rural cultivators into wage labor. In recent decades, Palestinian land titling and private developers have driven the slow transformation of agricultural land into real estate. In Plots and Deeds﻿: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine (Stanford UP, 2026) Paul Kohlbry argues that we should see these changes as part of a larger process of agrarian annihilation, one in which state violence and market coercion together devastate the social, ecological, and economic relationships that make agrarian livelihoods possible.

Kohlbry tells the story of those who, refusing annihilation, struggle both for the return of land, and for their return to it. Through long-term engagements in the central highlands of the West Bank, Kohlbry shows how peasant practices and ethics matter for those fighting to rebuild collective attachments to rural places, and the surprising ways that property ownership has become a means of both land dispossession and defense. Going beyond accounts that treat the peasant as a tragic figure or a heroic national symbol, Kohlbry foregrounds the complexity of agrarian life to reveal the relationships between agrarian regeneration and political liberation—ultimately connecting Palestine within a global struggle for land justice.

Paul Kohlbry is Assistant Professor of Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The emancipatory potential and limits of land justice, when land is at once home, property, territory, and homeland.

Peasant farming was once an integral part of Palestine&apos;s agrarian fabric. But after military occupation of the West Bank in 1967, Israeli land confiscations and economic policies pushed rural cultivators into wage labor. In recent decades, Palestinian land titling and private developers have driven the slow transformation of agricultural land into real estate. In Plots and Deeds﻿: Agrarian Annihilation and the Fight for Land Justice in Palestine (Stanford UP, 2026) Paul Kohlbry argues that we should see these changes as part of a larger process of agrarian annihilation, one in which state violence and market coercion together devastate the social, ecological, and economic relationships that make agrarian livelihoods possible.

Kohlbry tells the story of those who, refusing annihilation, struggle both for the return of land, and for their return to it. Through long-term engagements in the central highlands of the West Bank, Kohlbry shows how peasant practices and ethics matter for those fighting to rebuild collective attachments to rural places, and the surprising ways that property ownership has become a means of both land dispossession and defense. Going beyond accounts that treat the peasant as a tragic figure or a heroic national symbol, Kohlbry foregrounds the complexity of agrarian life to reveal the relationships between agrarian regeneration and political liberation—ultimately connecting Palestine within a global struggle for land justice.

Paul Kohlbry is Assistant Professor of Global Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>847</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b15f677a-2199-11f1-aee7-a77ec5771590</guid>
      <title>Our Age of War: A Discussion with Author Robert Pape</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book <em>Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War </em>(Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.</p>
<p>Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.</p>
<p>Veteran journalist <strong>Paul Starobin </strong>is a former Moscow bureau chief for <em>Business Week </em>and a former contributing editor of <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/">The Atlantic</a><em>. </em>He has written for <em>The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal </em>and many other publications<em>. </em>His most recent book is <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em> </em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book <em>Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War </em>(Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.</p>
<p>Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.</p>
<p>Veteran journalist <strong>Paul Starobin </strong>is a former Moscow bureau chief for <em>Business Week </em>and a former contributing editor of <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-starobin/">The Atlantic</a><em>. </em>He has written for <em>The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal </em>and many other publications<em>. </em>His most recent book is <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Putins-Exiles-Their-Better-Russia/dp/B0C9K6S9DP/">Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia</a><em> </em>(Columbia Global Reports, 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39647610" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/efbbb64b-a8ba-41ce-a41d-684747579a9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=efbbb64b-a8ba-41ce-a41d-684747579a9e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Our Age of War: A Discussion with Author Robert Pape</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.

Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.

Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has been writing about war for decades, including in his book Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Cornell University Press, 1996). In our conversation, we step back from the immediate conflict in Iran to reflect on what can be called our Age of War. We are in an era of chronic political violence, including in the United States, Pape notes—what he views as a Hobbesian period in global history. And there is not necessarily, he says, an end in sight.

Robert A. Pape is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago specializing in international security affairs.

Veteran journalist Paul Starobin is a former Moscow bureau chief for Business Week and a former contributing editor of The Atlantic. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. His most recent book is Putin’s Exiles: Their Fight for a Better Russia (Columbia Global Reports, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>846</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bfc346fa-210e-11f1-b04a-17b6c517a229</guid>
      <title>Alex Powell, &quot;Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration&quot; (Bristol UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529242577">Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration</a><em> </em>(Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, <em>Queering UK Refugee Law </em>offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. </p>
<p>Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of 'credibility,' Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. <em>Queering UK Refugee Law</em> is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/alex-powell/">Alex Powell</a> is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/"><br />Rine Vieth</a> is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529242577">Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration</a><em> </em>(Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, <em>Queering UK Refugee Law </em>offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. </p>
<p>Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of 'credibility,' Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. <em>Queering UK Refugee Law</em> is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/alex-powell/">Alex Powell</a> is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/"><br />Rine Vieth</a> is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54141782" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9a109244-ed60-4de5-b795-ae832d6df0a5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9a109244-ed60-4de5-b795-ae832d6df0a5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Powell, &quot;Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration&quot; (Bristol UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell&apos;s Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration (Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, Queering UK Refugee Law offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. 

Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of &apos;credibility,&apos; Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. Queering UK Refugee Law is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.

Alex Powell is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.

Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell&apos;s Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration (Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, Queering UK Refugee Law offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. 

Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of &apos;credibility,&apos; Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. Queering UK Refugee Law is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.

Alex Powell is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.

Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>845</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">629f048c-1dd5-11f1-b701-13bf8e9351f6</guid>
      <title>Lauren M. MacLean, &quot;Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity (Indiana UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In Ghana, much as in other parts of the Global South, postcolonial leaders aimed for industrial growth through the establishment of affordable hydroelectric power. However, in the current rapidly changing climate, many nations face recurring droughts, which hinder electricity production just when demand is on the rise. This situation has led to challenges like load shedding and unplanned power outages, which have strained the bond between citizens and the government.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780253074768">Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity</a> (Indiana UP, 2026) aims to unravel the puzzling reality that, despite enduring increasing difficulties from these electricity shortages, the Ghanaian citizens who suffer most harshly are also the least likely to demand political accountability from the state. Drawing on archival evidence, focus groups, qualitative interviews, survey data, and contemporary art and music, author Lauren M. MacLean explains how this disparity in experience—fueled by differences in income and geographical location—has led lower- and higher-income Ghanaians to form contrasting perspectives on their social rights regarding public services and to adopt varying approaches to political involvement. Rather than relying on a predetermined social contract, citizens in Ghana develop a more fluid relationship with the state, shaped by their histories, identities, and personal experiences. This reciprocity highlights their awareness of how climate change and the global shift toward green energy can significantly impact their lives while also underscoring the necessity for the government to take the lead and engage with Ghanaians to promote climate justice.</p>
<p>Lauren M. MacLean is the Thomas P. O’Neill Chair of Public Life and Department Chair of Political Science at Northeastern University. Her research focuses on the politics of electricity access and the everyday practice of citizenship in Africa. She conducts fieldwork in Ghana and Kenya, collecting survey data from individuals, conducting focus group discussions, doing archival work, and carrying out qualitative interviews with politicians, policymakers, practitioners, and ordinary people.</p>
<p>MacLean has published award-winning books and articles, including: Informal Institutions and Citizenship in Rural Africa (Cambridge, 2010), The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare in the Global South (Cornell, 2014), co-edited with Cammett, and Field Research in Political Science (Cambridge, 2015), coauthored with Kapiszewski and Read. Her research has been published in a wide range of journals and supported by grants, including NSF, SSRC, RWJ, Fulbright-Hays, and Carnegie. She was the recipient of the APSA QMMR 2016 David Collier Mid-Career Achievement Award.</p>
<p>You can learn more about her work <a href="https://cssh.northeastern.edu/faculty/lauren-maclean/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ghana, much as in other parts of the Global South, postcolonial leaders aimed for industrial growth through the establishment of affordable hydroelectric power. However, in the current rapidly changing climate, many nations face recurring droughts, which hinder electricity production just when demand is on the rise. This situation has led to challenges like load shedding and unplanned power outages, which have strained the bond between citizens and the government.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780253074768">Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity</a> (Indiana UP, 2026) aims to unravel the puzzling reality that, despite enduring increasing difficulties from these electricity shortages, the Ghanaian citizens who suffer most harshly are also the least likely to demand political accountability from the state. Drawing on archival evidence, focus groups, qualitative interviews, survey data, and contemporary art and music, author Lauren M. MacLean explains how this disparity in experience—fueled by differences in income and geographical location—has led lower- and higher-income Ghanaians to form contrasting perspectives on their social rights regarding public services and to adopt varying approaches to political involvement. Rather than relying on a predetermined social contract, citizens in Ghana develop a more fluid relationship with the state, shaped by their histories, identities, and personal experiences. This reciprocity highlights their awareness of how climate change and the global shift toward green energy can significantly impact their lives while also underscoring the necessity for the government to take the lead and engage with Ghanaians to promote climate justice.</p>
<p>Lauren M. MacLean is the Thomas P. O’Neill Chair of Public Life and Department Chair of Political Science at Northeastern University. Her research focuses on the politics of electricity access and the everyday practice of citizenship in Africa. She conducts fieldwork in Ghana and Kenya, collecting survey data from individuals, conducting focus group discussions, doing archival work, and carrying out qualitative interviews with politicians, policymakers, practitioners, and ordinary people.</p>
<p>MacLean has published award-winning books and articles, including: Informal Institutions and Citizenship in Rural Africa (Cambridge, 2010), The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare in the Global South (Cornell, 2014), co-edited with Cammett, and Field Research in Political Science (Cambridge, 2015), coauthored with Kapiszewski and Read. Her research has been published in a wide range of journals and supported by grants, including NSF, SSRC, RWJ, Fulbright-Hays, and Carnegie. She was the recipient of the APSA QMMR 2016 David Collier Mid-Career Achievement Award.</p>
<p>You can learn more about her work <a href="https://cssh.northeastern.edu/faculty/lauren-maclean/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75576224" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/acc8bc3e-76ea-4664-aa5b-b3cfbbb353bb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=acc8bc3e-76ea-4664-aa5b-b3cfbbb353bb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lauren M. MacLean, &quot;Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity (Indiana UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Ghana, much as in other parts of the Global South, postcolonial leaders aimed for industrial growth through the establishment of affordable hydroelectric power. However, in the current rapidly changing climate, many nations face recurring droughts, which hinder electricity production just when demand is on the rise. This situation has led to challenges like load shedding and unplanned power outages, which have strained the bond between citizens and the government.

Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity (Indiana UP, 2026) aims to unravel the puzzling reality that, despite enduring increasing difficulties from these electricity shortages, the Ghanaian citizens who suffer most harshly are also the least likely to demand political accountability from the state. Drawing on archival evidence, focus groups, qualitative interviews, survey data, and contemporary art and music, author Lauren M. MacLean explains how this disparity in experience—fueled by differences in income and geographical location—has led lower- and higher-income Ghanaians to form contrasting perspectives on their social rights regarding public services and to adopt varying approaches to political involvement. Rather than relying on a predetermined social contract, citizens in Ghana develop a more fluid relationship with the state, shaped by their histories, identities, and personal experiences. This reciprocity highlights their awareness of how climate change and the global shift toward green energy can significantly impact their lives while also underscoring the necessity for the government to take the lead and engage with Ghanaians to promote climate justice.

Lauren M. MacLean is the Thomas P. O’Neill Chair of Public Life and Department Chair of Political Science at Northeastern University. Her research focuses on the politics of electricity access and the everyday practice of citizenship in Africa. She conducts fieldwork in Ghana and Kenya, collecting survey data from individuals, conducting focus group discussions, doing archival work, and carrying out qualitative interviews with politicians, policymakers, practitioners, and ordinary people.

MacLean has published award-winning books and articles, including: Informal Institutions and Citizenship in Rural Africa (Cambridge, 2010), The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare in the Global South (Cornell, 2014), co-edited with Cammett, and Field Research in Political Science (Cambridge, 2015), coauthored with Kapiszewski and Read. Her research has been published in a wide range of journals and supported by grants, including NSF, SSRC, RWJ, Fulbright-Hays, and Carnegie. She was the recipient of the APSA QMMR 2016 David Collier Mid-Career Achievement Award.

You can learn more about her work here.

Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Ghana, much as in other parts of the Global South, postcolonial leaders aimed for industrial growth through the establishment of affordable hydroelectric power. However, in the current rapidly changing climate, many nations face recurring droughts, which hinder electricity production just when demand is on the rise. This situation has led to challenges like load shedding and unplanned power outages, which have strained the bond between citizens and the government.

Negotiating Power and Inequality in Ghana: Electricity and Citizenship as Reciprocity (Indiana UP, 2026) aims to unravel the puzzling reality that, despite enduring increasing difficulties from these electricity shortages, the Ghanaian citizens who suffer most harshly are also the least likely to demand political accountability from the state. Drawing on archival evidence, focus groups, qualitative interviews, survey data, and contemporary art and music, author Lauren M. MacLean explains how this disparity in experience—fueled by differences in income and geographical location—has led lower- and higher-income Ghanaians to form contrasting perspectives on their social rights regarding public services and to adopt varying approaches to political involvement. Rather than relying on a predetermined social contract, citizens in Ghana develop a more fluid relationship with the state, shaped by their histories, identities, and personal experiences. This reciprocity highlights their awareness of how climate change and the global shift toward green energy can significantly impact their lives while also underscoring the necessity for the government to take the lead and engage with Ghanaians to promote climate justice.

Lauren M. MacLean is the Thomas P. O’Neill Chair of Public Life and Department Chair of Political Science at Northeastern University. Her research focuses on the politics of electricity access and the everyday practice of citizenship in Africa. She conducts fieldwork in Ghana and Kenya, collecting survey data from individuals, conducting focus group discussions, doing archival work, and carrying out qualitative interviews with politicians, policymakers, practitioners, and ordinary people.

MacLean has published award-winning books and articles, including: Informal Institutions and Citizenship in Rural Africa (Cambridge, 2010), The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare in the Global South (Cornell, 2014), co-edited with Cammett, and Field Research in Political Science (Cambridge, 2015), coauthored with Kapiszewski and Read. Her research has been published in a wide range of journals and supported by grants, including NSF, SSRC, RWJ, Fulbright-Hays, and Carnegie. She was the recipient of the APSA QMMR 2016 David Collier Mid-Career Achievement Award.

You can learn more about her work here.

Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>844</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee464b76-1d08-11f1-a4ea-0f424412e6d2</guid>
      <title>Suzanne Mettler and Trevor E. Brown, &quot;Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264387">Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy</a> (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.</p>
<p><br />Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon's Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264387">Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy</a> (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.</p>
<p><br />Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon's Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39699768" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f8cdab09-18c4-4f33-b2a9-38d91b9d4a4c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f8cdab09-18c4-4f33-b2a9-38d91b9d4a4c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Suzanne Mettler and Trevor E. Brown, &quot;Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.

Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon&apos;s Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the urban-rural divide drives partisan polarization Why have Americans living in different places come to experience politics as a battle between “us” and “them”? In Rural Versus Urban: The Growing Divide That Threatens Democracy (Princeton UP, 2025) Suzanne Mettler and Trevor Brown argue that political polarization is not just about red states and blue states, or coastal elites who alienate those in fly-over country. Instead, polarization permeates every region and every state—and has become organized through a pernicious rural-urban division. Mettler and Brown explain the evolution of this gulf across five decades, charting political trends in both places. Drawing on data on individuals, communities, and members of Congress, as well as interviews with local party leaders and former elected officials, they show how the divide emerged and why it poses a threat to democracy. Until about thirty years ago, both political parties attracted support from rural and urban voters. But after place-based inequality grew due to deregulation and trade liberalization, white rural dwellers began to view urban people and Democrats as affluent elites out of touch with their needs. Politically active evangelical churches, antiabortion organizations, and gun groups helped deepen the divide, encouraging many of these rural residents to become staunch supporters of the GOP. Now, regional one-party rule in rural America gives Republicans a systematic edge for gaining control of crucial political institutions, including the Senate, House of Representatives, the Presidency, and even the Supreme Court. This is helping enable an extremist political party and pushing democracy to the brink. Mettler and Brown argue that the divide can be repaired—but only if the Democrats build their own robust local organizations and offer citizens a meaningful choice.

Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).

Trevor Brown is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. In Fall 2026, he will join the University of Oregon&apos;s Department of Political Science as Assistant Professor of Inequality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>843</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0107075c-1d07-11f1-9cf6-5b5c24b42f10</guid>
      <title>Pepper Culpepper and Taeku Lee, &quot;Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy&quot; (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy</a> (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399424103">Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy</a> (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61402234" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/255ab011-975c-41d1-9b99-1e5be43f22b3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=255ab011-975c-41d1-9b99-1e5be43f22b3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pepper Culpepper and Taeku Lee, &quot;Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy&quot; (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Giant companies, launch rockets into space, control satellite communication and develop era-defining AI technologies. But they are also seen as promoting misinformation, undermining democracy and violating privacy. Big banks, reeling since the financial crisis of 2008, continue to be racked with major scandals. Drawing on examples such as the VW scandal in Germany, Cambridge Analytica and Samsung the authors of ﻿Billionaire Backlash: The Age of Corporate Scandal and How it Could Save Democracy (﻿Bloomsbury, 2026) ﻿show that these scandals are opportunities for real political change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>842</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42b60e7c-1c13-11f1-bb7b-fbe3b2067f01</guid>
      <title>Wendy Brown, &quot;States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270609">States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2025)<em> </em>explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places <em>States of Injury</em> in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.</p>
<p><strong>Wendy Brown</strong> is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include <em>Nihilistic Times</em>, <em>In the Ruins of Neoliberalism</em>, and <em>Undoing the Demos.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270609">States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2025)<em> </em>explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places <em>States of Injury</em> in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.</p>
<p><strong>Wendy Brown</strong> is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include <em>Nihilistic Times</em>, <em>In the Ruins of Neoliberalism</em>, and <em>Undoing the Demos.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36014887" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/99e32b3e-9a19-4d68-acca-793b39abc621/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=99e32b3e-9a19-4d68-acca-793b39abc621&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wendy Brown, &quot;States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton University Press, 2025) explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places States of Injury in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.

Wendy Brown is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include Nihilistic Times, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism, and Undoing the Demos.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sympathetic critique that attempts to free Left politics from its own snares, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton University Press, 2025) explores how woundedness became a basis for contemporary political identity. Without condemning identity politics, Wendy Brown carefully probes the varied historical forces generating them today and the ways these formative conditions constrain emancipatory desire. Along the way, she advances a novel feminist critical theory of liberalism and the liberal democratic state. She also develops an original theoretical practice that weaves together Nietzsche, Marx, Weber, Foucault, and cultural theories of gender and race to analyze contemporary political predicaments. In a new preface, Brown places States of Injury in political and intellectual context, including the rise of neoliberalism, and addresses the book’s renewed relevance in today’s political landscape.

Wendy Brown is the UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her books include Nihilistic Times, In the Ruins of Neoliberalism, and Undoing the Demos.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>841</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d230a12-1c4f-11f1-a947-43505da11140</guid>
      <title>Katelyn E. Stauffer, &quot;The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em>: <em>How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.</em></a> is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.</p>
<p>We discussed the <a href="https://www.instagram.com/ghost.athens/">Ghost Bookstore</a> in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em>: <em>How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.</em></a> is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.</p>
<p>We discussed the <a href="https://www.instagram.com/ghost.athens/">Ghost Bookstore</a> in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-perception-9780197811030?lang=en&amp;cc=us"><em>The Politics of Perception</em></a> for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31502666" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cb9a4f53-8e21-4b85-814c-a2c240915231/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cb9a4f53-8e21-4b85-814c-a2c240915231&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katelyn E. Stauffer, &quot;The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S.&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.

The Politics of Perception explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. The Politics of Perception interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.

The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S. is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.

We discussed the Ghost Bookstore in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order The Politics of Perception for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Katelyn Stauffer, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Georgia, has an excellent new book focusing on how voters and citizens perceive the legitimacy and functionality of political institutions, especially when they think there are women elected to those institutions. The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the United States (Oxford UP, 2025) weaves together a number of different threads to reach some interesting conclusions about women in elected office and the trust that voters have in those elected offices and institutions. Stauffer starts the research trajectory with a framing around representation, and how the different kinds of representation within elected bodies connects to how voters think about those bodies themselves and whether they trust them and think they are effective. This opens the path to bring in the question of gender, and how voters’ or citizens’ perceptions of how many women are in legislative bodies also connects with how much trust those same citizens have in those representative bodies.

The Politics of Perception explores both accurate perceptions as well as misperceptions about governmental institutions, and this is also where the research is truly fascinating. Part of what the research indicates is that, perhaps unsurprisingly, the American public does not actually know a lot about politics or about how political institutions operate. At the same time, many citizens hold strong opinions or thoughts about politics, which generally are at odds with the lack of knowledge. This is also bound up with stereotypes that voters consider in terms of male and female elected officials and how they work within institutions. The Politics of Perception interrogates all of these misperceptions, unpacking the truth or reality versus the ideas that individuals hold about office holders and the political institutions in which those office holders work. Stauffer also discussed how she was able to build on a comparative politics approach, since parliamentary systems are, by their nature, collective institutions, and this approach helped to provide another theoretical framework for the analysis.

The Politics of Perception: How Beliefs About Women’s Inclusion Shape Democratic Legitimacy in the U.S. is an important and useful book for many different scholars: those who study American government and politics; scholars of gender and politics, especially in the United States; comparative political scientists; and political theorists exploring issues of representation and democracy.

We discussed the Ghost Bookstore in Athens, Georgia as a bookseller that can order The Politics of Perception for readers in Georgia or elsewhere.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>840</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">721be0c2-1b98-11f1-8b19-2fbef1453059</guid>
      <title>Sari Hanafi, &quot;Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology&quot; (Liverpool UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an era of deepening polarization, Sari Hanafi examines how social scientists often reproduce the very injustices they seek to challenge, taking entrenched positions while dismissing alternative perspectives.</p>
<p>He introduces the concept of <em>symbolic liberalism</em> - a contradiction in which individuals espouse classical liberal principles, yet act in politically illiberal ways. This, he argues, has exacerbated the pathologies of late modernity: authoritarianism, economic precarity, and environmental destruction, now all unfolding in a climate where reasonable debate seems increasingly impossible.</p>
<p>Examining key flashpoints of contemporary polarization, Hanafi critiques how symbolic liberalism inflates the universality of rights while simultaneously narrowing the space for dialogue. Rather than this rigid ideological stance, he calls for a dialogical turn, a renewed public sphere where diverse conceptions of the ‘common good’ engage in genuine conversation.</p>
<p>Blending political and moral philosophy with sociological critique, Hanafi offers a path forward in an age when intellectual exchange is more necessary, yet also more imperilled, than ever. <em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836244677">Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology</a> (Liverpool UP, 2025) is not just a critique of polarization but a critical and impassioned call to reclaim meaningful intellectual discourse.</p>
<p>Sari Hanafi is a Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies at the American University of Beirut. He served as President of the International Sociological Association (2018–23) and Vice President of the Arab Council for Social Sciences (2015–16). An International Fellow of the British Academy, he was also the Editor of <em>Idafat: The Arab Journal of Sociology (2007–22)</em>. His contributions to the field have been recognized with some of the Arab world’s most prestigious academic awards, including the Abdelhamid Shouman Award (2014) and the Kuwait Award for Social Science (2015). In 2019, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the National University of San Marcos, Peru.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an era of deepening polarization, Sari Hanafi examines how social scientists often reproduce the very injustices they seek to challenge, taking entrenched positions while dismissing alternative perspectives.</p>
<p>He introduces the concept of <em>symbolic liberalism</em> - a contradiction in which individuals espouse classical liberal principles, yet act in politically illiberal ways. This, he argues, has exacerbated the pathologies of late modernity: authoritarianism, economic precarity, and environmental destruction, now all unfolding in a climate where reasonable debate seems increasingly impossible.</p>
<p>Examining key flashpoints of contemporary polarization, Hanafi critiques how symbolic liberalism inflates the universality of rights while simultaneously narrowing the space for dialogue. Rather than this rigid ideological stance, he calls for a dialogical turn, a renewed public sphere where diverse conceptions of the ‘common good’ engage in genuine conversation.</p>
<p>Blending political and moral philosophy with sociological critique, Hanafi offers a path forward in an age when intellectual exchange is more necessary, yet also more imperilled, than ever. <em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836244677">Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology</a> (Liverpool UP, 2025) is not just a critique of polarization but a critical and impassioned call to reclaim meaningful intellectual discourse.</p>
<p>Sari Hanafi is a Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies at the American University of Beirut. He served as President of the International Sociological Association (2018–23) and Vice President of the Arab Council for Social Sciences (2015–16). An International Fellow of the British Academy, he was also the Editor of <em>Idafat: The Arab Journal of Sociology (2007–22)</em>. His contributions to the field have been recognized with some of the Arab world’s most prestigious academic awards, including the Abdelhamid Shouman Award (2014) and the Kuwait Award for Social Science (2015). In 2019, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the National University of San Marcos, Peru.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44527174" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/456916a2-5789-41bd-8057-522886027164/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=456916a2-5789-41bd-8057-522886027164&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sari Hanafi, &quot;Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology&quot; (Liverpool UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an era of deepening polarization, Sari Hanafi examines how social scientists often reproduce the very injustices they seek to challenge, taking entrenched positions while dismissing alternative perspectives.

He introduces the concept of symbolic liberalism - a contradiction in which individuals espouse classical liberal principles, yet act in politically illiberal ways. This, he argues, has exacerbated the pathologies of late modernity: authoritarianism, economic precarity, and environmental destruction, now all unfolding in a climate where reasonable debate seems increasingly impossible.

Examining key flashpoints of contemporary polarization, Hanafi critiques how symbolic liberalism inflates the universality of rights while simultaneously narrowing the space for dialogue. Rather than this rigid ideological stance, he calls for a dialogical turn, a renewed public sphere where diverse conceptions of the ‘common good’ engage in genuine conversation.

Blending political and moral philosophy with sociological critique, Hanafi offers a path forward in an age when intellectual exchange is more necessary, yet also more imperilled, than ever. ﻿Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology (Liverpool UP, 2025) is not just a critique of polarization but a critical and impassioned call to reclaim meaningful intellectual discourse.

Sari Hanafi is a Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies at the American University of Beirut. He served as President of the International Sociological Association (2018–23) and Vice President of the Arab Council for Social Sciences (2015–16). An International Fellow of the British Academy, he was also the Editor of Idafat: The Arab Journal of Sociology (2007–22). His contributions to the field have been recognized with some of the Arab world’s most prestigious academic awards, including the Abdelhamid Shouman Award (2014) and the Kuwait Award for Social Science (2015). In 2019, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the National University of San Marcos, Peru.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an era of deepening polarization, Sari Hanafi examines how social scientists often reproduce the very injustices they seek to challenge, taking entrenched positions while dismissing alternative perspectives.

He introduces the concept of symbolic liberalism - a contradiction in which individuals espouse classical liberal principles, yet act in politically illiberal ways. This, he argues, has exacerbated the pathologies of late modernity: authoritarianism, economic precarity, and environmental destruction, now all unfolding in a climate where reasonable debate seems increasingly impossible.

Examining key flashpoints of contemporary polarization, Hanafi critiques how symbolic liberalism inflates the universality of rights while simultaneously narrowing the space for dialogue. Rather than this rigid ideological stance, he calls for a dialogical turn, a renewed public sphere where diverse conceptions of the ‘common good’ engage in genuine conversation.

Blending political and moral philosophy with sociological critique, Hanafi offers a path forward in an age when intellectual exchange is more necessary, yet also more imperilled, than ever. ﻿Against Symbolic Liberalism: A Plea for Dialogical Sociology (Liverpool UP, 2025) is not just a critique of polarization but a critical and impassioned call to reclaim meaningful intellectual discourse.

Sari Hanafi is a Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies at the American University of Beirut. He served as President of the International Sociological Association (2018–23) and Vice President of the Arab Council for Social Sciences (2015–16). An International Fellow of the British Academy, he was also the Editor of Idafat: The Arab Journal of Sociology (2007–22). His contributions to the field have been recognized with some of the Arab world’s most prestigious academic awards, including the Abdelhamid Shouman Award (2014) and the Kuwait Award for Social Science (2015). In 2019, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from the National University of San Marcos, Peru.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>839</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de47aefe-1b91-11f1-82cc-f71488c774f1</guid>
      <title>Populism, Polarization and Politics: Hungary on the Eve of Elections</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How and why do leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orban not only come to power, but remain in power for so long (in Orban’s case 16 years)? And why does the impending election provide a serious challenge to Orban and his party Fidesz? Join Tim Haughton and guests Emilia Palonen and Zsolt Enyedi for a discussion that examines contemporary Hungary on the eve of parliamentary elections and places the country’s recent experience in historical and comparative perspective.</p>
<p><a href="https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/emilia-palonen/">Emilia Palonen</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Helsinki and the author of <a href="https://hup.fi/books/m/10.33134/pro-et-contra-4"><em>The Birth and Death of Liberal Democracy in Hungary: the Populist Logic of Polarisation as Hegemony</em></a> which was published last year by Helsinki University Press.</p>
<p><a href="https://people.ceu.edu/zsolt_enyedi">Zsolt Enyedi</a> is Professor of Political Science at the Central European University. He is the co-author of the acclaimed <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/39339"><em>Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives and Democracy in Europe</em></a> published by Oxford University Press in 2021. Moreover, he led a three year Horizon Project, <a href="https://www.authlib.eu/">AuthLIB</a> looking at neo-authoritarianisms in Europe and the liberal democratic response which has just concluded.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. ﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How and why do leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orban not only come to power, but remain in power for so long (in Orban’s case 16 years)? And why does the impending election provide a serious challenge to Orban and his party Fidesz? Join Tim Haughton and guests Emilia Palonen and Zsolt Enyedi for a discussion that examines contemporary Hungary on the eve of parliamentary elections and places the country’s recent experience in historical and comparative perspective.</p>
<p><a href="https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/emilia-palonen/">Emilia Palonen</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Helsinki and the author of <a href="https://hup.fi/books/m/10.33134/pro-et-contra-4"><em>The Birth and Death of Liberal Democracy in Hungary: the Populist Logic of Polarisation as Hegemony</em></a> which was published last year by Helsinki University Press.</p>
<p><a href="https://people.ceu.edu/zsolt_enyedi">Zsolt Enyedi</a> is Professor of Political Science at the Central European University. He is the co-author of the acclaimed <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/39339"><em>Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives and Democracy in Europe</em></a> published by Oxford University Press in 2021. Moreover, he led a three year Horizon Project, <a href="https://www.authlib.eu/">AuthLIB</a> looking at neo-authoritarianisms in Europe and the liberal democratic response which has just concluded.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/haughton-tim">Tim Haughton</a> is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. ﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66031913" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0c627d77-eec1-4265-a583-a47f68d63edc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0c627d77-eec1-4265-a583-a47f68d63edc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Populism, Polarization and Politics: Hungary on the Eve of Elections</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How and why do leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orban not only come to power, but remain in power for so long (in Orban’s case 16 years)? And why does the impending election provide a serious challenge to Orban and his party Fidesz? Join Tim Haughton and guests Emilia Palonen and Zsolt Enyedi for a discussion that examines contemporary Hungary on the eve of parliamentary elections and places the country’s recent experience in historical and comparative perspective.

Emilia Palonen is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Helsinki and the author of The Birth and Death of Liberal Democracy in Hungary: the Populist Logic of Polarisation as Hegemony which was published last year by Helsinki University Press.

Zsolt Enyedi is Professor of Political Science at the Central European University. He is the co-author of the acclaimed Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives and Democracy in Europe published by Oxford University Press in 2021. Moreover, he led a three year Horizon Project, AuthLIB looking at neo-authoritarianisms in Europe and the liberal democratic response which has just concluded.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. ﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How and why do leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orban not only come to power, but remain in power for so long (in Orban’s case 16 years)? And why does the impending election provide a serious challenge to Orban and his party Fidesz? Join Tim Haughton and guests Emilia Palonen and Zsolt Enyedi for a discussion that examines contemporary Hungary on the eve of parliamentary elections and places the country’s recent experience in historical and comparative perspective.

Emilia Palonen is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Helsinki and the author of The Birth and Death of Liberal Democracy in Hungary: the Populist Logic of Polarisation as Hegemony which was published last year by Helsinki University Press.

Zsolt Enyedi is Professor of Political Science at the Central European University. He is the co-author of the acclaimed Party System Closure: Party Alliances, Government Alternatives and Democracy in Europe published by Oxford University Press in 2021. Moreover, he led a three year Horizon Project, AuthLIB looking at neo-authoritarianisms in Europe and the liberal democratic response which has just concluded.

Tim Haughton is Professor of Comparative and European Politics and a Deputy Director of CEDAR at the University of Birmingham.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. ﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>838</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf0c7e08-1b30-11f1-af6c-c3741f211751</guid>
      <title>Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580"><em>Stuck:</em> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580">How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—<em>Stuck</em> offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, <em>Stuck </em>makes the case for how it could be saved.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Our guest is: <a href="https://www.mayakornberg.com/">Dr. Maya Kornberg</a>, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of <em>Stuck</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url">Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url">House of Diggs</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation#entry:373738@1:url">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-are-not-american#entry:413678@1:url">You Are Not American</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-have-more-influence-than-you-think-how-we-underestimate-our-powers-of-persuasion-and-why-it-matters#entry:392613@1:url">You Have More Influence Than You Think</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url">We Refuse</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany#entry:369570@1:url">Dear Miss Perkins</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven't fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580"><em>Stuck:</em> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421454580">How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</a>, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—<em>Stuck</em> offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.</p>
<p>Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress's capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy's most representative institution, <em>Stuck </em>makes the case for how it could be saved.</p>
<p>A Neuroscientist's Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life</p>
<p>Our guest is: <a href="https://www.mayakornberg.com/">Dr. Maya Kornberg</a>, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of <em>Stuck</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url">Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/house-of-diggs-the-rise-and-fall-of-americas-most-consequential-black-congressman-charles-c-diggs-jr#entry:429183@1:url">House of Diggs</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-fight-to-save-the-town#entry:167629@1:url">The Fight To Save The Town</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation#entry:373738@1:url">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-are-not-american#entry:413678@1:url">You Are Not American</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/you-have-more-influence-than-you-think-how-we-underestimate-our-powers-of-persuasion-and-why-it-matters#entry:392613@1:url">You Have More Influence Than You Think</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url">We Refuse</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany#entry:369570@1:url">Dear Miss Perkins</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49164359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0ef57c7e-7649-42be-8646-5f7b3dd95e0b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0ef57c7e-7649-42be-8646-5f7b3dd95e0b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.

Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.

Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.

A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life

Our guest is: Dr. Maya Kornberg, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of Stuck.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.

Playlist for listeners:

Bears and Ballots

House of Diggs

The Fight To Save The Town

The End of White Politics

Understanding Disinformation

You Are Not American

The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife

You Have More Influence Than You Think

We Refuse

Dear Miss Perkins

Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fifty years of changemaking and reform haven&apos;t fixed Congress—what does that reveal about American democracy? In Stuck: How Money, Media and Violence Prevent Change in Congress, Maya Kornberg chronicles the efforts of congressional reformers over the last fifty years and documents the mounting forces that have kept their reforms from creating meaningful change.

Dr. Kornberg reveals how political violence, astronomical campaign costs, relentless fundraising demands, shrinking staff, and centralized party leadership all constrain the ability of new members to legislate and represent their constituents. Social media, while offering new platforms for political expression, has also heightened harassment and fed a performative culture that rewards spectacle over substance. Bolstered by dozens of interviews, congressional records, and the voices of lawmakers past and present—including Henry Waxman, Toby Moffett, Phil English, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Lauren Underwood—Stuck offers a sobering portrait of a legislative body paralyzed by its own internal dynamics.

Dr. Kornberg outlines tangible reforms that could restore Congress&apos;s capacity to function and amplify the power of its newest members. At a time when Americans are losing faith in democracy&apos;s most representative institution, Stuck makes the case for how it could be saved.

A Neuroscientist&apos;s Guide to a Healthier, Happier Life

Our guest is: Dr. Maya Kornberg, who is a senior research fellow and manager in the Brennan Center’s Elections and Government Program. She’s taught political science at NYU, Georgetown and American University, worked on democratic governance issues at numerous institutions, and led research for a UNDP and IPU project examining civic engagement in the work of over 80 parliaments around the world. She is the author of Stuck.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.

Playlist for listeners:

Bears and Ballots

House of Diggs

The Fight To Save The Town

The End of White Politics

Understanding Disinformation

You Are Not American

The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife

You Have More Influence Than You Think

We Refuse

Dear Miss Perkins

Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>837</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8eb3060c-1864-11f1-b33c-5f4e7dd761a0</guid>
      <title>The Cave and the Coalition: Philosophy, Populism, and the MAGA New Right</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51314011" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d6a21cb1-edc6-445f-83ba-1e6027f53ac0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d6a21cb1-edc6-445f-83ba-1e6027f53ac0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Cave and the Coalition: Philosophy, Populism, and the MAGA New Right</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI acting director Eli Karetny sits down with political theorist Laura Field to trace the intellectual currents shaping today’s right — from Straussian thought at the Claremont Institute to Catholic integralism, the manosphere, and Trump-era populism. Using Plato’s Allegory of the Cave as a touchstone, they interrogate how philosophical radicalism becomes political strategy, why some thinkers return to the “cave” with prudence while others return with authoritarian blueprints, and what these debates mean for American democracy. Tune in for a lively, theory-steeped conversation that bridges political philosophy and contemporary conservative politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>836</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07a3a9f8-1866-11f1-9b83-936a707eecf0</guid>
      <title>Sean Parson, &quot;Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350537330">Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance</a><em> ﻿</em>(Bloomsbury, 2026)<em> </em>is a radical critique of contemporary politics, offering an alternative framework rooted in anarchism, punk rock, dadaism, situationism and political nihilism.﻿</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>Arguing that traditional approaches to political change are ineffective in the face of the climate crisis and the failures of liberal institutions, the book advocates for rejecting the possibility of meaningful political change within the existing political system.﻿</p>
<p>Drawing on historical cultural movements like the Russian and Japanese nihilists of the 19th and early 20th centuries, Sean Parson calls for a politics of pure negation, centered on the destruction of the current social order, rather than its reform – advocating for a revolutionary politics that embraces resentment against the wealthy and rejects hierarchical power dynamics. <em>Punk Anarchism</em> asks: what if resistance were motivated by a sense of playfulness and enjoyment, rather than hope for a better future? Ultimately, Parson proposes an anti-theory of negation as a way to imagine political agency beyond traditional frameworks.﻿</p>
<p>Sean Parson is Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University, USA. They are the author of <em>Cooking Up a Revolution:</em> <em>Resistance to Gentrification</em> (2019) and the co-editor of four edited books including<em>Representations of Political Resistance and Emancipation in Science Fiction (2020</em>).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350537330">Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance</a><em> ﻿</em>(Bloomsbury, 2026)<em> </em>is a radical critique of contemporary politics, offering an alternative framework rooted in anarchism, punk rock, dadaism, situationism and political nihilism.﻿</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>Arguing that traditional approaches to political change are ineffective in the face of the climate crisis and the failures of liberal institutions, the book advocates for rejecting the possibility of meaningful political change within the existing political system.﻿</p>
<p>Drawing on historical cultural movements like the Russian and Japanese nihilists of the 19th and early 20th centuries, Sean Parson calls for a politics of pure negation, centered on the destruction of the current social order, rather than its reform – advocating for a revolutionary politics that embraces resentment against the wealthy and rejects hierarchical power dynamics. <em>Punk Anarchism</em> asks: what if resistance were motivated by a sense of playfulness and enjoyment, rather than hope for a better future? Ultimately, Parson proposes an anti-theory of negation as a way to imagine political agency beyond traditional frameworks.﻿</p>
<p>Sean Parson is Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University, USA. They are the author of <em>Cooking Up a Revolution:</em> <em>Resistance to Gentrification</em> (2019) and the co-editor of four edited books including<em>Representations of Political Resistance and Emancipation in Science Fiction (2020</em>).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40331258" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/75b6fec1-f0ca-4a66-9325-6373e47d9378/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=75b6fec1-f0ca-4a66-9325-6373e47d9378&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sean Parson, &quot;Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance ﻿(Bloomsbury, 2026) is a radical critique of contemporary politics, offering an alternative framework rooted in anarchism, punk rock, dadaism, situationism and political nihilism.﻿



Arguing that traditional approaches to political change are ineffective in the face of the climate crisis and the failures of liberal institutions, the book advocates for rejecting the possibility of meaningful political change within the existing political system.﻿

Drawing on historical cultural movements like the Russian and Japanese nihilists of the 19th and early 20th centuries, Sean Parson calls for a politics of pure negation, centered on the destruction of the current social order, rather than its reform – advocating for a revolutionary politics that embraces resentment against the wealthy and rejects hierarchical power dynamics. Punk Anarchism asks: what if resistance were motivated by a sense of playfulness and enjoyment, rather than hope for a better future? Ultimately, Parson proposes an anti-theory of negation as a way to imagine political agency beyond traditional frameworks.﻿

Sean Parson is Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University, USA. They are the author of Cooking Up a Revolution: Resistance to Gentrification (2019) and the co-editor of four edited books includingRepresentations of Political Resistance and Emancipation in Science Fiction (2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Punk Anarchism: An Anti-Politics of Resistance ﻿(Bloomsbury, 2026) is a radical critique of contemporary politics, offering an alternative framework rooted in anarchism, punk rock, dadaism, situationism and political nihilism.﻿



Arguing that traditional approaches to political change are ineffective in the face of the climate crisis and the failures of liberal institutions, the book advocates for rejecting the possibility of meaningful political change within the existing political system.﻿

Drawing on historical cultural movements like the Russian and Japanese nihilists of the 19th and early 20th centuries, Sean Parson calls for a politics of pure negation, centered on the destruction of the current social order, rather than its reform – advocating for a revolutionary politics that embraces resentment against the wealthy and rejects hierarchical power dynamics. Punk Anarchism asks: what if resistance were motivated by a sense of playfulness and enjoyment, rather than hope for a better future? Ultimately, Parson proposes an anti-theory of negation as a way to imagine political agency beyond traditional frameworks.﻿

Sean Parson is Professor in the Department of Politics and International Affairs at Northern Arizona University, USA. They are the author of Cooking Up a Revolution: Resistance to Gentrification (2019) and the co-editor of four edited books includingRepresentations of Political Resistance and Emancipation in Science Fiction (2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>835</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dfc52742-16c9-11f1-9b0e-d3a900f819ac</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548627">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a><em>. </em>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.</p>
<p>Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including <em>The Politics of Truth in Polarized America</em>, with David Barker, <em>The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion</em>, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and "The Politics of Science" with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal <em>Political Psychology</em> and Editor of the Cambridge University Press <em>Elements in Political Psychology</em> series.</p>
<p>This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780871548627">Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics</a><em>. </em>Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.</p>
<p>Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including <em>The Politics of Truth in Polarized America</em>, with David Barker, <em>The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion</em>, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and "The Politics of Science" with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal <em>Political Psychology</em> and Editor of the Cambridge University Press <em>Elements in Political Psychology</em> series.</p>
<p>This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51729266" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/22634156-2f8a-46cf-9c45-8d3c345289a5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=22634156-2f8a-46cf-9c45-8d3c345289a5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Suhay, &quot;Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics&quot; (Russell Sage Foundation, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics. Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.

Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including The Politics of Truth in Polarized America, with David Barker, The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and &quot;The Politics of Science&quot; with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Political Psychology and Editor of the Cambridge University Press Elements in Political Psychology series.

This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our guest today is Elizabeth Suhay, the author of Debating the American Dream: How Explanations for Inequality Polarize Politics. Faith in the American Dream—the idea that anyone who works hard can achieve success—has waned in the 21st century. Decreases in economic mobility, increases in the wealth gap, and other economic shifts have undoubtedly influenced this decline. Dr. Suhay investigates how politics and political identity are intertwined with beliefs about the American Dream and the causes of inequality. Drawing on public opinion surveys spanning more than four decades, Suhay finds that Americans’ belief in the American Dream is strongly related to their political party affiliation. While it is true that Americans have become more skeptical of the American Dream overall, Suhay finds this skepticism is concentrated among Democratic members of the public. Despite the increasingly working-class make-up of the Republican coalition, most Republican members of the public continue to believe the American Dream is reality.

Elizabeth (Liz) Suhay is an associate professor of government in the School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, D.C. She specializes in the study of U.S. public opinion and political psychology and is a Sine Civic Life Faculty Fellow and Vice Director of the Science &amp; Policy certificate program. She has also co-edited three volumes including The Politics of Truth in Polarized America, with David Barker, The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, with Bernard Grofman and Alex Trechsel, and &quot;The Politics of Science&quot; with James Druckman. She currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal Political Psychology and Editor of the Cambridge University Press Elements in Political Psychology series.

This is episode is co-produced by Nora Kalaj, a student in the Master of Arts in Communication at Oakland University.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>834</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba82f134-15ee-11f1-b3ba-bbf014d62278</guid>
      <title>Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark, &quot;Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276205">Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave </a>(Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.<br />Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.</p>
<p>Our guests are Professor <a href="https://www.allisonjcarnegie.com/">Allison Carnegie</a>, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and <a href="https://politicalscience.nd.edu/people/richard-clark/">Professor Richard Clark</a>, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276205">Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave </a>(Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.<br />Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.</p>
<p>Our guests are Professor <a href="https://www.allisonjcarnegie.com/">Allison Carnegie</a>, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and <a href="https://politicalscience.nd.edu/people/richard-clark/">Professor Richard Clark</a>, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="23578715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9d218163-bc7f-4687-bf2e-983f77da1d25/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9d218163-bc7f-4687-bf2e-983f77da1d25&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark, &quot;Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave (Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.

Our guests are Professor Allison Carnegie, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and Professor Richard Clark, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave (Princeton UP, 2026) Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ to both appease and sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.

Our guests are Professor Allison Carnegie, a professor of political science at Columbia University. and Professor Richard Clark, who is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>833</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f803b1a-14b6-11f1-9490-eb78f0123a7e</guid>
      <title>Claire Provost and Matt Kennard, &quot;Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As European empires crumbled in the 20th century, the power structures that had dominated the world for centuries were up for renegotiation. Yet instead of a rebirth for democracy, what emerged was a silent coup – namely, the unstoppable rise of global corporate power.</p><p>Exposing the origins of this epic power grab as well as its present-day consequences, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350269989"><em>Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury, 2023) by Claire Provost &amp; Matt Kennard is the result of two investigative journalist's reports from 30 countries around the world. It provides an explosive guide to the rise of a corporate empire that now dictates how resources are allocated, how territories are governed, and how justice is defined.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As European empires crumbled in the 20th century, the power structures that had dominated the world for centuries were up for renegotiation. Yet instead of a rebirth for democracy, what emerged was a silent coup – namely, the unstoppable rise of global corporate power.</p><p>Exposing the origins of this epic power grab as well as its present-day consequences, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350269989"><em>Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury, 2023) by Claire Provost &amp; Matt Kennard is the result of two investigative journalist's reports from 30 countries around the world. It provides an explosive guide to the rise of a corporate empire that now dictates how resources are allocated, how territories are governed, and how justice is defined.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40114620" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3504a1e9-7891-4da5-9c7d-6273f7fe4368/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3504a1e9-7891-4da5-9c7d-6273f7fe4368&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Claire Provost and Matt Kennard, &quot;Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As European empires crumbled in the 20th century, the power structures that had dominated the world for centuries were up for renegotiation. Yet instead of a rebirth for democracy, what emerged was a silent coup – namely, the unstoppable rise of global corporate power.
Exposing the origins of this epic power grab as well as its present-day consequences, Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy (Bloomsbury, 2023) by Claire Provost &amp; Matt Kennard is the result of two investigative journalist&apos;s reports from 30 countries around the world. It provides an explosive guide to the rise of a corporate empire that now dictates how resources are allocated, how territories are governed, and how justice is defined.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As European empires crumbled in the 20th century, the power structures that had dominated the world for centuries were up for renegotiation. Yet instead of a rebirth for democracy, what emerged was a silent coup – namely, the unstoppable rise of global corporate power.
Exposing the origins of this epic power grab as well as its present-day consequences, Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy (Bloomsbury, 2023) by Claire Provost &amp; Matt Kennard is the result of two investigative journalist&apos;s reports from 30 countries around the world. It provides an explosive guide to the rise of a corporate empire that now dictates how resources are allocated, how territories are governed, and how justice is defined.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>171</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ed92d1c-3cf3-11e9-8972-076bec0b4610</guid>
      <title>Christine Loh, &quot;Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong&quot; (Hong Kong UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There can be little doubt that Hong Kong has stood out as a particularly intense East Asian news hotspot in recent years. Whether reports have focused on pro-democracy protests, abducted booksellers or PRC Mainland integration plans, most of this news has revolved around a common theme - namely questions over Beijing's ruling Chinese Communist Party and its influence in Hong Kong.</p><p>On this background, <a href="https://www.envr.ust.hk/our-division/people/faculty-staff/cloh.html">Christine Loh</a>’s book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QsFCVz5uDOuqrl_4z8bB3uwAAAFpNJjGCgEAAAFKAQZmba0/https://www.amazon.com/dp/9622099963/?creativeASIN=9622099963&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=qGqDPZY2JRVqNyxAr-jXJA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong</em></a>(Hong Kong University Press, 2018) is an indispensable guide to the Party's approaches to Hong Kong over time. As a former-lawmaker in the city’s Legislative Council, founder of the think tank Civic Exchange, and many other things, Loh makes the most of her unique vantage point on contemporary CCP affairs, as well her invaluable access to insights from the her hometown's colonial past. This book sets its analysis of how the Party seeks to maintain supremacy in Hong Kong within all-important historical context, and consequently will be a vital resource for anyone wishing to understand the questions of political culture, power and influence which are pivotal to the future of East Asia and the world at large.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can be little doubt that Hong Kong has stood out as a particularly intense East Asian news hotspot in recent years. Whether reports have focused on pro-democracy protests, abducted booksellers or PRC Mainland integration plans, most of this news has revolved around a common theme - namely questions over Beijing's ruling Chinese Communist Party and its influence in Hong Kong.</p><p>On this background, <a href="https://www.envr.ust.hk/our-division/people/faculty-staff/cloh.html">Christine Loh</a>’s book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QsFCVz5uDOuqrl_4z8bB3uwAAAFpNJjGCgEAAAFKAQZmba0/https://www.amazon.com/dp/9622099963/?creativeASIN=9622099963&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=qGqDPZY2JRVqNyxAr-jXJA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong</em></a>(Hong Kong University Press, 2018) is an indispensable guide to the Party's approaches to Hong Kong over time. As a former-lawmaker in the city’s Legislative Council, founder of the think tank Civic Exchange, and many other things, Loh makes the most of her unique vantage point on contemporary CCP affairs, as well her invaluable access to insights from the her hometown's colonial past. This book sets its analysis of how the Party seeks to maintain supremacy in Hong Kong within all-important historical context, and consequently will be a vital resource for anyone wishing to understand the questions of political culture, power and influence which are pivotal to the future of East Asia and the world at large.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56562951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/83ca3c6f-25d6-4a88-9743-b006d74804f5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=83ca3c6f-25d6-4a88-9743-b006d74804f5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christine Loh, &quot;Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong&quot; (Hong Kong UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There can be little doubt that Hong Kong has stood out as a particularly intense East Asian news hotspot in recent years. Whether reports have focused on pro-democracy protests, abducted booksellers or PRC Mainland integration plans, most of this news has revolved around a common theme - namely questions over Beijing&apos;s ruling Chinese Communist Party and its influence in Hong Kong.
On this background, Christine Loh’s book Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong(Hong Kong University Press, 2018) is an indispensable guide to the Party&apos;s approaches to Hong Kong over time. As a former-lawmaker in the city’s Legislative Council, founder of the think tank Civic Exchange, and many other things, Loh makes the most of her unique vantage point on contemporary CCP affairs, as well her invaluable access to insights from the her hometown&apos;s colonial past. This book sets its analysis of how the Party seeks to maintain supremacy in Hong Kong within all-important historical context, and consequently will be a vital resource for anyone wishing to understand the questions of political culture, power and influence which are pivotal to the future of East Asia and the world at large.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There can be little doubt that Hong Kong has stood out as a particularly intense East Asian news hotspot in recent years. Whether reports have focused on pro-democracy protests, abducted booksellers or PRC Mainland integration plans, most of this news has revolved around a common theme - namely questions over Beijing&apos;s ruling Chinese Communist Party and its influence in Hong Kong.
On this background, Christine Loh’s book Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong(Hong Kong University Press, 2018) is an indispensable guide to the Party&apos;s approaches to Hong Kong over time. As a former-lawmaker in the city’s Legislative Council, founder of the think tank Civic Exchange, and many other things, Loh makes the most of her unique vantage point on contemporary CCP affairs, as well her invaluable access to insights from the her hometown&apos;s colonial past. This book sets its analysis of how the Party seeks to maintain supremacy in Hong Kong within all-important historical context, and consequently will be a vital resource for anyone wishing to understand the questions of political culture, power and influence which are pivotal to the future of East Asia and the world at large.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>260</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4940a824-1150-11f1-942b-b7f0d519d2fb</guid>
      <title>Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, Senegal faced a severe constitutional and electoral crisis. The presidential vote was postponed, tensions escalated, and fears of democratic breakdown intensified. Yet democracy held. Why?</p>
<p>In this episode of <em>People Power Politics</em>, Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Catherine Lena Kelly and Ibrahima Fall and about their <em>Journal of Democracy</em> article, “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-senegals-democracy-survived/">Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived</a>.” They examine how the Constitutional Council asserted its independence under executive pressure, how civil society mobilised to defend constitutional norms, and how what they call democratic “muscle memory” shaped citizen response.</p>
<p>The discussion situates Senegal’s experience within a wider regional context of coups and democratic regression. What explains Senegal’s divergence? Are its institutional safeguards transferable, or deeply context-specific? And what lessons does this case hold for democracies worldwide facing executive overreach?</p>
<p><a href="https://africacenter.org/experts/dr-catherine-lena-kelly/">Catherine Lena Kelly</a> is Director of Engagement at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies and author of <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-19617-2"><em>Party Proliferation and Political Contestation in Africa: Senegal in Comparative Perspective</em></a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020). Ibrahima Fall is Director of Studies at the School of International Commerce, Communications, and Business Techniques (ETICCA) in Dakar and a leading analyst of Senegalese governance and constitutional politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world. ﻿Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Kelly-and-Fall-Transcript.docx#asset:444549@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, Senegal faced a severe constitutional and electoral crisis. The presidential vote was postponed, tensions escalated, and fears of democratic breakdown intensified. Yet democracy held. Why?</p>
<p>In this episode of <em>People Power Politics</em>, Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Catherine Lena Kelly and Ibrahima Fall and about their <em>Journal of Democracy</em> article, “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/why-senegals-democracy-survived/">Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived</a>.” They examine how the Constitutional Council asserted its independence under executive pressure, how civil society mobilised to defend constitutional norms, and how what they call democratic “muscle memory” shaped citizen response.</p>
<p>The discussion situates Senegal’s experience within a wider regional context of coups and democratic regression. What explains Senegal’s divergence? Are its institutional safeguards transferable, or deeply context-specific? And what lessons does this case hold for democracies worldwide facing executive overreach?</p>
<p><a href="https://africacenter.org/experts/dr-catherine-lena-kelly/">Catherine Lena Kelly</a> is Director of Engagement at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies and author of <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-19617-2"><em>Party Proliferation and Political Contestation in Africa: Senegal in Comparative Perspective</em></a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020). Ibrahima Fall is Director of Studies at the School of International Commerce, Communications, and Business Techniques (ETICCA) in Dakar and a leading analyst of Senegalese governance and constitutional politics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo">Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi</a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world. ﻿Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Kelly-and-Fall-Transcript.docx#asset:444549@1">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39430208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3ad7abc5-d690-488c-8cdb-8098b3346c85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3ad7abc5-d690-488c-8cdb-8098b3346c85&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2024, Senegal faced a severe constitutional and electoral crisis. The presidential vote was postponed, tensions escalated, and fears of democratic breakdown intensified. Yet democracy held. Why?

In this episode of People Power Politics, Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Catherine Lena Kelly and Ibrahima Fall and about their Journal of Democracy article, “Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived.” They examine how the Constitutional Council asserted its independence under executive pressure, how civil society mobilised to defend constitutional norms, and how what they call democratic “muscle memory” shaped citizen response.

The discussion situates Senegal’s experience within a wider regional context of coups and democratic regression. What explains Senegal’s divergence? Are its institutional safeguards transferable, or deeply context-specific? And what lessons does this case hold for democracies worldwide facing executive overreach?

Catherine Lena Kelly is Director of Engagement at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies and author of Party Proliferation and Political Contestation in Africa: Senegal in Comparative Perspective (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020). Ibrahima Fall is Director of Studies at the School of International Commerce, Communications, and Business Techniques (ETICCA) in Dakar and a leading analyst of Senegalese governance and constitutional politics.

Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world. ﻿Transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2024, Senegal faced a severe constitutional and electoral crisis. The presidential vote was postponed, tensions escalated, and fears of democratic breakdown intensified. Yet democracy held. Why?

In this episode of People Power Politics, Temitayo Odeyemi speaks with Catherine Lena Kelly and Ibrahima Fall and about their Journal of Democracy article, “Why Senegal’s Democracy Survived.” They examine how the Constitutional Council asserted its independence under executive pressure, how civil society mobilised to defend constitutional norms, and how what they call democratic “muscle memory” shaped citizen response.

The discussion situates Senegal’s experience within a wider regional context of coups and democratic regression. What explains Senegal’s divergence? Are its institutional safeguards transferable, or deeply context-specific? And what lessons does this case hold for democracies worldwide facing executive overreach?

Catherine Lena Kelly is Director of Engagement at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies and author of Party Proliferation and Political Contestation in Africa: Senegal in Comparative Perspective (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020). Ibrahima Fall is Director of Studies at the School of International Commerce, Communications, and Business Techniques (ETICCA) in Dakar and a leading analyst of Senegalese governance and constitutional politics.

Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world. ﻿Transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>830</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">43f18124-0d4d-11f1-b70c-eb8298bad57a</guid>
      <title>Thailand’s February 2026 Snap Election: A Conversation with Prof Duncan McCargo</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode unpacks the 8 February 2026 snap election and constitutional referendum in Thailand. The results paint a mixed picture: a decisive win for the country’s conservative forces alongside signals of progressive change, particularly regarding the drafting of a new constitution.</p>
<p>Dialogues on Southeast Asia sits down with Prof Duncan McCargo, President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a world-leading specialist on Thai politics, to make sense of what the results mean.</p>
<p>Prof McCargo focuses on the comparative politics of Southeast Asia, especially Thailand, on which he has published widely. He is the author of a dozen books, including Fighting for Virtue: Politics and Justice in Thailand (Cornell, 2019) and Future Forward: The Rise and Fall of a Thai Political Party (NIAS Press, 2020).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode unpacks the 8 February 2026 snap election and constitutional referendum in Thailand. The results paint a mixed picture: a decisive win for the country’s conservative forces alongside signals of progressive change, particularly regarding the drafting of a new constitution.</p>
<p>Dialogues on Southeast Asia sits down with Prof Duncan McCargo, President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a world-leading specialist on Thai politics, to make sense of what the results mean.</p>
<p>Prof McCargo focuses on the comparative politics of Southeast Asia, especially Thailand, on which he has published widely. He is the author of a dozen books, including Fighting for Virtue: Politics and Justice in Thailand (Cornell, 2019) and Future Forward: The Rise and Fall of a Thai Political Party (NIAS Press, 2020).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42498403" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5c6bbd0b-04fa-4b8b-9aef-200c525f1b07/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5c6bbd0b-04fa-4b8b-9aef-200c525f1b07&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thailand’s February 2026 Snap Election: A Conversation with Prof Duncan McCargo</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode unpacks the 8 February 2026 snap election and constitutional referendum in Thailand. The results paint a mixed picture: a decisive win for the country’s conservative forces alongside signals of progressive change, particularly regarding the drafting of a new constitution.

Dialogues on Southeast Asia sits down with Prof Duncan McCargo, President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a world-leading specialist on Thai politics, to make sense of what the results mean.

Prof McCargo focuses on the comparative politics of Southeast Asia, especially Thailand, on which he has published widely. He is the author of a dozen books, including Fighting for Virtue: Politics and Justice in Thailand (Cornell, 2019) and Future Forward: The Rise and Fall of a Thai Political Party (NIAS Press, 2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode unpacks the 8 February 2026 snap election and constitutional referendum in Thailand. The results paint a mixed picture: a decisive win for the country’s conservative forces alongside signals of progressive change, particularly regarding the drafting of a new constitution.

Dialogues on Southeast Asia sits down with Prof Duncan McCargo, President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and a world-leading specialist on Thai politics, to make sense of what the results mean.

Prof McCargo focuses on the comparative politics of Southeast Asia, especially Thailand, on which he has published widely. He is the author of a dozen books, including Fighting for Virtue: Politics and Justice in Thailand (Cornell, 2019) and Future Forward: The Rise and Fall of a Thai Political Party (NIAS Press, 2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>829</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf1a42e6-0d48-11f1-931f-5b37f7817542</guid>
      <title>Joanna Lillis, &quot;Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In September 2016, Islam Karimov–the first president of a post-Soviet Uzbekistan–died, at age 78. His death ended an oppressive dictatorship that had governed the Central Asian country for decades, which led to corruption, environmental damage, and political repression. Karimov was replaced with Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who instituted a tentative program of reforms.</p>
<p>These years are the subject of Joanna Lillis’s book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350292468">Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan </a>(Bloomsbury, 2025). Lillis tells the stories of both the Karimov and Mirziryoyev regimes, based on many conversations with activists, journalists, and other opposition leaders in the country.</p>
<p>Joanna Lillis is a Kazakhstan-based journalist and author writing about Central Asia who has lived and worked in the region since 2001, in Uzbekistan (2001-2005) and Kazakhstan (since 2005). Her reporting has featured in outlets including <em>The Economist,</em> <em>the Guardian, the Independent,</em> the <em>Eurasianet </em>website and <em>Foreign Policy</em> and <em>POLITICO </em>magazines. Prior to moving to Central Asia, she lived in Russia and worked for BBC Monitoring, the BBC World Service’s global media tracking service. She is also the author of <em>Dark Shadows: Inside the Secret World of Kazakhstan</em> (Bloomsbury: 2019).</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/silk-mirage-through-the-looking-glass-in-uzbekistan-by-joanna-lillis/"><em>Silk Mirage</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In September 2016, Islam Karimov–the first president of a post-Soviet Uzbekistan–died, at age 78. His death ended an oppressive dictatorship that had governed the Central Asian country for decades, which led to corruption, environmental damage, and political repression. Karimov was replaced with Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who instituted a tentative program of reforms.</p>
<p>These years are the subject of Joanna Lillis’s book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350292468">Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan </a>(Bloomsbury, 2025). Lillis tells the stories of both the Karimov and Mirziryoyev regimes, based on many conversations with activists, journalists, and other opposition leaders in the country.</p>
<p>Joanna Lillis is a Kazakhstan-based journalist and author writing about Central Asia who has lived and worked in the region since 2001, in Uzbekistan (2001-2005) and Kazakhstan (since 2005). Her reporting has featured in outlets including <em>The Economist,</em> <em>the Guardian, the Independent,</em> the <em>Eurasianet </em>website and <em>Foreign Policy</em> and <em>POLITICO </em>magazines. Prior to moving to Central Asia, she lived in Russia and worked for BBC Monitoring, the BBC World Service’s global media tracking service. She is also the author of <em>Dark Shadows: Inside the Secret World of Kazakhstan</em> (Bloomsbury: 2019).</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/silk-mirage-through-the-looking-glass-in-uzbekistan-by-joanna-lillis/"><em>Silk Mirage</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45428778" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fdfc78f6-0a8f-46f1-8d4c-92d727bb84b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fdfc78f6-0a8f-46f1-8d4c-92d727bb84b8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Lillis, &quot;Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In September 2016, Islam Karimov–the first president of a post-Soviet Uzbekistan–died, at age 78. His death ended an oppressive dictatorship that had governed the Central Asian country for decades, which led to corruption, environmental damage, and political repression. Karimov was replaced with Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who instituted a tentative program of reforms.

These years are the subject of Joanna Lillis’s book, Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan (Bloomsbury, 2025). Lillis tells the stories of both the Karimov and Mirziryoyev regimes, based on many conversations with activists, journalists, and other opposition leaders in the country.

Joanna Lillis is a Kazakhstan-based journalist and author writing about Central Asia who has lived and worked in the region since 2001, in Uzbekistan (2001-2005) and Kazakhstan (since 2005). Her reporting has featured in outlets including The Economist, the Guardian, the Independent, the Eurasianet website and Foreign Policy and POLITICO magazines. Prior to moving to Central Asia, she lived in Russia and worked for BBC Monitoring, the BBC World Service’s global media tracking service. She is also the author of Dark Shadows: Inside the Secret World of Kazakhstan (Bloomsbury: 2019).

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Silk Mirage. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at@nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In September 2016, Islam Karimov–the first president of a post-Soviet Uzbekistan–died, at age 78. His death ended an oppressive dictatorship that had governed the Central Asian country for decades, which led to corruption, environmental damage, and political repression. Karimov was replaced with Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who instituted a tentative program of reforms.

These years are the subject of Joanna Lillis’s book, Silk Mirage: Through the Looking Glass in Uzbekistan (Bloomsbury, 2025). Lillis tells the stories of both the Karimov and Mirziryoyev regimes, based on many conversations with activists, journalists, and other opposition leaders in the country.

Joanna Lillis is a Kazakhstan-based journalist and author writing about Central Asia who has lived and worked in the region since 2001, in Uzbekistan (2001-2005) and Kazakhstan (since 2005). Her reporting has featured in outlets including The Economist, the Guardian, the Independent, the Eurasianet website and Foreign Policy and POLITICO magazines. Prior to moving to Central Asia, she lived in Russia and worked for BBC Monitoring, the BBC World Service’s global media tracking service. She is also the author of Dark Shadows: Inside the Secret World of Kazakhstan (Bloomsbury: 2019).

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Silk Mirage. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at@nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>828</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7d006ecc-0c4d-11f1-9c64-13c3711413f7</guid>
      <title>Kenneth Lowande, &quot;False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a></p>
<p>The University of Chicago Press, 2024</p>
<p>Kenneth Lowande</p>
<p>Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>, examining the ways in which presidents <em><strong>seem</strong></em> to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.</p>
<p>This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.</p>
<p>Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a> essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a></p>
<p>The University of Chicago Press, 2024</p>
<p>Kenneth Lowande</p>
<p>Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a>, examining the ways in which presidents <em><strong>seem</strong></em> to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.</p>
<p>This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.</p>
<p>Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo238640940.html"><em>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age</em></a> essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40339213" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5b0f1d06-017b-4921-9b27-0510f1e5328b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5b0f1d06-017b-4921-9b27-0510f1e5328b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kenneth Lowande, &quot;False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age

The University of Chicago Press, 2024

Kenneth Lowande

Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age, examining the ways in which presidents seem to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.

This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.

Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age

The University of Chicago Press, 2024

Kenneth Lowande

Political Scientist Kenneth Lowande (University of Michigan) has a new book, False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age, examining the ways in which presidents seem to be using their extraordinary powers (of the office itself) but are often holding back so as to avoid the full implementation of policies and ideas. This is an interesting thesis, since it takes apart the ways in which presidents operate, getting at not only the presentation of presidential power and the rhetoric used by presidents to illuminate their powers, but also where the full capacity of the Executive branch may not be put into action around issues, policies, or ideas. Lowande is assessing what is essentially symbolic, especially for the president, but is not substantive, even if it may seem that way.

This concept, this “false front”, comes out of the polarization within the American political system, and the difficulty that presidents also have in trying to accomplish policy shifts and changes. This is also in context of a Congress that has ceded significant power to the Executive and is generally less productive in terms of passing and implementing policy than it was in the past. This is then combined with the adjustments that presidents and presidential candidates have made in the way they approach the campaign and then their work while in office, since they are compelled to construct their own “brand” as a means to getting elected. Once in office, presidents then need to perform in some way that convinces the public that they are trying to execute what they promised while on the campaign trail. But the political climate makes those outcomes extraordinarily difficult. So, presidents have constructed this path where they publicly lean into policy areas, making public statements, having ceremonies and press releases, taking executive actions, or signing Executive Orders to illustrate their commitment and their activity, but when these policy areas are examined in some depth, it turns out that not much happened after all of this attention and apparent action.

Lowande notes, in our conversation, how once he had zeroed in on this presidential mode of operating it is very difficult not to see it. This becomes a kind of model of presidential behavior and strategic approaches. False Front: The Failed Promise of Presidential Power in a Polarized Age essentially interrogates the founding basis for the American presidency, where Alexander Hamilton argued that the president is to be held accountable and responsible for the actions taken in the office itself. The media plays a role in this as well, since they report on the actions taken by the president—at least in terms of rhetoric, press releases, signing ceremonies, and executive actions—but there is no follow on analysis, for the most part, of the actual implementation of the policies and the plans. If there is no measurable outcome to distinguish how the policy solved the problem, or satisfied the demand for the policy, then the presidential action or rhetoric is disconnected from any particular policy or public good. This is also at odds with the reason for a democratic republic—where the demands of the voters are to be translated into real outcomes, not imaginary ones.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>827</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f10a760-0c42-11f1-836a-23e92af146c5</guid>
      <title>Thomas Zeitzoff, &quot;No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, <em>No Option But Sabotage</em> explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.</p>
<p>After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven't more radical tactics re-emerged?</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197796849">No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for "monkeywrenching;" the "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven't activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?</p>
<p>Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.</p>
<p>Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, <em>No Option But Sabotage</em> explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.</p>
<p>After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven't more radical tactics re-emerged?</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197796849">No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for "monkeywrenching;" the "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven't activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?</p>
<p>Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.</p>
<p>Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56265038" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/33bbd25b-5a13-4108-96ec-a3bf9c27bd73/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=33bbd25b-5a13-4108-96ec-a3bf9c27bd73&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Zeitzoff, &quot;No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, No Option But Sabotage explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.

After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven&apos;t more radical tactics re-emerged?

In No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis (Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for &quot;monkeywrenching;&quot; the &quot;Unabomber&quot; Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven&apos;t activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?

Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.

Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An authoritative history of the radical environmental movement in the United States, No Option But Sabotage explores how far activists are willing to go to defend the planet in the face of repression and the escalating climate crisis.

After 9/11, the radical environmental movement was considered the number one domestic terror threat by the U.S. government. But by the end of the decade the movement had largely gone silent. What happened? And given the threat from climate, why haven&apos;t more radical tactics re-emerged?

In No Option But Sabotage: The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis (Oxford University Press, 2026), Thomas Zeitzoff traces the origins, rise, fall, and potential rise again of the movement. Using in-depth interviews with past and current activists, as well as experts, Zeitzoff covers the main factions and actors. These include: Earth First! and its early advocacy for &quot;monkeywrenching;&quot; the &quot;Unabomber&quot; Ted Kaczynski and his years-long anti-technology bombing campaign; the connections between animal liberation, punk, and the emergence of the Earth Liberation Front and its arson campaign; and more recent climate activists and their use of disruptive tactics. Along with providing a comprehensive overview of the movement and its various sub-movements that emerged over time, Zeitzoff also asks the bigger question-given the scope and threat from climate change why haven&apos;t activists escalated their tactics? Property destruction, sabotage, and even arson were once regular features of the movement in the 1990s and early 2000s--will activists use them again, or will they stick to non-violence? Will the threat of increasing state repression scare activists, or radicalize them?

Not just a history of a major extremist movement, this book tells the story of radical environmentalism and highlights how activists are confronting the dual threats of climate change and repression, and asking themselves how far they are willing to go to protect the planet.

Thomas Zeitzoff is a professor in the School of Public Affairs at American University. His research focuses on political violence, social media, and political psychology.

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>826</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db756808-0b04-11f1-8132-4bc656fe16ea</guid>
      <title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58363603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a894bf43-33de-4289-a2fa-d4226644fdca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a894bf43-33de-4289-a2fa-d4226644fdca&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>825</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce3cec5a-0b00-11f1-94f7-7fc1fce974b2</guid>
      <title>Lisa Björkman, &quot;Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/bjorkman-9781452975733"><em>Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai</em></a> (U Minnesota Press, 2025), Lisa Björkman invites our attention to political form and how they allow us to appreciate the various mediums through which representation is negotiated.</p>
<p>Drawing on a decade of research in the city of Mumbai closely following the movements of corporation election candidates, protesting crowds, political rally organisers, and social workers, the book maps the linguistic, visual, sonic, and semiotic tools used to construct the spectacle of democracy. It asks: how does the figure of the crowd subvert what euromodern conceptions of political representation? How do films and their constructions of the public, the organising of rallies, election season cash flows, garlanding, placards and slogans in protests inform new meanings of representation? Through this richly engaging and genre-breaking work, Bjorkman offers new ways – originating from Mumbai – to explain the reorganisation of political authority around the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://louisville.edu/asiandemocracy/research/lisa-bjorkman-phd"><em>Lisa Björkman</em></a><em> is an Associate Professor in Urban and Public Affairs at the University of Louisville. She is the author of Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai, Waiting Town: Life in Transit and Mumbai’s Other World-Class Histories, and Bombay Brokers. Lisa is also a research associate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a> <em>is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.</em> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/bjorkman-9781452975733"><em>Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai</em></a> (U Minnesota Press, 2025), Lisa Björkman invites our attention to political form and how they allow us to appreciate the various mediums through which representation is negotiated.</p>
<p>Drawing on a decade of research in the city of Mumbai closely following the movements of corporation election candidates, protesting crowds, political rally organisers, and social workers, the book maps the linguistic, visual, sonic, and semiotic tools used to construct the spectacle of democracy. It asks: how does the figure of the crowd subvert what euromodern conceptions of political representation? How do films and their constructions of the public, the organising of rallies, election season cash flows, garlanding, placards and slogans in protests inform new meanings of representation? Through this richly engaging and genre-breaking work, Bjorkman offers new ways – originating from Mumbai – to explain the reorganisation of political authority around the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://louisville.edu/asiandemocracy/research/lisa-bjorkman-phd"><em>Lisa Björkman</em></a><em> is an Associate Professor in Urban and Public Affairs at the University of Louisville. She is the author of Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai, Waiting Town: Life in Transit and Mumbai’s Other World-Class Histories, and Bombay Brokers. Lisa is also a research associate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a> <em>is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.</em> <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74596413" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6ab85e01-cc4d-48af-ab65-17c6f9808217/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6ab85e01-cc4d-48af-ab65-17c6f9808217&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Björkman, &quot;Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai (U Minnesota Press, 2025), Lisa Björkman invites our attention to political form and how they allow us to appreciate the various mediums through which representation is negotiated.

Drawing on a decade of research in the city of Mumbai closely following the movements of corporation election candidates, protesting crowds, political rally organisers, and social workers, the book maps the linguistic, visual, sonic, and semiotic tools used to construct the spectacle of democracy. It asks: how does the figure of the crowd subvert what euromodern conceptions of political representation? How do films and their constructions of the public, the organising of rallies, election season cash flows, garlanding, placards and slogans in protests inform new meanings of representation? Through this richly engaging and genre-breaking work, Bjorkman offers new ways – originating from Mumbai – to explain the reorganisation of political authority around the world.

Lisa Björkman is an Associate Professor in Urban and Public Affairs at the University of Louisville. She is the author of Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai, Waiting Town: Life in Transit and Mumbai’s Other World-Class Histories, and Bombay Brokers. Lisa is also a research associate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle.

Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Drama of Democracy: Political Representation in Mumbai (U Minnesota Press, 2025), Lisa Björkman invites our attention to political form and how they allow us to appreciate the various mediums through which representation is negotiated.

Drawing on a decade of research in the city of Mumbai closely following the movements of corporation election candidates, protesting crowds, political rally organisers, and social workers, the book maps the linguistic, visual, sonic, and semiotic tools used to construct the spectacle of democracy. It asks: how does the figure of the crowd subvert what euromodern conceptions of political representation? How do films and their constructions of the public, the organising of rallies, election season cash flows, garlanding, placards and slogans in protests inform new meanings of representation? Through this richly engaging and genre-breaking work, Bjorkman offers new ways – originating from Mumbai – to explain the reorganisation of political authority around the world.

Lisa Björkman is an Associate Professor in Urban and Public Affairs at the University of Louisville. She is the author of Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai, Waiting Town: Life in Transit and Mumbai’s Other World-Class Histories, and Bombay Brokers. Lisa is also a research associate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle.

Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>824</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e2e093a-0aab-11f1-b66c-4ff8d21c5887</guid>
      <title>Alexis Lerner, &quot;Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487525422">Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States</a> (University of Toronto Press, 2025) is an empirically grounded ethnographic study of how graffiti and street art can be used as a political tool to circumvent censorship, express grievances, and control public discourse, particularly in authoritarian states.</p>
<p>For more than a decade, Dr. Alexis M. Lerner combed the alleyways, underpasses, and public squares of cities once under communist rule, from Berlin in the west to Vladivostok in the east, recording thousands of cases of critical and satirical political street art and cataloging these artworks linguistically and thematically across space and time. Complemented by first-hand interviews with leading artists, activists, and politicians from across the region, <em>Post-Soviet Graffiti</em> provides theoretical reflection on public space as a site for political action, a semiotic reading of signs and symbols, and street art as a form of text.</p>
<p>The book answers the question of how we conceptualize avenues of dissent under authoritarian rule by showing how contemporary graffiti functions not only as a popular public aesthetic, but also as a mouthpiece of political sentiment, especially within the post-Soviet region and post-communist Europe. A purposefully anonymous and accessible artform, graffiti is an effective tool for circumventing censorship and expressing political views. This is especially true for marginalized populations and for those living in otherwise closed and censored states.</p>
<p><em>Post-Soviet Graffiti</em> reveals that graffiti does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it can be read as a narrative about a place, the people who live there, and the things that matter to them.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487525422">Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States</a> (University of Toronto Press, 2025) is an empirically grounded ethnographic study of how graffiti and street art can be used as a political tool to circumvent censorship, express grievances, and control public discourse, particularly in authoritarian states.</p>
<p>For more than a decade, Dr. Alexis M. Lerner combed the alleyways, underpasses, and public squares of cities once under communist rule, from Berlin in the west to Vladivostok in the east, recording thousands of cases of critical and satirical political street art and cataloging these artworks linguistically and thematically across space and time. Complemented by first-hand interviews with leading artists, activists, and politicians from across the region, <em>Post-Soviet Graffiti</em> provides theoretical reflection on public space as a site for political action, a semiotic reading of signs and symbols, and street art as a form of text.</p>
<p>The book answers the question of how we conceptualize avenues of dissent under authoritarian rule by showing how contemporary graffiti functions not only as a popular public aesthetic, but also as a mouthpiece of political sentiment, especially within the post-Soviet region and post-communist Europe. A purposefully anonymous and accessible artform, graffiti is an effective tool for circumventing censorship and expressing political views. This is especially true for marginalized populations and for those living in otherwise closed and censored states.</p>
<p><em>Post-Soviet Graffiti</em> reveals that graffiti does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it can be read as a narrative about a place, the people who live there, and the things that matter to them.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43279982" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8714331a-ec62-4f74-94e2-02c4e5e75a39/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8714331a-ec62-4f74-94e2-02c4e5e75a39&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexis Lerner, &quot;Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States (University of Toronto Press, 2025) is an empirically grounded ethnographic study of how graffiti and street art can be used as a political tool to circumvent censorship, express grievances, and control public discourse, particularly in authoritarian states.

For more than a decade, Dr. Alexis M. Lerner combed the alleyways, underpasses, and public squares of cities once under communist rule, from Berlin in the west to Vladivostok in the east, recording thousands of cases of critical and satirical political street art and cataloging these artworks linguistically and thematically across space and time. Complemented by first-hand interviews with leading artists, activists, and politicians from across the region, Post-Soviet Graffiti provides theoretical reflection on public space as a site for political action, a semiotic reading of signs and symbols, and street art as a form of text.

The book answers the question of how we conceptualize avenues of dissent under authoritarian rule by showing how contemporary graffiti functions not only as a popular public aesthetic, but also as a mouthpiece of political sentiment, especially within the post-Soviet region and post-communist Europe. A purposefully anonymous and accessible artform, graffiti is an effective tool for circumventing censorship and expressing political views. This is especially true for marginalized populations and for those living in otherwise closed and censored states.

Post-Soviet Graffiti reveals that graffiti does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it can be read as a narrative about a place, the people who live there, and the things that matter to them.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Post-Soviet Graffiti: Free Speech in Authoritarian States (University of Toronto Press, 2025) is an empirically grounded ethnographic study of how graffiti and street art can be used as a political tool to circumvent censorship, express grievances, and control public discourse, particularly in authoritarian states.

For more than a decade, Dr. Alexis M. Lerner combed the alleyways, underpasses, and public squares of cities once under communist rule, from Berlin in the west to Vladivostok in the east, recording thousands of cases of critical and satirical political street art and cataloging these artworks linguistically and thematically across space and time. Complemented by first-hand interviews with leading artists, activists, and politicians from across the region, Post-Soviet Graffiti provides theoretical reflection on public space as a site for political action, a semiotic reading of signs and symbols, and street art as a form of text.

The book answers the question of how we conceptualize avenues of dissent under authoritarian rule by showing how contemporary graffiti functions not only as a popular public aesthetic, but also as a mouthpiece of political sentiment, especially within the post-Soviet region and post-communist Europe. A purposefully anonymous and accessible artform, graffiti is an effective tool for circumventing censorship and expressing political views. This is especially true for marginalized populations and for those living in otherwise closed and censored states.

Post-Soviet Graffiti reveals that graffiti does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it can be read as a narrative about a place, the people who live there, and the things that matter to them.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>823</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f0c1440-08a4-11f1-82a2-a7b5c00a406e</guid>
      <title>How Corporate Lobbyists are Capturing EU Institutions</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Brussels is full of lobbyists. Over decades, big companies have been using their financial might not only to influence EU policies but even to shape how EU institutions are designed and what their key goals are. Host Licia Cianetti talks to Kenneth Haar, who for almost two decades has been conducting research on corporate lobbying in the EU for Corporate Europe Observatory. Kenneth explains how corporate lobbying works, what lobbyists want, and how a sketchily defined “competitiveness” agenda is driving a far-reaching deregulation drive by the European Commission, which endangers hard fought for environmental, social, health, and labour protections. ﻿</p>
<p>Guest: ﻿Kenneth Haar is a researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). His freely downloadable book, <a href="https://www.rosalux.de/en/publication/id/53961/a-europe-of-capital"><em>A Europe of Capital</em></a><em>, </em>details how corporate lobbyists got to the core of the European project. Corporate Europe Observatory is an advocacy and investigative research group. Their many reports, articles, and infographics on corporate lobbying in the EU are available on the <a href="https://corporateeurope.org/en">CEO website</a>. You can download their alternative tourist guide to Bussels here: “<a href="https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/lp_brussels_report_v7-spreads-lo.pdf">Lobby Planet – Brussels</a>”. CEO’s podcast <a href="https://corporateeurope.org/en/blog/EU-watchdog-radio">EU Watchdog Radio</a> is also highly recommended!</p>
<p>Presenter: <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brussels is full of lobbyists. Over decades, big companies have been using their financial might not only to influence EU policies but even to shape how EU institutions are designed and what their key goals are. Host Licia Cianetti talks to Kenneth Haar, who for almost two decades has been conducting research on corporate lobbying in the EU for Corporate Europe Observatory. Kenneth explains how corporate lobbying works, what lobbyists want, and how a sketchily defined “competitiveness” agenda is driving a far-reaching deregulation drive by the European Commission, which endangers hard fought for environmental, social, health, and labour protections. ﻿</p>
<p>Guest: ﻿Kenneth Haar is a researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). His freely downloadable book, <a href="https://www.rosalux.de/en/publication/id/53961/a-europe-of-capital"><em>A Europe of Capital</em></a><em>, </em>details how corporate lobbyists got to the core of the European project. Corporate Europe Observatory is an advocacy and investigative research group. Their many reports, articles, and infographics on corporate lobbying in the EU are available on the <a href="https://corporateeurope.org/en">CEO website</a>. You can download their alternative tourist guide to Bussels here: “<a href="https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/lp_brussels_report_v7-spreads-lo.pdf">Lobby Planet – Brussels</a>”. CEO’s podcast <a href="https://corporateeurope.org/en/blog/EU-watchdog-radio">EU Watchdog Radio</a> is also highly recommended!</p>
<p>Presenter: <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia">Licia Cianetti</a> is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a> based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32315213" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8af8782e-ef3b-4633-ab9e-fe5aa6651338/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8af8782e-ef3b-4633-ab9e-fe5aa6651338&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Corporate Lobbyists are Capturing EU Institutions</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Brussels is full of lobbyists. Over decades, big companies have been using their financial might not only to influence EU policies but even to shape how EU institutions are designed and what their key goals are. Host Licia Cianetti talks to Kenneth Haar, who for almost two decades has been conducting research on corporate lobbying in the EU for Corporate Europe Observatory. Kenneth explains how corporate lobbying works, what lobbyists want, and how a sketchily defined “competitiveness” agenda is driving a far-reaching deregulation drive by the European Commission, which endangers hard fought for environmental, social, health, and labour protections. ﻿

Guest: ﻿Kenneth Haar is a researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). His freely downloadable book, A Europe of Capital, details how corporate lobbyists got to the core of the European project. Corporate Europe Observatory is an advocacy and investigative research group. Their many reports, articles, and infographics on corporate lobbying in the EU are available on the CEO website. You can download their alternative tourist guide to Bussels here: “Lobby Planet – Brussels”. CEO’s podcast EU Watchdog Radio is also highly recommended!

Presenter: Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Brussels is full of lobbyists. Over decades, big companies have been using their financial might not only to influence EU policies but even to shape how EU institutions are designed and what their key goals are. Host Licia Cianetti talks to Kenneth Haar, who for almost two decades has been conducting research on corporate lobbying in the EU for Corporate Europe Observatory. Kenneth explains how corporate lobbying works, what lobbyists want, and how a sketchily defined “competitiveness” agenda is driving a far-reaching deregulation drive by the European Commission, which endangers hard fought for environmental, social, health, and labour protections. ﻿

Guest: ﻿Kenneth Haar is a researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). His freely downloadable book, A Europe of Capital, details how corporate lobbyists got to the core of the European project. Corporate Europe Observatory is an advocacy and investigative research group. Their many reports, articles, and infographics on corporate lobbying in the EU are available on the CEO website. You can download their alternative tourist guide to Bussels here: “Lobby Planet – Brussels”. CEO’s podcast EU Watchdog Radio is also highly recommended!

Presenter: Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>822</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a9062780-0899-11f1-b5c2-dbe1fe50c15b</guid>
      <title>Nadine Gordimer: “Living in South Africa’s Interregnum” James Lecture, October 14, 1982</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode from the Vault, we revisit Nadine Gordimer’s James Lecture on the political landscape of South Africa, presented at the New York Institute for the Humanities on October 14, 1982.</p>
<p>In 1982, resistance to South Africa’s apartheid was growing increasingly militant, and the state’s brutal repression heightened this tension.</p>
<p>In her lecture, Gordimer speaks directly to this political landscape, describing the period as an “interregnum." She discusses the crisis of white identity in South Africa, the relationship between art and politics, the urgency for an alternative political left working toward what she calls a democracy without economic and military terror.</p>
<p>This lecture was the basis of Gordimer’s essay<a href="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1983/01/20/living-in-the-interregnum/"> “Living in the Interregnum,”</a> published in the New York Review of Books in January of 1983.</p>
<p>Nadine Gordimer was a South African writer and political activist. She authored fifteen novels, including <em>The Conversationalist</em>, <em>Burger’s Daughter</em> and <em>July’s People</em>, over two hundred short stories, and several volumes of essays. She was awarded the Booker prize for the <em>Conversationalist </em>in 1974 and the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1991. She died in 2014 at the age of 90 in Johannesburg, South Africa.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today’s episode from the Vault, we revisit Nadine Gordimer’s James Lecture on the political landscape of South Africa, presented at the New York Institute for the Humanities on October 14, 1982.</p>
<p>In 1982, resistance to South Africa’s apartheid was growing increasingly militant, and the state’s brutal repression heightened this tension.</p>
<p>In her lecture, Gordimer speaks directly to this political landscape, describing the period as an “interregnum." She discusses the crisis of white identity in South Africa, the relationship between art and politics, the urgency for an alternative political left working toward what she calls a democracy without economic and military terror.</p>
<p>This lecture was the basis of Gordimer’s essay<a href="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1983/01/20/living-in-the-interregnum/"> “Living in the Interregnum,”</a> published in the New York Review of Books in January of 1983.</p>
<p>Nadine Gordimer was a South African writer and political activist. She authored fifteen novels, including <em>The Conversationalist</em>, <em>Burger’s Daughter</em> and <em>July’s People</em>, over two hundred short stories, and several volumes of essays. She was awarded the Booker prize for the <em>Conversationalist </em>in 1974 and the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1991. She died in 2014 at the age of 90 in Johannesburg, South Africa.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63243499" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/049b245a-bf3e-4f88-8726-83375d22603f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=049b245a-bf3e-4f88-8726-83375d22603f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nadine Gordimer: “Living in South Africa’s Interregnum” James Lecture, October 14, 1982</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today’s episode from the Vault, we revisit Nadine Gordimer’s James Lecture on the political landscape of South Africa, presented at the New York Institute for the Humanities on October 14, 1982.

In 1982, resistance to South Africa’s apartheid was growing increasingly militant, and the state’s brutal repression heightened this tension.

In her lecture, Gordimer speaks directly to this political landscape, describing the period as an “interregnum.&quot; She discusses the crisis of white identity in South Africa, the relationship between art and politics, the urgency for an alternative political left working toward what she calls a democracy without economic and military terror.

This lecture was the basis of Gordimer’s essay “Living in the Interregnum,” published in the New York Review of Books in January of 1983.

Nadine Gordimer was a South African writer and political activist. She authored fifteen novels, including The Conversationalist, Burger’s Daughter and July’s People, over two hundred short stories, and several volumes of essays. She was awarded the Booker prize for the Conversationalist in 1974 and the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1991. She died in 2014 at the age of 90 in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today’s episode from the Vault, we revisit Nadine Gordimer’s James Lecture on the political landscape of South Africa, presented at the New York Institute for the Humanities on October 14, 1982.

In 1982, resistance to South Africa’s apartheid was growing increasingly militant, and the state’s brutal repression heightened this tension.

In her lecture, Gordimer speaks directly to this political landscape, describing the period as an “interregnum.&quot; She discusses the crisis of white identity in South Africa, the relationship between art and politics, the urgency for an alternative political left working toward what she calls a democracy without economic and military terror.

This lecture was the basis of Gordimer’s essay “Living in the Interregnum,” published in the New York Review of Books in January of 1983.

Nadine Gordimer was a South African writer and political activist. She authored fifteen novels, including The Conversationalist, Burger’s Daughter and July’s People, over two hundred short stories, and several volumes of essays. She was awarded the Booker prize for the Conversationalist in 1974 and the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1991. She died in 2014 at the age of 90 in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>821</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98ba14aa-0898-11f1-bb79-5ff4b466a8af</guid>
      <title>Himanshu Prabha Ray ed., &quot;Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032829456">Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections</a> (Routledge, 2026) assesses the impact of European colonization in the late 19th and early 20th century in ‘restructuring’ the shared past of India and Southeast Asia. It provides case studies that transcend colonial constructs and adopt newer approaches to understanding the shared past. The authors explore these developments through the lens of political figures like Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964) and re-examine themes such as the Greater India Society (1926–1959) established in Calcutta, and the role of Buddhism in post-World War II connections, as the repatriation of the mortal remains of Japanese soldiers killed in Burma (Myanmar) acquired urgency.</p>
<p>Drawing on a diverse range of sources including archaeology, Buddhist texts, the afterlives of the Hindu temples, maritime networks, and inscriptions from Vietnam and central India, the book will be an essential read for scholars and researchers of history, Buddhism, archaeology, heritage studies, cultural studies, and political history as well as South and Southeast Asian history.</p>
<p>Guest: ﻿<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Himanshu%20Prabha%20Ray">Himanshu Prabha Ray</a></p>
<p>Interviewer: Natali Pearson﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032829456">Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections</a> (Routledge, 2026) assesses the impact of European colonization in the late 19th and early 20th century in ‘restructuring’ the shared past of India and Southeast Asia. It provides case studies that transcend colonial constructs and adopt newer approaches to understanding the shared past. The authors explore these developments through the lens of political figures like Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964) and re-examine themes such as the Greater India Society (1926–1959) established in Calcutta, and the role of Buddhism in post-World War II connections, as the repatriation of the mortal remains of Japanese soldiers killed in Burma (Myanmar) acquired urgency.</p>
<p>Drawing on a diverse range of sources including archaeology, Buddhist texts, the afterlives of the Hindu temples, maritime networks, and inscriptions from Vietnam and central India, the book will be an essential read for scholars and researchers of history, Buddhism, archaeology, heritage studies, cultural studies, and political history as well as South and Southeast Asian history.</p>
<p>Guest: ﻿<a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Himanshu%20Prabha%20Ray">Himanshu Prabha Ray</a></p>
<p>Interviewer: Natali Pearson﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58170292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/79cd8f1c-90fe-409b-8c38-19a01d27dc2f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=79cd8f1c-90fe-409b-8c38-19a01d27dc2f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Himanshu Prabha Ray ed., &quot;Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections&quot; (Routledge, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections (Routledge, 2026) assesses the impact of European colonization in the late 19th and early 20th century in ‘restructuring’ the shared past of India and Southeast Asia. It provides case studies that transcend colonial constructs and adopt newer approaches to understanding the shared past. The authors explore these developments through the lens of political figures like Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964) and re-examine themes such as the Greater India Society (1926–1959) established in Calcutta, and the role of Buddhism in post-World War II connections, as the repatriation of the mortal remains of Japanese soldiers killed in Burma (Myanmar) acquired urgency.

Drawing on a diverse range of sources including archaeology, Buddhist texts, the afterlives of the Hindu temples, maritime networks, and inscriptions from Vietnam and central India, the book will be an essential read for scholars and researchers of history, Buddhism, archaeology, heritage studies, cultural studies, and political history as well as South and Southeast Asian history.

Guest: ﻿Himanshu Prabha Ray

Interviewer: Natali Pearson﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recentering Southeast Asia: Politics, Religion and Maritime Connections (Routledge, 2026) assesses the impact of European colonization in the late 19th and early 20th century in ‘restructuring’ the shared past of India and Southeast Asia. It provides case studies that transcend colonial constructs and adopt newer approaches to understanding the shared past. The authors explore these developments through the lens of political figures like Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964) and re-examine themes such as the Greater India Society (1926–1959) established in Calcutta, and the role of Buddhism in post-World War II connections, as the repatriation of the mortal remains of Japanese soldiers killed in Burma (Myanmar) acquired urgency.

Drawing on a diverse range of sources including archaeology, Buddhist texts, the afterlives of the Hindu temples, maritime networks, and inscriptions from Vietnam and central India, the book will be an essential read for scholars and researchers of history, Buddhism, archaeology, heritage studies, cultural studies, and political history as well as South and Southeast Asian history.

Guest: ﻿Himanshu Prabha Ray

Interviewer: Natali Pearson﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>820</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0dd50150-089e-11f1-a2da-7752d0bd3f84</guid>
      <title>India’s Democratic Republic in Flux</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Democracy Dialogues, co-host Maya Tudor speaks with Yogendra Yadav – political thinker, activist, and one of India’s most prominent voices on democratic reform. A former academic and party leader, Yadav has led influential research initiatives, built new political movements, and worked at the intersection of grassroots activism and national politics.</p>
<p>Their conversation explores the forces shaping India’s current democratic crossroads. Yadav reflects on global perceptions of India’s democratic decline, the meaning of its 2024 election results, and the interplay between national and state-level politics. He addresses the erosion of institutional independence – from the electoral commission to the media – and the growing impact of religious polarization on governance.</p>
<p>Drawing on decades of experience in social movements, Yadav considers what drives political mobilization, the role nationalism plays in supporting or undermining democracy, and the strategies citizens can use to protect democratic values in turbulent times.</p>
<p>From the “thousand small cuts” undermining India’s democracy to the enduring potential of grassroots activism, this episode offers both a candid diagnosis of India’s political challenges and a call to action for anyone committed to safeguarding democratic principles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Democracy Dialogues, co-host Maya Tudor speaks with Yogendra Yadav – political thinker, activist, and one of India’s most prominent voices on democratic reform. A former academic and party leader, Yadav has led influential research initiatives, built new political movements, and worked at the intersection of grassroots activism and national politics.</p>
<p>Their conversation explores the forces shaping India’s current democratic crossroads. Yadav reflects on global perceptions of India’s democratic decline, the meaning of its 2024 election results, and the interplay between national and state-level politics. He addresses the erosion of institutional independence – from the electoral commission to the media – and the growing impact of religious polarization on governance.</p>
<p>Drawing on decades of experience in social movements, Yadav considers what drives political mobilization, the role nationalism plays in supporting or undermining democracy, and the strategies citizens can use to protect democratic values in turbulent times.</p>
<p>From the “thousand small cuts” undermining India’s democracy to the enduring potential of grassroots activism, this episode offers both a candid diagnosis of India’s political challenges and a call to action for anyone committed to safeguarding democratic principles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40643393" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/98dc347f-5aa4-4ab5-9246-32a60829c827/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=98dc347f-5aa4-4ab5-9246-32a60829c827&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>India’s Democratic Republic in Flux</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Democracy Dialogues, co-host Maya Tudor speaks with Yogendra Yadav – political thinker, activist, and one of India’s most prominent voices on democratic reform. A former academic and party leader, Yadav has led influential research initiatives, built new political movements, and worked at the intersection of grassroots activism and national politics.

Their conversation explores the forces shaping India’s current democratic crossroads. Yadav reflects on global perceptions of India’s democratic decline, the meaning of its 2024 election results, and the interplay between national and state-level politics. He addresses the erosion of institutional independence – from the electoral commission to the media – and the growing impact of religious polarization on governance.

Drawing on decades of experience in social movements, Yadav considers what drives political mobilization, the role nationalism plays in supporting or undermining democracy, and the strategies citizens can use to protect democratic values in turbulent times.

From the “thousand small cuts” undermining India’s democracy to the enduring potential of grassroots activism, this episode offers both a candid diagnosis of India’s political challenges and a call to action for anyone committed to safeguarding democratic principles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Democracy Dialogues, co-host Maya Tudor speaks with Yogendra Yadav – political thinker, activist, and one of India’s most prominent voices on democratic reform. A former academic and party leader, Yadav has led influential research initiatives, built new political movements, and worked at the intersection of grassroots activism and national politics.

Their conversation explores the forces shaping India’s current democratic crossroads. Yadav reflects on global perceptions of India’s democratic decline, the meaning of its 2024 election results, and the interplay between national and state-level politics. He addresses the erosion of institutional independence – from the electoral commission to the media – and the growing impact of religious polarization on governance.

Drawing on decades of experience in social movements, Yadav considers what drives political mobilization, the role nationalism plays in supporting or undermining democracy, and the strategies citizens can use to protect democratic values in turbulent times.

From the “thousand small cuts” undermining India’s democracy to the enduring potential of grassroots activism, this episode offers both a candid diagnosis of India’s political challenges and a call to action for anyone committed to safeguarding democratic principles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>819</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08cb3f1a-07d3-11f1-8545-13a0fc3b07c1</guid>
      <title>Competing Visions for International Order</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032912714">Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation</a> (Routledge, 2025) edited by <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Ville%20Sinkkonen">Ville Sinkkonen</a>, <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Veera%20Laine">Veera Laine</a>, <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Matti%20Puranen">Matti Puranen</a> addresses the ultimate question.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to <a href="https://fiia.fi/henkilo/ville-sinkkonen">Ville Sinkkonen</a> (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and <a href="https://fiia.fi/sv/person/bart-gaens">Bart Gaens</a> (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003562306/competing-visions-international-order-veera-laine-matti-puranen-ville-sinkkonen">concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book</a>.</p>
<p>The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.</p>
<p>This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032912714">Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation</a> (Routledge, 2025) edited by <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Ville%20Sinkkonen">Ville Sinkkonen</a>, <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Veera%20Laine">Veera Laine</a>, <a href="https://www.routledge.com/search?author=Matti%20Puranen">Matti Puranen</a> addresses the ultimate question.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to <a href="https://fiia.fi/henkilo/ville-sinkkonen">Ville Sinkkonen</a> (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and <a href="https://fiia.fi/sv/person/bart-gaens">Bart Gaens</a> (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003562306/competing-visions-international-order-veera-laine-matti-puranen-ville-sinkkonen">concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book</a>.</p>
<p>The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.</p>
<p>This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).</p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).</p>
<p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27761048" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4a7b2c75-7de5-4d18-ad67-3b8e869679db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4a7b2c75-7de5-4d18-ad67-3b8e869679db&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Competing Visions for International Order</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation (Routledge, 2025) edited by Ville Sinkkonen, Veera Laine, Matti Puranen addresses the ultimate question.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Ville Sinkkonen (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and Bart Gaens (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book.

The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.

This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.

Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).

We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are we living in an era of competing international orders? A new book, entitled Competing Visions for International Order: Challenges for a Shared Direction in an Age of Global Contestation (Routledge, 2025) edited by Ville Sinkkonen, Veera Laine, Matti Puranen addresses the ultimate question.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Ville Sinkkonen (Finnish Institute of International Affairs), Matti Puranen (Finnish National Defense University and University of Helsinki), and Bart Gaens (Finnish Institute of International Affairs and the International Centre for Defense and Security) about the ambition of this new book and several key takeaways concerning particularly the US, China, and India from this book.

The book’s analysis also offers normative prescriptions on how to avoid a tragic race to the bottom – a fragmented world of competing orders where states are unable to address shared global crises and challenges such as pandemics, cross-border crime, climate tragedies, and armed conflict. With this, it concludes by recognising the importance of agency as well as political imagination in navigating the crisis-ridden ordering moment of the international system.

This book will be of key interest to scholars and students in global order studies and governance, geopolitics, regional studies, foreign policy analysis as well as more broadly to international relations and security, political history, human geography, and policymakers.

Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland).

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners: Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia), Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland), Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania), Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland), Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden) and Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo (Norway).

We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>818</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61b557b2-0721-11f1-9c62-5fb0b8d8e147</guid>
      <title>Laura K. Field, &quot;Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691255262"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.</p>
<p>Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds</em></a> is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691255262"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.</p>
<p>Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds</em></a>—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds</em></a> is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691255262/furious-minds?srsltid=AfmBOorQo46qMGVFATZlC-lUoVhwCoXmgjRGlaQkJ47HUcVsNfF77RuR"><em>Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right</em></a> is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38961405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a8ddc850-e9a2-417d-8ab6-351ac7d4581f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a8ddc850-e9a2-417d-8ab6-351ac7d4581f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Laura K. Field, &quot;Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.

Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in Furious Minds—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of Furious Minds is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.

Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Theorist Laura Field has written an insightful and detailed exploration of the people and the ideas that have shaped the second Trump Administration (and some contributed, as well, to the first Trump Administration.) While Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right (Princeton UP, 2025) is about quite a few scholars and academics, it is written like a propulsive page-turner of a book. And Field takes us through all the of the ins and outs of the individuals who have pursued a path to power and policy development, often from positions in the Ivory Tower. Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is truly fascinating, since it is not simply about egg-headed academics writing up white papers or books, or simply about presidential advisors and the way they have worked to influence the president or put particular policies into place. Instead, Field interrogates the construction of the ideas that have come to dominate this New Right, seeking their genesis and how these ideas, which are divided into three distinct but overlapping intellectual camps, have made their way to the Trump Administration, through Trump himself, Vice President J.D. Vance, and so many of the advisors and cabinet members who surround Trump.

Field’s training in political theory, especially Straussian political theory, contributes to her understanding and analysis of the individuals at the heart of the story in Furious Minds—and how these particular academics think, but in particular how they think about politics and political projects. The substance of Furious Minds is focused on the past decade or so of engagement between these various schools of thought and the Trump Administration—both while in elected office as well as during the out of office interregnum. At the same time, Field traces the deep origins of some of these schools of thought through the longer conservative tradition in the United States. In our discussion, we explore the Claremonters, the Postliberals, and the National Conservatives. Each group is populated by well-educated (PhDs, published authors, etc.) individuals (mostly men) who are urging a concept of the common good, as they define it, on to the American people, through the Trump Administration’s rhetoric, policies, institutional dispositions, cultural approaches, and general demeanor. Field takes all of these thinkers and ideas seriously, making the case for understanding both the ideas themselves and their origins, while also critiquing much of this by exposing the more extremist bases behind these paths of thinking as well as the people who are purveying them.

Furious Minds: The Making of the MAGA New Right is a tour de force of the intellectual and political landscape that has brought us to the midst of the second Trump Administration and provides the reader with deep insight into the radical origins of the myths and concepts that are the backbone of the current Trump Administration and the current Republican Party.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She studied political theory at Kenyon College and Boston College. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>817</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7f87a5a-064e-11f1-8ea1-8bbe7d6ddbfe</guid>
      <title>Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo, &quot;Governing Digital China&quot; (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>China's approach to digital governance has gained global influence, often evoking Orwellian 'Big Brother' comparisons. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009360661">Governing Digital China</a> (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025) challenges this perception, arguing that China's approach is radically different in practice. This book explores the logic of popular corporatism, highlighting the bottom-up influences of China's largest platform firms and its citizens. Drawing on extensive fieldwork and nationally representative surveys, the authors track governance of social media and commercial social credit ratings during both the Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping eras. Their findings reveal how Chinese tech companies such as Tencent, Sina, Baidu, and Alibaba, have become consultants and insiders to the state, thus forming a state-company partnership. Meanwhile, citizens voluntarily produce data, incentivizing platform firms to cater to their needs and motivating resistance by platforms. Authors Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo unveil the intricate mechanisms linking the state, platform firms, and citizens in the digital governance of authoritarian states.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.hertie-school.org/en/who-we-are/profile/person/stockmann">Daniela Stockmann</a> is Director of the Centre for Digital Governance and Professor of Digital Governance at the Hertie School.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/drtingluo/home">Ting Luo</a> is an Associate Professor in Government and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Birmingham.</p>
<p>Interviewer <a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/">Peter Lorentzen</a> is an associate professor of economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads the <a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/international-development-economics">Master's program in International and Development Economics</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China's approach to digital governance has gained global influence, often evoking Orwellian 'Big Brother' comparisons. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009360661">Governing Digital China</a> (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025) challenges this perception, arguing that China's approach is radically different in practice. This book explores the logic of popular corporatism, highlighting the bottom-up influences of China's largest platform firms and its citizens. Drawing on extensive fieldwork and nationally representative surveys, the authors track governance of social media and commercial social credit ratings during both the Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping eras. Their findings reveal how Chinese tech companies such as Tencent, Sina, Baidu, and Alibaba, have become consultants and insiders to the state, thus forming a state-company partnership. Meanwhile, citizens voluntarily produce data, incentivizing platform firms to cater to their needs and motivating resistance by platforms. Authors Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo unveil the intricate mechanisms linking the state, platform firms, and citizens in the digital governance of authoritarian states.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.hertie-school.org/en/who-we-are/profile/person/stockmann">Daniela Stockmann</a> is Director of the Centre for Digital Governance and Professor of Digital Governance at the Hertie School.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/drtingluo/home">Ting Luo</a> is an Associate Professor in Government and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Birmingham.</p>
<p>Interviewer <a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/">Peter Lorentzen</a> is an associate professor of economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads the <a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/international-development-economics">Master's program in International and Development Economics</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55987327" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6b05c471-e183-45e4-9781-1b0938b7d2fe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6b05c471-e183-45e4-9781-1b0938b7d2fe&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo, &quot;Governing Digital China&quot; (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>China&apos;s approach to digital governance has gained global influence, often evoking Orwellian &apos;Big Brother&apos; comparisons. Governing Digital China (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025) challenges this perception, arguing that China&apos;s approach is radically different in practice. This book explores the logic of popular corporatism, highlighting the bottom-up influences of China&apos;s largest platform firms and its citizens. Drawing on extensive fieldwork and nationally representative surveys, the authors track governance of social media and commercial social credit ratings during both the Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping eras. Their findings reveal how Chinese tech companies such as Tencent, Sina, Baidu, and Alibaba, have become consultants and insiders to the state, thus forming a state-company partnership. Meanwhile, citizens voluntarily produce data, incentivizing platform firms to cater to their needs and motivating resistance by platforms. Authors Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo unveil the intricate mechanisms linking the state, platform firms, and citizens in the digital governance of authoritarian states.

Daniela Stockmann is Director of the Centre for Digital Governance and Professor of Digital Governance at the Hertie School.

Ting Luo is an Associate Professor in Government and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Birmingham.

Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an associate professor of economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads the Master&apos;s program in International and Development Economics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>China&apos;s approach to digital governance has gained global influence, often evoking Orwellian &apos;Big Brother&apos; comparisons. Governing Digital China (Cambridge ﻿UP, 2025) challenges this perception, arguing that China&apos;s approach is radically different in practice. This book explores the logic of popular corporatism, highlighting the bottom-up influences of China&apos;s largest platform firms and its citizens. Drawing on extensive fieldwork and nationally representative surveys, the authors track governance of social media and commercial social credit ratings during both the Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping eras. Their findings reveal how Chinese tech companies such as Tencent, Sina, Baidu, and Alibaba, have become consultants and insiders to the state, thus forming a state-company partnership. Meanwhile, citizens voluntarily produce data, incentivizing platform firms to cater to their needs and motivating resistance by platforms. Authors Daniela Stockmann and Ting Luo unveil the intricate mechanisms linking the state, platform firms, and citizens in the digital governance of authoritarian states.

Daniela Stockmann is Director of the Centre for Digital Governance and Professor of Digital Governance at the Hertie School.

Ting Luo is an Associate Professor in Government and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Birmingham.

Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an associate professor of economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads the Master&apos;s program in International and Development Economics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>816</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8584fbd6-0648-11f1-ae3a-af8b00f37780</guid>
      <title>Mark Stout, &quot;World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. </p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856">World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856"> </a>﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. </p>
<p>World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. </p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856">World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700635856"> </a>﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. </p>
<p>World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66882589" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/504ed991-9b4a-4eb5-a5f6-235c79bcc766/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=504ed991-9b4a-4eb5-a5f6-235c79bcc766&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Stout, &quot;World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. 

In World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence ﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. 

World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ask an American intelligence officer to tell you when the country started doing modern intelligence and you will probably hear something about the Office of Strategic Services in World War II or the National Security Act of 1947 and the formation of the Central Intelligence Agency. What you almost certainly will not hear is anything about World War I. 

In World War I and the Foundations of American Intelligence ﻿(UP of Kansas, 2023), Mark Stout establishes that, in fact, World War I led to the realization that intelligence was indispensable in both wartime and peacetime. After a lengthy gestation that started in the late nineteenth century, and included important episode like the Spanish-American War of 1898 and the Punitive Expedition in Mexico, modern American intelligence emerged during World War I. The War was foundational in the establishment of a self-conscious profession of intelligence. Virtually everything that followed was maturation, reorganization, reinvigoration, or reinvention. 

World War I ushered in a period of rapid changes. Never again would the War Department be without an intelligence component. Never again would a senior American commander lead a force to war without intelligence personnel on their staff. Never again would the United States government be without a signals intelligence agency or aerial reconnaissance capability. Stout examines the breadth of American intelligence in the war, not just in France, not just at home, but around the world and across the army, navy, and State Department, and demonstrates how these far-flung efforts endured after the Armistice in 1918. For the first time, there came to be a group of intelligence practitioners who viewed themselves as different from other soldiers, sailors, and diplomats. Upon entering World War II, the United States had a solid foundation from which to expand to meet the needs of another global hot war and the Cold War that followed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>815</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22c59dde-058a-11f1-9d82-abe9580aca13</guid>
      <title>Caillan Davenport, &quot;Behind Caesar&apos;s Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300276459"><em>Behind Caesar's Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors</em> </a>(Yale UP, 2026), Professor Caillan Davenport presents a thrilling exploration of what Romans thought about their emperors, and how rumors and gossip—ranging from new taxes to rulers’ sex lives—shaped leadership.</p>
<p>Traversing more than seven hundred years of Roman history, this book explores how everyday Romans swapped gossip, spread rumors, told jokes, and chanted protests about their emperors—activity that amounted to much more than idle chatter. Professor Davenport uses ancient evidence, including letters, graffiti, and songs, to reveal how Romans engaged in politics outside the senate house or imperial council. He argues that the idea of the Roman emperor was shaped not only by the political powers granted to him but also by the debate taking place in the streets, churches, taverns, and markets.</p>
<p>Professor Davenport reveals how Romans spoke about “the emperor” as a figure of stability, as an agent of justice and retribution, or as a fallible human. Although few would ever see an emperor, his face (and therefore his power) was everywhere: on coins, banners, standards, and even dessert molds, as well as in statuary and paintings. While most Romans did not question the transformation of their republic into a monarchical system of government, they were indeed invested in the empire and were in constant discussion about the type of ruler they had, wanted, and deserved.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300276459"><em>Behind Caesar's Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors</em> </a>(Yale UP, 2026), Professor Caillan Davenport presents a thrilling exploration of what Romans thought about their emperors, and how rumors and gossip—ranging from new taxes to rulers’ sex lives—shaped leadership.</p>
<p>Traversing more than seven hundred years of Roman history, this book explores how everyday Romans swapped gossip, spread rumors, told jokes, and chanted protests about their emperors—activity that amounted to much more than idle chatter. Professor Davenport uses ancient evidence, including letters, graffiti, and songs, to reveal how Romans engaged in politics outside the senate house or imperial council. He argues that the idea of the Roman emperor was shaped not only by the political powers granted to him but also by the debate taking place in the streets, churches, taverns, and markets.</p>
<p>Professor Davenport reveals how Romans spoke about “the emperor” as a figure of stability, as an agent of justice and retribution, or as a fallible human. Although few would ever see an emperor, his face (and therefore his power) was everywhere: on coins, banners, standards, and even dessert molds, as well as in statuary and paintings. While most Romans did not question the transformation of their republic into a monarchical system of government, they were indeed invested in the empire and were in constant discussion about the type of ruler they had, wanted, and deserved.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41308700" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/01cbbf7e-b34b-4326-8c3a-80b16531242e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=01cbbf7e-b34b-4326-8c3a-80b16531242e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caillan Davenport, &quot;Behind Caesar&apos;s Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Behind Caesar&apos;s Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors (Yale UP, 2026), Professor Caillan Davenport presents a thrilling exploration of what Romans thought about their emperors, and how rumors and gossip—ranging from new taxes to rulers’ sex lives—shaped leadership.

Traversing more than seven hundred years of Roman history, this book explores how everyday Romans swapped gossip, spread rumors, told jokes, and chanted protests about their emperors—activity that amounted to much more than idle chatter. Professor Davenport uses ancient evidence, including letters, graffiti, and songs, to reveal how Romans engaged in politics outside the senate house or imperial council. He argues that the idea of the Roman emperor was shaped not only by the political powers granted to him but also by the debate taking place in the streets, churches, taverns, and markets.

Professor Davenport reveals how Romans spoke about “the emperor” as a figure of stability, as an agent of justice and retribution, or as a fallible human. Although few would ever see an emperor, his face (and therefore his power) was everywhere: on coins, banners, standards, and even dessert molds, as well as in statuary and paintings. While most Romans did not question the transformation of their republic into a monarchical system of government, they were indeed invested in the empire and were in constant discussion about the type of ruler they had, wanted, and deserved.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Behind Caesar&apos;s Back: Rumor, Gossip, and the Making of the Roman Emperors (Yale UP, 2026), Professor Caillan Davenport presents a thrilling exploration of what Romans thought about their emperors, and how rumors and gossip—ranging from new taxes to rulers’ sex lives—shaped leadership.

Traversing more than seven hundred years of Roman history, this book explores how everyday Romans swapped gossip, spread rumors, told jokes, and chanted protests about their emperors—activity that amounted to much more than idle chatter. Professor Davenport uses ancient evidence, including letters, graffiti, and songs, to reveal how Romans engaged in politics outside the senate house or imperial council. He argues that the idea of the Roman emperor was shaped not only by the political powers granted to him but also by the debate taking place in the streets, churches, taverns, and markets.

Professor Davenport reveals how Romans spoke about “the emperor” as a figure of stability, as an agent of justice and retribution, or as a fallible human. Although few would ever see an emperor, his face (and therefore his power) was everywhere: on coins, banners, standards, and even dessert molds, as well as in statuary and paintings. While most Romans did not question the transformation of their republic into a monarchical system of government, they were indeed invested in the empire and were in constant discussion about the type of ruler they had, wanted, and deserved.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>814</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">59fdc3ae-0200-11f1-908a-b39b3b96f63d</guid>
      <title>Peter S. Goodman, &quot;Davos Man: How the Billionaire Class Devoured Democracy&quot; (Custom House, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on decades of experience covering the global economy, New York Times' journalist Peter S. Goodman profiles five representative Davos Men-members of the billionaire class-chronicling how their shocking exploitation of the global pandemic has hastened a fifty-year trend of wealth centralization. Alongside this reporting, Goodman delivers textured portraits of those caught in Davos Man's wake, including a former steelworker in the American Midwest, a Bangladeshi migrant in Qatar, a Seattle doctor on the front lines of the fight against COVID, blue-collar workers in the tenements of Buenos Aires, an African immigrant in Sweden, a textile manufacturer in Italy, an Amazon warehouse employee in New York City, and more in his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063078307"><em>Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World</em></a> (Custom House, 2022).</p><p>Peter S. Goodman is the global economic correspondent for The New York Times, based in New York.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing on decades of experience covering the global economy, New York Times' journalist Peter S. Goodman profiles five representative Davos Men-members of the billionaire class-chronicling how their shocking exploitation of the global pandemic has hastened a fifty-year trend of wealth centralization. Alongside this reporting, Goodman delivers textured portraits of those caught in Davos Man's wake, including a former steelworker in the American Midwest, a Bangladeshi migrant in Qatar, a Seattle doctor on the front lines of the fight against COVID, blue-collar workers in the tenements of Buenos Aires, an African immigrant in Sweden, a textile manufacturer in Italy, an Amazon warehouse employee in New York City, and more in his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063078307"><em>Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World</em></a> (Custom House, 2022).</p><p>Peter S. Goodman is the global economic correspondent for The New York Times, based in New York.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52099135" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/84ce7893-3951-47ba-af03-9c590684b2c5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=84ce7893-3951-47ba-af03-9c590684b2c5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter S. Goodman, &quot;Davos Man: How the Billionaire Class Devoured Democracy&quot; (Custom House, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Drawing on decades of experience covering the global economy, New York Times&apos; journalist Peter S. Goodman profiles five representative Davos Men-members of the billionaire class-chronicling how their shocking exploitation of the global pandemic has hastened a fifty-year trend of wealth centralization. Alongside this reporting, Goodman delivers textured portraits of those caught in Davos Man&apos;s wake, including a former steelworker in the American Midwest, a Bangladeshi migrant in Qatar, a Seattle doctor on the front lines of the fight against COVID, blue-collar workers in the tenements of Buenos Aires, an African immigrant in Sweden, a textile manufacturer in Italy, an Amazon warehouse employee in New York City, and more in his book, Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World (Custom House, 2022).
Peter S. Goodman is the global economic correspondent for The New York Times, based in New York.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Drawing on decades of experience covering the global economy, New York Times&apos; journalist Peter S. Goodman profiles five representative Davos Men-members of the billionaire class-chronicling how their shocking exploitation of the global pandemic has hastened a fifty-year trend of wealth centralization. Alongside this reporting, Goodman delivers textured portraits of those caught in Davos Man&apos;s wake, including a former steelworker in the American Midwest, a Bangladeshi migrant in Qatar, a Seattle doctor on the front lines of the fight against COVID, blue-collar workers in the tenements of Buenos Aires, an African immigrant in Sweden, a textile manufacturer in Italy, an Amazon warehouse employee in New York City, and more in his book, Davos Man: How the Billionaires Devoured the World (Custom House, 2022).
Peter S. Goodman is the global economic correspondent for The New York Times, based in New York.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ab044aa4-02cb-11f1-84fe-5b5da8ee3aa9</guid>
      <title>Jon R. Lindsay &quot;Age of Deception: Cybersecurity as Secret Statecraft&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the heart of cybersecurity lies a paradox: Cooperation makes conflict possible. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/age-of-deception-cybersecurity-as-secret-statecraft-assistant-professor-of-digital-media-and-global-affairs-jon-r-lindsay/1dd493256f1e27aa?ean=9781501783470&amp;next=t"><strong>Age of Deception</strong> (Cornell University Press 2025),</a> Jon R. Lindsay shows that widespread trust in cyberspace enables espionage and subversion. While such acts of secret statecraft have long been part of global politics, digital systems have dramatically expanded their scope and scale. Yet success in secret statecraft hinges less on sophisticated technology than on political context.</p>
<p>To make sense of this, Lindsay offers a general theory of intelligence performance—the analogue to military performance in battle—that explains why spies and hackers alike depend on clandestine organizations and vulnerable institutions. Through cases spanning codebreaking at Bletchley Park during WWII to the weaponization of pagers by Israel in 2024, he traces both continuity and change in secret statecraft. Along the way, he explains why popular assumptions about cyber warfare are profoundly misleading. Offense does not simply dominate defense, for example, because the same digital complexity that expands opportunities for deception also creates potential for self-deception and counter-deception.</p>
<p>Provocative and persuasive, <em>Age of Deception </em>offers crucial insights into the future of secret statecraft in cyberspace and beyond.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.jonrlindsay.com/">Jon R. Lindsay</a>, an Associate Professor at the School of Cybersecurity and Privacy and the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the heart of cybersecurity lies a paradox: Cooperation makes conflict possible. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/age-of-deception-cybersecurity-as-secret-statecraft-assistant-professor-of-digital-media-and-global-affairs-jon-r-lindsay/1dd493256f1e27aa?ean=9781501783470&amp;next=t"><strong>Age of Deception</strong> (Cornell University Press 2025),</a> Jon R. Lindsay shows that widespread trust in cyberspace enables espionage and subversion. While such acts of secret statecraft have long been part of global politics, digital systems have dramatically expanded their scope and scale. Yet success in secret statecraft hinges less on sophisticated technology than on political context.</p>
<p>To make sense of this, Lindsay offers a general theory of intelligence performance—the analogue to military performance in battle—that explains why spies and hackers alike depend on clandestine organizations and vulnerable institutions. Through cases spanning codebreaking at Bletchley Park during WWII to the weaponization of pagers by Israel in 2024, he traces both continuity and change in secret statecraft. Along the way, he explains why popular assumptions about cyber warfare are profoundly misleading. Offense does not simply dominate defense, for example, because the same digital complexity that expands opportunities for deception also creates potential for self-deception and counter-deception.</p>
<p>Provocative and persuasive, <em>Age of Deception </em>offers crucial insights into the future of secret statecraft in cyberspace and beyond.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.jonrlindsay.com/">Jon R. Lindsay</a>, an Associate Professor at the School of Cybersecurity and Privacy and the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34836749" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/23f46302-9a2f-4098-ade2-88706570f6a6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=23f46302-9a2f-4098-ade2-88706570f6a6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jon R. Lindsay &quot;Age of Deception: Cybersecurity as Secret Statecraft&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the heart of cybersecurity lies a paradox: Cooperation makes conflict possible. In Age of Deception (Cornell University Press 2025), Jon R. Lindsay shows that widespread trust in cyberspace enables espionage and subversion. While such acts of secret statecraft have long been part of global politics, digital systems have dramatically expanded their scope and scale. Yet success in secret statecraft hinges less on sophisticated technology than on political context.

To make sense of this, Lindsay offers a general theory of intelligence performance—the analogue to military performance in battle—that explains why spies and hackers alike depend on clandestine organizations and vulnerable institutions. Through cases spanning codebreaking at Bletchley Park during WWII to the weaponization of pagers by Israel in 2024, he traces both continuity and change in secret statecraft. Along the way, he explains why popular assumptions about cyber warfare are profoundly misleading. Offense does not simply dominate defense, for example, because the same digital complexity that expands opportunities for deception also creates potential for self-deception and counter-deception.

Provocative and persuasive, Age of Deception offers crucial insights into the future of secret statecraft in cyberspace and beyond.

Our guest is Jon R. Lindsay, an Associate Professor at the School of Cybersecurity and Privacy and the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the heart of cybersecurity lies a paradox: Cooperation makes conflict possible. In Age of Deception (Cornell University Press 2025), Jon R. Lindsay shows that widespread trust in cyberspace enables espionage and subversion. While such acts of secret statecraft have long been part of global politics, digital systems have dramatically expanded their scope and scale. Yet success in secret statecraft hinges less on sophisticated technology than on political context.

To make sense of this, Lindsay offers a general theory of intelligence performance—the analogue to military performance in battle—that explains why spies and hackers alike depend on clandestine organizations and vulnerable institutions. Through cases spanning codebreaking at Bletchley Park during WWII to the weaponization of pagers by Israel in 2024, he traces both continuity and change in secret statecraft. Along the way, he explains why popular assumptions about cyber warfare are profoundly misleading. Offense does not simply dominate defense, for example, because the same digital complexity that expands opportunities for deception also creates potential for self-deception and counter-deception.

Provocative and persuasive, Age of Deception offers crucial insights into the future of secret statecraft in cyberspace and beyond.

Our guest is Jon R. Lindsay, an Associate Professor at the School of Cybersecurity and Privacy and the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>182</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">994e5a68-01e3-11f1-aea6-7343f80e7872</guid>
      <title>Alex Prichard, &quot;Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If you asked a passerby on the street what anarchism is, they may answer that it is an ideology based on chaos, disorder, and violence. But is this true? What exactly is anarchism?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198815617"><em>Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2022) provides a new point of departure for our understanding of anarchism. Prichard describes anarchism as a lived set of practices, with a rich historical legacy, and shows how anarchists have inspired and criticised some of our most cherished values and concepts, from the ideals of freedom, participatory education, federalism, to important topics like climate change, and wider popular culture in science fiction. By locating the emergence and globalization of anarchist ideas in a history of colonialism and imperialism, the book links anarchism into struggles for freedom across the world and demonstrates that anarchism has much to offer anyone trying to envision a better future.</p><p>Alex Prichard is Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Exeter. His research on anarchism has shed new light on old problems of constitutional politics, order and anarchy in world order, and the history of international thought. He is the co-founder of the Political Studies Association specialist group for the study of anarchism, the Manchester University Press monograph series, Contemporary Anarchist Studies, and a trained chef.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you asked a passerby on the street what anarchism is, they may answer that it is an ideology based on chaos, disorder, and violence. But is this true? What exactly is anarchism?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198815617"><em>Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2022) provides a new point of departure for our understanding of anarchism. Prichard describes anarchism as a lived set of practices, with a rich historical legacy, and shows how anarchists have inspired and criticised some of our most cherished values and concepts, from the ideals of freedom, participatory education, federalism, to important topics like climate change, and wider popular culture in science fiction. By locating the emergence and globalization of anarchist ideas in a history of colonialism and imperialism, the book links anarchism into struggles for freedom across the world and demonstrates that anarchism has much to offer anyone trying to envision a better future.</p><p>Alex Prichard is Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Exeter. His research on anarchism has shed new light on old problems of constitutional politics, order and anarchy in world order, and the history of international thought. He is the co-founder of the Political Studies Association specialist group for the study of anarchism, the Manchester University Press monograph series, Contemporary Anarchist Studies, and a trained chef.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53360544" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b6cd026c-05f3-410c-8205-8fd82b7bf8ba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b6cd026c-05f3-410c-8205-8fd82b7bf8ba&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Prichard, &quot;Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>If you asked a passerby on the street what anarchism is, they may answer that it is an ideology based on chaos, disorder, and violence. But is this true? What exactly is anarchism?
Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction (Oxford UP, 2022) provides a new point of departure for our understanding of anarchism. Prichard describes anarchism as a lived set of practices, with a rich historical legacy, and shows how anarchists have inspired and criticised some of our most cherished values and concepts, from the ideals of freedom, participatory education, federalism, to important topics like climate change, and wider popular culture in science fiction. By locating the emergence and globalization of anarchist ideas in a history of colonialism and imperialism, the book links anarchism into struggles for freedom across the world and demonstrates that anarchism has much to offer anyone trying to envision a better future.
Alex Prichard is Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Exeter. His research on anarchism has shed new light on old problems of constitutional politics, order and anarchy in world order, and the history of international thought. He is the co-founder of the Political Studies Association specialist group for the study of anarchism, the Manchester University Press monograph series, Contemporary Anarchist Studies, and a trained chef.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>If you asked a passerby on the street what anarchism is, they may answer that it is an ideology based on chaos, disorder, and violence. But is this true? What exactly is anarchism?
Anarchism: a Very Short Introduction (Oxford UP, 2022) provides a new point of departure for our understanding of anarchism. Prichard describes anarchism as a lived set of practices, with a rich historical legacy, and shows how anarchists have inspired and criticised some of our most cherished values and concepts, from the ideals of freedom, participatory education, federalism, to important topics like climate change, and wider popular culture in science fiction. By locating the emergence and globalization of anarchist ideas in a history of colonialism and imperialism, the book links anarchism into struggles for freedom across the world and demonstrates that anarchism has much to offer anyone trying to envision a better future.
Alex Prichard is Associate Professor of International Relations at the University of Exeter. His research on anarchism has shed new light on old problems of constitutional politics, order and anarchy in world order, and the history of international thought. He is the co-founder of the Political Studies Association specialist group for the study of anarchism, the Manchester University Press monograph series, Contemporary Anarchist Studies, and a trained chef.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>381</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29727b12-00cf-11f1-a086-0bdd3a8c8c54</guid>
      <title>Ning Leng, &quot;Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China&quot; (Cambridge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In her new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009662307"><em>Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China</em> </a>(Cambridge, 2025), Ning Leng shows how Chinese officials systematically treat formally private firms as political instruments, extracting services that advance careers and maintain social control—often at the expense of business interests, economic efficiency and sustainable development. <a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ning-leng/home">Ning Leng</a> is an Assistant Professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University.</p>
<p>Interviewer <a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/">Peter Lorentzen</a> is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco and is the Director of USF's <a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/international-development-economics">Master's Program in International and Development Economics</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009662307"><em>Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China</em> </a>(Cambridge, 2025), Ning Leng shows how Chinese officials systematically treat formally private firms as political instruments, extracting services that advance careers and maintain social control—often at the expense of business interests, economic efficiency and sustainable development. <a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ning-leng/home">Ning Leng</a> is an Assistant Professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University.</p>
<p>Interviewer <a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/">Peter Lorentzen</a> is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco and is the Director of USF's <a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/international-development-economics">Master's Program in International and Development Economics</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49978100" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4265f593-23f4-4ec5-b8de-3bdbbb3e5527/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4265f593-23f4-4ec5-b8de-3bdbbb3e5527&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ning Leng, &quot;Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China&quot; (Cambridge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In her new book, Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China (Cambridge, 2025), Ning Leng shows how Chinese officials systematically treat formally private firms as political instruments, extracting services that advance careers and maintain social control—often at the expense of business interests, economic efficiency and sustainable development. Ning Leng is an Assistant Professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University.

Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco and is the Director of USF&apos;s Master&apos;s Program in International and Development Economics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In her new book, Politicizing Business: How Firms Are Made to Serve the Party-State in China (Cambridge, 2025), Ning Leng shows how Chinese officials systematically treat formally private firms as political instruments, extracting services that advance careers and maintain social control—often at the expense of business interests, economic efficiency and sustainable development. Ning Leng is an Assistant Professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University.

Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco and is the Director of USF&apos;s Master&apos;s Program in International and Development Economics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>810</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26b1067c-00d5-11f1-ab26-079f12f5ed50</guid>
      <title>Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson, &quot;A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris&quot; (UP of Mississippi)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496859389">A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris</a>(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿</p>
<p>Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.</p>
<p>The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.</p>
<p>You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her <a href="https://www.watkinsdickerson.com/">website</a>, and on social platforms @drdwd.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her <a href="https://sullivansummer.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/">Instagram</a>, and on <a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/">Substack</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496859389">A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris</a>(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿</p>
<p>Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.</p>
<p>The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.</p>
<p>You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her <a href="https://www.watkinsdickerson.com/">website</a>, and on social platforms @drdwd.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her <a href="https://sullivansummer.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/">Instagram</a>, and on <a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/">Substack</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55338202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e44a3257-d2b8-4933-9d50-dd703632cacb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e44a3257-d2b8-4933-9d50-dd703632cacb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson, &quot;A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris&quot; (UP of Mississippi)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿

Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.

The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.

You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her website, and on social platforms @drdwd.

Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Throughout US history, only three Black women—Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris—have given successfully recognized bids for the office of president of the United States. In A Black Woman for President: Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun, and Kamala Harris(UP of Mississippi) author Dianna N. Watkins-Dickerson uses womanist rhetorical criticism to analyze the presidential announcement speeches of Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm, Ambassador Carol Moseley Braun, and then-Senator Kamala Harris. In close readings of each candidate’s speeches, Watkins-Dickerson defines womanist rhetorical theory and its efficacy for researching Black female voices in the field of communication in general, and the presidential announcement speeches of Black women, specifically.﻿

Beginning with Shirley Chisholm’s historic 1972 campaign as the first Black woman to run a viable campaign for the US presidency, the volume analyzes how Chisholm’s speech set a precedent for future generations of Black women in politics by boldly asserting her right to lead, despite the multiple barriers of race and gender. The study then moves to Carol Moseley Braun’s 2004 presidential announcement, exploring how Braun’s speech navigated the intersections of identity, representation, and political ambition during a time when Black women in the Senate were still a rarity. Finally, the analysis culminates with Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential bid, focusing on how her rhetoric blended elements of Black feminist resistance and national unity in an era of heightened political and racial division.

The volume highlights the ways in which Chisholm, Braun, and Harris drew upon their lived experiences and cultural legacies to construct powerful, transformative narratives and argues that their speeches not only expanded the boundaries of political discourse but also reimagined the possibilities for leadership in America. Ultimately, this study provides a rich, interdisciplinary framework for understanding how Black women have reshaped the political landscape through the power of their words.

You can find Dianna N. Watkins Dickerson at her website, and on social platforms @drdwd.

Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>809</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f49e97e0-000b-11f1-8335-ef3f48550d51</guid>
      <title>Lisa Min et al. eds., &quot;Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State&quot; (punctum books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?</p>
<p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/redacted-writing-in-the-negative-space-of-the-state/">Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State</a> (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.</p>
<p>This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?</p>
<p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/redacted-writing-in-the-negative-space-of-the-state/">Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State</a> (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.</p>
<p>This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77482197" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f05b2908-341f-490b-98dc-c2e50edb0540/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f05b2908-341f-490b-98dc-c2e50edb0540&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Min et al. eds., &quot;Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State&quot; (punctum books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?

Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.

This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When it comes to the political, acts of redaction, erasure, and blacking out sit in awkward tension with the myth of transparent governance, borderless access, and frictionless communication. But should there be more than this brute juxtaposition of truth and secrecy?

Redacted: Writing in the Negative Space of the State (punctum books, 2024) ﻿brings together essays, poems, artwork, and memes—a bricolage of media that conveys the experience of living in state-inflected worlds in flux. Critically and poetically engaging with redaction in politically charged contexts (from the United States and Denmark to Russia, China, and North Korea), the volume closely examines and turns loose this disquieting mark of state power, aiming to trouble the liberal imaginaries that configure the political as a left-right spectrum, as populism and nationalism versus global and transnational cosmopolitanism, as east versus west, authoritarianism versus democracy, good versus evil, or the state versus the people—age-old coordinates that no longer make sense. Because we know from the upheavals of the past decade that these relations are being reconfigured in novel, recursive, and unrecognizable ways, the consequences of which are perplexing and ever evolving.

This book takes up redaction as a vital form in this new political reality. Contributors both critically engage with statist redaction practices and also explore its alluring and ambivalent forms, as experimental practices that open up new dialogic possibilities in navigating and conveying the stakes of political encounters.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>808</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5bf1a422-ffa9-11f0-bcd9-d7c41db8fbff</guid>
      <title>Jens Ludwig, &quot;Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Disproving the popular narrative that shootings are the calculated acts of malicious or desperate people, Ludwig shows how most shootings actually grow out of a more fleeting source: interpersonal conflict, especially arguments. By examining why some arguments turn tragic while others don't, Ludwig shows gun violence to be more circumstantial—and more solvable—than our traditional approaches lead us to believe.<br />Drawing on decades of research and Ludwig’s immersive fieldwork in Chicago, including “countless hours spent in schools, parks, playgrounds, housing developments, courtrooms, jails, police stations, police cars, and lots and lots of McDonald's,” <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828138">Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence</a> (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a breakthrough work at the cutting edge of behavioral economics. As Ludwig shows, progress on gun violence doesn’t require America to solve every other social problem first; it only requires that we find ways to intervene in the places and the ten-minute windows where human behaviors predictably go haywire.</p>
<p>Jens Ludwig is the Edwin A. and Betty L. Bergman Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. He is the Pritzker Director of the University of Chicago's Crime Lab, codirector of the National Bureau of Economic Research's working group on the economics of crime, elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, and a member of the Committee on Law and Justice of the National Academies of Science.</p>
<p><em>Alfred Marcus is the Edson Spencer Professor at the Carlson School, University of Minnesota.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disproving the popular narrative that shootings are the calculated acts of malicious or desperate people, Ludwig shows how most shootings actually grow out of a more fleeting source: interpersonal conflict, especially arguments. By examining why some arguments turn tragic while others don't, Ludwig shows gun violence to be more circumstantial—and more solvable—than our traditional approaches lead us to believe.<br />Drawing on decades of research and Ludwig’s immersive fieldwork in Chicago, including “countless hours spent in schools, parks, playgrounds, housing developments, courtrooms, jails, police stations, police cars, and lots and lots of McDonald's,” <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828138">Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence</a> (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a breakthrough work at the cutting edge of behavioral economics. As Ludwig shows, progress on gun violence doesn’t require America to solve every other social problem first; it only requires that we find ways to intervene in the places and the ten-minute windows where human behaviors predictably go haywire.</p>
<p>Jens Ludwig is the Edwin A. and Betty L. Bergman Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. He is the Pritzker Director of the University of Chicago's Crime Lab, codirector of the National Bureau of Economic Research's working group on the economics of crime, elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, and a member of the Committee on Law and Justice of the National Academies of Science.</p>
<p><em>Alfred Marcus is the Edson Spencer Professor at the Carlson School, University of Minnesota.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59475438" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/46f3dca2-ea3a-43a1-9df6-8e903314310e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=46f3dca2-ea3a-43a1-9df6-8e903314310e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jens Ludwig, &quot;Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Disproving the popular narrative that shootings are the calculated acts of malicious or desperate people, Ludwig shows how most shootings actually grow out of a more fleeting source: interpersonal conflict, especially arguments. By examining why some arguments turn tragic while others don&apos;t, Ludwig shows gun violence to be more circumstantial—and more solvable—than our traditional approaches lead us to believe.Drawing on decades of research and Ludwig’s immersive fieldwork in Chicago, including “countless hours spent in schools, parks, playgrounds, housing developments, courtrooms, jails, police stations, police cars, and lots and lots of McDonald&apos;s,” Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a breakthrough work at the cutting edge of behavioral economics. As Ludwig shows, progress on gun violence doesn’t require America to solve every other social problem first; it only requires that we find ways to intervene in the places and the ten-minute windows where human behaviors predictably go haywire.

Jens Ludwig is the Edwin A. and Betty L. Bergman Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. He is the Pritzker Director of the University of Chicago&apos;s Crime Lab, codirector of the National Bureau of Economic Research&apos;s working group on the economics of crime, elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, and a member of the Committee on Law and Justice of the National Academies of Science.

Alfred Marcus is the Edson Spencer Professor at the Carlson School, University of Minnesota.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Disproving the popular narrative that shootings are the calculated acts of malicious or desperate people, Ludwig shows how most shootings actually grow out of a more fleeting source: interpersonal conflict, especially arguments. By examining why some arguments turn tragic while others don&apos;t, Ludwig shows gun violence to be more circumstantial—and more solvable—than our traditional approaches lead us to believe.Drawing on decades of research and Ludwig’s immersive fieldwork in Chicago, including “countless hours spent in schools, parks, playgrounds, housing developments, courtrooms, jails, police stations, police cars, and lots and lots of McDonald&apos;s,” Unforgiving Places: The Unexpected Origins of American Gun Violence (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a breakthrough work at the cutting edge of behavioral economics. As Ludwig shows, progress on gun violence doesn’t require America to solve every other social problem first; it only requires that we find ways to intervene in the places and the ten-minute windows where human behaviors predictably go haywire.

Jens Ludwig is the Edwin A. and Betty L. Bergman Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy. He is the Pritzker Director of the University of Chicago&apos;s Crime Lab, codirector of the National Bureau of Economic Research&apos;s working group on the economics of crime, elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, and a member of the Committee on Law and Justice of the National Academies of Science.

Alfred Marcus is the Edson Spencer Professor at the Carlson School, University of Minnesota.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>807</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb044746-fd9a-11f0-af26-73a1103352f6</guid>
      <title>Nathan Munier, &quot;Zimbabwe&apos;s Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when states experience a rapid increase in resource wealth? This book examines the significant diamond find in eastern Zimbabwe in 2006, possibly the largest in over 100 years, and its influence on the institutional trajectory of the country. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009674768"><em>Zimbabwe's Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development</em> </a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Nathan Munier examines how this rapid increase in resource production shaped the policies available to political actors, providing a fresh understanding of the perpetuation of ZANU-PF rule and the variation in the trajectory of institutions in Zimbabwe compared to other Southern African states. This study places Zimbabwe amongst the overall population of resource-wealthy countries such as Angola, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa, especially those that experience a significant increase in production. In doing so, Dr. Munier contributes to the understanding of resource politics, political economy, and comparative African politics.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when states experience a rapid increase in resource wealth? This book examines the significant diamond find in eastern Zimbabwe in 2006, possibly the largest in over 100 years, and its influence on the institutional trajectory of the country. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009674768"><em>Zimbabwe's Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development</em> </a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Nathan Munier examines how this rapid increase in resource production shaped the policies available to political actors, providing a fresh understanding of the perpetuation of ZANU-PF rule and the variation in the trajectory of institutions in Zimbabwe compared to other Southern African states. This study places Zimbabwe amongst the overall population of resource-wealthy countries such as Angola, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa, especially those that experience a significant increase in production. In doing so, Dr. Munier contributes to the understanding of resource politics, political economy, and comparative African politics.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32288769" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3ba7a5f9-1dc4-4f84-82e6-de684fc7317d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3ba7a5f9-1dc4-4f84-82e6-de684fc7317d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nathan Munier, &quot;Zimbabwe&apos;s Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when states experience a rapid increase in resource wealth? This book examines the significant diamond find in eastern Zimbabwe in 2006, possibly the largest in over 100 years, and its influence on the institutional trajectory of the country. In Zimbabwe&apos;s Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Nathan Munier examines how this rapid increase in resource production shaped the policies available to political actors, providing a fresh understanding of the perpetuation of ZANU-PF rule and the variation in the trajectory of institutions in Zimbabwe compared to other Southern African states. This study places Zimbabwe amongst the overall population of resource-wealthy countries such as Angola, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa, especially those that experience a significant increase in production. In doing so, Dr. Munier contributes to the understanding of resource politics, political economy, and comparative African politics.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when states experience a rapid increase in resource wealth? This book examines the significant diamond find in eastern Zimbabwe in 2006, possibly the largest in over 100 years, and its influence on the institutional trajectory of the country. In Zimbabwe&apos;s Diamond Trade: The State, Resource Politics and Development (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Nathan Munier examines how this rapid increase in resource production shaped the policies available to political actors, providing a fresh understanding of the perpetuation of ZANU-PF rule and the variation in the trajectory of institutions in Zimbabwe compared to other Southern African states. This study places Zimbabwe amongst the overall population of resource-wealthy countries such as Angola, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa, especially those that experience a significant increase in production. In doing so, Dr. Munier contributes to the understanding of resource politics, political economy, and comparative African politics.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>806</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b051180-2ca9-11ee-9df5-2bff7db18593</guid>
      <title>Blair Kelley, &quot;Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class&quot; (LIveright, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the <em>white </em>working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781631496554"><em>Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class</em> </a>(LIveright, 2023<em>), </em>Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.</p><p>Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.</p><p>Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, <em>Black Folk</em> celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” <em>Black Folk</em> looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.</p><p><a href="https://www.profblmkelley.com/">Dr. Blair LM Kelley</a> is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/right-to-ride-streetcar-boycotts-and-african-american-citizenship-in-the-era-of-plessy-v-ferguson-blair-l-m-kelley/10090103"><em>Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson</em></a> from the University of North Carolina Press.</p><p>Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/to-joy-my-freedom-southern-black-women-s-lives-and-labors-after-the-civil-war-tera-w-hunter/6726921?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwvilBhCFARIsADvYi7KdjrVy3RX86sASEF8xzlk8qYccLxCHgFIeAXN7FgDdJ_kt_oemwTkaAil4EALw_wcB"><em>To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War</em></a>, Duke University’s <a href="https://repository.duke.edu/dc/behindtheveil"><em>Behind the Veil</em></a> oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/there-s-always-work-at-the-post-office-african-american-postal-workers-and-the-fight-for-jobs-justice-and-equality-philip-f-rubio/10083852"><em>There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the <em>white </em>working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781631496554"><em>Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class</em> </a>(LIveright, 2023<em>), </em>Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.</p><p>Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.</p><p>Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, <em>Black Folk</em> celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” <em>Black Folk</em> looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.</p><p><a href="https://www.profblmkelley.com/">Dr. Blair LM Kelley</a> is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/right-to-ride-streetcar-boycotts-and-african-american-citizenship-in-the-era-of-plessy-v-ferguson-blair-l-m-kelley/10090103"><em>Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson</em></a> from the University of North Carolina Press.</p><p>Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/to-joy-my-freedom-southern-black-women-s-lives-and-labors-after-the-civil-war-tera-w-hunter/6726921?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwvilBhCFARIsADvYi7KdjrVy3RX86sASEF8xzlk8qYccLxCHgFIeAXN7FgDdJ_kt_oemwTkaAil4EALw_wcB"><em>To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War</em></a>, Duke University’s <a href="https://repository.duke.edu/dc/behindtheveil"><em>Behind the Veil</em></a> oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/there-s-always-work-at-the-post-office-african-american-postal-workers-and-the-fight-for-jobs-justice-and-equality-philip-f-rubio/10083852"><em>There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40595272" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c45bb1a1-11ad-475e-bbea-e9618aa2e328/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c45bb1a1-11ad-475e-bbea-e9618aa2e328&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Blair Kelley, &quot;Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class&quot; (LIveright, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the white working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. 
In Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class (LIveright, 2023), Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.
Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.
Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, Black Folk celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” Black Folk looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.
Dr. Blair LM Kelley is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson from the University of North Carolina Press.
Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War, Duke University’s Behind the Veil oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, the stoicism and importance of the “working class” is part of the national myth. The term is often used to conjure the contributions and challenges of the white working class – and this obscures the ways in which Black workers built institutions like the railroads and universities – but also how they transformed unions, changed public policy, and established community. 
In Black Folk: The Roots of the Black Working Class (LIveright, 2023), Dr. Blair LM Kelley restores the Black working class to the center of the American story by interrogating the lives of laundresses, Pullman porters, domestic maids, and postal workers. The book is both a personal journey and a history of Black labor in the United States from enslavement to the present day with a focus on a critical era: after Southern Emancipation to the early 20th century, when the first generations of Black working people carved out a world for themselves.
Dr. Kelley captures the character of the lives of Black workers not only as laborers, activists, or members of a class but as individuals whose daily experiences mattered – to themselves, to their communities, and to “the nation at large, even as it denied their importance.” As she weaves together rich oral histories, memoirs, photographs, and secondary sources, she shows how Black workers of all genders were “intertwined with the future of Black freedom, Black citizenship, and the establishment of civil rights for Black Americans.” She demonstrates how her own family’s experiences mirrors this wider history of the Black working class – sometimes in ways that she herself did not realize before writing the book.
Even as the book confronts violence, poor working conditions, and a government that often legislated to protect the interests of white workers and consumers, Black Folk celebrates the ways in which Black people “built and rebuilt vital spaces of resistance, grounded in the secrets that they knew about themselves, about their community, their dignity, and their survival.” Black Folk looks back but also forward. In examining the labor and challenges of individuals, Dr. Kelley sheds light on reparations and suggests that Amazon package processing centers, supermarkets, and nursing homes can be spaces of resistance and labor activism in the 21st century.
Dr. Blair LM Kelley is the Joel R. Williamson Distinguished Professor of Southern Studies at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and incoming director of the Center for the Study of the American South, the first Black woman to serve in that role in the center’s thirty-year history. She is also the author of Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson from the University of North Carolina Press.
Dr. Kelley mentions Dr. Tera W. Hunter’s To ‘Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women’s Lives and Labors After the Civil War, Duke University’s Behind the Veil oral history project, and Philip R. Rubio’s There’s Always Work at the Post Office: African American Postal Workers and the Fight for Jobs, Justice, and Equality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>666</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1eead114-fb05-11f0-a597-87a49c1f9b03</guid>
      <title>Betty Boyd Caroli, &quot;A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Betty Boyd Caroli's biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams's Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some "the mother of public housing." She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current "housing crisis" as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government's responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197793800">A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing</a> (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a "Wonder Woman of History" for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.</p>
<p>Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betty Boyd Caroli's biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams's Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some "the mother of public housing." She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current "housing crisis" as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government's responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197793800">A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing</a> (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a "Wonder Woman of History" for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.</p>
<p>Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57400513" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/75a7e359-652b-419c-bbaf-2c213761fbd4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=75a7e359-652b-419c-bbaf-2c213761fbd4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Betty Boyd Caroli, &quot;A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Betty Boyd Caroli&apos;s biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams&apos;s Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some &quot;the mother of public housing.&quot; She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current &quot;housing crisis&quot; as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government&apos;s responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.

A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a &quot;Wonder Woman of History&quot; for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.

Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Betty Boyd Caroli&apos;s biography of Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch is the first full-length work on a seminal figure in the settlement house movement, which spearheaded efforts to improve the life of immigrants and to counter urban squalor in cities around America in the early 19th century. Greenwich House, the community center Simkhovitch founded in 1902 in Greenwich Village, then a destination point for new immigrants to New York, quickly gained a reputation equal to that of Jane Addams&apos;s Hull House in Chicago, providing services in health, recreation, education, and the arts (which Greenwich House continues to do to this day). Simkhovitch became a tireless advocate of public housing and has been called by some &quot;the mother of public housing.&quot; She played a central role in designing and administering the first public housing projects in America during the New Deal, in which she was an integral figure. The National Housing Conference, which she founded in 1931, continues to operate in our current &quot;housing crisis&quot; as among the most prominent advocates for safe, affordable housing. She co-wrote the National House Act of 1937, the first piece of legislation to establish the federal government&apos;s responsibility to help provide low-income families with housing.

A Slumless America: Mary K. Simkhovitch and the Dream of Affordable Housing (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Caroli, best-known for her work on presidential First Ladies, which has gone through multiple editions, will become the standard account of a truly remarkable life. Born in New England and educated in Boston and at the University of Berlin, Simkhovitch married a Russian intellectual seven years her junior who spoke no English and had no job prospects. Raising a family while working for her rapidly expanding set of causes, Simkhovitch was portrayed in a DC Comics series (also featuring Diana Prince) in the early 1940s as a &quot;Wonder Woman of History&quot; for her seeming ability to do it all: take on the full spectrum of urban ills while also raising and supporting her family. Her husband eventually joined the Columbia faculty and became a noted art collector, advising collectors such as J. P. Morgan, while she exposed the squalor of Downtown slums. The stress of trying to do it all took a heavy toll on Simkhovitch, but her lifelong, passionate advocacy of and contributions to housing reform continued unabated and remains both inspiring and relevant.

Betty Boyd Caroli is a graduate of Oberlin College and holds an MA in Mass Communication from Annenberg School of University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in American Civilization from New York University. She studied at the Università Per Stranieri in Perugia, Italy, and the Salzburg Seminar in Austria. A Fulbright in Italy led her to teach at the British College in Palermo, the English School in Rome, and two branches of City University of New York (Queens College and Kingsborough Community College).

Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>804</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">417569dc-fa7f-11f0-b400-2fd9ac63525a</guid>
      <title>Colette Einfeld and Helen Sullivan, &quot;How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an academic supervisor and their former student get together to write and edit a book on researching our social world? In <a href="https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035313990"><em>How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers</em></a> (Edward Elgar, 2025) readers have an answer to this question from two writers working by interpretivist lights: one, <a href="https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/colette-einfeld/">Colette Einfeld</a>, an emerging new talent; the other, <a href="https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/helen-sullivan/">Helen Sullivan</a>, a renowned public policy professor. On this the 26th episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, they discuss the motivations for the book, the various meanings of interpretive research for them and their contributors, messiness and emotions in social and political scientific work, how they identified their authors, and what they learned from one another while writing and editing together. ﻿</p>
<p>Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-art-and-craft-of-comparison">John Boswell and Jack Corbett</a>, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rethinking-comparison">Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20social%20science/">Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely</a>, and way back at the start of the series, <a href="http://interpretive%20research%20design/">Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow</a>.﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something else to read? Helen recommends Hossein Asgari’s novel, <a href="https://publishing.hardiegrant.com/en-au/books/desolation-by-unknown/9781761154133"><em>Desolation</em></a><em>. </em>﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not extruded by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when an academic supervisor and their former student get together to write and edit a book on researching our social world? In <a href="https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035313990"><em>How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers</em></a> (Edward Elgar, 2025) readers have an answer to this question from two writers working by interpretivist lights: one, <a href="https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/colette-einfeld/">Colette Einfeld</a>, an emerging new talent; the other, <a href="https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/helen-sullivan/">Helen Sullivan</a>, a renowned public policy professor. On this the 26th episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, they discuss the motivations for the book, the various meanings of interpretive research for them and their contributors, messiness and emotions in social and political scientific work, how they identified their authors, and what they learned from one another while writing and editing together. ﻿</p>
<p>Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-art-and-craft-of-comparison">John Boswell and Jack Corbett</a>, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rethinking-comparison">Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20social%20science/">Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely</a>, and way back at the start of the series, <a href="http://interpretive%20research%20design/">Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow</a>.﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something else to read? Helen recommends Hossein Asgari’s novel, <a href="https://publishing.hardiegrant.com/en-au/books/desolation-by-unknown/9781761154133"><em>Desolation</em></a><em>. </em>﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not extruded by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41447884" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a712d524-77d1-4f20-8143-98f7bb467db8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a712d524-77d1-4f20-8143-98f7bb467db8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Colette Einfeld and Helen Sullivan, &quot;How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when an academic supervisor and their former student get together to write and edit a book on researching our social world? In How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers (Edward Elgar, 2025) readers have an answer to this question from two writers working by interpretivist lights: one, Colette Einfeld, an emerging new talent; the other, Helen Sullivan, a renowned public policy professor. On this the 26th episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, they discuss the motivations for the book, the various meanings of interpretive research for them and their contributors, messiness and emotions in social and political scientific work, how they identified their authors, and what they learned from one another while writing and editing together. ﻿

Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including John Boswell and Jack Corbett, Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith, Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely, and way back at the start of the series, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow.﻿

Looking for something else to read? Helen recommends Hossein Asgari’s novel, Desolation. ﻿

This interview summary was not extruded by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when an academic supervisor and their former student get together to write and edit a book on researching our social world? In How to Conduct Interpretive Research: Insights for Students and Researchers (Edward Elgar, 2025) readers have an answer to this question from two writers working by interpretivist lights: one, Colette Einfeld, an emerging new talent; the other, Helen Sullivan, a renowned public policy professor. On this the 26th episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, they discuss the motivations for the book, the various meanings of interpretive research for them and their contributors, messiness and emotions in social and political scientific work, how they identified their authors, and what they learned from one another while writing and editing together. ﻿

Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including John Boswell and Jack Corbett, Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith, Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely, and way back at the start of the series, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow.﻿

Looking for something else to read? Helen recommends Hossein Asgari’s novel, Desolation. ﻿

This interview summary was not extruded by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>803</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b586e41c-f5c6-11f0-a9e8-2730f4615b4e</guid>
      <title>Democracy and Its Inter-Connections</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla joins us for a conversation on global democratic backsliding, the role of the international community, and youth civic engagement. As a distinguished leader with experience at the highest level of national and global political affairs, President Chinchilla brings distinctive viewpoints to our conversation to foster democracy through democratic practices, public policy, and civil discourse. She currently serves as co-chair of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank, the newly inducted president of Club de Madrid, an independent, non-partisan organization created to promote democracy, and member of international initiatives like the United Nations Human Development Report and the International Olympic Committee.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla joins us for a conversation on global democratic backsliding, the role of the international community, and youth civic engagement. As a distinguished leader with experience at the highest level of national and global political affairs, President Chinchilla brings distinctive viewpoints to our conversation to foster democracy through democratic practices, public policy, and civil discourse. She currently serves as co-chair of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank, the newly inducted president of Club de Madrid, an independent, non-partisan organization created to promote democracy, and member of international initiatives like the United Nations Human Development Report and the International Olympic Committee.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49129006" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/85a39f78-bda6-4db7-b078-8d472f816dec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=85a39f78-bda6-4db7-b078-8d472f816dec&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democracy and Its Inter-Connections</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Former Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla joins us for a conversation on global democratic backsliding, the role of the international community, and youth civic engagement. As a distinguished leader with experience at the highest level of national and global political affairs, President Chinchilla brings distinctive viewpoints to our conversation to foster democracy through democratic practices, public policy, and civil discourse. She currently serves as co-chair of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank, the newly inducted president of Club de Madrid, an independent, non-partisan organization created to promote democracy, and member of international initiatives like the United Nations Human Development Report and the International Olympic Committee.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Former Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla joins us for a conversation on global democratic backsliding, the role of the international community, and youth civic engagement. As a distinguished leader with experience at the highest level of national and global political affairs, President Chinchilla brings distinctive viewpoints to our conversation to foster democracy through democratic practices, public policy, and civil discourse. She currently serves as co-chair of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank, the newly inducted president of Club de Madrid, an independent, non-partisan organization created to promote democracy, and member of international initiatives like the United Nations Human Development Report and the International Olympic Committee.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>802</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a1e11e4-f5ae-11f0-a32b-339d0e693d58</guid>
      <title>Yunus Emre Ozigci, &quot;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&quot; (Vernon Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/book/2483?srsltid=AfmBOopRvQ2yJLuwJAYPlqfexOKFzolsSllLpqMmUbbVHATsLWBIIPX_">NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (</a>Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO's identity and role, suggesting it's stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia's actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO's internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In<em> NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity </em>(2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz's structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane's complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.</p>
<p>Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. --<strong> </strong>﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿</p>
<p>Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149</p>
<p>Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://vernonpress.com/book/2483?srsltid=AfmBOopRvQ2yJLuwJAYPlqfexOKFzolsSllLpqMmUbbVHATsLWBIIPX_">NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (</a>Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO's identity and role, suggesting it's stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia's actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO's internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In<em> NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity </em>(2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz's structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane's complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.</p>
<p>Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. --<strong> </strong>﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿</p>
<p>Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149</p>
<p>Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76236988" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d1c99223-9413-44c0-9fc2-ca844bdc60d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d1c99223-9413-44c0-9fc2-ca844bdc60d9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yunus Emre Ozigci, &quot;NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity&quot; (Vernon Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO&apos;s identity and role, suggesting it&apos;s stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia&apos;s actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO&apos;s internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.

﻿﻿In NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz&apos;s structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane&apos;s complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.

Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. -- ﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿

Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149

Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (Vernon Press, 2026) a forthcoming 2026 book by Yunus Emre Ozigci, offers a deep analysis of NATO&apos;s identity and role, suggesting it&apos;s stuck in bureaucratic inertia despite modern crises, aiming to redefine its purpose through exploring shared identity and transformation, particularly in the context of Russia&apos;s actions. This scholarly work uses intersubjectivity to understand how NATO&apos;s internal dynamics and external relations, especially concerning the Ukraine conflict, shape its meaning beyond mere military power, potentially moving beyond traditional IR theories to explore collective identity and systemic challenges.

﻿﻿In NATO’s Meaning and Existence: Within the Interstate Intersubjectivity (2026), Ozigci treats NATO as an intersubjective phenomenon rather than an objective entity. To him, NATO “does not exist objectively” but rather appears “meaningfully through intersubjective recognition.” His skillful integration of philosophical innovations from such thinkers as Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre supports his deep insights into Kenneth Waltz&apos;s structural interpretations of the balance of power, John Mearsheimer’s offensive realism, and Robert Keohane&apos;s complex interdependence and invites readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This work reminds us that NATO’s real strength does not necessarily come from being the most efficient military structure in the world, promoting those who excel at following orders, but rather from its ingenuity, resourcefulness, and unity of purpose. His study provides a rare synthesis of diplomatic experience and philosophical depth, inviting readers to reconsider how alliances exist beyond the surface of policy and power. This is an original, meticulously argued, and intellectually stimulating contribution to both NATO studies and the philosophy of international relations.

Piotr Pietrzak, Ph.D. -- ﻿In Statu Nascendi Think Tank﻿

Yunus Emre Ozigci holds a PhD degree in Political Sciences from the Université catholique de Louvain. He graduated from the Galatasaray University (International relations) and completed his MA studies at the University of Ankara (International relations). His research interests and publications cover the IR theory and phenomenology. Since 2000, he has been working as a diplomat in the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served, besides various departments of the Ministry, in Algeria, Belgium, Switzerland and Russia. Currently, he is the First Counsellor of the Turkish Embassy in Nairobi and Deputy Permanent Representative to UNON (UNEP and UN-Habitat). ORCID: 0000-0003-3388-7149

Please note: This publication is a personal work. It does not reflect the official views of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>801</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e31bb1c6-f4b0-11f0-9a3d-0f40511c409c</guid>
      <title>Duncan Kelly, &quot;Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198799504">Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Duncan Kelly is a new intellectual history of the many and varied ideas about politics and economics that were made, and remade, through wartime and revolution, by political and economic thinkers working across the globe, from the 1880s to the 1930s. Spanning continents, connecting networks of people, power, and possibilities, in new and often experimental ways, the worlds of wartime saw histories of modern politics and economics revised and updated, used as well as abused, in myriad attempts to interpret, explain, understand, explore, and indeed to win, the war. This book takes the measure of a great many of these overlapping visions, and it does so by trying to learn some of the lessons that literary and artistic modernism can teach us about the complexities of political and economic ideas, their contingency and uncertainty, and how they are fixed into focus only at very particular moments. Moving from the stylised narratives of European and American political theory and intellectual history, through to the futurist politics of revolutionaries in Ireland, India, Ottoman-Turkey, and Russia, this book also tracks arguments and strategies for Pan-African diasporic federation, alongside German and American debates about federal pasts and federal futures. From the invention of the world economy, to the reality of multiple war economies, from revolutionary conjunctures to ideas of democracy and climate catastrophe in the Anthropocene today, <em>Worlds of Wartime</em> tells the story of just how strongly modern politics in general, and modern ideas about political and economic possibility, were fixed by the intellectual turbulence wrought during the First World War.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198799504">Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Duncan Kelly is a new intellectual history of the many and varied ideas about politics and economics that were made, and remade, through wartime and revolution, by political and economic thinkers working across the globe, from the 1880s to the 1930s. Spanning continents, connecting networks of people, power, and possibilities, in new and often experimental ways, the worlds of wartime saw histories of modern politics and economics revised and updated, used as well as abused, in myriad attempts to interpret, explain, understand, explore, and indeed to win, the war. This book takes the measure of a great many of these overlapping visions, and it does so by trying to learn some of the lessons that literary and artistic modernism can teach us about the complexities of political and economic ideas, their contingency and uncertainty, and how they are fixed into focus only at very particular moments. Moving from the stylised narratives of European and American political theory and intellectual history, through to the futurist politics of revolutionaries in Ireland, India, Ottoman-Turkey, and Russia, this book also tracks arguments and strategies for Pan-African diasporic federation, alongside German and American debates about federal pasts and federal futures. From the invention of the world economy, to the reality of multiple war economies, from revolutionary conjunctures to ideas of democracy and climate catastrophe in the Anthropocene today, <em>Worlds of Wartime</em> tells the story of just how strongly modern politics in general, and modern ideas about political and economic possibility, were fixed by the intellectual turbulence wrought during the First World War.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78534193" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1e5f89fb-560a-4b92-b271-f110a0e543ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1e5f89fb-560a-4b92-b271-f110a0e543ef&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Duncan Kelly, &quot;Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Duncan Kelly is a new intellectual history of the many and varied ideas about politics and economics that were made, and remade, through wartime and revolution, by political and economic thinkers working across the globe, from the 1880s to the 1930s. Spanning continents, connecting networks of people, power, and possibilities, in new and often experimental ways, the worlds of wartime saw histories of modern politics and economics revised and updated, used as well as abused, in myriad attempts to interpret, explain, understand, explore, and indeed to win, the war. This book takes the measure of a great many of these overlapping visions, and it does so by trying to learn some of the lessons that literary and artistic modernism can teach us about the complexities of political and economic ideas, their contingency and uncertainty, and how they are fixed into focus only at very particular moments. Moving from the stylised narratives of European and American political theory and intellectual history, through to the futurist politics of revolutionaries in Ireland, India, Ottoman-Turkey, and Russia, this book also tracks arguments and strategies for Pan-African diasporic federation, alongside German and American debates about federal pasts and federal futures. From the invention of the world economy, to the reality of multiple war economies, from revolutionary conjunctures to ideas of democracy and climate catastrophe in the Anthropocene today, Worlds of Wartime tells the story of just how strongly modern politics in general, and modern ideas about political and economic possibility, were fixed by the intellectual turbulence wrought during the First World War.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Worlds of Wartime: The First World War and the Reconstruction of Modern Politics (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Duncan Kelly is a new intellectual history of the many and varied ideas about politics and economics that were made, and remade, through wartime and revolution, by political and economic thinkers working across the globe, from the 1880s to the 1930s. Spanning continents, connecting networks of people, power, and possibilities, in new and often experimental ways, the worlds of wartime saw histories of modern politics and economics revised and updated, used as well as abused, in myriad attempts to interpret, explain, understand, explore, and indeed to win, the war. This book takes the measure of a great many of these overlapping visions, and it does so by trying to learn some of the lessons that literary and artistic modernism can teach us about the complexities of political and economic ideas, their contingency and uncertainty, and how they are fixed into focus only at very particular moments. Moving from the stylised narratives of European and American political theory and intellectual history, through to the futurist politics of revolutionaries in Ireland, India, Ottoman-Turkey, and Russia, this book also tracks arguments and strategies for Pan-African diasporic federation, alongside German and American debates about federal pasts and federal futures. From the invention of the world economy, to the reality of multiple war economies, from revolutionary conjunctures to ideas of democracy and climate catastrophe in the Anthropocene today, Worlds of Wartime tells the story of just how strongly modern politics in general, and modern ideas about political and economic possibility, were fixed by the intellectual turbulence wrought during the First World War.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>800</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f0143196-f28a-11f0-b3f4-372aaeac2d76</guid>
      <title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a> (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of <em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a> (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of <em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50604790" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c18e80cf-6936-43a8-bfa7-5850e2cdfccd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c18e80cf-6936-43a8-bfa7-5850e2cdfccd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.

A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.

A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>799</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d98a8e46-f10b-11f0-ba46-fbaff5a5adf4</guid>
      <title>Michael J. Illuzzi, &quot;Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the <em>Declaration of Independence</em>, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700640638">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a><em> </em>is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.</p>
<p>The case studies at the heart of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a> include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.</p>
<p>This is a beautifully written discussion of the <em>idea</em> of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/">Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a> is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the <em>Declaration of Independence</em>, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700640638">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a><em> </em>is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.</p>
<p>The case studies at the heart of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/">Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a> include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.</p>
<p>This is a beautifully written discussion of the <em>idea</em> of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640638/">Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age</a> is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37880366" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/44ba4c5e-02a1-49c4-92ee-78fc5b6028c7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=44ba4c5e-02a1-49c4-92ee-78fc5b6028c7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael J. Illuzzi, &quot;Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the Declaration of Independence, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.

The case studies at the heart of Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.

This is a beautifully written discussion of the idea of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Michael Illuzzi has a fascinating new book on peoplehood in the United States, focusing on different political actors at different crucial points in American history, and how the “story” of American peoplehood has been told. This idea of “peoplehood” is not necessarily new, since it brings with it a connection to the country where one is a citizen. But for the United States, this concept has been defined and redefined over more than 250 years and often connects back to the promise of the Declaration of Independence, where the commitment to equality was articulated, but has never been fully recognized or achieved. Part of what Illuzzi is doing in Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is explaining, through a number of case studies, the difference between what are called “mending stories” and “bleaching stories”—those narratives that design a country that is more inclusive, that explain the past but also work towards mending earlier injustices, in contrast to those narratives that choose to erase historical injustices and inequalities and, in the process, also define the American fabric as exclusionary. This framework, drawing out these different approaches to narratives about American peoplehood, is vitally important as we find ourselves at this particular inflection point, with daily debates and armed conflicts over who is and isn’t allowed to be considered an American.

The case studies at the heart of Mending the Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age include the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln, Mayor Samual Jones (of Toledo) and the integration of immigrants at the turn of the century, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, Martin Luther King Jr’s coalition building beyond the Civil Rights Movement, Black Panther Leader Fred Hampton’s Rainbow Coalition in Chicago in the 1960s, and finally the Poor People’s Campaign led by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Rev. Dr. William Barber II. In each case, Illuzzi examines different kinds of opposition to more authoritarian, more divisive, or more oppressive approaches, in the speeches and in the coalitions that are being built by those leading towards mending narratives. Part of the analysis is also about how political coalitions are expanded—especially in ways that may be unexpected, when common issues (like poverty, or police brutality, or healthcare access) transcend ethnic, racial, or even political boundaries and groupings.

This is a beautifully written discussion of the idea of the United States, and the ways in which politics, race, ethnicity, and class are all woven together within the broader fabric of a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Mending A Nation: Reclaiming We The People in a Populist Age is particularly important in helping us to think about and possibly act on “from many, one” in the age of divisive populism and discrimination.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>798</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc4bc2d8-f052-11f0-9a32-b3c4abcdcdb2</guid>
      <title>Vanessa Díaz and Petra R. Rivera-Rideau, &quot;P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance&quot; (Duke UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478033332">P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance</a> (Duke UP, 2026) explores the work of Puerto Rican musical superstar Bad Bunny (Benito A. Martinez Ocasio), focusing on his cultural and political significance.Global superstar Bad Bunny, like many other Puerto Ricans, has lived a life marked by public crises—blackouts, hurricanes, political corruption and oppression, among others—that have exposed the ongoing impacts of colonialism in Puerto Rico. Offering a portrait of the past and future of Puerto Rican resistance through one of its loudest and proudest voices, <em>P FKN R</em> draws on interviews with musicians, politicians, and journalists as well as ethnographic research to set Bad Bunny and Puerto Rican resistance in a historical, political, and cultural context. Authors Vanessa Díaz and Petra Rivera-Rideau—creators of the “Bad Bunny Syllabus”—demonstrate Bad Bunny’s place in a long tradition of infusing both joy and protest into music and honor the many evolving forms of daily resistance to oppression and colonialism that are part of Puerto Rican life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478033332">P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance</a> (Duke UP, 2026) explores the work of Puerto Rican musical superstar Bad Bunny (Benito A. Martinez Ocasio), focusing on his cultural and political significance.Global superstar Bad Bunny, like many other Puerto Ricans, has lived a life marked by public crises—blackouts, hurricanes, political corruption and oppression, among others—that have exposed the ongoing impacts of colonialism in Puerto Rico. Offering a portrait of the past and future of Puerto Rican resistance through one of its loudest and proudest voices, <em>P FKN R</em> draws on interviews with musicians, politicians, and journalists as well as ethnographic research to set Bad Bunny and Puerto Rican resistance in a historical, political, and cultural context. Authors Vanessa Díaz and Petra Rivera-Rideau—creators of the “Bad Bunny Syllabus”—demonstrate Bad Bunny’s place in a long tradition of infusing both joy and protest into music and honor the many evolving forms of daily resistance to oppression and colonialism that are part of Puerto Rican life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53041538" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8c0f2cdc-6abf-4698-829f-b9c31861e32f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8c0f2cdc-6abf-4698-829f-b9c31861e32f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vanessa Díaz and Petra R. Rivera-Rideau, &quot;P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance&quot; (Duke UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance (Duke UP, 2026) explores the work of Puerto Rican musical superstar Bad Bunny (Benito A. Martinez Ocasio), focusing on his cultural and political significance.Global superstar Bad Bunny, like many other Puerto Ricans, has lived a life marked by public crises—blackouts, hurricanes, political corruption and oppression, among others—that have exposed the ongoing impacts of colonialism in Puerto Rico. Offering a portrait of the past and future of Puerto Rican resistance through one of its loudest and proudest voices, P FKN R draws on interviews with musicians, politicians, and journalists as well as ethnographic research to set Bad Bunny and Puerto Rican resistance in a historical, political, and cultural context. Authors Vanessa Díaz and Petra Rivera-Rideau—creators of the “Bad Bunny Syllabus”—demonstrate Bad Bunny’s place in a long tradition of infusing both joy and protest into music and honor the many evolving forms of daily resistance to oppression and colonialism that are part of Puerto Rican life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>P FKN R: How Bad Bunny Became the Global Voice of Puerto Rican Resistance (Duke UP, 2026) explores the work of Puerto Rican musical superstar Bad Bunny (Benito A. Martinez Ocasio), focusing on his cultural and political significance.Global superstar Bad Bunny, like many other Puerto Ricans, has lived a life marked by public crises—blackouts, hurricanes, political corruption and oppression, among others—that have exposed the ongoing impacts of colonialism in Puerto Rico. Offering a portrait of the past and future of Puerto Rican resistance through one of its loudest and proudest voices, P FKN R draws on interviews with musicians, politicians, and journalists as well as ethnographic research to set Bad Bunny and Puerto Rican resistance in a historical, political, and cultural context. Authors Vanessa Díaz and Petra Rivera-Rideau—creators of the “Bad Bunny Syllabus”—demonstrate Bad Bunny’s place in a long tradition of infusing both joy and protest into music and honor the many evolving forms of daily resistance to oppression and colonialism that are part of Puerto Rican life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>797</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">877dae4e-eca1-11f0-afc2-bf0183f24037</guid>
      <title>Moritz Föllmer, &quot;The Quest for Individual Freedom: A Twentieth-Century European History&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to see oneself as free? And how can this freedom be attained in times of conflict and social upheaval? In this ambitious study, Moritz Föllmer explores what twentieth-century Europeans understood by individual freedom and how they endeavoured to achieve it. Combining cultural, social, and political history, this book highlights the tension between ordinary people's efforts to secure personal independence and the ambitious attempts of thinkers and activists to embed notions of freedom in political and cultural agendas. The quest to be a free individual was multi-faceted; no single concept predominated. Men and women articulated and pursued it against the backdrop of two world wars, the expanding power of the state, the constraints of working life, pre-established moral norms, the growing influence of America, and uncertain futures of colonial rule. But although claims to individual freedom could be steered and stymied, they could not, ultimately, be suppressed.</p>
<p>Moritz Föllmer is Associate Professor of Modern History at the University of Amsterdam. He is particularly interested in Weimar and Nazi Germany, and in concepts of individuality and urbanity in twentieth-century Europe.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to see oneself as free? And how can this freedom be attained in times of conflict and social upheaval? In this ambitious study, Moritz Föllmer explores what twentieth-century Europeans understood by individual freedom and how they endeavoured to achieve it. Combining cultural, social, and political history, this book highlights the tension between ordinary people's efforts to secure personal independence and the ambitious attempts of thinkers and activists to embed notions of freedom in political and cultural agendas. The quest to be a free individual was multi-faceted; no single concept predominated. Men and women articulated and pursued it against the backdrop of two world wars, the expanding power of the state, the constraints of working life, pre-established moral norms, the growing influence of America, and uncertain futures of colonial rule. But although claims to individual freedom could be steered and stymied, they could not, ultimately, be suppressed.</p>
<p>Moritz Föllmer is Associate Professor of Modern History at the University of Amsterdam. He is particularly interested in Weimar and Nazi Germany, and in concepts of individuality and urbanity in twentieth-century Europe.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68554408" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/09f24318-f0e4-48b8-80eb-f98f61586d3e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=09f24318-f0e4-48b8-80eb-f98f61586d3e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Moritz Föllmer, &quot;The Quest for Individual Freedom: A Twentieth-Century European History&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean to see oneself as free? And how can this freedom be attained in times of conflict and social upheaval? In this ambitious study, Moritz Föllmer explores what twentieth-century Europeans understood by individual freedom and how they endeavoured to achieve it. Combining cultural, social, and political history, this book highlights the tension between ordinary people&apos;s efforts to secure personal independence and the ambitious attempts of thinkers and activists to embed notions of freedom in political and cultural agendas. The quest to be a free individual was multi-faceted; no single concept predominated. Men and women articulated and pursued it against the backdrop of two world wars, the expanding power of the state, the constraints of working life, pre-established moral norms, the growing influence of America, and uncertain futures of colonial rule. But although claims to individual freedom could be steered and stymied, they could not, ultimately, be suppressed.

Moritz Föllmer is Associate Professor of Modern History at the University of Amsterdam. He is particularly interested in Weimar and Nazi Germany, and in concepts of individuality and urbanity in twentieth-century Europe.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean to see oneself as free? And how can this freedom be attained in times of conflict and social upheaval? In this ambitious study, Moritz Föllmer explores what twentieth-century Europeans understood by individual freedom and how they endeavoured to achieve it. Combining cultural, social, and political history, this book highlights the tension between ordinary people&apos;s efforts to secure personal independence and the ambitious attempts of thinkers and activists to embed notions of freedom in political and cultural agendas. The quest to be a free individual was multi-faceted; no single concept predominated. Men and women articulated and pursued it against the backdrop of two world wars, the expanding power of the state, the constraints of working life, pre-established moral norms, the growing influence of America, and uncertain futures of colonial rule. But although claims to individual freedom could be steered and stymied, they could not, ultimately, be suppressed.

Moritz Föllmer is Associate Professor of Modern History at the University of Amsterdam. He is particularly interested in Weimar and Nazi Germany, and in concepts of individuality and urbanity in twentieth-century Europe.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>265</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e847cc90-ec07-11f0-80ff-e724a0b18803</guid>
      <title>Keidrick Roy, &quot;American Dark Age: Racial Feudalism and the Rise of Black Liberalism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Though the United States has been heralded as a beacon of democracy, many nineteenth-century Americans viewed their nation through the prism of the Old World. What they saw was a racially stratified country that reflected not the ideals of a modern republic but rather the remnants of feudalism. <em>American Dark Age</em> reveals how defenders of racial hierarchy embraced America’s resemblance to medieval Europe and tells the stories of the abolitionists who exposed it as a glaring blemish on the national conscience.<br />Against those seeking to maintain what Frederick Douglass called an “aristocracy of the skin,” Keidrick Roy shows how a group of Black thinkers, including Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Hosea Easton, and Harriet Jacobs, challenged the medievalism in their midst—and transformed the nation’s founding liberal tradition. He demonstrates how they drew on spiritual insight, Enlightenment thought, and a homegrown political philosophy that gave expression to their experiences at the bottom of the American social order. Roy sheds new light on how Black abolitionist writers and activists worked to eradicate the pernicious ideology of racial feudalism from American liberalism and renew the country’s commitment to values such as individual liberty, social progress, and egalitarianism.<br /><em>American Dark Age</em> reveals how the antebellum Black liberal tradition holds vital lessons for us today as hate groups continue to align themselves with fantasies of a medieval past and openly call for a return of all-powerful monarchs, aristocrats, and nobles who rule by virtue of their race.</p>
<p><strong>Keidrick Roy</strong> is Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College. He has received national attention through media outlets such as <em>CBS News Sunday Morning</em> and the <em>Chicago Review of Books </em>and appears in the HBO documentary <em>Frederick Douglass: In Five Speeches</em>. He has curated two major exhibitions at the American Writers Museum in Chicago on Black American figures, including Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and Ralph Ellison.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the United States has been heralded as a beacon of democracy, many nineteenth-century Americans viewed their nation through the prism of the Old World. What they saw was a racially stratified country that reflected not the ideals of a modern republic but rather the remnants of feudalism. <em>American Dark Age</em> reveals how defenders of racial hierarchy embraced America’s resemblance to medieval Europe and tells the stories of the abolitionists who exposed it as a glaring blemish on the national conscience.<br />Against those seeking to maintain what Frederick Douglass called an “aristocracy of the skin,” Keidrick Roy shows how a group of Black thinkers, including Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Hosea Easton, and Harriet Jacobs, challenged the medievalism in their midst—and transformed the nation’s founding liberal tradition. He demonstrates how they drew on spiritual insight, Enlightenment thought, and a homegrown political philosophy that gave expression to their experiences at the bottom of the American social order. Roy sheds new light on how Black abolitionist writers and activists worked to eradicate the pernicious ideology of racial feudalism from American liberalism and renew the country’s commitment to values such as individual liberty, social progress, and egalitarianism.<br /><em>American Dark Age</em> reveals how the antebellum Black liberal tradition holds vital lessons for us today as hate groups continue to align themselves with fantasies of a medieval past and openly call for a return of all-powerful monarchs, aristocrats, and nobles who rule by virtue of their race.</p>
<p><strong>Keidrick Roy</strong> is Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College. He has received national attention through media outlets such as <em>CBS News Sunday Morning</em> and the <em>Chicago Review of Books </em>and appears in the HBO documentary <em>Frederick Douglass: In Five Speeches</em>. He has curated two major exhibitions at the American Writers Museum in Chicago on Black American figures, including Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and Ralph Ellison.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46608683" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/657421fe-49cf-4de8-8b28-2df83c9c19e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=657421fe-49cf-4de8-8b28-2df83c9c19e5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Keidrick Roy, &quot;American Dark Age: Racial Feudalism and the Rise of Black Liberalism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Though the United States has been heralded as a beacon of democracy, many nineteenth-century Americans viewed their nation through the prism of the Old World. What they saw was a racially stratified country that reflected not the ideals of a modern republic but rather the remnants of feudalism. American Dark Age reveals how defenders of racial hierarchy embraced America’s resemblance to medieval Europe and tells the stories of the abolitionists who exposed it as a glaring blemish on the national conscience.Against those seeking to maintain what Frederick Douglass called an “aristocracy of the skin,” Keidrick Roy shows how a group of Black thinkers, including Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Hosea Easton, and Harriet Jacobs, challenged the medievalism in their midst—and transformed the nation’s founding liberal tradition. He demonstrates how they drew on spiritual insight, Enlightenment thought, and a homegrown political philosophy that gave expression to their experiences at the bottom of the American social order. Roy sheds new light on how Black abolitionist writers and activists worked to eradicate the pernicious ideology of racial feudalism from American liberalism and renew the country’s commitment to values such as individual liberty, social progress, and egalitarianism.American Dark Age reveals how the antebellum Black liberal tradition holds vital lessons for us today as hate groups continue to align themselves with fantasies of a medieval past and openly call for a return of all-powerful monarchs, aristocrats, and nobles who rule by virtue of their race.

Keidrick Roy is Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College. He has received national attention through media outlets such as CBS News Sunday Morning and the Chicago Review of Books and appears in the HBO documentary Frederick Douglass: In Five Speeches. He has curated two major exhibitions at the American Writers Museum in Chicago on Black American figures, including Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and Ralph Ellison.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Though the United States has been heralded as a beacon of democracy, many nineteenth-century Americans viewed their nation through the prism of the Old World. What they saw was a racially stratified country that reflected not the ideals of a modern republic but rather the remnants of feudalism. American Dark Age reveals how defenders of racial hierarchy embraced America’s resemblance to medieval Europe and tells the stories of the abolitionists who exposed it as a glaring blemish on the national conscience.Against those seeking to maintain what Frederick Douglass called an “aristocracy of the skin,” Keidrick Roy shows how a group of Black thinkers, including Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Hosea Easton, and Harriet Jacobs, challenged the medievalism in their midst—and transformed the nation’s founding liberal tradition. He demonstrates how they drew on spiritual insight, Enlightenment thought, and a homegrown political philosophy that gave expression to their experiences at the bottom of the American social order. Roy sheds new light on how Black abolitionist writers and activists worked to eradicate the pernicious ideology of racial feudalism from American liberalism and renew the country’s commitment to values such as individual liberty, social progress, and egalitarianism.American Dark Age reveals how the antebellum Black liberal tradition holds vital lessons for us today as hate groups continue to align themselves with fantasies of a medieval past and openly call for a return of all-powerful monarchs, aristocrats, and nobles who rule by virtue of their race.

Keidrick Roy is Assistant Professor of Government at Dartmouth College. He has received national attention through media outlets such as CBS News Sunday Morning and the Chicago Review of Books and appears in the HBO documentary Frederick Douglass: In Five Speeches. He has curated two major exhibitions at the American Writers Museum in Chicago on Black American figures, including Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and Ralph Ellison.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>539</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d077f8b8-ed8f-11f0-b5c3-379e68bf873f</guid>
      <title>Amitav Acharya, &quot;The Once and Future World Order: Why Global Civilization Will Survive the Decline of the West&quot; (Hachette UK, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the dawn of the twenty-first century, the West has been in crisis. Social unrest, political polarization, and the rise of other great powers—especially China—threaten to unravel today’s Western-led world order. Many fear this would lead to global chaos. But the West has never had a monopoly on order.<br />Surveying five thousand years of global history, political scientist Amitav Acharya reveals that world order—the political architecture enabling cooperation and peace among nations—existed long before the rise of the West. Moving from ancient Sumer, India, Greece, and Mesoamerica, through medieval caliphates and Eurasian empires into the present, Acharya shows that humanitarian values, economic interdependence, and rules of inter-state conduct emerged across the globe over millennia. History suggests order will endure even as the West retreats. In fact, the end of Western dominance offers us the opportunity to build a better world, where non-Western nations find more voice, power, and prosperity. Instead of fearing the future, the West should learn from history and cooperate with the Rest to forge a more equitable order.</p>
<p>Amitav Acharya is the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance and Distinguished Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the dawn of the twenty-first century, the West has been in crisis. Social unrest, political polarization, and the rise of other great powers—especially China—threaten to unravel today’s Western-led world order. Many fear this would lead to global chaos. But the West has never had a monopoly on order.<br />Surveying five thousand years of global history, political scientist Amitav Acharya reveals that world order—the political architecture enabling cooperation and peace among nations—existed long before the rise of the West. Moving from ancient Sumer, India, Greece, and Mesoamerica, through medieval caliphates and Eurasian empires into the present, Acharya shows that humanitarian values, economic interdependence, and rules of inter-state conduct emerged across the globe over millennia. History suggests order will endure even as the West retreats. In fact, the end of Western dominance offers us the opportunity to build a better world, where non-Western nations find more voice, power, and prosperity. Instead of fearing the future, the West should learn from history and cooperate with the Rest to forge a more equitable order.</p>
<p>Amitav Acharya is the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance and Distinguished Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52129573" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f54fa83c-02ba-4c66-92b5-b41ea8b52f6d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f54fa83c-02ba-4c66-92b5-b41ea8b52f6d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amitav Acharya, &quot;The Once and Future World Order: Why Global Civilization Will Survive the Decline of the West&quot; (Hachette UK, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the dawn of the twenty-first century, the West has been in crisis. Social unrest, political polarization, and the rise of other great powers—especially China—threaten to unravel today’s Western-led world order. Many fear this would lead to global chaos. But the West has never had a monopoly on order.Surveying five thousand years of global history, political scientist Amitav Acharya reveals that world order—the political architecture enabling cooperation and peace among nations—existed long before the rise of the West. Moving from ancient Sumer, India, Greece, and Mesoamerica, through medieval caliphates and Eurasian empires into the present, Acharya shows that humanitarian values, economic interdependence, and rules of inter-state conduct emerged across the globe over millennia. History suggests order will endure even as the West retreats. In fact, the end of Western dominance offers us the opportunity to build a better world, where non-Western nations find more voice, power, and prosperity. Instead of fearing the future, the West should learn from history and cooperate with the Rest to forge a more equitable order.

Amitav Acharya is the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance and Distinguished Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the dawn of the twenty-first century, the West has been in crisis. Social unrest, political polarization, and the rise of other great powers—especially China—threaten to unravel today’s Western-led world order. Many fear this would lead to global chaos. But the West has never had a monopoly on order.Surveying five thousand years of global history, political scientist Amitav Acharya reveals that world order—the political architecture enabling cooperation and peace among nations—existed long before the rise of the West. Moving from ancient Sumer, India, Greece, and Mesoamerica, through medieval caliphates and Eurasian empires into the present, Acharya shows that humanitarian values, economic interdependence, and rules of inter-state conduct emerged across the globe over millennia. History suggests order will endure even as the West retreats. In fact, the end of Western dominance offers us the opportunity to build a better world, where non-Western nations find more voice, power, and prosperity. Instead of fearing the future, the West should learn from history and cooperate with the Rest to forge a more equitable order.

Amitav Acharya is the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance and Distinguished Professor at the School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC.

Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad82146c-832c-11ee-82e8-73b9522b49ff</guid>
      <title>Eve Warburton, &quot;Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501771972"><em>Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2023), Eve Warburton traces nationalist policy trajectories in Indonesia back to the preferences of big local business interests. Commodity booms often prompt more nationalist policy styles in resource-rich countries. Usually, this nationalist push weakens once a boom is over. But in Indonesia, a major global exporter of coal, palm oil, nickel, and other minerals, the intensity of nationalist policy interventions increased after the early twenty-first century commodity boom came to an end. Equally puzzling, the state applied nationalist policies unevenly across the land and resource sectors.<em> Resource Nationalism in Indonesia</em> explains these trends by examining the economic and political benefits that accrue to domestic business actors when commodity prices soar. Warburton shows how the centrality of patronage to Indonesia's democratic political economy, and the growing importance of mining and palm oil as a drivers of export earnings, enhanced both the instrumental and structural power of major domestic companies, giving them new influence over the direction of nationalist change.</p><p>Eve Warburton is Director of the ANU Indonesia Institute and a Research Fellow in the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University.</p><p><em>Professor </em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html"><em>Michele Ford</em></a><em> is the Director of the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre, a university-wide multidisciplinary center at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501771972"><em>Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2023), Eve Warburton traces nationalist policy trajectories in Indonesia back to the preferences of big local business interests. Commodity booms often prompt more nationalist policy styles in resource-rich countries. Usually, this nationalist push weakens once a boom is over. But in Indonesia, a major global exporter of coal, palm oil, nickel, and other minerals, the intensity of nationalist policy interventions increased after the early twenty-first century commodity boom came to an end. Equally puzzling, the state applied nationalist policies unevenly across the land and resource sectors.<em> Resource Nationalism in Indonesia</em> explains these trends by examining the economic and political benefits that accrue to domestic business actors when commodity prices soar. Warburton shows how the centrality of patronage to Indonesia's democratic political economy, and the growing importance of mining and palm oil as a drivers of export earnings, enhanced both the instrumental and structural power of major domestic companies, giving them new influence over the direction of nationalist change.</p><p>Eve Warburton is Director of the ANU Indonesia Institute and a Research Fellow in the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University.</p><p><em>Professor </em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html"><em>Michele Ford</em></a><em> is the Director of the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre, a university-wide multidisciplinary center at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52190111" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/421d1bc1-6497-4119-9e08-6f94a16b5a7e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=421d1bc1-6497-4119-9e08-6f94a16b5a7e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eve Warburton, &quot;Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State (Cornell UP, 2023), Eve Warburton traces nationalist policy trajectories in Indonesia back to the preferences of big local business interests. Commodity booms often prompt more nationalist policy styles in resource-rich countries. Usually, this nationalist push weakens once a boom is over. But in Indonesia, a major global exporter of coal, palm oil, nickel, and other minerals, the intensity of nationalist policy interventions increased after the early twenty-first century commodity boom came to an end. Equally puzzling, the state applied nationalist policies unevenly across the land and resource sectors. Resource Nationalism in Indonesia explains these trends by examining the economic and political benefits that accrue to domestic business actors when commodity prices soar. Warburton shows how the centrality of patronage to Indonesia&apos;s democratic political economy, and the growing importance of mining and palm oil as a drivers of export earnings, enhanced both the instrumental and structural power of major domestic companies, giving them new influence over the direction of nationalist change.
Eve Warburton is Director of the ANU Indonesia Institute and a Research Fellow in the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University.
Professor Michele Ford is the Director of the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre, a university-wide multidisciplinary center at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Booms, Big Business, and the State (Cornell UP, 2023), Eve Warburton traces nationalist policy trajectories in Indonesia back to the preferences of big local business interests. Commodity booms often prompt more nationalist policy styles in resource-rich countries. Usually, this nationalist push weakens once a boom is over. But in Indonesia, a major global exporter of coal, palm oil, nickel, and other minerals, the intensity of nationalist policy interventions increased after the early twenty-first century commodity boom came to an end. Equally puzzling, the state applied nationalist policies unevenly across the land and resource sectors. Resource Nationalism in Indonesia explains these trends by examining the economic and political benefits that accrue to domestic business actors when commodity prices soar. Warburton shows how the centrality of patronage to Indonesia&apos;s democratic political economy, and the growing importance of mining and palm oil as a drivers of export earnings, enhanced both the instrumental and structural power of major domestic companies, giving them new influence over the direction of nationalist change.
Eve Warburton is Director of the ANU Indonesia Institute and a Research Fellow in the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs at the Australian National University.
Professor Michele Ford is the Director of the Sydney Southeast Asia Centre, a university-wide multidisciplinary center at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4579473c-7f44-11ee-8216-5741bcf63335</guid>
      <title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a> demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including <em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses </em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and <em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities </em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of <em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a> demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including <em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses </em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and <em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities </em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of <em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53305106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ae71bf9e-93f1-45e6-b9e9-6762ed355b68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ae71bf9e-93f1-45e6-b9e9-6762ed355b68&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>686</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89e520f2-ecd0-11f0-a11e-1fc80de07122</guid>
      <title>David Broder, &quot;Mussolini&apos;s Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy&quot; (Pluto Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The fastest-rising force in Italian politics is Giorgia Meloni's Fratelli d'Italia - a party with a direct genealogy from Mussolini's regime. Surging to prominence in recent years, it has waged a fierce culture war against the Left, polarised political debate around World War II, and even secured the largest vote share in Italy's 2022 general election. Eighty years after the fall of Mussolini, his heirs, and admirers are again on the brink of taking power. So how exactly has this situation come about?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745348025"><em>Mussolini's Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy</em></a><em> </em>(Pluto Press, 2023) delves into Italy's self-styled 'post-fascist' movements - rooted in historical fascism yet claiming to have 'transcended' it. David Broder highlights the reinventions of far-right politics since the Second World War and examines the interplay between a parliamentary face aimed at integrating fascists into the mainstream and militant fringe groups which, despite their extremism, play an important role in nurturing the broader far right.</p><p>Fratelli d'Italia has retained its hegemony over fascist subcultures whilst embracing a raft of more pragmatic policy positions, fusing harsh Islamophobia and anti-communism with support for the European Union and NATO. As countervailing anti-fascist forces in Italian society wane, the far-right party's mission to redeem historical fascism, legitimize its political heirs, and shift the terrain of mainstream politics is proving alarmingly successful.</p><p>David Broder is a historian of the Italian far-right. He is a regular contributor to the New Statesman and Internazionale, writing about Italian politics, as well as Europe editor for Jacobin. His writing has also appeared in the New York Times, the Guardian, the Independent, New Left Review and Tribune. He is the author of The Rebirth of Italian Communism: Dissident Communists in Rome, 1943-44 and First They Took Rome: How the Populist Right Conquered Italy.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fastest-rising force in Italian politics is Giorgia Meloni's Fratelli d'Italia - a party with a direct genealogy from Mussolini's regime. Surging to prominence in recent years, it has waged a fierce culture war against the Left, polarised political debate around World War II, and even secured the largest vote share in Italy's 2022 general election. Eighty years after the fall of Mussolini, his heirs, and admirers are again on the brink of taking power. So how exactly has this situation come about?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745348025"><em>Mussolini's Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy</em></a><em> </em>(Pluto Press, 2023) delves into Italy's self-styled 'post-fascist' movements - rooted in historical fascism yet claiming to have 'transcended' it. David Broder highlights the reinventions of far-right politics since the Second World War and examines the interplay between a parliamentary face aimed at integrating fascists into the mainstream and militant fringe groups which, despite their extremism, play an important role in nurturing the broader far right.</p><p>Fratelli d'Italia has retained its hegemony over fascist subcultures whilst embracing a raft of more pragmatic policy positions, fusing harsh Islamophobia and anti-communism with support for the European Union and NATO. As countervailing anti-fascist forces in Italian society wane, the far-right party's mission to redeem historical fascism, legitimize its political heirs, and shift the terrain of mainstream politics is proving alarmingly successful.</p><p>David Broder is a historian of the Italian far-right. He is a regular contributor to the New Statesman and Internazionale, writing about Italian politics, as well as Europe editor for Jacobin. His writing has also appeared in the New York Times, the Guardian, the Independent, New Left Review and Tribune. He is the author of The Rebirth of Italian Communism: Dissident Communists in Rome, 1943-44 and First They Took Rome: How the Populist Right Conquered Italy.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69488922" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c4c1eb08-a19c-4681-b085-ba7fc5914c3b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c4c1eb08-a19c-4681-b085-ba7fc5914c3b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Broder, &quot;Mussolini&apos;s Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy&quot; (Pluto Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The fastest-rising force in Italian politics is Giorgia Meloni&apos;s Fratelli d&apos;Italia - a party with a direct genealogy from Mussolini&apos;s regime. Surging to prominence in recent years, it has waged a fierce culture war against the Left, polarised political debate around World War II, and even secured the largest vote share in Italy&apos;s 2022 general election. Eighty years after the fall of Mussolini, his heirs, and admirers are again on the brink of taking power. So how exactly has this situation come about?
Mussolini&apos;s Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy (Pluto Press, 2023) delves into Italy&apos;s self-styled &apos;post-fascist&apos; movements - rooted in historical fascism yet claiming to have &apos;transcended&apos; it. David Broder highlights the reinventions of far-right politics since the Second World War and examines the interplay between a parliamentary face aimed at integrating fascists into the mainstream and militant fringe groups which, despite their extremism, play an important role in nurturing the broader far right.
Fratelli d&apos;Italia has retained its hegemony over fascist subcultures whilst embracing a raft of more pragmatic policy positions, fusing harsh Islamophobia and anti-communism with support for the European Union and NATO. As countervailing anti-fascist forces in Italian society wane, the far-right party&apos;s mission to redeem historical fascism, legitimize its political heirs, and shift the terrain of mainstream politics is proving alarmingly successful.
David Broder is a historian of the Italian far-right. He is a regular contributor to the New Statesman and Internazionale, writing about Italian politics, as well as Europe editor for Jacobin. His writing has also appeared in the New York Times, the Guardian, the Independent, New Left Review and Tribune. He is the author of The Rebirth of Italian Communism: Dissident Communists in Rome, 1943-44 and First They Took Rome: How the Populist Right Conquered Italy.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The fastest-rising force in Italian politics is Giorgia Meloni&apos;s Fratelli d&apos;Italia - a party with a direct genealogy from Mussolini&apos;s regime. Surging to prominence in recent years, it has waged a fierce culture war against the Left, polarised political debate around World War II, and even secured the largest vote share in Italy&apos;s 2022 general election. Eighty years after the fall of Mussolini, his heirs, and admirers are again on the brink of taking power. So how exactly has this situation come about?
Mussolini&apos;s Grandchildren: Fascism in Contemporary Italy (Pluto Press, 2023) delves into Italy&apos;s self-styled &apos;post-fascist&apos; movements - rooted in historical fascism yet claiming to have &apos;transcended&apos; it. David Broder highlights the reinventions of far-right politics since the Second World War and examines the interplay between a parliamentary face aimed at integrating fascists into the mainstream and militant fringe groups which, despite their extremism, play an important role in nurturing the broader far right.
Fratelli d&apos;Italia has retained its hegemony over fascist subcultures whilst embracing a raft of more pragmatic policy positions, fusing harsh Islamophobia and anti-communism with support for the European Union and NATO. As countervailing anti-fascist forces in Italian society wane, the far-right party&apos;s mission to redeem historical fascism, legitimize its political heirs, and shift the terrain of mainstream politics is proving alarmingly successful.
David Broder is a historian of the Italian far-right. He is a regular contributor to the New Statesman and Internazionale, writing about Italian politics, as well as Europe editor for Jacobin. His writing has also appeared in the New York Times, the Guardian, the Independent, New Left Review and Tribune. He is the author of The Rebirth of Italian Communism: Dissident Communists in Rome, 1943-44 and First They Took Rome: How the Populist Right Conquered Italy.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">718b9190-eb35-11f0-bb0a-9f4f812a2a2a</guid>
      <title>Thomas Albert Howard, &quot;Broken Altars: Secularist Violence in Modern History&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sweeping history of the violence perpetrated by governments committed to extreme forms of secularism in the twentieth century<br />A popular truism derived from the Enlightenment holds that violence is somehow inherent to religion, to which political secularism offers a liberating solution. But this assumption ignores a glaring modern reality: that putatively progressive regimes committed to secularism have possessed just as much and often a vastly greater capacity for violence as those tied to a religious identity. In <em>Broken Altars</em>, Thomas Albert Howard presents a powerful account of the misery, deaths, and destruction visited on religious communities by secularist regimes in the twentieth century.<br />Presenting three principal forms of modern secularism that have arisen since the Enlightenment—passive secularism, combative secularism, and eliminationist secularism—Howard argues that the latter two have been especially violence-prone. Westerners do not fully grasp this, however, because they often mistake the first form, passive secularism, for secularism as a whole. But a disconcertingly more complicated picture emerges with the adoption of a broader global vision. Admitting different species of secularism, greater historical perspective, and case studies drawn from the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Mexico, Spain, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Mongolia, and China, among other countries, Howard calls into question the conventional tale of modernity as the pacifying triumph of secularism over a benighted religious past.</p>
<p><strong>Thomas Albert Howard</strong> is professor of humanities and history and holder of the Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Chair in Christian Ethics at Valparaiso University. He is the author of many books, including <em>The Faiths of Others: A History of Interreligious Dialogue</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sweeping history of the violence perpetrated by governments committed to extreme forms of secularism in the twentieth century<br />A popular truism derived from the Enlightenment holds that violence is somehow inherent to religion, to which political secularism offers a liberating solution. But this assumption ignores a glaring modern reality: that putatively progressive regimes committed to secularism have possessed just as much and often a vastly greater capacity for violence as those tied to a religious identity. In <em>Broken Altars</em>, Thomas Albert Howard presents a powerful account of the misery, deaths, and destruction visited on religious communities by secularist regimes in the twentieth century.<br />Presenting three principal forms of modern secularism that have arisen since the Enlightenment—passive secularism, combative secularism, and eliminationist secularism—Howard argues that the latter two have been especially violence-prone. Westerners do not fully grasp this, however, because they often mistake the first form, passive secularism, for secularism as a whole. But a disconcertingly more complicated picture emerges with the adoption of a broader global vision. Admitting different species of secularism, greater historical perspective, and case studies drawn from the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Mexico, Spain, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Mongolia, and China, among other countries, Howard calls into question the conventional tale of modernity as the pacifying triumph of secularism over a benighted religious past.</p>
<p><strong>Thomas Albert Howard</strong> is professor of humanities and history and holder of the Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Chair in Christian Ethics at Valparaiso University. He is the author of many books, including <em>The Faiths of Others: A History of Interreligious Dialogue</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40743799" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/249e6ee4-6ad7-42bf-8ad9-58a815250e9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=249e6ee4-6ad7-42bf-8ad9-58a815250e9b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Albert Howard, &quot;Broken Altars: Secularist Violence in Modern History&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sweeping history of the violence perpetrated by governments committed to extreme forms of secularism in the twentieth centuryA popular truism derived from the Enlightenment holds that violence is somehow inherent to religion, to which political secularism offers a liberating solution. But this assumption ignores a glaring modern reality: that putatively progressive regimes committed to secularism have possessed just as much and often a vastly greater capacity for violence as those tied to a religious identity. In Broken Altars, Thomas Albert Howard presents a powerful account of the misery, deaths, and destruction visited on religious communities by secularist regimes in the twentieth century.Presenting three principal forms of modern secularism that have arisen since the Enlightenment—passive secularism, combative secularism, and eliminationist secularism—Howard argues that the latter two have been especially violence-prone. Westerners do not fully grasp this, however, because they often mistake the first form, passive secularism, for secularism as a whole. But a disconcertingly more complicated picture emerges with the adoption of a broader global vision. Admitting different species of secularism, greater historical perspective, and case studies drawn from the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Mexico, Spain, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Mongolia, and China, among other countries, Howard calls into question the conventional tale of modernity as the pacifying triumph of secularism over a benighted religious past.

Thomas Albert Howard is professor of humanities and history and holder of the Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Chair in Christian Ethics at Valparaiso University. He is the author of many books, including The Faiths of Others: A History of Interreligious Dialogue.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sweeping history of the violence perpetrated by governments committed to extreme forms of secularism in the twentieth centuryA popular truism derived from the Enlightenment holds that violence is somehow inherent to religion, to which political secularism offers a liberating solution. But this assumption ignores a glaring modern reality: that putatively progressive regimes committed to secularism have possessed just as much and often a vastly greater capacity for violence as those tied to a religious identity. In Broken Altars, Thomas Albert Howard presents a powerful account of the misery, deaths, and destruction visited on religious communities by secularist regimes in the twentieth century.Presenting three principal forms of modern secularism that have arisen since the Enlightenment—passive secularism, combative secularism, and eliminationist secularism—Howard argues that the latter two have been especially violence-prone. Westerners do not fully grasp this, however, because they often mistake the first form, passive secularism, for secularism as a whole. But a disconcertingly more complicated picture emerges with the adoption of a broader global vision. Admitting different species of secularism, greater historical perspective, and case studies drawn from the former Soviet Union, Turkey, Mexico, Spain, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Mongolia, and China, among other countries, Howard calls into question the conventional tale of modernity as the pacifying triumph of secularism over a benighted religious past.

Thomas Albert Howard is professor of humanities and history and holder of the Phyllis and Richard Duesenberg Chair in Christian Ethics at Valparaiso University. He is the author of many books, including The Faiths of Others: A History of Interreligious Dialogue.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d70fe74-ebe5-11f0-8078-4bd9abbc883a</guid>
      <title>Mary E. Stuckey, &quot;Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700635207/">Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity</a><em>, </em>University Press of Kansas, 2004; <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634798/">For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands</a><em>, </em>University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the <em>Declaration of Independence</em>, architect, and enslaver. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a> is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.</p>
<p>Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a> then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson</a><em> </em>examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.</p>
<p>Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are</a> is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700635207/">Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity</a><em>, </em>University Press of Kansas, 2004; <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634798/">For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands</a><em>, </em>University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the <em>Declaration of Independence</em>, architect, and enslaver. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a> is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.</p>
<p>Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are</a> then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson</a><em> </em>examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.</p>
<p>Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. <a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639991/">Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are</a> is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. </em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38691733" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/593fb3f7-cd06-4e75-8fd9-e7e795613562/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=593fb3f7-cd06-4e75-8fd9-e7e795613562&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mary E. Stuckey, &quot;Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity, University Press of Kansas, 2004; For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands, University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the Declaration of Independence, architect, and enslaver. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.

Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of Remembering Jefferson examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.

Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mary E. Stuckey, the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Communication Arts &amp; Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, has a brilliant new book that dives into the question of who we are as Americans, a theme that Stuckey has long researched and considered in much of her work (Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity, University Press of Kansas, 2004; For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands, University Press of Kansas, 2023), but she traces this idea of American identity through Thomas Jefferson, the 3rd President of the United States, key author of the Declaration of Independence, architect, and enslaver. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are is an exploration not so much of Thomas Jefferson the person, but Thomas Jefferson as he has become iconic within the American imagination and what that position explains about not only Jefferson himself, but also what it says about the United States at any particular period in the course of American history.

Stuckey traces the symbolic and iconic Jefferson in a number of distinct areas, each of which communicate different presentations or representations of Jefferson himself but also how we, as citizens, consume the idea of Jefferson. All of these are avenues to understand American national identity. As a scholar of presidential rhetoric, Stuckey begins the research by exploring how other presidents have used Jefferson in their speeches and their rhetoric, finding that the vast majority of presidents have referenced Jefferson in some form or in some way to legitimize their own policies. Many presidents have integrated Jefferson’s own words (and he wrote many, many words over a long life, especially for the time) as a way to authorize what they were doing while in office. Remembering Jefferson: Who He Was, Who We Are then traces the many memorials and monuments that integrate Jefferson in some capacity. But this section is split into two pieces, one that specifically focuses on the Jefferson-centric presentations, and the other part that integrates Jefferson with other Founders or other presidents (like Mt. Rushmore). Stuckey makes clear the key dimension around the building of these kinds of memorials and monuments: they are as much about the people choosing to build them and how they are to look and exist as they are about the individual, in this case Jefferson, being honored within them. The next section of Remembering Jefferson examines Jefferson in popular culture, particularly in televisual and cinematic popular culture. And while Jefferson is, again, in many places, he comes across in fascinating ways in these renderings, since his relationship to slavery—that he had over 500 enslaved individuals over his lifetime, that a number of those who were enslaved were also his children—is often portrayed as incidental and as a kind of footnote. Jefferson is often hazy and romantic in these narratives. The final section of the book assesses Jefferson within children’s literature, since this is also a realm where Jefferson is taking on a civic teaching, and the presentation is about communicating a kind of citizenship to young people.

Mary Stuckey has produced an important reading of the United States by reading Thomas Jefferson in all the places and spaces where he turns up. Remembering Jefferson: Who He was, Who We Are is a delight to read, and discusses the complex ideas of national identity, enslavement, race, power, citizenship, and civic virtue.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>789</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51c7d9ea-ec0c-11f0-88de-d7adefedc59e</guid>
      <title>Charles G. Thomas, &quot;Ujamaa&apos;s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People&apos;s Defence Force, 1964-1979&quot; (Ohio UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The immediate postcolonial moment brought both promise and peril for the states of Africa and their security. The process of decolonization generated instability, and the emergent Cold War caught up the still-fragile independent states in a global ideological struggle between superpowers. While the political story of these states has been written in detail, the story of their militaries has been largely inaccessible, leaving only sketches of the coups, mutinies, and overall failures of security that outside observers could chronicle.<br /><em>Ujamaa’s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People's Defence Force, 1964–1979</em> (Ohio University Press, 2024) by Dr. Charles G. Thomas traces the evolution of the Tanzania People’s Defence Force from its inception in 1964 following the broader East African uprisings to its fully realized form on the eve of Tanzania’s 1978 conflict with Uganda. The book gathers primary interviews with key military actors within Tanzania and interweaves their narratives with archival sources to produce a detailed history of the culmination of President Julius Nyerere’s ideological project and the military leadership’s vision of a professional and effective force for guarding the nation and supporting liberation struggles across Southern Africa.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The immediate postcolonial moment brought both promise and peril for the states of Africa and their security. The process of decolonization generated instability, and the emergent Cold War caught up the still-fragile independent states in a global ideological struggle between superpowers. While the political story of these states has been written in detail, the story of their militaries has been largely inaccessible, leaving only sketches of the coups, mutinies, and overall failures of security that outside observers could chronicle.<br /><em>Ujamaa’s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People's Defence Force, 1964–1979</em> (Ohio University Press, 2024) by Dr. Charles G. Thomas traces the evolution of the Tanzania People’s Defence Force from its inception in 1964 following the broader East African uprisings to its fully realized form on the eve of Tanzania’s 1978 conflict with Uganda. The book gathers primary interviews with key military actors within Tanzania and interweaves their narratives with archival sources to produce a detailed history of the culmination of President Julius Nyerere’s ideological project and the military leadership’s vision of a professional and effective force for guarding the nation and supporting liberation struggles across Southern Africa.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52327492" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2975671e-08f2-4eed-9c84-a382b0dc9b6d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2975671e-08f2-4eed-9c84-a382b0dc9b6d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles G. Thomas, &quot;Ujamaa&apos;s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People&apos;s Defence Force, 1964-1979&quot; (Ohio UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The immediate postcolonial moment brought both promise and peril for the states of Africa and their security. The process of decolonization generated instability, and the emergent Cold War caught up the still-fragile independent states in a global ideological struggle between superpowers. While the political story of these states has been written in detail, the story of their militaries has been largely inaccessible, leaving only sketches of the coups, mutinies, and overall failures of security that outside observers could chronicle.Ujamaa’s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People&apos;s Defence Force, 1964–1979 (Ohio University Press, 2024) by Dr. Charles G. Thomas traces the evolution of the Tanzania People’s Defence Force from its inception in 1964 following the broader East African uprisings to its fully realized form on the eve of Tanzania’s 1978 conflict with Uganda. The book gathers primary interviews with key military actors within Tanzania and interweaves their narratives with archival sources to produce a detailed history of the culmination of President Julius Nyerere’s ideological project and the military leadership’s vision of a professional and effective force for guarding the nation and supporting liberation struggles across Southern Africa.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The immediate postcolonial moment brought both promise and peril for the states of Africa and their security. The process of decolonization generated instability, and the emergent Cold War caught up the still-fragile independent states in a global ideological struggle between superpowers. While the political story of these states has been written in detail, the story of their militaries has been largely inaccessible, leaving only sketches of the coups, mutinies, and overall failures of security that outside observers could chronicle.Ujamaa’s Army: The Creation and Evolution of the Tanzania People&apos;s Defence Force, 1964–1979 (Ohio University Press, 2024) by Dr. Charles G. Thomas traces the evolution of the Tanzania People’s Defence Force from its inception in 1964 following the broader East African uprisings to its fully realized form on the eve of Tanzania’s 1978 conflict with Uganda. The book gathers primary interviews with key military actors within Tanzania and interweaves their narratives with archival sources to produce a detailed history of the culmination of President Julius Nyerere’s ideological project and the military leadership’s vision of a professional and effective force for guarding the nation and supporting liberation struggles across Southern Africa.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>318</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3e39846a-eaf8-11f0-9660-3f50690425d9</guid>
      <title>Dylan Loh, &quot;China&apos;s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How has China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs transformed itself into one of the most assertive diplomatic actors on the global stage? What explains the rise of “wolf warrior” practices, and how should we interpret Beijing’s evolving diplomatic identity?</p>
<p>In this episode, Duncan McCargo speaks with Dylan Loh, an Associate Professor in the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme at Nanyang Technological University (<a href="https://dylanloh.com/">Dr. Dylan M.H. Loh - Associate Professor | International Relations Scholar | Chinese Foreign Policy</a>), about his award-winning new book <em>China’s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy</em> (Stanford University Press, 2024). Dylan Loh unpacks how Chinese diplomats craft narratives and balance assertiveness with professionalism, touching on institutional habitus, ritualised loyalty, and China’s bid for discourse power on platforms like X. This conversation offers timely insights for anyone interested in Chinese foreign policy, diplomacy, and the future of great-power relations.</p>
<p>Host: Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p>
<p>Podcast Editing: Ishaan Krishnan</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How has China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs transformed itself into one of the most assertive diplomatic actors on the global stage? What explains the rise of “wolf warrior” practices, and how should we interpret Beijing’s evolving diplomatic identity?</p>
<p>In this episode, Duncan McCargo speaks with Dylan Loh, an Associate Professor in the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme at Nanyang Technological University (<a href="https://dylanloh.com/">Dr. Dylan M.H. Loh - Associate Professor | International Relations Scholar | Chinese Foreign Policy</a>), about his award-winning new book <em>China’s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy</em> (Stanford University Press, 2024). Dylan Loh unpacks how Chinese diplomats craft narratives and balance assertiveness with professionalism, touching on institutional habitus, ritualised loyalty, and China’s bid for discourse power on platforms like X. This conversation offers timely insights for anyone interested in Chinese foreign policy, diplomacy, and the future of great-power relations.</p>
<p>Host: Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p>
<p>Podcast Editing: Ishaan Krishnan</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33677642" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/642a7754-6994-44ea-bcfd-90a71d69daa6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=642a7754-6994-44ea-bcfd-90a71d69daa6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dylan Loh, &quot;China&apos;s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How has China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs transformed itself into one of the most assertive diplomatic actors on the global stage? What explains the rise of “wolf warrior” practices, and how should we interpret Beijing’s evolving diplomatic identity?

In this episode, Duncan McCargo speaks with Dylan Loh, an Associate Professor in the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme at Nanyang Technological University (Dr. Dylan M.H. Loh - Associate Professor | International Relations Scholar | Chinese Foreign Policy), about his award-winning new book China’s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy (Stanford University Press, 2024). Dylan Loh unpacks how Chinese diplomats craft narratives and balance assertiveness with professionalism, touching on institutional habitus, ritualised loyalty, and China’s bid for discourse power on platforms like X. This conversation offers timely insights for anyone interested in Chinese foreign policy, diplomacy, and the future of great-power relations.

Host: Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.

Podcast Editing: Ishaan Krishnan
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How has China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs transformed itself into one of the most assertive diplomatic actors on the global stage? What explains the rise of “wolf warrior” practices, and how should we interpret Beijing’s evolving diplomatic identity?

In this episode, Duncan McCargo speaks with Dylan Loh, an Associate Professor in the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme at Nanyang Technological University (Dr. Dylan M.H. Loh - Associate Professor | International Relations Scholar | Chinese Foreign Policy), about his award-winning new book China’s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy (Stanford University Press, 2024). Dylan Loh unpacks how Chinese diplomats craft narratives and balance assertiveness with professionalism, touching on institutional habitus, ritualised loyalty, and China’s bid for discourse power on platforms like X. This conversation offers timely insights for anyone interested in Chinese foreign policy, diplomacy, and the future of great-power relations.

Host: Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.

Podcast Editing: Ishaan Krishnan
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aafe572e-e751-11f0-a66e-cfd79787d5d6</guid>
      <title>Florentine Koppenborg, &quot;Japan&apos;s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Florentine Koppenborg’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501770043"><em>Japan’s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2023) begins with the understated observation that the triple disaster of March 2011 “exposed severe deficiencies in Japan’s nuclear safety governance.” This is the starting point for the rather curious story of the regulatory reforms taken up in the wake of the Fukushima disaster and how they created a new system with a strong independent nuclear safety regulator that has refused to back down even as the political tides have changed, and what this has meant for energy policy in Japan in the past dozen years. Koppenborg’s history of nuclear power regulation in Japan also seriously considers the implications of this dramatic break for regimes in other countries. This case study provides a complex and thought-provoking contribution to discussions of the role of nuclear power and independent regulation in global efforts to decarbonize our energy supply.</p><p><a href="https://www.uib.no/en/persons/Nathan.Edwin.Hopson"><em>Nathan Hopson</em></a><em> is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florentine Koppenborg’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501770043"><em>Japan’s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2023) begins with the understated observation that the triple disaster of March 2011 “exposed severe deficiencies in Japan’s nuclear safety governance.” This is the starting point for the rather curious story of the regulatory reforms taken up in the wake of the Fukushima disaster and how they created a new system with a strong independent nuclear safety regulator that has refused to back down even as the political tides have changed, and what this has meant for energy policy in Japan in the past dozen years. Koppenborg’s history of nuclear power regulation in Japan also seriously considers the implications of this dramatic break for regimes in other countries. This case study provides a complex and thought-provoking contribution to discussions of the role of nuclear power and independent regulation in global efforts to decarbonize our energy supply.</p><p><a href="https://www.uib.no/en/persons/Nathan.Edwin.Hopson"><em>Nathan Hopson</em></a><em> is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38582160" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/33e7dea2-6274-4bc6-9df6-de7c1a844527/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=33e7dea2-6274-4bc6-9df6-de7c1a844527&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Florentine Koppenborg, &quot;Japan&apos;s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Florentine Koppenborg’s Japan’s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance (Cornell UP, 2023) begins with the understated observation that the triple disaster of March 2011 “exposed severe deficiencies in Japan’s nuclear safety governance.” This is the starting point for the rather curious story of the regulatory reforms taken up in the wake of the Fukushima disaster and how they created a new system with a strong independent nuclear safety regulator that has refused to back down even as the political tides have changed, and what this has meant for energy policy in Japan in the past dozen years. Koppenborg’s history of nuclear power regulation in Japan also seriously considers the implications of this dramatic break for regimes in other countries. This case study provides a complex and thought-provoking contribution to discussions of the role of nuclear power and independent regulation in global efforts to decarbonize our energy supply.
Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen&apos;s Department of Foreign Languages.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Florentine Koppenborg’s Japan’s Nuclear Disaster and the Politics of Safety Governance (Cornell UP, 2023) begins with the understated observation that the triple disaster of March 2011 “exposed severe deficiencies in Japan’s nuclear safety governance.” This is the starting point for the rather curious story of the regulatory reforms taken up in the wake of the Fukushima disaster and how they created a new system with a strong independent nuclear safety regulator that has refused to back down even as the political tides have changed, and what this has meant for energy policy in Japan in the past dozen years. Koppenborg’s history of nuclear power regulation in Japan also seriously considers the implications of this dramatic break for regimes in other countries. This case study provides a complex and thought-provoking contribution to discussions of the role of nuclear power and independent regulation in global efforts to decarbonize our energy supply.
Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen&apos;s Department of Foreign Languages.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">488eca76-e80d-11f0-9a11-633bcb5717bd</guid>
      <title>What happens when liberalism stops feeling like a victory and starts feeling like an exhaustion?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher <strong>Alexandre Lefebvre</strong> about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.</p>
<p>Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.</p>
<p>Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher <strong>Alexandre Lefebvre</strong> about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.</p>
<p>Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.</p>
<p>Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78755955" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/59795797-cbb7-4aca-a06e-997cd9222311/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=59795797-cbb7-4aca-a06e-997cd9222311&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What happens when liberalism stops feeling like a victory and starts feeling like an exhaustion?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher Alexandre Lefebvre about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.

Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.

Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI Director (acting) Eli Karetny speaks with philosopher Alexandre Lefebvre about liberalism not merely as a political doctrine, but as a lived way of life.

Against the backdrop of rising populism, nationalism, and post-liberal regimes, Lefebvre revisits the liberal tradition—from Locke and Mill to Rawls and Berlin—to argue that liberalism has always contained a moral and existential core. Drawing on John Rawls’s early work and Pierre Hadot’s idea of philosophy as spiritual exercise, the conversation explores freedom and generosity as liberal virtues, the tension between neutrality and perfectionism, and why liberal societies struggle to defend themselves against more overt visions of the good life.

Moving between political theory, international order, nationalism, and spirituality, Karetny and Lefebvre ask whether liberalism can still offer meaning without becoming imperial, moralistic, or coercive—and what liberals stand to lose if they fail to recognize the depth of their own commitments.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>179</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ccf0610e-e74e-11f0-8d68-bffc60404424</guid>
      <title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a> (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. </p><p>This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. </p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a> is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em> is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a> (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. </p><p>This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. </p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a> is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em> is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71432281" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/26ee4890-fb93-405e-94c8-a6707dc024d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=26ee4890-fb93-405e-94c8-a6707dc024d9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa2b3a0c-e5b1-11f0-b077-5b5844bfb8b2</guid>
      <title>Bernard Forjwuor, &quot;Critique of Political Decolonization&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is political independence? As a political act, what was it sanctioned to accomplish? Is formal colonialism over, or a condition in the present, albeit mutated and evolved?</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198871842"><em>Critique of Political Decolonization</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Bernard Forjwuor challenges what, in normative scholarship, has become a persistent conflation of two different concepts: political decolonization and political independence. This scholarly volume is an antinormative and critical refutation of the decolonial accomplishment of political independence or self-determination in Ghana. He argues that political independence is insufficiently a decolonial claim because it is framed within the context of a country, where a permanent colonial settlement was never deemed necessary for the consolidation of future colonial political obligations. So, while territorial dissolution was politically engineered by Ghanaians, the colonial merely reconstitutes itself in different legal and ideological forms.</p><p>Forjwuor offers new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual approaches to engaging the questions of colonialism, political independence, political decolonization, justice, and freedom, and constructs multiple conceptual bridges between traditional disciplinary fields of inquiry including politics, history, law, African studies, economic history, critical theory, and philosophy and political theory. Using the Ghanaian experience as a rich case study, Forjwuor rethinks what colonialism and decolonization mean, and asserts that decolonization is primarily a question of justice.</p><p>Bernard Forjwuor is an Assistant Professor of Africana Studies at the University of Notre Dame. He is a scholar of black political thought, and his research focuses on the philosophical, critical, and theoretical claims advanced by global black political thinkers. His recent work challenges the ways the colonial and the racial are routinely affirmed as extinguished in the liberal democratic affirmation of sovereignty.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is political independence? As a political act, what was it sanctioned to accomplish? Is formal colonialism over, or a condition in the present, albeit mutated and evolved?</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198871842"><em>Critique of Political Decolonization</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Bernard Forjwuor challenges what, in normative scholarship, has become a persistent conflation of two different concepts: political decolonization and political independence. This scholarly volume is an antinormative and critical refutation of the decolonial accomplishment of political independence or self-determination in Ghana. He argues that political independence is insufficiently a decolonial claim because it is framed within the context of a country, where a permanent colonial settlement was never deemed necessary for the consolidation of future colonial political obligations. So, while territorial dissolution was politically engineered by Ghanaians, the colonial merely reconstitutes itself in different legal and ideological forms.</p><p>Forjwuor offers new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual approaches to engaging the questions of colonialism, political independence, political decolonization, justice, and freedom, and constructs multiple conceptual bridges between traditional disciplinary fields of inquiry including politics, history, law, African studies, economic history, critical theory, and philosophy and political theory. Using the Ghanaian experience as a rich case study, Forjwuor rethinks what colonialism and decolonization mean, and asserts that decolonization is primarily a question of justice.</p><p>Bernard Forjwuor is an Assistant Professor of Africana Studies at the University of Notre Dame. He is a scholar of black political thought, and his research focuses on the philosophical, critical, and theoretical claims advanced by global black political thinkers. His recent work challenges the ways the colonial and the racial are routinely affirmed as extinguished in the liberal democratic affirmation of sovereignty.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49134735" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/795b63e1-b580-4fad-bd74-7099e787f2d0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=795b63e1-b580-4fad-bd74-7099e787f2d0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bernard Forjwuor, &quot;Critique of Political Decolonization&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is political independence? As a political act, what was it sanctioned to accomplish? Is formal colonialism over, or a condition in the present, albeit mutated and evolved?
In Critique of Political Decolonization (Oxford UP, 2023), Bernard Forjwuor challenges what, in normative scholarship, has become a persistent conflation of two different concepts: political decolonization and political independence. This scholarly volume is an antinormative and critical refutation of the decolonial accomplishment of political independence or self-determination in Ghana. He argues that political independence is insufficiently a decolonial claim because it is framed within the context of a country, where a permanent colonial settlement was never deemed necessary for the consolidation of future colonial political obligations. So, while territorial dissolution was politically engineered by Ghanaians, the colonial merely reconstitutes itself in different legal and ideological forms.
Forjwuor offers new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual approaches to engaging the questions of colonialism, political independence, political decolonization, justice, and freedom, and constructs multiple conceptual bridges between traditional disciplinary fields of inquiry including politics, history, law, African studies, economic history, critical theory, and philosophy and political theory. Using the Ghanaian experience as a rich case study, Forjwuor rethinks what colonialism and decolonization mean, and asserts that decolonization is primarily a question of justice.
Bernard Forjwuor is an Assistant Professor of Africana Studies at the University of Notre Dame. He is a scholar of black political thought, and his research focuses on the philosophical, critical, and theoretical claims advanced by global black political thinkers. His recent work challenges the ways the colonial and the racial are routinely affirmed as extinguished in the liberal democratic affirmation of sovereignty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is political independence? As a political act, what was it sanctioned to accomplish? Is formal colonialism over, or a condition in the present, albeit mutated and evolved?
In Critique of Political Decolonization (Oxford UP, 2023), Bernard Forjwuor challenges what, in normative scholarship, has become a persistent conflation of two different concepts: political decolonization and political independence. This scholarly volume is an antinormative and critical refutation of the decolonial accomplishment of political independence or self-determination in Ghana. He argues that political independence is insufficiently a decolonial claim because it is framed within the context of a country, where a permanent colonial settlement was never deemed necessary for the consolidation of future colonial political obligations. So, while territorial dissolution was politically engineered by Ghanaians, the colonial merely reconstitutes itself in different legal and ideological forms.
Forjwuor offers new methodological, theoretical, and conceptual approaches to engaging the questions of colonialism, political independence, political decolonization, justice, and freedom, and constructs multiple conceptual bridges between traditional disciplinary fields of inquiry including politics, history, law, African studies, economic history, critical theory, and philosophy and political theory. Using the Ghanaian experience as a rich case study, Forjwuor rethinks what colonialism and decolonization mean, and asserts that decolonization is primarily a question of justice.
Bernard Forjwuor is an Assistant Professor of Africana Studies at the University of Notre Dame. He is a scholar of black political thought, and his research focuses on the philosophical, critical, and theoretical claims advanced by global black political thinkers. His recent work challenges the ways the colonial and the racial are routinely affirmed as extinguished in the liberal democratic affirmation of sovereignty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>181</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e97c329a-1383-11ee-8994-737ae52a682d</guid>
      <title>Philip A. Wallach, &quot;Why Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To achieve legitimate self-government in America's extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country's factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197657874"><em>Why Congress</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature's distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation's attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. </p><p>The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country's deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress's future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature's expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.</p><p><strong>Philip A. Wallach</strong> is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America's separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To achieve legitimate self-government in America's extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country's factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197657874"><em>Why Congress</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature's distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation's attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. </p><p>The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country's deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress's future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature's expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.</p><p><strong>Philip A. Wallach</strong> is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America's separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45009613" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4a4f94c1-1b37-4ba0-b367-6c0215d3a648/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4a4f94c1-1b37-4ba0-b367-6c0215d3a648&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip A. Wallach, &quot;Why Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To achieve legitimate self-government in America&apos;s extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country&apos;s factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. Why Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature&apos;s distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation&apos;s attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. 
The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country&apos;s deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress&apos;s future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature&apos;s expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.
Philip A. Wallach is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America&apos;s separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To achieve legitimate self-government in America&apos;s extended Republic, the U.S. Constitution depends on Congress harmonizing the country&apos;s factions through a process of conflict and accommodation. Why Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023) demonstrates the value of this activity by showing the legislature&apos;s distinctive contributions in two crucial moments in the mid-twentieth century: during World War II, when congressional deliberation contributed to national cohesion by balancing interests and ensuring fairness, and during the push to end racial segregation, when a prolonged debate in Congress focused the nation&apos;s attention and delivered a decisive victory for the broad coalition united around civil rights. 
The second part of the book traces the evolution of Congress, which first experimented with radical decentralization in the 1970s and then, beginning in the 1980s, embraced powerful leadership and ideological caucuses that prioritized partisan unity and electoral confrontation. This transformed institution has been unable to work through the country&apos;s deep divisions on contemporary issues like immigration or the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary policymaking often circumvents Congress entirely. In other instances, Congress is engaged, but it proceeds without any bipartisan cooperation or through leader-broken compromises generated by crises. Each of these patterns creates serious difficulties for legitimating American policy. The book concludes with three scenarios for Congress&apos;s future. Without significant change, the institution will sink into decrepitude. But it could still be transformed, either by progressive constitutional reform empowering the president at the legislature&apos;s expense, or by a revival of meaningful deliberation and debate facilitated by the renewal of the committee system.
Philip A. Wallach is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), where he studies America&apos;s separation of powers, with a focus on regulatory policy issues and the relationship between Congress and the administrative state.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>662</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5ad17fec-e27e-11f0-b3d3-e34d96e35255</guid>
      <title>Amitav Acharya, &quot;Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed&quot; (Penguin Random House, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What went wrong with Burma’s democratic experiment? How are we to understand the country’s turbulent politics in the wake of the 2021 coup?</p><p>In this conversation with Duncan McCargo, Amitav Acharya talks about his new book on Burma, which draws extensively on communications with young activists he refers to as “thought warriors”. He also discusses the challenges of researching a closed country, and why he decided to write a crossover book that he hopes will reach beyond the usual academic audiences.</p><p>A decade ago, Burma was full of light and hope. Today, it has descended into darkness and despair. The once promising political and opening up of the country has been set back, possibly for a long time. How did this happen? Why? Many outside observers were surprised by the latest developments, but in some ways they were rather predictable. For those watching Burma the February 2021 coup was in the making for some time. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/tragic-nation-burma-why-and-how-democracy-failed-amitav-acharya/19706889?ean=9789815017762"><em>Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed</em></a> (Penguin Random House, 2023) provides a timely and insightful account of the political situation in Burma, assessing why the country experienced the coup, what are the implications for the people of Burma and the Southeast Asian region, and what role the international community can play to prevent Burma becoming a failed state.</p><p><a href="https://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/aacharya.cfm">Amitav Acharya</a> is a distinguished professor and the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. His writings on Southeast Asia include <em>Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism</em> (Cornell, 2009).</p><p><em>Duncan McCargo is director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What went wrong with Burma’s democratic experiment? How are we to understand the country’s turbulent politics in the wake of the 2021 coup?</p><p>In this conversation with Duncan McCargo, Amitav Acharya talks about his new book on Burma, which draws extensively on communications with young activists he refers to as “thought warriors”. He also discusses the challenges of researching a closed country, and why he decided to write a crossover book that he hopes will reach beyond the usual academic audiences.</p><p>A decade ago, Burma was full of light and hope. Today, it has descended into darkness and despair. The once promising political and opening up of the country has been set back, possibly for a long time. How did this happen? Why? Many outside observers were surprised by the latest developments, but in some ways they were rather predictable. For those watching Burma the February 2021 coup was in the making for some time. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/tragic-nation-burma-why-and-how-democracy-failed-amitav-acharya/19706889?ean=9789815017762"><em>Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed</em></a> (Penguin Random House, 2023) provides a timely and insightful account of the political situation in Burma, assessing why the country experienced the coup, what are the implications for the people of Burma and the Southeast Asian region, and what role the international community can play to prevent Burma becoming a failed state.</p><p><a href="https://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/aacharya.cfm">Amitav Acharya</a> is a distinguished professor and the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. His writings on Southeast Asia include <em>Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism</em> (Cornell, 2009).</p><p><em>Duncan McCargo is director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34456371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/eee50f52-3ac8-422f-a20c-9de88cd47332/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=eee50f52-3ac8-422f-a20c-9de88cd47332&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amitav Acharya, &quot;Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed&quot; (Penguin Random House, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What went wrong with Burma’s democratic experiment? How are we to understand the country’s turbulent politics in the wake of the 2021 coup?
In this conversation with Duncan McCargo, Amitav Acharya talks about his new book on Burma, which draws extensively on communications with young activists he refers to as “thought warriors”. He also discusses the challenges of researching a closed country, and why he decided to write a crossover book that he hopes will reach beyond the usual academic audiences.
A decade ago, Burma was full of light and hope. Today, it has descended into darkness and despair. The once promising political and opening up of the country has been set back, possibly for a long time. How did this happen? Why? Many outside observers were surprised by the latest developments, but in some ways they were rather predictable. For those watching Burma the February 2021 coup was in the making for some time. 
Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed (Penguin Random House, 2023) provides a timely and insightful account of the political situation in Burma, assessing why the country experienced the coup, what are the implications for the people of Burma and the Southeast Asian region, and what role the international community can play to prevent Burma becoming a failed state.
Amitav Acharya is a distinguished professor and the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. His writings on Southeast Asia include Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (Cornell, 2009).
Duncan McCargo is director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What went wrong with Burma’s democratic experiment? How are we to understand the country’s turbulent politics in the wake of the 2021 coup?
In this conversation with Duncan McCargo, Amitav Acharya talks about his new book on Burma, which draws extensively on communications with young activists he refers to as “thought warriors”. He also discusses the challenges of researching a closed country, and why he decided to write a crossover book that he hopes will reach beyond the usual academic audiences.
A decade ago, Burma was full of light and hope. Today, it has descended into darkness and despair. The once promising political and opening up of the country has been set back, possibly for a long time. How did this happen? Why? Many outside observers were surprised by the latest developments, but in some ways they were rather predictable. For those watching Burma the February 2021 coup was in the making for some time. 
Tragic Nation: Burma--Why and How Democracy Failed (Penguin Random House, 2023) provides a timely and insightful account of the political situation in Burma, assessing why the country experienced the coup, what are the implications for the people of Burma and the Southeast Asian region, and what role the international community can play to prevent Burma becoming a failed state.
Amitav Acharya is a distinguished professor and the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC. His writings on Southeast Asia include Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (Cornell, 2009).
Duncan McCargo is director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25eefc8a-15b4-11ee-ab37-47fb480784e5</guid>
      <title>Danielle Allen, &quot;Justice by Means of Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at <a href="https://partnersindemocracy.us/">Partners in Democracy</a>. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a> examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?</p><p>Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s <em>Theory of Justice</em> and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a> also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at <a href="https://partnersindemocracy.us/">Partners in Democracy</a>. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a> examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?</p><p>Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s <em>Theory of Justice</em> and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a> also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50878281" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/00a9aa43-02f7-4040-a4ff-b80104064c69/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=00a9aa43-02f7-4040-a4ff-b80104064c69&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Danielle Allen, &quot;Justice by Means of Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, Justice by Means of Democracy, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at Partners in Democracy. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. Justice by Means of Democracy examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?
Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s Theory of Justice and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. Justice by Means of Democracy also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, Justice by Means of Democracy, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at Partners in Democracy. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. Justice by Means of Democracy examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?
Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s Theory of Justice and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. Justice by Means of Democracy also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>663</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72222704-df00-11f0-b2c1-c344d6cb9bf0</guid>
      <title>Paul Kelly, &quot;Against Postliberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.</p>
<p>In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509552450">Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left</a> (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers "capitalism without social mobility".</p>
<p>"Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be," he writes. "It doesn't give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change".</p>
<p>Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at <a href="http://www.242.news/">242.news</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.</p>
<p>In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509552450">Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left</a> (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers "capitalism without social mobility".</p>
<p>"Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be," he writes. "It doesn't give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change".</p>
<p>Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at <a href="http://www.242.news/">242.news</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36149294" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ca39ae95-acf3-4d43-9fb2-5af92953f48f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ca39ae95-acf3-4d43-9fb2-5af92953f48f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Kelly, &quot;Against Postliberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.

In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.

In Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers &quot;capitalism without social mobility&quot;.

&quot;Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be,&quot; he writes. &quot;It doesn&apos;t give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change&quot;.

Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.

Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Post-liberalism is all the rage on the American right, finding a common cause between legal theorists like Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen and rising political stars like J.D. Vance, the serving vice president.

In the UK, on the other hand, the movement has been pioneered by left-wing thinkers seeking to return lost working-class voters to the Labour Party and return the party itself to its non-urban, communitarian and patriotic roots.

In Against Post-Liberalism: Why ‘Family, Faith and Flag’ is a Dead End for the Left (Polity, 2025), Paul Kelly explores this post-liberal strain and concludes that it offers &quot;capitalism without social mobility&quot;.

&quot;Liberalism is not everything but it’s not supposed to be,&quot; he writes. &quot;It doesn&apos;t give an account of the meaning of life or the point of the universe. What it does offer is a way of negotiating social change and, hopefully, of ensuring that the burdens of that change fall reasonably equitably on everyone across generations. It looks to the future. It does not lock us into some nostalgia for a world gone by or frustrate our engagement with a future of necessary change&quot;.

Paul Kelly is Professor of Political Theory at the London School of Economics.

Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>779</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6e885f3c-dea1-11f0-b3c3-dfb7f1566278</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Sumption, &quot;The Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law&quot; (Profile Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.<br /></p>
<p>But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?<br /></p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.<br /></p>
<p>Timely, incisive and wholly original, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805222521">Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law</a> (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of 'the cleverest man in Britain' to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.</p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.</p>
<p><em>Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research's Reviews in History and the University of Rouen's online periodical Cercles.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.<br /></p>
<p>But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?<br /></p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.<br /></p>
<p>Timely, incisive and wholly original, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805222521">Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law</a> (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of 'the cleverest man in Britain' to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.</p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.</p>
<p><em>Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research's Reviews in History and the University of Rouen's online periodical Cercles.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26666812" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fbcc7de7-378f-4fbb-86a8-8bf17ac085b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fbcc7de7-378f-4fbb-86a8-8bf17ac085b7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Sumption, &quot;The Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law&quot; (Profile Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.

But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?

Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.

Timely, incisive and wholly original, Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of &apos;the cleverest man in Britain&apos; to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.

Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.

Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research&apos;s Reviews in History and the University of Rouen&apos;s online periodical Cercles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.

But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?

Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.

Timely, incisive and wholly original, Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of &apos;the cleverest man in Britain&apos; to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.

Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.

Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research&apos;s Reviews in History and the University of Rouen&apos;s online periodical Cercles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>778</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14a7fbfe-deff-11f0-92f8-1b3288018989</guid>
      <title>Joel S. Wit, &quot;Fallout: The Inside Story of America&apos;s Failure to Disarm North Korea&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After nearly four decades of negotiations, sanctions, summits, threats, and backdoor channels, the United States has failed to stop North Korea's nuclear program which now has the capability to strike American cities with weapons of mass destruction. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300278774">Fallout: The Inside Story of America's Failure to Disarm North Korea</a> (Yale UP, 2025), Joel S. Wit explains why US efforts to contain North Korea have not worked and gives readers a front-row seat to the policy debates, diplomatic deals, and secret talks between Washington and Pyongyang.</p>
<p>Wit, a former State Department official, takes readers to the front lines of nuclear negotiations and recounts how perilously close the United States and North Korea have come, on various occasions, to nuclear confrontation. Based on more than three hundred interviews with officials in Washington, Beijing, and Seoul, as well as with the author’s contacts in Pyongyang, this book chronicles how six American presidents have approached the problem of North Korea.<br />Wit points to Barack Obama and Donald Trump as the two presidents most responsible for the failure to halt North Korea’s march to build a nuclear arsenal, since it was under their successive tenures that Pyongyang acquired the ability to threaten every city in North America. Wit also offers an unparalleled portrait of Kim Jong Un that refutes his caricature as impulsive and illogical. Like his father and his grandfather, Kim is a ruthless despot but also a canny and informed negotiator determined to secure his dictatorship’s future by exploring diplomacy or, failing that, by building a nuclear arsenal.</p>
<p>Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on his first book which examines the high price that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations were willing to pay in order to achieve total victory in World War II. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a> or via <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">his website</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After nearly four decades of negotiations, sanctions, summits, threats, and backdoor channels, the United States has failed to stop North Korea's nuclear program which now has the capability to strike American cities with weapons of mass destruction. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300278774">Fallout: The Inside Story of America's Failure to Disarm North Korea</a> (Yale UP, 2025), Joel S. Wit explains why US efforts to contain North Korea have not worked and gives readers a front-row seat to the policy debates, diplomatic deals, and secret talks between Washington and Pyongyang.</p>
<p>Wit, a former State Department official, takes readers to the front lines of nuclear negotiations and recounts how perilously close the United States and North Korea have come, on various occasions, to nuclear confrontation. Based on more than three hundred interviews with officials in Washington, Beijing, and Seoul, as well as with the author’s contacts in Pyongyang, this book chronicles how six American presidents have approached the problem of North Korea.<br />Wit points to Barack Obama and Donald Trump as the two presidents most responsible for the failure to halt North Korea’s march to build a nuclear arsenal, since it was under their successive tenures that Pyongyang acquired the ability to threaten every city in North America. Wit also offers an unparalleled portrait of Kim Jong Un that refutes his caricature as impulsive and illogical. Like his father and his grandfather, Kim is a ruthless despot but also a canny and informed negotiator determined to secure his dictatorship’s future by exploring diplomacy or, failing that, by building a nuclear arsenal.</p>
<p>Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on his first book which examines the high price that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations were willing to pay in order to achieve total victory in World War II. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a> or via <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">his website</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45800066" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1fb4e034-c3eb-4241-994d-29d0f2ed44eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1fb4e034-c3eb-4241-994d-29d0f2ed44eb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joel S. Wit, &quot;Fallout: The Inside Story of America&apos;s Failure to Disarm North Korea&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After nearly four decades of negotiations, sanctions, summits, threats, and backdoor channels, the United States has failed to stop North Korea&apos;s nuclear program which now has the capability to strike American cities with weapons of mass destruction. In Fallout: The Inside Story of America&apos;s Failure to Disarm North Korea (Yale UP, 2025), Joel S. Wit explains why US efforts to contain North Korea have not worked and gives readers a front-row seat to the policy debates, diplomatic deals, and secret talks between Washington and Pyongyang.

Wit, a former State Department official, takes readers to the front lines of nuclear negotiations and recounts how perilously close the United States and North Korea have come, on various occasions, to nuclear confrontation. Based on more than three hundred interviews with officials in Washington, Beijing, and Seoul, as well as with the author’s contacts in Pyongyang, this book chronicles how six American presidents have approached the problem of North Korea.Wit points to Barack Obama and Donald Trump as the two presidents most responsible for the failure to halt North Korea’s march to build a nuclear arsenal, since it was under their successive tenures that Pyongyang acquired the ability to threaten every city in North America. Wit also offers an unparalleled portrait of Kim Jong Un that refutes his caricature as impulsive and illogical. Like his father and his grandfather, Kim is a ruthless despot but also a canny and informed negotiator determined to secure his dictatorship’s future by exploring diplomacy or, failing that, by building a nuclear arsenal.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on his first book which examines the high price that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations were willing to pay in order to achieve total victory in World War II. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via his website. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After nearly four decades of negotiations, sanctions, summits, threats, and backdoor channels, the United States has failed to stop North Korea&apos;s nuclear program which now has the capability to strike American cities with weapons of mass destruction. In Fallout: The Inside Story of America&apos;s Failure to Disarm North Korea (Yale UP, 2025), Joel S. Wit explains why US efforts to contain North Korea have not worked and gives readers a front-row seat to the policy debates, diplomatic deals, and secret talks between Washington and Pyongyang.

Wit, a former State Department official, takes readers to the front lines of nuclear negotiations and recounts how perilously close the United States and North Korea have come, on various occasions, to nuclear confrontation. Based on more than three hundred interviews with officials in Washington, Beijing, and Seoul, as well as with the author’s contacts in Pyongyang, this book chronicles how six American presidents have approached the problem of North Korea.Wit points to Barack Obama and Donald Trump as the two presidents most responsible for the failure to halt North Korea’s march to build a nuclear arsenal, since it was under their successive tenures that Pyongyang acquired the ability to threaten every city in North America. Wit also offers an unparalleled portrait of Kim Jong Un that refutes his caricature as impulsive and illogical. Like his father and his grandfather, Kim is a ruthless despot but also a canny and informed negotiator determined to secure his dictatorship’s future by exploring diplomacy or, failing that, by building a nuclear arsenal.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on his first book which examines the high price that the Roosevelt and Truman administrations were willing to pay in order to achieve total victory in World War II. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via his website. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>777</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1e47b8c-dc52-11f0-a42b-0fcb46de39d2</guid>
      <title>Weila Gong, &quot;Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode explores what China’s subnational climate experiments tell us about the possibilities and limits of climate leadership in an era of intensified geopolitics. We discuss how China’s domestic governance dynamics matter for international climate cooperation and competition, especially as Chinese actors become central in the global low-carbon transition. Thus, we turn our attention away from headline-grabbing climate summits and national pledges to examine the less visible, but often decisive, actors shaping China’s low-carbon transition. <em>Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025), a new book by <a href="https://www.weilagong.com/book.html">Weila Gong</a>, opens the black box of subnational climate governance in China and asks: who actually makes low-carbon policy work on the ground?</p>
<p>Our guest, Weila Gong, is a visiting scholar at UC Davis’s Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior and a nonresident scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. She has held fellowships at Georgetown, Harvard, and UC Berkeley School of Law, and brings more than a decade of experience studying the politics and policies of low-carbon energy transitions in China. Her work is timely. Despite being the world’s largest carbon emitter, China has pledged to peak carbon emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, commitments that place it at the center of global climate cooperation and competition.</p>
<p>We’re recording this episode in November 2025 as COP30 unfolds in Brazil, and at a moment when China is stepping into a more assertive role as a climate-technology power. Chinese officials and firms increasingly frame the country’s dominance in renewables, electric vehicles, and clean-energy supply chains as central to the global transition. Yet, as Gong’s book shows, climate leadership is not only forged through clean technologies or in international negotiating rooms and national policy announcements. It is also built, often unevenly, across hundreds of cities and counties within China.</p>
<p>At the heart of this variation, Gong identifies a pivotal group of actors: mid-level local bureaucrats. These officials function as “bridge leaders,” translating national directives into locally workable policies, mediating between political leadership changes, and sustaining experimentation over time. In doing so, they challenge top-down views of China’s climate governance and reveal how bottom-up dynamics shape both domestic outcomes and China’s role as a global climate leader.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode explores what China’s subnational climate experiments tell us about the possibilities and limits of climate leadership in an era of intensified geopolitics. We discuss how China’s domestic governance dynamics matter for international climate cooperation and competition, especially as Chinese actors become central in the global low-carbon transition. Thus, we turn our attention away from headline-grabbing climate summits and national pledges to examine the less visible, but often decisive, actors shaping China’s low-carbon transition. <em>Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025), a new book by <a href="https://www.weilagong.com/book.html">Weila Gong</a>, opens the black box of subnational climate governance in China and asks: who actually makes low-carbon policy work on the ground?</p>
<p>Our guest, Weila Gong, is a visiting scholar at UC Davis’s Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior and a nonresident scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. She has held fellowships at Georgetown, Harvard, and UC Berkeley School of Law, and brings more than a decade of experience studying the politics and policies of low-carbon energy transitions in China. Her work is timely. Despite being the world’s largest carbon emitter, China has pledged to peak carbon emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, commitments that place it at the center of global climate cooperation and competition.</p>
<p>We’re recording this episode in November 2025 as COP30 unfolds in Brazil, and at a moment when China is stepping into a more assertive role as a climate-technology power. Chinese officials and firms increasingly frame the country’s dominance in renewables, electric vehicles, and clean-energy supply chains as central to the global transition. Yet, as Gong’s book shows, climate leadership is not only forged through clean technologies or in international negotiating rooms and national policy announcements. It is also built, often unevenly, across hundreds of cities and counties within China.</p>
<p>At the heart of this variation, Gong identifies a pivotal group of actors: mid-level local bureaucrats. These officials function as “bridge leaders,” translating national directives into locally workable policies, mediating between political leadership changes, and sustaining experimentation over time. In doing so, they challenge top-down views of China’s climate governance and reveal how bottom-up dynamics shape both domestic outcomes and China’s role as a global climate leader.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38560205" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0e259060-8ea1-4e89-b706-124181ff1e40/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0e259060-8ea1-4e89-b706-124181ff1e40&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Weila Gong, &quot;Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This episode explores what China’s subnational climate experiments tell us about the possibilities and limits of climate leadership in an era of intensified geopolitics. We discuss how China’s domestic governance dynamics matter for international climate cooperation and competition, especially as Chinese actors become central in the global low-carbon transition. Thus, we turn our attention away from headline-grabbing climate summits and national pledges to examine the less visible, but often decisive, actors shaping China’s low-carbon transition. Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities (Oxford University Press, 2025), a new book by Weila Gong, opens the black box of subnational climate governance in China and asks: who actually makes low-carbon policy work on the ground?

Our guest, Weila Gong, is a visiting scholar at UC Davis’s Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior and a nonresident scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. She has held fellowships at Georgetown, Harvard, and UC Berkeley School of Law, and brings more than a decade of experience studying the politics and policies of low-carbon energy transitions in China. Her work is timely. Despite being the world’s largest carbon emitter, China has pledged to peak carbon emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, commitments that place it at the center of global climate cooperation and competition.

We’re recording this episode in November 2025 as COP30 unfolds in Brazil, and at a moment when China is stepping into a more assertive role as a climate-technology power. Chinese officials and firms increasingly frame the country’s dominance in renewables, electric vehicles, and clean-energy supply chains as central to the global transition. Yet, as Gong’s book shows, climate leadership is not only forged through clean technologies or in international negotiating rooms and national policy announcements. It is also built, often unevenly, across hundreds of cities and counties within China.

At the heart of this variation, Gong identifies a pivotal group of actors: mid-level local bureaucrats. These officials function as “bridge leaders,” translating national directives into locally workable policies, mediating between political leadership changes, and sustaining experimentation over time. In doing so, they challenge top-down views of China’s climate governance and reveal how bottom-up dynamics shape both domestic outcomes and China’s role as a global climate leader.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This episode explores what China’s subnational climate experiments tell us about the possibilities and limits of climate leadership in an era of intensified geopolitics. We discuss how China’s domestic governance dynamics matter for international climate cooperation and competition, especially as Chinese actors become central in the global low-carbon transition. Thus, we turn our attention away from headline-grabbing climate summits and national pledges to examine the less visible, but often decisive, actors shaping China’s low-carbon transition. Implementing a Low-Carbon Future: Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities (Oxford University Press, 2025), a new book by Weila Gong, opens the black box of subnational climate governance in China and asks: who actually makes low-carbon policy work on the ground?

Our guest, Weila Gong, is a visiting scholar at UC Davis’s Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior and a nonresident scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. She has held fellowships at Georgetown, Harvard, and UC Berkeley School of Law, and brings more than a decade of experience studying the politics and policies of low-carbon energy transitions in China. Her work is timely. Despite being the world’s largest carbon emitter, China has pledged to peak carbon emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, commitments that place it at the center of global climate cooperation and competition.

We’re recording this episode in November 2025 as COP30 unfolds in Brazil, and at a moment when China is stepping into a more assertive role as a climate-technology power. Chinese officials and firms increasingly frame the country’s dominance in renewables, electric vehicles, and clean-energy supply chains as central to the global transition. Yet, as Gong’s book shows, climate leadership is not only forged through clean technologies or in international negotiating rooms and national policy announcements. It is also built, often unevenly, across hundreds of cities and counties within China.

At the heart of this variation, Gong identifies a pivotal group of actors: mid-level local bureaucrats. These officials function as “bridge leaders,” translating national directives into locally workable policies, mediating between political leadership changes, and sustaining experimentation over time. In doing so, they challenge top-down views of China’s climate governance and reveal how bottom-up dynamics shape both domestic outcomes and China’s role as a global climate leader.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dac4aa80-db71-11f0-9218-b765042ff21e</guid>
      <title>Kwame Nkrumah and Pan-Africanism’s High Tide: A Conversation with Howard W. French</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324092452">The Second Emancipation: Nkrumah, Pan-Africanism, and Global Blackness at High Tide</a><em> </em>(Liveright, 2025), the second work in a trilogy from best-selling author Howard W. French about Africa's pivotal role in shaping world history, underscores Adam Hochschild's contention that French is a "modern-day Copernicus." The title--referring to a brief period beginning in 1957 when dozens of African colonies gained their freedom--positions this liberation at the center of a "movement of global Blackness," with one charismatic leader, Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972), at its head.<br />That so few people today know about Nkrumah is an omission that French demonstrates is "typical of our deliberate neglect of Africa's enormous role in the birth of the modern world." Determined to re-create Nkrumah's life as "an epic twentieth-century story," <em>The Second Emancipation</em> begins with his impoverished, unheralded birth in the far-western region of Ghana's Gold Coast. But blessed with a deep curiosity, a young Nkrumah pursued an overseas education in the United States. Nowhere is French's consummate style more vivid than in Nkrumah's early years in Depression-era America, especially in his mesmerizing portrait of a culturally effervescent Harlem that Nkrumah encountered in 1935 before heading to college. During his student years in Pennsylvania and later as an activist in London, Nkrumah became steeped in a renowned international Black intellectual milieu--including Du Bois, Garvey, Fanon, Padmore, and C.L.R. James, who called him "one of the greatest political leaders of our century"--and formed an ideology that readied him for an extraordinarily swift and peaceful rise to power upon his return to Ghana in 1947.<br />Four years later, in a political landslide he engineered while imprisoned, Nkrumah stunned Britain by winning the first general election under universal franchise in Africa, becoming Ghana's first independent prime minister in 1957. As leader of a sovereign nation, Nkrumah wielded his influence to promote the liberation of the entire continent, pushing unity as the only pathway to recover from the damages of enslavement and subjugation. By the time national military and police forces, aided by the CIA, overthrew him in 1966, Nkrumah's radical belief in pan-African liberation had both galvanized dozens of nascent African states and fired a global agenda of Black power.<br />In its dramatic recasting of the American civil rights story and in its tragic depiction of a continent that once exuded all the promise of a newly won freedom, <em>The Second Emancipation</em> becomes a generational work that positions Africa at the forefront of modern-day history.</p>
<p>Howard W. French<strong> </strong>is a professor of journalism at Columbia University and a former <em>New York Times </em>bureau chief for Central America and the Caribbean, West and Central Africa, Japan and the Koreas, and China, based in Shanghai. The author of six books, including <em>Born in Blackness</em>, French lives in New York City.</p>
<p><em>Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324092452">The Second Emancipation: Nkrumah, Pan-Africanism, and Global Blackness at High Tide</a><em> </em>(Liveright, 2025), the second work in a trilogy from best-selling author Howard W. French about Africa's pivotal role in shaping world history, underscores Adam Hochschild's contention that French is a "modern-day Copernicus." The title--referring to a brief period beginning in 1957 when dozens of African colonies gained their freedom--positions this liberation at the center of a "movement of global Blackness," with one charismatic leader, Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972), at its head.<br />That so few people today know about Nkrumah is an omission that French demonstrates is "typical of our deliberate neglect of Africa's enormous role in the birth of the modern world." Determined to re-create Nkrumah's life as "an epic twentieth-century story," <em>The Second Emancipation</em> begins with his impoverished, unheralded birth in the far-western region of Ghana's Gold Coast. But blessed with a deep curiosity, a young Nkrumah pursued an overseas education in the United States. Nowhere is French's consummate style more vivid than in Nkrumah's early years in Depression-era America, especially in his mesmerizing portrait of a culturally effervescent Harlem that Nkrumah encountered in 1935 before heading to college. During his student years in Pennsylvania and later as an activist in London, Nkrumah became steeped in a renowned international Black intellectual milieu--including Du Bois, Garvey, Fanon, Padmore, and C.L.R. James, who called him "one of the greatest political leaders of our century"--and formed an ideology that readied him for an extraordinarily swift and peaceful rise to power upon his return to Ghana in 1947.<br />Four years later, in a political landslide he engineered while imprisoned, Nkrumah stunned Britain by winning the first general election under universal franchise in Africa, becoming Ghana's first independent prime minister in 1957. As leader of a sovereign nation, Nkrumah wielded his influence to promote the liberation of the entire continent, pushing unity as the only pathway to recover from the damages of enslavement and subjugation. By the time national military and police forces, aided by the CIA, overthrew him in 1966, Nkrumah's radical belief in pan-African liberation had both galvanized dozens of nascent African states and fired a global agenda of Black power.<br />In its dramatic recasting of the American civil rights story and in its tragic depiction of a continent that once exuded all the promise of a newly won freedom, <em>The Second Emancipation</em> becomes a generational work that positions Africa at the forefront of modern-day history.</p>
<p>Howard W. French<strong> </strong>is a professor of journalism at Columbia University and a former <em>New York Times </em>bureau chief for Central America and the Caribbean, West and Central Africa, Japan and the Koreas, and China, based in Shanghai. The author of six books, including <em>Born in Blackness</em>, French lives in New York City.</p>
<p><em>Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46421603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5d8c94ac-3672-4d2f-bcea-9a7a47cc1fe3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5d8c94ac-3672-4d2f-bcea-9a7a47cc1fe3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kwame Nkrumah and Pan-Africanism’s High Tide: A Conversation with Howard W. French</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Second Emancipation: Nkrumah, Pan-Africanism, and Global Blackness at High Tide (Liveright, 2025), the second work in a trilogy from best-selling author Howard W. French about Africa&apos;s pivotal role in shaping world history, underscores Adam Hochschild&apos;s contention that French is a &quot;modern-day Copernicus.&quot; The title--referring to a brief period beginning in 1957 when dozens of African colonies gained their freedom--positions this liberation at the center of a &quot;movement of global Blackness,&quot; with one charismatic leader, Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972), at its head.That so few people today know about Nkrumah is an omission that French demonstrates is &quot;typical of our deliberate neglect of Africa&apos;s enormous role in the birth of the modern world.&quot; Determined to re-create Nkrumah&apos;s life as &quot;an epic twentieth-century story,&quot; The Second Emancipation begins with his impoverished, unheralded birth in the far-western region of Ghana&apos;s Gold Coast. But blessed with a deep curiosity, a young Nkrumah pursued an overseas education in the United States. Nowhere is French&apos;s consummate style more vivid than in Nkrumah&apos;s early years in Depression-era America, especially in his mesmerizing portrait of a culturally effervescent Harlem that Nkrumah encountered in 1935 before heading to college. During his student years in Pennsylvania and later as an activist in London, Nkrumah became steeped in a renowned international Black intellectual milieu--including Du Bois, Garvey, Fanon, Padmore, and C.L.R. James, who called him &quot;one of the greatest political leaders of our century&quot;--and formed an ideology that readied him for an extraordinarily swift and peaceful rise to power upon his return to Ghana in 1947.Four years later, in a political landslide he engineered while imprisoned, Nkrumah stunned Britain by winning the first general election under universal franchise in Africa, becoming Ghana&apos;s first independent prime minister in 1957. As leader of a sovereign nation, Nkrumah wielded his influence to promote the liberation of the entire continent, pushing unity as the only pathway to recover from the damages of enslavement and subjugation. By the time national military and police forces, aided by the CIA, overthrew him in 1966, Nkrumah&apos;s radical belief in pan-African liberation had both galvanized dozens of nascent African states and fired a global agenda of Black power.In its dramatic recasting of the American civil rights story and in its tragic depiction of a continent that once exuded all the promise of a newly won freedom, The Second Emancipation becomes a generational work that positions Africa at the forefront of modern-day history.

Howard W. French is a professor of journalism at Columbia University and a former New York Times bureau chief for Central America and the Caribbean, West and Central Africa, Japan and the Koreas, and China, based in Shanghai. The author of six books, including Born in Blackness, French lives in New York City.

Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Second Emancipation: Nkrumah, Pan-Africanism, and Global Blackness at High Tide (Liveright, 2025), the second work in a trilogy from best-selling author Howard W. French about Africa&apos;s pivotal role in shaping world history, underscores Adam Hochschild&apos;s contention that French is a &quot;modern-day Copernicus.&quot; The title--referring to a brief period beginning in 1957 when dozens of African colonies gained their freedom--positions this liberation at the center of a &quot;movement of global Blackness,&quot; with one charismatic leader, Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972), at its head.That so few people today know about Nkrumah is an omission that French demonstrates is &quot;typical of our deliberate neglect of Africa&apos;s enormous role in the birth of the modern world.&quot; Determined to re-create Nkrumah&apos;s life as &quot;an epic twentieth-century story,&quot; The Second Emancipation begins with his impoverished, unheralded birth in the far-western region of Ghana&apos;s Gold Coast. But blessed with a deep curiosity, a young Nkrumah pursued an overseas education in the United States. Nowhere is French&apos;s consummate style more vivid than in Nkrumah&apos;s early years in Depression-era America, especially in his mesmerizing portrait of a culturally effervescent Harlem that Nkrumah encountered in 1935 before heading to college. During his student years in Pennsylvania and later as an activist in London, Nkrumah became steeped in a renowned international Black intellectual milieu--including Du Bois, Garvey, Fanon, Padmore, and C.L.R. James, who called him &quot;one of the greatest political leaders of our century&quot;--and formed an ideology that readied him for an extraordinarily swift and peaceful rise to power upon his return to Ghana in 1947.Four years later, in a political landslide he engineered while imprisoned, Nkrumah stunned Britain by winning the first general election under universal franchise in Africa, becoming Ghana&apos;s first independent prime minister in 1957. As leader of a sovereign nation, Nkrumah wielded his influence to promote the liberation of the entire continent, pushing unity as the only pathway to recover from the damages of enslavement and subjugation. By the time national military and police forces, aided by the CIA, overthrew him in 1966, Nkrumah&apos;s radical belief in pan-African liberation had both galvanized dozens of nascent African states and fired a global agenda of Black power.In its dramatic recasting of the American civil rights story and in its tragic depiction of a continent that once exuded all the promise of a newly won freedom, The Second Emancipation becomes a generational work that positions Africa at the forefront of modern-day history.

Howard W. French is a professor of journalism at Columbia University and a former New York Times bureau chief for Central America and the Caribbean, West and Central Africa, Japan and the Koreas, and China, based in Shanghai. The author of six books, including Born in Blackness, French lives in New York City.

Ayisha Osori is a lawyer and Director at Open Society Foundations Ideas Workshop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>775</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3d0df038-dab5-11f0-be92-3f2587a68915</guid>
      <title>Jeff Roche, &quot;The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right&quot; (U Texas Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in <em>The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right</em> (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state's conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the "cowboy conservatism" of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, <em>The Conservative Frontier</em> makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in <em>The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right</em> (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state's conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the "cowboy conservatism" of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, <em>The Conservative Frontier</em> makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74110485" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4da4e7c3-52ed-418b-a68c-878fa2b5f38a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4da4e7c3-52ed-418b-a68c-878fa2b5f38a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeff Roche, &quot;The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right&quot; (U Texas Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state&apos;s conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the &quot;cowboy conservatism&quot; of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, The Conservative Frontier makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American conservatism as we know it today is a West Texas export, argues College of Wooster professor Jeff Roche in The Conservative Frontier: Texas and the Origins of the New Right (U Texas Press, 2025). Tracing the roots of the state&apos;s conservative movement back to the giant cattle ranches and tycoons of the nineteenth century, Roche argues that you cannot separate the local and historical conditions in the West (and in West Texas specifically) from the &quot;cowboy conservatism&quot; of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Full of fascinating characters and the kind of tall tales you only find in the Lone Star State, The Conservative Frontier makes a compelling case for Texas politics eventually becoming national politics by the mid to late 20th century. No matter where you are in the United States today, the political weight of Texas creates a gravity that has proven impossible for American politics to emerge from.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>194</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2fbd176-da1a-11f0-a65e-f31da40875f4</guid>
      <title>Celina Su, &quot;Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Amid political repression and a deepening affordability crisis, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691251318"><em>Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities</em> </a>(Princeton UP, 2025) challenges everything you thought you knew about “dull” and daunting government budgets. It shows how the latter confuse and mislead the public by design, not accident. Arguing that they are moral documents that demand grassroots participation to truly work for everyone, the book reveals how everyday citizens can shape policy to tackle everything from rising housing and food costs to unabated police violence, underfunded schools, and climate change–driven floods and wildfires.<br />Drawing on her years of engagement with democratic governance in New York City and around the globe, Celina Su proposes a new kind of democracy—in which city residents make collective decisions about public needs through processes like participatory budgeting, and in which they work across racial divides and segregated spaces as neighbors rather than as consumers or members of voting blocs. Su presents a series of “interludes” that vividly illustrate how budget justice plays out on the ground, including in-depth interviews with activists from Porto Alegre, Brazil, Barcelona, Spain, and Jackson, Mississippi, and shares her own personal reflections on how changing social identities inform one’s activism.<br />Essential reading to empower citizens, <em>Budget Justice</em> explains why public budgets reflect a crisis not so much in accounting as in democracy, and enables everyone, especially those from historically marginalized communities, to imagine and enact people’s budgets and policies—from universal preschool to affordable housing—that will enable their communities to thrive.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.celinasu.net/">Celina Su</a> is the inaugural Marilyn J. Gittell Chair in Urban Studies (with an appointment in Critical Social &amp; Environmental Psychology) at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, as well as Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College. Her interests lie in civil society and the cultural politics of education and health policy. She is especially interested in how everyday citizens engage in policy-making—via deliberative democracy when inclusive institutions exist, and via protest and social movements when they do not. Celina received a Ph.D. in Urban Studies from MIT and a B.A. Honors from Wesleyan University.</p>
<p><a href="https://jenhoyer.info/">Jen Hoyer</a> is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at<a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/"> CUNY New York City College of Technology</a>. She is co-author of<a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/"> <em>What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a> (2022) and<a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/"> <em>The Social Movement Archive</em></a> (2021)<em>, </em>and co-editor of <a href="https://www.commonnotions.org/buy/armed-by-design"><em>Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America</em></a> (2025)<em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid political repression and a deepening affordability crisis, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691251318"><em>Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities</em> </a>(Princeton UP, 2025) challenges everything you thought you knew about “dull” and daunting government budgets. It shows how the latter confuse and mislead the public by design, not accident. Arguing that they are moral documents that demand grassroots participation to truly work for everyone, the book reveals how everyday citizens can shape policy to tackle everything from rising housing and food costs to unabated police violence, underfunded schools, and climate change–driven floods and wildfires.<br />Drawing on her years of engagement with democratic governance in New York City and around the globe, Celina Su proposes a new kind of democracy—in which city residents make collective decisions about public needs through processes like participatory budgeting, and in which they work across racial divides and segregated spaces as neighbors rather than as consumers or members of voting blocs. Su presents a series of “interludes” that vividly illustrate how budget justice plays out on the ground, including in-depth interviews with activists from Porto Alegre, Brazil, Barcelona, Spain, and Jackson, Mississippi, and shares her own personal reflections on how changing social identities inform one’s activism.<br />Essential reading to empower citizens, <em>Budget Justice</em> explains why public budgets reflect a crisis not so much in accounting as in democracy, and enables everyone, especially those from historically marginalized communities, to imagine and enact people’s budgets and policies—from universal preschool to affordable housing—that will enable their communities to thrive.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.celinasu.net/">Celina Su</a> is the inaugural Marilyn J. Gittell Chair in Urban Studies (with an appointment in Critical Social &amp; Environmental Psychology) at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, as well as Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College. Her interests lie in civil society and the cultural politics of education and health policy. She is especially interested in how everyday citizens engage in policy-making—via deliberative democracy when inclusive institutions exist, and via protest and social movements when they do not. Celina received a Ph.D. in Urban Studies from MIT and a B.A. Honors from Wesleyan University.</p>
<p><a href="https://jenhoyer.info/">Jen Hoyer</a> is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at<a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/"> CUNY New York City College of Technology</a>. She is co-author of<a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/"> <em>What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a> (2022) and<a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/"> <em>The Social Movement Archive</em></a> (2021)<em>, </em>and co-editor of <a href="https://www.commonnotions.org/buy/armed-by-design"><em>Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America</em></a> (2025)<em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31551293" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f2e25465-e711-4218-a6c1-52530fe01401/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f2e25465-e711-4218-a6c1-52530fe01401&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Celina Su, &quot;Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amid political repression and a deepening affordability crisis, Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities (Princeton UP, 2025) challenges everything you thought you knew about “dull” and daunting government budgets. It shows how the latter confuse and mislead the public by design, not accident. Arguing that they are moral documents that demand grassroots participation to truly work for everyone, the book reveals how everyday citizens can shape policy to tackle everything from rising housing and food costs to unabated police violence, underfunded schools, and climate change–driven floods and wildfires.Drawing on her years of engagement with democratic governance in New York City and around the globe, Celina Su proposes a new kind of democracy—in which city residents make collective decisions about public needs through processes like participatory budgeting, and in which they work across racial divides and segregated spaces as neighbors rather than as consumers or members of voting blocs. Su presents a series of “interludes” that vividly illustrate how budget justice plays out on the ground, including in-depth interviews with activists from Porto Alegre, Brazil, Barcelona, Spain, and Jackson, Mississippi, and shares her own personal reflections on how changing social identities inform one’s activism.Essential reading to empower citizens, Budget Justice explains why public budgets reflect a crisis not so much in accounting as in democracy, and enables everyone, especially those from historically marginalized communities, to imagine and enact people’s budgets and policies—from universal preschool to affordable housing—that will enable their communities to thrive.

Celina Su is the inaugural Marilyn J. Gittell Chair in Urban Studies (with an appointment in Critical Social &amp; Environmental Psychology) at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, as well as Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College. Her interests lie in civil society and the cultural politics of education and health policy. She is especially interested in how everyday citizens engage in policy-making—via deliberative democracy when inclusive institutions exist, and via protest and social movements when they do not. Celina received a Ph.D. in Urban Studies from MIT and a B.A. Honors from Wesleyan University.

Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom (2022) and The Social Movement Archive (2021), and co-editor of Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (2025).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amid political repression and a deepening affordability crisis, Budget Justice: ﻿﻿On Building Grassroots Politics and Solidarities (Princeton UP, 2025) challenges everything you thought you knew about “dull” and daunting government budgets. It shows how the latter confuse and mislead the public by design, not accident. Arguing that they are moral documents that demand grassroots participation to truly work for everyone, the book reveals how everyday citizens can shape policy to tackle everything from rising housing and food costs to unabated police violence, underfunded schools, and climate change–driven floods and wildfires.Drawing on her years of engagement with democratic governance in New York City and around the globe, Celina Su proposes a new kind of democracy—in which city residents make collective decisions about public needs through processes like participatory budgeting, and in which they work across racial divides and segregated spaces as neighbors rather than as consumers or members of voting blocs. Su presents a series of “interludes” that vividly illustrate how budget justice plays out on the ground, including in-depth interviews with activists from Porto Alegre, Brazil, Barcelona, Spain, and Jackson, Mississippi, and shares her own personal reflections on how changing social identities inform one’s activism.Essential reading to empower citizens, Budget Justice explains why public budgets reflect a crisis not so much in accounting as in democracy, and enables everyone, especially those from historically marginalized communities, to imagine and enact people’s budgets and policies—from universal preschool to affordable housing—that will enable their communities to thrive.

Celina Su is the inaugural Marilyn J. Gittell Chair in Urban Studies (with an appointment in Critical Social &amp; Environmental Psychology) at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, as well as Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College. Her interests lie in civil society and the cultural politics of education and health policy. She is especially interested in how everyday citizens engage in policy-making—via deliberative democracy when inclusive institutions exist, and via protest and social movements when they do not. Celina received a Ph.D. in Urban Studies from MIT and a B.A. Honors from Wesleyan University.

Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom (2022) and The Social Movement Archive (2021), and co-editor of Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (2025).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>773</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66f8676e-d71a-11f0-b965-375249f596fe</guid>
      <title>Mirya Holman, &quot;The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439926703"><em>The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy</em> </a>(Temple UP, 2025) by Dr. Mirya Holman explicates the purpose, role, and consequences of appointed boards in U.S. cities. Dr. Holman finds cities create strong boards that generate policy, consolidate power, and defend the interests of businesses and wealthy and white residents. In contrast, weak boards pacify agitation from marginalized groups to give the appearance of inclusivity, democratic deliberation, and redistributional policymaking. Cities preserve this strong board/weak board dichotomy through policymaking power, institutional design, and by controlling who serves on the boards.</p>
<p><em>The Hidden Face of Local Power</em> examines the role of boards in the development of urban political institutions, the allocation of power in local politics, and the persistence of inequality. Holman enhances our understanding of how political institutions have contributed to racism and their impact on how people use and live in urban spaces. In her shrewd analysis of the creation and use of boards as political institutions, Dr. Holman proves that neither weak or strong boards achieves the goal they are advertised to achieve. In doing so, she provides a new view of the failures of local democracy along with ideas for improvement.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439926703"><em>The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy</em> </a>(Temple UP, 2025) by Dr. Mirya Holman explicates the purpose, role, and consequences of appointed boards in U.S. cities. Dr. Holman finds cities create strong boards that generate policy, consolidate power, and defend the interests of businesses and wealthy and white residents. In contrast, weak boards pacify agitation from marginalized groups to give the appearance of inclusivity, democratic deliberation, and redistributional policymaking. Cities preserve this strong board/weak board dichotomy through policymaking power, institutional design, and by controlling who serves on the boards.</p>
<p><em>The Hidden Face of Local Power</em> examines the role of boards in the development of urban political institutions, the allocation of power in local politics, and the persistence of inequality. Holman enhances our understanding of how political institutions have contributed to racism and their impact on how people use and live in urban spaces. In her shrewd analysis of the creation and use of boards as political institutions, Dr. Holman proves that neither weak or strong boards achieves the goal they are advertised to achieve. In doing so, she provides a new view of the failures of local democracy along with ideas for improvement.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39791995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a67e3b7c-ca27-4621-a7d1-311b0dea1894/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a67e3b7c-ca27-4621-a7d1-311b0dea1894&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mirya Holman, &quot;The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy (Temple UP, 2025) by Dr. Mirya Holman explicates the purpose, role, and consequences of appointed boards in U.S. cities. Dr. Holman finds cities create strong boards that generate policy, consolidate power, and defend the interests of businesses and wealthy and white residents. In contrast, weak boards pacify agitation from marginalized groups to give the appearance of inclusivity, democratic deliberation, and redistributional policymaking. Cities preserve this strong board/weak board dichotomy through policymaking power, institutional design, and by controlling who serves on the boards.

The Hidden Face of Local Power examines the role of boards in the development of urban political institutions, the allocation of power in local politics, and the persistence of inequality. Holman enhances our understanding of how political institutions have contributed to racism and their impact on how people use and live in urban spaces. In her shrewd analysis of the creation and use of boards as political institutions, Dr. Holman proves that neither weak or strong boards achieves the goal they are advertised to achieve. In doing so, she provides a new view of the failures of local democracy along with ideas for improvement.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy (Temple UP, 2025) by Dr. Mirya Holman explicates the purpose, role, and consequences of appointed boards in U.S. cities. Dr. Holman finds cities create strong boards that generate policy, consolidate power, and defend the interests of businesses and wealthy and white residents. In contrast, weak boards pacify agitation from marginalized groups to give the appearance of inclusivity, democratic deliberation, and redistributional policymaking. Cities preserve this strong board/weak board dichotomy through policymaking power, institutional design, and by controlling who serves on the boards.

The Hidden Face of Local Power examines the role of boards in the development of urban political institutions, the allocation of power in local politics, and the persistence of inequality. Holman enhances our understanding of how political institutions have contributed to racism and their impact on how people use and live in urban spaces. In her shrewd analysis of the creation and use of boards as political institutions, Dr. Holman proves that neither weak or strong boards achieves the goal they are advertised to achieve. In doing so, she provides a new view of the failures of local democracy along with ideas for improvement.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>772</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ae23b8a-d57f-11f0-9cc9-73cfcac91b36</guid>
      <title>Matt Sleat, &quot;Post-Liberalism&quot; (Polity, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the "dominant ideology of the modern west" - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.</p>
<p>﻿Yet a new generation of "post-liberal" thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.<br />In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. </p>
<p>"Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good," writes Matt Sleat in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509562206"><em>Post-Liberalism</em></a> (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism's two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.<br />Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.<br />*The author's book recommendations were <em>Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century </em>by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and <em>Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order</em> by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click <a href="https://the242readinglist.tiiny.site/">here</a> to see the full reading list.<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones"><br />Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at <a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a>.<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the "dominant ideology of the modern west" - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.</p>
<p>﻿Yet a new generation of "post-liberal" thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.<br />In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. </p>
<p>"Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good," writes Matt Sleat in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509562206"><em>Post-Liberalism</em></a> (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism's two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.<br />Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.<br />*The author's book recommendations were <em>Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century </em>by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and <em>Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order</em> by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click <a href="https://the242readinglist.tiiny.site/">here</a> to see the full reading list.<a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones"><br />Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at <a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a>.<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37956414" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5c0d17ac-7798-4864-8c70-91574a49ae66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5c0d17ac-7798-4864-8c70-91574a49ae66&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matt Sleat, &quot;Post-Liberalism&quot; (Polity, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the &quot;dominant ideology of the modern west&quot; - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.

﻿Yet a new generation of &quot;post-liberal&quot; thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. 

&quot;Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good,&quot; writes Matt Sleat in Post-Liberalism (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism&apos;s two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.*The author&apos;s book recommendations were Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click here to see the full reading list.Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberalism may feel as though it has been around forever - as the &quot;dominant ideology of the modern west&quot; - but not even its advocates and detractors can agree what it is. Political sophisticates ask whether it is classical-, social-, ordo- or neo-liberal while American main street associates it with socialism.

﻿Yet a new generation of &quot;post-liberal&quot; thinkers know liberalism well enough to want to give it upi or, in most cases, go back to a time - real or imagined - before it took hold.In the US, these political philosophers are mostly Catholic conservatives. In the UK, with one prominent exception, they are largely left-wing Anglicans. In both countries, they tend to be religious and yearn for pre-globalisation communitarian, familial and patriotic certainties. 

&quot;Where liberals believe political authority is derived from individuals consenting to be ruled, for post-liberals it comes from serving the common good,&quot; writes Matt Sleat in Post-Liberalism (Polity, 2025). His book explores the ideas of the likes of Chad Pecknold, Gladden Pappin, Sohrab Ahmari and post-liberalism&apos;s two standout thinkers: Adrian Vermeule and Patrick Deneen.Matt Sleat is Reader in Political Theory at the University of Sheffield.*The author&apos;s book recommendations were Power and Powerlessness: The Liberalism of Fear in the Twenty First Century by Edward Hall (OUP Oxford, 2025) and Global Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order by Paul Tucker (Princeton University Press, 2022). Click here to see the full reading list.Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who writes and podcasts at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>771</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06a60030-d5a6-11f0-afec-83e6395aa917</guid>
      <title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844886">The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a> (U Chicago Press, 2025) is a complex and important analysis of the American constitutional system, of the <em>U.S. Constitution</em> itself, and the way that pressures on that system have pushed and pulled on the institutions of government, federalism, and ultimately democracy. Stephen Skowronek, the Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political and Social Science at Yale University, continues his work and exploration of the viability of the constitutional system in the United States in this new book, following on the 2022 book: <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic-9780197656945?lang=en&amp;cc=us">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a> (with John Dearborn and Desmond King, Oxford University Press, 2022). Skowronek traces the shifts and adaptations of the constitutional system as it contended with waves of democratization, with the anti-bellum expansion of voting rights for all white men, to the post-Civil War period and the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, through the advocacy at the turn of the 19th century for labor and gender reforms, and then the advent of the Administrative state in the middle of the 20th century, and finally through the Civil Rights/Women’s Rights/Sexual Revolution/Disability Rights period of the 1960s and 1970s. Part of the argument is that the system itself adapted, becoming more democratic and inclusive with regard to particular groups while at the same time loosening up the constitutional system as a whole. Even with these democratic advances over the course of 250 years, each iterative cycle also tended to exclude other groups of citizens.</p>
<p>This tension—with the extension of rights to groups who had been excluded, only to have other groups excluded to keep this ballast of the system—goes to the heart of the promise of democracy within this constitutional system. And we find ourselves with the <em>Constitution</em> under significant stress, with the growth and implementation of substantial presidentialism and an undue dependence on judicial supremacy, leaving the structures of the system potentially unmoored from the very document and ideas that created the system itself. This also gets at the apparent loss of consensus around the <em>idea</em> of the United States, the lack of a common vision of a great commercial republic, which was at the heart of the American Founding. Skowronek also notes that the <em>U.S. Constitution</em> is particularly inept at pursuing social justice, especially within the context of the common vision of a great commercial republic.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844886">The Adaptability Paradox</a> is a vitally important book examining the current constitutional dismay in which we find ourselves and provides the historical and political paths that brought us here. We learn a great deal about the tensions between democracy and the American constitutional system—which have been at the heart of the U.S. system since the early days of the republic, but have become much more attenuated of late, with a general lack of consensus around the purpose of constitutional system itself.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844886">The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a> (U Chicago Press, 2025) is a complex and important analysis of the American constitutional system, of the <em>U.S. Constitution</em> itself, and the way that pressures on that system have pushed and pulled on the institutions of government, federalism, and ultimately democracy. Stephen Skowronek, the Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political and Social Science at Yale University, continues his work and exploration of the viability of the constitutional system in the United States in this new book, following on the 2022 book: <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic-9780197656945?lang=en&amp;cc=us">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a> (with John Dearborn and Desmond King, Oxford University Press, 2022). Skowronek traces the shifts and adaptations of the constitutional system as it contended with waves of democratization, with the anti-bellum expansion of voting rights for all white men, to the post-Civil War period and the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, through the advocacy at the turn of the 19th century for labor and gender reforms, and then the advent of the Administrative state in the middle of the 20th century, and finally through the Civil Rights/Women’s Rights/Sexual Revolution/Disability Rights period of the 1960s and 1970s. Part of the argument is that the system itself adapted, becoming more democratic and inclusive with regard to particular groups while at the same time loosening up the constitutional system as a whole. Even with these democratic advances over the course of 250 years, each iterative cycle also tended to exclude other groups of citizens.</p>
<p>This tension—with the extension of rights to groups who had been excluded, only to have other groups excluded to keep this ballast of the system—goes to the heart of the promise of democracy within this constitutional system. And we find ourselves with the <em>Constitution</em> under significant stress, with the growth and implementation of substantial presidentialism and an undue dependence on judicial supremacy, leaving the structures of the system potentially unmoored from the very document and ideas that created the system itself. This also gets at the apparent loss of consensus around the <em>idea</em> of the United States, the lack of a common vision of a great commercial republic, which was at the heart of the American Founding. Skowronek also notes that the <em>U.S. Constitution</em> is particularly inept at pursuing social justice, especially within the context of the common vision of a great commercial republic.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844886">The Adaptability Paradox</a> is a vitally important book examining the current constitutional dismay in which we find ourselves and provides the historical and political paths that brought us here. We learn a great deal about the tensions between democracy and the American constitutional system—which have been at the heart of the U.S. system since the early days of the republic, but have become much more attenuated of late, with a general lack of consensus around the purpose of constitutional system itself.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47925314" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2ca550b4-46e1-42b2-98ed-1ee2dde5d2e1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2ca550b4-46e1-42b2-98ed-1ee2dde5d2e1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (U Chicago Press, 2025) is a complex and important analysis of the American constitutional system, of the U.S. Constitution itself, and the way that pressures on that system have pushed and pulled on the institutions of government, federalism, and ultimately democracy. Stephen Skowronek, the Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political and Social Science at Yale University, continues his work and exploration of the viability of the constitutional system in the United States in this new book, following on the 2022 book: Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (with John Dearborn and Desmond King, Oxford University Press, 2022). Skowronek traces the shifts and adaptations of the constitutional system as it contended with waves of democratization, with the anti-bellum expansion of voting rights for all white men, to the post-Civil War period and the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, through the advocacy at the turn of the 19th century for labor and gender reforms, and then the advent of the Administrative state in the middle of the 20th century, and finally through the Civil Rights/Women’s Rights/Sexual Revolution/Disability Rights period of the 1960s and 1970s. Part of the argument is that the system itself adapted, becoming more democratic and inclusive with regard to particular groups while at the same time loosening up the constitutional system as a whole. Even with these democratic advances over the course of 250 years, each iterative cycle also tended to exclude other groups of citizens.

This tension—with the extension of rights to groups who had been excluded, only to have other groups excluded to keep this ballast of the system—goes to the heart of the promise of democracy within this constitutional system. And we find ourselves with the Constitution under significant stress, with the growth and implementation of substantial presidentialism and an undue dependence on judicial supremacy, leaving the structures of the system potentially unmoored from the very document and ideas that created the system itself. This also gets at the apparent loss of consensus around the idea of the United States, the lack of a common vision of a great commercial republic, which was at the heart of the American Founding. Skowronek also notes that the U.S. Constitution is particularly inept at pursuing social justice, especially within the context of the common vision of a great commercial republic.

The Adaptability Paradox is a vitally important book examining the current constitutional dismay in which we find ourselves and provides the historical and political paths that brought us here. We learn a great deal about the tensions between democracy and the American constitutional system—which have been at the heart of the U.S. system since the early days of the republic, but have become much more attenuated of late, with a general lack of consensus around the purpose of constitutional system itself.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (U Chicago Press, 2025) is a complex and important analysis of the American constitutional system, of the U.S. Constitution itself, and the way that pressures on that system have pushed and pulled on the institutions of government, federalism, and ultimately democracy. Stephen Skowronek, the Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political and Social Science at Yale University, continues his work and exploration of the viability of the constitutional system in the United States in this new book, following on the 2022 book: Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (with John Dearborn and Desmond King, Oxford University Press, 2022). Skowronek traces the shifts and adaptations of the constitutional system as it contended with waves of democratization, with the anti-bellum expansion of voting rights for all white men, to the post-Civil War period and the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, through the advocacy at the turn of the 19th century for labor and gender reforms, and then the advent of the Administrative state in the middle of the 20th century, and finally through the Civil Rights/Women’s Rights/Sexual Revolution/Disability Rights period of the 1960s and 1970s. Part of the argument is that the system itself adapted, becoming more democratic and inclusive with regard to particular groups while at the same time loosening up the constitutional system as a whole. Even with these democratic advances over the course of 250 years, each iterative cycle also tended to exclude other groups of citizens.

This tension—with the extension of rights to groups who had been excluded, only to have other groups excluded to keep this ballast of the system—goes to the heart of the promise of democracy within this constitutional system. And we find ourselves with the Constitution under significant stress, with the growth and implementation of substantial presidentialism and an undue dependence on judicial supremacy, leaving the structures of the system potentially unmoored from the very document and ideas that created the system itself. This also gets at the apparent loss of consensus around the idea of the United States, the lack of a common vision of a great commercial republic, which was at the heart of the American Founding. Skowronek also notes that the U.S. Constitution is particularly inept at pursuing social justice, especially within the context of the common vision of a great commercial republic.

The Adaptability Paradox is a vitally important book examining the current constitutional dismay in which we find ourselves and provides the historical and political paths that brought us here. We learn a great deal about the tensions between democracy and the American constitutional system—which have been at the heart of the U.S. system since the early days of the republic, but have become much more attenuated of late, with a general lack of consensus around the purpose of constitutional system itself.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>770</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48e2f426-4959-11ed-a504-1f90b779a587</guid>
      <title>Peace A. Medie, &quot;Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/global-norms-and-local-action-the-campaigns-to-end-violence-against-women-in-africa/9780190922962"><em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women's movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie's study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women's rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.</p><p>Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘<em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ </em>(OUP 2020). Her debut novel, <em>His Only Wife</em>, was a <em>New York Times</em> Notable Book of 2020 and a <em>Time Magazine</em> Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, <em>Nightbloom</em>, will be published in June 2023.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em> or tweet to </em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/global-norms-and-local-action-the-campaigns-to-end-violence-against-women-in-africa/9780190922962"><em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women's movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie's study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women's rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.</p><p>Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘<em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ </em>(OUP 2020). Her debut novel, <em>His Only Wife</em>, was a <em>New York Times</em> Notable Book of 2020 and a <em>Time Magazine</em> Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, <em>Nightbloom</em>, will be published in June 2023.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em> or tweet to </em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56983478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/34fd2720-8e3e-4621-9534-8e192dc0e8c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=34fd2720-8e3e-4621-9534-8e192dc0e8c3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peace A. Medie, &quot;Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women&apos;s movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie&apos;s study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women&apos;s rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.
Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ (OUP 2020). Her debut novel, His Only Wife, was a New York Times Notable Book of 2020 and a Time Magazine Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, Nightbloom, will be published in June 2023.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women&apos;s movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie&apos;s study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women&apos;s rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.
Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ (OUP 2020). Her debut novel, His Only Wife, was a New York Times Notable Book of 2020 and a Time Magazine Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, Nightbloom, will be published in June 2023.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>625</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93a9861a-d1a9-11f0-a27a-5309d0280621</guid>
      <title>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey speak with Susan C. Stokes, Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy.</p>
<p>Drawing from her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022), Stokes examines why elected leaders sometimes choose to erode the democratic institutions that brought them to power. She explores the structural, economic, and political incentives that drive these choices—and how citizens, parties, and institutions can push back.</p>
<p>The conversation ranges across global cases—from Latin America and Eastern Europe to the United States—revealing the common “playbook” used by backsliding leaders and the conditions that make resistance possible. The episode also considers the difficult choices facing pro-democracy actors: Should they always follow the highest democratic standards, or sometimes play hardball to defend democracy itself?</p>
<p>This is a crucial conversation for understanding why backsliding happens, how it can be resisted, and what practical lessons democratic leaders and citizens can draw as new elections approach in the U.S. and around the world.</p>
<p>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan C. Stokes</a>, The Backsliders: <a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/news/new-book-highlights-economic-inequality-heart-democratic-backsliding">Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</a> (<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOop6O5JpelpqD7zaSzcdtVKZu7nbOGqZFLSu42vddtYBzCqbTqw2">Princeton University Press, 2022</a>)</li>
  <li>Chicago Center on Democracy – <a href="https://democracy.uchicago.edu/">here</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democracy Dialogues, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey speak with Susan C. Stokes, Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy.</p>
<p>Drawing from her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022), Stokes examines why elected leaders sometimes choose to erode the democratic institutions that brought them to power. She explores the structural, economic, and political incentives that drive these choices—and how citizens, parties, and institutions can push back.</p>
<p>The conversation ranges across global cases—from Latin America and Eastern Europe to the United States—revealing the common “playbook” used by backsliding leaders and the conditions that make resistance possible. The episode also considers the difficult choices facing pro-democracy actors: Should they always follow the highest democratic standards, or sometimes play hardball to defend democracy itself?</p>
<p>This is a crucial conversation for understanding why backsliding happens, how it can be resisted, and what practical lessons democratic leaders and citizens can draw as new elections approach in the U.S. and around the world.</p>
<p>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/directory/susan-stokes">Susan C. Stokes</a>, The Backsliders: <a href="https://political-science.uchicago.edu/news/new-book-highlights-economic-inequality-heart-democratic-backsliding">Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</a> (<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691271545/the-backsliders?srsltid=AfmBOop6O5JpelpqD7zaSzcdtVKZu7nbOGqZFLSu42vddtYBzCqbTqw2">Princeton University Press, 2022</a>)</li>
  <li>Chicago Center on Democracy – <a href="https://democracy.uchicago.edu/">here</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47543641" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/771e5ceb-a8d6-4297-bd60-6b093321a5b6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=771e5ceb-a8d6-4297-bd60-6b093321a5b6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democracy Dialogues, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey speak with Susan C. Stokes, Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy.

Drawing from her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022), Stokes examines why elected leaders sometimes choose to erode the democratic institutions that brought them to power. She explores the structural, economic, and political incentives that drive these choices—and how citizens, parties, and institutions can push back.

The conversation ranges across global cases—from Latin America and Eastern Europe to the United States—revealing the common “playbook” used by backsliding leaders and the conditions that make resistance possible. The episode also considers the difficult choices facing pro-democracy actors: Should they always follow the highest democratic standards, or sometimes play hardball to defend democracy itself?

This is a crucial conversation for understanding why backsliding happens, how it can be resisted, and what practical lessons democratic leaders and citizens can draw as new elections approach in the U.S. and around the world.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles


  
Susan C. Stokes, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022)

  Chicago Center on Democracy – here



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democracy Dialogues, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey speak with Susan C. Stokes, Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy.

Drawing from her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022), Stokes examines why elected leaders sometimes choose to erode the democratic institutions that brought them to power. She explores the structural, economic, and political incentives that drive these choices—and how citizens, parties, and institutions can push back.

The conversation ranges across global cases—from Latin America and Eastern Europe to the United States—revealing the common “playbook” used by backsliding leaders and the conditions that make resistance possible. The episode also considers the difficult choices facing pro-democracy actors: Should they always follow the highest democratic standards, or sometimes play hardball to defend democracy itself?

This is a crucial conversation for understanding why backsliding happens, how it can be resisted, and what practical lessons democratic leaders and citizens can draw as new elections approach in the U.S. and around the world.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles


  
Susan C. Stokes, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press, 2022)

  Chicago Center on Democracy – here



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>768</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">151ae308-cf50-11f0-8169-cb343c98d2d4</guid>
      <title>Mark Griffiths, &quot;Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Checkpoint 300, the highly securitized border facility between occupied Bethlehem and Jerusalem, is a central feature of Israeli control of Palestinian land and life. An apparatus of turnstiles, overcrowded corridors, and invasive inspections, the checkpoint regulates the movement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, granting access to some while excluding most. Offering a nuanced exploration of space in<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919849"> ﻿﻿Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine</a><em> </em>﻿(U Minnesota Press, 2025), Mark Griffiths reveals Checkpoint 300 as a stark symbol of Israeli colonialism that embodies larger systems of control and violence.</p>
<p>Griffiths’s sensitive and timely work highlights the myriad ways Palestinians are affected by Israel’s spatial control—whether they travel through the checkpoint or not—demonstrating how colonial infrastructures of inequity extend far beyond their physical boundaries to shape daily life. Drawing on nearly a decade of fieldwork, Griffiths examines how colonial power infiltrates family dynamics, enforces gendered mobility restrictions, shapes local economies, and extends into the global exchange of capital and security technologies. He also underscores how Palestinians endure and resist under oppressive conditions and how indigenous forms of life and living are sustained, illuminating how colonial space is contested and countered, unmade and remade.</p>
<p>Blending meticulous research with vivid human stories to show the lived realities of borders, power, and resistance in the West Bank, <em>Checkpoint 300</em> portrays the checkpoint as an entry into the ways that colonial space is formed through security infrastructure that is both the product and producer of wider geographies of oppression, complicity, and control.</p>
<p>Mark Griffiths is reader in political geography at Newcastle University. He is coeditor of <em>Encountering Palestine: Un/making Spaces of Colonial Violence</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checkpoint 300, the highly securitized border facility between occupied Bethlehem and Jerusalem, is a central feature of Israeli control of Palestinian land and life. An apparatus of turnstiles, overcrowded corridors, and invasive inspections, the checkpoint regulates the movement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, granting access to some while excluding most. Offering a nuanced exploration of space in<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919849"> ﻿﻿Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine</a><em> </em>﻿(U Minnesota Press, 2025), Mark Griffiths reveals Checkpoint 300 as a stark symbol of Israeli colonialism that embodies larger systems of control and violence.</p>
<p>Griffiths’s sensitive and timely work highlights the myriad ways Palestinians are affected by Israel’s spatial control—whether they travel through the checkpoint or not—demonstrating how colonial infrastructures of inequity extend far beyond their physical boundaries to shape daily life. Drawing on nearly a decade of fieldwork, Griffiths examines how colonial power infiltrates family dynamics, enforces gendered mobility restrictions, shapes local economies, and extends into the global exchange of capital and security technologies. He also underscores how Palestinians endure and resist under oppressive conditions and how indigenous forms of life and living are sustained, illuminating how colonial space is contested and countered, unmade and remade.</p>
<p>Blending meticulous research with vivid human stories to show the lived realities of borders, power, and resistance in the West Bank, <em>Checkpoint 300</em> portrays the checkpoint as an entry into the ways that colonial space is formed through security infrastructure that is both the product and producer of wider geographies of oppression, complicity, and control.</p>
<p>Mark Griffiths is reader in political geography at Newcastle University. He is coeditor of <em>Encountering Palestine: Un/making Spaces of Colonial Violence</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45286156" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6505394d-9ab2-4ce7-8730-3090d4899749/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6505394d-9ab2-4ce7-8730-3090d4899749&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Griffiths, &quot;Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Checkpoint 300, the highly securitized border facility between occupied Bethlehem and Jerusalem, is a central feature of Israeli control of Palestinian land and life. An apparatus of turnstiles, overcrowded corridors, and invasive inspections, the checkpoint regulates the movement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, granting access to some while excluding most. Offering a nuanced exploration of space in ﻿﻿Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine ﻿(U Minnesota Press, 2025), Mark Griffiths reveals Checkpoint 300 as a stark symbol of Israeli colonialism that embodies larger systems of control and violence.

Griffiths’s sensitive and timely work highlights the myriad ways Palestinians are affected by Israel’s spatial control—whether they travel through the checkpoint or not—demonstrating how colonial infrastructures of inequity extend far beyond their physical boundaries to shape daily life. Drawing on nearly a decade of fieldwork, Griffiths examines how colonial power infiltrates family dynamics, enforces gendered mobility restrictions, shapes local economies, and extends into the global exchange of capital and security technologies. He also underscores how Palestinians endure and resist under oppressive conditions and how indigenous forms of life and living are sustained, illuminating how colonial space is contested and countered, unmade and remade.

Blending meticulous research with vivid human stories to show the lived realities of borders, power, and resistance in the West Bank, Checkpoint 300 portrays the checkpoint as an entry into the ways that colonial space is formed through security infrastructure that is both the product and producer of wider geographies of oppression, complicity, and control.

Mark Griffiths is reader in political geography at Newcastle University. He is coeditor of Encountering Palestine: Un/making Spaces of Colonial Violence.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Checkpoint 300, the highly securitized border facility between occupied Bethlehem and Jerusalem, is a central feature of Israeli control of Palestinian land and life. An apparatus of turnstiles, overcrowded corridors, and invasive inspections, the checkpoint regulates the movement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, granting access to some while excluding most. Offering a nuanced exploration of space in ﻿﻿Checkpoint 300: Colonial Space in Palestine ﻿(U Minnesota Press, 2025), Mark Griffiths reveals Checkpoint 300 as a stark symbol of Israeli colonialism that embodies larger systems of control and violence.

Griffiths’s sensitive and timely work highlights the myriad ways Palestinians are affected by Israel’s spatial control—whether they travel through the checkpoint or not—demonstrating how colonial infrastructures of inequity extend far beyond their physical boundaries to shape daily life. Drawing on nearly a decade of fieldwork, Griffiths examines how colonial power infiltrates family dynamics, enforces gendered mobility restrictions, shapes local economies, and extends into the global exchange of capital and security technologies. He also underscores how Palestinians endure and resist under oppressive conditions and how indigenous forms of life and living are sustained, illuminating how colonial space is contested and countered, unmade and remade.

Blending meticulous research with vivid human stories to show the lived realities of borders, power, and resistance in the West Bank, Checkpoint 300 portrays the checkpoint as an entry into the ways that colonial space is formed through security infrastructure that is both the product and producer of wider geographies of oppression, complicity, and control.

Mark Griffiths is reader in political geography at Newcastle University. He is coeditor of Encountering Palestine: Un/making Spaces of Colonial Violence.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">985b4112-ce6b-11f0-b2d2-7bd7dd86eb61</guid>
      <title>Brooke Barbier, &quot;King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674271777">King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father </a>(Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.</p>
<p>Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock's life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.</p>
<p>Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England's most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain's most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays's Rebellion.</p>
<p>An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, <em>King Hancock</em> traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674271777">King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father </a>(Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.</p>
<p>Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock's life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.</p>
<p>Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England's most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain's most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays's Rebellion.</p>
<p>An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, <em>King Hancock</em> traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47186847" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ceae6e49-515a-436d-8b57-68032198f46d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ceae6e49-515a-436d-8b57-68032198f46d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brooke Barbier, &quot;King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father (Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.

Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock&apos;s life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.

Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England&apos;s most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain&apos;s most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays&apos;s Rebellion.

An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, King Hancock traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>King Hancock: The Radical Influence of a Moderate Founding Father (Harvard UP, 2023) is a rollicking portrait of the paradoxical patriot, whose measured pragmatism helped make American independence a reality.

Americans are surprisingly more familiar with his famous signature than with the man himself. In this spirited account of John Hancock&apos;s life, Brooke Barbier depicts a patriot of fascinating contradictions--a child of enormous privilege who would nevertheless become a voice of the common folk; a pillar of society uncomfortable with radicalism who yet was crucial to independence. About two-fifths of the American population held neutral or ambivalent views about the Revolution, and Hancock spoke for them and to them, bringing them along.

Orphaned young, Hancock was raised by his merchant uncle, whose business and vast wealth he inherited--including household slaves, whom Hancock later freed. By his early thirties, he was one of New England&apos;s most prominent politicians, earning a place on Britain&apos;s most-wanted list and the derisive nickname King Hancock. While he eventually joined the revolution against England, his ever moderate--and moderating--disposition would prove an asset after 1776. Barbier shows Hancock appealing to southerners and northerners, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. He was a famously steadying force as president of the fractious Second Continental Congress. He parlayed with French military officials, strengthening a key alliance with his hospitable diplomacy. As governor of Massachusetts, Hancock convinced its delegates to vote for the federal Constitution and calmed the fallout from the shocking Shays&apos;s Rebellion.

An insightful study of leadership in the revolutionary era, King Hancock traces a moment when passion was on the side of compromise and accommodation proved the basis of profound social and political change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>766</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75876002-cb0b-11f0-a2ab-4b1f23af0d6e</guid>
      <title>Is a River Alive?: A Conversation with Robert Macfarlane</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hailed in the <em>New York Times</em> as "a naturalist who can unfurl a sentence with the breathless ease of a master angler," Robert Macfarlane brings his glittering style to a profound work of travel writing, reportage, and natural history. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393242133">Is a River Alive?</a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2025) is a joyful, mind-expanding exploration of an ancient, urgent idea: that rivers are living beings who should be recognized as such in imagination and law.</p>
<p>Macfarlane takes readers on three unforgettable journeys teeming with extraordinary people, stories, and places: to the miraculous cloud-forests and mountain streams of Ecuador, to the wounded creeks and lagoons of India, and to the spectacular wild rivers of Canada--imperiled respectively by mining, pollution, and dams. Braiding these journeys is the life story of the fragile chalk stream a mile from Macfarlane's house, a stream who flows through his own years and days.</p>
<p>Powered by dazzling prose and lit throughout by other minds and voices, <em>Is a River Alive?</em> will open hearts, challenge perspectives, and remind us that our fate flows with that of rivers--and always has.</p>
<p>Robert Macfarlane's best-selling books include <em>Is a River Alive?</em> and <em>Underland</em>. His work has been translated into more than thirty languages and has won many prizes around the world. He is a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.</p>
<p><em>Darius Cuplinskas is director at The Ideas Workshop of the Open Society Foundations. He is based in London.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hailed in the <em>New York Times</em> as "a naturalist who can unfurl a sentence with the breathless ease of a master angler," Robert Macfarlane brings his glittering style to a profound work of travel writing, reportage, and natural history. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393242133">Is a River Alive?</a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2025) is a joyful, mind-expanding exploration of an ancient, urgent idea: that rivers are living beings who should be recognized as such in imagination and law.</p>
<p>Macfarlane takes readers on three unforgettable journeys teeming with extraordinary people, stories, and places: to the miraculous cloud-forests and mountain streams of Ecuador, to the wounded creeks and lagoons of India, and to the spectacular wild rivers of Canada--imperiled respectively by mining, pollution, and dams. Braiding these journeys is the life story of the fragile chalk stream a mile from Macfarlane's house, a stream who flows through his own years and days.</p>
<p>Powered by dazzling prose and lit throughout by other minds and voices, <em>Is a River Alive?</em> will open hearts, challenge perspectives, and remind us that our fate flows with that of rivers--and always has.</p>
<p>Robert Macfarlane's best-selling books include <em>Is a River Alive?</em> and <em>Underland</em>. His work has been translated into more than thirty languages and has won many prizes around the world. He is a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.</p>
<p><em>Darius Cuplinskas is director at The Ideas Workshop of the Open Society Foundations. He is based in London.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32715071" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c83cb26d-5fa6-4761-aefe-064eb9c60f77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c83cb26d-5fa6-4761-aefe-064eb9c60f77&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is a River Alive?: A Conversation with Robert Macfarlane</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hailed in the New York Times as &quot;a naturalist who can unfurl a sentence with the breathless ease of a master angler,&quot; Robert Macfarlane brings his glittering style to a profound work of travel writing, reportage, and natural history. Is a River Alive? (W.W. Norton, 2025) is a joyful, mind-expanding exploration of an ancient, urgent idea: that rivers are living beings who should be recognized as such in imagination and law.

Macfarlane takes readers on three unforgettable journeys teeming with extraordinary people, stories, and places: to the miraculous cloud-forests and mountain streams of Ecuador, to the wounded creeks and lagoons of India, and to the spectacular wild rivers of Canada--imperiled respectively by mining, pollution, and dams. Braiding these journeys is the life story of the fragile chalk stream a mile from Macfarlane&apos;s house, a stream who flows through his own years and days.

Powered by dazzling prose and lit throughout by other minds and voices, Is a River Alive? will open hearts, challenge perspectives, and remind us that our fate flows with that of rivers--and always has.

Robert Macfarlane&apos;s best-selling books include Is a River Alive? and Underland. His work has been translated into more than thirty languages and has won many prizes around the world. He is a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.

Darius Cuplinskas is director at The Ideas Workshop of the Open Society Foundations. He is based in London.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hailed in the New York Times as &quot;a naturalist who can unfurl a sentence with the breathless ease of a master angler,&quot; Robert Macfarlane brings his glittering style to a profound work of travel writing, reportage, and natural history. Is a River Alive? (W.W. Norton, 2025) is a joyful, mind-expanding exploration of an ancient, urgent idea: that rivers are living beings who should be recognized as such in imagination and law.

Macfarlane takes readers on three unforgettable journeys teeming with extraordinary people, stories, and places: to the miraculous cloud-forests and mountain streams of Ecuador, to the wounded creeks and lagoons of India, and to the spectacular wild rivers of Canada--imperiled respectively by mining, pollution, and dams. Braiding these journeys is the life story of the fragile chalk stream a mile from Macfarlane&apos;s house, a stream who flows through his own years and days.

Powered by dazzling prose and lit throughout by other minds and voices, Is a River Alive? will open hearts, challenge perspectives, and remind us that our fate flows with that of rivers--and always has.

Robert Macfarlane&apos;s best-selling books include Is a River Alive? and Underland. His work has been translated into more than thirty languages and has won many prizes around the world. He is a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.

Darius Cuplinskas is director at The Ideas Workshop of the Open Society Foundations. He is based in London.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>765</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cacf456e-f4c8-11ed-98e9-f708cccf12b4</guid>
      <title>Philip Pettit, &quot;The State&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182209"><em>The State</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.</p><p>Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182209"><em>The State</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.</p><p>Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38841187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/57e5a08e-da5d-4ab8-bf5a-0972d118b446/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=57e5a08e-da5d-4ab8-bf5a-0972d118b446&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Pettit, &quot;The State&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The State (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.
Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The State (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.
Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>658</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2142608-ca40-11f0-b009-bb383ff7c816</guid>
      <title>Yoram Hazony, &quot;Conservatism: A Rediscovery&quot; (Regnery Publishing, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.</p><p>These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684511099"><em>Conservatism: A Rediscovery</em></a> (Regnery Publishing, 2022).</p><p>It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.</p><p>For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.</p><p>To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.</p><p>This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.</p><p>This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.</p><p>He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.</p><p>Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.</p><p>These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684511099"><em>Conservatism: A Rediscovery</em></a> (Regnery Publishing, 2022).</p><p>It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.</p><p>For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.</p><p>To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.</p><p>This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.</p><p>This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.</p><p>He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.</p><p>Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63980049" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/82ace0e4-4299-4b88-b162-a1c42d351c58/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=82ace0e4-4299-4b88-b162-a1c42d351c58&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yoram Hazony, &quot;Conservatism: A Rediscovery&quot; (Regnery Publishing, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.
These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book Conservatism: A Rediscovery (Regnery Publishing, 2022).
It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.
For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.
To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.
This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.
This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.
He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.
Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Conservatism needs to be rediscovered. That is, it needs to be differentiated from the post WWII concept of liberal democracy and return to its traditional three pillars of religion, nationalism, and economic growth. And it needs to be thought of as Anglo-American conservatism, rooted in the tradition of the English Constitution going back to such thinkers as John Fortescue (c. 1394 –1479) and John Selden (1584 –1654). We need to be a God-fearing nation, with nation and religion at the center of our national belief system. We must live conservative lives.
These are some of the arguments made by the political theorist and public intellectual Yoram Hazony in his 2022 book Conservatism: A Rediscovery (Regnery Publishing, 2022).
It is a provocative book that even many conservatives may take issue with.
For example, Hazony puts a great deal of emphasis on the importance of hierarchy both within the family and in society at large. Given that a good deal of the rationale of right-wing thinking in recent years has been predicated on the necessity for non-violent rebellion against the establishment in the Republican party and the left-wing dominance of academia, Hazony’s arguments may not be embraced by large swaths of the right. But to get conservatives and those on the right who do not identify as such thinking about what they stand for, what they want and how to get it is one of the goals of the book. It succeeds.
To those who might blanch at the embrace of religion in the public sphere, Hazony argues that for all intents and purposes the increasingly powerful political philosophy woke neo-Marxism is itself a religion. Hazony criticizes the right for acquiescing in the relegation of traditional religion to the private sphere. He argues robustly for religion, particularly Christianity, to serve as a countervailing force to wokeism. In the face of a progressive order that leaves people in the position of being unable to distinguish between a man and a woman, Hazony advocates for such measures as ending the ban on the Bible and God in the public school classroom.
This is a full-throated defense of conservatism and is, therefore, must reading for those on all sides of the political spectrum. Hazony addresses the need for the idea of a nation, its cohesion, and its inherited traditions. For that, he says, you need conservatism. And by conservatism, he means a public conservatism, a public traditionalism in those places where there is a majority that will support it. Hazony maintains that our culture must support parents and congregations in the work of the transmission of values that ensure respect for tradition, nation and hierarchy.
This book is a substantive intellectual history of conservative thought and profiles significant figures in the conservative movement (e.g., William F. Buckley, Frank Meyer, Russell Kirk). It is also a clarion call for those who claim to be conservatives to live genuinely conservative lives. Hazony urges conservatives to stand up for principles like the public acknowledgment of God and such core values as the honor due parents by their adult children, loyalty within marriage, and observance of the sabbath. In the Hazony version of conservatism, all ten of the Ten Commandments ought to be the basis for our country’s social and political life.
He includes in his book a memoir of his days at Princeton University in the 1980s, where a campus culture of loose living and rampant drinking led him to seek out a life of faith and family. College students of today and their parents would do well to read this moving chronicle of a young person surrounded by decadence who escapes its ravages via a solid marriage and a return to traditional religion.
Let’s hear from Mr. Hazony about his book and the path forward for conservatives and America itself.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">001bdfca-c9dd-11f0-a3ec-4f0413d34992</guid>
      <title>Philip Rocco, &quot;Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 US Census&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700639687">Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a> (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.</p>
<p>As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639687/">Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a> examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"> The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700639687">Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a> (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.</p>
<p>As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.</p>
<p><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700639687/">Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census</a> examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"> The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47963588" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/18a724e6-5a72-431e-9281-b6fd285daa9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=18a724e6-5a72-431e-9281-b6fd285daa9b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Rocco, &quot;Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 US Census&quot; (UP Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.

As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.

Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marquette University Political Scientist Phil Rocco has a new book focusing on the 2020 U.S. Census and how the states, localities, and federal government all worked – at times well, at times not quite as well – to conduct the census. This is a fascinating exploration of federalism at work in the American system, with some states putting in place extensive mechanisms to help with the census, which is a national responsibility. Other states did far less; and the national government, which is constitutionally required to execute a census every ten years, approached the census with some controversial requirements, with the federal courts having to make decisions as to the constitutional validity of some of those requirements. Counting Like a State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census (UP Kansas, 2025) explores this particular census as a kind of case study. The 2020 census was tricky on a number of fronts, not the least because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and because of the Trump Administration’s approach to the census itself. Rocco goes through the various approaches to the census as a national undertaking, searching for understandings of how the process actually worked and where there were positive and negative engagements with the process.

As a scholar of federalism, data science, and public policy, Rocco was intrigued by what he found in terms of cooperation on the state level, especially in places like California. The research also highlights various levels of mistrust of government entities and institutions, which makes the census process more difficult and potentially inaccurate because individuals are skeptical about completing the census forms. Because the census is required by law and regulation, it has a number of statutory deadlines, and in 2020, the Covid pandemic shattered the expected and legally compelled timeline for the reporting of results. This is another important aspect of this particular census that Rocco examines in order to assess how states and the national government tried to manage a rather unique process in 2020.

Counting Like A State: How Intergovernmental Partnerships Shaped the 2020 U.S. Census examines not only the 2020 census but also sketches out the history of the census process in the United States so as to provide context for the most recent census and the processes that were implemented across the board. This is a very interesting exploration of how the federal government works, especially in context of federalism and unanticipated constraints.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>762</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">78ae1284-c9a9-11f0-82a4-2fa92373e060</guid>
      <title>Joe Greenwood-Hau,&quot; Capital, Privilege and Political Participation&quot; (Liverpool UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who gets involved in politics? In<em>﻿ </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836245902">Capital, Privilege and Political Participation</a> (Liverpool UP, 2025) ﻿<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/niceonecombo.bsky.social">Joe Greenwood-Hau</a> <a href="https://joegreenwoodhau.org/">a Lecturer in the </a><a href="https://www.johnsmithcentre.com/">John Smith Centre</a> at the <a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/joegreenwoodhau/">University of Glasgow</a>, examines the dynamics of who participates, who is excluded and the reasons why. Drawing on a broad approach to political participation, the analysis connects levels of social, economic and cultural capital and resources to the question of political engagement. The book also thinks through how people understand both social inequalities and their own sense of self and social positioning, connecting quantitative perspectives to rich qualitative narratives. Connecting politics and sociology, and speaking to one of the most crucial issues in contemporary democracy. The book is available open access <a href="https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/book/10.3828/9781836245902">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gets involved in politics? In<em>﻿ </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781836245902">Capital, Privilege and Political Participation</a> (Liverpool UP, 2025) ﻿<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/niceonecombo.bsky.social">Joe Greenwood-Hau</a> <a href="https://joegreenwoodhau.org/">a Lecturer in the </a><a href="https://www.johnsmithcentre.com/">John Smith Centre</a> at the <a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/joegreenwoodhau/">University of Glasgow</a>, examines the dynamics of who participates, who is excluded and the reasons why. Drawing on a broad approach to political participation, the analysis connects levels of social, economic and cultural capital and resources to the question of political engagement. The book also thinks through how people understand both social inequalities and their own sense of self and social positioning, connecting quantitative perspectives to rich qualitative narratives. Connecting politics and sociology, and speaking to one of the most crucial issues in contemporary democracy. The book is available open access <a href="https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/book/10.3828/9781836245902">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44422615" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1f9dfd50-41ad-4d2e-a518-568eb8bcb25e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1f9dfd50-41ad-4d2e-a518-568eb8bcb25e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joe Greenwood-Hau,&quot; Capital, Privilege and Political Participation&quot; (Liverpool UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who gets involved in politics? In﻿ Capital, Privilege and Political Participation (Liverpool UP, 2025) ﻿Joe Greenwood-Hau a Lecturer in the John Smith Centre at the University of Glasgow, examines the dynamics of who participates, who is excluded and the reasons why. Drawing on a broad approach to political participation, the analysis connects levels of social, economic and cultural capital and resources to the question of political engagement. The book also thinks through how people understand both social inequalities and their own sense of self and social positioning, connecting quantitative perspectives to rich qualitative narratives. Connecting politics and sociology, and speaking to one of the most crucial issues in contemporary democracy. The book is available open access here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who gets involved in politics? In﻿ Capital, Privilege and Political Participation (Liverpool UP, 2025) ﻿Joe Greenwood-Hau a Lecturer in the John Smith Centre at the University of Glasgow, examines the dynamics of who participates, who is excluded and the reasons why. Drawing on a broad approach to political participation, the analysis connects levels of social, economic and cultural capital and resources to the question of political engagement. The book also thinks through how people understand both social inequalities and their own sense of self and social positioning, connecting quantitative perspectives to rich qualitative narratives. Connecting politics and sociology, and speaking to one of the most crucial issues in contemporary democracy. The book is available open access here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>761</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec957df6-c8e9-11f0-a8d0-2f7b4882a728</guid>
      <title>Nina Wilén, &quot;Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Sahel has become a focal point of international security interventions, with external actors providing extensive security force assistance (SFA) to local military, police, and paramilitary forces. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198980674">Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences </a>(Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Nina Wilen critically examines the rationale, implementation, and consequences of these efforts (2012-2024). With unique access to both military operations and strategy-making in European capitals, the author provides an innovative methodological approach, exclusive material, and a comprehensive perspective. Drawing on extensive fieldwork, including participant observation of military operations and over 100 interviews with policymakers, military personnel, and security practitioners across the Sahel and Europe,this book offers an unprecedented analysis of how SFA has shaped local security dynamics and broader geopolitical competition.</p>
<p>The book argues that SFA in the Sahel is driven not just by regional security threats, such as insurgency, violent extremism, and transnational crime, but also by external actors' strategic interests. Through a comparative analysis of bilateral (France, U.S.) and multilateral (EU, UN) initiatives, it demonstrates how SFA has been framed as the primary policy tool to manage instability. Securitizing the Sahel offers both theoretical and empirical contributions to understanding SFA in fragile states. It challenges prevailing frameworks, provides critical insights for policymakers, and highlights the unintended consequences of militarized external assistance in the Sahel and beyond.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sahel has become a focal point of international security interventions, with external actors providing extensive security force assistance (SFA) to local military, police, and paramilitary forces. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198980674">Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences </a>(Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Nina Wilen critically examines the rationale, implementation, and consequences of these efforts (2012-2024). With unique access to both military operations and strategy-making in European capitals, the author provides an innovative methodological approach, exclusive material, and a comprehensive perspective. Drawing on extensive fieldwork, including participant observation of military operations and over 100 interviews with policymakers, military personnel, and security practitioners across the Sahel and Europe,this book offers an unprecedented analysis of how SFA has shaped local security dynamics and broader geopolitical competition.</p>
<p>The book argues that SFA in the Sahel is driven not just by regional security threats, such as insurgency, violent extremism, and transnational crime, but also by external actors' strategic interests. Through a comparative analysis of bilateral (France, U.S.) and multilateral (EU, UN) initiatives, it demonstrates how SFA has been framed as the primary policy tool to manage instability. Securitizing the Sahel offers both theoretical and empirical contributions to understanding SFA in fragile states. It challenges prevailing frameworks, provides critical insights for policymakers, and highlights the unintended consequences of militarized external assistance in the Sahel and beyond.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47749267" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2757d1f4-b5c7-4e44-9a94-155c3e500a6e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2757d1f4-b5c7-4e44-9a94-155c3e500a6e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nina Wilén, &quot;Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Sahel has become a focal point of international security interventions, with external actors providing extensive security force assistance (SFA) to local military, police, and paramilitary forces. Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences (Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Nina Wilen critically examines the rationale, implementation, and consequences of these efforts (2012-2024). With unique access to both military operations and strategy-making in European capitals, the author provides an innovative methodological approach, exclusive material, and a comprehensive perspective. Drawing on extensive fieldwork, including participant observation of military operations and over 100 interviews with policymakers, military personnel, and security practitioners across the Sahel and Europe,this book offers an unprecedented analysis of how SFA has shaped local security dynamics and broader geopolitical competition.

The book argues that SFA in the Sahel is driven not just by regional security threats, such as insurgency, violent extremism, and transnational crime, but also by external actors&apos; strategic interests. Through a comparative analysis of bilateral (France, U.S.) and multilateral (EU, UN) initiatives, it demonstrates how SFA has been framed as the primary policy tool to manage instability. Securitizing the Sahel offers both theoretical and empirical contributions to understanding SFA in fragile states. It challenges prevailing frameworks, provides critical insights for policymakers, and highlights the unintended consequences of militarized external assistance in the Sahel and beyond.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Sahel has become a focal point of international security interventions, with external actors providing extensive security force assistance (SFA) to local military, police, and paramilitary forces. Securitizing the Sahel: Analyzing External Interventions and Their Consequences (Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Nina Wilen critically examines the rationale, implementation, and consequences of these efforts (2012-2024). With unique access to both military operations and strategy-making in European capitals, the author provides an innovative methodological approach, exclusive material, and a comprehensive perspective. Drawing on extensive fieldwork, including participant observation of military operations and over 100 interviews with policymakers, military personnel, and security practitioners across the Sahel and Europe,this book offers an unprecedented analysis of how SFA has shaped local security dynamics and broader geopolitical competition.

The book argues that SFA in the Sahel is driven not just by regional security threats, such as insurgency, violent extremism, and transnational crime, but also by external actors&apos; strategic interests. Through a comparative analysis of bilateral (France, U.S.) and multilateral (EU, UN) initiatives, it demonstrates how SFA has been framed as the primary policy tool to manage instability. Securitizing the Sahel offers both theoretical and empirical contributions to understanding SFA in fragile states. It challenges prevailing frameworks, provides critical insights for policymakers, and highlights the unintended consequences of militarized external assistance in the Sahel and beyond.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>760</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db5a17ac-c6a7-11f0-8a8d-3f16fb1107fd</guid>
      <title>Democracy and Freedom: The Role of Philanthropy and Education</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week, we feature an episode with Dr. Alvaro Salas-Castro, President and CEO of the Reynolds Foundation, and Founder and Chairman of the Democracy Lab Foundation, which fosters civic innovation. We discuss the current state of the freedom and democracy movement, how philanthropic partnerships and democracy defenders are responding to authoritarianism, and how we create new transnational narratives and collaborative practices to support the movement for freedom and rights. We also dive into innovative projects in civic education and their potential to foster democratic renewal and commitments from the ground up.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, we feature an episode with Dr. Alvaro Salas-Castro, President and CEO of the Reynolds Foundation, and Founder and Chairman of the Democracy Lab Foundation, which fosters civic innovation. We discuss the current state of the freedom and democracy movement, how philanthropic partnerships and democracy defenders are responding to authoritarianism, and how we create new transnational narratives and collaborative practices to support the movement for freedom and rights. We also dive into innovative projects in civic education and their potential to foster democratic renewal and commitments from the ground up.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40440356" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/26df7516-3f6e-42bb-b8c7-abe57087ded8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=26df7516-3f6e-42bb-b8c7-abe57087ded8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democracy and Freedom: The Role of Philanthropy and Education</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week, we feature an episode with Dr. Alvaro Salas-Castro, President and CEO of the Reynolds Foundation, and Founder and Chairman of the Democracy Lab Foundation, which fosters civic innovation. We discuss the current state of the freedom and democracy movement, how philanthropic partnerships and democracy defenders are responding to authoritarianism, and how we create new transnational narratives and collaborative practices to support the movement for freedom and rights. We also dive into innovative projects in civic education and their potential to foster democratic renewal and commitments from the ground up.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week, we feature an episode with Dr. Alvaro Salas-Castro, President and CEO of the Reynolds Foundation, and Founder and Chairman of the Democracy Lab Foundation, which fosters civic innovation. We discuss the current state of the freedom and democracy movement, how philanthropic partnerships and democracy defenders are responding to authoritarianism, and how we create new transnational narratives and collaborative practices to support the movement for freedom and rights. We also dive into innovative projects in civic education and their potential to foster democratic renewal and commitments from the ground up.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>759</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">955cc0e0-c51e-11f0-975c-7fbad4077e2f</guid>
      <title>Emily Callaci, &quot;Wages for Housework: The Feminist Fight Against Unpaid Labor&quot; (Seal Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe in the 1970s, a network of feminists distilled their struggles into a single demand: <em>Wages for Housework! </em>Today, it remains a provocative idea, and an unfulfilled promise.</p>
<p>﻿ In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541603523"><em>Wages for Housework: The Story of a Movement, an Idea, a Promise </em></a>(Penguin/Seal Press 2025), historian Emily Callaci tells the story of this campaign by exploring the lives and ideas of its key creators – Selma James, Mariarosa Dalla Costa, Silvia Federici, Wilmette Brown, and Margaret Prescod - tracing their wildly creative political vision over the past five decades. Drawing on new archival research and extensive interviews, Callaci takes us deep inside the heart of the movement as it reached across Europe, America, Africa and the Caribbean. For these women, the wage was more than a demand for money: it was a starting point for remaking the world as we know it, imagining potential futures under capitalism – and beyond. Then as now, Wages for Housework poses profound questions. What would it be like to live in a society that prioritizes care rather than production? How would this change our relationship with the natural world? And what would women do with their lives if they had more time?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe in the 1970s, a network of feminists distilled their struggles into a single demand: <em>Wages for Housework! </em>Today, it remains a provocative idea, and an unfulfilled promise.</p>
<p>﻿ In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541603523"><em>Wages for Housework: The Story of a Movement, an Idea, a Promise </em></a>(Penguin/Seal Press 2025), historian Emily Callaci tells the story of this campaign by exploring the lives and ideas of its key creators – Selma James, Mariarosa Dalla Costa, Silvia Federici, Wilmette Brown, and Margaret Prescod - tracing their wildly creative political vision over the past five decades. Drawing on new archival research and extensive interviews, Callaci takes us deep inside the heart of the movement as it reached across Europe, America, Africa and the Caribbean. For these women, the wage was more than a demand for money: it was a starting point for remaking the world as we know it, imagining potential futures under capitalism – and beyond. Then as now, Wages for Housework poses profound questions. What would it be like to live in a society that prioritizes care rather than production? How would this change our relationship with the natural world? And what would women do with their lives if they had more time?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41668178" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9ca8b9b9-a70a-41ca-ad7a-1884716fc178/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9ca8b9b9-a70a-41ca-ad7a-1884716fc178&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emily Callaci, &quot;Wages for Housework: The Feminist Fight Against Unpaid Labor&quot; (Seal Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Across the globe in the 1970s, a network of feminists distilled their struggles into a single demand: Wages for Housework! Today, it remains a provocative idea, and an unfulfilled promise.

﻿ In Wages for Housework: The Story of a Movement, an Idea, a Promise (Penguin/Seal Press 2025), historian Emily Callaci tells the story of this campaign by exploring the lives and ideas of its key creators – Selma James, Mariarosa Dalla Costa, Silvia Federici, Wilmette Brown, and Margaret Prescod - tracing their wildly creative political vision over the past five decades. Drawing on new archival research and extensive interviews, Callaci takes us deep inside the heart of the movement as it reached across Europe, America, Africa and the Caribbean. For these women, the wage was more than a demand for money: it was a starting point for remaking the world as we know it, imagining potential futures under capitalism – and beyond. Then as now, Wages for Housework poses profound questions. What would it be like to live in a society that prioritizes care rather than production? How would this change our relationship with the natural world? And what would women do with their lives if they had more time?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Across the globe in the 1970s, a network of feminists distilled their struggles into a single demand: Wages for Housework! Today, it remains a provocative idea, and an unfulfilled promise.

﻿ In Wages for Housework: The Story of a Movement, an Idea, a Promise (Penguin/Seal Press 2025), historian Emily Callaci tells the story of this campaign by exploring the lives and ideas of its key creators – Selma James, Mariarosa Dalla Costa, Silvia Federici, Wilmette Brown, and Margaret Prescod - tracing their wildly creative political vision over the past five decades. Drawing on new archival research and extensive interviews, Callaci takes us deep inside the heart of the movement as it reached across Europe, America, Africa and the Caribbean. For these women, the wage was more than a demand for money: it was a starting point for remaking the world as we know it, imagining potential futures under capitalism – and beyond. Then as now, Wages for Housework poses profound questions. What would it be like to live in a society that prioritizes care rather than production? How would this change our relationship with the natural world? And what would women do with their lives if they had more time?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>758</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53439778-c5b0-11f0-b2fd-63ddb07c844a</guid>
      <title>Killian Clarke, &quot;Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do some revolutions fail and succumb to counterrevolutions, whereas others go on to establish durable rule?</p>
<p>Marshalling original data on counterrevolutions worldwide since 1900 and new evidence from the reversal of Egypt's 2011 revolution, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009646871">Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed</a> (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Killian Clarke explains both why counterrevolutions emerge and when they are likely to succeed. He forwards a movement-centric argument that emphasizes the strategies revolutionary leaders embrace both during their opposition campaigns and after they seize power.</p>
<p>Movements that wage violent resistance and espouse radical ideologies establish regimes that are very difficult to overthrow. By contrast, democratic revolutions like Egypt's are more vulnerable, though Dr. Clarke also identifies a path by which they too can avoid counterrevolution. By preserving their elite coalitions and broad popular support, these movements can return to mass mobilization to thwart counterrevolutionary threats. In an era of resurgent authoritarianism worldwide, <em>Return of Tyranny</em> sheds light on one particularly violent form of reactionary politics.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do some revolutions fail and succumb to counterrevolutions, whereas others go on to establish durable rule?</p>
<p>Marshalling original data on counterrevolutions worldwide since 1900 and new evidence from the reversal of Egypt's 2011 revolution, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009646871">Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed</a> (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Killian Clarke explains both why counterrevolutions emerge and when they are likely to succeed. He forwards a movement-centric argument that emphasizes the strategies revolutionary leaders embrace both during their opposition campaigns and after they seize power.</p>
<p>Movements that wage violent resistance and espouse radical ideologies establish regimes that are very difficult to overthrow. By contrast, democratic revolutions like Egypt's are more vulnerable, though Dr. Clarke also identifies a path by which they too can avoid counterrevolution. By preserving their elite coalitions and broad popular support, these movements can return to mass mobilization to thwart counterrevolutionary threats. In an era of resurgent authoritarianism worldwide, <em>Return of Tyranny</em> sheds light on one particularly violent form of reactionary politics.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58856915" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d21bb4eb-5b76-4e91-9bc4-350767dd7e1e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d21bb4eb-5b76-4e91-9bc4-350767dd7e1e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Killian Clarke, &quot;Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do some revolutions fail and succumb to counterrevolutions, whereas others go on to establish durable rule?

Marshalling original data on counterrevolutions worldwide since 1900 and new evidence from the reversal of Egypt&apos;s 2011 revolution, in Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Killian Clarke explains both why counterrevolutions emerge and when they are likely to succeed. He forwards a movement-centric argument that emphasizes the strategies revolutionary leaders embrace both during their opposition campaigns and after they seize power.

Movements that wage violent resistance and espouse radical ideologies establish regimes that are very difficult to overthrow. By contrast, democratic revolutions like Egypt&apos;s are more vulnerable, though Dr. Clarke also identifies a path by which they too can avoid counterrevolution. By preserving their elite coalitions and broad popular support, these movements can return to mass mobilization to thwart counterrevolutionary threats. In an era of resurgent authoritarianism worldwide, Return of Tyranny sheds light on one particularly violent form of reactionary politics.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do some revolutions fail and succumb to counterrevolutions, whereas others go on to establish durable rule?

Marshalling original data on counterrevolutions worldwide since 1900 and new evidence from the reversal of Egypt&apos;s 2011 revolution, in Return of Tyranny: Why Counterrevolutions Emerge and Succeed (Cambridge UP, 2025) Dr. Killian Clarke explains both why counterrevolutions emerge and when they are likely to succeed. He forwards a movement-centric argument that emphasizes the strategies revolutionary leaders embrace both during their opposition campaigns and after they seize power.

Movements that wage violent resistance and espouse radical ideologies establish regimes that are very difficult to overthrow. By contrast, democratic revolutions like Egypt&apos;s are more vulnerable, though Dr. Clarke also identifies a path by which they too can avoid counterrevolution. By preserving their elite coalitions and broad popular support, these movements can return to mass mobilization to thwart counterrevolutionary threats. In an era of resurgent authoritarianism worldwide, Return of Tyranny sheds light on one particularly violent form of reactionary politics.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>757</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffd150ba-c4f8-11f0-81e1-9f096bbd1899</guid>
      <title>160* Hannah Arendt&apos;s Refugee Politics (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>John's <a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair/">“</a><a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/arendts-refugee-politics/">Arendt's Refugee Politics</a><a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair/">”</a> came out in <em>Public Book</em>s in early November. He made the case that his favorite political philosopher, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt">Hannah Arendt</a> is an opponent both of identity politics and also of a cosmpolitan universalism that is blind to all the differences (of race, gender, belief) that make us <em>who</em> though not <em>what</em> we are. Going back to one of the first pieces she published in English, a 1943 essay from <em>Menorah </em>called "<a href="https://amroali.com/2017/04/refugees-essay-hannah-arendt/">We Refugees</a>", he reflected on how amazingly Arendt was able to air her unease about militant Zionism at the same time she warned fellow arrivals in America from rushing to disguise their origins.</p>
<p><a href="http://recallthisbook.org/">Recall this Book</a> 153 is simply John reading the article aloud. It is an experiment (akin to <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/books-in-dark-times/">Books in Dark Times</a> and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=recall+this+story">Recall This Story</a> and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/recall-this-b-side/">Recall This B-Side</a>) in soliloquy. You can consult footnotes and a read a transcript by heading back to the article in<a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/arendts-refugee-politics/"> its original form here</a>.</p>
<p>Reach out and let us know if you think it should be the first of many, or simply a one-off!﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John's <a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair/">“</a><a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/arendts-refugee-politics/">Arendt's Refugee Politics</a><a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/lying-in-politics-hannah-arendts-antidote-to-anticipatory-despair/">”</a> came out in <em>Public Book</em>s in early November. He made the case that his favorite political philosopher, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt">Hannah Arendt</a> is an opponent both of identity politics and also of a cosmpolitan universalism that is blind to all the differences (of race, gender, belief) that make us <em>who</em> though not <em>what</em> we are. Going back to one of the first pieces she published in English, a 1943 essay from <em>Menorah </em>called "<a href="https://amroali.com/2017/04/refugees-essay-hannah-arendt/">We Refugees</a>", he reflected on how amazingly Arendt was able to air her unease about militant Zionism at the same time she warned fellow arrivals in America from rushing to disguise their origins.</p>
<p><a href="http://recallthisbook.org/">Recall this Book</a> 153 is simply John reading the article aloud. It is an experiment (akin to <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/books-in-dark-times/">Books in Dark Times</a> and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=recall+this+story">Recall This Story</a> and <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/recall-this-b-side/">Recall This B-Side</a>) in soliloquy. You can consult footnotes and a read a transcript by heading back to the article in<a href="https://www.publicbooks.org/arendts-refugee-politics/"> its original form here</a>.</p>
<p>Reach out and let us know if you think it should be the first of many, or simply a one-off!﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="17971151" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ca41abf0-4ecc-4369-a5d7-277f7edba49c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ca41abf0-4ecc-4369-a5d7-277f7edba49c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>160* Hannah Arendt&apos;s Refugee Politics (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>John&apos;s “Arendt&apos;s Refugee Politics” came out in Public Books in early November. He made the case that his favorite political philosopher, Hannah Arendt is an opponent both of identity politics and also of a cosmpolitan universalism that is blind to all the differences (of race, gender, belief) that make us who though not what we are. Going back to one of the first pieces she published in English, a 1943 essay from Menorah called &quot;We Refugees&quot;, he reflected on how amazingly Arendt was able to air her unease about militant Zionism at the same time she warned fellow arrivals in America from rushing to disguise their origins.

Recall this Book 153 is simply John reading the article aloud. It is an experiment (akin to Books in Dark Times and Recall This Story and Recall This B-Side) in soliloquy. You can consult footnotes and a read a transcript by heading back to the article in its original form here.

Reach out and let us know if you think it should be the first of many, or simply a one-off!﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>John&apos;s “Arendt&apos;s Refugee Politics” came out in Public Books in early November. He made the case that his favorite political philosopher, Hannah Arendt is an opponent both of identity politics and also of a cosmpolitan universalism that is blind to all the differences (of race, gender, belief) that make us who though not what we are. Going back to one of the first pieces she published in English, a 1943 essay from Menorah called &quot;We Refugees&quot;, he reflected on how amazingly Arendt was able to air her unease about militant Zionism at the same time she warned fellow arrivals in America from rushing to disguise their origins.

Recall this Book 153 is simply John reading the article aloud. It is an experiment (akin to Books in Dark Times and Recall This Story and Recall This B-Side) in soliloquy. You can consult footnotes and a read a transcript by heading back to the article in its original form here.

Reach out and let us know if you think it should be the first of many, or simply a one-off!﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>756</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">819ff382-c4de-11f0-8807-37c1badeb4dc</guid>
      <title>Can Feminism be African?: A Conversation with Minna Salami</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Can-Feminism-be-African-Transcript.pdf#asset:431245@1:url">Transcript of the interview</a></p>
<p>Minna Salami is a writer, social critic, and thought leader on feminism, knowledge production, and the aesthetics and structures of power. She formerly served as Programme Chair and Senior Fellow at THE NEW INSTITUTE, where she led the <em>Black Feminism and the Polycrisis</em> programme. Her work sits at the intersection of ideas, culture, and systems thinking, with a commitment to making complex theories accessible through books, essays, public speaking, and creative projects.</p>
<p>She is the author of <a href="https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/can-feminism-be-african-a-most-paradoxical-question-minna-salami?variant=41459562676302">Can Feminism Be African?</a> (Harper Collins, 2025) and <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/sensuous-knowledge-9781786997111/">Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone</a> (Bloomsbury, 2020), which has been translated into multiple languages. Her writing also appears in numerous anthologies and educational publications exploring feminism, African philosophy, media, and cultural criticism.</p>
<p>Her work has featured in <em>The Guardian</em>, <em>The Financial Times</em>, <em>The Ideas Letter</em>, <em>Project Syndicate</em>, and <em>The Philosopher</em>, and she has delivered talks at global institutions including TEDx, the Institute of Arts and Ideas, the European Commission, the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, Yale, and Singularity University at NASA.</p>
<p>Salami was the creative director of the short film <em>Black Feminism and the Polycrisis</em>, which won the Silver Award for Public Service and Activism at the 2024 Lovie Awards.</p>
<p>From 2019 to 2022, she co-directed <em>Activate</em>, an intersectional feminist movement that supported minoritised women in politics and community organising through visibility campaigns, mentoring, and fundraising. The initiative played a key role in shifting narratives and resources toward a more inclusive political landscape in the UK.</p>
<p>She has also worked as a Research Associate and Editor at Perspectiva, advised governments on gender equality, developed national school curricula, and curated cultural events at institutions such as the Victoria &amp; Albert Museum in London.</p>
<p>Her blog, <a href="https://msafropolitan.com/">MsAfropolitan</a>, launched in 2010, has reached over a million readers and remains a platform for exploring feminist and African-centred approaches to contemporary life.</p>
<p>Salami is a Full Member of the Club of Rome, a BMW Foundation Responsible Leader, and serves on the advisory boards of the African Feminist Initiative at Penn State University and Public Humanities at Cambridge University Press, as well as the council of the British Royal Institute of Philosophy.</p>
<p>Links to References:<a href="https://aeon.co/essays/how-cesaire-and-senghor-saw-the-decolonised-world"><br />Apart Together</a> – essay on Leopold Senghor and Aimé Césaire’s radical vision for the world</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/africas-populist-trap/">Africa’s Populist Trap</a> for The Ideas Letter</p>
<p><a href="https://rpublc.com/february-march-2024/deconstructing-the-myths-of-mungo-park/">The Niger River and the Dearth of History: Deconstructing the Myths of Mungo Park</a> by Ezenwa E. Olumba</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Can-Feminism-be-African-Transcript.pdf#asset:431245@1:url">Transcript of the interview</a></p>
<p>Minna Salami is a writer, social critic, and thought leader on feminism, knowledge production, and the aesthetics and structures of power. She formerly served as Programme Chair and Senior Fellow at THE NEW INSTITUTE, where she led the <em>Black Feminism and the Polycrisis</em> programme. Her work sits at the intersection of ideas, culture, and systems thinking, with a commitment to making complex theories accessible through books, essays, public speaking, and creative projects.</p>
<p>She is the author of <a href="https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/can-feminism-be-african-a-most-paradoxical-question-minna-salami?variant=41459562676302">Can Feminism Be African?</a> (Harper Collins, 2025) and <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/sensuous-knowledge-9781786997111/">Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone</a> (Bloomsbury, 2020), which has been translated into multiple languages. Her writing also appears in numerous anthologies and educational publications exploring feminism, African philosophy, media, and cultural criticism.</p>
<p>Her work has featured in <em>The Guardian</em>, <em>The Financial Times</em>, <em>The Ideas Letter</em>, <em>Project Syndicate</em>, and <em>The Philosopher</em>, and she has delivered talks at global institutions including TEDx, the Institute of Arts and Ideas, the European Commission, the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, Yale, and Singularity University at NASA.</p>
<p>Salami was the creative director of the short film <em>Black Feminism and the Polycrisis</em>, which won the Silver Award for Public Service and Activism at the 2024 Lovie Awards.</p>
<p>From 2019 to 2022, she co-directed <em>Activate</em>, an intersectional feminist movement that supported minoritised women in politics and community organising through visibility campaigns, mentoring, and fundraising. The initiative played a key role in shifting narratives and resources toward a more inclusive political landscape in the UK.</p>
<p>She has also worked as a Research Associate and Editor at Perspectiva, advised governments on gender equality, developed national school curricula, and curated cultural events at institutions such as the Victoria &amp; Albert Museum in London.</p>
<p>Her blog, <a href="https://msafropolitan.com/">MsAfropolitan</a>, launched in 2010, has reached over a million readers and remains a platform for exploring feminist and African-centred approaches to contemporary life.</p>
<p>Salami is a Full Member of the Club of Rome, a BMW Foundation Responsible Leader, and serves on the advisory boards of the African Feminist Initiative at Penn State University and Public Humanities at Cambridge University Press, as well as the council of the British Royal Institute of Philosophy.</p>
<p>Links to References:<a href="https://aeon.co/essays/how-cesaire-and-senghor-saw-the-decolonised-world"><br />Apart Together</a> – essay on Leopold Senghor and Aimé Césaire’s radical vision for the world</p>
<p><a href="https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/africas-populist-trap/">Africa’s Populist Trap</a> for The Ideas Letter</p>
<p><a href="https://rpublc.com/february-march-2024/deconstructing-the-myths-of-mungo-park/">The Niger River and the Dearth of History: Deconstructing the Myths of Mungo Park</a> by Ezenwa E. Olumba</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32701003" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f8cad423-3e66-49ed-91f2-98e4d412238f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f8cad423-3e66-49ed-91f2-98e4d412238f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Can Feminism be African?: A Conversation with Minna Salami</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Transcript of the interview

Minna Salami is a writer, social critic, and thought leader on feminism, knowledge production, and the aesthetics and structures of power. She formerly served as Programme Chair and Senior Fellow at THE NEW INSTITUTE, where she led the Black Feminism and the Polycrisis programme. Her work sits at the intersection of ideas, culture, and systems thinking, with a commitment to making complex theories accessible through books, essays, public speaking, and creative projects.

She is the author of Can Feminism Be African? (Harper Collins, 2025) and Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone (Bloomsbury, 2020), which has been translated into multiple languages. Her writing also appears in numerous anthologies and educational publications exploring feminism, African philosophy, media, and cultural criticism.

Her work has featured in The Guardian, The Financial Times, The Ideas Letter, Project Syndicate, and The Philosopher, and she has delivered talks at global institutions including TEDx, the Institute of Arts and Ideas, the European Commission, the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, Yale, and Singularity University at NASA.

Salami was the creative director of the short film Black Feminism and the Polycrisis, which won the Silver Award for Public Service and Activism at the 2024 Lovie Awards.

From 2019 to 2022, she co-directed Activate, an intersectional feminist movement that supported minoritised women in politics and community organising through visibility campaigns, mentoring, and fundraising. The initiative played a key role in shifting narratives and resources toward a more inclusive political landscape in the UK.

She has also worked as a Research Associate and Editor at Perspectiva, advised governments on gender equality, developed national school curricula, and curated cultural events at institutions such as the Victoria &amp; Albert Museum in London.

Her blog, MsAfropolitan, launched in 2010, has reached over a million readers and remains a platform for exploring feminist and African-centred approaches to contemporary life.

Salami is a Full Member of the Club of Rome, a BMW Foundation Responsible Leader, and serves on the advisory boards of the African Feminist Initiative at Penn State University and Public Humanities at Cambridge University Press, as well as the council of the British Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Links to References:Apart Together – essay on Leopold Senghor and Aimé Césaire’s radical vision for the world

Africa’s Populist Trap for The Ideas Letter

The Niger River and the Dearth of History: Deconstructing the Myths of Mungo Park by Ezenwa E. Olumba
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Transcript of the interview

Minna Salami is a writer, social critic, and thought leader on feminism, knowledge production, and the aesthetics and structures of power. She formerly served as Programme Chair and Senior Fellow at THE NEW INSTITUTE, where she led the Black Feminism and the Polycrisis programme. Her work sits at the intersection of ideas, culture, and systems thinking, with a commitment to making complex theories accessible through books, essays, public speaking, and creative projects.

She is the author of Can Feminism Be African? (Harper Collins, 2025) and Sensuous Knowledge: A Black Feminist Approach for Everyone (Bloomsbury, 2020), which has been translated into multiple languages. Her writing also appears in numerous anthologies and educational publications exploring feminism, African philosophy, media, and cultural criticism.

Her work has featured in The Guardian, The Financial Times, The Ideas Letter, Project Syndicate, and The Philosopher, and she has delivered talks at global institutions including TEDx, the Institute of Arts and Ideas, the European Commission, the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, Yale, and Singularity University at NASA.

Salami was the creative director of the short film Black Feminism and the Polycrisis, which won the Silver Award for Public Service and Activism at the 2024 Lovie Awards.

From 2019 to 2022, she co-directed Activate, an intersectional feminist movement that supported minoritised women in politics and community organising through visibility campaigns, mentoring, and fundraising. The initiative played a key role in shifting narratives and resources toward a more inclusive political landscape in the UK.

She has also worked as a Research Associate and Editor at Perspectiva, advised governments on gender equality, developed national school curricula, and curated cultural events at institutions such as the Victoria &amp; Albert Museum in London.

Her blog, MsAfropolitan, launched in 2010, has reached over a million readers and remains a platform for exploring feminist and African-centred approaches to contemporary life.

Salami is a Full Member of the Club of Rome, a BMW Foundation Responsible Leader, and serves on the advisory boards of the African Feminist Initiative at Penn State University and Public Humanities at Cambridge University Press, as well as the council of the British Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Links to References:Apart Together – essay on Leopold Senghor and Aimé Césaire’s radical vision for the world

Africa’s Populist Trap for The Ideas Letter

The Niger River and the Dearth of History: Deconstructing the Myths of Mungo Park by Ezenwa E. Olumba
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>755</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f0eabaa-c426-11f0-8e97-677b9de02a7e</guid>
      <title>Carl Benedikt Frey, &quot;How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233079">How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2025), Carl Benedikt Frey challenges the conventional belief that economic and technological progress is inevitable. For most of human history, stagnation was the norm, and even today progress and prosperity in the world's largest, most advanced economies--the United States and China--have fallen short of expectations. To appreciate why we cannot depend on any AI-fueled great leap forward, Frey offers a remarkable and fascinating journey across the globe, spanning the past 1,000 years, to explain why some societies flourish and others fail in the wake of rapid technological change.</p>
<p>By examining key historical moments--from the rise of the steam engine to the dawn of AI--Frey shows why technological shifts have shaped, and sometimes destabilized, entire civilizations. He explores why some leading technological powers of the past--such as Song China, the Dutch Republic, and Victorian Britain--ultimately lost their innovative edge, why some modern nations such as Japan had periods of rapid growth followed by stagnation, and why planned economies like the Soviet Union collapsed after brief surges of progress. Frey uncovers a recurring tension in history: while decentralization fosters the exploration of new technologies, bureaucracy is crucial for scaling them. When institutions fail to adapt to technological change, stagnation inevitably follows. Only by carefully balancing decentralization and bureaucracy can nations innovate and grow over the long term--findings that have worrying implications for the United States, Europe, China, and other economies today.</p>
<p>Through a rich narrative that weaves together history, economics, and technology, <em>How Progress Ends</em> reveals that managing the future requires us to draw the right lessons from the past.</p>
<p>Carl Benedikt Frey is the Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI and Work at the Oxford Internet Institute and Oxford Martin Citi Fellow at the Oxford Martin School, both at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233079">How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2025), Carl Benedikt Frey challenges the conventional belief that economic and technological progress is inevitable. For most of human history, stagnation was the norm, and even today progress and prosperity in the world's largest, most advanced economies--the United States and China--have fallen short of expectations. To appreciate why we cannot depend on any AI-fueled great leap forward, Frey offers a remarkable and fascinating journey across the globe, spanning the past 1,000 years, to explain why some societies flourish and others fail in the wake of rapid technological change.</p>
<p>By examining key historical moments--from the rise of the steam engine to the dawn of AI--Frey shows why technological shifts have shaped, and sometimes destabilized, entire civilizations. He explores why some leading technological powers of the past--such as Song China, the Dutch Republic, and Victorian Britain--ultimately lost their innovative edge, why some modern nations such as Japan had periods of rapid growth followed by stagnation, and why planned economies like the Soviet Union collapsed after brief surges of progress. Frey uncovers a recurring tension in history: while decentralization fosters the exploration of new technologies, bureaucracy is crucial for scaling them. When institutions fail to adapt to technological change, stagnation inevitably follows. Only by carefully balancing decentralization and bureaucracy can nations innovate and grow over the long term--findings that have worrying implications for the United States, Europe, China, and other economies today.</p>
<p>Through a rich narrative that weaves together history, economics, and technology, <em>How Progress Ends</em> reveals that managing the future requires us to draw the right lessons from the past.</p>
<p>Carl Benedikt Frey is the Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI and Work at the Oxford Internet Institute and Oxford Martin Citi Fellow at the Oxford Martin School, both at the University of Oxford.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52427944" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fe1cc39b-d38f-47fa-b1e0-c3f9cc74111b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fe1cc39b-d38f-47fa-b1e0-c3f9cc74111b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carl Benedikt Frey, &quot;How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations (Princeton University Press, 2025), Carl Benedikt Frey challenges the conventional belief that economic and technological progress is inevitable. For most of human history, stagnation was the norm, and even today progress and prosperity in the world&apos;s largest, most advanced economies--the United States and China--have fallen short of expectations. To appreciate why we cannot depend on any AI-fueled great leap forward, Frey offers a remarkable and fascinating journey across the globe, spanning the past 1,000 years, to explain why some societies flourish and others fail in the wake of rapid technological change.

By examining key historical moments--from the rise of the steam engine to the dawn of AI--Frey shows why technological shifts have shaped, and sometimes destabilized, entire civilizations. He explores why some leading technological powers of the past--such as Song China, the Dutch Republic, and Victorian Britain--ultimately lost their innovative edge, why some modern nations such as Japan had periods of rapid growth followed by stagnation, and why planned economies like the Soviet Union collapsed after brief surges of progress. Frey uncovers a recurring tension in history: while decentralization fosters the exploration of new technologies, bureaucracy is crucial for scaling them. When institutions fail to adapt to technological change, stagnation inevitably follows. Only by carefully balancing decentralization and bureaucracy can nations innovate and grow over the long term--findings that have worrying implications for the United States, Europe, China, and other economies today.

Through a rich narrative that weaves together history, economics, and technology, How Progress Ends reveals that managing the future requires us to draw the right lessons from the past.

Carl Benedikt Frey is the Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI and Work at the Oxford Internet Institute and Oxford Martin Citi Fellow at the Oxford Martin School, both at the University of Oxford.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In How Progress Ends: Technology, Innovation, and the Fate of Nations (Princeton University Press, 2025), Carl Benedikt Frey challenges the conventional belief that economic and technological progress is inevitable. For most of human history, stagnation was the norm, and even today progress and prosperity in the world&apos;s largest, most advanced economies--the United States and China--have fallen short of expectations. To appreciate why we cannot depend on any AI-fueled great leap forward, Frey offers a remarkable and fascinating journey across the globe, spanning the past 1,000 years, to explain why some societies flourish and others fail in the wake of rapid technological change.

By examining key historical moments--from the rise of the steam engine to the dawn of AI--Frey shows why technological shifts have shaped, and sometimes destabilized, entire civilizations. He explores why some leading technological powers of the past--such as Song China, the Dutch Republic, and Victorian Britain--ultimately lost their innovative edge, why some modern nations such as Japan had periods of rapid growth followed by stagnation, and why planned economies like the Soviet Union collapsed after brief surges of progress. Frey uncovers a recurring tension in history: while decentralization fosters the exploration of new technologies, bureaucracy is crucial for scaling them. When institutions fail to adapt to technological change, stagnation inevitably follows. Only by carefully balancing decentralization and bureaucracy can nations innovate and grow over the long term--findings that have worrying implications for the United States, Europe, China, and other economies today.

Through a rich narrative that weaves together history, economics, and technology, How Progress Ends reveals that managing the future requires us to draw the right lessons from the past.

Carl Benedikt Frey is the Dieter Schwarz Associate Professor of AI and Work at the Oxford Internet Institute and Oxford Martin Citi Fellow at the Oxford Martin School, both at the University of Oxford.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>754</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">245039c8-c45f-11f0-8123-4789debd6249</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Buccola, &quot;One Man’s Freedom: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the acclaimed author of <em>The Fire Is upon Us</em>, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.'s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics</p>
<p>In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of "freedom now," insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of "extremism in defense of liberty," advocating radical individualism. In <em>One Man's Freedom</em>, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King's dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.</p>
<p>Part dual biography, part history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230306">One Man's Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal</a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater's landslide defeat in the presidential election and King's Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the acclaimed author of <em>The Fire Is upon Us</em>, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.'s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics</p>
<p>In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of "freedom now," insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of "extremism in defense of liberty," advocating radical individualism. In <em>One Man's Freedom</em>, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King's dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.</p>
<p>Part dual biography, part history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691230306">One Man's Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal</a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater's landslide defeat in the presidential election and King's Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72768077" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0b54bdb2-cc3c-4b58-9bf8-cc44cd15b1bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0b54bdb2-cc3c-4b58-9bf8-cc44cd15b1bf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Buccola, &quot;One Man’s Freedom: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the acclaimed author of The Fire Is upon Us, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.&apos;s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics

In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of &quot;freedom now,&quot; insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of &quot;extremism in defense of liberty,&quot; advocating radical individualism. In One Man&apos;s Freedom, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King&apos;s dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.

Part dual biography, part history, One Man&apos;s Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal (Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater&apos;s landslide defeat in the presidential election and King&apos;s Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the acclaimed author of The Fire Is upon Us, the dramatic untold story of Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr.&apos;s decade-long clash over the meaning of freedom--and how their conflicting visions still divide American politics

In the mid-1950s, Barry Goldwater and Martin Luther King Jr. emerged as the leaders of two diametrically opposed freedom movements that changed the course of American history--and still divide American politics. King mobilized civil rights activists under the banner of &quot;freedom now,&quot; insisting that true freedom would not be realized until all people--regardless of race--were empowered politically, economically, and socially. Goldwater rallied conservatives to the cause of &quot;extremism in defense of liberty,&quot; advocating radical individualism. In One Man&apos;s Freedom, Nicholas Buccola tells the compelling story of Goldwater and King&apos;s dramatic decade-long debate over the meaning of an all-important American ideal.

Part dual biography, part history, One Man&apos;s Freedom﻿: Goldwater, King, and the Struggle Over an American Ideal (Princeton UP, 2025)  traces the actions and words of Goldwater and King over a crucial and eventful decade, from their dizzying rise through 1964, which ended with Goldwater&apos;s landslide defeat in the presidential election and King&apos;s Nobel Peace Prize. The book chronicles why Goldwater and King, who never met in person, came to view each other as perhaps the greatest threat to freedom in America. It explains how their ideas of freedom could be so vastly different, yet both so deeply rooted in American history and their times. And it shows how their disagreement continues to shape and explain politics today, when the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats often come down to the question of what kind of freedom Americans want--the one defined by Goldwater or by King?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>753</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7708557c-c321-11f0-a78f-f72dbee615da</guid>
      <title>On Democracy and Bullshit with Hélène Landemore</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about <em>Democracy and Bullshit,</em> with a special focus on her 2020 book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181998">Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2020)<em>.</em></p>
<p>Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.</p>
<p>To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.<br /></p>
<p>Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about <em>Democracy and Bullshit,</em> with a special focus on her 2020 book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691181998">Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2020)<em>.</em></p>
<p>Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.</p>
<p>To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.<br /></p>
<p>Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63725118" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fd9f0907-4289-41c5-a205-553332eb713e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fd9f0907-4289-41c5-a205-553332eb713e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Democracy and Bullshit with Hélène Landemore</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/fd9f0907-4289-41c5-a205-553332eb713e/3000x3000/ea2a49c4e9c23e97f5c24000b77ee81a.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about Democracy and Bullshit, with a special focus on her 2020 book, Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton University Press, 2020).

Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.

To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.

Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Hélène Landemore, Professor of Political Science at Yale University, about Democracy and Bullshit, with a special focus on her 2020 book, Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton University Press, 2020).

Bullshit is a feature of both democracies and dictatorships alike, but it takes different forms. In democracies, while citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the right to vote, a range of forces often conspire to limit their real power in favor of competing elites. The political and economic elite’s toolkit includes the art of bullshit—the persuasive use of language without regard for truth. Whether meritocratic or populist, elites alike have mastered this form of manipulation, amplified by modern tools of dissemination and authority.

To help us understand the challenges that bullshit poses to democratic citizens, I’m pleased to welcome Hélène Landemore.

Hélène Landemore is a professor of political science at Yale University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>752</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f313fd88-beb7-11f0-bf20-fb9a8271b512</guid>
      <title>Lisa Vanhala, &quot;Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A searing account of how the international community is trying—and failing—to address the worst effects of climate change and the differential burdens borne by rich and poor countries.</p>
<p>Climate change is increasingly accepted as a global emergency creating irrevocable losses for the planet. Yet, each country experiences these losses differently, and reaching even inadequate political agreements is fraught with contestation. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226843018">Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage</a> (U Chicago Press, 2025) untangles the complex relationship between deteriorating environmental conditions, high politics, and everyday diplomatic practices, focusing on the United Nations’ agreement to address “loss and damage” and subsequent battles over implementation.</p>
<p>Lisa Vanhala looks at the differing assumptions and strategic framings that poor and rich countries bring to bear and asks why some norms emerge and diffuse while others fail to do so. Governing the End is based on ethnographic observation of eight years of UN meetings and negotiations and more than one hundred and fifty interviews with diplomats, policymakers, UN secretariat staff, experts, and activists. It explores explicit political contestation, as well as the more clandestine politics that have stymied implementation and substantially reduced the scope of compensation to poor countries. In doing so, Governing the End elucidates the successes and failures of international climate governance, revealing the importance of how ideas are constructed and then institutionally embodied.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has just been published (2025, Oxford University Press).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A searing account of how the international community is trying—and failing—to address the worst effects of climate change and the differential burdens borne by rich and poor countries.</p>
<p>Climate change is increasingly accepted as a global emergency creating irrevocable losses for the planet. Yet, each country experiences these losses differently, and reaching even inadequate political agreements is fraught with contestation. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226843018">Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage</a> (U Chicago Press, 2025) untangles the complex relationship between deteriorating environmental conditions, high politics, and everyday diplomatic practices, focusing on the United Nations’ agreement to address “loss and damage” and subsequent battles over implementation.</p>
<p>Lisa Vanhala looks at the differing assumptions and strategic framings that poor and rich countries bring to bear and asks why some norms emerge and diffuse while others fail to do so. Governing the End is based on ethnographic observation of eight years of UN meetings and negotiations and more than one hundred and fifty interviews with diplomats, policymakers, UN secretariat staff, experts, and activists. It explores explicit political contestation, as well as the more clandestine politics that have stymied implementation and substantially reduced the scope of compensation to poor countries. In doing so, Governing the End elucidates the successes and failures of international climate governance, revealing the importance of how ideas are constructed and then institutionally embodied.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-game-9780197812280?cc=us&amp;lang=en"><em>new book</em></a><em> has just been published (2025, Oxford University Press).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44511584" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/31f4f6dd-c85c-4866-b5d1-ee96ce4dc1a9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=31f4f6dd-c85c-4866-b5d1-ee96ce4dc1a9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Vanhala, &quot;Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A searing account of how the international community is trying—and failing—to address the worst effects of climate change and the differential burdens borne by rich and poor countries.

Climate change is increasingly accepted as a global emergency creating irrevocable losses for the planet. Yet, each country experiences these losses differently, and reaching even inadequate political agreements is fraught with contestation. Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage (U Chicago Press, 2025) untangles the complex relationship between deteriorating environmental conditions, high politics, and everyday diplomatic practices, focusing on the United Nations’ agreement to address “loss and damage” and subsequent battles over implementation.

Lisa Vanhala looks at the differing assumptions and strategic framings that poor and rich countries bring to bear and asks why some norms emerge and diffuse while others fail to do so. Governing the End is based on ethnographic observation of eight years of UN meetings and negotiations and more than one hundred and fifty interviews with diplomats, policymakers, UN secretariat staff, experts, and activists. It explores explicit political contestation, as well as the more clandestine politics that have stymied implementation and substantially reduced the scope of compensation to poor countries. In doing so, Governing the End elucidates the successes and failures of international climate governance, revealing the importance of how ideas are constructed and then institutionally embodied.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has just been published (2025, Oxford University Press).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A searing account of how the international community is trying—and failing—to address the worst effects of climate change and the differential burdens borne by rich and poor countries.

Climate change is increasingly accepted as a global emergency creating irrevocable losses for the planet. Yet, each country experiences these losses differently, and reaching even inadequate political agreements is fraught with contestation. Governing the End: The Making of Climate Change Loss and Damage (U Chicago Press, 2025) untangles the complex relationship between deteriorating environmental conditions, high politics, and everyday diplomatic practices, focusing on the United Nations’ agreement to address “loss and damage” and subsequent battles over implementation.

Lisa Vanhala looks at the differing assumptions and strategic framings that poor and rich countries bring to bear and asks why some norms emerge and diffuse while others fail to do so. Governing the End is based on ethnographic observation of eight years of UN meetings and negotiations and more than one hundred and fifty interviews with diplomats, policymakers, UN secretariat staff, experts, and activists. It explores explicit political contestation, as well as the more clandestine politics that have stymied implementation and substantially reduced the scope of compensation to poor countries. In doing so, Governing the End elucidates the successes and failures of international climate governance, revealing the importance of how ideas are constructed and then institutionally embodied.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Hannah Pool, a senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Studies of Societies. Her research focuses on human mobilities and her new book has just been published (2025, Oxford University Press).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>751</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ffdaedc4-bd6d-11f0-83a4-93f0b05bc300</guid>
      <title>Two Decades On: The African Union, Power, and Africa’s Democratic Future</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the African Union was founded in 2002, it promised to deliver a more united, prosperous, and people-centred continent. Two decades later, Africa’s political landscape tells a more complex story: one of ambition and frustration, democratic progress and reversal, renewed activism, and enduring inequality. How far has the AU come in shaping <em>“The Africa We Want”</em>, and what does its evolving role reveal about power, governance, and the continent’s place in a rapidly changing world?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host <strong>Temitayo Odeyemi</strong> talks to Dr <strong>Adeoye Akinola</strong> about his new co-edited volume <a href="https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/104314/1/9780906785713.pdf#page=47"><em>African Union and Agenda 2063: The Past, Present, and Future</em></a> (UJ Press, 2025) to unpack what over two decades of continental politics teach us about Africa’s democratic future, regional integration, and global voice.</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=YnR5ir4AAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate"><strong>Adeoye O. Akinola</strong></a> is Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg, where he leads the African Union Studies Unit. His research spans African political economy, governance, peace and security, and regional integration. His other publications include <em>The Resurgence of Military Coups and Democratic Relapse in Africa </em>(Palgrave 2024) and <em>The Political Economy of Xenophobia in Africa</em> (Springer 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo"><strong>Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi</strong></a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the African Union was founded in 2002, it promised to deliver a more united, prosperous, and people-centred continent. Two decades later, Africa’s political landscape tells a more complex story: one of ambition and frustration, democratic progress and reversal, renewed activism, and enduring inequality. How far has the AU come in shaping <em>“The Africa We Want”</em>, and what does its evolving role reveal about power, governance, and the continent’s place in a rapidly changing world?</p>
<p>In this episode, CEDAR host <strong>Temitayo Odeyemi</strong> talks to Dr <strong>Adeoye Akinola</strong> about his new co-edited volume <a href="https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/104314/1/9780906785713.pdf#page=47"><em>African Union and Agenda 2063: The Past, Present, and Future</em></a> (UJ Press, 2025) to unpack what over two decades of continental politics teach us about Africa’s democratic future, regional integration, and global voice.</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=YnR5ir4AAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate"><strong>Adeoye O. Akinola</strong></a> is Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg, where he leads the African Union Studies Unit. His research spans African political economy, governance, peace and security, and regional integration. His other publications include <em>The Resurgence of Military Coups and Democratic Relapse in Africa </em>(Palgrave 2024) and <em>The Political Economy of Xenophobia in Africa</em> (Springer 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/odeyemi-temitayo"><strong>Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi</strong></a> is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.</p>
<p>The <em>People, Power, Politics</em> podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35178134" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c248fa9a-c49d-4594-b7a2-4428fb2f3b2d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c248fa9a-c49d-4594-b7a2-4428fb2f3b2d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Two Decades On: The African Union, Power, and Africa’s Democratic Future</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the African Union was founded in 2002, it promised to deliver a more united, prosperous, and people-centred continent. Two decades later, Africa’s political landscape tells a more complex story: one of ambition and frustration, democratic progress and reversal, renewed activism, and enduring inequality. How far has the AU come in shaping “The Africa We Want”, and what does its evolving role reveal about power, governance, and the continent’s place in a rapidly changing world?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi talks to Dr Adeoye Akinola about his new co-edited volume African Union and Agenda 2063: The Past, Present, and Future (UJ Press, 2025) to unpack what over two decades of continental politics teach us about Africa’s democratic future, regional integration, and global voice.

Adeoye O. Akinola is Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg, where he leads the African Union Studies Unit. His research spans African political economy, governance, peace and security, and regional integration. His other publications include The Resurgence of Military Coups and Democratic Relapse in Africa (Palgrave 2024) and The Political Economy of Xenophobia in Africa (Springer 2018).

Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the African Union was founded in 2002, it promised to deliver a more united, prosperous, and people-centred continent. Two decades later, Africa’s political landscape tells a more complex story: one of ambition and frustration, democratic progress and reversal, renewed activism, and enduring inequality. How far has the AU come in shaping “The Africa We Want”, and what does its evolving role reveal about power, governance, and the continent’s place in a rapidly changing world?

In this episode, CEDAR host Temitayo Odeyemi talks to Dr Adeoye Akinola about his new co-edited volume African Union and Agenda 2063: The Past, Present, and Future (UJ Press, 2025) to unpack what over two decades of continental politics teach us about Africa’s democratic future, regional integration, and global voice.

Adeoye O. Akinola is Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg, where he leads the African Union Studies Unit. His research spans African political economy, governance, peace and security, and regional integration. His other publications include The Resurgence of Military Coups and Democratic Relapse in Africa (Palgrave 2024) and The Political Economy of Xenophobia in Africa (Springer 2018).

Temitayo Isaac Odeyemi is a Research Fellow in Democratic Resilience at the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR). His research examines institutions, actors, and democratic engagement in Africa.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Election, Democracy, Accountability and Representation at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the forces that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57199988-bd77-11f0-84a5-3b6ba1743c08</guid>
      <title>Wolfgang Wagner, &quot;The Democratic Politics of Military Interventions&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>According to a widely shared notion, foreign affairs are exempted from democratic politics, i.e. party-political divisions are overcome-and should be overcome-for the sake of a common national interest. This book shows that this is not the case. Examining votes in the US Congress and several European parliaments, the book demonstrates that contestation over foreign affairs is barely different from contestation over domestic politics. Analyses of a new collection of deployment votes, of party manifestos, and of expert survey data show that political parties differ systematically over foreign policy and military interventions in particular. The left/right divide is the best guide to the pattern of party-political contestation: support is weakest at the far left of the spectrum and increases as one moves along the left/right axis to green, social democratic, liberal and conservative parties; amongst parties of the far right, support is again weaker than amongst parties of the centre. An analysis of parliamentary debates in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom about the interventions in Afghanistan and against Daesh in Iraq and Syria shows that political parties also differ systematically in how they frame the use of force abroad. For example, parties on the right tend to frame their country's participation in the US-led missions in terms of national security and national interests whereas parties on the left tend to engage in 'spiral model thinking', i.e. they critically reflect on the unintended consequences of the use of force in fuelling the conflicts with the Taliban and Daesh.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a widely shared notion, foreign affairs are exempted from democratic politics, i.e. party-political divisions are overcome-and should be overcome-for the sake of a common national interest. This book shows that this is not the case. Examining votes in the US Congress and several European parliaments, the book demonstrates that contestation over foreign affairs is barely different from contestation over domestic politics. Analyses of a new collection of deployment votes, of party manifestos, and of expert survey data show that political parties differ systematically over foreign policy and military interventions in particular. The left/right divide is the best guide to the pattern of party-political contestation: support is weakest at the far left of the spectrum and increases as one moves along the left/right axis to green, social democratic, liberal and conservative parties; amongst parties of the far right, support is again weaker than amongst parties of the centre. An analysis of parliamentary debates in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom about the interventions in Afghanistan and against Daesh in Iraq and Syria shows that political parties also differ systematically in how they frame the use of force abroad. For example, parties on the right tend to frame their country's participation in the US-led missions in terms of national security and national interests whereas parties on the left tend to engage in 'spiral model thinking', i.e. they critically reflect on the unintended consequences of the use of force in fuelling the conflicts with the Taliban and Daesh.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34360608" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1ea2a555-3d76-44e7-9860-f277768b6323/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1ea2a555-3d76-44e7-9860-f277768b6323&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Wolfgang Wagner, &quot;The Democratic Politics of Military Interventions&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>According to a widely shared notion, foreign affairs are exempted from democratic politics, i.e. party-political divisions are overcome-and should be overcome-for the sake of a common national interest. This book shows that this is not the case. Examining votes in the US Congress and several European parliaments, the book demonstrates that contestation over foreign affairs is barely different from contestation over domestic politics. Analyses of a new collection of deployment votes, of party manifestos, and of expert survey data show that political parties differ systematically over foreign policy and military interventions in particular. The left/right divide is the best guide to the pattern of party-political contestation: support is weakest at the far left of the spectrum and increases as one moves along the left/right axis to green, social democratic, liberal and conservative parties; amongst parties of the far right, support is again weaker than amongst parties of the centre. An analysis of parliamentary debates in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom about the interventions in Afghanistan and against Daesh in Iraq and Syria shows that political parties also differ systematically in how they frame the use of force abroad. For example, parties on the right tend to frame their country&apos;s participation in the US-led missions in terms of national security and national interests whereas parties on the left tend to engage in &apos;spiral model thinking&apos;, i.e. they critically reflect on the unintended consequences of the use of force in fuelling the conflicts with the Taliban and Daesh.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>According to a widely shared notion, foreign affairs are exempted from democratic politics, i.e. party-political divisions are overcome-and should be overcome-for the sake of a common national interest. This book shows that this is not the case. Examining votes in the US Congress and several European parliaments, the book demonstrates that contestation over foreign affairs is barely different from contestation over domestic politics. Analyses of a new collection of deployment votes, of party manifestos, and of expert survey data show that political parties differ systematically over foreign policy and military interventions in particular. The left/right divide is the best guide to the pattern of party-political contestation: support is weakest at the far left of the spectrum and increases as one moves along the left/right axis to green, social democratic, liberal and conservative parties; amongst parties of the far right, support is again weaker than amongst parties of the centre. An analysis of parliamentary debates in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom about the interventions in Afghanistan and against Daesh in Iraq and Syria shows that political parties also differ systematically in how they frame the use of force abroad. For example, parties on the right tend to frame their country&apos;s participation in the US-led missions in terms of national security and national interests whereas parties on the left tend to engage in &apos;spiral model thinking&apos;, i.e. they critically reflect on the unintended consequences of the use of force in fuelling the conflicts with the Taliban and Daesh.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>788</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03e80e10-bb93-11f0-921d-073e6752fb02</guid>
      <title>Clint Smith, &quot;How the Word Is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America&quot; (Little, Brown and Company, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do we narrate history, both the troubling past and what we chose to remember? Clint Smith sets out to wrestle with this question and its relationship to enslavement in his first nonfiction book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780316492935"><em>How the Word is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America</em></a> (Little, Brown and Company, 2021). From Monticello plantation to Angola Prison to Galveston Island, Smith guides the reader on a journey as he visits domestic and abroad landmarks. In his exploration, he includes the reactions of the people he meets, like tourists, local public historians, and teachers, illuminating how these sites and all of us participate in remembering enslavement in contemporary America.</p><p><em>N'Kosi Oates is a Ph.D. candidate in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at NKosiOates.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we narrate history, both the troubling past and what we chose to remember? Clint Smith sets out to wrestle with this question and its relationship to enslavement in his first nonfiction book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780316492935"><em>How the Word is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America</em></a> (Little, Brown and Company, 2021). From Monticello plantation to Angola Prison to Galveston Island, Smith guides the reader on a journey as he visits domestic and abroad landmarks. In his exploration, he includes the reactions of the people he meets, like tourists, local public historians, and teachers, illuminating how these sites and all of us participate in remembering enslavement in contemporary America.</p><p><em>N'Kosi Oates is a Ph.D. candidate in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at NKosiOates.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="81363648" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f98ab585-b1b1-4854-9ffd-6fa7d018f5f2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f98ab585-b1b1-4854-9ffd-6fa7d018f5f2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Clint Smith, &quot;How the Word Is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America&quot; (Little, Brown and Company, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:24:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do we narrate history, both the troubling past and what we chose to remember? Clint Smith sets out to wrestle with this question and its relationship to enslavement in his first nonfiction book, How the Word is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America (Little, Brown and Company, 2021). From Monticello plantation to Angola Prison to Galveston Island, Smith guides the reader on a journey as he visits domestic and abroad landmarks. In his exploration, he includes the reactions of the people he meets, like tourists, local public historians, and teachers, illuminating how these sites and all of us participate in remembering enslavement in contemporary America.
N&apos;Kosi Oates is a Ph.D. candidate in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at NKosiOates.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do we narrate history, both the troubling past and what we chose to remember? Clint Smith sets out to wrestle with this question and its relationship to enslavement in his first nonfiction book, How the Word is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America (Little, Brown and Company, 2021). From Monticello plantation to Angola Prison to Galveston Island, Smith guides the reader on a journey as he visits domestic and abroad landmarks. In his exploration, he includes the reactions of the people he meets, like tourists, local public historians, and teachers, illuminating how these sites and all of us participate in remembering enslavement in contemporary America.
N&apos;Kosi Oates is a Ph.D. candidate in Africana Studies at Brown University. Find him on Twitter at NKosiOates.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>264</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6cb9a8a-bbec-11f0-8815-33811938473a</guid>
      <title>E. Alaverdov and M. W. Bari, &quot;Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones&quot; (IGI Global, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The protection and restoration of cultural heritage is essential, especially in conflict and post-conflict zones. Armed conflicts frequently result in the destruction or collateral damage of cultural landmarks, artifacts, and traditions. In post-conflict recovery, preserving cultural heritage is not only a matter of historical conservation but helps heal society and national rebuilding. This complex process demands interdisciplinary collaboration, sensitive policy frameworks, and sustainable strategies to safeguard heritage under threat and to foster resilience in communities emerging from crisis.</p>
<p>Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones explores the need for cultural heritage protection. This book speaks out against the damage to cultural heritage during conflicts, because the damage caused to the cultural heritage of each nation is damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind, and each nation has its contribution to world culture. Covering topics such as heritage, culture, and restoration, this book is an excellent resource for scholars, professors, students and stakeholders.</p>
<p>Emilia Alaverdov , Ph.D. in Political Science, professor, Faculty of Law and International Relations since 2011.</p>
<p>Prof. Muhammad Waseem Bari , Educator, trainer, consultant, and researcher who prioritizes public education, scientific advancement, and students’ engagement.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The protection and restoration of cultural heritage is essential, especially in conflict and post-conflict zones. Armed conflicts frequently result in the destruction or collateral damage of cultural landmarks, artifacts, and traditions. In post-conflict recovery, preserving cultural heritage is not only a matter of historical conservation but helps heal society and national rebuilding. This complex process demands interdisciplinary collaboration, sensitive policy frameworks, and sustainable strategies to safeguard heritage under threat and to foster resilience in communities emerging from crisis.</p>
<p>Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones explores the need for cultural heritage protection. This book speaks out against the damage to cultural heritage during conflicts, because the damage caused to the cultural heritage of each nation is damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind, and each nation has its contribution to world culture. Covering topics such as heritage, culture, and restoration, this book is an excellent resource for scholars, professors, students and stakeholders.</p>
<p>Emilia Alaverdov , Ph.D. in Political Science, professor, Faculty of Law and International Relations since 2011.</p>
<p>Prof. Muhammad Waseem Bari , Educator, trainer, consultant, and researcher who prioritizes public education, scientific advancement, and students’ engagement.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34131848" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cb321589-4177-4147-a166-786f2e841892/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cb321589-4177-4147-a166-786f2e841892&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>E. Alaverdov and M. W. Bari, &quot;Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones&quot; (IGI Global, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The protection and restoration of cultural heritage is essential, especially in conflict and post-conflict zones. Armed conflicts frequently result in the destruction or collateral damage of cultural landmarks, artifacts, and traditions. In post-conflict recovery, preserving cultural heritage is not only a matter of historical conservation but helps heal society and national rebuilding. This complex process demands interdisciplinary collaboration, sensitive policy frameworks, and sustainable strategies to safeguard heritage under threat and to foster resilience in communities emerging from crisis.

Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones explores the need for cultural heritage protection. This book speaks out against the damage to cultural heritage during conflicts, because the damage caused to the cultural heritage of each nation is damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind, and each nation has its contribution to world culture. Covering topics such as heritage, culture, and restoration, this book is an excellent resource for scholars, professors, students and stakeholders.

Emilia Alaverdov , Ph.D. in Political Science, professor, Faculty of Law and International Relations since 2011.

Prof. Muhammad Waseem Bari , Educator, trainer, consultant, and researcher who prioritizes public education, scientific advancement, and students’ engagement.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The protection and restoration of cultural heritage is essential, especially in conflict and post-conflict zones. Armed conflicts frequently result in the destruction or collateral damage of cultural landmarks, artifacts, and traditions. In post-conflict recovery, preserving cultural heritage is not only a matter of historical conservation but helps heal society and national rebuilding. This complex process demands interdisciplinary collaboration, sensitive policy frameworks, and sustainable strategies to safeguard heritage under threat and to foster resilience in communities emerging from crisis.

Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration in Conflict and Post-Conflict Zones explores the need for cultural heritage protection. This book speaks out against the damage to cultural heritage during conflicts, because the damage caused to the cultural heritage of each nation is damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind, and each nation has its contribution to world culture. Covering topics such as heritage, culture, and restoration, this book is an excellent resource for scholars, professors, students and stakeholders.

Emilia Alaverdov , Ph.D. in Political Science, professor, Faculty of Law and International Relations since 2011.

Prof. Muhammad Waseem Bari , Educator, trainer, consultant, and researcher who prioritizes public education, scientific advancement, and students’ engagement.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85d2a366-bb90-11f0-8003-c7760163a15f</guid>
      <title>Ihnji Jon, &quot;Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics&quot; (Pluto Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Climate change is real, and extreme weather events are its physical manifestations. These extreme events affect how we live and work in cities, and subsequently the way we design, plan, and govern them. Taking action 'for the environment' is not only a moral imperative; instead, it is activated by our everyday experience in the city. Based on the author's site visits and interviews in Darwin (Australia), Tulsa (Oklahoma), Cleveland (Ohio), and Cape Town (South Africa), Ihnji Jon's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745341507"><em>Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2021) tells the story of how cities can lead a transformative pro-environment politics. National governments often fail to make binding agreements that bring about radical actions for the environment. This book shows how cities, as local sites of mobilizing a collective, political agenda, can be frontiers for activating the kind of environmental politics that appreciates the role of 'nature' in the everyday functioning of our urban life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate change is real, and extreme weather events are its physical manifestations. These extreme events affect how we live and work in cities, and subsequently the way we design, plan, and govern them. Taking action 'for the environment' is not only a moral imperative; instead, it is activated by our everyday experience in the city. Based on the author's site visits and interviews in Darwin (Australia), Tulsa (Oklahoma), Cleveland (Ohio), and Cape Town (South Africa), Ihnji Jon's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745341507"><em>Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2021) tells the story of how cities can lead a transformative pro-environment politics. National governments often fail to make binding agreements that bring about radical actions for the environment. This book shows how cities, as local sites of mobilizing a collective, political agenda, can be frontiers for activating the kind of environmental politics that appreciates the role of 'nature' in the everyday functioning of our urban life.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41674082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4cdd6b9a-db1b-4b85-8d16-e8d793b2783b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4cdd6b9a-db1b-4b85-8d16-e8d793b2783b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ihnji Jon, &quot;Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics&quot; (Pluto Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Climate change is real, and extreme weather events are its physical manifestations. These extreme events affect how we live and work in cities, and subsequently the way we design, plan, and govern them. Taking action &apos;for the environment&apos; is not only a moral imperative; instead, it is activated by our everyday experience in the city. Based on the author&apos;s site visits and interviews in Darwin (Australia), Tulsa (Oklahoma), Cleveland (Ohio), and Cape Town (South Africa), Ihnji Jon&apos;s Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics (Pluto Press, 2021) tells the story of how cities can lead a transformative pro-environment politics. National governments often fail to make binding agreements that bring about radical actions for the environment. This book shows how cities, as local sites of mobilizing a collective, political agenda, can be frontiers for activating the kind of environmental politics that appreciates the role of &apos;nature&apos; in the everyday functioning of our urban life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Climate change is real, and extreme weather events are its physical manifestations. These extreme events affect how we live and work in cities, and subsequently the way we design, plan, and govern them. Taking action &apos;for the environment&apos; is not only a moral imperative; instead, it is activated by our everyday experience in the city. Based on the author&apos;s site visits and interviews in Darwin (Australia), Tulsa (Oklahoma), Cleveland (Ohio), and Cape Town (South Africa), Ihnji Jon&apos;s Cities in the Anthropocene: New Ecology and Urban Politics (Pluto Press, 2021) tells the story of how cities can lead a transformative pro-environment politics. National governments often fail to make binding agreements that bring about radical actions for the environment. This book shows how cities, as local sites of mobilizing a collective, political agenda, can be frontiers for activating the kind of environmental politics that appreciates the role of &apos;nature&apos; in the everyday functioning of our urban life.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c81e7e5e-bc2e-11f0-b8bb-8fa2ee4f9f41</guid>
      <title>What Democracy Does… and Does Not Do</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democratic Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl welcomes Maya Tudor, Professor of Government and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.</p>
<p>In her recent article, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” published in the Journal of Democracy, Tudor examines one of the most urgent questions of our time: Does democracy deliver? As authoritarian models gain visibility and confidence around the world, citizens and policymakers alike are questioning whether democratic systems can still provide stability, growth, and fairness.</p>
<p>Tudor’s research draws on cross-national data and historical evidence to show what democracies have achieved — and where their performance has fallen short. In this episode, she discusses how democracy shapes economic outcomes, social inclusion, and governance quality, and what these patterns mean for democratic legitimacy today.</p>
<p>The conversation also looks ahead: how well equipped are democracies to handle future global challenges like climate change, inequality, and technological disruption? And what can leaders and citizens do to ensure that democracy not only survives but thrives in meeting the expectations of its people?</p>
<p>This is an essential episode for anyone grappling with the question of whether democracy still delivers — and what it must do next.</p>
<p>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</p>
<p>Maya Tudor, “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/what-democracy-does-and-does-not-do/">What Democracy Does and Does Not Do</a>,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 35, No. 2 (2024)</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/people/maya-tudor">Maya Tudor</a>, The Promise of Power: <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/promise-of-power/A814EDC3F558831E0876CE4C8682C1BD">The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2013)</li>
  <li>Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/varieties-of-nationalism/479019877D9D7F0504AD64F6D9AF102B">Varieties of Nationalism</a> (Cambridge University Press Elements 2023).</li>
</ul>
<p><u><em>Listen on </em></u><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@DemocraticDialogues25"><em>YouTube</em></a><u><em>, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Democratic Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl welcomes Maya Tudor, Professor of Government and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.</p>
<p>In her recent article, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” published in the Journal of Democracy, Tudor examines one of the most urgent questions of our time: Does democracy deliver? As authoritarian models gain visibility and confidence around the world, citizens and policymakers alike are questioning whether democratic systems can still provide stability, growth, and fairness.</p>
<p>Tudor’s research draws on cross-national data and historical evidence to show what democracies have achieved — and where their performance has fallen short. In this episode, she discusses how democracy shapes economic outcomes, social inclusion, and governance quality, and what these patterns mean for democratic legitimacy today.</p>
<p>The conversation also looks ahead: how well equipped are democracies to handle future global challenges like climate change, inequality, and technological disruption? And what can leaders and citizens do to ensure that democracy not only survives but thrives in meeting the expectations of its people?</p>
<p>This is an essential episode for anyone grappling with the question of whether democracy still delivers — and what it must do next.</p>
<p>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</p>
<p>Maya Tudor, “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/what-democracy-does-and-does-not-do/">What Democracy Does and Does Not Do</a>,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 35, No. 2 (2024)</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/people/maya-tudor">Maya Tudor</a>, The Promise of Power: <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/promise-of-power/A814EDC3F558831E0876CE4C8682C1BD">The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2013)</li>
  <li>Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/varieties-of-nationalism/479019877D9D7F0504AD64F6D9AF102B">Varieties of Nationalism</a> (Cambridge University Press Elements 2023).</li>
</ul>
<p><u><em>Listen on </em></u><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@DemocraticDialogues25"><em>YouTube</em></a><u><em>, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26668725" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/bf92a2cf-f1d6-445c-b333-ed921a91c3e6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=bf92a2cf-f1d6-445c-b333-ed921a91c3e6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What Democracy Does… and Does Not Do</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Democratic Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl welcomes Maya Tudor, Professor of Government and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.

In her recent article, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” published in the Journal of Democracy, Tudor examines one of the most urgent questions of our time: Does democracy deliver? As authoritarian models gain visibility and confidence around the world, citizens and policymakers alike are questioning whether democratic systems can still provide stability, growth, and fairness.

Tudor’s research draws on cross-national data and historical evidence to show what democracies have achieved — and where their performance has fallen short. In this episode, she discusses how democracy shapes economic outcomes, social inclusion, and governance quality, and what these patterns mean for democratic legitimacy today.

The conversation also looks ahead: how well equipped are democracies to handle future global challenges like climate change, inequality, and technological disruption? And what can leaders and citizens do to ensure that democracy not only survives but thrives in meeting the expectations of its people?

This is an essential episode for anyone grappling with the question of whether democracy still delivers — and what it must do next.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles

Maya Tudor, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 35, No. 2 (2024)


  
Maya Tudor, The Promise of Power: The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

  Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor, Varieties of Nationalism (Cambridge University Press Elements 2023).


Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Democratic Dialogues, host Rachel Beatty Riedl welcomes Maya Tudor, Professor of Government and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.

In her recent article, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” published in the Journal of Democracy, Tudor examines one of the most urgent questions of our time: Does democracy deliver? As authoritarian models gain visibility and confidence around the world, citizens and policymakers alike are questioning whether democratic systems can still provide stability, growth, and fairness.

Tudor’s research draws on cross-national data and historical evidence to show what democracies have achieved — and where their performance has fallen short. In this episode, she discusses how democracy shapes economic outcomes, social inclusion, and governance quality, and what these patterns mean for democratic legitimacy today.

The conversation also looks ahead: how well equipped are democracies to handle future global challenges like climate change, inequality, and technological disruption? And what can leaders and citizens do to ensure that democracy not only survives but thrives in meeting the expectations of its people?

This is an essential episode for anyone grappling with the question of whether democracy still delivers — and what it must do next.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles

Maya Tudor, “What Democracy Does and Does Not Do,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 35, No. 2 (2024)


  
Maya Tudor, The Promise of Power: The Origins of Democracy in India and Autocracy in Pakistan (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

  Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor, Varieties of Nationalism (Cambridge University Press Elements 2023).


Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>745</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8182c51c-b9d2-11f0-95e9-cbb69f29fe49</guid>
      <title>House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America’s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, <em>House of Diggs</em> is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, <em>House of Diggs</em> restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.</a></p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground#entry:392015@1:url">No Common Ground</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url">The Social Constructions of Race</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/considering-museum-work-a-conversation-with-curators-from-the-smithsonian#entry:140933@1:url">Smithsonian American Women</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/he-first-and-last-king-of-haiti-the-rise-and-fall-of-henry-christophe#entry:372054@1:url">The First and Last King of Haiti</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url">Of Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url">Never Caught</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And get free bonus content <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">HERE.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, <em>House of Diggs</em> is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, <em>House of Diggs</em> restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.</a></p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-white-politics-how-to-heal-our-liberal-divide#entry:347905@1:url">The End of White Politics</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-vice-presidents-black-wife-the-untold-life-of-julia-chinn#entry:377076@1:url">The Vice-President's Black Wife</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground#entry:392015@1:url">No Common Ground</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-constructions-of-race-a-discussion-with-brigette-fielder#entry:71281@1:url">The Social Constructions of Race</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/considering-museum-work-a-conversation-with-curators-from-the-smithsonian#entry:140933@1:url">Smithsonian American Women</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/he-first-and-last-king-of-haiti-the-rise-and-fall-of-henry-christophe#entry:372054@1:url">The First and Last King of Haiti</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/studying-the-pipeline-to-politics-for-women#entry:226734@1:url">Of Bears and Ballots</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reclaiming-lost-voices-and-recovering-history-a-discussion-with-erica-armstrong-dunbar#entry:71808@1:url">Never Caught</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And get free bonus content <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">HERE.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49421149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/365d50aa-e985-4be0-bf3c-e83ae12dbc77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=365d50aa-e985-4be0-bf3c-e83ae12dbc77&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>House of Diggs: The Rise and Fall of America’s Most Consequential Black Congressman, Charles C. Diggs Jr.</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.

Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.

Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.

Playlist for listeners:

The End of White Politics

The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife

No Common Ground

The Social Constructions of Race

Smithsonian American Women

The First and Last King of Haiti

Of Bears and Ballots

Never Caught

Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And get free bonus content HERE.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the height of the civil rights movement, Charles C. Diggs Jr. (1922–1998) was the consummate power broker. In a political career spanning 1951 to 1980, Diggs, Michigan’s first Black member of Congress, was the only federal official to attend the trial of Emmett Till’s killers, worked behind the scenes with Martin Luther King Jr., and founded the Congressional Black Caucus. He was also the chief architect of legislation that restored home rule to Washington, DC, and almost single-handedly ignited the American anti-apartheid movement in the 1960s.

Drawing on extensive archival research, including Diggs’s rarely seen personal papers, FBI documents, and original interviews with family members and political associates, political scientist Dr. Marion Orr reveals that Diggs practiced a politics of strategic moderation. Dr. Orr argues that this quiet approach was more effective than the militant race politics practiced by Adam Clayton Powell and more appealing than the conservative Chicago-style approach of William Dawson—two of Diggs’s better-known Black contemporaries. Vividly written and deeply researched, House of Diggs is the first biography of Congressman Charles C. Diggs Jr., one of the most consequential Black federal legislators in US history. Congressman Diggs was a legislative lion whose unfortunate downfall punctuated his distinguished career and pushed him and his historic accomplishments out of sight. Now, for the first time, House of Diggs restores him to his much-deserved place in the history of American politics.

Our guest is: Dr. Marion Orr, who is the inaugural Frederick Lippitt Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Political Science and Urban Studies at Brown University. He specializes in urban politics, race and ethnic politics, and African-American politics.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who produces the Academic Life podcast. She is a dissertation and grad student coach, and a developmental editor for humanities scholars at all stages of their careers. She writes the Academic Life Newsletter at ChristinaGessler.Substack.Com.

Playlist for listeners:

The End of White Politics

The Vice-President&apos;s Black Wife

No Common Ground

The Social Constructions of Race

Smithsonian American Women

The First and Last King of Haiti

Of Bears and Ballots

Never Caught

Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And get free bonus content HERE.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>744</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">736333e0-b9c3-11f0-baa1-bbe8d13d1d03</guid>
      <title>Jack B. Greenberg and John A. Dearborn, &quot;Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/congressional-expectations-presidential-self-restraint?format=PB">Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint</a> integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.</p>
<p>This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/american-government-politics-and-policy/congressional-expectations-presidential-self-restraint?format=PB">Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint</a> integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.</p>
<p>This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</a><u><em> Volume I: The Infinity Saga</em></u><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43793140" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ebc17390-117e-479e-b22d-e22f7f12fc31/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ebc17390-117e-479e-b22d-e22f7f12fc31&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jack B. Greenberg and John A. Dearborn, &quot;Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.

Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.

This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Jack Greenberg (Yale University) and John Dearborn (Vanderbilt University) have a new book that focuses on the idea of presidential self-restraint and the ways in which the U.S. Congress has tried to design Executive positions with an eye towards making real this dimension of presidential norms. The concept of presidential self-restraint is a component of how the president uses his/her executive powers: that the president has a certain expanse of power and chooses, based on a variety of reasons or outcomes, to husband some of that power, or restrain its use. Because presidential self-restraint is particularly hard to divine, especially in how presidents think about the execution of their powers, Greenberg and Dearborn turned to congressional considerations that essentially take into account this idea. Congress has spent quite a lot of time over the past fifty years (since Watergate) in designing appointed positions within the Executive branch in such a way as to flesh out a kind of restraint on the president’s part. In so doing, Congress has attempted different means to insulate individuals/positions from potential abuse by a president.

Congressional Expectations of Presidential Self-Restraint integrates a number of case studies of congressional action on presidential appointments to examine this push and pull between the legislative and executive branches. As the issue of self-restraint has become more pressing, Greenberg and Dearborn sketch out three foundational shifts that provides the framework for the way that Congress has tried to insulate executive positions, and the ways in which Congress has acknowledged the tension around depending on presidential self-restraint. The issues of political polarization, especially as demonstrated by congressional co-partisans with the president, the Supreme Court’s growing commitment to constitutional formalism and unilateralism in the Executive, and Congress’s unwillingness to defend its own powers and assert those powers all contribute to this conundrum of a reliance on presidential self-restraint that is often caught up in an expansion of the use of executive powers. The case studies provided demonstrate this conundrum and help us to see just how Congress tried to structure self-restraint into a number of different appointments and how presidents have tried to work around those constraints, some more successfully than others.

This is a brief but complex analysis of the current dynamic between the president and Article II powers, the U.S. Congress’s evaporating powers, and the Supreme Court’s complicit role in fortifying an expansive understanding of presidential power.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022) and The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>787</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed902432-b565-11f0-87c9-0f83de43ddb7</guid>
      <title>Rachel Myrick, &quot;Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/polarization-and-international-politics-how-extreme-partisanship-threatens-global-stability-rachel-myrick/b74a28fb69a763b8?ean=9780691274621&amp;next=t">Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability</a>” (Princeton UP, 2025)</p>
<p>In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.</p>
<p>Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.rachelmyrick.com/">Rachel Myrick</a>, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/polarization-and-international-politics-how-extreme-partisanship-threatens-global-stability-rachel-myrick/b74a28fb69a763b8?ean=9780691274621&amp;next=t">Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability</a>” (Princeton UP, 2025)</p>
<p>In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.</p>
<p>Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.rachelmyrick.com/">Rachel Myrick</a>, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22209092" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d1eeea1a-5539-4c2f-afee-af8b5238e655/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d1eeea1a-5539-4c2f-afee-af8b5238e655&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Myrick, &quot;Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability” (Princeton UP, 2025)

In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.

Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.

Our guest is Rachel Myrick, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Polarization is a defining feature of politics in the United States and many other democracies. Yet although there is much research focusing on the effects of polarization on domestic politics, little is known about how polarization influences international cooperation and conflict. Democracies are thought to have advantages over nondemocratic nations in international relations, including the ability to keep foreign policy stable across time, credibly signal information to adversaries, and maintain commitments to allies. Does domestic polarization affect these “democratic advantages”? These are the questions that Rachel Myrick tackles in her new book, “Polarization and International Politics: How Extreme Partisanship Threatens Global Stability” (Princeton UP, 2025)

In this timely book, Myrick argues that polarization reshapes the nature of constraints on democratic leaders, which in turn erodes the advantages democracies have in foreign affairs. Drawing on a range of evidence, including cross-national analyses, observational and experimental public opinion research, descriptive data on the behavior of politicians, and interviews with policymakers, Myrick develops metrics that explain the effect of extreme polarization on international politics and traces the pathways by which polarization undermines each of the democratic advantages.

Turning to the case of contemporary US foreign policy, Myrick shows that as its political leaders become less responsive to the public and less accountable to political opposition, the United States loses both reliability as an ally and credibility as an adversary. Myrick’s account links the effects of polarization on democratic governance to theories of international relations, integrating work across the fields of international relations, comparative politics, and American politics to explore how patterns of domestic polarization shape the international system.

Our guest is Rachel Myrick, the Douglas &amp; Ellen Lowey Associate Professor of Political Science at Duke University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>742</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c2b9802-b561-11f0-8c5f-5f43db43ec6a</guid>
      <title>Natasha Piano, &quot;Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Do competitive elections secure democracy, or might they undermine it by breeding popular disillusionment with liberal norms and procedures? The so-called Italian School of Elitism, comprising Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetano Mosca, and Robert Michels, voiced this very concern. They feared that defining democracy exclusively through representative practices creates unrealistic expectations of what elections can achieve, generating mass demoralization and disillusionment with popular government.</p>
<p>The Italian School’s concern has gone unheeded, even as their elite theory has been foundational for political science in the United States. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674295377">Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science</a><em> </em>(Harvard UP, 2025) argues that scholars have misinterpreted the Italians as conservative, antidemocratic figures who championed the equation of democracy with representative practices to restrain popular participation in politics. Natasha Piano contends not only that the Italian School’s thought has been distorted but also that theorists have ignored its main objective: to contain demagogues and plutocrats who prey on the cynicism of the masses. We ought to view these thinkers not as elite theorists of democracy but as democratic theorists of elitism.</p>
<p>The Italian School’s original writings do not reject electoral politics; they emphasize the power and promise of democracy beyond the ballot. Elections undoubtedly are an essential component of functioning democracies, but in order to preserve their legitimacy we must understand their true capacities and limitations. It is past time to dispel the delusion that we need only elections to solve political crises, or else mass publics, dissatisfied with the status quo, will fall deeper into the arms of authoritarians who capture and pervert formal democratic institutions to serve their own ends.</p>
<p>Natasha Piano is an Assistant Professor of Political Theory in the Department of Political Science at UCLA. She specializes in democratic theory and the history of political thought, focusing on the realist and empirical traditions in political science and Italian political theory</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do competitive elections secure democracy, or might they undermine it by breeding popular disillusionment with liberal norms and procedures? The so-called Italian School of Elitism, comprising Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetano Mosca, and Robert Michels, voiced this very concern. They feared that defining democracy exclusively through representative practices creates unrealistic expectations of what elections can achieve, generating mass demoralization and disillusionment with popular government.</p>
<p>The Italian School’s concern has gone unheeded, even as their elite theory has been foundational for political science in the United States. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674295377">Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science</a><em> </em>(Harvard UP, 2025) argues that scholars have misinterpreted the Italians as conservative, antidemocratic figures who championed the equation of democracy with representative practices to restrain popular participation in politics. Natasha Piano contends not only that the Italian School’s thought has been distorted but also that theorists have ignored its main objective: to contain demagogues and plutocrats who prey on the cynicism of the masses. We ought to view these thinkers not as elite theorists of democracy but as democratic theorists of elitism.</p>
<p>The Italian School’s original writings do not reject electoral politics; they emphasize the power and promise of democracy beyond the ballot. Elections undoubtedly are an essential component of functioning democracies, but in order to preserve their legitimacy we must understand their true capacities and limitations. It is past time to dispel the delusion that we need only elections to solve political crises, or else mass publics, dissatisfied with the status quo, will fall deeper into the arms of authoritarians who capture and pervert formal democratic institutions to serve their own ends.</p>
<p>Natasha Piano is an Assistant Professor of Political Theory in the Department of Political Science at UCLA. She specializes in democratic theory and the history of political thought, focusing on the realist and empirical traditions in political science and Italian political theory</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54996321" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c65a5608-9487-4c17-b34b-7b86aacb6e02/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c65a5608-9487-4c17-b34b-7b86aacb6e02&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Natasha Piano, &quot;Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Do competitive elections secure democracy, or might they undermine it by breeding popular disillusionment with liberal norms and procedures? The so-called Italian School of Elitism, comprising Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetano Mosca, and Robert Michels, voiced this very concern. They feared that defining democracy exclusively through representative practices creates unrealistic expectations of what elections can achieve, generating mass demoralization and disillusionment with popular government.

The Italian School’s concern has gone unheeded, even as their elite theory has been foundational for political science in the United States. Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science (Harvard UP, 2025) argues that scholars have misinterpreted the Italians as conservative, antidemocratic figures who championed the equation of democracy with representative practices to restrain popular participation in politics. Natasha Piano contends not only that the Italian School’s thought has been distorted but also that theorists have ignored its main objective: to contain demagogues and plutocrats who prey on the cynicism of the masses. We ought to view these thinkers not as elite theorists of democracy but as democratic theorists of elitism.

The Italian School’s original writings do not reject electoral politics; they emphasize the power and promise of democracy beyond the ballot. Elections undoubtedly are an essential component of functioning democracies, but in order to preserve their legitimacy we must understand their true capacities and limitations. It is past time to dispel the delusion that we need only elections to solve political crises, or else mass publics, dissatisfied with the status quo, will fall deeper into the arms of authoritarians who capture and pervert formal democratic institutions to serve their own ends.

Natasha Piano is an Assistant Professor of Political Theory in the Department of Political Science at UCLA. She specializes in democratic theory and the history of political thought, focusing on the realist and empirical traditions in political science and Italian political theory

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Do competitive elections secure democracy, or might they undermine it by breeding popular disillusionment with liberal norms and procedures? The so-called Italian School of Elitism, comprising Vilfredo Pareto, Gaetano Mosca, and Robert Michels, voiced this very concern. They feared that defining democracy exclusively through representative practices creates unrealistic expectations of what elections can achieve, generating mass demoralization and disillusionment with popular government.

The Italian School’s concern has gone unheeded, even as their elite theory has been foundational for political science in the United States. Democratic Elitism: The Founding Myth of American Political Science (Harvard UP, 2025) argues that scholars have misinterpreted the Italians as conservative, antidemocratic figures who championed the equation of democracy with representative practices to restrain popular participation in politics. Natasha Piano contends not only that the Italian School’s thought has been distorted but also that theorists have ignored its main objective: to contain demagogues and plutocrats who prey on the cynicism of the masses. We ought to view these thinkers not as elite theorists of democracy but as democratic theorists of elitism.

The Italian School’s original writings do not reject electoral politics; they emphasize the power and promise of democracy beyond the ballot. Elections undoubtedly are an essential component of functioning democracies, but in order to preserve their legitimacy we must understand their true capacities and limitations. It is past time to dispel the delusion that we need only elections to solve political crises, or else mass publics, dissatisfied with the status quo, will fall deeper into the arms of authoritarians who capture and pervert formal democratic institutions to serve their own ends.

Natasha Piano is an Assistant Professor of Political Theory in the Department of Political Science at UCLA. She specializes in democratic theory and the history of political thought, focusing on the realist and empirical traditions in political science and Italian political theory

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>741</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">703e2b1c-b5c6-11f0-8d28-bbe63f222691</guid>
      <title>Nancy Neiman, &quot;Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures&quot; (Routledge, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A series of market-related crises over the past two decades – financial, environmental, health, education, poverty – reinvigorated the debate about markets and social justice. Since then, counter-hegemonic movements all over the globe are attempting to redefine markets and the meaning of economic enterprise in people’s daily lives. Assessments of market outcomes tend toward the polemical, with capitalists and socialists, globalization advocates and anti-globalization movements, those on the political right and those on the left, all facing off to argue the benefits or harms brought about by markets. Yet not enough attention has been paid to analyzing the conditions under which markets result in just outcomes. </p>
<p><em>Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures</em> (Routledge, 2020) explores how culture, politics, and ideology help shape market incentives in an attempt to reclaim the language of economic rationality and the policymaking legitimacy that accompanies it. Through a variety of case studies – labor relations in the U.S. meatpacking industry, the globalization process in Juaìrez, Mexico, financial reform in Cuba, and an interfaith Ugandan coffee cooperative – this book provides a framework for understanding the conditions under which markets promote just or unjust outcomes (e.g., discrimination, income inequality, environmental degradation, or racial justice, human rights, and equitable growth). </p>
<p>This book touches on subject matter as varied as food, religion, banking, and race and gender equality, from a multi-disciplinary perspective. It offers an analysis of markets based on community rather than pure individualism that has the potential to change the way we think about economic rationality. An accessible and compelling read, this book will appeal to students and scholars in political science, economics, sociology, geography, gender studies, critical race studies, environmental studies, and all those interested in the critique of mainstream economics and neoliberal logic.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A series of market-related crises over the past two decades – financial, environmental, health, education, poverty – reinvigorated the debate about markets and social justice. Since then, counter-hegemonic movements all over the globe are attempting to redefine markets and the meaning of economic enterprise in people’s daily lives. Assessments of market outcomes tend toward the polemical, with capitalists and socialists, globalization advocates and anti-globalization movements, those on the political right and those on the left, all facing off to argue the benefits or harms brought about by markets. Yet not enough attention has been paid to analyzing the conditions under which markets result in just outcomes. </p>
<p><em>Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures</em> (Routledge, 2020) explores how culture, politics, and ideology help shape market incentives in an attempt to reclaim the language of economic rationality and the policymaking legitimacy that accompanies it. Through a variety of case studies – labor relations in the U.S. meatpacking industry, the globalization process in Juaìrez, Mexico, financial reform in Cuba, and an interfaith Ugandan coffee cooperative – this book provides a framework for understanding the conditions under which markets promote just or unjust outcomes (e.g., discrimination, income inequality, environmental degradation, or racial justice, human rights, and equitable growth). </p>
<p>This book touches on subject matter as varied as food, religion, banking, and race and gender equality, from a multi-disciplinary perspective. It offers an analysis of markets based on community rather than pure individualism that has the potential to change the way we think about economic rationality. An accessible and compelling read, this book will appeal to students and scholars in political science, economics, sociology, geography, gender studies, critical race studies, environmental studies, and all those interested in the critique of mainstream economics and neoliberal logic.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71624596" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/12221d79-1f50-4145-8cf8-bd976ed91a35/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=12221d79-1f50-4145-8cf8-bd976ed91a35&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nancy Neiman, &quot;Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures&quot; (Routledge, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A series of market-related crises over the past two decades – financial, environmental, health, education, poverty – reinvigorated the debate about markets and social justice. Since then, counter-hegemonic movements all over the globe are attempting to redefine markets and the meaning of economic enterprise in people’s daily lives. Assessments of market outcomes tend toward the polemical, with capitalists and socialists, globalization advocates and anti-globalization movements, those on the political right and those on the left, all facing off to argue the benefits or harms brought about by markets. Yet not enough attention has been paid to analyzing the conditions under which markets result in just outcomes. 

Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures (Routledge, 2020) explores how culture, politics, and ideology help shape market incentives in an attempt to reclaim the language of economic rationality and the policymaking legitimacy that accompanies it. Through a variety of case studies – labor relations in the U.S. meatpacking industry, the globalization process in Juaìrez, Mexico, financial reform in Cuba, and an interfaith Ugandan coffee cooperative – this book provides a framework for understanding the conditions under which markets promote just or unjust outcomes (e.g., discrimination, income inequality, environmental degradation, or racial justice, human rights, and equitable growth). 

This book touches on subject matter as varied as food, religion, banking, and race and gender equality, from a multi-disciplinary perspective. It offers an analysis of markets based on community rather than pure individualism that has the potential to change the way we think about economic rationality. An accessible and compelling read, this book will appeal to students and scholars in political science, economics, sociology, geography, gender studies, critical race studies, environmental studies, and all those interested in the critique of mainstream economics and neoliberal logic.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A series of market-related crises over the past two decades – financial, environmental, health, education, poverty – reinvigorated the debate about markets and social justice. Since then, counter-hegemonic movements all over the globe are attempting to redefine markets and the meaning of economic enterprise in people’s daily lives. Assessments of market outcomes tend toward the polemical, with capitalists and socialists, globalization advocates and anti-globalization movements, those on the political right and those on the left, all facing off to argue the benefits or harms brought about by markets. Yet not enough attention has been paid to analyzing the conditions under which markets result in just outcomes. 

Markets, Community and Just Infrastructures (Routledge, 2020) explores how culture, politics, and ideology help shape market incentives in an attempt to reclaim the language of economic rationality and the policymaking legitimacy that accompanies it. Through a variety of case studies – labor relations in the U.S. meatpacking industry, the globalization process in Juaìrez, Mexico, financial reform in Cuba, and an interfaith Ugandan coffee cooperative – this book provides a framework for understanding the conditions under which markets promote just or unjust outcomes (e.g., discrimination, income inequality, environmental degradation, or racial justice, human rights, and equitable growth). 

This book touches on subject matter as varied as food, religion, banking, and race and gender equality, from a multi-disciplinary perspective. It offers an analysis of markets based on community rather than pure individualism that has the potential to change the way we think about economic rationality. An accessible and compelling read, this book will appeal to students and scholars in political science, economics, sociology, geography, gender studies, critical race studies, environmental studies, and all those interested in the critique of mainstream economics and neoliberal logic.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c031404-b4ef-11f0-a963-03e44dbab437</guid>
      <title>Tamar Mitts, &quot;Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. <em>Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.<br />Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.<br />Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, <em>Safe Havens for Hate</em> sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. <em>Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism</em> (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.<br />Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.<br />Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, <em>Safe Havens for Hate</em> sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42704438" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a7eee98e-492f-4492-8d75-21b9951f9ef9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a7eee98e-492f-4492-8d75-21b9951f9ef9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tamar Mitts, &quot;Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, Safe Havens for Hate sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, Safe Havens for Hate sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>403</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c4d86e54-b476-11f0-b0a9-9b64df863ad3</guid>
      <title>Elif Kalaycioglu, &quot;The Politics of World Heritage: Visions, Custodians, and Futures of Humanity&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does it take to construct humanity's cultural history and what do these efforts produce in the world? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-world-heritage-visions-custodians-and-futures-of-humanity-assistant-professor-of-political-science-elif-kalaycioglu/776267d6d1565afe?ean=9780198912767&amp;next=t">The Politics of World Heritage</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025), Elif Kalaycioglu analyzes UNESCO's flagship regime, which seeks to curate a cultural history of humanity, attached to "outstanding universal value" and tethered to goals of peace and solidarity. Kalaycioglu's analysis tracks that construction across fifty years of the regime and maps it onto three distinct visions: humanity as a rarified transhistorical subject, humanity as a diverse subject, and humanity as a subject that is adequately represented by the community of nation states. In each of these constructions, experts and states take up the cultural and historical resources that circulate within the regime to narrate a humanity into being, and position themselves as its adjudicators, contributors and custodians. Each construction comes with remainders, that is, parts of humanity excluded from this cultural history, and internal hierarchies between those at its center and others that remain on the margins.<br />These hierarchies challenge the aspiration to peace and solidarity. While these aspirations have changed across the three iterations of humanity, across the different forms, the regime's structures and participants have been ill-equipped and hesitant to engage with the underbellies of humanity towards robust visions of peace and solidarity. In contrast to this general tendency, Kalaycioglu excavates from select nomination files nested constructions of humanity that hold onto the globality and unevenness of its political conditions and presents the possibility of robust visions of peace and solidarity, and humanity's different futures.</p>
<p>Elif Kalaycioglu is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at The University of Alabama.</p>
<p><a href="https://jenhoyer.info/">Jen Hoyer</a> is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at<a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/"> CUNY New York City College of Technology</a>. She is co-author of<a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/"> <em>What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a> (2022) and<a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/"> <em>The Social Movement Archive</em></a> (2021)<em>, </em>and co-editor of <a href="https://www.commonnotions.org/buy/armed-by-design"><em>Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America</em></a> (2025)<em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it take to construct humanity's cultural history and what do these efforts produce in the world? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-world-heritage-visions-custodians-and-futures-of-humanity-assistant-professor-of-political-science-elif-kalaycioglu/776267d6d1565afe?ean=9780198912767&amp;next=t">The Politics of World Heritage</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025), Elif Kalaycioglu analyzes UNESCO's flagship regime, which seeks to curate a cultural history of humanity, attached to "outstanding universal value" and tethered to goals of peace and solidarity. Kalaycioglu's analysis tracks that construction across fifty years of the regime and maps it onto three distinct visions: humanity as a rarified transhistorical subject, humanity as a diverse subject, and humanity as a subject that is adequately represented by the community of nation states. In each of these constructions, experts and states take up the cultural and historical resources that circulate within the regime to narrate a humanity into being, and position themselves as its adjudicators, contributors and custodians. Each construction comes with remainders, that is, parts of humanity excluded from this cultural history, and internal hierarchies between those at its center and others that remain on the margins.<br />These hierarchies challenge the aspiration to peace and solidarity. While these aspirations have changed across the three iterations of humanity, across the different forms, the regime's structures and participants have been ill-equipped and hesitant to engage with the underbellies of humanity towards robust visions of peace and solidarity. In contrast to this general tendency, Kalaycioglu excavates from select nomination files nested constructions of humanity that hold onto the globality and unevenness of its political conditions and presents the possibility of robust visions of peace and solidarity, and humanity's different futures.</p>
<p>Elif Kalaycioglu is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at The University of Alabama.</p>
<p><a href="https://jenhoyer.info/">Jen Hoyer</a> is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at<a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/"> CUNY New York City College of Technology</a>. She is co-author of<a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/"> <em>What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a> (2022) and<a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/"> <em>The Social Movement Archive</em></a> (2021)<em>, </em>and co-editor of <a href="https://www.commonnotions.org/buy/armed-by-design"><em>Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America</em></a> (2025)<em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52372915" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/39bd677d-fc00-4a95-8c75-9fce6a743014/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=39bd677d-fc00-4a95-8c75-9fce6a743014&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elif Kalaycioglu, &quot;The Politics of World Heritage: Visions, Custodians, and Futures of Humanity&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it take to construct humanity&apos;s cultural history and what do these efforts produce in the world? In The Politics of World Heritage (Oxford UP, 2025), Elif Kalaycioglu analyzes UNESCO&apos;s flagship regime, which seeks to curate a cultural history of humanity, attached to &quot;outstanding universal value&quot; and tethered to goals of peace and solidarity. Kalaycioglu&apos;s analysis tracks that construction across fifty years of the regime and maps it onto three distinct visions: humanity as a rarified transhistorical subject, humanity as a diverse subject, and humanity as a subject that is adequately represented by the community of nation states. In each of these constructions, experts and states take up the cultural and historical resources that circulate within the regime to narrate a humanity into being, and position themselves as its adjudicators, contributors and custodians. Each construction comes with remainders, that is, parts of humanity excluded from this cultural history, and internal hierarchies between those at its center and others that remain on the margins.These hierarchies challenge the aspiration to peace and solidarity. While these aspirations have changed across the three iterations of humanity, across the different forms, the regime&apos;s structures and participants have been ill-equipped and hesitant to engage with the underbellies of humanity towards robust visions of peace and solidarity. In contrast to this general tendency, Kalaycioglu excavates from select nomination files nested constructions of humanity that hold onto the globality and unevenness of its political conditions and presents the possibility of robust visions of peace and solidarity, and humanity&apos;s different futures.

Elif Kalaycioglu is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at The University of Alabama.

Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom (2022) and The Social Movement Archive (2021), and co-editor of Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (2025).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it take to construct humanity&apos;s cultural history and what do these efforts produce in the world? In The Politics of World Heritage (Oxford UP, 2025), Elif Kalaycioglu analyzes UNESCO&apos;s flagship regime, which seeks to curate a cultural history of humanity, attached to &quot;outstanding universal value&quot; and tethered to goals of peace and solidarity. Kalaycioglu&apos;s analysis tracks that construction across fifty years of the regime and maps it onto three distinct visions: humanity as a rarified transhistorical subject, humanity as a diverse subject, and humanity as a subject that is adequately represented by the community of nation states. In each of these constructions, experts and states take up the cultural and historical resources that circulate within the regime to narrate a humanity into being, and position themselves as its adjudicators, contributors and custodians. Each construction comes with remainders, that is, parts of humanity excluded from this cultural history, and internal hierarchies between those at its center and others that remain on the margins.These hierarchies challenge the aspiration to peace and solidarity. While these aspirations have changed across the three iterations of humanity, across the different forms, the regime&apos;s structures and participants have been ill-equipped and hesitant to engage with the underbellies of humanity towards robust visions of peace and solidarity. In contrast to this general tendency, Kalaycioglu excavates from select nomination files nested constructions of humanity that hold onto the globality and unevenness of its political conditions and presents the possibility of robust visions of peace and solidarity, and humanity&apos;s different futures.

Elif Kalaycioglu is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science at The University of Alabama.

Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom (2022) and The Social Movement Archive (2021), and co-editor of Armed By Design: Posters and Publications of Cuba’s Organization of Solidarity of the Peoples of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (2025).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>738</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df5def1a-b363-11f0-a963-a3c4843a3147</guid>
      <title>Democratic Dialogues: Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy</em></p>
<p><u><strong>About the Podcast</strong></u></p>
<p>Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.</p>
<p><u><em>Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p>
<p><u><em><strong>Episode 1</strong></em></u></p>
<p><strong>Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</strong></p>
<p>This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.</p>
<p>Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.</p>
<p><u><strong>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</strong></u></p>
<ul>
  <li>“<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162251319909">Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</a>,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/jennifer-mccoy?lang=en">Jennifer McCoy</a> &amp; <a href="https://www.ozyegin.edu.tr/en/faculty/muratsomer">Murat Somer</a>, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/kenneth-roberts">Kenneth Roberts</a>, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Upcoming Episodes</strong></u></p>
<p>Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.</p>
<p><u><em>Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month</em></u>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy</em></p>
<p><u><strong>About the Podcast</strong></u></p>
<p>Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.</p>
<p><u><em>Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.</em></u></p>
<p><u><em><strong>Episode 1</strong></em></u></p>
<p><strong>Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</strong></p>
<p>This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.</p>
<p>Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.</p>
<p><u><strong>Books, Links, &amp; Articles</strong></u></p>
<ul>
  <li>“<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162251319909">Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</a>,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/jennifer-mccoy?lang=en">Jennifer McCoy</a> &amp; <a href="https://www.ozyegin.edu.tr/en/faculty/muratsomer">Murat Somer</a>, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/kenneth-roberts">Kenneth Roberts</a>, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a>, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Upcoming Episodes</strong></u></p>
<p>Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.</p>
<p><u><em>Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month</em></u>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37831743" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b802bb59-164c-406c-ac72-3d473bc28f4e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b802bb59-164c-406c-ac72-3d473bc28f4e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democratic Dialogues: Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/b802bb59-164c-406c-ac72-3d473bc28f4e/3000x3000/5c2830b69912313f375a47794b1a4527.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy

About the Podcast

Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.

Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Episode 1

Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries

This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles


  “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)

  
Jennifer McCoy &amp; Murat Somer, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact

  
Kenneth Roberts, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left

  
Rachel Beatty Riedl, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa


Upcoming Episodes

Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.

Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A podcast from Cornell University’s Brooks School of Public Policy Center on Global Democracy

About the Podcast

Each week, co-hosts Rachel Beatty Riedl and Esam Boraey bring together leading scholars, policymakers, and practitioners to explore the challenges and possibilities facing democracy around the world. Produced by Cornell’s Center on Global Democracy, Democratic Dialogues bridges academic research with real-world debates — from democratic backsliding and authoritarian resurgence to civic resistance, renewal, and reform. We look at new books, groundbreaking articles, and the ideas reshaping how we understand and practice democracy today.

Listen on YouTube, NBN, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Episode 1

Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries

This week, we feature an episode with Kenneth Roberts, Jennifer McCoy, and Murat Somer, joining co-hosts Rachel Riedl and Esam Boraey to discuss their collaborative article, “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” recently published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Together, they unpack how democracies don’t collapse overnight, but instead erode through different pathways — from executive aggrandizement to elite collusion — and how societies can resist or even partially recover. The conversation examines how these dynamics unfold in contexts as varied as Latin America, Turkey, Hungary, and the United States, and what practical lessons citizens and policymakers can draw today. This is an essential conversation for understanding how democracies falter, and how collective action, civic mobilization, and institutional renewal can push them back from the brink.

Books, Links, &amp; Articles


  “Pathways of Democratic Backsliding, Resistance, and (Partial) Recoveries,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2025)

  
Jennifer McCoy &amp; Murat Somer, Pernicious Polarization and Its Global Impact

  
Kenneth Roberts, Populism, Political Mobilization, and the Latin American Left

  
Rachel Beatty Riedl, Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Institutions in Africa


Upcoming Episodes

Our next episode features Susan C. Stokes (University of Chicago) discussing her book The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies. Stay tuned for an in-depth conversation on why democratic leaders sometimes turn against the institutions that empower them — and what can be done to safeguard democracy in an era of uncertainty.

Subscribe and follow us on YouTube and social media for new releases every month.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>737</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8763afa-b2a0-11f0-964a-130fc22d6e5c</guid>
      <title>Kate Epstein on How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode I sit down with Kate Epstein, an associate professor of history at Rutgers University-Camden, as she details her research on the intersection of defense contracting, intellectual property, and government secrecy in Great Britain and the United States. We talk about her process in researching and writing her latest book <em>Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State</em> and how breaking the law, historically speaking, has been important for the emergence of new technologies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode I sit down with Kate Epstein, an associate professor of history at Rutgers University-Camden, as she details her research on the intersection of defense contracting, intellectual property, and government secrecy in Great Britain and the United States. We talk about her process in researching and writing her latest book <em>Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State</em> and how breaking the law, historically speaking, has been important for the emergence of new technologies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="85205549" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9cc4e6ea-e744-4a62-b019-5e0525ddcdbc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9cc4e6ea-e744-4a62-b019-5e0525ddcdbc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kate Epstein on How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode I sit down with Kate Epstein, an associate professor of history at Rutgers University-Camden, as she details her research on the intersection of defense contracting, intellectual property, and government secrecy in Great Britain and the United States. We talk about her process in researching and writing her latest book Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State and how breaking the law, historically speaking, has been important for the emergence of new technologies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode I sit down with Kate Epstein, an associate professor of history at Rutgers University-Camden, as she details her research on the intersection of defense contracting, intellectual property, and government secrecy in Great Britain and the United States. We talk about her process in researching and writing her latest book Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National-Security State and how breaking the law, historically speaking, has been important for the emergence of new technologies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b9bff3e-b277-11f0-bc18-a7fd197d2772</guid>
      <title>Garrett Hardin’s Tragic Environmentalism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An ecologist in California claimed that the iron laws of nature locked humanity into destroying our environment. This meant that we must take drastic measures to rein in unfettered capitalism and the American habit of overconsumption, lest we deplete our common resources. That argument made Garrett Hardin one of the most influential and celebrated environmentalists to ever live. Yet, he had a tragic view of the world that turned his green dream into a green nightmare.</p>
<p>This is the final episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> RSS</a>).</p>
<p>There were a number of works that we pulled from to help us understand this story. If you want to learn more about conservative ecological thought, the population panic, and related themes, we recommend that you read: by Richard Hames and Alex Roberts, <a href="https://www.thetedkarchive.com/library/sam-moore-alex-roberts-the-rise-of-ecofascism-climate-change-and-the-far-right"><em>The Rise of Eco-Fascism: Climate Change and the Far Right</em></a>; from Jason Oakes, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160932716300977?via%3Dihub"><em>Garret Hardin’s Tragic Sense of Life</em></a>, a short article on the the ecological models that influenced Hardin; and finally, Thomas Robertson’s excellent survey of the population panic of the mid-60s to late-70s, <a href="https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/the-malthusian-moment/9780813552729/"><em>The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ecologist in California claimed that the iron laws of nature locked humanity into destroying our environment. This meant that we must take drastic measures to rein in unfettered capitalism and the American habit of overconsumption, lest we deplete our common resources. That argument made Garrett Hardin one of the most influential and celebrated environmentalists to ever live. Yet, he had a tragic view of the world that turned his green dream into a green nightmare.</p>
<p>This is the final episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> RSS</a>).</p>
<p>There were a number of works that we pulled from to help us understand this story. If you want to learn more about conservative ecological thought, the population panic, and related themes, we recommend that you read: by Richard Hames and Alex Roberts, <a href="https://www.thetedkarchive.com/library/sam-moore-alex-roberts-the-rise-of-ecofascism-climate-change-and-the-far-right"><em>The Rise of Eco-Fascism: Climate Change and the Far Right</em></a>; from Jason Oakes, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160932716300977?via%3Dihub"><em>Garret Hardin’s Tragic Sense of Life</em></a>, a short article on the the ecological models that influenced Hardin; and finally, Thomas Robertson’s excellent survey of the population panic of the mid-60s to late-70s, <a href="https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/the-malthusian-moment/9780813552729/"><em>The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68844021" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9f09d9fe-92b4-48a3-9713-b4017636c94a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9f09d9fe-92b4-48a3-9713-b4017636c94a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Garrett Hardin’s Tragic Environmentalism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An ecologist in California claimed that the iron laws of nature locked humanity into destroying our environment. This meant that we must take drastic measures to rein in unfettered capitalism and the American habit of overconsumption, lest we deplete our common resources. That argument made Garrett Hardin one of the most influential and celebrated environmentalists to ever live. Yet, he had a tragic view of the world that turned his green dream into a green nightmare.

This is the final episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).

There were a number of works that we pulled from to help us understand this story. If you want to learn more about conservative ecological thought, the population panic, and related themes, we recommend that you read: by Richard Hames and Alex Roberts, The Rise of Eco-Fascism: Climate Change and the Far Right; from Jason Oakes, Garret Hardin’s Tragic Sense of Life, a short article on the the ecological models that influenced Hardin; and finally, Thomas Robertson’s excellent survey of the population panic of the mid-60s to late-70s, The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An ecologist in California claimed that the iron laws of nature locked humanity into destroying our environment. This meant that we must take drastic measures to rein in unfettered capitalism and the American habit of overconsumption, lest we deplete our common resources. That argument made Garrett Hardin one of the most influential and celebrated environmentalists to ever live. Yet, he had a tragic view of the world that turned his green dream into a green nightmare.

This is the final episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).

There were a number of works that we pulled from to help us understand this story. If you want to learn more about conservative ecological thought, the population panic, and related themes, we recommend that you read: by Richard Hames and Alex Roberts, The Rise of Eco-Fascism: Climate Change and the Far Right; from Jason Oakes, Garret Hardin’s Tragic Sense of Life, a short article on the the ecological models that influenced Hardin; and finally, Thomas Robertson’s excellent survey of the population panic of the mid-60s to late-70s, The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>735</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71130576-b107-11f0-9273-57e801fdfda8</guid>
      <title>Michael Lazarus, &quot;Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx by Michael Lazarus</p>
<p>Karl Marx gave us not just a critique of the political economy of capital but a way of confronting the impoverished ethical quality of life we face under capitalism. Interpreting Marx anew as an ethical thinker, <em>Absolute Ethical Life</em> provides crucial resources for understanding how freedom and rational agency are impacted by a social world formed by value under capitalism, with consequences for philosophy today.</p>
<p>Michael Lazarus situates Marx within a shared tradition of ethical inquiry, placing him in close dialogue with Aristotle and Hegel. Lazarus traces the ethical and political dimensions of Marx's work missed by Hannah Arendt and Alasdair MacIntyre, two of the most profound critics of modern politics and ethics. Ultimately, the book claims that Marx's value-form theory is both a continuation of Aristotelian and Hegelian themes and at the same time his most distinctive theoretical achievement.</p>
<p>In this normative interpretation of Marx, Lazarus integrates recent moral philosophy with a historically specific analysis of capitalism as a social form of life. He challenges contemporary political and economic theory to insist that any conception of modern life needs to account for capitalism. With a robust critique of capitalism derived from the determinations of what Marx calls the "form of value," Lazarus argues for an ethical life beyond capital.</p>
<p>Michael Lazarus is a Lecturer in Political Theory in the Department of Political Economy. Before coming to King’s College London, he was Deakin University Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Alfred Deakin Institute and a visiting Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx by Michael Lazarus</p>
<p>Karl Marx gave us not just a critique of the political economy of capital but a way of confronting the impoverished ethical quality of life we face under capitalism. Interpreting Marx anew as an ethical thinker, <em>Absolute Ethical Life</em> provides crucial resources for understanding how freedom and rational agency are impacted by a social world formed by value under capitalism, with consequences for philosophy today.</p>
<p>Michael Lazarus situates Marx within a shared tradition of ethical inquiry, placing him in close dialogue with Aristotle and Hegel. Lazarus traces the ethical and political dimensions of Marx's work missed by Hannah Arendt and Alasdair MacIntyre, two of the most profound critics of modern politics and ethics. Ultimately, the book claims that Marx's value-form theory is both a continuation of Aristotelian and Hegelian themes and at the same time his most distinctive theoretical achievement.</p>
<p>In this normative interpretation of Marx, Lazarus integrates recent moral philosophy with a historically specific analysis of capitalism as a social form of life. He challenges contemporary political and economic theory to insist that any conception of modern life needs to account for capitalism. With a robust critique of capitalism derived from the determinations of what Marx calls the "form of value," Lazarus argues for an ethical life beyond capital.</p>
<p>Michael Lazarus is a Lecturer in Political Theory in the Department of Political Economy. Before coming to King’s College London, he was Deakin University Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Alfred Deakin Institute and a visiting Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60776237" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/58e5b31f-5135-444e-885f-01dfb9cebf0f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=58e5b31f-5135-444e-885f-01dfb9cebf0f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Lazarus, &quot;Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx by Michael Lazarus

Karl Marx gave us not just a critique of the political economy of capital but a way of confronting the impoverished ethical quality of life we face under capitalism. Interpreting Marx anew as an ethical thinker, Absolute Ethical Life provides crucial resources for understanding how freedom and rational agency are impacted by a social world formed by value under capitalism, with consequences for philosophy today.

Michael Lazarus situates Marx within a shared tradition of ethical inquiry, placing him in close dialogue with Aristotle and Hegel. Lazarus traces the ethical and political dimensions of Marx&apos;s work missed by Hannah Arendt and Alasdair MacIntyre, two of the most profound critics of modern politics and ethics. Ultimately, the book claims that Marx&apos;s value-form theory is both a continuation of Aristotelian and Hegelian themes and at the same time his most distinctive theoretical achievement.

In this normative interpretation of Marx, Lazarus integrates recent moral philosophy with a historically specific analysis of capitalism as a social form of life. He challenges contemporary political and economic theory to insist that any conception of modern life needs to account for capitalism. With a robust critique of capitalism derived from the determinations of what Marx calls the &quot;form of value,&quot; Lazarus argues for an ethical life beyond capital.

Michael Lazarus is a Lecturer in Political Theory in the Department of Political Economy. Before coming to King’s College London, he was Deakin University Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Alfred Deakin Institute and a visiting Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Absolute Ethical Life: Aristotle, Hegel and Marx by Michael Lazarus

Karl Marx gave us not just a critique of the political economy of capital but a way of confronting the impoverished ethical quality of life we face under capitalism. Interpreting Marx anew as an ethical thinker, Absolute Ethical Life provides crucial resources for understanding how freedom and rational agency are impacted by a social world formed by value under capitalism, with consequences for philosophy today.

Michael Lazarus situates Marx within a shared tradition of ethical inquiry, placing him in close dialogue with Aristotle and Hegel. Lazarus traces the ethical and political dimensions of Marx&apos;s work missed by Hannah Arendt and Alasdair MacIntyre, two of the most profound critics of modern politics and ethics. Ultimately, the book claims that Marx&apos;s value-form theory is both a continuation of Aristotelian and Hegelian themes and at the same time his most distinctive theoretical achievement.

In this normative interpretation of Marx, Lazarus integrates recent moral philosophy with a historically specific analysis of capitalism as a social form of life. He challenges contemporary political and economic theory to insist that any conception of modern life needs to account for capitalism. With a robust critique of capitalism derived from the determinations of what Marx calls the &quot;form of value,&quot; Lazarus argues for an ethical life beyond capital.

Michael Lazarus is a Lecturer in Political Theory in the Department of Political Economy. Before coming to King’s College London, he was Deakin University Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Alfred Deakin Institute and a visiting Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>734</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca028920-afe7-11f0-b419-7fc82d41ccac</guid>
      <title>Hindutva and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo and leader of the Centre for South Asian Democracy.</p>
<p>M. Sudhir Selvaraj is Assistant Professor at the Department of Peace Studies and International Development at the University of Bradford.</p>
<p>Kathinka Frøystad is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo and leader of the Centre for South Asian Democracy.</p>
<p>M. Sudhir Selvaraj is Assistant Professor at the Department of Peace Studies and International Development at the University of Bradford.</p>
<p>Kathinka Frøystad is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19090873" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ee5c6657-cd50-467c-a24f-5d8699f99e8e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ee5c6657-cd50-467c-a24f-5d8699f99e8e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hindutva and Anti-Christian Violence in Contemporary India</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo and leader of the Centre for South Asian Democracy.

M. Sudhir Selvaraj is Assistant Professor at the Department of Peace Studies and International Development at the University of Bradford.

Kathinka Frøystad is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo and leader of the Centre for South Asian Democracy.

M. Sudhir Selvaraj is Assistant Professor at the Department of Peace Studies and International Development at the University of Bradford.

Kathinka Frøystad is Professor of South Asia Studies at the University of Oslo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>733</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e7a6a88-afe5-11f0-98a4-2b9b36e63256</guid>
      <title>Taru Salmenkari, &quot;Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Exploring the boundaries, fringes, and inner workings of civil society, Taru Salmenkari investigates local forms of political agency in China in light of the globalization of political values, practices, and institutions in ﻿<em>Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society</em> (Edward Elgar, 2025). She provides a theoretical framework for globalization, examining new forms of governance emerging with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and how these have reconfigured social power in China.<br />This topical book outlines how civil society has been promoted globally since the 1980s, as NGOs advance development cooperation, democratization, and neoliberal third-sector service production. Salmenkari studies the outcomes of these processes in China, where civil society promotion met strong localizing forces rising from NGO activists'' own values, governmental regulation, and local society. Evaluating various forms of Chinese self-organizing, she discusses the social omissions of Chinese environmental NGO agendas, Confucian ties in global translations, gay self-organizing, and the idea and practice of Minjian. The book identifies complexities within Chinese civil society and how it navigates academia, global partnerships, social exclusions and alternative values, analyzing how these conflicting positions influence Chinese politics and society.</p>
<p>Taru Salmenkari is senior research at the University of Helsinki.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exploring the boundaries, fringes, and inner workings of civil society, Taru Salmenkari investigates local forms of political agency in China in light of the globalization of political values, practices, and institutions in ﻿<em>Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society</em> (Edward Elgar, 2025). She provides a theoretical framework for globalization, examining new forms of governance emerging with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and how these have reconfigured social power in China.<br />This topical book outlines how civil society has been promoted globally since the 1980s, as NGOs advance development cooperation, democratization, and neoliberal third-sector service production. Salmenkari studies the outcomes of these processes in China, where civil society promotion met strong localizing forces rising from NGO activists'' own values, governmental regulation, and local society. Evaluating various forms of Chinese self-organizing, she discusses the social omissions of Chinese environmental NGO agendas, Confucian ties in global translations, gay self-organizing, and the idea and practice of Minjian. The book identifies complexities within Chinese civil society and how it navigates academia, global partnerships, social exclusions and alternative values, analyzing how these conflicting positions influence Chinese politics and society.</p>
<p>Taru Salmenkari is senior research at the University of Helsinki.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41783051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/87ff8570-4c44-432d-9189-837fc7b4c1ea/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=87ff8570-4c44-432d-9189-837fc7b4c1ea&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Taru Salmenkari, &quot;Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Exploring the boundaries, fringes, and inner workings of civil society, Taru Salmenkari investigates local forms of political agency in China in light of the globalization of political values, practices, and institutions in ﻿Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society (Edward Elgar, 2025). She provides a theoretical framework for globalization, examining new forms of governance emerging with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and how these have reconfigured social power in China.This topical book outlines how civil society has been promoted globally since the 1980s, as NGOs advance development cooperation, democratization, and neoliberal third-sector service production. Salmenkari studies the outcomes of these processes in China, where civil society promotion met strong localizing forces rising from NGO activists&apos;&apos; own values, governmental regulation, and local society. Evaluating various forms of Chinese self-organizing, she discusses the social omissions of Chinese environmental NGO agendas, Confucian ties in global translations, gay self-organizing, and the idea and practice of Minjian. The book identifies complexities within Chinese civil society and how it navigates academia, global partnerships, social exclusions and alternative values, analyzing how these conflicting positions influence Chinese politics and society.

Taru Salmenkari is senior research at the University of Helsinki.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Exploring the boundaries, fringes, and inner workings of civil society, Taru Salmenkari investigates local forms of political agency in China in light of the globalization of political values, practices, and institutions in ﻿Global Ideas, Local Adaptations: Chinese Activism and the Will to Make Civil Society (Edward Elgar, 2025). She provides a theoretical framework for globalization, examining new forms of governance emerging with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and how these have reconfigured social power in China.This topical book outlines how civil society has been promoted globally since the 1980s, as NGOs advance development cooperation, democratization, and neoliberal third-sector service production. Salmenkari studies the outcomes of these processes in China, where civil society promotion met strong localizing forces rising from NGO activists&apos;&apos; own values, governmental regulation, and local society. Evaluating various forms of Chinese self-organizing, she discusses the social omissions of Chinese environmental NGO agendas, Confucian ties in global translations, gay self-organizing, and the idea and practice of Minjian. The book identifies complexities within Chinese civil society and how it navigates academia, global partnerships, social exclusions and alternative values, analyzing how these conflicting positions influence Chinese politics and society.

Taru Salmenkari is senior research at the University of Helsinki.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>732</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e03eb636-aec1-11f0-8788-e32e0729371f</guid>
      <title>Nathan E. Sanders and Bruce Schneier, &quot;Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.<br />AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.<br />In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049948">Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship</a><em> </em>(MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.<br />The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.<br />Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.<br />Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.</p>
<p>Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.<br />AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.<br />In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049948">Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship</a><em> </em>(MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.<br />The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.<br />Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.<br />Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.</p>
<p>Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42012331" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9ca4e8c3-8306-4ec3-84b9-7b009da2d8b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9ca4e8c3-8306-4ec3-84b9-7b009da2d8b4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nathan E. Sanders and Bruce Schneier, &quot;Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship (MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.

Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship (MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.

Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>731</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">91585fb8-aefd-11f0-8498-970f082aba77</guid>
      <title>Matthew D. Nelsen, &quot;The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685655"><em>The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/46685"><em>The Color of Civics</em></a> pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.</p>
<p>This book may be acquired at <a href="https://www.booksandbooks.com/">Books and Books</a> in Miami, Florida, at the <a href="https://www.semcoop.com/">Seminary Co-op</a> Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at <a href="https://womenandchildrenfirst.com/">Women &amp; Children First</a> Bookstore in Chicago, IL.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage </a><em>and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of</em> <a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685655"><em>The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/46685"><em>The Color of Civics</em></a> pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.</p>
<p>This book may be acquired at <a href="https://www.booksandbooks.com/">Books and Books</a> in Miami, Florida, at the <a href="https://www.semcoop.com/">Seminary Co-op</a> Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at <a href="https://womenandchildrenfirst.com/">Women &amp; Children First</a> Bookstore in Chicago, IL.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/">The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage </a><em>and </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/"><em>Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em> (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of</em> <a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42783202" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9dafa662-9419-40bb-9544-cb2dd8d13591/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9dafa662-9419-40bb-9544-cb2dd8d13591&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew D. Nelsen, &quot;The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.

The Color of Civics pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.

This book may be acquired at Books and Books in Miami, Florida, at the Seminary Co-op Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at Women &amp; Children First Bookstore in Chicago, IL.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage and Volume II: Into the Multiverse (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matthew D. Nelsen, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, has a new book out that focuses on the content of civic education in the United States, and how we learn about the diverse and varied history of the United States. There is an ongoing and contemporary conversation about civic education in the United States, and what should and should not be taught in explaining the United States, how it works, who is part of it, and how it has evolved over four centuries. Nelsen’s work, The Color of Civics: Civic Education for a Multiracial Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023), pays close attention to what happens in classrooms, particularly urban classrooms, when these lessons are taught, and how students respond to these curricula and experiences. What he finds should be of interest to all of us, since it gets to the very heart of civic education, which is how to teach young people about being citizens in a democracy. Nelsen poses these broader questions throughout the book: Who is learning what? What is the general social studies curriculum that discusses “how a bill becomes a law” and the basic information about separation of powers and checks and balances? How is this curriculum, which is both somewhat abstract and also an idealized version of the American political system, taught, and how is it engaged by students? Nelsen found a variety of answers, but what is of particular interest is that there are teachers and instructors who have taken this somewhat static curriculum, and integrated different dimensions to it, engaging students in understandings of social movements, highlighting activities by a number of different political leaders, from both mainstream and marginalized groups. When the education becomes more multifaceted, it pulls in more students, and allows them to see themselves in these activities, even in leadership roles. And it also is more encompassing for all of the students in the classroom, regardless of race or other identity groupings.

The Color of Civics pulls together a variety of forms and kinds of research methodology to understand what happens in classrooms and how students learn and see themselves within this fabric of American democracy. Using qualitative, quantitative, and ethnographic approaches, Nelsen weaves together robust data to explore what makes diverse impacts within the classrooms, especially within a big, urban public school system. Part of what is teased out in this research is the potential longevity of political socialization that transpires at an early age among students—this is a key dimension of citizenship, creating in individuals an understanding of their role and capacities within a democracy. The ability to teach about social movements, and political movements, and the individuals who were involved in these movements expands the concept of citizen participation in American politics and thus expands the notion of citizenship in general. This approach also moves beyond the “great man” narrative of history and helps students to think about how various people engage in politics, not just by running for elected office. Nelsen’s work is important and useful as we continue to consider how citizens can and should participate in American politics and how the next generation is taught about citizenship, the American republic, and the idea of a complex democracy.

This book may be acquired at Books and Books in Miami, Florida, at the Seminary Co-op Bookstore in Chicago, IL, and at Women &amp; Children First Bookstore in Chicago, IL.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University, and co-host of the New Books in Political Science. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Sage and Volume II: Into the Multiverse (UP Kansas, 2022 &amp; 2025), as well as co-editor of Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (UP Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>730</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da279584-ae52-11f0-bbbc-a367bac8f0ab</guid>
      <title>Yong-Shik Lee, &quot;Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia&quot; (Anthem Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the long run, countries in Northeast Asia will have to see the need for collective defense. Otherwise, you won’t be able to stop rivalry between powers like the U.S. and China. It sounds utopian now, but so did the idea of French and German soldiers serving under the same command a century ago.<br />                                                                                                                                        – Y.S. Lee, <em>NBN Interview (2025)</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839983764">Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia</a> (Anthem Press, 2023) examines the enduring political and military tensions in one of the world’s most dynamic yet unstable regions, from China and the Korean Peninsula to Japan, Mongolia, and Russia’s Far East. Despite its economic vitality, Northeast Asia remains fraught with persistent risks of conflict including North Korea’s nuclear program, and the unresolved disputes over territory, history, and power imbalances fueled in part by China’s rise.</p>
<p>Y.S. Lee traces the political, historical, military, and economic forces behind these tensions and their global implications. Offering a comparative, country-by-country analysis, he also explores the influence of external powers such as the United States and Russia. The book assesses the prospects and consequences of Korean reunification and provides a fresh look at Mongolia’s often-overlooked role in regional stability, suggesting how imagination and diplomacy together might begin to rebuild trust across the region.</p>
<p>In this NBN interview, Professor Lee discusses how history, ideology, and institutional design intersect across the region – from the entanglement of North Korea’s <em>Juche</em> ideology with its nuclear ambitions to Japan’s struggle for reconciliation, and South Korea’s evolving identity as a middle power. He argues that sustainable peace requires economic, political, and even eventual military cooperation akin to Europe’s postwar transformation, which was once unthinkable, but ultimately necessary.</p>
<p>Yong-Shik Lee is Director of the Law and Development Institute and a leading scholar of international economic law and institutional reform. His previous works include <em>Law and Development: Theory and Practice</em> (2011; 2nd ed. 2021), <em>Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2016), and <em>Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis</em> (Edward Elgar, 3rd ed. 2014). His research bridges economic theory and policy design to advance inclusive development and peace.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the long run, countries in Northeast Asia will have to see the need for collective defense. Otherwise, you won’t be able to stop rivalry between powers like the U.S. and China. It sounds utopian now, but so did the idea of French and German soldiers serving under the same command a century ago.<br />                                                                                                                                        – Y.S. Lee, <em>NBN Interview (2025)</em></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839983764">Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia</a> (Anthem Press, 2023) examines the enduring political and military tensions in one of the world’s most dynamic yet unstable regions, from China and the Korean Peninsula to Japan, Mongolia, and Russia’s Far East. Despite its economic vitality, Northeast Asia remains fraught with persistent risks of conflict including North Korea’s nuclear program, and the unresolved disputes over territory, history, and power imbalances fueled in part by China’s rise.</p>
<p>Y.S. Lee traces the political, historical, military, and economic forces behind these tensions and their global implications. Offering a comparative, country-by-country analysis, he also explores the influence of external powers such as the United States and Russia. The book assesses the prospects and consequences of Korean reunification and provides a fresh look at Mongolia’s often-overlooked role in regional stability, suggesting how imagination and diplomacy together might begin to rebuild trust across the region.</p>
<p>In this NBN interview, Professor Lee discusses how history, ideology, and institutional design intersect across the region – from the entanglement of North Korea’s <em>Juche</em> ideology with its nuclear ambitions to Japan’s struggle for reconciliation, and South Korea’s evolving identity as a middle power. He argues that sustainable peace requires economic, political, and even eventual military cooperation akin to Europe’s postwar transformation, which was once unthinkable, but ultimately necessary.</p>
<p>Yong-Shik Lee is Director of the Law and Development Institute and a leading scholar of international economic law and institutional reform. His previous works include <em>Law and Development: Theory and Practice</em> (2011; 2nd ed. 2021), <em>Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2016), and <em>Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis</em> (Edward Elgar, 3rd ed. 2014). His research bridges economic theory and policy design to advance inclusive development and peace.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57475695" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f728c141-cc35-4740-8b6b-9de14ce6079a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f728c141-cc35-4740-8b6b-9de14ce6079a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yong-Shik Lee, &quot;Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia&quot; (Anthem Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the long run, countries in Northeast Asia will have to see the need for collective defense. Otherwise, you won’t be able to stop rivalry between powers like the U.S. and China. It sounds utopian now, but so did the idea of French and German soldiers serving under the same command a century ago.                                                                                                                                        – Y.S. Lee, NBN Interview (2025)

Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia (Anthem Press, 2023) examines the enduring political and military tensions in one of the world’s most dynamic yet unstable regions, from China and the Korean Peninsula to Japan, Mongolia, and Russia’s Far East. Despite its economic vitality, Northeast Asia remains fraught with persistent risks of conflict including North Korea’s nuclear program, and the unresolved disputes over territory, history, and power imbalances fueled in part by China’s rise.

Y.S. Lee traces the political, historical, military, and economic forces behind these tensions and their global implications. Offering a comparative, country-by-country analysis, he also explores the influence of external powers such as the United States and Russia. The book assesses the prospects and consequences of Korean reunification and provides a fresh look at Mongolia’s often-overlooked role in regional stability, suggesting how imagination and diplomacy together might begin to rebuild trust across the region.

In this NBN interview, Professor Lee discusses how history, ideology, and institutional design intersect across the region – from the entanglement of North Korea’s Juche ideology with its nuclear ambitions to Japan’s struggle for reconciliation, and South Korea’s evolving identity as a middle power. He argues that sustainable peace requires economic, political, and even eventual military cooperation akin to Europe’s postwar transformation, which was once unthinkable, but ultimately necessary.

Yong-Shik Lee is Director of the Law and Development Institute and a leading scholar of international economic law and institutional reform. His previous works include Law and Development: Theory and Practice (2011; 2nd ed. 2021), Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2016), and Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis (Edward Elgar, 3rd ed. 2014). His research bridges economic theory and policy design to advance inclusive development and peace.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the long run, countries in Northeast Asia will have to see the need for collective defense. Otherwise, you won’t be able to stop rivalry between powers like the U.S. and China. It sounds utopian now, but so did the idea of French and German soldiers serving under the same command a century ago.                                                                                                                                        – Y.S. Lee, NBN Interview (2025)

Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia (Anthem Press, 2023) examines the enduring political and military tensions in one of the world’s most dynamic yet unstable regions, from China and the Korean Peninsula to Japan, Mongolia, and Russia’s Far East. Despite its economic vitality, Northeast Asia remains fraught with persistent risks of conflict including North Korea’s nuclear program, and the unresolved disputes over territory, history, and power imbalances fueled in part by China’s rise.

Y.S. Lee traces the political, historical, military, and economic forces behind these tensions and their global implications. Offering a comparative, country-by-country analysis, he also explores the influence of external powers such as the United States and Russia. The book assesses the prospects and consequences of Korean reunification and provides a fresh look at Mongolia’s often-overlooked role in regional stability, suggesting how imagination and diplomacy together might begin to rebuild trust across the region.

In this NBN interview, Professor Lee discusses how history, ideology, and institutional design intersect across the region – from the entanglement of North Korea’s Juche ideology with its nuclear ambitions to Japan’s struggle for reconciliation, and South Korea’s evolving identity as a middle power. He argues that sustainable peace requires economic, political, and even eventual military cooperation akin to Europe’s postwar transformation, which was once unthinkable, but ultimately necessary.

Yong-Shik Lee is Director of the Law and Development Institute and a leading scholar of international economic law and institutional reform. His previous works include Law and Development: Theory and Practice (2011; 2nd ed. 2021), Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2016), and Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis (Edward Elgar, 3rd ed. 2014). His research bridges economic theory and policy design to advance inclusive development and peace.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>729</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a840304-ae11-11f0-b27c-3f2ce02e7139</guid>
      <title>Aileen Teague, &quot;Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, images of cartels, security agents donning face coverings, graphs depicting egregious murder rates, and military guards at US border crossings influence the world's perception of Mexico. Mexico's so-called drug war, as generally conceived by journalists and academics, was the product of recent cartel turf wars, the end of the PRI's single party rule in 2000, and enhanced US border security measures post-9/11. These explanations are compelling, but they overlook state actions beginning in the 1970s that set the foundation for drug violence over the longer term.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197761861">Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025), Aileen Teague chronicles a largely ignored but critical prehistory of intensified bilateral antidrug efforts by exploring their origins and inherent contradictions in Mexico. Beginning in the 1960s, US leaders externalized their aggressive domestic drug control practices by forcing junior partners such as Mexico into adopting their policies. Leaders on both sides of the border situated counternarcotics within a larger paradigm of militarized policing, which increased the power and influence of the military and aggressive counternarcotics in both countries. However, different security imperatives motivated US and Mexican agents, complicating enforcement in Mexico. Between 1969 and 2000, Mexico's embrace of America's punitive antidrug policies strengthened the coercive capacities of the Mexican state, exacerbated crime, and were so ineffective in an era of open trade blocs that they hastened the expansion of the drug trade.</p>
<p>Drawing on such sources as records from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the US State Department, interviews with key officials, accounts from Mexican journalists, and rarely seen Mexican intelligence reports, Teague relates the war on drugs as a transnational story with deep historical roots in US and Mexican conceptions of policing and security. The negative impacts of US-led counternarcotics policies in Mexico can be attributed to the complex relationship between the United States' and Mexico's shared approach to the drug war--with critical implications for present-day relations.</p>
<p>Aileen Teague is an Assistant Professor of International Affairs at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&amp;M University. She is a former Marine Corps officer and a fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, images of cartels, security agents donning face coverings, graphs depicting egregious murder rates, and military guards at US border crossings influence the world's perception of Mexico. Mexico's so-called drug war, as generally conceived by journalists and academics, was the product of recent cartel turf wars, the end of the PRI's single party rule in 2000, and enhanced US border security measures post-9/11. These explanations are compelling, but they overlook state actions beginning in the 1970s that set the foundation for drug violence over the longer term.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197761861">Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025), Aileen Teague chronicles a largely ignored but critical prehistory of intensified bilateral antidrug efforts by exploring their origins and inherent contradictions in Mexico. Beginning in the 1960s, US leaders externalized their aggressive domestic drug control practices by forcing junior partners such as Mexico into adopting their policies. Leaders on both sides of the border situated counternarcotics within a larger paradigm of militarized policing, which increased the power and influence of the military and aggressive counternarcotics in both countries. However, different security imperatives motivated US and Mexican agents, complicating enforcement in Mexico. Between 1969 and 2000, Mexico's embrace of America's punitive antidrug policies strengthened the coercive capacities of the Mexican state, exacerbated crime, and were so ineffective in an era of open trade blocs that they hastened the expansion of the drug trade.</p>
<p>Drawing on such sources as records from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the US State Department, interviews with key officials, accounts from Mexican journalists, and rarely seen Mexican intelligence reports, Teague relates the war on drugs as a transnational story with deep historical roots in US and Mexican conceptions of policing and security. The negative impacts of US-led counternarcotics policies in Mexico can be attributed to the complex relationship between the United States' and Mexico's shared approach to the drug war--with critical implications for present-day relations.</p>
<p>Aileen Teague is an Assistant Professor of International Affairs at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&amp;M University. She is a former Marine Corps officer and a fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51890915" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/afcdf358-473a-4e43-9543-3f3314771f1b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=afcdf358-473a-4e43-9543-3f3314771f1b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aileen Teague, &quot;Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today, images of cartels, security agents donning face coverings, graphs depicting egregious murder rates, and military guards at US border crossings influence the world&apos;s perception of Mexico. Mexico&apos;s so-called drug war, as generally conceived by journalists and academics, was the product of recent cartel turf wars, the end of the PRI&apos;s single party rule in 2000, and enhanced US border security measures post-9/11. These explanations are compelling, but they overlook state actions beginning in the 1970s that set the foundation for drug violence over the longer term.

In Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000 (Oxford University Press, 2025), Aileen Teague chronicles a largely ignored but critical prehistory of intensified bilateral antidrug efforts by exploring their origins and inherent contradictions in Mexico. Beginning in the 1960s, US leaders externalized their aggressive domestic drug control practices by forcing junior partners such as Mexico into adopting their policies. Leaders on both sides of the border situated counternarcotics within a larger paradigm of militarized policing, which increased the power and influence of the military and aggressive counternarcotics in both countries. However, different security imperatives motivated US and Mexican agents, complicating enforcement in Mexico. Between 1969 and 2000, Mexico&apos;s embrace of America&apos;s punitive antidrug policies strengthened the coercive capacities of the Mexican state, exacerbated crime, and were so ineffective in an era of open trade blocs that they hastened the expansion of the drug trade.

Drawing on such sources as records from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the US State Department, interviews with key officials, accounts from Mexican journalists, and rarely seen Mexican intelligence reports, Teague relates the war on drugs as a transnational story with deep historical roots in US and Mexican conceptions of policing and security. The negative impacts of US-led counternarcotics policies in Mexico can be attributed to the complex relationship between the United States&apos; and Mexico&apos;s shared approach to the drug war--with critical implications for present-day relations.

Aileen Teague is an Assistant Professor of International Affairs at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&amp;M University. She is a former Marine Corps officer and a fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today, images of cartels, security agents donning face coverings, graphs depicting egregious murder rates, and military guards at US border crossings influence the world&apos;s perception of Mexico. Mexico&apos;s so-called drug war, as generally conceived by journalists and academics, was the product of recent cartel turf wars, the end of the PRI&apos;s single party rule in 2000, and enhanced US border security measures post-9/11. These explanations are compelling, but they overlook state actions beginning in the 1970s that set the foundation for drug violence over the longer term.

In Policing on Drugs: The United States, Mexico, and the Origins of the Modern Drug War, 1969-2000 (Oxford University Press, 2025), Aileen Teague chronicles a largely ignored but critical prehistory of intensified bilateral antidrug efforts by exploring their origins and inherent contradictions in Mexico. Beginning in the 1960s, US leaders externalized their aggressive domestic drug control practices by forcing junior partners such as Mexico into adopting their policies. Leaders on both sides of the border situated counternarcotics within a larger paradigm of militarized policing, which increased the power and influence of the military and aggressive counternarcotics in both countries. However, different security imperatives motivated US and Mexican agents, complicating enforcement in Mexico. Between 1969 and 2000, Mexico&apos;s embrace of America&apos;s punitive antidrug policies strengthened the coercive capacities of the Mexican state, exacerbated crime, and were so ineffective in an era of open trade blocs that they hastened the expansion of the drug trade.

Drawing on such sources as records from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the US State Department, interviews with key officials, accounts from Mexican journalists, and rarely seen Mexican intelligence reports, Teague relates the war on drugs as a transnational story with deep historical roots in US and Mexican conceptions of policing and security. The negative impacts of US-led counternarcotics policies in Mexico can be attributed to the complex relationship between the United States&apos; and Mexico&apos;s shared approach to the drug war--with critical implications for present-day relations.

Aileen Teague is an Assistant Professor of International Affairs at the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&amp;M University. She is a former Marine Corps officer and a fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>728</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fa59ddae-ad84-11f0-ab16-9f756002f65f</guid>
      <title>José Marichal, &quot;You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the age of AI, where personal data fuels corporate profits and state surveillance, what are the implications for democracy?</p>
<p>This incisive book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529244724">You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract </a>(Policy Press, 2025) explores the unspoken agreement we have with tech companies. In exchange for reducing the anxiety of an increasingly complex online world, we submit to algorithmic classification and predictability. This reduces incentives for us to become “algorithmic problems” with dire consequences for liberal democracy. He calls for a movement to demand that algorithms promote play, creativity and potentiality rather than conformity.</p>
<p>This is a must-read for anyone navigating the intersection of technology, politics and identity in an increasingly data-driven world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the age of AI, where personal data fuels corporate profits and state surveillance, what are the implications for democracy?</p>
<p>This incisive book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529244724">You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract </a>(Policy Press, 2025) explores the unspoken agreement we have with tech companies. In exchange for reducing the anxiety of an increasingly complex online world, we submit to algorithmic classification and predictability. This reduces incentives for us to become “algorithmic problems” with dire consequences for liberal democracy. He calls for a movement to demand that algorithms promote play, creativity and potentiality rather than conformity.</p>
<p>This is a must-read for anyone navigating the intersection of technology, politics and identity in an increasingly data-driven world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31350212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/22013dfb-2c4e-4b29-bb73-8f1fcfc63e45/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=22013dfb-2c4e-4b29-bb73-8f1fcfc63e45&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>José Marichal, &quot;You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the age of AI, where personal data fuels corporate profits and state surveillance, what are the implications for democracy?

This incisive book You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract (Policy Press, 2025) explores the unspoken agreement we have with tech companies. In exchange for reducing the anxiety of an increasingly complex online world, we submit to algorithmic classification and predictability. This reduces incentives for us to become “algorithmic problems” with dire consequences for liberal democracy. He calls for a movement to demand that algorithms promote play, creativity and potentiality rather than conformity.

This is a must-read for anyone navigating the intersection of technology, politics and identity in an increasingly data-driven world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the age of AI, where personal data fuels corporate profits and state surveillance, what are the implications for democracy?

This incisive book You Must Become an Algorithmic Problem: Renegotiating the Socio-Technical Contract (Policy Press, 2025) explores the unspoken agreement we have with tech companies. In exchange for reducing the anxiety of an increasingly complex online world, we submit to algorithmic classification and predictability. This reduces incentives for us to become “algorithmic problems” with dire consequences for liberal democracy. He calls for a movement to demand that algorithms promote play, creativity and potentiality rather than conformity.

This is a must-read for anyone navigating the intersection of technology, politics and identity in an increasingly data-driven world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>727</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7fa9b2fa-ac21-11f0-93ee-8f0d1ac36dd3</guid>
      <title>Massimo Modonesi, &quot;The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action​&quot; (Haymarket, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to be a political subject? This is one of the key questions asked by <a href="https://massimomodonesi.net/">Massimo Modonesi</a> in ​<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1642590614/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action</em></a> (2019)​, published as part of the Historical Materialism book series from Brill and Haymarket books. The book takes on the theories of Marx and Gramsci to develop a philosophical triad of subalternity-antagonism-autonomy as a way of studying political subjectification under oppressive conditions and the potential for resistance. The book then looks at political developments in South and Latin America, trying to understand the underlying dynamics of both where it’s coming from, and what its possibilities are for anticapitalist resistance.</p><p>Massimo Modonesi is professor and chair of the Political and Social Sciences Faculty at the Autonomous National University in Mexico, and is the author of numerous books on political theory and history in Latin America, his most recent in English being ​<em>Subalternity, Antagonism, Autonomy: Constructing the Political Subject</em>.​ He is a member of the coordinating committee of the International Gramsci Society.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/mariavigl">Maria Vignau</a> served as a research assistant under Modonesi, and now teaches while working on her PhD at the University of Washington in Seattle.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to be a political subject? This is one of the key questions asked by <a href="https://massimomodonesi.net/">Massimo Modonesi</a> in ​<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1642590614/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action</em></a> (2019)​, published as part of the Historical Materialism book series from Brill and Haymarket books. The book takes on the theories of Marx and Gramsci to develop a philosophical triad of subalternity-antagonism-autonomy as a way of studying political subjectification under oppressive conditions and the potential for resistance. The book then looks at political developments in South and Latin America, trying to understand the underlying dynamics of both where it’s coming from, and what its possibilities are for anticapitalist resistance.</p><p>Massimo Modonesi is professor and chair of the Political and Social Sciences Faculty at the Autonomous National University in Mexico, and is the author of numerous books on political theory and history in Latin America, his most recent in English being ​<em>Subalternity, Antagonism, Autonomy: Constructing the Political Subject</em>.​ He is a member of the coordinating committee of the International Gramsci Society.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/mariavigl">Maria Vignau</a> served as a research assistant under Modonesi, and now teaches while working on her PhD at the University of Washington in Seattle.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41432911" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2329e3cc-e219-4355-b61a-9e9876c40a3f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2329e3cc-e219-4355-b61a-9e9876c40a3f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Massimo Modonesi, &quot;The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action​&quot; (Haymarket, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean to be a political subject? This is one of the key questions asked by Massimo Modonesi in ​The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action (2019)​, published as part of the Historical Materialism book series from Brill and Haymarket books. The book takes on the theories of Marx and Gramsci to develop a philosophical triad of subalternity-antagonism-autonomy as a way of studying political subjectification under oppressive conditions and the potential for resistance. The book then looks at political developments in South and Latin America, trying to understand the underlying dynamics of both where it’s coming from, and what its possibilities are for anticapitalist resistance.
Massimo Modonesi is professor and chair of the Political and Social Sciences Faculty at the Autonomous National University in Mexico, and is the author of numerous books on political theory and history in Latin America, his most recent in English being ​Subalternity, Antagonism, Autonomy: Constructing the Political Subject.​ He is a member of the coordinating committee of the International Gramsci Society.
Maria Vignau served as a research assistant under Modonesi, and now teaches while working on her PhD at the University of Washington in Seattle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean to be a political subject? This is one of the key questions asked by Massimo Modonesi in ​The Antagonistic Principle: Marxism and Political Action (2019)​, published as part of the Historical Materialism book series from Brill and Haymarket books. The book takes on the theories of Marx and Gramsci to develop a philosophical triad of subalternity-antagonism-autonomy as a way of studying political subjectification under oppressive conditions and the potential for resistance. The book then looks at political developments in South and Latin America, trying to understand the underlying dynamics of both where it’s coming from, and what its possibilities are for anticapitalist resistance.
Massimo Modonesi is professor and chair of the Political and Social Sciences Faculty at the Autonomous National University in Mexico, and is the author of numerous books on political theory and history in Latin America, his most recent in English being ​Subalternity, Antagonism, Autonomy: Constructing the Political Subject.​ He is a member of the coordinating committee of the International Gramsci Society.
Maria Vignau served as a research assistant under Modonesi, and now teaches while working on her PhD at the University of Washington in Seattle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>169</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c15035d4-03a1-11ed-9eb0-136ba382d6d4</guid>
      <title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a> (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, <em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of <em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These <em>ugly freedoms</em> legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. <em>Ugly Freedom</em> explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/"> <em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a> (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, <em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of <em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These <em>ugly freedoms</em> legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. <em>Ugly Freedom</em> explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/"> <em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55119857" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8fd16c22-6b87-4423-9164-76964ecec397/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8fd16c22-6b87-4423-9164-76964ecec397&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>613</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e497040a-ab05-11f0-aa0f-f3fd213ee47e</guid>
      <title>Piotr Pietrzak, &quot;Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice&quot; (Information Science Reference, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the world becomes more connected, strengthening international relations is essential for fostering global stability for economic and cultural growth. By integrating theory and practice applications, nations can move beyond traditional diplomatic approaches to embrace new strategies. By applying transformative theories, it allows for fresh perspectives to address global challenges and utilize practical applications. Further research may ensure these concepts translate into meaningful action.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/strengthening-international-relations-through-transformative-theory-and-practice-piotr-pietrzak/22863329?ean=9798369367353&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice</a><em> </em>(IGI Global, 2025) edited by Piotr Pietrzak explores the debate between international relations theory and global response.</p>
<p>It examines how integrations with theory and practices devise the most applicable solutions to ongoing confrontations and tensions between various countries and other non-state actors.</p>
<p>This book covers topics such as international relations, globalization, and global business and is a useful resource for government officials, business owners, academicians, researchers, and policymakers.<br />Piotr Pietrzak is a co-founder of <a href="https://irinstatunascendi.wixsite.com/irtheorist/home">In Statu Nascendi Think Tank</a> a non-partisan, independent, and highly diversified network of scholars organized to study a contemporary conflict and political philosophy that provides advice and ideas on specific issues related to geoeconomic, political, or socio-economic problems. He immerses himself in geopolitics every day. As a political thinker, author, and trained ontologist, he takes pride in infusing a pragmatic perspective into IR theory, conflict management, and geopolitics.<br /><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/StephenSatkiewicz">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the world becomes more connected, strengthening international relations is essential for fostering global stability for economic and cultural growth. By integrating theory and practice applications, nations can move beyond traditional diplomatic approaches to embrace new strategies. By applying transformative theories, it allows for fresh perspectives to address global challenges and utilize practical applications. Further research may ensure these concepts translate into meaningful action.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/strengthening-international-relations-through-transformative-theory-and-practice-piotr-pietrzak/22863329?ean=9798369367353&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice</a><em> </em>(IGI Global, 2025) edited by Piotr Pietrzak explores the debate between international relations theory and global response.</p>
<p>It examines how integrations with theory and practices devise the most applicable solutions to ongoing confrontations and tensions between various countries and other non-state actors.</p>
<p>This book covers topics such as international relations, globalization, and global business and is a useful resource for government officials, business owners, academicians, researchers, and policymakers.<br />Piotr Pietrzak is a co-founder of <a href="https://irinstatunascendi.wixsite.com/irtheorist/home">In Statu Nascendi Think Tank</a> a non-partisan, independent, and highly diversified network of scholars organized to study a contemporary conflict and political philosophy that provides advice and ideas on specific issues related to geoeconomic, political, or socio-economic problems. He immerses himself in geopolitics every day. As a political thinker, author, and trained ontologist, he takes pride in infusing a pragmatic perspective into IR theory, conflict management, and geopolitics.<br /><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/StephenSatkiewicz">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56670292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b3b1c844-aa7f-451a-9aa7-9dbccb5d2f37/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b3b1c844-aa7f-451a-9aa7-9dbccb5d2f37&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Piotr Pietrzak, &quot;Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice&quot; (Information Science Reference, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the world becomes more connected, strengthening international relations is essential for fostering global stability for economic and cultural growth. By integrating theory and practice applications, nations can move beyond traditional diplomatic approaches to embrace new strategies. By applying transformative theories, it allows for fresh perspectives to address global challenges and utilize practical applications. Further research may ensure these concepts translate into meaningful action.

Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice (IGI Global, 2025) edited by Piotr Pietrzak explores the debate between international relations theory and global response.

It examines how integrations with theory and practices devise the most applicable solutions to ongoing confrontations and tensions between various countries and other non-state actors.

This book covers topics such as international relations, globalization, and global business and is a useful resource for government officials, business owners, academicians, researchers, and policymakers.Piotr Pietrzak is a co-founder of In Statu Nascendi Think Tank a non-partisan, independent, and highly diversified network of scholars organized to study a contemporary conflict and political philosophy that provides advice and ideas on specific issues related to geoeconomic, political, or socio-economic problems. He immerses himself in geopolitics every day. As a political thinker, author, and trained ontologist, he takes pride in infusing a pragmatic perspective into IR theory, conflict management, and geopolitics.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the world becomes more connected, strengthening international relations is essential for fostering global stability for economic and cultural growth. By integrating theory and practice applications, nations can move beyond traditional diplomatic approaches to embrace new strategies. By applying transformative theories, it allows for fresh perspectives to address global challenges and utilize practical applications. Further research may ensure these concepts translate into meaningful action.

Strengthening International Relations Through Transformative Theory and Practice (IGI Global, 2025) edited by Piotr Pietrzak explores the debate between international relations theory and global response.

It examines how integrations with theory and practices devise the most applicable solutions to ongoing confrontations and tensions between various countries and other non-state actors.

This book covers topics such as international relations, globalization, and global business and is a useful resource for government officials, business owners, academicians, researchers, and policymakers.Piotr Pietrzak is a co-founder of In Statu Nascendi Think Tank a non-partisan, independent, and highly diversified network of scholars organized to study a contemporary conflict and political philosophy that provides advice and ideas on specific issues related to geoeconomic, political, or socio-economic problems. He immerses himself in geopolitics every day. As a political thinker, author, and trained ontologist, he takes pride in infusing a pragmatic perspective into IR theory, conflict management, and geopolitics.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>724</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8ed84112-ab02-11f0-8e97-6371483bd40a</guid>
      <title>In Search of Green China: Ma Tianjie on Pan Yue and the CCP’s “Ecological Civilization&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A former journalist and environmental campaigner named Pan Yue rose through the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party, championing the concept of “ecological civilization.” This green dream combines elements of traditional Chinese culture with eco-Marxism, suggesting a radical reorientation of humanity’s relationship to the natural world. Is the idea a serious alternative to sustainable development, as the CCP claims? Or is it just a cynical cover for eco-authoritarianism? We speak with Beijing-based journalist and environmentalist Ma Tianjie, author of <a href="https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=in-search-of-green-china--9781509557219"><em>In Search of Green China</em></a> (2025)</p>
<p>This is the fourth episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> RSS</a>).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A former journalist and environmental campaigner named Pan Yue rose through the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party, championing the concept of “ecological civilization.” This green dream combines elements of traditional Chinese culture with eco-Marxism, suggesting a radical reorientation of humanity’s relationship to the natural world. Is the idea a serious alternative to sustainable development, as the CCP claims? Or is it just a cynical cover for eco-authoritarianism? We speak with Beijing-based journalist and environmentalist Ma Tianjie, author of <a href="https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=in-search-of-green-china--9781509557219"><em>In Search of Green China</em></a> (2025)</p>
<p>This is the fourth episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> RSS</a>).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69584360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7df8b753-755b-4cf8-9431-cfa2042be34c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7df8b753-755b-4cf8-9431-cfa2042be34c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>In Search of Green China: Ma Tianjie on Pan Yue and the CCP’s “Ecological Civilization&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A former journalist and environmental campaigner named Pan Yue rose through the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party, championing the concept of “ecological civilization.” This green dream combines elements of traditional Chinese culture with eco-Marxism, suggesting a radical reorientation of humanity’s relationship to the natural world. Is the idea a serious alternative to sustainable development, as the CCP claims? Or is it just a cynical cover for eco-authoritarianism? We speak with Beijing-based journalist and environmentalist Ma Tianjie, author of In Search of Green China (2025)

This is the fourth episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A former journalist and environmental campaigner named Pan Yue rose through the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party, championing the concept of “ecological civilization.” This green dream combines elements of traditional Chinese culture with eco-Marxism, suggesting a radical reorientation of humanity’s relationship to the natural world. Is the idea a serious alternative to sustainable development, as the CCP claims? Or is it just a cynical cover for eco-authoritarianism? We speak with Beijing-based journalist and environmentalist Ma Tianjie, author of In Search of Green China (2025)

This is the fourth episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>723</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d31fbbe-aabe-11f0-8462-6f823b427579</guid>
      <title>David Stasavage, &quot;The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historical accounts of democracy's rise tend to focus on ancient Greece and pre-Renaissance Europe. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691177465">The Decline and Rise of Democracy: ﻿﻿A Global History from Antiquity to Today</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2020) draws from global evidence to show that the story is much richer--democratic practices were present in many places, at many other times, from the Americas before European conquest, to ancient Mesopotamia, to precolonial Africa. Delving into the prevalence of early democracy throughout the world, David Stasavage makes the case that understanding how and where these democracies flourished--and when and why they declined--can provide crucial information not just about the history of governance, but also about the ways modern democracies work and where they could manifest in the future.</p>
<p>Drawing from examples spanning several millennia, Stasavage first considers why states developed either democratic or autocratic styles of governance and argues that early democracy tended to develop in small places with a weak state and, counterintuitively, simple technologies. When central state institutions (such as a tax bureaucracy) were absent--as in medieval Europe--rulers needed consent from their populace to govern. When central institutions were strong--as in China or the Middle East--consent was less necessary and autocracy more likely. He then explores the transition from early to modern democracy, which first took shape in England and then the United States, illustrating that modern democracy arose as an effort to combine popular control with a strong state over a large territory. Democracy has been an experiment that has unfolded over time and across the world--and its transformation is ongoing.</p>
<p>Amidst rising democratic anxieties, <em>The Decline and Rise of Democracy</em> widens the historical lens on the growth of political institutions and offers surprising lessons for all who care about governance.</p>
<p>﻿David Stasavage is dean for the social sciences and Julius Silver Professor of Politics at New York University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historical accounts of democracy's rise tend to focus on ancient Greece and pre-Renaissance Europe. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691177465">The Decline and Rise of Democracy: ﻿﻿A Global History from Antiquity to Today</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2020) draws from global evidence to show that the story is much richer--democratic practices were present in many places, at many other times, from the Americas before European conquest, to ancient Mesopotamia, to precolonial Africa. Delving into the prevalence of early democracy throughout the world, David Stasavage makes the case that understanding how and where these democracies flourished--and when and why they declined--can provide crucial information not just about the history of governance, but also about the ways modern democracies work and where they could manifest in the future.</p>
<p>Drawing from examples spanning several millennia, Stasavage first considers why states developed either democratic or autocratic styles of governance and argues that early democracy tended to develop in small places with a weak state and, counterintuitively, simple technologies. When central state institutions (such as a tax bureaucracy) were absent--as in medieval Europe--rulers needed consent from their populace to govern. When central institutions were strong--as in China or the Middle East--consent was less necessary and autocracy more likely. He then explores the transition from early to modern democracy, which first took shape in England and then the United States, illustrating that modern democracy arose as an effort to combine popular control with a strong state over a large territory. Democracy has been an experiment that has unfolded over time and across the world--and its transformation is ongoing.</p>
<p>Amidst rising democratic anxieties, <em>The Decline and Rise of Democracy</em> widens the historical lens on the growth of political institutions and offers surprising lessons for all who care about governance.</p>
<p>﻿David Stasavage is dean for the social sciences and Julius Silver Professor of Politics at New York University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35021972" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ce9f0dc6-06e7-404c-9a83-f7fc9dbcf805/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ce9f0dc6-06e7-404c-9a83-f7fc9dbcf805&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Stasavage, &quot;The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historical accounts of democracy&apos;s rise tend to focus on ancient Greece and pre-Renaissance Europe. The Decline and Rise of Democracy: ﻿﻿A Global History from Antiquity to Today (Princeton University Press, 2020) draws from global evidence to show that the story is much richer--democratic practices were present in many places, at many other times, from the Americas before European conquest, to ancient Mesopotamia, to precolonial Africa. Delving into the prevalence of early democracy throughout the world, David Stasavage makes the case that understanding how and where these democracies flourished--and when and why they declined--can provide crucial information not just about the history of governance, but also about the ways modern democracies work and where they could manifest in the future.

Drawing from examples spanning several millennia, Stasavage first considers why states developed either democratic or autocratic styles of governance and argues that early democracy tended to develop in small places with a weak state and, counterintuitively, simple technologies. When central state institutions (such as a tax bureaucracy) were absent--as in medieval Europe--rulers needed consent from their populace to govern. When central institutions were strong--as in China or the Middle East--consent was less necessary and autocracy more likely. He then explores the transition from early to modern democracy, which first took shape in England and then the United States, illustrating that modern democracy arose as an effort to combine popular control with a strong state over a large territory. Democracy has been an experiment that has unfolded over time and across the world--and its transformation is ongoing.

Amidst rising democratic anxieties, The Decline and Rise of Democracy widens the historical lens on the growth of political institutions and offers surprising lessons for all who care about governance.

﻿David Stasavage is dean for the social sciences and Julius Silver Professor of Politics at New York University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historical accounts of democracy&apos;s rise tend to focus on ancient Greece and pre-Renaissance Europe. The Decline and Rise of Democracy: ﻿﻿A Global History from Antiquity to Today (Princeton University Press, 2020) draws from global evidence to show that the story is much richer--democratic practices were present in many places, at many other times, from the Americas before European conquest, to ancient Mesopotamia, to precolonial Africa. Delving into the prevalence of early democracy throughout the world, David Stasavage makes the case that understanding how and where these democracies flourished--and when and why they declined--can provide crucial information not just about the history of governance, but also about the ways modern democracies work and where they could manifest in the future.

Drawing from examples spanning several millennia, Stasavage first considers why states developed either democratic or autocratic styles of governance and argues that early democracy tended to develop in small places with a weak state and, counterintuitively, simple technologies. When central state institutions (such as a tax bureaucracy) were absent--as in medieval Europe--rulers needed consent from their populace to govern. When central institutions were strong--as in China or the Middle East--consent was less necessary and autocracy more likely. He then explores the transition from early to modern democracy, which first took shape in England and then the United States, illustrating that modern democracy arose as an effort to combine popular control with a strong state over a large territory. Democracy has been an experiment that has unfolded over time and across the world--and its transformation is ongoing.

Amidst rising democratic anxieties, The Decline and Rise of Democracy widens the historical lens on the growth of political institutions and offers surprising lessons for all who care about governance.

﻿David Stasavage is dean for the social sciences and Julius Silver Professor of Politics at New York University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>722</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8156354-a8c9-11f0-84e9-2fe75d55d50e</guid>
      <title>Gianna Englert, &quot;Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Does good democratic government require intelligent, moral, and productive citizens? Can our political institutions educate the kind of citizens we wish or need to have? With recent arguments "against democracy" and fears about the rise of populism, there is growing scepticism about whether liberalism and democracy can continue to survive together. Some even question whether democracy is worth saving.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197635315">Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage </a>(Oxford UP, 2024), Gianna Englert argues that the dilemmas facing liberal democracy are not unique to our present moment, but have existed since the birth of liberal political thought in nineteenth-century France. Combining political theory and intellectual history, Englert shows how nineteenth-century French liberals championed the idea of "political capacity" as an alternative to democratic political rights and argued that voting rights should be limited to capable citizens who would preserve free, stable institutions against revolutionary passions and democratic demands. Liberals also redefined democracy itself, from its ancient meaning as political rule by the people to something that, counterintuitively, demanded the guidance of a capable few rather than the rule of all.<br />Understandably, scholarly treatments of political capacity have criticized the idea as exclusionary and potentially dangerous. Englert argues instead that political capacity was a flexible standard that developed alongside a changing society and economy, allowing liberals to embrace democracy without abandoning their first principles. She reveals a forgotten, uncharted path of liberalism in France that remained open to political democracy while aiming to foster citizen capacity. Overall, <em>Democracy Tamed </em>tells the story of how the earliest liberals deployed their notion of the "new democracy" to resist universal suffrage. But it also reveals how later liberals would appropriate their predecessors' antidemocratic arguments to safeguard liberal democracies as we have come to know them.</p>
<p>Gianna Englert is Associate Professor of Humanities in The Hamilton School for Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does good democratic government require intelligent, moral, and productive citizens? Can our political institutions educate the kind of citizens we wish or need to have? With recent arguments "against democracy" and fears about the rise of populism, there is growing scepticism about whether liberalism and democracy can continue to survive together. Some even question whether democracy is worth saving.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197635315">Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage </a>(Oxford UP, 2024), Gianna Englert argues that the dilemmas facing liberal democracy are not unique to our present moment, but have existed since the birth of liberal political thought in nineteenth-century France. Combining political theory and intellectual history, Englert shows how nineteenth-century French liberals championed the idea of "political capacity" as an alternative to democratic political rights and argued that voting rights should be limited to capable citizens who would preserve free, stable institutions against revolutionary passions and democratic demands. Liberals also redefined democracy itself, from its ancient meaning as political rule by the people to something that, counterintuitively, demanded the guidance of a capable few rather than the rule of all.<br />Understandably, scholarly treatments of political capacity have criticized the idea as exclusionary and potentially dangerous. Englert argues instead that political capacity was a flexible standard that developed alongside a changing society and economy, allowing liberals to embrace democracy without abandoning their first principles. She reveals a forgotten, uncharted path of liberalism in France that remained open to political democracy while aiming to foster citizen capacity. Overall, <em>Democracy Tamed </em>tells the story of how the earliest liberals deployed their notion of the "new democracy" to resist universal suffrage. But it also reveals how later liberals would appropriate their predecessors' antidemocratic arguments to safeguard liberal democracies as we have come to know them.</p>
<p>Gianna Englert is Associate Professor of Humanities in The Hamilton School for Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71196459" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ed48b44d-b3d0-4e52-9837-c44b5da072f9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ed48b44d-b3d0-4e52-9837-c44b5da072f9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gianna Englert, &quot;Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does good democratic government require intelligent, moral, and productive citizens? Can our political institutions educate the kind of citizens we wish or need to have? With recent arguments &quot;against democracy&quot; and fears about the rise of populism, there is growing scepticism about whether liberalism and democracy can continue to survive together. Some even question whether democracy is worth saving.

In Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage (Oxford UP, 2024), Gianna Englert argues that the dilemmas facing liberal democracy are not unique to our present moment, but have existed since the birth of liberal political thought in nineteenth-century France. Combining political theory and intellectual history, Englert shows how nineteenth-century French liberals championed the idea of &quot;political capacity&quot; as an alternative to democratic political rights and argued that voting rights should be limited to capable citizens who would preserve free, stable institutions against revolutionary passions and democratic demands. Liberals also redefined democracy itself, from its ancient meaning as political rule by the people to something that, counterintuitively, demanded the guidance of a capable few rather than the rule of all.Understandably, scholarly treatments of political capacity have criticized the idea as exclusionary and potentially dangerous. Englert argues instead that political capacity was a flexible standard that developed alongside a changing society and economy, allowing liberals to embrace democracy without abandoning their first principles. She reveals a forgotten, uncharted path of liberalism in France that remained open to political democracy while aiming to foster citizen capacity. Overall, Democracy Tamed tells the story of how the earliest liberals deployed their notion of the &quot;new democracy&quot; to resist universal suffrage. But it also reveals how later liberals would appropriate their predecessors&apos; antidemocratic arguments to safeguard liberal democracies as we have come to know them.

Gianna Englert is Associate Professor of Humanities in The Hamilton School for Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does good democratic government require intelligent, moral, and productive citizens? Can our political institutions educate the kind of citizens we wish or need to have? With recent arguments &quot;against democracy&quot; and fears about the rise of populism, there is growing scepticism about whether liberalism and democracy can continue to survive together. Some even question whether democracy is worth saving.

In Democracy Tamed: French Liberalism and the Politics of Suffrage (Oxford UP, 2024), Gianna Englert argues that the dilemmas facing liberal democracy are not unique to our present moment, but have existed since the birth of liberal political thought in nineteenth-century France. Combining political theory and intellectual history, Englert shows how nineteenth-century French liberals championed the idea of &quot;political capacity&quot; as an alternative to democratic political rights and argued that voting rights should be limited to capable citizens who would preserve free, stable institutions against revolutionary passions and democratic demands. Liberals also redefined democracy itself, from its ancient meaning as political rule by the people to something that, counterintuitively, demanded the guidance of a capable few rather than the rule of all.Understandably, scholarly treatments of political capacity have criticized the idea as exclusionary and potentially dangerous. Englert argues instead that political capacity was a flexible standard that developed alongside a changing society and economy, allowing liberals to embrace democracy without abandoning their first principles. She reveals a forgotten, uncharted path of liberalism in France that remained open to political democracy while aiming to foster citizen capacity. Overall, Democracy Tamed tells the story of how the earliest liberals deployed their notion of the &quot;new democracy&quot; to resist universal suffrage. But it also reveals how later liberals would appropriate their predecessors&apos; antidemocratic arguments to safeguard liberal democracies as we have come to know them.

Gianna Englert is Associate Professor of Humanities in The Hamilton School for Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>721</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9dae3ca4-a5fe-11f0-8bb2-fb8852ba006d</guid>
      <title>Gustav Meibauer, &quot;The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Suggested additional channels: Political Science, National Security, American Politics, Middle Eastern Studies, Eastern European Studies, New Books with Miranda Melcher <em>NB: I don’t think this needs to go on General History</em></p>
<p>The no-fly zone is a frequently used instrument in the US foreign policy arsenal, despite detrimental, or even catastrophic, results. This book examines why the instrument has such a hold on leaders’ imaginations and rhetoric despite its patchy record in practice.</p>
<p>Examining detailed historical case studies from conflicts in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, South Sudan/Darfur, Libya and Syria, <em>The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument</em> (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Dr. Gustav Meibauer shows how debates about, and actual use of, no-fly zones in US foreign policy have not been primarily about managing conflict or protecting civilians. Instead, the focus is often on navigating contradictory international and domestic political incentives and constraints, leading to US intervention in an ill-considered and incremental manner.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggested additional channels: Political Science, National Security, American Politics, Middle Eastern Studies, Eastern European Studies, New Books with Miranda Melcher <em>NB: I don’t think this needs to go on General History</em></p>
<p>The no-fly zone is a frequently used instrument in the US foreign policy arsenal, despite detrimental, or even catastrophic, results. This book examines why the instrument has such a hold on leaders’ imaginations and rhetoric despite its patchy record in practice.</p>
<p>Examining detailed historical case studies from conflicts in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, South Sudan/Darfur, Libya and Syria, <em>The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument</em> (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Dr. Gustav Meibauer shows how debates about, and actual use of, no-fly zones in US foreign policy have not been primarily about managing conflict or protecting civilians. Instead, the focus is often on navigating contradictory international and domestic political incentives and constraints, leading to US intervention in an ill-considered and incremental manner.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43932877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fed06001-674d-4a51-8316-e958ee23d1d5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fed06001-674d-4a51-8316-e958ee23d1d5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gustav Meibauer, &quot;The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Suggested additional channels: Political Science, National Security, American Politics, Middle Eastern Studies, Eastern European Studies, New Books with Miranda Melcher NB: I don’t think this needs to go on General History

The no-fly zone is a frequently used instrument in the US foreign policy arsenal, despite detrimental, or even catastrophic, results. This book examines why the instrument has such a hold on leaders’ imaginations and rhetoric despite its patchy record in practice.

Examining detailed historical case studies from conflicts in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, South Sudan/Darfur, Libya and Syria, The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Dr. Gustav Meibauer shows how debates about, and actual use of, no-fly zones in US foreign policy have not been primarily about managing conflict or protecting civilians. Instead, the focus is often on navigating contradictory international and domestic political incentives and constraints, leading to US intervention in an ill-considered and incremental manner.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Suggested additional channels: Political Science, National Security, American Politics, Middle Eastern Studies, Eastern European Studies, New Books with Miranda Melcher NB: I don’t think this needs to go on General History

The no-fly zone is a frequently used instrument in the US foreign policy arsenal, despite detrimental, or even catastrophic, results. This book examines why the instrument has such a hold on leaders’ imaginations and rhetoric despite its patchy record in practice.

Examining detailed historical case studies from conflicts in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, South Sudan/Darfur, Libya and Syria, The No-Fly Zone in US Foreign Policy: The Curious Persistence of a Flawed Instrument (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Dr. Gustav Meibauer shows how debates about, and actual use of, no-fly zones in US foreign policy have not been primarily about managing conflict or protecting civilians. Instead, the focus is often on navigating contradictory international and domestic political incentives and constraints, leading to US intervention in an ill-considered and incremental manner.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">465ff3f6-a5f5-11f0-b393-cfa2ab3c9558</guid>
      <title>Naomi R. Williams, &quot;A Blueprint for Worker Solidarity: Class Politics and Community in Wisconsin&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40640418" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/887de26f-7ee1-4f9c-bff7-4ff765a0c65a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=887de26f-7ee1-4f9c-bff7-4ff765a0c65a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Naomi R. Williams, &quot;A Blueprint for Worker Solidarity: Class Politics and Community in Wisconsin&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Naomi R Williams is associate professor of Labor Studies and Employment Relations at Rutgers University. Their primary research interests include labor and working-class history, urban history and politics, gender and women, race and politics, and more broadly, social and economic movements of working people. Naomi focuses on worker voice and late-capitalism at the end of the 20th century. Naomi’s research also examines the ways working people impact local and national political economies and the ways workers participate in collaborative social justice movements. Naomi engages working-class history in urban settings, looking at low-wage service work, industrial employment, and workers in higher education.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>440</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a060bc7c-a47f-11f0-a685-937f61a87411</guid>
      <title>Kevin M. Schultz, &quot;Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A History&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.<br />If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.<br />This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.<br />Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.<br />With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824369">Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History</a><em> </em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025)<em> </em>is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin M. Schultz </strong>is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of <em>Buckley and Mailer </em>and <em>Tri-Faith America</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.<br />If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.<br />This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.<br />Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.<br />With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824369">Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History</a><em> </em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025)<em> </em>is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin M. Schultz </strong>is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of <em>Buckley and Mailer </em>and <em>Tri-Faith America</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="79591047" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2bd028a4-b206-4991-84e2-b5421ff41db7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2bd028a4-b206-4991-84e2-b5421ff41db7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin M. Schultz, &quot;Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A History&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.

Kevin M. Schultz is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of Buckley and Mailer and Tri-Faith America.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A bracing, accessible history of white American liberals—and why it’s time to change the conversation about them.If there’s one thing most Americans can agree on, it’s that everyone hates white liberals. Conservatives hate them for being culturally tolerant and threatening to usher in communism. Libertarians hate them for believing in the power of the state. Socialists hate them for serving as capitalism’s beard. Even liberals hate liberals—either because they can’t manage to overcome their own prejudices, or precisely because they’re so self-hating.This is the starting point for Kevin M. Schultz’s lively new history of white liberals in the United States. He efficiently lays out the array of objections to liberals—ineffective, spineless, judgmental, authoritarian, and more—in a historical frame that shows how protean the concept has been throughout the past hundred years. It turns out, he declares, that how you define a “white liberal” is less a reflection of reality and more a Rorschach test revealing your own anxieties.Sharply assessing how decades of attacks on liberals and liberalism have steadily hollowed out the center of American political life, Schultz also explains precisely what needs to be done to avoid digging ourselves even further into the hole of polarization. The ultimate goal, he argues, is to achieve political fragmentation that will fuel the rise of a true multiparty system, where ideology will matter more, not less.With a tight command of postwar American history and a spirited voice, Why Everyone Hates White Liberals (Including White Liberals): A Critical History (University of Chicago Press, 2025) is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand—and envision a way forward in—the complicated landscape of American politics.

Kevin M. Schultz is professor and chair of history at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). He is the author of Buckley and Mailer and Tri-Faith America.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>718</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9ac88e80-a3ca-11f0-bbdb-5ba350be2f3d</guid>
      <title>Joshua Eisenman and David H. Shinn, &quot;China&apos;s Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since Xi Jinping’s accession to power in 2012, nearly every aspect of China’s relations with Africa has grown dramatically. Beijing has increased the share of resources it devotes to African countries, expanding military cooperation, technological investment, and educational and cultural programs as well as extending its political influence.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210010">China's Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement</a> (Columbia University Press, 2023) examines the full scope of contemporary political and security relations between China and Africa. David H. Shinn and Joshua Eisenman not only explain the specific tactics and methods that Beijing uses to build its strategic relations with African political and military elites but also contextualize and interpret them within China’s larger geostrategy. They argue that the priorities of Chinese leaders―including the conflation of threats to the Communist Party with threats to the country, a growing emphasis on relations in the Global South, and a focus on countering U.S. hegemony―have combined to elevate Africa’s importance among policy makers in Beijing.</p>
<p>Ranging from diplomacy and propaganda to arms sales and space cooperation, from increasingly frequent People’s Liberation Army Navy port calls in Africa to the rising number of African students studying in China, this book marshals extensive and compelling qualitative and quantitative evidence of the deepening ties between China and Africa. Drawing on two decades of systematic data and hundreds of surveys and in-person interviews, Shinn and Eisenman shed new light on the state of China-Africa relations today and consider what the future may hold.</p>
<p><strong>Byline</strong></p>
<p>Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Xi Jinping’s accession to power in 2012, nearly every aspect of China’s relations with Africa has grown dramatically. Beijing has increased the share of resources it devotes to African countries, expanding military cooperation, technological investment, and educational and cultural programs as well as extending its political influence.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210010">China's Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement</a> (Columbia University Press, 2023) examines the full scope of contemporary political and security relations between China and Africa. David H. Shinn and Joshua Eisenman not only explain the specific tactics and methods that Beijing uses to build its strategic relations with African political and military elites but also contextualize and interpret them within China’s larger geostrategy. They argue that the priorities of Chinese leaders―including the conflation of threats to the Communist Party with threats to the country, a growing emphasis on relations in the Global South, and a focus on countering U.S. hegemony―have combined to elevate Africa’s importance among policy makers in Beijing.</p>
<p>Ranging from diplomacy and propaganda to arms sales and space cooperation, from increasingly frequent People’s Liberation Army Navy port calls in Africa to the rising number of African students studying in China, this book marshals extensive and compelling qualitative and quantitative evidence of the deepening ties between China and Africa. Drawing on two decades of systematic data and hundreds of surveys and in-person interviews, Shinn and Eisenman shed new light on the state of China-Africa relations today and consider what the future may hold.</p>
<p><strong>Byline</strong></p>
<p>Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="99110571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/470c856b-e3f6-4ad8-a55c-cca8fdb7c15e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=470c856b-e3f6-4ad8-a55c-cca8fdb7c15e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joshua Eisenman and David H. Shinn, &quot;China&apos;s Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:43:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since Xi Jinping’s accession to power in 2012, nearly every aspect of China’s relations with Africa has grown dramatically. Beijing has increased the share of resources it devotes to African countries, expanding military cooperation, technological investment, and educational and cultural programs as well as extending its political influence.

China&apos;s Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement (Columbia University Press, 2023) examines the full scope of contemporary political and security relations between China and Africa. David H. Shinn and Joshua Eisenman not only explain the specific tactics and methods that Beijing uses to build its strategic relations with African political and military elites but also contextualize and interpret them within China’s larger geostrategy. They argue that the priorities of Chinese leaders―including the conflation of threats to the Communist Party with threats to the country, a growing emphasis on relations in the Global South, and a focus on countering U.S. hegemony―have combined to elevate Africa’s importance among policy makers in Beijing.

Ranging from diplomacy and propaganda to arms sales and space cooperation, from increasingly frequent People’s Liberation Army Navy port calls in Africa to the rising number of African students studying in China, this book marshals extensive and compelling qualitative and quantitative evidence of the deepening ties between China and Africa. Drawing on two decades of systematic data and hundreds of surveys and in-person interviews, Shinn and Eisenman shed new light on the state of China-Africa relations today and consider what the future may hold.

Byline

Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since Xi Jinping’s accession to power in 2012, nearly every aspect of China’s relations with Africa has grown dramatically. Beijing has increased the share of resources it devotes to African countries, expanding military cooperation, technological investment, and educational and cultural programs as well as extending its political influence.

China&apos;s Relations with Africa: A New Era of Strategic Engagement (Columbia University Press, 2023) examines the full scope of contemporary political and security relations between China and Africa. David H. Shinn and Joshua Eisenman not only explain the specific tactics and methods that Beijing uses to build its strategic relations with African political and military elites but also contextualize and interpret them within China’s larger geostrategy. They argue that the priorities of Chinese leaders―including the conflation of threats to the Communist Party with threats to the country, a growing emphasis on relations in the Global South, and a focus on countering U.S. hegemony―have combined to elevate Africa’s importance among policy makers in Beijing.

Ranging from diplomacy and propaganda to arms sales and space cooperation, from increasingly frequent People’s Liberation Army Navy port calls in Africa to the rising number of African students studying in China, this book marshals extensive and compelling qualitative and quantitative evidence of the deepening ties between China and Africa. Drawing on two decades of systematic data and hundreds of surveys and in-person interviews, Shinn and Eisenman shed new light on the state of China-Africa relations today and consider what the future may hold.

Byline

Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>717</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ae15368-a353-11f0-8d40-b380e929ae39</guid>
      <title>Tyler Jost, &quot;Bureaucracies at War: The Institutional Origins of Miscalculation&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do states start conflicts that they ultimately lose? Why do leaders possess inaccurate expectations of their prospects for victory? <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/bureaucracies-at-war-tyler-jost/c499b712060280c4?ean=9781009307222&amp;next=t"><em>Bureaucracies at War</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) examines how national security institutions shape the quality of bureaucratic information upon which leaders base their choice for conflict – which institutional designs provide the best counsel, why those institutions perform better, and why many leaders fail to adopt them. Author Tyler Jost argues that the same institutions that provide the best information also empower the bureaucracy to punish the leader. Thus, miscalculation on the road to war is often the tragic consequence of how leaders resolve the trade-off between good information and political security.</p>
<p>Employing an original cross-national data set and detailed explorations of the origins and consequences of institutions inside China, India, Pakistan, and the United States, this book explores why bureaucracy helps to avoid disaster, how bureaucratic competition produces better information, and why institutional design is fundamentally political.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="http://www.tylerjost.com/">Tyler Jost</a>, an assistant professor of political science and the Watson Institute Assistant Professor of China Studies at Brown University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do states start conflicts that they ultimately lose? Why do leaders possess inaccurate expectations of their prospects for victory? <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/bureaucracies-at-war-tyler-jost/c499b712060280c4?ean=9781009307222&amp;next=t"><em>Bureaucracies at War</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) examines how national security institutions shape the quality of bureaucratic information upon which leaders base their choice for conflict – which institutional designs provide the best counsel, why those institutions perform better, and why many leaders fail to adopt them. Author Tyler Jost argues that the same institutions that provide the best information also empower the bureaucracy to punish the leader. Thus, miscalculation on the road to war is often the tragic consequence of how leaders resolve the trade-off between good information and political security.</p>
<p>Employing an original cross-national data set and detailed explorations of the origins and consequences of institutions inside China, India, Pakistan, and the United States, this book explores why bureaucracy helps to avoid disaster, how bureaucratic competition produces better information, and why institutional design is fundamentally political.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="http://www.tylerjost.com/">Tyler Jost</a>, an assistant professor of political science and the Watson Institute Assistant Professor of China Studies at Brown University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43824617" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/55918eeb-cb39-49fc-8153-9596b218a93d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=55918eeb-cb39-49fc-8153-9596b218a93d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tyler Jost, &quot;Bureaucracies at War: The Institutional Origins of Miscalculation&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do states start conflicts that they ultimately lose? Why do leaders possess inaccurate expectations of their prospects for victory? Bureaucracies at War (Cambridge UP, 2024) examines how national security institutions shape the quality of bureaucratic information upon which leaders base their choice for conflict – which institutional designs provide the best counsel, why those institutions perform better, and why many leaders fail to adopt them. Author Tyler Jost argues that the same institutions that provide the best information also empower the bureaucracy to punish the leader. Thus, miscalculation on the road to war is often the tragic consequence of how leaders resolve the trade-off between good information and political security.

Employing an original cross-national data set and detailed explorations of the origins and consequences of institutions inside China, India, Pakistan, and the United States, this book explores why bureaucracy helps to avoid disaster, how bureaucratic competition produces better information, and why institutional design is fundamentally political.

Our guest is Tyler Jost, an assistant professor of political science and the Watson Institute Assistant Professor of China Studies at Brown University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do states start conflicts that they ultimately lose? Why do leaders possess inaccurate expectations of their prospects for victory? Bureaucracies at War (Cambridge UP, 2024) examines how national security institutions shape the quality of bureaucratic information upon which leaders base their choice for conflict – which institutional designs provide the best counsel, why those institutions perform better, and why many leaders fail to adopt them. Author Tyler Jost argues that the same institutions that provide the best information also empower the bureaucracy to punish the leader. Thus, miscalculation on the road to war is often the tragic consequence of how leaders resolve the trade-off between good information and political security.

Employing an original cross-national data set and detailed explorations of the origins and consequences of institutions inside China, India, Pakistan, and the United States, this book explores why bureaucracy helps to avoid disaster, how bureaucratic competition produces better information, and why institutional design is fundamentally political.

Our guest is Tyler Jost, an assistant professor of political science and the Watson Institute Assistant Professor of China Studies at Brown University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>716</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fc57422-a397-11f0-8cdb-17fe76dadee4</guid>
      <title>Xiaobo Lü, &quot;Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China&apos;s Republican Era&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How and why did the Chinese Communist Party rise to power in the 1940s at the expense of its Nationalist (KMT) rival? In his new book, <em>Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China’s Republican Era </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2025), Professor Xiaobo Lü (UC Berkeley) adopts a new model for thinking about this question. Using new qualitative and quantitative evidence, Lü shows how CCP success was built on dominant leadership and its interaction with a strategy of mass-centric mobilization to harness resources. By contrast, the contested factional leadership of the KMT and its elite-centric mobilization held back the party’s power, particularly after it lost its geographical and fiscal base during China’s war with Japan.</p>
<p>In this interview, Professor Lü draws out the comparison between the two parties going back to the 1920s. He discusses how both parties adapted to the challenges of the Nanjing Decade and the 1937-45 wartime period – and how the legacies of party-building before 1949 still affect China today.</p>
<p><em>Domination and Mobilization </em>is strongly recommended for anyone interested in modern Chinese history, comparative revolutions, and party mobilization in authoritarian systems.</p>
<p>Mark Baker is lecturer (assistant professor) in East Asian history at the University of Manchester, UK.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How and why did the Chinese Communist Party rise to power in the 1940s at the expense of its Nationalist (KMT) rival? In his new book, <em>Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China’s Republican Era </em>(Cambridge University Press, 2025), Professor Xiaobo Lü (UC Berkeley) adopts a new model for thinking about this question. Using new qualitative and quantitative evidence, Lü shows how CCP success was built on dominant leadership and its interaction with a strategy of mass-centric mobilization to harness resources. By contrast, the contested factional leadership of the KMT and its elite-centric mobilization held back the party’s power, particularly after it lost its geographical and fiscal base during China’s war with Japan.</p>
<p>In this interview, Professor Lü draws out the comparison between the two parties going back to the 1920s. He discusses how both parties adapted to the challenges of the Nanjing Decade and the 1937-45 wartime period – and how the legacies of party-building before 1949 still affect China today.</p>
<p><em>Domination and Mobilization </em>is strongly recommended for anyone interested in modern Chinese history, comparative revolutions, and party mobilization in authoritarian systems.</p>
<p>Mark Baker is lecturer (assistant professor) in East Asian history at the University of Manchester, UK.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54397809" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1cce04ad-26b5-4390-b73a-0027b3a6b6ec/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1cce04ad-26b5-4390-b73a-0027b3a6b6ec&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Xiaobo Lü, &quot;Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China&apos;s Republican Era&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How and why did the Chinese Communist Party rise to power in the 1940s at the expense of its Nationalist (KMT) rival? In his new book, Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China’s Republican Era (Cambridge University Press, 2025), Professor Xiaobo Lü (UC Berkeley) adopts a new model for thinking about this question. Using new qualitative and quantitative evidence, Lü shows how CCP success was built on dominant leadership and its interaction with a strategy of mass-centric mobilization to harness resources. By contrast, the contested factional leadership of the KMT and its elite-centric mobilization held back the party’s power, particularly after it lost its geographical and fiscal base during China’s war with Japan.

In this interview, Professor Lü draws out the comparison between the two parties going back to the 1920s. He discusses how both parties adapted to the challenges of the Nanjing Decade and the 1937-45 wartime period – and how the legacies of party-building before 1949 still affect China today.

Domination and Mobilization is strongly recommended for anyone interested in modern Chinese history, comparative revolutions, and party mobilization in authoritarian systems.

Mark Baker is lecturer (assistant professor) in East Asian history at the University of Manchester, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How and why did the Chinese Communist Party rise to power in the 1940s at the expense of its Nationalist (KMT) rival? In his new book, Domination and Mobilization: The Rise and Fall of Political Parties in China’s Republican Era (Cambridge University Press, 2025), Professor Xiaobo Lü (UC Berkeley) adopts a new model for thinking about this question. Using new qualitative and quantitative evidence, Lü shows how CCP success was built on dominant leadership and its interaction with a strategy of mass-centric mobilization to harness resources. By contrast, the contested factional leadership of the KMT and its elite-centric mobilization held back the party’s power, particularly after it lost its geographical and fiscal base during China’s war with Japan.

In this interview, Professor Lü draws out the comparison between the two parties going back to the 1920s. He discusses how both parties adapted to the challenges of the Nanjing Decade and the 1937-45 wartime period – and how the legacies of party-building before 1949 still affect China today.

Domination and Mobilization is strongly recommended for anyone interested in modern Chinese history, comparative revolutions, and party mobilization in authoritarian systems.

Mark Baker is lecturer (assistant professor) in East Asian history at the University of Manchester, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>579</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c6491d90-a285-11f0-81b7-679c6e572cdf</guid>
      <title>Delivering for Democracy – Why results matter</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The global wave of democratic backsliding has undermined the ascendancy of democracy in the twenty-first century. So what do democracies need to do to insulate themselves against this trend? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Francis Fukuyama, one of the world’s best-known political scientists, about why democracies need to show they can make progress without sacrificing accountability in order to restore and sustain citizen’s confidence. Drawing on his new article in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> with Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni, he argues that delivery for citizens is crucial to rebuilding the social contract and hence support for democracy – and warns about the dire consequences of failing this challenge.</p>
<p>This episode is based on Francis Fukuyama, Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni’s article “Delivering for Democracy: Why Results Matter” that was published in the April 2025 issue of the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> and the People, Power, Politics podcast.</p>
<p>Guest: <u>Francis Fukuyama</u> is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and professor (by courtesy) of political science at Stanford University. He is the author of some of the best-known book published on politics in the last thirty years, including <em>The End of History and the Last Man</em> (1992), <em>Trust</em> (1995), <em>The Origins of Political Order </em>(2011), <em>Political Order and Political Decay</em> (2014), and <em>Identity</em> (2018). His books have won numerous awards, including the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award, and the Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in International and Comparative Public Administration (2024).</p>
<p>Presenter: <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Francis-Fukuyama-Transcript.docx#asset:424931">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The global wave of democratic backsliding has undermined the ascendancy of democracy in the twenty-first century. So what do democracies need to do to insulate themselves against this trend? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Francis Fukuyama, one of the world’s best-known political scientists, about why democracies need to show they can make progress without sacrificing accountability in order to restore and sustain citizen’s confidence. Drawing on his new article in the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> with Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni, he argues that delivery for citizens is crucial to rebuilding the social contract and hence support for democracy – and warns about the dire consequences of failing this challenge.</p>
<p>This episode is based on Francis Fukuyama, Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni’s article “Delivering for Democracy: Why Results Matter” that was published in the April 2025 issue of the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> and the People, Power, Politics podcast.</p>
<p>Guest: <u>Francis Fukuyama</u> is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and professor (by courtesy) of political science at Stanford University. He is the author of some of the best-known book published on politics in the last thirty years, including <em>The End of History and the Last Man</em> (1992), <em>Trust</em> (1995), <em>The Origins of Political Order </em>(2011), <em>Political Order and Political Decay</em> (2014), and <em>Identity</em> (2018). His books have won numerous awards, including the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award, and the Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in International and Comparative Public Administration (2024).</p>
<p>Presenter: <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p>Transcript <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Francis-Fukuyama-Transcript.docx#asset:424931">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29704824" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7647bbee-6d26-4942-9ce4-94d8ea858251/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7647bbee-6d26-4942-9ce4-94d8ea858251&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Delivering for Democracy – Why results matter</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The global wave of democratic backsliding has undermined the ascendancy of democracy in the twenty-first century. So what do democracies need to do to insulate themselves against this trend? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Francis Fukuyama, one of the world’s best-known political scientists, about why democracies need to show they can make progress without sacrificing accountability in order to restore and sustain citizen’s confidence. Drawing on his new article in the Journal of Democracy with Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni, he argues that delivery for citizens is crucial to rebuilding the social contract and hence support for democracy – and warns about the dire consequences of failing this challenge.

This episode is based on Francis Fukuyama, Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni’s article “Delivering for Democracy: Why Results Matter” that was published in the April 2025 issue of the Journal of Democracy, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the Journal of Democracy and the People, Power, Politics podcast.

Guest: Francis Fukuyama is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and professor (by courtesy) of political science at Stanford University. He is the author of some of the best-known book published on politics in the last thirty years, including The End of History and the Last Man (1992), Trust (1995), The Origins of Political Order (2011), Political Order and Political Decay (2014), and Identity (2018). His books have won numerous awards, including the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award, and the Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in International and Comparative Public Administration (2024).

Presenter: Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The global wave of democratic backsliding has undermined the ascendancy of democracy in the twenty-first century. So what do democracies need to do to insulate themselves against this trend? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Francis Fukuyama, one of the world’s best-known political scientists, about why democracies need to show they can make progress without sacrificing accountability in order to restore and sustain citizen’s confidence. Drawing on his new article in the Journal of Democracy with Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni, he argues that delivery for citizens is crucial to rebuilding the social contract and hence support for democracy – and warns about the dire consequences of failing this challenge.

This episode is based on Francis Fukuyama, Chris Dann and Beatriz Magaloni’s article “Delivering for Democracy: Why Results Matter” that was published in the April 2025 issue of the Journal of Democracy, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the Journal of Democracy and the People, Power, Politics podcast.

Guest: Francis Fukuyama is the Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and professor (by courtesy) of political science at Stanford University. He is the author of some of the best-known book published on politics in the last thirty years, including The End of History and the Last Man (1992), Trust (1995), The Origins of Political Order (2011), Political Order and Political Decay (2014), and Identity (2018). His books have won numerous awards, including the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award, and the Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in International and Comparative Public Administration (2024).

Presenter: Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Transcript here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>714</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4979f72-a129-11f0-b909-17edff930b5e</guid>
      <title>Emma Ashford, &quot;First Among Equals: U. S. Foreign Policy in a Multipolar World&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A fresh, concise roadmap for U.S. grand strategy in a multipolar world For the past thirty years, post-Cold War triumphalism and a desire to reshape the world have defined U.S. foreign policy. But the failures of the global war on terror, the return of conflict to Europe, and growing tensions with China all suggest that this approach to the world is flawed. For the United States--the country that has ruled the international system largely alone since 1991--this moment is particularly perilous. Can policymakers adapt American foreign policy to better fit the twenty-first century, and in doing so avoid the pitfalls and excesses of the past three decades? In this book, Emma Ashford proposes a return to a more pragmatic, realist set of strategic principles, ones better suited for the emerging multipolar world, that would pursue narrower U.S. interests, cultivate the capabilities of friendly states, and emphasize room for maneuver over rigid alliances. In this she provides a valuable counterpoint to today's liberal internationalist consensus, as well as a road map for policymakers who seek to change the course of U.S. foreign policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fresh, concise roadmap for U.S. grand strategy in a multipolar world For the past thirty years, post-Cold War triumphalism and a desire to reshape the world have defined U.S. foreign policy. But the failures of the global war on terror, the return of conflict to Europe, and growing tensions with China all suggest that this approach to the world is flawed. For the United States--the country that has ruled the international system largely alone since 1991--this moment is particularly perilous. Can policymakers adapt American foreign policy to better fit the twenty-first century, and in doing so avoid the pitfalls and excesses of the past three decades? In this book, Emma Ashford proposes a return to a more pragmatic, realist set of strategic principles, ones better suited for the emerging multipolar world, that would pursue narrower U.S. interests, cultivate the capabilities of friendly states, and emphasize room for maneuver over rigid alliances. In this she provides a valuable counterpoint to today's liberal internationalist consensus, as well as a road map for policymakers who seek to change the course of U.S. foreign policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32315076" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e9df6227-21f2-4bab-90a4-9923a2030d50/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e9df6227-21f2-4bab-90a4-9923a2030d50&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emma Ashford, &quot;First Among Equals: U. S. Foreign Policy in a Multipolar World&quot; (Yale UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A fresh, concise roadmap for U.S. grand strategy in a multipolar world For the past thirty years, post-Cold War triumphalism and a desire to reshape the world have defined U.S. foreign policy. But the failures of the global war on terror, the return of conflict to Europe, and growing tensions with China all suggest that this approach to the world is flawed. For the United States--the country that has ruled the international system largely alone since 1991--this moment is particularly perilous. Can policymakers adapt American foreign policy to better fit the twenty-first century, and in doing so avoid the pitfalls and excesses of the past three decades? In this book, Emma Ashford proposes a return to a more pragmatic, realist set of strategic principles, ones better suited for the emerging multipolar world, that would pursue narrower U.S. interests, cultivate the capabilities of friendly states, and emphasize room for maneuver over rigid alliances. In this she provides a valuable counterpoint to today&apos;s liberal internationalist consensus, as well as a road map for policymakers who seek to change the course of U.S. foreign policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A fresh, concise roadmap for U.S. grand strategy in a multipolar world For the past thirty years, post-Cold War triumphalism and a desire to reshape the world have defined U.S. foreign policy. But the failures of the global war on terror, the return of conflict to Europe, and growing tensions with China all suggest that this approach to the world is flawed. For the United States--the country that has ruled the international system largely alone since 1991--this moment is particularly perilous. Can policymakers adapt American foreign policy to better fit the twenty-first century, and in doing so avoid the pitfalls and excesses of the past three decades? In this book, Emma Ashford proposes a return to a more pragmatic, realist set of strategic principles, ones better suited for the emerging multipolar world, that would pursue narrower U.S. interests, cultivate the capabilities of friendly states, and emphasize room for maneuver over rigid alliances. In this she provides a valuable counterpoint to today&apos;s liberal internationalist consensus, as well as a road map for policymakers who seek to change the course of U.S. foreign policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b22af868-9f3a-11f0-880f-4f45df70411f</guid>
      <title>Madison Schramm, &quot;Why Democracies Fight Dictators&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the <em>democratic</em> side that has chosen to employ military force.</p>
<p>﻿﻿﻿ <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197807453">Why Democracies Fight Dictators</a> (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies' understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.</p>
<p>Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the <em>democratic</em> side that has chosen to employ military force.</p>
<p>﻿﻿﻿ <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197807453">Why Democracies Fight Dictators</a> (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies' understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.</p>
<p>Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48822149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/82fdc105-1ef1-40fd-976f-c42802c9df8d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=82fdc105-1ef1-40fd-976f-c42802c9df8d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Madison Schramm, &quot;Why Democracies Fight Dictators&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the democratic side that has chosen to employ military force.

﻿﻿﻿ Why Democracies Fight Dictators (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies&apos; understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein&apos;s invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.

Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the course of the last century, there has been an outsized incidence of conflict between democracies and personalist regimes—political systems where a single individual has undisputed executive power and prominence. In most cases, it has been the democratic side that has chosen to employ military force.

﻿﻿﻿ Why Democracies Fight Dictators (Oxford UP, 2025) takes up the question of why liberal democracies are so inclined to engage in conflict with personalist dictators. Building on research in political science, history, sociology, and psychology and marshalling evidence from statistical analysis of conflict, multi-archival research of American and British perceptions during the Suez Crisis and Gulf War, and non-democracies&apos; understanding of the threat from Saddam Hussein&apos;s invasion of Kuwait, Madison V. Schramm offers a novel and nuanced explanation for patterns in escalation and hostility between liberal democracies and personalist regimes. When conflicts of interest arise between the two types of states, Schramm argues, cognitive biases and social narratives predispose leaders in liberal democracies to perceive personalist dictators as particularly threatening and to respond with anger—an emotional response that elicits more risk acceptance and aggressive behavior. She also locates this tendency in the escalatory dynamics that precede open military conflict: coercion, covert action, and crisis bargaining. At all of these stages, the tendency toward anger and risk acceptance contributes to explosive outcomes between democratic and personalist regimes.

Madison Schramm, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>712</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81bfde82-9f1c-11f0-adef-032e4249ab29</guid>
      <title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a> (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a> (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53812630" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1a4d6e26-398c-477e-bc0a-ff8a7f858c7f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1a4d6e26-398c-477e-bc0a-ff8a7f858c7f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.

In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.

Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.

In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.

Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>711</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dcf179b2-9ea6-11f0-bd7b-f7431c76034d</guid>
      <title>Luis L. Schenoni, &quot;Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009442152">Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America </a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) provides a fresh theory connecting war and state formation that incorporates the contingency of warfare and the effects of war outcomes in the long run. The book demonstrates that international wars in nineteenth-century Latin America triggered state-building, that the outcomes of those wars affected the legitimacy and continuity of such efforts, and that the relative capacity of states in this region today continues to reflect those distant processes. Combining comparative historical analysis with cutting edge social science methods, the book provides a comprehensive picture of state formation in nineteenth-century Latin America that is compelling for readers across disciplines, breathes new life into bellicist approaches to state formation, and offers a novel framework to explain variation in state capacity across Latin America and the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009442152">Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America </a>(Cambridge UP, 2025) provides a fresh theory connecting war and state formation that incorporates the contingency of warfare and the effects of war outcomes in the long run. The book demonstrates that international wars in nineteenth-century Latin America triggered state-building, that the outcomes of those wars affected the legitimacy and continuity of such efforts, and that the relative capacity of states in this region today continues to reflect those distant processes. Combining comparative historical analysis with cutting edge social science methods, the book provides a comprehensive picture of state formation in nineteenth-century Latin America that is compelling for readers across disciplines, breathes new life into bellicist approaches to state formation, and offers a novel framework to explain variation in state capacity across Latin America and the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55446528" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/efcd3bd5-4755-45a8-a154-fda3a029874e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=efcd3bd5-4755-45a8-a154-fda3a029874e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luis L. Schenoni, &quot;Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (Cambridge UP, 2025) provides a fresh theory connecting war and state formation that incorporates the contingency of warfare and the effects of war outcomes in the long run. The book demonstrates that international wars in nineteenth-century Latin America triggered state-building, that the outcomes of those wars affected the legitimacy and continuity of such efforts, and that the relative capacity of states in this region today continues to reflect those distant processes. Combining comparative historical analysis with cutting edge social science methods, the book provides a comprehensive picture of state formation in nineteenth-century Latin America that is compelling for readers across disciplines, breathes new life into bellicist approaches to state formation, and offers a novel framework to explain variation in state capacity across Latin America and the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bringing War Back In: Victory, Defeat, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (Cambridge UP, 2025) provides a fresh theory connecting war and state formation that incorporates the contingency of warfare and the effects of war outcomes in the long run. The book demonstrates that international wars in nineteenth-century Latin America triggered state-building, that the outcomes of those wars affected the legitimacy and continuity of such efforts, and that the relative capacity of states in this region today continues to reflect those distant processes. Combining comparative historical analysis with cutting edge social science methods, the book provides a comprehensive picture of state formation in nineteenth-century Latin America that is compelling for readers across disciplines, breathes new life into bellicist approaches to state formation, and offers a novel framework to explain variation in state capacity across Latin America and the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>710</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51d4aac4-9dc6-11f0-ae5b-07320c385c25</guid>
      <title>Sasha Davis, &quot;Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919528">Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail</a> (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai'i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully "replacing the state" and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517919528">Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail</a> (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai'i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully "replacing the state" and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24730871" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d67906f4-a744-44c3-a8d8-e01e5ebc0e66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d67906f4-a744-44c3-a8d8-e01e5ebc0e66&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sasha Davis, &quot;Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai&apos;i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully &quot;replacing the state&quot; and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A practical call to action against oppression. Across the globe, millions of people have participated in protests and marches, donated to political groups, or lobbied their representatives with the aim of creating lasting social change, overturning repressive laws, or limiting environmental destruction. Yet very little seems to improve for those affected by rapacious governments. Replace the State: How to Change the World When Elections and Protests Fail (U Minnesota Press, 2025) brings new hope for social justice movements by looking to progressive campaigns that have found success by unconventional, and more direct, means. Sasha Davis, an activist and scholar of radical environmental advocacy, focuses on the strategies of movements, many of them Indigenous, that have occupied contested sites and demonstrated their effectiveness at managing or governing them. Including case studies of resistance to development on Indigenous lands in Hawai&apos;i, nuclear testing in the Nevada desert, and the U.S. military occupation of Okinawa, he offers insight and direction for activists, students, academics, and others dedicated to protecting and improving the well-being of their communities and beyond. It would be easy to succumb to pessimism and political apathy in the face of governing institutions that are increasingly unresponsive to calls for change and repressive in response to protest, even as they violate human rights, ignore existential climate catastrophes, and concentrate power into fewer and fewer hands. Instead, Davis finds inspiration for genuine political change through social movements that are successfully &quot;replacing the state&quot; and taking over the day-to-day governance of threatened places. From contesting environmental abuse to reasserting Indigenous sovereignty, these social movements demonstrate how people can collectively wrest control over their communities from oppressive governments and manage them with a more egalitarian ethics of care.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>709</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b095aba-9dc2-11f0-b465-03dbb0caf596</guid>
      <title>Michael Rowe, &quot;Researching Street-Level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/researching-street-level-bureaucracy-bringing-out-the-interpretive-dimensions-mike-rowe/b8cd1b3829084bf6"><em>Researching Street-level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions</em></a> (Routledge, 2024) is the first among a number of new titles in the <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a> that we’ll be featuring on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>. In it, <a href="https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/people/michael-rowe">Mike Rowe</a> discusses the continued relevance of the idea of street level bureaucracy, and the merits of adopting interpretive methodologies for studying frontline discretionary workers. He reflects on his own ethnographic and interview-based research among social welfare officers and police culture in the United Kingdom, and comparatively, in places where bureaucracy may be noteworthy more for its absence than its presence. ﻿</p>
<p>Like this episode? You might also be interested in Sarah Ball talking about <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/behavioural-public-policy-in-australia"><em>Behavioural Public Policy in Australia</em></a>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read? Mike recommends <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/in-praise-of-floods-the-untamed-river-and-the-life-it-brings-james-c-scott/b3b141305f6bdd49"><em>In Praise of Floods</em></a> by James C. Scott, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/then-we-came-to-the-end-joshua-ferris/8a95e5edbbecca1f"><em>Then We Came to the End</em></a> by Joshua Ferris. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/researching-street-level-bureaucracy-bringing-out-the-interpretive-dimensions-mike-rowe/b8cd1b3829084bf6"><em>Researching Street-level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions</em></a> (Routledge, 2024) is the first among a number of new titles in the <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Series-on-Interpretive-Methods/book-series/RSIM">Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods</a> that we’ll be featuring on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>. In it, <a href="https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/people/michael-rowe">Mike Rowe</a> discusses the continued relevance of the idea of street level bureaucracy, and the merits of adopting interpretive methodologies for studying frontline discretionary workers. He reflects on his own ethnographic and interview-based research among social welfare officers and police culture in the United Kingdom, and comparatively, in places where bureaucracy may be noteworthy more for its absence than its presence. ﻿</p>
<p>Like this episode? You might also be interested in Sarah Ball talking about <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/behavioural-public-policy-in-australia"><em>Behavioural Public Policy in Australia</em></a>﻿</p>
<p>Looking for something to read? Mike recommends <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/in-praise-of-floods-the-untamed-river-and-the-life-it-brings-james-c-scott/b3b141305f6bdd49"><em>In Praise of Floods</em></a> by James C. Scott, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/then-we-came-to-the-end-joshua-ferris/8a95e5edbbecca1f"><em>Then We Came to the End</em></a> by Joshua Ferris. ﻿</p>
<p><em>This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35910333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d80dffc8-5fb1-4b6b-baf3-b8ec748f04f7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d80dffc8-5fb1-4b6b-baf3-b8ec748f04f7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Rowe, &quot;Researching Street-Level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Researching Street-level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions (Routledge, 2024) is the first among a number of new titles in the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods that we’ll be featuring on New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science. In it, Mike Rowe discusses the continued relevance of the idea of street level bureaucracy, and the merits of adopting interpretive methodologies for studying frontline discretionary workers. He reflects on his own ethnographic and interview-based research among social welfare officers and police culture in the United Kingdom, and comparatively, in places where bureaucracy may be noteworthy more for its absence than its presence. ﻿

Like this episode? You might also be interested in Sarah Ball talking about Behavioural Public Policy in Australia﻿

Looking for something to read? Mike recommends In Praise of Floods by James C. Scott, and Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris. ﻿

This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Researching Street-level Bureaucracy: Bringing Out the Interpretive Dimensions (Routledge, 2024) is the first among a number of new titles in the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods that we’ll be featuring on New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science. In it, Mike Rowe discusses the continued relevance of the idea of street level bureaucracy, and the merits of adopting interpretive methodologies for studying frontline discretionary workers. He reflects on his own ethnographic and interview-based research among social welfare officers and police culture in the United Kingdom, and comparatively, in places where bureaucracy may be noteworthy more for its absence than its presence. ﻿

Like this episode? You might also be interested in Sarah Ball talking about Behavioural Public Policy in Australia﻿

Looking for something to read? Mike recommends In Praise of Floods by James C. Scott, and Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris. ﻿

This interview summary was not synthesised by a machine. Unlike the makers and owners of those machines, the author accepts responsibility for its contents.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>708</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">876d1f24-9d5b-11f0-b76e-5b91536d0289</guid>
      <title>Kolby Hanson, &quot;Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197792780">Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Kolby Hanson argues that these periods of state toleration do not simply change armed groups' behavior, but fundamentally transform the organizations themselves by shaping who takes up arms and which leaders they follow. This book draws on a set of innovative experimental surveys and 75 in-depth interviews tracing four armed movements over time in Northeast India and Sri Lanka. A powerful new theory of how conditions shape the trajectory of non-state armed groups, this book reshapes our understanding of why such organizations become more moderate over time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197792780">Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Kolby Hanson argues that these periods of state toleration do not simply change armed groups' behavior, but fundamentally transform the organizations themselves by shaping who takes up arms and which leaders they follow. This book draws on a set of innovative experimental surveys and 75 in-depth interviews tracing four armed movements over time in Northeast India and Sri Lanka. A powerful new theory of how conditions shape the trajectory of non-state armed groups, this book reshapes our understanding of why such organizations become more moderate over time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38103394" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/75e95025-c57e-4d10-b95f-b95e2067d052/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=75e95025-c57e-4d10-b95f-b95e2067d052&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kolby Hanson, &quot;Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace (Oxford University Press, 2025), Kolby Hanson argues that these periods of state toleration do not simply change armed groups&apos; behavior, but fundamentally transform the organizations themselves by shaping who takes up arms and which leaders they follow. This book draws on a set of innovative experimental surveys and 75 in-depth interviews tracing four armed movements over time in Northeast India and Sri Lanka. A powerful new theory of how conditions shape the trajectory of non-state armed groups, this book reshapes our understanding of why such organizations become more moderate over time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Ordinary Rebels: Rank-And-File Militants Between War and Peace (Oxford University Press, 2025), Kolby Hanson argues that these periods of state toleration do not simply change armed groups&apos; behavior, but fundamentally transform the organizations themselves by shaping who takes up arms and which leaders they follow. This book draws on a set of innovative experimental surveys and 75 in-depth interviews tracing four armed movements over time in Northeast India and Sri Lanka. A powerful new theory of how conditions shape the trajectory of non-state armed groups, this book reshapes our understanding of why such organizations become more moderate over time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>707</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1b4e9882-523f-11ed-b303-f399f452681a</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Micinski, &quot;Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472038992"><em>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union</em></a> (U Michigan Press, 2022) explores the politics of migration in the European Union and explains how the EU responded to the 2015–17 refugee crisis. Based on 86 interviews and fieldwork in Greece and Italy, Nicholas R. Micinski proposes a new theory of international cooperation on international migration. States approach migration policies in many ways—such as coordination, collaboration, subcontracting, and unilateralism—but which policy they choose is based on capacity and on credible partners on the ground. Micinski traces the fifty-year evolution of EU migration management, like border security and asylum policies, and shows how EU officials used “crises” as political leverage to further Europeanize migration governance. In two in-depth case studies, he explains how Italy and Greece responded to the most recent refugee crisis. He concludes with a discussion of policy recommendations regarding contemporary as well as long-term aspirations for migration management in the EU.</p><p>Nicholas R. Micinski is Libra Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the University of Maine. His research focuses on global governance, particularly how states and international organizations respond to refugees, migration, climate change, and peacebuilding. Micinski is the author of two books: <em>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union</em> (University of Michigan Press, 2022) and <em>UN Global Compacts: Governing Migrants and Refugees</em> (Routledge, 2021). Previously, Micinski was postdoctoral fellow at Université Laval, ISA James N. Rosenau Postdoctoral Fellow, and visiting researcher at the Center for the Study of Europe, Boston University. Before academia, he worked in the NGO sector in London for five years on refugee policy and service delivery. Micinski received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Graduate Center at the City University of New York (CUNY).</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em> or tweet to </em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472038992"><em>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union</em></a> (U Michigan Press, 2022) explores the politics of migration in the European Union and explains how the EU responded to the 2015–17 refugee crisis. Based on 86 interviews and fieldwork in Greece and Italy, Nicholas R. Micinski proposes a new theory of international cooperation on international migration. States approach migration policies in many ways—such as coordination, collaboration, subcontracting, and unilateralism—but which policy they choose is based on capacity and on credible partners on the ground. Micinski traces the fifty-year evolution of EU migration management, like border security and asylum policies, and shows how EU officials used “crises” as political leverage to further Europeanize migration governance. In two in-depth case studies, he explains how Italy and Greece responded to the most recent refugee crisis. He concludes with a discussion of policy recommendations regarding contemporary as well as long-term aspirations for migration management in the EU.</p><p>Nicholas R. Micinski is Libra Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the University of Maine. His research focuses on global governance, particularly how states and international organizations respond to refugees, migration, climate change, and peacebuilding. Micinski is the author of two books: <em>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union</em> (University of Michigan Press, 2022) and <em>UN Global Compacts: Governing Migrants and Refugees</em> (Routledge, 2021). Previously, Micinski was postdoctoral fellow at Université Laval, ISA James N. Rosenau Postdoctoral Fellow, and visiting researcher at the Center for the Study of Europe, Boston University. Before academia, he worked in the NGO sector in London for five years on refugee policy and service delivery. Micinski received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Graduate Center at the City University of New York (CUNY).</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em> is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of </em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em> (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at </em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em> or tweet to </em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55047899" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d2c87c73-e6b9-4832-ae3c-599f31f94820/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d2c87c73-e6b9-4832-ae3c-599f31f94820&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Micinski, &quot;Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union (U Michigan Press, 2022) explores the politics of migration in the European Union and explains how the EU responded to the 2015–17 refugee crisis. Based on 86 interviews and fieldwork in Greece and Italy, Nicholas R. Micinski proposes a new theory of international cooperation on international migration. States approach migration policies in many ways—such as coordination, collaboration, subcontracting, and unilateralism—but which policy they choose is based on capacity and on credible partners on the ground. Micinski traces the fifty-year evolution of EU migration management, like border security and asylum policies, and shows how EU officials used “crises” as political leverage to further Europeanize migration governance. In two in-depth case studies, he explains how Italy and Greece responded to the most recent refugee crisis. He concludes with a discussion of policy recommendations regarding contemporary as well as long-term aspirations for migration management in the EU.
Nicholas R. Micinski is Libra Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the University of Maine. His research focuses on global governance, particularly how states and international organizations respond to refugees, migration, climate change, and peacebuilding. Micinski is the author of two books: Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union (University of Michigan Press, 2022) and UN Global Compacts: Governing Migrants and Refugees (Routledge, 2021). Previously, Micinski was postdoctoral fellow at Université Laval, ISA James N. Rosenau Postdoctoral Fellow, and visiting researcher at the Center for the Study of Europe, Boston University. Before academia, he worked in the NGO sector in London for five years on refugee policy and service delivery. Micinski received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Graduate Center at the City University of New York (CUNY).
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union (U Michigan Press, 2022) explores the politics of migration in the European Union and explains how the EU responded to the 2015–17 refugee crisis. Based on 86 interviews and fieldwork in Greece and Italy, Nicholas R. Micinski proposes a new theory of international cooperation on international migration. States approach migration policies in many ways—such as coordination, collaboration, subcontracting, and unilateralism—but which policy they choose is based on capacity and on credible partners on the ground. Micinski traces the fifty-year evolution of EU migration management, like border security and asylum policies, and shows how EU officials used “crises” as political leverage to further Europeanize migration governance. In two in-depth case studies, he explains how Italy and Greece responded to the most recent refugee crisis. He concludes with a discussion of policy recommendations regarding contemporary as well as long-term aspirations for migration management in the EU.
Nicholas R. Micinski is Libra Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the University of Maine. His research focuses on global governance, particularly how states and international organizations respond to refugees, migration, climate change, and peacebuilding. Micinski is the author of two books: Delegating Responsibility: International Cooperation on Migration in the European Union (University of Michigan Press, 2022) and UN Global Compacts: Governing Migrants and Refugees (Routledge, 2021). Previously, Micinski was postdoctoral fellow at Université Laval, ISA James N. Rosenau Postdoctoral Fellow, and visiting researcher at the Center for the Study of Europe, Boston University. Before academia, he worked in the NGO sector in London for five years on refugee policy and service delivery. Micinski received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Graduate Center at the City University of New York (CUNY).
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>627</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7dd0668-9aa1-11f0-a295-3fa3aa6e10de</guid>
      <title>Timothy Williams, &quot;Memory Politics After Mass Violence: Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape&quot; (Bristol UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529227581">Memory Politics After Mass Violence: ﻿Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape </a>(Bristol UP, 2025) explores how political actors draw on memories of violent pasts to generate political power and legitimacy in the present. Drawing on fieldwork in post-violence Cambodia, Rwanda and Indonesia, the book demonstrates in what way power is derived from how roles are assigned, exploring who is deemed a perpetrator, victim or hero, as well as ambivalences in this memory.</p>
<p><br />In the book, Williams interrogates the ways in which these roles are attributed and ambivalences created in each society’s political discourses, transitional justice processes and cultural heritage. The comparative empirical analysis illustrates the importance of memory for political power and legitimacy today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529227581">Memory Politics After Mass Violence: ﻿Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape </a>(Bristol UP, 2025) explores how political actors draw on memories of violent pasts to generate political power and legitimacy in the present. Drawing on fieldwork in post-violence Cambodia, Rwanda and Indonesia, the book demonstrates in what way power is derived from how roles are assigned, exploring who is deemed a perpetrator, victim or hero, as well as ambivalences in this memory.</p>
<p><br />In the book, Williams interrogates the ways in which these roles are attributed and ambivalences created in each society’s political discourses, transitional justice processes and cultural heritage. The comparative empirical analysis illustrates the importance of memory for political power and legitimacy today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54618358" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3cc2ca27-7bd4-45e4-8613-16e7a5d41a46/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3cc2ca27-7bd4-45e4-8613-16e7a5d41a46&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy Williams, &quot;Memory Politics After Mass Violence: Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape&quot; (Bristol UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Memory Politics After Mass Violence: ﻿Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape (Bristol UP, 2025) explores how political actors draw on memories of violent pasts to generate political power and legitimacy in the present. Drawing on fieldwork in post-violence Cambodia, Rwanda and Indonesia, the book demonstrates in what way power is derived from how roles are assigned, exploring who is deemed a perpetrator, victim or hero, as well as ambivalences in this memory.

In the book, Williams interrogates the ways in which these roles are attributed and ambivalences created in each society’s political discourses, transitional justice processes and cultural heritage. The comparative empirical analysis illustrates the importance of memory for political power and legitimacy today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Memory Politics After Mass Violence: ﻿Attributing Roles in the Memoryscape (Bristol UP, 2025) explores how political actors draw on memories of violent pasts to generate political power and legitimacy in the present. Drawing on fieldwork in post-violence Cambodia, Rwanda and Indonesia, the book demonstrates in what way power is derived from how roles are assigned, exploring who is deemed a perpetrator, victim or hero, as well as ambivalences in this memory.

In the book, Williams interrogates the ways in which these roles are attributed and ambivalences created in each society’s political discourses, transitional justice processes and cultural heritage. The comparative empirical analysis illustrates the importance of memory for political power and legitimacy today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>705</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">618fe444-9a5e-11f0-95c8-ef8c993a0f60</guid>
      <title>Carol Atack, &quot;Plato: A Civic Life&quot; (Reaktion, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Plato is a key figure from the beginnings of Western philosophy, yet the impact of his lived experience on his thought has rarely been explored. Born during a war that would lead to Athens’ decline, Plato lived in turbulent times. In ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781789149463">Plato: A Civic Life</a><em> </em>﻿(Reaktion, 2025), Carol Atack explores how Plato’s life in Athens influenced his thought, how he developed the Socratic dialogue into a powerful philosophical tool, and how he used the institutions of Athenian society to create a compelling imaginative world. Accessibly written, this book shows how Plato made Athens the place where diverse ideas were integrated into a new way of approaching the big questions about our lives, then and now.</p>
<p>Carol Atack teaches classical Greek and ancient philosophy at the University of Cambridge. She is the author and coauthor of two books, most recently <em>Anachronism and Antiquity</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</em></p>
<p><em>YouTube Channel: </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plato is a key figure from the beginnings of Western philosophy, yet the impact of his lived experience on his thought has rarely been explored. Born during a war that would lead to Athens’ decline, Plato lived in turbulent times. In ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781789149463">Plato: A Civic Life</a><em> </em>﻿(Reaktion, 2025), Carol Atack explores how Plato’s life in Athens influenced his thought, how he developed the Socratic dialogue into a powerful philosophical tool, and how he used the institutions of Athenian society to create a compelling imaginative world. Accessibly written, this book shows how Plato made Athens the place where diverse ideas were integrated into a new way of approaching the big questions about our lives, then and now.</p>
<p>Carol Atack teaches classical Greek and ancient philosophy at the University of Cambridge. She is the author and coauthor of two books, most recently <em>Anachronism and Antiquity</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</em></p>
<p><em>YouTube Channel: </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71029647" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b6eebb50-0035-41da-a901-f7ec25745f15/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b6eebb50-0035-41da-a901-f7ec25745f15&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Atack, &quot;Plato: A Civic Life&quot; (Reaktion, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Plato is a key figure from the beginnings of Western philosophy, yet the impact of his lived experience on his thought has rarely been explored. Born during a war that would lead to Athens’ decline, Plato lived in turbulent times. In ﻿Plato: A Civic Life ﻿(Reaktion, 2025), Carol Atack explores how Plato’s life in Athens influenced his thought, how he developed the Socratic dialogue into a powerful philosophical tool, and how he used the institutions of Athenian society to create a compelling imaginative world. Accessibly written, this book shows how Plato made Athens the place where diverse ideas were integrated into a new way of approaching the big questions about our lives, then and now.

Carol Atack teaches classical Greek and ancient philosophy at the University of Cambridge. She is the author and coauthor of two books, most recently Anachronism and Antiquity.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Plato is a key figure from the beginnings of Western philosophy, yet the impact of his lived experience on his thought has rarely been explored. Born during a war that would lead to Athens’ decline, Plato lived in turbulent times. In ﻿Plato: A Civic Life ﻿(Reaktion, 2025), Carol Atack explores how Plato’s life in Athens influenced his thought, how he developed the Socratic dialogue into a powerful philosophical tool, and how he used the institutions of Athenian society to create a compelling imaginative world. Accessibly written, this book shows how Plato made Athens the place where diverse ideas were integrated into a new way of approaching the big questions about our lives, then and now.

Carol Atack teaches classical Greek and ancient philosophy at the University of Cambridge. She is the author and coauthor of two books, most recently Anachronism and Antiquity.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>704</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bde8c5a-99de-11f0-bb3f-b3f511cfffc1</guid>
      <title>Gen Z Uprising: Youth, Protest and Political Change in Nepal</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In early September 2025, Nepal witnessed an extraordinary week of upheaval that many now refer to as the ‘five-day revolution’. Within the span of a single week, youth-led ‘Gen Z’ protests spread across Kathmandu and other major cities, the prime minister and his government resigned, the army intervened, parliament was dissolved, and Nepal’s new (and first female) interim prime minister was sworn in. The events revealed deep frustrations among young Nepalis with corruption, socioeconomic exclusion, and a lack of political accountability.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Jeevan Baniya joins host Hanna Geschewski to explore the deeper forces behind this moment. They discuss the grievances that brought young Nepalis to the streets, why these long-standing frustrations erupted now, and how the ‘Gen Z’ protests should be understood in relation to questions of representation and political change. The conversation also considers the diversity within Nepal’s youth movement and the pathways through which young people may shape politics in the aftermath of the uprising.</p>
<p>Jeevan Baniya is a political scientist and Deputy Director of the research institute Social Science Baha in Kathmandu, Nepal.</p>
<p>Hanna Geschewski is a PhD researcher in Human Geography at the Chr. Michelsen Institute and the University of Bergen in Norway. Her work focuses on migration, displacement and socio-environmental change in the Himalayan region and South Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early September 2025, Nepal witnessed an extraordinary week of upheaval that many now refer to as the ‘five-day revolution’. Within the span of a single week, youth-led ‘Gen Z’ protests spread across Kathmandu and other major cities, the prime minister and his government resigned, the army intervened, parliament was dissolved, and Nepal’s new (and first female) interim prime minister was sworn in. The events revealed deep frustrations among young Nepalis with corruption, socioeconomic exclusion, and a lack of political accountability.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Jeevan Baniya joins host Hanna Geschewski to explore the deeper forces behind this moment. They discuss the grievances that brought young Nepalis to the streets, why these long-standing frustrations erupted now, and how the ‘Gen Z’ protests should be understood in relation to questions of representation and political change. The conversation also considers the diversity within Nepal’s youth movement and the pathways through which young people may shape politics in the aftermath of the uprising.</p>
<p>Jeevan Baniya is a political scientist and Deputy Director of the research institute Social Science Baha in Kathmandu, Nepal.</p>
<p>Hanna Geschewski is a PhD researcher in Human Geography at the Chr. Michelsen Institute and the University of Bergen in Norway. Her work focuses on migration, displacement and socio-environmental change in the Himalayan region and South Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29949741" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3a575d8c-01d5-4a64-9891-597f3f2e8253/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3a575d8c-01d5-4a64-9891-597f3f2e8253&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gen Z Uprising: Youth, Protest and Political Change in Nepal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In early September 2025, Nepal witnessed an extraordinary week of upheaval that many now refer to as the ‘five-day revolution’. Within the span of a single week, youth-led ‘Gen Z’ protests spread across Kathmandu and other major cities, the prime minister and his government resigned, the army intervened, parliament was dissolved, and Nepal’s new (and first female) interim prime minister was sworn in. The events revealed deep frustrations among young Nepalis with corruption, socioeconomic exclusion, and a lack of political accountability.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Jeevan Baniya joins host Hanna Geschewski to explore the deeper forces behind this moment. They discuss the grievances that brought young Nepalis to the streets, why these long-standing frustrations erupted now, and how the ‘Gen Z’ protests should be understood in relation to questions of representation and political change. The conversation also considers the diversity within Nepal’s youth movement and the pathways through which young people may shape politics in the aftermath of the uprising.

Jeevan Baniya is a political scientist and Deputy Director of the research institute Social Science Baha in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Hanna Geschewski is a PhD researcher in Human Geography at the Chr. Michelsen Institute and the University of Bergen in Norway. Her work focuses on migration, displacement and socio-environmental change in the Himalayan region and South Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In early September 2025, Nepal witnessed an extraordinary week of upheaval that many now refer to as the ‘five-day revolution’. Within the span of a single week, youth-led ‘Gen Z’ protests spread across Kathmandu and other major cities, the prime minister and his government resigned, the army intervened, parliament was dissolved, and Nepal’s new (and first female) interim prime minister was sworn in. The events revealed deep frustrations among young Nepalis with corruption, socioeconomic exclusion, and a lack of political accountability.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Dr. Jeevan Baniya joins host Hanna Geschewski to explore the deeper forces behind this moment. They discuss the grievances that brought young Nepalis to the streets, why these long-standing frustrations erupted now, and how the ‘Gen Z’ protests should be understood in relation to questions of representation and political change. The conversation also considers the diversity within Nepal’s youth movement and the pathways through which young people may shape politics in the aftermath of the uprising.

Jeevan Baniya is a political scientist and Deputy Director of the research institute Social Science Baha in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Hanna Geschewski is a PhD researcher in Human Geography at the Chr. Michelsen Institute and the University of Bergen in Norway. Her work focuses on migration, displacement and socio-environmental change in the Himalayan region and South Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>703</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d203f86a-978d-11f0-aee0-2302ed795215</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Bromell, &quot;The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2013)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nick Bromell is the author of <em>By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture</em> and<em> Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties</em>, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in <em>American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan,</em> and <em>The Sewanee Review</em>. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.</p>
<p>Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflects<br />the idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/5294"><br />The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy</a> (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideas<br />about freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,<br />and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.<br />Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.<br />Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.<br />Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democratic<br />practice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as political<br />theory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources for<br />democratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. </p>
<p>Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Bromell is the author of <em>By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture</em> and<em> Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties</em>, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in <em>American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan,</em> and <em>The Sewanee Review</em>. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.</p>
<p>Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflects<br />the idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/5294"><br />The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy</a> (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideas<br />about freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,<br />and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.<br />Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.<br />Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.<br />Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democratic<br />practice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as political<br />theory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources for<br />democratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. </p>
<p>Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55221770" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d00327cc-3d25-4a90-93c7-dcd60c757051/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d00327cc-3d25-4a90-93c7-dcd60c757051&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Bromell, &quot;The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2013)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nick Bromell is the author of By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture and Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan, and The Sewanee Review. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.

Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflectsthe idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideasabout freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democraticpractice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as politicaltheory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources fordemocratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. 

Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nick Bromell is the author of By the Sweat of the Brow: Labor and Literature in Antebellum American Culture and Tomorrow Never Knows: Rock and Psychedelics in the Sixties, both published by the University of Chicago Press. His articles and essays on African American literature and political thought have appeared in American Literature, American Literary History, Political Theory, Raritan, and The Sewanee Review. He teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and he blogs at thetimeisalwaysnow.org.

Nick Bromell’s book is a work of intellectual history and political theory that places Black thinkers—writers, activists, and artists—at the center of American democratic thought. He argues that African American intellectual traditions have continually reshaped the meaning of democracy in the U.S., offering critiques and visions that go beyond the frameworks typically emphasized in mainstream political philosophy. The title, taken from James Baldwin’s writings, reflectsthe idea that democracy is never finished—it is always urgent and ongoing.The Time is Always Now: Black Political Thought and the Transformation of U.S. Democracy (Oxford UP, 2013) posits that Black thought epitomizes the crucible of American Democratic theory Bromell contends that African American thinkers are not simply responding to oppression but actively producing political theory—ideasabout freedom, justice, equality, and collective life. Their insights emerge from lived experiences of slavery, segregation,and racial inequality, which provide a unique vantage point for critiquing American democracy.Secondly, Democracy is an ongoing and incomplete project of reconstruction, renewal, and revival. Building on Baldwin’s phrase “the time is always now,” Bromell argues that democracy must be constantly reimagined and fought for. Black intellectual traditions highlight democracy’s fragility and incompleteness, challenging myths of American exceptionalism.Third, American Democracy exists beyond what are known to be traditional American institutions. While mainstream American political theory often places focus on constitutions, governments, or laws, Black thinkers and citizens emphasize affective, relational, and cultural dimensions of democracy—dimensions that exhibit and feature American virtues and values of community, solidarity, and recognition.Fourth, Professor Bromell calls for a vibrant relational empathy and mutual recognition. In this sense, Bromell highlights Black thought’s insistence on recognition of shared humanity and mutual vulnerability as the foundation for democraticpractice. Thinkers as varied as James Baldwin, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr, Toni Morrison, and Ralph Ellison stress the necessity of empathy as a civic virtue. Bromell reframes African American intellectual history as politicaltheory, not just cultural or social commentary. He challenges readers to recognize that the deepest resources fordemocratic renewal in America come from traditions forged under conditions of racial oppression. 

Ultimately The Time is Always Now insists that democracy is less about stable American institutions and more about the practice of bettering and refining incipient features of American institutions-facing each other honestly, acknowledging and shouldering of collective pain, and being committed to a shared mutual recognition of the totality of our collective experience.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>702</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">862c5f26-9789-11f0-aff9-0338826e6b10</guid>
      <title>Robert F. Carley, &quot;Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice&quot; (SUNY Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While scholars of social and political movements tend to analyze tactics in terms of their effectiveness in achieving specific outcomes, Robert F. Carley argues by contrast that tactics are, above all, what social movements do. They are not mere means to an end so much as they are a public form of expression pointing out injustices and making just demands. Rooted in a highly original analysis of the tactically mediated relationship between race and mobilization in the work of Italian philosopher and revolutionary Antonio Gramsci, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438476438">Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice</a> (SUNY Press, 2019) demonstrates how tactics impact the organizational structures of social movements and expand the affinities of political communities. Carley looks at how Gramsci used innovative tactics to bridge perceptions of racial differences between factory workers and subaltern groups, the latter having been denigrated to the point of subhumanity by a complex Italian national racial economy. Newly envisioning Gramsci as a theorist of race within a broader context of social struggle, Carley connects Gramsci's insights into the political mobilizations of racialized subaltern groups to contemporary critical race theory and cultural studies of racialization and racism. Speaking across disciplines and drawing on a number of empirical examples, Carley offers a battery of original concepts to assist scholars and activists in analyzing the tactical practices of protests in which race is a central factor.</p>
<p>Author info - Robert F. Carley is Associate Professor of International Studies at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station.</p>
<p>Host info – Michael L. Rosino is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Molloy University, whose work focuses on racial politics, media, and democracy. He recently published the book <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469685632/democracy-is-awkward/">Democracy is Awkward: Grappling with Racism inside Grassroots Political Organizing</a> and an essay in Time on <a href="https://time.com/7307042/history-coalition-building/">the importance of cross-racial coalitions in social movements</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While scholars of social and political movements tend to analyze tactics in terms of their effectiveness in achieving specific outcomes, Robert F. Carley argues by contrast that tactics are, above all, what social movements do. They are not mere means to an end so much as they are a public form of expression pointing out injustices and making just demands. Rooted in a highly original analysis of the tactically mediated relationship between race and mobilization in the work of Italian philosopher and revolutionary Antonio Gramsci, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781438476438">Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice</a> (SUNY Press, 2019) demonstrates how tactics impact the organizational structures of social movements and expand the affinities of political communities. Carley looks at how Gramsci used innovative tactics to bridge perceptions of racial differences between factory workers and subaltern groups, the latter having been denigrated to the point of subhumanity by a complex Italian national racial economy. Newly envisioning Gramsci as a theorist of race within a broader context of social struggle, Carley connects Gramsci's insights into the political mobilizations of racialized subaltern groups to contemporary critical race theory and cultural studies of racialization and racism. Speaking across disciplines and drawing on a number of empirical examples, Carley offers a battery of original concepts to assist scholars and activists in analyzing the tactical practices of protests in which race is a central factor.</p>
<p>Author info - Robert F. Carley is Associate Professor of International Studies at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station.</p>
<p>Host info – Michael L. Rosino is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Molloy University, whose work focuses on racial politics, media, and democracy. He recently published the book <a href="https://uncpress.org/9781469685632/democracy-is-awkward/">Democracy is Awkward: Grappling with Racism inside Grassroots Political Organizing</a> and an essay in Time on <a href="https://time.com/7307042/history-coalition-building/">the importance of cross-racial coalitions in social movements</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43276289" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6890be90-ca34-41d6-ad1c-14d803177510/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6890be90-ca34-41d6-ad1c-14d803177510&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert F. Carley, &quot;Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice&quot; (SUNY Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While scholars of social and political movements tend to analyze tactics in terms of their effectiveness in achieving specific outcomes, Robert F. Carley argues by contrast that tactics are, above all, what social movements do. They are not mere means to an end so much as they are a public form of expression pointing out injustices and making just demands. Rooted in a highly original analysis of the tactically mediated relationship between race and mobilization in the work of Italian philosopher and revolutionary Antonio Gramsci, Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice (SUNY Press, 2019) demonstrates how tactics impact the organizational structures of social movements and expand the affinities of political communities. Carley looks at how Gramsci used innovative tactics to bridge perceptions of racial differences between factory workers and subaltern groups, the latter having been denigrated to the point of subhumanity by a complex Italian national racial economy. Newly envisioning Gramsci as a theorist of race within a broader context of social struggle, Carley connects Gramsci&apos;s insights into the political mobilizations of racialized subaltern groups to contemporary critical race theory and cultural studies of racialization and racism. Speaking across disciplines and drawing on a number of empirical examples, Carley offers a battery of original concepts to assist scholars and activists in analyzing the tactical practices of protests in which race is a central factor.

Author info - Robert F. Carley is Associate Professor of International Studies at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station.

Host info – Michael L. Rosino is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Molloy University, whose work focuses on racial politics, media, and democracy. He recently published the book Democracy is Awkward: Grappling with Racism inside Grassroots Political Organizing and an essay in Time on the importance of cross-racial coalitions in social movements.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While scholars of social and political movements tend to analyze tactics in terms of their effectiveness in achieving specific outcomes, Robert F. Carley argues by contrast that tactics are, above all, what social movements do. They are not mere means to an end so much as they are a public form of expression pointing out injustices and making just demands. Rooted in a highly original analysis of the tactically mediated relationship between race and mobilization in the work of Italian philosopher and revolutionary Antonio Gramsci, Culture and Tactics: Gramsci, Race, and the Politics of Practice (SUNY Press, 2019) demonstrates how tactics impact the organizational structures of social movements and expand the affinities of political communities. Carley looks at how Gramsci used innovative tactics to bridge perceptions of racial differences between factory workers and subaltern groups, the latter having been denigrated to the point of subhumanity by a complex Italian national racial economy. Newly envisioning Gramsci as a theorist of race within a broader context of social struggle, Carley connects Gramsci&apos;s insights into the political mobilizations of racialized subaltern groups to contemporary critical race theory and cultural studies of racialization and racism. Speaking across disciplines and drawing on a number of empirical examples, Carley offers a battery of original concepts to assist scholars and activists in analyzing the tactical practices of protests in which race is a central factor.

Author info - Robert F. Carley is Associate Professor of International Studies at Texas A&amp;M University, College Station.

Host info – Michael L. Rosino is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Molloy University, whose work focuses on racial politics, media, and democracy. He recently published the book Democracy is Awkward: Grappling with Racism inside Grassroots Political Organizing and an essay in Time on the importance of cross-racial coalitions in social movements.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>701</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">887fac40-9637-11f0-9307-c322384d06f9</guid>
      <title>Tim Weiner, &quot;The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century&quot; (Mariner Books, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book <em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.</p>
<p>Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to <em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. His new book is called <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063270183">The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century</a><em> </em>(Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today's battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. </p>
<p>At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn't being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA's officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. </p>
<p>Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. </p>
<p>The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. <em>The Mission</em> includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book <em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.</p>
<p>Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to <em>Legacy of Ashes</em>. His new book is called <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063270183">The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century</a><em> </em>(Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today's battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. </p>
<p>At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn't being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA's officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. </p>
<p>Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. </p>
<p>The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. <em>The Mission</em> includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46880137" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8439560e-a652-44fc-82a3-e11b3be7aa39/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8439560e-a652-44fc-82a3-e11b3be7aa39&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tim Weiner, &quot;The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century&quot; (Mariner Books, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book Legacy of Ashes. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.

Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to Legacy of Ashes. His new book is called The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century (Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today&apos;s battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. 

At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn&apos;t being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA&apos;s officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. 

Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. 

The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. The Mission includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2007, Tim Weiner published the book Legacy of Ashes. It was a history of the CIA from its founding to the early 2000s. As a university student in Italy, I bought the book as soon as it came out. The second non-fiction book I ever bought in English. The book was riveting. It kickstarted my interest in the CIA and covert operations.

Now, Tim Weiner has published a sequel to Legacy of Ashes. His new book is called The Mission: the CIA in the 21st Century (Mariner Books, 2025). It is a gripping and revelatory history of the from the late 1990s to the present. It ranges from 9/11 through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to today&apos;s battles with Russia and China--and with the President of the United States. 

At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. More than thirty overseas stations and bases had been shuttered, and scores that remained had been severely cut back. Many countries where surveillance was once deemed crucial went uncovered. Essential intelligence wasn&apos;t being collected. At the dawn of the information age, the CIA&apos;s officers and analysts worked with outmoded technology, struggling to distinguish the clear signals of significant facts from the cacophony of background noise. 

Then came September 11th, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq. A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets--Moscow, Beijing, Tehran--while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. 

The book reveals how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the war on terror--and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. The key message of the book is that the CIA must reclaim its original mission: know thy enemies. This is made even more difficult by the attacks on the intelligence community deployed by the second Trump presidency, from unqualified senior officials to loyalty tests. The fate of the free world hangs in the balance. The Mission includes exclusive on-the-record interviews with six former CIA directors, the top spymaster, thirteen station chiefs, and scores of top operations officers who served undercover for decades and have never spoken to a journalist before.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>700</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d8fad2c-9639-11f0-851c-1bc0cd6127a1</guid>
      <title>Kenja McCray, &quot;Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Academics and popular commentors have expressed common sentiments about the Black Power movement of the 1960s and 1970s—that it was male dominated and overrun with autocratic leaders. Yet women’s strategizing, management, and sustained work were integral to movement organizations’ functioning, and female advocates of cultural nationalism often exhibited a unique service-oriented, collaborative leadership style.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479833047"><br /></a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479833047">Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership</a><em> </em>(New York University Press, 2025) documents a variety of women Pan-African nationalists’ experiences, considering the ways they produced a distinctive kind of leadership through their devotion and service to the struggle for freedom and equality. Relying on oral histories, textual archival material, and scholarly literature, this book delves into women’s organizing and resistance efforts, investigating how they challenged the one-dimensional notions of gender roles within cultural nationalist organizations. Revealing a form of Black Power leadership that has never been highlighted, author Kenja McCray explores how women articulated and used their power to transform themselves and their environments. Through her examination, McCray argues that women’s Pan-Africanist cultural nationalist activism embodied a work-centered, people-centered, and African-centered form of service leadership. A dynamic and fascinating narrative of African American women activists, <em>Essential Soldiers</em> provides a new vantage point for considering Black Power leadership legacies.</p>
<p>This episode includes a reference to the book <em>Prose to the People: A Celebration of Black Bookstores</em> by Katie Mitchell (Random House, 2025). <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/prose-to-the-people#entry:390613@1:url">Listen to Mitchell discuss her book</a> at New Books in African American Studies, hosted by N’Kosi Oates.</p>
<p>Dr. Kenja McCray is Assistant Professor of History in the Department of Humanities at Clayton State University and coauthor of <em>Atlanta Metropolitan State College</em>: <em>A Campus History</em> (Arcadia Publishing, 2023)<em>.</em> You can find Dr. McCray at her <a href="https://kenjamccray.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/p/Essential-Soldiers-Women-Activists-and-Black-Power-Movement-Leadership-61576674309372/">Facebook</a>, and on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/essentialsoldiers/">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p>Find host Sullivan Summer at her <a href="https://sullivansummer.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/">Instagram</a>, and on <a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer">Substack</a>, where she and Dr. McCray continued their conversation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Academics and popular commentors have expressed common sentiments about the Black Power movement of the 1960s and 1970s—that it was male dominated and overrun with autocratic leaders. Yet women’s strategizing, management, and sustained work were integral to movement organizations’ functioning, and female advocates of cultural nationalism often exhibited a unique service-oriented, collaborative leadership style.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479833047"><br /></a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479833047">Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership</a><em> </em>(New York University Press, 2025) documents a variety of women Pan-African nationalists’ experiences, considering the ways they produced a distinctive kind of leadership through their devotion and service to the struggle for freedom and equality. Relying on oral histories, textual archival material, and scholarly literature, this book delves into women’s organizing and resistance efforts, investigating how they challenged the one-dimensional notions of gender roles within cultural nationalist organizations. Revealing a form of Black Power leadership that has never been highlighted, author Kenja McCray explores how women articulated and used their power to transform themselves and their environments. Through her examination, McCray argues that women’s Pan-Africanist cultural nationalist activism embodied a work-centered, people-centered, and African-centered form of service leadership. A dynamic and fascinating narrative of African American women activists, <em>Essential Soldiers</em> provides a new vantage point for considering Black Power leadership legacies.</p>
<p>This episode includes a reference to the book <em>Prose to the People: A Celebration of Black Bookstores</em> by Katie Mitchell (Random House, 2025). <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/prose-to-the-people#entry:390613@1:url">Listen to Mitchell discuss her book</a> at New Books in African American Studies, hosted by N’Kosi Oates.</p>
<p>Dr. Kenja McCray is Assistant Professor of History in the Department of Humanities at Clayton State University and coauthor of <em>Atlanta Metropolitan State College</em>: <em>A Campus History</em> (Arcadia Publishing, 2023)<em>.</em> You can find Dr. McCray at her <a href="https://kenjamccray.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/p/Essential-Soldiers-Women-Activists-and-Black-Power-Movement-Leadership-61576674309372/">Facebook</a>, and on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/essentialsoldiers/">Instagram</a>.</p>
<p>Find host Sullivan Summer at her <a href="https://sullivansummer.com/">website</a>, on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/">Instagram</a>, and on <a href="https://substack.com/@sullivansummer">Substack</a>, where she and Dr. McCray continued their conversation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63514139" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/96449669-934e-4550-86c4-9da344a05130/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=96449669-934e-4550-86c4-9da344a05130&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kenja McCray, &quot;Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Academics and popular commentors have expressed common sentiments about the Black Power movement of the 1960s and 1970s—that it was male dominated and overrun with autocratic leaders. Yet women’s strategizing, management, and sustained work were integral to movement organizations’ functioning, and female advocates of cultural nationalism often exhibited a unique service-oriented, collaborative leadership style.Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership (New York University Press, 2025) documents a variety of women Pan-African nationalists’ experiences, considering the ways they produced a distinctive kind of leadership through their devotion and service to the struggle for freedom and equality. Relying on oral histories, textual archival material, and scholarly literature, this book delves into women’s organizing and resistance efforts, investigating how they challenged the one-dimensional notions of gender roles within cultural nationalist organizations. Revealing a form of Black Power leadership that has never been highlighted, author Kenja McCray explores how women articulated and used their power to transform themselves and their environments. Through her examination, McCray argues that women’s Pan-Africanist cultural nationalist activism embodied a work-centered, people-centered, and African-centered form of service leadership. A dynamic and fascinating narrative of African American women activists, Essential Soldiers provides a new vantage point for considering Black Power leadership legacies.

This episode includes a reference to the book Prose to the People: A Celebration of Black Bookstores by Katie Mitchell (Random House, 2025). Listen to Mitchell discuss her book at New Books in African American Studies, hosted by N’Kosi Oates.

Dr. Kenja McCray is Assistant Professor of History in the Department of Humanities at Clayton State University and coauthor of Atlanta Metropolitan State College: A Campus History (Arcadia Publishing, 2023). You can find Dr. McCray at her website, on Facebook, and on Instagram.

Find host Sullivan Summer at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack, where she and Dr. McCray continued their conversation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Academics and popular commentors have expressed common sentiments about the Black Power movement of the 1960s and 1970s—that it was male dominated and overrun with autocratic leaders. Yet women’s strategizing, management, and sustained work were integral to movement organizations’ functioning, and female advocates of cultural nationalism often exhibited a unique service-oriented, collaborative leadership style.Essential Soldiers: Women Activists and Black Power Movement Leadership (New York University Press, 2025) documents a variety of women Pan-African nationalists’ experiences, considering the ways they produced a distinctive kind of leadership through their devotion and service to the struggle for freedom and equality. Relying on oral histories, textual archival material, and scholarly literature, this book delves into women’s organizing and resistance efforts, investigating how they challenged the one-dimensional notions of gender roles within cultural nationalist organizations. Revealing a form of Black Power leadership that has never been highlighted, author Kenja McCray explores how women articulated and used their power to transform themselves and their environments. Through her examination, McCray argues that women’s Pan-Africanist cultural nationalist activism embodied a work-centered, people-centered, and African-centered form of service leadership. A dynamic and fascinating narrative of African American women activists, Essential Soldiers provides a new vantage point for considering Black Power leadership legacies.

This episode includes a reference to the book Prose to the People: A Celebration of Black Bookstores by Katie Mitchell (Random House, 2025). Listen to Mitchell discuss her book at New Books in African American Studies, hosted by N’Kosi Oates.

Dr. Kenja McCray is Assistant Professor of History in the Department of Humanities at Clayton State University and coauthor of Atlanta Metropolitan State College: A Campus History (Arcadia Publishing, 2023). You can find Dr. McCray at her website, on Facebook, and on Instagram.

Find host Sullivan Summer at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack, where she and Dr. McCray continued their conversation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>699</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">353ae7a2-9515-11f0-9a21-f3878fe53db2</guid>
      <title>Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami, &quot;Causal Inquiry in International Relations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/58671?login=false">Causal Inquiry in International Relations</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024) by Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami defends a new, philosophically informed account of the principles which must underpin any causal research in a discipline such as International Relations. Its central claim is that there is an underlying logic to all causal inquiry, at the core of which is the search for empirical evidence capable of ruling out competing accounts of how specific events were brought about. Although this crucial fact is obscured by the ‘culture of generalization’ which predominates in contemporary social science, <em>all</em> causal knowledge ultimately depends on the provision of empirical support for concrete claims about specific events, located in space and time. </p>
<p><em>Causal Inquiry in International Relations</em> not only explores existing philosophical debates around causation; it also provides a detailed study of some of the most fundamental methodological questions which arise in the course of causal inquiry. Using examples drawn from philosophy and from the study of international relations, it demonstrates what is problematic about established ways of thinking, brings new clarity to both philosophical and methodological questions, and seeks to enhance collective understanding of the contribution that causal inquiry can make to empirically rich and critically aware scholarship about world politics. It concludes by situating ‘causal inquiry’ in relation to other forms of inquiry employed in the study of world politics, emphasizing especially the often unnoticed dependence of causal inquiry on precisely the kind of knowledge of specific events which historians are well placed to provide.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.reading.ac.uk/politics-international-relations/staff/adam-humphreys">Adam Humphreys</a> is Associate Professor and Head of Department in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading. He joined the University of Reading in 2013, having previously been a British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford (2007-10) and Fellow in Politics at Brasenose College, Oxford (2010-13). His principal research interests are in International Relations theory and meta-theory, especially causation and causal explanation, realism and neo-realism, the English School, and the relationship between theory and history. He also has research interests in British foreign and defence policy, strategy, and the ethics of war.<a href="https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/interpol/staff-profiles/listing/profile/hss/"><br />Hidemi Suganami</a> studied International Relations at Tokyo, Aberystwyth, and London Universities. His first academic appointment was at Keele in 1975, where he later became Professor of the Philosophy of International Relations. In 2004, he moved to Aberystwyth, where currently he is Emeritus Professor of International Politics. His publications include: <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-domestic-analogy-and-world-order-proposals-emeritus-professor-of-international-politics-hidemi-suganami/b76139eb4fb87c6a?ean=9780521055055&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals</a> (1989); <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-the-causes-of-war-emeritus-professor-of-international-politics-hidemi-suganami/7e26306a550d0ff7?ean=9780198273387&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">On the Causes of War</a> (1996); and, with Andrew Linklater, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/English-School-International-Relations-Contemporary/dp/0521858356/">The English School of International Relations</a> (2006). Over a number of years, he has been studying philosophical issues surrounding causation and explanation in International Relations.</p>
<p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/StephenSatkiewicz">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/58671?login=false">Causal Inquiry in International Relations</a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024) by Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami defends a new, philosophically informed account of the principles which must underpin any causal research in a discipline such as International Relations. Its central claim is that there is an underlying logic to all causal inquiry, at the core of which is the search for empirical evidence capable of ruling out competing accounts of how specific events were brought about. Although this crucial fact is obscured by the ‘culture of generalization’ which predominates in contemporary social science, <em>all</em> causal knowledge ultimately depends on the provision of empirical support for concrete claims about specific events, located in space and time. </p>
<p><em>Causal Inquiry in International Relations</em> not only explores existing philosophical debates around causation; it also provides a detailed study of some of the most fundamental methodological questions which arise in the course of causal inquiry. Using examples drawn from philosophy and from the study of international relations, it demonstrates what is problematic about established ways of thinking, brings new clarity to both philosophical and methodological questions, and seeks to enhance collective understanding of the contribution that causal inquiry can make to empirically rich and critically aware scholarship about world politics. It concludes by situating ‘causal inquiry’ in relation to other forms of inquiry employed in the study of world politics, emphasizing especially the often unnoticed dependence of causal inquiry on precisely the kind of knowledge of specific events which historians are well placed to provide.<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.reading.ac.uk/politics-international-relations/staff/adam-humphreys">Adam Humphreys</a> is Associate Professor and Head of Department in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading. He joined the University of Reading in 2013, having previously been a British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford (2007-10) and Fellow in Politics at Brasenose College, Oxford (2010-13). His principal research interests are in International Relations theory and meta-theory, especially causation and causal explanation, realism and neo-realism, the English School, and the relationship between theory and history. He also has research interests in British foreign and defence policy, strategy, and the ethics of war.<a href="https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/interpol/staff-profiles/listing/profile/hss/"><br />Hidemi Suganami</a> studied International Relations at Tokyo, Aberystwyth, and London Universities. His first academic appointment was at Keele in 1975, where he later became Professor of the Philosophy of International Relations. In 2004, he moved to Aberystwyth, where currently he is Emeritus Professor of International Politics. His publications include: <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-domestic-analogy-and-world-order-proposals-emeritus-professor-of-international-politics-hidemi-suganami/b76139eb4fb87c6a?ean=9780521055055&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals</a> (1989); <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-the-causes-of-war-emeritus-professor-of-international-politics-hidemi-suganami/7e26306a550d0ff7?ean=9780198273387&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">On the Causes of War</a> (1996); and, with Andrew Linklater, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/English-School-International-Relations-Contemporary/dp/0521858356/">The English School of International Relations</a> (2006). Over a number of years, he has been studying philosophical issues surrounding causation and explanation in International Relations.</p>
<p><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/StephenSatkiewicz">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em> is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="87127604" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/582629c4-c4c4-4407-ab76-9b5ae8541190/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=582629c4-c4c4-4407-ab76-9b5ae8541190&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami, &quot;Causal Inquiry in International Relations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Causal Inquiry in International Relations (Oxford UP, 2024) by Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami defends a new, philosophically informed account of the principles which must underpin any causal research in a discipline such as International Relations. Its central claim is that there is an underlying logic to all causal inquiry, at the core of which is the search for empirical evidence capable of ruling out competing accounts of how specific events were brought about. Although this crucial fact is obscured by the ‘culture of generalization’ which predominates in contemporary social science, all causal knowledge ultimately depends on the provision of empirical support for concrete claims about specific events, located in space and time. 

Causal Inquiry in International Relations not only explores existing philosophical debates around causation; it also provides a detailed study of some of the most fundamental methodological questions which arise in the course of causal inquiry. Using examples drawn from philosophy and from the study of international relations, it demonstrates what is problematic about established ways of thinking, brings new clarity to both philosophical and methodological questions, and seeks to enhance collective understanding of the contribution that causal inquiry can make to empirically rich and critically aware scholarship about world politics. It concludes by situating ‘causal inquiry’ in relation to other forms of inquiry employed in the study of world politics, emphasizing especially the often unnoticed dependence of causal inquiry on precisely the kind of knowledge of specific events which historians are well placed to provide.

Adam Humphreys is Associate Professor and Head of Department in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading. He joined the University of Reading in 2013, having previously been a British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford (2007-10) and Fellow in Politics at Brasenose College, Oxford (2010-13). His principal research interests are in International Relations theory and meta-theory, especially causation and causal explanation, realism and neo-realism, the English School, and the relationship between theory and history. He also has research interests in British foreign and defence policy, strategy, and the ethics of war.Hidemi Suganami studied International Relations at Tokyo, Aberystwyth, and London Universities. His first academic appointment was at Keele in 1975, where he later became Professor of the Philosophy of International Relations. In 2004, he moved to Aberystwyth, where currently he is Emeritus Professor of International Politics. His publications include: The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (1989); On the Causes of War (1996); and, with Andrew Linklater, The English School of International Relations (2006). Over a number of years, he has been studying philosophical issues surrounding causation and explanation in International Relations.

Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Causal Inquiry in International Relations (Oxford UP, 2024) by Adam R. C. Humphreys and Hidemi Suganami defends a new, philosophically informed account of the principles which must underpin any causal research in a discipline such as International Relations. Its central claim is that there is an underlying logic to all causal inquiry, at the core of which is the search for empirical evidence capable of ruling out competing accounts of how specific events were brought about. Although this crucial fact is obscured by the ‘culture of generalization’ which predominates in contemporary social science, all causal knowledge ultimately depends on the provision of empirical support for concrete claims about specific events, located in space and time. 

Causal Inquiry in International Relations not only explores existing philosophical debates around causation; it also provides a detailed study of some of the most fundamental methodological questions which arise in the course of causal inquiry. Using examples drawn from philosophy and from the study of international relations, it demonstrates what is problematic about established ways of thinking, brings new clarity to both philosophical and methodological questions, and seeks to enhance collective understanding of the contribution that causal inquiry can make to empirically rich and critically aware scholarship about world politics. It concludes by situating ‘causal inquiry’ in relation to other forms of inquiry employed in the study of world politics, emphasizing especially the often unnoticed dependence of causal inquiry on precisely the kind of knowledge of specific events which historians are well placed to provide.

Adam Humphreys is Associate Professor and Head of Department in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading. He joined the University of Reading in 2013, having previously been a British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford (2007-10) and Fellow in Politics at Brasenose College, Oxford (2010-13). His principal research interests are in International Relations theory and meta-theory, especially causation and causal explanation, realism and neo-realism, the English School, and the relationship between theory and history. He also has research interests in British foreign and defence policy, strategy, and the ethics of war.Hidemi Suganami studied International Relations at Tokyo, Aberystwyth, and London Universities. His first academic appointment was at Keele in 1975, where he later became Professor of the Philosophy of International Relations. In 2004, he moved to Aberystwyth, where currently he is Emeritus Professor of International Politics. His publications include: The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (1989); On the Causes of War (1996); and, with Andrew Linklater, The English School of International Relations (2006). Over a number of years, he has been studying philosophical issues surrounding causation and explanation in International Relations.

Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>698</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c72dc4c-9512-11f0-9718-43de12935f04</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Jacobs and Sidney M. Milkis, &quot;Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638901">Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</a><em> </em>﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who <em>belongs</em> within the American community. <em>Subverting The Republic</em> spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.</p>
<p>This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. <em>While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</em> went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700638901">Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</a><em> </em>﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who <em>belongs</em> within the American community. <em>Subverting The Republic</em> spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.</p>
<p>This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. <em>While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism</em> went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55449715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f81fad79-b7cf-4aa3-acb4-4f2bf66da2b7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f81fad79-b7cf-4aa3-acb4-4f2bf66da2b7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Jacobs and Sidney M. Milkis, &quot;Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism ﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who belongs within the American community. Subverting The Republic spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.

This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nicholas Jacobs (Colby College) and Sidney Milkis (University of Virginia) have a new book, Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism ﻿﻿(UP of Kansas, 2025), focusing on the idea of presidentialism, which is a way to think of political systems that include a dominant president or executive. In the United States, with the original constitutional system of separate co-equal branches of government, presidentialism disrupts the structure that was initially constructed under the U.S. Constitution. Over the course of more than two centuries, the United States has contended with the waxing and waning of presidential power within the multi-branch system. But Jacobs and Milkis maintain that since the 1990s we have seen an expansion of presidentialism, with a collective tendency to invest greater responsibilities and power in the presidential office itself as well as in the person who is serving in that capacity. Part of this thesis is also about how different, competing forces and ideologies have pushed for the use of presidential power to solve cultural struggles, which are not necessarily the institutional or structural role of the presidency. While the growth of American presidentialism may be more contemporary, it has origins in the struggles and ruptures of the 1960s and the 1970s—which were never fully resolved, especially in regard to who belongs within the American community. Subverting The Republic spends time examining this historical framework to help us think about the current structural, political, and cultural contexts, and especially the place of President Donald J. Trump within our understanding of presidentialism.

This book is a careful and deeply researched historical and political analysis of the shifts and changes in how the American presidency has operated over the past 75 years, and grounds many of the actions we have seen within both Trump Administrations, as well as much of the pushback against some of these actions and assertions of power. In weaving together the historical background with the structural form of the presidency and the various tools that a president has at his command, Jacobs and Milkis lay out both the precedents relied upon by presidents of the 21st century, especially Donald Trump, but also the anomalies of the Trump Administration and actions. While Subverting the Republic: Donald J. Trump and the Perils of Presidentialism went to press before President Trump was re-elected in 2024 (and there is a brief postscript that is included, noting the results and considering what the second Trump Administration might look like), the authors noted in our conversation that much of what they discuss about the first Trump Administration in the book has only grown and expanded in the second Trump Administration. This is an important analysis of the office of the American presidency and how that office, as conceived of by the Founders and situated within a constitutional system that includes other centers of power and responsibility, has evolved rather dramatically from that initial form and structure.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>697</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b126d89c-9409-11f0-b88f-6f20cf2e724a</guid>
      <title>Our Common Future: The Birth of Liberal Environmentalism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is the second episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/">series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> </a><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi">Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/">RSS</a>).</p>
<p>An Albertan oil man and a socialist policy wonk from Saskatchewan banded together to think up “eco-development,” a precursor to today’s sustainable development. This unlikely duo forged a global consensus at the United Nations, effectively codifying the reigning orthodoxy of liberal environmental governance. They told us that capitalism and sustainability are indeed compatible. Might that be the most utopian of all green dreams?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second episode of<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a> new season, <em>Green Dreams</em>. <em>Green Dreams</em> tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-04-green-dreams/">series page</a>, and subscribe today (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi"> </a><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi">Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/"> </a><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/">RSS</a>).</p>
<p>An Albertan oil man and a socialist policy wonk from Saskatchewan banded together to think up “eco-development,” a precursor to today’s sustainable development. This unlikely duo forged a global consensus at the United Nations, effectively codifying the reigning orthodoxy of liberal environmental governance. They told us that capitalism and sustainability are indeed compatible. Might that be the most utopian of all green dreams?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61942698" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3ad82878-9708-442b-9228-198ad7bbc1d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3ad82878-9708-442b-9228-198ad7bbc1d4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Our Common Future: The Birth of Liberal Environmentalism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is the second episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).

An Albertan oil man and a socialist policy wonk from Saskatchewan banded together to think up “eco-development,” a precursor to today’s sustainable development. This unlikely duo forged a global consensus at the United Nations, effectively codifying the reigning orthodoxy of liberal environmental governance. They told us that capitalism and sustainability are indeed compatible. Might that be the most utopian of all green dreams?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is the second episode of Cited Podcast’s new season, Green Dreams. Green Dreams tells stories of radical environmental thinkers and their dreams for our green future. Should we make those dreams reality, or are they actually nightmares? For the rest of the episodes, visit the series page, and subscribe today (Apple, Spotify, RSS).

An Albertan oil man and a socialist policy wonk from Saskatchewan banded together to think up “eco-development,” a precursor to today’s sustainable development. This unlikely duo forged a global consensus at the United Nations, effectively codifying the reigning orthodoxy of liberal environmental governance. They told us that capitalism and sustainability are indeed compatible. Might that be the most utopian of all green dreams?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>696</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7cc534e-9371-11f0-88b1-2b7be9fc312a</guid>
      <title>Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths, &quot;Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s international system is made up of states: Territorial entities with defined borders, with exclusive control within those borders, diplomatic recognition by other states outside of them and usually (though not always) tied to some idea of the “nation.”</p>
<p>But how many states have existed throughout history, such as during the nineteenth century? Some early counts put the number at just a few dozen–a measure that international relations professors Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths thought was far too low, missing polities throughout the non-Western world. Together, they put together their own count of independent states in the nineteenth century, as published in their latest work<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231219365"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231219365">Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century﻿</a> ﻿(Columbia UP, 2025).</p>
<p>Charles joins us today to talk about his work. He is a professor in the Department of Sociology and Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on the legacies of historical states and state systems, democratization, and civil resistance.</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/before-colonization-non-western-states-and-systems-in-the-nineteenth-century-by-charles-r-butcher-and-ryan-d-griffiths/"><em>Before Colonization</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"> <em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s international system is made up of states: Territorial entities with defined borders, with exclusive control within those borders, diplomatic recognition by other states outside of them and usually (though not always) tied to some idea of the “nation.”</p>
<p>But how many states have existed throughout history, such as during the nineteenth century? Some early counts put the number at just a few dozen–a measure that international relations professors Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths thought was far too low, missing polities throughout the non-Western world. Together, they put together their own count of independent states in the nineteenth century, as published in their latest work<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231219365"> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231219365">Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century﻿</a> ﻿(Columbia UP, 2025).</p>
<p>Charles joins us today to talk about his work. He is a professor in the Department of Sociology and Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on the legacies of historical states and state systems, democratization, and civil resistance.</p>
<p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/before-colonization-non-western-states-and-systems-in-the-nineteenth-century-by-charles-r-butcher-and-ryan-d-griffiths/"><em>Before Colonization</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"> <em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42934615" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ae405538-34d9-402a-ba49-ceb254d4dc86/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ae405538-34d9-402a-ba49-ceb254d4dc86&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths, &quot;Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s international system is made up of states: Territorial entities with defined borders, with exclusive control within those borders, diplomatic recognition by other states outside of them and usually (though not always) tied to some idea of the “nation.”

But how many states have existed throughout history, such as during the nineteenth century? Some early counts put the number at just a few dozen–a measure that international relations professors Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths thought was far too low, missing polities throughout the non-Western world. Together, they put together their own count of independent states in the nineteenth century, as published in their latest work Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century﻿ ﻿(Columbia UP, 2025).

Charles joins us today to talk about his work. He is a professor in the Department of Sociology and Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on the legacies of historical states and state systems, democratization, and civil resistance.

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Before Colonization. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s international system is made up of states: Territorial entities with defined borders, with exclusive control within those borders, diplomatic recognition by other states outside of them and usually (though not always) tied to some idea of the “nation.”

But how many states have existed throughout history, such as during the nineteenth century? Some early counts put the number at just a few dozen–a measure that international relations professors Charles R. Butcher and Ryan D. Griffiths thought was far too low, missing polities throughout the non-Western world. Together, they put together their own count of independent states in the nineteenth century, as published in their latest work Before Colonization: Non-Western States and Systems in the Nineteenth Century﻿ ﻿(Columbia UP, 2025).

Charles joins us today to talk about his work. He is a professor in the Department of Sociology and Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on the legacies of historical states and state systems, democratization, and civil resistance.

You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of Before Colonization. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.

Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>695</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9196bf9c-9288-11f0-b375-4b62d41a4350</guid>
      <title>George Papaconstantinou and Jean Pisani-Ferry, &quot;New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries&quot; (Agenda, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The need for collective action has never been greater, but geopolitics, structural changes and diverging preferences mean that existing global governance arrangements, devised at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, are either unravelling or outmoded. Reconciling this contradiction is today's pressing global policy challenge.<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788217736"><em>New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries</em></a> (Agenda, 2024), two of Europe's most-experienced policymakers and analysts outline a new agenda for global governance. They examine governance practices across several key policy areas - climate, health, trade and competition, banking and finance, taxation, migration and the digital economy - and consider what works and what doesn't, and why. The global governance solutions they put forward are ambitious but pragmatic. They require complexity, flexibility and compromise. Attributes that global governments are demonstrably short of, but today's global crises urgently demand.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The need for collective action has never been greater, but geopolitics, structural changes and diverging preferences mean that existing global governance arrangements, devised at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, are either unravelling or outmoded. Reconciling this contradiction is today's pressing global policy challenge.<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781788217736"><em>New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries</em></a> (Agenda, 2024), two of Europe's most-experienced policymakers and analysts outline a new agenda for global governance. They examine governance practices across several key policy areas - climate, health, trade and competition, banking and finance, taxation, migration and the digital economy - and consider what works and what doesn't, and why. The global governance solutions they put forward are ambitious but pragmatic. They require complexity, flexibility and compromise. Attributes that global governments are demonstrably short of, but today's global crises urgently demand.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39314588" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1ce3dadb-9757-4000-976f-4b57678f1107/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1ce3dadb-9757-4000-976f-4b57678f1107&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>George Papaconstantinou and Jean Pisani-Ferry, &quot;New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries&quot; (Agenda, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The need for collective action has never been greater, but geopolitics, structural changes and diverging preferences mean that existing global governance arrangements, devised at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, are either unravelling or outmoded. Reconciling this contradiction is today&apos;s pressing global policy challenge.In New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries (Agenda, 2024), two of Europe&apos;s most-experienced policymakers and analysts outline a new agenda for global governance. They examine governance practices across several key policy areas - climate, health, trade and competition, banking and finance, taxation, migration and the digital economy - and consider what works and what doesn&apos;t, and why. The global governance solutions they put forward are ambitious but pragmatic. They require complexity, flexibility and compromise. Attributes that global governments are demonstrably short of, but today&apos;s global crises urgently demand.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The need for collective action has never been greater, but geopolitics, structural changes and diverging preferences mean that existing global governance arrangements, devised at Bretton Woods in the 1940s, are either unravelling or outmoded. Reconciling this contradiction is today&apos;s pressing global policy challenge.In New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries (Agenda, 2024), two of Europe&apos;s most-experienced policymakers and analysts outline a new agenda for global governance. They examine governance practices across several key policy areas - climate, health, trade and competition, banking and finance, taxation, migration and the digital economy - and consider what works and what doesn&apos;t, and why. The global governance solutions they put forward are ambitious but pragmatic. They require complexity, flexibility and compromise. Attributes that global governments are demonstrably short of, but today&apos;s global crises urgently demand.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>694</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9384eab2-91ee-11f0-beeb-a3e9beb7b30b</guid>
      <title>Michael Poznansky, &quot;Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the "liberal international order" (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US's relative power within it has diminished.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/great-power-great-responsibility-how-the-liberal-international-order-shapes-us-foreign-policy-associate-professor-strategic-and-operational-research/32c36b88fc0ed071?ean=9780197812914&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy</a> (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America's approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order's core tenets in a given case.</p>
<p>Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Michael-Poznansky">Michael Poznansky</a>, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the "liberal international order" (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US's relative power within it has diminished.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/great-power-great-responsibility-how-the-liberal-international-order-shapes-us-foreign-policy-associate-professor-strategic-and-operational-research/32c36b88fc0ed071?ean=9780197812914&amp;next=t&amp;next=t">Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy</a> (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America's approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order's core tenets in a given case.</p>
<p>Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Michael-Poznansky">Michael Poznansky</a>, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28409425" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4d760acb-4817-4dbf-b733-4d95be8822e4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4d760acb-4817-4dbf-b733-4d95be8822e4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Poznansky, &quot;Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the &quot;liberal international order&quot; (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US&apos;s relative power within it has diminished.

In Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America&apos;s approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order&apos;s core tenets in a given case.

Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.

Our guest is Michael Poznansky, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the wake of World War II, the United States leveraged its hegemonic position in the international political system to gradually build a new global order centered around democracy, the expansion of free market capitalism, and the containment of communism. Named in retrospect the &quot;liberal international order&quot; (LIO), the system took decades to build and is still largely with us today even as the US&apos;s relative power within it has diminished.

In Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes US Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2025), Michael Poznansky explores how the LIO has influenced US foreign policy from its founding to the present. Proponents argue that its impact has been profound, producing a system that has been more rule-bound and beneficial than any previous order. Critics charge that it has failed to prevent the US itself from consistently violating rules and norms. Poznansky contends that the answer lies in between. While rule-breaking has been a constant feature of the postwar order, the nature of violations varies in surprising and poorly understood ways. America&apos;s approach to compliance with the LIO, including whether leaders feel the need to conceal rule violations at all, is a function of two primary factors: the intensity of competition over international order, and the burden of complying with the liberal order&apos;s core tenets in a given case.

Drawing on nine case studies, including the Korean War and Iraq War, Great Power, Great Responsibility sheds important light on the future of US foreign policy in an era where American unipolarity has ended and great power rivalry has returned.

Our guest is Michael Poznansky, an Associate Professor in the Strategic and Operational Research Department and a core faculty member in the Cyber &amp; Innovation Policy Institute at the U.S. Naval War College.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>693</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61e57948-92bd-11f0-920a-3763096164cc</guid>
      <title>When Should the Majority Rule – and is it time to resign democracy?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, well-known as authors of the best-selling book <em>How Democracies Die</em>, about their new framework for understanding when the best way to protect democracy is to constrain the wishes of the majority, and when we need to empower them. Lumping all majoritarian measures into the same category, they argue, can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. So does saving democracy actually depend on the recognition that while special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities?</p>
<p>This episode is based on Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s article “When Should the Majority Rule?” that was published in the January 2025 issue of the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> and the People, Power, Politics podcast. ﻿A transcript is available for download <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Levitsky-and-Ziblatt-Transcript.docx#asset:421529@1">here</a>.</p>
<p><u>Steven Levitsky</u> is Professor of Government at Harvard University and the co-author of <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. A leading scholar of authoritarianism and democratic backsliding, his earlier works include <em>Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War</em> (2010). Levitsky directs Harvard’s David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and served as Vice Provost for International Affairs. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Karl Deutsch Award for his contributions to comparative politics. His research spans Latin American politics, party systems, and informal institutions, influencing both academic debate and public discourse on democracy’s challenges.</p>
<p><u>Daniel Ziblatt</u> is Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University and co-author of <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. His book <em>Conservative Advantage</em> (2017) received the Luebbert Prize for the Best Book on Comparative Politics. Ziblatt’s research explores democratic durability and party systems, especially in Europe. He serves as Co-Director of Harvard’s Center for European Studies and holds a Guggenheim Fellowship. His work has significantly influenced understandings of conservative parties’ roles in sustaining democracy and the threats posed by their erosion.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, well-known as authors of the best-selling book <em>How Democracies Die</em>, about their new framework for understanding when the best way to protect democracy is to constrain the wishes of the majority, and when we need to empower them. Lumping all majoritarian measures into the same category, they argue, can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. So does saving democracy actually depend on the recognition that while special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities?</p>
<p>This episode is based on Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s article “When Should the Majority Rule?” that was published in the January 2025 issue of the <em>Journal of Democracy</em>, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the <em>Journal of Democracy</em> and the People, Power, Politics podcast. ﻿A transcript is available for download <a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Levitsky-and-Ziblatt-Transcript.docx#asset:421529@1">here</a>.</p>
<p><u>Steven Levitsky</u> is Professor of Government at Harvard University and the co-author of <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. A leading scholar of authoritarianism and democratic backsliding, his earlier works include <em>Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War</em> (2010). Levitsky directs Harvard’s David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and served as Vice Provost for International Affairs. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Karl Deutsch Award for his contributions to comparative politics. His research spans Latin American politics, party systems, and informal institutions, influencing both academic debate and public discourse on democracy’s challenges.</p>
<p><u>Daniel Ziblatt</u> is Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University and co-author of <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. His book <em>Conservative Advantage</em> (2017) received the Luebbert Prize for the Best Book on Comparative Politics. Ziblatt’s research explores democratic durability and party systems, especially in Europe. He serves as Co-Director of Harvard’s Center for European Studies and holds a Guggenheim Fellowship. His work has significantly influenced understandings of conservative parties’ roles in sustaining democracy and the threats posed by their erosion.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27448703" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/05135bbd-e205-43a9-91fa-46cac3b9cd36/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=05135bbd-e205-43a9-91fa-46cac3b9cd36&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>When Should the Majority Rule – and is it time to resign democracy?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, well-known as authors of the best-selling book How Democracies Die, about their new framework for understanding when the best way to protect democracy is to constrain the wishes of the majority, and when we need to empower them. Lumping all majoritarian measures into the same category, they argue, can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. So does saving democracy actually depend on the recognition that while special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities?

This episode is based on Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s article “When Should the Majority Rule?” that was published in the January 2025 issue of the Journal of Democracy, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the Journal of Democracy and the People, Power, Politics podcast. ﻿A transcript is available for download here.

Steven Levitsky is Professor of Government at Harvard University and the co-author of How Democracies Die (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. A leading scholar of authoritarianism and democratic backsliding, his earlier works include Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (2010). Levitsky directs Harvard’s David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and served as Vice Provost for International Affairs. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Karl Deutsch Award for his contributions to comparative politics. His research spans Latin American politics, party systems, and informal institutions, influencing both academic debate and public discourse on democracy’s challenges.

Daniel Ziblatt is Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University and co-author of How Democracies Die (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. His book Conservative Advantage (2017) received the Luebbert Prize for the Best Book on Comparative Politics. Ziblatt’s research explores democratic durability and party systems, especially in Europe. He serves as Co-Director of Harvard’s Center for European Studies and holds a Guggenheim Fellowship. His work has significantly influenced understandings of conservative parties’ roles in sustaining democracy and the threats posed by their erosion.

Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, well-known as authors of the best-selling book How Democracies Die, about their new framework for understanding when the best way to protect democracy is to constrain the wishes of the majority, and when we need to empower them. Lumping all majoritarian measures into the same category, they argue, can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. So does saving democracy actually depend on the recognition that while special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities?

This episode is based on Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s article “When Should the Majority Rule?” that was published in the January 2025 issue of the Journal of Democracy, and is part of an ongoing partnership between the Journal of Democracy and the People, Power, Politics podcast. ﻿A transcript is available for download here.

Steven Levitsky is Professor of Government at Harvard University and the co-author of How Democracies Die (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. A leading scholar of authoritarianism and democratic backsliding, his earlier works include Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (2010). Levitsky directs Harvard’s David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and served as Vice Provost for International Affairs. He has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Karl Deutsch Award for his contributions to comparative politics. His research spans Latin American politics, party systems, and informal institutions, influencing both academic debate and public discourse on democracy’s challenges.

Daniel Ziblatt is Eaton Professor of the Science of Government at Harvard University and co-author of How Democracies Die (2018), which won the Lionel Gelber Prize and the Arthur Ross Book Award. His book Conservative Advantage (2017) received the Luebbert Prize for the Best Book on Comparative Politics. Ziblatt’s research explores democratic durability and party systems, especially in Europe. He serves as Co-Director of Harvard’s Center for European Studies and holds a Guggenheim Fellowship. His work has significantly influenced understandings of conservative parties’ roles in sustaining democracy and the threats posed by their erosion.

Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>692</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5301478-8eec-11f0-b606-c7ccc658f9e9</guid>
      <title>Matthew Benjamin Cole, &quot;Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century&quot; (U of Michigan Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.</em></p>
<p>                                                                                                                   – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025</p>
<p>After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472057740">Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century</a> (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom.</p>
<p>Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview <a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/br86b6684">here as an online publication</a> with downloadable options.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.</em></p>
<p>                                                                                                                   – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025</p>
<p>After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472057740">Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century</a> (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom.</p>
<p>Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview <a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/br86b6684">here as an online publication</a> with downloadable options.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="99736384" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/396dc078-5f08-4649-bdc9-f6b3ab4a838e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=396dc078-5f08-4649-bdc9-f6b3ab4a838e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Benjamin Cole, &quot;Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century&quot; (U of Michigan Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:43:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you&apos;ll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don&apos;t fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.

                                                                                                                   – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025

After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom.

Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you&apos;ll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don&apos;t fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.

                                                                                                                   – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025

After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom.

Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>691</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a2ad93c-8e74-11f0-a508-5303c17385c9</guid>
      <title>“Plato and the Tyrant” with author James Romm</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 388 BCE, Plato, at the age of about forty and in the midst of writing <em>The Republic, </em>visited for the first time the then-Greek city state of Syracuse, on the eastern shores of Sicily. Syracuse was ruled by a tyrant, Dionysius, who on death was followed by his son, also a tyrant. Over the course of his three separate visits to Syracuse over the years, encountering both father and son, Plato arrived at the model for tyranny laid out in <em>The Republic. </em>That’s the argument of James Romm’s splendid book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324093183">Plato and the Tyrant: The Fall of Greece’s Greatest Dynasty and the Making of a Philosophic Masterpiece</a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2025)<em>. </em>In our conversation, Romm renders, not the familiar “marble Plato” of his God-like dialogues, but an altogether human figure grappling with his own personal vulnerabilities. We discuss, too, the parallels to today’s times, in which tyrants and would-be tyrants continue to plague the world. The tyrant, as Romm ably shows, is an archetype for all time.</p>
<p>James Romm is the James H. Ottaway Jr. Professor of Classics at Bard College and editor of the Ancient Lives biography series from Yale University Press.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 388 BCE, Plato, at the age of about forty and in the midst of writing <em>The Republic, </em>visited for the first time the then-Greek city state of Syracuse, on the eastern shores of Sicily. Syracuse was ruled by a tyrant, Dionysius, who on death was followed by his son, also a tyrant. Over the course of his three separate visits to Syracuse over the years, encountering both father and son, Plato arrived at the model for tyranny laid out in <em>The Republic. </em>That’s the argument of James Romm’s splendid book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324093183">Plato and the Tyrant: The Fall of Greece’s Greatest Dynasty and the Making of a Philosophic Masterpiece</a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2025)<em>. </em>In our conversation, Romm renders, not the familiar “marble Plato” of his God-like dialogues, but an altogether human figure grappling with his own personal vulnerabilities. We discuss, too, the parallels to today’s times, in which tyrants and would-be tyrants continue to plague the world. The tyrant, as Romm ably shows, is an archetype for all time.</p>
<p>James Romm is the James H. Ottaway Jr. Professor of Classics at Bard College and editor of the Ancient Lives biography series from Yale University Press.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52192872" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/38382197-8548-4a53-99d5-a311279b1ae0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=38382197-8548-4a53-99d5-a311279b1ae0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>“Plato and the Tyrant” with author James Romm</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 388 BCE, Plato, at the age of about forty and in the midst of writing The Republic, visited for the first time the then-Greek city state of Syracuse, on the eastern shores of Sicily. Syracuse was ruled by a tyrant, Dionysius, who on death was followed by his son, also a tyrant. Over the course of his three separate visits to Syracuse over the years, encountering both father and son, Plato arrived at the model for tyranny laid out in The Republic. That’s the argument of James Romm’s splendid book, Plato and the Tyrant: The Fall of Greece’s Greatest Dynasty and the Making of a Philosophic Masterpiece (W.W. Norton, 2025). In our conversation, Romm renders, not the familiar “marble Plato” of his God-like dialogues, but an altogether human figure grappling with his own personal vulnerabilities. We discuss, too, the parallels to today’s times, in which tyrants and would-be tyrants continue to plague the world. The tyrant, as Romm ably shows, is an archetype for all time.

James Romm is the James H. Ottaway Jr. Professor of Classics at Bard College and editor of the Ancient Lives biography series from Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 388 BCE, Plato, at the age of about forty and in the midst of writing The Republic, visited for the first time the then-Greek city state of Syracuse, on the eastern shores of Sicily. Syracuse was ruled by a tyrant, Dionysius, who on death was followed by his son, also a tyrant. Over the course of his three separate visits to Syracuse over the years, encountering both father and son, Plato arrived at the model for tyranny laid out in The Republic. That’s the argument of James Romm’s splendid book, Plato and the Tyrant: The Fall of Greece’s Greatest Dynasty and the Making of a Philosophic Masterpiece (W.W. Norton, 2025). In our conversation, Romm renders, not the familiar “marble Plato” of his God-like dialogues, but an altogether human figure grappling with his own personal vulnerabilities. We discuss, too, the parallels to today’s times, in which tyrants and would-be tyrants continue to plague the world. The tyrant, as Romm ably shows, is an archetype for all time.

James Romm is the James H. Ottaway Jr. Professor of Classics at Bard College and editor of the Ancient Lives biography series from Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>690</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0a730df8-8e2e-11f0-9f22-7ffea4b0a532</guid>
      <title>Vera Michlin-Shapir, &quot;Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501760549">Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era</a> (Cornell UP, 2021) offers a new framework for understanding Russian national identity by focusing on the impact of globalization on its formation, something which has been largely overlooked. This approach sheds new light on the Russian case, revealing a dynamic Russian identity that is developing along the lines of other countries exposed to globalization. Vera Michlin-Shapir shows how along with the freedoms afforded when Russia joined the globalizing world in the 1990s came globalization's disruptions.</p>
<p>Michlin-Shapir describes Putin's rise to power and his project to reaffirm a stronger identity not as a uniquely Russian diversion from liberal democracy, but as part of a broader phenomenon of challenges to globalization. She underlines the limits of Putin's regime to shape Russian politics and society, which is still very much impacted by global trends. As well, Michlin-Shapir questions a prevalent approach in Russia studies that views Russia's experience with national identity as abnormal or defective, either being too weak or too aggressive.</p>
<p>What is offered is a novel explanation for the so-called Russian identity crisis. As the liberal postwar order faces growing challenges, Russia's experience can be an instructive example of how these processes unfold. This study ties Russia's authoritarian politics and nationalist rallying to the shortcomings of globalization and neoliberal economics, potentially making Russia "patient zero" of the anti-globalist populist wave and rise of neo-authoritarian regimes. In this way, <em>Fluid Russia</em> contributes to the broader understanding of national identity in the current age and the complexities of identity formation in the global world.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong> Vera Michlin-Shapir (she/her), is a Visiting Research Fellow at King's Russia Institute, King's College London.</p>
<p><strong>Host: </strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke <a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman">here</a></p>
<p>Linktree <a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501760549">Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era</a> (Cornell UP, 2021) offers a new framework for understanding Russian national identity by focusing on the impact of globalization on its formation, something which has been largely overlooked. This approach sheds new light on the Russian case, revealing a dynamic Russian identity that is developing along the lines of other countries exposed to globalization. Vera Michlin-Shapir shows how along with the freedoms afforded when Russia joined the globalizing world in the 1990s came globalization's disruptions.</p>
<p>Michlin-Shapir describes Putin's rise to power and his project to reaffirm a stronger identity not as a uniquely Russian diversion from liberal democracy, but as part of a broader phenomenon of challenges to globalization. She underlines the limits of Putin's regime to shape Russian politics and society, which is still very much impacted by global trends. As well, Michlin-Shapir questions a prevalent approach in Russia studies that views Russia's experience with national identity as abnormal or defective, either being too weak or too aggressive.</p>
<p>What is offered is a novel explanation for the so-called Russian identity crisis. As the liberal postwar order faces growing challenges, Russia's experience can be an instructive example of how these processes unfold. This study ties Russia's authoritarian politics and nationalist rallying to the shortcomings of globalization and neoliberal economics, potentially making Russia "patient zero" of the anti-globalist populist wave and rise of neo-authoritarian regimes. In this way, <em>Fluid Russia</em> contributes to the broader understanding of national identity in the current age and the complexities of identity formation in the global world.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong> Vera Michlin-Shapir (she/her), is a Visiting Research Fellow at King's Russia Institute, King's College London.</p>
<p><strong>Host: </strong>Jenna Pittman (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke <a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman">here</a></p>
<p>Linktree <a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49290908" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5373936d-58e7-4562-bd3c-79a782783a01/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5373936d-58e7-4562-bd3c-79a782783a01&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vera Michlin-Shapir, &quot;Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era (Cornell UP, 2021) offers a new framework for understanding Russian national identity by focusing on the impact of globalization on its formation, something which has been largely overlooked. This approach sheds new light on the Russian case, revealing a dynamic Russian identity that is developing along the lines of other countries exposed to globalization. Vera Michlin-Shapir shows how along with the freedoms afforded when Russia joined the globalizing world in the 1990s came globalization&apos;s disruptions.

Michlin-Shapir describes Putin&apos;s rise to power and his project to reaffirm a stronger identity not as a uniquely Russian diversion from liberal democracy, but as part of a broader phenomenon of challenges to globalization. She underlines the limits of Putin&apos;s regime to shape Russian politics and society, which is still very much impacted by global trends. As well, Michlin-Shapir questions a prevalent approach in Russia studies that views Russia&apos;s experience with national identity as abnormal or defective, either being too weak or too aggressive.

What is offered is a novel explanation for the so-called Russian identity crisis. As the liberal postwar order faces growing challenges, Russia&apos;s experience can be an instructive example of how these processes unfold. This study ties Russia&apos;s authoritarian politics and nationalist rallying to the shortcomings of globalization and neoliberal economics, potentially making Russia &quot;patient zero&quot; of the anti-globalist populist wave and rise of neo-authoritarian regimes. In this way, Fluid Russia contributes to the broader understanding of national identity in the current age and the complexities of identity formation in the global world.

Guest: Vera Michlin-Shapir (she/her), is a Visiting Research Fellow at King&apos;s Russia Institute, King&apos;s College London.

Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.

Scholars@Duke here

Linktree here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fluid Russia: Between the Global and the National in the Post-Soviet Era (Cornell UP, 2021) offers a new framework for understanding Russian national identity by focusing on the impact of globalization on its formation, something which has been largely overlooked. This approach sheds new light on the Russian case, revealing a dynamic Russian identity that is developing along the lines of other countries exposed to globalization. Vera Michlin-Shapir shows how along with the freedoms afforded when Russia joined the globalizing world in the 1990s came globalization&apos;s disruptions.

Michlin-Shapir describes Putin&apos;s rise to power and his project to reaffirm a stronger identity not as a uniquely Russian diversion from liberal democracy, but as part of a broader phenomenon of challenges to globalization. She underlines the limits of Putin&apos;s regime to shape Russian politics and society, which is still very much impacted by global trends. As well, Michlin-Shapir questions a prevalent approach in Russia studies that views Russia&apos;s experience with national identity as abnormal or defective, either being too weak or too aggressive.

What is offered is a novel explanation for the so-called Russian identity crisis. As the liberal postwar order faces growing challenges, Russia&apos;s experience can be an instructive example of how these processes unfold. This study ties Russia&apos;s authoritarian politics and nationalist rallying to the shortcomings of globalization and neoliberal economics, potentially making Russia &quot;patient zero&quot; of the anti-globalist populist wave and rise of neo-authoritarian regimes. In this way, Fluid Russia contributes to the broader understanding of national identity in the current age and the complexities of identity formation in the global world.

Guest: Vera Michlin-Shapir (she/her), is a Visiting Research Fellow at King&apos;s Russia Institute, King&apos;s College London.

Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.

Scholars@Duke here

Linktree here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>689</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29c19cbe-8e43-11f0-a9b3-eb08fcf5869d</guid>
      <title>Thomas Graham, &quot;Getting Russia Right&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia,” Winston Churchill once said. “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” That saying sounds as true now as ever in the midst of Russia’s war in Ukraine. In <em>Getting Russia Right </em>(Polity Press, 2023), however, Thomas Graham provides an expert perspective on Russian history and statecraft and offers timely keys to Russian national interests which can help the United States get Russia right.</p>
<p>As US-Russian relations scrape the depths of Cold-War antagonism, the promise of partnership that beguiled American administrations during the first post-Soviet decades increasingly appears to have been false from the start. Why did American leaders persist in pursuing it? Was there another path that would have produced more constructive relations or better prepared Washington to face the challenge Russia poses today?</p>
<p>With a practitioner's eye honed during decades of work on Russian affairs, Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, deftly traces the evolution of opposing ideas of national purpose that created an inherent tension in relations. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509556892">Getting Russia Right</a><em> </em>(Polity Press, 2023) identifies the blind spots that prevented Washington from seeing Russia as it really is and crafting a policy to advance American interests without provoking an aggressive Russian response. Distilling the Putin factor to reveal the contours of the Russia challenge facing the United States whenever he departs the scene, Graham lays out a compelling way to deal with it so that the United States can continue to advance its interests in a rapidly changing world.</p>
<p>Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached by email <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">here</a> or via his <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">website</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia,” Winston Churchill once said. “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” That saying sounds as true now as ever in the midst of Russia’s war in Ukraine. In <em>Getting Russia Right </em>(Polity Press, 2023), however, Thomas Graham provides an expert perspective on Russian history and statecraft and offers timely keys to Russian national interests which can help the United States get Russia right.</p>
<p>As US-Russian relations scrape the depths of Cold-War antagonism, the promise of partnership that beguiled American administrations during the first post-Soviet decades increasingly appears to have been false from the start. Why did American leaders persist in pursuing it? Was there another path that would have produced more constructive relations or better prepared Washington to face the challenge Russia poses today?</p>
<p>With a practitioner's eye honed during decades of work on Russian affairs, Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, deftly traces the evolution of opposing ideas of national purpose that created an inherent tension in relations. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509556892">Getting Russia Right</a><em> </em>(Polity Press, 2023) identifies the blind spots that prevented Washington from seeing Russia as it really is and crafting a policy to advance American interests without provoking an aggressive Russian response. Distilling the Putin factor to reveal the contours of the Russia challenge facing the United States whenever he departs the scene, Graham lays out a compelling way to deal with it so that the United States can continue to advance its interests in a rapidly changing world.</p>
<p>Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached by email <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">here</a> or via his <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">website</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57001066" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fbcd8d40-0785-4338-afac-7ec75c491bff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fbcd8d40-0785-4338-afac-7ec75c491bff&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas Graham, &quot;Getting Russia Right&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia,” Winston Churchill once said. “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” That saying sounds as true now as ever in the midst of Russia’s war in Ukraine. In Getting Russia Right (Polity Press, 2023), however, Thomas Graham provides an expert perspective on Russian history and statecraft and offers timely keys to Russian national interests which can help the United States get Russia right.

As US-Russian relations scrape the depths of Cold-War antagonism, the promise of partnership that beguiled American administrations during the first post-Soviet decades increasingly appears to have been false from the start. Why did American leaders persist in pursuing it? Was there another path that would have produced more constructive relations or better prepared Washington to face the challenge Russia poses today?

With a practitioner&apos;s eye honed during decades of work on Russian affairs, Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, deftly traces the evolution of opposing ideas of national purpose that created an inherent tension in relations. Getting Russia Right (Polity Press, 2023) identifies the blind spots that prevented Washington from seeing Russia as it really is and crafting a policy to advance American interests without provoking an aggressive Russian response. Distilling the Putin factor to reveal the contours of the Russia challenge facing the United States whenever he departs the scene, Graham lays out a compelling way to deal with it so that the United States can continue to advance its interests in a rapidly changing world.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached by email here or via his website. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia,” Winston Churchill once said. “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” That saying sounds as true now as ever in the midst of Russia’s war in Ukraine. In Getting Russia Right (Polity Press, 2023), however, Thomas Graham provides an expert perspective on Russian history and statecraft and offers timely keys to Russian national interests which can help the United States get Russia right.

As US-Russian relations scrape the depths of Cold-War antagonism, the promise of partnership that beguiled American administrations during the first post-Soviet decades increasingly appears to have been false from the start. Why did American leaders persist in pursuing it? Was there another path that would have produced more constructive relations or better prepared Washington to face the challenge Russia poses today?

With a practitioner&apos;s eye honed during decades of work on Russian affairs, Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, deftly traces the evolution of opposing ideas of national purpose that created an inherent tension in relations. Getting Russia Right (Polity Press, 2023) identifies the blind spots that prevented Washington from seeing Russia as it really is and crafting a policy to advance American interests without provoking an aggressive Russian response. Distilling the Putin factor to reveal the contours of the Russia challenge facing the United States whenever he departs the scene, Graham lays out a compelling way to deal with it so that the United States can continue to advance its interests in a rapidly changing world.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached by email here or via his website. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>688</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0b3ccc2a-8d4c-11f0-952c-670e7a23bf82</guid>
      <title>Andrea Louise Campbell, &quot;Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why Americans favor progressive taxation in principle but not in practice</p>
<p>Most Americans support progressive taxation in principle, and want the rich to pay more. But the specific tax policies that most favor are more regressive than progressive. What is behind such a disconnect? In ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691137865">Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes</a> (Princeton UP, 2025), Andrea Louise Campbell examines public opinion on taxation, exploring why what Americans favor in principle differs from what they accept in practice. Campbell shows that since the federal income tax began a century ago, the rich have fought for lower taxes through reduced rates and a complicated system of tax breaks. The resulting complexity leaves the public confused about who benefits from the convoluted tax code, and leads to tax preferences that are driven by factors other than principles or interests.</p>
<p>Campbell argues that tax attitudes vary little by income, or by party, as some Democrats, more Republicans, and even more independents want most taxes decreased. Instead, white opinion on nearly every tax is racialized. Many do not realize the rich benefit the most from tax breaks, attitudes toward which are racialized, too. And among Black and Hispanic Americans, long subject to government coercion, greater support for government spending is not matched by greater support for taxation. Everyone has a reason to dislike taxes, which helps antitax Republicans win votes--and helps the rich in their long campaign to get their own taxes reduced and undermine progressivity.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Americans favor progressive taxation in principle but not in practice</p>
<p>Most Americans support progressive taxation in principle, and want the rich to pay more. But the specific tax policies that most favor are more regressive than progressive. What is behind such a disconnect? In ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691137865">Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes</a> (Princeton UP, 2025), Andrea Louise Campbell examines public opinion on taxation, exploring why what Americans favor in principle differs from what they accept in practice. Campbell shows that since the federal income tax began a century ago, the rich have fought for lower taxes through reduced rates and a complicated system of tax breaks. The resulting complexity leaves the public confused about who benefits from the convoluted tax code, and leads to tax preferences that are driven by factors other than principles or interests.</p>
<p>Campbell argues that tax attitudes vary little by income, or by party, as some Democrats, more Republicans, and even more independents want most taxes decreased. Instead, white opinion on nearly every tax is racialized. Many do not realize the rich benefit the most from tax breaks, attitudes toward which are racialized, too. And among Black and Hispanic Americans, long subject to government coercion, greater support for government spending is not matched by greater support for taxation. Everyone has a reason to dislike taxes, which helps antitax Republicans win votes--and helps the rich in their long campaign to get their own taxes reduced and undermine progressivity.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51636189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a0145645-c9a4-49db-b3aa-4516ec1d0fbc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a0145645-c9a4-49db-b3aa-4516ec1d0fbc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrea Louise Campbell, &quot;Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why Americans favor progressive taxation in principle but not in practice

Most Americans support progressive taxation in principle, and want the rich to pay more. But the specific tax policies that most favor are more regressive than progressive. What is behind such a disconnect? In ﻿Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes (Princeton UP, 2025), Andrea Louise Campbell examines public opinion on taxation, exploring why what Americans favor in principle differs from what they accept in practice. Campbell shows that since the federal income tax began a century ago, the rich have fought for lower taxes through reduced rates and a complicated system of tax breaks. The resulting complexity leaves the public confused about who benefits from the convoluted tax code, and leads to tax preferences that are driven by factors other than principles or interests.

Campbell argues that tax attitudes vary little by income, or by party, as some Democrats, more Republicans, and even more independents want most taxes decreased. Instead, white opinion on nearly every tax is racialized. Many do not realize the rich benefit the most from tax breaks, attitudes toward which are racialized, too. And among Black and Hispanic Americans, long subject to government coercion, greater support for government spending is not matched by greater support for taxation. Everyone has a reason to dislike taxes, which helps antitax Republicans win votes--and helps the rich in their long campaign to get their own taxes reduced and undermine progressivity.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why Americans favor progressive taxation in principle but not in practice

Most Americans support progressive taxation in principle, and want the rich to pay more. But the specific tax policies that most favor are more regressive than progressive. What is behind such a disconnect? In ﻿Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes (Princeton UP, 2025), Andrea Louise Campbell examines public opinion on taxation, exploring why what Americans favor in principle differs from what they accept in practice. Campbell shows that since the federal income tax began a century ago, the rich have fought for lower taxes through reduced rates and a complicated system of tax breaks. The resulting complexity leaves the public confused about who benefits from the convoluted tax code, and leads to tax preferences that are driven by factors other than principles or interests.

Campbell argues that tax attitudes vary little by income, or by party, as some Democrats, more Republicans, and even more independents want most taxes decreased. Instead, white opinion on nearly every tax is racialized. Many do not realize the rich benefit the most from tax breaks, attitudes toward which are racialized, too. And among Black and Hispanic Americans, long subject to government coercion, greater support for government spending is not matched by greater support for taxation. Everyone has a reason to dislike taxes, which helps antitax Republicans win votes--and helps the rich in their long campaign to get their own taxes reduced and undermine progressivity.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>687</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3ead4b0-8c86-11f0-98f5-67b827c199a4</guid>
      <title>Ariel Colonomos, &quot;Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192890559">Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement </a>(Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192890559">Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement </a>(Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40156655" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2486f3a2-67db-4ff1-bae9-0efdde96052b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2486f3a2-67db-4ff1-bae9-0efdde96052b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ariel Colonomos, &quot;Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement (Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pricing Lives: The Political Art of Measurement (Oxford UP, 2023) discusses how human lives are equated with the material, and argues that pricing lives lies at the core of the political; in fact, as in Plato or Hobbes, and in the Weberian ethics of responsibility, measurement is considered to be one of its central features. Ariel Colonomos argues that this measure relies primarily on human lives and interests, and that the material equivalence to lives is twofold. The equivalence is a double equation, as we pay for lives and we pay with lives. This double equation constitutes the measurement upon which the political equilibrium of a society depends and is thus a key constitutive part of the political. The book adopts two approaches, both with an interdisciplinary perspective: one explanatory and the other normative. First, it explains the nexus between existential goods and material goods, drawing on a detailed analysis of several case studies from contemporary politics, both domestic and international. Second, it discusses normatively the material valuation of human lives and the human value of material goods. Value attribution and the question of the material equivalent to lives are of relevance not only for political theory and philosophy, but also for sociology, history, international relations, and legal studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>686</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed66fbc0-8c11-11f0-b6d6-6fa4cb8ebdbd</guid>
      <title>Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley, &quot;Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland&apos;s Illiberal Revolution&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In Poland between 2015 and 2023, Jarosław Kaczyński and his Law and Justice Party (PiS) attempted a novel experiment. Could a governing party sustain a coalition committed religiously inspired social conservatism, old-school left-wing welfarism, and antipathy to Moscow and Brussels while also unravelling democratic institutions?</p>
<p>It was, write Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley in <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/good-change-the-rise-and-fall-of-poland-s-illiberal-revolution-stanley-bill/7876625?ean=9781503643680">Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland’s Illiberal Revolution</a> (Stanford University Press, 2025), an experiment in "how much illiberalism the electorate would bear".</p>
<p>With Kaczyński and PiS now in opposition but threatening a return in 2027, Donald Tusk's liberal administration is road-testing how effectively illiberalism can be unpicked without antagonising the voters it needs to stay in office.</p>
<p>Stanley Bill is Professor of Polish Studies at the University of Cambridge, and Ben Stanley is an associate professor at the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a><em> is policy analyst at Medley Advisors and a writer/podcaster at </em><a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Poland between 2015 and 2023, Jarosław Kaczyński and his Law and Justice Party (PiS) attempted a novel experiment. Could a governing party sustain a coalition committed religiously inspired social conservatism, old-school left-wing welfarism, and antipathy to Moscow and Brussels while also unravelling democratic institutions?</p>
<p>It was, write Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley in <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/good-change-the-rise-and-fall-of-poland-s-illiberal-revolution-stanley-bill/7876625?ean=9781503643680">Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland’s Illiberal Revolution</a> (Stanford University Press, 2025), an experiment in "how much illiberalism the electorate would bear".</p>
<p>With Kaczyński and PiS now in opposition but threatening a return in 2027, Donald Tusk's liberal administration is road-testing how effectively illiberalism can be unpicked without antagonising the voters it needs to stay in office.</p>
<p>Stanley Bill is Professor of Polish Studies at the University of Cambridge, and Ben Stanley is an associate professor at the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a><em> is policy analyst at Medley Advisors and a writer/podcaster at </em><a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35656526" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8c598f79-0161-42ec-9a56-ccb150d6ad31/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8c598f79-0161-42ec-9a56-ccb150d6ad31&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley, &quot;Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland&apos;s Illiberal Revolution&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Poland between 2015 and 2023, Jarosław Kaczyński and his Law and Justice Party (PiS) attempted a novel experiment. Could a governing party sustain a coalition committed religiously inspired social conservatism, old-school left-wing welfarism, and antipathy to Moscow and Brussels while also unravelling democratic institutions?

It was, write Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley in Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland’s Illiberal Revolution (Stanford University Press, 2025), an experiment in &quot;how much illiberalism the electorate would bear&quot;.

With Kaczyński and PiS now in opposition but threatening a return in 2027, Donald Tusk&apos;s liberal administration is road-testing how effectively illiberalism can be unpicked without antagonising the voters it needs to stay in office.

Stanley Bill is Professor of Polish Studies at the University of Cambridge, and Ben Stanley is an associate professor at the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw.

Tim Gwynn Jones is policy analyst at Medley Advisors and a writer/podcaster at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Poland between 2015 and 2023, Jarosław Kaczyński and his Law and Justice Party (PiS) attempted a novel experiment. Could a governing party sustain a coalition committed religiously inspired social conservatism, old-school left-wing welfarism, and antipathy to Moscow and Brussels while also unravelling democratic institutions?

It was, write Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley in Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland’s Illiberal Revolution (Stanford University Press, 2025), an experiment in &quot;how much illiberalism the electorate would bear&quot;.

With Kaczyński and PiS now in opposition but threatening a return in 2027, Donald Tusk&apos;s liberal administration is road-testing how effectively illiberalism can be unpicked without antagonising the voters it needs to stay in office.

Stanley Bill is Professor of Polish Studies at the University of Cambridge, and Ben Stanley is an associate professor at the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Warsaw.

Tim Gwynn Jones is policy analyst at Medley Advisors and a writer/podcaster at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>685</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad21e686-8c13-11f0-9cf9-6333bbdecc4a</guid>
      <title>Is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? with Damon Linker</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62481842" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5599ba3d-f2ea-4731-aa3d-f71450500fa4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5599ba3d-f2ea-4731-aa3d-f71450500fa4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? with Damon Linker</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We begin the new season of International Horizons by asking a crucial question: is the U.S. helping speed up its own decline? RBI Deputy Director, Eli Karetny talks with political writer and scholar Damon Linker about how Trump’s movement sees presidential power, why it challenges long-standing rules and institutions, and what it means for America’s role in the world. They explore whether U.S. influence has shifted from leading a global order after World War II to carving out its own “sphere of influence” alongside other major powers. The discussion looks at attacks on government expertise, the idea of “restraint” in foreign policy, and how fringe thinkers on the right are shaping real political choices. What happens when leaders value absolute freedom of action over laws, expertise, or alliances? Tune in for a clear look at the ideas driving today’s high-stakes political battles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>684</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53e5408e-8b43-11f0-ba0e-b3c7f2e9805b</guid>
      <title>Sarah McLaughlin, &quot;Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.</p>
<p>This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.</p>
<p>Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452807">Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech</a> (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.</p>
<p>Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.</p>
<p>This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.</p>
<p>Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421452807">Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech</a> (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.</p>
<p>Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36581527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9a8268c2-3149-4efe-b967-fcd24e1c26e6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9a8268c2-3149-4efe-b967-fcd24e1c26e6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah McLaughlin, &quot;Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.

This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.

Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.

Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an era of globalized education, where ideals of freedom and inquiry should thrive, an alarming trend has emerged: foreign authoritarian regimes infiltrating American academia. In Authoritarians in the Academy, Sarah McLaughlin exposes how higher education institutions, long considered bastions of free thought, are compromising their values for financial gain and global partnerships.

This groundbreaking investigation reveals the subtle yet sweeping influence of authoritarian governments. University leaders are allowing censorship to flourish on campus, putting pressure on faculty, and silencing international student voices, all in the name of appeasing foreign powers. McLaughlin exposes the troubling reality where university leaders prioritize expansion and profit over the principles of free expression. The book describes incidents in classrooms where professors hesitate to discuss controversial topics and in boardrooms where administrators weigh the costs of offending oppressive regimes. McLaughlin offers a sobering look at how the compromises made in American academia reflect broader societal patterns seen in industries like tech, sports, and entertainment.

Meticulously researched and unapologetically candid, Authoritarians in the Academy: How the Internationalization of Higher Education and Borderless Censorship Threaten Free Speech (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025) is an essential read for anyone who believes in the transformative power of education and the necessity of safeguarding it from the creeping tide of authoritarianism.

Sarah McLaughlin is a senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>683</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5ad46ae6-8a85-11f0-a833-73984838a754</guid>
      <title>Molly Worthen, &quot;Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593729007">Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump" (Random House, 2025)<br />Context</a><em> </em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em> historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.<br />The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.<br />Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, <em>Spellbound</em> places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.</p>
<p>Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593729007">Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump" (Random House, 2025)<br />Context</a><em> </em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em> historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.<br />The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.<br />Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, <em>Spellbound</em> places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.</p>
<p>Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61653187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c8b1f952-9e70-4721-a01e-9a23dfabecf0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c8b1f952-9e70-4721-a01e-9a23dfabecf0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Molly Worthen, &quot;Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?In Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)Context (Random House, 2025), historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, Spellbound places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.

Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Everyone feels it. Cultural and political life in America has become unrecognizable and strange. Firebrands and would-be sages have taken the place of reasonable and responsible leaders. Nuanced debates have given way to the smug confidence of yard signs. How did we get here?In Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History from the Puritans to Donald Trump&quot; (Random House, 2025)Context (Random House, 2025), historian Molly Worthen argues that we will understand our present moment if we learn the story of charisma in America. From the Puritans and Andrew Jackson to Black nationalists and Donald Trump, the saga of American charisma, Worthen argues, stars figures who possess a dangerous and alluring power to move crowds. They invite followers into a cosmic drama where hopes are fulfilled and grievances are put right—and these charismatic leaders insist that they alone plot the way.The story of charisma in America reveals that when traditional religious institutions fail to deliver on their promise of a meaningful life, people will get their spiritual needs met in a warped cultural and political landscape dominated by those who appear to have the power to bring order and meaning out of chaos. Charismatic leaders address spiritual needs, offering an alternate reality where people have knowledge, power, and heroic status, whether as divinely chosen instruments of God or those who will restore national glory.Through Worthen’s centuries-spanning historical research, Spellbound places a crucial religious lens on the cultural, economic, and political upheavals facing Americans today.

Molly Worthen is a professor of history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a freelance journalist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>682</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c27db72-891e-11f0-80ec-0f40ec876319</guid>
      <title>Lyndsey Stonebridge on Hannah Arendt&apos;s Lessons on Love and Disobedience (JP)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An Arendt expert has arrived at Arendt-obsessed <a href="http://recallthisbook.org/"><em>Recall This Book</em></a>. <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/english/stonebridge-lyndsey">Lyndsey Stonebridge</a> discusses her widely praised <em>2024 </em><a href="https://lyndseystonebridge.com/books"><em>We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience</em></a>. Lyndsey sees both radical evil and the banality of evil at work in Nazi Germany and in the causes of suffering and death in Gaza today. She compares the moral idiocy of authoritarians (like the murderous Nazis and those who are starving Gaza) to that of philosophers who cannot hear the echoes of what they are doing.</p>
<p>Lyndsey and John discuss Arendt’s belief in the fragile ethics of the Founding Fathers, with its checks and balances and its politics based not on emotion but cool deliberation. Arendt could say that “<a href="https://publicseminar.org/2016/06/hannah-arendt-on-american-social-slavery/#:~:text=She%20remarked%2C%20%E2%80%9CThe%20fundamental%20contradiction,is%20striking%20for%20three%20reasons.">The fundamental contradiction of [America] is political freedom coupled with social slavery,”</a>” but why was she too easy on the legacy of imperial racism in America, missing its settler-colonial logic? Arendt read W. E. B. DuBois (who saw and said this) but perhaps, says Lyndsey, not attentively enough.</p>
<p>Lyndsey is not a fan of Jonathan Glazer's <em>Zone of Interest</em>, because it makes the evil banality of extermination monstrous all over again (cf. her"<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2024.2351263">Mythic Banality: Jonathan Glazer and Hannah Arendt</a>.") Responsibility is crucial: She praises Arendt for distinguishing between <em>temptation</em> and <em>coercion</em>.</p>
<p><u>Mentioned in the episode:</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnation_Revolution">Carnation Revolution</a> in Portugal in 1974 one of the last great historical events in Arendt’s lifetime.</li>
  <li>Lyndsey praises “reading while walking” and the unpacking of the totalitarian in Anna Burns’s marvelous Norther Ireland novel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkman_(novel)">Milkman</a>.</li>
  <li>Hannah Pitkin’s wonderful 1998 <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo3633281.html">The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social, </a>emphasizes Arendt’s idea that although we are free, we can forfeit that freedom by assuming we are rule-bound.</li>
  <li>Arendt on the challenge of identity: “<a href="https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/vivian-gornick-hannah-arendt-on-being-jewish/">When one is attacked as a Jew,</a> one must respond not as a German or a Frenchman or a world citizen, but<em> as a Jew.</em>” <a href="https://www.loc.gov/collections/hannah-arendt-papers/articles-and-essays/evil-the-crime-against-humanity/">The Holocaust is a crime agains humanity a crime against the human status, a crime "perpetrated on the body of the Jewish people".”</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Various books by Hannah Arendt come up:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem"><em>Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.</em></a><em> (1963).</em>
</li>
  <li>Judgement in Arendt is crucial from earliest days studying Kant and in her final works (among <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Life_of_the_Mind"><em>The Life of the Mind</em>)</a> she speaks of the moments when "the mind goes visiting.”</li>
  <li>Her earliest ideas about love and natality are in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_and_Saint_Augustine">Love and Saint Augustine</a> (1929, not published in English until 1996).</li>
  <li>Hannah Arendt<a href="https://lli.bard.edu/2023/11/walking-the-bard-cemetery/"> is buried at Bard</a>, near her husband Heinrich Blucher and opposite Philip Roth, who reportedly wanted to capture some of the spillover Arendt traffic.</li>
  <li>James Baldwin's essay “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fire_Next_Time">The Fire Next Time”</a> (1963) caused Arendt to write Baldwin about the difference between pariah love and the love of those in power, who think that love can justify lashing out with power.</li>
</ul>
<p>Recallable Books</p>
<ul>
  <li>Lyndsey praises <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/government/people/academic-staff/lea-ypi">Leah Ypi</a>'s (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_(Ypi_book)"><em>Free</em></a><em>) </em>forthcoming memoir about her Albanian family, <a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374614096/indignity/"><em>Indignity.</em></a>
</li>
  <li>John recalls <em>E. M Forster, </em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howards_End">Howard’s End</a> a novel that thinks philosophically (in a novelistic vein) about how to continue being an individual in a new Imperial Britain.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/recall-this-book-155-stonebridge-transcript.pdf">Read</a> transcript here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Arendt expert has arrived at Arendt-obsessed <a href="http://recallthisbook.org/"><em>Recall This Book</em></a>. <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/english/stonebridge-lyndsey">Lyndsey Stonebridge</a> discusses her widely praised <em>2024 </em><a href="https://lyndseystonebridge.com/books"><em>We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience</em></a>. Lyndsey sees both radical evil and the banality of evil at work in Nazi Germany and in the causes of suffering and death in Gaza today. She compares the moral idiocy of authoritarians (like the murderous Nazis and those who are starving Gaza) to that of philosophers who cannot hear the echoes of what they are doing.</p>
<p>Lyndsey and John discuss Arendt’s belief in the fragile ethics of the Founding Fathers, with its checks and balances and its politics based not on emotion but cool deliberation. Arendt could say that “<a href="https://publicseminar.org/2016/06/hannah-arendt-on-american-social-slavery/#:~:text=She%20remarked%2C%20%E2%80%9CThe%20fundamental%20contradiction,is%20striking%20for%20three%20reasons.">The fundamental contradiction of [America] is political freedom coupled with social slavery,”</a>” but why was she too easy on the legacy of imperial racism in America, missing its settler-colonial logic? Arendt read W. E. B. DuBois (who saw and said this) but perhaps, says Lyndsey, not attentively enough.</p>
<p>Lyndsey is not a fan of Jonathan Glazer's <em>Zone of Interest</em>, because it makes the evil banality of extermination monstrous all over again (cf. her"<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2024.2351263">Mythic Banality: Jonathan Glazer and Hannah Arendt</a>.") Responsibility is crucial: She praises Arendt for distinguishing between <em>temptation</em> and <em>coercion</em>.</p>
<p><u>Mentioned in the episode:</u></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnation_Revolution">Carnation Revolution</a> in Portugal in 1974 one of the last great historical events in Arendt’s lifetime.</li>
  <li>Lyndsey praises “reading while walking” and the unpacking of the totalitarian in Anna Burns’s marvelous Norther Ireland novel, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkman_(novel)">Milkman</a>.</li>
  <li>Hannah Pitkin’s wonderful 1998 <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo3633281.html">The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social, </a>emphasizes Arendt’s idea that although we are free, we can forfeit that freedom by assuming we are rule-bound.</li>
  <li>Arendt on the challenge of identity: “<a href="https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/vivian-gornick-hannah-arendt-on-being-jewish/">When one is attacked as a Jew,</a> one must respond not as a German or a Frenchman or a world citizen, but<em> as a Jew.</em>” <a href="https://www.loc.gov/collections/hannah-arendt-papers/articles-and-essays/evil-the-crime-against-humanity/">The Holocaust is a crime agains humanity a crime against the human status, a crime "perpetrated on the body of the Jewish people".”</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Various books by Hannah Arendt come up:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem"><em>Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil.</em></a><em> (1963).</em>
</li>
  <li>Judgement in Arendt is crucial from earliest days studying Kant and in her final works (among <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Life_of_the_Mind"><em>The Life of the Mind</em>)</a> she speaks of the moments when "the mind goes visiting.”</li>
  <li>Her earliest ideas about love and natality are in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_and_Saint_Augustine">Love and Saint Augustine</a> (1929, not published in English until 1996).</li>
  <li>Hannah Arendt<a href="https://lli.bard.edu/2023/11/walking-the-bard-cemetery/"> is buried at Bard</a>, near her husband Heinrich Blucher and opposite Philip Roth, who reportedly wanted to capture some of the spillover Arendt traffic.</li>
  <li>James Baldwin's essay “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fire_Next_Time">The Fire Next Time”</a> (1963) caused Arendt to write Baldwin about the difference between pariah love and the love of those in power, who think that love can justify lashing out with power.</li>
</ul>
<p>Recallable Books</p>
<ul>
  <li>Lyndsey praises <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/government/people/academic-staff/lea-ypi">Leah Ypi</a>'s (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_(Ypi_book)"><em>Free</em></a><em>) </em>forthcoming memoir about her Albanian family, <a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374614096/indignity/"><em>Indignity.</em></a>
</li>
  <li>John recalls <em>E. M Forster, </em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howards_End">Howard’s End</a> a novel that thinks philosophically (in a novelistic vein) about how to continue being an individual in a new Imperial Britain.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/recall-this-book-155-stonebridge-transcript.pdf">Read</a> transcript here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52471370" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d0c39cf1-bc3f-4af0-8157-ae882875cb9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d0c39cf1-bc3f-4af0-8157-ae882875cb9b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lyndsey Stonebridge on Hannah Arendt&apos;s Lessons on Love and Disobedience (JP)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An Arendt expert has arrived at Arendt-obsessed Recall This Book. Lyndsey Stonebridge discusses her widely praised 2024 We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience. Lyndsey sees both radical evil and the banality of evil at work in Nazi Germany and in the causes of suffering and death in Gaza today. She compares the moral idiocy of authoritarians (like the murderous Nazis and those who are starving Gaza) to that of philosophers who cannot hear the echoes of what they are doing.

Lyndsey and John discuss Arendt’s belief in the fragile ethics of the Founding Fathers, with its checks and balances and its politics based not on emotion but cool deliberation. Arendt could say that “The fundamental contradiction of [America] is political freedom coupled with social slavery,”” but why was she too easy on the legacy of imperial racism in America, missing its settler-colonial logic? Arendt read W. E. B. DuBois (who saw and said this) but perhaps, says Lyndsey, not attentively enough.

Lyndsey is not a fan of Jonathan Glazer&apos;s Zone of Interest, because it makes the evil banality of extermination monstrous all over again (cf. her&quot;Mythic Banality: Jonathan Glazer and Hannah Arendt.&quot;) Responsibility is crucial: She praises Arendt for distinguishing between temptation and coercion.

Mentioned in the episode:


  
Carnation Revolution in Portugal in 1974 one of the last great historical events in Arendt’s lifetime.

  Lyndsey praises “reading while walking” and the unpacking of the totalitarian in Anna Burns’s marvelous Norther Ireland novel, Milkman.

  Hannah Pitkin’s wonderful 1998 The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social, emphasizes Arendt’s idea that although we are free, we can forfeit that freedom by assuming we are rule-bound.

  Arendt on the challenge of identity: “When one is attacked as a Jew, one must respond not as a German or a Frenchman or a world citizen, but as a Jew.” The Holocaust is a crime agains humanity a crime against the human status, a crime &quot;perpetrated on the body of the Jewish people&quot;.”



Various books by Hannah Arendt come up:


  
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. (1963).


  Judgement in Arendt is crucial from earliest days studying Kant and in her final works (among The Life of the Mind) she speaks of the moments when &quot;the mind goes visiting.”

  Her earliest ideas about love and natality are in Love and Saint Augustine (1929, not published in English until 1996).

  Hannah Arendt is buried at Bard, near her husband Heinrich Blucher and opposite Philip Roth, who reportedly wanted to capture some of the spillover Arendt traffic.

  James Baldwin&apos;s essay “The Fire Next Time” (1963) caused Arendt to write Baldwin about the difference between pariah love and the love of those in power, who think that love can justify lashing out with power.


Recallable Books


  Lyndsey praises Leah Ypi&apos;s (Free) forthcoming memoir about her Albanian family, Indignity.


  John recalls E. M Forster, Howard’s End a novel that thinks philosophically (in a novelistic vein) about how to continue being an individual in a new Imperial Britain.


Read transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An Arendt expert has arrived at Arendt-obsessed Recall This Book. Lyndsey Stonebridge discusses her widely praised 2024 We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience. Lyndsey sees both radical evil and the banality of evil at work in Nazi Germany and in the causes of suffering and death in Gaza today. She compares the moral idiocy of authoritarians (like the murderous Nazis and those who are starving Gaza) to that of philosophers who cannot hear the echoes of what they are doing.

Lyndsey and John discuss Arendt’s belief in the fragile ethics of the Founding Fathers, with its checks and balances and its politics based not on emotion but cool deliberation. Arendt could say that “The fundamental contradiction of [America] is political freedom coupled with social slavery,”” but why was she too easy on the legacy of imperial racism in America, missing its settler-colonial logic? Arendt read W. E. B. DuBois (who saw and said this) but perhaps, says Lyndsey, not attentively enough.

Lyndsey is not a fan of Jonathan Glazer&apos;s Zone of Interest, because it makes the evil banality of extermination monstrous all over again (cf. her&quot;Mythic Banality: Jonathan Glazer and Hannah Arendt.&quot;) Responsibility is crucial: She praises Arendt for distinguishing between temptation and coercion.

Mentioned in the episode:


  
Carnation Revolution in Portugal in 1974 one of the last great historical events in Arendt’s lifetime.

  Lyndsey praises “reading while walking” and the unpacking of the totalitarian in Anna Burns’s marvelous Norther Ireland novel, Milkman.

  Hannah Pitkin’s wonderful 1998 The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social, emphasizes Arendt’s idea that although we are free, we can forfeit that freedom by assuming we are rule-bound.

  Arendt on the challenge of identity: “When one is attacked as a Jew, one must respond not as a German or a Frenchman or a world citizen, but as a Jew.” The Holocaust is a crime agains humanity a crime against the human status, a crime &quot;perpetrated on the body of the Jewish people&quot;.”



Various books by Hannah Arendt come up:


  
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. (1963).


  Judgement in Arendt is crucial from earliest days studying Kant and in her final works (among The Life of the Mind) she speaks of the moments when &quot;the mind goes visiting.”

  Her earliest ideas about love and natality are in Love and Saint Augustine (1929, not published in English until 1996).

  Hannah Arendt is buried at Bard, near her husband Heinrich Blucher and opposite Philip Roth, who reportedly wanted to capture some of the spillover Arendt traffic.

  James Baldwin&apos;s essay “The Fire Next Time” (1963) caused Arendt to write Baldwin about the difference between pariah love and the love of those in power, who think that love can justify lashing out with power.


Recallable Books


  Lyndsey praises Leah Ypi&apos;s (Free) forthcoming memoir about her Albanian family, Indignity.


  John recalls E. M Forster, Howard’s End a novel that thinks philosophically (in a novelistic vein) about how to continue being an individual in a new Imperial Britain.


Read transcript here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>681</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fff76ba2-8910-11f0-9e63-83d833760293</guid>
      <title>Matthew Bowser, &quot;Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma&quot; (Manchester UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526187949">Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma</a> (Manchester University Press, 2025), historian Matthew Bowser examines British imperialism in late colonial Burma (from roughly 1929 to 1948) to study how imperialists attempted to protect their strategic and economic interests after decolonization: they did so by supporting ethnonationalism. This process resembles the Cold War tactic of “containment,” and the book makes a crucial contribution to the study of modern imperialism by demonstrating the continuity between “containment’s” late- and “neo”-colonial manifestations. For Burma/Myanmar, it also explores the origin of the present-day military junta’s racial regime: it emphasizes the protection of the ethnoreligious majority from ethnic minority insurgency. The Rohingya people are currently suffering a genocide because of this racial regime. As the country endures civil war against the junta, this book highlights how ethnonationalists in the late colonial period first promoted this racial regime to seize power and prevent revolution, a process supported by British imperialists for their own ends.</p>
<p>Matthew Bowser is Assistant Professor of Asian History at Alabama A&amp;M University.</p>
<p><br /><em>Brad H. Wright is a historian of Latin America specializing in postrevolutionary Mexico. PhD in Public History. Asst. Prof. of Latin American History at Alabama A&amp;M University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526187949">Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma</a> (Manchester University Press, 2025), historian Matthew Bowser examines British imperialism in late colonial Burma (from roughly 1929 to 1948) to study how imperialists attempted to protect their strategic and economic interests after decolonization: they did so by supporting ethnonationalism. This process resembles the Cold War tactic of “containment,” and the book makes a crucial contribution to the study of modern imperialism by demonstrating the continuity between “containment’s” late- and “neo”-colonial manifestations. For Burma/Myanmar, it also explores the origin of the present-day military junta’s racial regime: it emphasizes the protection of the ethnoreligious majority from ethnic minority insurgency. The Rohingya people are currently suffering a genocide because of this racial regime. As the country endures civil war against the junta, this book highlights how ethnonationalists in the late colonial period first promoted this racial regime to seize power and prevent revolution, a process supported by British imperialists for their own ends.</p>
<p>Matthew Bowser is Assistant Professor of Asian History at Alabama A&amp;M University.</p>
<p><br /><em>Brad H. Wright is a historian of Latin America specializing in postrevolutionary Mexico. PhD in Public History. Asst. Prof. of Latin American History at Alabama A&amp;M University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56627776" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2ad29233-869b-47ee-b13a-4d1ed5e31e80/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2ad29233-869b-47ee-b13a-4d1ed5e31e80&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Bowser, &quot;Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma&quot; (Manchester UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma (Manchester University Press, 2025), historian Matthew Bowser examines British imperialism in late colonial Burma (from roughly 1929 to 1948) to study how imperialists attempted to protect their strategic and economic interests after decolonization: they did so by supporting ethnonationalism. This process resembles the Cold War tactic of “containment,” and the book makes a crucial contribution to the study of modern imperialism by demonstrating the continuity between “containment’s” late- and “neo”-colonial manifestations. For Burma/Myanmar, it also explores the origin of the present-day military junta’s racial regime: it emphasizes the protection of the ethnoreligious majority from ethnic minority insurgency. The Rohingya people are currently suffering a genocide because of this racial regime. As the country endures civil war against the junta, this book highlights how ethnonationalists in the late colonial period first promoted this racial regime to seize power and prevent revolution, a process supported by British imperialists for their own ends.

Matthew Bowser is Assistant Professor of Asian History at Alabama A&amp;M University.

Brad H. Wright is a historian of Latin America specializing in postrevolutionary Mexico. PhD in Public History. Asst. Prof. of Latin American History at Alabama A&amp;M University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Containing Decolonization: British Imperialism and the Politics of Race in Late Colonial Burma (Manchester University Press, 2025), historian Matthew Bowser examines British imperialism in late colonial Burma (from roughly 1929 to 1948) to study how imperialists attempted to protect their strategic and economic interests after decolonization: they did so by supporting ethnonationalism. This process resembles the Cold War tactic of “containment,” and the book makes a crucial contribution to the study of modern imperialism by demonstrating the continuity between “containment’s” late- and “neo”-colonial manifestations. For Burma/Myanmar, it also explores the origin of the present-day military junta’s racial regime: it emphasizes the protection of the ethnoreligious majority from ethnic minority insurgency. The Rohingya people are currently suffering a genocide because of this racial regime. As the country endures civil war against the junta, this book highlights how ethnonationalists in the late colonial period first promoted this racial regime to seize power and prevent revolution, a process supported by British imperialists for their own ends.

Matthew Bowser is Assistant Professor of Asian History at Alabama A&amp;M University.

Brad H. Wright is a historian of Latin America specializing in postrevolutionary Mexico. PhD in Public History. Asst. Prof. of Latin American History at Alabama A&amp;M University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>680</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85f97580-8711-11f0-9506-cf7746aacbc2</guid>
      <title>Maddalena Cerrato, &quot;Michel Foucault&apos;s Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes&quot; (SUNY Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Michel Foucault's thought, Maddalena Cerrato writes, may be understood as practical philosophy. In this perspective, political analysis, philosophy of history, epistemology, and ethics appear as necessarily cast together in a philosophical project that aims to rethink freedom and emancipation from domination of all kinds. The idea of practical philosophy accounts for Foucault's specific approach to the object, as well as to the task of philosophy, and it identifies the perspective that led him to consider the question of subjectivity as the guiding thread of his work. Overall, in <em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855802214">Michel Foucault's Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes</a> (SUNY Press, 2025) Cerrato shows the deep consistency underlying Foucault's reflection and the substantial coherence of his philosophical itinerary, setting aside all the conventional interpretations that pivot on the idea that his thought underwent a radical "turn" from the political engagement of the question of power toward an ethical retrieval of the question of subjectivity.</p>
<p>Maddalena Cerrato is an assistant professor in the Department of International Affairs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michel Foucault's thought, Maddalena Cerrato writes, may be understood as practical philosophy. In this perspective, political analysis, philosophy of history, epistemology, and ethics appear as necessarily cast together in a philosophical project that aims to rethink freedom and emancipation from domination of all kinds. The idea of practical philosophy accounts for Foucault's specific approach to the object, as well as to the task of philosophy, and it identifies the perspective that led him to consider the question of subjectivity as the guiding thread of his work. Overall, in <em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798855802214">Michel Foucault's Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes</a> (SUNY Press, 2025) Cerrato shows the deep consistency underlying Foucault's reflection and the substantial coherence of his philosophical itinerary, setting aside all the conventional interpretations that pivot on the idea that his thought underwent a radical "turn" from the political engagement of the question of power toward an ethical retrieval of the question of subjectivity.</p>
<p>Maddalena Cerrato is an assistant professor in the Department of International Affairs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53276669" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4dac628a-d568-4892-9225-7f971c277cc4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4dac628a-d568-4892-9225-7f971c277cc4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Maddalena Cerrato, &quot;Michel Foucault&apos;s Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes&quot; (SUNY Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Michel Foucault&apos;s thought, Maddalena Cerrato writes, may be understood as practical philosophy. In this perspective, political analysis, philosophy of history, epistemology, and ethics appear as necessarily cast together in a philosophical project that aims to rethink freedom and emancipation from domination of all kinds. The idea of practical philosophy accounts for Foucault&apos;s specific approach to the object, as well as to the task of philosophy, and it identifies the perspective that led him to consider the question of subjectivity as the guiding thread of his work. Overall, in ﻿Michel Foucault&apos;s Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes (SUNY Press, 2025) Cerrato shows the deep consistency underlying Foucault&apos;s reflection and the substantial coherence of his philosophical itinerary, setting aside all the conventional interpretations that pivot on the idea that his thought underwent a radical &quot;turn&quot; from the political engagement of the question of power toward an ethical retrieval of the question of subjectivity.

Maddalena Cerrato is an assistant professor in the Department of International Affairs.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Michel Foucault&apos;s thought, Maddalena Cerrato writes, may be understood as practical philosophy. In this perspective, political analysis, philosophy of history, epistemology, and ethics appear as necessarily cast together in a philosophical project that aims to rethink freedom and emancipation from domination of all kinds. The idea of practical philosophy accounts for Foucault&apos;s specific approach to the object, as well as to the task of philosophy, and it identifies the perspective that led him to consider the question of subjectivity as the guiding thread of his work. Overall, in ﻿Michel Foucault&apos;s Practical Philosophy: A Critique of Subjectivation Processes (SUNY Press, 2025) Cerrato shows the deep consistency underlying Foucault&apos;s reflection and the substantial coherence of his philosophical itinerary, setting aside all the conventional interpretations that pivot on the idea that his thought underwent a radical &quot;turn&quot; from the political engagement of the question of power toward an ethical retrieval of the question of subjectivity.

Maddalena Cerrato is an assistant professor in the Department of International Affairs.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel here
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>679</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">272ef68e-84fe-11f0-92c3-3bd0aa9c233f</guid>
      <title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br />Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. </p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, <em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br />Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. </p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, <em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71038751" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/144aa511-4a58-44b9-9ded-fdee8f229044/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=144aa511-4a58-44b9-9ded-fdee8f229044&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 

Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 

Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c341d8e-6f91-11ea-ad18-cb0d3f34cb94</guid>
      <title>Margaret E. Roberts, &quot;Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But <a href="http://www.margaretroberts.net/">Margaret E. Roberts</a>’ new book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691204004/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.</p><p>She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.</p><p>Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there <em>is</em> better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.</p><p><em>Foreign Affairs</em> named <em>Censored</em> one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950"><em>Susan</em> Liebell<em> </em></a><em>is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-Intelligent-Design-Evolution-Liebell-dp-1138999482/dp/1138999482/ref=mt_paperback?_encoding=UTF8&amp;me=&amp;qid="><em>Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship</em></a><em> (Routledge, 2013).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But <a href="http://www.margaretroberts.net/">Margaret E. Roberts</a>’ new book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691204004/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.</p><p>She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.</p><p>Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there <em>is</em> better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.</p><p><em>Foreign Affairs</em> named <em>Censored</em> one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950"><em>Susan</em> Liebell<em> </em></a><em>is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-Intelligent-Design-Evolution-Liebell-dp-1138999482/dp/1138999482/ref=mt_paperback?_encoding=UTF8&amp;me=&amp;qid="><em>Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship</em></a><em> (Routledge, 2013).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45291684" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c566099c-e6ad-4669-ac66-aaa4520c7b25/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c566099c-e6ad-4669-ac66-aaa4520c7b25&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Margaret E. Roberts, &quot;Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But Margaret E. Roberts’ new book Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.
She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.
Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there is better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.
Foreign Affairs named Censored one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.
Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But Margaret E. Roberts’ new book Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.
She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.
Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there is better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.
Foreign Affairs named Censored one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.
Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>415</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">90c9e7a2-8404-11f0-9206-0f1578141eb5</guid>
      <title>Syria After Assad</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>What are the prospects for democracy in Syria? Is this the right question to ask? What do we need to better understand about Syria’s new leader, its civil society, and the challenges it faces in a new era for Syria? Join Rana Khoury, Daniel Neep, and Emily Scott for this special joint episode of the </em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3QGIfkx9UzZoVOYw4uyOrW?si=0e202ac669b742b3"><em>Localization in World Politics</em></a><em> and </em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6f2iJ31WPkgVu2qUITaYdf?si=e67efdb9517a4ca7"><em>People, Power, Politics</em></a><em> podcasts.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://ranakhoury.com/">Rana B. Khoury</a> is assistant professor of political science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work explores conflict processes, civil action, and humanitarianism, particularly in the Middle East and Syria. Her book, <em>Civilizing Contention: International Aid in Syria’s War</em>, is forthcoming from Cornell University Press and available for pre-order <a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501784118/civilizing-contention/#bookTabs=1">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://danielneep.com/">Daniel Neep</a> is nonresident fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. He is interested in conflict and state-building, as well as processes of political, institutional, and social transformation in the Middle East, in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. His book <em>A History of Modern Syria</em> is forthcoming with Penguin Books and is available for pre-order <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/213366/a-history-of-modern-syria-by-neep-daniel/9780241003299">here</a>.</p>
<p>Check out their contributions to the Journal of Democracy Special Section, Syria After Assad, can be found <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/issue/april-2025/">here</a>!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.emilykmscott.org/">Emily K. M. Scott</a> is Associate Professor at the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/scott-emily">University of Birmingham</a> and co-host of the Localization in World Politics Podcast. Her most recent publication, “Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response” can be found <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592725000635">here</a>.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Syria-Episode-Transcript-1.docx#asset:418604">Click here for a transcript of this episode</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What are the prospects for democracy in Syria? Is this the right question to ask? What do we need to better understand about Syria’s new leader, its civil society, and the challenges it faces in a new era for Syria? Join Rana Khoury, Daniel Neep, and Emily Scott for this special joint episode of the </em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3QGIfkx9UzZoVOYw4uyOrW?si=0e202ac669b742b3"><em>Localization in World Politics</em></a><em> and </em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6f2iJ31WPkgVu2qUITaYdf?si=e67efdb9517a4ca7"><em>People, Power, Politics</em></a><em> podcasts.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://ranakhoury.com/">Rana B. Khoury</a> is assistant professor of political science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work explores conflict processes, civil action, and humanitarianism, particularly in the Middle East and Syria. Her book, <em>Civilizing Contention: International Aid in Syria’s War</em>, is forthcoming from Cornell University Press and available for pre-order <a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501784118/civilizing-contention/#bookTabs=1">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://danielneep.com/">Daniel Neep</a> is nonresident fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. He is interested in conflict and state-building, as well as processes of political, institutional, and social transformation in the Middle East, in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. His book <em>A History of Modern Syria</em> is forthcoming with Penguin Books and is available for pre-order <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/213366/a-history-of-modern-syria-by-neep-daniel/9780241003299">here</a>.</p>
<p>Check out their contributions to the Journal of Democracy Special Section, Syria After Assad, can be found <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/issue/april-2025/">here</a>!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.emilykmscott.org/">Emily K. M. Scott</a> is Associate Professor at the <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/scott-emily">University of Birmingham</a> and co-host of the Localization in World Politics Podcast. Her most recent publication, “Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response” can be found <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592725000635">here</a>.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p>
<p><a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Syria-Episode-Transcript-1.docx#asset:418604">Click here for a transcript of this episode</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37492491" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b249c4ae-bd1b-40aa-8ee5-b2b0ebd5ef3d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b249c4ae-bd1b-40aa-8ee5-b2b0ebd5ef3d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Syria After Assad</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What are the prospects for democracy in Syria? Is this the right question to ask? What do we need to better understand about Syria’s new leader, its civil society, and the challenges it faces in a new era for Syria? Join Rana Khoury, Daniel Neep, and Emily Scott for this special joint episode of the Localization in World Politics and People, Power, Politics podcasts.

Rana B. Khoury is assistant professor of political science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work explores conflict processes, civil action, and humanitarianism, particularly in the Middle East and Syria. Her book, Civilizing Contention: International Aid in Syria’s War, is forthcoming from Cornell University Press and available for pre-order here.

Daniel Neep is nonresident fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. He is interested in conflict and state-building, as well as processes of political, institutional, and social transformation in the Middle East, in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. His book A History of Modern Syria is forthcoming with Penguin Books and is available for pre-order here.

Check out their contributions to the Journal of Democracy Special Section, Syria After Assad, can be found here!

Emily K. M. Scott is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and co-host of the Localization in World Politics Podcast. Her most recent publication, “Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response” can be found here.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Click here for a transcript of this episode
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What are the prospects for democracy in Syria? Is this the right question to ask? What do we need to better understand about Syria’s new leader, its civil society, and the challenges it faces in a new era for Syria? Join Rana Khoury, Daniel Neep, and Emily Scott for this special joint episode of the Localization in World Politics and People, Power, Politics podcasts.

Rana B. Khoury is assistant professor of political science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work explores conflict processes, civil action, and humanitarianism, particularly in the Middle East and Syria. Her book, Civilizing Contention: International Aid in Syria’s War, is forthcoming from Cornell University Press and available for pre-order here.

Daniel Neep is nonresident fellow at the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University. He is interested in conflict and state-building, as well as processes of political, institutional, and social transformation in the Middle East, in Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. His book A History of Modern Syria is forthcoming with Penguin Books and is available for pre-order here.

Check out their contributions to the Journal of Democracy Special Section, Syria After Assad, can be found here!

Emily K. M. Scott is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and co-host of the Localization in World Politics Podcast. Her most recent publication, “Negotiating for Autonomy: How Humanitarian INGOs Resisted Donors During the Syrian Refugee Response” can be found here.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!

Click here for a transcript of this episode
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>676</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ec2b1ea-838d-11f0-8373-7f364125d99e</guid>
      <title>Thane Gustafson, &quot;Perfect Storm: Russia&apos;s Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 brought a tragic close to a thirty-year period of history that began with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reopening of Russia to the West after six decades of Soviet isolation. The opening lasted for three tumultuous decades and ended with a new closing, driven by the Ukrainian war, the imposition of Western sanctions, and the Russian responses to them.</p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197795682">Perfect Storm: Russia's Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025), Russia analyst Thane Gustafson reinterprets the story of Russia's failed opening to the West, focusing on its economic, technological, and social aspects, and the role they played in its ultimate failure. These parallel events are essential for understanding what happened and what went wrong. Yet they have received much less attention than the military and geopolitical aspects of the current conflict. Gustafson tells the story of the West's entry into Russia, the arrival of Russians into the West, and the conflicting emotions and responses these aroused on both sides, contributing to the ultimate breakdown of relations and the unprecedented hurricane of Western sanctions. The book concludes with an examination of possible futures under a new generation of leaders.</p>
<p>A measured and nuanced account of the evolution of Russia's economic relations with the world, <em>Perfect Storm </em>illuminates the longer history of Russia's opening to the West, from its achievements and disappointments to the complexity of the post-invasion sanctions regime and Russia's responses to them.</p>
<p>Thane Gustafson is Professor of Government at Georgetown University. He is the author of many books, including <em>Klimat</em> (2021), <em>The Bridge</em> (2020), and <em>Wheel of Fortune</em> (2012).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 brought a tragic close to a thirty-year period of history that began with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reopening of Russia to the West after six decades of Soviet isolation. The opening lasted for three tumultuous decades and ended with a new closing, driven by the Ukrainian war, the imposition of Western sanctions, and the Russian responses to them.</p>
<p>In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197795682">Perfect Storm: Russia's Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025), Russia analyst Thane Gustafson reinterprets the story of Russia's failed opening to the West, focusing on its economic, technological, and social aspects, and the role they played in its ultimate failure. These parallel events are essential for understanding what happened and what went wrong. Yet they have received much less attention than the military and geopolitical aspects of the current conflict. Gustafson tells the story of the West's entry into Russia, the arrival of Russians into the West, and the conflicting emotions and responses these aroused on both sides, contributing to the ultimate breakdown of relations and the unprecedented hurricane of Western sanctions. The book concludes with an examination of possible futures under a new generation of leaders.</p>
<p>A measured and nuanced account of the evolution of Russia's economic relations with the world, <em>Perfect Storm </em>illuminates the longer history of Russia's opening to the West, from its achievements and disappointments to the complexity of the post-invasion sanctions regime and Russia's responses to them.</p>
<p>Thane Gustafson is Professor of Government at Georgetown University. He is the author of many books, including <em>Klimat</em> (2021), <em>The Bridge</em> (2020), and <em>Wheel of Fortune</em> (2012).</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58132080" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c658a592-cca6-4063-8ab9-9f7058a47a25/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c658a592-cca6-4063-8ab9-9f7058a47a25&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Thane Gustafson, &quot;Perfect Storm: Russia&apos;s Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Russia&apos;s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 brought a tragic close to a thirty-year period of history that began with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reopening of Russia to the West after six decades of Soviet isolation. The opening lasted for three tumultuous decades and ended with a new closing, driven by the Ukrainian war, the imposition of Western sanctions, and the Russian responses to them.

In Perfect Storm: Russia&apos;s Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future (Oxford University Press, 2025), Russia analyst Thane Gustafson reinterprets the story of Russia&apos;s failed opening to the West, focusing on its economic, technological, and social aspects, and the role they played in its ultimate failure. These parallel events are essential for understanding what happened and what went wrong. Yet they have received much less attention than the military and geopolitical aspects of the current conflict. Gustafson tells the story of the West&apos;s entry into Russia, the arrival of Russians into the West, and the conflicting emotions and responses these aroused on both sides, contributing to the ultimate breakdown of relations and the unprecedented hurricane of Western sanctions. The book concludes with an examination of possible futures under a new generation of leaders.

A measured and nuanced account of the evolution of Russia&apos;s economic relations with the world, Perfect Storm illuminates the longer history of Russia&apos;s opening to the West, from its achievements and disappointments to the complexity of the post-invasion sanctions regime and Russia&apos;s responses to them.

Thane Gustafson is Professor of Government at Georgetown University. He is the author of many books, including Klimat (2021), The Bridge (2020), and Wheel of Fortune (2012).

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Russia&apos;s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 brought a tragic close to a thirty-year period of history that began with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reopening of Russia to the West after six decades of Soviet isolation. The opening lasted for three tumultuous decades and ended with a new closing, driven by the Ukrainian war, the imposition of Western sanctions, and the Russian responses to them.

In Perfect Storm: Russia&apos;s Failed Economic Opening, the Hurricane of War and Sanctions, and the Uncertain Future (Oxford University Press, 2025), Russia analyst Thane Gustafson reinterprets the story of Russia&apos;s failed opening to the West, focusing on its economic, technological, and social aspects, and the role they played in its ultimate failure. These parallel events are essential for understanding what happened and what went wrong. Yet they have received much less attention than the military and geopolitical aspects of the current conflict. Gustafson tells the story of the West&apos;s entry into Russia, the arrival of Russians into the West, and the conflicting emotions and responses these aroused on both sides, contributing to the ultimate breakdown of relations and the unprecedented hurricane of Western sanctions. The book concludes with an examination of possible futures under a new generation of leaders.

A measured and nuanced account of the evolution of Russia&apos;s economic relations with the world, Perfect Storm illuminates the longer history of Russia&apos;s opening to the West, from its achievements and disappointments to the complexity of the post-invasion sanctions regime and Russia&apos;s responses to them.

Thane Gustafson is Professor of Government at Georgetown University. He is the author of many books, including Klimat (2021), The Bridge (2020), and Wheel of Fortune (2012).

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>675</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5eb8a8a-6e60-11e9-93d0-f743318fb393</guid>
      <title>Lindsey N. Kingston, &quot;Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webster.edu/arts-and-sciences/faculty/kingston.html">Lindsey N. Kingston</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0190918268/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and "second class" citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. <em>Fully Human</em> focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webster.edu/arts-and-sciences/faculty/kingston.html">Lindsey N. Kingston</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0190918268/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and "second class" citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. <em>Fully Human</em> focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49122729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fb6abdf3-f467-473d-baae-fc8e78efdc44/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fb6abdf3-f467-473d-baae-fc8e78efdc44&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lindsey N. Kingston, &quot;Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lindsey N. Kingston’s new book, Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights (Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and &quot;second class&quot; citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. Fully Human focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lindsey N. Kingston’s new book, Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights (Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and &quot;second class&quot; citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. Fully Human focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>343</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e85b3a1c-81d3-11f0-8c27-0fcc6fb8b1f6</guid>
      <title>Mark L. Haas, &quot;The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The vast majority of the world's countries are experiencing a demographic revolution: dramatic, sustained, and likely irreversible population aging. States' median ages are steadily increasing as the number of people ages 65 and older skyrockets. Analysts and policymakers frequently decry population aging's domestic costs, especially likely slowing economic growth and massive new public expenditures for elderly welfare. But aging has a major yet largely unrecognized international benefit: it significantly reduces the likelihood of international war. Although wars continue to rage in parts of the world, almost none involve aged countries. This book provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking argument why population aging will be a powerful force for peace.</p>
<p>Aging will significantly reduce states' military capabilities available for war while also boosting leaders’ and citizens' preferences for peaceful foreign policies. At the same time, the effects of aging will help prevent the emergence of a power transition between the United States and China, which would be a development that is particularly likely to devolve into armed hostilities. If an aged country does initiate war, the effects of aging will create major barriers to military success. The more aging reduces the probability of victory, the greater the disincentives to aggressing. Detailed case studies show how aging has affected the capabilities and preferences in Japan, China, the United States, and Russia.</p>
<p>Guest: Mark L. Haas is a Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University. He is the author of <em>The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025); <em>Frenemies: When Ideological Enemies Ally</em> (Cornell University Press, 2022); <em>The Clash of Ideologies: Middle Eastern Politics and American Security</em> (Oxford University Press, 2012); <em>The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789-1989</em> (Cornell University Press, 2005), and co-editor of <em>Ideologies and International Relations</em> (Routledge Press); <em>The Middle East and the United States: History, Politics, and Ideologies</em> (Routledge, 2018, sixth edition) and <em>The Arab Spring: The Hope and Reality of the Uprisings</em> (Routledge, 2017).</p>
<p>Host: <a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman">Jenna Pittman </a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vast majority of the world's countries are experiencing a demographic revolution: dramatic, sustained, and likely irreversible population aging. States' median ages are steadily increasing as the number of people ages 65 and older skyrockets. Analysts and policymakers frequently decry population aging's domestic costs, especially likely slowing economic growth and massive new public expenditures for elderly welfare. But aging has a major yet largely unrecognized international benefit: it significantly reduces the likelihood of international war. Although wars continue to rage in parts of the world, almost none involve aged countries. This book provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking argument why population aging will be a powerful force for peace.</p>
<p>Aging will significantly reduce states' military capabilities available for war while also boosting leaders’ and citizens' preferences for peaceful foreign policies. At the same time, the effects of aging will help prevent the emergence of a power transition between the United States and China, which would be a development that is particularly likely to devolve into armed hostilities. If an aged country does initiate war, the effects of aging will create major barriers to military success. The more aging reduces the probability of victory, the greater the disincentives to aggressing. Detailed case studies show how aging has affected the capabilities and preferences in Japan, China, the United States, and Russia.</p>
<p>Guest: Mark L. Haas is a Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University. He is the author of <em>The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War</em> (Oxford University Press, 2025); <em>Frenemies: When Ideological Enemies Ally</em> (Cornell University Press, 2022); <em>The Clash of Ideologies: Middle Eastern Politics and American Security</em> (Oxford University Press, 2012); <em>The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789-1989</em> (Cornell University Press, 2005), and co-editor of <em>Ideologies and International Relations</em> (Routledge Press); <em>The Middle East and the United States: History, Politics, and Ideologies</em> (Routledge, 2018, sixth edition) and <em>The Arab Spring: The Hope and Reality of the Uprisings</em> (Routledge, 2017).</p>
<p>Host: <a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman">Jenna Pittman </a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46656669" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a8ce4a24-33ea-4cf5-a7cb-61afb6ca79d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a8ce4a24-33ea-4cf5-a7cb-61afb6ca79d3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark L. Haas, &quot;The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The vast majority of the world&apos;s countries are experiencing a demographic revolution: dramatic, sustained, and likely irreversible population aging. States&apos; median ages are steadily increasing as the number of people ages 65 and older skyrockets. Analysts and policymakers frequently decry population aging&apos;s domestic costs, especially likely slowing economic growth and massive new public expenditures for elderly welfare. But aging has a major yet largely unrecognized international benefit: it significantly reduces the likelihood of international war. Although wars continue to rage in parts of the world, almost none involve aged countries. This book provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking argument why population aging will be a powerful force for peace.

Aging will significantly reduce states&apos; military capabilities available for war while also boosting leaders’ and citizens&apos; preferences for peaceful foreign policies. At the same time, the effects of aging will help prevent the emergence of a power transition between the United States and China, which would be a development that is particularly likely to devolve into armed hostilities. If an aged country does initiate war, the effects of aging will create major barriers to military success. The more aging reduces the probability of victory, the greater the disincentives to aggressing. Detailed case studies show how aging has affected the capabilities and preferences in Japan, China, the United States, and Russia.

Guest: Mark L. Haas is a Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University. He is the author of The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War (Oxford University Press, 2025); Frenemies: When Ideological Enemies Ally (Cornell University Press, 2022); The Clash of Ideologies: Middle Eastern Politics and American Security (Oxford University Press, 2012); The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789-1989 (Cornell University Press, 2005), and co-editor of Ideologies and International Relations (Routledge Press); The Middle East and the United States: History, Politics, and Ideologies (Routledge, 2018, sixth edition) and The Arab Spring: The Hope and Reality of the Uprisings (Routledge, 2017).

Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The vast majority of the world&apos;s countries are experiencing a demographic revolution: dramatic, sustained, and likely irreversible population aging. States&apos; median ages are steadily increasing as the number of people ages 65 and older skyrockets. Analysts and policymakers frequently decry population aging&apos;s domestic costs, especially likely slowing economic growth and massive new public expenditures for elderly welfare. But aging has a major yet largely unrecognized international benefit: it significantly reduces the likelihood of international war. Although wars continue to rage in parts of the world, almost none involve aged countries. This book provides a comprehensive and groundbreaking argument why population aging will be a powerful force for peace.

Aging will significantly reduce states&apos; military capabilities available for war while also boosting leaders’ and citizens&apos; preferences for peaceful foreign policies. At the same time, the effects of aging will help prevent the emergence of a power transition between the United States and China, which would be a development that is particularly likely to devolve into armed hostilities. If an aged country does initiate war, the effects of aging will create major barriers to military success. The more aging reduces the probability of victory, the greater the disincentives to aggressing. Detailed case studies show how aging has affected the capabilities and preferences in Japan, China, the United States, and Russia.

Guest: Mark L. Haas is a Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University. He is the author of The Geriatric Peace: Population Aging and the Decline of War (Oxford University Press, 2025); Frenemies: When Ideological Enemies Ally (Cornell University Press, 2022); The Clash of Ideologies: Middle Eastern Politics and American Security (Oxford University Press, 2012); The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789-1989 (Cornell University Press, 2005), and co-editor of Ideologies and International Relations (Routledge Press); The Middle East and the United States: History, Politics, and Ideologies (Routledge, 2018, sixth edition) and The Arab Spring: The Hope and Reality of the Uprisings (Routledge, 2017).

Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>778</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bbee0ae-8230-11f0-8e94-d3a0042eb379</guid>
      <title>Victoria Basualdo et al., &quot;Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of the Economic and Business History channel, I spoke with Dr. Victoria Basualdo and Dr. Marcelo Bucheli about their new edited book. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030439248"><em>Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression</em></a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020) is an edited volume that studies the relationship between big business and the Latin American dictatorial regimes during the Cold War. The first section provides a general background about the contemporary history of business corporations and dictatorships in the twentieth century at the international level. The second section comprises chapters that analyze five national cases (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, and Peru), as well as a comparative analysis of the banking sector in the Southern Cone (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay). The third section presents six case studies of large companies in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Central America. This book is crucial reading because it provides the first comprehensive analysis of a key yet understudied topic in Cold War history in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Victoria Basualdo</strong> is Researcher at the Argentine National Scientific Council (CONICET) and at the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), and Professor in the Political Economy Master's Degree Program at FLACSO, Argentina. She specializes in contemporary economic and labor history, with special focus on structural changes and the transformations of trade-union organizations in Argentina and Latin America.</p><p><strong>Hartmut Berghoff </strong>is Director of the Institute of Economic and Social History at the University of Göttingen, Germany. He was the Director of the German Historical Institute in Washington DC (2008-2015) and held various visiting positions at the Center of Advanced Study, Harvard Business School, the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, and the Henley Business School. He has worked on the history of consumption, business history, immigration history and the history of modern Germany.</p><p><strong>Marcelo Bucheli </strong>is Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. His research focuses on the political economy of multinational corporations in Latin America, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the relationship between firms and states in a historical perspective, and business groups.</p><p><em>Hosted by </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/paula-de-la-cruz-fernandez-ph-d-6b36437/"><em>Paula De La Cruz-Fernandez</em></a><em>, consultant, historian, and digital editor. </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/72734215/admin/"><em>New Books Network en español</em></a><em> editor. </em><a href="https://www.edita.us/"><em>Edita</em></a><em> CEO.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of the Economic and Business History channel, I spoke with Dr. Victoria Basualdo and Dr. Marcelo Bucheli about their new edited book. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030439248"><em>Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression</em></a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020) is an edited volume that studies the relationship between big business and the Latin American dictatorial regimes during the Cold War. The first section provides a general background about the contemporary history of business corporations and dictatorships in the twentieth century at the international level. The second section comprises chapters that analyze five national cases (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, and Peru), as well as a comparative analysis of the banking sector in the Southern Cone (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay). The third section presents six case studies of large companies in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Central America. This book is crucial reading because it provides the first comprehensive analysis of a key yet understudied topic in Cold War history in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Victoria Basualdo</strong> is Researcher at the Argentine National Scientific Council (CONICET) and at the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), and Professor in the Political Economy Master's Degree Program at FLACSO, Argentina. She specializes in contemporary economic and labor history, with special focus on structural changes and the transformations of trade-union organizations in Argentina and Latin America.</p><p><strong>Hartmut Berghoff </strong>is Director of the Institute of Economic and Social History at the University of Göttingen, Germany. He was the Director of the German Historical Institute in Washington DC (2008-2015) and held various visiting positions at the Center of Advanced Study, Harvard Business School, the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, and the Henley Business School. He has worked on the history of consumption, business history, immigration history and the history of modern Germany.</p><p><strong>Marcelo Bucheli </strong>is Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. His research focuses on the political economy of multinational corporations in Latin America, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the relationship between firms and states in a historical perspective, and business groups.</p><p><em>Hosted by </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/paula-de-la-cruz-fernandez-ph-d-6b36437/"><em>Paula De La Cruz-Fernandez</em></a><em>, consultant, historian, and digital editor. </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/72734215/admin/"><em>New Books Network en español</em></a><em> editor. </em><a href="https://www.edita.us/"><em>Edita</em></a><em> CEO.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46054784" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/66dc8857-3005-436d-b25d-301c190ed373/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=66dc8857-3005-436d-b25d-301c190ed373&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Victoria Basualdo et al., &quot;Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of the Economic and Business History channel, I spoke with Dr. Victoria Basualdo and Dr. Marcelo Bucheli about their new edited book. Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020) is an edited volume that studies the relationship between big business and the Latin American dictatorial regimes during the Cold War. The first section provides a general background about the contemporary history of business corporations and dictatorships in the twentieth century at the international level. The second section comprises chapters that analyze five national cases (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, and Peru), as well as a comparative analysis of the banking sector in the Southern Cone (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay). The third section presents six case studies of large companies in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Central America. This book is crucial reading because it provides the first comprehensive analysis of a key yet understudied topic in Cold War history in Latin America.
Victoria Basualdo is Researcher at the Argentine National Scientific Council (CONICET) and at the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), and Professor in the Political Economy Master&apos;s Degree Program at FLACSO, Argentina. She specializes in contemporary economic and labor history, with special focus on structural changes and the transformations of trade-union organizations in Argentina and Latin America.
Hartmut Berghoff is Director of the Institute of Economic and Social History at the University of Göttingen, Germany. He was the Director of the German Historical Institute in Washington DC (2008-2015) and held various visiting positions at the Center of Advanced Study, Harvard Business School, the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, and the Henley Business School. He has worked on the history of consumption, business history, immigration history and the history of modern Germany.
Marcelo Bucheli is Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. His research focuses on the political economy of multinational corporations in Latin America, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the relationship between firms and states in a historical perspective, and business groups.
Hosted by Paula De La Cruz-Fernandez, consultant, historian, and digital editor. New Books Network en español editor. Edita CEO.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode of the Economic and Business History channel, I spoke with Dr. Victoria Basualdo and Dr. Marcelo Bucheli about their new edited book. Big Business and Dictatorships in Latin America: A Transnational History of Profits and Repression (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020) is an edited volume that studies the relationship between big business and the Latin American dictatorial regimes during the Cold War. The first section provides a general background about the contemporary history of business corporations and dictatorships in the twentieth century at the international level. The second section comprises chapters that analyze five national cases (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, and Peru), as well as a comparative analysis of the banking sector in the Southern Cone (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay). The third section presents six case studies of large companies in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Central America. This book is crucial reading because it provides the first comprehensive analysis of a key yet understudied topic in Cold War history in Latin America.
Victoria Basualdo is Researcher at the Argentine National Scientific Council (CONICET) and at the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), and Professor in the Political Economy Master&apos;s Degree Program at FLACSO, Argentina. She specializes in contemporary economic and labor history, with special focus on structural changes and the transformations of trade-union organizations in Argentina and Latin America.
Hartmut Berghoff is Director of the Institute of Economic and Social History at the University of Göttingen, Germany. He was the Director of the German Historical Institute in Washington DC (2008-2015) and held various visiting positions at the Center of Advanced Study, Harvard Business School, the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, and the Henley Business School. He has worked on the history of consumption, business history, immigration history and the history of modern Germany.
Marcelo Bucheli is Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA. His research focuses on the political economy of multinational corporations in Latin America, theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the relationship between firms and states in a historical perspective, and business groups.
Hosted by Paula De La Cruz-Fernandez, consultant, historian, and digital editor. New Books Network en español editor. Edita CEO.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d200f286-8032-11f0-a267-77957cbff7c0</guid>
      <title>Gregory A. Daddis, &quot;Faith and Fear: America&apos;s Relationship with War Since 1945&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking reassessment of the long Cold War era, historian Gregory A. Daddis argues that ever since the Second World War's fateful conclusion, faith in and fear of war became central to Americans' thinking about the world around them. With war pervading nearly all aspects of American society, an interplay between blind faith and existential fear framed US policymaking and grand strategy, often with tragic results. A sweeping history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197804223">Faith and Fear: America's Relationship with War Since 1945</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes a forceful argument by examining the tensions between Americans' overreaching faith in war as a foreign policy tool and their overwhelming fear of war as a destructive force.</p>
<p>Gregory A. Daddis is Professor of History and holds the Melbern G. Glasscock Endowed Chair in American History at Texas A&amp;M University. A retired US Army colonel, he deployed to both Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking reassessment of the long Cold War era, historian Gregory A. Daddis argues that ever since the Second World War's fateful conclusion, faith in and fear of war became central to Americans' thinking about the world around them. With war pervading nearly all aspects of American society, an interplay between blind faith and existential fear framed US policymaking and grand strategy, often with tragic results. A sweeping history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197804223">Faith and Fear: America's Relationship with War Since 1945</a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes a forceful argument by examining the tensions between Americans' overreaching faith in war as a foreign policy tool and their overwhelming fear of war as a destructive force.</p>
<p>Gregory A. Daddis is Professor of History and holds the Melbern G. Glasscock Endowed Chair in American History at Texas A&amp;M University. A retired US Army colonel, he deployed to both Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55661802" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5f027662-b8c8-430e-bd5d-1cabebbde206/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5f027662-b8c8-430e-bd5d-1cabebbde206&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gregory A. Daddis, &quot;Faith and Fear: America&apos;s Relationship with War Since 1945&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a groundbreaking reassessment of the long Cold War era, historian Gregory A. Daddis argues that ever since the Second World War&apos;s fateful conclusion, faith in and fear of war became central to Americans&apos; thinking about the world around them. With war pervading nearly all aspects of American society, an interplay between blind faith and existential fear framed US policymaking and grand strategy, often with tragic results. A sweeping history, Faith and Fear: America&apos;s Relationship with War Since 1945 (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes a forceful argument by examining the tensions between Americans&apos; overreaching faith in war as a foreign policy tool and their overwhelming fear of war as a destructive force.

Gregory A. Daddis is Professor of History and holds the Melbern G. Glasscock Endowed Chair in American History at Texas A&amp;M University. A retired US Army colonel, he deployed to both Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a groundbreaking reassessment of the long Cold War era, historian Gregory A. Daddis argues that ever since the Second World War&apos;s fateful conclusion, faith in and fear of war became central to Americans&apos; thinking about the world around them. With war pervading nearly all aspects of American society, an interplay between blind faith and existential fear framed US policymaking and grand strategy, often with tragic results. A sweeping history, Faith and Fear: America&apos;s Relationship with War Since 1945 (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes a forceful argument by examining the tensions between Americans&apos; overreaching faith in war as a foreign policy tool and their overwhelming fear of war as a destructive force.

Gregory A. Daddis is Professor of History and holds the Melbern G. Glasscock Endowed Chair in American History at Texas A&amp;M University. A retired US Army colonel, he deployed to both Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>671</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a024af96-801e-11f0-8e6a-cfcf13089a4f</guid>
      <title>Donald G. Nieman, &quot;The Path to Paralysis: How American Politics Became Nasty, Dysfunctional, and a Threat to the Republic&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what <em>The Path to Paralysis</em> does.</p>
<p>The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.</p>
<p>These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.</p>
<p>The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.</p>
<p>Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what <em>The Path to Paralysis</em> does.</p>
<p>The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.</p>
<p>These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.</p>
<p>The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.</p>
<p>Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49926584" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f67edb1a-750a-4297-b584-b71a2d4b906b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f67edb1a-750a-4297-b584-b71a2d4b906b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Donald G. Nieman, &quot;The Path to Paralysis: How American Politics Became Nasty, Dysfunctional, and a Threat to the Republic&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what The Path to Paralysis does.

The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.

These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.

The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.

Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Much has been written about political polarisation in the United States, but no one has examined it through the lens of recent U.S. history. There is nothing deterministic about how we became polarised, and it happened more recently than many think. To fully understand the problem, we must take the long view, the perspective provided by history, with its attention to change over time and the role of contingency. That’s what The Path to Paralysis does.

The book illuminates the broad forces that have shaped and reshaped American society and politics since the mid-1960s: the shift from an industrial to an information economy that produced economic inequality not seen since the 1920s; dramatic, unsettling changes in gender and sexuality; sharp conflict between those who embrace the culture of personal freedom that was a legacy of the 1960s and politically mobilised White evangelicals; persistent racial discord that transformed Southern politics and shattered the New Deal coalition; and dramatic changes in communication that transformed broadcasting into narrowcasting, creating alternate news and truths.

These developments had their origin in the late 1960s and have generated sharp political conflict for six decades. But they didn’t overwhelm the system until the 21st century. Ronald Reagan moved American politics to the right, but Republicans and Democrats forged compromise on issues as diverse as economic policy, civil rights, and immigration. After the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tacked to the centre and sought bipartisan solutions to issues like welfare, education and immigration. Sharp conflict and governance were compatible.

The tipping point was the election of the nation’s first Black president and the economic collapse he inherited. Fault lines of religion, region, gender, sexual orientation, class, education and, especially, race widened. People chose sides and identified enemies, the number of true swing voters shrunk, fewer states and congressional districts were competitive, the two major parties became more monolithic, and appeals to the base drove strategy and what passed for policy. It was an atmosphere that provided fertile ground for a demagogue whose norm-busting appeals to White grievance and Christian Nationalism, as well as to regional and class resentment strengthened his appeal to an angry base and threatened the peaceful transition of power, the bedrock of American democracy for more than two centuries.

Donald G. Nieman is an authority on modern U.S. law and politics, and professor of history and provost emeritus at Binghamton University – State University of New York.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">443daf88-7f5c-11f0-b342-c3992afc8f77</guid>
      <title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;Securing Peace in Europe: Strobe Talbott, NATO, and Russia After the Cold War&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This deeply researched book offers new perspective on the NATO-Russia relationship through the eyes of Strobe Talbott, a deputy secretary of state for seven years under President Bill Clinton and the key US diplomatic broker for the former USSR. Stephan Kieninger traces the Clinton administration’s efforts to engage Russia and enlarge NATO at the same time, as elements of a new European security architecture. Drawing on Talbott’s diaries, as well as US and European archives and extensive interviews with former government officials, he sheds light on NATO’s opening, its missions in Bosnia and Kosovo, and other vexed issues. Kieninger argues that a careful look at Talbott’s statecraft rebuts Putin’s claims that the West exploited Russia’s weakness after the Cold War, demonstrating that the Clinton administration and its NATO allies sought to include Russia at every step. An illuminating and comprehensive account of US diplomacy during the Clinton years, <em>Securing Peace in Europe</em> provides vital insight into the complex relations between Russia and the West.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deeply researched book offers new perspective on the NATO-Russia relationship through the eyes of Strobe Talbott, a deputy secretary of state for seven years under President Bill Clinton and the key US diplomatic broker for the former USSR. Stephan Kieninger traces the Clinton administration’s efforts to engage Russia and enlarge NATO at the same time, as elements of a new European security architecture. Drawing on Talbott’s diaries, as well as US and European archives and extensive interviews with former government officials, he sheds light on NATO’s opening, its missions in Bosnia and Kosovo, and other vexed issues. Kieninger argues that a careful look at Talbott’s statecraft rebuts Putin’s claims that the West exploited Russia’s weakness after the Cold War, demonstrating that the Clinton administration and its NATO allies sought to include Russia at every step. An illuminating and comprehensive account of US diplomacy during the Clinton years, <em>Securing Peace in Europe</em> provides vital insight into the complex relations between Russia and the West.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39911877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/344dce33-bab4-4b1c-8b21-4e02936d5d5c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=344dce33-bab4-4b1c-8b21-4e02936d5d5c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephan Kieninger, &quot;Securing Peace in Europe: Strobe Talbott, NATO, and Russia After the Cold War&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This deeply researched book offers new perspective on the NATO-Russia relationship through the eyes of Strobe Talbott, a deputy secretary of state for seven years under President Bill Clinton and the key US diplomatic broker for the former USSR. Stephan Kieninger traces the Clinton administration’s efforts to engage Russia and enlarge NATO at the same time, as elements of a new European security architecture. Drawing on Talbott’s diaries, as well as US and European archives and extensive interviews with former government officials, he sheds light on NATO’s opening, its missions in Bosnia and Kosovo, and other vexed issues. Kieninger argues that a careful look at Talbott’s statecraft rebuts Putin’s claims that the West exploited Russia’s weakness after the Cold War, demonstrating that the Clinton administration and its NATO allies sought to include Russia at every step. An illuminating and comprehensive account of US diplomacy during the Clinton years, Securing Peace in Europe provides vital insight into the complex relations between Russia and the West.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This deeply researched book offers new perspective on the NATO-Russia relationship through the eyes of Strobe Talbott, a deputy secretary of state for seven years under President Bill Clinton and the key US diplomatic broker for the former USSR. Stephan Kieninger traces the Clinton administration’s efforts to engage Russia and enlarge NATO at the same time, as elements of a new European security architecture. Drawing on Talbott’s diaries, as well as US and European archives and extensive interviews with former government officials, he sheds light on NATO’s opening, its missions in Bosnia and Kosovo, and other vexed issues. Kieninger argues that a careful look at Talbott’s statecraft rebuts Putin’s claims that the West exploited Russia’s weakness after the Cold War, demonstrating that the Clinton administration and its NATO allies sought to include Russia at every step. An illuminating and comprehensive account of US diplomacy during the Clinton years, Securing Peace in Europe provides vital insight into the complex relations between Russia and the West.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17b7244c-793f-11ed-95d4-a39fbabf93be</guid>
      <title>Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, &quot;Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691169521"><em>Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2022) explores why dictatorships born of social revolution—such as those in China, Cuba, Iran, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam—are extraordinarily durable, even in the face of economic crisis, large-scale policy failure, mass discontent, and intense external pressure. Few other modern autocracies have survived in the face of such extreme challenges. Drawing on comparative historical analysis, Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way argue that radical efforts to transform the social and geopolitical order trigger intense counterrevolutionary conflict, which initially threatens regime survival, but ultimately fosters the unity and state-building that supports authoritarianism.</p><p>Steven Levitsky is the David Rockefeller Professor of Latin American Studies and Professor of Government at Harvard University.</p><p>Lucan Way is a professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, where he co-directs the Petro Jacyk Program for the Study of Ukraine.</p><p>The previous book by both authors is <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521709156"><em>Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2010).</p><p><a href="http://www.sallysharif.com/"><em>Sally Sharif</em></a><em> is Simons Foundation Canada Post-Doctoral Fellow at the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University. Her most recent paper is “</em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2128337"><em>Can the Rebel Body Function without its Visible Heads? The Role of Mid-Level Commanders in Peacebuilding</em></a><em>.”</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691169521"><em>Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2022) explores why dictatorships born of social revolution—such as those in China, Cuba, Iran, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam—are extraordinarily durable, even in the face of economic crisis, large-scale policy failure, mass discontent, and intense external pressure. Few other modern autocracies have survived in the face of such extreme challenges. Drawing on comparative historical analysis, Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way argue that radical efforts to transform the social and geopolitical order trigger intense counterrevolutionary conflict, which initially threatens regime survival, but ultimately fosters the unity and state-building that supports authoritarianism.</p><p>Steven Levitsky is the David Rockefeller Professor of Latin American Studies and Professor of Government at Harvard University.</p><p>Lucan Way is a professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, where he co-directs the Petro Jacyk Program for the Study of Ukraine.</p><p>The previous book by both authors is <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521709156"><em>Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2010).</p><p><a href="http://www.sallysharif.com/"><em>Sally Sharif</em></a><em> is Simons Foundation Canada Post-Doctoral Fellow at the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University. Her most recent paper is “</em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2128337"><em>Can the Rebel Body Function without its Visible Heads? The Role of Mid-Level Commanders in Peacebuilding</em></a><em>.”</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52559204" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2933df6c-6ca1-4f34-b2d5-17fa5f506b79/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2933df6c-6ca1-4f34-b2d5-17fa5f506b79&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, &quot;Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism (Princeton UP, 2022) explores why dictatorships born of social revolution—such as those in China, Cuba, Iran, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam—are extraordinarily durable, even in the face of economic crisis, large-scale policy failure, mass discontent, and intense external pressure. Few other modern autocracies have survived in the face of such extreme challenges. Drawing on comparative historical analysis, Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way argue that radical efforts to transform the social and geopolitical order trigger intense counterrevolutionary conflict, which initially threatens regime survival, but ultimately fosters the unity and state-building that supports authoritarianism.
Steven Levitsky is the David Rockefeller Professor of Latin American Studies and Professor of Government at Harvard University.
Lucan Way is a professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, where he co-directs the Petro Jacyk Program for the Study of Ukraine.
The previous book by both authors is Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Sally Sharif is Simons Foundation Canada Post-Doctoral Fellow at the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University. Her most recent paper is “Can the Rebel Body Function without its Visible Heads? The Role of Mid-Level Commanders in Peacebuilding.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Revolution and Dictatorship: The Violent Origins of Durable Authoritarianism (Princeton UP, 2022) explores why dictatorships born of social revolution—such as those in China, Cuba, Iran, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam—are extraordinarily durable, even in the face of economic crisis, large-scale policy failure, mass discontent, and intense external pressure. Few other modern autocracies have survived in the face of such extreme challenges. Drawing on comparative historical analysis, Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way argue that radical efforts to transform the social and geopolitical order trigger intense counterrevolutionary conflict, which initially threatens regime survival, but ultimately fosters the unity and state-building that supports authoritarianism.
Steven Levitsky is the David Rockefeller Professor of Latin American Studies and Professor of Government at Harvard University.
Lucan Way is a professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto, where he co-directs the Petro Jacyk Program for the Study of Ukraine.
The previous book by both authors is Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Sally Sharif is Simons Foundation Canada Post-Doctoral Fellow at the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University. Her most recent paper is “Can the Rebel Body Function without its Visible Heads? The Role of Mid-Level Commanders in Peacebuilding.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>634</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d16c1e14-7ac3-11f0-80dc-83adf7522484</guid>
      <title>Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson, &quot;Racial Resentment in the Political Mind&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<em> Racial Resentment in the Political Mind</em>, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.<br />The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.</p>
<p>Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.<br />Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, <em>Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective</em>. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, <em>Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America</em>, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<em> Racial Resentment in the Political Mind</em>, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.<br />The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.</p>
<p>Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.<br />Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, <em>Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective</em>. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, <em>Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America</em>, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52030476" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cfb34bcd-308b-41cb-a748-ec9b840d3974/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cfb34bcd-308b-41cb-a748-ec9b840d3974&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson, &quot;Racial Resentment in the Political Mind&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Racial Resentment in the Political Mind, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.

Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Racial Resentment in the Political Mind, Darren W. Davis and David C. Wilson challenge the commonly held notion that all racial negativity, disagreements, and objections to policies that seek to help racial minorities stem from racial prejudice. They argue that racial resentment arises from just-world beliefs and appraisals of deservingness that help explain the persistence of racial inequality in America in ways more consequential than racism or racial prejudice alone.The culprits, as many White people see it, are undeserving people of color, who are perceived to benefit unfairly from, and take advantage of, resources that come at Whites’ expense—a worldview in which any attempt at modest change is seen as a challenge to the status quo and privilege. Yet, as Davis and Wilson reveal, many Whites have become racially resentful due to their perceptions that African Americans skirt the “rules of the game” and violate traditional values by taking advantage of unearned resources. Resulting attempts at racial progress lead Whites to respond in ways that retain their social advantage—opposing ameliorative policies, minority candidates, and other advancement on racial progress. Because racial resentment is rooted in beliefs about justice, fairness, and deservingness, ordinary citizens, who may not harbor racist motivations, may wind up in the same political position as racists, but for different reasons.

Professor Davis’ research interests include most areas in public opinion and political behavior. A unifying theme running through much of his research is a concern for identifying the social psychological motivations underlying political attitudes and behavior. This approach has been applied to specific research areas, including political tolerance, implicit racial attitudes, the role of threat and anxiety in political behavior, public reactions to terrorism, social desirability, the measurement of political and social attitudes, racism and racial politics, and the political behavior of African Americans.Professor Davis is co-author of a forthcoming Cambridge University Press book, Perseverance in the Parish? Religious Attitudes from a Black Catholic Perspective. Based on the first national survey of African American Catholics, this book explores the perceptions of racism and racial experiences in the Catholic Church. His other book, Negative Liberty: Public Opinion and the Terrorist Attacks on America, examines the role of threat perceptions on the tradeoffs between civil liberties and security, political tolerance, and ideas of citizenship.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>513</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f12bf9c-6803-11f0-a342-ff8184803e2f</guid>
      <title>Vinay Lal, &quot;Gandhi, Truth, and Nonviolence: The Politics of Engagement in Post-Truth Times&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The anthology presents a diverse array of essays delving into Gandhi's political activities, ethical beliefs, and philosophical stance. Distinguished Gandhian scholars contribute to this collection, setting it apart from similar compilations by focusing not just on Gandhi's impact or the debate over his relevance, but on maintaining his bold ethical ideals and progressive views in an era of skepticism. The essays delve into Gandhi's comprehensive dissection of political logic, his concept of neighbourly political bonds, his fearlessness and adeptness as a yogi. The work also discusses the worldwide landscape of nonviolence, Gandhi's perspectives on Palestine, his legal work in South Africa, his dialogues with Tagore, the pursuit of his ethical goals, and the portrayal of his persona, as well as the ongoing relevance of his nonviolent resistance methods, as seen in India's anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests. These pieces portray Gandhi as a perpetual participant in limitless endeavours, as described by philosopher James Carse. The book concludes with an interview with Rev. James Lawson, a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement, which offers a fresh perspective. The Gandhi that emerges from these reflections and intellectual explorations has become all but a stranger to India, and especially to his native Gujarat.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anthology presents a diverse array of essays delving into Gandhi's political activities, ethical beliefs, and philosophical stance. Distinguished Gandhian scholars contribute to this collection, setting it apart from similar compilations by focusing not just on Gandhi's impact or the debate over his relevance, but on maintaining his bold ethical ideals and progressive views in an era of skepticism. The essays delve into Gandhi's comprehensive dissection of political logic, his concept of neighbourly political bonds, his fearlessness and adeptness as a yogi. The work also discusses the worldwide landscape of nonviolence, Gandhi's perspectives on Palestine, his legal work in South Africa, his dialogues with Tagore, the pursuit of his ethical goals, and the portrayal of his persona, as well as the ongoing relevance of his nonviolent resistance methods, as seen in India's anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests. These pieces portray Gandhi as a perpetual participant in limitless endeavours, as described by philosopher James Carse. The book concludes with an interview with Rev. James Lawson, a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement, which offers a fresh perspective. The Gandhi that emerges from these reflections and intellectual explorations has become all but a stranger to India, and especially to his native Gujarat.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62191022" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/32a9efc7-2b27-4ebd-a5ee-f12e394fce10/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=32a9efc7-2b27-4ebd-a5ee-f12e394fce10&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vinay Lal, &quot;Gandhi, Truth, and Nonviolence: The Politics of Engagement in Post-Truth Times&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The anthology presents a diverse array of essays delving into Gandhi&apos;s political activities, ethical beliefs, and philosophical stance. Distinguished Gandhian scholars contribute to this collection, setting it apart from similar compilations by focusing not just on Gandhi&apos;s impact or the debate over his relevance, but on maintaining his bold ethical ideals and progressive views in an era of skepticism. The essays delve into Gandhi&apos;s comprehensive dissection of political logic, his concept of neighbourly political bonds, his fearlessness and adeptness as a yogi. The work also discusses the worldwide landscape of nonviolence, Gandhi&apos;s perspectives on Palestine, his legal work in South Africa, his dialogues with Tagore, the pursuit of his ethical goals, and the portrayal of his persona, as well as the ongoing relevance of his nonviolent resistance methods, as seen in India&apos;s anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests. These pieces portray Gandhi as a perpetual participant in limitless endeavours, as described by philosopher James Carse. The book concludes with an interview with Rev. James Lawson, a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement, which offers a fresh perspective. The Gandhi that emerges from these reflections and intellectual explorations has become all but a stranger to India, and especially to his native Gujarat.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The anthology presents a diverse array of essays delving into Gandhi&apos;s political activities, ethical beliefs, and philosophical stance. Distinguished Gandhian scholars contribute to this collection, setting it apart from similar compilations by focusing not just on Gandhi&apos;s impact or the debate over his relevance, but on maintaining his bold ethical ideals and progressive views in an era of skepticism. The essays delve into Gandhi&apos;s comprehensive dissection of political logic, his concept of neighbourly political bonds, his fearlessness and adeptness as a yogi. The work also discusses the worldwide landscape of nonviolence, Gandhi&apos;s perspectives on Palestine, his legal work in South Africa, his dialogues with Tagore, the pursuit of his ethical goals, and the portrayal of his persona, as well as the ongoing relevance of his nonviolent resistance methods, as seen in India&apos;s anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests. These pieces portray Gandhi as a perpetual participant in limitless endeavours, as described by philosopher James Carse. The book concludes with an interview with Rev. James Lawson, a pivotal figure in the American civil rights movement, which offers a fresh perspective. The Gandhi that emerges from these reflections and intellectual explorations has become all but a stranger to India, and especially to his native Gujarat.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>601</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5c9f5eac-7da7-11f0-a34b-0b568fdee004</guid>
      <title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br />The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in <em>Dred Scott</em> was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em> </em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br />The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in <em>Dred Scott</em> was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em> </em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is: <a href="https://christinagessler.com/">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found <a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life">here.</a> And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48828073" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/133bf1f0-304b-4e6a-9281-4e51646c4d1d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=133bf1f0-304b-4e6a-9281-4e51646c4d1d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.

Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.

Playlist:


  Dear Miss Perkins

  Secret Harvests

  Who Gets Believed

  We Take Our Cities With Us

  The House on Henry Street

  Immigration Realities

  The Ungrateful Refugee

  Sin Padres Ni Papeles

  Reunited


Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.

Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.

Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.

Playlist:


  Dear Miss Perkins

  Secret Harvests

  Who Gets Believed

  We Take Our Cities With Us

  The House on Henry Street

  Immigration Realities

  The Ungrateful Refugee

  Sin Padres Ni Papeles

  Reunited


Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>665</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0cbc12e-7cb3-11f0-9ecc-eb0e35e79a63</guid>
      <title>Catherine Malabou, &quot;Stop Thief!: Anarchism and Philosophy&quot; (Polity Books, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many philosophers value anarchy but refuse to call themselves anarchists? Why don’t philosophers draw on the classical anarchist tradition? How can we think de facto anarchism as distinct from dawning anarchism? What is at stake in doing so? Does philosophy need anarchism? To answer these questions, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509555239">Stop Thief! Anarchism and Philosophy</a><em> </em>(Polity Books, 2023), Catherine Malabou reads submerged counter-revolutionary themes in the texts of several key philosophical thinkers. By doing so, Malabou helps us understand the ways in which philosophy has left anarchy unthought, while also stealing from it, and disavowing it. What emerges in her analysis is the importance of the non-governable, not just as a problem for philosophy, but as what opens towards other ways of sharing, acting, and thinking.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do so many philosophers value anarchy but refuse to call themselves anarchists? Why don’t philosophers draw on the classical anarchist tradition? How can we think de facto anarchism as distinct from dawning anarchism? What is at stake in doing so? Does philosophy need anarchism? To answer these questions, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509555239">Stop Thief! Anarchism and Philosophy</a><em> </em>(Polity Books, 2023), Catherine Malabou reads submerged counter-revolutionary themes in the texts of several key philosophical thinkers. By doing so, Malabou helps us understand the ways in which philosophy has left anarchy unthought, while also stealing from it, and disavowing it. What emerges in her analysis is the importance of the non-governable, not just as a problem for philosophy, but as what opens towards other ways of sharing, acting, and thinking.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42136417" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/95d4f829-8768-4443-a60f-d23373acdece/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=95d4f829-8768-4443-a60f-d23373acdece&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Catherine Malabou, &quot;Stop Thief!: Anarchism and Philosophy&quot; (Polity Books, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do so many philosophers value anarchy but refuse to call themselves anarchists? Why don’t philosophers draw on the classical anarchist tradition? How can we think de facto anarchism as distinct from dawning anarchism? What is at stake in doing so? Does philosophy need anarchism? To answer these questions, in Stop Thief! Anarchism and Philosophy (Polity Books, 2023), Catherine Malabou reads submerged counter-revolutionary themes in the texts of several key philosophical thinkers. By doing so, Malabou helps us understand the ways in which philosophy has left anarchy unthought, while also stealing from it, and disavowing it. What emerges in her analysis is the importance of the non-governable, not just as a problem for philosophy, but as what opens towards other ways of sharing, acting, and thinking.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do so many philosophers value anarchy but refuse to call themselves anarchists? Why don’t philosophers draw on the classical anarchist tradition? How can we think de facto anarchism as distinct from dawning anarchism? What is at stake in doing so? Does philosophy need anarchism? To answer these questions, in Stop Thief! Anarchism and Philosophy (Polity Books, 2023), Catherine Malabou reads submerged counter-revolutionary themes in the texts of several key philosophical thinkers. By doing so, Malabou helps us understand the ways in which philosophy has left anarchy unthought, while also stealing from it, and disavowing it. What emerges in her analysis is the importance of the non-governable, not just as a problem for philosophy, but as what opens towards other ways of sharing, acting, and thinking.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>664</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7d3a540-7aad-11f0-8b07-77155e4699d5</guid>
      <title>Reid B. C. Pauly, &quot;The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Strong states are surprisingly bad at coercion. History shows they prevail only a third of the time. Dr. Pauly argues that coercion often fails because targets fear punishment even if they comply. In this "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario, targets have little reason to obey. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501782787">The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma</a> (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Reid B. C. Pauly presents a fresh explanation for the success—and failure—of coercive demands in international politics.</p>
<p>Dr. Pauly illustrates this logic in nuclear counterproliferation efforts with South Africa, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. He shows that coercers face an "assurance dilemma": When threats are more credible, assurances not to punish are less so. But without credible assurances, targets may defy threats, bracing for seemingly inevitable punishment. For coercion to work, as such, coercers must not only make targets believe that they will be punished if they do not comply, but also that they will not be if they do.</p>
<p>Packed with insights for any foreign policy challenge involving coercive strategies, <em>The Art of Coercion</em> crucially corrects assumptions that tougher threats alone achieve results.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong states are surprisingly bad at coercion. History shows they prevail only a third of the time. Dr. Pauly argues that coercion often fails because targets fear punishment even if they comply. In this "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario, targets have little reason to obey. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501782787">The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma</a> (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Reid B. C. Pauly presents a fresh explanation for the success—and failure—of coercive demands in international politics.</p>
<p>Dr. Pauly illustrates this logic in nuclear counterproliferation efforts with South Africa, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. He shows that coercers face an "assurance dilemma": When threats are more credible, assurances not to punish are less so. But without credible assurances, targets may defy threats, bracing for seemingly inevitable punishment. For coercion to work, as such, coercers must not only make targets believe that they will be punished if they do not comply, but also that they will not be if they do.</p>
<p>Packed with insights for any foreign policy challenge involving coercive strategies, <em>The Art of Coercion</em> crucially corrects assumptions that tougher threats alone achieve results.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53595801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ab778018-890e-4c91-955e-f4e8bc8aac49/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ab778018-890e-4c91-955e-f4e8bc8aac49&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Reid B. C. Pauly, &quot;The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Strong states are surprisingly bad at coercion. History shows they prevail only a third of the time. Dr. Pauly argues that coercion often fails because targets fear punishment even if they comply. In this &quot;damned if you do, damned if you don&apos;t&quot; scenario, targets have little reason to obey. The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Reid B. C. Pauly presents a fresh explanation for the success—and failure—of coercive demands in international politics.

Dr. Pauly illustrates this logic in nuclear counterproliferation efforts with South Africa, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. He shows that coercers face an &quot;assurance dilemma&quot;: When threats are more credible, assurances not to punish are less so. But without credible assurances, targets may defy threats, bracing for seemingly inevitable punishment. For coercion to work, as such, coercers must not only make targets believe that they will be punished if they do not comply, but also that they will not be if they do.

Packed with insights for any foreign policy challenge involving coercive strategies, The Art of Coercion crucially corrects assumptions that tougher threats alone achieve results.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Strong states are surprisingly bad at coercion. History shows they prevail only a third of the time. Dr. Pauly argues that coercion often fails because targets fear punishment even if they comply. In this &quot;damned if you do, damned if you don&apos;t&quot; scenario, targets have little reason to obey. The Art of Coercion: Credible Threats and the Assurance Dilemma (Cornell UP, 2025) by Dr. Reid B. C. Pauly presents a fresh explanation for the success—and failure—of coercive demands in international politics.

Dr. Pauly illustrates this logic in nuclear counterproliferation efforts with South Africa, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. He shows that coercers face an &quot;assurance dilemma&quot;: When threats are more credible, assurances not to punish are less so. But without credible assurances, targets may defy threats, bracing for seemingly inevitable punishment. For coercion to work, as such, coercers must not only make targets believe that they will be punished if they do not comply, but also that they will not be if they do.

Packed with insights for any foreign policy challenge involving coercive strategies, The Art of Coercion crucially corrects assumptions that tougher threats alone achieve results.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>776</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89d83e16-7a05-11f0-96ce-a7833f9f9232</guid>
      <title>Georgiy Kasianov et al., &quot;From &apos;the Ukraine&apos; to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021&quot; (Ibidem Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783838215143"><em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021</em></a> (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. <em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine</em> outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.</p><p><a href="https://russian.indiana.edu/about/tutors/shpylova-saeed-nataliya.html"><em>Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed</em></a><em> is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783838215143"><em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021</em></a> (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. <em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine</em> outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.</p><p><a href="https://russian.indiana.edu/about/tutors/shpylova-saeed-nataliya.html"><em>Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed</em></a><em> is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46456666" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/97fb491b-5168-497a-a011-45a060114b5f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=97fb491b-5168-497a-a011-45a060114b5f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Georgiy Kasianov et al., &quot;From &apos;the Ukraine&apos; to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021&quot; (Ibidem Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021 (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.
Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021 (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.
Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50834f5a-7bec-11f0-9cd3-d3159335dcd6</guid>
      <title>Rob Goodman, &quot;Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Conditions&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why is political rhetoric broken – and how can it be fixed? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009045773">Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Condition</a>s (Cambridge University Press, 2022) returns to the origins of rhetoric to recover the central place of eloquence in political thought. Eloquence, for the orators of classical antiquity, emerged from rhetorical relationships that exposed both speaker and audience to risk. Through close readings of Cicero – and his predecessors, rivals, and successors – political theorist and former speechwriter Rob Goodman tracks the development of this ideal, in which speech is both spontaneous and stylized, and in which the pursuit of eloquence mitigates political inequalities. He goes on to trace the fierce disputes over Ciceronian speech in the modern world through the work of such figures as Burke, Macaulay, Tocqueville, and Schmitt, explaining how rhetorical risk-sharing has broken down. Words on Fire offers a powerful critique of today's political language – and shows how the struggle over the meaning of eloquence has shaped our world.</p>
<p>The book was the finalist for the C.B. Macpherson Prize from the Canadian Political Science Association.</p>
<p>Rob Goodman is an Associate Professor of Politics and Public Administration at Toronto Metropolitan University. He was previously a postdoctoral researcher at McGill University and a Core Curriculum instructor at Columbia University. Before starting his doctoral research, he worked as a speechwriter for U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Honer and Senator Chris Dodd. Goodman has published widely in leading academic journals. He has also co-edited ‘Populism, Demagoguery, and Rhetoric in Historical Perspective’ published by Oxford University Press, 2024. Goodman is also the author of ‘Not Here’ (Simon &amp; Schuster Canada, 2023), a book on democratic erosion in Canada and the United States, which was a finalist for the Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing from the Writers' Trust of Canada.</p>
<p>Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is political rhetoric broken – and how can it be fixed? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009045773">Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Condition</a>s (Cambridge University Press, 2022) returns to the origins of rhetoric to recover the central place of eloquence in political thought. Eloquence, for the orators of classical antiquity, emerged from rhetorical relationships that exposed both speaker and audience to risk. Through close readings of Cicero – and his predecessors, rivals, and successors – political theorist and former speechwriter Rob Goodman tracks the development of this ideal, in which speech is both spontaneous and stylized, and in which the pursuit of eloquence mitigates political inequalities. He goes on to trace the fierce disputes over Ciceronian speech in the modern world through the work of such figures as Burke, Macaulay, Tocqueville, and Schmitt, explaining how rhetorical risk-sharing has broken down. Words on Fire offers a powerful critique of today's political language – and shows how the struggle over the meaning of eloquence has shaped our world.</p>
<p>The book was the finalist for the C.B. Macpherson Prize from the Canadian Political Science Association.</p>
<p>Rob Goodman is an Associate Professor of Politics and Public Administration at Toronto Metropolitan University. He was previously a postdoctoral researcher at McGill University and a Core Curriculum instructor at Columbia University. Before starting his doctoral research, he worked as a speechwriter for U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Honer and Senator Chris Dodd. Goodman has published widely in leading academic journals. He has also co-edited ‘Populism, Demagoguery, and Rhetoric in Historical Perspective’ published by Oxford University Press, 2024. Goodman is also the author of ‘Not Here’ (Simon &amp; Schuster Canada, 2023), a book on democratic erosion in Canada and the United States, which was a finalist for the Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing from the Writers' Trust of Canada.</p>
<p>Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40123120" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fc47232a-55f9-4036-a03c-c4db3655051b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fc47232a-55f9-4036-a03c-c4db3655051b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rob Goodman, &quot;Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Conditions&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why is political rhetoric broken – and how can it be fixed? Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Conditions (Cambridge University Press, 2022) returns to the origins of rhetoric to recover the central place of eloquence in political thought. Eloquence, for the orators of classical antiquity, emerged from rhetorical relationships that exposed both speaker and audience to risk. Through close readings of Cicero – and his predecessors, rivals, and successors – political theorist and former speechwriter Rob Goodman tracks the development of this ideal, in which speech is both spontaneous and stylized, and in which the pursuit of eloquence mitigates political inequalities. He goes on to trace the fierce disputes over Ciceronian speech in the modern world through the work of such figures as Burke, Macaulay, Tocqueville, and Schmitt, explaining how rhetorical risk-sharing has broken down. Words on Fire offers a powerful critique of today&apos;s political language – and shows how the struggle over the meaning of eloquence has shaped our world.

The book was the finalist for the C.B. Macpherson Prize from the Canadian Political Science Association.

Rob Goodman is an Associate Professor of Politics and Public Administration at Toronto Metropolitan University. He was previously a postdoctoral researcher at McGill University and a Core Curriculum instructor at Columbia University. Before starting his doctoral research, he worked as a speechwriter for U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Honer and Senator Chris Dodd. Goodman has published widely in leading academic journals. He has also co-edited ‘Populism, Demagoguery, and Rhetoric in Historical Perspective’ published by Oxford University Press, 2024. Goodman is also the author of ‘Not Here’ (Simon &amp; Schuster Canada, 2023), a book on democratic erosion in Canada and the United States, which was a finalist for the Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing from the Writers&apos; Trust of Canada.

Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why is political rhetoric broken – and how can it be fixed? Words on Fire: Eloquence and Its Conditions (Cambridge University Press, 2022) returns to the origins of rhetoric to recover the central place of eloquence in political thought. Eloquence, for the orators of classical antiquity, emerged from rhetorical relationships that exposed both speaker and audience to risk. Through close readings of Cicero – and his predecessors, rivals, and successors – political theorist and former speechwriter Rob Goodman tracks the development of this ideal, in which speech is both spontaneous and stylized, and in which the pursuit of eloquence mitigates political inequalities. He goes on to trace the fierce disputes over Ciceronian speech in the modern world through the work of such figures as Burke, Macaulay, Tocqueville, and Schmitt, explaining how rhetorical risk-sharing has broken down. Words on Fire offers a powerful critique of today&apos;s political language – and shows how the struggle over the meaning of eloquence has shaped our world.

The book was the finalist for the C.B. Macpherson Prize from the Canadian Political Science Association.

Rob Goodman is an Associate Professor of Politics and Public Administration at Toronto Metropolitan University. He was previously a postdoctoral researcher at McGill University and a Core Curriculum instructor at Columbia University. Before starting his doctoral research, he worked as a speechwriter for U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Honer and Senator Chris Dodd. Goodman has published widely in leading academic journals. He has also co-edited ‘Populism, Demagoguery, and Rhetoric in Historical Perspective’ published by Oxford University Press, 2024. Goodman is also the author of ‘Not Here’ (Simon &amp; Schuster Canada, 2023), a book on democratic erosion in Canada and the United States, which was a finalist for the Shaughnessy Cohen Prize for Political Writing from the Writers&apos; Trust of Canada.

Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>661</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c3aa8b6-7c00-11f0-b59a-23dafbb74c5f</guid>
      <title>Steve L. Monroe, &quot;Mirages of Reform: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501780608">Mirages of Reform﻿: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World </a>(Cornell UP, 2025), Steve L. Monroe argues that geopolitics and social connections between state and capital underpin the Arab world's uneven trade policies<strong>.</strong> Despite decades of international pressure, neoliberal trade policy reform in the Arab world has been varied, selective, and often ineffective. Neoliberal trade policies have not deepened international trade in many of the region's markets. This book explains why.</p>
<p>When the region's regimes have strong support from global powers and strong social connections to the industrial elite, they engage in extensive but deceptive trade policy reform. Behind an edifice of neoliberal trade policies, neopatrimonial forms of protectionism like tax evasion and noncompetitive procurement shield the socially connected from international competition and obstruct actual trade liberalization. Industrialists are less trustful of regime promises of neopatrimonial protectionism after reform when they have weak social connections to their regime and their regime has low support from global powers. They are more likely to defend existing protectionist policies under these conditions, resulting in less trade policy reform.</p>
<p>Drawing on interviews, firm- and industry-level data, and evidence from Jordan to Morocco, <em>Mirages of Reform</em> reveals how international and domestic factors interact to shape the Arab world's rugged trade policy terrain. Insightful and well researched, this book imparts important lessons and warnings about the repercussions of economic reform in the region.﻿<br /></p>
<p>Steve L. Monroe is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore. He is a scholar of development, with a primary focus on the Arab world. Monroe's scholarship examines two of the region's most pressing developmental challenges: limited economic integration, and gender inequality.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501780608">Mirages of Reform﻿: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World </a>(Cornell UP, 2025), Steve L. Monroe argues that geopolitics and social connections between state and capital underpin the Arab world's uneven trade policies<strong>.</strong> Despite decades of international pressure, neoliberal trade policy reform in the Arab world has been varied, selective, and often ineffective. Neoliberal trade policies have not deepened international trade in many of the region's markets. This book explains why.</p>
<p>When the region's regimes have strong support from global powers and strong social connections to the industrial elite, they engage in extensive but deceptive trade policy reform. Behind an edifice of neoliberal trade policies, neopatrimonial forms of protectionism like tax evasion and noncompetitive procurement shield the socially connected from international competition and obstruct actual trade liberalization. Industrialists are less trustful of regime promises of neopatrimonial protectionism after reform when they have weak social connections to their regime and their regime has low support from global powers. They are more likely to defend existing protectionist policies under these conditions, resulting in less trade policy reform.</p>
<p>Drawing on interviews, firm- and industry-level data, and evidence from Jordan to Morocco, <em>Mirages of Reform</em> reveals how international and domestic factors interact to shape the Arab world's rugged trade policy terrain. Insightful and well researched, this book imparts important lessons and warnings about the repercussions of economic reform in the region.﻿<br /></p>
<p>Steve L. Monroe is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore. He is a scholar of development, with a primary focus on the Arab world. Monroe's scholarship examines two of the region's most pressing developmental challenges: limited economic integration, and gender inequality.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="20409173" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4b299c8a-428b-4880-a296-64d68e3cf4f9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4b299c8a-428b-4880-a296-64d68e3cf4f9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Steve L. Monroe, &quot;Mirages of Reform: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:21:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Mirages of Reform﻿: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World (Cornell UP, 2025), Steve L. Monroe argues that geopolitics and social connections between state and capital underpin the Arab world&apos;s uneven trade policies. Despite decades of international pressure, neoliberal trade policy reform in the Arab world has been varied, selective, and often ineffective. Neoliberal trade policies have not deepened international trade in many of the region&apos;s markets. This book explains why.

When the region&apos;s regimes have strong support from global powers and strong social connections to the industrial elite, they engage in extensive but deceptive trade policy reform. Behind an edifice of neoliberal trade policies, neopatrimonial forms of protectionism like tax evasion and noncompetitive procurement shield the socially connected from international competition and obstruct actual trade liberalization. Industrialists are less trustful of regime promises of neopatrimonial protectionism after reform when they have weak social connections to their regime and their regime has low support from global powers. They are more likely to defend existing protectionist policies under these conditions, resulting in less trade policy reform.

Drawing on interviews, firm- and industry-level data, and evidence from Jordan to Morocco, Mirages of Reform reveals how international and domestic factors interact to shape the Arab world&apos;s rugged trade policy terrain. Insightful and well researched, this book imparts important lessons and warnings about the repercussions of economic reform in the region.﻿

Steve L. Monroe is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore. He is a scholar of development, with a primary focus on the Arab world. Monroe&apos;s scholarship examines two of the region&apos;s most pressing developmental challenges: limited economic integration, and gender inequality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Mirages of Reform﻿: The Politics of Elite Protectionism in the Arab World (Cornell UP, 2025), Steve L. Monroe argues that geopolitics and social connections between state and capital underpin the Arab world&apos;s uneven trade policies. Despite decades of international pressure, neoliberal trade policy reform in the Arab world has been varied, selective, and often ineffective. Neoliberal trade policies have not deepened international trade in many of the region&apos;s markets. This book explains why.

When the region&apos;s regimes have strong support from global powers and strong social connections to the industrial elite, they engage in extensive but deceptive trade policy reform. Behind an edifice of neoliberal trade policies, neopatrimonial forms of protectionism like tax evasion and noncompetitive procurement shield the socially connected from international competition and obstruct actual trade liberalization. Industrialists are less trustful of regime promises of neopatrimonial protectionism after reform when they have weak social connections to their regime and their regime has low support from global powers. They are more likely to defend existing protectionist policies under these conditions, resulting in less trade policy reform.

Drawing on interviews, firm- and industry-level data, and evidence from Jordan to Morocco, Mirages of Reform reveals how international and domestic factors interact to shape the Arab world&apos;s rugged trade policy terrain. Insightful and well researched, this book imparts important lessons and warnings about the repercussions of economic reform in the region.﻿

Steve L. Monroe is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore. He is a scholar of development, with a primary focus on the Arab world. Monroe&apos;s scholarship examines two of the region&apos;s most pressing developmental challenges: limited economic integration, and gender inequality.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>660</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd192d5a-7a9e-11f0-b08b-b77b6bbf07a4</guid>
      <title>What Makes for Successful Civil Resistance?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As authoritarian leaders attack democracy from all sides, and the rights of women, ethnic minorities and the LGTBQI+ community are increasingly threatened, civil resistance is more important than ever. But what forms of resistance are most effective, and how can we build movements so that they have the greatest chance of success? Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Erica Chenoweth, author of <em>Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know, </em>to discuss these issues and so much more!</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p>Erica Chenoweth is the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Kennedy School and a Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at Harvard's Radcliffe Institute. They are widely known as one of the most important and influential voices on civil resistance and what makes for successful popular mobilization, and have authored a number of path-breaking books including <em>Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know</em> (Oxford UP, 2021) and <em>On Revolutions</em> (2022).</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As authoritarian leaders attack democracy from all sides, and the rights of women, ethnic minorities and the LGTBQI+ community are increasingly threatened, civil resistance is more important than ever. But what forms of resistance are most effective, and how can we build movements so that they have the greatest chance of success? Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Erica Chenoweth, author of <em>Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know, </em>to discuss these issues and so much more!</p>
<p>Guest:</p>
<p>Erica Chenoweth is the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Kennedy School and a Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at Harvard's Radcliffe Institute. They are widely known as one of the most important and influential voices on civil resistance and what makes for successful popular mobilization, and have authored a number of path-breaking books including <em>Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know</em> (Oxford UP, 2021) and <em>On Revolutions</em> (2022).</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36127484" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/447fbcd9-0d46-4bf0-a437-d1e6a2b61976/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=447fbcd9-0d46-4bf0-a437-d1e6a2b61976&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What Makes for Successful Civil Resistance?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As authoritarian leaders attack democracy from all sides, and the rights of women, ethnic minorities and the LGTBQI+ community are increasingly threatened, civil resistance is more important than ever. But what forms of resistance are most effective, and how can we build movements so that they have the greatest chance of success? Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Erica Chenoweth, author of Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know, to discuss these issues and so much more!

Guest:

Erica Chenoweth is the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Kennedy School and a Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at Harvard&apos;s Radcliffe Institute. They are widely known as one of the most important and influential voices on civil resistance and what makes for successful popular mobilization, and have authored a number of path-breaking books including Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford UP, 2021) and On Revolutions (2022).

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As authoritarian leaders attack democracy from all sides, and the rights of women, ethnic minorities and the LGTBQI+ community are increasingly threatened, civil resistance is more important than ever. But what forms of resistance are most effective, and how can we build movements so that they have the greatest chance of success? Join the People, Power, Politics podcast as we talk to Erica Chenoweth, author of Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know, to discuss these issues and so much more!

Guest:

Erica Chenoweth is the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Kennedy School and a Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at Harvard&apos;s Radcliffe Institute. They are widely known as one of the most important and influential voices on civil resistance and what makes for successful popular mobilization, and have authored a number of path-breaking books including Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford UP, 2021) and On Revolutions (2022).

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d3154e4e-7a04-11f0-b5d5-ef3989b6413b</guid>
      <title>Georgiy Kasianov et al., &quot;From &apos;the Ukraine&apos; to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021&quot; (Ibidem Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783838215143"><em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021</em></a> (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. <em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine</em> outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.</p><p><a href="https://russian.indiana.edu/about/tutors/shpylova-saeed-nataliya.html"><em>Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed</em></a><em> is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783838215143"><em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021</em></a> (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. <em>From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine</em> outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.</p><p><a href="https://russian.indiana.edu/about/tutors/shpylova-saeed-nataliya.html"><em>Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed</em></a><em> is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46456666" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ba07e0f2-936d-41c7-b3de-b2ee493b7274/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ba07e0f2-936d-41c7-b3de-b2ee493b7274&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Georgiy Kasianov et al., &quot;From &apos;the Ukraine&apos; to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021&quot; (Ibidem Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021 (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.
Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2021, Ukraine celebrates its thirty-year independence anniversary. During this relatively short period of time—when considered in historical terms—Ukraine underwent a number of drastic changes that have so far shaped the country’s domestic and international environments. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine: A Contemporary History, 1991-2021 (Ibidem Press, 2021), edited by Georgiy Kasianov, Matthew Rojansky, and Mykhailo Minakov, guides its readers through the labyrinthine developments that provide a wide spectrum of views and approaches that help receive a better understanding of the contemporary history of Ukraine. While detailing how independent Ukraine was taking shape locally, the editors and contributors of the volume simultaneously position Ukraine in the international environment that arouse after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine is thus inscribed into the international political map, which further complicates and advances the surveys presented in the volume. After the collapse of the USSR, the country faced a number of challenges: in addition to learning how to construct and narrate its own history, the new independent state also had to find a way to present itself to the global community. From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine outlines trajectories that illustrate a gradual process of the country’s political awareness, ambitions, and maturity. Thirty years may seem like an inconsiderable amount of time for a new independent state. The material presented in the book proves otherwise. In a concise and yet acute way, the contributors touch upon the most challenging and sensitive issues which have shaped the recent history of Ukraine: ranging from the enthusiastic support of independence to the current Russian-Ukrainian war, the volume constructs a multilayered historical scene which at the same time invites further surveys and elaborations.
Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed is a PhD student in the Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d31a4b8-78b8-11f0-a5f1-87f78bf5fc09</guid>
      <title>Enrique Dussel, &quot;The Theological Metaphors of Marx&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)–A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025771"><em>The Theological Metaphors of Mar</em>x </a>(Duke UP, 2024) by Enrique Dussel – A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta</p>
<p>In <em>The Theological Metaphors of Marx</em>, Enrique Dussel provides a groundbreaking combination of Marxology, theology, and ethical theory. Dussel shows that Marx unveils the theology of capitalism in his critique of commodity fetishization. Capitalism constitutes an idolatry of the commodity that undergirds the capitalist expropriation of labor. Dussel examines Marx’s early writings on religion and fetishism and proceeds through what Dussel refers to as the four major drafts of <em>Capital</em>, ultimately situating Marx’s philosophical, economic, ethical, and historical insights in relation to the theological problems of his time. Dussel notes a shift in Marx’s underlying theological schema from a political critique of the state to an economic critique of the commodity fetish as the Devil, or anti-God, of modernity. Marx’s thought, impact, and influence cannot be fully understood without Dussel’s historic reinterpretation of the theological origins and implications of Marx’s critiques of political economy and politics.</p>
<p>Enrique Dussel (1934–2023) was Emeritus Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, and the author of many books, including <em>Twenty Theses on Politics</em> and <em>Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion</em>, both also published by Duke University Press.<br />Camilo Pérez-Bustillo is coauthor of <em>Human Rights, Hegemony, and Utopia in Latin America</em>.<br />Eduardo Mendieta is Professor of Philosophy and Latina/o Studies at Pennsylvania State University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025771"><em>The Theological Metaphors of Mar</em>x </a>(Duke UP, 2024) by Enrique Dussel – A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta</p>
<p>In <em>The Theological Metaphors of Marx</em>, Enrique Dussel provides a groundbreaking combination of Marxology, theology, and ethical theory. Dussel shows that Marx unveils the theology of capitalism in his critique of commodity fetishization. Capitalism constitutes an idolatry of the commodity that undergirds the capitalist expropriation of labor. Dussel examines Marx’s early writings on religion and fetishism and proceeds through what Dussel refers to as the four major drafts of <em>Capital</em>, ultimately situating Marx’s philosophical, economic, ethical, and historical insights in relation to the theological problems of his time. Dussel notes a shift in Marx’s underlying theological schema from a political critique of the state to an economic critique of the commodity fetish as the Devil, or anti-God, of modernity. Marx’s thought, impact, and influence cannot be fully understood without Dussel’s historic reinterpretation of the theological origins and implications of Marx’s critiques of political economy and politics.</p>
<p>Enrique Dussel (1934–2023) was Emeritus Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, and the author of many books, including <em>Twenty Theses on Politics</em> and <em>Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion</em>, both also published by Duke University Press.<br />Camilo Pérez-Bustillo is coauthor of <em>Human Rights, Hegemony, and Utopia in Latin America</em>.<br />Eduardo Mendieta is Professor of Philosophy and Latina/o Studies at Pennsylvania State University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">here</a></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49748855" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/cb61ffc9-0bad-4107-8578-10d3595ce42a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=cb61ffc9-0bad-4107-8578-10d3595ce42a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Enrique Dussel, &quot;The Theological Metaphors of Marx&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)–A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Theological Metaphors of Marx (Duke UP, 2024) by Enrique Dussel – A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta

In The Theological Metaphors of Marx, Enrique Dussel provides a groundbreaking combination of Marxology, theology, and ethical theory. Dussel shows that Marx unveils the theology of capitalism in his critique of commodity fetishization. Capitalism constitutes an idolatry of the commodity that undergirds the capitalist expropriation of labor. Dussel examines Marx’s early writings on religion and fetishism and proceeds through what Dussel refers to as the four major drafts of Capital, ultimately situating Marx’s philosophical, economic, ethical, and historical insights in relation to the theological problems of his time. Dussel notes a shift in Marx’s underlying theological schema from a political critique of the state to an economic critique of the commodity fetish as the Devil, or anti-God, of modernity. Marx’s thought, impact, and influence cannot be fully understood without Dussel’s historic reinterpretation of the theological origins and implications of Marx’s critiques of political economy and politics.

Enrique Dussel (1934–2023) was Emeritus Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, and the author of many books, including Twenty Theses on Politics and Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion, both also published by Duke University Press.Camilo Pérez-Bustillo is coauthor of Human Rights, Hegemony, and Utopia in Latin America.Eduardo Mendieta is Professor of Philosophy and Latina/o Studies at Pennsylvania State University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel here


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Theological Metaphors of Marx (Duke UP, 2024) by Enrique Dussel – A Conversation with Camilo Pérez-Bustillo and Eduardo Mendieta

In The Theological Metaphors of Marx, Enrique Dussel provides a groundbreaking combination of Marxology, theology, and ethical theory. Dussel shows that Marx unveils the theology of capitalism in his critique of commodity fetishization. Capitalism constitutes an idolatry of the commodity that undergirds the capitalist expropriation of labor. Dussel examines Marx’s early writings on religion and fetishism and proceeds through what Dussel refers to as the four major drafts of Capital, ultimately situating Marx’s philosophical, economic, ethical, and historical insights in relation to the theological problems of his time. Dussel notes a shift in Marx’s underlying theological schema from a political critique of the state to an economic critique of the commodity fetish as the Devil, or anti-God, of modernity. Marx’s thought, impact, and influence cannot be fully understood without Dussel’s historic reinterpretation of the theological origins and implications of Marx’s critiques of political economy and politics.

Enrique Dussel (1934–2023) was Emeritus Professor, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, and the author of many books, including Twenty Theses on Politics and Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion, both also published by Duke University Press.Camilo Pérez-Bustillo is coauthor of Human Rights, Hegemony, and Utopia in Latin America.Eduardo Mendieta is Professor of Philosophy and Latina/o Studies at Pennsylvania State University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel here


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>657</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a11931a6-77e5-11f0-900c-9f5bd0ae5580</guid>
      <title>Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman, &quot;Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hitler, Stalin, and Mao ruled through violence, fear, and ideology. But in recent decades a new breed of media-savvy strongmen has been redesigning authoritarian rule for a more sophisticated, globally connected world. In place of overt, mass repression, rulers such as Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Viktor Orbán control their citizens by distorting information and simulating democratic procedures. Like spin doctors in democracies, they spin the news to engineer support. Uncovering this new brand of authoritarianism, Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman explain the rise of such “spin dictators,” describing how they emerge and operate, the new threats they pose, and how democracies should respond.</p><p><em>Spin Dictators</em> traces how leaders such as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew and Peru’s Alberto Fujimori pioneered less violent, more covert, and more effective methods of monopolizing power. They cultivated an image of competence, concealed censorship, and used democratic institutions to undermine democracy, all while increasing international engagement for financial and reputational benefits. The book reveals why most of today’s authoritarians are spin dictators—and how they differ from the remaining “fear dictators” such as Kim Jong-un and Bashar al-Assad.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691211411"><em>Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2022) is aimed at a general audience, synthesizing a vast amount of qualitative and quantitative research by the authors and many other scholars. The book is highly readable, with a great mix of anecdotes and examples along with plain-English explanations of academic research findings. However, it also provides an excellent overview of contemporary global authoritarianism for academics. Almost every claim in the book has an endnote reference to the original research for those who want to follow up. The endnotes mean that despite its moderately intimidating 340-page heft, the main text is a very approachable 219 pages.</p><p><a href="https://www.danieltreisman.org/">Daniel Treisman</a> is a professor of political science at the <a href="http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/">University of California, Los Angeles</a> and a research associate of the <a href="http://www.nber.org/people/daniel_treisman">National Bureau of Economic Research</a>. His research focuses on Russian politics and economics as well as comparative political economy, including in particular the analysis of democratization, the politics of authoritarian states, political decentralization, and corruption.</p><p>In 2021-22, he was a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and he was recently named a <a href="https://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/daniel-treisman-named-2022-carnegie-fellow">2022 Andrew Carnegie Fellow</a>. A graduate of Oxford University (B.A. Hons.) and Harvard University (Ph.D. 1995), he has published five books and numerous articles in leading political science and economics journals including <em>The</em> <em>American Political Science Review </em>and <em>The American Economic Review, </em>as well as in public affairs journals such as <em>Foreign Affairs </em>and <em>Foreign Policy</em>. He has also served as a consultant for the World Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and USAID. In Russia, he has been a member of the International Advisory Committee of the Higher School of Economics and a member of the Jury of the National Prize in Applied Economics</p><p><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen"><em>Peter Lorentzen</em></a><em> is an Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads a new </em><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/graduate-programs/applied-economics/program-overview"><em>Master's program in Applied Economics</em></a><em> focused on the digital economy. His research focuses on the political economy and governance of China.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler, Stalin, and Mao ruled through violence, fear, and ideology. But in recent decades a new breed of media-savvy strongmen has been redesigning authoritarian rule for a more sophisticated, globally connected world. In place of overt, mass repression, rulers such as Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Viktor Orbán control their citizens by distorting information and simulating democratic procedures. Like spin doctors in democracies, they spin the news to engineer support. Uncovering this new brand of authoritarianism, Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman explain the rise of such “spin dictators,” describing how they emerge and operate, the new threats they pose, and how democracies should respond.</p><p><em>Spin Dictators</em> traces how leaders such as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew and Peru’s Alberto Fujimori pioneered less violent, more covert, and more effective methods of monopolizing power. They cultivated an image of competence, concealed censorship, and used democratic institutions to undermine democracy, all while increasing international engagement for financial and reputational benefits. The book reveals why most of today’s authoritarians are spin dictators—and how they differ from the remaining “fear dictators” such as Kim Jong-un and Bashar al-Assad.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691211411"><em>Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2022) is aimed at a general audience, synthesizing a vast amount of qualitative and quantitative research by the authors and many other scholars. The book is highly readable, with a great mix of anecdotes and examples along with plain-English explanations of academic research findings. However, it also provides an excellent overview of contemporary global authoritarianism for academics. Almost every claim in the book has an endnote reference to the original research for those who want to follow up. The endnotes mean that despite its moderately intimidating 340-page heft, the main text is a very approachable 219 pages.</p><p><a href="https://www.danieltreisman.org/">Daniel Treisman</a> is a professor of political science at the <a href="http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/">University of California, Los Angeles</a> and a research associate of the <a href="http://www.nber.org/people/daniel_treisman">National Bureau of Economic Research</a>. His research focuses on Russian politics and economics as well as comparative political economy, including in particular the analysis of democratization, the politics of authoritarian states, political decentralization, and corruption.</p><p>In 2021-22, he was a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and he was recently named a <a href="https://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/daniel-treisman-named-2022-carnegie-fellow">2022 Andrew Carnegie Fellow</a>. A graduate of Oxford University (B.A. Hons.) and Harvard University (Ph.D. 1995), he has published five books and numerous articles in leading political science and economics journals including <em>The</em> <em>American Political Science Review </em>and <em>The American Economic Review, </em>as well as in public affairs journals such as <em>Foreign Affairs </em>and <em>Foreign Policy</em>. He has also served as a consultant for the World Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and USAID. In Russia, he has been a member of the International Advisory Committee of the Higher School of Economics and a member of the Jury of the National Prize in Applied Economics</p><p><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen"><em>Peter Lorentzen</em></a><em> is an Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads a new </em><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/graduate-programs/applied-economics/program-overview"><em>Master's program in Applied Economics</em></a><em> focused on the digital economy. His research focuses on the political economy and governance of China.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54079457" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b63aa371-a3c1-4d4f-8d76-a364f07b1de7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b63aa371-a3c1-4d4f-8d76-a364f07b1de7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman, &quot;Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hitler, Stalin, and Mao ruled through violence, fear, and ideology. But in recent decades a new breed of media-savvy strongmen has been redesigning authoritarian rule for a more sophisticated, globally connected world. In place of overt, mass repression, rulers such as Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Viktor Orbán control their citizens by distorting information and simulating democratic procedures. Like spin doctors in democracies, they spin the news to engineer support. Uncovering this new brand of authoritarianism, Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman explain the rise of such “spin dictators,” describing how they emerge and operate, the new threats they pose, and how democracies should respond.
Spin Dictators traces how leaders such as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew and Peru’s Alberto Fujimori pioneered less violent, more covert, and more effective methods of monopolizing power. They cultivated an image of competence, concealed censorship, and used democratic institutions to undermine democracy, all while increasing international engagement for financial and reputational benefits. The book reveals why most of today’s authoritarians are spin dictators—and how they differ from the remaining “fear dictators” such as Kim Jong-un and Bashar al-Assad.
Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century (Princeton UP, 2022) is aimed at a general audience, synthesizing a vast amount of qualitative and quantitative research by the authors and many other scholars. The book is highly readable, with a great mix of anecdotes and examples along with plain-English explanations of academic research findings. However, it also provides an excellent overview of contemporary global authoritarianism for academics. Almost every claim in the book has an endnote reference to the original research for those who want to follow up. The endnotes mean that despite its moderately intimidating 340-page heft, the main text is a very approachable 219 pages.
Daniel Treisman is a professor of political science at the University of California, Los Angeles and a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His research focuses on Russian politics and economics as well as comparative political economy, including in particular the analysis of democratization, the politics of authoritarian states, political decentralization, and corruption.
In 2021-22, he was a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and he was recently named a 2022 Andrew Carnegie Fellow. A graduate of Oxford University (B.A. Hons.) and Harvard University (Ph.D. 1995), he has published five books and numerous articles in leading political science and economics journals including The American Political Science Review and The American Economic Review, as well as in public affairs journals such as Foreign Affairs and Foreign Policy. He has also served as a consultant for the World Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and USAID. In Russia, he has been a member of the International Advisory Committee of the Higher School of Economics and a member of the Jury of the National Prize in Applied Economics
Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads a new Master&apos;s program in Applied Economics focused on the digital economy. His research focuses on the political economy and governance of China.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hitler, Stalin, and Mao ruled through violence, fear, and ideology. But in recent decades a new breed of media-savvy strongmen has been redesigning authoritarian rule for a more sophisticated, globally connected world. In place of overt, mass repression, rulers such as Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Viktor Orbán control their citizens by distorting information and simulating democratic procedures. Like spin doctors in democracies, they spin the news to engineer support. Uncovering this new brand of authoritarianism, Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman explain the rise of such “spin dictators,” describing how they emerge and operate, the new threats they pose, and how democracies should respond.
Spin Dictators traces how leaders such as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew and Peru’s Alberto Fujimori pioneered less violent, more covert, and more effective methods of monopolizing power. They cultivated an image of competence, concealed censorship, and used democratic institutions to undermine democracy, all while increasing international engagement for financial and reputational benefits. The book reveals why most of today’s authoritarians are spin dictators—and how they differ from the remaining “fear dictators” such as Kim Jong-un and Bashar al-Assad.
Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century (Princeton UP, 2022) is aimed at a general audience, synthesizing a vast amount of qualitative and quantitative research by the authors and many other scholars. The book is highly readable, with a great mix of anecdotes and examples along with plain-English explanations of academic research findings. However, it also provides an excellent overview of contemporary global authoritarianism for academics. Almost every claim in the book has an endnote reference to the original research for those who want to follow up. The endnotes mean that despite its moderately intimidating 340-page heft, the main text is a very approachable 219 pages.
Daniel Treisman is a professor of political science at the University of California, Los Angeles and a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His research focuses on Russian politics and economics as well as comparative political economy, including in particular the analysis of democratization, the politics of authoritarian states, political decentralization, and corruption.
In 2021-22, he was a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and he was recently named a 2022 Andrew Carnegie Fellow. A graduate of Oxford University (B.A. Hons.) and Harvard University (Ph.D. 1995), he has published five books and numerous articles in leading political science and economics journals including The American Political Science Review and The American Economic Review, as well as in public affairs journals such as Foreign Affairs and Foreign Policy. He has also served as a consultant for the World Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and USAID. In Russia, he has been a member of the International Advisory Committee of the Higher School of Economics and a member of the Jury of the National Prize in Applied Economics
Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of San Francisco, where he leads a new Master&apos;s program in Applied Economics focused on the digital economy. His research focuses on the political economy and governance of China.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1103ecd6-76c9-11f0-a20c-23f9095d6701</guid>
      <title>Kevin P. Donovan, &quot;Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his book, <em>Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Kevin Donovan argues that East African decolonization was not coterminous with political sovereignty but rather consisted of a longer process of reorganizing how value was legitimately defined, produced, and distributed. It is an analysis of how postcolonial states tried to remake economic temporalities, space, and standards and how citizens pursued alternatives that subverted economic sovereignty. This is a story of central banking, national currencies, and coffee smuggling, as well as rites of initiation and econometric modelling. An article from the project -- on coffee smuggling, kinship relations, and measurement devices -- was published in <em>Cultural Anthropology</em>, and one on economic crimes, scarcity, and accusation was published in <em>Journal of African History.</em></p>
<p>Kevin Donovan is an anthropologist and historian of East Africa. He works in the fields of economic and political anthropology, African history, and science &amp; technology studies at the University of Edinburgh as a Senior Lecturer.</p>
<p>Sara Katz has a Ph.D. in African History from the University of Michigan, and is currently a Project Manager in the Office of Global Affairs at the University of Washington, Seattle.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his book, <em>Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Kevin Donovan argues that East African decolonization was not coterminous with political sovereignty but rather consisted of a longer process of reorganizing how value was legitimately defined, produced, and distributed. It is an analysis of how postcolonial states tried to remake economic temporalities, space, and standards and how citizens pursued alternatives that subverted economic sovereignty. This is a story of central banking, national currencies, and coffee smuggling, as well as rites of initiation and econometric modelling. An article from the project -- on coffee smuggling, kinship relations, and measurement devices -- was published in <em>Cultural Anthropology</em>, and one on economic crimes, scarcity, and accusation was published in <em>Journal of African History.</em></p>
<p>Kevin Donovan is an anthropologist and historian of East Africa. He works in the fields of economic and political anthropology, African history, and science &amp; technology studies at the University of Edinburgh as a Senior Lecturer.</p>
<p>Sara Katz has a Ph.D. in African History from the University of Michigan, and is currently a Project Manager in the Office of Global Affairs at the University of Washington, Seattle.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57904441" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e0b8b806-4acd-4a99-b89a-7e519afdf742/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e0b8b806-4acd-4a99-b89a-7e519afdf742&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin P. Donovan, &quot;Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his book, Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Kevin Donovan argues that East African decolonization was not coterminous with political sovereignty but rather consisted of a longer process of reorganizing how value was legitimately defined, produced, and distributed. It is an analysis of how postcolonial states tried to remake economic temporalities, space, and standards and how citizens pursued alternatives that subverted economic sovereignty. This is a story of central banking, national currencies, and coffee smuggling, as well as rites of initiation and econometric modelling. An article from the project -- on coffee smuggling, kinship relations, and measurement devices -- was published in Cultural Anthropology, and one on economic crimes, scarcity, and accusation was published in Journal of African History.

Kevin Donovan is an anthropologist and historian of East Africa. He works in the fields of economic and political anthropology, African history, and science &amp; technology studies at the University of Edinburgh as a Senior Lecturer.

Sara Katz has a Ph.D. in African History from the University of Michigan, and is currently a Project Manager in the Office of Global Affairs at the University of Washington, Seattle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his book, Money, Value, and the State: Sovereignty and Citizenship in East Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Kevin Donovan argues that East African decolonization was not coterminous with political sovereignty but rather consisted of a longer process of reorganizing how value was legitimately defined, produced, and distributed. It is an analysis of how postcolonial states tried to remake economic temporalities, space, and standards and how citizens pursued alternatives that subverted economic sovereignty. This is a story of central banking, national currencies, and coffee smuggling, as well as rites of initiation and econometric modelling. An article from the project -- on coffee smuggling, kinship relations, and measurement devices -- was published in Cultural Anthropology, and one on economic crimes, scarcity, and accusation was published in Journal of African History.

Kevin Donovan is an anthropologist and historian of East Africa. He works in the fields of economic and political anthropology, African history, and science &amp; technology studies at the University of Edinburgh as a Senior Lecturer.

Sara Katz has a Ph.D. in African History from the University of Michigan, and is currently a Project Manager in the Office of Global Affairs at the University of Washington, Seattle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b3ed3498-75f7-11f0-90a3-1b907ac2ac16</guid>
      <title>Federico Marcon, &quot;Fascism: The History of a Word&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The rise and popular support for authoritarianism around the world and within traditional democracies have spurred debates over the meaning of the term “fascist” and when and whether it is appropriate to use it. The landmark study <em>Fascism: The History of a Word</em> (The University of Chicago Press, 2025) takes this debate further by tackling its most fundamental questions: How did the terms “fascism” and “fascist” come to be in the first place? How and in what circumstances have they been used? How can they be understood today? And what are the advantages (or disadvantages) of using “fascism” to make sense of interwar authoritarianism as well as contemporary politics?<br />Exploring the writings and deeds of political leaders, activists, artists, authors, and philosophers, Federico Marcon traces the history of the term’s use (and usefulness) in relation to Mussolini’s political regime, antifascist resistance, and the quest of postwar historians to develop a definition of a “fascist minimum.” This investigation of the semiotics of “fascism” also aims to inquire about people’s voluntary renunciation of the modern emancipatory ideals of freedom, equality, and solidarity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise and popular support for authoritarianism around the world and within traditional democracies have spurred debates over the meaning of the term “fascist” and when and whether it is appropriate to use it. The landmark study <em>Fascism: The History of a Word</em> (The University of Chicago Press, 2025) takes this debate further by tackling its most fundamental questions: How did the terms “fascism” and “fascist” come to be in the first place? How and in what circumstances have they been used? How can they be understood today? And what are the advantages (or disadvantages) of using “fascism” to make sense of interwar authoritarianism as well as contemporary politics?<br />Exploring the writings and deeds of political leaders, activists, artists, authors, and philosophers, Federico Marcon traces the history of the term’s use (and usefulness) in relation to Mussolini’s political regime, antifascist resistance, and the quest of postwar historians to develop a definition of a “fascist minimum.” This investigation of the semiotics of “fascism” also aims to inquire about people’s voluntary renunciation of the modern emancipatory ideals of freedom, equality, and solidarity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="85742442" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/30c7f67c-9367-408a-90de-95bca45c837a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=30c7f67c-9367-408a-90de-95bca45c837a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Federico Marcon, &quot;Fascism: The History of a Word&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:29:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The rise and popular support for authoritarianism around the world and within traditional democracies have spurred debates over the meaning of the term “fascist” and when and whether it is appropriate to use it. The landmark study Fascism: The History of a Word (The University of Chicago Press, 2025) takes this debate further by tackling its most fundamental questions: How did the terms “fascism” and “fascist” come to be in the first place? How and in what circumstances have they been used? How can they be understood today? And what are the advantages (or disadvantages) of using “fascism” to make sense of interwar authoritarianism as well as contemporary politics?Exploring the writings and deeds of political leaders, activists, artists, authors, and philosophers, Federico Marcon traces the history of the term’s use (and usefulness) in relation to Mussolini’s political regime, antifascist resistance, and the quest of postwar historians to develop a definition of a “fascist minimum.” This investigation of the semiotics of “fascism” also aims to inquire about people’s voluntary renunciation of the modern emancipatory ideals of freedom, equality, and solidarity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The rise and popular support for authoritarianism around the world and within traditional democracies have spurred debates over the meaning of the term “fascist” and when and whether it is appropriate to use it. The landmark study Fascism: The History of a Word (The University of Chicago Press, 2025) takes this debate further by tackling its most fundamental questions: How did the terms “fascism” and “fascist” come to be in the first place? How and in what circumstances have they been used? How can they be understood today? And what are the advantages (or disadvantages) of using “fascism” to make sense of interwar authoritarianism as well as contemporary politics?Exploring the writings and deeds of political leaders, activists, artists, authors, and philosophers, Federico Marcon traces the history of the term’s use (and usefulness) in relation to Mussolini’s political regime, antifascist resistance, and the quest of postwar historians to develop a definition of a “fascist minimum.” This investigation of the semiotics of “fascism” also aims to inquire about people’s voluntary renunciation of the modern emancipatory ideals of freedom, equality, and solidarity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>249</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be50afd2-7525-11f0-a218-c77741784b9f</guid>
      <title>Jacob F. H. Smith, &quot;Waves of Discontent: Electoral Volatility, Public Policymaking, and the Health of American Democracy&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21400480" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/da45a337-8376-4dd8-965a-2319e3a7d5f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=da45a337-8376-4dd8-965a-2319e3a7d5f6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacob F. H. Smith, &quot;Waves of Discontent: Electoral Volatility, Public Policymaking, and the Health of American Democracy&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After a period of relative calm in congressional elections prior to 2006, America has experienced a series of highly competitive, volatile national elections. Since then, at least one of the US House, US Senate, and presidency has flipped party control--often with a large House or Senate seat swing--with the exception of the 2012 election. In Waves of Discontent, Jacob F. H. Smith argues that a pervasive feeling of displeasure in the American public has caused this increase in electoral volatility. Examining the consequences of volatility in congressional elections reveals that political amateurs are more likely to win in wave years than in normal years. Based on this data, Smith presents a new theory about the policy process--the policy doom loop--in which frustration among voters at both the inability of Congress to pass policy and anger at policies that actually do pass results in even more churn in congressional elections. Waves of Discontent offers some suggestions to promote constructive policymaking efforts in Washington to reduce frustration in the electorate.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2f3b14be-746b-11f0-b74c-fbdbc063365f</guid>
      <title>Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa, &quot;Africa&apos;s New Global Politics: Regionalism in International Relations&quot; (Lynne Rienner, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The African Union's threat to lead African states' mass withdrawal from the International Criminal Court in 2008 marked just one of many encounters that demonstrate African leaders' growing confidence and activism in international relations. Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa explore the myriad ways in which the continent’s diplomatic engagement and influence in the global arena has been expanding in recent decades.</p>
<p>Focusing in particular on collective action through the institutional platform of the AU―while acknowledging the internal challenges involved―the authors show how Africa's role as a dynamic world region is both shaping and being shaped by current trends in global development and geopolitics.</p>
<p>Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The African Union's threat to lead African states' mass withdrawal from the International Criminal Court in 2008 marked just one of many encounters that demonstrate African leaders' growing confidence and activism in international relations. Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa explore the myriad ways in which the continent’s diplomatic engagement and influence in the global arena has been expanding in recent decades.</p>
<p>Focusing in particular on collective action through the institutional platform of the AU―while acknowledging the internal challenges involved―the authors show how Africa's role as a dynamic world region is both shaping and being shaped by current trends in global development and geopolitics.</p>
<p>Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="110900573" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a18787bc-e17a-455a-a6d4-ef6b7915fc7d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a18787bc-e17a-455a-a6d4-ef6b7915fc7d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa, &quot;Africa&apos;s New Global Politics: Regionalism in International Relations&quot; (Lynne Rienner, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:55:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The African Union&apos;s threat to lead African states&apos; mass withdrawal from the International Criminal Court in 2008 marked just one of many encounters that demonstrate African leaders&apos; growing confidence and activism in international relations. Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa explore the myriad ways in which the continent’s diplomatic engagement and influence in the global arena has been expanding in recent decades.

Focusing in particular on collective action through the institutional platform of the AU―while acknowledging the internal challenges involved―the authors show how Africa&apos;s role as a dynamic world region is both shaping and being shaped by current trends in global development and geopolitics.

Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The African Union&apos;s threat to lead African states&apos; mass withdrawal from the International Criminal Court in 2008 marked just one of many encounters that demonstrate African leaders&apos; growing confidence and activism in international relations. Rita Kiki Edozie and Moses Khisa explore the myriad ways in which the continent’s diplomatic engagement and influence in the global arena has been expanding in recent decades.

Focusing in particular on collective action through the institutional platform of the AU―while acknowledging the internal challenges involved―the authors show how Africa&apos;s role as a dynamic world region is both shaping and being shaped by current trends in global development and geopolitics.

Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, Great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9602c3ca-68bf-11f0-a999-7b8665c8c431</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Fisher and Nina Wilén, &quot;African Peacekeeping&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <em>African Peacekeeping</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Jonathan Fisher and Dr. Nina Wilén explore the story of Africa's contemporary history and politics through the lens of peacekeeping. This concise and accessible book, based on over a decade of research across ten countries, focuses not on peacekeeping in Africa but, rather, peacekeeping by Africans. The book argues that “African peacekeeping should be understood not as simply an adjunct, technical activity but as a complex set of practices deeply embedded within - and entangled with - Africa’s contemporary political economy.”</p><p>Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén demonstrate how peacekeeping is – and has been – weaved into Africa's national, regional and international politics more broadly, as well as what implications this has for how we should understand the continent, its history and its politics. In doing so, and drawing on fieldwork undertaken in every region of the continent, Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén explain how profoundly this involvement in peacekeeping has shaped contemporary Africa.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <em>African Peacekeeping</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Jonathan Fisher and Dr. Nina Wilén explore the story of Africa's contemporary history and politics through the lens of peacekeeping. This concise and accessible book, based on over a decade of research across ten countries, focuses not on peacekeeping in Africa but, rather, peacekeeping by Africans. The book argues that “African peacekeeping should be understood not as simply an adjunct, technical activity but as a complex set of practices deeply embedded within - and entangled with - Africa’s contemporary political economy.”</p><p>Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén demonstrate how peacekeeping is – and has been – weaved into Africa's national, regional and international politics more broadly, as well as what implications this has for how we should understand the continent, its history and its politics. In doing so, and drawing on fieldwork undertaken in every region of the continent, Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén explain how profoundly this involvement in peacekeeping has shaped contemporary Africa.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49165229" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f42155cc-9846-452d-908a-97a24e16d4b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f42155cc-9846-452d-908a-97a24e16d4b2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Fisher and Nina Wilén, &quot;African Peacekeeping&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In African Peacekeeping (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Jonathan Fisher and Dr. Nina Wilén explore the story of Africa&apos;s contemporary history and politics through the lens of peacekeeping. This concise and accessible book, based on over a decade of research across ten countries, focuses not on peacekeeping in Africa but, rather, peacekeeping by Africans. The book argues that “African peacekeeping should be understood not as simply an adjunct, technical activity but as a complex set of practices deeply embedded within - and entangled with - Africa’s contemporary political economy.”
Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén demonstrate how peacekeeping is – and has been – weaved into Africa&apos;s national, regional and international politics more broadly, as well as what implications this has for how we should understand the continent, its history and its politics. In doing so, and drawing on fieldwork undertaken in every region of the continent, Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén explain how profoundly this involvement in peacekeeping has shaped contemporary Africa.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In African Peacekeeping (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Jonathan Fisher and Dr. Nina Wilén explore the story of Africa&apos;s contemporary history and politics through the lens of peacekeeping. This concise and accessible book, based on over a decade of research across ten countries, focuses not on peacekeeping in Africa but, rather, peacekeeping by Africans. The book argues that “African peacekeeping should be understood not as simply an adjunct, technical activity but as a complex set of practices deeply embedded within - and entangled with - Africa’s contemporary political economy.”
Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén demonstrate how peacekeeping is – and has been – weaved into Africa&apos;s national, regional and international politics more broadly, as well as what implications this has for how we should understand the continent, its history and its politics. In doing so, and drawing on fieldwork undertaken in every region of the continent, Dr. Fisher and Dr. Wilén explain how profoundly this involvement in peacekeeping has shaped contemporary Africa.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1176</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=77506</guid>
      <title>Neil Roberts, “A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass” (UP of Kentucky, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. <a href="https://political-science.williams.edu/profile/nr2/">Neil Roberts</a>’ new edited volume, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QoEz574IsS4nitXQuFkAG5wAAAFleybJSQEAAAFKAcMCzNA/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0813175623/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0813175623&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Mn2Uu.QyQOaH0PgPJokgHA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20">A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass</a> (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.</p><p>
</p><p>
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/culturedmodesty?lang=en">@CulturedModesty</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. <a href="https://political-science.williams.edu/profile/nr2/">Neil Roberts</a>’ new edited volume, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QoEz574IsS4nitXQuFkAG5wAAAFleybJSQEAAAFKAcMCzNA/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0813175623/ref=as_at?creativeASIN=0813175623&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=Mn2Uu.QyQOaH0PgPJokgHA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20">A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass</a> (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.</p><p>
</p><p>
Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/culturedmodesty?lang=en">@CulturedModesty</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75957583" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5b04e157-ca1b-4634-8dd4-148a87a7446d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5b04e157-ca1b-4634-8dd4-148a87a7446d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Neil Roberts, “A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass” (UP of Kentucky, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. Neil Roberts’ new edited volume, A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.



Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter @CulturedModesty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The year 2018 marks the 200th anniversary of Frederick Douglass’ birth. It can hardly be said that scholars have neglected Douglass; indeed, he is one of the most written-about figures in American history. But not all aspects of Douglass’ thought have received their due. One such blank spot in what might be called “Douglass Studies” concerns his political philosophy. Williams College scholar Dr. Neil Roberts’ new edited volume, A Political Companion to Frederick Douglass (University Press of Kentucky, 2018), helps to fill this lacuna in Douglass scholarship.



Adam McNeil is a PhD student in History, African American Public Humanities Initiative and Colored Conventions Project Scholar at the University of Delaware. He can be reached on Twitter @CulturedModesty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d0afb1c-7132-11f0-ad6d-ebdcb0a048fb</guid>
      <title>Timothy W. Kneeland, &quot;Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo's Blizzard of '77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.</p>
<p>Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.</p>
<p>Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.</p>
<p>ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo's Blizzard of '77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.</p>
<p>Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.</p>
<p>Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.</p>
<p>ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72320676" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f93237bc-9f5e-4d72-96ca-2658dccc0552/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f93237bc-9f5e-4d72-96ca-2658dccc0552&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy W. Kneeland, &quot;Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.

Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.

Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.

ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join me for an insightful and timely conversation with historian Timothy Kneeland about his book Declaring Disaster: Buffalo&apos;s Blizzard of &apos;77 and the Creation of FEMA (Syracuse University Press, 2021). This book masterfully bridges the gap between academic research and real-world policy implications.

Hear from the author himself as he reflects on the historical roots of disaster policy, the political forces that shape emergency response, and the enduring implications for governance today.

Timothy W. Kneeland is a Professor and Director of the Center for Public History at Nazareth University. He writes on American politics and disaster policy, American science, and psychiatry.

ABOUT THE BOOK: On Friday, January 28, 1977, it began to snow in Buffalo. The second largest city in New York State, located directly in line with the Great Lakes’ snowbelt, was no stranger to this kind of winter weather. With their city averaging ninety-four inches of snow per year, the citizens of Buffalo knew how to survive a snowstorm. But the blizzard that engulfed the city for the next four days was about to make history. Between the subzero wind chill and whiteout conditions, hundreds of people were trapped when the snow began to fall. Twenty- to thirty-foot-high snow drifts isolated residents in their offices and homes, and even in their cars on the highway. With a dependency on rubber-tire vehicles, which lost all traction in the heavily blanketed urban streets, they were cut off from food, fuel, and even electricity. This one unexpected snow disaster stranded tens of thousands of people, froze public utilities and transportation, and cost Buffalo hundreds of millions of dollars in economic losses and property damages. The destruction wrought by this snowstorm, like the destruction brought on by other natural disasters, was from a combination of weather-related hazards and the public policies meant to mitigate them. Buffalo’s 1977 blizzard, the first snowstorm to be declared a disaster in US history, came after a century of automobility, suburbanization, and snow removal guidelines like the bare-pavement policy. Kneeland offers a compelling examination of whether the 1977 storm was an anomaly or the inevitable outcome of years of city planning. From the local to the state and federal levels, Kneeland discusses governmental response and disaster relief, showing how this regional event had national implications for environmental policy and how its effects have resounded through the complexities of disaster politics long after the snow fell.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3fe88f0e-719f-11f0-adc9-b396c09461ba</guid>
      <title>Jean-Marc Coicaud, &quot;The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107008274">The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.<br /></p>
<p>Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107008274">The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy</a> (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.<br /></p>
<p>Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36872920" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/86e33974-4132-45c0-bb48-e6ecb951d5ed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=86e33974-4132-45c0-bb48-e6ecb951d5ed&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jean-Marc Coicaud, &quot;The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.

Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).

Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.

Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).

Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>648</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bb608d7a-6f1b-11f0-a74c-cfa717a0b485</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Francis-Fallon, &quot;The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” <a href="https://www.wcu.edu/learn/departments-schools-colleges/cas/humanities/history/history-faculty-and-staff/Benjamin-Francis-Fallon.aspx">Benjamin Francis-Fallon</a> historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/067473744X/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History</em> </a>(Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic <em>Latinidad </em>was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” <a href="https://www.wcu.edu/learn/departments-schools-colleges/cas/humanities/history/history-faculty-and-staff/Benjamin-Francis-Fallon.aspx">Benjamin Francis-Fallon</a> historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/067473744X/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History</em> </a>(Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic <em>Latinidad </em>was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49637601" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0e9c8227-5aba-4425-8ecf-baf4e9404dcf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0e9c8227-5aba-4425-8ecf-baf4e9404dcf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Francis-Fallon, &quot;The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” Benjamin Francis-Fallon historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History (Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic Latinidad was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While media pundits continually speculate over the future leanings of the so-called “Latino vote,” Benjamin Francis-Fallon historicizes how Latinos were imagined into a national electoral constituency in his new book The Rise of the Latino Vote: A History (Harvard University Press, 2019). Francis-Fallon, Assistant Professor of History at Western Carolina University, examines the rhetorical construction of a national voting bloc by politicians, parties, and a national network of Latino political elites. This interview explores some of the major themes in the book, including the essential role of Latino congressmen, the ideological struggles between Latino elected officials and radical activists, and the ongoing appeals to a panethnic Latino voting bloc from presidential campaigns. Of course Democratic Party politics is only half of the story, with the efforts of the Republican Party featuring prominently in the text as well. By discussing the parallel Latino engagement strategies of both parties, Francis-Fallon underscores the fact that the “rise of the Latino vote was a multiparty phenomenon.” Building upon existing studies that detail how panethnic Latinidad was constructed in the twentieth-century United States, Francis-Fallon adds national and presidential politics to the list of forces that continue to define what it means to be Latino.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b1359b4-6f11-11f0-a780-9b58fcf28fc3</guid>
      <title>Dan Reiter, &quot;Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596077">Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars</a><em> (</em>Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.</p>
<p>Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596077">Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars</a><em> (</em>Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.</p>
<p>Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39561021" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c971818c-6729-424d-ab51-3a04b90a373d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c971818c-6729-424d-ab51-3a04b90a373d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dan Reiter, &quot;Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars (Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.

Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.

Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do states advance their national security interests? Conventional wisdom holds that states must court the risk of catastrophic war by “tying their hands” to credibly protect their interests. Dan Reiter overturns this perspective with the compelling argument that states craft flexible foreign policies to avoid unwanted wars. Through a comprehensive analysis of key international crises, including the Berlin, Taiwan Straits, and Cuban Missile Crises, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars, Reiter provides new perspectives on the causes of wars, the role of international alliances, foreign troop deployments, leader madness, and the impact of AI on international relations. With critical insights into contemporary foreign policy challenges, such as America’s role in NATO, the risks of war with China, containing a resurgent Russia, and the dangers of nuclear war, Untied Hands: How States Avoid the Wrong Wars (Cambridge University Press, 2025) is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how states can effectively manage international crises while avoiding the wrong wars.

Dan Reiter is Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Political Science at Emory University.

Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>646</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">217ba878-6e6e-11f0-9209-b7a6c4616d7d</guid>
      <title>Philip Cunliffe, &quot;The National Interest: Politics After Globalization&quot; (Polity Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Globalization is over. With US president Donald Trump pursuing an 'America First' agenda in trade and foreign policy, everyone now recognises the urgency of defending their own country's national interest. But what is the national interest and why did it disappear from the political agenda? Will Trump restore American national interests, or will he betray them? How might we know the difference?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561100">The National Interest: Politics After Globalization</a><em> </em>(Polity Press, 2025) answers these questions. It explains how and why globalist political leaders and bureaucrats abandoned the national interest over the past thirty years. Even today, many of our elites still sneer at the concept as an anachronism in an age of global environmental collapse and 'polycrisis'. But without it, there can be no political representation, and without representation there can be no democratic accountability. The national interest <em>can</em> be revived as part of a strategy of nation-building and national rebirth. This book makes the case for such a revival, heralding a new era of democratic renewal and international cooperation.</p>
<p>Philip Cunliffe is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globalization is over. With US president Donald Trump pursuing an 'America First' agenda in trade and foreign policy, everyone now recognises the urgency of defending their own country's national interest. But what is the national interest and why did it disappear from the political agenda? Will Trump restore American national interests, or will he betray them? How might we know the difference?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561100">The National Interest: Politics After Globalization</a><em> </em>(Polity Press, 2025) answers these questions. It explains how and why globalist political leaders and bureaucrats abandoned the national interest over the past thirty years. Even today, many of our elites still sneer at the concept as an anachronism in an age of global environmental collapse and 'polycrisis'. But without it, there can be no political representation, and without representation there can be no democratic accountability. The national interest <em>can</em> be revived as part of a strategy of nation-building and national rebirth. This book makes the case for such a revival, heralding a new era of democratic renewal and international cooperation.</p>
<p>Philip Cunliffe is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52539134" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/300340ce-112d-4a3d-95c2-99628e514c48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=300340ce-112d-4a3d-95c2-99628e514c48&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Cunliffe, &quot;The National Interest: Politics After Globalization&quot; (Polity Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Globalization is over. With US president Donald Trump pursuing an &apos;America First&apos; agenda in trade and foreign policy, everyone now recognises the urgency of defending their own country&apos;s national interest. But what is the national interest and why did it disappear from the political agenda? Will Trump restore American national interests, or will he betray them? How might we know the difference?

The National Interest: Politics After Globalization (Polity Press, 2025) answers these questions. It explains how and why globalist political leaders and bureaucrats abandoned the national interest over the past thirty years. Even today, many of our elites still sneer at the concept as an anachronism in an age of global environmental collapse and &apos;polycrisis&apos;. But without it, there can be no political representation, and without representation there can be no democratic accountability. The national interest can be revived as part of a strategy of nation-building and national rebirth. This book makes the case for such a revival, heralding a new era of democratic renewal and international cooperation.

Philip Cunliffe is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Globalization is over. With US president Donald Trump pursuing an &apos;America First&apos; agenda in trade and foreign policy, everyone now recognises the urgency of defending their own country&apos;s national interest. But what is the national interest and why did it disappear from the political agenda? Will Trump restore American national interests, or will he betray them? How might we know the difference?

The National Interest: Politics After Globalization (Polity Press, 2025) answers these questions. It explains how and why globalist political leaders and bureaucrats abandoned the national interest over the past thirty years. Even today, many of our elites still sneer at the concept as an anachronism in an age of global environmental collapse and &apos;polycrisis&apos;. But without it, there can be no political representation, and without representation there can be no democratic accountability. The national interest can be revived as part of a strategy of nation-building and national rebirth. This book makes the case for such a revival, heralding a new era of democratic renewal and international cooperation.

Philip Cunliffe is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>645</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">603578fe-6d48-11f0-84ff-3b477144b739</guid>
      <title>Suruchi Mazumdar, &quot;Divided Media: Politics and Mediated Movements in India&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Suruchi Mazumdar’s book addresses the complex relationship between India’s evolving, emerging media landscape, the political and economic interests of diverse media actors, and movements opposing contentious issues such as market-based economic reforms and religious nationalism. In the mid-2000s, Singur and Nandigram, nondescript semi-urban and rural areas in the east Indian state of West Bengal, suddenly became the center of national and international media attention and debates on state-led neoliberal agenda. The point of controversy were local agitations provoked by the then state government’s plans to acquire agricultural land for large scale corporate industrial projects. The movements by farmers to protect their agricultural land were described variously as challenges to neoliberal initiatives and widespread social tension that put a temporary brake to state-led market reforms. In traditional liberal narratives, the triumph of economic reforms was expected to replace value-based ideology with global economic principles, perceived as objective and neutral. </p>
<p>But the forces of neoliberalism became strongly entrenched in India alongside religious nationalism. Such political economic developments paralleled with the simultaneous expansion of India’s digital and traditional media sectors, consolidation of market forces, the co-option of both old and new media by powerful actors, and opportunities of mediated democratization and activism. While narratives of economic liberalization and global trends of commercialized journalism have been amply documented, this book addresses the tension between mainstream media’s political and commercial logic, movements and citizen-led activisms questioning dominant development and religious nationalist agenda, and the possibilities of political diversity and democratic participation in the Indian city of Kolkata. By focusing on the hybridities, commonalities, differences, and complexities in Kolkata’s mainstream news media and emerging digital space, this book captures the regional and linguistic variations in the studies of media, movements, and politics in India.</p>
<p><strong>Dr Suruchi Mazumdar</strong> is an Associate Professor at Jindal School of Journalism and Communication, O.P. Jindal Global University in India. </p>
<p><strong>Dr Priyam Sinha</strong> is an Alexander Von Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Institute for Asian and African Studies, Humboldt University in Berlin. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suruchi Mazumdar’s book addresses the complex relationship between India’s evolving, emerging media landscape, the political and economic interests of diverse media actors, and movements opposing contentious issues such as market-based economic reforms and religious nationalism. In the mid-2000s, Singur and Nandigram, nondescript semi-urban and rural areas in the east Indian state of West Bengal, suddenly became the center of national and international media attention and debates on state-led neoliberal agenda. The point of controversy were local agitations provoked by the then state government’s plans to acquire agricultural land for large scale corporate industrial projects. The movements by farmers to protect their agricultural land were described variously as challenges to neoliberal initiatives and widespread social tension that put a temporary brake to state-led market reforms. In traditional liberal narratives, the triumph of economic reforms was expected to replace value-based ideology with global economic principles, perceived as objective and neutral. </p>
<p>But the forces of neoliberalism became strongly entrenched in India alongside religious nationalism. Such political economic developments paralleled with the simultaneous expansion of India’s digital and traditional media sectors, consolidation of market forces, the co-option of both old and new media by powerful actors, and opportunities of mediated democratization and activism. While narratives of economic liberalization and global trends of commercialized journalism have been amply documented, this book addresses the tension between mainstream media’s political and commercial logic, movements and citizen-led activisms questioning dominant development and religious nationalist agenda, and the possibilities of political diversity and democratic participation in the Indian city of Kolkata. By focusing on the hybridities, commonalities, differences, and complexities in Kolkata’s mainstream news media and emerging digital space, this book captures the regional and linguistic variations in the studies of media, movements, and politics in India.</p>
<p><strong>Dr Suruchi Mazumdar</strong> is an Associate Professor at Jindal School of Journalism and Communication, O.P. Jindal Global University in India. </p>
<p><strong>Dr Priyam Sinha</strong> is an Alexander Von Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Institute for Asian and African Studies, Humboldt University in Berlin. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64375146" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5ae13a01-56e8-4bd6-abf9-6d85c0bc1a42/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5ae13a01-56e8-4bd6-abf9-6d85c0bc1a42&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Suruchi Mazumdar, &quot;Divided Media: Politics and Mediated Movements in India&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Suruchi Mazumdar’s book addresses the complex relationship between India’s evolving, emerging media landscape, the political and economic interests of diverse media actors, and movements opposing contentious issues such as market-based economic reforms and religious nationalism. In the mid-2000s, Singur and Nandigram, nondescript semi-urban and rural areas in the east Indian state of West Bengal, suddenly became the center of national and international media attention and debates on state-led neoliberal agenda. The point of controversy were local agitations provoked by the then state government’s plans to acquire agricultural land for large scale corporate industrial projects. The movements by farmers to protect their agricultural land were described variously as challenges to neoliberal initiatives and widespread social tension that put a temporary brake to state-led market reforms. In traditional liberal narratives, the triumph of economic reforms was expected to replace value-based ideology with global economic principles, perceived as objective and neutral. 

But the forces of neoliberalism became strongly entrenched in India alongside religious nationalism. Such political economic developments paralleled with the simultaneous expansion of India’s digital and traditional media sectors, consolidation of market forces, the co-option of both old and new media by powerful actors, and opportunities of mediated democratization and activism. While narratives of economic liberalization and global trends of commercialized journalism have been amply documented, this book addresses the tension between mainstream media’s political and commercial logic, movements and citizen-led activisms questioning dominant development and religious nationalist agenda, and the possibilities of political diversity and democratic participation in the Indian city of Kolkata. By focusing on the hybridities, commonalities, differences, and complexities in Kolkata’s mainstream news media and emerging digital space, this book captures the regional and linguistic variations in the studies of media, movements, and politics in India.

Dr Suruchi Mazumdar is an Associate Professor at Jindal School of Journalism and Communication, O.P. Jindal Global University in India. 

Dr Priyam Sinha is an Alexander Von Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Institute for Asian and African Studies, Humboldt University in Berlin. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Suruchi Mazumdar’s book addresses the complex relationship between India’s evolving, emerging media landscape, the political and economic interests of diverse media actors, and movements opposing contentious issues such as market-based economic reforms and religious nationalism. In the mid-2000s, Singur and Nandigram, nondescript semi-urban and rural areas in the east Indian state of West Bengal, suddenly became the center of national and international media attention and debates on state-led neoliberal agenda. The point of controversy were local agitations provoked by the then state government’s plans to acquire agricultural land for large scale corporate industrial projects. The movements by farmers to protect their agricultural land were described variously as challenges to neoliberal initiatives and widespread social tension that put a temporary brake to state-led market reforms. In traditional liberal narratives, the triumph of economic reforms was expected to replace value-based ideology with global economic principles, perceived as objective and neutral. 

But the forces of neoliberalism became strongly entrenched in India alongside religious nationalism. Such political economic developments paralleled with the simultaneous expansion of India’s digital and traditional media sectors, consolidation of market forces, the co-option of both old and new media by powerful actors, and opportunities of mediated democratization and activism. While narratives of economic liberalization and global trends of commercialized journalism have been amply documented, this book addresses the tension between mainstream media’s political and commercial logic, movements and citizen-led activisms questioning dominant development and religious nationalist agenda, and the possibilities of political diversity and democratic participation in the Indian city of Kolkata. By focusing on the hybridities, commonalities, differences, and complexities in Kolkata’s mainstream news media and emerging digital space, this book captures the regional and linguistic variations in the studies of media, movements, and politics in India.

Dr Suruchi Mazumdar is an Associate Professor at Jindal School of Journalism and Communication, O.P. Jindal Global University in India. 

Dr Priyam Sinha is an Alexander Von Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Institute for Asian and African Studies, Humboldt University in Berlin. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>287</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2354027a-6ba9-11f0-9fce-d3785f1c37ba</guid>
      <title>How Late-Stage Neoliberal Capitalism is Breaking Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/954569">Neoliberalism and the Third Wave</a>” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. <em>This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the </em><a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/"><em>Journal of Democracy</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a> is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig '78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-challenges-to-democracy/C50D0AC769FF0AA2C62DA9337F2C03E6">Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience</a> (CUP 2025).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?src=">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (<em>Democratization</em>, 2025).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “<a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/954569">Neoliberalism and the Third Wave</a>” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. <em>This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the </em><a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/"><em>Journal of Democracy</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://government.cornell.edu/rachel-beatty-riedl">Rachel Beatty Riedl</a> is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig '78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/global-challenges-to-democracy/C50D0AC769FF0AA2C62DA9337F2C03E6">Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience</a> (CUP 2025).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?src=">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (<em>Democratization</em>, 2025).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30242113" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f57d9e1e-2f32-4461-a128-f4b8543b4b4d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f57d9e1e-2f32-4461-a128-f4b8543b4b4d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Late-Stage Neoliberal Capitalism is Breaking Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “Neoliberalism and the Third Wave” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

Rachel Beatty Riedl is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig &apos;78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience (CUP 2025).

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (Democratization, 2025).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For a long time many (although by no means all) scholars saw the relationship between capitalism and democracy as mutually reinforcing: economic competition and growth were expected to sustain democratic competition and improve governance and public good delivery for citizens, in turn creating a better environment for capitalist competition to flourish. But as capitalism has changed and has in many respects freed itself from the constraints of the state and of democratic processes, it has unleashed a new era of extreme wealth accumulation, deregulated markets, weak states, unresponsive political elites, and choiceless democracies. In this episode, CEDAR host Licia Cianetti talks to Rachel Riedl about her recent essay on “Neoliberalism and the Third Wave” to better understand why and how this happened and what we can do about it. This episode is part of PPP’s ongoing collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

Rachel Beatty Riedl is Professor of public policy and government at Cornell University and the Peggy J. Koenig &apos;78 Director of the Brooks Center on Global Democracy. Her latest co-edited book is entitled Global Challenges to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience (CUP 2025).

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her latest publication is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (Democratization, 2025).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f98597a0-51c9-11ea-bd38-03e38925d1d9</guid>
      <title>Murad Idris, &quot;War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://politics.virginia.edu/murad-idris/">Murad Idris</a>, a political theorist in the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics at the University of Virginia, explores the concept of peace, the term itself and the way that it has been considered and analyzed in western and Islamic political thought. <em>War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought</em> (Oxford University Press, 2018) traces the concept of peace, and the way it is often insinuated with other words and concepts, over more than 2000 years of political thought. Idris begins with Plato’s <em>Laws</em> as one of the early sources to consider the tension that seems to be constant in terms of the pursuit of violence in order to attain peace.</p><p><em>War for Peace</em> provides some important framing in thinking about peace, in large measure because the research indicates how rare it is for peace itself to be solitary, it is almost always lassoed to other words and concepts, and functions either as a binary opposition (e.g.: war and peace) or as part of a dyad combination (e.g.: peace and justice). We are urged to think about peace and the valence that is given to the word and the ideal—since the moral and the political understandings of peace are often entangled and part of what Idris is doing in his careful and thoughtful research is to tease out the political concept, apart from the often religious and moral ideal. This rich and complex analysis integrates a broad group of theorists—Plato, al-Farabi, Aquinas, Erasmus, Gentili, Grotius, Ibn Khaldun, Hobbes, Kant, and Sayyid Qutb)—all of whom were examining the role of peace within politics and political thought. And Idris structures these thinkers into chronological and theoretical groupings, to explore the ways in which they were responding to each other, across time, but also to understand how different thinkers were connecting peace to other concepts. <em>War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought</em> may leave the reader anxious but also enlightened in considering this idea and its perplexing place within the history of political thought.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0">Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</a> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), <em>as well as co-editor of</em> <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/">Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://politics.virginia.edu/murad-idris/">Murad Idris</a>, a political theorist in the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics at the University of Virginia, explores the concept of peace, the term itself and the way that it has been considered and analyzed in western and Islamic political thought. <em>War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought</em> (Oxford University Press, 2018) traces the concept of peace, and the way it is often insinuated with other words and concepts, over more than 2000 years of political thought. Idris begins with Plato’s <em>Laws</em> as one of the early sources to consider the tension that seems to be constant in terms of the pursuit of violence in order to attain peace.</p><p><em>War for Peace</em> provides some important framing in thinking about peace, in large measure because the research indicates how rare it is for peace itself to be solitary, it is almost always lassoed to other words and concepts, and functions either as a binary opposition (e.g.: war and peace) or as part of a dyad combination (e.g.: peace and justice). We are urged to think about peace and the valence that is given to the word and the ideal—since the moral and the political understandings of peace are often entangled and part of what Idris is doing in his careful and thoughtful research is to tease out the political concept, apart from the often religious and moral ideal. This rich and complex analysis integrates a broad group of theorists—Plato, al-Farabi, Aquinas, Erasmus, Gentili, Grotius, Ibn Khaldun, Hobbes, Kant, and Sayyid Qutb)—all of whom were examining the role of peace within politics and political thought. And Idris structures these thinkers into chronological and theoretical groupings, to explore the ways in which they were responding to each other, across time, but also to understand how different thinkers were connecting peace to other concepts. <em>War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought</em> may leave the reader anxious but also enlightened in considering this idea and its perplexing place within the history of political thought.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0">Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</a> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), <em>as well as co-editor of</em> <a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/">Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60774791" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e487d433-bed3-4713-b289-3769f544d8dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e487d433-bed3-4713-b289-3769f544d8dc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Murad Idris, &quot;War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Murad Idris, a political theorist in the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics at the University of Virginia, explores the concept of peace, the term itself and the way that it has been considered and analyzed in western and Islamic political thought. War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought (Oxford University Press, 2018) traces the concept of peace, and the way it is often insinuated with other words and concepts, over more than 2000 years of political thought. Idris begins with Plato’s Laws as one of the early sources to consider the tension that seems to be constant in terms of the pursuit of violence in order to attain peace.
War for Peace provides some important framing in thinking about peace, in large measure because the research indicates how rare it is for peace itself to be solitary, it is almost always lassoed to other words and concepts, and functions either as a binary opposition (e.g.: war and peace) or as part of a dyad combination (e.g.: peace and justice). We are urged to think about peace and the valence that is given to the word and the ideal—since the moral and the political understandings of peace are often entangled and part of what Idris is doing in his careful and thoughtful research is to tease out the political concept, apart from the often religious and moral ideal. This rich and complex analysis integrates a broad group of theorists—Plato, al-Farabi, Aquinas, Erasmus, Gentili, Grotius, Ibn Khaldun, Hobbes, Kant, and Sayyid Qutb)—all of whom were examining the role of peace within politics and political thought. And Idris structures these thinkers into chronological and theoretical groupings, to explore the ways in which they were responding to each other, across time, but also to understand how different thinkers were connecting peace to other concepts. War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought may leave the reader anxious but also enlightened in considering this idea and its perplexing place within the history of political thought.
Lilly J. Goren is professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Murad Idris, a political theorist in the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics at the University of Virginia, explores the concept of peace, the term itself and the way that it has been considered and analyzed in western and Islamic political thought. War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought (Oxford University Press, 2018) traces the concept of peace, and the way it is often insinuated with other words and concepts, over more than 2000 years of political thought. Idris begins with Plato’s Laws as one of the early sources to consider the tension that seems to be constant in terms of the pursuit of violence in order to attain peace.
War for Peace provides some important framing in thinking about peace, in large measure because the research indicates how rare it is for peace itself to be solitary, it is almost always lassoed to other words and concepts, and functions either as a binary opposition (e.g.: war and peace) or as part of a dyad combination (e.g.: peace and justice). We are urged to think about peace and the valence that is given to the word and the ideal—since the moral and the political understandings of peace are often entangled and part of what Idris is doing in his careful and thoughtful research is to tease out the political concept, apart from the often religious and moral ideal. This rich and complex analysis integrates a broad group of theorists—Plato, al-Farabi, Aquinas, Erasmus, Gentili, Grotius, Ibn Khaldun, Hobbes, Kant, and Sayyid Qutb)—all of whom were examining the role of peace within politics and political thought. And Idris structures these thinkers into chronological and theoretical groupings, to explore the ways in which they were responding to each other, across time, but also to understand how different thinkers were connecting peace to other concepts. War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought may leave the reader anxious but also enlightened in considering this idea and its perplexing place within the history of political thought.
Lilly J. Goren is professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>406</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12548f16-6952-11f0-b586-6bac38801df2</guid>
      <title>Hanno Sauer, &quot;The Invention of Good and Evil: A World History of Morality &quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this sweeping new history of humanity, told through the prism of our ever-changing moral norms and values, Hanno Sauer shows how modern society is just the latest step in the long evolution of good and evil and everything in between.</p>
<p>What makes us moral beings? How do we decide what is good and what is evil? And has it always been that way? Hanno Sauer's sweeping new history of humanity, covering five million years of our universal moral values, comes at a crucial moment of crisis for those values, and helps to explain how they arose -- and why we need them.</p>
<p>We humans were born to cooperate, but everywhere we find ourselves in conflict. The way we live together has changed fundamentally in recent decades: global mobility, demographic upheaval, migration movements, and digital networking, have all called the moral foundations of human communities into question. Modern societies are in crisis: a shared universal morality seems to be a thing of the past. Hanno Sauer explains why this appearance is deceptive: in fact, there are universal values that all people share. If we understand the origin of our morality, we can understand its future too.</p>
<p>With philosophical expertise and empirical data, Sauer explains how processes of biological, cultural, social, and historical evolution shaped the moral grammar that defines our present. Seven chapters recount the crucial moral upheavals of human history showing how the emergence of humankind five million years ago, the rise of first civilizations 5,000 years ago, and the dynamics of moral progress in the last fifty years are interrelated. This genealogical perspective allows us, on the one hand, to see the contradictions and potential conflicts of our moral identities; on the other, it makes clear that we share fundamental values that apply to all human beings at all times. Sauer's elegant prose, translated into English by Jo Heinrich, brings the history of humanity to vivid new life.</p>
<p>Hanno Sauer is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy &amp; Religious Studies at Utrecht University. He teaches ethics, metaethics and political philosophy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this sweeping new history of humanity, told through the prism of our ever-changing moral norms and values, Hanno Sauer shows how modern society is just the latest step in the long evolution of good and evil and everything in between.</p>
<p>What makes us moral beings? How do we decide what is good and what is evil? And has it always been that way? Hanno Sauer's sweeping new history of humanity, covering five million years of our universal moral values, comes at a crucial moment of crisis for those values, and helps to explain how they arose -- and why we need them.</p>
<p>We humans were born to cooperate, but everywhere we find ourselves in conflict. The way we live together has changed fundamentally in recent decades: global mobility, demographic upheaval, migration movements, and digital networking, have all called the moral foundations of human communities into question. Modern societies are in crisis: a shared universal morality seems to be a thing of the past. Hanno Sauer explains why this appearance is deceptive: in fact, there are universal values that all people share. If we understand the origin of our morality, we can understand its future too.</p>
<p>With philosophical expertise and empirical data, Sauer explains how processes of biological, cultural, social, and historical evolution shaped the moral grammar that defines our present. Seven chapters recount the crucial moral upheavals of human history showing how the emergence of humankind five million years ago, the rise of first civilizations 5,000 years ago, and the dynamics of moral progress in the last fifty years are interrelated. This genealogical perspective allows us, on the one hand, to see the contradictions and potential conflicts of our moral identities; on the other, it makes clear that we share fundamental values that apply to all human beings at all times. Sauer's elegant prose, translated into English by Jo Heinrich, brings the history of humanity to vivid new life.</p>
<p>Hanno Sauer is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy &amp; Religious Studies at Utrecht University. He teaches ethics, metaethics and political philosophy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64613125" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e573c76c-0853-4815-9d89-3e2b7c3b7ee6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e573c76c-0853-4815-9d89-3e2b7c3b7ee6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hanno Sauer, &quot;The Invention of Good and Evil: A World History of Morality &quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this sweeping new history of humanity, told through the prism of our ever-changing moral norms and values, Hanno Sauer shows how modern society is just the latest step in the long evolution of good and evil and everything in between.

What makes us moral beings? How do we decide what is good and what is evil? And has it always been that way? Hanno Sauer&apos;s sweeping new history of humanity, covering five million years of our universal moral values, comes at a crucial moment of crisis for those values, and helps to explain how they arose -- and why we need them.

We humans were born to cooperate, but everywhere we find ourselves in conflict. The way we live together has changed fundamentally in recent decades: global mobility, demographic upheaval, migration movements, and digital networking, have all called the moral foundations of human communities into question. Modern societies are in crisis: a shared universal morality seems to be a thing of the past. Hanno Sauer explains why this appearance is deceptive: in fact, there are universal values that all people share. If we understand the origin of our morality, we can understand its future too.

With philosophical expertise and empirical data, Sauer explains how processes of biological, cultural, social, and historical evolution shaped the moral grammar that defines our present. Seven chapters recount the crucial moral upheavals of human history showing how the emergence of humankind five million years ago, the rise of first civilizations 5,000 years ago, and the dynamics of moral progress in the last fifty years are interrelated. This genealogical perspective allows us, on the one hand, to see the contradictions and potential conflicts of our moral identities; on the other, it makes clear that we share fundamental values that apply to all human beings at all times. Sauer&apos;s elegant prose, translated into English by Jo Heinrich, brings the history of humanity to vivid new life.

Hanno Sauer is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy &amp; Religious Studies at Utrecht University. He teaches ethics, metaethics and political philosophy.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this sweeping new history of humanity, told through the prism of our ever-changing moral norms and values, Hanno Sauer shows how modern society is just the latest step in the long evolution of good and evil and everything in between.

What makes us moral beings? How do we decide what is good and what is evil? And has it always been that way? Hanno Sauer&apos;s sweeping new history of humanity, covering five million years of our universal moral values, comes at a crucial moment of crisis for those values, and helps to explain how they arose -- and why we need them.

We humans were born to cooperate, but everywhere we find ourselves in conflict. The way we live together has changed fundamentally in recent decades: global mobility, demographic upheaval, migration movements, and digital networking, have all called the moral foundations of human communities into question. Modern societies are in crisis: a shared universal morality seems to be a thing of the past. Hanno Sauer explains why this appearance is deceptive: in fact, there are universal values that all people share. If we understand the origin of our morality, we can understand its future too.

With philosophical expertise and empirical data, Sauer explains how processes of biological, cultural, social, and historical evolution shaped the moral grammar that defines our present. Seven chapters recount the crucial moral upheavals of human history showing how the emergence of humankind five million years ago, the rise of first civilizations 5,000 years ago, and the dynamics of moral progress in the last fifty years are interrelated. This genealogical perspective allows us, on the one hand, to see the contradictions and potential conflicts of our moral identities; on the other, it makes clear that we share fundamental values that apply to all human beings at all times. Sauer&apos;s elegant prose, translated into English by Jo Heinrich, brings the history of humanity to vivid new life.

Hanno Sauer is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at the Department of Philosophy &amp; Religious Studies at Utrecht University. He teaches ethics, metaethics and political philosophy.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>248</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d37e03c0-68a3-11f0-a84f-5335cb9e3c31</guid>
      <title>Joseph Gfroerer, &quot;War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Gfroerer spent nearly 40 years working as a statistician for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Starting in 1988, when the American drug war was taking its current shape, he led the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), one of the federal government’s largest and most important ongoing health surveys that tracks Americans’ use of illegal drugs, prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107122703"><em>War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2018), written after he retired, shows where the survey came from, details how it gathers information, and tracks the impact that the shifting cultural and political climate surrounding drug use played on how these statistics were understood. Gfroerer provides necessary insight on what drug use statistics have meant, how they’ve been used (and misused), and what this means for our understanding of drug use in America today.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em> is the author of </em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em> (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Gfroerer spent nearly 40 years working as a statistician for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Starting in 1988, when the American drug war was taking its current shape, he led the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), one of the federal government’s largest and most important ongoing health surveys that tracks Americans’ use of illegal drugs, prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107122703"><em>War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2018), written after he retired, shows where the survey came from, details how it gathers information, and tracks the impact that the shifting cultural and political climate surrounding drug use played on how these statistics were understood. Gfroerer provides necessary insight on what drug use statistics have meant, how they’ve been used (and misused), and what this means for our understanding of drug use in America today.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em> is the author of </em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em> (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51589097" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/abec59bf-51ad-49e5-95df-a5c2b5685e08/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=abec59bf-51ad-49e5-95df-a5c2b5685e08&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Joseph Gfroerer, &quot;War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Joseph Gfroerer spent nearly 40 years working as a statistician for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Starting in 1988, when the American drug war was taking its current shape, he led the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), one of the federal government’s largest and most important ongoing health surveys that tracks Americans’ use of illegal drugs, prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco. War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (Cambridge UP, 2018), written after he retired, shows where the survey came from, details how it gathers information, and tracks the impact that the shifting cultural and political climate surrounding drug use played on how these statistics were understood. Gfroerer provides necessary insight on what drug use statistics have meant, how they’ve been used (and misused), and what this means for our understanding of drug use in America today.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Joseph Gfroerer spent nearly 40 years working as a statistician for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Starting in 1988, when the American drug war was taking its current shape, he led the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), one of the federal government’s largest and most important ongoing health surveys that tracks Americans’ use of illegal drugs, prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco. War Stories from the Drug Survey: How Culture, Politics, and Statistics Shaped the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (Cambridge UP, 2018), written after he retired, shows where the survey came from, details how it gathers information, and tracks the impact that the shifting cultural and political climate surrounding drug use played on how these statistics were understood. Gfroerer provides necessary insight on what drug use statistics have meant, how they’ve been used (and misused), and what this means for our understanding of drug use in America today.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08f8b73e-68a9-11f0-ad61-5f9e412cfbbe</guid>
      <title>Teo Ballvé, &quot;The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501747540"><em>The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2020), Teo Ballvé challenges the notion that in Urabá, Colombia, the cause of the region's violent history and unruly contemporary condition is the absence of the state. Although he takes this locally oft-repeated claim seriously, he demonstrates that Urabá is more than a case of Hobbesian political disorder.</p><p>Through his insightful exploration of war, paramilitary organizations, grassroots support and resistance, and drug-related violence, Ballvé argues that Urabá, rather than existing in statelessness, has actually been an intense and persistent site of state-building projects. Indeed, these projects have thrust together an unlikely gathering of guerilla groups, drug-trafficking paramilitaries, military strategists, technocratic planners, local politicians, and development experts each seeking to give concrete coherence to the inherently unwieldy abstraction of "the state" in a space in which it supposedly does not exist. By untangling this odd mix, Ballvé reveals how Colombia's violent conflicts have produced surprisingly coherent and resilient, if not at all benevolent, regimes of rule.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501747540"><em>The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia</em></a><em> </em>(Cornell UP, 2020), Teo Ballvé challenges the notion that in Urabá, Colombia, the cause of the region's violent history and unruly contemporary condition is the absence of the state. Although he takes this locally oft-repeated claim seriously, he demonstrates that Urabá is more than a case of Hobbesian political disorder.</p><p>Through his insightful exploration of war, paramilitary organizations, grassroots support and resistance, and drug-related violence, Ballvé argues that Urabá, rather than existing in statelessness, has actually been an intense and persistent site of state-building projects. Indeed, these projects have thrust together an unlikely gathering of guerilla groups, drug-trafficking paramilitaries, military strategists, technocratic planners, local politicians, and development experts each seeking to give concrete coherence to the inherently unwieldy abstraction of "the state" in a space in which it supposedly does not exist. By untangling this odd mix, Ballvé reveals how Colombia's violent conflicts have produced surprisingly coherent and resilient, if not at all benevolent, regimes of rule.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37670243" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a1bc9081-9f77-4deb-8176-c1f788625d72/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a1bc9081-9f77-4deb-8176-c1f788625d72&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Teo Ballvé, &quot;The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia (Cornell UP, 2020), Teo Ballvé challenges the notion that in Urabá, Colombia, the cause of the region&apos;s violent history and unruly contemporary condition is the absence of the state. Although he takes this locally oft-repeated claim seriously, he demonstrates that Urabá is more than a case of Hobbesian political disorder.
Through his insightful exploration of war, paramilitary organizations, grassroots support and resistance, and drug-related violence, Ballvé argues that Urabá, rather than existing in statelessness, has actually been an intense and persistent site of state-building projects. Indeed, these projects have thrust together an unlikely gathering of guerilla groups, drug-trafficking paramilitaries, military strategists, technocratic planners, local politicians, and development experts each seeking to give concrete coherence to the inherently unwieldy abstraction of &quot;the state&quot; in a space in which it supposedly does not exist. By untangling this odd mix, Ballvé reveals how Colombia&apos;s violent conflicts have produced surprisingly coherent and resilient, if not at all benevolent, regimes of rule.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Frontier Effect: State Formation and Violence in Colombia (Cornell UP, 2020), Teo Ballvé challenges the notion that in Urabá, Colombia, the cause of the region&apos;s violent history and unruly contemporary condition is the absence of the state. Although he takes this locally oft-repeated claim seriously, he demonstrates that Urabá is more than a case of Hobbesian political disorder.
Through his insightful exploration of war, paramilitary organizations, grassroots support and resistance, and drug-related violence, Ballvé argues that Urabá, rather than existing in statelessness, has actually been an intense and persistent site of state-building projects. Indeed, these projects have thrust together an unlikely gathering of guerilla groups, drug-trafficking paramilitaries, military strategists, technocratic planners, local politicians, and development experts each seeking to give concrete coherence to the inherently unwieldy abstraction of &quot;the state&quot; in a space in which it supposedly does not exist. By untangling this odd mix, Ballvé reveals how Colombia&apos;s violent conflicts have produced surprisingly coherent and resilient, if not at all benevolent, regimes of rule.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5fcc2bf8-6823-11f0-a804-f7d7e18ed4ac</guid>
      <title>Agathe Demarais, &quot;Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199902"><em>Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests</em></a> (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. </p><p>Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran's COVID response and China's cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider's account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.</p><p><em>Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at </em><a href="https://twitter.com/bucephalus424"><em>https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199902"><em>Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests</em></a> (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. </p><p>Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran's COVID response and China's cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider's account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.</p><p><em>Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at </em><a href="https://twitter.com/bucephalus424"><em>https://twitter.com/bucephalus424</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61185832" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5384e41c-74e6-498a-8bd5-83419a4597df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5384e41c-74e6-498a-8bd5-83419a4597df&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Agathe Demarais, &quot;Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. 
Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. 
Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran&apos;s COVID response and China&apos;s cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider&apos;s account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.
Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bucephalus424
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sanctions have become the go-to foreign policy tool for the United States. Coercive economic measures such as trade tariffs, financial penalties, and export controls affect large numbers of companies and states across the globe. Some of these penalties target nonstate actors, such as Colombian drug cartels and Islamist terror groups; others apply to entire countries, including North Korea, Iran, and Russia. U.S. policy makers see sanctions as a low-cost tactic, but in reality these measures often fail to achieve their intended goals--and their potent side effects can even harm American interests. 
Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests (Columbia UP, 2022) explores the surprising ways sanctions affect multinational companies, governments, and ultimately millions of people around the world. Drawing on interviews with experts, policy makers, and people in sanctioned countries, Agathe Demarais examines the unintended consequences of the use of sanctions as a diplomatic weapon. The proliferation of sanctions spurs efforts to evade them, as states and firms seek ways to circumvent U.S. penalties. This is only part of the story. Sanctions also reshape relations between countries, pushing governments that are at odds with the U.S. closer to each other--or, increasingly, to Russia and China. 
Full of counterintuitive insights spanning a wide range of topics, from commodities markets in Russia to Iran&apos;s COVID response and China&apos;s cryptocurrency ambitions, Backfire reveals how sanctions are transforming geopolitics and the global economy--as well as diminishing U.S. influence. This insider&apos;s account is an eye-opening, accessible, and timely book that sheds light on the future of sanctions in an increasingly multipolar world.
Mathias Fuelling is a doctoral candidate in History at Temple University, working on a political history of Czechoslovakia in the immediate post-WWII years. He can be found on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bucephalus424
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b682ccc2-6620-11f0-8f36-abb5f99fdbc0</guid>
      <title>Luke A. Nichter, &quot;The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election Of 1968&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300280135">The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968</a><em> </em>(Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.</p>
<p>The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.</p>
<p>Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.</p>
<p>Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong> is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a> or via <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300280135">The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968</a><em> </em>(Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.</p>
<p>The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.</p>
<p>Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.</p>
<p>Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong> is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:andrew.pace@usm.edu">andrew.pace@usm.edu</a> or via <a href="https://www.andrewopace.com/">https://www.andrewopace.com/</a>. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60011801" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ee3a57e7-41fe-4e2c-a4ca-c5a73d42901b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ee3a57e7-41fe-4e2c-a4ca-c5a73d42901b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luke A. Nichter, &quot;The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election Of 1968&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968 (Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.

The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.

Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.

Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.



Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A sitting Democratic president who chooses not to run for re-election, a vice president running out of the president’s shadow, and a Republican nominee trying to make a political comeback amidst accusations of collusion – welcome to the 2024 1968 presidential election. What we think we know about the election has been challenged, however, by a new book by Luke A. Nichter, a professor of history and presidential studies at Chapman University. In The Year That Broke Politics: Collusion and Chaos in the Presidential Election of 1968 (Yale UP, 2024) Nichter reexamines the campaign and shows how the ‘68 election foreshadowed our current political landscape.

The 1968 presidential race was a contentious battle between vice president Hubert Humphrey, Republican Richard Nixon, and former Alabama governor George Wallace. The United States was reeling from the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy and was bitterly divided on the Vietnam War and domestic issues, including civil rights and rising crime. Drawing on previously unexamined archives and numerous interviews, Luke A. Nichter upends the conventional understanding of the campaign.

Nichter chronicles how the evangelist Billy Graham met with Johnson after the president’s attempt to reenter the race was stymied by his own party, and offered him a deal: Nixon, if elected, would continue Johnson’s Vietnam War policy and also not oppose his Great Society, if Johnson would soften his support for Humphrey. Johnson agreed.

Nichter also shows that Johnson was far more active in the campaign than has previously been described; that Humphrey’s resurgence in October had nothing to do with his changing his position on the war; that Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” has been misunderstood, since he hardly even campaigned there; and that Wallace’s appeal went far beyond the South and anticipated today’s Republican populism. This eye-opening account of the political calculations and maneuvering that decided this fiercely fought election reshapes our understanding of a key moment in twentieth-century American history.



Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via https://www.andrewopace.com/. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>637</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a81a5f8-6577-11f0-9c45-df21d623abda</guid>
      <title>Ketian Zhang, &quot;China&apos;s Gambit: The Calculus of Coercion&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Emerging from an award-winning article in International Security, <em>China's Gambit</em> examines when, why, and how China attempts to coerce states over perceived threats to its national security. Since 1990, China has used coercion for territorial disputes and issues related to Taiwan and Tibet, yet China is curiously selective in the timing, target, and tools of coercion. This book offers a new and generalizable cost-balancing theory to explain states' coercion decisions. It demonstrates that China does not coerce frequently and uses military coercion less when it becomes stronger, resorting primarily to non-militarized tools. Leveraging rich empirical evidence, including primary Chinese documents and interviews with Chinese and foreign officials, this book explains how contemporary rising powers translate their power into influence and offers a new framework for explaining states' coercion decisions in an era of economic interdependence, particularly how contemporary global economic interdependence affects rising powers' foreign security policies.</p>
<p>﻿Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emerging from an award-winning article in International Security, <em>China's Gambit</em> examines when, why, and how China attempts to coerce states over perceived threats to its national security. Since 1990, China has used coercion for territorial disputes and issues related to Taiwan and Tibet, yet China is curiously selective in the timing, target, and tools of coercion. This book offers a new and generalizable cost-balancing theory to explain states' coercion decisions. It demonstrates that China does not coerce frequently and uses military coercion less when it becomes stronger, resorting primarily to non-militarized tools. Leveraging rich empirical evidence, including primary Chinese documents and interviews with Chinese and foreign officials, this book explains how contemporary rising powers translate their power into influence and offers a new framework for explaining states' coercion decisions in an era of economic interdependence, particularly how contemporary global economic interdependence affects rising powers' foreign security policies.</p>
<p>﻿Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa's diaspora relations, African-China relations, great power rivalry and IR theories.</p>
<p>Check out my new article <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70780551" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2de57be5-f229-44ce-bb4c-a98f9cf90370/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2de57be5-f229-44ce-bb4c-a98f9cf90370&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ketian Zhang, &quot;China&apos;s Gambit: The Calculus of Coercion&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Emerging from an award-winning article in International Security, China&apos;s Gambit examines when, why, and how China attempts to coerce states over perceived threats to its national security. Since 1990, China has used coercion for territorial disputes and issues related to Taiwan and Tibet, yet China is curiously selective in the timing, target, and tools of coercion. This book offers a new and generalizable cost-balancing theory to explain states&apos; coercion decisions. It demonstrates that China does not coerce frequently and uses military coercion less when it becomes stronger, resorting primarily to non-militarized tools. Leveraging rich empirical evidence, including primary Chinese documents and interviews with Chinese and foreign officials, this book explains how contemporary rising powers translate their power into influence and offers a new framework for explaining states&apos; coercion decisions in an era of economic interdependence, particularly how contemporary global economic interdependence affects rising powers&apos; foreign security policies.

﻿Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Emerging from an award-winning article in International Security, China&apos;s Gambit examines when, why, and how China attempts to coerce states over perceived threats to its national security. Since 1990, China has used coercion for territorial disputes and issues related to Taiwan and Tibet, yet China is curiously selective in the timing, target, and tools of coercion. This book offers a new and generalizable cost-balancing theory to explain states&apos; coercion decisions. It demonstrates that China does not coerce frequently and uses military coercion less when it becomes stronger, resorting primarily to non-militarized tools. Leveraging rich empirical evidence, including primary Chinese documents and interviews with Chinese and foreign officials, this book explains how contemporary rising powers translate their power into influence and offers a new framework for explaining states&apos; coercion decisions in an era of economic interdependence, particularly how contemporary global economic interdependence affects rising powers&apos; foreign security policies.

﻿Nomeh Anthony Kanayo, Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Florida International University, with research interest in Africa&apos;s diaspora relations, African-China relations, great power rivalry and IR theories.

Check out my new article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02699
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f89609b8-4a35-11ec-a4cb-ff84fa116c33</guid>
      <title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. <em>American by Birth</em> examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. <em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States </em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a> (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a> is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a> (UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a> is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em> </a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics </a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a> (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a> and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html">the symposium on <em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950"><em>Susan Liebell </em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. <em>American by Birth</em> examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. <em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States </em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a> (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a> is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a> (UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a> is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em> </a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics </a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and <a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a> (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a> and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html">the symposium on <em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950"><em>Susan Liebell </em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74080054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5d3f3e37-307f-487a-8f25-ab3f749e70fc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5d3f3e37-307f-487a-8f25-ab3f749e70fc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>562</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d3e7ddc6-64a3-11f0-8530-df9fb975d761</guid>
      <title>Frank L. Jones, &quot;Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age&quot; (UP Kansas, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).</p><p>Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.</p><p>At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700630127"><em>Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age</em></a><em> </em>(University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.</p><p>Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes <em>Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aryah"><em>Arya Hariharan</em></a><em> is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or </em><a href="https://twitter.com/arya_hariharan"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).</p><p>Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.</p><p>At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700630127"><em>Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age</em></a><em> </em>(University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.</p><p>Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes <em>Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aryah"><em>Arya Hariharan</em></a><em> is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or </em><a href="https://twitter.com/arya_hariharan"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61511589" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/01d2f7d7-9d1f-4cfe-ba10-ff68a6ee8b46/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=01d2f7d7-9d1f-4cfe-ba10-ff68a6ee8b46&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Frank L. Jones, &quot;Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age&quot; (UP Kansas, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).
Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization&apos;s military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.
At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age (University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.
Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy.
Arya Hariharan is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a 2012 opinion piece bemoaning the state of the US Senate, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank cited a “leading theory: There are no giants in the chamber today.” Among the respected members who once walked the Senate floor, admired for their expertise and with a stature that went beyond party, Milbank counted Sam Nunn (D-GA).
Nunn served in the Senate for four terms beginning in 1972, at a moment when domestic politics and foreign policy were undergoing far-reaching changes. As a member and then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, he had a vital impact on most of the crucial national security and defense issues of the Cold War era and the “new world order” that followed—issues that included the revitalization of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization&apos;s military capability, US-Soviet relations, national defense reorganization and reform, the Persian Gulf conflict, and nuclear arms control. In this first full account of Nunn’s senatorial career, Frank Leith Jones reveals how, as a congressional leader and “shadow secretary of defense,” Nunn helped win the Cold War, constructing the foundation for the defense and foreign policies of the 1970s and 1980s that secured the United States and its allies from the Soviet threat.
At a time of bitter political polarization and partisanship, Nunn’s reputation remains that of a statesman with a record of bipartisanship and a dedication to US national interests above all. His career, as recounted in Sam Nunn: Statesman of the Nuclear Age (University Press of Kansas, 2020), provides both a valuable lesson in the relationships among the US government, foreign powers, and societies and a welcome reminder of the capacity of Congress, even a lone senator, to promote and enact policies that can make the country, and the world, a better and safer place.
Frank Leith Jones is professor of security studies and the General C. Marshall Chair of Military Studies in the Department of National Security and Strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. His published work includes Blowtorch: Robert Komer, Vietnam, and American Cold War Strategy.
Arya Hariharan is a lawyer in politics. She spends much of her time working on congressional investigations and addressing challenges to the rule of law. You can reach her at arya.hariharan@gmail.com or Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>76</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8173d634-e26b-11ec-a8af-136c34dcb35c</guid>
      <title>Dayna Bowen Matthew, &quot;Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802661"><em>Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America</em></a> (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.</p><p>Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/"> <em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802661"><em>Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America</em></a> (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.</p><p>Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/"> <em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42387260" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/32bff62b-4cdf-4f72-bf20-9897b297ec9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=32bff62b-4cdf-4f72-bf20-9897b297ec9e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dayna Bowen Matthew, &quot;Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America&quot; (NYU Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.
Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, systemic racism is embedded in policies and practices, thereby structuring American society to perpetuate inequality and all of the symptoms and results of that inequality. Racial, social, and class inequities and the public health crises in the United States are deeply intertwined, their roots and manifestations continually pressuring each other. This has been both illuminated and exacerbated since 2020, with the Movement for Black Lives (BLM) and the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically disadvantaged groups within the U.S. Dr. Dayna Bowen Matthew, Dean of the George Washington University Law School, explores and unpacks the public health crisis that is racism in her new book ﻿Just Health: Treating Structural Racism to Heal America (NYU Press, 2022)﻿. She describes how structural inequality undermines the interests of a thriving nation and the steps we can take to undo the pervasive nature of inequality to create more equitable and just systems.
Dr. Bowen Matthew describes her personal relationship with the concepts of structural inequality and racism in the public health system, opening with a heart-wrenching ode to her father’s experience with poverty and prejudice, which ultimately led to his premature death. Through her family’s story, she explains how structural inequality is perpetuated on a large-enough scale and with a powerful-enough scope so as to virtually guarantee social outcomes that reflect predetermined hierarchies based on race and/or class, hierarchies that remain consistent across generations. These disproportionate outcomes are often dismissed as due to comorbidities without the attention paid to social factors are the primary cause of comorbidities, because oppression in its many forms blocks equitable access to the social determinants of health. These social determinants include, but are not limited to, clean and safe housing, adequate education, nutritious food and fresh water, access to recreational spaces, and mental health services. Individuals who lack these, through no fault of their own, are then obligated to accept disproportionate care, illness, and disturbingly shorter life spans then are the norm for many Americans and are much closer to life spans in impoverished countries. Dr. Bowen Matthew presents evidence of discrimination in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system, detailing how law has played a central role in erecting disproportionate access to the social determinants of health, and therefore is a requisite tool for dismantling it. She provides a clear path to undoing structural racism and providing an equitable society to all, encouraging health providers, law makers, and citizens all to fight to dismantle the hurdles that many patients face because of the zip code in which they live.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>610</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05ed8758-6233-11f0-953a-ef89facf79e6</guid>
      <title>David E. Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht, &quot;See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People&quot; (U of Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Notre Dame University Political Scientists Dave Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht have a new book that focuses on the impression that female candidates make on young people, specifically on young people in the United States. This is a fascinating analysis since it fleshes out, with a sizeable study, the idea that candidates running for office, particularly female candidates, leave a lasting impact on younger people, even if they do not win. Studying role models has not been a focus in political science per se, but Campbell and Wolbrecht have brought together work from social psychology, democratic theory, political science, and gender studies to craft an understanding of role models within the context of campaigns and elections.<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em>⁠</a> (U of Chicago Press, 2025) is an important exploration of the connection between those who run for office, particularly those who may look different than the expected “norm”, and how that very action has long-term impacts on younger voters, particularly adolescents and teenagers.</p>
<p>One of the unique perspectives of the research in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run</em></a> is the focus on younger people and their engagement with politics. As the authors note, there is not that much political science research that explores the interactions between young people and politics—especially before those young people can vote. The authors also explain that teenagers generally identify with a partisan affiliation, which means that Campbell and Wolbrecht were able to sort the individuals into partisan groups and track the impact of women candidates within these partisan contexts. They found that female candidates clearly influenced two distinct groups within the study: Democratic young women and Republican young men. Young women saw these female candidates (both Republican and Democratic) as reflecting a more inclusive political environment, and the analysis suggests that this has a long-term impact, making these young women more engaged with the political process and democracy over time. The Republican young men responded as well, seeing female candidates as pursuing something—political activity—that they determined they were also qualified to pursue. The outcomes of the research in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em></a> also had racial dimensions, including exploring the impact on young Black men, who became less engaged in politics when a woman of color was running for office.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em></a> explores what has been essentially folklore about the impact of political role models on young people by pulling together data and research to flesh out an understanding of these notions that we all have about candidates for political office, role models, and the impacts on younger people.</p>
<p>Please check out <a href="https://www.brainlairbooks.com/">Brain Lair Books</a> (in South Bend, Indiana or online) to purchase a copy of <a href="https://www.brainlairbooks.com/item/9ZxRdsPjguuMipF82oEtzw"><em>See Jane Run</em></a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notre Dame University Political Scientists Dave Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht have a new book that focuses on the impression that female candidates make on young people, specifically on young people in the United States. This is a fascinating analysis since it fleshes out, with a sizeable study, the idea that candidates running for office, particularly female candidates, leave a lasting impact on younger people, even if they do not win. Studying role models has not been a focus in political science per se, but Campbell and Wolbrecht have brought together work from social psychology, democratic theory, political science, and gender studies to craft an understanding of role models within the context of campaigns and elections.<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em>⁠</a> (U of Chicago Press, 2025) is an important exploration of the connection between those who run for office, particularly those who may look different than the expected “norm”, and how that very action has long-term impacts on younger voters, particularly adolescents and teenagers.</p>
<p>One of the unique perspectives of the research in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run</em></a> is the focus on younger people and their engagement with politics. As the authors note, there is not that much political science research that explores the interactions between young people and politics—especially before those young people can vote. The authors also explain that teenagers generally identify with a partisan affiliation, which means that Campbell and Wolbrecht were able to sort the individuals into partisan groups and track the impact of women candidates within these partisan contexts. They found that female candidates clearly influenced two distinct groups within the study: Democratic young women and Republican young men. Young women saw these female candidates (both Republican and Democratic) as reflecting a more inclusive political environment, and the analysis suggests that this has a long-term impact, making these young women more engaged with the political process and democracy over time. The Republican young men responded as well, seeing female candidates as pursuing something—political activity—that they determined they were also qualified to pursue. The outcomes of the research in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em></a> also had racial dimensions, including exploring the impact on young Black men, who became less engaged in politics when a woman of color was running for office.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo244727925.html"><em>See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People</em></a> explores what has been essentially folklore about the impact of political role models on young people by pulling together data and research to flesh out an understanding of these notions that we all have about candidates for political office, role models, and the impacts on younger people.</p>
<p>Please check out <a href="https://www.brainlairbooks.com/">Brain Lair Books</a> (in South Bend, Indiana or online) to purchase a copy of <a href="https://www.brainlairbooks.com/item/9ZxRdsPjguuMipF82oEtzw"><em>See Jane Run</em></a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49637417" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/03583bad-4671-4fe3-9544-4540b8e7eedf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=03583bad-4671-4fe3-9544-4540b8e7eedf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David E. Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht, &quot;See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People&quot; (U of Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Notre Dame University Political Scientists Dave Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht have a new book that focuses on the impression that female candidates make on young people, specifically on young people in the United States. This is a fascinating analysis since it fleshes out, with a sizeable study, the idea that candidates running for office, particularly female candidates, leave a lasting impact on younger people, even if they do not win. Studying role models has not been a focus in political science per se, but Campbell and Wolbrecht have brought together work from social psychology, democratic theory, political science, and gender studies to craft an understanding of role models within the context of campaigns and elections.See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People⁠ (U of Chicago Press, 2025) is an important exploration of the connection between those who run for office, particularly those who may look different than the expected “norm”, and how that very action has long-term impacts on younger voters, particularly adolescents and teenagers.

One of the unique perspectives of the research in See Jane Run is the focus on younger people and their engagement with politics. As the authors note, there is not that much political science research that explores the interactions between young people and politics—especially before those young people can vote. The authors also explain that teenagers generally identify with a partisan affiliation, which means that Campbell and Wolbrecht were able to sort the individuals into partisan groups and track the impact of women candidates within these partisan contexts. They found that female candidates clearly influenced two distinct groups within the study: Democratic young women and Republican young men. Young women saw these female candidates (both Republican and Democratic) as reflecting a more inclusive political environment, and the analysis suggests that this has a long-term impact, making these young women more engaged with the political process and democracy over time. The Republican young men responded as well, seeing female candidates as pursuing something—political activity—that they determined they were also qualified to pursue. The outcomes of the research in See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People also had racial dimensions, including exploring the impact on young Black men, who became less engaged in politics when a woman of color was running for office.

See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People explores what has been essentially folklore about the impact of political role models on young people by pulling together data and research to flesh out an understanding of these notions that we all have about candidates for political office, role models, and the impacts on younger people.

Please check out Brain Lair Books (in South Bend, Indiana or online) to purchase a copy of See Jane Run.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Notre Dame University Political Scientists Dave Campbell and Christina Wolbrecht have a new book that focuses on the impression that female candidates make on young people, specifically on young people in the United States. This is a fascinating analysis since it fleshes out, with a sizeable study, the idea that candidates running for office, particularly female candidates, leave a lasting impact on younger people, even if they do not win. Studying role models has not been a focus in political science per se, but Campbell and Wolbrecht have brought together work from social psychology, democratic theory, political science, and gender studies to craft an understanding of role models within the context of campaigns and elections.See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People⁠ (U of Chicago Press, 2025) is an important exploration of the connection between those who run for office, particularly those who may look different than the expected “norm”, and how that very action has long-term impacts on younger voters, particularly adolescents and teenagers.

One of the unique perspectives of the research in See Jane Run is the focus on younger people and their engagement with politics. As the authors note, there is not that much political science research that explores the interactions between young people and politics—especially before those young people can vote. The authors also explain that teenagers generally identify with a partisan affiliation, which means that Campbell and Wolbrecht were able to sort the individuals into partisan groups and track the impact of women candidates within these partisan contexts. They found that female candidates clearly influenced two distinct groups within the study: Democratic young women and Republican young men. Young women saw these female candidates (both Republican and Democratic) as reflecting a more inclusive political environment, and the analysis suggests that this has a long-term impact, making these young women more engaged with the political process and democracy over time. The Republican young men responded as well, seeing female candidates as pursuing something—political activity—that they determined they were also qualified to pursue. The outcomes of the research in See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People also had racial dimensions, including exploring the impact on young Black men, who became less engaged in politics when a woman of color was running for office.

See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People explores what has been essentially folklore about the impact of political role models on young people by pulling together data and research to flesh out an understanding of these notions that we all have about candidates for political office, role models, and the impacts on younger people.

Please check out Brain Lair Books (in South Bend, Indiana or online) to purchase a copy of See Jane Run.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>632</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ff11684-613b-11f0-9459-ef3c994c4b7d</guid>
      <title>Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&quot; (Bristol UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529206722">Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq </a>(Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.</p>
<p>Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529206722">Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq </a>(Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.</p>
<p>Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26105776" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0a77fdc7-57a5-4695-8f60-0c8580352003/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0a77fdc7-57a5-4695-8f60-0c8580352003&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lily Hamourtziadou, &quot;Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq&quot; (Bristol UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq (Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.

Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Body Count: The War on Terror and Civilian Deaths in Iraq (Bristol University Press, 2021), Lily Hamourtziadou’s investigation into civilian victims during the conflicts that followed the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq provides important new perspectives on the human cost of the War on Terror. From early fighting to the withdrawal and return of coalition troops, the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS, the book explores the scale and causes of deaths and places them in the contexts of power struggles, US foreign policy and radicalisation. Casting fresh light on not just the conflict but international geopolitics and the history of Iraq, it constructs a unique and insightful human security approach to war.

Lily Hamourtziadou is Senior Lecturer in Criminology with Security Studies and Deputy Course Director at Birmingham City University, and Principal Researcher of Iraq Body Count, which maintains the largest public database of violent civilian deaths.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>631</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3dfc5ca4-613a-11f0-91e2-6b98f63be44d</guid>
      <title>Simon Butt, &quot;Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia's judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia's first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto's regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879926">Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</a><em> </em>(Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. <em>Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</em> shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.</p>
<p>Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.</p>
<p><em>Professor </em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html">Michele Ford</a><em> is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia's judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia's first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto's regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879926">Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</a><em> </em>(Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. <em>Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</em> shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.</p>
<p>Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.</p>
<p><em>Professor </em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html">Michele Ford</a><em> is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35986025" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d45a621b-3272-4e8a-b49b-cfe45ade9040/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d45a621b-3272-4e8a-b49b-cfe45ade9040&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Butt, &quot;Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Indonesia&apos;s judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia&apos;s first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto&apos;s regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia (Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.

Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.

Professor Michele Ford is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Indonesia&apos;s judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia&apos;s first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto&apos;s regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia (Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.

Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.

Professor Michele Ford is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>630</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94719fc2-6009-11f0-b339-1fe80c477c6e</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Popp Berman, &quot;Thinking like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In <em>Thinking like an Economist</em>, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.</p>
<p><br />Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.<br />A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, <em>Thinking like an Economist </em>also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.</p>
<p><strong>Elizabeth Popp Berman</strong> is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of <em>Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine</em> (Princeton).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In <em>Thinking like an Economist</em>, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.</p>
<p><br />Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.<br />A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, <em>Thinking like an Economist </em>also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.</p>
<p><strong>Elizabeth Popp Berman</strong> is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of <em>Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine</em> (Princeton).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45304128" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4bfdb61b-a943-466c-b4f4-469833fb094b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4bfdb61b-a943-466c-b4f4-469833fb094b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Popp Berman, &quot;Thinking like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In Thinking like an Economist, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.

Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, Thinking like an Economist also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.

Elizabeth Popp Berman is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine (Princeton).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For decades, Democratic politicians have frustrated progressives by tinkering around the margins of policy while shying away from truly ambitious change. What happened to bold political vision on the left, and what shrunk the very horizons of possibility? In Thinking like an Economist, Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking—an “economic style of reasoning”—became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today.

Introduced by liberal technocrats who hoped to improve government, this way of thinking was grounded in economics but also transformed law and policy. At its core was an economic understanding of efficiency, and its advocates often found themselves allied with Republicans and in conflict with liberal Democrats who argued for rights, equality, and limits on corporate power. By the Carter administration, economic reasoning had spread throughout government policy and laws affecting poverty, healthcare, antitrust, transportation, and the environment. Fearing waste and overspending, liberals reined in their ambitions for decades to come, even as Reagan and his Republican successors argued for economic efficiency only when it helped their own goals.A compelling account that illuminates what brought American politics to its current state, Thinking like an Economist also offers critical lessons for the future. With the political left resurgent today, Democrats seem poised to break with the past—but doing so will require abandoning the shibboleth of economic efficiency and successfully advocating new ways of thinking about policy.

Elizabeth Popp Berman is Director and Richard H. Price Professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan and the author of Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine (Princeton).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>629</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3438a172-5ffb-11f0-9c16-e39031ede0d7</guid>
      <title>Kampung Activism in Indonesia</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>My village, my kampung. The term kampung is a Malay word, referring to a "village hamlet" or "urban informal settlement." As rapid urbanization takes place both regionally and globally, the designation of kampung accrued a negative connotation associated with impoverishment and obsolescence. However, commencing in the mid-2010s, a countermovement aimed at the revitalization of kampung emerged in Indonesia, involving locals, activists, and scholars.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Prof. Melani Budianta from the Cultural Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences about the practice of cultural studies within the Asian context, with a specific emphasis on her native Indonesia, where her dual role as an academic and activist in Kampung “commoning” has constituted a significant odyssey in the construction of knowledge. The term “commoning” refers to a collective reservoir of resources intended for community sharing in the kampung context. Professor Budianta has shared her experiences in her works titled <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2019.1650194">Smart Kampung: Doing Cultural Studies in the Global South</a> and <a href="https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/UNITAS-95-2-Budianta-Lumbung-Commoning_compressed.pdf">Lumbung Commoning: Reflections on Kampung Network Research/Activism</a>.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is <a href="http://blogs.helsinki.fi/chinastudies/team/">Professor of Chinese Studies</a> and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland). Since 2023, she has been involved in the EUVIP: <a href="https://www.euvip-project.com/">The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region</a>, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My village, my kampung. The term kampung is a Malay word, referring to a "village hamlet" or "urban informal settlement." As rapid urbanization takes place both regionally and globally, the designation of kampung accrued a negative connotation associated with impoverishment and obsolescence. However, commencing in the mid-2010s, a countermovement aimed at the revitalization of kampung emerged in Indonesia, involving locals, activists, and scholars.</p>
<p>In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Prof. Melani Budianta from the Cultural Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences about the practice of cultural studies within the Asian context, with a specific emphasis on her native Indonesia, where her dual role as an academic and activist in Kampung “commoning” has constituted a significant odyssey in the construction of knowledge. The term “commoning” refers to a collective reservoir of resources intended for community sharing in the kampung context. Professor Budianta has shared her experiences in her works titled <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420.2019.1650194">Smart Kampung: Doing Cultural Studies in the Global South</a> and <a href="https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/UNITAS-95-2-Budianta-Lumbung-Commoning_compressed.pdf">Lumbung Commoning: Reflections on Kampung Network Research/Activism</a>.</p>
<p>Julie Yu-Wen Chen is <a href="http://blogs.helsinki.fi/chinastudies/team/">Professor of Chinese Studies</a> and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland). Since 2023, she has been involved in the EUVIP: <a href="https://www.euvip-project.com/">The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region</a>, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19937513" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9d72375a-5b55-44e4-882a-07545eacc3cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9d72375a-5b55-44e4-882a-07545eacc3cd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kampung Activism in Indonesia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:20:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>My village, my kampung. The term kampung is a Malay word, referring to a &quot;village hamlet&quot; or &quot;urban informal settlement.&quot; As rapid urbanization takes place both regionally and globally, the designation of kampung accrued a negative connotation associated with impoverishment and obsolescence. However, commencing in the mid-2010s, a countermovement aimed at the revitalization of kampung emerged in Indonesia, involving locals, activists, and scholars.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Prof. Melani Budianta from the Cultural Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences about the practice of cultural studies within the Asian context, with a specific emphasis on her native Indonesia, where her dual role as an academic and activist in Kampung “commoning” has constituted a significant odyssey in the construction of knowledge. The term “commoning” refers to a collective reservoir of resources intended for community sharing in the kampung context. Professor Budianta has shared her experiences in her works titled Smart Kampung: Doing Cultural Studies in the Global South and Lumbung Commoning: Reflections on Kampung Network Research/Activism.

Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland). Since 2023, she has been involved in the EUVIP: The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>My village, my kampung. The term kampung is a Malay word, referring to a &quot;village hamlet&quot; or &quot;urban informal settlement.&quot; As rapid urbanization takes place both regionally and globally, the designation of kampung accrued a negative connotation associated with impoverishment and obsolescence. However, commencing in the mid-2010s, a countermovement aimed at the revitalization of kampung emerged in Indonesia, involving locals, activists, and scholars.

In this episode of the Nordic Asia Podcast, Prof. Julie Yu-Wen Chen from the University of Helsinki talks to Prof. Melani Budianta from the Cultural Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences about the practice of cultural studies within the Asian context, with a specific emphasis on her native Indonesia, where her dual role as an academic and activist in Kampung “commoning” has constituted a significant odyssey in the construction of knowledge. The term “commoning” refers to a collective reservoir of resources intended for community sharing in the kampung context. Professor Budianta has shared her experiences in her works titled Smart Kampung: Doing Cultural Studies in the Global South and Lumbung Commoning: Reflections on Kampung Network Research/Activism.

Julie Yu-Wen Chen is Professor of Chinese Studies and Asian studies coordinator at the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki (Finland). Since 2023, she has been involved in the EUVIP: The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e6e26aa-5e5f-11f0-b25b-0bdd569f26f7</guid>
      <title>Aggie Hirst, &quot;Politics of Play: Wargaming with the US Military&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military's strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197629208">Politics of Play</a> is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players' cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, <em>Politics of Play</em> develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military's strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197629208">Politics of Play</a> is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players' cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, <em>Politics of Play</em> develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45112309" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e570d199-7d4b-4c4f-8b94-f803181e659d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e570d199-7d4b-4c4f-8b94-f803181e659d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aggie Hirst, &quot;Politics of Play: Wargaming with the US Military&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military&apos;s strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.

Politics of Play is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players&apos; cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, Politics of Play develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A wargaming renaissance has been underway in the US military. Having proven to be the most effective recruitment tool of the 21st century, games have proliferated across all levels of the military&apos;s strategic, operational, training, and rehabilitation architecture. From board games to high-tech digital and virtual reality platforms, wargames enable milarites to learn lessons from the past, play out possible responses to current crises, and explore the effectiveness of future operations and strategies. From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Covid 19 pandemic, today wargames are a key means by which the US military--and many other militaries--make plans and fight wars.

Politics of Play is the first academic book dedicated to the US military wargaming renaissance. Grounded in 100 hours of interviews undertaken by the author during fieldwork with US military wargamers, it explores how games intervene in players&apos; cognitive and affective registers using immersion and the drive to win. In addition, Politics of Play develops a new theory of play grounded in the thought of Jacques Derrida which seeks to expose and disrupt the politics and power relations at work in the use of games to produce warfighters in the digital age.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>280</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85147d84-5de2-11f0-8233-b37fb70a8376</guid>
      <title>On Bullshit in Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691231938">On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It </a>(Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691231938">On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It </a>(Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30006110" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/539a3528-09d1-46ab-ac9e-5daee2c1c378/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=539a3528-09d1-46ab-ac9e-5daee2c1c378&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>On Bullshit in Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/539a3528-09d1-46ab-ac9e-5daee2c1c378/3000x3000/ea2a49c4e9c23e97f5c24000b77ee81a.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It (Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we’re continuing our series on philosopher Harry Frankfurt’s seminal work, On Bullshit. Our guest is Michael Patrick Lynch, Provost Professor of the Humanities and Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Michael is the author of the recently published book, On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It (Princeton University Press, 2025). The topic of our discussion today will be on bullshit in politics, and how we might think about ways to combat it.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>626</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46948e10-5df0-11f0-88ab-37550cd02050</guid>
      <title>Ignacio G. Galán, &quot;Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Along with the rise of Mussolini’s fascist regime, the interwar years in Italy also saw the widespread development of its modernist interior design and furnishing practices. While the regime’s politics were overtly manifest in monumental government architecture, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517916817">Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy</a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2025) by Dr. Ignacio G. Galán examines the subtler yet effective role of household goods and decor in the cultivation of Italy’s exclusionary sense of national identity.</p>
<p>Presenting a fresh look at the work of various architects and designers, including iconic figures such as Gio Ponti and Carlo Enrico Rava, Dr. Galán explores how seemingly neutral products of everyday life contributed to the propagation of fascist ideology. Through extensive promotion in popular magazines and department stores, on the film sets of Cinecittà Studios, and throughout the country’s colonial territories, Italy’s modernist design practices were part of a larger political project that aimed to produce a totalizing image of cultural hegemony.</p>
<p>Interweaving design theory, architectural history, and media scholarship, <em>Furnishing Fascism</em> reexamines the period’s so-called minor arts to reveal the political entanglement of modernism in early twentieth-century Italy and offers valuable insight into the complications of cultural production under the auspices of authoritarian power.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with the rise of Mussolini’s fascist regime, the interwar years in Italy also saw the widespread development of its modernist interior design and furnishing practices. While the regime’s politics were overtly manifest in monumental government architecture, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517916817">Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy</a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2025) by Dr. Ignacio G. Galán examines the subtler yet effective role of household goods and decor in the cultivation of Italy’s exclusionary sense of national identity.</p>
<p>Presenting a fresh look at the work of various architects and designers, including iconic figures such as Gio Ponti and Carlo Enrico Rava, Dr. Galán explores how seemingly neutral products of everyday life contributed to the propagation of fascist ideology. Through extensive promotion in popular magazines and department stores, on the film sets of Cinecittà Studios, and throughout the country’s colonial territories, Italy’s modernist design practices were part of a larger political project that aimed to produce a totalizing image of cultural hegemony.</p>
<p>Interweaving design theory, architectural history, and media scholarship, <em>Furnishing Fascism</em> reexamines the period’s so-called minor arts to reveal the political entanglement of modernism in early twentieth-century Italy and offers valuable insight into the complications of cultural production under the auspices of authoritarian power.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49092532" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f9ba00b8-51ab-4c5d-8fbe-6eb0b2d3aeba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f9ba00b8-51ab-4c5d-8fbe-6eb0b2d3aeba&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ignacio G. Galán, &quot;Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Along with the rise of Mussolini’s fascist regime, the interwar years in Italy also saw the widespread development of its modernist interior design and furnishing practices. While the regime’s politics were overtly manifest in monumental government architecture, Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy (University of Minnesota Press, 2025) by Dr. Ignacio G. Galán examines the subtler yet effective role of household goods and decor in the cultivation of Italy’s exclusionary sense of national identity.

Presenting a fresh look at the work of various architects and designers, including iconic figures such as Gio Ponti and Carlo Enrico Rava, Dr. Galán explores how seemingly neutral products of everyday life contributed to the propagation of fascist ideology. Through extensive promotion in popular magazines and department stores, on the film sets of Cinecittà Studios, and throughout the country’s colonial territories, Italy’s modernist design practices were part of a larger political project that aimed to produce a totalizing image of cultural hegemony.

Interweaving design theory, architectural history, and media scholarship, Furnishing Fascism reexamines the period’s so-called minor arts to reveal the political entanglement of modernism in early twentieth-century Italy and offers valuable insight into the complications of cultural production under the auspices of authoritarian power.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Along with the rise of Mussolini’s fascist regime, the interwar years in Italy also saw the widespread development of its modernist interior design and furnishing practices. While the regime’s politics were overtly manifest in monumental government architecture, Furnishing Fascism: Modernist Design and Politics in Italy (University of Minnesota Press, 2025) by Dr. Ignacio G. Galán examines the subtler yet effective role of household goods and decor in the cultivation of Italy’s exclusionary sense of national identity.

Presenting a fresh look at the work of various architects and designers, including iconic figures such as Gio Ponti and Carlo Enrico Rava, Dr. Galán explores how seemingly neutral products of everyday life contributed to the propagation of fascist ideology. Through extensive promotion in popular magazines and department stores, on the film sets of Cinecittà Studios, and throughout the country’s colonial territories, Italy’s modernist design practices were part of a larger political project that aimed to produce a totalizing image of cultural hegemony.

Interweaving design theory, architectural history, and media scholarship, Furnishing Fascism reexamines the period’s so-called minor arts to reveal the political entanglement of modernism in early twentieth-century Italy and offers valuable insight into the complications of cultural production under the auspices of authoritarian power.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>625</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d664c62-5e99-11f0-9eef-6bf30826f2f3</guid>
      <title>Noëlle McAfee, &quot;Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his classic essay on the fear of breakdown, Donald Winnicott famously conveys to a patient that the disaster powerfully feared has, in fact, already happened. Taking her cue from Winnicott,<a href="http://philosophy.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/mcafee-noelle.html"> Noëlle McAfee</a>’s <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/023119269X/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Columbia University Press, 2019), explores the implications of breakdown fears for the practice of democracy.</p><p>Democracy, as you may dimly recall, demands the capacity to bear difference, tolerate loss, and to speak into the unknown. Meanwhile we have come to live in a world where, if my clinical practice and personal life are any indication, people often prefer writing to speaking. Patients who want to make a schedule change--never a neutral event in psychoanalysis—write me. I say, addressing the resistance, “This is a talking cure. Get your money’s worth. Speak!” Among intimates, bad news is something I too often read about. I surmise that in speaking desire or conveying pain, a fantasized recipient is sought, an ideal listener, who, like a blow up doll lover can be invoked, controlled and then deflated at will.</p><p>Circling back to difference and loss, ideas that do not mirror our already existing thoughts find themselves batted out of the park to an elsewhere not worth enunciating. Cultivating a protective bubble—such a heartbreak right?  It seems there is something about democracy that frightens the shit out of us.</p><p>Deploying the work of Winnicott, Klein, Green and Kristeva, Mcafee reminds us of our original loss—what she calls “plenum”. That loss, to the degree it is recognized, initiates our undoing. Mother’s other—be it her lover, her piano lessons, a visit to the dentist for a cavity—tears a hole in our emotional shield. In her wake, we cling to seemingly strong leaders, a father, or failing that potent ideologies reeking of misogyny, all the while hoping for compensation for an unfathomable loss.</p><p>Embedded within democracy lies the demand that we see other than ourselves. This demand challenges the thin-skinned among us. And all of us are thin-skinned from time to time. How to manage?</p><p>Mcafee adds her voice to the popular chorus of those practicing applied psychoanalysis and suggests we embrace mourning. It is an inarguable position yet also nice work if you can get it! Of course, with the original disaster elided, like sleepwalkers in our night fog, we will helplessly seek it out; worse, we will make it manifest, with a vengeance. What is not remembered gets repeated. Trapped in America, as I am, one wonders about democracy. What might lure us to revisit the sight of the disaster, “the thing itself’,” to quote Adrienne Rich, “and not the myth?”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his classic essay on the fear of breakdown, Donald Winnicott famously conveys to a patient that the disaster powerfully feared has, in fact, already happened. Taking her cue from Winnicott,<a href="http://philosophy.emory.edu/home/people/faculty/mcafee-noelle.html"> Noëlle McAfee</a>’s <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/023119269X/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Columbia University Press, 2019), explores the implications of breakdown fears for the practice of democracy.</p><p>Democracy, as you may dimly recall, demands the capacity to bear difference, tolerate loss, and to speak into the unknown. Meanwhile we have come to live in a world where, if my clinical practice and personal life are any indication, people often prefer writing to speaking. Patients who want to make a schedule change--never a neutral event in psychoanalysis—write me. I say, addressing the resistance, “This is a talking cure. Get your money’s worth. Speak!” Among intimates, bad news is something I too often read about. I surmise that in speaking desire or conveying pain, a fantasized recipient is sought, an ideal listener, who, like a blow up doll lover can be invoked, controlled and then deflated at will.</p><p>Circling back to difference and loss, ideas that do not mirror our already existing thoughts find themselves batted out of the park to an elsewhere not worth enunciating. Cultivating a protective bubble—such a heartbreak right?  It seems there is something about democracy that frightens the shit out of us.</p><p>Deploying the work of Winnicott, Klein, Green and Kristeva, Mcafee reminds us of our original loss—what she calls “plenum”. That loss, to the degree it is recognized, initiates our undoing. Mother’s other—be it her lover, her piano lessons, a visit to the dentist for a cavity—tears a hole in our emotional shield. In her wake, we cling to seemingly strong leaders, a father, or failing that potent ideologies reeking of misogyny, all the while hoping for compensation for an unfathomable loss.</p><p>Embedded within democracy lies the demand that we see other than ourselves. This demand challenges the thin-skinned among us. And all of us are thin-skinned from time to time. How to manage?</p><p>Mcafee adds her voice to the popular chorus of those practicing applied psychoanalysis and suggests we embrace mourning. It is an inarguable position yet also nice work if you can get it! Of course, with the original disaster elided, like sleepwalkers in our night fog, we will helplessly seek it out; worse, we will make it manifest, with a vengeance. What is not remembered gets repeated. Trapped in America, as I am, one wonders about democracy. What might lure us to revisit the sight of the disaster, “the thing itself’,” to quote Adrienne Rich, “and not the myth?”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52244044" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/365e3df3-51f4-4e0a-b579-333d20f94d95/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=365e3df3-51f4-4e0a-b579-333d20f94d95&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Noëlle McAfee, &quot;Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his classic essay on the fear of breakdown, Donald Winnicott famously conveys to a patient that the disaster powerfully feared has, in fact, already happened. Taking her cue from Winnicott, Noëlle McAfee’s Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics (Columbia University Press, 2019), explores the implications of breakdown fears for the practice of democracy.
Democracy, as you may dimly recall, demands the capacity to bear difference, tolerate loss, and to speak into the unknown. Meanwhile we have come to live in a world where, if my clinical practice and personal life are any indication, people often prefer writing to speaking. Patients who want to make a schedule change--never a neutral event in psychoanalysis—write me. I say, addressing the resistance, “This is a talking cure. Get your money’s worth. Speak!” Among intimates, bad news is something I too often read about. I surmise that in speaking desire or conveying pain, a fantasized recipient is sought, an ideal listener, who, like a blow up doll lover can be invoked, controlled and then deflated at will.
Circling back to difference and loss, ideas that do not mirror our already existing thoughts find themselves batted out of the park to an elsewhere not worth enunciating. Cultivating a protective bubble—such a heartbreak right?  It seems there is something about democracy that frightens the shit out of us.
Deploying the work of Winnicott, Klein, Green and Kristeva, Mcafee reminds us of our original loss—what she calls “plenum”. That loss, to the degree it is recognized, initiates our undoing. Mother’s other—be it her lover, her piano lessons, a visit to the dentist for a cavity—tears a hole in our emotional shield. In her wake, we cling to seemingly strong leaders, a father, or failing that potent ideologies reeking of misogyny, all the while hoping for compensation for an unfathomable loss.
Embedded within democracy lies the demand that we see other than ourselves. This demand challenges the thin-skinned among us. And all of us are thin-skinned from time to time. How to manage?
Mcafee adds her voice to the popular chorus of those practicing applied psychoanalysis and suggests we embrace mourning. It is an inarguable position yet also nice work if you can get it! Of course, with the original disaster elided, like sleepwalkers in our night fog, we will helplessly seek it out; worse, we will make it manifest, with a vengeance. What is not remembered gets repeated. Trapped in America, as I am, one wonders about democracy. What might lure us to revisit the sight of the disaster, “the thing itself’,” to quote Adrienne Rich, “and not the myth?”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his classic essay on the fear of breakdown, Donald Winnicott famously conveys to a patient that the disaster powerfully feared has, in fact, already happened. Taking her cue from Winnicott, Noëlle McAfee’s Fear of Breakdown: Psychoanalysis and Politics (Columbia University Press, 2019), explores the implications of breakdown fears for the practice of democracy.
Democracy, as you may dimly recall, demands the capacity to bear difference, tolerate loss, and to speak into the unknown. Meanwhile we have come to live in a world where, if my clinical practice and personal life are any indication, people often prefer writing to speaking. Patients who want to make a schedule change--never a neutral event in psychoanalysis—write me. I say, addressing the resistance, “This is a talking cure. Get your money’s worth. Speak!” Among intimates, bad news is something I too often read about. I surmise that in speaking desire or conveying pain, a fantasized recipient is sought, an ideal listener, who, like a blow up doll lover can be invoked, controlled and then deflated at will.
Circling back to difference and loss, ideas that do not mirror our already existing thoughts find themselves batted out of the park to an elsewhere not worth enunciating. Cultivating a protective bubble—such a heartbreak right?  It seems there is something about democracy that frightens the shit out of us.
Deploying the work of Winnicott, Klein, Green and Kristeva, Mcafee reminds us of our original loss—what she calls “plenum”. That loss, to the degree it is recognized, initiates our undoing. Mother’s other—be it her lover, her piano lessons, a visit to the dentist for a cavity—tears a hole in our emotional shield. In her wake, we cling to seemingly strong leaders, a father, or failing that potent ideologies reeking of misogyny, all the while hoping for compensation for an unfathomable loss.
Embedded within democracy lies the demand that we see other than ourselves. This demand challenges the thin-skinned among us. And all of us are thin-skinned from time to time. How to manage?
Mcafee adds her voice to the popular chorus of those practicing applied psychoanalysis and suggests we embrace mourning. It is an inarguable position yet also nice work if you can get it! Of course, with the original disaster elided, like sleepwalkers in our night fog, we will helplessly seek it out; worse, we will make it manifest, with a vengeance. What is not remembered gets repeated. Trapped in America, as I am, one wonders about democracy. What might lure us to revisit the sight of the disaster, “the thing itself’,” to quote Adrienne Rich, “and not the myth?”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>130</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14aa571e-50d4-11f0-ae6f-632fa3c446d8</guid>
      <title>Ali Aslam, David W. McIvor, and Joel Alden Schlosser, &quot;Earthborn Democracy: A Political Theory of Entangled Life&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ecological crises threaten all forms of life on earth. Democracy too is endangered, as popular discontent, elite malfeasance, and unresponsive institutions imperil its survival. Present political concepts have proven inadequate to meeting these challenges, and their inadequacies are themselves symptoms of the failures of prevailing political, cultural, and ecological stories and practices.<br />This book offers a new vision of ecological and participatory democratic life for a time of crisis. Identifying myth and ritual as key resources for contemporary politics, <em>Earthborn Democracy</em> excavates practices and narratives that illustrate the interdependence necessary to inspire ecological renewal. It tells stories of multispecies agency and egalitarian political organization across history, from ancient Mesopotamia and the precolonial Americas to contemporary social movements, emphasizing Indigenous traditions and resistance. Resonating across these practices and stories past and present is a belief that we are all―human as well as nonhuman―earthborn, and this can serve as the basis for reimagining democracy. Allying visionary political theory with environmental activism, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231216425"><em>Earthborn Democracy﻿: A Political Theory of Entangled Life</em> </a>(Columbia UP, 2024) provides a foundation and a guide for collective action in pursuit of earthly flourishing.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ecological crises threaten all forms of life on earth. Democracy too is endangered, as popular discontent, elite malfeasance, and unresponsive institutions imperil its survival. Present political concepts have proven inadequate to meeting these challenges, and their inadequacies are themselves symptoms of the failures of prevailing political, cultural, and ecological stories and practices.<br />This book offers a new vision of ecological and participatory democratic life for a time of crisis. Identifying myth and ritual as key resources for contemporary politics, <em>Earthborn Democracy</em> excavates practices and narratives that illustrate the interdependence necessary to inspire ecological renewal. It tells stories of multispecies agency and egalitarian political organization across history, from ancient Mesopotamia and the precolonial Americas to contemporary social movements, emphasizing Indigenous traditions and resistance. Resonating across these practices and stories past and present is a belief that we are all―human as well as nonhuman―earthborn, and this can serve as the basis for reimagining democracy. Allying visionary political theory with environmental activism, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231216425"><em>Earthborn Democracy﻿: A Political Theory of Entangled Life</em> </a>(Columbia UP, 2024) provides a foundation and a guide for collective action in pursuit of earthly flourishing.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46655592" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/002bd158-2f26-4c55-87ef-f3c278f2e1db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=002bd158-2f26-4c55-87ef-f3c278f2e1db&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ali Aslam, David W. McIvor, and Joel Alden Schlosser, &quot;Earthborn Democracy: A Political Theory of Entangled Life&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ecological crises threaten all forms of life on earth. Democracy too is endangered, as popular discontent, elite malfeasance, and unresponsive institutions imperil its survival. Present political concepts have proven inadequate to meeting these challenges, and their inadequacies are themselves symptoms of the failures of prevailing political, cultural, and ecological stories and practices.This book offers a new vision of ecological and participatory democratic life for a time of crisis. Identifying myth and ritual as key resources for contemporary politics, Earthborn Democracy excavates practices and narratives that illustrate the interdependence necessary to inspire ecological renewal. It tells stories of multispecies agency and egalitarian political organization across history, from ancient Mesopotamia and the precolonial Americas to contemporary social movements, emphasizing Indigenous traditions and resistance. Resonating across these practices and stories past and present is a belief that we are all―human as well as nonhuman―earthborn, and this can serve as the basis for reimagining democracy. Allying visionary political theory with environmental activism, Earthborn Democracy﻿: A Political Theory of Entangled Life (Columbia UP, 2024) provides a foundation and a guide for collective action in pursuit of earthly flourishing.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ecological crises threaten all forms of life on earth. Democracy too is endangered, as popular discontent, elite malfeasance, and unresponsive institutions imperil its survival. Present political concepts have proven inadequate to meeting these challenges, and their inadequacies are themselves symptoms of the failures of prevailing political, cultural, and ecological stories and practices.This book offers a new vision of ecological and participatory democratic life for a time of crisis. Identifying myth and ritual as key resources for contemporary politics, Earthborn Democracy excavates practices and narratives that illustrate the interdependence necessary to inspire ecological renewal. It tells stories of multispecies agency and egalitarian political organization across history, from ancient Mesopotamia and the precolonial Americas to contemporary social movements, emphasizing Indigenous traditions and resistance. Resonating across these practices and stories past and present is a belief that we are all―human as well as nonhuman―earthborn, and this can serve as the basis for reimagining democracy. Allying visionary political theory with environmental activism, Earthborn Democracy﻿: A Political Theory of Entangled Life (Columbia UP, 2024) provides a foundation and a guide for collective action in pursuit of earthly flourishing.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>623</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5ed5c600-5bc1-11f0-8570-0bfaed51903e</guid>
      <title>Siri Schwabe, &quot;Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Two juxtaposed years frame the subject matter of <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/moving-memory-remembering-palestine-in-post-dictatorship-chile-siri-schwabe/18712416"><em>Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile</em></a>. In one, 1973, General Augusto Pinochet’s troops stormed Chile’s presidential palace. In the other, 1948, Zionist militias expelled hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homeland. That 1973 should move memories in Chile is obvious. That 1948 does is because Chile is home to the largest number of Palestinians outside the Middle East. Yet, while most are descended from people who migrated prior to the expulsion, 1948 and its consequences are what move Chilean Palestinians to act together politically, whereas 1973 divides them. In this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, <a href="https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/en/persons/siri-agnete-schwabe-2">Siri Shwabe</a> discusses how her ethnographic research in Santiago explored the paradoxical relationship between the movement of two collective memories of violence and dispossession: an ambivalent one in the recent lived past, and the other residing in a distant land and the struggle for survival of an expelled and relentlessly attacked people whose trauma the diaspora adopts and differently experiences.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> Why not check out others on the New Books Network, including Kevin Funk talking about <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rooted-globalism"><em>Rooted Globalism: Arab–Latin American Business Elites and the Politics of Global Imaginaries</em></a>, or Tahrir Hamdi on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/imagining-palestine"><em>Imagining Palestine: Cultures of Exile and National Identity</em></a>.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Looking for something to read? </strong>Siri recommends<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/vibrant-matter-a-political-ecology-of-things-jane-bennett/10894670"><em>Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things</em></a> by Jane Bennett.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two juxtaposed years frame the subject matter of <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/moving-memory-remembering-palestine-in-post-dictatorship-chile-siri-schwabe/18712416"><em>Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile</em></a>. In one, 1973, General Augusto Pinochet’s troops stormed Chile’s presidential palace. In the other, 1948, Zionist militias expelled hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homeland. That 1973 should move memories in Chile is obvious. That 1948 does is because Chile is home to the largest number of Palestinians outside the Middle East. Yet, while most are descended from people who migrated prior to the expulsion, 1948 and its consequences are what move Chilean Palestinians to act together politically, whereas 1973 divides them. In this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, <a href="https://researchprofiles.ku.dk/en/persons/siri-agnete-schwabe-2">Siri Shwabe</a> discusses how her ethnographic research in Santiago explored the paradoxical relationship between the movement of two collective memories of violence and dispossession: an ambivalent one in the recent lived past, and the other residing in a distant land and the struggle for survival of an expelled and relentlessly attacked people whose trauma the diaspora adopts and differently experiences.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> Why not check out others on the New Books Network, including Kevin Funk talking about <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rooted-globalism"><em>Rooted Globalism: Arab–Latin American Business Elites and the Politics of Global Imaginaries</em></a>, or Tahrir Hamdi on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/imagining-palestine"><em>Imagining Palestine: Cultures of Exile and National Identity</em></a>.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>Looking for something to read? </strong>Siri recommends<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/vibrant-matter-a-political-ecology-of-things-jane-bennett/10894670"><em>Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things</em></a> by Jane Bennett.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45343916" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f386ba90-8f97-4edb-8c13-78ef03b9c526/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f386ba90-8f97-4edb-8c13-78ef03b9c526&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Siri Schwabe, &quot;Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two juxtaposed years frame the subject matter of Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile. In one, 1973, General Augusto Pinochet’s troops stormed Chile’s presidential palace. In the other, 1948, Zionist militias expelled hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homeland. That 1973 should move memories in Chile is obvious. That 1948 does is because Chile is home to the largest number of Palestinians outside the Middle East. Yet, while most are descended from people who migrated prior to the expulsion, 1948 and its consequences are what move Chilean Palestinians to act together politically, whereas 1973 divides them. In this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, Siri Shwabe discusses how her ethnographic research in Santiago explored the paradoxical relationship between the movement of two collective memories of violence and dispossession: an ambivalent one in the recent lived past, and the other residing in a distant land and the struggle for survival of an expelled and relentlessly attacked people whose trauma the diaspora adopts and differently experiences.



Like this episode? Why not check out others on the New Books Network, including Kevin Funk talking about Rooted Globalism: Arab–Latin American Business Elites and the Politics of Global Imaginaries, or Tahrir Hamdi on Imagining Palestine: Cultures of Exile and National Identity.



Looking for something to read? Siri recommendsVibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things by Jane Bennett.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two juxtaposed years frame the subject matter of Moving Memory: Remembering Palestine in Postdictatorship Chile. In one, 1973, General Augusto Pinochet’s troops stormed Chile’s presidential palace. In the other, 1948, Zionist militias expelled hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homeland. That 1973 should move memories in Chile is obvious. That 1948 does is because Chile is home to the largest number of Palestinians outside the Middle East. Yet, while most are descended from people who migrated prior to the expulsion, 1948 and its consequences are what move Chilean Palestinians to act together politically, whereas 1973 divides them. In this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, Siri Shwabe discusses how her ethnographic research in Santiago explored the paradoxical relationship between the movement of two collective memories of violence and dispossession: an ambivalent one in the recent lived past, and the other residing in a distant land and the struggle for survival of an expelled and relentlessly attacked people whose trauma the diaspora adopts and differently experiences.



Like this episode? Why not check out others on the New Books Network, including Kevin Funk talking about Rooted Globalism: Arab–Latin American Business Elites and the Politics of Global Imaginaries, or Tahrir Hamdi on Imagining Palestine: Cultures of Exile and National Identity.



Looking for something to read? Siri recommendsVibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things by Jane Bennett.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>622</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8af28832-5b16-11f0-bc02-fb3f93312470</guid>
      <title>Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law – a Conversation with Dr. Martin Lavicka</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does the 'rule of law' really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?</p>
<p><a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/tabita-rosendal-ebbesen">Dr. Tabita Rosendal</a> from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka">Dr. Martin Lavicka</a> is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.</p>
<p>Episode producer: <a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/julia-olsson">Julia Olsson</a></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka">ResearchGate profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://upol.academia.edu/MartinLavicka">AcademiaEdu profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390475838_Rule_of_Law_with_Chinese_Characteristics_A_Contested_Landscape">Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”</a></p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
  <li>Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
  <li>Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
  <li>Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
  <li>Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
  <li>Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul>
<p>This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the 'rule of law' really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?</p>
<p><a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/tabita-rosendal-ebbesen">Dr. Tabita Rosendal</a> from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka">Dr. Martin Lavicka</a> is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.</p>
<p>Episode producer: <a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/julia-olsson">Julia Olsson</a></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka">ResearchGate profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://upol.academia.edu/MartinLavicka">AcademiaEdu profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390475838_Rule_of_Law_with_Chinese_Characteristics_A_Contested_Landscape">Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”</a></p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
  <li>Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
  <li>Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
  <li>Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
  <li>Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
  <li>Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul>
<p>This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22456107" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/62a50f9c-5903-482e-88fa-22d40f2e3218/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=62a50f9c-5903-482e-88fa-22d40f2e3218&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law – a Conversation with Dr. Martin Lavicka</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the &apos;rule of law&apos; really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?

Dr. Tabita Rosendal from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.

Dr. Martin Lavicka is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Episode producer: Julia Olsson

Links:

ResearchGate profile

AcademiaEdu profile

Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:


  Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)

  Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)

  Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

  Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)

  Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)

  Norwegian Network for Asian Studies


This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the &apos;rule of law&apos; really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?

Dr. Tabita Rosendal from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.

Dr. Martin Lavicka is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Episode producer: Julia Olsson

Links:

ResearchGate profile

AcademiaEdu profile

Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”

The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:


  Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)

  Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)

  Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

  Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)

  Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)

  Norwegian Network for Asian Studies


This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>621</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">196e612c-5b7f-11f0-8a88-1f4d4f010cce</guid>
      <title>Genocide Studies International Partners with New Books Network</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m thrilled to announce a new partnership with <a href="https://www.genocidestudies.org/gsi-journal">Genocide Studies International</a>. GSI is one of the preeminent journals in the field of Genocide Studies. Published by the University of Toronto Press and housed in the <a href="https://zoryaninstitute.org/">Zoryan Institute</a>, GSI is dedicated to “to raising knowledge and awareness among scholars, policy makers, and civil society actors by providing a forum for the critical analysis of genocide, human rights, crimes against humanity, and related mass atrocities.”</p>
<p>With this new partnership, I’ll be bringing you interviews with the editors and authors of cutting-edge articles and special editions on the journal. This isn’t new—we’ve done this with several other journals before. But by formalizing our partnership, we hope you’ll have more access to the best recent research and analysis on the causes, course and consequences of mass atrocity violence. It’s a partnership that enriches both organizations.</p>
<p>In a few weeks, you’ll hear from Alex Alvarez, the editor of a new special issue on genocide education. But first I got a chance to talk with Henry Thierault, one of the editors of the journal, and Megan Reid, Deputy Executive Director of the Zoryan Institute. We discuss the editorial vision of the journal, the Zoryan Institute’s role in genocide education and prevention, and the reasons we’re so excited about the partnership. I hope you enjoy our discussion.</p>
<p><em>Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m thrilled to announce a new partnership with <a href="https://www.genocidestudies.org/gsi-journal">Genocide Studies International</a>. GSI is one of the preeminent journals in the field of Genocide Studies. Published by the University of Toronto Press and housed in the <a href="https://zoryaninstitute.org/">Zoryan Institute</a>, GSI is dedicated to “to raising knowledge and awareness among scholars, policy makers, and civil society actors by providing a forum for the critical analysis of genocide, human rights, crimes against humanity, and related mass atrocities.”</p>
<p>With this new partnership, I’ll be bringing you interviews with the editors and authors of cutting-edge articles and special editions on the journal. This isn’t new—we’ve done this with several other journals before. But by formalizing our partnership, we hope you’ll have more access to the best recent research and analysis on the causes, course and consequences of mass atrocity violence. It’s a partnership that enriches both organizations.</p>
<p>In a few weeks, you’ll hear from Alex Alvarez, the editor of a new special issue on genocide education. But first I got a chance to talk with Henry Thierault, one of the editors of the journal, and Megan Reid, Deputy Executive Director of the Zoryan Institute. We discuss the editorial vision of the journal, the Zoryan Institute’s role in genocide education and prevention, and the reasons we’re so excited about the partnership. I hope you enjoy our discussion.</p>
<p><em>Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34279948" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1157b8a9-20cb-4fac-abe8-f50c630621eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1157b8a9-20cb-4fac-abe8-f50c630621eb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Genocide Studies International Partners with New Books Network</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m thrilled to announce a new partnership with Genocide Studies International. GSI is one of the preeminent journals in the field of Genocide Studies. Published by the University of Toronto Press and housed in the Zoryan Institute, GSI is dedicated to “to raising knowledge and awareness among scholars, policy makers, and civil society actors by providing a forum for the critical analysis of genocide, human rights, crimes against humanity, and related mass atrocities.”

With this new partnership, I’ll be bringing you interviews with the editors and authors of cutting-edge articles and special editions on the journal. This isn’t new—we’ve done this with several other journals before. But by formalizing our partnership, we hope you’ll have more access to the best recent research and analysis on the causes, course and consequences of mass atrocity violence. It’s a partnership that enriches both organizations.

In a few weeks, you’ll hear from Alex Alvarez, the editor of a new special issue on genocide education. But first I got a chance to talk with Henry Thierault, one of the editors of the journal, and Megan Reid, Deputy Executive Director of the Zoryan Institute. We discuss the editorial vision of the journal, the Zoryan Institute’s role in genocide education and prevention, and the reasons we’re so excited about the partnership. I hope you enjoy our discussion.

Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m thrilled to announce a new partnership with Genocide Studies International. GSI is one of the preeminent journals in the field of Genocide Studies. Published by the University of Toronto Press and housed in the Zoryan Institute, GSI is dedicated to “to raising knowledge and awareness among scholars, policy makers, and civil society actors by providing a forum for the critical analysis of genocide, human rights, crimes against humanity, and related mass atrocities.”

With this new partnership, I’ll be bringing you interviews with the editors and authors of cutting-edge articles and special editions on the journal. This isn’t new—we’ve done this with several other journals before. But by formalizing our partnership, we hope you’ll have more access to the best recent research and analysis on the causes, course and consequences of mass atrocity violence. It’s a partnership that enriches both organizations.

In a few weeks, you’ll hear from Alex Alvarez, the editor of a new special issue on genocide education. But first I got a chance to talk with Henry Thierault, one of the editors of the journal, and Megan Reid, Deputy Executive Director of the Zoryan Institute. We discuss the editorial vision of the journal, the Zoryan Institute’s role in genocide education and prevention, and the reasons we’re so excited about the partnership. I hope you enjoy our discussion.

Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>620</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8538e35e-57bb-11f0-859e-5fa12428859e</guid>
      <title>Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the CEU Review of Books Podcast I sat down with Dr Doina Anca Cretu to talk about her first book, <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/history/foreign-aid-and-state-building-interwar-romania"><em>Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania: In Quest of an Ideal</em></a>, published by Stanford University Press. In the podcast we talk about Anca’s academic background, how she came to research foreign aid in Romania, any surprises she encountered during her research, the nature of foreign aid in interwar Romania, and how to approach publishing a first monograph.</p>
<p>The CEU Review of Books Podcast Series explores the questions that affect us all through in-depth talks with researchers, policy makers, journalists, academics and others. We bring the most current research linked to Central Europe through these discussions.</p>
<p>At the CEU Review of Books, we encourage an open discussion that challenges conventional assumptions to foster a vibrant debate.</p>
<p>Visit our <a href="http://www.ceureviewofbooks.com/">website</a> to read our latest reviews, long reads and interviews.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the CEU Review of Books Podcast I sat down with Dr Doina Anca Cretu to talk about her first book, <a href="https://www.sup.org/books/history/foreign-aid-and-state-building-interwar-romania"><em>Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania: In Quest of an Ideal</em></a>, published by Stanford University Press. In the podcast we talk about Anca’s academic background, how she came to research foreign aid in Romania, any surprises she encountered during her research, the nature of foreign aid in interwar Romania, and how to approach publishing a first monograph.</p>
<p>The CEU Review of Books Podcast Series explores the questions that affect us all through in-depth talks with researchers, policy makers, journalists, academics and others. We bring the most current research linked to Central Europe through these discussions.</p>
<p>At the CEU Review of Books, we encourage an open discussion that challenges conventional assumptions to foster a vibrant debate.</p>
<p>Visit our <a href="http://www.ceureviewofbooks.com/">website</a> to read our latest reviews, long reads and interviews.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29442853" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/74f84551-2acb-40a9-bd05-e95a6b2895ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=74f84551-2acb-40a9-bd05-e95a6b2895ac&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/74f84551-2acb-40a9-bd05-e95a6b2895ac/3000x3000/aa34643a63ddafd42dab4a8f0f746375.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of the CEU Review of Books Podcast I sat down with Dr Doina Anca Cretu to talk about her first book, Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania: In Quest of an Ideal, published by Stanford University Press. In the podcast we talk about Anca’s academic background, how she came to research foreign aid in Romania, any surprises she encountered during her research, the nature of foreign aid in interwar Romania, and how to approach publishing a first monograph.

The CEU Review of Books Podcast Series explores the questions that affect us all through in-depth talks with researchers, policy makers, journalists, academics and others. We bring the most current research linked to Central Europe through these discussions.

At the CEU Review of Books, we encourage an open discussion that challenges conventional assumptions to foster a vibrant debate.

Visit our website to read our latest reviews, long reads and interviews.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of the CEU Review of Books Podcast I sat down with Dr Doina Anca Cretu to talk about her first book, Foreign Aid and State Building in Interwar Romania: In Quest of an Ideal, published by Stanford University Press. In the podcast we talk about Anca’s academic background, how she came to research foreign aid in Romania, any surprises she encountered during her research, the nature of foreign aid in interwar Romania, and how to approach publishing a first monograph.

The CEU Review of Books Podcast Series explores the questions that affect us all through in-depth talks with researchers, policy makers, journalists, academics and others. We bring the most current research linked to Central Europe through these discussions.

At the CEU Review of Books, we encourage an open discussion that challenges conventional assumptions to foster a vibrant debate.

Visit our website to read our latest reviews, long reads and interviews.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>619</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e573408-57b9-11f0-86f4-db0a105de264</guid>
      <title>Didi Kuo, &quot;The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664193">The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don't</a><em> (</em>Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.</p>
<p>Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a "good" political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?</p>
<p><em>The Great Retreat</em> explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.</p>
<p>For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, <em>The Great Retreat </em>provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.</p>
<p>Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664193">The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don't</a><em> (</em>Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.</p>
<p>Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a "good" political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?</p>
<p><em>The Great Retreat</em> explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.</p>
<p>For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, <em>The Great Retreat </em>provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.</p>
<p>Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51296337" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b79f898d-8a61-4cea-8089-1e7377f05577/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b79f898d-8a61-4cea-8089-1e7377f05577&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Didi Kuo, &quot;The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.

Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a &quot;good&quot; political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?

The Great Retreat explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.

For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, The Great Retreat provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.

Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the crisis of democratic capitalism sweeps the globe, The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don&apos;t (Oxford University Press, 2025) makes the controversial argument that what democracies require most are stronger political parties that serve as intermediaries between citizens and governments.

Once a centralizing force of the democratic process, political parties have eroded over the past fifty years. Parties now rank among the most unpopular institutions in society--less trusted than business, the police, and the media. Identification with parties has plummeted, and even those who are loyal to a party report feeling that parties care more about special interests than about regular citizens. What does a &quot;good&quot; political party look like? Why do we urgently need them? And how do we get them?

The Great Retreat explores the development of political parties as democracy expanded across the West in the nineteenth century. It focuses in particular on mass parties, and the ways they served as intermediaries that fostered ties between citizens and governments. While parties have become professionalized and nationalized, they have lost the robust organizational density that made them effective representatives. After the Cold War, a neoliberal economic consensus, changes to campaign finance, and shifting party priorities weakened the party systems of Western democracies. As Didi Kuo argues, this erosion of political parties has contributed to the recent crisis of democratic capitalism, as weak parties have ceded governance to the private sector.

For democracy to adapt to a new era of global capitalism, Kuo makes the case that we need strong intermediaries like mass parties--socially embedded institutions with deep connections to communities and citizens. Parties are essential to long-term democratic stability and economic growth, while the breakdown of party systems, on the other hand, has historically led to democratic collapse. As trust in political parties has plummeted, The Great Retreat provides a powerful defense of political parties--for without parties, democratic representation is impossible.

Didi Kuo is Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>618</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8d78460-56be-11f0-87e5-9362d44c62fa</guid>
      <title>Angela Katrina Lewis-Maddox ed., &quot;Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline&quot; (SUNY Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Angela K. Lewis-Maddox has pulled together an important and useful edited volume focusing on black women political scientists and their experiences in the discipline itself and in studying topics that include race and gender. Political Science, as a discipline, is a bit more than 100 years old, and studies politics, power, institutions, policy, methodology, and theory. These are the over-arching umbrellas within the discipline and many of the specific areas within political science take up questions that are connected to these broad concepts. As with many dimensions of our society, race and gender play a role in the discipline itself and in what we study as political scientists. But race and gender have also been considered tertiary issues within the discipline in terms of research.</p>
<p><a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline</em></a> (SUNY Press, 2025) ﻿is both autobiographical for some of the contributors as well as a rigorous interrogation of political science as a discipline. Lewis-Maddox has assembled a group of scholars across rank and position, region and geography, kinds of institutions, and scholarly emphasis. This diverse assembly of contributors have reflected on their particular experience within political science and have written about that experience from a variety of perspectives and approaches. This is a rich and deep study of those who have found themselves to be “space invaders”—black women in spaces and places that are not designed for them. These women all bring the experience of interposing themselves in a place or in places where they are not accepted. And yet they have also persevered in these spaces, in institutions, and within the discipline, and they have considered how they operate professionally and personally in “hostile” territory. Part of the thrust of <a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science</em></a> is to encourage the reimagining of political science as a discipline, to challenge the norms and expectations that have remained in place for over a century.</p>
<p>Angela K. Lewis-Maddox and her assembly of contributing authors have done a great service to the discipline of Political Science in publishing these analyses and considerations. <a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline</em></a> is shining a light on those who have often been obscured within the boundaries of the academic discipline—either because of who they are or because of what they study. Political Science is truly an expansive discipline, and to understand the world in which we live, individuals or groups should not be marginalized or erased, but re-centered and engaged. This book goes far in helping to refocus and consider otherwise obscured dimensions of political science and political scientists.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Angela K. Lewis-Maddox has pulled together an important and useful edited volume focusing on black women political scientists and their experiences in the discipline itself and in studying topics that include race and gender. Political Science, as a discipline, is a bit more than 100 years old, and studies politics, power, institutions, policy, methodology, and theory. These are the over-arching umbrellas within the discipline and many of the specific areas within political science take up questions that are connected to these broad concepts. As with many dimensions of our society, race and gender play a role in the discipline itself and in what we study as political scientists. But race and gender have also been considered tertiary issues within the discipline in terms of research.</p>
<p><a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline</em></a> (SUNY Press, 2025) ﻿is both autobiographical for some of the contributors as well as a rigorous interrogation of political science as a discipline. Lewis-Maddox has assembled a group of scholars across rank and position, region and geography, kinds of institutions, and scholarly emphasis. This diverse assembly of contributors have reflected on their particular experience within political science and have written about that experience from a variety of perspectives and approaches. This is a rich and deep study of those who have found themselves to be “space invaders”—black women in spaces and places that are not designed for them. These women all bring the experience of interposing themselves in a place or in places where they are not accepted. And yet they have also persevered in these spaces, in institutions, and within the discipline, and they have considered how they operate professionally and personally in “hostile” territory. Part of the thrust of <a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science</em></a> is to encourage the reimagining of political science as a discipline, to challenge the norms and expectations that have remained in place for over a century.</p>
<p>Angela K. Lewis-Maddox and her assembly of contributing authors have done a great service to the discipline of Political Science in publishing these analyses and considerations. <a href="https://sunypress.edu/Books/D/Disrupting-Political-Science2"><em>Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline</em></a> is shining a light on those who have often been obscured within the boundaries of the academic discipline—either because of who they are or because of what they study. Political Science is truly an expansive discipline, and to understand the world in which we live, individuals or groups should not be marginalized or erased, but re-centered and engaged. This book goes far in helping to refocus and consider otherwise obscured dimensions of political science and political scientists.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45442749" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a35183fd-bf8c-4d3a-aa82-aab35af8ea11/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a35183fd-bf8c-4d3a-aa82-aab35af8ea11&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Angela Katrina Lewis-Maddox ed., &quot;Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline&quot; (SUNY Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Angela K. Lewis-Maddox has pulled together an important and useful edited volume focusing on black women political scientists and their experiences in the discipline itself and in studying topics that include race and gender. Political Science, as a discipline, is a bit more than 100 years old, and studies politics, power, institutions, policy, methodology, and theory. These are the over-arching umbrellas within the discipline and many of the specific areas within political science take up questions that are connected to these broad concepts. As with many dimensions of our society, race and gender play a role in the discipline itself and in what we study as political scientists. But race and gender have also been considered tertiary issues within the discipline in terms of research.

Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline (SUNY Press, 2025) ﻿is both autobiographical for some of the contributors as well as a rigorous interrogation of political science as a discipline. Lewis-Maddox has assembled a group of scholars across rank and position, region and geography, kinds of institutions, and scholarly emphasis. This diverse assembly of contributors have reflected on their particular experience within political science and have written about that experience from a variety of perspectives and approaches. This is a rich and deep study of those who have found themselves to be “space invaders”—black women in spaces and places that are not designed for them. These women all bring the experience of interposing themselves in a place or in places where they are not accepted. And yet they have also persevered in these spaces, in institutions, and within the discipline, and they have considered how they operate professionally and personally in “hostile” territory. Part of the thrust of Disrupting Political Science is to encourage the reimagining of political science as a discipline, to challenge the norms and expectations that have remained in place for over a century.

Angela K. Lewis-Maddox and her assembly of contributing authors have done a great service to the discipline of Political Science in publishing these analyses and considerations. Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline is shining a light on those who have often been obscured within the boundaries of the academic discipline—either because of who they are or because of what they study. Political Science is truly an expansive discipline, and to understand the world in which we live, individuals or groups should not be marginalized or erased, but re-centered and engaged. This book goes far in helping to refocus and consider otherwise obscured dimensions of political science and political scientists.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Angela K. Lewis-Maddox has pulled together an important and useful edited volume focusing on black women political scientists and their experiences in the discipline itself and in studying topics that include race and gender. Political Science, as a discipline, is a bit more than 100 years old, and studies politics, power, institutions, policy, methodology, and theory. These are the over-arching umbrellas within the discipline and many of the specific areas within political science take up questions that are connected to these broad concepts. As with many dimensions of our society, race and gender play a role in the discipline itself and in what we study as political scientists. But race and gender have also been considered tertiary issues within the discipline in terms of research.

Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline (SUNY Press, 2025) ﻿is both autobiographical for some of the contributors as well as a rigorous interrogation of political science as a discipline. Lewis-Maddox has assembled a group of scholars across rank and position, region and geography, kinds of institutions, and scholarly emphasis. This diverse assembly of contributors have reflected on their particular experience within political science and have written about that experience from a variety of perspectives and approaches. This is a rich and deep study of those who have found themselves to be “space invaders”—black women in spaces and places that are not designed for them. These women all bring the experience of interposing themselves in a place or in places where they are not accepted. And yet they have also persevered in these spaces, in institutions, and within the discipline, and they have considered how they operate professionally and personally in “hostile” territory. Part of the thrust of Disrupting Political Science is to encourage the reimagining of political science as a discipline, to challenge the norms and expectations that have remained in place for over a century.

Angela K. Lewis-Maddox and her assembly of contributing authors have done a great service to the discipline of Political Science in publishing these analyses and considerations. Disrupting Political Science: Black Women Reimagining the Discipline is shining a light on those who have often been obscured within the boundaries of the academic discipline—either because of who they are or because of what they study. Political Science is truly an expansive discipline, and to understand the world in which we live, individuals or groups should not be marginalized or erased, but re-centered and engaged. This book goes far in helping to refocus and consider otherwise obscured dimensions of political science and political scientists.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>617</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ab3d8afc-564c-11f0-97a8-57a25f26ab9b</guid>
      <title>Robert Chernomas and Ian Hudson, &quot;Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032752532">Why America Didn't Become Great Again </a>(Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America's corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn't Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032752532">Why America Didn't Become Great Again </a>(Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America's corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn't Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33429212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3485ab9d-a0a7-4753-9f0d-f806fbef7e30/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3485ab9d-a0a7-4753-9f0d-f806fbef7e30&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Chernomas and Ian Hudson, &quot;Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again (Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America&apos;s corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Examining the conditions that not only blocked attempts to make America great again, but actively made the country worse, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again (Routledge, 2025) identifies those organizations, institutions, politicians and prominent characters in the forefront of the economic and social policies - ultimately asking who is responsible. While the period from the late 1970s to 2020s became the best of times for America&apos;s corporate class, as profits grew along with the wealth and income that they delivered for their stockholders and management, their goal was to set new rules for the rest of us to live by, not as special interests but with a clear class agenda - for which institutions have been organized, government policies reoriented, economists, journalists and politicians recruited, funded and promoted. And so it has not been the best of times for working families as inequality, stagnant wages, debt, and ever longer working hours became their fate. This book critically analyses those who very deliberately set out to implement policies enacted at the state and federal level in order to redistribute wealth and income upwards and change the balance of power in the United States in response to the class, gender and racial challenges that resulted in compressed income and wealth differentials. An essential book on contemporary inequality in America, Why America Didn&apos;t Become Great Again surveys the past near half century that have resulted in American economic instability and inequality, environmental crisis, a crumbling physical and harmful social infrastructure, among the very worst health outcomes, child poverty, food insecurity and social mobility of the industrialized countries culminating in a Trump regime and the road to further ruin.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>616</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d44ec24-564c-11f0-af54-47879197ae25</guid>
      <title>Timothy Stacey, &quot;Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529215489">Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿</a>Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By <a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/timothy-stacey">Timothy Stacey</a></p>
<p>In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.</p>
<p>It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.</p>
<p>The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.</p>
<p>Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529215489">Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿</a>Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By <a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/timothy-stacey">Timothy Stacey</a></p>
<p>In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.</p>
<p>It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.</p>
<p>The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.</p>
<p>Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53402406" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6bbeae98-60ed-4dc6-aff1-7fc49bba938f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6bbeae98-60ed-4dc6-aff1-7fc49bba938f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy Stacey, &quot;Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By Timothy Stacey

In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.

It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.

The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.

Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Saving Liberalism from Itself: The Spirit of Political Participation ﻿Bristol UP, 2022) ﻿By Timothy Stacey

In the wake of populism, Timothy Stacey’s book critically reflects on what is missing from the liberal project with the aim of saving liberalism.

It explains that populists have harnessed myth, ritual, magic and tradition to advance their ambitions, and why opponents need to embrace rather than eschew them. Using examples of liberally oriented activists in Vancouver, it presents an accessible theorization of these quasi-religious concepts in secular life.

The result is to provide both a new theoretical understanding of why liberalism fails to engage people, and a toolkit for campaigners, policymakers and academics seeking to bridge the gap between liberal aspirations and lived experiences, in order to promote political engagement and to create unity out of division.

Timothy Stacey is Researcher in the Urban Future Studio at Utrecht University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>615</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5722c3c0-563c-11f0-86f3-2b5553eb423f</guid>
      <title>Minxin Pei, &quot;The Sentinel State: Surveillance and the Survival of Dictatorship in China&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Rising prosperity was supposed to bring democracy to China, yet the Communist Party’s political monopoly endures. How? Minxin Pei looks to the surveillance state. Though renowned for high-tech repression, China’s surveillance system is above all a labor-intensive project. Pei delves into the human sources of coercion at the foundation of CCP power, examining the historical development of China's surveillance state, its relationship to economic modernization and political liberalization, and what might destabilize it in the future.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rising prosperity was supposed to bring democracy to China, yet the Communist Party’s political monopoly endures. How? Minxin Pei looks to the surveillance state. Though renowned for high-tech repression, China’s surveillance system is above all a labor-intensive project. Pei delves into the human sources of coercion at the foundation of CCP power, examining the historical development of China's surveillance state, its relationship to economic modernization and political liberalization, and what might destabilize it in the future.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35838299" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fcc89498-248c-4e5b-bc8b-f2db19d606e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fcc89498-248c-4e5b-bc8b-f2db19d606e7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Minxin Pei, &quot;The Sentinel State: Surveillance and the Survival of Dictatorship in China&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rising prosperity was supposed to bring democracy to China, yet the Communist Party’s political monopoly endures. How? Minxin Pei looks to the surveillance state. Though renowned for high-tech repression, China’s surveillance system is above all a labor-intensive project. Pei delves into the human sources of coercion at the foundation of CCP power, examining the historical development of China&apos;s surveillance state, its relationship to economic modernization and political liberalization, and what might destabilize it in the future.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rising prosperity was supposed to bring democracy to China, yet the Communist Party’s political monopoly endures. How? Minxin Pei looks to the surveillance state. Though renowned for high-tech repression, China’s surveillance system is above all a labor-intensive project. Pei delves into the human sources of coercion at the foundation of CCP power, examining the historical development of China&apos;s surveillance state, its relationship to economic modernization and political liberalization, and what might destabilize it in the future.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>614</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">61e567dc-550f-11f0-b0db-7b62ced3d549</guid>
      <title>Jack Snyder, &quot;Human Rights for Pragmatists: Social Power in Modern Times&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Human rights are among our most pressing issues today. But rights promoters have reached an impasse in their effort to achieve rights for all. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/human-rights-for-pragmatists-social-power-in-modern-times-jack-snyder/17477642?ean=9780691231556&amp;next=t">Human Rights for Pragmatists</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2022) explains why: activists prioritize universal legal and moral norms, backed by the public shaming of violators, but in fact, rights prevail only when they serve the interests of powerful local constituencies. Jack Snyder demonstrates that where local power and politics lead, rights follow. He presents an innovative roadmap for addressing a broad agenda of human rights concerns: impunity for atrocities, dilemmas of free speech in the age of social media, entrenched abuses of women’s rights, and more.<br />Exploring the historical development of human rights around the globe, Snyder shows that liberal rights–based states have experienced a competitive edge over authoritarian regimes in the modern era. He focuses on the role of power, the interests of individuals and the groups they form, and the dynamics of bargaining and coalitions among those groups. The path to human rights entails transitioning from a social order grounded in patronage and favoritism to one dedicated to equal treatment under impersonal rules. Rights flourish when they benefit dominant local actors with the clout to persuade ambivalent peers. Activists, policymakers, and others attempting to advance rights should embrace a tailored strategy, one that acknowledges local power structures and cultural practices.<br />Constructively turning the mainstream framework of human rights advocacy on its head, <em>Human Rights for Pragmatists</em> offers tangible steps that all advocates can take to move the rights project forward.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://polisci.columbia.edu/content/jack-lewis-snyder">Jack Snyder</a>, the Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political Science and the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human rights are among our most pressing issues today. But rights promoters have reached an impasse in their effort to achieve rights for all. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/human-rights-for-pragmatists-social-power-in-modern-times-jack-snyder/17477642?ean=9780691231556&amp;next=t">Human Rights for Pragmatists</a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2022) explains why: activists prioritize universal legal and moral norms, backed by the public shaming of violators, but in fact, rights prevail only when they serve the interests of powerful local constituencies. Jack Snyder demonstrates that where local power and politics lead, rights follow. He presents an innovative roadmap for addressing a broad agenda of human rights concerns: impunity for atrocities, dilemmas of free speech in the age of social media, entrenched abuses of women’s rights, and more.<br />Exploring the historical development of human rights around the globe, Snyder shows that liberal rights–based states have experienced a competitive edge over authoritarian regimes in the modern era. He focuses on the role of power, the interests of individuals and the groups they form, and the dynamics of bargaining and coalitions among those groups. The path to human rights entails transitioning from a social order grounded in patronage and favoritism to one dedicated to equal treatment under impersonal rules. Rights flourish when they benefit dominant local actors with the clout to persuade ambivalent peers. Activists, policymakers, and others attempting to advance rights should embrace a tailored strategy, one that acknowledges local power structures and cultural practices.<br />Constructively turning the mainstream framework of human rights advocacy on its head, <em>Human Rights for Pragmatists</em> offers tangible steps that all advocates can take to move the rights project forward.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://polisci.columbia.edu/content/jack-lewis-snyder">Jack Snyder</a>, the Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political Science and the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41573364" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0bf4c50b-413c-4bb3-839d-9a06aef3670c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0bf4c50b-413c-4bb3-839d-9a06aef3670c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jack Snyder, &quot;Human Rights for Pragmatists: Social Power in Modern Times&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Human rights are among our most pressing issues today. But rights promoters have reached an impasse in their effort to achieve rights for all. Human Rights for Pragmatists (Princeton University Press, 2022) explains why: activists prioritize universal legal and moral norms, backed by the public shaming of violators, but in fact, rights prevail only when they serve the interests of powerful local constituencies. Jack Snyder demonstrates that where local power and politics lead, rights follow. He presents an innovative roadmap for addressing a broad agenda of human rights concerns: impunity for atrocities, dilemmas of free speech in the age of social media, entrenched abuses of women’s rights, and more.Exploring the historical development of human rights around the globe, Snyder shows that liberal rights–based states have experienced a competitive edge over authoritarian regimes in the modern era. He focuses on the role of power, the interests of individuals and the groups they form, and the dynamics of bargaining and coalitions among those groups. The path to human rights entails transitioning from a social order grounded in patronage and favoritism to one dedicated to equal treatment under impersonal rules. Rights flourish when they benefit dominant local actors with the clout to persuade ambivalent peers. Activists, policymakers, and others attempting to advance rights should embrace a tailored strategy, one that acknowledges local power structures and cultural practices.Constructively turning the mainstream framework of human rights advocacy on its head, Human Rights for Pragmatists offers tangible steps that all advocates can take to move the rights project forward.

Our guest is Jack Snyder, the Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political Science and the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Human rights are among our most pressing issues today. But rights promoters have reached an impasse in their effort to achieve rights for all. Human Rights for Pragmatists (Princeton University Press, 2022) explains why: activists prioritize universal legal and moral norms, backed by the public shaming of violators, but in fact, rights prevail only when they serve the interests of powerful local constituencies. Jack Snyder demonstrates that where local power and politics lead, rights follow. He presents an innovative roadmap for addressing a broad agenda of human rights concerns: impunity for atrocities, dilemmas of free speech in the age of social media, entrenched abuses of women’s rights, and more.Exploring the historical development of human rights around the globe, Snyder shows that liberal rights–based states have experienced a competitive edge over authoritarian regimes in the modern era. He focuses on the role of power, the interests of individuals and the groups they form, and the dynamics of bargaining and coalitions among those groups. The path to human rights entails transitioning from a social order grounded in patronage and favoritism to one dedicated to equal treatment under impersonal rules. Rights flourish when they benefit dominant local actors with the clout to persuade ambivalent peers. Activists, policymakers, and others attempting to advance rights should embrace a tailored strategy, one that acknowledges local power structures and cultural practices.Constructively turning the mainstream framework of human rights advocacy on its head, Human Rights for Pragmatists offers tangible steps that all advocates can take to move the rights project forward.

Our guest is Jack Snyder, the Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political Science and the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>613</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db427ff4-5332-11f0-8696-378e2342caa6</guid>
      <title>Amogh Dhar Sharma, &quot;The Backstage of Democracy: India&apos;s Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>About the Book</strong></p>
<p>Over the last decade, election campaigns in India have undergone a dramatic shift. Political parties increasingly rely on political consulting firms, social media volunteers, pollsters, data-driven insights, and hashtag wars to mobilize voters. What is driving these changes in the landscape of electioneering? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009423984">The Backstage of Democracy: India's Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) takes readers to the hidden arena of strategizing and deliberations that takes place between politicians and a new cabal of political professionals as they organize election campaigns in India. The book argues that this change is not reducible to a story of technological innovations alone. Rather, it is indicative of a new political culture where ideas of political expertise, the distribution of power within parties, and citizens' attitudes towards political participation have undergone a profound change. Marshalling an eclectic range of data sources, the book breaks new ground on how we understand the workings of India's electoral and party politics.<br /></p>
<p><strong>About the Author</strong></p>
<p>Amogh Dhar Sharma is Departmental Lecturer in the Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford. After receiving his PhD from the University of Oxford, he was awarded an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) postdoctoral fellowship. His research explores the interface between politics and technology, political communication and histories of science and technology.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>About the Book</strong></p>
<p>Over the last decade, election campaigns in India have undergone a dramatic shift. Political parties increasingly rely on political consulting firms, social media volunteers, pollsters, data-driven insights, and hashtag wars to mobilize voters. What is driving these changes in the landscape of electioneering? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009423984">The Backstage of Democracy: India's Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) takes readers to the hidden arena of strategizing and deliberations that takes place between politicians and a new cabal of political professionals as they organize election campaigns in India. The book argues that this change is not reducible to a story of technological innovations alone. Rather, it is indicative of a new political culture where ideas of political expertise, the distribution of power within parties, and citizens' attitudes towards political participation have undergone a profound change. Marshalling an eclectic range of data sources, the book breaks new ground on how we understand the workings of India's electoral and party politics.<br /></p>
<p><strong>About the Author</strong></p>
<p>Amogh Dhar Sharma is Departmental Lecturer in the Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford. After receiving his PhD from the University of Oxford, he was awarded an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) postdoctoral fellowship. His research explores the interface between politics and technology, political communication and histories of science and technology.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="79169235" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ca826da3-9b36-4ac5-a636-a132574cc26d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ca826da3-9b36-4ac5-a636-a132574cc26d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amogh Dhar Sharma, &quot;The Backstage of Democracy: India&apos;s Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>About the Book

Over the last decade, election campaigns in India have undergone a dramatic shift. Political parties increasingly rely on political consulting firms, social media volunteers, pollsters, data-driven insights, and hashtag wars to mobilize voters. What is driving these changes in the landscape of electioneering? The Backstage of Democracy: India&apos;s Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them (Cambridge UP, 2024) takes readers to the hidden arena of strategizing and deliberations that takes place between politicians and a new cabal of political professionals as they organize election campaigns in India. The book argues that this change is not reducible to a story of technological innovations alone. Rather, it is indicative of a new political culture where ideas of political expertise, the distribution of power within parties, and citizens&apos; attitudes towards political participation have undergone a profound change. Marshalling an eclectic range of data sources, the book breaks new ground on how we understand the workings of India&apos;s electoral and party politics.

About the Author

Amogh Dhar Sharma is Departmental Lecturer in the Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford. After receiving his PhD from the University of Oxford, he was awarded an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) postdoctoral fellowship. His research explores the interface between politics and technology, political communication and histories of science and technology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>About the Book

Over the last decade, election campaigns in India have undergone a dramatic shift. Political parties increasingly rely on political consulting firms, social media volunteers, pollsters, data-driven insights, and hashtag wars to mobilize voters. What is driving these changes in the landscape of electioneering? The Backstage of Democracy: India&apos;s Election Campaigns and the People Who Manage Them (Cambridge UP, 2024) takes readers to the hidden arena of strategizing and deliberations that takes place between politicians and a new cabal of political professionals as they organize election campaigns in India. The book argues that this change is not reducible to a story of technological innovations alone. Rather, it is indicative of a new political culture where ideas of political expertise, the distribution of power within parties, and citizens&apos; attitudes towards political participation have undergone a profound change. Marshalling an eclectic range of data sources, the book breaks new ground on how we understand the workings of India&apos;s electoral and party politics.

About the Author

Amogh Dhar Sharma is Departmental Lecturer in the Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford. After receiving his PhD from the University of Oxford, he was awarded an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) postdoctoral fellowship. His research explores the interface between politics and technology, political communication and histories of science and technology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>612</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75d1ab60-5155-11f0-84f8-b721004e53ae</guid>
      <title>Bryan D. Jones, The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770429">The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family's History</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025)<em> </em>explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones draws from his own family's centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the "two minds" of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism's supporters. Indeed, one of Jones' ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.</p>
<p>Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones is J.J."Jake" Pickle Regents' Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770429">The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family's History</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025)<em> </em>explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones draws from his own family's centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the "two minds" of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism's supporters. Indeed, one of Jones' ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.</p>
<p>Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.</p>
<p>Bryan Jones is J.J."Jake" Pickle Regents' Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54481098" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/77e3c631-44c2-419d-9090-0cacd4c617c4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=77e3c631-44c2-419d-9090-0cacd4c617c4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bryan D. Jones, The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History (Oxford University Press, 2025) explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.

Bryan Jones draws from his own family&apos;s centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the &quot;two minds&quot; of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism&apos;s supporters. Indeed, one of Jones&apos; ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.

Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.

Bryan Jones is J.J.&quot;Jake&quot; Pickle Regents&apos; Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Southern Fault Line: How Race, Class, and Region Shaped One Family&apos;s History (Oxford University Press, 2025) explores the under-appreciated division in the South between the oligarchic rule of plantation owners and industrialists on the one hand, and the more democratic mindset of the mountain-dwelling small farmers on the other. These two mindsets were in continual tension from the 1800s to the 1960s, when the adherents of the more democratic side of the struggle capitulated to the oligarchical side in response to the Civil Rights movement.

Bryan Jones draws from his own family&apos;s centuries-old history in the region to explore the rise and fall of the &quot;two minds&quot; of the South. Through a comparison of the experiences of a slaveholding line in his family with three non-slaveholding lines, Jones provides a rich history of the politics of both class and race in the region from the Founding era to the present. The slaveholding side of his family settled in Black Belt Alabama, while ancestral members of the other side of his family were poorer uplanders. In the 1890s, the latter supported the burgeoning populist movement, which for a short window of time tried to unite poor Blacks and poor whites against the patrician planter class and industrialists. After a series of close elections, the planter class was able to stanch the populist tide. They did this in large part by sowing racial division among populism&apos;s supporters. Indeed, one of Jones&apos; ancestors helped draft the 1901 Alabama constitution that made Jim Crow the law of the state.

Throughout, Jones shows how deep the political differences were between the two regions, with oligarchy characterizing the slaveholding region and a more democratic ethos shaping the non-slaveholding areas. Jones serves as the final observer, a white boy observing not only the demise of the Jim Crow South, but--in the wake of the Civil Rights movement--the demise of the mountain democratic South as well. Today, the vast majority of Southern whites regardless of class support an oligarchical Republican Party.

Bryan Jones is J.J.&quot;Jake&quot; Pickle Regents&apos; Chair in Congressional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>611</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be3fe306-50d0-11f0-ae6f-b73d0f61a9e5</guid>
      <title>How do Small States Navigate and Shape the Liberal World Order? A conversation with Dylan Loh</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Globally, the liberal international order has been under pressure for quite some time, but we often tend to discuss this in relation to big international players such as the United States and China. But how do small states like Singapore navigate and shape this increasingly contested space? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Dylan Loh about Singapore’s understanding of the liberal international order, its position on liberal democratic values and human rights, its relations with big international players, and the ways in which this small city state seeks to uphold and modify the liberal international order, so it better aligns with its own interests.</p>
<p>Read Dylan’s article ‘Singapore's conception of the liberal international order as a small state’ in <a href="https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/99/4/1499/7216737?login=false"><em>International Affairs</em></a>.</p>
<p>*** This episode was originally recorded in November 2024. ***</p>
<p>Dylan Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme, at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He studies China’s foreign policy, international diplomacy, and ASEAN regionalism. He is the author of a recently published book ‘China's Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy’ which was published by Stanford University Press (2024).</p>
<p>Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globally, the liberal international order has been under pressure for quite some time, but we often tend to discuss this in relation to big international players such as the United States and China. But how do small states like Singapore navigate and shape this increasingly contested space? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Dylan Loh about Singapore’s understanding of the liberal international order, its position on liberal democratic values and human rights, its relations with big international players, and the ways in which this small city state seeks to uphold and modify the liberal international order, so it better aligns with its own interests.</p>
<p>Read Dylan’s article ‘Singapore's conception of the liberal international order as a small state’ in <a href="https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/99/4/1499/7216737?login=false"><em>International Affairs</em></a>.</p>
<p>*** This episode was originally recorded in November 2024. ***</p>
<p>Dylan Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme, at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He studies China’s foreign policy, international diplomacy, and ASEAN regionalism. He is the author of a recently published book ‘China's Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy’ which was published by Stanford University Press (2024).</p>
<p>Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33748199" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ab8b6c6e-d814-46fd-acf1-6c02a4873c70/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ab8b6c6e-d814-46fd-acf1-6c02a4873c70&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How do Small States Navigate and Shape the Liberal World Order? A conversation with Dylan Loh</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Globally, the liberal international order has been under pressure for quite some time, but we often tend to discuss this in relation to big international players such as the United States and China. But how do small states like Singapore navigate and shape this increasingly contested space? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Dylan Loh about Singapore’s understanding of the liberal international order, its position on liberal democratic values and human rights, its relations with big international players, and the ways in which this small city state seeks to uphold and modify the liberal international order, so it better aligns with its own interests.

Read Dylan’s article ‘Singapore&apos;s conception of the liberal international order as a small state’ in International Affairs.

*** This episode was originally recorded in November 2024. ***

Dylan Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme, at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He studies China’s foreign policy, international diplomacy, and ASEAN regionalism. He is the author of a recently published book ‘China&apos;s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy’ which was published by Stanford University Press (2024).

Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Globally, the liberal international order has been under pressure for quite some time, but we often tend to discuss this in relation to big international players such as the United States and China. But how do small states like Singapore navigate and shape this increasingly contested space? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Dylan Loh about Singapore’s understanding of the liberal international order, its position on liberal democratic values and human rights, its relations with big international players, and the ways in which this small city state seeks to uphold and modify the liberal international order, so it better aligns with its own interests.

Read Dylan’s article ‘Singapore&apos;s conception of the liberal international order as a small state’ in International Affairs.

*** This episode was originally recorded in November 2024. ***

Dylan Loh is an Assistant Professor at the Public Policy and Global Affairs programme, at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. He studies China’s foreign policy, international diplomacy, and ASEAN regionalism. He is the author of a recently published book ‘China&apos;s Rising Foreign Ministry: Practices and Representations of Assertive Diplomacy’ which was published by Stanford University Press (2024).

Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>610</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f49078f4-5075-11f0-a595-e7882b7f6667</guid>
      <title>Yaroslav Hrytsak, &quot;Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation&quot; (PublicAffairs, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the world witnessed the “creative, freewheeling, darkly humorous, and deeply resilient society” that is contemporary Ukraine. In this timely and original history, a bestseller in Ukraine, the historian Yaroslav Hrytsak tells the sweeping story of his nation through a meticulous examination of the major events, conflicts, and developments that have shaped it over the course of centuries.</p>
<p>Hrytsak, is a Ukrainian historian and public intellectual. Professor of the Ukrainian Catholic University and Honorary Professor of the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Hrytsak has taught at Columbia and Harvard Universities and was a guest lecturer at the Central European University in Budapest. He is the author of many historical books, including several bestsellers and the recipient of numerous national and international awards. weaves a rich and detailed tapestry of a country in continual transformation.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541704602">Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation</a> (PublicAffairs, 2024) is essential reading for anyone who wants to better understand Ukraine’s dramatic past and its global significance--from the 17th-century Cossack uprising to the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and Ukrainian independence, and from the evolution of the Ukrainian language to the warning signs that anticipated Russia’s 2022 invasion. This book is the definitive story of Ukraine and its people, as told by one of its most celebrated voices.</p>
<p>Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the world witnessed the “creative, freewheeling, darkly humorous, and deeply resilient society” that is contemporary Ukraine. In this timely and original history, a bestseller in Ukraine, the historian Yaroslav Hrytsak tells the sweeping story of his nation through a meticulous examination of the major events, conflicts, and developments that have shaped it over the course of centuries.</p>
<p>Hrytsak, is a Ukrainian historian and public intellectual. Professor of the Ukrainian Catholic University and Honorary Professor of the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Hrytsak has taught at Columbia and Harvard Universities and was a guest lecturer at the Central European University in Budapest. He is the author of many historical books, including several bestsellers and the recipient of numerous national and international awards. weaves a rich and detailed tapestry of a country in continual transformation.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541704602">Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation</a> (PublicAffairs, 2024) is essential reading for anyone who wants to better understand Ukraine’s dramatic past and its global significance--from the 17th-century Cossack uprising to the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and Ukrainian independence, and from the evolution of the Ukrainian language to the warning signs that anticipated Russia’s 2022 invasion. This book is the definitive story of Ukraine and its people, as told by one of its most celebrated voices.</p>
<p>Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76218020" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0bb79bcc-db8b-476d-af62-3ffd415669ff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0bb79bcc-db8b-476d-af62-3ffd415669ff&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yaroslav Hrytsak, &quot;Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation&quot; (PublicAffairs, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the world witnessed the “creative, freewheeling, darkly humorous, and deeply resilient society” that is contemporary Ukraine. In this timely and original history, a bestseller in Ukraine, the historian Yaroslav Hrytsak tells the sweeping story of his nation through a meticulous examination of the major events, conflicts, and developments that have shaped it over the course of centuries.

Hrytsak, is a Ukrainian historian and public intellectual. Professor of the Ukrainian Catholic University and Honorary Professor of the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Hrytsak has taught at Columbia and Harvard Universities and was a guest lecturer at the Central European University in Budapest. He is the author of many historical books, including several bestsellers and the recipient of numerous national and international awards. weaves a rich and detailed tapestry of a country in continual transformation.

Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation (PublicAffairs, 2024) is essential reading for anyone who wants to better understand Ukraine’s dramatic past and its global significance--from the 17th-century Cossack uprising to the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and Ukrainian independence, and from the evolution of the Ukrainian language to the warning signs that anticipated Russia’s 2022 invasion. This book is the definitive story of Ukraine and its people, as told by one of its most celebrated voices.

Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the world witnessed the “creative, freewheeling, darkly humorous, and deeply resilient society” that is contemporary Ukraine. In this timely and original history, a bestseller in Ukraine, the historian Yaroslav Hrytsak tells the sweeping story of his nation through a meticulous examination of the major events, conflicts, and developments that have shaped it over the course of centuries.

Hrytsak, is a Ukrainian historian and public intellectual. Professor of the Ukrainian Catholic University and Honorary Professor of the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Hrytsak has taught at Columbia and Harvard Universities and was a guest lecturer at the Central European University in Budapest. He is the author of many historical books, including several bestsellers and the recipient of numerous national and international awards. weaves a rich and detailed tapestry of a country in continual transformation.

Ukraine: The Forging of a Nation (PublicAffairs, 2024) is essential reading for anyone who wants to better understand Ukraine’s dramatic past and its global significance--from the 17th-century Cossack uprising to the collapse of the USSR in 1991 and Ukrainian independence, and from the evolution of the Ukrainian language to the warning signs that anticipated Russia’s 2022 invasion. This book is the definitive story of Ukraine and its people, as told by one of its most celebrated voices.

Sidney Michelini is a post-doctoral researcher working on Ecology, Climate, and Violence at the Peace Research Institute of Frankfurt (PRIF).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>609</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5547fc4e-50cb-11f0-97b8-1f0f2af78d18</guid>
      <title>The May 2025 Mid-Term Elections in the Philippines</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode focuses on the mid-term elections in the Philippines which were held in May of this year, including all local elected positions, all seats in the House of Representatives, and twelve of the twenty-four seats in the Senate. The elections have been viewed as a reflection on the administration of President Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos, Jr. and as especially consequential for the future of Vice-President Sara Duterte. She was impeached by the House of Representatives in February 2025, setting the stage for a trial by the Senate, but with her continuing popularity making her a serious contender for the presidency in 2028.</p>
<p>To interpret the mid-term elections, <em>Dialogues on Southeast Asia </em>has turned to Dr. Sharmila Parmanand, an Assistant Professor in Gender, Development and Globalisation in the Department of Gender Studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and also an Associate and member of the Management Committee of the LSE’s Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre. Dr. Parmanand’s research focuses on the intersection of gender and politics in the Philippines, ranging from sex work and migration policies to the connections between gender, nationalism, and democracy. She is currently working on her first book, titled <em>Saving Our Sisters: The Politics of Anti-Trafficking and Sex Work in the Philippines</em>, but she is also busy conducting research, writing, and publishing on other fronts, including a new collaborative project on queer activism across Southeast Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s episode focuses on the mid-term elections in the Philippines which were held in May of this year, including all local elected positions, all seats in the House of Representatives, and twelve of the twenty-four seats in the Senate. The elections have been viewed as a reflection on the administration of President Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos, Jr. and as especially consequential for the future of Vice-President Sara Duterte. She was impeached by the House of Representatives in February 2025, setting the stage for a trial by the Senate, but with her continuing popularity making her a serious contender for the presidency in 2028.</p>
<p>To interpret the mid-term elections, <em>Dialogues on Southeast Asia </em>has turned to Dr. Sharmila Parmanand, an Assistant Professor in Gender, Development and Globalisation in the Department of Gender Studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and also an Associate and member of the Management Committee of the LSE’s Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre. Dr. Parmanand’s research focuses on the intersection of gender and politics in the Philippines, ranging from sex work and migration policies to the connections between gender, nationalism, and democracy. She is currently working on her first book, titled <em>Saving Our Sisters: The Politics of Anti-Trafficking and Sex Work in the Philippines</em>, but she is also busy conducting research, writing, and publishing on other fronts, including a new collaborative project on queer activism across Southeast Asia.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43582370" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a3db2014-abcf-4a3c-a557-3acf73020778/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a3db2014-abcf-4a3c-a557-3acf73020778&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The May 2025 Mid-Term Elections in the Philippines</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s episode focuses on the mid-term elections in the Philippines which were held in May of this year, including all local elected positions, all seats in the House of Representatives, and twelve of the twenty-four seats in the Senate. The elections have been viewed as a reflection on the administration of President Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos, Jr. and as especially consequential for the future of Vice-President Sara Duterte. She was impeached by the House of Representatives in February 2025, setting the stage for a trial by the Senate, but with her continuing popularity making her a serious contender for the presidency in 2028.

To interpret the mid-term elections, Dialogues on Southeast Asia has turned to Dr. Sharmila Parmanand, an Assistant Professor in Gender, Development and Globalisation in the Department of Gender Studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and also an Associate and member of the Management Committee of the LSE’s Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre. Dr. Parmanand’s research focuses on the intersection of gender and politics in the Philippines, ranging from sex work and migration policies to the connections between gender, nationalism, and democracy. She is currently working on her first book, titled Saving Our Sisters: The Politics of Anti-Trafficking and Sex Work in the Philippines, but she is also busy conducting research, writing, and publishing on other fronts, including a new collaborative project on queer activism across Southeast Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s episode focuses on the mid-term elections in the Philippines which were held in May of this year, including all local elected positions, all seats in the House of Representatives, and twelve of the twenty-four seats in the Senate. The elections have been viewed as a reflection on the administration of President Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos, Jr. and as especially consequential for the future of Vice-President Sara Duterte. She was impeached by the House of Representatives in February 2025, setting the stage for a trial by the Senate, but with her continuing popularity making her a serious contender for the presidency in 2028.

To interpret the mid-term elections, Dialogues on Southeast Asia has turned to Dr. Sharmila Parmanand, an Assistant Professor in Gender, Development and Globalisation in the Department of Gender Studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and also an Associate and member of the Management Committee of the LSE’s Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre. Dr. Parmanand’s research focuses on the intersection of gender and politics in the Philippines, ranging from sex work and migration policies to the connections between gender, nationalism, and democracy. She is currently working on her first book, titled Saving Our Sisters: The Politics of Anti-Trafficking and Sex Work in the Philippines, but she is also busy conducting research, writing, and publishing on other fronts, including a new collaborative project on queer activism across Southeast Asia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>608</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05243870-500a-11f0-be59-d72e73f5b6dc</guid>
      <title>Nicole Watts, &quot;Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nicole F. Watts's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479823062">Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan</a> (NYU Press, 2025) is a harrowing portrait of Iraqi Kurdistan and its history, as it weathers Hussein’s genocidal campaign against the Kurds, a civil war, the US invasion of Iraq, the Arab Spring, and the sustained neglect of the city of Halabja. Watts, a former journalist and now professor of political science, has spent over a decade researching the struggles of the Kurdish people in Iraq, and in vivid, lyrical prose, she tells their story through the eyes of Peshawa, a young Muslim Kurd whose family barely survived the bombing and then fled for their lives.Throughout the book, the thread of Peshawa’s story immerses readers in the everyday and extraordinary world of Iraqi Kurds between the late 1980s and 2022, exploring the meaning of home and dislocation in the wake of war and genocide.<br />Based on over a hundred in-depth interviews with Iraqi Kurdish activists, journalists, elected officials, and community organizers, and hundreds of hours of conversations with Peshawa and his family, <em>Republic of Dreams</em> brings to vivid life the story of modern Kurdistan, and the Kurdish national dream to have their own homeland.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole F. Watts's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479823062">Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan</a> (NYU Press, 2025) is a harrowing portrait of Iraqi Kurdistan and its history, as it weathers Hussein’s genocidal campaign against the Kurds, a civil war, the US invasion of Iraq, the Arab Spring, and the sustained neglect of the city of Halabja. Watts, a former journalist and now professor of political science, has spent over a decade researching the struggles of the Kurdish people in Iraq, and in vivid, lyrical prose, she tells their story through the eyes of Peshawa, a young Muslim Kurd whose family barely survived the bombing and then fled for their lives.Throughout the book, the thread of Peshawa’s story immerses readers in the everyday and extraordinary world of Iraqi Kurds between the late 1980s and 2022, exploring the meaning of home and dislocation in the wake of war and genocide.<br />Based on over a hundred in-depth interviews with Iraqi Kurdish activists, journalists, elected officials, and community organizers, and hundreds of hours of conversations with Peshawa and his family, <em>Republic of Dreams</em> brings to vivid life the story of modern Kurdistan, and the Kurdish national dream to have their own homeland.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43012127" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8564737b-9134-42d5-996b-e2bcaca0e850/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8564737b-9134-42d5-996b-e2bcaca0e850&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicole Watts, &quot;Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nicole F. Watts&apos;s Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan (NYU Press, 2025) is a harrowing portrait of Iraqi Kurdistan and its history, as it weathers Hussein’s genocidal campaign against the Kurds, a civil war, the US invasion of Iraq, the Arab Spring, and the sustained neglect of the city of Halabja. Watts, a former journalist and now professor of political science, has spent over a decade researching the struggles of the Kurdish people in Iraq, and in vivid, lyrical prose, she tells their story through the eyes of Peshawa, a young Muslim Kurd whose family barely survived the bombing and then fled for their lives.Throughout the book, the thread of Peshawa’s story immerses readers in the everyday and extraordinary world of Iraqi Kurds between the late 1980s and 2022, exploring the meaning of home and dislocation in the wake of war and genocide.Based on over a hundred in-depth interviews with Iraqi Kurdish activists, journalists, elected officials, and community organizers, and hundreds of hours of conversations with Peshawa and his family, Republic of Dreams brings to vivid life the story of modern Kurdistan, and the Kurdish national dream to have their own homeland.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nicole F. Watts&apos;s Republic of Dreams: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Struggles, and the Future of Iraqi Kurdistan (NYU Press, 2025) is a harrowing portrait of Iraqi Kurdistan and its history, as it weathers Hussein’s genocidal campaign against the Kurds, a civil war, the US invasion of Iraq, the Arab Spring, and the sustained neglect of the city of Halabja. Watts, a former journalist and now professor of political science, has spent over a decade researching the struggles of the Kurdish people in Iraq, and in vivid, lyrical prose, she tells their story through the eyes of Peshawa, a young Muslim Kurd whose family barely survived the bombing and then fled for their lives.Throughout the book, the thread of Peshawa’s story immerses readers in the everyday and extraordinary world of Iraqi Kurds between the late 1980s and 2022, exploring the meaning of home and dislocation in the wake of war and genocide.Based on over a hundred in-depth interviews with Iraqi Kurdish activists, journalists, elected officials, and community organizers, and hundreds of hours of conversations with Peshawa and his family, Republic of Dreams brings to vivid life the story of modern Kurdistan, and the Kurdish national dream to have their own homeland.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>607</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b8af67cc-4fd1-11f0-94dc-43eb7f09df9e</guid>
      <title>The Truth About Bullshit: Celebrating the 20th Anniversary Edition of On Bullshit with Pamela Hieronymi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m thrilled to launch a brand new series for the Princeton UP Ideas Podcast. 20 years ago, Princeton University Press published a short volume with an excellent title: <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276786">On Bullshit</a> (Princeton UP, 2025). Written by philosopher Harry Frankfurt, <em>On Bullshit</em> was adapted from an essay that explored the meaning, uses, and consequences of bullshit.</p>
<p>At just 80 pages, <em>On Bullshit</em> became a favorite of readers, selling over 1 million copies and spending 27 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. It’s not often that a work of philosophy breaks through to the mainstream, but readers of <em>On Bullshit</em> quickly discover why. Harry’s meditation on the meaning of bullshit can be read in one sitting, but the ideas have staying power. After you read Harry’s book, you start to see bullshit everywhere and recognize it’s uniquely pernicious effects on whatever’s left of the public square. Harry wrote his book long before modern social media and AI-generated slop. He was unbelievably prescient, making <em>On Bullshit</em> required reading for today. Harry sadly passed in 2023 at 94 years old, but his ideas live on. In this series, we’ll speak with scholars whose lives and work have been influenced by Harry and his seminal book.</p>
<p>To kick things off, I’ll be speaking with Pamela Hieronymi, one of Harry’s former students. Pamela is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA and a leading scholar in the field of moral philosophy. Like Harry, her work has resonated outside the academy. She served as an advisor on the sitcom, The Good Place, which brought philosophical concepts like the trolley problem to a mainstream audience. For the first episode in the series, Pamela will introduce readers to both the book and the man who wrote it. In subsequent episodes, I’ll speak with other scholars who explore Harry’s notion of bullshit in politics, science, and more. If you haven’t read <em>On Bullshit</em>, you should preorder the anniversary edition, which is set to release on August 5th. Now, let’s have ourselves a bull session.</p>
<p>Pamela Hieronymi is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA. Watch her <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS2CyL1c-70">lecture on the blame game</a>.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m thrilled to launch a brand new series for the Princeton UP Ideas Podcast. 20 years ago, Princeton University Press published a short volume with an excellent title: <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691276786">On Bullshit</a> (Princeton UP, 2025). Written by philosopher Harry Frankfurt, <em>On Bullshit</em> was adapted from an essay that explored the meaning, uses, and consequences of bullshit.</p>
<p>At just 80 pages, <em>On Bullshit</em> became a favorite of readers, selling over 1 million copies and spending 27 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. It’s not often that a work of philosophy breaks through to the mainstream, but readers of <em>On Bullshit</em> quickly discover why. Harry’s meditation on the meaning of bullshit can be read in one sitting, but the ideas have staying power. After you read Harry’s book, you start to see bullshit everywhere and recognize it’s uniquely pernicious effects on whatever’s left of the public square. Harry wrote his book long before modern social media and AI-generated slop. He was unbelievably prescient, making <em>On Bullshit</em> required reading for today. Harry sadly passed in 2023 at 94 years old, but his ideas live on. In this series, we’ll speak with scholars whose lives and work have been influenced by Harry and his seminal book.</p>
<p>To kick things off, I’ll be speaking with Pamela Hieronymi, one of Harry’s former students. Pamela is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA and a leading scholar in the field of moral philosophy. Like Harry, her work has resonated outside the academy. She served as an advisor on the sitcom, The Good Place, which brought philosophical concepts like the trolley problem to a mainstream audience. For the first episode in the series, Pamela will introduce readers to both the book and the man who wrote it. In subsequent episodes, I’ll speak with other scholars who explore Harry’s notion of bullshit in politics, science, and more. If you haven’t read <em>On Bullshit</em>, you should preorder the anniversary edition, which is set to release on August 5th. Now, let’s have ourselves a bull session.</p>
<p>Pamela Hieronymi is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA. Watch her <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS2CyL1c-70">lecture on the blame game</a>.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33718575" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5d91e04e-076b-4591-bb23-38ccf3467d69/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5d91e04e-076b-4591-bb23-38ccf3467d69&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Truth About Bullshit: Celebrating the 20th Anniversary Edition of On Bullshit with Pamela Hieronymi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/5d91e04e-076b-4591-bb23-38ccf3467d69/3000x3000/ea2a49c4e9c23e97f5c24000b77ee81a.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m thrilled to launch a brand new series for the Princeton UP Ideas Podcast. 20 years ago, Princeton University Press published a short volume with an excellent title: On Bullshit (Princeton UP, 2025). Written by philosopher Harry Frankfurt, On Bullshit was adapted from an essay that explored the meaning, uses, and consequences of bullshit.

At just 80 pages, On Bullshit became a favorite of readers, selling over 1 million copies and spending 27 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. It’s not often that a work of philosophy breaks through to the mainstream, but readers of On Bullshit quickly discover why. Harry’s meditation on the meaning of bullshit can be read in one sitting, but the ideas have staying power. After you read Harry’s book, you start to see bullshit everywhere and recognize it’s uniquely pernicious effects on whatever’s left of the public square. Harry wrote his book long before modern social media and AI-generated slop. He was unbelievably prescient, making On Bullshit required reading for today. Harry sadly passed in 2023 at 94 years old, but his ideas live on. In this series, we’ll speak with scholars whose lives and work have been influenced by Harry and his seminal book.

To kick things off, I’ll be speaking with Pamela Hieronymi, one of Harry’s former students. Pamela is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA and a leading scholar in the field of moral philosophy. Like Harry, her work has resonated outside the academy. She served as an advisor on the sitcom, The Good Place, which brought philosophical concepts like the trolley problem to a mainstream audience. For the first episode in the series, Pamela will introduce readers to both the book and the man who wrote it. In subsequent episodes, I’ll speak with other scholars who explore Harry’s notion of bullshit in politics, science, and more. If you haven’t read On Bullshit, you should preorder the anniversary edition, which is set to release on August 5th. Now, let’s have ourselves a bull session.

Pamela Hieronymi is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA. Watch her lecture on the blame game.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m thrilled to launch a brand new series for the Princeton UP Ideas Podcast. 20 years ago, Princeton University Press published a short volume with an excellent title: On Bullshit (Princeton UP, 2025). Written by philosopher Harry Frankfurt, On Bullshit was adapted from an essay that explored the meaning, uses, and consequences of bullshit.

At just 80 pages, On Bullshit became a favorite of readers, selling over 1 million copies and spending 27 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list. It’s not often that a work of philosophy breaks through to the mainstream, but readers of On Bullshit quickly discover why. Harry’s meditation on the meaning of bullshit can be read in one sitting, but the ideas have staying power. After you read Harry’s book, you start to see bullshit everywhere and recognize it’s uniquely pernicious effects on whatever’s left of the public square. Harry wrote his book long before modern social media and AI-generated slop. He was unbelievably prescient, making On Bullshit required reading for today. Harry sadly passed in 2023 at 94 years old, but his ideas live on. In this series, we’ll speak with scholars whose lives and work have been influenced by Harry and his seminal book.

To kick things off, I’ll be speaking with Pamela Hieronymi, one of Harry’s former students. Pamela is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA and a leading scholar in the field of moral philosophy. Like Harry, her work has resonated outside the academy. She served as an advisor on the sitcom, The Good Place, which brought philosophical concepts like the trolley problem to a mainstream audience. For the first episode in the series, Pamela will introduce readers to both the book and the man who wrote it. In subsequent episodes, I’ll speak with other scholars who explore Harry’s notion of bullshit in politics, science, and more. If you haven’t read On Bullshit, you should preorder the anniversary edition, which is set to release on August 5th. Now, let’s have ourselves a bull session.

Pamela Hieronymi is Professor of Philosophy at UCLA. Watch her lecture on the blame game.

Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>606</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f619bd7a-4daf-11f0-8b2d-8773ce1610a8</guid>
      <title>NIAS Podcast from the University of Tartu Asia Centre Kashmir Crisis: The India-Pakistan Blame Game?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This podcast episode, hosted by Kikee Doma Bhutia from the University of Tartu, features Nitasha Kaul, Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD), University of Westminster, London, UK.</p>
<p>The episode focuses on the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. The discussion shows how the issue is shaped more by political narratives than by verified facts. Militant attacks, such as the one in Pahalgam, raise questions about accountability, but the governments of both countries often avoid proper investigation and turn instead to blame games and international lobbying.</p>
<p>The episode also explores political shifts in India since 2014. It highlights the decline of democratic freedoms, the rise of Islamophobia, and increasing control over dissent. It points out how narratives about women’s empowerment are often used for political purposes rather than real change. The conversation underlines the human cost of the conflict, including displacement, violence, and deepening religious divides. Also, about the potential role of international actors, including European and Nordic countries, in supporting human rights and democratic values. It suggests that greater attention to the situation in Kashmir, and the broader democratic developments in the region, could help encourage more inclusive and constructive approaches to long-standing conflicts.</p>
<p>Kikee Doma Bhutia is a Research Fellow and India Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu, Estonia. Her current research combines folkloristics, international relations and Asian studies, focusing on the role of religion and culture in times of crisis, national and regional identities, and geopolitics conflict between India and China</p>
<p>Nitasha Kaul is a Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at the University of Westminster, London. With a background that spans economics, philosophy, creative writing, and international relations, her work explores the intersections of politics, identity, gender, and global justice</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This podcast episode, hosted by Kikee Doma Bhutia from the University of Tartu, features Nitasha Kaul, Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD), University of Westminster, London, UK.</p>
<p>The episode focuses on the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. The discussion shows how the issue is shaped more by political narratives than by verified facts. Militant attacks, such as the one in Pahalgam, raise questions about accountability, but the governments of both countries often avoid proper investigation and turn instead to blame games and international lobbying.</p>
<p>The episode also explores political shifts in India since 2014. It highlights the decline of democratic freedoms, the rise of Islamophobia, and increasing control over dissent. It points out how narratives about women’s empowerment are often used for political purposes rather than real change. The conversation underlines the human cost of the conflict, including displacement, violence, and deepening religious divides. Also, about the potential role of international actors, including European and Nordic countries, in supporting human rights and democratic values. It suggests that greater attention to the situation in Kashmir, and the broader democratic developments in the region, could help encourage more inclusive and constructive approaches to long-standing conflicts.</p>
<p>Kikee Doma Bhutia is a Research Fellow and India Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu, Estonia. Her current research combines folkloristics, international relations and Asian studies, focusing on the role of religion and culture in times of crisis, national and regional identities, and geopolitics conflict between India and China</p>
<p>Nitasha Kaul is a Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at the University of Westminster, London. With a background that spans economics, philosophy, creative writing, and international relations, her work explores the intersections of politics, identity, gender, and global justice</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40481404" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/37f8dbb5-ac43-4746-a2b6-b90bdd09691b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=37f8dbb5-ac43-4746-a2b6-b90bdd09691b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>NIAS Podcast from the University of Tartu Asia Centre Kashmir Crisis: The India-Pakistan Blame Game?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This podcast episode, hosted by Kikee Doma Bhutia from the University of Tartu, features Nitasha Kaul, Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD), University of Westminster, London, UK.

The episode focuses on the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. The discussion shows how the issue is shaped more by political narratives than by verified facts. Militant attacks, such as the one in Pahalgam, raise questions about accountability, but the governments of both countries often avoid proper investigation and turn instead to blame games and international lobbying.

The episode also explores political shifts in India since 2014. It highlights the decline of democratic freedoms, the rise of Islamophobia, and increasing control over dissent. It points out how narratives about women’s empowerment are often used for political purposes rather than real change. The conversation underlines the human cost of the conflict, including displacement, violence, and deepening religious divides. Also, about the potential role of international actors, including European and Nordic countries, in supporting human rights and democratic values. It suggests that greater attention to the situation in Kashmir, and the broader democratic developments in the region, could help encourage more inclusive and constructive approaches to long-standing conflicts.

Kikee Doma Bhutia is a Research Fellow and India Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu, Estonia. Her current research combines folkloristics, international relations and Asian studies, focusing on the role of religion and culture in times of crisis, national and regional identities, and geopolitics conflict between India and China

Nitasha Kaul is a Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at the University of Westminster, London. With a background that spans economics, philosophy, creative writing, and international relations, her work explores the intersections of politics, identity, gender, and global justice
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This podcast episode, hosted by Kikee Doma Bhutia from the University of Tartu, features Nitasha Kaul, Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD), University of Westminster, London, UK.

The episode focuses on the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. The discussion shows how the issue is shaped more by political narratives than by verified facts. Militant attacks, such as the one in Pahalgam, raise questions about accountability, but the governments of both countries often avoid proper investigation and turn instead to blame games and international lobbying.

The episode also explores political shifts in India since 2014. It highlights the decline of democratic freedoms, the rise of Islamophobia, and increasing control over dissent. It points out how narratives about women’s empowerment are often used for political purposes rather than real change. The conversation underlines the human cost of the conflict, including displacement, violence, and deepening religious divides. Also, about the potential role of international actors, including European and Nordic countries, in supporting human rights and democratic values. It suggests that greater attention to the situation in Kashmir, and the broader democratic developments in the region, could help encourage more inclusive and constructive approaches to long-standing conflicts.

Kikee Doma Bhutia is a Research Fellow and India Coordinator at the Asia Centre, University of Tartu, Estonia. Her current research combines folkloristics, international relations and Asian studies, focusing on the role of religion and culture in times of crisis, national and regional identities, and geopolitics conflict between India and China

Nitasha Kaul is a Professor of Politics, International Relations, and Critical Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at the University of Westminster, London. With a background that spans economics, philosophy, creative writing, and international relations, her work explores the intersections of politics, identity, gender, and global justice
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>605</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed2b8a98-4d6b-11f0-90e2-b7cd9b9b2bc9</guid>
      <title>Lieba Faier, &quot;The Banality of Good: The UN&apos;s Global Fight Against Human Trafficking&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478030560">The Banality of Good: The UN’s Global Fight against Human Trafficking</a> (Duke University Press, 2024), Dr. Lieba Faier examines why contemporary efforts to curb human trafficking have fallen so spectacularly short of their stated goals despite well-funded campaigns by the United Nations and its member-state governments. Focusing on Japan’s efforts to enact the UN’s counter-trafficking protocol and assist Filipina migrants working in Japan’s sex industry, Dr. Faier draws from interviews with NGO caseworkers and government officials to demonstrate how these efforts disregard the needs and perspectives of those they are designed to help. She finds that these campaigns tend to privilege bureaucracies and institutional compliance, resulting in the compromised quality of life, repatriation, and even criminalization of human trafficking survivors.</p>
<p>Dr. Faier expands on Hannah Arendt’s idea of the “banality of evil” by coining the titular “banality of good” to describe the reality of the UN’s fight against human trafficking. Detailing the protocols that have been put in place and evaluating their enactment, Dr. Faier reveals how the continued failure of humanitarian institutions to address structural inequities and colonial history ultimately reinforces the violent status quo they claim to be working to change.</p>
<p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"> new book</a> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478030560">The Banality of Good: The UN’s Global Fight against Human Trafficking</a> (Duke University Press, 2024), Dr. Lieba Faier examines why contemporary efforts to curb human trafficking have fallen so spectacularly short of their stated goals despite well-funded campaigns by the United Nations and its member-state governments. Focusing on Japan’s efforts to enact the UN’s counter-trafficking protocol and assist Filipina migrants working in Japan’s sex industry, Dr. Faier draws from interviews with NGO caseworkers and government officials to demonstrate how these efforts disregard the needs and perspectives of those they are designed to help. She finds that these campaigns tend to privilege bureaucracies and institutional compliance, resulting in the compromised quality of life, repatriation, and even criminalization of human trafficking survivors.</p>
<p>Dr. Faier expands on Hannah Arendt’s idea of the “banality of evil” by coining the titular “banality of good” to describe the reality of the UN’s fight against human trafficking. Detailing the protocols that have been put in place and evaluating their enactment, Dr. Faier reveals how the continued failure of humanitarian institutions to address structural inequities and colonial history ultimately reinforces the violent status quo they claim to be working to change.</p>
<p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"> new book</a> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49911374" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8fb2bb9f-9494-4b1b-b801-e6499cbe7a39/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8fb2bb9f-9494-4b1b-b801-e6499cbe7a39&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lieba Faier, &quot;The Banality of Good: The UN&apos;s Global Fight Against Human Trafficking&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Banality of Good: The UN’s Global Fight against Human Trafficking (Duke University Press, 2024), Dr. Lieba Faier examines why contemporary efforts to curb human trafficking have fallen so spectacularly short of their stated goals despite well-funded campaigns by the United Nations and its member-state governments. Focusing on Japan’s efforts to enact the UN’s counter-trafficking protocol and assist Filipina migrants working in Japan’s sex industry, Dr. Faier draws from interviews with NGO caseworkers and government officials to demonstrate how these efforts disregard the needs and perspectives of those they are designed to help. She finds that these campaigns tend to privilege bureaucracies and institutional compliance, resulting in the compromised quality of life, repatriation, and even criminalization of human trafficking survivors.

Dr. Faier expands on Hannah Arendt’s idea of the “banality of evil” by coining the titular “banality of good” to describe the reality of the UN’s fight against human trafficking. Detailing the protocols that have been put in place and evaluating their enactment, Dr. Faier reveals how the continued failure of humanitarian institutions to address structural inequities and colonial history ultimately reinforces the violent status quo they claim to be working to change.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Banality of Good: The UN’s Global Fight against Human Trafficking (Duke University Press, 2024), Dr. Lieba Faier examines why contemporary efforts to curb human trafficking have fallen so spectacularly short of their stated goals despite well-funded campaigns by the United Nations and its member-state governments. Focusing on Japan’s efforts to enact the UN’s counter-trafficking protocol and assist Filipina migrants working in Japan’s sex industry, Dr. Faier draws from interviews with NGO caseworkers and government officials to demonstrate how these efforts disregard the needs and perspectives of those they are designed to help. She finds that these campaigns tend to privilege bureaucracies and institutional compliance, resulting in the compromised quality of life, repatriation, and even criminalization of human trafficking survivors.

Dr. Faier expands on Hannah Arendt’s idea of the “banality of evil” by coining the titular “banality of good” to describe the reality of the UN’s fight against human trafficking. Detailing the protocols that have been put in place and evaluating their enactment, Dr. Faier reveals how the continued failure of humanitarian institutions to address structural inequities and colonial history ultimately reinforces the violent status quo they claim to be working to change.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>604</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b973bea-4cd4-11f0-afac-431f9e42ca66</guid>
      <title>Claire Pierson, &quot;Women&apos;s Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland&quot; (Manchester University Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do feminist movements develop and organise in ethno-nationally divided societies? How does this challenge our understandings of contemporary fourth wave feminism? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526161802">Women's Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland</a> (Manchester University Press, 2025) by Dr. Claire Pierson sets out to answer these questions using rich empirical data and analysis in an examination of feminist activism after the Northern Irish peace agreement.</p>
<p>Utilising feminist frameworks and debates on movement building, policymaking, abortion rights, gender-based violence and the UN women, peace and security agenda, Dr. Pierson interrogates the opportunities and challenges in articulating a feminist voice and creating feminist spaces in the conflict transformational politics and society. Capturing the complexities of contemporary feminist movement building in a divided society, <em>Women's Troubles</em> contributes to ongoing analysis of contemporary global feminisms.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do feminist movements develop and organise in ethno-nationally divided societies? How does this challenge our understandings of contemporary fourth wave feminism? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526161802">Women's Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland</a> (Manchester University Press, 2025) by Dr. Claire Pierson sets out to answer these questions using rich empirical data and analysis in an examination of feminist activism after the Northern Irish peace agreement.</p>
<p>Utilising feminist frameworks and debates on movement building, policymaking, abortion rights, gender-based violence and the UN women, peace and security agenda, Dr. Pierson interrogates the opportunities and challenges in articulating a feminist voice and creating feminist spaces in the conflict transformational politics and society. Capturing the complexities of contemporary feminist movement building in a divided society, <em>Women's Troubles</em> contributes to ongoing analysis of contemporary global feminisms.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51571014" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fab27e72-8dc2-476e-81a5-35b93fb8d7ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fab27e72-8dc2-476e-81a5-35b93fb8d7ce&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Claire Pierson, &quot;Women&apos;s Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland&quot; (Manchester University Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do feminist movements develop and organise in ethno-nationally divided societies? How does this challenge our understandings of contemporary fourth wave feminism? Women&apos;s Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland (Manchester University Press, 2025) by Dr. Claire Pierson sets out to answer these questions using rich empirical data and analysis in an examination of feminist activism after the Northern Irish peace agreement.

Utilising feminist frameworks and debates on movement building, policymaking, abortion rights, gender-based violence and the UN women, peace and security agenda, Dr. Pierson interrogates the opportunities and challenges in articulating a feminist voice and creating feminist spaces in the conflict transformational politics and society. Capturing the complexities of contemporary feminist movement building in a divided society, Women&apos;s Troubles contributes to ongoing analysis of contemporary global feminisms.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do feminist movements develop and organise in ethno-nationally divided societies? How does this challenge our understandings of contemporary fourth wave feminism? Women&apos;s Troubles: Gender and Feminist Politics in Post-Agreement Northern Ireland (Manchester University Press, 2025) by Dr. Claire Pierson sets out to answer these questions using rich empirical data and analysis in an examination of feminist activism after the Northern Irish peace agreement.

Utilising feminist frameworks and debates on movement building, policymaking, abortion rights, gender-based violence and the UN women, peace and security agenda, Dr. Pierson interrogates the opportunities and challenges in articulating a feminist voice and creating feminist spaces in the conflict transformational politics and society. Capturing the complexities of contemporary feminist movement building in a divided society, Women&apos;s Troubles contributes to ongoing analysis of contemporary global feminisms.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>603</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">04037422-4c10-11f0-a8ba-0b44066fcb45</guid>
      <title>Emmanuel Akyeampong, &quot;Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders&quot; (Indiana UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780253066657">Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders</a><em> </em>(Indiana UP, 2023)explores Africa's political economy in the first two full decades of independence through the joint projects of nation-building, economic development, and international relations.</p>
<p>Drawing on the political careers of four heads of states: Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Ahmed Sékou Touré of Guinea, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Julius Kambarage Nyerere of Tanzania, Independent Africa engages four major themes: what does it mean to construct an African nation-state and what should an African nation-state look like; how does one grow a tropical economy emerging from European colonialism; how to explore an indigenous model of economic development, a "third way," in the context of a Cold War that had divided the world into two camps; and how to leverage internal resources and external opportunities to diversify agricultural economies and industrialize.</p>
<p>Combining aspects of history, economics, and political science, Independent Africa examines the important connections between the first generation of African leaders and the shared ideas that informed their endeavors at nation-building and worldmaking.</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong is the former Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Harvard University Center for African Studies and the Ellen Gurney Professor of History and of African and African American Studies at Harvard University. He joined the History faculty at Harvard upon receiving his Ph.D. in African History from the University of Virginia in 1993. He received his master's degree at Wake Forest University in North Carolina in 1989, where he concentrated on English labor history, and his bachelor's degree in History and Religions from the University of Ghana at Legon in 1984. Professor Akyeampong is currently the Ellen Gurney Professor of</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong's publications include Themes in West Africa's History (2005), which he edited; Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (2023); Between the Sea and the Lagoon: An Eco-Social History of the Anlo of Southeastern Ghana, 1850 to Recent Times (2001); and Drink, Power and Cultural Change: A Social History of Alcohol in Ghana, c. 1800 to Present Times (1996). He was a co-chief editor with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., for the Dictionary of African Biography, 6 Vols. (2012).</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong has been awarded several research fellowships, and from 1993 to 1994, he was the Zora Neale Hurston Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study and Research in the African Humanities at Northwestern University. He was named a Corresponding Fellow of the Royal Historical Society in 2002, and was nominated to be a Fellow of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2018 he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws by the University of Ghana. At Harvard, Professor Akyeampong is a faculty associate for the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and a member of the executive committee of the Hutchins Center. As a former chair of the Committee on African Studies, he has been instrumental, along with Professor Gates, in creating the Department of African and African American Studies and formerly served as the Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Center for African Studies.</p>
<p>You can learn more about Professor Akyeampong’s work <a href="https://eakyeampong.scholars.harvard.edu/">here</a></p>
<p>Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780253066657">Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders</a><em> </em>(Indiana UP, 2023)explores Africa's political economy in the first two full decades of independence through the joint projects of nation-building, economic development, and international relations.</p>
<p>Drawing on the political careers of four heads of states: Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Ahmed Sékou Touré of Guinea, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Julius Kambarage Nyerere of Tanzania, Independent Africa engages four major themes: what does it mean to construct an African nation-state and what should an African nation-state look like; how does one grow a tropical economy emerging from European colonialism; how to explore an indigenous model of economic development, a "third way," in the context of a Cold War that had divided the world into two camps; and how to leverage internal resources and external opportunities to diversify agricultural economies and industrialize.</p>
<p>Combining aspects of history, economics, and political science, Independent Africa examines the important connections between the first generation of African leaders and the shared ideas that informed their endeavors at nation-building and worldmaking.</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong is the former Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Harvard University Center for African Studies and the Ellen Gurney Professor of History and of African and African American Studies at Harvard University. He joined the History faculty at Harvard upon receiving his Ph.D. in African History from the University of Virginia in 1993. He received his master's degree at Wake Forest University in North Carolina in 1989, where he concentrated on English labor history, and his bachelor's degree in History and Religions from the University of Ghana at Legon in 1984. Professor Akyeampong is currently the Ellen Gurney Professor of</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong's publications include Themes in West Africa's History (2005), which he edited; Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (2023); Between the Sea and the Lagoon: An Eco-Social History of the Anlo of Southeastern Ghana, 1850 to Recent Times (2001); and Drink, Power and Cultural Change: A Social History of Alcohol in Ghana, c. 1800 to Present Times (1996). He was a co-chief editor with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., for the Dictionary of African Biography, 6 Vols. (2012).</p>
<p>Professor Akyeampong has been awarded several research fellowships, and from 1993 to 1994, he was the Zora Neale Hurston Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study and Research in the African Humanities at Northwestern University. He was named a Corresponding Fellow of the Royal Historical Society in 2002, and was nominated to be a Fellow of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2018 he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws by the University of Ghana. At Harvard, Professor Akyeampong is a faculty associate for the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and a member of the executive committee of the Hutchins Center. As a former chair of the Committee on African Studies, he has been instrumental, along with Professor Gates, in creating the Department of African and African American Studies and formerly served as the Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Center for African Studies.</p>
<p>You can learn more about Professor Akyeampong’s work <a href="https://eakyeampong.scholars.harvard.edu/">here</a></p>
<p>Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76535994" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3342457c-1510-4b96-93ef-6131c069c5df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3342457c-1510-4b96-93ef-6131c069c5df&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Emmanuel Akyeampong, &quot;Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders&quot; (Indiana UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (Indiana UP, 2023)explores Africa&apos;s political economy in the first two full decades of independence through the joint projects of nation-building, economic development, and international relations.

Drawing on the political careers of four heads of states: Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Ahmed Sékou Touré of Guinea, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Julius Kambarage Nyerere of Tanzania, Independent Africa engages four major themes: what does it mean to construct an African nation-state and what should an African nation-state look like; how does one grow a tropical economy emerging from European colonialism; how to explore an indigenous model of economic development, a &quot;third way,&quot; in the context of a Cold War that had divided the world into two camps; and how to leverage internal resources and external opportunities to diversify agricultural economies and industrialize.

Combining aspects of history, economics, and political science, Independent Africa examines the important connections between the first generation of African leaders and the shared ideas that informed their endeavors at nation-building and worldmaking.

Professor Akyeampong is the former Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Harvard University Center for African Studies and the Ellen Gurney Professor of History and of African and African American Studies at Harvard University. He joined the History faculty at Harvard upon receiving his Ph.D. in African History from the University of Virginia in 1993. He received his master&apos;s degree at Wake Forest University in North Carolina in 1989, where he concentrated on English labor history, and his bachelor&apos;s degree in History and Religions from the University of Ghana at Legon in 1984. Professor Akyeampong is currently the Ellen Gurney Professor of

Professor Akyeampong&apos;s publications include Themes in West Africa&apos;s History (2005), which he edited; Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (2023); Between the Sea and the Lagoon: An Eco-Social History of the Anlo of Southeastern Ghana, 1850 to Recent Times (2001); and Drink, Power and Cultural Change: A Social History of Alcohol in Ghana, c. 1800 to Present Times (1996). He was a co-chief editor with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., for the Dictionary of African Biography, 6 Vols. (2012).

Professor Akyeampong has been awarded several research fellowships, and from 1993 to 1994, he was the Zora Neale Hurston Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study and Research in the African Humanities at Northwestern University. He was named a Corresponding Fellow of the Royal Historical Society in 2002, and was nominated to be a Fellow of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2018 he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws by the University of Ghana. At Harvard, Professor Akyeampong is a faculty associate for the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and a member of the executive committee of the Hutchins Center. As a former chair of the Committee on African Studies, he has been instrumental, along with Professor Gates, in creating the Department of African and African American Studies and formerly served as the Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Center for African Studies.

You can learn more about Professor Akyeampong’s work here

Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (Indiana UP, 2023)explores Africa&apos;s political economy in the first two full decades of independence through the joint projects of nation-building, economic development, and international relations.

Drawing on the political careers of four heads of states: Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Ahmed Sékou Touré of Guinea, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Julius Kambarage Nyerere of Tanzania, Independent Africa engages four major themes: what does it mean to construct an African nation-state and what should an African nation-state look like; how does one grow a tropical economy emerging from European colonialism; how to explore an indigenous model of economic development, a &quot;third way,&quot; in the context of a Cold War that had divided the world into two camps; and how to leverage internal resources and external opportunities to diversify agricultural economies and industrialize.

Combining aspects of history, economics, and political science, Independent Africa examines the important connections between the first generation of African leaders and the shared ideas that informed their endeavors at nation-building and worldmaking.

Professor Akyeampong is the former Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Harvard University Center for African Studies and the Ellen Gurney Professor of History and of African and African American Studies at Harvard University. He joined the History faculty at Harvard upon receiving his Ph.D. in African History from the University of Virginia in 1993. He received his master&apos;s degree at Wake Forest University in North Carolina in 1989, where he concentrated on English labor history, and his bachelor&apos;s degree in History and Religions from the University of Ghana at Legon in 1984. Professor Akyeampong is currently the Ellen Gurney Professor of

Professor Akyeampong&apos;s publications include Themes in West Africa&apos;s History (2005), which he edited; Independent Africa: The First Generation of Nation Builders (2023); Between the Sea and the Lagoon: An Eco-Social History of the Anlo of Southeastern Ghana, 1850 to Recent Times (2001); and Drink, Power and Cultural Change: A Social History of Alcohol in Ghana, c. 1800 to Present Times (1996). He was a co-chief editor with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., for the Dictionary of African Biography, 6 Vols. (2012).

Professor Akyeampong has been awarded several research fellowships, and from 1993 to 1994, he was the Zora Neale Hurston Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study and Research in the African Humanities at Northwestern University. He was named a Corresponding Fellow of the Royal Historical Society in 2002, and was nominated to be a Fellow of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2018 he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws by the University of Ghana. At Harvard, Professor Akyeampong is a faculty associate for the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs and a member of the executive committee of the Hutchins Center. As a former chair of the Committee on African Studies, he has been instrumental, along with Professor Gates, in creating the Department of African and African American Studies and formerly served as the Oppenheimer Faculty Director of the Center for African Studies.

You can learn more about Professor Akyeampong’s work here

Afua Baafi Quarshie is a Ph.D. candidate in history at the Johns Hopkins University. Her research focuses on mothering and childhood in post-independence Ghana.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>602</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9673d1a-4926-11f0-82d4-bba61a80339b</guid>
      <title>Ioana Emy Matesan, &quot;The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Research shows that repression can lead to both radicalization and deradicalization. When does it drive groups to pick up arms, and under what conditions does it foster disengagement from violence? To answer these questions, it is important to trace tactical changes over time, and to parse the factors that push groups toward or away from violence. Through an examination of four case studies—the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Gama'a al-Islamiya'a in Egypt, and Darul Islam and Jemaah Islamiyaa in Indonesia—Ioana Emy Matesan establishes a framework for understanding what leads groups to escalate towards violence, or to renounce it. Matesan breaks down how escalation occurs into ideological, organizational, and behavorial escalation, giving us a nuanced and systematic approach to examining the complex nature of Islamist groups and providing a structure for analyzing other social groups that engage in violent tactics.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197510087"><em>The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia</em> (</a>Oxford UP, 2020).</p>
<p>Ioana Emy Matesan is Assistant Professor of Government and Tutor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research shows that repression can lead to both radicalization and deradicalization. When does it drive groups to pick up arms, and under what conditions does it foster disengagement from violence? To answer these questions, it is important to trace tactical changes over time, and to parse the factors that push groups toward or away from violence. Through an examination of four case studies—the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Gama'a al-Islamiya'a in Egypt, and Darul Islam and Jemaah Islamiyaa in Indonesia—Ioana Emy Matesan establishes a framework for understanding what leads groups to escalate towards violence, or to renounce it. Matesan breaks down how escalation occurs into ideological, organizational, and behavorial escalation, giving us a nuanced and systematic approach to examining the complex nature of Islamist groups and providing a structure for analyzing other social groups that engage in violent tactics.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197510087"><em>The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia</em> (</a>Oxford UP, 2020).</p>
<p>Ioana Emy Matesan is Assistant Professor of Government and Tutor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36034188" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f3b15bef-0488-4776-98bc-8441eb83fc66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f3b15bef-0488-4776-98bc-8441eb83fc66&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ioana Emy Matesan, &quot;The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Research shows that repression can lead to both radicalization and deradicalization. When does it drive groups to pick up arms, and under what conditions does it foster disengagement from violence? To answer these questions, it is important to trace tactical changes over time, and to parse the factors that push groups toward or away from violence. Through an examination of four case studies—the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Gama&apos;a al-Islamiya&apos;a in Egypt, and Darul Islam and Jemaah Islamiyaa in Indonesia—Ioana Emy Matesan establishes a framework for understanding what leads groups to escalate towards violence, or to renounce it. Matesan breaks down how escalation occurs into ideological, organizational, and behavorial escalation, giving us a nuanced and systematic approach to examining the complex nature of Islamist groups and providing a structure for analyzing other social groups that engage in violent tactics.

The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia (Oxford UP, 2020).

Ioana Emy Matesan is Assistant Professor of Government and Tutor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Research shows that repression can lead to both radicalization and deradicalization. When does it drive groups to pick up arms, and under what conditions does it foster disengagement from violence? To answer these questions, it is important to trace tactical changes over time, and to parse the factors that push groups toward or away from violence. Through an examination of four case studies—the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Gama&apos;a al-Islamiya&apos;a in Egypt, and Darul Islam and Jemaah Islamiyaa in Indonesia—Ioana Emy Matesan establishes a framework for understanding what leads groups to escalate towards violence, or to renounce it. Matesan breaks down how escalation occurs into ideological, organizational, and behavorial escalation, giving us a nuanced and systematic approach to examining the complex nature of Islamist groups and providing a structure for analyzing other social groups that engage in violent tactics.

The Violence Pendulum: Tactical Change in Islamist Groups in Egypt and Indonesia (Oxford UP, 2020).

Ioana Emy Matesan is Assistant Professor of Government and Tutor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>601</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ef39f0a-467c-11f0-a070-9f7a00098467</guid>
      <title>Marlene Laruelle, &quot;Ideology and Meaning-Making Under the Putin Regime&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written to try to understand the ideological characteristics of the current Russian government, as well as what is happening inside the mind of Vladimir Putin. Refusing pundits' clichés that depict the Russian regime as either a cynical kleptocracy or the product of Putin's grand Machiavellian designs, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503641594">Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime</a> offers a critical genealogy of ideology in Russia today. Marlene Laruelle provides an innovative, multi-method analysis of the Russian regime's ideological production process and the ways it is operationalized in both domestic and foreign policies. <em>Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime</em> reclaims the study of ideology as an unavoidable component of the tools we use to render the world intelligible and represents a significant contribution to the scholarly debate on the interaction between ideas and policy decisions. By placing the current Russian regime into a broader context of different strains of strategic culture, ideological interest groups, and intellectual history, this book gives readers key insights into how the Russo-Ukrainian War became possible and the role ideology played in enabling it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been written to try to understand the ideological characteristics of the current Russian government, as well as what is happening inside the mind of Vladimir Putin. Refusing pundits' clichés that depict the Russian regime as either a cynical kleptocracy or the product of Putin's grand Machiavellian designs, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503641594">Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime</a> offers a critical genealogy of ideology in Russia today. Marlene Laruelle provides an innovative, multi-method analysis of the Russian regime's ideological production process and the ways it is operationalized in both domestic and foreign policies. <em>Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime</em> reclaims the study of ideology as an unavoidable component of the tools we use to render the world intelligible and represents a significant contribution to the scholarly debate on the interaction between ideas and policy decisions. By placing the current Russian regime into a broader context of different strains of strategic culture, ideological interest groups, and intellectual history, this book gives readers key insights into how the Russo-Ukrainian War became possible and the role ideology played in enabling it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43103147" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/01d7b83c-d64b-497c-ba98-7abda6f14b2c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=01d7b83c-d64b-497c-ba98-7abda6f14b2c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marlene Laruelle, &quot;Ideology and Meaning-Making Under the Putin Regime&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Much has been written to try to understand the ideological characteristics of the current Russian government, as well as what is happening inside the mind of Vladimir Putin. Refusing pundits&apos; clichés that depict the Russian regime as either a cynical kleptocracy or the product of Putin&apos;s grand Machiavellian designs, Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime offers a critical genealogy of ideology in Russia today. Marlene Laruelle provides an innovative, multi-method analysis of the Russian regime&apos;s ideological production process and the ways it is operationalized in both domestic and foreign policies. Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime reclaims the study of ideology as an unavoidable component of the tools we use to render the world intelligible and represents a significant contribution to the scholarly debate on the interaction between ideas and policy decisions. By placing the current Russian regime into a broader context of different strains of strategic culture, ideological interest groups, and intellectual history, this book gives readers key insights into how the Russo-Ukrainian War became possible and the role ideology played in enabling it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Much has been written to try to understand the ideological characteristics of the current Russian government, as well as what is happening inside the mind of Vladimir Putin. Refusing pundits&apos; clichés that depict the Russian regime as either a cynical kleptocracy or the product of Putin&apos;s grand Machiavellian designs, Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime offers a critical genealogy of ideology in Russia today. Marlene Laruelle provides an innovative, multi-method analysis of the Russian regime&apos;s ideological production process and the ways it is operationalized in both domestic and foreign policies. Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime reclaims the study of ideology as an unavoidable component of the tools we use to render the world intelligible and represents a significant contribution to the scholarly debate on the interaction between ideas and policy decisions. By placing the current Russian regime into a broader context of different strains of strategic culture, ideological interest groups, and intellectual history, this book gives readers key insights into how the Russo-Ukrainian War became possible and the role ideology played in enabling it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>600</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14640d40-4675-11f0-a8a9-ef96df2bdce6</guid>
      <title>Ethnic minorities are good for democracy – Here is why</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democracy scholars often assume that ethnic homogeneity is good for democracy. Politically mobilised ethnic minorities, the assumption goes, stoke divisions and can destabilise democracy. In his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198906711">Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy: Circumstantial Liberals</a> (Oxford UP 2024), Jan Rovny turns this assumption on its head and argues that not only minorities are not bad for democracy but in fact they can help strengthen and protect it. In this episode, he talks with host Licia Cianetti about why this is the case, under what circumstances, and how the book’s lessons from minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can travel well beyond the region and might even provide insights to interpret recent voting patterns in the US.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etudes-europeennes/en/researcher/jan-rovny.html">Jan Rovny</a> is Professor of Political Science at the Center for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po, Paris.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her book on these themes is <a href="https://press.umich.edu/Books/T/The-Quality-of-Divided-Democracies">The Quality of Divided Democracies: Minority Inclusion, Exclusion and Representation in the New Europe</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2019).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy scholars often assume that ethnic homogeneity is good for democracy. Politically mobilised ethnic minorities, the assumption goes, stoke divisions and can destabilise democracy. In his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198906711">Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy: Circumstantial Liberals</a> (Oxford UP 2024), Jan Rovny turns this assumption on its head and argues that not only minorities are not bad for democracy but in fact they can help strengthen and protect it. In this episode, he talks with host Licia Cianetti about why this is the case, under what circumstances, and how the book’s lessons from minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can travel well beyond the region and might even provide insights to interpret recent voting patterns in the US.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etudes-europeennes/en/researcher/jan-rovny.html">Jan Rovny</a> is Professor of Political Science at the Center for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po, Paris.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her book on these themes is <a href="https://press.umich.edu/Books/T/The-Quality-of-Divided-Democracies">The Quality of Divided Democracies: Minority Inclusion, Exclusion and Representation in the New Europe</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2019).</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30810027" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c42bd9d4-af78-4b42-b963-3286e03cba63/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c42bd9d4-af78-4b42-b963-3286e03cba63&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ethnic minorities are good for democracy – Here is why</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy scholars often assume that ethnic homogeneity is good for democracy. Politically mobilised ethnic minorities, the assumption goes, stoke divisions and can destabilise democracy. In his latest book Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy: Circumstantial Liberals (Oxford UP 2024), Jan Rovny turns this assumption on its head and argues that not only minorities are not bad for democracy but in fact they can help strengthen and protect it. In this episode, he talks with host Licia Cianetti about why this is the case, under what circumstances, and how the book’s lessons from minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can travel well beyond the region and might even provide insights to interpret recent voting patterns in the US.

Jan Rovny is Professor of Political Science at the Center for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po, Paris.

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her book on these themes is The Quality of Divided Democracies: Minority Inclusion, Exclusion and Representation in the New Europe (University of Michigan Press, 2019).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy scholars often assume that ethnic homogeneity is good for democracy. Politically mobilised ethnic minorities, the assumption goes, stoke divisions and can destabilise democracy. In his latest book Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy: Circumstantial Liberals (Oxford UP 2024), Jan Rovny turns this assumption on its head and argues that not only minorities are not bad for democracy but in fact they can help strengthen and protect it. In this episode, he talks with host Licia Cianetti about why this is the case, under what circumstances, and how the book’s lessons from minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can travel well beyond the region and might even provide insights to interpret recent voting patterns in the US.

Jan Rovny is Professor of Political Science at the Center for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po, Paris.

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Founding Director of CEDAR. Her book on these themes is The Quality of Divided Democracies: Minority Inclusion, Exclusion and Representation in the New Europe (University of Michigan Press, 2019).

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>599</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f5048fa-43e0-11f0-b208-fb97601fa149</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth N. Saunders, &quot;The Insiders&apos; Game: How Elites Make War and Peace&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-insiders-game-how-elites-make-war-and-peace-elizabeth-n-saunders/20158787"><em>The Insiders’ Game</em> </a>(Princeton University Press, 2024<em>) </em>sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.<br />Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.<br />Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. <em>The Insiders’ Game</em> shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://profsaunders.com/">Elizabeth N. Saunders</a>, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-insiders-game-how-elites-make-war-and-peace-elizabeth-n-saunders/20158787"><em>The Insiders’ Game</em> </a>(Princeton University Press, 2024<em>) </em>sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.<br />Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.<br />Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. <em>The Insiders’ Game</em> shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://profsaunders.com/">Elizabeth N. Saunders</a>, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42506265" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fa2fb983-405a-4b97-875d-6ac152e43cb0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fa2fb983-405a-4b97-875d-6ac152e43cb0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth N. Saunders, &quot;The Insiders&apos; Game: How Elites Make War and Peace&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? The Insiders’ Game (Princeton University Press, 2024) sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. The Insiders’ Game shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.

Our guest is Elizabeth N. Saunders, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of the most widely held views of democratic leaders is that they are cautious about using military force because voters can hold them accountable, ultimately making democracies more peaceful. How, then, are leaders able to wage war in the face of popular opposition, or end conflicts when the public still supports them? The Insiders’ Game (Princeton University Press, 2024) sheds light on this enduring puzzle, arguing that the primary constraints on decisions about war and peace come from elites, not the public.Elizabeth Saunders focuses on three groups of elites—presidential advisers, legislators, and military officials—to show how the dynamics of this insiders’ game are key to understanding the use of force in American foreign policy. She explores how elite preferences differ from those of ordinary voters and how leaders must bargain with elites to secure their support for war. Saunders provides insights into why leaders start and prolong conflicts the public does not want but also demonstrates how elites can force leaders to change course and end wars.Tracing presidential decisions about the use of force from the Cold War through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Saunders reveals how the elite politics of war are a central feature of democracy. The Insiders’ Game shifts the focus of democratic accountability from the voting booth to the halls of power.

Our guest is Elizabeth N. Saunders, Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a member of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>598</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0fe0c5e-41ea-11f0-849a-e369f51145ea</guid>
      <title>Ulf Laessing, &quot;Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi&quot; (Hurst, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has Libya fallen apart since 2011? The world has largely given up trying to understand how the revolution that toppled Muammar Gaddafi has left the country a failed state and a major security headache for Europe. Gaddafi's police state has been replaced by yet another dictatorship, amidst a complex conflict of myriad armed groups, Islamists, tribes, towns and secularists. What happened? One of few foreign journalists to have lived in post-revolution Tripoli, Ulf Laessing has unique insight into the violent nature of post-Gaddafi politics. Confronting threats from media-hostile militias and jihadi kidnappings, in a world where diplomats retreat to their compounds and guns are drawn at government press conferences, Laessing has kept his ear to the ground and won the trust of many key players. Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi is an original blend of personal anecdote and nuanced Libyan history. It offers a much-needed diagnosis of why war has erupted over a desert nation of just 6 million, and of how the country blessed with Africa's greatest energy reserves has been reduced to state collapse.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has Libya fallen apart since 2011? The world has largely given up trying to understand how the revolution that toppled Muammar Gaddafi has left the country a failed state and a major security headache for Europe. Gaddafi's police state has been replaced by yet another dictatorship, amidst a complex conflict of myriad armed groups, Islamists, tribes, towns and secularists. What happened? One of few foreign journalists to have lived in post-revolution Tripoli, Ulf Laessing has unique insight into the violent nature of post-Gaddafi politics. Confronting threats from media-hostile militias and jihadi kidnappings, in a world where diplomats retreat to their compounds and guns are drawn at government press conferences, Laessing has kept his ear to the ground and won the trust of many key players. Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi is an original blend of personal anecdote and nuanced Libyan history. It offers a much-needed diagnosis of why war has erupted over a desert nation of just 6 million, and of how the country blessed with Africa's greatest energy reserves has been reduced to state collapse.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59886526" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/56bc3acb-d17d-43e2-9a1d-b564460581da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=56bc3acb-d17d-43e2-9a1d-b564460581da&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ulf Laessing, &quot;Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi&quot; (Hurst, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why has Libya fallen apart since 2011? The world has largely given up trying to understand how the revolution that toppled Muammar Gaddafi has left the country a failed state and a major security headache for Europe. Gaddafi&apos;s police state has been replaced by yet another dictatorship, amidst a complex conflict of myriad armed groups, Islamists, tribes, towns and secularists. What happened? One of few foreign journalists to have lived in post-revolution Tripoli, Ulf Laessing has unique insight into the violent nature of post-Gaddafi politics. Confronting threats from media-hostile militias and jihadi kidnappings, in a world where diplomats retreat to their compounds and guns are drawn at government press conferences, Laessing has kept his ear to the ground and won the trust of many key players. Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi is an original blend of personal anecdote and nuanced Libyan history. It offers a much-needed diagnosis of why war has erupted over a desert nation of just 6 million, and of how the country blessed with Africa&apos;s greatest energy reserves has been reduced to state collapse.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why has Libya fallen apart since 2011? The world has largely given up trying to understand how the revolution that toppled Muammar Gaddafi has left the country a failed state and a major security headache for Europe. Gaddafi&apos;s police state has been replaced by yet another dictatorship, amidst a complex conflict of myriad armed groups, Islamists, tribes, towns and secularists. What happened? One of few foreign journalists to have lived in post-revolution Tripoli, Ulf Laessing has unique insight into the violent nature of post-Gaddafi politics. Confronting threats from media-hostile militias and jihadi kidnappings, in a world where diplomats retreat to their compounds and guns are drawn at government press conferences, Laessing has kept his ear to the ground and won the trust of many key players. Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi is an original blend of personal anecdote and nuanced Libyan history. It offers a much-needed diagnosis of why war has erupted over a desert nation of just 6 million, and of how the country blessed with Africa&apos;s greatest energy reserves has been reduced to state collapse.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>597</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19b5b7b6-418a-11f0-beb2-bf0e7277dd67</guid>
      <title>NATO, the Indo-Pacific, and the Future of Burden-Sharing: A Conversation with Brian Blankenship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501772474">The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics</a><em> </em>(Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe's burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.</p>
<p>Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501772474">The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics</a><em> </em>(Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe's burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.</p>
<p>Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43214578" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/95ed2cef-659a-4134-b776-9087dbdaa163/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=95ed2cef-659a-4134-b776-9087dbdaa163&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>NATO, the Indo-Pacific, and the Future of Burden-Sharing: A Conversation with Brian Blankenship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics (Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe&apos;s burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.

Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Brian Blankenship comes back to the New Books Network to talk about what his book, The Burden-Sharing Dilemma: Coercive Diplomacy in US Alliance Politics (Cornell University Press, 2023), might be able to tell us about the quickly changing nature of US military alliances across the globe. We discuss the implications of Europe&apos;s burgeoning rearmament, the prospect of a collective defense pact in the Indo-Pacific, and how changing technologies and threats might affect burden-sharing in future alliances.

Brian D. Blankenship is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>596</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57c6ba0a-40b3-11f0-a5fc-0b5d8abdeda3</guid>
      <title>James Graham Wilson, &quot;America&apos;s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>In </strong><em><strong>America's Cold Warrior</strong></em><strong>, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze's career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life.</strong> Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter's presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze's most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. <em>America's Cold Warrior </em>connects Nitze's career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People's Republic of China and Russia.</p>
<p>Short Bio:</p>
<p>James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the <strong>Office of the Historian</strong> at the Department of State.</p>
<p>He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.</p>
<p>He is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501776076">America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan</a> (Cornell Press, 2024) and <em>The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War</em> (Cornell Press, 2014).</p>
<p>He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<p>Susan Colbourn, <a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501766022/euromissiles/"><em>Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO</em></a> (2022).</p>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy, <a href="https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Thirteen-Days-Memoir-Cuban-Missile-Crisis/30643504298/bd"><em>Thirteen Days</em></a> (1969).</p>
<p>Nicholas Thompson, <a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312658861/thehawkandthedove/"><em>The Hawk and the Dove</em></a> (2010).</p>
<p>Also mentioned:</p>
<p>Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, <a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments">here</a>.</p>
<p>The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, <a href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In </strong><em><strong>America's Cold Warrior</strong></em><strong>, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze's career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life.</strong> Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter's presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze's most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. <em>America's Cold Warrior </em>connects Nitze's career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People's Republic of China and Russia.</p>
<p>Short Bio:</p>
<p>James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the <strong>Office of the Historian</strong> at the Department of State.</p>
<p>He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.</p>
<p>He is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501776076">America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan</a> (Cornell Press, 2024) and <em>The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War</em> (Cornell Press, 2014).</p>
<p>He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<p>Susan Colbourn, <a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501766022/euromissiles/"><em>Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO</em></a> (2022).</p>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy, <a href="https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Thirteen-Days-Memoir-Cuban-Missile-Crisis/30643504298/bd"><em>Thirteen Days</em></a> (1969).</p>
<p>Nicholas Thompson, <a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312658861/thehawkandthedove/"><em>The Hawk and the Dove</em></a> (2010).</p>
<p>Also mentioned:</p>
<p>Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, <a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments">here</a>.</p>
<p>The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, <a href="https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65167085" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/43ac7d92-43ed-4ae6-8e34-5d4f483858ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=43ac7d92-43ed-4ae6-8e34-5d4f483858ad&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Graham Wilson, &quot;America&apos;s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In America&apos;s Cold Warrior, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze&apos;s career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life. Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter&apos;s presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze&apos;s most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. America&apos;s Cold Warrior connects Nitze&apos;s career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People&apos;s Republic of China and Russia.

Short Bio:

James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the Office of the Historian at the Department of State.

He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.

He is the author of America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan (Cornell Press, 2024) and The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War (Cornell Press, 2014).

He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.

Mentioned:

Susan Colbourn, Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO (2022).

Robert F. Kennedy, Thirteen Days (1969).

Nicholas Thompson, The Hawk and the Dove (2010).

Also mentioned:

Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, here.

The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, here.

Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In America&apos;s Cold Warrior, James Graham Wilson traces Paul Nitze&apos;s career path in national security after World War II, a time when many of his mentors and peers returned to civilian life. Serving in eight presidential administrations, Nitze commanded White House attention even when he was out of government, especially with his withering criticism of Jimmy Carter during Carter&apos;s presidency. While Nitze is perhaps best known for leading the formulation of NSC-68, which Harry Truman signed in 1950, Wilson contends that Nitze&apos;s most significant contribution to American peace and security came in the painstaking work done in the 1980s to negotiate successful treaties with the Soviets to reduce nuclear weapons while simultaneously deflecting skeptics surrounding Ronald Reagan. America&apos;s Cold Warrior connects Nitze&apos;s career and concerns about strategic vulnerability to the post-9/11 era and the challenges of the 2020s, where the United States finds itself locked in geopolitical competition with the People&apos;s Republic of China and Russia.

Short Bio:

James Graham Wilson is a Supervisory Historian in the Office of the Historian at the Department of State.

He has compiled 11 volumes in the Foreign Relations of the United States series, including the sequence of National Security Policy volumes covering 1977–1992.

He is the author of America’s Cold Warrior: Paul Nitze and National Security from Roosevelt to Reagan (Cornell Press, 2024) and The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War (Cornell Press, 2014).

He received his PhD from the University of Virginia in 2011, where he studied with Melvyn Leffler.

Mentioned:

Susan Colbourn, Euromissiles: The Nuclear Weapons That Nearly Destroyed NATO (2022).

Robert F. Kennedy, Thirteen Days (1969).

Nicholas Thompson, The Hawk and the Dove (2010).

Also mentioned:

Foreign Relations of the United States Volumes, here.

The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, here.

Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor in International Relations at Swansea University, in Wales (UK).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>595</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3722afe-404b-11f0-b38f-bb26590705dd</guid>
      <title>NIAS Podcast from the University of Tartu Asia Centre China&apos;s Psychological Power</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso <a href="https://icds.ee/en/">International Centre for Defence and Security</a> (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the <a href="https://aasiakeskus.ut.ee/en">University of Tartu Asia Centre</a> and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule.</p>
<p>Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP’s hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable.</p>
<p>In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso <a href="https://icds.ee/en/">International Centre for Defence and Security</a> (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the <a href="https://aasiakeskus.ut.ee/en">University of Tartu Asia Centre</a> and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule.</p>
<p>Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP’s hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable.</p>
<p>In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36950145" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5e915bea-2be7-48e1-80ca-6121cc91dd2a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5e915bea-2be7-48e1-80ca-6121cc91dd2a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>NIAS Podcast from the University of Tartu Asia Centre China&apos;s Psychological Power</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule.

Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP’s hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable.

In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule.

Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP’s hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable.

In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>594</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42246836-4055-11f0-92bd-97b4692ef405</guid>
      <title>Sarah Nagaty, &quot;The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031350153">The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) links two seminal moments in Egypt’s history – the Revolution of 25th January 2011 and the presidency of Gamal Abdel Nasser – through various cultural manifestations. It conceives the concept of “collective dreaming” to map out the subliminal feeling that runs deep through experiences of socially transformative moments. Sarah Nagaty has extensively studied the structure of feelings that encompasses the experiences not only of activist minorities but the broader mass of revolutionary movements. In certain historical moments, hopes and aspirations bind together millions of people from all walks of life: students, workers, farmers, and middle-class professionals. Nagaty calls this phenomenon the “collective dream”, something which has been carried through generations of Egyptians.</p>
<p>In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy sat down with Sarah Nagaty to discuss the conceptual roots of the collective dream and the overlooked histories of Nubian displacement during the construction of the High Dam. They also explored how thinkers like Raymond Williams and Lauren Berlant shaped Nagaty’s method of reading revolutionary time and cultural memory, as well as how vernacular poetry, reportage, and graffiti served as vital archival traces of collective feeling.</p>
<p><em>Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031350153">The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) links two seminal moments in Egypt’s history – the Revolution of 25th January 2011 and the presidency of Gamal Abdel Nasser – through various cultural manifestations. It conceives the concept of “collective dreaming” to map out the subliminal feeling that runs deep through experiences of socially transformative moments. Sarah Nagaty has extensively studied the structure of feelings that encompasses the experiences not only of activist minorities but the broader mass of revolutionary movements. In certain historical moments, hopes and aspirations bind together millions of people from all walks of life: students, workers, farmers, and middle-class professionals. Nagaty calls this phenomenon the “collective dream”, something which has been carried through generations of Egyptians.</p>
<p>In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy sat down with Sarah Nagaty to discuss the conceptual roots of the collective dream and the overlooked histories of Nubian displacement during the construction of the High Dam. They also explored how thinkers like Raymond Williams and Lauren Berlant shaped Nagaty’s method of reading revolutionary time and cultural memory, as well as how vernacular poetry, reportage, and graffiti served as vital archival traces of collective feeling.</p>
<p><em>Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34273703" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a6cf44e3-23cb-467f-8b14-07a4c55facb2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a6cf44e3-23cb-467f-8b14-07a4c55facb2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah Nagaty, &quot;The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) links two seminal moments in Egypt’s history – the Revolution of 25th January 2011 and the presidency of Gamal Abdel Nasser – through various cultural manifestations. It conceives the concept of “collective dreaming” to map out the subliminal feeling that runs deep through experiences of socially transformative moments. Sarah Nagaty has extensively studied the structure of feelings that encompasses the experiences not only of activist minorities but the broader mass of revolutionary movements. In certain historical moments, hopes and aspirations bind together millions of people from all walks of life: students, workers, farmers, and middle-class professionals. Nagaty calls this phenomenon the “collective dream”, something which has been carried through generations of Egyptians.

In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy sat down with Sarah Nagaty to discuss the conceptual roots of the collective dream and the overlooked histories of Nubian displacement during the construction of the High Dam. They also explored how thinkers like Raymond Williams and Lauren Berlant shaped Nagaty’s method of reading revolutionary time and cultural memory, as well as how vernacular poetry, reportage, and graffiti served as vital archival traces of collective feeling.

Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Collective Dream: Egyptians Longing For A Better Life (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023) links two seminal moments in Egypt’s history – the Revolution of 25th January 2011 and the presidency of Gamal Abdel Nasser – through various cultural manifestations. It conceives the concept of “collective dreaming” to map out the subliminal feeling that runs deep through experiences of socially transformative moments. Sarah Nagaty has extensively studied the structure of feelings that encompasses the experiences not only of activist minorities but the broader mass of revolutionary movements. In certain historical moments, hopes and aspirations bind together millions of people from all walks of life: students, workers, farmers, and middle-class professionals. Nagaty calls this phenomenon the “collective dream”, something which has been carried through generations of Egyptians.

In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy sat down with Sarah Nagaty to discuss the conceptual roots of the collective dream and the overlooked histories of Nubian displacement during the construction of the High Dam. They also explored how thinkers like Raymond Williams and Lauren Berlant shaped Nagaty’s method of reading revolutionary time and cultural memory, as well as how vernacular poetry, reportage, and graffiti served as vital archival traces of collective feeling.

Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>593</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fb768234-3f96-11f0-9eeb-ffd594a26e33</guid>
      <title>Jeremy Morris, &quot;Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance&quot; (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What do Russians really want? Do they want authoritarianism and are they prepared to go along with a war of conquest and destruction? Or do they want something else? A landmark contribution to the field, Morris is the only social researcher to have carried out fieldwork in Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, engaging with communities in Moscow, regional cities, as well as rural areas to bring perspectives on Russian everyday lives that are now entirely inaccessible to the West. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350509313">Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025) uses the lens of micropolitics, defined not as politics in miniature but instead as taking seriously the political content of people's normal lives revealed in their practices, interactions and discussions. Based on decades-long interactions with people from a diverse cross-section of society in Russia – from security service officers to factory workers, from unemployed young men to citizen journalists and activists, this is the most comprehensive insight to date into the complexity of Russian attitudes toward war, their government and the post-1991 political trajectory.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do Russians really want? Do they want authoritarianism and are they prepared to go along with a war of conquest and destruction? Or do they want something else? A landmark contribution to the field, Morris is the only social researcher to have carried out fieldwork in Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, engaging with communities in Moscow, regional cities, as well as rural areas to bring perspectives on Russian everyday lives that are now entirely inaccessible to the West. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350509313">Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance</a> (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025) uses the lens of micropolitics, defined not as politics in miniature but instead as taking seriously the political content of people's normal lives revealed in their practices, interactions and discussions. Based on decades-long interactions with people from a diverse cross-section of society in Russia – from security service officers to factory workers, from unemployed young men to citizen journalists and activists, this is the most comprehensive insight to date into the complexity of Russian attitudes toward war, their government and the post-1991 political trajectory.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58289220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d57aaf4c-14d4-43bf-a8f7-b49a63a45ec1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d57aaf4c-14d4-43bf-a8f7-b49a63a45ec1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy Morris, &quot;Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance&quot; (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What do Russians really want? Do they want authoritarianism and are they prepared to go along with a war of conquest and destruction? Or do they want something else? A landmark contribution to the field, Morris is the only social researcher to have carried out fieldwork in Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, engaging with communities in Moscow, regional cities, as well as rural areas to bring perspectives on Russian everyday lives that are now entirely inaccessible to the West. Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025) uses the lens of micropolitics, defined not as politics in miniature but instead as taking seriously the political content of people&apos;s normal lives revealed in their practices, interactions and discussions. Based on decades-long interactions with people from a diverse cross-section of society in Russia – from security service officers to factory workers, from unemployed young men to citizen journalists and activists, this is the most comprehensive insight to date into the complexity of Russian attitudes toward war, their government and the post-1991 political trajectory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What do Russians really want? Do they want authoritarianism and are they prepared to go along with a war of conquest and destruction? Or do they want something else? A landmark contribution to the field, Morris is the only social researcher to have carried out fieldwork in Russia since the invasion of Ukraine, engaging with communities in Moscow, regional cities, as well as rural areas to bring perspectives on Russian everyday lives that are now entirely inaccessible to the West. Everyday Politics in Russia: From Resentment to Resistance (Bloomsbury Academic, 2025) uses the lens of micropolitics, defined not as politics in miniature but instead as taking seriously the political content of people&apos;s normal lives revealed in their practices, interactions and discussions. Based on decades-long interactions with people from a diverse cross-section of society in Russia – from security service officers to factory workers, from unemployed young men to citizen journalists and activists, this is the most comprehensive insight to date into the complexity of Russian attitudes toward war, their government and the post-1991 political trajectory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>592</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd1b7030-2d15-11f0-9bfa-6373d003e6d4</guid>
      <title>How Do Autocrats Stay in Power: A Discussion with Johannes Gerschewski</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his <em>book </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009199384">The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule</a> (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump<em>. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump's second inauguration*</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wzb.eu/en/persons/johannes-gerschewski">Johannes Gerschewski</a> is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?scroll=top#metrics-summary">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in <em>Democratization </em>in 2025.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his <em>book </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009199384">The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule</a> (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump<em>. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump's second inauguration*</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.wzb.eu/en/persons/johannes-gerschewski">Johannes Gerschewski</a> is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia.aspx">Licia Cianetti</a> is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/10.1080/13510347.2025.2483418?scroll=top#metrics-summary">What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies</a>” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in <em>Democratization </em>in 2025.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31804551" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/807f5f96-02ca-400e-aac9-0e1f59b87ade/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=807f5f96-02ca-400e-aac9-0e1f59b87ade&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How Do Autocrats Stay in Power: A Discussion with Johannes Gerschewski</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his book The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump&apos;s second inauguration*

Johannes Gerschewski is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in Democratization in 2025.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode Licia Cianetti talks to Johannes Gerschewski about his book The Two Logics of Autocratic Rule (Cambridge UP, 2023). We discuss how autocrats try to either hyper-politicise or de-politicise their rule in order to stay in power, whether the word “fascist” is useful today, and what the two logics identified in the book might tell us about politics in contemporary autocratising democracies. As we recorded during Johannes’s stay at Thomas Mann House in LA, soon after the US 2024 elections, a lot of this had unavoidably to do with Trump. *This episode was recorded soon after the US elections, before the LA fires and Trump&apos;s second inauguration*

Johannes Gerschewski is research fellow at the WZB and academic coordinator of the Theory Network at the Cluster of Excellence SCRIPTS. In his research, he works both theoretically and empirically on questions of legitimacy, stability, and crisis proneness of democratic and autocratic regimes.

Licia Cianetti is Lecturer in Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham and Deputy Co-Director of CEDAR. Her most recent work on these themes is “What is a “regime”? Three definitions and their implications for the future of regime studies” (with Gianni Del Panta and Catherine Owen) published in Democratization in 2025.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a72eba3e-3b4f-11f0-ad91-03ff5e49fbb5</guid>
      <title>Peter Allen, &quot;How to Think about Politics: A Guide in Five Parts&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What part should politics play in our everyday lives? In <a href="https://www.peter-allen.co.uk/how-to-think-about-politics/"><em>How to Think About Politics: A Guide in Five Parts</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/peterallen.bsky.social">Peter Allen</a>, <a href="https://www.peter-allen.co.uk/">a professor of Politics</a> and <a href="https://www.bath.ac.uk/research-institutes/institute-for-policy-research/">Co-Director of the Institute for Policy Research</a> at the <a href="https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/persons/peter-allen/publications/">University of Bath,</a> explores this question across a range of practical and philosophical examples. The book directly challenges the conventional academic understanding of politics, showing how politics is much more than election polls or parliamentary behaviours. This broader view of the politic allows the book to offer insights as to what needs to change in political systems, as well as more generally in societies. A much needed and urgent intervention on the current state of our world, the book should be widely read by any readers interested in politics today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What part should politics play in our everyday lives? In <a href="https://www.peter-allen.co.uk/how-to-think-about-politics/"><em>How to Think About Politics: A Guide in Five Parts</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025) <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/peterallen.bsky.social">Peter Allen</a>, <a href="https://www.peter-allen.co.uk/">a professor of Politics</a> and <a href="https://www.bath.ac.uk/research-institutes/institute-for-policy-research/">Co-Director of the Institute for Policy Research</a> at the <a href="https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/persons/peter-allen/publications/">University of Bath,</a> explores this question across a range of practical and philosophical examples. The book directly challenges the conventional academic understanding of politics, showing how politics is much more than election polls or parliamentary behaviours. This broader view of the politic allows the book to offer insights as to what needs to change in political systems, as well as more generally in societies. A much needed and urgent intervention on the current state of our world, the book should be widely read by any readers interested in politics today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35552191" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/864f56fd-4ddf-4a67-b2a5-f860f54822b3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=864f56fd-4ddf-4a67-b2a5-f860f54822b3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Allen, &quot;How to Think about Politics: A Guide in Five Parts&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What part should politics play in our everyday lives? In How to Think About Politics: A Guide in Five Parts (Oxford University Press, 2025) Peter Allen, a professor of Politics and Co-Director of the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Bath, explores this question across a range of practical and philosophical examples. The book directly challenges the conventional academic understanding of politics, showing how politics is much more than election polls or parliamentary behaviours. This broader view of the politic allows the book to offer insights as to what needs to change in political systems, as well as more generally in societies. A much needed and urgent intervention on the current state of our world, the book should be widely read by any readers interested in politics today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What part should politics play in our everyday lives? In How to Think About Politics: A Guide in Five Parts (Oxford University Press, 2025) Peter Allen, a professor of Politics and Co-Director of the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Bath, explores this question across a range of practical and philosophical examples. The book directly challenges the conventional academic understanding of politics, showing how politics is much more than election polls or parliamentary behaviours. This broader view of the politic allows the book to offer insights as to what needs to change in political systems, as well as more generally in societies. A much needed and urgent intervention on the current state of our world, the book should be widely read by any readers interested in politics today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>590</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e8cff66-3cdc-11f0-8c3e-8b5d89b9ba18</guid>
      <title>Jaime Lee Kucinskas, &quot;The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231208154">The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy</a> (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.<br /></p>
<p>Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231208154">The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy</a> (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.<br /></p>
<p>Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24497874" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/40edc090-6720-4786-93f4-4c7bff032928/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=40edc090-6720-4786-93f4-4c7bff032928&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jaime Lee Kucinskas, &quot;The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.

Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Loyalty Trap: Conflicting Loyalties of Civil Servants Under Increasing Autocracy (Columbia University Press, 2025) explores how civil servants navigated competing pressures and duties amid the chaos of the first Trump administration, drawing on in-depth interviews with senior officials in the most contested agencies over the course of a tumultuous term. A revealing investigation that is now more relevant than ever.

Jaime Kucinskas is Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at Hamilton College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>589</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f9cb2da-2f6e-11f0-a5fd-3ba4592ccc90</guid>
      <title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. </p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. </p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33101569" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/132694b9-acf3-4e4f-bd9c-ae8061480ef5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=132694b9-acf3-4e4f-bd9c-ae8061480ef5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 

For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 

For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26b40af8-3d02-11f0-a736-23a6f62f3f3f</guid>
      <title>Katarina Kušic, &quot;Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia&quot; (University of Michigan Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Studies of statebuilding and peacebuilding have been criticized for their disregard of people living the consequences of intervention projects. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472077359">Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Katarina Kušic takes on the task of engaging with spaces and peoples not usually present in IR scholarship to rethink the very concept of “intervention” by paying close attention to how people actually experience and make sense of those efforts. In particular, the book offers a detailed engagement with ethnographic fieldwork in two policy areas in Serbia—agricultural policy and non-formal youth education.</p>
<p>By engaging with subjects, the book not only enhances our understanding of intervention, but also uncovers the limitations of the concept. Dr. Kušić argues that the concept limits what we can observe and theorize, and it prevents researchers from engaging with the people living in spaces of intervention as coeval political subjects. As an alternative, she proposes to foreground improvement over “intervention.” This reorientation enables researchers to trace hierarchies beyond the local/international dichotomy, expands fields of visibility beyond those prescribed by interventions themselves, and seriously considers the contradictions at the heart of liberalism.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies of statebuilding and peacebuilding have been criticized for their disregard of people living the consequences of intervention projects. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472077359">Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Katarina Kušic takes on the task of engaging with spaces and peoples not usually present in IR scholarship to rethink the very concept of “intervention” by paying close attention to how people actually experience and make sense of those efforts. In particular, the book offers a detailed engagement with ethnographic fieldwork in two policy areas in Serbia—agricultural policy and non-formal youth education.</p>
<p>By engaging with subjects, the book not only enhances our understanding of intervention, but also uncovers the limitations of the concept. Dr. Kušić argues that the concept limits what we can observe and theorize, and it prevents researchers from engaging with the people living in spaces of intervention as coeval political subjects. As an alternative, she proposes to foreground improvement over “intervention.” This reorientation enables researchers to trace hierarchies beyond the local/international dichotomy, expands fields of visibility beyond those prescribed by interventions themselves, and seriously considers the contradictions at the heart of liberalism.</p>
<p><br /><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53636494" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a858bbd7-4ac3-4330-92be-078f5a98a50c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a858bbd7-4ac3-4330-92be-078f5a98a50c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katarina Kušic, &quot;Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia&quot; (University of Michigan Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Studies of statebuilding and peacebuilding have been criticized for their disregard of people living the consequences of intervention projects. Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Katarina Kušic takes on the task of engaging with spaces and peoples not usually present in IR scholarship to rethink the very concept of “intervention” by paying close attention to how people actually experience and make sense of those efforts. In particular, the book offers a detailed engagement with ethnographic fieldwork in two policy areas in Serbia—agricultural policy and non-formal youth education.

By engaging with subjects, the book not only enhances our understanding of intervention, but also uncovers the limitations of the concept. Dr. Kušić argues that the concept limits what we can observe and theorize, and it prevents researchers from engaging with the people living in spaces of intervention as coeval political subjects. As an alternative, she proposes to foreground improvement over “intervention.” This reorientation enables researchers to trace hierarchies beyond the local/international dichotomy, expands fields of visibility beyond those prescribed by interventions themselves, and seriously considers the contradictions at the heart of liberalism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Studies of statebuilding and peacebuilding have been criticized for their disregard of people living the consequences of intervention projects. Beyond International Intervention: Politics of Improvement in Serbia (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Katarina Kušic takes on the task of engaging with spaces and peoples not usually present in IR scholarship to rethink the very concept of “intervention” by paying close attention to how people actually experience and make sense of those efforts. In particular, the book offers a detailed engagement with ethnographic fieldwork in two policy areas in Serbia—agricultural policy and non-formal youth education.

By engaging with subjects, the book not only enhances our understanding of intervention, but also uncovers the limitations of the concept. Dr. Kušić argues that the concept limits what we can observe and theorize, and it prevents researchers from engaging with the people living in spaces of intervention as coeval political subjects. As an alternative, she proposes to foreground improvement over “intervention.” This reorientation enables researchers to trace hierarchies beyond the local/international dichotomy, expands fields of visibility beyond those prescribed by interventions themselves, and seriously considers the contradictions at the heart of liberalism.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>587</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">017879c2-3c7b-11f0-b035-0b4dd769fed8</guid>
      <title>Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan, &quot;Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>To what extent do cyberspace operations increase the risks of escalation between nation-state rivals? Scholars and practitioners have been concerned about cyber escalation for decades, but the question remains hotly debated. The issue is increasingly important for international politics as more states develop and employ offensive cyber capabilities, and as the international system is increasingly characterized by emergent multipolarity.<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escalation-dynamics-in-cyberspace-assistant-professor-in-the-army-cyber-institute-erica-d-lonergan/1191bfa60d0976f9?ean=9780197550892&amp;next=t">Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace</a>, Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan tackle this question head-on, presenting a comprehensive theory that explains the conditions under which cyber operations may lead to escalation. In doing so, they challenge long-held assumptions about strategic interactions in cyberspace, arguing that cyberspace is not as dangerous as the conventional wisdom might suggest. In some cases, cyber operations could even facilitate the de-escalation of international crises. To support their claims, Lonergan and Lonergan test their theory against a range of in-depth case studies, including strategic interactions between the United States and key rivals; a series of case studies of the role of cyber operations in international crises; and plausible future scenarios involving cyber operations during conflict. </p>
<p>The authors then apply their analytical insights to policymaking, making the case that skepticism is warranted about the overall efficacy of employing cyber power for strategic ends. By exploring the role of cyber operations in routine competition, crises, and warfighting, <em>Escalation</em> <em>Dynamics in Cyberspace</em> presents nuanced insights about how cyberspace affects international politics</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/communities-connections/faculty/erica-lonergan">Erica D. Lonergan</a>, an Assistant Professor in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To what extent do cyberspace operations increase the risks of escalation between nation-state rivals? Scholars and practitioners have been concerned about cyber escalation for decades, but the question remains hotly debated. The issue is increasingly important for international politics as more states develop and employ offensive cyber capabilities, and as the international system is increasingly characterized by emergent multipolarity.<br />In <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escalation-dynamics-in-cyberspace-assistant-professor-in-the-army-cyber-institute-erica-d-lonergan/1191bfa60d0976f9?ean=9780197550892&amp;next=t">Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace</a>, Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan tackle this question head-on, presenting a comprehensive theory that explains the conditions under which cyber operations may lead to escalation. In doing so, they challenge long-held assumptions about strategic interactions in cyberspace, arguing that cyberspace is not as dangerous as the conventional wisdom might suggest. In some cases, cyber operations could even facilitate the de-escalation of international crises. To support their claims, Lonergan and Lonergan test their theory against a range of in-depth case studies, including strategic interactions between the United States and key rivals; a series of case studies of the role of cyber operations in international crises; and plausible future scenarios involving cyber operations during conflict. </p>
<p>The authors then apply their analytical insights to policymaking, making the case that skepticism is warranted about the overall efficacy of employing cyber power for strategic ends. By exploring the role of cyber operations in routine competition, crises, and warfighting, <em>Escalation</em> <em>Dynamics in Cyberspace</em> presents nuanced insights about how cyberspace affects international politics</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/communities-connections/faculty/erica-lonergan">Erica D. Lonergan</a>, an Assistant Professor in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46556651" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a23bb426-be3c-4515-a8da-e6f582d3cc07/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a23bb426-be3c-4515-a8da-e6f582d3cc07&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan, &quot;Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>To what extent do cyberspace operations increase the risks of escalation between nation-state rivals? Scholars and practitioners have been concerned about cyber escalation for decades, but the question remains hotly debated. The issue is increasingly important for international politics as more states develop and employ offensive cyber capabilities, and as the international system is increasingly characterized by emergent multipolarity.In Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace, Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan tackle this question head-on, presenting a comprehensive theory that explains the conditions under which cyber operations may lead to escalation. In doing so, they challenge long-held assumptions about strategic interactions in cyberspace, arguing that cyberspace is not as dangerous as the conventional wisdom might suggest. In some cases, cyber operations could even facilitate the de-escalation of international crises. To support their claims, Lonergan and Lonergan test their theory against a range of in-depth case studies, including strategic interactions between the United States and key rivals; a series of case studies of the role of cyber operations in international crises; and plausible future scenarios involving cyber operations during conflict. 

The authors then apply their analytical insights to policymaking, making the case that skepticism is warranted about the overall efficacy of employing cyber power for strategic ends. By exploring the role of cyber operations in routine competition, crises, and warfighting, Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace presents nuanced insights about how cyberspace affects international politics

Our guest is Erica D. Lonergan, an Assistant Professor in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>To what extent do cyberspace operations increase the risks of escalation between nation-state rivals? Scholars and practitioners have been concerned about cyber escalation for decades, but the question remains hotly debated. The issue is increasingly important for international politics as more states develop and employ offensive cyber capabilities, and as the international system is increasingly characterized by emergent multipolarity.In Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace, Erica D. Lonergan and Shawn W. Lonergan tackle this question head-on, presenting a comprehensive theory that explains the conditions under which cyber operations may lead to escalation. In doing so, they challenge long-held assumptions about strategic interactions in cyberspace, arguing that cyberspace is not as dangerous as the conventional wisdom might suggest. In some cases, cyber operations could even facilitate the de-escalation of international crises. To support their claims, Lonergan and Lonergan test their theory against a range of in-depth case studies, including strategic interactions between the United States and key rivals; a series of case studies of the role of cyber operations in international crises; and plausible future scenarios involving cyber operations during conflict. 

The authors then apply their analytical insights to policymaking, making the case that skepticism is warranted about the overall efficacy of employing cyber power for strategic ends. By exploring the role of cyber operations in routine competition, crises, and warfighting, Escalation Dynamics in Cyberspace presents nuanced insights about how cyberspace affects international politics

Our guest is Erica D. Lonergan, an Assistant Professor in the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>586</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6efebb9a-3033-11f0-b040-cfea2881fa89</guid>
      <title>Júlia Király, &quot;Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Troubles to Global Hurricane&quot; (Springer, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump is putting liberal democracy through its greatest test in 80 years. </p>
<p>None of it is original. His style of rule is straight from the democratic backsliders' playbook. To secure long-term power rather than short-term office, rulers must take over the institutions that check and balance majority rule and bend them to their will. Trump has tamed Congress and inserted his people into the Supreme Court, law enforcement, intelligence, and competition regulation but - to his great frustration - the Federal Reserve is holding out.</p>
<p>It was the same story in Hungary after Viktor Orbán returned to the premiership in 2010. Bound by EU law and the mandates of the governor and his deputies, Orbán had to wait three years to break the national bank. One of those deputy governors, Júlia Király, experienced state capture from the inside and resigned with a public protest at the loss of institutional independence.</p>
<p>Now an associate professor of finance and monetary economics at the International Business School in Budapest, she began her career under socialism at the statistics and planning offices. As deputy governor, she was part of the team that managed the Hungarian economy through the post-2007 financial crisis – an experience she chronicles in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030495435">Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Turbulences to a Global Hurricane</a> (Springer, 2020).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at www.242.news on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump is putting liberal democracy through its greatest test in 80 years. </p>
<p>None of it is original. His style of rule is straight from the democratic backsliders' playbook. To secure long-term power rather than short-term office, rulers must take over the institutions that check and balance majority rule and bend them to their will. Trump has tamed Congress and inserted his people into the Supreme Court, law enforcement, intelligence, and competition regulation but - to his great frustration - the Federal Reserve is holding out.</p>
<p>It was the same story in Hungary after Viktor Orbán returned to the premiership in 2010. Bound by EU law and the mandates of the governor and his deputies, Orbán had to wait three years to break the national bank. One of those deputy governors, Júlia Király, experienced state capture from the inside and resigned with a public protest at the loss of institutional independence.</p>
<p>Now an associate professor of finance and monetary economics at the International Business School in Budapest, she began her career under socialism at the statistics and planning offices. As deputy governor, she was part of the team that managed the Hungarian economy through the post-2007 financial crisis – an experience she chronicles in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030495435">Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Turbulences to a Global Hurricane</a> (Springer, 2020).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at www.242.news on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39148088" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/168fcb53-4425-4702-9410-ab2614b52564/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=168fcb53-4425-4702-9410-ab2614b52564&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Júlia Király, &quot;Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Troubles to Global Hurricane&quot; (Springer, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Donald Trump is putting liberal democracy through its greatest test in 80 years. 

None of it is original. His style of rule is straight from the democratic backsliders&apos; playbook. To secure long-term power rather than short-term office, rulers must take over the institutions that check and balance majority rule and bend them to their will. Trump has tamed Congress and inserted his people into the Supreme Court, law enforcement, intelligence, and competition regulation but - to his great frustration - the Federal Reserve is holding out.

It was the same story in Hungary after Viktor Orbán returned to the premiership in 2010. Bound by EU law and the mandates of the governor and his deputies, Orbán had to wait three years to break the national bank. One of those deputy governors, Júlia Király, experienced state capture from the inside and resigned with a public protest at the loss of institutional independence.

Now an associate professor of finance and monetary economics at the International Business School in Budapest, she began her career under socialism at the statistics and planning offices. As deputy governor, she was part of the team that managed the Hungarian economy through the post-2007 financial crisis – an experience she chronicles in Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Turbulences to a Global Hurricane (Springer, 2020).

Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at www.242.news on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Donald Trump is putting liberal democracy through its greatest test in 80 years. 

None of it is original. His style of rule is straight from the democratic backsliders&apos; playbook. To secure long-term power rather than short-term office, rulers must take over the institutions that check and balance majority rule and bend them to their will. Trump has tamed Congress and inserted his people into the Supreme Court, law enforcement, intelligence, and competition regulation but - to his great frustration - the Federal Reserve is holding out.

It was the same story in Hungary after Viktor Orbán returned to the premiership in 2010. Bound by EU law and the mandates of the governor and his deputies, Orbán had to wait three years to break the national bank. One of those deputy governors, Júlia Király, experienced state capture from the inside and resigned with a public protest at the loss of institutional independence.

Now an associate professor of finance and monetary economics at the International Business School in Budapest, she began her career under socialism at the statistics and planning offices. As deputy governor, she was part of the team that managed the Hungarian economy through the post-2007 financial crisis – an experience she chronicles in Hungary and Other Emerging EU Countries in the Financial Storm: From Minor Turbulences to a Global Hurricane (Springer, 2020).

Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts at www.242.news on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">495b194c-33f8-11f0-8e93-1ba8dc16909f</guid>
      <title>Book Talk 66: Political Hope, with Loren Goldman</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is <a href="https://live-sas-www-polisci.pantheon.sas.upenn.edu/people/standing-faculty/loren-goldman">Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania</a>, is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197675823">The Principle of Political Hope</a> (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is <a href="https://live-sas-www-polisci.pantheon.sas.upenn.edu/people/standing-faculty/loren-goldman">Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania</a>, is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197675823">The Principle of Political Hope</a> (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78222690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c30096f5-02b5-42a9-a8b1-c52d287aac0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c30096f5-02b5-42a9-a8b1-c52d287aac0a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Book Talk 66: Political Hope, with Loren Goldman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:21:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, is the author of The Principle of Political Hope (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How to find hope in these times? I spoke with political scientist Loren Goldman about the principle of political hope: why we should have hope, how to have hope in dark times, and how political hope differs from naïve optimism, faith in progress, or passive reliance on a hidden logic that will save us in the end. Goldman, who is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, is the author of The Principle of Political Hope (Oxford University Press, 2023), where he reveals hope to be an indispensable aspect of much continental and American political thought, especially in the works of Immanuel Kant, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Ernst Bloch, Richard Rorty, and others. Our conversation on Goldman’s study of hope ends with three concrete lessons to counter hopelessness, cynicism, and despair.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>584</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">397f342a-3be3-11f0-9110-afa6d45b1663</guid>
      <title>Amit Ron and Abraham A. Singer, &quot;Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Amit Ron and Abraham Singer, both political theorists, examine the concept of the responsibilities that private companies and corporations have in a democracy. This new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society</em></a>, weaves together democratic theory, business ethics, and the relationship between the citizen and the for-profit entity. The emphasis here may be of interest to a variety of different audiences, since the aim is to consider the role of the business or corporation with a democratic framework, where part of the structure of this kind of framework is the expectation of reflection and deliberation. Ron and Singer argue that businesses should take on this role within society, they should reflect on their position within a democratic society and consider what they contribute to the society itself but also to the functioning of the government within society.</p>
<p>Democratic theory includes a number of dimensions, including equality, participation, the rule of law, and limits on power. Citizenship is a core idea of democratic theory, and businesses and companies act in some manner as kinds of citizens within the society itself. Thus, they inhabit spaces that have certain responsibilities given their status within the society. Each chapter in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business</em></a> gets at a part of democratic theory, posing questions about the responsibilities that businesses have to follow laws, to participate in protecting democracy, to understand the impact of their advertising and marketing, to consider their role in politics, and more. All of these chapters focus on the different ways in which businesses and corporations act, and urges these private, for-profit entities to consider each dimension of their role within democratic society. Because we often focus on businesses as part of the economy and not necessarily part of the political structure of society, these roles and responsibilities go unnoticed or uninterrogated. Ron and Singer are emphasizing the importance of these roles, and advocating to companies to take these roles seriously, since they have both political and economic power within our society and in many other societies as well.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society</em></a> is not a discourse on business ethics, as is often the case in evaluating the role of private companies in society. Instead, it builds a structure within democratic political theory around the role and responsibility of the corporation and asks corporations and businesses to reflect on their place and power within society.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a><br /></p>
<p>Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.</p>
<p>Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of <em>The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit Ron and Abraham Singer, both political theorists, examine the concept of the responsibilities that private companies and corporations have in a democracy. This new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society</em></a>, weaves together democratic theory, business ethics, and the relationship between the citizen and the for-profit entity. The emphasis here may be of interest to a variety of different audiences, since the aim is to consider the role of the business or corporation with a democratic framework, where part of the structure of this kind of framework is the expectation of reflection and deliberation. Ron and Singer argue that businesses should take on this role within society, they should reflect on their position within a democratic society and consider what they contribute to the society itself but also to the functioning of the government within society.</p>
<p>Democratic theory includes a number of dimensions, including equality, participation, the rule of law, and limits on power. Citizenship is a core idea of democratic theory, and businesses and companies act in some manner as kinds of citizens within the society itself. Thus, they inhabit spaces that have certain responsibilities given their status within the society. Each chapter in <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business</em></a> gets at a part of democratic theory, posing questions about the responsibilities that businesses have to follow laws, to participate in protecting democracy, to understand the impact of their advertising and marketing, to consider their role in politics, and more. All of these chapters focus on the different ways in which businesses and corporations act, and urges these private, for-profit entities to consider each dimension of their role within democratic society. Because we often focus on businesses as part of the economy and not necessarily part of the political structure of society, these roles and responsibilities go unnoticed or uninterrogated. Ron and Singer are emphasizing the importance of these roles, and advocating to companies to take these roles seriously, since they have both political and economic power within our society and in many other societies as well.</p>
<p><a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo237124748.html"><em>Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society</em></a> is not a discourse on business ethics, as is often the case in evaluating the role of private companies in society. Instead, it builds a structure within democratic political theory around the role and responsibility of the corporation and asks corporations and businesses to reflect on their place and power within society.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a><br /></p>
<p>Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.</p>
<p>Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of <em>The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47847326" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/07502707-1c32-4291-a05d-674874e9a578/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=07502707-1c32-4291-a05d-674874e9a578&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amit Ron and Abraham A. Singer, &quot;Everyone&apos;s Business: What Companies Owe Society&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amit Ron and Abraham Singer, both political theorists, examine the concept of the responsibilities that private companies and corporations have in a democracy. This new book, Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society, weaves together democratic theory, business ethics, and the relationship between the citizen and the for-profit entity. The emphasis here may be of interest to a variety of different audiences, since the aim is to consider the role of the business or corporation with a democratic framework, where part of the structure of this kind of framework is the expectation of reflection and deliberation. Ron and Singer argue that businesses should take on this role within society, they should reflect on their position within a democratic society and consider what they contribute to the society itself but also to the functioning of the government within society.

Democratic theory includes a number of dimensions, including equality, participation, the rule of law, and limits on power. Citizenship is a core idea of democratic theory, and businesses and companies act in some manner as kinds of citizens within the society itself. Thus, they inhabit spaces that have certain responsibilities given their status within the society. Each chapter in Everyone’s Business gets at a part of democratic theory, posing questions about the responsibilities that businesses have to follow laws, to participate in protecting democracy, to understand the impact of their advertising and marketing, to consider their role in politics, and more. All of these chapters focus on the different ways in which businesses and corporations act, and urges these private, for-profit entities to consider each dimension of their role within democratic society. Because we often focus on businesses as part of the economy and not necessarily part of the political structure of society, these roles and responsibilities go unnoticed or uninterrogated. Ron and Singer are emphasizing the importance of these roles, and advocating to companies to take these roles seriously, since they have both political and economic power within our society and in many other societies as well.

Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society is not a discourse on business ethics, as is often the case in evaluating the role of private companies in society. Instead, it builds a structure within democratic political theory around the role and responsibility of the corporation and asks corporations and businesses to reflect on their place and power within society.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social

Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.

Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amit Ron and Abraham Singer, both political theorists, examine the concept of the responsibilities that private companies and corporations have in a democracy. This new book, Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society, weaves together democratic theory, business ethics, and the relationship between the citizen and the for-profit entity. The emphasis here may be of interest to a variety of different audiences, since the aim is to consider the role of the business or corporation with a democratic framework, where part of the structure of this kind of framework is the expectation of reflection and deliberation. Ron and Singer argue that businesses should take on this role within society, they should reflect on their position within a democratic society and consider what they contribute to the society itself but also to the functioning of the government within society.

Democratic theory includes a number of dimensions, including equality, participation, the rule of law, and limits on power. Citizenship is a core idea of democratic theory, and businesses and companies act in some manner as kinds of citizens within the society itself. Thus, they inhabit spaces that have certain responsibilities given their status within the society. Each chapter in Everyone’s Business gets at a part of democratic theory, posing questions about the responsibilities that businesses have to follow laws, to participate in protecting democracy, to understand the impact of their advertising and marketing, to consider their role in politics, and more. All of these chapters focus on the different ways in which businesses and corporations act, and urges these private, for-profit entities to consider each dimension of their role within democratic society. Because we often focus on businesses as part of the economy and not necessarily part of the political structure of society, these roles and responsibilities go unnoticed or uninterrogated. Ron and Singer are emphasizing the importance of these roles, and advocating to companies to take these roles seriously, since they have both political and economic power within our society and in many other societies as well.

Everyone’s Business: What Companies Owe Society is not a discourse on business ethics, as is often the case in evaluating the role of private companies in society. Instead, it builds a structure within democratic political theory around the role and responsibility of the corporation and asks corporations and businesses to reflect on their place and power within society.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social

Amit Ron is associate professor of political science at Arizona State University.

Abraham Singer is assistant professor of business at Loyola University Chicago. He is the author of The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>583</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b9ff1a4-3a94-11f0-a506-278f9fddb596</guid>
      <title>Samuel Western, &quot;The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies&quot; (UP of Kansas)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When did the West lose its way? In 1889, when the US government carved five states out of the spawling Dakota Territory, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and North and South Dakota, all created state constitutions that enshrined certain progressive values into their structre of government. These included the right for women to vote, the power to curtail monopolies, and the ban on child labor. They also maintained a community ethos, as represented by the state ownership of running water and state-owned banks. Yet, in the 2024 presidential electinon, all five states gave their electoral votes to the hyper-individualistic conservatism of Donald Trump's Republcian Party. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700637041">The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies</a><em> </em>(UP of Kansas, 2024), longtime western journalist and educator Samuel Western traces the roots of this shift, and charts a pathway into a new, community oriented, future. Rather than purely extractive industries, Western argues for a socially and ecologically sustainable stewardship agriculture, and points to several examples from across the contemporary West where this practice is already taking place. A fascinating look at our current political moment, <em>The Spirit of 1889 </em>is an example of how even the most entrenched political values can blow away when the cultural winds change.</p>
<p>Samuel Western's Substack: <a href="https://samuelwestern.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-mountains-and-plains">https://samuelwestern.substack...</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did the West lose its way? In 1889, when the US government carved five states out of the spawling Dakota Territory, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and North and South Dakota, all created state constitutions that enshrined certain progressive values into their structre of government. These included the right for women to vote, the power to curtail monopolies, and the ban on child labor. They also maintained a community ethos, as represented by the state ownership of running water and state-owned banks. Yet, in the 2024 presidential electinon, all five states gave their electoral votes to the hyper-individualistic conservatism of Donald Trump's Republcian Party. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700637041">The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies</a><em> </em>(UP of Kansas, 2024), longtime western journalist and educator Samuel Western traces the roots of this shift, and charts a pathway into a new, community oriented, future. Rather than purely extractive industries, Western argues for a socially and ecologically sustainable stewardship agriculture, and points to several examples from across the contemporary West where this practice is already taking place. A fascinating look at our current political moment, <em>The Spirit of 1889 </em>is an example of how even the most entrenched political values can blow away when the cultural winds change.</p>
<p>Samuel Western's Substack: <a href="https://samuelwestern.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-mountains-and-plains">https://samuelwestern.substack...</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39873912" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d580f053-47a5-481f-a51b-9b74fedc7524/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d580f053-47a5-481f-a51b-9b74fedc7524&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Western, &quot;The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies&quot; (UP of Kansas)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When did the West lose its way? In 1889, when the US government carved five states out of the spawling Dakota Territory, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and North and South Dakota, all created state constitutions that enshrined certain progressive values into their structre of government. These included the right for women to vote, the power to curtail monopolies, and the ban on child labor. They also maintained a community ethos, as represented by the state ownership of running water and state-owned banks. Yet, in the 2024 presidential electinon, all five states gave their electoral votes to the hyper-individualistic conservatism of Donald Trump&apos;s Republcian Party. In The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies (UP of Kansas, 2024), longtime western journalist and educator Samuel Western traces the roots of this shift, and charts a pathway into a new, community oriented, future. Rather than purely extractive industries, Western argues for a socially and ecologically sustainable stewardship agriculture, and points to several examples from across the contemporary West where this practice is already taking place. A fascinating look at our current political moment, The Spirit of 1889 is an example of how even the most entrenched political values can blow away when the cultural winds change.

Samuel Western&apos;s Substack: https://samuelwestern.substack...
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When did the West lose its way? In 1889, when the US government carved five states out of the spawling Dakota Territory, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and North and South Dakota, all created state constitutions that enshrined certain progressive values into their structre of government. These included the right for women to vote, the power to curtail monopolies, and the ban on child labor. They also maintained a community ethos, as represented by the state ownership of running water and state-owned banks. Yet, in the 2024 presidential electinon, all five states gave their electoral votes to the hyper-individualistic conservatism of Donald Trump&apos;s Republcian Party. In The Spirit of 1889: Restoring the Lost Promise of the High Plains and Northern Rockies (UP of Kansas, 2024), longtime western journalist and educator Samuel Western traces the roots of this shift, and charts a pathway into a new, community oriented, future. Rather than purely extractive industries, Western argues for a socially and ecologically sustainable stewardship agriculture, and points to several examples from across the contemporary West where this practice is already taking place. A fascinating look at our current political moment, The Spirit of 1889 is an example of how even the most entrenched political values can blow away when the cultural winds change.

Samuel Western&apos;s Substack: https://samuelwestern.substack...
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>582</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a4b17410-2e8c-11f0-b050-6f93c2ec76ba</guid>
      <title>Ryan J. Vander Wielen et al., &quot;The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009432078">The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News' influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network's power may be overstated.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009432078">The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News' influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network's power may be overstated.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29363877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f9b8abc7-a017-48b0-ae8e-2c871698ebe5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f9b8abc7-a017-48b0-ae8e-2c871698ebe5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan J. Vander Wielen et al., &quot;The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News&apos; influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network&apos;s power may be overstated.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The influence of partisan news is presumed to be powerful, but evidence for its effects on political elites is limited, often based more on anecdotes than science. Using a rigorous quasi-experimental research design, observational data, and open science practices, The House that Fox News Built?: Representation, Political Accountability, and the Rise of Partisan News (Cambridge UP, 2024) carefully demonstrates how the re-emergence and rise of partisan cable news in the US affected the behavior of political elites during the rise and proliferation of Fox News across media markets between 1996 and 2010. Despite widespread concerns over the ills of partisan news, evidence provides a nuanced, albeit cautionary tale. On one hand, findings suggest that the rise of Fox indeed changed elite political behavior in recent decades. At the same time, the limited conditions under which Fox News&apos; influence occurred suggests that concerns about the network&apos;s power may be overstated.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">47ad6c50-334c-11f0-bd9f-13bf8133435a</guid>
      <title>Helen Thompson on Disorder and the Analysis of Contemporary Geopolitics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Helen Thompson, Professor of Political Economy at Cambridge University and co-host of the great podcast, These Times, about her approach to geopolitical analysis and the centrality of energy geopolitics in that approach. The pair start by talking about Thompson’s book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198864981">Disorder: Hard Times in the 21st Century</a> (Cambridge UP, 2023), her background and training, and how she came to develop the distinctive style of geopolitical analysis she deploys, including on episodes of These Times. Vinsel and Thompson also discuss a number of topics, including military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and the global energy geopolitics of Net Zero, as a way of exploring Thompson’s way of thinking.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Helen Thompson, Professor of Political Economy at Cambridge University and co-host of the great podcast, These Times, about her approach to geopolitical analysis and the centrality of energy geopolitics in that approach. The pair start by talking about Thompson’s book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198864981">Disorder: Hard Times in the 21st Century</a> (Cambridge UP, 2023), her background and training, and how she came to develop the distinctive style of geopolitical analysis she deploys, including on episodes of These Times. Vinsel and Thompson also discuss a number of topics, including military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and the global energy geopolitics of Net Zero, as a way of exploring Thompson’s way of thinking.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65850916" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7ab820bd-d8be-4056-a3e0-486436fb11a1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7ab820bd-d8be-4056-a3e0-486436fb11a1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Helen Thompson on Disorder and the Analysis of Contemporary Geopolitics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Helen Thompson, Professor of Political Economy at Cambridge University and co-host of the great podcast, These Times, about her approach to geopolitical analysis and the centrality of energy geopolitics in that approach. The pair start by talking about Thompson’s book, Disorder: Hard Times in the 21st Century (Cambridge UP, 2023), her background and training, and how she came to develop the distinctive style of geopolitical analysis she deploys, including on episodes of These Times. Vinsel and Thompson also discuss a number of topics, including military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and the global energy geopolitics of Net Zero, as a way of exploring Thompson’s way of thinking.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Helen Thompson, Professor of Political Economy at Cambridge University and co-host of the great podcast, These Times, about her approach to geopolitical analysis and the centrality of energy geopolitics in that approach. The pair start by talking about Thompson’s book, Disorder: Hard Times in the 21st Century (Cambridge UP, 2023), her background and training, and how she came to develop the distinctive style of geopolitical analysis she deploys, including on episodes of These Times. Vinsel and Thompson also discuss a number of topics, including military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and the global energy geopolitics of Net Zero, as a way of exploring Thompson’s way of thinking.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>580</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd9d3564-332c-11f0-8533-af8fa836f4f2</guid>
      <title>Quentin Skinner, &quot;Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107027732"><em>Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.</p>
<ul>
  <li>Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place</li>
  <li>Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty</li>
  <li>Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty</li>
</ul>
<p>Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?<br /></p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107027732"><em>Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.</p>
<ul>
  <li>Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place</li>
  <li>Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty</li>
  <li>Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty</li>
</ul>
<p>Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49584338" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3cc7b8ec-3902-4003-a67c-b958b39c5676/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3cc7b8ec-3902-4003-a67c-b958b39c5676&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Quentin Skinner, &quot;Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?

Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.


  Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place

  Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty

  Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty


Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does liberty entail? How have concepts of liberty changed over time? And what are the global consequences?

Liberty as Independence: The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal (Cambridge UP, 2025) surveys the history of rival views of liberty from antiquity to modern times. Quentin Skinner traces the understanding of liberty as independence from the classical ideal to early modern Britain, culminating in the claims of the Whig oligarchy to have transformed this idea into reality. Yet, with the Whig vision of a free state and civil society undermined by the American Revolution of 1776, Skinner explores how claims that liberty was fulfilled by an absence of physical or coercive restraint came to prominence. Liberty as Independence examines new dimensions of these rival views, considering the connections between debates on liberty and debates on slavery, and demonstrating how these ideas were harnessed in feminist discussions surrounding limitations on the liberty of women. The concept of liberty is inherently global, and Skinner argues strongly for the reinstatement of the understanding of liberty as independence.


  Illustrates the connections between philosophical debates surrounding liberty and the sociopolitical contexts in which they took place

  Provides a comprehensive analysis and bibliography of rival ways of thinking about liberty

  Explores the contribution of the American Revolution to discussions on the idea of liberty


Quentin Skinner is Emeritus Professor of Humanities at Queen Mary University of London. He was at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton between 1974 and 1979, and was Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge between 1996 and 2008. He is the author and editor of numerous books on Renaissance and Modern Intellectual History, and the recipient of many awards including the Wolfson Prize for History and a Balzan Prize. Previous publications include the two-volume study, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 1978), Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge, 1998) and, most recently, From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics (Cambridge, 2018).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>246</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6fd2d986-381a-11f0-b1c8-3f0182cac817</guid>
      <title>Jeffrey Wasserstrom, &quot;Vigil: The Struggle for Hong Kong&quot; (Brixton Ink, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Given what has happened since – from a global pandemic to wars in Europe, Africa and the Middle East – events in Hong Kong in 2019-20 can seem remote when seen from today’s perspective. But the momentous scale and significance of the protests there during those years, and the ensuing crackdown and increasing restrictions on Hong Kong’s distinctive politics and society, continue to resonate, not least for the tens of thousands who have left the territory recently. Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s <a href="https://brixtonink.co.uk/books/vigil/">Vigil</a><em> </em>– a brilliant encapsulation of the mood in Hong Kong in 2019 and its pre-history and precedents – was published soon after the protests that year reached their zenith. Six years on, this new release of the book includes a foreword by <em>Guardian </em>senior China correspondent <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/profile/amy-hawkins">Amy Hawkins</a> as well as an Afterword by journalist Kris Cheng. This conversation with Amy Hawkins discusses the book and events since.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Given what has happened since – from a global pandemic to wars in Europe, Africa and the Middle East – events in Hong Kong in 2019-20 can seem remote when seen from today’s perspective. But the momentous scale and significance of the protests there during those years, and the ensuing crackdown and increasing restrictions on Hong Kong’s distinctive politics and society, continue to resonate, not least for the tens of thousands who have left the territory recently. Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s <a href="https://brixtonink.co.uk/books/vigil/">Vigil</a><em> </em>– a brilliant encapsulation of the mood in Hong Kong in 2019 and its pre-history and precedents – was published soon after the protests that year reached their zenith. Six years on, this new release of the book includes a foreword by <em>Guardian </em>senior China correspondent <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/profile/amy-hawkins">Amy Hawkins</a> as well as an Afterword by journalist Kris Cheng. This conversation with Amy Hawkins discusses the book and events since.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39592944" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f66dc474-10f3-4843-a2a5-cb824ba8496d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f66dc474-10f3-4843-a2a5-cb824ba8496d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeffrey Wasserstrom, &quot;Vigil: The Struggle for Hong Kong&quot; (Brixton Ink, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Given what has happened since – from a global pandemic to wars in Europe, Africa and the Middle East – events in Hong Kong in 2019-20 can seem remote when seen from today’s perspective. But the momentous scale and significance of the protests there during those years, and the ensuing crackdown and increasing restrictions on Hong Kong’s distinctive politics and society, continue to resonate, not least for the tens of thousands who have left the territory recently. Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s Vigil – a brilliant encapsulation of the mood in Hong Kong in 2019 and its pre-history and precedents – was published soon after the protests that year reached their zenith. Six years on, this new release of the book includes a foreword by Guardian senior China correspondent Amy Hawkins as well as an Afterword by journalist Kris Cheng. This conversation with Amy Hawkins discusses the book and events since.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Given what has happened since – from a global pandemic to wars in Europe, Africa and the Middle East – events in Hong Kong in 2019-20 can seem remote when seen from today’s perspective. But the momentous scale and significance of the protests there during those years, and the ensuing crackdown and increasing restrictions on Hong Kong’s distinctive politics and society, continue to resonate, not least for the tens of thousands who have left the territory recently. Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s Vigil – a brilliant encapsulation of the mood in Hong Kong in 2019 and its pre-history and precedents – was published soon after the protests that year reached their zenith. Six years on, this new release of the book includes a foreword by Guardian senior China correspondent Amy Hawkins as well as an Afterword by journalist Kris Cheng. This conversation with Amy Hawkins discusses the book and events since.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>569</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e587f38-328a-11f0-80ec-03b2692dc655</guid>
      <title>Dennis Ross, &quot;Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Survive in a Multipolar World&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a multipolar world where America wields less relative power, the United States can no longer get away with poor statecraft. To understand how the US can approach future national security challenges, I spoke with Dennis Ross, a senior US diplomat and the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. His new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197698921">Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Lead in a Multipolar World</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025) offers a revised toolkit for US foreign policy and global leadership.</p>
<p>The United States may still be the world's strongest country, but it now faces real challenges at both a global and regional level. The unipolar world which was dominated by America after the Cold War is gone. Unlike the Soviet Union, China is both a military and economic competitor and it is actively challenging the norms and institutions that the US used to shape an international order during and after the Cold War. Directly and indirectly, it has partners trying to undo the American-dominated order, with Russia seeking to extinguish Ukraine, and Iran trying to undermine American presence, influence, and any set of rules for the Middle East that it does not dominate.</p>
<p>The failures of American policy in Afghanistan and Iraq have weakened the domestic consensus for a US leadership role internationally. Traditions in US foreign policy, especially the American sense of exceptionalism, have at different points justified both withdrawal and international activism. Iraq and Afghanistan fed the instinct to withdraw and to end the “forever wars.” But the folly of these US interventions did not necessarily mean that all use of force to back diplomacy or specific political ends was wrong; rather it meant in these cases, the Bush Administration failed in the most basic task of good statecraft: namely, marrying objectives and means. Nothing more clearly defines effective statecraft than identifying well-considered goals and then knowing how to use all the tools of statecraft—diplomatic, economic, military, intelligence, information, cyber, scientific, education—to achieve them. But all too often American presidents have adopted goals that were poorly defined and not thought through.</p>
<p>In <em>Statecraft 2.0</em>, Dennis Ross explains why failing to marry objectives and means has happened so often in American foreign policy. He uses historical examples to illustrate the factors that account for this, including political pressures, weak understanding of the countries where the US has intervened, changing objectives before achieving those that have been established, relying too much on ourselves and too little on allies and partners. To be fair, there have not only been failures, there have been successes as well. Ross uses case studies to look more closely at the circumstances in which Administrations have succeeded and failed in marrying objectives and means. He distills the lessons from good cases of statecraft—German unification in NATO, the first Gulf War, the surge in Iraq 2007-8—and bad cases of statecraft—going to war in Iraq 2003, and the Obama policy toward Syria. Based on those lessons, he develops a framework for applying today a statecraft approach to our policy toward China, Iran, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The book concludes with how a smart statecraft approach would shape policy toward the new national security challenges of climate, pandemics, and cyber.</p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong> is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a multipolar world where America wields less relative power, the United States can no longer get away with poor statecraft. To understand how the US can approach future national security challenges, I spoke with Dennis Ross, a senior US diplomat and the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. His new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197698921">Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Lead in a Multipolar World</a><em> </em>(Oxford University Press, 2025) offers a revised toolkit for US foreign policy and global leadership.</p>
<p>The United States may still be the world's strongest country, but it now faces real challenges at both a global and regional level. The unipolar world which was dominated by America after the Cold War is gone. Unlike the Soviet Union, China is both a military and economic competitor and it is actively challenging the norms and institutions that the US used to shape an international order during and after the Cold War. Directly and indirectly, it has partners trying to undo the American-dominated order, with Russia seeking to extinguish Ukraine, and Iran trying to undermine American presence, influence, and any set of rules for the Middle East that it does not dominate.</p>
<p>The failures of American policy in Afghanistan and Iraq have weakened the domestic consensus for a US leadership role internationally. Traditions in US foreign policy, especially the American sense of exceptionalism, have at different points justified both withdrawal and international activism. Iraq and Afghanistan fed the instinct to withdraw and to end the “forever wars.” But the folly of these US interventions did not necessarily mean that all use of force to back diplomacy or specific political ends was wrong; rather it meant in these cases, the Bush Administration failed in the most basic task of good statecraft: namely, marrying objectives and means. Nothing more clearly defines effective statecraft than identifying well-considered goals and then knowing how to use all the tools of statecraft—diplomatic, economic, military, intelligence, information, cyber, scientific, education—to achieve them. But all too often American presidents have adopted goals that were poorly defined and not thought through.</p>
<p>In <em>Statecraft 2.0</em>, Dennis Ross explains why failing to marry objectives and means has happened so often in American foreign policy. He uses historical examples to illustrate the factors that account for this, including political pressures, weak understanding of the countries where the US has intervened, changing objectives before achieving those that have been established, relying too much on ourselves and too little on allies and partners. To be fair, there have not only been failures, there have been successes as well. Ross uses case studies to look more closely at the circumstances in which Administrations have succeeded and failed in marrying objectives and means. He distills the lessons from good cases of statecraft—German unification in NATO, the first Gulf War, the surge in Iraq 2007-8—and bad cases of statecraft—going to war in Iraq 2003, and the Obama policy toward Syria. Based on those lessons, he develops a framework for applying today a statecraft approach to our policy toward China, Iran, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The book concludes with how a smart statecraft approach would shape policy toward the new national security challenges of climate, pandemics, and cyber.</p>
<p><strong>Dr. Andrew O. Pace</strong> is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47203285" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7c5cff90-8b58-4be9-9578-1794b8bc8aa8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7c5cff90-8b58-4be9-9578-1794b8bc8aa8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dennis Ross, &quot;Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Survive in a Multipolar World&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a multipolar world where America wields less relative power, the United States can no longer get away with poor statecraft. To understand how the US can approach future national security challenges, I spoke with Dennis Ross, a senior US diplomat and the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. His new book, Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Lead in a Multipolar World (Oxford University Press, 2025) offers a revised toolkit for US foreign policy and global leadership.

The United States may still be the world&apos;s strongest country, but it now faces real challenges at both a global and regional level. The unipolar world which was dominated by America after the Cold War is gone. Unlike the Soviet Union, China is both a military and economic competitor and it is actively challenging the norms and institutions that the US used to shape an international order during and after the Cold War. Directly and indirectly, it has partners trying to undo the American-dominated order, with Russia seeking to extinguish Ukraine, and Iran trying to undermine American presence, influence, and any set of rules for the Middle East that it does not dominate.

The failures of American policy in Afghanistan and Iraq have weakened the domestic consensus for a US leadership role internationally. Traditions in US foreign policy, especially the American sense of exceptionalism, have at different points justified both withdrawal and international activism. Iraq and Afghanistan fed the instinct to withdraw and to end the “forever wars.” But the folly of these US interventions did not necessarily mean that all use of force to back diplomacy or specific political ends was wrong; rather it meant in these cases, the Bush Administration failed in the most basic task of good statecraft: namely, marrying objectives and means. Nothing more clearly defines effective statecraft than identifying well-considered goals and then knowing how to use all the tools of statecraft—diplomatic, economic, military, intelligence, information, cyber, scientific, education—to achieve them. But all too often American presidents have adopted goals that were poorly defined and not thought through.

In Statecraft 2.0, Dennis Ross explains why failing to marry objectives and means has happened so often in American foreign policy. He uses historical examples to illustrate the factors that account for this, including political pressures, weak understanding of the countries where the US has intervened, changing objectives before achieving those that have been established, relying too much on ourselves and too little on allies and partners. To be fair, there have not only been failures, there have been successes as well. Ross uses case studies to look more closely at the circumstances in which Administrations have succeeded and failed in marrying objectives and means. He distills the lessons from good cases of statecraft—German unification in NATO, the first Gulf War, the surge in Iraq 2007-8—and bad cases of statecraft—going to war in Iraq 2003, and the Obama policy toward Syria. Based on those lessons, he develops a framework for applying today a statecraft approach to our policy toward China, Iran, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The book concludes with how a smart statecraft approach would shape policy toward the new national security challenges of climate, pandemics, and cyber.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a multipolar world where America wields less relative power, the United States can no longer get away with poor statecraft. To understand how the US can approach future national security challenges, I spoke with Dennis Ross, a senior US diplomat and the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. His new book, Statecraft 2.0: What America Needs to Lead in a Multipolar World (Oxford University Press, 2025) offers a revised toolkit for US foreign policy and global leadership.

The United States may still be the world&apos;s strongest country, but it now faces real challenges at both a global and regional level. The unipolar world which was dominated by America after the Cold War is gone. Unlike the Soviet Union, China is both a military and economic competitor and it is actively challenging the norms and institutions that the US used to shape an international order during and after the Cold War. Directly and indirectly, it has partners trying to undo the American-dominated order, with Russia seeking to extinguish Ukraine, and Iran trying to undermine American presence, influence, and any set of rules for the Middle East that it does not dominate.

The failures of American policy in Afghanistan and Iraq have weakened the domestic consensus for a US leadership role internationally. Traditions in US foreign policy, especially the American sense of exceptionalism, have at different points justified both withdrawal and international activism. Iraq and Afghanistan fed the instinct to withdraw and to end the “forever wars.” But the folly of these US interventions did not necessarily mean that all use of force to back diplomacy or specific political ends was wrong; rather it meant in these cases, the Bush Administration failed in the most basic task of good statecraft: namely, marrying objectives and means. Nothing more clearly defines effective statecraft than identifying well-considered goals and then knowing how to use all the tools of statecraft—diplomatic, economic, military, intelligence, information, cyber, scientific, education—to achieve them. But all too often American presidents have adopted goals that were poorly defined and not thought through.

In Statecraft 2.0, Dennis Ross explains why failing to marry objectives and means has happened so often in American foreign policy. He uses historical examples to illustrate the factors that account for this, including political pressures, weak understanding of the countries where the US has intervened, changing objectives before achieving those that have been established, relying too much on ourselves and too little on allies and partners. To be fair, there have not only been failures, there have been successes as well. Ross uses case studies to look more closely at the circumstances in which Administrations have succeeded and failed in marrying objectives and means. He distills the lessons from good cases of statecraft—German unification in NATO, the first Gulf War, the surge in Iraq 2007-8—and bad cases of statecraft—going to war in Iraq 2003, and the Obama policy toward Syria. Based on those lessons, he develops a framework for applying today a statecraft approach to our policy toward China, Iran, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The book concludes with how a smart statecraft approach would shape policy toward the new national security challenges of climate, pandemics, and cyber.

Dr. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9eed8de0-31c3-11f0-b055-db78418e0434</guid>
      <title>The Price of Free Speech: Politics and Power on Campus</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.<br />Guests:<br />-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).<br />-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)<br />Producer: Pearse Lynch<br />Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.<br />Guests:<br />-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).<br />-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)<br />Producer: Pearse Lynch<br />Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30557038" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/eceadc08-fd17-42e0-9591-550af2a46213/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=eceadc08-fd17-42e0-9591-550af2a46213&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Price of Free Speech: Politics and Power on Campus</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.Guests:-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore the mounting political and financial pressures confronting higher education on both sides of the Atlantic. In the U.S., it unpacks the unprecedented clash between the Trump administration and Harvard, raising broader questions about academic freedom, ideological conformity, and the role of government oversight. In the U.K., the conversation turns to the sector’s growing reliance on international students and foreign funding—particularly from China—and the implications for institutional independence and research integrity. Together, the episodes chart the uneasy intersection of education, economics, and geopolitics in today’s universities.Guests:-Tyler Coward is the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).-Rose Stephenson is Director of Policy and Advocacy at Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI)Producer: Pearse LynchExecutive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>576</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a0ca0a72-3104-11f0-8293-f74000ea940c</guid>
      <title>Eric Heinze, &quot;Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049580">Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left</a> ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.</p>
<p>Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049580">Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left</a> ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.</p>
<p>Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67352909" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d0320264-624c-4c0b-addd-92bb45ee79ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d0320264-624c-4c0b-addd-92bb45ee79ae&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Heinze, &quot;Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” 

In Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.

Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What has gone wrong with the left—and what leftists must do if they want to change politics, ethics, and minds. Leftists have long taught that people in the West must take responsibility for centuries of classism, racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and other gross injustices. Of course, right-wingers constantly ridicule this claim for its “wokeness.” 

In Coming Clean: The Rise of Critical Theory and the Future of the Left ( MIT Press, 2025), Eric Heinze rejects the idea that we should be less woke. In fact, we need more wokeness, but of a new kind. Yes, we must teach about these bleak pasts, but we must also educate the public about the left’s own support for regimes that damaged and destroyed millions of lives for over a century—Stalin in the Soviet Union, Mao Zedong in China, Pol Pot in Cambodia, or the Kim dynasty in North Korea. Criticisms of Western wrongdoing are certainly important, yet Heinze explains that leftists have rarely engaged in the kinds of open and public self-scrutiny that they demand from others. Citing examples as different as the Ukraine war, LGBTQ+ people in Cuba, the concept of “hatred,” and the problem of leftwing antisemitism, Heinze explains why and how the left must change its memory politics if it is to claim any ethical high ground.

Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at Queen Mary University of London.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>575</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f5a89ea-3662-11f0-b4d1-3370d1b58ea2</guid>
      <title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em> </a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em> </a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48330692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e722cf7d-5dd4-4edd-ac53-e401be63fdc4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e722cf7d-5dd4-4edd-ac53-e401be63fdc4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?

Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.

Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.

Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?

Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.

Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.

Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">611ef564-35ae-11f0-9efa-3f959e026ce7</guid>
      <title>Lori Jo Marso, &quot;Feminism and the Cinema of Experience&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Lori Marso has been intrigued by filmmaker Chantal Ackerman for many years and has integrated Ackerman’s work into her courses at Union College and into her writings and scholarship as well. So it is no surprise that <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031222">Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</a> (Duke UP, 2024) is both an academic and a personal journey into Ackerman’s work but also the ways in which Ackerman’s work and similar kinds of artistry have made their way into our imaginations and our cinematic spaces. In <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> Marso uses both Ackerman’s cinematic work and the written work of Simone de Beauvoir to frame a variety of approaches to thinking about feminism and contemporary film. As Marso explains, Ackerman’s work attends to and notices women’s experiences, often with the kinds of cinematography that are used to explore these experiences in ways that make audiences a bit uncomfortable. Part of the thrust of Marso’s analysis is interrogating what it means to “feel like a feminist.” This is an important component to the discussion in <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> since this feeling may be a space where we are puzzled by what we actually do feel and we need to accept that we are alright sitting with that discomfort and with that inconclusive affect.</p>
<p><em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> explores the ways that cinema and film shift our senses, through what we see, hear, and the focus of our thinking. Film is also a profoundly emotional experience, especially if we are in a theater with others or viewing it in a community. The discussions that we have with others about what we have seen and experienced are political—this is a form of political engagement and a kind of democratic engagement. Marso provides the reader with different genres and categories that help us think about films within the broader framework at hand. And within these sections, many more contemporary films are put into conversation with Ackerman’s work. Finally, Marso wrote an epilogue of a kind that brings Greta Gerwig’s <em>Barbie</em> movie into the discussion as well.</p>
<p>This is an important and thoughtful examination of contemporary cinema—but it is also a valuable analysis of feminism and feminist thought as we see it all around us, but particularly in narrative form on the silver screen. <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> is fascinating, engaging, and opens doors to new and different ways of thinking and seeing and experiencing.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political theorist Lori Marso has been intrigued by filmmaker Chantal Ackerman for many years and has integrated Ackerman’s work into her courses at Union College and into her writings and scholarship as well. So it is no surprise that <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031222">Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</a> (Duke UP, 2024) is both an academic and a personal journey into Ackerman’s work but also the ways in which Ackerman’s work and similar kinds of artistry have made their way into our imaginations and our cinematic spaces. In <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> Marso uses both Ackerman’s cinematic work and the written work of Simone de Beauvoir to frame a variety of approaches to thinking about feminism and contemporary film. As Marso explains, Ackerman’s work attends to and notices women’s experiences, often with the kinds of cinematography that are used to explore these experiences in ways that make audiences a bit uncomfortable. Part of the thrust of Marso’s analysis is interrogating what it means to “feel like a feminist.” This is an important component to the discussion in <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> since this feeling may be a space where we are puzzled by what we actually do feel and we need to accept that we are alright sitting with that discomfort and with that inconclusive affect.</p>
<p><em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> explores the ways that cinema and film shift our senses, through what we see, hear, and the focus of our thinking. Film is also a profoundly emotional experience, especially if we are in a theater with others or viewing it in a community. The discussions that we have with others about what we have seen and experienced are political—this is a form of political engagement and a kind of democratic engagement. Marso provides the reader with different genres and categories that help us think about films within the broader framework at hand. And within these sections, many more contemporary films are put into conversation with Ackerman’s work. Finally, Marso wrote an epilogue of a kind that brings Greta Gerwig’s <em>Barbie</em> movie into the discussion as well.</p>
<p>This is an important and thoughtful examination of contemporary cinema—but it is also a valuable analysis of feminism and feminist thought as we see it all around us, but particularly in narrative form on the silver screen. <em>Feminism and the Cinema of Experience</em> is fascinating, engaging, and opens doors to new and different ways of thinking and seeing and experiencing.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46512282" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0080c48f-bf01-460d-9ad0-2f312d2c8393/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0080c48f-bf01-460d-9ad0-2f312d2c8393&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lori Jo Marso, &quot;Feminism and the Cinema of Experience&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political theorist Lori Marso has been intrigued by filmmaker Chantal Ackerman for many years and has integrated Ackerman’s work into her courses at Union College and into her writings and scholarship as well. So it is no surprise that Feminism and the Cinema of Experience (Duke UP, 2024) is both an academic and a personal journey into Ackerman’s work but also the ways in which Ackerman’s work and similar kinds of artistry have made their way into our imaginations and our cinematic spaces. In Feminism and the Cinema of Experience Marso uses both Ackerman’s cinematic work and the written work of Simone de Beauvoir to frame a variety of approaches to thinking about feminism and contemporary film. As Marso explains, Ackerman’s work attends to and notices women’s experiences, often with the kinds of cinematography that are used to explore these experiences in ways that make audiences a bit uncomfortable. Part of the thrust of Marso’s analysis is interrogating what it means to “feel like a feminist.” This is an important component to the discussion in Feminism and the Cinema of Experience since this feeling may be a space where we are puzzled by what we actually do feel and we need to accept that we are alright sitting with that discomfort and with that inconclusive affect.

Feminism and the Cinema of Experience explores the ways that cinema and film shift our senses, through what we see, hear, and the focus of our thinking. Film is also a profoundly emotional experience, especially if we are in a theater with others or viewing it in a community. The discussions that we have with others about what we have seen and experienced are political—this is a form of political engagement and a kind of democratic engagement. Marso provides the reader with different genres and categories that help us think about films within the broader framework at hand. And within these sections, many more contemporary films are put into conversation with Ackerman’s work. Finally, Marso wrote an epilogue of a kind that brings Greta Gerwig’s Barbie movie into the discussion as well.

This is an important and thoughtful examination of contemporary cinema—but it is also a valuable analysis of feminism and feminist thought as we see it all around us, but particularly in narrative form on the silver screen. Feminism and the Cinema of Experience is fascinating, engaging, and opens doors to new and different ways of thinking and seeing and experiencing.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political theorist Lori Marso has been intrigued by filmmaker Chantal Ackerman for many years and has integrated Ackerman’s work into her courses at Union College and into her writings and scholarship as well. So it is no surprise that Feminism and the Cinema of Experience (Duke UP, 2024) is both an academic and a personal journey into Ackerman’s work but also the ways in which Ackerman’s work and similar kinds of artistry have made their way into our imaginations and our cinematic spaces. In Feminism and the Cinema of Experience Marso uses both Ackerman’s cinematic work and the written work of Simone de Beauvoir to frame a variety of approaches to thinking about feminism and contemporary film. As Marso explains, Ackerman’s work attends to and notices women’s experiences, often with the kinds of cinematography that are used to explore these experiences in ways that make audiences a bit uncomfortable. Part of the thrust of Marso’s analysis is interrogating what it means to “feel like a feminist.” This is an important component to the discussion in Feminism and the Cinema of Experience since this feeling may be a space where we are puzzled by what we actually do feel and we need to accept that we are alright sitting with that discomfort and with that inconclusive affect.

Feminism and the Cinema of Experience explores the ways that cinema and film shift our senses, through what we see, hear, and the focus of our thinking. Film is also a profoundly emotional experience, especially if we are in a theater with others or viewing it in a community. The discussions that we have with others about what we have seen and experienced are political—this is a form of political engagement and a kind of democratic engagement. Marso provides the reader with different genres and categories that help us think about films within the broader framework at hand. And within these sections, many more contemporary films are put into conversation with Ackerman’s work. Finally, Marso wrote an epilogue of a kind that brings Greta Gerwig’s Barbie movie into the discussion as well.

This is an important and thoughtful examination of contemporary cinema—but it is also a valuable analysis of feminism and feminist thought as we see it all around us, but particularly in narrative form on the silver screen. Feminism and the Cinema of Experience is fascinating, engaging, and opens doors to new and different ways of thinking and seeing and experiencing.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>770</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09edc2d2-333f-11f0-8e1a-0736ecde69f0</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a> (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. <em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics </em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. <em>Constitutional Conventions</em> provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a> is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> </a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a> (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. <em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics </em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. <em>Constitutional Conventions</em> provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a> is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> </a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43997051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2eeeebb2-2c8a-427f-8369-681aafe8eeba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2eeeebb2-2c8a-427f-8369-681aafe8eeba&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.

In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.

Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.

In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.

Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.

Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">358d3040-33e3-11f0-8591-635b551855ee</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of <em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what <em>everyone </em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/">Dr. Robert Blair</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the <a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as <em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>, <em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, </em>and <em>International Organization </em>but also science journals such as <em>Science</em>, <em>Nature Human</em> <em>Behaviour</em>, or <em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,” <em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em> by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266">special issue of <em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a> on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author">combatting misinformation from <em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a> by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/">Democratic Erosion Project website</a> and <a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner, <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a> Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s <a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html">Polity Project</a> coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s <a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project">V-Dem Project</a> measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from <em>The New York Times</em> <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share">here</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob: <a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of <em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what <em>everyone </em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/">Dr. Robert Blair</a> is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the <a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as <em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>, <em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, </em>and <em>International Organization </em>but also science journals such as <em>Science</em>, <em>Nature Human</em> <em>Behaviour</em>, or <em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,” <em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em> by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266">special issue of <em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a> on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author">combatting misinformation from <em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a> by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/">Democratic Erosion Project website</a> and <a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner, <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a> Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s <a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html">Polity Project</a> coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s <a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project">V-Dem Project</a> measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from <em>The New York Times</em> <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share">here</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob: <a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37140056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7de47d88-9b9a-4de6-8fb1-14750450e0ca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7de47d88-9b9a-4de6-8fb1-14750450e0ca&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.

Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.

Mentioned:


  
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium

  “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding

  A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding

  An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield

  
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set


  Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack

  Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system

  University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy

  Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.

  Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu


  Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.

Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.

Mentioned:


  
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium

  “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding

  A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding

  An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield

  
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set


  Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack

  Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system

  University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy

  Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.

  Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu


  Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>571</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6628ba4c-2d00-11f0-99b7-83c4d26ca71c</guid>
      <title>Globalization&apos;s Backlash: Echoes of the Interwar Era in Today’s World</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director John Torpey interviews historian Tara Zahra, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393651966">Against the World: Anti-Globalism and Mass Politics Between the World Wars</a> (W.W. Norton, 2023). Zahra reflects on the historical parallels between the current backlash against globalization and the anti-globalist movements of the interwar period. She highlights how economic insecurity, the rise of mass politics, and anxieties over immigration and trade shaped political reactions in both eras, while noting key differences—such as the role of environmentalism today and the absence of a world war in recent memory. Zahra also discusses the collapse of the international economic system in the 1930s, the ideological diversity of anti-globalist movements, and the legacy of Bretton Woods. She proposes that revisiting elements of the post-WWII international order, including regional cooperation and economic stabilization, may offer insight into managing today’s fractured global landscape.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI Director John Torpey interviews historian Tara Zahra, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393651966">Against the World: Anti-Globalism and Mass Politics Between the World Wars</a> (W.W. Norton, 2023). Zahra reflects on the historical parallels between the current backlash against globalization and the anti-globalist movements of the interwar period. She highlights how economic insecurity, the rise of mass politics, and anxieties over immigration and trade shaped political reactions in both eras, while noting key differences—such as the role of environmentalism today and the absence of a world war in recent memory. Zahra also discusses the collapse of the international economic system in the 1930s, the ideological diversity of anti-globalist movements, and the legacy of Bretton Woods. She proposes that revisiting elements of the post-WWII international order, including regional cooperation and economic stabilization, may offer insight into managing today’s fractured global landscape.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30052608" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8c70fc4f-3c2f-4673-bc28-af84c751d4c8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8c70fc4f-3c2f-4673-bc28-af84c751d4c8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Globalization&apos;s Backlash: Echoes of the Interwar Era in Today’s World</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on International Horizons, RBI Director John Torpey interviews historian Tara Zahra, author of Against the World: Anti-Globalism and Mass Politics Between the World Wars (W.W. Norton, 2023). Zahra reflects on the historical parallels between the current backlash against globalization and the anti-globalist movements of the interwar period. She highlights how economic insecurity, the rise of mass politics, and anxieties over immigration and trade shaped political reactions in both eras, while noting key differences—such as the role of environmentalism today and the absence of a world war in recent memory. Zahra also discusses the collapse of the international economic system in the 1930s, the ideological diversity of anti-globalist movements, and the legacy of Bretton Woods. She proposes that revisiting elements of the post-WWII international order, including regional cooperation and economic stabilization, may offer insight into managing today’s fractured global landscape.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on International Horizons, RBI Director John Torpey interviews historian Tara Zahra, author of Against the World: Anti-Globalism and Mass Politics Between the World Wars (W.W. Norton, 2023). Zahra reflects on the historical parallels between the current backlash against globalization and the anti-globalist movements of the interwar period. She highlights how economic insecurity, the rise of mass politics, and anxieties over immigration and trade shaped political reactions in both eras, while noting key differences—such as the role of environmentalism today and the absence of a world war in recent memory. Zahra also discusses the collapse of the international economic system in the 1930s, the ideological diversity of anti-globalist movements, and the legacy of Bretton Woods. She proposes that revisiting elements of the post-WWII international order, including regional cooperation and economic stabilization, may offer insight into managing today’s fractured global landscape.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bbd93460-2c1c-11f0-a7c4-5beea3f6860f</guid>
      <title>Make Britain Great Again? The MAGA-Style Rise of Reform UK</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Britain's Conservative Party is one of the oldest and most successful political parties in history. Local elections in the UK have signalled that they are facing the prospect of being wiped out, imperilled by the rise of the right-wing Reform Party, headed by one of the most pervasive and divisive figures in British politics: Nigel Farage. Reform’s success is also coming at the expense of Labour, whose voters are underwhelmed and unconvinced by the performance so far of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.﻿﻿</p>
<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore what makes Reform such a potent political threat that they could upend 100 years of Labour and Conservative rule, charting the party's rise from UKIP to Brexit to now.﻿﻿﻿ </p>
<p>They speak to Gawain Towler, former Reform spokesperson and close political confidant of Nigel Farage, and Ben Habib, formerly deputy leader of Reform two men who understand the soul of the movement and the man who leads and embodies the party: Nigel Farage.</p>
<p>Producer, Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer, Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain's Conservative Party is one of the oldest and most successful political parties in history. Local elections in the UK have signalled that they are facing the prospect of being wiped out, imperilled by the rise of the right-wing Reform Party, headed by one of the most pervasive and divisive figures in British politics: Nigel Farage. Reform’s success is also coming at the expense of Labour, whose voters are underwhelmed and unconvinced by the performance so far of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.﻿﻿</p>
<p>Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore what makes Reform such a potent political threat that they could upend 100 years of Labour and Conservative rule, charting the party's rise from UKIP to Brexit to now.﻿﻿﻿ </p>
<p>They speak to Gawain Towler, former Reform spokesperson and close political confidant of Nigel Farage, and Ben Habib, formerly deputy leader of Reform two men who understand the soul of the movement and the man who leads and embodies the party: Nigel Farage.</p>
<p>Producer, Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer, Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37402471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6252dfba-8d2b-446d-a33f-39c43ae07d47/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6252dfba-8d2b-446d-a33f-39c43ae07d47&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Make Britain Great Again? The MAGA-Style Rise of Reform UK</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Britain&apos;s Conservative Party is one of the oldest and most successful political parties in history. Local elections in the UK have signalled that they are facing the prospect of being wiped out, imperilled by the rise of the right-wing Reform Party, headed by one of the most pervasive and divisive figures in British politics: Nigel Farage. Reform’s success is also coming at the expense of Labour, whose voters are underwhelmed and unconvinced by the performance so far of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.﻿﻿

Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore what makes Reform such a potent political threat that they could upend 100 years of Labour and Conservative rule, charting the party&apos;s rise from UKIP to Brexit to now.﻿﻿﻿ 

They speak to Gawain Towler, former Reform spokesperson and close political confidant of Nigel Farage, and Ben Habib, formerly deputy leader of Reform two men who understand the soul of the movement and the man who leads and embodies the party: Nigel Farage.

Producer, Pearse Lynch

Executive Producer, Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Britain&apos;s Conservative Party is one of the oldest and most successful political parties in history. Local elections in the UK have signalled that they are facing the prospect of being wiped out, imperilled by the rise of the right-wing Reform Party, headed by one of the most pervasive and divisive figures in British politics: Nigel Farage. Reform’s success is also coming at the expense of Labour, whose voters are underwhelmed and unconvinced by the performance so far of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government.﻿﻿

Hosts Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones explore what makes Reform such a potent political threat that they could upend 100 years of Labour and Conservative rule, charting the party&apos;s rise from UKIP to Brexit to now.﻿﻿﻿ 

They speak to Gawain Towler, former Reform spokesperson and close political confidant of Nigel Farage, and Ben Habib, formerly deputy leader of Reform two men who understand the soul of the movement and the man who leads and embodies the party: Nigel Farage.

Producer, Pearse Lynch

Executive Producer, Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f072b2c-2b68-11f0-8f49-eb91f23623ef</guid>
      <title>Ruth Braunstein, &quot;My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982"><em>My Tax Dollars:</em> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982">The Morality of Taxpaying in America</a> (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.<br /></p>
<p>Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”<br />Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.</p>
<p>Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982"><em>My Tax Dollars:</em> </a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254982">The Morality of Taxpaying in America</a> (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.<br /></p>
<p>Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”<br />Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.</p>
<p>Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62939965" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ba918b48-4aee-41cd-a120-5031d92c3596/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ba918b48-4aee-41cd-a120-5031d92c3596&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ruth Braunstein, &quot;My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.

Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.

Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.

Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In My Tax Dollars: The Morality of Taxpaying in America (Princeton University Press, 2025), Ruth Braunstein maps the contested moral landscape in which Americans experience and make sense of the tax system. Braunstein tells the stories of Americans who view taxpaying as more than a mundane chore: antigovernment tax defiers who challenge the legitimacy of the tax system, antiwar activists who resist the use of their taxes to fund war, antiabortion activists against “taxpayer funded abortions,” and a diverse group of people who promote taxpaying as a moral good.

Though taxpaying is often portrayed as dull and technical, exposure to collective rituals, civic education, propaganda, and protest transforms the practice for many Americans into either a sacred rite of citizenship or a profane threat to what they hold dear. These sacred and profane meanings can apply to the act of taxpaying itself or to the specific uses of tax dollars. Despite intense disagreement about these meanings, politically diverse Americans engaged in both taxpaying and tax resistance valorize the individual taxpayer and “my tax dollars.”Braunstein explores the profound implications of this meaning making for tax consent, the legitimacy of the tax system, and citizens’ broader understandings of their political relationships. Going beyond the usual focus on tax policy, Braunstein’s innovative view of taxation through the lens of cultural sociology shows how citizens in value-diverse societies coalesce around shared visions of the sacred and fears of the profane.

Interviewee: Ruth Braunstein is Associate Professor of sociology at the University of Connecticut.

Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>412</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b946813e-2b7d-11f0-a20f-6f2d057e3153</guid>
      <title>Lara Montesinos Coleman, &quot;Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025566"><em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em> </a>(Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.</p>
<p><a href="https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p259636-lara-montesinos-coleman">Lara Montesinos Coleman</a> is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of <em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies<em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/">Tim Wyman-McCarthy</a> is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu">tw2468@columbia.edu</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025566"><em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em> </a>(Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.</p>
<p><a href="https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p259636-lara-montesinos-coleman">Lara Montesinos Coleman</a> is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of <em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies<em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/">Tim Wyman-McCarthy</a> is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at <a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu">tw2468@columbia.edu</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62814347" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e344c057-6be6-451e-9a85-b5a52c3fdd1c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e344c057-6be6-451e-9a85-b5a52c3fdd1c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Lara Montesinos Coleman, &quot;Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights (Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.

Lara Montesinos Coleman is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies.

Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights (Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.

Lara Montesinos Coleman is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies.

Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eadc35a2-2b7f-11f0-8fcc-9b9652f25d0d</guid>
      <title>What is environmental authoritarianism and why we should be mindful of its allure</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The argument that authoritarian governments are better at dealing with the climate emergency is gaining ground, fuelled by the idea that undemocratic states face fewer constraints and so can operate more efficiently and effectively. Some are even arguing that this isn’t just a necessary evil but a legitimate policy response to pending environmental catastrophe. Yet the data suggests that on average authoritarian governments do not perform better, and on many measures actually do worse than democracies. So why does this idea persist? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Nomi Claire Lazar and Jeremy Wallace about their new article on <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/resisting-the-authoritarian-temptation/">Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation</a>. Why is democracy not delivering? Why is authoritarianism not the answer? And what new models exist that can be used to deliver a greener and more inclusive future?﻿</p>
<p>This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/">Journal of Democracy</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.nomiclairelazar.com/">Nomi Claire Lazar</a> is a Professor of Politics in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. Her work looks at crises from a range of perspectives, including emergency powers, constitutional legitimacy and climate politics. Author of the books <em>States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies</em> (Cambridge 2009) &amp; <em>Out of Joint: Power, Crisis and the Rhetoric of Time</em> (Yale, 2019), Nomi currently co-leads the British Academy’s Global Convening Programme, “The Times of a Just Transition.” She served in 2022-23 on the Rouleau Commission investigating the Federal Government’s use of the Emergencies Act in the trucker convoy crisis, and in 2024 was appointed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to Canada’s Foreign Interference Commission. She is at work on a book on apocalyptic politics, and is a frequent contributor of commentary to news outlets around the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://jeremywallace.org/">Jeremy Wallace</a> is the A. Doak Barnett Professor of China Studies at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He researches the political economy of China’s decarbonization, including the book <em>Phenomenal World</em> which investigated the carbon implications of its growth model for land, finance, and real estate. Jeremy has also written on a wide range of issues relating to cities, climate change, environmental information flows, and social media. He is also an editor at Good Authority and writes the China Lab newsletter, and his latest book is <em>Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument that authoritarian governments are better at dealing with the climate emergency is gaining ground, fuelled by the idea that undemocratic states face fewer constraints and so can operate more efficiently and effectively. Some are even arguing that this isn’t just a necessary evil but a legitimate policy response to pending environmental catastrophe. Yet the data suggests that on average authoritarian governments do not perform better, and on many measures actually do worse than democracies. So why does this idea persist? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Nomi Claire Lazar and Jeremy Wallace about their new article on <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/resisting-the-authoritarian-temptation/">Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation</a>. Why is democracy not delivering? Why is authoritarianism not the answer? And what new models exist that can be used to deliver a greener and more inclusive future?﻿</p>
<p>This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the <a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/">Journal of Democracy</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.nomiclairelazar.com/">Nomi Claire Lazar</a> is a Professor of Politics in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. Her work looks at crises from a range of perspectives, including emergency powers, constitutional legitimacy and climate politics. Author of the books <em>States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies</em> (Cambridge 2009) &amp; <em>Out of Joint: Power, Crisis and the Rhetoric of Time</em> (Yale, 2019), Nomi currently co-leads the British Academy’s Global Convening Programme, “The Times of a Just Transition.” She served in 2022-23 on the Rouleau Commission investigating the Federal Government’s use of the Emergencies Act in the trucker convoy crisis, and in 2024 was appointed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to Canada’s Foreign Interference Commission. She is at work on a book on apocalyptic politics, and is a frequent contributor of commentary to news outlets around the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://jeremywallace.org/">Jeremy Wallace</a> is the A. Doak Barnett Professor of China Studies at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He researches the political economy of China’s decarbonization, including the book <em>Phenomenal World</em> which investigated the carbon implications of its growth model for land, finance, and real estate. Jeremy has also written on a wide range of issues relating to cities, climate change, environmental information flows, and social media. He is also an editor at Good Authority and writes the China Lab newsletter, and his latest book is <em>Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p>
<p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34190491" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/705375d0-0825-4aa2-bcd3-582d7cf8fbb9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=705375d0-0825-4aa2-bcd3-582d7cf8fbb9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>What is environmental authoritarianism and why we should be mindful of its allure</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The argument that authoritarian governments are better at dealing with the climate emergency is gaining ground, fuelled by the idea that undemocratic states face fewer constraints and so can operate more efficiently and effectively. Some are even arguing that this isn’t just a necessary evil but a legitimate policy response to pending environmental catastrophe. Yet the data suggests that on average authoritarian governments do not perform better, and on many measures actually do worse than democracies. So why does this idea persist? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Nomi Claire Lazar and Jeremy Wallace about their new article on Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation. Why is democracy not delivering? Why is authoritarianism not the answer? And what new models exist that can be used to deliver a greener and more inclusive future?﻿

This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

Guest:

Nomi Claire Lazar is a Professor of Politics in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. Her work looks at crises from a range of perspectives, including emergency powers, constitutional legitimacy and climate politics. Author of the books States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies (Cambridge 2009) &amp; Out of Joint: Power, Crisis and the Rhetoric of Time (Yale, 2019), Nomi currently co-leads the British Academy’s Global Convening Programme, “The Times of a Just Transition.” She served in 2022-23 on the Rouleau Commission investigating the Federal Government’s use of the Emergencies Act in the trucker convoy crisis, and in 2024 was appointed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to Canada’s Foreign Interference Commission. She is at work on a book on apocalyptic politics, and is a frequent contributor of commentary to news outlets around the world.

Jeremy Wallace is the A. Doak Barnett Professor of China Studies at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He researches the political economy of China’s decarbonization, including the book Phenomenal World which investigated the carbon implications of its growth model for land, finance, and real estate. Jeremy has also written on a wide range of issues relating to cities, climate change, environmental information flows, and social media. He is also an editor at Good Authority and writes the China Lab newsletter, and his latest book is Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The argument that authoritarian governments are better at dealing with the climate emergency is gaining ground, fuelled by the idea that undemocratic states face fewer constraints and so can operate more efficiently and effectively. Some are even arguing that this isn’t just a necessary evil but a legitimate policy response to pending environmental catastrophe. Yet the data suggests that on average authoritarian governments do not perform better, and on many measures actually do worse than democracies. So why does this idea persist? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Nomi Claire Lazar and Jeremy Wallace about their new article on Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation. Why is democracy not delivering? Why is authoritarianism not the answer? And what new models exist that can be used to deliver a greener and more inclusive future?﻿

This podcast is part of our regular collaboration with the Journal of Democracy.

Guest:

Nomi Claire Lazar is a Professor of Politics in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. Her work looks at crises from a range of perspectives, including emergency powers, constitutional legitimacy and climate politics. Author of the books States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies (Cambridge 2009) &amp; Out of Joint: Power, Crisis and the Rhetoric of Time (Yale, 2019), Nomi currently co-leads the British Academy’s Global Convening Programme, “The Times of a Just Transition.” She served in 2022-23 on the Rouleau Commission investigating the Federal Government’s use of the Emergencies Act in the trucker convoy crisis, and in 2024 was appointed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to Canada’s Foreign Interference Commission. She is at work on a book on apocalyptic politics, and is a frequent contributor of commentary to news outlets around the world.

Jeremy Wallace is the A. Doak Barnett Professor of China Studies at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He researches the political economy of China’s decarbonization, including the book Phenomenal World which investigated the carbon implications of its growth model for land, finance, and real estate. Jeremy has also written on a wide range of issues relating to cities, climate change, environmental information flows, and social media. He is also an editor at Good Authority and writes the China Lab newsletter, and his latest book is Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China.

Presenter:

Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69f7088a-29eb-11f0-ad0b-97c3d9bb0310</guid>
      <title>Katherine Stewart, &quot;Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.</p>
<p>Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781635578546">Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy</a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury Press, 2025).</p>
<p>Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.</p>
<p><a href="https://voices.uchicago.edu/richardbmiller/">Richard B. Miller</a> is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is <em>Why Study Religion? </em>(NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/richardbmiller24sf.bsky.social">Bluesky</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.</p>
<p>Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781635578546">Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy</a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury Press, 2025).</p>
<p>Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.</p>
<p><a href="https://voices.uchicago.edu/richardbmiller/">Richard B. Miller</a> is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is <em>Why Study Religion? </em>(NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/richardbmiller24sf.bsky.social">Bluesky</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50031224" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/967824c7-4905-4cbe-a212-f395458320b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=967824c7-4905-4cbe-a212-f395458320b1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Katherine Stewart, &quot;Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.

Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy (Bloomsbury Press, 2025).

Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.

Richard B. Miller is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is Why Study Religion? (NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). Bluesky.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today, and for the past several years, many people both here and abroad have been trying to make sense of the radical right and its financial and ideological grip on the Republican party. Why is it that so many Americans have turned against democracy? What explains the authoritarian reaction of so many American citizens, even when that reaction works so directly against their basic interests? How is it that this anti-democratic trend has escaped the explanatory frameworks of pundits and scholars alike? Perhaps we need to re-frame the narrative about the MAGA movement and the various constituencies that have somehow conspired to undermine democratic values and replace them with radical libertarian principles joined by theocratic, White nationalist, and anti-intellectual ideals.

Addressing these concerns, Katherine Stewart has written Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy (Bloomsbury Press, 2025).

Casting a light on the religious right’s “Funders, Thinkers, Sergeants, Infantry, and Power Players,” Stewart recounts her effort “to record what I have seen and heard from the leaders and supporters of the antidemocratic movement in the auditoriums and breakout rooms at national conferences, around the table at informal gatherings of activists, in the living rooms of the rank and file, and in the pews of hard-line churches. The story features a rowdy mix of personalities: ‘apostles’ of Jesus, atheist billionaires, reactionary Catholic theologians, pseudo-Platonic intellectuals, woman-hating opponents of ‘the gynocracy,’ high-powered evangelical networkers, Jewish devotees of Ayn Rand, pronatalists preoccupied with a dearth of (White) babies, COVID truthers, and battalions of ‘spirit warriors’ who appear to be inventing a new style of religion even as they set about undermining democracy at its foundations.” Over and against the idea that religion is a relatively insignificant factor in the rise of the radical political right, Stewart makes plain how Christian nationalism is “front and center” in the effort to solidify the power of the MAGA movement and Donald Trump’s presidency.

Richard B. Miller is the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Emeritus Professor of Religion, Politics and Ethics at the University of Chicago. He previously taught in the Department of Religious Studies at Indiana University where he also served as Director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions. The author of numerous articles and books, the most of which is Why Study Religion? (NY: Oxford University Press, 2021). Bluesky.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f26495ce-2db1-11f0-893e-9f7ce51f4b9f</guid>
      <title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at <em>Bright Line Watch</em> released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the <a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/">scope of executive power</a> and the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html">authority of courts to check it</a>, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment">individual freedom of expression</a>, <a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/">due process</a> and <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/">habeas corpus</a>, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown">immigration</a>, and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of <em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of <em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/">Dr. John Carey</a> (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a> is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the <em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, <a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a> (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/">Bright Line Watch homepage</a> with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist">NPR’s <em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/">Democratic Erosion Project</a> (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at <em>Bright Line Watch</em> released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the <a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/">scope of executive power</a> and the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html">authority of courts to check it</a>, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment">individual freedom of expression</a>, <a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/">due process</a> and <a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/">habeas corpus</a>, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown">immigration</a>, and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of <em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of <em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/">Dr. John Carey</a> (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a> is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the <em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, <a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a> (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/">Bright Line Watch homepage</a> with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist">NPR’s <em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/">Democratic Erosion Project</a> (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42981755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/da5991d0-ab07-407e-b63b-5d56f75cecbb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=da5991d0-ab07-407e-b63b-5d56f75cecbb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.

Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.

Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.

Mentioned:


  Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).



  
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports

  John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.

  Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)

  
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)

  Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.

Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.

Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.

Mentioned:


  Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).



  
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports

  John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.

  Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)

  
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)

  Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9f566e8-2850-11f0-b9b7-b744eda1cf98</guid>
      <title>Threats to Universities and What We Can Do: A Conversation with Brandice Canes Wrone</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?</p>
<p>In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?</p>
<p>In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56076018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f1d77509-c9b0-4c77-94a6-bbd2b1ffb539/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f1d77509-c9b0-4c77-94a6-bbd2b1ffb539&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Threats to Universities and What We Can Do: A Conversation with Brandice Canes Wrone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?

In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.

Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.

Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Universities are under attack, but what exactly are the threats? How does free speech in the last 10 years compare to today? What do we stand to lose if higher education collapses?

In this episode, Brandice Canes-Wrone dives into the major threats facing universities—from defunding to restrictions on free expression—and what we can do to solve them. We explore the history of universities, from their religious roots to the transformative impact of the GI Bill, examine how America’s global leadership is tied to the strength of its higher education system, and discuss why universities must remain vital spaces for intellectual experimentation, free inquiry, and personal growth.

Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.

Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48761124-2789-11f0-981c-f7c28516a181</guid>
      <title>Catching the China-Europe Express: Logistics, Local Agency &amp; Eurasian Geopolitics in the Polish Borderlands</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we focus on the often-overlooked geographies of Eurasian connectivity with <a href="https://urbanstudies.brussels/person/wojciech-keblowski">Dr. Wojciech Kębłowski</a>, whose research brings attention to the Polish border towns of Małaszewicze and Narevka, key yet rarely discussed nodes in global infrastructure networks. As Eurasia undergoes a dramatic reconfiguration—with initiatives like China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor, and numerous regional projects vying for influence—we discuss what happens at the edges. How are logistics nodes developed? Who lives in these nodes of connection, and how do they navigate the shifting tides of global ambition?</p>
<p>Our conversation spans local politics, logistics, labor, railway connectivity, and geopolitics, offering a multidimensional view of border hubs where the global meets the local. These sites are not only shaped by supply chain logics but also by mounting geopolitical rivalries, as powers compete for infrastructural influence across continents. Dr. Kębłowski paints a vivid picture of Małaszewicze, once a booming railway town employing over 10,000 people, now economically depressed but still strategically vital. While geopolitical tensions—like the war in Ukraine—have disrupted trade flows, they haven’t derailed Małaszewicze’s importance. The town’s traffic has rebounded, a testament to its logistical centrality. Dr. Kębłowski discussed the hopes of renewal spurred by the BRI and how local leaders have actively tried to position Małaszewicze on the global map—courting Chinese delegations, lobbying Warsaw, and crafting narratives of international relevance. He shares insights into how these symbolic and practical efforts illustrate both the ambitions and the limitations faced by peripheries striving to assert their place in global politics and connectivity networks.</p>
<p><strong>GUEST BIO:</strong></p>
<p>Wojciech Kębłowski is an urban researcher, <a href="https://fotogeografia.com/">photographer</a>, and Assistant Professor in Urban Studies and Planning at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, with affiliations at the Université libre de Bruxelles. He will begin a new professorship at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in June 2025. His research sits at the intersection of urban, transport, and political geography, and draws on critical social and decolonial theory. It spans three main areas: the political economy and governance of “sustainable” transport, the urban geography of Global China, and alternatives to capitalist urbanism, including circular economy and degrowth practices. Wojciech’s research is global in scope, with fieldwork and collaborations in diverse cities in Western Europe (Aubagne, Brussels, Luxembourg, Helsinki, Madrid), Eastern Europe (Sopot, Wrocław, Tallinn), China (Chengdu) and Cuba (Santiago). He uses a range of qualitative methods and is interested in photography as a research tool and a creative practice. Wojciech is involved in several international research projects, including <em>LiFT</em> (on fare-related mobility transitions), <em>CARIN-PT</em> (on flexible and on-demand transport), and previously led <em>PUTSPACE</em> and <em>CIRCITY</em>, focused on public transport and circular economies, respectively.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we focus on the often-overlooked geographies of Eurasian connectivity with <a href="https://urbanstudies.brussels/person/wojciech-keblowski">Dr. Wojciech Kębłowski</a>, whose research brings attention to the Polish border towns of Małaszewicze and Narevka, key yet rarely discussed nodes in global infrastructure networks. As Eurasia undergoes a dramatic reconfiguration—with initiatives like China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor, and numerous regional projects vying for influence—we discuss what happens at the edges. How are logistics nodes developed? Who lives in these nodes of connection, and how do they navigate the shifting tides of global ambition?</p>
<p>Our conversation spans local politics, logistics, labor, railway connectivity, and geopolitics, offering a multidimensional view of border hubs where the global meets the local. These sites are not only shaped by supply chain logics but also by mounting geopolitical rivalries, as powers compete for infrastructural influence across continents. Dr. Kębłowski paints a vivid picture of Małaszewicze, once a booming railway town employing over 10,000 people, now economically depressed but still strategically vital. While geopolitical tensions—like the war in Ukraine—have disrupted trade flows, they haven’t derailed Małaszewicze’s importance. The town’s traffic has rebounded, a testament to its logistical centrality. Dr. Kębłowski discussed the hopes of renewal spurred by the BRI and how local leaders have actively tried to position Małaszewicze on the global map—courting Chinese delegations, lobbying Warsaw, and crafting narratives of international relevance. He shares insights into how these symbolic and practical efforts illustrate both the ambitions and the limitations faced by peripheries striving to assert their place in global politics and connectivity networks.</p>
<p><strong>GUEST BIO:</strong></p>
<p>Wojciech Kębłowski is an urban researcher, <a href="https://fotogeografia.com/">photographer</a>, and Assistant Professor in Urban Studies and Planning at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, with affiliations at the Université libre de Bruxelles. He will begin a new professorship at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in June 2025. His research sits at the intersection of urban, transport, and political geography, and draws on critical social and decolonial theory. It spans three main areas: the political economy and governance of “sustainable” transport, the urban geography of Global China, and alternatives to capitalist urbanism, including circular economy and degrowth practices. Wojciech’s research is global in scope, with fieldwork and collaborations in diverse cities in Western Europe (Aubagne, Brussels, Luxembourg, Helsinki, Madrid), Eastern Europe (Sopot, Wrocław, Tallinn), China (Chengdu) and Cuba (Santiago). He uses a range of qualitative methods and is interested in photography as a research tool and a creative practice. Wojciech is involved in several international research projects, including <em>LiFT</em> (on fare-related mobility transitions), <em>CARIN-PT</em> (on flexible and on-demand transport), and previously led <em>PUTSPACE</em> and <em>CIRCITY</em>, focused on public transport and circular economies, respectively.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50710893" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d37164eb-5c1a-4d12-af4b-b80446e58025/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d37164eb-5c1a-4d12-af4b-b80446e58025&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Catching the China-Europe Express: Logistics, Local Agency &amp; Eurasian Geopolitics in the Polish Borderlands</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we focus on the often-overlooked geographies of Eurasian connectivity with Dr. Wojciech Kębłowski, whose research brings attention to the Polish border towns of Małaszewicze and Narevka, key yet rarely discussed nodes in global infrastructure networks. As Eurasia undergoes a dramatic reconfiguration—with initiatives like China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor, and numerous regional projects vying for influence—we discuss what happens at the edges. How are logistics nodes developed? Who lives in these nodes of connection, and how do they navigate the shifting tides of global ambition?

Our conversation spans local politics, logistics, labor, railway connectivity, and geopolitics, offering a multidimensional view of border hubs where the global meets the local. These sites are not only shaped by supply chain logics but also by mounting geopolitical rivalries, as powers compete for infrastructural influence across continents. Dr. Kębłowski paints a vivid picture of Małaszewicze, once a booming railway town employing over 10,000 people, now economically depressed but still strategically vital. While geopolitical tensions—like the war in Ukraine—have disrupted trade flows, they haven’t derailed Małaszewicze’s importance. The town’s traffic has rebounded, a testament to its logistical centrality. Dr. Kębłowski discussed the hopes of renewal spurred by the BRI and how local leaders have actively tried to position Małaszewicze on the global map—courting Chinese delegations, lobbying Warsaw, and crafting narratives of international relevance. He shares insights into how these symbolic and practical efforts illustrate both the ambitions and the limitations faced by peripheries striving to assert their place in global politics and connectivity networks.

GUEST BIO:

Wojciech Kębłowski is an urban researcher, photographer, and Assistant Professor in Urban Studies and Planning at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, with affiliations at the Université libre de Bruxelles. He will begin a new professorship at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in June 2025. His research sits at the intersection of urban, transport, and political geography, and draws on critical social and decolonial theory. It spans three main areas: the political economy and governance of “sustainable” transport, the urban geography of Global China, and alternatives to capitalist urbanism, including circular economy and degrowth practices. Wojciech’s research is global in scope, with fieldwork and collaborations in diverse cities in Western Europe (Aubagne, Brussels, Luxembourg, Helsinki, Madrid), Eastern Europe (Sopot, Wrocław, Tallinn), China (Chengdu) and Cuba (Santiago). He uses a range of qualitative methods and is interested in photography as a research tool and a creative practice. Wojciech is involved in several international research projects, including LiFT (on fare-related mobility transitions), CARIN-PT (on flexible and on-demand transport), and previously led PUTSPACE and CIRCITY, focused on public transport and circular economies, respectively.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we focus on the often-overlooked geographies of Eurasian connectivity with Dr. Wojciech Kębłowski, whose research brings attention to the Polish border towns of Małaszewicze and Narevka, key yet rarely discussed nodes in global infrastructure networks. As Eurasia undergoes a dramatic reconfiguration—with initiatives like China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor, and numerous regional projects vying for influence—we discuss what happens at the edges. How are logistics nodes developed? Who lives in these nodes of connection, and how do they navigate the shifting tides of global ambition?

Our conversation spans local politics, logistics, labor, railway connectivity, and geopolitics, offering a multidimensional view of border hubs where the global meets the local. These sites are not only shaped by supply chain logics but also by mounting geopolitical rivalries, as powers compete for infrastructural influence across continents. Dr. Kębłowski paints a vivid picture of Małaszewicze, once a booming railway town employing over 10,000 people, now economically depressed but still strategically vital. While geopolitical tensions—like the war in Ukraine—have disrupted trade flows, they haven’t derailed Małaszewicze’s importance. The town’s traffic has rebounded, a testament to its logistical centrality. Dr. Kębłowski discussed the hopes of renewal spurred by the BRI and how local leaders have actively tried to position Małaszewicze on the global map—courting Chinese delegations, lobbying Warsaw, and crafting narratives of international relevance. He shares insights into how these symbolic and practical efforts illustrate both the ambitions and the limitations faced by peripheries striving to assert their place in global politics and connectivity networks.

GUEST BIO:

Wojciech Kębłowski is an urban researcher, photographer, and Assistant Professor in Urban Studies and Planning at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, with affiliations at the Université libre de Bruxelles. He will begin a new professorship at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in June 2025. His research sits at the intersection of urban, transport, and political geography, and draws on critical social and decolonial theory. It spans three main areas: the political economy and governance of “sustainable” transport, the urban geography of Global China, and alternatives to capitalist urbanism, including circular economy and degrowth practices. Wojciech’s research is global in scope, with fieldwork and collaborations in diverse cities in Western Europe (Aubagne, Brussels, Luxembourg, Helsinki, Madrid), Eastern Europe (Sopot, Wrocław, Tallinn), China (Chengdu) and Cuba (Santiago). He uses a range of qualitative methods and is interested in photography as a research tool and a creative practice. Wojciech is involved in several international research projects, including LiFT (on fare-related mobility transitions), CARIN-PT (on flexible and on-demand transport), and previously led PUTSPACE and CIRCITY, focused on public transport and circular economies, respectively.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50eb6592-26cc-11f0-861e-cbccff9a9fd6</guid>
      <title>Alan Chong, &quot;The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalization, international communication constantly takes place across borders, defying sovereign control as it influences opinion. While diplomacy between states is the visible face of international relations, this “informal diplomacy” is usually less visible but no less powerful. Information politics can be found in propaganda, Internet politics, educational exchanges, tourism, and even popular film.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472057313">The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Alan Chong examines this informational dimension of international politics, investigating how information is generated, conveyed through channels, and directed specifically at audiences. While citizens are often portrayed as faithfully loyal supporters and beneficiaries of the modern nation-state—a fiction supported by passports, identification papers, and other notarized credentials—they are subject to the pulls of loyalty from transnational tribal affiliations, mythological and historical narratives of ethnicity, as well as the transcendental claims of religion and philosophy. Increasingly, social media also enchants non-state individuals, providing new virtual communities as the center of loyalties rather than national affiliations. By reinterpreting taken-for-granted concepts in journalism, media, political economy, nationalism, development, and propaganda as information politics, this book prepares serious-minded scholars, citizens, politicians, and social activists everywhere to understand the power plays in international communication and use alternatives to begin transforming power relations.</p>
<p>﻿ <em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an era of globalization, international communication constantly takes place across borders, defying sovereign control as it influences opinion. While diplomacy between states is the visible face of international relations, this “informal diplomacy” is usually less visible but no less powerful. Information politics can be found in propaganda, Internet politics, educational exchanges, tourism, and even popular film.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472057313">The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World</a> (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Alan Chong examines this informational dimension of international politics, investigating how information is generated, conveyed through channels, and directed specifically at audiences. While citizens are often portrayed as faithfully loyal supporters and beneficiaries of the modern nation-state—a fiction supported by passports, identification papers, and other notarized credentials—they are subject to the pulls of loyalty from transnational tribal affiliations, mythological and historical narratives of ethnicity, as well as the transcendental claims of religion and philosophy. Increasingly, social media also enchants non-state individuals, providing new virtual communities as the center of loyalties rather than national affiliations. By reinterpreting taken-for-granted concepts in journalism, media, political economy, nationalism, development, and propaganda as information politics, this book prepares serious-minded scholars, citizens, politicians, and social activists everywhere to understand the power plays in international communication and use alternatives to begin transforming power relations.</p>
<p>﻿ <em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72437535" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b2778eef-12c1-49a2-99f9-bd7c05201856/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b2778eef-12c1-49a2-99f9-bd7c05201856&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alan Chong, &quot;The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In an era of globalization, international communication constantly takes place across borders, defying sovereign control as it influences opinion. While diplomacy between states is the visible face of international relations, this “informal diplomacy” is usually less visible but no less powerful. Information politics can be found in propaganda, Internet politics, educational exchanges, tourism, and even popular film.

In The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Alan Chong examines this informational dimension of international politics, investigating how information is generated, conveyed through channels, and directed specifically at audiences. While citizens are often portrayed as faithfully loyal supporters and beneficiaries of the modern nation-state—a fiction supported by passports, identification papers, and other notarized credentials—they are subject to the pulls of loyalty from transnational tribal affiliations, mythological and historical narratives of ethnicity, as well as the transcendental claims of religion and philosophy. Increasingly, social media also enchants non-state individuals, providing new virtual communities as the center of loyalties rather than national affiliations. By reinterpreting taken-for-granted concepts in journalism, media, political economy, nationalism, development, and propaganda as information politics, this book prepares serious-minded scholars, citizens, politicians, and social activists everywhere to understand the power plays in international communication and use alternatives to begin transforming power relations.

﻿ ﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In an era of globalization, international communication constantly takes place across borders, defying sovereign control as it influences opinion. While diplomacy between states is the visible face of international relations, this “informal diplomacy” is usually less visible but no less powerful. Information politics can be found in propaganda, Internet politics, educational exchanges, tourism, and even popular film.

In The International Politics of Communication: Representing Community in a Globalizing World (University of Michigan Press, 2025) by Dr. Alan Chong examines this informational dimension of international politics, investigating how information is generated, conveyed through channels, and directed specifically at audiences. While citizens are often portrayed as faithfully loyal supporters and beneficiaries of the modern nation-state—a fiction supported by passports, identification papers, and other notarized credentials—they are subject to the pulls of loyalty from transnational tribal affiliations, mythological and historical narratives of ethnicity, as well as the transcendental claims of religion and philosophy. Increasingly, social media also enchants non-state individuals, providing new virtual communities as the center of loyalties rather than national affiliations. By reinterpreting taken-for-granted concepts in journalism, media, political economy, nationalism, development, and propaganda as information politics, this book prepares serious-minded scholars, citizens, politicians, and social activists everywhere to understand the power plays in international communication and use alternatives to begin transforming power relations.

﻿ ﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f65355f2-26b4-11f0-aa25-83434d5e463d</guid>
      <title>Democracy for Sale: Death by Dark Money</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.</p>
<p>Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.<br />Panelists:<br />--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI<br />--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society<br />--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London</p>
<p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.</p>
<p>Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.<br />Panelists:<br />--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI<br />--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society<br />--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London</p>
<p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p>
<p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62706975" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e85944d4-6754-476e-a891-07b67034c077/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e85944d4-6754-476e-a891-07b67034c077&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Democracy for Sale: Death by Dark Money</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.

Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.Panelists:--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London

Producer: Pearse Lynch

Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this edition of Ctrl Alt Deceit: Democracy in Danger, we are live at the Royal United Services Institute.

Nina Dos Santos and Owen Bennett Jones are joined by a world-class panel to discuss the dangers posed by the waves of dark money threatening to overwhelm our democratic institutions.Panelists:--Tom Keatinge, Director, Centre for Finance and Security, RUSI--Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society--Gina Neff, Executive Director, Minderoo Centre for Technology &amp; Democracy at the University of Cambridge, and Professor of Responsible AI, Queen Mary University London

Producer: Pearse Lynch

Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cee0657a-25f9-11f0-ab54-b74e55947df1</guid>
      <title>Diana Graizbord, &quot;Indicators of Democracy: The Politics and Promise of Evaluation Expertise in Mexico&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The spread of democracy across the Global South has taken many different forms, but certain features are consistent: implementing a system of elections and an overarching mission of serving the will and well-being of a country's citizens. But how do we hold politicians accountable for such a mission? How are we to understand the efficacy of the policies they put forth? </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503630833">Indicators of Democracy</a> (Stanford UP, 2024), Diana Graizbord exposes the complex, often-hidden world of the institutions that are meant to ensure democratic accountability and transparency. Taking the case of Mexico's National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL), Graizbord provides a deep theory of what happens when democratic aspirations intersect with technocratic ambitions. Analyzing what it takes to establish and sustain monitoring and evaluation as a form of official state expertise, Graizbord is able to put forward the contours of technodemocracy—a democratic political project that hinges on the power of experts to shape politics in unexpected but profound ways.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spread of democracy across the Global South has taken many different forms, but certain features are consistent: implementing a system of elections and an overarching mission of serving the will and well-being of a country's citizens. But how do we hold politicians accountable for such a mission? How are we to understand the efficacy of the policies they put forth? </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503630833">Indicators of Democracy</a> (Stanford UP, 2024), Diana Graizbord exposes the complex, often-hidden world of the institutions that are meant to ensure democratic accountability and transparency. Taking the case of Mexico's National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL), Graizbord provides a deep theory of what happens when democratic aspirations intersect with technocratic ambitions. Analyzing what it takes to establish and sustain monitoring and evaluation as a form of official state expertise, Graizbord is able to put forward the contours of technodemocracy—a democratic political project that hinges on the power of experts to shape politics in unexpected but profound ways.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45115577" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6b586034-3d18-4876-baaf-946a2dd24449/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6b586034-3d18-4876-baaf-946a2dd24449&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Diana Graizbord, &quot;Indicators of Democracy: The Politics and Promise of Evaluation Expertise in Mexico&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The spread of democracy across the Global South has taken many different forms, but certain features are consistent: implementing a system of elections and an overarching mission of serving the will and well-being of a country&apos;s citizens. But how do we hold politicians accountable for such a mission? How are we to understand the efficacy of the policies they put forth? 

In Indicators of Democracy (Stanford UP, 2024), Diana Graizbord exposes the complex, often-hidden world of the institutions that are meant to ensure democratic accountability and transparency. Taking the case of Mexico&apos;s National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL), Graizbord provides a deep theory of what happens when democratic aspirations intersect with technocratic ambitions. Analyzing what it takes to establish and sustain monitoring and evaluation as a form of official state expertise, Graizbord is able to put forward the contours of technodemocracy—a democratic political project that hinges on the power of experts to shape politics in unexpected but profound ways.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The spread of democracy across the Global South has taken many different forms, but certain features are consistent: implementing a system of elections and an overarching mission of serving the will and well-being of a country&apos;s citizens. But how do we hold politicians accountable for such a mission? How are we to understand the efficacy of the policies they put forth? 

In Indicators of Democracy (Stanford UP, 2024), Diana Graizbord exposes the complex, often-hidden world of the institutions that are meant to ensure democratic accountability and transparency. Taking the case of Mexico&apos;s National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL), Graizbord provides a deep theory of what happens when democratic aspirations intersect with technocratic ambitions. Analyzing what it takes to establish and sustain monitoring and evaluation as a form of official state expertise, Graizbord is able to put forward the contours of technodemocracy—a democratic political project that hinges on the power of experts to shape politics in unexpected but profound ways.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>413</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">402379b6-246a-11f0-b927-97d983ce37f6</guid>
      <title>Martin Thomas, &quot;The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Empires, until recently, were everywhere. They shaped borders, stirred conflicts, and set the terms of international politics. With the collapse of empire came a fundamental reorganization of our world. Decolonization unfolded across territories as well as within them. Its struggles became internationalized and transnational, as much global campaigns of moral disarmament against colonial injustice as local contests of arms. In this expansive history, Martin Thomas tells the story of decolonization and its intrinsic link to globalization. He traces the connections between these two transformative processes: the end of formal empire and the acceleration of global integration, market reorganization, cultural exchange, and migration.﻿﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691190921">The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization</a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2024) shows how profoundly decolonization shaped the process of globalization in the wake of empire collapse. In the second half of the twentieth century, decolonization catalyzed new international coalitions; it triggered partitions and wars; and it reshaped North-South dynamics. Globalization promised the decolonized greater access to essential resources, to wider networks of influence, and to worldwide audiences, but its neoliberal variant has reinforced economic inequalities and imperial forms of political and cultural influences. In surveying these two codependent histories across the world, from Latin America to Asia, Thomas explains why the deck was so heavily stacked against newly independent nations.<br />Decolonization stands alongside the great world wars as the most transformative event of twentieth-century history. In <em>The End of Empires and a World Remade</em>, Thomas offers a masterful analysis of the greatest process of state-making (and empire-unmaking) in modern history.</p>
<p>Martin Thomas is professor of imperial history and director of the Centre for Histories of Violence and Conflict at the University of Exeter. A fellow of the Leverhulme Trust and the Independent Social Research Foundation, he is the author of <em>Violence and Colonial Order: Police, Workers and Protest in the European Colonial Empires</em>, <em>1918–1940</em>; <em>Fight or Flight: Britain, France, and the Roads from Empire</em>; and other books.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Empires, until recently, were everywhere. They shaped borders, stirred conflicts, and set the terms of international politics. With the collapse of empire came a fundamental reorganization of our world. Decolonization unfolded across territories as well as within them. Its struggles became internationalized and transnational, as much global campaigns of moral disarmament against colonial injustice as local contests of arms. In this expansive history, Martin Thomas tells the story of decolonization and its intrinsic link to globalization. He traces the connections between these two transformative processes: the end of formal empire and the acceleration of global integration, market reorganization, cultural exchange, and migration.﻿﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691190921">The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization</a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2024) shows how profoundly decolonization shaped the process of globalization in the wake of empire collapse. In the second half of the twentieth century, decolonization catalyzed new international coalitions; it triggered partitions and wars; and it reshaped North-South dynamics. Globalization promised the decolonized greater access to essential resources, to wider networks of influence, and to worldwide audiences, but its neoliberal variant has reinforced economic inequalities and imperial forms of political and cultural influences. In surveying these two codependent histories across the world, from Latin America to Asia, Thomas explains why the deck was so heavily stacked against newly independent nations.<br />Decolonization stands alongside the great world wars as the most transformative event of twentieth-century history. In <em>The End of Empires and a World Remade</em>, Thomas offers a masterful analysis of the greatest process of state-making (and empire-unmaking) in modern history.</p>
<p>Martin Thomas is professor of imperial history and director of the Centre for Histories of Violence and Conflict at the University of Exeter. A fellow of the Leverhulme Trust and the Independent Social Research Foundation, he is the author of <em>Violence and Colonial Order: Police, Workers and Protest in the European Colonial Empires</em>, <em>1918–1940</em>; <em>Fight or Flight: Britain, France, and the Roads from Empire</em>; and other books.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41391163" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a907d838-53f3-4a63-b335-54f1d49867d5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a907d838-53f3-4a63-b335-54f1d49867d5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Martin Thomas, &quot;The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Empires, until recently, were everywhere. They shaped borders, stirred conflicts, and set the terms of international politics. With the collapse of empire came a fundamental reorganization of our world. Decolonization unfolded across territories as well as within them. Its struggles became internationalized and transnational, as much global campaigns of moral disarmament against colonial injustice as local contests of arms. In this expansive history, Martin Thomas tells the story of decolonization and its intrinsic link to globalization. He traces the connections between these two transformative processes: the end of formal empire and the acceleration of global integration, market reorganization, cultural exchange, and migration.﻿﻿

The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization (Princeton UP, 2024) shows how profoundly decolonization shaped the process of globalization in the wake of empire collapse. In the second half of the twentieth century, decolonization catalyzed new international coalitions; it triggered partitions and wars; and it reshaped North-South dynamics. Globalization promised the decolonized greater access to essential resources, to wider networks of influence, and to worldwide audiences, but its neoliberal variant has reinforced economic inequalities and imperial forms of political and cultural influences. In surveying these two codependent histories across the world, from Latin America to Asia, Thomas explains why the deck was so heavily stacked against newly independent nations.Decolonization stands alongside the great world wars as the most transformative event of twentieth-century history. In The End of Empires and a World Remade, Thomas offers a masterful analysis of the greatest process of state-making (and empire-unmaking) in modern history.

Martin Thomas is professor of imperial history and director of the Centre for Histories of Violence and Conflict at the University of Exeter. A fellow of the Leverhulme Trust and the Independent Social Research Foundation, he is the author of Violence and Colonial Order: Police, Workers and Protest in the European Colonial Empires, 1918–1940; Fight or Flight: Britain, France, and the Roads from Empire; and other books.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Empires, until recently, were everywhere. They shaped borders, stirred conflicts, and set the terms of international politics. With the collapse of empire came a fundamental reorganization of our world. Decolonization unfolded across territories as well as within them. Its struggles became internationalized and transnational, as much global campaigns of moral disarmament against colonial injustice as local contests of arms. In this expansive history, Martin Thomas tells the story of decolonization and its intrinsic link to globalization. He traces the connections between these two transformative processes: the end of formal empire and the acceleration of global integration, market reorganization, cultural exchange, and migration.﻿﻿

The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization (Princeton UP, 2024) shows how profoundly decolonization shaped the process of globalization in the wake of empire collapse. In the second half of the twentieth century, decolonization catalyzed new international coalitions; it triggered partitions and wars; and it reshaped North-South dynamics. Globalization promised the decolonized greater access to essential resources, to wider networks of influence, and to worldwide audiences, but its neoliberal variant has reinforced economic inequalities and imperial forms of political and cultural influences. In surveying these two codependent histories across the world, from Latin America to Asia, Thomas explains why the deck was so heavily stacked against newly independent nations.Decolonization stands alongside the great world wars as the most transformative event of twentieth-century history. In The End of Empires and a World Remade, Thomas offers a masterful analysis of the greatest process of state-making (and empire-unmaking) in modern history.

Martin Thomas is professor of imperial history and director of the Centre for Histories of Violence and Conflict at the University of Exeter. A fellow of the Leverhulme Trust and the Independent Social Research Foundation, he is the author of Violence and Colonial Order: Police, Workers and Protest in the European Colonial Empires, 1918–1940; Fight or Flight: Britain, France, and the Roads from Empire; and other books.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07bc4482-2392-11f0-af8b-a7d581761aba</guid>
      <title>Time to Rethink Democracy: Participatory and More-Than-Human Perspectives</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a special episode that features a conversation between Sonia Bussu and Hans Asenbaum on democracy, capitalism, climate and the practices and prospects of participatory, deliberative and more-than-human democracy to transform their relationship. Can we rethink democracy beyond the liberal-democratic institutions that were created as part of the bargain for fossil-fuel-driven, Western-centric economic growth? What does and could democratic participation look like? What does it mean to include the non-human in our understanding of democracy?</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/bussu-sonia">Sonia Bussu</a> is Associate Professor in Public Policy at the University of Birmingham. She researches participatory democracy and in her work she uses participatory and creative methods for research and public engagement. She has led on projects on youth participation to influence mental health policy, youth employment policies, as well as coproduction of research on health and social care integration, and leadership styles within collaborative governance. She is scientific coordinator of a Horizon Europe project on participatory policymaking, <a href="https://www.inspiredemocracy.eu/">INSPIRE</a>. She is co-editor of <a href="https://d.docs.live.net/a807a3d75f3f8d41/Academic/BELMAS/Reclaiming%20Participatory%20Governance:%20Social%20Movements%20and%20the%20Reinvention%20of%20Democratic%20Innovation.%20Routledge."><em>Reclaiming Participatory Governance: Social Movements and the Reinvention of Democratic Innovation. </em>Routledge</a><u>.</u></p>
<p><a href="https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/persons/hans-asenbaum">Hans Asenbaum</a> is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. His research interests include radical democracy, queer and gender studies, digital politics, and participatory research methods. In 2022 he received the ECPR Rising Star Award. Hans is the author of <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-becoming-9780192858870?cc=gb&amp;lang=en&amp;"><em>The Politics of Becoming: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023) and co-editor of <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/44646?login=false"><em>Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy</em></a> (with Ercan, Curato and Mendonça, Oxford University Press, 2022). His work has been published in the <em>American Political Science Review</em>, <em>New Media &amp; Society</em>, <em>Politics &amp; Gender</em>, and the<em> International Journal of Qualitative Methods.</em></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a special episode that features a conversation between Sonia Bussu and Hans Asenbaum on democracy, capitalism, climate and the practices and prospects of participatory, deliberative and more-than-human democracy to transform their relationship. Can we rethink democracy beyond the liberal-democratic institutions that were created as part of the bargain for fossil-fuel-driven, Western-centric economic growth? What does and could democratic participation look like? What does it mean to include the non-human in our understanding of democracy?</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/bussu-sonia">Sonia Bussu</a> is Associate Professor in Public Policy at the University of Birmingham. She researches participatory democracy and in her work she uses participatory and creative methods for research and public engagement. She has led on projects on youth participation to influence mental health policy, youth employment policies, as well as coproduction of research on health and social care integration, and leadership styles within collaborative governance. She is scientific coordinator of a Horizon Europe project on participatory policymaking, <a href="https://www.inspiredemocracy.eu/">INSPIRE</a>. She is co-editor of <a href="https://d.docs.live.net/a807a3d75f3f8d41/Academic/BELMAS/Reclaiming%20Participatory%20Governance:%20Social%20Movements%20and%20the%20Reinvention%20of%20Democratic%20Innovation.%20Routledge."><em>Reclaiming Participatory Governance: Social Movements and the Reinvention of Democratic Innovation. </em>Routledge</a><u>.</u></p>
<p><a href="https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/persons/hans-asenbaum">Hans Asenbaum</a> is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. His research interests include radical democracy, queer and gender studies, digital politics, and participatory research methods. In 2022 he received the ECPR Rising Star Award. Hans is the author of <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-politics-of-becoming-9780192858870?cc=gb&amp;lang=en&amp;"><em>The Politics of Becoming: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023) and co-editor of <a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/44646?login=false"><em>Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy</em></a> (with Ercan, Curato and Mendonça, Oxford University Press, 2022). His work has been published in the <em>American Political Science Review</em>, <em>New Media &amp; Society</em>, <em>Politics &amp; Gender</em>, and the<em> International Journal of Qualitative Methods.</em></p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!<br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36175764" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/dd738015-cdf7-4359-adab-3d0c6ece17f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=dd738015-cdf7-4359-adab-3d0c6ece17f0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Time to Rethink Democracy: Participatory and More-Than-Human Perspectives</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is a special episode that features a conversation between Sonia Bussu and Hans Asenbaum on democracy, capitalism, climate and the practices and prospects of participatory, deliberative and more-than-human democracy to transform their relationship. Can we rethink democracy beyond the liberal-democratic institutions that were created as part of the bargain for fossil-fuel-driven, Western-centric economic growth? What does and could democratic participation look like? What does it mean to include the non-human in our understanding of democracy?

Sonia Bussu is Associate Professor in Public Policy at the University of Birmingham. She researches participatory democracy and in her work she uses participatory and creative methods for research and public engagement. She has led on projects on youth participation to influence mental health policy, youth employment policies, as well as coproduction of research on health and social care integration, and leadership styles within collaborative governance. She is scientific coordinator of a Horizon Europe project on participatory policymaking, INSPIRE. She is co-editor of Reclaiming Participatory Governance: Social Movements and the Reinvention of Democratic Innovation. Routledge.

Hans Asenbaum is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. His research interests include radical democracy, queer and gender studies, digital politics, and participatory research methods. In 2022 he received the ECPR Rising Star Award. Hans is the author of The Politics of Becoming: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age (Oxford University Press, 2023) and co-editor of Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy (with Ercan, Curato and Mendonça, Oxford University Press, 2022). His work has been published in the American Political Science Review, New Media &amp; Society, Politics &amp; Gender, and the International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is a special episode that features a conversation between Sonia Bussu and Hans Asenbaum on democracy, capitalism, climate and the practices and prospects of participatory, deliberative and more-than-human democracy to transform their relationship. Can we rethink democracy beyond the liberal-democratic institutions that were created as part of the bargain for fossil-fuel-driven, Western-centric economic growth? What does and could democratic participation look like? What does it mean to include the non-human in our understanding of democracy?

Sonia Bussu is Associate Professor in Public Policy at the University of Birmingham. She researches participatory democracy and in her work she uses participatory and creative methods for research and public engagement. She has led on projects on youth participation to influence mental health policy, youth employment policies, as well as coproduction of research on health and social care integration, and leadership styles within collaborative governance. She is scientific coordinator of a Horizon Europe project on participatory policymaking, INSPIRE. She is co-editor of Reclaiming Participatory Governance: Social Movements and the Reinvention of Democratic Innovation. Routledge.

Hans Asenbaum is a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. His research interests include radical democracy, queer and gender studies, digital politics, and participatory research methods. In 2022 he received the ECPR Rising Star Award. Hans is the author of The Politics of Becoming: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age (Oxford University Press, 2023) and co-editor of Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy (with Ercan, Curato and Mendonça, Oxford University Press, 2022). His work has been published in the American Political Science Review, New Media &amp; Society, Politics &amp; Gender, and the International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1dfc47ac-237d-11f0-8c93-03fc18281fd9</guid>
      <title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of <em>their states </em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. </p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a> (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. <em>Reimagining the American Union</em> understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. <em>Reimagining the American Union</em> interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/">Stephen H. Legomsky</a> is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering <a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf">a 20% discount here</a> (until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a> (Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a> of Robert A. Dahl’s <em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em> (Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of <em>their states </em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. </p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a> (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. <em>Reimagining the American Union</em> understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. <em>Reimagining the American Union</em> interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/">Stephen H. Legomsky</a> is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering <a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf">a 20% discount here</a> (until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a> (Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a> of Robert A. Dahl’s <em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em> (Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51373189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aede7f54-3644-4670-a239-784bf8b7c2f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aede7f54-3644-4670-a239-784bf8b7c2f8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 

But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.

Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.

Mentioned:


  Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)

  Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union


  Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)

  
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)

  
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 

But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.

Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.

Mentioned:


  Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)

  Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union


  Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)

  
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)

  
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>768</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d21caa56-2783-11f0-991b-17348fc213b1</guid>
      <title>Jerome Powell: “We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome ("Jay") Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn't the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.</p>
<p>To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/trillion-dollar-triage-how-jay-powell-and-the-fed-battled-a-president-and-a-pandemic-and-prevented-economic-disaster-nick-timiraos/6493929?ean=9780316272810">Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster</a> (Little, Brown, 2022).</p>
<p>“If people think you're not going to act in the country's best interest, that's bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don't think you're a straight shooter. We're not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We're not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don't think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won't be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that's what you're going to do?”</p>
<p>Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the "Fed whisperer".</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 4 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome ("Jay") Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn't the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.</p>
<p>To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/trillion-dollar-triage-how-jay-powell-and-the-fed-battled-a-president-and-a-pandemic-and-prevented-economic-disaster-nick-timiraos/6493929?ean=9780316272810">Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster</a> (Little, Brown, 2022).</p>
<p>“If people think you're not going to act in the country's best interest, that's bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don't think you're a straight shooter. We're not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We're not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don't think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won't be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that's what you're going to do?”</p>
<p>Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the "Fed whisperer".</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47501150" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1d4f184a-9f39-44de-81cb-49d457271672/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1d4f184a-9f39-44de-81cb-49d457271672&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jerome Powell: “We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome (&quot;Jay&quot;) Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn&apos;t the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.

To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster (Little, Brown, 2022).

“If people think you&apos;re not going to act in the country&apos;s best interest, that&apos;s bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter. We&apos;re not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We&apos;re not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don&apos;t think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won&apos;t be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that&apos;s what you&apos;re going to do?”

Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the &quot;Fed whisperer&quot;.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any one institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

This eighth and final episode covers the life and times of the current chair, Jerome (&quot;Jay&quot;) Powell - the technocratic lawyer-turned-banker who managed the global economy through two unprecedented disasters: the Covid pandemic and Donald Trump’s protectionist trade policies. As the episodes about Martin, Burns, and Volcker all attest, Powell isn&apos;t the first chairman to face political blowback. But he is the first to be publicly denounced as “Mr Too Late” and a “major loser” by a president intent on removing him from office before his term ends in mid-2026.

To discuss Powell, Tim is joined by Nick Timiraos, author of Trillion Dollar Triage: How Jay Powell and the Fed Battled a President and a Pandemic and Prevented Economic Disaster (Little, Brown, 2022).

“If people think you&apos;re not going to act in the country&apos;s best interest, that&apos;s bad for the Fed,” he says. “The next time the Fed decides it needs to do something that actually is ‘exigent and unusual’, people will say: ‘Well, wait a minute, the last time you did this, we thought you were a toady for the Democrats or a toady for the Republicans. We don&apos;t think you&apos;re a straight shooter. We&apos;re not going to let you raise interest rates by 25 basis points. We&apos;re not going to give you money to backstop your purchases of corporate credit’. Those are the kind of medium and long term risks from a fight with the White House. I think, for Powell, the worst outcome is that people don&apos;t think you have an independent central bank anymore. Your monetary policy won&apos;t be credible. Why not just roll that thing into the Treasury Department if that&apos;s what you&apos;re going to do?”

Since 2017, Nick Timiraos has been the chief economics correspondent at The Wall Street Journal and has developed an unrivalled reputation as the &quot;Fed whisperer&quot;.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>177</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a43a012-25cf-11f0-b5dc-fff55ddae899</guid>
      <title>Janet Yellen: “She had a view that the world was on fire”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first <em>person</em> of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/yellen-the-trailblazing-economist-who-navigated-an-era-of-upheaval-jon-hilsenrath/7016622?ean=9780063162464">Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval</a> (Harper Collins, 2022).</p>
<p>“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn't the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.</p>
<p>In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first <em>person</em> of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/yellen-the-trailblazing-economist-who-navigated-an-era-of-upheaval-jon-hilsenrath/7016622?ean=9780063162464">Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval</a> (Harper Collins, 2022).</p>
<p>“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn't the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.</p>
<p>In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57132986" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e0fec3d7-8f1f-4f4c-8090-ccbfa448f142/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e0fec3d7-8f1f-4f4c-8090-ccbfa448f142&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Janet Yellen: “She had a view that the world was on fire”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/e0fec3d7-8f1f-4f4c-8090-ccbfa448f142/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first person of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval (Harper Collins, 2022).

“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn&apos;t the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.

In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

The third episode of the second series covers Janet Yellen – not only the first woman to become Fed Chair but the first person of either sex to lead the Fed, the Treasury, and the Council of Economic Advisors. To discuss Ben Bernanke’s successor, Tim is joined by Jon Hilsenrath, author of Yellen: The Trailblazing Economist Who Navigated an Era of Upheaval (Harper Collins, 2022).

“Bernanke was a consensus builder,” says Hilsenrath. “He wasn&apos;t the kind of guy who was going to push people on a personal level out of their comfort zones … Yellen was a bit of a bulldog there, but she was also a bulldog with the Fed staff. I mean, she had a view that the world was on fire and that they, you know, and that they had to be moving like people putting out a fire”.

In 2023, Hilsenrath left the Wall Street Journal after a 26-year career during which he developed a market reputation as a pre-eminent Fed-watcher. He’s still watching the Fed but now for his own advisory firm.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>173</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">43a9938e-25cf-11f0-9d8e-37faf7904aa3</guid>
      <title>Ben Bernanke: “Like being a paleontologist”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/FED-We-Trust-Bernankes-Great/dp/0307459691/ref=sr_1_1?crid=33QWV8HA53XAN&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.E4suER8a6Z7i7IGjLukKni3jn6wdFXp708JSuF3oG-nGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.JcWz1_-ryRnmyqu_XRvKlD0AdZlu6BFUunrIGkwhtww&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=bernanke+wessel&amp;qid=1744731403&amp;sprefix=bernanke+wessel%2Caps%2C159&amp;sr=8-1">In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic</a> (Crown, 2010).</p>
<p>“It wasn't obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan's successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It's very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else's”.</p>
<p>Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of <a href="https://www.amazon.com/FED-We-Trust-Bernankes-Great/dp/0307459691/ref=sr_1_1?crid=33QWV8HA53XAN&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.E4suER8a6Z7i7IGjLukKni3jn6wdFXp708JSuF3oG-nGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.JcWz1_-ryRnmyqu_XRvKlD0AdZlu6BFUunrIGkwhtww&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=bernanke+wessel&amp;qid=1744731403&amp;sprefix=bernanke+wessel%2Caps%2C159&amp;sr=8-1">In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic</a> (Crown, 2010).</p>
<p>“It wasn't obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan's successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It's very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else's”.</p>
<p>Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42457018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3da60e9a-af56-41bc-bbdc-55e799722058/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3da60e9a-af56-41bc-bbdc-55e799722058&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ben Bernanke: “Like being a paleontologist”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/3da60e9a-af56-41bc-bbdc-55e799722058/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke&apos;s War on the Great Panic (Crown, 2010).

“It wasn&apos;t obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan&apos;s successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It&apos;s very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else&apos;s”.

Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

Episode two of the second series covers the life and crisis-era times of Ben Bernanke, the man who filled Alan Greenspan’s big shoes and ran the Fed from 2006 to 2014. A shy but world-renowned monetary economist and historian of the Great Depression, Bernanke was left holding the proverbial bomb when the financial system came close to collapse in 2008. To discuss Bernanke, Tim is joined by David Wessel, author of In FED We Trust: Ben Bernanke&apos;s War on the Great Panic (Crown, 2010).

“It wasn&apos;t obvious when he was appointed to the Fed in 2006 that having somebody who had spent their life studying the Great Depression would be well equipped to be Alan Greenspan&apos;s successor,” says Wessel. “I have sometimes said it was a like being a paleontologist. It&apos;s very nice that you know a lot about dinosaurs, but what use is that to us today until one day a Stegosaurus appears on the horizon. And it was remarkable good fortune for the country and the world that there was a guy who happened to have studied all the mistakes that the Fed made in the 1920s and the 1930s in a position to do something about it when a situation, not all that dissimilar, appears both to his surprise and to almost everybody else&apos;s”.

Wessel is two-time Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who now runs the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution. For 30 years, he worked at the Wall Street Journal - reporting mostly from Washington and covering economics and the Fed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db020160-2397-11f0-acaa-27add818b788</guid>
      <title>Nicholas D. Anderson, &quot;Inadvertent Expansion: How Peripheral Agents Shape World Politics&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Territorial expansion is typically understood as a centrally driven and often strategic activity. But Nicholas D. Anderson’s new book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779497">Inadvertent Expansion</a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), shows that nearly a quarter of great power coercive territorial acquisitions since the nineteenth century have in fact been instances of what the author calls “inadvertent expansion.”</p>
<p>A two-step process, inadvertent expansion first involves agents on the periphery of a state or empire acquiring territory without the authorization or knowledge of higher-ups. Leaders in the capital must then decide whether to accept or reject the already-acquired territory.</p>
<p>Through cases ranging from those of the United States in Florida and Texas to Japan in Manchuria and Germany in East Africa, Anderson shows that inadvertent expansion is rooted in a principal-agent problem. When leaders in the capital fail to exert or have limited control over their agents on the periphery, unauthorized efforts to take territory are more likely to occur. Yet it is only when the geopolitical risks associated with keeping the acquired territory are perceived to be low that leaders are more likely to accept such expansion.</p>
<p>Accentuating the influence of small, seemingly insignificant actors over the foreign policy behavior of powerful states, Inadvertent Expansion offers new insights into how the boundaries of states and empires came to be and captures timeless dynamics between state leaders and their peripheral agents.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://elliott.gwu.edu/nicholas-anderson">Nicholas D. Anderson</a>, an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Territorial expansion is typically understood as a centrally driven and often strategic activity. But Nicholas D. Anderson’s new book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779497">Inadvertent Expansion</a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), shows that nearly a quarter of great power coercive territorial acquisitions since the nineteenth century have in fact been instances of what the author calls “inadvertent expansion.”</p>
<p>A two-step process, inadvertent expansion first involves agents on the periphery of a state or empire acquiring territory without the authorization or knowledge of higher-ups. Leaders in the capital must then decide whether to accept or reject the already-acquired territory.</p>
<p>Through cases ranging from those of the United States in Florida and Texas to Japan in Manchuria and Germany in East Africa, Anderson shows that inadvertent expansion is rooted in a principal-agent problem. When leaders in the capital fail to exert or have limited control over their agents on the periphery, unauthorized efforts to take territory are more likely to occur. Yet it is only when the geopolitical risks associated with keeping the acquired territory are perceived to be low that leaders are more likely to accept such expansion.</p>
<p>Accentuating the influence of small, seemingly insignificant actors over the foreign policy behavior of powerful states, Inadvertent Expansion offers new insights into how the boundaries of states and empires came to be and captures timeless dynamics between state leaders and their peripheral agents.</p>
<p>Our guest is <a href="https://elliott.gwu.edu/nicholas-anderson">Nicholas D. Anderson</a>, an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University.</p>
<p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29473564" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/faf9e357-6207-4c17-85d7-e54c2ec26d37/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=faf9e357-6207-4c17-85d7-e54c2ec26d37&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas D. Anderson, &quot;Inadvertent Expansion: How Peripheral Agents Shape World Politics&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Territorial expansion is typically understood as a centrally driven and often strategic activity. But Nicholas D. Anderson’s new book, Inadvertent Expansion (Cornell University Press, 2025), shows that nearly a quarter of great power coercive territorial acquisitions since the nineteenth century have in fact been instances of what the author calls “inadvertent expansion.”

A two-step process, inadvertent expansion first involves agents on the periphery of a state or empire acquiring territory without the authorization or knowledge of higher-ups. Leaders in the capital must then decide whether to accept or reject the already-acquired territory.

Through cases ranging from those of the United States in Florida and Texas to Japan in Manchuria and Germany in East Africa, Anderson shows that inadvertent expansion is rooted in a principal-agent problem. When leaders in the capital fail to exert or have limited control over their agents on the periphery, unauthorized efforts to take territory are more likely to occur. Yet it is only when the geopolitical risks associated with keeping the acquired territory are perceived to be low that leaders are more likely to accept such expansion.

Accentuating the influence of small, seemingly insignificant actors over the foreign policy behavior of powerful states, Inadvertent Expansion offers new insights into how the boundaries of states and empires came to be and captures timeless dynamics between state leaders and their peripheral agents.

Our guest is Nicholas D. Anderson, an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Territorial expansion is typically understood as a centrally driven and often strategic activity. But Nicholas D. Anderson’s new book, Inadvertent Expansion (Cornell University Press, 2025), shows that nearly a quarter of great power coercive territorial acquisitions since the nineteenth century have in fact been instances of what the author calls “inadvertent expansion.”

A two-step process, inadvertent expansion first involves agents on the periphery of a state or empire acquiring territory without the authorization or knowledge of higher-ups. Leaders in the capital must then decide whether to accept or reject the already-acquired territory.

Through cases ranging from those of the United States in Florida and Texas to Japan in Manchuria and Germany in East Africa, Anderson shows that inadvertent expansion is rooted in a principal-agent problem. When leaders in the capital fail to exert or have limited control over their agents on the periphery, unauthorized efforts to take territory are more likely to occur. Yet it is only when the geopolitical risks associated with keeping the acquired territory are perceived to be low that leaders are more likely to accept such expansion.

Accentuating the influence of small, seemingly insignificant actors over the foreign policy behavior of powerful states, Inadvertent Expansion offers new insights into how the boundaries of states and empires came to be and captures timeless dynamics between state leaders and their peripheral agents.

Our guest is Nicholas D. Anderson, an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at The George Washington University.

Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33e07fc6-25cf-11f0-adc5-e385a1392807</guid>
      <title>Alan Greenspan: “The man who knew”</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-man-who-knew-the-life-times-of-alan-greenspan-sebastian-mallaby/4281449?ean=9781408830956">The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan</a> (Bloomsbury, 2016).</p>
<p>“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.</p>
<p>A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World's Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.</p>
<p>In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed's foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.</p>
<p>The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/the-man-who-knew-the-life-times-of-alan-greenspan-sebastian-mallaby/4281449?ean=9781408830956">The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan</a> (Bloomsbury, 2016).</p>
<p>“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.</p>
<p>A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World's Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46963320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0d76c10e-6344-45d5-8c7e-aa8c4181f4a7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0d76c10e-6344-45d5-8c7e-aa8c4181f4a7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alan Greenspan: “The man who knew”</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/0d76c10e-6344-45d5-8c7e-aa8c4181f4a7/3000x3000/08751e144d5ccec30f9c57e6b2b2bb88.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan (Bloomsbury, 2016).

“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.

A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World&apos;s Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than any other single institution, the US Federal Reserve drives global capital markets with its decisions and communications. While its interest rates are set by a committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.

In the first series of The Chair, Tim Gwynn Jones talked to authors of books about the Fed&apos;s foundational Chairs – Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker. In this second series, he covers the people who chaired the Fed through the post-1990 period of financialisation, globalisation, and – perhaps today – deglobalisation.

The first episode of the second series explores Alan Greenspan, the chairman who followed Paul Volcker and ran the Fed from 1987 until 2006. Once bestowed with “Maestro” status, Greenspan – who turns 100 in March 2026 – has seen his reputation deflate in the wake of the post-2008 financial crisis. To discuss the fallen Maestro, Tim is joined by Sebastian Mallaby, author of The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan (Bloomsbury, 2016).

“Greenspan was the man who knew,” says Mallaby. “He was the man who knew that bubbles were extremely destructive, and yet he was not the man who acted against those bubbles. So, whilst he was great on inflation and on stabilising the price of eggs, he was not good on asset-price inflation or stabilising the price of nest eggs”.

A former journalist at The Economist and the Washington Post, Mallaby is the prize-winning author of The World&apos;s Banker – a portrait of the World Bank under James Wolfensohn – and More Money Than God: Hedge Funds and the Making of a New Elite. He is now the Paul A. Volcker senior fellow for international economics at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>174</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3de6c3e-2142-11f0-8035-cf1669c64cc5</guid>
      <title>The Vote Gap: What’s Pulling Young Men and Women Apart?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.</p><p>Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.</p><p>This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.</p><p>Guests</p><p><br /></p><p>Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.</p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.</p><p>Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.</p><p>This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.</p><p>Guests</p><p><br /></p><p>Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.</p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51658176" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/87794d91-0085-4011-904f-e561d0f7b736/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=87794d91-0085-4011-904f-e561d0f7b736&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Vote Gap: What’s Pulling Young Men and Women Apart?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.
Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.
This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.
Guests

Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.

Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.

Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why are young men leaning right while young women shift left? Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones speak with NYU’s Scott Galloway, political analyst Sophie Stowers, and commentator Oliver Dean to explore the forces behind this growing divide.
Whether it’s a broken social contract where young people no longer believe they will lead better, more prosperous lives than their parents or the work of algorithms that feed off rage and division, the implications are profound.
This podcast was recorded live at NYU London, in front of an audience of students who are part of a generation searching for increasingly radical solutions to fix society.
Guests

Scott Galloway is a Professor of Marketing at NYU Stern School of Business where he teaches Brand Strategy and Digital Marketing to second-year MBA students. He is also a Bestselling author, professor and entrepreneur.

Sophie Stowers - A Research Associate at UK in a Changing Europe. Her background is in British and European politics, and her research focuses on UK-EU relations, British politics and parties, and public opinion. She previously worked as a Parliamentary Assistant.

Oliver Dean a political commentator with Young Voices UK. He studies History and Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science where he is the Treasurer of the LSE Hayek Society.
Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6293dace-220b-11f0-a586-2f74f144d797</guid>
      <title>The Good Father Syndrome: Why Strongmen Still Seduce</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509563159">The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future </a>(Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509563159">The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future </a>(Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27930106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f4d4f04d-35f1-47b8-8243-82fe747467d1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f4d4f04d-35f1-47b8-8243-82fe747467d1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Good Father Syndrome: Why Strongmen Still Seduce</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future (Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey speaks with Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey Kopstein, co-authors of The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future (Polity Press, 2024). In this conversation, they discuss how today’s right-wing movements, from the United States to Hungary, are waging a new form of politics that undermines the very foundations of the modern, rules-based state. Drawing on Max Weber’s concept of “patrimonialism,” Hanson and Kopstein explore how these leaders erode public trust, demolish impersonal bureaucracies, and replace rational governance with personal loyalty and whim. Along the way, they examine the role of conspiracy theories, the rise of “deep state” narratives, and the uneasy alliances connecting libertarians, Christian nationalists, and advocates of an all-powerful executive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">24ae65b4-2376-11f0-9e57-c3054084338e</guid>
      <title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em> world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework, <em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts </em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a> is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, <em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em> (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in <em>Contexts</em> magazine and <em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a> is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book <em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime </em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) <em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants </em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney">Dr Jaya Keaney</a> is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of <a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as <em>Body and Society,</em> <em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values, </em>and the Duke University Press edited collection <em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment </em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a> (Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em> world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework, <em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts </em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a> is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, <em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em> (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in <em>Contexts</em> magazine and <em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a> is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book <em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime </em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) <em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants </em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney">Dr Jaya Keaney</a> is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of <a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as <em>Body and Society,</em> <em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values, </em>and the Duke University Press edited collection <em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment </em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a> (Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57719674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/23878cb1-cef8-4197-92f1-63c22b2660d1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=23878cb1-cef8-4197-92f1-63c22b2660d1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.

Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.

Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women

Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.

Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).

Mentioned:


  Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.

Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.

Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women

Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.

Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).

Mentioned:


  Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">57a1cdc4-1a2c-11f0-9967-abab25842497</guid>
      <title>Ian Boyd, &quot;Science and Politics&quot; (Polity, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The recent coronavirus pandemic proved that the time-old notion seems now truer than ever: that science and politics represent a clash of cultures. But why should scientists simply “stick to the facts” and leave politics to the politicians when the world seems to be falling down around us?</p><p><br /></p><p>Drawing on his experience as both a research scientist and an expert advisor at the centre of government, Ian Boyd takes an empirical approach to examining the current state of the relationship between science and politics. He argues that the way politicians and scientists work together today results in a science that is on tap for ideological (mis)use, and governance that fails to serve humanity’s most fundamental needs. Justice is unlikely―perhaps impossible―while science is not a fully integrated part of the systems for collective decision-making across society.</p><p><br /></p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561582"> <em>Science and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Polity, 2024), Boyd presents an impassioned argument for a series of conceptual and structural innovations that could resolve this fundamental tension, revealing how a radical intermingling of these (apparently contradictory) professions might provide the world with better politics <em>and</em> better science.</p><p>Professor Sir Ian Boyd is currently a professor at the University of St Andrews and Chair of the UK Research Integrity Office. He was Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government on Food and the Environment (2012-2019). He is a marine and polar scientist and previously served as the first Director of the Scottish Oceans Institute at St Andrews</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent coronavirus pandemic proved that the time-old notion seems now truer than ever: that science and politics represent a clash of cultures. But why should scientists simply “stick to the facts” and leave politics to the politicians when the world seems to be falling down around us?</p><p><br /></p><p>Drawing on his experience as both a research scientist and an expert advisor at the centre of government, Ian Boyd takes an empirical approach to examining the current state of the relationship between science and politics. He argues that the way politicians and scientists work together today results in a science that is on tap for ideological (mis)use, and governance that fails to serve humanity’s most fundamental needs. Justice is unlikely―perhaps impossible―while science is not a fully integrated part of the systems for collective decision-making across society.</p><p><br /></p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509561582"> <em>Science and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Polity, 2024), Boyd presents an impassioned argument for a series of conceptual and structural innovations that could resolve this fundamental tension, revealing how a radical intermingling of these (apparently contradictory) professions might provide the world with better politics <em>and</em> better science.</p><p>Professor Sir Ian Boyd is currently a professor at the University of St Andrews and Chair of the UK Research Integrity Office. He was Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government on Food and the Environment (2012-2019). He is a marine and polar scientist and previously served as the first Director of the Scottish Oceans Institute at St Andrews</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60958410" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9e42f3d2-2814-4372-a680-3dbc3e16055b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9e42f3d2-2814-4372-a680-3dbc3e16055b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ian Boyd, &quot;Science and Politics&quot; (Polity, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The recent coronavirus pandemic proved that the time-old notion seems now truer than ever: that science and politics represent a clash of cultures. But why should scientists simply “stick to the facts” and leave politics to the politicians when the world seems to be falling down around us?

Drawing on his experience as both a research scientist and an expert advisor at the centre of government, Ian Boyd takes an empirical approach to examining the current state of the relationship between science and politics. He argues that the way politicians and scientists work together today results in a science that is on tap for ideological (mis)use, and governance that fails to serve humanity’s most fundamental needs. Justice is unlikely―perhaps impossible―while science is not a fully integrated part of the systems for collective decision-making across society.

In Science and Politics (Polity, 2024), Boyd presents an impassioned argument for a series of conceptual and structural innovations that could resolve this fundamental tension, revealing how a radical intermingling of these (apparently contradictory) professions might provide the world with better politics and better science.
Professor Sir Ian Boyd is currently a professor at the University of St Andrews and Chair of the UK Research Integrity Office. He was Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government on Food and the Environment (2012-2019). He is a marine and polar scientist and previously served as the first Director of the Scottish Oceans Institute at St Andrews
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The recent coronavirus pandemic proved that the time-old notion seems now truer than ever: that science and politics represent a clash of cultures. But why should scientists simply “stick to the facts” and leave politics to the politicians when the world seems to be falling down around us?

Drawing on his experience as both a research scientist and an expert advisor at the centre of government, Ian Boyd takes an empirical approach to examining the current state of the relationship between science and politics. He argues that the way politicians and scientists work together today results in a science that is on tap for ideological (mis)use, and governance that fails to serve humanity’s most fundamental needs. Justice is unlikely―perhaps impossible―while science is not a fully integrated part of the systems for collective decision-making across society.

In Science and Politics (Polity, 2024), Boyd presents an impassioned argument for a series of conceptual and structural innovations that could resolve this fundamental tension, revealing how a radical intermingling of these (apparently contradictory) professions might provide the world with better politics and better science.
Professor Sir Ian Boyd is currently a professor at the University of St Andrews and Chair of the UK Research Integrity Office. He was Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government on Food and the Environment (2012-2019). He is a marine and polar scientist and previously served as the first Director of the Scottish Oceans Institute at St Andrews
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5db8d25c-2125-11f0-9860-f38efa4be00a</guid>
      <title>Russell Blackford, &quot;How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350322943">How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration</a> (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism's ideas and language are still worth saving.</p><p>From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.</p><p>Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of <em>Freedom of Religion and the Secular State </em>(2012), <em>Humanity Enhanced</em> (2014), <em>The Mystery of Moral Authority </em>(2016), and <em>Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination </em>(2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download </em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing"><em>this poster here</em></a><em> to spread the word.</em></p><p><br /></p><p><em>Please share this interview on </em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>, </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/"><em>here</em></a><em> to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350322943">How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration</a> (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism's ideas and language are still worth saving.</p><p>From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.</p><p>Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of <em>Freedom of Religion and the Secular State </em>(2012), <em>Humanity Enhanced</em> (2014), <em>The Mystery of Moral Authority </em>(2016), and <em>Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination </em>(2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download </em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing"><em>this poster here</em></a><em> to spread the word.</em></p><p><br /></p><p><em>Please share this interview on </em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>, </em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/"><em>here</em></a><em> to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74209423" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c6ce136f-cd58-4240-a832-87f6e8dc3f58/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c6ce136f-cd58-4240-a832-87f6e8dc3f58&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Russell Blackford, &quot;How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.
How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism&apos;s ideas and language are still worth saving.
From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.
Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of Freedom of Religion and the Secular State (2012), Humanity Enhanced (2014), The Mystery of Moral Authority (2016), and Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination (2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.

Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.

Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberalism is in trouble. As a set of ideas, it has lost much of its historical authority in guiding public policy and personal behaviour. In this post-liberal climate, Russell Blackford asks whether liberalism is truly over.
How We Became Post-Liberal: The Rise and Fall of Toleration (Bloomsbury, 2023) examines how Western liberal democracies became nations where traditional liberal principles of toleration (religious and otherwise), individual liberty and freedom of speech are frequently dismissed as outdated or twisted to support conservative policies. Blackford traces the lineage of liberalism from problems of toleration that emerged when Christianity triumphed in the late centuries of classical antiquity, with comparison to non-Western civilizations. The political and philosophical story culminates in the recent development – over the past 30 to 50 years – of post-liberal ideologies in the West. At each stage, Blackford discusses arguments for and against liberal principles, identifying why no argument to date has been totally successful in convincing opponents, while maintaining that liberalism&apos;s ideas and language are still worth saving.
From campus wars over academic freedom to the Charlie Hebdo attack and the murder of Samuel Paty, this is an indispensable guide for anyone wanting to understand the why, what and how of the post-liberal world.
Russell Blackford is a philosopher, legal scholar, literary critic based at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. He is the author of Freedom of Religion and the Secular State (2012), Humanity Enhanced (2014), The Mystery of Moral Authority (2016), and Science Fiction and the Moral Imagination (2017). In 2014, he was inducted as a Laureate of the International Academy of Humanism.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.

Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.

Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>527</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2ead62e-2128-11f0-88cb-6306f2556f5a</guid>
      <title>Randy Laist and Brian Dixon, &quot;Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis&quot; (Fourth Horseman, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis</em></a> takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.</p><p>Broad questions are at the heart of <a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom</em></a>: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series <em>Mad Men</em>, Don DeLillo’s <em>Zero K</em>, Jonathan Franzen’s <em>Freedom</em>, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s <em>Between the World and Me</em>, Colson Whitehead’s <em>Underground Railroad</em>, Pixar’s <em>Toy Story</em> films, Sam Esmail’s television series <em>Mr. Robot</em>, and many more.</p><p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis</em></a> wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis</em></a> takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.</p><p>Broad questions are at the heart of <a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom</em></a>: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series <em>Mad Men</em>, Don DeLillo’s <em>Zero K</em>, Jonathan Franzen’s <em>Freedom</em>, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s <em>Between the World and Me</em>, Colson Whitehead’s <em>Underground Railroad</em>, Pixar’s <em>Toy Story</em> films, Sam Esmail’s television series <em>Mr. Robot</em>, and many more.</p><p><a href="https://www.fourthhorsemanpress.com/library/figures-of-freedom"><em>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis</em></a> wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42590307" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/23e35349-5dcc-4902-9822-1265330786fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=23e35349-5dcc-4902-9822-1265330786fd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Randy Laist and Brian Dixon, &quot;Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis&quot; (Fourth Horseman, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.
Broad questions are at the heart of Figures of Freedom: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series Mad Men, Don DeLillo’s Zero K, Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s Between the World and Me, Colson Whitehead’s Underground Railroad, Pixar’s Toy Story films, Sam Esmail’s television series Mr. Robot, and many more.
Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time of Crisis takes on the idea and terminology of freedom, examining our understanding of this concept and our relationship to the word itself as well as what it means to society, culture, and politics. Randy Laist and Brian A. Dixon, two scholars who often explore popular culture to better understand the society and politics all around us, have brought their admirable skills to Figures of Freedom, where they have assembled a broad array of contributors exploring freedom in a host of different venues and artifacts. The thrust of the book is to examine representations of freedom in the early 21st century, and the authors look at this evolving nature of freedom in popular culture 21st century texts, where they trace this shifting discourse across time and geography.
Broad questions are at the heart of Figures of Freedom: who gets to be free? What is freedom? How does freedom work or play out in different situations and settings? Is freedom itself an archaic idea in the face of rising dictatorships and authoritarian governments, where voices of freedom are being silenced? Freedom is often a concept and term that one understands from an individualistic perspective—my freedom is constrained by governmental actions or limited by societal norms or protected by the Bill of Rights. Liberty, which is often connected to freedom, especially in American discourse, is considered by these authors as more communal, and as part of a delicate balance within the U.S. constitutional system, but the advocacy for individual freedom has eclipsed liberty in the 21st century. Laist and Dixon frame their book by examining some of the facets of freedom, which may be ugly (Elizabeth Anker’s conception in her 2022 book), or masculinized (Linda Zerilli’s idea in her 2005 book), or colonial (Mimi Thi Nguyen thoughts in her 2012 book), or otherwise characterized by some quality constraining some dimensions of freedom. The contributing authors take up many of these concepts and use them to explore these ideas within a variety of narrative popular culture artifacts from the first part of the 21st century. These include, but are not limited to, Matthew Weiner’s television series Mad Men, Don DeLillo’s Zero K, Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom, Ta-Nehisi Coate’s Between the World and Me, Colson Whitehead’s Underground Railroad, Pixar’s Toy Story films, Sam Esmail’s television series Mr. Robot, and many more.
Figures of Freedom: Representations of Agency in a Time on Crisis wrestles with what it means to be free and how we, as citizens, consume this idea through many of our cultural artifacts. At times, we may feel free but are, in fact, limited by unseen or unknown political, cultural, or societal constraints. Laist and Dixon compel us to consider our own understanding of freedom, particular in context of the idea of liberty, and how these ideas are shaped and shifted by the world around us, especially in the ways we see freedom represented within film and literary narratives.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). Email her at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky: @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>545</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ed688c6-1de5-11f0-b6ca-b35d06c96da1</guid>
      <title>Maurizio Ferrera, &quot;Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The starting point of this book is the 'civil war' of ideas that broke out during the early 2010s about the purpose and even the desirability of the European Union as a polity, with a number of right-wing populist formations openly advocating for exiting the Union. The sovereign debt crisis triggered a spiral of ideological decommunalization: national leaders seemed to have lost that sense of 'togetherness' and mutual bonds that had been laboriously developed over decades of integration. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198863311">Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) explores this politically disruptive process from an ideational perspective, on the assumption that symbols and visions play a crucial role. In processes of polity formation, ideologies offer competing partisan views, but tend to converge along the 'communal' dimension, which defines the nature and boundaries of the emerging polity. This convergence has been a challenge for the EU since its origins, as it has required the construction of a coherent and acceptable image of Europe as a compound polity of nation-states with a divisive past. Maurizio Ferrera offers a reconstruction of how the main ideological currents have struggled - and often failed - to reconfigure their horizontal profiles (i.e. their images of the national within Europe) into a new vertical profile (i.e. an image of the European within the national). The challenge has been especially demanding for European left-wing parties, which have been largely unable to forge a shared and recognizable 'social vision' of the European Union. Only during the COVID pandemic have the seeds of a novel communal consensus emerged that might prove capable of defeating the anti-communal views of Eurosceptic ideologies and free market technocrats.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The starting point of this book is the 'civil war' of ideas that broke out during the early 2010s about the purpose and even the desirability of the European Union as a polity, with a number of right-wing populist formations openly advocating for exiting the Union. The sovereign debt crisis triggered a spiral of ideological decommunalization: national leaders seemed to have lost that sense of 'togetherness' and mutual bonds that had been laboriously developed over decades of integration. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198863311">Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU</a> (Oxford UP, 2024) explores this politically disruptive process from an ideational perspective, on the assumption that symbols and visions play a crucial role. In processes of polity formation, ideologies offer competing partisan views, but tend to converge along the 'communal' dimension, which defines the nature and boundaries of the emerging polity. This convergence has been a challenge for the EU since its origins, as it has required the construction of a coherent and acceptable image of Europe as a compound polity of nation-states with a divisive past. Maurizio Ferrera offers a reconstruction of how the main ideological currents have struggled - and often failed - to reconfigure their horizontal profiles (i.e. their images of the national within Europe) into a new vertical profile (i.e. an image of the European within the national). The challenge has been especially demanding for European left-wing parties, which have been largely unable to forge a shared and recognizable 'social vision' of the European Union. Only during the COVID pandemic have the seeds of a novel communal consensus emerged that might prove capable of defeating the anti-communal views of Eurosceptic ideologies and free market technocrats.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72090948" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a9182844-7393-44be-93af-b05f0b1f0faf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a9182844-7393-44be-93af-b05f0b1f0faf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Maurizio Ferrera, &quot;Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The starting point of this book is the &apos;civil war&apos; of ideas that broke out during the early 2010s about the purpose and even the desirability of the European Union as a polity, with a number of right-wing populist formations openly advocating for exiting the Union. The sovereign debt crisis triggered a spiral of ideological decommunalization: national leaders seemed to have lost that sense of &apos;togetherness&apos; and mutual bonds that had been laboriously developed over decades of integration. 
Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU (Oxford UP, 2024) explores this politically disruptive process from an ideational perspective, on the assumption that symbols and visions play a crucial role. In processes of polity formation, ideologies offer competing partisan views, but tend to converge along the &apos;communal&apos; dimension, which defines the nature and boundaries of the emerging polity. This convergence has been a challenge for the EU since its origins, as it has required the construction of a coherent and acceptable image of Europe as a compound polity of nation-states with a divisive past. Maurizio Ferrera offers a reconstruction of how the main ideological currents have struggled - and often failed - to reconfigure their horizontal profiles (i.e. their images of the national within Europe) into a new vertical profile (i.e. an image of the European within the national). The challenge has been especially demanding for European left-wing parties, which have been largely unable to forge a shared and recognizable &apos;social vision&apos; of the European Union. Only during the COVID pandemic have the seeds of a novel communal consensus emerged that might prove capable of defeating the anti-communal views of Eurosceptic ideologies and free market technocrats.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The starting point of this book is the &apos;civil war&apos; of ideas that broke out during the early 2010s about the purpose and even the desirability of the European Union as a polity, with a number of right-wing populist formations openly advocating for exiting the Union. The sovereign debt crisis triggered a spiral of ideological decommunalization: national leaders seemed to have lost that sense of &apos;togetherness&apos; and mutual bonds that had been laboriously developed over decades of integration. 
Politics and Social Visions: Ideology, Conflict, and Solidarity in the EU (Oxford UP, 2024) explores this politically disruptive process from an ideational perspective, on the assumption that symbols and visions play a crucial role. In processes of polity formation, ideologies offer competing partisan views, but tend to converge along the &apos;communal&apos; dimension, which defines the nature and boundaries of the emerging polity. This convergence has been a challenge for the EU since its origins, as it has required the construction of a coherent and acceptable image of Europe as a compound polity of nation-states with a divisive past. Maurizio Ferrera offers a reconstruction of how the main ideological currents have struggled - and often failed - to reconfigure their horizontal profiles (i.e. their images of the national within Europe) into a new vertical profile (i.e. an image of the European within the national). The challenge has been especially demanding for European left-wing parties, which have been largely unable to forge a shared and recognizable &apos;social vision&apos; of the European Union. Only during the COVID pandemic have the seeds of a novel communal consensus emerged that might prove capable of defeating the anti-communal views of Eurosceptic ideologies and free market technocrats.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">698cb1de-1ba8-11f0-8af9-1b4d235ca2ae</guid>
      <title>China’s Trade War Strategy: How Xi Jinping Uses Autocracy, Fear, and Innovation to Compete with the West</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones analyze the global fallout after Donald Trump plunged America and the world into a trade war with China. David Rennie, The Economist’s geopolitics editor and former Beijing and Washington D.C. bureau chief, joins the podcast to unpack how Xi Jinping is playing the long game and playing to win.</p><p>In this episode, we explore Xi’s high-stakes strategy in the global trade war. </p><p><br /></p><p>From embracing economic pain to fostering innovation under autocracy, China is challenging Western dominance on every front. However, as the controversy over British Steel demonstrates, Beijing’s drive to exert control often at the expense of freedoms abroad—risks alienating future partners.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the second half, activist Chloe Chung shares her personal story of falling afoul of the Chinese authorities. A pro-democracy campaigner, Chloe awoke in December to news that police in Hong Kong had issued a HK$1 million ($128,000; £102,000) bounty for information leading to her capture abroad.</p><p>With democracy under pressure, this is more than just a trade war—it’s a battle for the future of the global order.</p><p><br /></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones analyze the global fallout after Donald Trump plunged America and the world into a trade war with China. David Rennie, The Economist’s geopolitics editor and former Beijing and Washington D.C. bureau chief, joins the podcast to unpack how Xi Jinping is playing the long game and playing to win.</p><p>In this episode, we explore Xi’s high-stakes strategy in the global trade war. </p><p><br /></p><p>From embracing economic pain to fostering innovation under autocracy, China is challenging Western dominance on every front. However, as the controversy over British Steel demonstrates, Beijing’s drive to exert control often at the expense of freedoms abroad—risks alienating future partners.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the second half, activist Chloe Chung shares her personal story of falling afoul of the Chinese authorities. A pro-democracy campaigner, Chloe awoke in December to news that police in Hong Kong had issued a HK$1 million ($128,000; £102,000) bounty for information leading to her capture abroad.</p><p>With democracy under pressure, this is more than just a trade war—it’s a battle for the future of the global order.</p><p><br /></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42496761" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3bc5f166-0684-4861-8785-b170d036930a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3bc5f166-0684-4861-8785-b170d036930a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>China’s Trade War Strategy: How Xi Jinping Uses Autocracy, Fear, and Innovation to Compete with the West</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones analyze the global fallout after Donald Trump plunged America and the world into a trade war with China. David Rennie, The Economist’s geopolitics editor and former Beijing and Washington D.C. bureau chief, joins the podcast to unpack how Xi Jinping is playing the long game and playing to win.
In this episode, we explore Xi’s high-stakes strategy in the global trade war. 

From embracing economic pain to fostering innovation under autocracy, China is challenging Western dominance on every front. However, as the controversy over British Steel demonstrates, Beijing’s drive to exert control often at the expense of freedoms abroad—risks alienating future partners.

In the second half, activist Chloe Chung shares her personal story of falling afoul of the Chinese authorities. A pro-democracy campaigner, Chloe awoke in December to news that police in Hong Kong had issued a HK$1 million ($128,000; £102,000) bounty for information leading to her capture abroad.
With democracy under pressure, this is more than just a trade war—it’s a battle for the future of the global order.

Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones analyze the global fallout after Donald Trump plunged America and the world into a trade war with China. David Rennie, The Economist’s geopolitics editor and former Beijing and Washington D.C. bureau chief, joins the podcast to unpack how Xi Jinping is playing the long game and playing to win.
In this episode, we explore Xi’s high-stakes strategy in the global trade war. 

From embracing economic pain to fostering innovation under autocracy, China is challenging Western dominance on every front. However, as the controversy over British Steel demonstrates, Beijing’s drive to exert control often at the expense of freedoms abroad—risks alienating future partners.

In the second half, activist Chloe Chung shares her personal story of falling afoul of the Chinese authorities. A pro-democracy campaigner, Chloe awoke in December to news that police in Hong Kong had issued a HK$1 million ($128,000; £102,000) bounty for information leading to her capture abroad.
With democracy under pressure, this is more than just a trade war—it’s a battle for the future of the global order.

Producer: Pearse Lynch
Executive Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2463c024-1de8-11f0-acae-675f67a1eb78</guid>
      <title>Marcus Kreuzer, &quot;The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108718233"><em>The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis </em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2023), political scientist <a href="https://www.marcuskreuzer.com/home">Marcus Kreuzer</a> synthesises the different strands and traditions of Comparative Historical Analysis to show how interpretive and positivist research designs might complement rather than compete with one another. Like the contents of the book, our discussion on this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a> is wide-ranging and lively, addressing topics like the many types of time, the meaning of its “grammar”, the importance of context, debates over transparency and replicability, and why pedagogy matters. Whether you are persuaded by Kreuzer’s advocacy for CHA or not, you will surely appreciate his enthusiasm to communicate about it, his deep knowledge of methodology and respect for its various traditions, and his concern to build (rather than burn) methodological bridges.</p><p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> Why not check out others in this special series on the political science channel of the New Books Network, including the <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-art-and-craft-of-comparison#entry:346032@1:url">previous episode</a>, also from the Methods for Social Inquiry book series, with John Boswell and Jack Corbett talking about <em>The Art and Craft of Comparison.</em></p><p><strong>Looking for something to read? </strong>Marcus recommends Arlie Hochschild’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/stolen-pride-loss-shame-and-the-rise-of-the-right-arlie-russell-hochschild/21138616?ean=9781620976463&amp;next=t"><em>Stolen Pride</em></a><em>, </em>Carol Kaesuk Yoon’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/naming-nature-the-clash-between-instinct-and-science-carol-kaesuk-yoon/8750560"><em>Naming Nature</em></a>, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/how-the-heartland-went-red-why-local-forces-matter-in-an-age-of-nationalized-politics-stephanie-ternullo/20158853"><em>How the Heartland Went Red</em></a><em>, </em>by Stephanie Ternullo, whom <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-the-heartland-went-red#entry:305256@1:url">Miranda Melcher has interviewed</a> for the American Studies channel of our Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108718233"><em>The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis </em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2023), political scientist <a href="https://www.marcuskreuzer.com/home">Marcus Kreuzer</a> synthesises the different strands and traditions of Comparative Historical Analysis to show how interpretive and positivist research designs might complement rather than compete with one another. Like the contents of the book, our discussion on this episode of <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a> is wide-ranging and lively, addressing topics like the many types of time, the meaning of its “grammar”, the importance of context, debates over transparency and replicability, and why pedagogy matters. Whether you are persuaded by Kreuzer’s advocacy for CHA or not, you will surely appreciate his enthusiasm to communicate about it, his deep knowledge of methodology and respect for its various traditions, and his concern to build (rather than burn) methodological bridges.</p><p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> Why not check out others in this special series on the political science channel of the New Books Network, including the <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-art-and-craft-of-comparison#entry:346032@1:url">previous episode</a>, also from the Methods for Social Inquiry book series, with John Boswell and Jack Corbett talking about <em>The Art and Craft of Comparison.</em></p><p><strong>Looking for something to read? </strong>Marcus recommends Arlie Hochschild’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/stolen-pride-loss-shame-and-the-rise-of-the-right-arlie-russell-hochschild/21138616?ean=9781620976463&amp;next=t"><em>Stolen Pride</em></a><em>, </em>Carol Kaesuk Yoon’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/naming-nature-the-clash-between-instinct-and-science-carol-kaesuk-yoon/8750560"><em>Naming Nature</em></a>, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/how-the-heartland-went-red-why-local-forces-matter-in-an-age-of-nationalized-politics-stephanie-ternullo/20158853"><em>How the Heartland Went Red</em></a><em>, </em>by Stephanie Ternullo, whom <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-the-heartland-went-red#entry:305256@1:url">Miranda Melcher has interviewed</a> for the American Studies channel of our Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49198222" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fe34c4e8-7f5c-4b44-b791-b07a1813733c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fe34c4e8-7f5c-4b44-b791-b07a1813733c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marcus Kreuzer, &quot;The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis (Cambridge UP, 2023), political scientist Marcus Kreuzer synthesises the different strands and traditions of Comparative Historical Analysis to show how interpretive and positivist research designs might complement rather than compete with one another. Like the contents of the book, our discussion on this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science is wide-ranging and lively, addressing topics like the many types of time, the meaning of its “grammar”, the importance of context, debates over transparency and replicability, and why pedagogy matters. Whether you are persuaded by Kreuzer’s advocacy for CHA or not, you will surely appreciate his enthusiasm to communicate about it, his deep knowledge of methodology and respect for its various traditions, and his concern to build (rather than burn) methodological bridges.
Like this episode? Why not check out others in this special series on the political science channel of the New Books Network, including the previous episode, also from the Methods for Social Inquiry book series, with John Boswell and Jack Corbett talking about The Art and Craft of Comparison.
Looking for something to read? Marcus recommends Arlie Hochschild’s Stolen Pride, Carol Kaesuk Yoon’s Naming Nature, and How the Heartland Went Red, by Stephanie Ternullo, whom Miranda Melcher has interviewed for the American Studies channel of our Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Grammar of Time: A Toolbox for Comparative Historical Analysis (Cambridge UP, 2023), political scientist Marcus Kreuzer synthesises the different strands and traditions of Comparative Historical Analysis to show how interpretive and positivist research designs might complement rather than compete with one another. Like the contents of the book, our discussion on this episode of New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science is wide-ranging and lively, addressing topics like the many types of time, the meaning of its “grammar”, the importance of context, debates over transparency and replicability, and why pedagogy matters. Whether you are persuaded by Kreuzer’s advocacy for CHA or not, you will surely appreciate his enthusiasm to communicate about it, his deep knowledge of methodology and respect for its various traditions, and his concern to build (rather than burn) methodological bridges.
Like this episode? Why not check out others in this special series on the political science channel of the New Books Network, including the previous episode, also from the Methods for Social Inquiry book series, with John Boswell and Jack Corbett talking about The Art and Craft of Comparison.
Looking for something to read? Marcus recommends Arlie Hochschild’s Stolen Pride, Carol Kaesuk Yoon’s Naming Nature, and How the Heartland Went Red, by Stephanie Ternullo, whom Miranda Melcher has interviewed for the American Studies channel of our Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9255d12-1d37-11f0-a424-57aba00b8666</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Political Scientists Ring Alarm Bell Over Trump’s Second Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. <em>Postscript </em>has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-backsliders-why-leaders-undermine-their-own-democracies-susan-c-stokes/DHRH5yzALqKURrT5?ean=9780691271545&amp;next=t"><em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em></a> (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.</p><p><a href="https://susan-stokes.com/">Dr. Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include <em>Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics</em> (Cambridge, 2013), and <em>Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests</em>, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).</p><p><br /></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ps-2025-statement/statement?authuser=0">Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists</a> (closed for signatures)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/">Bright Line Watch</a>: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats</li>
<li>
<a href="https://apsanet.org/programs/advocacy-program/member-action/">APSA “take action” suggestions</a> (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)</li>
<li><a href="https://apsanet.org/about/apsa-public-statements-and-letters/">APSA public statements and letters</a></li>
<li>Nancy Bermeo, <a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/607612">“On Democratic Backsliding,” <em>Journal of Democracy</em></a> (2016)</li>
<li>Timothy Snyder, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-freedom-timothy-snyder/20984814?ean=9780593728727&amp;next=t"><em>On Freedom</em></a> (2024) and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-tyranny-twenty-lessons-from-the-twentieth-century-timothy-snyder/16520165?ean=9780804190114&amp;next=t"><em>On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century</em></a> (2017)</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, <em>Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All </em>(2024), <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/tyranny-of-the-minority-2#entry:344764@1:url">New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina</a>
</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url">New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/">Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary</a></li>
<li>
<a>Democratic Erosion Consortium</a> (nonpartisan effort with resources)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. <em>Postscript </em>has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-backsliders-why-leaders-undermine-their-own-democracies-susan-c-stokes/DHRH5yzALqKURrT5?ean=9780691271545&amp;next=t"><em>The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies</em></a> (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.</p><p><a href="https://susan-stokes.com/">Dr. Susan Stokes</a> is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include <em>Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics</em> (Cambridge, 2013), and <em>Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests</em>, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).</p><p><br /></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://sites.google.com/view/ps-2025-statement/statement?authuser=0">Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists</a> (closed for signatures)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/">Bright Line Watch</a>: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats</li>
<li>
<a href="https://apsanet.org/programs/advocacy-program/member-action/">APSA “take action” suggestions</a> (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)</li>
<li><a href="https://apsanet.org/about/apsa-public-statements-and-letters/">APSA public statements and letters</a></li>
<li>Nancy Bermeo, <a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/607612">“On Democratic Backsliding,” <em>Journal of Democracy</em></a> (2016)</li>
<li>Timothy Snyder, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-freedom-timothy-snyder/20984814?ean=9780593728727&amp;next=t"><em>On Freedom</em></a> (2024) and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/on-tyranny-twenty-lessons-from-the-twentieth-century-timothy-snyder/16520165?ean=9780804190114&amp;next=t"><em>On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century</em></a> (2017)</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, <em>Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All </em>(2024), <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/tyranny-of-the-minority-2#entry:344764@1:url">New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina</a>
</li>
<li>Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, <em>How Democracies Die</em> (2018), <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url">New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/">Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary</a></li>
<li>
<a>Democratic Erosion Consortium</a> (nonpartisan effort with resources)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35466902" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/dfddfbf1-bd22-4cb9-a5a0-4924cf9ea831/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=dfddfbf1-bd22-4cb9-a5a0-4924cf9ea831&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Political Scientists Ring Alarm Bell Over Trump’s Second Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. Postscript has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.
Dr. Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge, 2013), and Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).

Mentioned:


Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists (closed for signatures)


Bright Line Watch: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats


APSA “take action” suggestions (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)

APSA public statements and letters

Nancy Bermeo, “On Democratic Backsliding,” Journal of Democracy (2016)

Timothy Snyder, On Freedom (2024) and On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century (2017)

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All (2024), New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina


Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (2018), New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle


Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary


Democratic Erosion Consortium (nonpartisan effort with resources)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After being sworn in as the 47th president, President Donald Trump quickly altered American government – and political discourse. He issued a slew of executive orders that affected how American government functions and he spoke about officers of the government, federal agencies, executive power, the press, the Constitution, and the rule of law in ways that surprised citizens, journalists, and many scholars. Postscript has devoted three podcasts to how professional historians have assessed Trump’s actions. Today, we look at how political scientists understand the second Trump presidency and how they have organized to amplify their concerns. Over 1200 trained political scientists signed a statement that lays out alarming changes to American government – and today’s podcast features the incoming president of the American Political Science Association, Dr. Susan Stokes, to discuss the statement and what it means for so many political scientists to sign it. With her forthcoming book, The Backsliders: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies (Princeton University Press), Sue Stokes is the perfect person to assess democratic erosion and autocracy. Our conversation provides insights into the state of American politics, resources for people who want to oppose democratic erosion, and particular suggestions for teachers – and sneak peak into her new book.
Dr. Susan Stokes is the Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor of political science and Director of the Chicago Center on Democracy at The University of Chicago. She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She is co-director of Bright Line Watch, a group of political scientists who monitor democratic practices, their resilience, and potential threats. Dr. Stokes has spent her career unpacking how democracy functions in developing societies, distributive politics, and comparative political behavior. Her books include Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge, 2013), and Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests, co-authored with S. Erdem Aytaç (Cambridge, 2019).

Mentioned:


Statement signed by over 1200 political scientists (closed for signatures)


Bright Line Watch: political scientists monitor democratic practices, resilience, and potential threats


APSA “take action” suggestions (really helpful if you are calling or writing your leaders)

APSA public statements and letters

Nancy Bermeo, “On Democratic Backsliding,” Journal of Democracy (2016)

Timothy Snyder, On Freedom (2024) and On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century (2017)

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, Tyranny of the Minority: How to Reverse an Authoritarian Turn, and Force a Democracy for All (2024), New Books Interview with Levitsky and Ziblatt by Karyne Messina


Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (2018), New Books Interview with Daniel Ziblatt by Jenna Spinelle


Brendan Nyhan’s work and commentary


Democratic Erosion Consortium (nonpartisan effort with resources)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c0206ac-1d24-11f0-9a85-c3a57986de85</guid>
      <title>Fernanda Gallo, &quot;Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Fernanda Gallo (Homerton College, University of Cambridge) has a fascinating new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009494120"><em>Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024), about how Georg Hegel’s philosophical thought made its way to Italy and how it was integrated into the various schools of thought within Italy. This is a fascinating exploration of the history of ideas, especially more recent thinking, tracing not only the ideas themselves, but the ways in which they were adapted by different theorists and cultural approaches. Gallo provides the reader with deep historical insights alongside the explication of complex theoretical understandings, noting how ideas travel across language, time, geography, and cultures. Gallo’s project here is to weave together history, politics, and ideas more fully to understand ideas in different spaces, providing a transnational perspective of Hegel’s thinking and how it evolved in other places, with other thinkers.</p><p>Italy often finds itself the “forgotten stepchild” in political theory, even though it sits at the intersection of the global North and South, as well as the global East and global West, where ideas from different parts of the world intertwine with each other. The physical space where Italy is located provides this connectivity not only between geographical regions and ideas, but it is also where goods are exchanged alongside intellectual ideas. One of the key lines of interrogation in <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/history/history-ideas-and-intellectual-history/hegel-and-italian-political-thought-practice-ideas-18321900?format=HB"><em>Hegel and Italian Political Thought</em></a> is how Hegelian ideas were put into practice in different parts of Italy and what those ideas looked like in practice. For Italy, given the regional distinctions and the seven different states within the peninsula in the early 1800s, Hegel’s ideas contributed to a variety of paths towards nation and state building. Gallo examines the ways in which many of the Italian intellectuals during this period were also politicians involved in their respective states, and many of them looked towards Hegel’s considerations, mixing them with Italian culture, to rethink how Italy should be structured to function as a modern nation-state, or an array of states within the nation.</p><p>Gallo and I have a great conversation about the interweaving of Hegel with Italian political thought. We also discuss the rise of the mafia in southern Italy during this period, and how this is connected to these broader ideas of the state’s monopoly on violence, issues of freedom and liberty, and how power and power vacuums contribute to the form of the state. This is a lively discussion of the history of ideas, the particular dimensions of Italy and Italian political thought and praxis, Hegel’s concepts that apply to the state, and what we can learn from how all of these components were woven together during the 19th century in the Mediterranean.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky @gorenlj.bsky.social</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Fernanda Gallo (Homerton College, University of Cambridge) has a fascinating new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009494120"><em>Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024), about how Georg Hegel’s philosophical thought made its way to Italy and how it was integrated into the various schools of thought within Italy. This is a fascinating exploration of the history of ideas, especially more recent thinking, tracing not only the ideas themselves, but the ways in which they were adapted by different theorists and cultural approaches. Gallo provides the reader with deep historical insights alongside the explication of complex theoretical understandings, noting how ideas travel across language, time, geography, and cultures. Gallo’s project here is to weave together history, politics, and ideas more fully to understand ideas in different spaces, providing a transnational perspective of Hegel’s thinking and how it evolved in other places, with other thinkers.</p><p>Italy often finds itself the “forgotten stepchild” in political theory, even though it sits at the intersection of the global North and South, as well as the global East and global West, where ideas from different parts of the world intertwine with each other. The physical space where Italy is located provides this connectivity not only between geographical regions and ideas, but it is also where goods are exchanged alongside intellectual ideas. One of the key lines of interrogation in <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/history/history-ideas-and-intellectual-history/hegel-and-italian-political-thought-practice-ideas-18321900?format=HB"><em>Hegel and Italian Political Thought</em></a> is how Hegelian ideas were put into practice in different parts of Italy and what those ideas looked like in practice. For Italy, given the regional distinctions and the seven different states within the peninsula in the early 1800s, Hegel’s ideas contributed to a variety of paths towards nation and state building. Gallo examines the ways in which many of the Italian intellectuals during this period were also politicians involved in their respective states, and many of them looked towards Hegel’s considerations, mixing them with Italian culture, to rethink how Italy should be structured to function as a modern nation-state, or an array of states within the nation.</p><p>Gallo and I have a great conversation about the interweaving of Hegel with Italian political thought. We also discuss the rise of the mafia in southern Italy during this period, and how this is connected to these broader ideas of the state’s monopoly on violence, issues of freedom and liberty, and how power and power vacuums contribute to the form of the state. This is a lively discussion of the history of ideas, the particular dimensions of Italy and Italian political thought and praxis, Hegel’s concepts that apply to the state, and what we can learn from how all of these components were woven together during the 19th century in the Mediterranean.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky @gorenlj.bsky.social</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40666233" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0e1deb38-55d2-45b6-ac97-45f9fbc149b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0e1deb38-55d2-45b6-ac97-45f9fbc149b2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Fernanda Gallo, &quot;Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Theorist Fernanda Gallo (Homerton College, University of Cambridge) has a fascinating new book, Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900 (Cambridge UP, 2024), about how Georg Hegel’s philosophical thought made its way to Italy and how it was integrated into the various schools of thought within Italy. This is a fascinating exploration of the history of ideas, especially more recent thinking, tracing not only the ideas themselves, but the ways in which they were adapted by different theorists and cultural approaches. Gallo provides the reader with deep historical insights alongside the explication of complex theoretical understandings, noting how ideas travel across language, time, geography, and cultures. Gallo’s project here is to weave together history, politics, and ideas more fully to understand ideas in different spaces, providing a transnational perspective of Hegel’s thinking and how it evolved in other places, with other thinkers.
Italy often finds itself the “forgotten stepchild” in political theory, even though it sits at the intersection of the global North and South, as well as the global East and global West, where ideas from different parts of the world intertwine with each other. The physical space where Italy is located provides this connectivity not only between geographical regions and ideas, but it is also where goods are exchanged alongside intellectual ideas. One of the key lines of interrogation in Hegel and Italian Political Thought is how Hegelian ideas were put into practice in different parts of Italy and what those ideas looked like in practice. For Italy, given the regional distinctions and the seven different states within the peninsula in the early 1800s, Hegel’s ideas contributed to a variety of paths towards nation and state building. Gallo examines the ways in which many of the Italian intellectuals during this period were also politicians involved in their respective states, and many of them looked towards Hegel’s considerations, mixing them with Italian culture, to rethink how Italy should be structured to function as a modern nation-state, or an array of states within the nation.
Gallo and I have a great conversation about the interweaving of Hegel with Italian political thought. We also discuss the rise of the mafia in southern Italy during this period, and how this is connected to these broader ideas of the state’s monopoly on violence, issues of freedom and liberty, and how power and power vacuums contribute to the form of the state. This is a lively discussion of the history of ideas, the particular dimensions of Italy and Italian political thought and praxis, Hegel’s concepts that apply to the state, and what we can learn from how all of these components were woven together during the 19th century in the Mediterranean.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky @gorenlj.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Theorist Fernanda Gallo (Homerton College, University of Cambridge) has a fascinating new book, Hegel and Italian Political Thought: The Practice of Ideas, 1832-1900 (Cambridge UP, 2024), about how Georg Hegel’s philosophical thought made its way to Italy and how it was integrated into the various schools of thought within Italy. This is a fascinating exploration of the history of ideas, especially more recent thinking, tracing not only the ideas themselves, but the ways in which they were adapted by different theorists and cultural approaches. Gallo provides the reader with deep historical insights alongside the explication of complex theoretical understandings, noting how ideas travel across language, time, geography, and cultures. Gallo’s project here is to weave together history, politics, and ideas more fully to understand ideas in different spaces, providing a transnational perspective of Hegel’s thinking and how it evolved in other places, with other thinkers.
Italy often finds itself the “forgotten stepchild” in political theory, even though it sits at the intersection of the global North and South, as well as the global East and global West, where ideas from different parts of the world intertwine with each other. The physical space where Italy is located provides this connectivity not only between geographical regions and ideas, but it is also where goods are exchanged alongside intellectual ideas. One of the key lines of interrogation in Hegel and Italian Political Thought is how Hegelian ideas were put into practice in different parts of Italy and what those ideas looked like in practice. For Italy, given the regional distinctions and the seven different states within the peninsula in the early 1800s, Hegel’s ideas contributed to a variety of paths towards nation and state building. Gallo examines the ways in which many of the Italian intellectuals during this period were also politicians involved in their respective states, and many of them looked towards Hegel’s considerations, mixing them with Italian culture, to rethink how Italy should be structured to function as a modern nation-state, or an array of states within the nation.
Gallo and I have a great conversation about the interweaving of Hegel with Italian political thought. We also discuss the rise of the mafia in southern Italy during this period, and how this is connected to these broader ideas of the state’s monopoly on violence, issues of freedom and liberty, and how power and power vacuums contribute to the form of the state. This is a lively discussion of the history of ideas, the particular dimensions of Italy and Italian political thought and praxis, Hegel’s concepts that apply to the state, and what we can learn from how all of these components were woven together during the 19th century in the Mediterranean.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or find her at Bluesky @gorenlj.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>765</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7525568-1a27-11f0-9d04-bfa3ef04a91a</guid>
      <title>Agnieszka Pasieka, &quot;Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Radical nationalism is on the rise in Europe and throughout the world. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/living-right-far-right-youth-activists-in-contemporary-europe-agnieszka-pasieka/21271999?ean=9780691258423&amp;next=t"><em>Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2024) provides an in-depth account of the ideas and practices that are driving the varied forms of far-right activism by young people from all walks of life, revealing how these social movements offer the promise of comradery, purpose, and a moral calling to self-sacrifice, and demonstrating how far-right ideas are understood and lived in ways that speak to a variety of experiences.</p><p><br /></p><p>In this eye-opening book, Agnieszka Pasieka draws on her own sometimes harrowing fieldwork among Italian, Polish, and Hungarian militant youths, painting unforgettable portraits of students, laborers, entrepreneurs, musicians, and activists from well-off middle class backgrounds who have all found a nurturing home in the far right. Providing an in-depth account of radical nationalist communities and networks that are taking root across Europe, she shows how the simultaneous orientation of these groups toward the local and the transnational is a key to their success. With a focus on far-right morality that challenges commonly held ideas about the right, Pasieka describes how far-right movements afford opportunities to the young to be active members of tightly bonded comradeships while sharing in a broader project with global ramifications.</p><p><br /></p><p>Required reading for anthropologists and anyone concerned about the resurgence of far-right militancy today, <em>Living Right</em> sheds necessary light on the forces that have made the growing appeal of fascist idealism for young people one of the most alarming trends of our time.</p><p><em>Agnieszka Pasieka is assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Montreal.</em></p><p>* This episode is part of a special collaboration between the New Books Network and <a href="https://sae.americananthro.org/">the Society for the Anthropology of Europe</a>, a section of the American Anthropological Association. Together, we’re highlighting exciting new work in Europeanist anthropology—featuring authors from across the field, including winners of the William A. Douglass Book Prize and contributors to the <em>European Anthropology in Translation</em> series published by Berghahn Books.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical nationalism is on the rise in Europe and throughout the world. <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/living-right-far-right-youth-activists-in-contemporary-europe-agnieszka-pasieka/21271999?ean=9780691258423&amp;next=t"><em>Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton University Press, 2024) provides an in-depth account of the ideas and practices that are driving the varied forms of far-right activism by young people from all walks of life, revealing how these social movements offer the promise of comradery, purpose, and a moral calling to self-sacrifice, and demonstrating how far-right ideas are understood and lived in ways that speak to a variety of experiences.</p><p><br /></p><p>In this eye-opening book, Agnieszka Pasieka draws on her own sometimes harrowing fieldwork among Italian, Polish, and Hungarian militant youths, painting unforgettable portraits of students, laborers, entrepreneurs, musicians, and activists from well-off middle class backgrounds who have all found a nurturing home in the far right. Providing an in-depth account of radical nationalist communities and networks that are taking root across Europe, she shows how the simultaneous orientation of these groups toward the local and the transnational is a key to their success. With a focus on far-right morality that challenges commonly held ideas about the right, Pasieka describes how far-right movements afford opportunities to the young to be active members of tightly bonded comradeships while sharing in a broader project with global ramifications.</p><p><br /></p><p>Required reading for anthropologists and anyone concerned about the resurgence of far-right militancy today, <em>Living Right</em> sheds necessary light on the forces that have made the growing appeal of fascist idealism for young people one of the most alarming trends of our time.</p><p><em>Agnieszka Pasieka is assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Montreal.</em></p><p>* This episode is part of a special collaboration between the New Books Network and <a href="https://sae.americananthro.org/">the Society for the Anthropology of Europe</a>, a section of the American Anthropological Association. Together, we’re highlighting exciting new work in Europeanist anthropology—featuring authors from across the field, including winners of the William A. Douglass Book Prize and contributors to the <em>European Anthropology in Translation</em> series published by Berghahn Books.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39122983" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/704c5c33-0ac9-4a49-a5a8-c421d1571ca7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=704c5c33-0ac9-4a49-a5a8-c421d1571ca7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Agnieszka Pasieka, &quot;Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Radical nationalism is on the rise in Europe and throughout the world. Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe (Princeton University Press, 2024) provides an in-depth account of the ideas and practices that are driving the varied forms of far-right activism by young people from all walks of life, revealing how these social movements offer the promise of comradery, purpose, and a moral calling to self-sacrifice, and demonstrating how far-right ideas are understood and lived in ways that speak to a variety of experiences.

In this eye-opening book, Agnieszka Pasieka draws on her own sometimes harrowing fieldwork among Italian, Polish, and Hungarian militant youths, painting unforgettable portraits of students, laborers, entrepreneurs, musicians, and activists from well-off middle class backgrounds who have all found a nurturing home in the far right. Providing an in-depth account of radical nationalist communities and networks that are taking root across Europe, she shows how the simultaneous orientation of these groups toward the local and the transnational is a key to their success. With a focus on far-right morality that challenges commonly held ideas about the right, Pasieka describes how far-right movements afford opportunities to the young to be active members of tightly bonded comradeships while sharing in a broader project with global ramifications.

Required reading for anthropologists and anyone concerned about the resurgence of far-right militancy today, Living Right sheds necessary light on the forces that have made the growing appeal of fascist idealism for young people one of the most alarming trends of our time.
Agnieszka Pasieka is assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Montreal.
* This episode is part of a special collaboration between the New Books Network and the Society for the Anthropology of Europe, a section of the American Anthropological Association. Together, we’re highlighting exciting new work in Europeanist anthropology—featuring authors from across the field, including winners of the William A. Douglass Book Prize and contributors to the European Anthropology in Translation series published by Berghahn Books.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Radical nationalism is on the rise in Europe and throughout the world. Living Right: Far-Right Youth Activists in Contemporary Europe (Princeton University Press, 2024) provides an in-depth account of the ideas and practices that are driving the varied forms of far-right activism by young people from all walks of life, revealing how these social movements offer the promise of comradery, purpose, and a moral calling to self-sacrifice, and demonstrating how far-right ideas are understood and lived in ways that speak to a variety of experiences.

In this eye-opening book, Agnieszka Pasieka draws on her own sometimes harrowing fieldwork among Italian, Polish, and Hungarian militant youths, painting unforgettable portraits of students, laborers, entrepreneurs, musicians, and activists from well-off middle class backgrounds who have all found a nurturing home in the far right. Providing an in-depth account of radical nationalist communities and networks that are taking root across Europe, she shows how the simultaneous orientation of these groups toward the local and the transnational is a key to their success. With a focus on far-right morality that challenges commonly held ideas about the right, Pasieka describes how far-right movements afford opportunities to the young to be active members of tightly bonded comradeships while sharing in a broader project with global ramifications.

Required reading for anthropologists and anyone concerned about the resurgence of far-right militancy today, Living Right sheds necessary light on the forces that have made the growing appeal of fascist idealism for young people one of the most alarming trends of our time.
Agnieszka Pasieka is assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Montreal.
* This episode is part of a special collaboration between the New Books Network and the Society for the Anthropology of Europe, a section of the American Anthropological Association. Together, we’re highlighting exciting new work in Europeanist anthropology—featuring authors from across the field, including winners of the William A. Douglass Book Prize and contributors to the European Anthropology in Translation series published by Berghahn Books.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>360</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99498fb6-1886-11f0-8306-ab8f2086daef</guid>
      <title>Political Mythmaking in Nepal</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How and why do local political processes in rural Nepal become an arena for political mythmaking? And, how do political myths obscure their own historical construction, thereby making hierarchical power structures appear inevitable? In this episode we discuss these questions with Ankita Shrestha whose ethnographic explorations into these issues foreground the persistent centrality of caste, gender and indigeneity to everyday forms of domination and hierarchy in contemporary rural Nepal.</p><p>Ankita Shrestha holds a PhD in human geography from the University of Oslo.</p><p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, a social anthropologist based in Oslo, and the leader of the centre for South Asian Democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How and why do local political processes in rural Nepal become an arena for political mythmaking? And, how do political myths obscure their own historical construction, thereby making hierarchical power structures appear inevitable? In this episode we discuss these questions with Ankita Shrestha whose ethnographic explorations into these issues foreground the persistent centrality of caste, gender and indigeneity to everyday forms of domination and hierarchy in contemporary rural Nepal.</p><p>Ankita Shrestha holds a PhD in human geography from the University of Oslo.</p><p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen, a social anthropologist based in Oslo, and the leader of the centre for South Asian Democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30203915" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/44c6cbc8-488f-4268-b982-5fa504eaeb39/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=44c6cbc8-488f-4268-b982-5fa504eaeb39&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Political Mythmaking in Nepal</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How and why do local political processes in rural Nepal become an arena for political mythmaking? And, how do political myths obscure their own historical construction, thereby making hierarchical power structures appear inevitable? In this episode we discuss these questions with Ankita Shrestha whose ethnographic explorations into these issues foreground the persistent centrality of caste, gender and indigeneity to everyday forms of domination and hierarchy in contemporary rural Nepal.
Ankita Shrestha holds a PhD in human geography from the University of Oslo.
Kenneth Bo Nielsen, a social anthropologist based in Oslo, and the leader of the centre for South Asian Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How and why do local political processes in rural Nepal become an arena for political mythmaking? And, how do political myths obscure their own historical construction, thereby making hierarchical power structures appear inevitable? In this episode we discuss these questions with Ankita Shrestha whose ethnographic explorations into these issues foreground the persistent centrality of caste, gender and indigeneity to everyday forms of domination and hierarchy in contemporary rural Nepal.
Ankita Shrestha holds a PhD in human geography from the University of Oslo.
Kenneth Bo Nielsen, a social anthropologist based in Oslo, and the leader of the centre for South Asian Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>244</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9a43e738-19fb-11f0-ab37-57ac1c51cd6d</guid>
      <title>Is Democracy and Peace Possible in Myanmar? A Conversation with Claire Smith</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the civil conflict in Myanmar passes its fourth anniversary, is this ethnically complex country any closer to a peaceful resolution of its internal conflict? Do opposition forces have a singular vision for what a post-conflict Myanmar might look like, or could the country simply break apart? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Claire Smith about the evolution of Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, the different domestic and international actors involved, potential pathways for peace, and the broader regional and geopolitical implications of intervention in Myanmar. *This episode was recorded prior to the March 2025 earthquake*</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/politics/research/peace-myanmar/">Project website</a> (with links to conflict &amp; peace backgrounder and poster)</p><p>*** This episode was originally recorded in early December 2024. ***</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/politics/people/academicstaff/c-smith/">Claire Smith</a> is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of York (UK). She works on the comparative politics of conflict management, intervention and peacebuilding in the context of political transition in Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia and Myanmar. Claire’s research has appeared in leading conflict and peace journals including Conflict, Security and Development, Third World Quarterly, Global Responsibility to Protect and Peacebuilding. Her research has been funded by the ESRC, GCRF, The Asia Foundation, the ISRF and The World Peace Foundation.</p><p><a href="https://d8q167itd1z7d.cloudfront.net/craft/Claire-Smith-Transcript.docx#asset:388515@1:url">Claire Smith Transcript</a></p><p>Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on X (Twitter) at @CEDAR_Bham</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the civil conflict in Myanmar passes its fourth anniversary, is this ethnically complex country any closer to a peaceful resolution of its internal conflict? Do opposition forces have a singular vision for what a post-conflict Myanmar might look like, or could the country simply break apart? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Claire Smith about the evolution of Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, the different domestic and international actors involved, potential pathways for peace, and the broader regional and geopolitical implications of intervention in Myanmar. *This episode was recorded prior to the March 2025 earthquake*</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/politics/research/peace-myanmar/">Project website</a> (with links to conflict &amp; peace backgrounder and poster)</p><p>*** This episode was originally recorded in early December 2024. ***</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/politics/people/academicstaff/c-smith/">Claire Smith</a> is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of York (UK). She works on the comparative politics of conflict management, intervention and peacebuilding in the context of political transition in Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia and Myanmar. Claire’s research has appeared in leading conflict and peace journals including Conflict, Security and Development, Third World Quarterly, Global Responsibility to Protect and Peacebuilding. Her research has been funded by the ESRC, GCRF, The Asia Foundation, the ISRF and The World Peace Foundation.</p><p><a href="https://d8q167itd1z7d.cloudfront.net/craft/Claire-Smith-Transcript.docx#asset:388515@1:url">Claire Smith Transcript</a></p><p>Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on X (Twitter) at @CEDAR_Bham</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37868848" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0497f9d1-bf13-445a-ad5c-2ef7194ba495/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0497f9d1-bf13-445a-ad5c-2ef7194ba495&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Democracy and Peace Possible in Myanmar? A Conversation with Claire Smith</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the civil conflict in Myanmar passes its fourth anniversary, is this ethnically complex country any closer to a peaceful resolution of its internal conflict? Do opposition forces have a singular vision for what a post-conflict Myanmar might look like, or could the country simply break apart? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Claire Smith about the evolution of Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, the different domestic and international actors involved, potential pathways for peace, and the broader regional and geopolitical implications of intervention in Myanmar. *This episode was recorded prior to the March 2025 earthquake*
Project website (with links to conflict &amp; peace backgrounder and poster)
*** This episode was originally recorded in early December 2024. ***
Claire Smith is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of York (UK). She works on the comparative politics of conflict management, intervention and peacebuilding in the context of political transition in Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia and Myanmar. Claire’s research has appeared in leading conflict and peace journals including Conflict, Security and Development, Third World Quarterly, Global Responsibility to Protect and Peacebuilding. Her research has been funded by the ESRC, GCRF, The Asia Foundation, the ISRF and The World Peace Foundation.
Claire Smith Transcript
Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on X (Twitter) at @CEDAR_Bham
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the civil conflict in Myanmar passes its fourth anniversary, is this ethnically complex country any closer to a peaceful resolution of its internal conflict? Do opposition forces have a singular vision for what a post-conflict Myanmar might look like, or could the country simply break apart? Join Petra Alderman as she talks to Claire Smith about the evolution of Myanmar’s ongoing conflict, the different domestic and international actors involved, potential pathways for peace, and the broader regional and geopolitical implications of intervention in Myanmar. *This episode was recorded prior to the March 2025 earthquake*
Project website (with links to conflict &amp; peace backgrounder and poster)
*** This episode was originally recorded in early December 2024. ***
Claire Smith is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of York (UK). She works on the comparative politics of conflict management, intervention and peacebuilding in the context of political transition in Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia and Myanmar. Claire’s research has appeared in leading conflict and peace journals including Conflict, Security and Development, Third World Quarterly, Global Responsibility to Protect and Peacebuilding. Her research has been funded by the ESRC, GCRF, The Asia Foundation, the ISRF and The World Peace Foundation.
Claire Smith Transcript
Petra Alderman is a researcher, CEDAR affiliate, and a manager of the LSE Saw Swee Hock Southeast Asia Centre.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on X (Twitter) at @CEDAR_Bham
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d63a73ee-16c5-11f0-8f37-c744864b1d91</guid>
      <title>Is Liberal Democracy Dying?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. </p><p><br /></p><p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump's re-election. </p><p><br /></p><p>Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.</p><p><br /></p><p>And </p><p><br /></p><p>Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com</p><p><br /></p><p>In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.</p><p><br /></p><p>As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?</p><p>From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. </p><p><br /></p><p>Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump's re-election. </p><p><br /></p><p>Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.</p><p><br /></p><p>And </p><p><br /></p><p>Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com</p><p><br /></p><p>In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.</p><p><br /></p><p>As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?</p><p>From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Producer: Pearse Lynch</p><p>Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62362149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/66a26276-9e5b-47b3-a01d-04d22ceaca34/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=66a26276-9e5b-47b3-a01d-04d22ceaca34&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Liberal Democracy Dying?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/66a26276-9e5b-47b3-a01d-04d22ceaca34/3000x3000/d2f49cc4f547a3ca6ef037887344dc18.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. 

Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump&apos;s re-election. 

Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.

And 

Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali&apos;s Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com

In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.

As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?
From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?


Producer: Pearse Lynch
Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Live from the Frontline Club in London, Ctrl Alt Deceit is back for its second season. 

Hosts Nina dos Santos and Owen Bennett-Jones host a fascinating discussion on the myriad threats to democracy, particularly in light of Trump&apos;s re-election. 

Joined by Gabriel Gatehouse is an award-winning BBC journalist and broadcaster, formerly International Editor of Newsnight and host of the award winning podcast The Coming Storm.

And 

Connor Tomlinson is a commentator and writer, contributing to Ayaan Hirsi Ali&apos;s Courage Media and presenting the Deprogrammed podcast at the New Culture Forum. He previously hosted Tomlinson Talks on LotusEaters.com

In this provocative and timely discussion, big ideas collide as our panel tackles the fault lines shaking the foundations of the democratic world.

As power shifts, authoritarianism rises, and ideological battles intensify, is liberal democracy collapsing under its own contradictions—or is it still the best system we’ve got?
From Silicon Valley’s techno-libertarian ambitions to the push for a return to a more rigidly defined Western identity, our panel will explore the competing visions for the future. Has democracy been hijacked by global institutions that sideline voters? Was the dream of a liberal world order always doomed to fail? And if democracy is in decline—what comes next?


Producer: Pearse Lynch
Exec Producer: Lucinda Knight
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">983a48a2-163a-11f0-a62e-d3eb0698a020</guid>
      <title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285"><em>Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285"><em>Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48064379" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3b2bbaa7-7a1e-4571-aef5-67e30b16f7d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3b2bbaa7-7a1e-4571-aef5-67e30b16f7d3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1f2e626-1643-11f0-9064-df63be8b58b3</guid>
      <title>Dána-Ain Davis and Christa Craven, &quot;Feminist Ethnography: Thinking Through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do we acquire knowledge about societies? Does <em>how</em> we acquire social knowledge shape what we know? How conscious must we be of our own experiences as we do our research? What does feminism add to our methods and modes of research?</p><p>Now in its second edition, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538129791"><em>Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities</em></a> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2022) by Drs. Crista Craven and Dána-Ain Davis answers these questions. The book is at once a how-to manual for doing feminist ethnography and a compendium of contributions from influential feminist ethnographers. Designed for students, scholars, community activists, and anyone interested in social knowledge, the book is multi-vocal and interdisciplinary and promotes critical methodologies as sites for reflection, collaboration, and creativity. It is a particularly important work for this moment in which anti-DEI efforts aim to minimize the work and perspectives of minoritized groups.</p><p><a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/discover.wooster.edu/ccraven/__;!!E8lrGBvW!unHqTxgkIQoH2Jq1o7h8AhpemGqHd2seji7VlDXv5l20HGnHrwusdq47tmJuSNJ_W1kHYeIZOZUtPND09UPl2oiP$">Dr. Christa Craven</a> (she/her/hers) is a Professor of Anthropology and Women’s, Gender &amp; Sexuality Studies at the College of Wooster, and co-founder of the Global Queer Studies minor. She has published four books, including <em>Feminist Ethnography</em>. Her 2019 monograph, <em>Reproductive Losses: Challenges to LGBTQ Family-Making</em> was awarded the Council on Anthropology &amp; Reproduction’s Book Prize in 2021, and selected by Women.com as a book that puts “the long, complicated history of reproductive rights into sharp focus.”</p><p><a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/dana-ain-davis">Dr. Dána-Ain Davis</a> is Professor of Urban Studies at Queens College, City University of New York and on the faculty of the PhD Programs in Anthropology and Critical Psychology. She is the director of the Center for the Study of Women and Society at the CUNY Graduate Center. Davis is the author, co-author, or co-editor of five books including <em>Feminist </em>Ethnography. NYU Press published Davis’s <em>Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth</em> in 2019 and the book received the <em>Eileen Basker Memorial Prize</em> from the Society for Medical Anthropology and <em>The Senior Book Prize </em>from the Association of Feminist Anthropology. Dr. Davis is also a doula.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/feminist-activist-ethnography-pb-christa-craven/942861?ean=9780739191309&amp;next=t"><em>Feminist Activist Ethnography:Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America</em></a>, edited by Christa Craven and Dána-Ain Davis</li>
<li>Jafari S. Allen’s T<em>he Anthropology of ‘What is Utterly Precious: Black Feminists, Black Queer Habits of Mind</em>, <em>and the ‘Object’ of Ethnography,</em>” in <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/unsettling-queer-anthropology-foundations-reorientations-and-departures-margot-weiss/20414699?ean=9781478030386&amp;next=t">Unsettling Queer Anthropology: Foundations, Reorientations, and Departures</a>, edited by Margot Weiss</li>
<li>Wiki Education help for faculty. <a href="https://wikiedu.org/teach-with-wikipedia/#:~:text=Each%20term%2C%20Wiki%20Education%20supports,student%20trainings%2C%20and%20staff%20support.">Sign up for their info sessions!</a>
</li>
<li>College of Wooster’s Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies’s oral histories</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we acquire knowledge about societies? Does <em>how</em> we acquire social knowledge shape what we know? How conscious must we be of our own experiences as we do our research? What does feminism add to our methods and modes of research?</p><p>Now in its second edition, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538129791"><em>Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities</em></a> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2022) by Drs. Crista Craven and Dána-Ain Davis answers these questions. The book is at once a how-to manual for doing feminist ethnography and a compendium of contributions from influential feminist ethnographers. Designed for students, scholars, community activists, and anyone interested in social knowledge, the book is multi-vocal and interdisciplinary and promotes critical methodologies as sites for reflection, collaboration, and creativity. It is a particularly important work for this moment in which anti-DEI efforts aim to minimize the work and perspectives of minoritized groups.</p><p><a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/discover.wooster.edu/ccraven/__;!!E8lrGBvW!unHqTxgkIQoH2Jq1o7h8AhpemGqHd2seji7VlDXv5l20HGnHrwusdq47tmJuSNJ_W1kHYeIZOZUtPND09UPl2oiP$">Dr. Christa Craven</a> (she/her/hers) is a Professor of Anthropology and Women’s, Gender &amp; Sexuality Studies at the College of Wooster, and co-founder of the Global Queer Studies minor. She has published four books, including <em>Feminist Ethnography</em>. Her 2019 monograph, <em>Reproductive Losses: Challenges to LGBTQ Family-Making</em> was awarded the Council on Anthropology &amp; Reproduction’s Book Prize in 2021, and selected by Women.com as a book that puts “the long, complicated history of reproductive rights into sharp focus.”</p><p><a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/dana-ain-davis">Dr. Dána-Ain Davis</a> is Professor of Urban Studies at Queens College, City University of New York and on the faculty of the PhD Programs in Anthropology and Critical Psychology. She is the director of the Center for the Study of Women and Society at the CUNY Graduate Center. Davis is the author, co-author, or co-editor of five books including <em>Feminist </em>Ethnography. NYU Press published Davis’s <em>Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth</em> in 2019 and the book received the <em>Eileen Basker Memorial Prize</em> from the Society for Medical Anthropology and <em>The Senior Book Prize </em>from the Association of Feminist Anthropology. Dr. Davis is also a doula.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/feminist-activist-ethnography-pb-christa-craven/942861?ean=9780739191309&amp;next=t"><em>Feminist Activist Ethnography:Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America</em></a>, edited by Christa Craven and Dána-Ain Davis</li>
<li>Jafari S. Allen’s T<em>he Anthropology of ‘What is Utterly Precious: Black Feminists, Black Queer Habits of Mind</em>, <em>and the ‘Object’ of Ethnography,</em>” in <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/unsettling-queer-anthropology-foundations-reorientations-and-departures-margot-weiss/20414699?ean=9781478030386&amp;next=t">Unsettling Queer Anthropology: Foundations, Reorientations, and Departures</a>, edited by Margot Weiss</li>
<li>Wiki Education help for faculty. <a href="https://wikiedu.org/teach-with-wikipedia/#:~:text=Each%20term%2C%20Wiki%20Education%20supports,student%20trainings%2C%20and%20staff%20support.">Sign up for their info sessions!</a>
</li>
<li>College of Wooster’s Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies’s oral histories</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48590953" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/69d6560f-3b11-4a6e-b378-16d0736ca123/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=69d6560f-3b11-4a6e-b378-16d0736ca123&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Dána-Ain Davis and Christa Craven, &quot;Feminist Ethnography: Thinking Through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do we acquire knowledge about societies? Does how we acquire social knowledge shape what we know? How conscious must we be of our own experiences as we do our research? What does feminism add to our methods and modes of research?
Now in its second edition, Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities (Rowman and Littlefield, 2022) by Drs. Crista Craven and Dána-Ain Davis answers these questions. The book is at once a how-to manual for doing feminist ethnography and a compendium of contributions from influential feminist ethnographers. Designed for students, scholars, community activists, and anyone interested in social knowledge, the book is multi-vocal and interdisciplinary and promotes critical methodologies as sites for reflection, collaboration, and creativity. It is a particularly important work for this moment in which anti-DEI efforts aim to minimize the work and perspectives of minoritized groups.
Dr. Christa Craven (she/her/hers) is a Professor of Anthropology and Women’s, Gender &amp; Sexuality Studies at the College of Wooster, and co-founder of the Global Queer Studies minor. She has published four books, including Feminist Ethnography. Her 2019 monograph, Reproductive Losses: Challenges to LGBTQ Family-Making was awarded the Council on Anthropology &amp; Reproduction’s Book Prize in 2021, and selected by Women.com as a book that puts “the long, complicated history of reproductive rights into sharp focus.”
Dr. Dána-Ain Davis is Professor of Urban Studies at Queens College, City University of New York and on the faculty of the PhD Programs in Anthropology and Critical Psychology. She is the director of the Center for the Study of Women and Society at the CUNY Graduate Center. Davis is the author, co-author, or co-editor of five books including Feminist Ethnography. NYU Press published Davis’s Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth in 2019 and the book received the Eileen Basker Memorial Prize from the Society for Medical Anthropology and The Senior Book Prize from the Association of Feminist Anthropology. Dr. Davis is also a doula.
Mentioned in the Podcast:


Feminist Activist Ethnography:Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America, edited by Christa Craven and Dána-Ain Davis

Jafari S. Allen’s The Anthropology of ‘What is Utterly Precious: Black Feminists, Black Queer Habits of Mind, and the ‘Object’ of Ethnography,” in Unsettling Queer Anthropology: Foundations, Reorientations, and Departures, edited by Margot Weiss

Wiki Education help for faculty. Sign up for their info sessions!


College of Wooster’s Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies’s oral histories


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do we acquire knowledge about societies? Does how we acquire social knowledge shape what we know? How conscious must we be of our own experiences as we do our research? What does feminism add to our methods and modes of research?
Now in its second edition, Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities (Rowman and Littlefield, 2022) by Drs. Crista Craven and Dána-Ain Davis answers these questions. The book is at once a how-to manual for doing feminist ethnography and a compendium of contributions from influential feminist ethnographers. Designed for students, scholars, community activists, and anyone interested in social knowledge, the book is multi-vocal and interdisciplinary and promotes critical methodologies as sites for reflection, collaboration, and creativity. It is a particularly important work for this moment in which anti-DEI efforts aim to minimize the work and perspectives of minoritized groups.
Dr. Christa Craven (she/her/hers) is a Professor of Anthropology and Women’s, Gender &amp; Sexuality Studies at the College of Wooster, and co-founder of the Global Queer Studies minor. She has published four books, including Feminist Ethnography. Her 2019 monograph, Reproductive Losses: Challenges to LGBTQ Family-Making was awarded the Council on Anthropology &amp; Reproduction’s Book Prize in 2021, and selected by Women.com as a book that puts “the long, complicated history of reproductive rights into sharp focus.”
Dr. Dána-Ain Davis is Professor of Urban Studies at Queens College, City University of New York and on the faculty of the PhD Programs in Anthropology and Critical Psychology. She is the director of the Center for the Study of Women and Society at the CUNY Graduate Center. Davis is the author, co-author, or co-editor of five books including Feminist Ethnography. NYU Press published Davis’s Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth in 2019 and the book received the Eileen Basker Memorial Prize from the Society for Medical Anthropology and The Senior Book Prize from the Association of Feminist Anthropology. Dr. Davis is also a doula.
Mentioned in the Podcast:


Feminist Activist Ethnography:Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America, edited by Christa Craven and Dána-Ain Davis

Jafari S. Allen’s The Anthropology of ‘What is Utterly Precious: Black Feminists, Black Queer Habits of Mind, and the ‘Object’ of Ethnography,” in Unsettling Queer Anthropology: Foundations, Reorientations, and Departures, edited by Margot Weiss

Wiki Education help for faculty. Sign up for their info sessions!


College of Wooster’s Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies’s oral histories


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>764</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7a2a4f4-1634-11f0-80c8-4330c89f3a4f</guid>
      <title>David Wiles, &quot;Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democracy, argues David Wiles, is actually a form of theatre. In making his case, the author deftly investigates orators at the foundational moments of ancient and modern democracy, demonstrating how their performative skills were used to try to create a better world. People often complain about demagogues, or wish that politicians might be more sincere. But to do good, politicians (paradoxically) must be hypocrites - or actors. </p><p>Moving from Athens to Indian independence via three great revolutions – in Puritan England, republican France and liberal America – <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009167994">Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi </a>(Cambridge UP, 2024) opens up larger questions about the nature of democracy. When in the classical past Plato condemned rhetoric, the only alternative he could offer was authoritarianism. Wiles' bold historical study has profound implications for our present: calls for personal authenticity, he suggests, are not an effective way to counter the rise of populism.</p><ul>
<li>Brilliantly reveals the ways in which culture shapes politics, with apposite historical examples</li>
<li>Reframes politics as theatre, allowing politically-minded readers to reflect upon the way performance must always shape the democratic process and in turn allowing theatrically-oriented readers to look afresh at political processes</li>
<li>Proposes a novel and striking historical framing of contemporary issues – Brexit, Trump, political polarization – by using theatre as a tool to imaginatively unlock these issues</li>
<li>Deploys wide-ranging case studies to contrast the ancient Greek city-state with modern electoral democracy around the world</li>
</ul><p>David Wiles is Emeritus Professor of Drama at the University of Exeter. A British theatre historian, he specialises in classical and early modern theatre and has spent his career in departments of drama, where his teaching has always engaged with practice. His research interests include performance space and time, mask, acting and citizenship.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy, argues David Wiles, is actually a form of theatre. In making his case, the author deftly investigates orators at the foundational moments of ancient and modern democracy, demonstrating how their performative skills were used to try to create a better world. People often complain about demagogues, or wish that politicians might be more sincere. But to do good, politicians (paradoxically) must be hypocrites - or actors. </p><p>Moving from Athens to Indian independence via three great revolutions – in Puritan England, republican France and liberal America – <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009167994">Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi </a>(Cambridge UP, 2024) opens up larger questions about the nature of democracy. When in the classical past Plato condemned rhetoric, the only alternative he could offer was authoritarianism. Wiles' bold historical study has profound implications for our present: calls for personal authenticity, he suggests, are not an effective way to counter the rise of populism.</p><ul>
<li>Brilliantly reveals the ways in which culture shapes politics, with apposite historical examples</li>
<li>Reframes politics as theatre, allowing politically-minded readers to reflect upon the way performance must always shape the democratic process and in turn allowing theatrically-oriented readers to look afresh at political processes</li>
<li>Proposes a novel and striking historical framing of contemporary issues – Brexit, Trump, political polarization – by using theatre as a tool to imaginatively unlock these issues</li>
<li>Deploys wide-ranging case studies to contrast the ancient Greek city-state with modern electoral democracy around the world</li>
</ul><p>David Wiles is Emeritus Professor of Drama at the University of Exeter. A British theatre historian, he specialises in classical and early modern theatre and has spent his career in departments of drama, where his teaching has always engaged with practice. His research interests include performance space and time, mask, acting and citizenship.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65703929" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6de7b41f-89c3-48b0-b189-31e6cf16ae9c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6de7b41f-89c3-48b0-b189-31e6cf16ae9c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Wiles, &quot;Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democracy, argues David Wiles, is actually a form of theatre. In making his case, the author deftly investigates orators at the foundational moments of ancient and modern democracy, demonstrating how their performative skills were used to try to create a better world. People often complain about demagogues, or wish that politicians might be more sincere. But to do good, politicians (paradoxically) must be hypocrites - or actors. 
Moving from Athens to Indian independence via three great revolutions – in Puritan England, republican France and liberal America – Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi (Cambridge UP, 2024) opens up larger questions about the nature of democracy. When in the classical past Plato condemned rhetoric, the only alternative he could offer was authoritarianism. Wiles&apos; bold historical study has profound implications for our present: calls for personal authenticity, he suggests, are not an effective way to counter the rise of populism.

Brilliantly reveals the ways in which culture shapes politics, with apposite historical examples

Reframes politics as theatre, allowing politically-minded readers to reflect upon the way performance must always shape the democratic process and in turn allowing theatrically-oriented readers to look afresh at political processes

Proposes a novel and striking historical framing of contemporary issues – Brexit, Trump, political polarization – by using theatre as a tool to imaginatively unlock these issues

Deploys wide-ranging case studies to contrast the ancient Greek city-state with modern electoral democracy around the world

David Wiles is Emeritus Professor of Drama at the University of Exeter. A British theatre historian, he specialises in classical and early modern theatre and has spent his career in departments of drama, where his teaching has always engaged with practice. His research interests include performance space and time, mask, acting and citizenship.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democracy, argues David Wiles, is actually a form of theatre. In making his case, the author deftly investigates orators at the foundational moments of ancient and modern democracy, demonstrating how their performative skills were used to try to create a better world. People often complain about demagogues, or wish that politicians might be more sincere. But to do good, politicians (paradoxically) must be hypocrites - or actors. 
Moving from Athens to Indian independence via three great revolutions – in Puritan England, republican France and liberal America – Democracy, Theatre and Performance: From the Greeks to Gandhi (Cambridge UP, 2024) opens up larger questions about the nature of democracy. When in the classical past Plato condemned rhetoric, the only alternative he could offer was authoritarianism. Wiles&apos; bold historical study has profound implications for our present: calls for personal authenticity, he suggests, are not an effective way to counter the rise of populism.

Brilliantly reveals the ways in which culture shapes politics, with apposite historical examples

Reframes politics as theatre, allowing politically-minded readers to reflect upon the way performance must always shape the democratic process and in turn allowing theatrically-oriented readers to look afresh at political processes

Proposes a novel and striking historical framing of contemporary issues – Brexit, Trump, political polarization – by using theatre as a tool to imaginatively unlock these issues

Deploys wide-ranging case studies to contrast the ancient Greek city-state with modern electoral democracy around the world

David Wiles is Emeritus Professor of Drama at the University of Exeter. A British theatre historian, he specialises in classical and early modern theatre and has spent his career in departments of drama, where his teaching has always engaged with practice. His research interests include performance space and time, mask, acting and citizenship.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>533</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0ba6f4b2-162b-11f0-aba5-8b144e63bd30</guid>
      <title>Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, host Andrea Talabér (CEU Press) sat down with Muriel Blaive to talk about her new book with CEU Press, <a href="https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789633869338/pandemic-power"><em>Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique</em></a>. In the podcast we talked about the (failure of the) pandemic response, the necessity of critique, being shadowbanned on Facebook, censorship, and about liberal intellectuals abandoning their core values.</p><p><em>Pandemic Power</em> is available in Open Access, thanks to the support of the Austrian Science Fund. You can download a PDF copy <a href="https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/99327">here</a>.</p><p>You can purchase a physical copy <a href="https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789633869338/pandemic-power">here</a>.</p><p>During the podcast, we discussed the following article: Laura Spinney, “<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/09/covid-five-years-right-narrative-outbreak">Five years on, the right’s Covid narrative has been turbo-charged into the mainstream</a>”, The Observer, 9 March 2025.</p><p>Muriel frequently posts on <a href="https://x.com/murielblaivephd?s=21">X</a>.</p><p>The CEU Press Podcast delves into various aspects of the publishing process: from crafting a book proposal, finding a publisher, responding to peer review feedback on the manuscript, to the subsequent distribution, promotion and marketing of academic books. We also talk to series editors and authors, who will share their experiences of getting published and discuss their series or books.</p><p>Interested in CEU Press’s publications? Click here to find out more: <a href="https://ceupress.com/">https://ceupress.com/</a></p><p>Stay tuned for future episodes and subscribe to our podcast to be the first to be notified.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, host Andrea Talabér (CEU Press) sat down with Muriel Blaive to talk about her new book with CEU Press, <a href="https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789633869338/pandemic-power"><em>Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique</em></a>. In the podcast we talked about the (failure of the) pandemic response, the necessity of critique, being shadowbanned on Facebook, censorship, and about liberal intellectuals abandoning their core values.</p><p><em>Pandemic Power</em> is available in Open Access, thanks to the support of the Austrian Science Fund. You can download a PDF copy <a href="https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/99327">here</a>.</p><p>You can purchase a physical copy <a href="https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789633869338/pandemic-power">here</a>.</p><p>During the podcast, we discussed the following article: Laura Spinney, “<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/09/covid-five-years-right-narrative-outbreak">Five years on, the right’s Covid narrative has been turbo-charged into the mainstream</a>”, The Observer, 9 March 2025.</p><p>Muriel frequently posts on <a href="https://x.com/murielblaivephd?s=21">X</a>.</p><p>The CEU Press Podcast delves into various aspects of the publishing process: from crafting a book proposal, finding a publisher, responding to peer review feedback on the manuscript, to the subsequent distribution, promotion and marketing of academic books. We also talk to series editors and authors, who will share their experiences of getting published and discuss their series or books.</p><p>Interested in CEU Press’s publications? Click here to find out more: <a href="https://ceupress.com/">https://ceupress.com/</a></p><p>Stay tuned for future episodes and subscribe to our podcast to be the first to be notified.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57217816" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3c850bfa-987d-44f2-b514-d9296e566c40/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3c850bfa-987d-44f2-b514-d9296e566c40&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/7743b6/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/3c850bfa-987d-44f2-b514-d9296e566c40/3000x3000/e130cfd6e715f5ffa5a08164434a39d7.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, host Andrea Talabér (CEU Press) sat down with Muriel Blaive to talk about her new book with CEU Press, Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique. In the podcast we talked about the (failure of the) pandemic response, the necessity of critique, being shadowbanned on Facebook, censorship, and about liberal intellectuals abandoning their core values.
Pandemic Power is available in Open Access, thanks to the support of the Austrian Science Fund. You can download a PDF copy here.
You can purchase a physical copy here.
During the podcast, we discussed the following article: Laura Spinney, “Five years on, the right’s Covid narrative has been turbo-charged into the mainstream”, The Observer, 9 March 2025.
Muriel frequently posts on X.
The CEU Press Podcast delves into various aspects of the publishing process: from crafting a book proposal, finding a publisher, responding to peer review feedback on the manuscript, to the subsequent distribution, promotion and marketing of academic books. We also talk to series editors and authors, who will share their experiences of getting published and discuss their series or books.
Interested in CEU Press’s publications? Click here to find out more: https://ceupress.com/
Stay tuned for future episodes and subscribe to our podcast to be the first to be notified.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, host Andrea Talabér (CEU Press) sat down with Muriel Blaive to talk about her new book with CEU Press, Pandemic Power: The Covid Response and the Erosion of Democracy - A Liberal Critique. In the podcast we talked about the (failure of the) pandemic response, the necessity of critique, being shadowbanned on Facebook, censorship, and about liberal intellectuals abandoning their core values.
Pandemic Power is available in Open Access, thanks to the support of the Austrian Science Fund. You can download a PDF copy here.
You can purchase a physical copy here.
During the podcast, we discussed the following article: Laura Spinney, “Five years on, the right’s Covid narrative has been turbo-charged into the mainstream”, The Observer, 9 March 2025.
Muriel frequently posts on X.
The CEU Press Podcast delves into various aspects of the publishing process: from crafting a book proposal, finding a publisher, responding to peer review feedback on the manuscript, to the subsequent distribution, promotion and marketing of academic books. We also talk to series editors and authors, who will share their experiences of getting published and discuss their series or books.
Interested in CEU Press’s publications? Click here to find out more: https://ceupress.com/
Stay tuned for future episodes and subscribe to our podcast to be the first to be notified.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a56b2fde-1494-11f0-985c-cbd7fb64fb21</guid>
      <title>James Davison Hunter, &quot;Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”</p><p><br /></p><p>James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300274370"><em>Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America's Political Crisis</em> </a>(Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.</p><p><br /></p><p>Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”</p><p><br /></p><p>James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300274370"><em>Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America's Political Crisis</em> </a>(Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.</p><p><br /></p><p>Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33579071" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4d950531-03aa-4073-992f-1af7f71d9c6d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4d950531-03aa-4073-992f-1af7f71d9c6d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>James Davison Hunter, &quot;Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”

James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis (Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.

Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberal democracy in America has always contained contradictions—most notably, a noble but abstract commitment to freedom, justice, and equality that, tragically, has seldom been realized in practice. While these contradictions have caused dissent and even violence, there was always an underlying and evolving solidarity drawn from the cultural resources of America’s “hybrid Enlightenment.”

James Davison Hunter, who introduced the concept of “culture wars” thirty years ago, tells us in Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America&apos;s Political Crisis (Yale UP, 2024) that those historic sources of national solidarity have now largely dissolved. While a deepening political polarization is the most obvious sign of this, the true problem is not polarization per se but the absence of cultural resources to work through what divides us. The destructive logic that has filled the void only makes bridging our differences more challenging. In the end, all political regimes require some level of unity. If it cannot be generated organically, it will be imposed by force.

Can America’s political crisis be fixed? Can an Enlightenment-era institution—liberal democracy—survive and thrive in a post-Enlightenment world? If, for some, salvaging the older sources of national solidarity is neither possible sociologically, nor desirable politically or ethically, what cultural resources will support liberal democracy in the future?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7500ebc2-1237-11f0-9c32-bbcec0a86757</guid>
      <title>Matthew D&apos;Auria et al., &quot;The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The origins and nature of nationhood and nationalism continue to be topics of heated scholarly debate. This major new reference work with contributions from an international team of scholars provides a comprehensive account of ideas and practices of nationhood and nationalism from antiquity to the present. It considers both continuities and discontinuities, engaging critically and analytically with the scholarly literature in the field. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108781237">The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) also explores nationhood and nationalism's relationships with a wide variety of cultural practices and social institutions, in addition to the phenomenon's crucial political dimensions. Its wide range of regional case studies brings a truly global, comparative perspective to a field long constrained by Eurocentric assumptions. Volume I tracks turning points in the history of nationhood and nationalism from ancient times to the twentieth century. Volume II theorizes the connections between nationhood/nationalism and ideology, religion and culture. Together, they enable readers to understand the roots of how nationhood and nationalism function in the present day.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Cathie+Carmichael&amp;text=Cathie+Carmichael&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books-single-index">Cathie Carmichael</a>﻿ is Professor of European History at the University of East Anglia, Norwich.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Matthew+D%27Auria&amp;text=Matthew+D%27Auria&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books-single-index">Matthew D'Auria</a>﻿ is a Lecturer in Modern European History at the University of East Anglia.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/Aviel-Roshwald/e/B001HD21YW/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_3">Aviel Roshwald</a> is an American historian and Professor of history at Georgetown University.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The origins and nature of nationhood and nationalism continue to be topics of heated scholarly debate. This major new reference work with contributions from an international team of scholars provides a comprehensive account of ideas and practices of nationhood and nationalism from antiquity to the present. It considers both continuities and discontinuities, engaging critically and analytically with the scholarly literature in the field. </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108781237">The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism</a> (Cambridge UP, 2024) also explores nationhood and nationalism's relationships with a wide variety of cultural practices and social institutions, in addition to the phenomenon's crucial political dimensions. Its wide range of regional case studies brings a truly global, comparative perspective to a field long constrained by Eurocentric assumptions. Volume I tracks turning points in the history of nationhood and nationalism from ancient times to the twentieth century. Volume II theorizes the connections between nationhood/nationalism and ideology, religion and culture. Together, they enable readers to understand the roots of how nationhood and nationalism function in the present day.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Cathie+Carmichael&amp;text=Cathie+Carmichael&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books-single-index">Cathie Carmichael</a>﻿ is Professor of European History at the University of East Anglia, Norwich.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_2?ie=UTF8&amp;field-author=Matthew+D%27Auria&amp;text=Matthew+D%27Auria&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books-single-index">Matthew D'Auria</a>﻿ is a Lecturer in Modern European History at the University of East Anglia.</p><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com.au/Aviel-Roshwald/e/B001HD21YW/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_3">Aviel Roshwald</a> is an American historian and Professor of history at Georgetown University.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="87727394" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1f51ce49-86d3-44db-9515-df1516469e2f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1f51ce49-86d3-44db-9515-df1516469e2f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew D&apos;Auria et al., &quot;The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:31:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The origins and nature of nationhood and nationalism continue to be topics of heated scholarly debate. This major new reference work with contributions from an international team of scholars provides a comprehensive account of ideas and practices of nationhood and nationalism from antiquity to the present. It considers both continuities and discontinuities, engaging critically and analytically with the scholarly literature in the field. 
The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism (Cambridge UP, 2024) also explores nationhood and nationalism&apos;s relationships with a wide variety of cultural practices and social institutions, in addition to the phenomenon&apos;s crucial political dimensions. Its wide range of regional case studies brings a truly global, comparative perspective to a field long constrained by Eurocentric assumptions. Volume I tracks turning points in the history of nationhood and nationalism from ancient times to the twentieth century. Volume II theorizes the connections between nationhood/nationalism and ideology, religion and culture. Together, they enable readers to understand the roots of how nationhood and nationalism function in the present day.
Cathie Carmichael﻿ is Professor of European History at the University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Matthew D&apos;Auria﻿ is a Lecturer in Modern European History at the University of East Anglia.
Aviel Roshwald is an American historian and Professor of history at Georgetown University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The origins and nature of nationhood and nationalism continue to be topics of heated scholarly debate. This major new reference work with contributions from an international team of scholars provides a comprehensive account of ideas and practices of nationhood and nationalism from antiquity to the present. It considers both continuities and discontinuities, engaging critically and analytically with the scholarly literature in the field. 
The Cambridge History of Nationhood and Nationalism (Cambridge UP, 2024) also explores nationhood and nationalism&apos;s relationships with a wide variety of cultural practices and social institutions, in addition to the phenomenon&apos;s crucial political dimensions. Its wide range of regional case studies brings a truly global, comparative perspective to a field long constrained by Eurocentric assumptions. Volume I tracks turning points in the history of nationhood and nationalism from ancient times to the twentieth century. Volume II theorizes the connections between nationhood/nationalism and ideology, religion and culture. Together, they enable readers to understand the roots of how nationhood and nationalism function in the present day.
Cathie Carmichael﻿ is Professor of European History at the University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Matthew D&apos;Auria﻿ is a Lecturer in Modern European History at the University of East Anglia.
Aviel Roshwald is an American historian and Professor of history at Georgetown University.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>530</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1bc1b068-1233-11f0-8674-e71d11e9a7d9</guid>
      <title>Benjamin M. Studebaker, &quot;Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.</p><p>The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399534680"><em>Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies</em></a><em> </em>(Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.</p><p>Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.</p><p>Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3JwcqFCSwC9gwR6rUXwFFQ">Political Theory 101</a> and co-hosts the film podcast <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/7mXhhxC6BiUSXcjnwFWkB7">The Lack</a>.</p><p>Benjamin is also the author of <em>The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy</em> which <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-chronic-crisis-of-american-democracy#entry:233898@1:url">we spoke about in 2023</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.</p><p>The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399534680"><em>Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies</em></a><em> </em>(Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.</p><p>Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.</p><p>Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/3JwcqFCSwC9gwR6rUXwFFQ">Political Theory 101</a> and co-hosts the film podcast <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/7mXhhxC6BiUSXcjnwFWkB7">The Lack</a>.</p><p>Benjamin is also the author of <em>The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy</em> which <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-chronic-crisis-of-american-democracy#entry:233898@1:url">we spoke about in 2023</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54108234" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ca744ed6-9745-498f-af73-ae2d7a72163b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ca744ed6-9745-498f-af73-ae2d7a72163b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin M. Studebaker, &quot;Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.
The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies (Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.
Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.
Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts Political Theory 101 and co-hosts the film podcast The Lack.
Benjamin is also the author of The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy which we spoke about in 2023.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Liberal democracies don’t age gracefully. Established systems of governance like those of the UK and the US which once served as blueprints are today experiencing a profound crisis of legitimacy. In Britain, a landslide general election result was quickly followed by a catastrophic tumble in approval ratings. In the US presidential campaign, meanwhile, voters were told that democracy itself was on the ballot, with both candidates suggesting the election might well be the last one ever.
The consensus underpinning the world’s most powerful democracies is, indeed, waning. The populaces have developed a deep dissatisfaction with their governments’ political procedures, yet no credible alternatives have emerged. In his latest book Legitimacy in Liberal Democracies (Edinburgh UP, 2024), Benjamin Studebaker argues that the kinds of disagreements which historically led to political violence today instead just linger throughout the state and society. Without alternatives, liberal democracy’s legitimation crisis leads to neither reform nor revolution.
Studebaker depicts a legitimacy crisis rife with state capacity problems, in which citizens tell each other many conflicting legitimation stories as they search for ways to live with a dissatisfying political system they cannot replace. As different factions try to ‘save’ democracy in their own ways, they appear authoritarian to one another. Efforts to build legitimacy thus only spark greater inequality, pluralism, and ever-tighter gridlock.
Benjamin Studebaker is a political theorist. He holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge. He has written for Aeon, Sublation, Compact, Current Affairs, The Bellows, and Huffington Post, among others. He hosts Political Theory 101 and co-hosts the film podcast The Lack.
Benjamin is also the author of The Chronic Crisis of American Democracy which we spoke about in 2023.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">215e26c6-1195-11f0-8713-93e26ddb76fa</guid>
      <title>Adam J. Berinsky, &quot;Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political rumors and misinformation pollute the political landscape. This is not a recent phenomenon; before the currently rampant and unfounded rumors about a stolen election and vote-rigging, there were other rumors that continued to spread even after they were thoroughly debunked, including doubts about 9/11 (an “inside job”) and the furor over President Obama’s birthplace and birth certificate. If misinformation crowds out the truth, how can Americans communicate with one another about important issues? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691158389">Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It</a> (Princeton UP, 2023), Adam Berinsky examines why political rumors exist and persist despite their unsubstantiated and refuted claims, who is most likely to believe them, and how to combat them.</p><p><br /></p><p>Drawing on original survey and experimental data, Berinsky shows that a tendency toward conspiratorial thinking and vehement partisan attachment fuel belief in rumors. Yet the reach of rumors is wide, and Berinsky argues that in fighting misinformation, it is as important to target the undecided and the uncertain as it is the true believers. We’re all vulnerable to misinformation, and public skepticism about the veracity of political facts is damaging to democracy. Moreover, in a world where most people simply don’t pay attention to politics, political leaders are often guilty of disseminating false information—and failing to correct it when it is proven wrong. Berinsky suggests that we should focus on the messenger as much as the message of rumors. Just as important as how misinformation is debunked is who does the debunking.</p><p><strong>Adam J. Berinsky</strong> is the Mitsui Professor of Political Science at MIT and the founding director of the MIT Political Experiments Research Lab. A specialist in the fields of political behavior and public opinion, he is the author of <em>Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America</em> (Princeton) and <em>In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq</em>.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political rumors and misinformation pollute the political landscape. This is not a recent phenomenon; before the currently rampant and unfounded rumors about a stolen election and vote-rigging, there were other rumors that continued to spread even after they were thoroughly debunked, including doubts about 9/11 (an “inside job”) and the furor over President Obama’s birthplace and birth certificate. If misinformation crowds out the truth, how can Americans communicate with one another about important issues? In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691158389">Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It</a> (Princeton UP, 2023), Adam Berinsky examines why political rumors exist and persist despite their unsubstantiated and refuted claims, who is most likely to believe them, and how to combat them.</p><p><br /></p><p>Drawing on original survey and experimental data, Berinsky shows that a tendency toward conspiratorial thinking and vehement partisan attachment fuel belief in rumors. Yet the reach of rumors is wide, and Berinsky argues that in fighting misinformation, it is as important to target the undecided and the uncertain as it is the true believers. We’re all vulnerable to misinformation, and public skepticism about the veracity of political facts is damaging to democracy. Moreover, in a world where most people simply don’t pay attention to politics, political leaders are often guilty of disseminating false information—and failing to correct it when it is proven wrong. Berinsky suggests that we should focus on the messenger as much as the message of rumors. Just as important as how misinformation is debunked is who does the debunking.</p><p><strong>Adam J. Berinsky</strong> is the Mitsui Professor of Political Science at MIT and the founding director of the MIT Political Experiments Research Lab. A specialist in the fields of political behavior and public opinion, he is the author of <em>Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America</em> (Princeton) and <em>In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq</em>.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42316297" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d0f2eff6-ee82-4296-a2dc-8009bc25bbcd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d0f2eff6-ee82-4296-a2dc-8009bc25bbcd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam J. Berinsky, &quot;Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political rumors and misinformation pollute the political landscape. This is not a recent phenomenon; before the currently rampant and unfounded rumors about a stolen election and vote-rigging, there were other rumors that continued to spread even after they were thoroughly debunked, including doubts about 9/11 (an “inside job”) and the furor over President Obama’s birthplace and birth certificate. If misinformation crowds out the truth, how can Americans communicate with one another about important issues? In Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It (Princeton UP, 2023), Adam Berinsky examines why political rumors exist and persist despite their unsubstantiated and refuted claims, who is most likely to believe them, and how to combat them.

Drawing on original survey and experimental data, Berinsky shows that a tendency toward conspiratorial thinking and vehement partisan attachment fuel belief in rumors. Yet the reach of rumors is wide, and Berinsky argues that in fighting misinformation, it is as important to target the undecided and the uncertain as it is the true believers. We’re all vulnerable to misinformation, and public skepticism about the veracity of political facts is damaging to democracy. Moreover, in a world where most people simply don’t pay attention to politics, political leaders are often guilty of disseminating false information—and failing to correct it when it is proven wrong. Berinsky suggests that we should focus on the messenger as much as the message of rumors. Just as important as how misinformation is debunked is who does the debunking.
Adam J. Berinsky is the Mitsui Professor of Political Science at MIT and the founding director of the MIT Political Experiments Research Lab. A specialist in the fields of political behavior and public opinion, he is the author of Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America (Princeton) and In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political rumors and misinformation pollute the political landscape. This is not a recent phenomenon; before the currently rampant and unfounded rumors about a stolen election and vote-rigging, there were other rumors that continued to spread even after they were thoroughly debunked, including doubts about 9/11 (an “inside job”) and the furor over President Obama’s birthplace and birth certificate. If misinformation crowds out the truth, how can Americans communicate with one another about important issues? In Political Rumors: Why We Accept Misinformation and How to Fight It (Princeton UP, 2023), Adam Berinsky examines why political rumors exist and persist despite their unsubstantiated and refuted claims, who is most likely to believe them, and how to combat them.

Drawing on original survey and experimental data, Berinsky shows that a tendency toward conspiratorial thinking and vehement partisan attachment fuel belief in rumors. Yet the reach of rumors is wide, and Berinsky argues that in fighting misinformation, it is as important to target the undecided and the uncertain as it is the true believers. We’re all vulnerable to misinformation, and public skepticism about the veracity of political facts is damaging to democracy. Moreover, in a world where most people simply don’t pay attention to politics, political leaders are often guilty of disseminating false information—and failing to correct it when it is proven wrong. Berinsky suggests that we should focus on the messenger as much as the message of rumors. Just as important as how misinformation is debunked is who does the debunking.
Adam J. Berinsky is the Mitsui Professor of Political Science at MIT and the founding director of the MIT Political Experiments Research Lab. A specialist in the fields of political behavior and public opinion, he is the author of Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America (Princeton) and In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7137d76e-1177-11f0-bb76-b71ac5558ec2</guid>
      <title>Eric Min, &quot;Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Of all interstate conflicts across the last two centuries, two-thirds have ended through negotiated agreement. Wartime diplomacy is thus commonly seen as a costless and mechanical process solely designed to end fighting. But as Dr. Eric Min argues in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779244"><em>Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), that wartime negotiations are not just peacemaking tools. They are in fact a highly strategic activity that can also help states manage, fight, and potentially win wars.</p><p>To demonstrate that wartime talk does more than simply end hostilities, Dr. Min distinguishes between two kinds of negotiations: sincere and insincere. Whereas sincere negotiations are good faith honest attempts to reach peace, insincere negotiations exploit diplomacy for some other purpose, such as currying gaining political support or remobilizing forces. Two factors determine whether and how belligerents will negotiate: the amount of pressure that outside parties can place on belligerents them to engage in diplomacy, and information obtained from fighting on the battlefield.</p><p>Combining statistical and computational text analyses with qualitative case studies ranging from the War of the Roman Republic to the Korean War, Dr. Min shows that negotiations are more likely to occur with strong external pressures. A combination of such pressures and indeterminate battlefield activity, however, will most likely leads to insincere negotiations that may stoke fighting rather than end it. By revealing that diplomacy can sometimes be counterproductive to peace, <em>Words of War</em> compels us to rethink the assumption that it "cannot hurt" to promote diplomacy during war.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all interstate conflicts across the last two centuries, two-thirds have ended through negotiated agreement. Wartime diplomacy is thus commonly seen as a costless and mechanical process solely designed to end fighting. But as Dr. Eric Min argues in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779244"><em>Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), that wartime negotiations are not just peacemaking tools. They are in fact a highly strategic activity that can also help states manage, fight, and potentially win wars.</p><p>To demonstrate that wartime talk does more than simply end hostilities, Dr. Min distinguishes between two kinds of negotiations: sincere and insincere. Whereas sincere negotiations are good faith honest attempts to reach peace, insincere negotiations exploit diplomacy for some other purpose, such as currying gaining political support or remobilizing forces. Two factors determine whether and how belligerents will negotiate: the amount of pressure that outside parties can place on belligerents them to engage in diplomacy, and information obtained from fighting on the battlefield.</p><p>Combining statistical and computational text analyses with qualitative case studies ranging from the War of the Roman Republic to the Korean War, Dr. Min shows that negotiations are more likely to occur with strong external pressures. A combination of such pressures and indeterminate battlefield activity, however, will most likely leads to insincere negotiations that may stoke fighting rather than end it. By revealing that diplomacy can sometimes be counterproductive to peace, <em>Words of War</em> compels us to rethink the assumption that it "cannot hurt" to promote diplomacy during war.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54365773" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ec5dbdcd-5fb5-439b-9c9c-6cc90ce786b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ec5dbdcd-5fb5-439b-9c9c-6cc90ce786b8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Min, &quot;Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Of all interstate conflicts across the last two centuries, two-thirds have ended through negotiated agreement. Wartime diplomacy is thus commonly seen as a costless and mechanical process solely designed to end fighting. But as Dr. Eric Min argues in Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict (Cornell University Press, 2025), that wartime negotiations are not just peacemaking tools. They are in fact a highly strategic activity that can also help states manage, fight, and potentially win wars.
To demonstrate that wartime talk does more than simply end hostilities, Dr. Min distinguishes between two kinds of negotiations: sincere and insincere. Whereas sincere negotiations are good faith honest attempts to reach peace, insincere negotiations exploit diplomacy for some other purpose, such as currying gaining political support or remobilizing forces. Two factors determine whether and how belligerents will negotiate: the amount of pressure that outside parties can place on belligerents them to engage in diplomacy, and information obtained from fighting on the battlefield.
Combining statistical and computational text analyses with qualitative case studies ranging from the War of the Roman Republic to the Korean War, Dr. Min shows that negotiations are more likely to occur with strong external pressures. A combination of such pressures and indeterminate battlefield activity, however, will most likely leads to insincere negotiations that may stoke fighting rather than end it. By revealing that diplomacy can sometimes be counterproductive to peace, Words of War compels us to rethink the assumption that it &quot;cannot hurt&quot; to promote diplomacy during war.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Of all interstate conflicts across the last two centuries, two-thirds have ended through negotiated agreement. Wartime diplomacy is thus commonly seen as a costless and mechanical process solely designed to end fighting. But as Dr. Eric Min argues in Words of War: Negotiation as a Tool of Conflict (Cornell University Press, 2025), that wartime negotiations are not just peacemaking tools. They are in fact a highly strategic activity that can also help states manage, fight, and potentially win wars.
To demonstrate that wartime talk does more than simply end hostilities, Dr. Min distinguishes between two kinds of negotiations: sincere and insincere. Whereas sincere negotiations are good faith honest attempts to reach peace, insincere negotiations exploit diplomacy for some other purpose, such as currying gaining political support or remobilizing forces. Two factors determine whether and how belligerents will negotiate: the amount of pressure that outside parties can place on belligerents them to engage in diplomacy, and information obtained from fighting on the battlefield.
Combining statistical and computational text analyses with qualitative case studies ranging from the War of the Roman Republic to the Korean War, Dr. Min shows that negotiations are more likely to occur with strong external pressures. A combination of such pressures and indeterminate battlefield activity, however, will most likely leads to insincere negotiations that may stoke fighting rather than end it. By revealing that diplomacy can sometimes be counterproductive to peace, Words of War compels us to rethink the assumption that it &quot;cannot hurt&quot; to promote diplomacy during war.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>262</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df231408-1223-11f0-a094-9304cc1c4f52</guid>
      <title>Frances Yaping Wang, &quot;The Art of State Persuasion: China&apos;s Strategic Use of Media in Interstate Disputes&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do nations actively publicize previously overlooked disputes? And why does this domestic mobilization sometimes fail to result in aggressive policy measures? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197757505"><em>The Art of State Persuasion </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2024) delves into China's strategic use of state propaganda during crucial crisis events, particularly focusing on border disputes. Frances Wang aims to explain the diverse strategies employed in Chinese state media, analyzing why certain disputes are amplified while others are downplayed. This variation, as proposed, is contingent on the degree of alignment between Chinese state policy and public opinion. When public sentiment is more moderate than the state's foreign policy objectives, the government initiates a "mobilization campaign." Conversely, if public opinion is more hawkish than state policy, the authorities deploy a "pacification campaign" to mollify public sentiment.</p><p>Through a comprehensive examination of medium-N and case-study analyses, Wang elucidates these arguments. The research incorporates extensive textual analyses of media reports, interviews with officials and journalists, and archival data. The book also illuminates the mechanics of mobilization and pacification media campaigns, enabling policy makers to distinguish varying state foreign policy intentions. This book not only acknowledges the significance of public opinion but also illustrates how fluctuating public sentiment is delicately managed by the state through diverse discursive tactics. By highlighting the existence and relevance of pacification campaigns, <em>The Art of State Persuasion </em>enhances our understanding of propaganda, and challenges the traditional view of China's propaganda as uniformly aggressive, bringing to light a more nuanced picture especially in the domain of foreign policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do nations actively publicize previously overlooked disputes? And why does this domestic mobilization sometimes fail to result in aggressive policy measures? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197757505"><em>The Art of State Persuasion </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2024) delves into China's strategic use of state propaganda during crucial crisis events, particularly focusing on border disputes. Frances Wang aims to explain the diverse strategies employed in Chinese state media, analyzing why certain disputes are amplified while others are downplayed. This variation, as proposed, is contingent on the degree of alignment between Chinese state policy and public opinion. When public sentiment is more moderate than the state's foreign policy objectives, the government initiates a "mobilization campaign." Conversely, if public opinion is more hawkish than state policy, the authorities deploy a "pacification campaign" to mollify public sentiment.</p><p>Through a comprehensive examination of medium-N and case-study analyses, Wang elucidates these arguments. The research incorporates extensive textual analyses of media reports, interviews with officials and journalists, and archival data. The book also illuminates the mechanics of mobilization and pacification media campaigns, enabling policy makers to distinguish varying state foreign policy intentions. This book not only acknowledges the significance of public opinion but also illustrates how fluctuating public sentiment is delicately managed by the state through diverse discursive tactics. By highlighting the existence and relevance of pacification campaigns, <em>The Art of State Persuasion </em>enhances our understanding of propaganda, and challenges the traditional view of China's propaganda as uniformly aggressive, bringing to light a more nuanced picture especially in the domain of foreign policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22870032" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/689f98a1-583c-4c62-a212-9dcd3758c064/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=689f98a1-583c-4c62-a212-9dcd3758c064&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Frances Yaping Wang, &quot;The Art of State Persuasion: China&apos;s Strategic Use of Media in Interstate Disputes&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do nations actively publicize previously overlooked disputes? And why does this domestic mobilization sometimes fail to result in aggressive policy measures? 
The Art of State Persuasion (Oxford UP, 2024) delves into China&apos;s strategic use of state propaganda during crucial crisis events, particularly focusing on border disputes. Frances Wang aims to explain the diverse strategies employed in Chinese state media, analyzing why certain disputes are amplified while others are downplayed. This variation, as proposed, is contingent on the degree of alignment between Chinese state policy and public opinion. When public sentiment is more moderate than the state&apos;s foreign policy objectives, the government initiates a &quot;mobilization campaign.&quot; Conversely, if public opinion is more hawkish than state policy, the authorities deploy a &quot;pacification campaign&quot; to mollify public sentiment.
Through a comprehensive examination of medium-N and case-study analyses, Wang elucidates these arguments. The research incorporates extensive textual analyses of media reports, interviews with officials and journalists, and archival data. The book also illuminates the mechanics of mobilization and pacification media campaigns, enabling policy makers to distinguish varying state foreign policy intentions. This book not only acknowledges the significance of public opinion but also illustrates how fluctuating public sentiment is delicately managed by the state through diverse discursive tactics. By highlighting the existence and relevance of pacification campaigns, The Art of State Persuasion enhances our understanding of propaganda, and challenges the traditional view of China&apos;s propaganda as uniformly aggressive, bringing to light a more nuanced picture especially in the domain of foreign policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do nations actively publicize previously overlooked disputes? And why does this domestic mobilization sometimes fail to result in aggressive policy measures? 
The Art of State Persuasion (Oxford UP, 2024) delves into China&apos;s strategic use of state propaganda during crucial crisis events, particularly focusing on border disputes. Frances Wang aims to explain the diverse strategies employed in Chinese state media, analyzing why certain disputes are amplified while others are downplayed. This variation, as proposed, is contingent on the degree of alignment between Chinese state policy and public opinion. When public sentiment is more moderate than the state&apos;s foreign policy objectives, the government initiates a &quot;mobilization campaign.&quot; Conversely, if public opinion is more hawkish than state policy, the authorities deploy a &quot;pacification campaign&quot; to mollify public sentiment.
Through a comprehensive examination of medium-N and case-study analyses, Wang elucidates these arguments. The research incorporates extensive textual analyses of media reports, interviews with officials and journalists, and archival data. The book also illuminates the mechanics of mobilization and pacification media campaigns, enabling policy makers to distinguish varying state foreign policy intentions. This book not only acknowledges the significance of public opinion but also illustrates how fluctuating public sentiment is delicately managed by the state through diverse discursive tactics. By highlighting the existence and relevance of pacification campaigns, The Art of State Persuasion enhances our understanding of propaganda, and challenges the traditional view of China&apos;s propaganda as uniformly aggressive, bringing to light a more nuanced picture especially in the domain of foreign policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>263</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">76966e80-0fe4-11f0-a6f2-c7658b417de1</guid>
      <title>Populism, Power, and the Crisis of Globalism: A Conversation with Wolfgang Streeck</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What explains the growing divide between elites and the broader public in democracies across Europe and the United States? In this episode of International Horizons, sociologist Wolfgang Streeck joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss the rise of populism, the limits of globalism, and the tensions between democracy and capitalism. </p><p>Drawing from his recent book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839767296"><em>Taking Back Control? States and State Systems After Globalism</em></a><em> </em>(Verso, 2024), Streeck examines how market forces, technocracy, and the erosion of national sovereignty have fueled discontent across the transatlantic world. He also reflects on the educational divide shaping political cleavages, the challenges posed by immigration, and the implications of U.S. foreign policy and security commitments in Europe and beyond. The conversation explores the shifting foundations of the postwar international order and the prospects for a more democratic and egalitarian global system.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What explains the growing divide between elites and the broader public in democracies across Europe and the United States? In this episode of International Horizons, sociologist Wolfgang Streeck joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss the rise of populism, the limits of globalism, and the tensions between democracy and capitalism. </p><p>Drawing from his recent book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839767296"><em>Taking Back Control? States and State Systems After Globalism</em></a><em> </em>(Verso, 2024), Streeck examines how market forces, technocracy, and the erosion of national sovereignty have fueled discontent across the transatlantic world. He also reflects on the educational divide shaping political cleavages, the challenges posed by immigration, and the implications of U.S. foreign policy and security commitments in Europe and beyond. The conversation explores the shifting foundations of the postwar international order and the prospects for a more democratic and egalitarian global system.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34304010" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c41f8a46-88b4-405f-a4b1-6b4e68c0dd2d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c41f8a46-88b4-405f-a4b1-6b4e68c0dd2d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Populism, Power, and the Crisis of Globalism: A Conversation with Wolfgang Streeck</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What explains the growing divide between elites and the broader public in democracies across Europe and the United States? In this episode of International Horizons, sociologist Wolfgang Streeck joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss the rise of populism, the limits of globalism, and the tensions between democracy and capitalism. 
Drawing from his recent book, Taking Back Control? States and State Systems After Globalism (Verso, 2024), Streeck examines how market forces, technocracy, and the erosion of national sovereignty have fueled discontent across the transatlantic world. He also reflects on the educational divide shaping political cleavages, the challenges posed by immigration, and the implications of U.S. foreign policy and security commitments in Europe and beyond. The conversation explores the shifting foundations of the postwar international order and the prospects for a more democratic and egalitarian global system.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What explains the growing divide between elites and the broader public in democracies across Europe and the United States? In this episode of International Horizons, sociologist Wolfgang Streeck joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss the rise of populism, the limits of globalism, and the tensions between democracy and capitalism. 
Drawing from his recent book, Taking Back Control? States and State Systems After Globalism (Verso, 2024), Streeck examines how market forces, technocracy, and the erosion of national sovereignty have fueled discontent across the transatlantic world. He also reflects on the educational divide shaping political cleavages, the challenges posed by immigration, and the implications of U.S. foreign policy and security commitments in Europe and beyond. The conversation explores the shifting foundations of the postwar international order and the prospects for a more democratic and egalitarian global system.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8b370ba-0f28-11f0-b468-0728b0ff8f9a</guid>
      <title>Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: A Discussion with Alexander Lee and Jack Paine</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The debate about the impact of colonialism on the prospects for democracy and development continues to rage. Was the legacy of colonialism equally destructive everywhere? Or were some forms of colonial rule more likely to give rise to stable and effective democracies? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Alexander Lee and Jack Paine about their important new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009423533"><em>The Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024), which makes a compelling new contribution to the debate<em>. </em>Find out why countries with lengthy exposure to competitive colonial institutions tended to consolidate democracies after independence, and how regime trajectories shaped by colonial rule persist to the present day.</p><p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p><p><a href="https://www.rochester.edu/college/faculty/alexander_lee/">Alexander Lee</a> is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester. His work has made important contributions to a number of areas, including gender quotas, affirmative action, the political economy of South Asia and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, <em>Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</em> has been highly praised and is out now with Cambridge University Press.</p><p><a href="http://www.jackpaine.com/">Jack Paine</a> is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Political Science at Emory University. He is known for influential research on a range of topics including democratic backsliding, authoritarian power sharing, conflict and the resource curse, and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Colonial-Origins-Democracy-Dictatorship-Alexander/dp/1009423533">Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</a> has been highly praised and is out now with Oxford University Press.</p><p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate about the impact of colonialism on the prospects for democracy and development continues to rage. Was the legacy of colonialism equally destructive everywhere? Or were some forms of colonial rule more likely to give rise to stable and effective democracies? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Alexander Lee and Jack Paine about their important new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009423533"><em>The Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024), which makes a compelling new contribution to the debate<em>. </em>Find out why countries with lengthy exposure to competitive colonial institutions tended to consolidate democracies after independence, and how regime trajectories shaped by colonial rule persist to the present day.</p><p><strong>Guest</strong>:</p><p><a href="https://www.rochester.edu/college/faculty/alexander_lee/">Alexander Lee</a> is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester. His work has made important contributions to a number of areas, including gender quotas, affirmative action, the political economy of South Asia and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, <em>Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</em> has been highly praised and is out now with Cambridge University Press.</p><p><a href="http://www.jackpaine.com/">Jack Paine</a> is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Political Science at Emory University. He is known for influential research on a range of topics including democratic backsliding, authoritarian power sharing, conflict and the resource curse, and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Colonial-Origins-Democracy-Dictatorship-Alexander/dp/1009423533">Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship</a> has been highly praised and is out now with Oxford University Press.</p><p><strong>Presenter</strong>:</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33319342" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a3b5a52b-6040-4608-b470-0028bbfe6218/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a3b5a52b-6040-4608-b470-0028bbfe6218&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: A Discussion with Alexander Lee and Jack Paine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The debate about the impact of colonialism on the prospects for democracy and development continues to rage. Was the legacy of colonialism equally destructive everywhere? Or were some forms of colonial rule more likely to give rise to stable and effective democracies? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Alexander Lee and Jack Paine about their important new book, The Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship (Cambridge UP, 2024), which makes a compelling new contribution to the debate. Find out why countries with lengthy exposure to competitive colonial institutions tended to consolidate democracies after independence, and how regime trajectories shaped by colonial rule persist to the present day.
Guest:
Alexander Lee is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester. His work has made important contributions to a number of areas, including gender quotas, affirmative action, the political economy of South Asia and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship has been highly praised and is out now with Cambridge University Press.
Jack Paine is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Political Science at Emory University. He is known for influential research on a range of topics including democratic backsliding, authoritarian power sharing, conflict and the resource curse, and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship has been highly praised and is out now with Oxford University Press.
Presenter:
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The debate about the impact of colonialism on the prospects for democracy and development continues to rage. Was the legacy of colonialism equally destructive everywhere? Or were some forms of colonial rule more likely to give rise to stable and effective democracies? Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Alexander Lee and Jack Paine about their important new book, The Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship (Cambridge UP, 2024), which makes a compelling new contribution to the debate. Find out why countries with lengthy exposure to competitive colonial institutions tended to consolidate democracies after independence, and how regime trajectories shaped by colonial rule persist to the present day.
Guest:
Alexander Lee is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester. His work has made important contributions to a number of areas, including gender quotas, affirmative action, the political economy of South Asia and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship has been highly praised and is out now with Cambridge University Press.
Jack Paine is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Political Science at Emory University. He is known for influential research on a range of topics including democratic backsliding, authoritarian power sharing, conflict and the resource curse, and the legacy of colonialism. His most recent book, Colonial Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship has been highly praised and is out now with Oxford University Press.
Presenter:
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">103095d6-0f1b-11f0-94b3-6f57ffc8ce5c</guid>
      <title>We Have Never Been Woke: A Conversation with Musa al-Gharbi</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?</p><p>Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232607"><em>We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the "symbolic capital elite" and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past "great awakenings"—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining "wokeness" is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.</p><p>Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?</p><p>Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691232607"><em>We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the "symbolic capital elite" and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past "great awakenings"—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining "wokeness" is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.</p><p>Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42127220" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/09b1322a-24a1-4cfa-aad6-3ce6888d7cc4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=09b1322a-24a1-4cfa-aad6-3ce6888d7cc4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>We Have Never Been Woke: A Conversation with Musa al-Gharbi</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?
Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the &quot;symbolic capital elite&quot; and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past &quot;great awakenings&quot;—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining &quot;wokeness&quot; is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.
Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why does occupation reliably predict political leanings? What is social capitalism, and how does it span income classes? If social capitalists are sincerely committed to equality and “wokeness,” why do they simultaneously benefit from—and perpetuate—the very inequalities they denounce?
Join us as we dive into Musa al-Gharbi’s provocative new book, We Have Never Been Woke: The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite (Princeton University Press, 2024). We explore al-Gharbi’s central argument: the disconnect between the stated values of the &quot;symbolic capital elite&quot; and the real-world consequences of their actions, despite their genuine intentions. Al-Gharbi draws parallels to past &quot;great awakenings&quot;—periods of profound cultural upheaval and shifting attitudes toward civil rights. We also examine whether defining &quot;wokeness&quot; is essential to his thesis, and al-Gharbi clarifies some of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of his work.
Musa al-Gharbi is a sociologist and assistant professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University. A columnist for The Guardian, his writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, and other major publications.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>523</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">665a3c4a-0f35-11f0-9f54-576c4864f915</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Collective Action to Support Students at American Colleges and Universities</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A coalition of educators and allies has come together to push back against a variety of different kinds of attacks on higher education and students at colleges and universities, particularly in the United States. This group is driven by the belief that a democracy is only as strong as its commitments to academic freedom, intellectual integrity, human diversity, and individual dignity. The impetus among this particular group of academics and staff members is to make sure that students at all the campuses, in all the programs at those campuses across the United States are supported and free to engage in their chosen courses of study. The various ways in which this mission is being attacked or undermined, with the slashing of grants, attempts to control curriculum, freezing of campus free speech, snatching of students off the streets, and threats to the bottom line all contribute to destabilizing the educational paths of students, and the ability of the faculty and the staff to provide students with the education, research opportunities, and higher education experiences they are seeking at these institutions.</p><p>I am joined on this installment of <em>PostScript</em> by three members of an organic group of educators—across disciplines—who came together in the early days of the new Trump Administration to try to figure out how to best support students at different institutions. One of the results of this collaboration among academics and educators across disciplines, institutions, and parts of the country, was to craft a letter directed at university administrators, governmental entities, and the public, explaining the value and import of education, especially in a democracy, and the need for a diversity of voices and contributors to that enterprise. I discuss the origin of the group, the genesis of the letter (which is available to sign <a href="https://bit.ly/DemocracyAndHigherEdSign">here</a>), and the deep concerns among those who work in higher education in the United States with Alison Gash, Daniel Laurison, and Nathan Lents.</p><p><a href="https://cas.uoregon.edu/directory/cas-faculty/all/gash">Alison Gash</a> is Professor of Political Science and Head of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon. </p><p><a href="https://daniellaurison.com/">Daniel Laurison</a> is Associate Professor of Sociology at <a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/profile/daniel-laurison">Swarthmore College</a>, the former Editor-in-Chief of the British Journal of Sociology, and a 2021-2023 Carnegie Fellow. </p><p><a href="https://www.jjay.cuny.edu/faculty/nathan-h-lents">Nathan Lents</a> is Professor of Biology at John Jay College, </p><p>Links:</p><p><em>We are Higher Ed</em> Letter: <a href="https://bit.ly/DemocracyAndHigherEdSign">Speaking Out for Democracy and US Higher Education</a></p><p><em>We are Higher Ed</em> Website: <a href="https://www.wearehighered.org/">https://www.wearehighered.org/</a></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A coalition of educators and allies has come together to push back against a variety of different kinds of attacks on higher education and students at colleges and universities, particularly in the United States. This group is driven by the belief that a democracy is only as strong as its commitments to academic freedom, intellectual integrity, human diversity, and individual dignity. The impetus among this particular group of academics and staff members is to make sure that students at all the campuses, in all the programs at those campuses across the United States are supported and free to engage in their chosen courses of study. The various ways in which this mission is being attacked or undermined, with the slashing of grants, attempts to control curriculum, freezing of campus free speech, snatching of students off the streets, and threats to the bottom line all contribute to destabilizing the educational paths of students, and the ability of the faculty and the staff to provide students with the education, research opportunities, and higher education experiences they are seeking at these institutions.</p><p>I am joined on this installment of <em>PostScript</em> by three members of an organic group of educators—across disciplines—who came together in the early days of the new Trump Administration to try to figure out how to best support students at different institutions. One of the results of this collaboration among academics and educators across disciplines, institutions, and parts of the country, was to craft a letter directed at university administrators, governmental entities, and the public, explaining the value and import of education, especially in a democracy, and the need for a diversity of voices and contributors to that enterprise. I discuss the origin of the group, the genesis of the letter (which is available to sign <a href="https://bit.ly/DemocracyAndHigherEdSign">here</a>), and the deep concerns among those who work in higher education in the United States with Alison Gash, Daniel Laurison, and Nathan Lents.</p><p><a href="https://cas.uoregon.edu/directory/cas-faculty/all/gash">Alison Gash</a> is Professor of Political Science and Head of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon. </p><p><a href="https://daniellaurison.com/">Daniel Laurison</a> is Associate Professor of Sociology at <a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/profile/daniel-laurison">Swarthmore College</a>, the former Editor-in-Chief of the British Journal of Sociology, and a 2021-2023 Carnegie Fellow. </p><p><a href="https://www.jjay.cuny.edu/faculty/nathan-h-lents">Nathan Lents</a> is Professor of Biology at John Jay College, </p><p>Links:</p><p><em>We are Higher Ed</em> Letter: <a href="https://bit.ly/DemocracyAndHigherEdSign">Speaking Out for Democracy and US Higher Education</a></p><p><em>We are Higher Ed</em> Website: <a href="https://www.wearehighered.org/">https://www.wearehighered.org/</a></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40246457" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/5a1649c0-0187-4af7-aa04-f372a0b4bd71/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=5a1649c0-0187-4af7-aa04-f372a0b4bd71&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Collective Action to Support Students at American Colleges and Universities</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A coalition of educators and allies has come together to push back against a variety of different kinds of attacks on higher education and students at colleges and universities, particularly in the United States. This group is driven by the belief that a democracy is only as strong as its commitments to academic freedom, intellectual integrity, human diversity, and individual dignity. The impetus among this particular group of academics and staff members is to make sure that students at all the campuses, in all the programs at those campuses across the United States are supported and free to engage in their chosen courses of study. The various ways in which this mission is being attacked or undermined, with the slashing of grants, attempts to control curriculum, freezing of campus free speech, snatching of students off the streets, and threats to the bottom line all contribute to destabilizing the educational paths of students, and the ability of the faculty and the staff to provide students with the education, research opportunities, and higher education experiences they are seeking at these institutions.
I am joined on this installment of PostScript by three members of an organic group of educators—across disciplines—who came together in the early days of the new Trump Administration to try to figure out how to best support students at different institutions. One of the results of this collaboration among academics and educators across disciplines, institutions, and parts of the country, was to craft a letter directed at university administrators, governmental entities, and the public, explaining the value and import of education, especially in a democracy, and the need for a diversity of voices and contributors to that enterprise. I discuss the origin of the group, the genesis of the letter (which is available to sign here), and the deep concerns among those who work in higher education in the United States with Alison Gash, Daniel Laurison, and Nathan Lents.
Alison Gash is Professor of Political Science and Head of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon. 
Daniel Laurison is Associate Professor of Sociology at Swarthmore College, the former Editor-in-Chief of the British Journal of Sociology, and a 2021-2023 Carnegie Fellow. 
Nathan Lents is Professor of Biology at John Jay College, 
Links:
We are Higher Ed Letter: Speaking Out for Democracy and US Higher Education
We are Higher Ed Website: https://www.wearehighered.org/
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A coalition of educators and allies has come together to push back against a variety of different kinds of attacks on higher education and students at colleges and universities, particularly in the United States. This group is driven by the belief that a democracy is only as strong as its commitments to academic freedom, intellectual integrity, human diversity, and individual dignity. The impetus among this particular group of academics and staff members is to make sure that students at all the campuses, in all the programs at those campuses across the United States are supported and free to engage in their chosen courses of study. The various ways in which this mission is being attacked or undermined, with the slashing of grants, attempts to control curriculum, freezing of campus free speech, snatching of students off the streets, and threats to the bottom line all contribute to destabilizing the educational paths of students, and the ability of the faculty and the staff to provide students with the education, research opportunities, and higher education experiences they are seeking at these institutions.
I am joined on this installment of PostScript by three members of an organic group of educators—across disciplines—who came together in the early days of the new Trump Administration to try to figure out how to best support students at different institutions. One of the results of this collaboration among academics and educators across disciplines, institutions, and parts of the country, was to craft a letter directed at university administrators, governmental entities, and the public, explaining the value and import of education, especially in a democracy, and the need for a diversity of voices and contributors to that enterprise. I discuss the origin of the group, the genesis of the letter (which is available to sign here), and the deep concerns among those who work in higher education in the United States with Alison Gash, Daniel Laurison, and Nathan Lents.
Alison Gash is Professor of Political Science and Head of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon. 
Daniel Laurison is Associate Professor of Sociology at Swarthmore College, the former Editor-in-Chief of the British Journal of Sociology, and a 2021-2023 Carnegie Fellow. 
Nathan Lents is Professor of Biology at John Jay College, 
Links:
We are Higher Ed Letter: Speaking Out for Democracy and US Higher Education
We are Higher Ed Website: https://www.wearehighered.org/
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1abccc2-0cbd-11f0-a8ea-ef5cc764e34f</guid>
      <title>Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Global Media &amp; Communication podcast series, a multimodal project powered by the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication (CARGC) at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. At CARGC, we produce and promote critical, interdisciplinary, and multimodal research on global media and communication. We aim to bridge academic scholarship and public life, bringing the best scholarship to bear on enduring global questions and pressing contemporary issues.</p><p>Today, our host Juan Llamas-Rodriguez interviews Martín Echeverría about his book <em>Political Entertainment in a Post Authoritarian Democracy: Humor in the Mexican Media</em> (Routledge, 2024), co-written with Frida Rodelo.</p><p>In this episode you will hear about:</p><ul>
<li>The affordances and limitations of YouTube for the political media ecosystem</li>
<li>The role of memes in generating political interest among politically disinterested groups</li>
<li>How people’s distrust of news organizations impact the communication environment for political news</li>
<li>How restrictions on political speech have shifted in Mexico in the last few decades</li>
</ul><p><strong>Guest Biography:</strong></p><p><strong>Martín Echeverría</strong> is the Head of the Center for Studies in Political Communication at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico. He holds a PhD in Communication and Culture from the University of Seville, Spain, and serves as Co-Chair of the Political Communication Section of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR). His research, which focuses on the mediatization of politics, media systems, and the reception and political effects of media, has been published in leading journals such as <em>The International Journal of Press/Politics</em>, <em>International Journal of Communication</em>, <em>Journalism Studies</em>, and top Latin American outlets. He is the author and editor of several books, including <em>Media and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Mexico: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy</em> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and <em>Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy</em> (Routledge, 2023), the latter receiving the AEJMC 2024 Knudson Award for the best book on Latin American media in the United States.</p><p><strong>Host Biography:</strong></p><p><strong>Juan Llamas-Rodriguez</strong> is a researcher and educator interested in how media theories allow us to critically analyze social phenomena on a global scale. He works as assistant professor in the Annenberg School for Communication and associate director of the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of <em>Border Tunnels: A Media Theory of the US-Mexico Underground</em> (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) and <em>Y Tu Mamá También: A Queer Film Classic</em> (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2025), and editor of <em>Media Travels: Toward an Atlas of Global Media</em> (Amherst College Press, 2025).</p><p><strong>Credits</strong></p><ul>
<li>Interview by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez</li>
<li>Produced by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez </li>
<li>Edited by: Anna Gamarnik</li>
</ul><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> authoritarianism, memes, Mexico, political communication, political satire, YouTube</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Global Media &amp; Communication podcast series, a multimodal project powered by the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication (CARGC) at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. At CARGC, we produce and promote critical, interdisciplinary, and multimodal research on global media and communication. We aim to bridge academic scholarship and public life, bringing the best scholarship to bear on enduring global questions and pressing contemporary issues.</p><p>Today, our host Juan Llamas-Rodriguez interviews Martín Echeverría about his book <em>Political Entertainment in a Post Authoritarian Democracy: Humor in the Mexican Media</em> (Routledge, 2024), co-written with Frida Rodelo.</p><p>In this episode you will hear about:</p><ul>
<li>The affordances and limitations of YouTube for the political media ecosystem</li>
<li>The role of memes in generating political interest among politically disinterested groups</li>
<li>How people’s distrust of news organizations impact the communication environment for political news</li>
<li>How restrictions on political speech have shifted in Mexico in the last few decades</li>
</ul><p><strong>Guest Biography:</strong></p><p><strong>Martín Echeverría</strong> is the Head of the Center for Studies in Political Communication at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico. He holds a PhD in Communication and Culture from the University of Seville, Spain, and serves as Co-Chair of the Political Communication Section of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR). His research, which focuses on the mediatization of politics, media systems, and the reception and political effects of media, has been published in leading journals such as <em>The International Journal of Press/Politics</em>, <em>International Journal of Communication</em>, <em>Journalism Studies</em>, and top Latin American outlets. He is the author and editor of several books, including <em>Media and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Mexico: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy</em> (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and <em>Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy</em> (Routledge, 2023), the latter receiving the AEJMC 2024 Knudson Award for the best book on Latin American media in the United States.</p><p><strong>Host Biography:</strong></p><p><strong>Juan Llamas-Rodriguez</strong> is a researcher and educator interested in how media theories allow us to critically analyze social phenomena on a global scale. He works as assistant professor in the Annenberg School for Communication and associate director of the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of <em>Border Tunnels: A Media Theory of the US-Mexico Underground</em> (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) and <em>Y Tu Mamá También: A Queer Film Classic</em> (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2025), and editor of <em>Media Travels: Toward an Atlas of Global Media</em> (Amherst College Press, 2025).</p><p><strong>Credits</strong></p><ul>
<li>Interview by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez</li>
<li>Produced by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez </li>
<li>Edited by: Anna Gamarnik</li>
</ul><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> authoritarianism, memes, Mexico, political communication, political satire, YouTube</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54164470" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7bef8808-1c57-4124-a5d9-c0510ef9ebb2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7bef8808-1c57-4124-a5d9-c0510ef9ebb2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to the Global Media &amp; Communication podcast series, a multimodal project powered by the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication (CARGC) at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. At CARGC, we produce and promote critical, interdisciplinary, and multimodal research on global media and communication. We aim to bridge academic scholarship and public life, bringing the best scholarship to bear on enduring global questions and pressing contemporary issues.
Today, our host Juan Llamas-Rodriguez interviews Martín Echeverría about his book Political Entertainment in a Post Authoritarian Democracy: Humor in the Mexican Media (Routledge, 2024), co-written with Frida Rodelo.
In this episode you will hear about:

The affordances and limitations of YouTube for the political media ecosystem

The role of memes in generating political interest among politically disinterested groups

How people’s distrust of news organizations impact the communication environment for political news

How restrictions on political speech have shifted in Mexico in the last few decades

Guest Biography:
Martín Echeverría is the Head of the Center for Studies in Political Communication at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico. He holds a PhD in Communication and Culture from the University of Seville, Spain, and serves as Co-Chair of the Political Communication Section of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR). His research, which focuses on the mediatization of politics, media systems, and the reception and political effects of media, has been published in leading journals such as The International Journal of Press/Politics, International Journal of Communication, Journalism Studies, and top Latin American outlets. He is the author and editor of several books, including Media and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Mexico: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy (Routledge, 2023), the latter receiving the AEJMC 2024 Knudson Award for the best book on Latin American media in the United States.
Host Biography:
Juan Llamas-Rodriguez is a researcher and educator interested in how media theories allow us to critically analyze social phenomena on a global scale. He works as assistant professor in the Annenberg School for Communication and associate director of the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Border Tunnels: A Media Theory of the US-Mexico Underground (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) and Y Tu Mamá También: A Queer Film Classic (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2025), and editor of Media Travels: Toward an Atlas of Global Media (Amherst College Press, 2025).
Credits

Interview by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez

Produced by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez 

Edited by: Anna Gamarnik

Keywords: authoritarianism, memes, Mexico, political communication, political satire, YouTube
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to the Global Media &amp; Communication podcast series, a multimodal project powered by the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication (CARGC) at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. At CARGC, we produce and promote critical, interdisciplinary, and multimodal research on global media and communication. We aim to bridge academic scholarship and public life, bringing the best scholarship to bear on enduring global questions and pressing contemporary issues.
Today, our host Juan Llamas-Rodriguez interviews Martín Echeverría about his book Political Entertainment in a Post Authoritarian Democracy: Humor in the Mexican Media (Routledge, 2024), co-written with Frida Rodelo.
In this episode you will hear about:

The affordances and limitations of YouTube for the political media ecosystem

The role of memes in generating political interest among politically disinterested groups

How people’s distrust of news organizations impact the communication environment for political news

How restrictions on political speech have shifted in Mexico in the last few decades

Guest Biography:
Martín Echeverría is the Head of the Center for Studies in Political Communication at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico. He holds a PhD in Communication and Culture from the University of Seville, Spain, and serves as Co-Chair of the Political Communication Section of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR). His research, which focuses on the mediatization of politics, media systems, and the reception and political effects of media, has been published in leading journals such as The International Journal of Press/Politics, International Journal of Communication, Journalism Studies, and top Latin American outlets. He is the author and editor of several books, including Media and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Mexico: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) and Political Entertainment in a Post-Authoritarian Democracy (Routledge, 2023), the latter receiving the AEJMC 2024 Knudson Award for the best book on Latin American media in the United States.
Host Biography:
Juan Llamas-Rodriguez is a researcher and educator interested in how media theories allow us to critically analyze social phenomena on a global scale. He works as assistant professor in the Annenberg School for Communication and associate director of the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Border Tunnels: A Media Theory of the US-Mexico Underground (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) and Y Tu Mamá También: A Queer Film Classic (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2025), and editor of Media Travels: Toward an Atlas of Global Media (Amherst College Press, 2025).
Credits

Interview by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez

Produced by: Juan Llamas-Rodriguez 

Edited by: Anna Gamarnik

Keywords: authoritarianism, memes, Mexico, political communication, political satire, YouTube
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93334754-0cb8-11f0-b419-879874220d6b</guid>
      <title>Postscript: History, Narratives, and Political Power--An Emergency Oral History Project</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate "divisive race-centered ideology" from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.</p><p>While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.</p><p>Today’s guests are two historians featured in <a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ">a <em>Washington Post</em> article</a> on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-m-chernesky-phd-bba2b429/">Dr. Jason Chernesky</a> is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.</p><p><a href="https://www.oah.org/beth-english/">Dr. Beth English</a> is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/">Emergency Oral History Project</a> for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ">Gift link to the <em>Washington Post</em> article</a> by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/origins-fda-history-office">“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website</a></li>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/">Joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/">Organization of American Historians</a>
</li>
<li>Previous <em>Postscripts </em>with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-donald-trump-is-erasing-history-what-you-can-do-about-it#entry:382471@1:url"><em>Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it</em></a>) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship#entry:384118@1:url"><em>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</em></a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.oah.org/donate">Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate "divisive race-centered ideology" from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.</p><p>While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.</p><p>Today’s guests are two historians featured in <a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ">a <em>Washington Post</em> article</a> on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-m-chernesky-phd-bba2b429/">Dr. Jason Chernesky</a> is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.</p><p><a href="https://www.oah.org/beth-english/">Dr. Beth English</a> is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/">Emergency Oral History Project</a> for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://wapo.st/4cdjRFQ">Gift link to the <em>Washington Post</em> article</a> by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project</li>
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/origins-fda-history-office">“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website</a></li>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/">Joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/">Organization of American Historians</a>
</li>
<li>Previous <em>Postscripts </em>with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-donald-trump-is-erasing-history-what-you-can-do-about-it#entry:382471@1:url"><em>Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it</em></a>) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship#entry:384118@1:url"><em>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</em></a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.oah.org/donate">Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42601356" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7f00ff6f-18a3-41fc-85b3-1dde53c13e03/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7f00ff6f-18a3-41fc-85b3-1dde53c13e03&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: History, Narratives, and Political Power--An Emergency Oral History Project</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate &quot;divisive race-centered ideology&quot; from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.
While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.
Today’s guests are two historians featured in a Washington Post article on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.
Dr. Jason Chernesky is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.
Dr. Beth English is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Mentioned in the podcast:

OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)


Gift link to the Washington Post article by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project

“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website

Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans


Joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians


Previous Postscripts with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship)

Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>President Donald Trump has threatened the federal funding and jobs of institutions and individuals that document, archive, and analyze historical materials. On March 27, 2025, Trump signed “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” an executive order that directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate &quot;divisive race-centered ideology&quot; from Smithsonian museums, educational and research centers, and the National Zoo and to “restore” American history.
While Trump has framed these actions as “efficiency” measures or removing bias in favor of women and underrepresented minorities, they are better understood as removing professionals who preserve the images and documents that politicians and public officials use to create powerful narratives.
Today’s guests are two historians featured in a Washington Post article on the firing of federal historians and the new oral history project designed to capture the history of federal firings, layoffs, and the current work climate.
Dr. Jason Chernesky is a historian of medicine, public health, and environmental history whose research focuses on child health issues in the United States. Jason was the historian for the Food and Drug Administration until receiving a termination letter in February 2025. He is now on temporary administrative leave and the creator of the emergency oral history project.
Dr. Beth English is the Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. Beth has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Mentioned in the podcast:

OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project for federal workers (fired, on leave, or currently working)


Gift link to the Washington Post article by Kyle Swenson about the oral history project

“Origins of the FDA History Office” on the FDA website

Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans


Joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians


Previous Postscripts with historian Dr. Wendy Rouse (Donald Trump is Erasing History – and what YOU can do about it) and executive directors of AHA and OAH, Drs. Jim Grossman and Beth English (Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship)

Donate to the Emergency Oral History Project


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>520</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5dc98be-0bcf-11f0-ac2d-7f81bdb6a06c</guid>
      <title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a> (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. <em>Savages and Citizens</em> makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a> (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. <em>Savages and Citizens</em> makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56612298" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ea475778-ff71-499c-beac-bda9eb8b5fb5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ea475778-ff71-499c-beac-bda9eb8b5fb5&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8fd928a0-0b49-11f0-94e1-b70d25742abf</guid>
      <title>Rhys Machold, &quot;Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Homeland security is rarely just a matter of the homeland; it involves the circulation and multiplication of policing practices across borders. Though the term "homeland security" is closely associated with the United States, Israel is credited with first developing this all-encompassing approach to domestic surveillance and territorial control. Today, it is a central node in the sprawling global homeland security industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, India emerged as a major growth market. Known as "India's 9/11" or simply "26/11," the attacks sparked significant public pressure to adopt "modern" homeland security approaches. Since 2008, India has become not only the single largest buyer of Israeli conventional weapons, but also a range of other surveillance technology, police training, and security expertise.</p><p>Pairing insights from science and technology studies with those from decolonial and postcolonial theory, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640719">Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel </a>(Stanford UP, 2024) traces 26/11's political and policy fallout, concentrating on the efforts of Israel's homeland security industry to advise and equip Indian city and state governments. Through a focus on the often unseen and overlooked political struggles at work in the making of homeland security, Rhys Machold details how homeland security is a universalizing project, which seeks to remake the world in its image, and tells the story of how claims to global authority are fabricated and put to work.</p><p><a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/rhysmachold/#biography">Rhys Machold</a> is Senior Lecturer in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Glasgow. His work focuses on imperialism, colonialism, and empire, working from a transnational approach. He is an editor at Critical Studies on Security and an editorial board member at International Studies Review. He held research and teaching appointments at York University (Canada), the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and Wilfrid Laurier University.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.ncl.ac.uk/gps/staff/profile/denizyonucu.html">Deniz Yonucu</a> is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology at Newcastle University. Her work focuses on policing and security, surveillance, left-wing and anti-colonial resistance, memory, and racism. Her monograph <a href="https://denizyonucu.com/book-police-provocation-politics"><em>Police, Provocation, Politics</em></a><em>: Counterinsurgency in Istanbul</em> is the winner of the 2023 Anthony Leeds Prize for the best book in urban anthropology, awarded by the Critical Urban Anthropology Section of the American Anthropological Association.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homeland security is rarely just a matter of the homeland; it involves the circulation and multiplication of policing practices across borders. Though the term "homeland security" is closely associated with the United States, Israel is credited with first developing this all-encompassing approach to domestic surveillance and territorial control. Today, it is a central node in the sprawling global homeland security industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, India emerged as a major growth market. Known as "India's 9/11" or simply "26/11," the attacks sparked significant public pressure to adopt "modern" homeland security approaches. Since 2008, India has become not only the single largest buyer of Israeli conventional weapons, but also a range of other surveillance technology, police training, and security expertise.</p><p>Pairing insights from science and technology studies with those from decolonial and postcolonial theory, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640719">Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel </a>(Stanford UP, 2024) traces 26/11's political and policy fallout, concentrating on the efforts of Israel's homeland security industry to advise and equip Indian city and state governments. Through a focus on the often unseen and overlooked political struggles at work in the making of homeland security, Rhys Machold details how homeland security is a universalizing project, which seeks to remake the world in its image, and tells the story of how claims to global authority are fabricated and put to work.</p><p><a href="https://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/rhysmachold/#biography">Rhys Machold</a> is Senior Lecturer in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Glasgow. His work focuses on imperialism, colonialism, and empire, working from a transnational approach. He is an editor at Critical Studies on Security and an editorial board member at International Studies Review. He held research and teaching appointments at York University (Canada), the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and Wilfrid Laurier University.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.ncl.ac.uk/gps/staff/profile/denizyonucu.html">Deniz Yonucu</a> is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology at Newcastle University. Her work focuses on policing and security, surveillance, left-wing and anti-colonial resistance, memory, and racism. Her monograph <a href="https://denizyonucu.com/book-police-provocation-politics"><em>Police, Provocation, Politics</em></a><em>: Counterinsurgency in Istanbul</em> is the winner of the 2023 Anthony Leeds Prize for the best book in urban anthropology, awarded by the Critical Urban Anthropology Section of the American Anthropological Association.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33645640" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2e23cd15-9775-4884-a82c-2deee662c282/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2e23cd15-9775-4884-a82c-2deee662c282&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rhys Machold, &quot;Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Homeland security is rarely just a matter of the homeland; it involves the circulation and multiplication of policing practices across borders. Though the term &quot;homeland security&quot; is closely associated with the United States, Israel is credited with first developing this all-encompassing approach to domestic surveillance and territorial control. Today, it is a central node in the sprawling global homeland security industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, India emerged as a major growth market. Known as &quot;India&apos;s 9/11&quot; or simply &quot;26/11,&quot; the attacks sparked significant public pressure to adopt &quot;modern&quot; homeland security approaches. Since 2008, India has become not only the single largest buyer of Israeli conventional weapons, but also a range of other surveillance technology, police training, and security expertise.
Pairing insights from science and technology studies with those from decolonial and postcolonial theory, Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel (Stanford UP, 2024) traces 26/11&apos;s political and policy fallout, concentrating on the efforts of Israel&apos;s homeland security industry to advise and equip Indian city and state governments. Through a focus on the often unseen and overlooked political struggles at work in the making of homeland security, Rhys Machold details how homeland security is a universalizing project, which seeks to remake the world in its image, and tells the story of how claims to global authority are fabricated and put to work.
Rhys Machold is Senior Lecturer in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Glasgow. His work focuses on imperialism, colonialism, and empire, working from a transnational approach. He is an editor at Critical Studies on Security and an editorial board member at International Studies Review. He held research and teaching appointments at York University (Canada), the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and Wilfrid Laurier University.

Deniz Yonucu is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology at Newcastle University. Her work focuses on policing and security, surveillance, left-wing and anti-colonial resistance, memory, and racism. Her monograph Police, Provocation, Politics: Counterinsurgency in Istanbul is the winner of the 2023 Anthony Leeds Prize for the best book in urban anthropology, awarded by the Critical Urban Anthropology Section of the American Anthropological Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Homeland security is rarely just a matter of the homeland; it involves the circulation and multiplication of policing practices across borders. Though the term &quot;homeland security&quot; is closely associated with the United States, Israel is credited with first developing this all-encompassing approach to domestic surveillance and territorial control. Today, it is a central node in the sprawling global homeland security industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, India emerged as a major growth market. Known as &quot;India&apos;s 9/11&quot; or simply &quot;26/11,&quot; the attacks sparked significant public pressure to adopt &quot;modern&quot; homeland security approaches. Since 2008, India has become not only the single largest buyer of Israeli conventional weapons, but also a range of other surveillance technology, police training, and security expertise.
Pairing insights from science and technology studies with those from decolonial and postcolonial theory, Fabricating Homeland Security: Police Entanglements Across India and Palestine/Israel (Stanford UP, 2024) traces 26/11&apos;s political and policy fallout, concentrating on the efforts of Israel&apos;s homeland security industry to advise and equip Indian city and state governments. Through a focus on the often unseen and overlooked political struggles at work in the making of homeland security, Rhys Machold details how homeland security is a universalizing project, which seeks to remake the world in its image, and tells the story of how claims to global authority are fabricated and put to work.
Rhys Machold is Senior Lecturer in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Glasgow. His work focuses on imperialism, colonialism, and empire, working from a transnational approach. He is an editor at Critical Studies on Security and an editorial board member at International Studies Review. He held research and teaching appointments at York University (Canada), the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and Wilfrid Laurier University.

Deniz Yonucu is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology at Newcastle University. Her work focuses on policing and security, surveillance, left-wing and anti-colonial resistance, memory, and racism. Her monograph Police, Provocation, Politics: Counterinsurgency in Istanbul is the winner of the 2023 Anthony Leeds Prize for the best book in urban anthropology, awarded by the Critical Urban Anthropology Section of the American Anthropological Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">883e794c-0275-11f0-8ac0-8310cd18f22b</guid>
      <title>Amy Adamczyk, &quot;Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Most people think about abortion in the context of the country they live in. In the U.S., abortion fuels debate, elections, and legislation. In China, abortion is often treated as a settled issue. Why and how do abortion attitudes vary across the world? </p><p>In her new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197761052"><em>Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025)<em>, </em>Dr. Amy Adamczyk examines the factors influencing cross-national abortion opinion, rates and individual abortion decisions. She investigates the relationship between attitudes and laws, and explores how personal and national characteristics shape views on abortion. Using large-scale public opinion surveys, interviews from two case study countries, and an analysis of newspaper articles from over 40 countries, she argues that cross-national differences in public opinion can largely be explained based on overall levels of religious belief, economic and educational development, type of government and government history, and gender inequality. The book distinguishes beliefs from behaviors and macro factors from personal characteristics to analyze the forces shaping cross-national abortion rates and personal abortion decisions.</p><p><a href="http://amyadamczyk.com/">Dr. Amy Adamczyk</a> is a sociology professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center at the City University of New York. Her work unravels the religious, cultural and social forces shaping public opinion on controversial issues like abortion, same-sex relations, premarital sex, and marijuana and terrorism. Her many earlier books include, <em>Cross-National Public Opinion about Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes across the Globe</em> (University of California Press 2017).</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp">World Values Study</a> (free database)</li>
<li>Amy Adamczyk, Brittany Suh, and Lindsay Lerner, <a href="https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/561/">“Analysis of the Relationship between Religion, Abortion, and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Insights into Cross-National Public Opinion”</a> (2024) (free access to article)</li>
<li>Ronald Inglehart and Wayne E. Baker, “<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230557601_Modernization_Cultural_Change_and_the_Persistence_of_Traditional_Values">Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values” (2000) </a>(free access to article)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people think about abortion in the context of the country they live in. In the U.S., abortion fuels debate, elections, and legislation. In China, abortion is often treated as a settled issue. Why and how do abortion attitudes vary across the world? </p><p>In her new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197761052"><em>Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2025)<em>, </em>Dr. Amy Adamczyk examines the factors influencing cross-national abortion opinion, rates and individual abortion decisions. She investigates the relationship between attitudes and laws, and explores how personal and national characteristics shape views on abortion. Using large-scale public opinion surveys, interviews from two case study countries, and an analysis of newspaper articles from over 40 countries, she argues that cross-national differences in public opinion can largely be explained based on overall levels of religious belief, economic and educational development, type of government and government history, and gender inequality. The book distinguishes beliefs from behaviors and macro factors from personal characteristics to analyze the forces shaping cross-national abortion rates and personal abortion decisions.</p><p><a href="http://amyadamczyk.com/">Dr. Amy Adamczyk</a> is a sociology professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center at the City University of New York. Her work unravels the religious, cultural and social forces shaping public opinion on controversial issues like abortion, same-sex relations, premarital sex, and marijuana and terrorism. Her many earlier books include, <em>Cross-National Public Opinion about Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes across the Globe</em> (University of California Press 2017).</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp">World Values Study</a> (free database)</li>
<li>Amy Adamczyk, Brittany Suh, and Lindsay Lerner, <a href="https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/561/">“Analysis of the Relationship between Religion, Abortion, and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Insights into Cross-National Public Opinion”</a> (2024) (free access to article)</li>
<li>Ronald Inglehart and Wayne E. Baker, “<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230557601_Modernization_Cultural_Change_and_the_Persistence_of_Traditional_Values">Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values” (2000) </a>(free access to article)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50496949" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/696b8158-e32b-47ed-ad88-578eefeb90a4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=696b8158-e32b-47ed-ad88-578eefeb90a4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy Adamczyk, &quot;Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Most people think about abortion in the context of the country they live in. In the U.S., abortion fuels debate, elections, and legislation. In China, abortion is often treated as a settled issue. Why and how do abortion attitudes vary across the world? 
In her new book, Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion (Oxford UP, 2025), Dr. Amy Adamczyk examines the factors influencing cross-national abortion opinion, rates and individual abortion decisions. She investigates the relationship between attitudes and laws, and explores how personal and national characteristics shape views on abortion. Using large-scale public opinion surveys, interviews from two case study countries, and an analysis of newspaper articles from over 40 countries, she argues that cross-national differences in public opinion can largely be explained based on overall levels of religious belief, economic and educational development, type of government and government history, and gender inequality. The book distinguishes beliefs from behaviors and macro factors from personal characteristics to analyze the forces shaping cross-national abortion rates and personal abortion decisions.
Dr. Amy Adamczyk is a sociology professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center at the City University of New York. Her work unravels the religious, cultural and social forces shaping public opinion on controversial issues like abortion, same-sex relations, premarital sex, and marijuana and terrorism. Her many earlier books include, Cross-National Public Opinion about Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes across the Globe (University of California Press 2017).
Mentioned:


World Values Study (free database)

Amy Adamczyk, Brittany Suh, and Lindsay Lerner, “Analysis of the Relationship between Religion, Abortion, and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Insights into Cross-National Public Opinion” (2024) (free access to article)

Ronald Inglehart and Wayne E. Baker, “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values” (2000) (free access to article)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Most people think about abortion in the context of the country they live in. In the U.S., abortion fuels debate, elections, and legislation. In China, abortion is often treated as a settled issue. Why and how do abortion attitudes vary across the world? 
In her new book, Fetal Positions: Understanding Cross-National Public Opinion about Abortion (Oxford UP, 2025), Dr. Amy Adamczyk examines the factors influencing cross-national abortion opinion, rates and individual abortion decisions. She investigates the relationship between attitudes and laws, and explores how personal and national characteristics shape views on abortion. Using large-scale public opinion surveys, interviews from two case study countries, and an analysis of newspaper articles from over 40 countries, she argues that cross-national differences in public opinion can largely be explained based on overall levels of religious belief, economic and educational development, type of government and government history, and gender inequality. The book distinguishes beliefs from behaviors and macro factors from personal characteristics to analyze the forces shaping cross-national abortion rates and personal abortion decisions.
Dr. Amy Adamczyk is a sociology professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center at the City University of New York. Her work unravels the religious, cultural and social forces shaping public opinion on controversial issues like abortion, same-sex relations, premarital sex, and marijuana and terrorism. Her many earlier books include, Cross-National Public Opinion about Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes across the Globe (University of California Press 2017).
Mentioned:


World Values Study (free database)

Amy Adamczyk, Brittany Suh, and Lindsay Lerner, “Analysis of the Relationship between Religion, Abortion, and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Insights into Cross-National Public Opinion” (2024) (free access to article)

Ronald Inglehart and Wayne E. Baker, “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values” (2000) (free access to article)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>759</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92ec3dec-072b-11f0-b33c-03b3b2ce22cb</guid>
      <title>Human Rights in the Trump Era: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321"><em>Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments</em></a><em> </em>(Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump's dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321"><em>Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments</em></a><em> </em>(Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump's dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27888609" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/66c9110c-1148-4216-9c6f-c159582acee4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=66c9110c-1148-4216-9c6f-c159582acee4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Human Rights in the Trump Era: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments (Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump&apos;s dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth’s recent book, Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments (Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump&apos;s dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>164</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">312fb812-068c-11f0-859a-0fcd6e0dc2f8</guid>
      <title>Madhavi Devasher, &quot;Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032504506">Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation</a> (Routledge, 2024) explains why, how, and where ethnic political parties unexpectedly seek votes from non-coethnics and when voters support non-coethnic parties. It draws on case studies of three Indian states (Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan) and of Indian national elections to demonstrate how differences in party systems impact political party strategies and voter choices. It shows that multipolar party systems encourage political parties to provide physical security, representation, and economic benefits for minorities, especially Muslims, in India and as a result, foster cross-ethnic links between parties and voters. However, as political arenas become dominated by two or even one party, advocacy for the interests of marginalized groups declines, weakening cross-ethnic linkages. The book thus explains why representation and advocacy for Muslims in Uttar Pradesh and at the national level has alternated dramatically in the 21st century.</p><p>Yash is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the School of Public and International Affairs, University of Cincinnati. His research is focused on the interactions of political mobilization and anti-minority violence within Hindu nationalist organizations in India.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/YASHsh">Twitter</a></p><p>Email: <a href="mailto:sharmaym@mail.uc.edu">sharmaym@mail.uc.edu</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032504506">Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation</a> (Routledge, 2024) explains why, how, and where ethnic political parties unexpectedly seek votes from non-coethnics and when voters support non-coethnic parties. It draws on case studies of three Indian states (Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan) and of Indian national elections to demonstrate how differences in party systems impact political party strategies and voter choices. It shows that multipolar party systems encourage political parties to provide physical security, representation, and economic benefits for minorities, especially Muslims, in India and as a result, foster cross-ethnic links between parties and voters. However, as political arenas become dominated by two or even one party, advocacy for the interests of marginalized groups declines, weakening cross-ethnic linkages. The book thus explains why representation and advocacy for Muslims in Uttar Pradesh and at the national level has alternated dramatically in the 21st century.</p><p>Yash is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the School of Public and International Affairs, University of Cincinnati. His research is focused on the interactions of political mobilization and anti-minority violence within Hindu nationalist organizations in India.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/YASHsh">Twitter</a></p><p>Email: <a href="mailto:sharmaym@mail.uc.edu">sharmaym@mail.uc.edu</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34916492" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6978a3a8-27f3-4968-a277-ca5a0ab59711/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6978a3a8-27f3-4968-a277-ca5a0ab59711&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Madhavi Devasher, &quot;Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation (Routledge, 2024) explains why, how, and where ethnic political parties unexpectedly seek votes from non-coethnics and when voters support non-coethnic parties. It draws on case studies of three Indian states (Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan) and of Indian national elections to demonstrate how differences in party systems impact political party strategies and voter choices. It shows that multipolar party systems encourage political parties to provide physical security, representation, and economic benefits for minorities, especially Muslims, in India and as a result, foster cross-ethnic links between parties and voters. However, as political arenas become dominated by two or even one party, advocacy for the interests of marginalized groups declines, weakening cross-ethnic linkages. The book thus explains why representation and advocacy for Muslims in Uttar Pradesh and at the national level has alternated dramatically in the 21st century.
Yash is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the School of Public and International Affairs, University of Cincinnati. His research is focused on the interactions of political mobilization and anti-minority violence within Hindu nationalist organizations in India.
Twitter
Email: sharmaym@mail.uc.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Crossing Lines: Cross-Ethnic Coalitions in India and Prospects for Minority Representation (Routledge, 2024) explains why, how, and where ethnic political parties unexpectedly seek votes from non-coethnics and when voters support non-coethnic parties. It draws on case studies of three Indian states (Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan) and of Indian national elections to demonstrate how differences in party systems impact political party strategies and voter choices. It shows that multipolar party systems encourage political parties to provide physical security, representation, and economic benefits for minorities, especially Muslims, in India and as a result, foster cross-ethnic links between parties and voters. However, as political arenas become dominated by two or even one party, advocacy for the interests of marginalized groups declines, weakening cross-ethnic linkages. The book thus explains why representation and advocacy for Muslims in Uttar Pradesh and at the national level has alternated dramatically in the 21st century.
Yash is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the School of Public and International Affairs, University of Cincinnati. His research is focused on the interactions of political mobilization and anti-minority violence within Hindu nationalist organizations in India.
Twitter
Email: sharmaym@mail.uc.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>272</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c0956990-0711-11f0-9bca-771c1b0e9a9a</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The executive directors of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a <a href="https://www.historians.org/">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and the <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/">Organization of American Historians</a> recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, <em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em> and <em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>, <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, <em>Time</em>, <em>The Hill</em>, <em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and <em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the <em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37">National Center for Education Statistics</a> (NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to <a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf">AHA</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/">5calls ap</a> for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a> (and <a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The executive directors of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a <a href="https://www.historians.org/">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and the <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/">Organization of American Historians</a> recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, <em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em> and <em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>, <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, <em>Time</em>, <em>The Hill</em>, <em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and <em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the <em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37">National Center for Education Statistics</a> (NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to <a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf">AHA</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/">5calls ap</a> for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a> (and <a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36223082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0235572e-adbc-4dba-b3ed-787414144d48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0235572e-adbc-4dba-b3ed-787414144d48&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The executive directors of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:

OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project


Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans


National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

Removal of climate data from government websites

Contribute to AHA and OAH



5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives


AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The executive directors of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:

OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project


Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans


National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

Removal of climate data from government websites

Contribute to AHA and OAH



5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives


AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4faf946a-0664-11f0-9412-539ced3a8490</guid>
      <title>Adam K. Webb, &quot;The World&apos;s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“One thing I would note about the Trumpian populists and their counterparts elsewhere in the West today is that they're a very peculiarly tribal kind of post conservative right. It's almost a kind of reassertion of paganism and tribal boundaries and grievance. That is very different from a more traditional kind of conservatism, where the texture of society and the accumulated wisdom of the past and the cultivation of virtue loomed large – at least as ideals, as aspirations. In contrast to that, this kind of contemporary populism has very little texture or wisdom or virtue – its more like a resentful atomism that is invoking certain tribal markers of membership because it's politically convenient, as it were.”</p><p>– Adam Kempton Webb, NBN interview March 2025</p><p>In this expansive and thought-provoking interview, Adam K. Webb lays out a sweeping vision for a post-liberal, post-national world constitution, challenging the dominance of state sovereignty, corporate capitalism, and procedural liberalism. Drawing on over a quarter-century of scholarship culminating in his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032893433"><em>The World’s Constitution</em></a><strong><em> </em></strong><em>(Routledge, 2025)</em> Webb proposes a system of functional sphere pluralism, where governance is rooted in ethical traditions rather than ideology – where citizenship, law, and economic participation are no longer restricted by territorial nation-states.</p><p>Coming to terms with Webb’s interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspective suggests an affinity with thinkers like the late James C. Scott, in his critique of centralized control, coupled with the sensibilities of Roger Scruton and Patrick Deneen, in their defense of ethical and cultural order. Yet Webb diverges from them all in his insistence on a global, meta-constitutional framework, which might place him closer to the likes of Robert D. Kaplan, as seen in his latest work on civilizational cycles and geopolitical evolution.</p><p>From his critique of elite legal capture (responding to a question on Katharina Pistor’s <em>The Code of Capital</em>) to his historical engagement with Confucian, Islamic, and European pluralist traditions, Webb offers a bold alternative to today’s stagnating governance models. Whether you are interested in constitutional theory, global governance, or the future of civilization itself, the professor’s insights in this interview offers an intellectually rich and thought provoking conversation that is well worth your time.</p><p>Below are links to Dr. Webb’s latest books – Taylor &amp; Francis <strong>Open Access</strong> publications:</p><p><a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.4324/9781315709703/deep-cosmopolis-adam-webb?context=ubx"><strong><em>Deep Cosmopolis: Rethinking World Politics and Globalization</em></strong></a><strong> (2015)</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.4324/9781003582632/world-constitution-adam-webb"><strong><em>The World’s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order</em></strong></a><strong> (2025)</strong></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“One thing I would note about the Trumpian populists and their counterparts elsewhere in the West today is that they're a very peculiarly tribal kind of post conservative right. It's almost a kind of reassertion of paganism and tribal boundaries and grievance. That is very different from a more traditional kind of conservatism, where the texture of society and the accumulated wisdom of the past and the cultivation of virtue loomed large – at least as ideals, as aspirations. In contrast to that, this kind of contemporary populism has very little texture or wisdom or virtue – its more like a resentful atomism that is invoking certain tribal markers of membership because it's politically convenient, as it were.”</p><p>– Adam Kempton Webb, NBN interview March 2025</p><p>In this expansive and thought-provoking interview, Adam K. Webb lays out a sweeping vision for a post-liberal, post-national world constitution, challenging the dominance of state sovereignty, corporate capitalism, and procedural liberalism. Drawing on over a quarter-century of scholarship culminating in his latest book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032893433"><em>The World’s Constitution</em></a><strong><em> </em></strong><em>(Routledge, 2025)</em> Webb proposes a system of functional sphere pluralism, where governance is rooted in ethical traditions rather than ideology – where citizenship, law, and economic participation are no longer restricted by territorial nation-states.</p><p>Coming to terms with Webb’s interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspective suggests an affinity with thinkers like the late James C. Scott, in his critique of centralized control, coupled with the sensibilities of Roger Scruton and Patrick Deneen, in their defense of ethical and cultural order. Yet Webb diverges from them all in his insistence on a global, meta-constitutional framework, which might place him closer to the likes of Robert D. Kaplan, as seen in his latest work on civilizational cycles and geopolitical evolution.</p><p>From his critique of elite legal capture (responding to a question on Katharina Pistor’s <em>The Code of Capital</em>) to his historical engagement with Confucian, Islamic, and European pluralist traditions, Webb offers a bold alternative to today’s stagnating governance models. Whether you are interested in constitutional theory, global governance, or the future of civilization itself, the professor’s insights in this interview offers an intellectually rich and thought provoking conversation that is well worth your time.</p><p>Below are links to Dr. Webb’s latest books – Taylor &amp; Francis <strong>Open Access</strong> publications:</p><p><a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.4324/9781315709703/deep-cosmopolis-adam-webb?context=ubx"><strong><em>Deep Cosmopolis: Rethinking World Politics and Globalization</em></strong></a><strong> (2015)</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.4324/9781003582632/world-constitution-adam-webb"><strong><em>The World’s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order</em></strong></a><strong> (2025)</strong></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="105537344" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/93320c7e-0620-478d-bcd7-91ce3b55f9e9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=93320c7e-0620-478d-bcd7-91ce3b55f9e9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam K. Webb, &quot;The World&apos;s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:49:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“One thing I would note about the Trumpian populists and their counterparts elsewhere in the West today is that they&apos;re a very peculiarly tribal kind of post conservative right. It&apos;s almost a kind of reassertion of paganism and tribal boundaries and grievance. That is very different from a more traditional kind of conservatism, where the texture of society and the accumulated wisdom of the past and the cultivation of virtue loomed large – at least as ideals, as aspirations. In contrast to that, this kind of contemporary populism has very little texture or wisdom or virtue – its more like a resentful atomism that is invoking certain tribal markers of membership because it&apos;s politically convenient, as it were.”
– Adam Kempton Webb, NBN interview March 2025
In this expansive and thought-provoking interview, Adam K. Webb lays out a sweeping vision for a post-liberal, post-national world constitution, challenging the dominance of state sovereignty, corporate capitalism, and procedural liberalism. Drawing on over a quarter-century of scholarship culminating in his latest book The World’s Constitution (Routledge, 2025) Webb proposes a system of functional sphere pluralism, where governance is rooted in ethical traditions rather than ideology – where citizenship, law, and economic participation are no longer restricted by territorial nation-states.
Coming to terms with Webb’s interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspective suggests an affinity with thinkers like the late James C. Scott, in his critique of centralized control, coupled with the sensibilities of Roger Scruton and Patrick Deneen, in their defense of ethical and cultural order. Yet Webb diverges from them all in his insistence on a global, meta-constitutional framework, which might place him closer to the likes of Robert D. Kaplan, as seen in his latest work on civilizational cycles and geopolitical evolution.
From his critique of elite legal capture (responding to a question on Katharina Pistor’s The Code of Capital) to his historical engagement with Confucian, Islamic, and European pluralist traditions, Webb offers a bold alternative to today’s stagnating governance models. Whether you are interested in constitutional theory, global governance, or the future of civilization itself, the professor’s insights in this interview offers an intellectually rich and thought provoking conversation that is well worth your time.
Below are links to Dr. Webb’s latest books – Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access publications:
Deep Cosmopolis: Rethinking World Politics and Globalization (2015)
The World’s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order (2025)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“One thing I would note about the Trumpian populists and their counterparts elsewhere in the West today is that they&apos;re a very peculiarly tribal kind of post conservative right. It&apos;s almost a kind of reassertion of paganism and tribal boundaries and grievance. That is very different from a more traditional kind of conservatism, where the texture of society and the accumulated wisdom of the past and the cultivation of virtue loomed large – at least as ideals, as aspirations. In contrast to that, this kind of contemporary populism has very little texture or wisdom or virtue – its more like a resentful atomism that is invoking certain tribal markers of membership because it&apos;s politically convenient, as it were.”
– Adam Kempton Webb, NBN interview March 2025
In this expansive and thought-provoking interview, Adam K. Webb lays out a sweeping vision for a post-liberal, post-national world constitution, challenging the dominance of state sovereignty, corporate capitalism, and procedural liberalism. Drawing on over a quarter-century of scholarship culminating in his latest book The World’s Constitution (Routledge, 2025) Webb proposes a system of functional sphere pluralism, where governance is rooted in ethical traditions rather than ideology – where citizenship, law, and economic participation are no longer restricted by territorial nation-states.
Coming to terms with Webb’s interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspective suggests an affinity with thinkers like the late James C. Scott, in his critique of centralized control, coupled with the sensibilities of Roger Scruton and Patrick Deneen, in their defense of ethical and cultural order. Yet Webb diverges from them all in his insistence on a global, meta-constitutional framework, which might place him closer to the likes of Robert D. Kaplan, as seen in his latest work on civilizational cycles and geopolitical evolution.
From his critique of elite legal capture (responding to a question on Katharina Pistor’s The Code of Capital) to his historical engagement with Confucian, Islamic, and European pluralist traditions, Webb offers a bold alternative to today’s stagnating governance models. Whether you are interested in constitutional theory, global governance, or the future of civilization itself, the professor’s insights in this interview offers an intellectually rich and thought provoking conversation that is well worth your time.
Below are links to Dr. Webb’s latest books – Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access publications:
Deep Cosmopolis: Rethinking World Politics and Globalization (2015)
The World’s Constitution: Spheres of Liberty in the Future Global Order (2025)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">333d3fea-065e-11f0-bee6-2b3a2f65a5a0</guid>
      <title>Gerald J. Postema, &quot;Law&apos;s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190645342">Law’s Rule</a> (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law's ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.</p><p>Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law's protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law's rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.</p><p>Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.</p><p>Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.</p><p>He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the <a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a> newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190645342">Law’s Rule</a> (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law's ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.</p><p>Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law's protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law's rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.</p><p>Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.</p><p>Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.</p><p>He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the <a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a> newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53443866" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fdeb4aad-c6a3-4512-88ce-1e21b7c6e469/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fdeb4aad-c6a3-4512-88ce-1e21b7c6e469&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gerald J. Postema, &quot;Law&apos;s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.
In Law’s Rule (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law&apos;s ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.
Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law&apos;s protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law&apos;s rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.
Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.
Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.
He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.
In Law’s Rule (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law&apos;s ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.
Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law&apos;s protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law&apos;s rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.
Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.
Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.
He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>512</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44206dc2-0588-11f0-b945-575958ab99e4</guid>
      <title>Vuk Vuksanovic, &quot;Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Even before its rebirth as a nation in the 1990s, Serbia had acquired a reputation abroad as Russia’s stalwart Slavic ally in the Western Balkans.</p><p>Yet, as Vuk Vuksanović argues in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350400603"><em>Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West</em></a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury, 2025), two centuries of history and the 25 years since the fall of Slobodan Milošević tell a more nuanced story.</p><p>"When it comes to Russia's interests,” he writes, “there are no sacred cows in Serbia-Russia relations". Governments in Belgrade will be courted and then discarded depending on Moscow’s needs, and they know it. For their part, the Serbs depend on Russian political support in their campaign for a face-saving settlement of the long-running Kosovo dispute but know their economic success hinges on their ties to the EU and the US. Belgrade must "manipulate the superpower rivalry to secure economic resources from both superpowers and its political strategic autonomy".</p><p>Vuk Vuksanović is a foreign policy expert at the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, an associate of the Central and South-East Europe Programme at LSE IDEAS, and a prominent media commentator on strategy in the Balkans.</p><p>*His book recommendations were <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/rival-power-russia-in-southeast-europe-dimitar-bechev/207991?ean=9780300219135">Rival Power: Russia in Southeast Europe</a> by Dimitar Bechev (Yale University Press, 2017) and <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/why-war-christopher-coker/2277635?ean=9781787383890">Why War?</a> by Christopher Coker (Hurst, 2021).</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts on Substack at <a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before its rebirth as a nation in the 1990s, Serbia had acquired a reputation abroad as Russia’s stalwart Slavic ally in the Western Balkans.</p><p>Yet, as Vuk Vuksanović argues in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350400603"><em>Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West</em></a><em> </em>(Bloomsbury, 2025), two centuries of history and the 25 years since the fall of Slobodan Milošević tell a more nuanced story.</p><p>"When it comes to Russia's interests,” he writes, “there are no sacred cows in Serbia-Russia relations". Governments in Belgrade will be courted and then discarded depending on Moscow’s needs, and they know it. For their part, the Serbs depend on Russian political support in their campaign for a face-saving settlement of the long-running Kosovo dispute but know their economic success hinges on their ties to the EU and the US. Belgrade must "manipulate the superpower rivalry to secure economic resources from both superpowers and its political strategic autonomy".</p><p>Vuk Vuksanović is a foreign policy expert at the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, an associate of the Central and South-East Europe Programme at LSE IDEAS, and a prominent media commentator on strategy in the Balkans.</p><p>*His book recommendations were <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/rival-power-russia-in-southeast-europe-dimitar-bechev/207991?ean=9780300219135">Rival Power: Russia in Southeast Europe</a> by Dimitar Bechev (Yale University Press, 2017) and <a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/why-war-christopher-coker/2277635?ean=9781787383890">Why War?</a> by Christopher Coker (Hurst, 2021).</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/users/timgwynnjones">Tim Gwynn Jones</a> is an economic and political risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts on Substack at <a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/">242.news</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36700282" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/83d76420-b1e2-48cd-91af-954454fec836/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=83d76420-b1e2-48cd-91af-954454fec836&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vuk Vuksanovic, &quot;Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Even before its rebirth as a nation in the 1990s, Serbia had acquired a reputation abroad as Russia’s stalwart Slavic ally in the Western Balkans.
Yet, as Vuk Vuksanović argues in Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West (Bloomsbury, 2025), two centuries of history and the 25 years since the fall of Slobodan Milošević tell a more nuanced story.
&quot;When it comes to Russia&apos;s interests,” he writes, “there are no sacred cows in Serbia-Russia relations&quot;. Governments in Belgrade will be courted and then discarded depending on Moscow’s needs, and they know it. For their part, the Serbs depend on Russian political support in their campaign for a face-saving settlement of the long-running Kosovo dispute but know their economic success hinges on their ties to the EU and the US. Belgrade must &quot;manipulate the superpower rivalry to secure economic resources from both superpowers and its political strategic autonomy&quot;.
Vuk Vuksanović is a foreign policy expert at the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, an associate of the Central and South-East Europe Programme at LSE IDEAS, and a prominent media commentator on strategy in the Balkans.
*His book recommendations were Rival Power: Russia in Southeast Europe by Dimitar Bechev (Yale University Press, 2017) and Why War? by Christopher Coker (Hurst, 2021).
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts on Substack at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Even before its rebirth as a nation in the 1990s, Serbia had acquired a reputation abroad as Russia’s stalwart Slavic ally in the Western Balkans.
Yet, as Vuk Vuksanović argues in Serbia’s Balancing Act: Between Russia and the West (Bloomsbury, 2025), two centuries of history and the 25 years since the fall of Slobodan Milošević tell a more nuanced story.
&quot;When it comes to Russia&apos;s interests,” he writes, “there are no sacred cows in Serbia-Russia relations&quot;. Governments in Belgrade will be courted and then discarded depending on Moscow’s needs, and they know it. For their part, the Serbs depend on Russian political support in their campaign for a face-saving settlement of the long-running Kosovo dispute but know their economic success hinges on their ties to the EU and the US. Belgrade must &quot;manipulate the superpower rivalry to secure economic resources from both superpowers and its political strategic autonomy&quot;.
Vuk Vuksanović is a foreign policy expert at the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy, an associate of the Central and South-East Europe Programme at LSE IDEAS, and a prominent media commentator on strategy in the Balkans.
*His book recommendations were Rival Power: Russia in Southeast Europe by Dimitar Bechev (Yale University Press, 2017) and Why War? by Christopher Coker (Hurst, 2021).
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes and podcasts on Substack at 242.news.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d290b4a-026d-11f0-ba1c-735767e02b28</guid>
      <title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us--A Conversation with Stephen Macedo (Part 2)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135"><em>In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.</p><p>We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.</p><p>The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.</p><p>Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.</p><p>This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135"><em>In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.</p><p>We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.</p><p>The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.</p><p>Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.</p><p>This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49155641" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/94704077-bcb9-4c7f-894d-252777bd6aaa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=94704077-bcb9-4c7f-894d-252777bd6aaa&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us--A Conversation with Stephen Macedo (Part 2)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us (Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.
We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.
The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.
Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.
This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week on Madison’s Notes, we continue our discussion with Stephen Macedo, co-author of In COVID’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us (Princeton UP, 2025). The book examines the institutional failures during the pandemic, including the politicization of science, inconsistent messaging, and the disproportionate impacts of policies.
We cover key questions: What did “following the science” mean before COVID-19? Macedo explains that science is inherently uncertain, but this nuance was often lost during the pandemic, leading to unrealistic expectations. He also highlights how poor communication about scientific uncertainty eroded public trust.
The conversation addresses contradictory messaging about the origins of COVID-19, with public statements often differing from internal expert discussions. Macedo notes how this disconnect fueled skepticism. He also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest among health officials and the dangers of concentrating decision-making power in a few unchecked individuals.
Macedo discusses the politicization of masking, which overshadowed scientific evidence and deepened divisions. He advises individuals to seek reputable sources, embrace uncertainty, and remain critical of simplistic narratives. Finally, he stresses the importance of accountability, open debate, and a commitment to democratic values like tolerance and truth as essential for navigating future crises.
This episode offers a concise yet powerful reflection on the lessons of the pandemic and the need for stronger, more transparent governance. Tune in for the full conversation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7807cb86-04d3-11f0-b32e-072babc6f854</guid>
      <title>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts, &quot;Creolizing Hannah Arendt&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts have edited a new collection of essays, <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a>. This edited volume dives into Hannah Arendt’s thinking while also pushing the understanding and ways that Arendt has influenced political theory, philosophy, and politics. The idea of “creolizing,” especially philosophic or theoretical work, is to explore a thinker’s work from more pluralistic perspectives, often pushing the ideas and their analysis beyond the northern and western position in which that work was generally created. Arendt’s work, which comes to us in a number of forms, was written in the context of the Holocaust and the world before and after that trauma. The contributing authors to <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> build on Arendt’s considerations and analysis, taking and applying her work to other situations, to determine what we can learn in a distinct situation or in context of other theoretical frameworks. Creolizing is an engagement where two or more elements come into discourse with each other, rethinking the ways those in western political thought are positioned, or see the world. This process questions, on some level, the entire notion of the “canon” and the design of borders that hem in thinking, or disciplinary lines.</p><p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> is a sophisticated collection of essays that brings forth Hannah Arendt’s thinking about freedom and individuals while also integrating other theorists who have interpreted Arendt’s work over the last century. Arendt focused some of her early work on the notion of being an outsider, of having a kind of double consciousness (for her, it was her Jewish identity in Europe during the Holocaust and afterwards in the United States.) But double consciousness was originally posited as an understanding and perspective by W.E.B. Dubois and Sylvia Wynter in their work, specifically the experience of African Americans, and that Paget Henry analyzes in the chapter “Sylvia Wynter, Political Philosophy, and the Creolization of Hannah Arendt.” Thus, putting these ideas in conversation with each other is an example of creolization, and an example of the kind of analysis in this edited volume.</p><p>This is a fascinating book, opening up spheres of thinking not just about Arendt, but about so many other important theorists. And putting these ideas into conversation with each other. <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> does not intend to proselytize on behalf of Hannah Arendt, as Nissim-Sabat and Roberts note in our conversation, but to truly interact act with Arendt’s thinking and her ideas about freedom and unfreedom, double consciousness, revolution, and the concept of humanity.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts have edited a new collection of essays, <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a>. This edited volume dives into Hannah Arendt’s thinking while also pushing the understanding and ways that Arendt has influenced political theory, philosophy, and politics. The idea of “creolizing,” especially philosophic or theoretical work, is to explore a thinker’s work from more pluralistic perspectives, often pushing the ideas and their analysis beyond the northern and western position in which that work was generally created. Arendt’s work, which comes to us in a number of forms, was written in the context of the Holocaust and the world before and after that trauma. The contributing authors to <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> build on Arendt’s considerations and analysis, taking and applying her work to other situations, to determine what we can learn in a distinct situation or in context of other theoretical frameworks. Creolizing is an engagement where two or more elements come into discourse with each other, rethinking the ways those in western political thought are positioned, or see the world. This process questions, on some level, the entire notion of the “canon” and the design of borders that hem in thinking, or disciplinary lines.</p><p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> is a sophisticated collection of essays that brings forth Hannah Arendt’s thinking about freedom and individuals while also integrating other theorists who have interpreted Arendt’s work over the last century. Arendt focused some of her early work on the notion of being an outsider, of having a kind of double consciousness (for her, it was her Jewish identity in Europe during the Holocaust and afterwards in the United States.) But double consciousness was originally posited as an understanding and perspective by W.E.B. Dubois and Sylvia Wynter in their work, specifically the experience of African Americans, and that Paget Henry analyzes in the chapter “Sylvia Wynter, Political Philosophy, and the Creolization of Hannah Arendt.” Thus, putting these ideas in conversation with each other is an example of creolization, and an example of the kind of analysis in this edited volume.</p><p>This is a fascinating book, opening up spheres of thinking not just about Arendt, but about so many other important theorists. And putting these ideas into conversation with each other. <a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538176566/Creolizing-Hannah-Arendt"><em>Creolizing Hannah Arendt</em></a> does not intend to proselytize on behalf of Hannah Arendt, as Nissim-Sabat and Roberts note in our conversation, but to truly interact act with Arendt’s thinking and her ideas about freedom and unfreedom, double consciousness, revolution, and the concept of humanity.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54367276" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/673e430a-b75a-41b8-9dd0-754025c7b4a4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=673e430a-b75a-41b8-9dd0-754025c7b4a4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts, &quot;Creolizing Hannah Arendt&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts have edited a new collection of essays, Creolizing Hannah Arendt. This edited volume dives into Hannah Arendt’s thinking while also pushing the understanding and ways that Arendt has influenced political theory, philosophy, and politics. The idea of “creolizing,” especially philosophic or theoretical work, is to explore a thinker’s work from more pluralistic perspectives, often pushing the ideas and their analysis beyond the northern and western position in which that work was generally created. Arendt’s work, which comes to us in a number of forms, was written in the context of the Holocaust and the world before and after that trauma. The contributing authors to Creolizing Hannah Arendt build on Arendt’s considerations and analysis, taking and applying her work to other situations, to determine what we can learn in a distinct situation or in context of other theoretical frameworks. Creolizing is an engagement where two or more elements come into discourse with each other, rethinking the ways those in western political thought are positioned, or see the world. This process questions, on some level, the entire notion of the “canon” and the design of borders that hem in thinking, or disciplinary lines.
Creolizing Hannah Arendt is a sophisticated collection of essays that brings forth Hannah Arendt’s thinking about freedom and individuals while also integrating other theorists who have interpreted Arendt’s work over the last century. Arendt focused some of her early work on the notion of being an outsider, of having a kind of double consciousness (for her, it was her Jewish identity in Europe during the Holocaust and afterwards in the United States.) But double consciousness was originally posited as an understanding and perspective by W.E.B. Dubois and Sylvia Wynter in their work, specifically the experience of African Americans, and that Paget Henry analyzes in the chapter “Sylvia Wynter, Political Philosophy, and the Creolization of Hannah Arendt.” Thus, putting these ideas in conversation with each other is an example of creolization, and an example of the kind of analysis in this edited volume.
This is a fascinating book, opening up spheres of thinking not just about Arendt, but about so many other important theorists. And putting these ideas into conversation with each other. Creolizing Hannah Arendt does not intend to proselytize on behalf of Hannah Arendt, as Nissim-Sabat and Roberts note in our conversation, but to truly interact act with Arendt’s thinking and her ideas about freedom and unfreedom, double consciousness, revolution, and the concept of humanity.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marilyn Nissim-Sabat and Neil Roberts have edited a new collection of essays, Creolizing Hannah Arendt. This edited volume dives into Hannah Arendt’s thinking while also pushing the understanding and ways that Arendt has influenced political theory, philosophy, and politics. The idea of “creolizing,” especially philosophic or theoretical work, is to explore a thinker’s work from more pluralistic perspectives, often pushing the ideas and their analysis beyond the northern and western position in which that work was generally created. Arendt’s work, which comes to us in a number of forms, was written in the context of the Holocaust and the world before and after that trauma. The contributing authors to Creolizing Hannah Arendt build on Arendt’s considerations and analysis, taking and applying her work to other situations, to determine what we can learn in a distinct situation or in context of other theoretical frameworks. Creolizing is an engagement where two or more elements come into discourse with each other, rethinking the ways those in western political thought are positioned, or see the world. This process questions, on some level, the entire notion of the “canon” and the design of borders that hem in thinking, or disciplinary lines.
Creolizing Hannah Arendt is a sophisticated collection of essays that brings forth Hannah Arendt’s thinking about freedom and individuals while also integrating other theorists who have interpreted Arendt’s work over the last century. Arendt focused some of her early work on the notion of being an outsider, of having a kind of double consciousness (for her, it was her Jewish identity in Europe during the Holocaust and afterwards in the United States.) But double consciousness was originally posited as an understanding and perspective by W.E.B. Dubois and Sylvia Wynter in their work, specifically the experience of African Americans, and that Paget Henry analyzes in the chapter “Sylvia Wynter, Political Philosophy, and the Creolization of Hannah Arendt.” Thus, putting these ideas in conversation with each other is an example of creolization, and an example of the kind of analysis in this edited volume.
This is a fascinating book, opening up spheres of thinking not just about Arendt, but about so many other important theorists. And putting these ideas into conversation with each other. Creolizing Hannah Arendt does not intend to proselytize on behalf of Hannah Arendt, as Nissim-Sabat and Roberts note in our conversation, but to truly interact act with Arendt’s thinking and her ideas about freedom and unfreedom, double consciousness, revolution, and the concept of humanity.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>760</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f77bdb68-0407-11f0-9fc8-0b1ef5e99a64</guid>
      <title>Rahul Rao, &quot;The Psychic Lives of Statues: Reckoning with the Rubble of Empire&quot; (Pluto Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From Cape Town to Bristol and Richmond, statues have become sites of resistance and contestation of our imperial past and postcolonial present. <em>The Psychic Lives of Statues </em>by Rahul Rao offers an insightful exploration of these global controversies, demonstrating that beneath their surface lie deeper struggles over race, caste, and the politics of decolonisation.</p><p>Rao takes readers on a journey through South Africa, England, the US, Ghana, India, Australia, and Scotland, revealing how statue controversies have dramatically rearranged the canon of anticolonial political thought. By examining these debates through a personal and literary lens, Rao addresses the multifaceted issues of justice, cultural memory, and belonging.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745350769"><em>The Psychic Lives of Statues</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2025) examines both the toppling of colonial statues and the raising of postcolonial ones, demonstrating that the statue form as a medium of representation and a bid for immortality is by no means obsolete. Engaging with artists, scholars, and activists, Rao provides fresh perspectives on how societies grapple with and reinterpret the past and present through iconography.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Rahul Rao is a Reader in International Political Thought in the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews, and Professorial Research Associate at SOAS University of London. He is the author of two books – <em>Third World Protest: Between Home and the World</em> (2010) and <em>Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality</em> (2020), both published by Oxford University Press. He is a member of the Radical Philosophy editorial collective.</p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Cape Town to Bristol and Richmond, statues have become sites of resistance and contestation of our imperial past and postcolonial present. <em>The Psychic Lives of Statues </em>by Rahul Rao offers an insightful exploration of these global controversies, demonstrating that beneath their surface lie deeper struggles over race, caste, and the politics of decolonisation.</p><p>Rao takes readers on a journey through South Africa, England, the US, Ghana, India, Australia, and Scotland, revealing how statue controversies have dramatically rearranged the canon of anticolonial political thought. By examining these debates through a personal and literary lens, Rao addresses the multifaceted issues of justice, cultural memory, and belonging.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780745350769"><em>The Psychic Lives of Statues</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2025) examines both the toppling of colonial statues and the raising of postcolonial ones, demonstrating that the statue form as a medium of representation and a bid for immortality is by no means obsolete. Engaging with artists, scholars, and activists, Rao provides fresh perspectives on how societies grapple with and reinterpret the past and present through iconography.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Rahul Rao is a Reader in International Political Thought in the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews, and Professorial Research Associate at SOAS University of London. He is the author of two books – <em>Third World Protest: Between Home and the World</em> (2010) and <em>Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality</em> (2020), both published by Oxford University Press. He is a member of the Radical Philosophy editorial collective.</p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50943058" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0f230e1e-db2a-4f98-9add-dea0dca624ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0f230e1e-db2a-4f98-9add-dea0dca624ce&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rahul Rao, &quot;The Psychic Lives of Statues: Reckoning with the Rubble of Empire&quot; (Pluto Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From Cape Town to Bristol and Richmond, statues have become sites of resistance and contestation of our imperial past and postcolonial present. The Psychic Lives of Statues by Rahul Rao offers an insightful exploration of these global controversies, demonstrating that beneath their surface lie deeper struggles over race, caste, and the politics of decolonisation.
Rao takes readers on a journey through South Africa, England, the US, Ghana, India, Australia, and Scotland, revealing how statue controversies have dramatically rearranged the canon of anticolonial political thought. By examining these debates through a personal and literary lens, Rao addresses the multifaceted issues of justice, cultural memory, and belonging.
The Psychic Lives of Statues (Pluto Press, 2025) examines both the toppling of colonial statues and the raising of postcolonial ones, demonstrating that the statue form as a medium of representation and a bid for immortality is by no means obsolete. Engaging with artists, scholars, and activists, Rao provides fresh perspectives on how societies grapple with and reinterpret the past and present through iconography.
About the Author: 
Rahul Rao is a Reader in International Political Thought in the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews, and Professorial Research Associate at SOAS University of London. He is the author of two books – Third World Protest: Between Home and the World (2010) and Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality (2020), both published by Oxford University Press. He is a member of the Radical Philosophy editorial collective.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From Cape Town to Bristol and Richmond, statues have become sites of resistance and contestation of our imperial past and postcolonial present. The Psychic Lives of Statues by Rahul Rao offers an insightful exploration of these global controversies, demonstrating that beneath their surface lie deeper struggles over race, caste, and the politics of decolonisation.
Rao takes readers on a journey through South Africa, England, the US, Ghana, India, Australia, and Scotland, revealing how statue controversies have dramatically rearranged the canon of anticolonial political thought. By examining these debates through a personal and literary lens, Rao addresses the multifaceted issues of justice, cultural memory, and belonging.
The Psychic Lives of Statues (Pluto Press, 2025) examines both the toppling of colonial statues and the raising of postcolonial ones, demonstrating that the statue form as a medium of representation and a bid for immortality is by no means obsolete. Engaging with artists, scholars, and activists, Rao provides fresh perspectives on how societies grapple with and reinterpret the past and present through iconography.
About the Author: 
Rahul Rao is a Reader in International Political Thought in the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews, and Professorial Research Associate at SOAS University of London. He is the author of two books – Third World Protest: Between Home and the World (2010) and Out of Time: The Queer Politics of Postcoloniality (2020), both published by Oxford University Press. He is a member of the Radical Philosophy editorial collective.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>762</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2d644ea-028b-11f0-868f-db18fbb2690c</guid>
      <title>Bryan Caplan, &quot;Build, Baby, Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing&quot; (Cato Institute, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Economist Bryan Caplan has written—and artist Ady Branzei has illustrated—this new graphic novel about housing regulation (if ‘novel’ can be applied to an imaginative essay on a nonfiction topic), <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781952223426"><em>Build Baby Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing Regulation</em></a><em> </em>(Cato Institute, 2024). The thesis of the work is that regulation has driven up the cost of housing and ‘manufactured scarcity.’ Regulation is always well intentioned but often ill considered, as Caplan shows, and every benefit—‘free’ parking, zoning restrictions, environmental considerations—is provided by a hidden cost to the consumer and the tax-payer, disproportionately born by the poor (ironically the people they are supposed to be helping).</p><p>This conversation touched on other areas where free-market principles conflict with government interventions: bike lanes, environmental policy, immigration, and public education, especially at the taxpayer-supported university, a topic that Bryan Caplan discussed <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/bryan-caplan-the-case-against-education-why-the-education-system-is-a-waste-of-time-and-money-princeton-up-2018#entry:9776@1:url">last time he was on the New Books Network, in his 2018 interview with Editor-in-Chief Marshall Poe when they discussed his earlier book, <em>The Case Against Education</em></a>.</p><p>Bryan Caplan is a professor of economics at George Mason University, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute; <a href="https://www.betonit.ai/">his blog on Substack is called <em>Bet on It</em></a>.</p><p>Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; his dissertation is a forthcoming book, published by Brepols: <em>Dantiscus: Diplomat and Traveller in Sixteenth-Century Europe. </em>He is a regular host on the <em>New Books Network</em> also the host of the <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/academic-partners/almost-good-catholics">'Almost Good Catholics' podcast</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economist Bryan Caplan has written—and artist Ady Branzei has illustrated—this new graphic novel about housing regulation (if ‘novel’ can be applied to an imaginative essay on a nonfiction topic), <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781952223426"><em>Build Baby Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing Regulation</em></a><em> </em>(Cato Institute, 2024). The thesis of the work is that regulation has driven up the cost of housing and ‘manufactured scarcity.’ Regulation is always well intentioned but often ill considered, as Caplan shows, and every benefit—‘free’ parking, zoning restrictions, environmental considerations—is provided by a hidden cost to the consumer and the tax-payer, disproportionately born by the poor (ironically the people they are supposed to be helping).</p><p>This conversation touched on other areas where free-market principles conflict with government interventions: bike lanes, environmental policy, immigration, and public education, especially at the taxpayer-supported university, a topic that Bryan Caplan discussed <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/bryan-caplan-the-case-against-education-why-the-education-system-is-a-waste-of-time-and-money-princeton-up-2018#entry:9776@1:url">last time he was on the New Books Network, in his 2018 interview with Editor-in-Chief Marshall Poe when they discussed his earlier book, <em>The Case Against Education</em></a>.</p><p>Bryan Caplan is a professor of economics at George Mason University, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute; <a href="https://www.betonit.ai/">his blog on Substack is called <em>Bet on It</em></a>.</p><p>Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; his dissertation is a forthcoming book, published by Brepols: <em>Dantiscus: Diplomat and Traveller in Sixteenth-Century Europe. </em>He is a regular host on the <em>New Books Network</em> also the host of the <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/academic-partners/almost-good-catholics">'Almost Good Catholics' podcast</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35885453" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/37a37a79-5b57-4d56-9e59-ab80b25ac560/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=37a37a79-5b57-4d56-9e59-ab80b25ac560&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bryan Caplan, &quot;Build, Baby, Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing&quot; (Cato Institute, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Economist Bryan Caplan has written—and artist Ady Branzei has illustrated—this new graphic novel about housing regulation (if ‘novel’ can be applied to an imaginative essay on a nonfiction topic), Build Baby Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing Regulation (Cato Institute, 2024). The thesis of the work is that regulation has driven up the cost of housing and ‘manufactured scarcity.’ Regulation is always well intentioned but often ill considered, as Caplan shows, and every benefit—‘free’ parking, zoning restrictions, environmental considerations—is provided by a hidden cost to the consumer and the tax-payer, disproportionately born by the poor (ironically the people they are supposed to be helping).
This conversation touched on other areas where free-market principles conflict with government interventions: bike lanes, environmental policy, immigration, and public education, especially at the taxpayer-supported university, a topic that Bryan Caplan discussed last time he was on the New Books Network, in his 2018 interview with Editor-in-Chief Marshall Poe when they discussed his earlier book, The Case Against Education.
Bryan Caplan is a professor of economics at George Mason University, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute; his blog on Substack is called Bet on It.
Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; his dissertation is a forthcoming book, published by Brepols: Dantiscus: Diplomat and Traveller in Sixteenth-Century Europe. He is a regular host on the New Books Network also the host of the &apos;Almost Good Catholics&apos; podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Economist Bryan Caplan has written—and artist Ady Branzei has illustrated—this new graphic novel about housing regulation (if ‘novel’ can be applied to an imaginative essay on a nonfiction topic), Build Baby Build: The Science and Ethics of Housing Regulation (Cato Institute, 2024). The thesis of the work is that regulation has driven up the cost of housing and ‘manufactured scarcity.’ Regulation is always well intentioned but often ill considered, as Caplan shows, and every benefit—‘free’ parking, zoning restrictions, environmental considerations—is provided by a hidden cost to the consumer and the tax-payer, disproportionately born by the poor (ironically the people they are supposed to be helping).
This conversation touched on other areas where free-market principles conflict with government interventions: bike lanes, environmental policy, immigration, and public education, especially at the taxpayer-supported university, a topic that Bryan Caplan discussed last time he was on the New Books Network, in his 2018 interview with Editor-in-Chief Marshall Poe when they discussed his earlier book, The Case Against Education.
Bryan Caplan is a professor of economics at George Mason University, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute; his blog on Substack is called Bet on It.
Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; his dissertation is a forthcoming book, published by Brepols: Dantiscus: Diplomat and Traveller in Sixteenth-Century Europe. He is a regular host on the New Books Network also the host of the &apos;Almost Good Catholics&apos; podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>203</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a507e8a2-01c0-11f0-8210-ab63ba67f9d4</guid>
      <title>Luca Trenta, &quot;The President&apos;s Kill List: Assassination and Us Foreign Policy Since 1945&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. </p><p>Using primary documents and interviews, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399519496"><em>The President’s Kill List</em></a><em> </em>meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.</p><p><a href="https://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/l.trenta/">Dr. Luca Trenta</a> is an Associate Professor of International Relations <em>i</em>n the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, <em>Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises </em>(Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called <em>Secret Wars Uncovered </em>(2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Joseph Burkholder Smith, <a href="https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/portrait-cold-warrior/author/joseph-burkholder-smith/"><em>Portrait of a Cold Warrior</em></a> (1976)</li>
<li>John Frankenheimer, <em>The Manchurian Candidate</em> (1962)</li>
<li>The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at <a href="https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/sites/default/files/pdf_documents/library/document/0312/1552390.pdf">page 35 here</a> and <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16161262.2018.1430431">Luca’s story about the meeting is here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/family-jewels#:~:text=Widely%20known%20as%20the%20%22Family,inconsistent%20with%20the%20Agency's%20charter.">“Family Jewels”</a> document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)</li>
<li>Rebecca Sanders, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/plausible-legality-legal-culture-and-political-imperative-in-the-global-war-on-terror-rebecca-sanders/21764343?ean=9780190870553&amp;next=t">Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror</a> (2018)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94465.pdf">The Church Committee Report</a> (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)</li>
<li>Hugh Wilford, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-cia-an-imperial-history-hugh-wilford/20664615?ean=9781541645912&amp;next=t"><em>The CIA: An Imperial History</em></a> (2024)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/legacy-of-ashes-the-history-of-the-cia-tim-weiner/8582123?ean=9780307389008&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gbraid=0AAAAACfld41PyiPXK7q6QUeP2QTm9WNYd&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwm7q-BhDRARIsACD6-fW1v4sqc0l2U2Phdg_SWAiY4kN18_mq15ZwIpK0FQDt5WJLNWm2sNMaApONEALw_wcB"><em>Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA</em></a> (2008)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-mission-the-cia-in-the-21st-century-tim-weiner/22062129"><em>The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century</em></a> (2024)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. </p><p>Using primary documents and interviews, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399519496"><em>The President’s Kill List</em></a><em> </em>meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.</p><p><a href="https://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/l.trenta/">Dr. Luca Trenta</a> is an Associate Professor of International Relations <em>i</em>n the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, <em>Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises </em>(Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called <em>Secret Wars Uncovered </em>(2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Joseph Burkholder Smith, <a href="https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/portrait-cold-warrior/author/joseph-burkholder-smith/"><em>Portrait of a Cold Warrior</em></a> (1976)</li>
<li>John Frankenheimer, <em>The Manchurian Candidate</em> (1962)</li>
<li>The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at <a href="https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/sites/default/files/pdf_documents/library/document/0312/1552390.pdf">page 35 here</a> and <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16161262.2018.1430431">Luca’s story about the meeting is here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/family-jewels#:~:text=Widely%20known%20as%20the%20%22Family,inconsistent%20with%20the%20Agency's%20charter.">“Family Jewels”</a> document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)</li>
<li>Rebecca Sanders, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/plausible-legality-legal-culture-and-political-imperative-in-the-global-war-on-terror-rebecca-sanders/21764343?ean=9780190870553&amp;next=t">Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror</a> (2018)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/94465.pdf">The Church Committee Report</a> (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)</li>
<li>Hugh Wilford, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-cia-an-imperial-history-hugh-wilford/20664615?ean=9781541645912&amp;next=t"><em>The CIA: An Imperial History</em></a> (2024)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/legacy-of-ashes-the-history-of-the-cia-tim-weiner/8582123?ean=9780307389008&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gbraid=0AAAAACfld41PyiPXK7q6QUeP2QTm9WNYd&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwm7q-BhDRARIsACD6-fW1v4sqc0l2U2Phdg_SWAiY4kN18_mq15ZwIpK0FQDt5WJLNWm2sNMaApONEALw_wcB"><em>Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA</em></a> (2008)</li>
<li>Tim Weiner, <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-mission-the-cia-in-the-21st-century-tim-weiner/22062129"><em>The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century</em></a> (2024)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53326743" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/02eac560-f4d1-48f1-8cab-e7b9065c4065/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=02eac560-f4d1-48f1-8cab-e7b9065c4065&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Luca Trenta, &quot;The President&apos;s Kill List: Assassination and Us Foreign Policy Since 1945&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. 
Using primary documents and interviews, The President’s Kill List meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.
Dr. Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises (Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called Secret Wars Uncovered (2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.
Mentioned:

Joseph Burkholder Smith, Portrait of a Cold Warrior (1976)

John Frankenheimer, The Manchurian Candidate (1962)

The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at page 35 here and Luca’s story about the meeting is here



“Family Jewels” document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)

Rebecca Sanders, Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror (2018)


The Church Committee Report (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)

Hugh Wilford, The CIA: An Imperial History (2024)

Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA (2008)

Tim Weiner, The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century (2024)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Investigative reporter Bob Woodward once noted that assassination was the Scarlett letter of American politics because targeted killings challenge the image of the United States as a liberal democracy and the driving force behind a rules-based international order. In his new book, Luca Trenta documents how assassination and assassination attempts have been a persistent feature in US foreign policy. The US government has relied on a variety of direct methods as well as more indirectly laying the groundwork for local assassins. 
Using primary documents and interviews, The President’s Kill List meticulously documents how policymakers decided on assassination and the level of Presidential control over these decisions. The book analyzes the evolution of assassination policies and reveals how successive administrations - through private justifications and public legitimations - ensured that assassination remained an available tool. The podcast includes insightful comments on assassination and the Trump administration. The paperback is coming out in May 2025.
Dr. Luca Trenta is an Associate Professor of International Relations in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University. His previous publications include an earlier book, Risk and Presidential Decision-making: The Emergence of Foreign Policy Crises (Routledge, 2016) and he hosts Out of the Shadows, interviewing authors and experts in intelligence and covert operations. In his public-facing scholarship, Dr. Trenta has appeared in a History Channel documentary called Secret Wars Uncovered (2020) and he regularly contributes to and collaborates with media outlets such as the BBC.
Mentioned:

Joseph Burkholder Smith, Portrait of a Cold Warrior (1976)

John Frankenheimer, The Manchurian Candidate (1962)

The Ford-Colby-Kissinger meeting is at page 35 here and Luca’s story about the meeting is here



“Family Jewels” document of CIA employee responses to James Schlesinger asking to report activities outside CIA charter (1973)

Rebecca Sanders, Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror (2018)


The Church Committee Report (Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1976)

Hugh Wilford, The CIA: An Imperial History (2024)

Tim Weiner, Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA (2008)

Tim Weiner, The Mission: The CIA in the 21st Century (2024)


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>757</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">121452be-fea6-11ef-9ee9-1fc3cf489a67</guid>
      <title>Matthew Fuhrmann, &quot;Influence without Arms: The New Logic of Nuclear Deterrence&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How does nuclear technology influence international relations? While many books focus on countries armed with nuclear weapons, this volume puts the spotlight on those who have the technology to build nuclear bombs but choose not to. These weapons-capable countries, such as Brazil, Germany, and Japan, have what is known as nuclear latency, and they shape world politics in important ways.</p><p>Matthew Fuhrmann navigates a critical yet poorly understood issue by offering a definitive account of nuclear latency. He identifies global trends, explains why countries obtain nuclear latency and analyzes its consequences for international security. Influence Without Arms presents new statistical and case evidence that nuclear latency enhances deterrence, provides greater influence, and triggers conflict and arms races. The book offers a framework to explain when nuclear latency increases security and, when it incites instability, generates far-reaching implications for deterrence, nuclear proliferation, arms races, preventive war, and disarmament.</p><p>Our guest is <a href="http://www.matthewfuhrmann.com/">Matthew Fuhrmann</a>, the Cullen-McFadden Professor of Political Science at Texas A&amp;M University.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does nuclear technology influence international relations? While many books focus on countries armed with nuclear weapons, this volume puts the spotlight on those who have the technology to build nuclear bombs but choose not to. These weapons-capable countries, such as Brazil, Germany, and Japan, have what is known as nuclear latency, and they shape world politics in important ways.</p><p>Matthew Fuhrmann navigates a critical yet poorly understood issue by offering a definitive account of nuclear latency. He identifies global trends, explains why countries obtain nuclear latency and analyzes its consequences for international security. Influence Without Arms presents new statistical and case evidence that nuclear latency enhances deterrence, provides greater influence, and triggers conflict and arms races. The book offers a framework to explain when nuclear latency increases security and, when it incites instability, generates far-reaching implications for deterrence, nuclear proliferation, arms races, preventive war, and disarmament.</p><p>Our guest is <a href="http://www.matthewfuhrmann.com/">Matthew Fuhrmann</a>, the Cullen-McFadden Professor of Political Science at Texas A&amp;M University.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50323296" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d4009373-df40-4af6-a3ed-2b23bf9aeb96/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d4009373-df40-4af6-a3ed-2b23bf9aeb96&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Fuhrmann, &quot;Influence without Arms: The New Logic of Nuclear Deterrence&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How does nuclear technology influence international relations? While many books focus on countries armed with nuclear weapons, this volume puts the spotlight on those who have the technology to build nuclear bombs but choose not to. These weapons-capable countries, such as Brazil, Germany, and Japan, have what is known as nuclear latency, and they shape world politics in important ways.
Matthew Fuhrmann navigates a critical yet poorly understood issue by offering a definitive account of nuclear latency. He identifies global trends, explains why countries obtain nuclear latency and analyzes its consequences for international security. Influence Without Arms presents new statistical and case evidence that nuclear latency enhances deterrence, provides greater influence, and triggers conflict and arms races. The book offers a framework to explain when nuclear latency increases security and, when it incites instability, generates far-reaching implications for deterrence, nuclear proliferation, arms races, preventive war, and disarmament.
Our guest is Matthew Fuhrmann, the Cullen-McFadden Professor of Political Science at Texas A&amp;M University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How does nuclear technology influence international relations? While many books focus on countries armed with nuclear weapons, this volume puts the spotlight on those who have the technology to build nuclear bombs but choose not to. These weapons-capable countries, such as Brazil, Germany, and Japan, have what is known as nuclear latency, and they shape world politics in important ways.
Matthew Fuhrmann navigates a critical yet poorly understood issue by offering a definitive account of nuclear latency. He identifies global trends, explains why countries obtain nuclear latency and analyzes its consequences for international security. Influence Without Arms presents new statistical and case evidence that nuclear latency enhances deterrence, provides greater influence, and triggers conflict and arms races. The book offers a framework to explain when nuclear latency increases security and, when it incites instability, generates far-reaching implications for deterrence, nuclear proliferation, arms races, preventive war, and disarmament.
Our guest is Matthew Fuhrmann, the Cullen-McFadden Professor of Political Science at Texas A&amp;M University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46f7daf4-fea2-11ef-aeea-7bc2efc663b0</guid>
      <title>Martin Spychal, &quot;Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act&quot; (U London Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country’s ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain’s slow lurch towards democracy by 1928.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781915249258"><em>Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act</em></a><em> </em>(U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England’s electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery­­—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country’s ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain’s slow lurch towards democracy by 1928.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781915249258"><em>Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act</em></a><em> </em>(U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England’s electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery­­—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49865828" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/407ef0ab-870e-4c4b-87c2-3e7d1a242032/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=407ef0ab-870e-4c4b-87c2-3e7d1a242032&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Martin Spychal, &quot;Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act&quot; (U London Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country’s ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain’s slow lurch towards democracy by 1928.
Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England’s electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery­­—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 1832 Reform Act was a landmark moment in the development of modern British politics. By overhauling the country’s ancient representative system, the legislation reshaped constitutional arrangements at Westminster, reinvigorated political relationships between the center and the provinces, and established the political structures and precedents that both shaped and hindered Britain’s slow lurch towards democracy by 1928.
Mapping the State: English Boundaries and the 1832 Reform Act (U London Press, 2024) leads to a fundamental rethinking of the 1832 Reform Act by demonstrating how boundary reform and the reconstruction of England’s electoral map by the little-known 1831–1832 boundary commission underpinned this turning point in the development of the British political nation. Eschewing traditional approaches to the 1832 Reform Act, it draws from a significant new archival discovery­­—the working papers of the boundary commission—and a range of innovative quantitative techniques to provide a major reassessment of why and how the 1832 Reform Act passed, its impact on reformed politics both at Westminster and in the constituencies, and its significance to the expansion of the modern British state.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b4d4bf0-0025-11f0-a1fa-47f0606c3b66</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Donald Trump is Erasing History – What YOU Can Do about it</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”</p><p>The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a <a href="https://www.historians.org/">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/">Organization of American Historians</a> recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. <a href="https://wendylrouse.com/">Wendy L. Rouse</a>, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including <em>Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement</em> published by NYU Press in 2022. <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/public-faces-secret-lives#entry:176437@1:url">Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>Reports by <a href="https://apnews.com/article/dei-purge-images-pentagon-diversity-women-black-8efcfaec909954f4a24bad0d49c78074">AP</a> about scrubbing military websites and <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/05/nx-s1-5318767/nps-lgbtq-transgender-history">NPR</a> on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites</li>
<li>LBGTQ Historian <a href="http://clgbthistory.org/">statements </a>and <a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/herebefore/powerofourhistory">articles</a> including <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qHqQix_XkmiXVb6dclAPQNMSElDuIMsqV3gUN_Byxxo/edit?tab=t.0">letter</a> signed by 360 historians</li>
<li>Wendy’s blogposts on <a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/suff/yetmore">OutHistory </a>and the <a href="https://nyupress.org/blog/2025/03/11/rewriting-womens-history-how-the-national-parks-service-erased-transgender-people-from-my-research-by-wendy-l-rouse/">NYU Press</a> blog</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/">5calls ap</a> for connecting with senators and representatives</li>
<li><a href="https://www.glbthistory.org/">GLBT Historical Association</a></li>
<li>Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have <a href="https://lambdalegal.org/newsroom/sf_us_20250220_lgbtq-hiv-advocates-file-lawsuit-challenging-trump-orders-to-erase-trans-people-defund-services/">filed a lawsuit</a> challenging the Trump Administration's executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”</p><p>The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a <a href="https://www.historians.org/">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a> and <a href="https://www.oah.org/">Organization of American Historians</a> recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. <a href="https://wendylrouse.com/">Wendy L. Rouse</a>, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including <em>Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement</em> published by NYU Press in 2022. <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/public-faces-secret-lives#entry:176437@1:url">Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the Podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s <a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a> for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>Reports by <a href="https://apnews.com/article/dei-purge-images-pentagon-diversity-women-black-8efcfaec909954f4a24bad0d49c78074">AP</a> about scrubbing military websites and <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/05/nx-s1-5318767/nps-lgbtq-transgender-history">NPR</a> on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites</li>
<li>LBGTQ Historian <a href="http://clgbthistory.org/">statements </a>and <a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/herebefore/powerofourhistory">articles</a> including <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qHqQix_XkmiXVb6dclAPQNMSElDuIMsqV3gUN_Byxxo/edit?tab=t.0">letter</a> signed by 360 historians</li>
<li>Wendy’s blogposts on <a href="https://outhistory.org/exhibits/show/suff/yetmore">OutHistory </a>and the <a href="https://nyupress.org/blog/2025/03/11/rewriting-womens-history-how-the-national-parks-service-erased-transgender-people-from-my-research-by-wendy-l-rouse/">NYU Press</a> blog</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/">5calls ap</a> for connecting with senators and representatives</li>
<li><a href="https://www.glbthistory.org/">GLBT Historical Association</a></li>
<li>Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have <a href="https://lambdalegal.org/newsroom/sf_us_20250220_lgbtq-hiv-advocates-file-lawsuit-challenging-trump-orders-to-erase-trans-people-defund-services/">filed a lawsuit</a> challenging the Trump Administration's executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="16402194" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/37ce8848-d210-4937-97a1-ae213aab542b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=37ce8848-d210-4937-97a1-ae213aab542b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Donald Trump is Erasing History – What YOU Can Do about it</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:17:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”
The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. Wendy L. Rouse, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement published by NYU Press in 2022. Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here.
Mentioned in the Podcast:

Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

Reports by AP about scrubbing military websites and NPR on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites

LBGTQ Historian statements and articles including letter signed by 360 historians

Wendy’s blogposts on OutHistory and the NYU Press blog


5calls ap for connecting with senators and representatives

GLBT Historical Association

Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration&apos;s executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On January 20th, Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” The order announced that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...”
The enforcement of this executive order has rippled through the United States – and has included removing words and images from websites and papering over interpretive panels in museums. For example, material related to the Enola Gay -- a WWII Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber, named after Enola Gay Tibbets, the mother of the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets – was removed because it contained the word “gay.” As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
To discuss how – and why – the Trump administration is censoring and removing historical materials, my guest is Dr. Wendy L. Rouse, Professor of History at San Jose State University where she is the program coordinator for the History/Social Science Teacher Preparation Program. Her research focuses on the history of gender and sexuality in the Progressive Era – and her publication for the National Park Service was changed after the executive order. She is the author of books and articles, including Public Faces, Secret Lives: A Queer History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement published by NYU Press in 2022. Susan’s NBN conversation with Wendy about the book is here.
Mentioned in the Podcast:

Organization of American Historians (OAH)’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material

Reports by AP about scrubbing military websites and NPR on removal of photographs and mentions of trans and queer on National Park Service websites

LBGTQ Historian statements and articles including letter signed by 360 historians

Wendy’s blogposts on OutHistory and the NYU Press blog


5calls ap for connecting with senators and representatives

GLBT Historical Association

Multiple LGBTQ organizations, represented by Lambda Legal, have filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration&apos;s executive orders attempting to erase transgender people and deny them access to services


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">25c42be4-ff3d-11ef-bb1f-3701dfbbb715</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf">Calvin’s Case</a> (1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s <a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a> and their <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur, <em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em> (2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf">Calvin’s Case</a> (1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s <a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a> and their <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur, <em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em> (2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34471898" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/673f23e9-80fb-4ad4-8476-195cd941d17a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=673f23e9-80fb-4ad4-8476-195cd941d17a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:


Calvin’s Case (1608)

Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160


Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.

Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”

Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts


Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America


Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)

Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:


Calvin’s Case (1608)

Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160


Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.

Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”

Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts


Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America


Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)

Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">374b6d08-fe9a-11ef-9f0b-fb581be9d7b9</guid>
      <title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us: A Conversation with Frances Lee</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the first part of our two-part conversation on <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135"><em>In COVID’s Wake</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.</p><p>This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.</p><p>Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake<em>”</em> challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first part of our two-part conversation on <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691267135"><em>In COVID’s Wake</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.</p><p>This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.</p><p>Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake<em>”</em> challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42438862" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/10b30396-8879-4c3a-a95c-d8f95fc29e2d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=10b30396-8879-4c3a-a95c-d8f95fc29e2d&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>In Covid’s Wake: How our Politics Failed Us: A Conversation with Frances Lee</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the first part of our two-part conversation on Madison’s Notes, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book In COVID’s Wake (Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.
This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.
Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake” challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the first part of our two-part conversation on Madison’s Notes, we speak with Frances Lee, Professor of Politics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, about her co-authored book In COVID’s Wake (Princeton UP, 2025). The book offers a comprehensive and candid political assessment of how institutions performed during the pandemic. It explores how governments, influenced by Wuhan’s lockdown, deviated from existing pandemic plans, leading to policies that often favored the “laptop class” while leaving essential workers vulnerable. Extended school closures disproportionately affected less-privileged families, and the politicization of science marginalized dissent. Lee and her co-author, Stephen Macedo, argue that future crises must uphold the values of liberal democracy: tolerance, respect for evidence, and a commitment to truth.
This discussion dives into key questions raised in the book, including the importance of conducting a post-mortem of the pandemic response. Lee highlighted how polarization in the two-party system complicates evaluations of what worked and what didn’t. We also explored the role of states as “laboratories” for different responses and whether meaningful comparisons can be drawn between them. Lee reflected on why pre-existing pandemic plans were abandoned and how the pandemic strained the public’s trust in media, policy advisors, and academic institutions. The ambiguity of desired policy outcomes, she noted, often hindered rational cost-benefit analysis, further complicating the response.
Lee emphasized the value of embracing complexity and ambiguity in conversations about societal and political issues. By examining the pandemic’s lessons, “In COVID’s Wake” challenges readers to consider how we can better prepare for future crises while staying true to democratic principles.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b3221996-fc3c-11ef-8be4-3b743d678479</guid>
      <title>Postscript: All talk and no action? How political scientists respond to racism and authoritarianism?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a> appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.</p><p><a href="https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/0031Q00002QQ02IQAT/nadia-brown">Dr. Nadia E. Brown</a> is Professor of Government and Director of the Women's and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown's research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women's studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sister-style#entry:50542@1:url"><em>Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites</em></a> (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).</p><p><a href="http://www.fernandotormos.com/">Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte</a> is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.</p><p><a href="https://www.aast.umd.edu/bio-janelle-wong">Dr. Janelle Wong</a> is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/janelle-wong-immigrants-evangelicals-and-politics-in-an-era-of-demographic-change-russell-sage-foundation-2018#entry:10194@1:url">Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change</a> and also her work on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/co-authored-the-collaborative-multiracial-post-election-survey#entry:2626@1:url">The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey</a> as part of Heath Brown’s <em>Co-Authored</em> series.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a> in <em>APSR</em>, Cambridge</li>
<li>
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lGk2F6LPMJmcrgAYrZPvUPn7vmPECCqi/view?usp=sharing">APSA Letter with 1202 signatures</a> from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfI4whjcUXdIQgmbfAU9pq7YYLepK9DWBz4fHsHyS611riAcw/viewform">here</a>.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a> appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.</p><p><a href="https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/contact/0031Q00002QQ02IQAT/nadia-brown">Dr. Nadia E. Brown</a> is Professor of Government and Director of the Women's and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown's research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women's studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sister-style#entry:50542@1:url"><em>Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites</em></a> (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).</p><p><a href="http://www.fernandotormos.com/">Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte</a> is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.</p><p><a href="https://www.aast.umd.edu/bio-janelle-wong">Dr. Janelle Wong</a> is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/janelle-wong-immigrants-evangelicals-and-politics-in-an-era-of-demographic-change-russell-sage-foundation-2018#entry:10194@1:url">Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change</a> and also her work on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/co-authored-the-collaborative-multiracial-post-election-survey#entry:2626@1:url">The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey</a> as part of Heath Brown’s <em>Co-Authored</em> series.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/an-incomplete-recognition-an-analysis-of-political-science-department-statements-after-the-murder-of-george-floyd/E08240CB9657DF3D47B4F4EE48927471">“An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd”</a> in <em>APSR</em>, Cambridge</li>
<li>
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lGk2F6LPMJmcrgAYrZPvUPn7vmPECCqi/view?usp=sharing">APSA Letter with 1202 signatures</a> from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfI4whjcUXdIQgmbfAU9pq7YYLepK9DWBz4fHsHyS611riAcw/viewform">here</a>.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55654245" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1c6ee19f-9d0f-48ad-964c-9f7fa55cfced/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1c6ee19f-9d0f-48ad-964c-9f7fa55cfced&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: All talk and no action? How political scientists respond to racism and authoritarianism?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.
Dr. Nadia E. Brown is Professor of Government and Director of the Women&apos;s and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown&apos;s research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women&apos;s studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).
Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.
Dr. Janelle Wong is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change and also her work on The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey as part of Heath Brown’s Co-Authored series.
Mentioned:

Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” in APSR, Cambridge


APSA Letter with 1202 signatures from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name here.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After the murder of George Floyd, the United States had the largest protests in the nation’s history. Other public and private responses included corporations, organizations, and communities making policies, issuing statements, and engaging in conversations. Some political science departments issued statements. My guests today are three political scientists who looked at the substance of those statements – and reflected on what it means about the discipline of political science. Their article “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” appeared in the prestigious APSR (American Political Science Review) published by Cambridge University Press. In the podcast, the authors analyze what political scientists did – and did not do – and what their statements might tell us about how political scientists understand race, racism, and power. We also reflect on how political scientists have reacted to the second Trump presidency in a joint statement.
Dr. Nadia E. Brown is Professor of Government and Director of the Women&apos;s and Gender Studies Program at Georgetown University. Dr. Brown&apos;s research interests lie broadly in identity politics, legislative studies, and Black women&apos;s studies. While trained as a political scientist, her scholarship on intersectionality seeks to push beyond disciplinary constraints to think more holistically about the politics of identity. She previously discussed in one of her books on the NBN: Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites (co-authored with Danielle Casarez Lemi).
Dr. Fernando Tormos-Aponte is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Pittsburgh and Policy Lead for the Just Transition Alliance. Dr. Tormos-Aponte specializes in environmental and racial justice, intersectional solidarity, identity politics, social policy, and transnational politics. Dr. Tormos-Aponte’s research on social movements focuses on how social movements cope with internal divisions and gain political influence. Tormos-Aponte also investigates civil society claims about the uneven government response across communities. His work in this area examines the causes and consequences of government neglect of socially vulnerable communities during disaster recoveries.
Dr. Janelle Wong is Professor of Government and Politics and Professor of American Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is also the Director of the Asian American Studies Program. Dr. Wong’s research focuses on race, immigration, and political mobilization. As a scholar and teacher, Wong has worked closely with social service, labor, civil rights, and media organizations that serve the Asian American population. She has talked about her book on the NBN Immigrants, Evangelicals, and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change and also her work on The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey as part of Heath Brown’s Co-Authored series.
Mentioned:

Brown, Tormos-Aponte, and Wong, “An Incomplete Recognition: An Analysis of Political Science Department Statements after the Murder of George Floyd” in APSR, Cambridge


APSA Letter with 1202 signatures from political science PhDs expressing urgent concern about threats to the basic design of American government and democracy. Add your name here.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">707695be-fc31-11ef-9017-178bbcd2815f</guid>
      <title>&quot;Steadfast Democrats&quot; Five Years Later: A Conversation with Chryl N. Laird</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691228983"><em>Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior</em></a><em>.</em> Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.</p><p>Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691228983"><em>Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior</em></a><em>.</em> Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.</p><p>Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60193112" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3b2a0766-4689-4eb8-817c-26683f161880/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3b2a0766-4689-4eb8-817c-26683f161880&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>&quot;Steadfast Democrats&quot; Five Years Later: A Conversation with Chryl N. Laird</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.
Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Chryl Laird, Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park. We are discussing her co-authored book with Ismail White, Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Published in 2020, this book remains highly relevant for understanding American political behavior. While Trump did make significant gains among black voters in 2024, particularly male voters, African American voters still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party. Chryl has appeared on the NBN in the past, so while we will discuss the book, we will also discuss it in the context of today.
Chryl Laird is Associate Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">487d83d0-fc48-11ef-9df6-f7ea978ba41f</guid>
      <title>Cotton, Central Asia and the New Great Game</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode, rural sociologist Dr. Irna Hofman explores how Tajikistan’s cotton fields illuminate shifting power dynamics in Central Asia, historically and in the present. She discusses how the Soviet Union once showcased cotton production to visiting delegations—particularly from Muslim-majority countries—as evidence of its development model. Now, as global powers, including Russia, China, and the EU, vie for influence in the region, cotton has again become a strategic commodity—used to forge political ties, secure resources, and drive infrastructure projects. Hofman highlights local communities’ active role in shaping these developments, emphasizing that rural landscapes are not simply backdrops for a “New Great Game,” but sites where broader geopolitical forces and grassroots agency intersect. Through her long-term fieldwork, she illustrates how Tajik farmers navigate and negotiate these overlapping external interests, and in doing so, reframe Central Asia’s future amidst geopolitical tensions.</p><p>Dr. Hofman specializes in agrarian and social change in Central Asia, where she has worked since 2012. She completed post-doctoral research at Oxford's Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies as part of an ERC-funded project "China, law and development." In 2019, she obtained her Ph.D. from Leiden University in the Netherlands with a dissertation focused on the political economy of agrarian transformation in Tajikistan: "Cotton, control, and continuity in disguise: The political economy of agrarian transformation in lowland Tajikistan." Her research interests span political economy, political ecology, and political sociology. In recent years, she has focused on rural labour, gender, and commodity politics. Dr. Hofman is completing a monograph based on her dissertation and post-doctoral research projects. Her research agenda for the coming years centers on the rural everyday of geopolitics, focusing on China's growing assertiveness in the global agrifood regime, shifting geographies of production, and rural labour.</p><p><a href="https://www.geog.ox.ac.uk/staff/ihofman.html">Dr Irna Hofman | School of Geography and the Environment | University of Oxford</a></p><p><a href="https://x.com/irnahofman">@irnahofman</a></p><p>Resources:</p><ul>
<li>Hofman, I. (2024) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12581">Seeds of empire or seeds of friendship? The politics of the diffusion of Chinese crop seeds in Tajikistan</a>. <em>Journal of Agrarian Chang</em>e, 24(2): e12581.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2022) <a href="https://thepeoplesmap.net/country/tajikistan/">Tajikistan</a>. <a href="https://thepeoplesmap.net/"><em>The people's map of global China</em></a>
</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2021) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2020.1788519">Migration, crop diversification, and adverse incorporation: Understanding the repertoire of contention in rural Tajikistan</a>. <em>Canadian Journal of Development Studies,</em> 42(4): 499-518.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2021). <a href="https://cld.web.ox.ac.uk/files/hofmanrbformattedfinalpdf">Chinese cotton diplomacy in Tajikistan: greasing the ties by reviving the cotton economy</a>. Research Brief.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2018). <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315146676-8/politics-profits-along-silk-road-drives-chinese-farms-tajikistan-helps-thrive-irna-hofman">Politics or profits along the “Silk Road”: What drives Chinese farms in Tajikistan and helps them thrive?</a> In <em>The Geoeconomics and Geopolitics of Chinese Development and Investment in Asia</em>, pp. 183-208. Routledge.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this episode, rural sociologist Dr. Irna Hofman explores how Tajikistan’s cotton fields illuminate shifting power dynamics in Central Asia, historically and in the present. She discusses how the Soviet Union once showcased cotton production to visiting delegations—particularly from Muslim-majority countries—as evidence of its development model. Now, as global powers, including Russia, China, and the EU, vie for influence in the region, cotton has again become a strategic commodity—used to forge political ties, secure resources, and drive infrastructure projects. Hofman highlights local communities’ active role in shaping these developments, emphasizing that rural landscapes are not simply backdrops for a “New Great Game,” but sites where broader geopolitical forces and grassroots agency intersect. Through her long-term fieldwork, she illustrates how Tajik farmers navigate and negotiate these overlapping external interests, and in doing so, reframe Central Asia’s future amidst geopolitical tensions.</p><p>Dr. Hofman specializes in agrarian and social change in Central Asia, where she has worked since 2012. She completed post-doctoral research at Oxford's Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies as part of an ERC-funded project "China, law and development." In 2019, she obtained her Ph.D. from Leiden University in the Netherlands with a dissertation focused on the political economy of agrarian transformation in Tajikistan: "Cotton, control, and continuity in disguise: The political economy of agrarian transformation in lowland Tajikistan." Her research interests span political economy, political ecology, and political sociology. In recent years, she has focused on rural labour, gender, and commodity politics. Dr. Hofman is completing a monograph based on her dissertation and post-doctoral research projects. Her research agenda for the coming years centers on the rural everyday of geopolitics, focusing on China's growing assertiveness in the global agrifood regime, shifting geographies of production, and rural labour.</p><p><a href="https://www.geog.ox.ac.uk/staff/ihofman.html">Dr Irna Hofman | School of Geography and the Environment | University of Oxford</a></p><p><a href="https://x.com/irnahofman">@irnahofman</a></p><p>Resources:</p><ul>
<li>Hofman, I. (2024) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12581">Seeds of empire or seeds of friendship? The politics of the diffusion of Chinese crop seeds in Tajikistan</a>. <em>Journal of Agrarian Chang</em>e, 24(2): e12581.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2022) <a href="https://thepeoplesmap.net/country/tajikistan/">Tajikistan</a>. <a href="https://thepeoplesmap.net/"><em>The people's map of global China</em></a>
</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2021) <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2020.1788519">Migration, crop diversification, and adverse incorporation: Understanding the repertoire of contention in rural Tajikistan</a>. <em>Canadian Journal of Development Studies,</em> 42(4): 499-518.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2021). <a href="https://cld.web.ox.ac.uk/files/hofmanrbformattedfinalpdf">Chinese cotton diplomacy in Tajikistan: greasing the ties by reviving the cotton economy</a>. Research Brief.</li>
<li>Hofman, I. (2018). <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315146676-8/politics-profits-along-silk-road-drives-chinese-farms-tajikistan-helps-thrive-irna-hofman">Politics or profits along the “Silk Road”: What drives Chinese farms in Tajikistan and helps them thrive?</a> In <em>The Geoeconomics and Geopolitics of Chinese Development and Investment in Asia</em>, pp. 183-208. Routledge.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38676820" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c5f3f67f-f877-43f2-81e8-a8db053563bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c5f3f67f-f877-43f2-81e8-a8db053563bf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Cotton, Central Asia and the New Great Game</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode, rural sociologist Dr. Irna Hofman explores how Tajikistan’s cotton fields illuminate shifting power dynamics in Central Asia, historically and in the present. She discusses how the Soviet Union once showcased cotton production to visiting delegations—particularly from Muslim-majority countries—as evidence of its development model. Now, as global powers, including Russia, China, and the EU, vie for influence in the region, cotton has again become a strategic commodity—used to forge political ties, secure resources, and drive infrastructure projects. Hofman highlights local communities’ active role in shaping these developments, emphasizing that rural landscapes are not simply backdrops for a “New Great Game,” but sites where broader geopolitical forces and grassroots agency intersect. Through her long-term fieldwork, she illustrates how Tajik farmers navigate and negotiate these overlapping external interests, and in doing so, reframe Central Asia’s future amidst geopolitical tensions.
Dr. Hofman specializes in agrarian and social change in Central Asia, where she has worked since 2012. She completed post-doctoral research at Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies as part of an ERC-funded project &quot;China, law and development.&quot; In 2019, she obtained her Ph.D. from Leiden University in the Netherlands with a dissertation focused on the political economy of agrarian transformation in Tajikistan: &quot;Cotton, control, and continuity in disguise: The political economy of agrarian transformation in lowland Tajikistan.&quot; Her research interests span political economy, political ecology, and political sociology. In recent years, she has focused on rural labour, gender, and commodity politics. Dr. Hofman is completing a monograph based on her dissertation and post-doctoral research projects. Her research agenda for the coming years centers on the rural everyday of geopolitics, focusing on China&apos;s growing assertiveness in the global agrifood regime, shifting geographies of production, and rural labour.
Dr Irna Hofman | School of Geography and the Environment | University of Oxford
@irnahofman
Resources:

Hofman, I. (2024) Seeds of empire or seeds of friendship? The politics of the diffusion of Chinese crop seeds in Tajikistan. Journal of Agrarian Change, 24(2): e12581.

Hofman, I. (2022) Tajikistan. The people&apos;s map of global China


Hofman, I. (2021) Migration, crop diversification, and adverse incorporation: Understanding the repertoire of contention in rural Tajikistan. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 42(4): 499-518.

Hofman, I. (2021). Chinese cotton diplomacy in Tajikistan: greasing the ties by reviving the cotton economy. Research Brief.

Hofman, I. (2018). Politics or profits along the “Silk Road”: What drives Chinese farms in Tajikistan and helps them thrive? In The Geoeconomics and Geopolitics of Chinese Development and Investment in Asia, pp. 183-208. Routledge.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode, rural sociologist Dr. Irna Hofman explores how Tajikistan’s cotton fields illuminate shifting power dynamics in Central Asia, historically and in the present. She discusses how the Soviet Union once showcased cotton production to visiting delegations—particularly from Muslim-majority countries—as evidence of its development model. Now, as global powers, including Russia, China, and the EU, vie for influence in the region, cotton has again become a strategic commodity—used to forge political ties, secure resources, and drive infrastructure projects. Hofman highlights local communities’ active role in shaping these developments, emphasizing that rural landscapes are not simply backdrops for a “New Great Game,” but sites where broader geopolitical forces and grassroots agency intersect. Through her long-term fieldwork, she illustrates how Tajik farmers navigate and negotiate these overlapping external interests, and in doing so, reframe Central Asia’s future amidst geopolitical tensions.
Dr. Hofman specializes in agrarian and social change in Central Asia, where she has worked since 2012. She completed post-doctoral research at Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies as part of an ERC-funded project &quot;China, law and development.&quot; In 2019, she obtained her Ph.D. from Leiden University in the Netherlands with a dissertation focused on the political economy of agrarian transformation in Tajikistan: &quot;Cotton, control, and continuity in disguise: The political economy of agrarian transformation in lowland Tajikistan.&quot; Her research interests span political economy, political ecology, and political sociology. In recent years, she has focused on rural labour, gender, and commodity politics. Dr. Hofman is completing a monograph based on her dissertation and post-doctoral research projects. Her research agenda for the coming years centers on the rural everyday of geopolitics, focusing on China&apos;s growing assertiveness in the global agrifood regime, shifting geographies of production, and rural labour.
Dr Irna Hofman | School of Geography and the Environment | University of Oxford
@irnahofman
Resources:

Hofman, I. (2024) Seeds of empire or seeds of friendship? The politics of the diffusion of Chinese crop seeds in Tajikistan. Journal of Agrarian Change, 24(2): e12581.

Hofman, I. (2022) Tajikistan. The people&apos;s map of global China


Hofman, I. (2021) Migration, crop diversification, and adverse incorporation: Understanding the repertoire of contention in rural Tajikistan. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 42(4): 499-518.

Hofman, I. (2021). Chinese cotton diplomacy in Tajikistan: greasing the ties by reviving the cotton economy. Research Brief.

Hofman, I. (2018). Politics or profits along the “Silk Road”: What drives Chinese farms in Tajikistan and helps them thrive? In The Geoeconomics and Geopolitics of Chinese Development and Investment in Asia, pp. 183-208. Routledge.


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf8d2016-fb6b-11ef-8f8e-abecb21f156b</guid>
      <title>Abby Innes, &quot;Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has the United Kingdom, historically one of the strongest democracies in the world, become so unstable? What changed?<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009373630"> <em>Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2023) demonstrates that a major part of the answer lies in the transformation of its state. It shows how Britain championed radical economic liberalisation only to weaken and ultimately break its own governing institutions. The crisis of democracy in rich countries has brought forward many urgent analyses of neoliberal capitalism. This book explores for the first time how the 'governing science' in Leninist and neoliberal revolutions fails for many of the same reasons. These systems may have been utterly opposed in their political values, but Abby Innes argues that when we grasp the kinship in their closed-system forms of economic reasoning and their strategies for government, we may better understand the causes of state failure in what remains an inescapably open-system reality.</p><p>Abby Innes is Associate Professor of Political Economy in the European Institute at the LSE.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has the United Kingdom, historically one of the strongest democracies in the world, become so unstable? What changed?<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009373630"> <em>Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2023) demonstrates that a major part of the answer lies in the transformation of its state. It shows how Britain championed radical economic liberalisation only to weaken and ultimately break its own governing institutions. The crisis of democracy in rich countries has brought forward many urgent analyses of neoliberal capitalism. This book explores for the first time how the 'governing science' in Leninist and neoliberal revolutions fails for many of the same reasons. These systems may have been utterly opposed in their political values, but Abby Innes argues that when we grasp the kinship in their closed-system forms of economic reasoning and their strategies for government, we may better understand the causes of state failure in what remains an inescapably open-system reality.</p><p>Abby Innes is Associate Professor of Political Economy in the European Institute at the LSE.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="87344929" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4cbaf686-0d07-44ec-b12d-e3634eb72b03/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4cbaf686-0d07-44ec-b12d-e3634eb72b03&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Abby Innes, &quot;Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why has the United Kingdom, historically one of the strongest democracies in the world, become so unstable? What changed? Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail (Cambridge UP, 2023) demonstrates that a major part of the answer lies in the transformation of its state. It shows how Britain championed radical economic liberalisation only to weaken and ultimately break its own governing institutions. The crisis of democracy in rich countries has brought forward many urgent analyses of neoliberal capitalism. This book explores for the first time how the &apos;governing science&apos; in Leninist and neoliberal revolutions fails for many of the same reasons. These systems may have been utterly opposed in their political values, but Abby Innes argues that when we grasp the kinship in their closed-system forms of economic reasoning and their strategies for government, we may better understand the causes of state failure in what remains an inescapably open-system reality.
Abby Innes is Associate Professor of Political Economy in the European Institute at the LSE.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why has the United Kingdom, historically one of the strongest democracies in the world, become so unstable? What changed? Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail (Cambridge UP, 2023) demonstrates that a major part of the answer lies in the transformation of its state. It shows how Britain championed radical economic liberalisation only to weaken and ultimately break its own governing institutions. The crisis of democracy in rich countries has brought forward many urgent analyses of neoliberal capitalism. This book explores for the first time how the &apos;governing science&apos; in Leninist and neoliberal revolutions fails for many of the same reasons. These systems may have been utterly opposed in their political values, but Abby Innes argues that when we grasp the kinship in their closed-system forms of economic reasoning and their strategies for government, we may better understand the causes of state failure in what remains an inescapably open-system reality.
Abby Innes is Associate Professor of Political Economy in the European Institute at the LSE.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>515</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5f6c388-fb66-11ef-b0b6-f3e64e9909a6</guid>
      <title>Coup Attempts and Democratic Resistance: Lessons from Brazil</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Brazil moves toward trying former president Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup against democracy, the United States grapples with constitutional challenges from the new administration as well. Are these two cases of democratic backsliding comparable? </p><p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, John Torpey speaks with <a href="https://www.josemauriciodomingues.com/">José Maurício Domingues</a>, Professor of Social and Political Science at the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, about the resilience of democratic institutions, the role of the judiciary, and the evolving strategies of authoritarian leaders. Domingues unpacks the historical and institutional factors that shaped Bolsonaro’s failed power grab and contrasts them with Trump’s approach to executive power. What can these cases tell us about the future of democracy in both countries? Tune in for a deep dive into the politics of resistance, accountability, and the shifting nature of authoritarianism in the 21st century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Brazil moves toward trying former president Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup against democracy, the United States grapples with constitutional challenges from the new administration as well. Are these two cases of democratic backsliding comparable? </p><p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, John Torpey speaks with <a href="https://www.josemauriciodomingues.com/">José Maurício Domingues</a>, Professor of Social and Political Science at the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, about the resilience of democratic institutions, the role of the judiciary, and the evolving strategies of authoritarian leaders. Domingues unpacks the historical and institutional factors that shaped Bolsonaro’s failed power grab and contrasts them with Trump’s approach to executive power. What can these cases tell us about the future of democracy in both countries? Tune in for a deep dive into the politics of resistance, accountability, and the shifting nature of authoritarianism in the 21st century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31920824" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a657e1f2-dee2-413d-a498-06c1082f790f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a657e1f2-dee2-413d-a498-06c1082f790f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Coup Attempts and Democratic Resistance: Lessons from Brazil</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Brazil moves toward trying former president Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup against democracy, the United States grapples with constitutional challenges from the new administration as well. Are these two cases of democratic backsliding comparable? 
In this episode of International Horizons, John Torpey speaks with José Maurício Domingues, Professor of Social and Political Science at the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, about the resilience of democratic institutions, the role of the judiciary, and the evolving strategies of authoritarian leaders. Domingues unpacks the historical and institutional factors that shaped Bolsonaro’s failed power grab and contrasts them with Trump’s approach to executive power. What can these cases tell us about the future of democracy in both countries? Tune in for a deep dive into the politics of resistance, accountability, and the shifting nature of authoritarianism in the 21st century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Brazil moves toward trying former president Jair Bolsonaro for plotting a coup against democracy, the United States grapples with constitutional challenges from the new administration as well. Are these two cases of democratic backsliding comparable? 
In this episode of International Horizons, John Torpey speaks with José Maurício Domingues, Professor of Social and Political Science at the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, about the resilience of democratic institutions, the role of the judiciary, and the evolving strategies of authoritarian leaders. Domingues unpacks the historical and institutional factors that shaped Bolsonaro’s failed power grab and contrasts them with Trump’s approach to executive power. What can these cases tell us about the future of democracy in both countries? Tune in for a deep dive into the politics of resistance, accountability, and the shifting nature of authoritarianism in the 21st century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>162</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf1b2cda-fac2-11ef-b318-8f1d475650ea</guid>
      <title>Jørgen Møller and Jonathan Doucette, &quot;The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Generations of social scientists and historians have argued that the escape from empire and consequent fragmentation of power - across and within polities - was a necessary condition for the European development of the modern territorial state, modern representative democracy, and modern levels of prosperity. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192857118"><em>The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500</em> </a>(Oxford UP, 2022) inserts the Catholic Church as the main engine of this persistent international and domestic power pluralism, which has moulded European state-formation for almost a millennium.</p><p>The 'crisis of church and state' that began in the second half of the eleventh century is argued here as having fundamentally reshaped European patterns of state formation and regime change. It did so by doing away with the norm in historical societies - sacral monarchy - and by consolidating the two great balancing acts European state builders have been engaged in since the eleventh century: against strong social groups and against each other. The book traces the roots of this crisis to a large-scale breakdown of public authority in the Latin West, which began in the ninth century, and which at one and the same time incentivised and permitted a religious reform movement to radically transform the Catholic Church in the period from the late tenth century onwards.</p><p>Drawing on a unique dataset of towns, parliaments, and ecclesiastical institutions such as bishoprics and monasteries, the book documents how this church reform movement was crucial for the development and spread of self-government (the internal balancing act) and the weakening of the Holy Roman Empire (the external balancing act) in the period AD 1000-1500.</p><p><strong>Jørgen Møller</strong>, Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, and <strong>Jonathan Stavnskær Doucette</strong>, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generations of social scientists and historians have argued that the escape from empire and consequent fragmentation of power - across and within polities - was a necessary condition for the European development of the modern territorial state, modern representative democracy, and modern levels of prosperity. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192857118"><em>The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500</em> </a>(Oxford UP, 2022) inserts the Catholic Church as the main engine of this persistent international and domestic power pluralism, which has moulded European state-formation for almost a millennium.</p><p>The 'crisis of church and state' that began in the second half of the eleventh century is argued here as having fundamentally reshaped European patterns of state formation and regime change. It did so by doing away with the norm in historical societies - sacral monarchy - and by consolidating the two great balancing acts European state builders have been engaged in since the eleventh century: against strong social groups and against each other. The book traces the roots of this crisis to a large-scale breakdown of public authority in the Latin West, which began in the ninth century, and which at one and the same time incentivised and permitted a religious reform movement to radically transform the Catholic Church in the period from the late tenth century onwards.</p><p>Drawing on a unique dataset of towns, parliaments, and ecclesiastical institutions such as bishoprics and monasteries, the book documents how this church reform movement was crucial for the development and spread of self-government (the internal balancing act) and the weakening of the Holy Roman Empire (the external balancing act) in the period AD 1000-1500.</p><p><strong>Jørgen Møller</strong>, Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, and <strong>Jonathan Stavnskær Doucette</strong>, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47203370" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a02a3864-6f2c-4f55-87b1-9b874b517d3e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a02a3864-6f2c-4f55-87b1-9b874b517d3e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jørgen Møller and Jonathan Doucette, &quot;The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Generations of social scientists and historians have argued that the escape from empire and consequent fragmentation of power - across and within polities - was a necessary condition for the European development of the modern territorial state, modern representative democracy, and modern levels of prosperity. The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500 (Oxford UP, 2022) inserts the Catholic Church as the main engine of this persistent international and domestic power pluralism, which has moulded European state-formation for almost a millennium.
The &apos;crisis of church and state&apos; that began in the second half of the eleventh century is argued here as having fundamentally reshaped European patterns of state formation and regime change. It did so by doing away with the norm in historical societies - sacral monarchy - and by consolidating the two great balancing acts European state builders have been engaged in since the eleventh century: against strong social groups and against each other. The book traces the roots of this crisis to a large-scale breakdown of public authority in the Latin West, which began in the ninth century, and which at one and the same time incentivised and permitted a religious reform movement to radically transform the Catholic Church in the period from the late tenth century onwards.
Drawing on a unique dataset of towns, parliaments, and ecclesiastical institutions such as bishoprics and monasteries, the book documents how this church reform movement was crucial for the development and spread of self-government (the internal balancing act) and the weakening of the Holy Roman Empire (the external balancing act) in the period AD 1000-1500.
Jørgen Møller, Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, and Jonathan Stavnskær Doucette, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Generations of social scientists and historians have argued that the escape from empire and consequent fragmentation of power - across and within polities - was a necessary condition for the European development of the modern territorial state, modern representative democracy, and modern levels of prosperity. The Catholic Church and European State Formation, AD 1000-1500 (Oxford UP, 2022) inserts the Catholic Church as the main engine of this persistent international and domestic power pluralism, which has moulded European state-formation for almost a millennium.
The &apos;crisis of church and state&apos; that began in the second half of the eleventh century is argued here as having fundamentally reshaped European patterns of state formation and regime change. It did so by doing away with the norm in historical societies - sacral monarchy - and by consolidating the two great balancing acts European state builders have been engaged in since the eleventh century: against strong social groups and against each other. The book traces the roots of this crisis to a large-scale breakdown of public authority in the Latin West, which began in the ninth century, and which at one and the same time incentivised and permitted a religious reform movement to radically transform the Catholic Church in the period from the late tenth century onwards.
Drawing on a unique dataset of towns, parliaments, and ecclesiastical institutions such as bishoprics and monasteries, the book documents how this church reform movement was crucial for the development and spread of self-government (the internal balancing act) and the weakening of the Holy Roman Empire (the external balancing act) in the period AD 1000-1500.
Jørgen Møller, Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, and Jonathan Stavnskær Doucette, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de08832a-f9d5-11ef-91f1-dfdc1d1765b7</guid>
      <title>Christian Gerlach, &quot;Conditions of Violence&quot; (de Gruyter, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mass violence comes not only from states, but also from people. By analyzing mass violence as social interaction through survivor accounts and other sources, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111567266"><em>Conditions of Violence</em></a> (de Gruyter, 2024) presents understudied agents, aims and practices of direct violence and ways of action of those under persecution. Sound history – examining the noises of mass violence and persecution – is particularly telling about such practices. This volume shows that violence can become socially hegemonic, and some people claim a freedom to kill as a political right. To scrutinize indirect violence, which is often imperialist in character and claims many victims, the book proposes the concept of conditions of violence. These conditions are produced by definable groups of actors and foreseeably harm definable groups (which differs from the anonymous and static ‘structural violence’). This is exemplified in a case study concerning famines in World War II and another on COVID-19 as mass violence. Less global in character, other case studies in this volume deal with Rwanda, Bangladesh/East Pakistan and the Soviet Union.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mass violence comes not only from states, but also from people. By analyzing mass violence as social interaction through survivor accounts and other sources, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111567266"><em>Conditions of Violence</em></a> (de Gruyter, 2024) presents understudied agents, aims and practices of direct violence and ways of action of those under persecution. Sound history – examining the noises of mass violence and persecution – is particularly telling about such practices. This volume shows that violence can become socially hegemonic, and some people claim a freedom to kill as a political right. To scrutinize indirect violence, which is often imperialist in character and claims many victims, the book proposes the concept of conditions of violence. These conditions are produced by definable groups of actors and foreseeably harm definable groups (which differs from the anonymous and static ‘structural violence’). This is exemplified in a case study concerning famines in World War II and another on COVID-19 as mass violence. Less global in character, other case studies in this volume deal with Rwanda, Bangladesh/East Pakistan and the Soviet Union.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34149154" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/98dcad1b-7dfa-4e0e-afd1-4968cd1764f3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=98dcad1b-7dfa-4e0e-afd1-4968cd1764f3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christian Gerlach, &quot;Conditions of Violence&quot; (de Gruyter, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mass violence comes not only from states, but also from people. By analyzing mass violence as social interaction through survivor accounts and other sources, Conditions of Violence (de Gruyter, 2024) presents understudied agents, aims and practices of direct violence and ways of action of those under persecution. Sound history – examining the noises of mass violence and persecution – is particularly telling about such practices. This volume shows that violence can become socially hegemonic, and some people claim a freedom to kill as a political right. To scrutinize indirect violence, which is often imperialist in character and claims many victims, the book proposes the concept of conditions of violence. These conditions are produced by definable groups of actors and foreseeably harm definable groups (which differs from the anonymous and static ‘structural violence’). This is exemplified in a case study concerning famines in World War II and another on COVID-19 as mass violence. Less global in character, other case studies in this volume deal with Rwanda, Bangladesh/East Pakistan and the Soviet Union.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mass violence comes not only from states, but also from people. By analyzing mass violence as social interaction through survivor accounts and other sources, Conditions of Violence (de Gruyter, 2024) presents understudied agents, aims and practices of direct violence and ways of action of those under persecution. Sound history – examining the noises of mass violence and persecution – is particularly telling about such practices. This volume shows that violence can become socially hegemonic, and some people claim a freedom to kill as a political right. To scrutinize indirect violence, which is often imperialist in character and claims many victims, the book proposes the concept of conditions of violence. These conditions are produced by definable groups of actors and foreseeably harm definable groups (which differs from the anonymous and static ‘structural violence’). This is exemplified in a case study concerning famines in World War II and another on COVID-19 as mass violence. Less global in character, other case studies in this volume deal with Rwanda, Bangladesh/East Pakistan and the Soviet Union.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">466fe1dc-f6b7-11ef-9768-7b4b587d7bf9</guid>
      <title>Jeffrey A. Lenowitz, &quot;Constitutional Ratification Without Reason&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198852346"><em>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. </p><p>To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.</p><p>Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.</p><p> <a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a> is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198852346"><em>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. </p><p>To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.</p><p>Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.</p><p> <a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a> is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50865174" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/048bcd62-ae96-455c-aee3-f8d85dca961a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=048bcd62-ae96-455c-aee3-f8d85dca961a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeffrey A. Lenowitz, &quot;Constitutional Ratification Without Reason&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. 
To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.
Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. 
To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.
Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c98a48b6-f77d-11ef-ada0-c3a34f374c0e</guid>
      <title>John Boswell et al., &quot;The Art and Craft of Comparison&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There are many books giving advice about research methods on the market, but <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108472852"><em>The Art and Craft of Comparison</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2019) is the first monographic marriage of comparative and interpretive methods. In this episode of the special series <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, two of its authors, <a href="https://www.southampton.ac.uk/people/5xbhpx/professor-john-boswell">John Boswell</a> and <a href="https://research.monash.edu/en/persons/jack-corbett">Jack Corbett</a>, discuss their confessional tone in the book, the dilemmas of comparative-interpretive research, some of their rules of thumb for starting and finishing political research that aims for creative comparison, and why Chat GPT is no substitute for embodied, immersive interpretation. Embrace the grind!</p><p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rethinking-comparison">Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20social%20science/">Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20research%20design/">Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow</a>, and <a href="http://interviewing%20in%20social%20science%20research/">Aarie Glas and Jessica Soedirgo</a> talking about Lee Ann Fujii’s <em>Interviewing in Social Science Research. </em></p><p><strong>Looking around for something to read? </strong>If so, then John recommends <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/personalizing-the-state-an-anthropology-of-law-politics-and-welfare-in-austerity-britain-insa-lee-koch/9833604?ean=9780198807513&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Personalizing the State</em></a> by Insa Lee Koch, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/state-of-empowerment-low-income-families-and-the-new-welfare-state-carolyn-barnes/10787653?ean=9780472131648&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>State of Empowerment</em></a> by Carolyn Barnes, while Jack recommends Stephanie Lawson’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/regional-politics-in-oceania-from-colonialism-and-cold-war-to-the-pacific-century-stephanie-lawson/20347450?ean=9781009427630&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Regional Politics in Oceania</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many books giving advice about research methods on the market, but <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108472852"><em>The Art and Craft of Comparison</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2019) is the first monographic marriage of comparative and interpretive methods. In this episode of the special series <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/interpretive-political-and-social-science">New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science</a>, two of its authors, <a href="https://www.southampton.ac.uk/people/5xbhpx/professor-john-boswell">John Boswell</a> and <a href="https://research.monash.edu/en/persons/jack-corbett">Jack Corbett</a>, discuss their confessional tone in the book, the dilemmas of comparative-interpretive research, some of their rules of thumb for starting and finishing political research that aims for creative comparison, and why Chat GPT is no substitute for embodied, immersive interpretation. Embrace the grind!</p><p><strong>Like this episode?</strong> You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rethinking-comparison">Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20social%20science/">Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely</a>, <a href="http://interpretive%20research%20design/">Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow</a>, and <a href="http://interviewing%20in%20social%20science%20research/">Aarie Glas and Jessica Soedirgo</a> talking about Lee Ann Fujii’s <em>Interviewing in Social Science Research. </em></p><p><strong>Looking around for something to read? </strong>If so, then John recommends <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/personalizing-the-state-an-anthropology-of-law-politics-and-welfare-in-austerity-britain-insa-lee-koch/9833604?ean=9780198807513&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Personalizing the State</em></a> by Insa Lee Koch, and <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/state-of-empowerment-low-income-families-and-the-new-welfare-state-carolyn-barnes/10787653?ean=9780472131648&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>State of Empowerment</em></a> by Carolyn Barnes, while Jack recommends Stephanie Lawson’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/regional-politics-in-oceania-from-colonialism-and-cold-war-to-the-pacific-century-stephanie-lawson/20347450?ean=9781009427630&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Regional Politics in Oceania</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38008553" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/7ed5e787-2448-44bb-9bc1-e51f92d53e9c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=7ed5e787-2448-44bb-9bc1-e51f92d53e9c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>John Boswell et al., &quot;The Art and Craft of Comparison&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There are many books giving advice about research methods on the market, but The Art and Craft of Comparison (Cambridge UP, 2019) is the first monographic marriage of comparative and interpretive methods. In this episode of the special series New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, two of its authors, John Boswell and Jack Corbett, discuss their confessional tone in the book, the dilemmas of comparative-interpretive research, some of their rules of thumb for starting and finishing political research that aims for creative comparison, and why Chat GPT is no substitute for embodied, immersive interpretation. Embrace the grind!
Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith, Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow, and Aarie Glas and Jessica Soedirgo talking about Lee Ann Fujii’s Interviewing in Social Science Research. 
Looking around for something to read? If so, then John recommends Personalizing the State by Insa Lee Koch, and State of Empowerment by Carolyn Barnes, while Jack recommends Stephanie Lawson’s Regional Politics in Oceania.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There are many books giving advice about research methods on the market, but The Art and Craft of Comparison (Cambridge UP, 2019) is the first monographic marriage of comparative and interpretive methods. In this episode of the special series New Books in Interpretive Political and Social Science, two of its authors, John Boswell and Jack Corbett, discuss their confessional tone in the book, the dilemmas of comparative-interpretive research, some of their rules of thumb for starting and finishing political research that aims for creative comparison, and why Chat GPT is no substitute for embodied, immersive interpretation. Embrace the grind!
Like this episode? You might also be interested in others in the series with co-authors talking about their work, including Erica Simmons and Nicholas Rush Smith, Mark Bevir and Jason Blakely, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow, and Aarie Glas and Jessica Soedirgo talking about Lee Ann Fujii’s Interviewing in Social Science Research. 
Looking around for something to read? If so, then John recommends Personalizing the State by Insa Lee Koch, and State of Empowerment by Carolyn Barnes, while Jack recommends Stephanie Lawson’s Regional Politics in Oceania.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee9d4ce4-f461-11ef-a0e5-eb3c8dcbb6a0</guid>
      <title>Noam Leshem, &quot;Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man&apos;s Land&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“No man’s land” invokes stretches of barren landscape, twisted barbed wire, desolation, and the devastation of war. But this is not always the reality. According to Noam Leshem in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835976"><em>Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man's Land</em> </a>(U Chicago Press, 2025)<em>, </em>the term also reveals radical abandonment by the state. From the Northern Sahara to the Amazon rainforests, people around the world find themselves in places that have been stripped of sovereign care. Leshem is committed to defining these spaces and providing a more intimate understanding of this urgent political reality.</p><p>Based on nearly a decade of research in some of the world’s most challenging conflict zones, <em>Edges of Care</em> offers a profound account of abandoned lives and lands, and how they endure and sometimes thrive once left to fend for themselves. Leshem interrogates no man’s land as a site of radical uncaring: abandoned by a sovereign power in a relinquishment of responsibility for the space or anyone inside it. To understand the ramifications of such uncaring, Leshem takes readers through a diverse series of abandoned places, including areas in Palestine, Syria, Colombia, Sudan, and Cyprus. He shows that no man’s land is not empty of life, but almost always inhabited and, in fact, often generative of new modes of being.</p><p>Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting scholar at the Buffett Institute for Global Affairs at Northwestern University. He is the host of the <a href="https://shows.acast.com/jerusalemunplugged">Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast</a> and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at <a href="mailto:robbymazza@gmail.com">robbymazza@gmail.com</a>. Blusky and IG: @robbyref Website: <a href="http://www.robertomazza.org/">www.robertomazza.org</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“No man’s land” invokes stretches of barren landscape, twisted barbed wire, desolation, and the devastation of war. But this is not always the reality. According to Noam Leshem in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835976"><em>Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man's Land</em> </a>(U Chicago Press, 2025)<em>, </em>the term also reveals radical abandonment by the state. From the Northern Sahara to the Amazon rainforests, people around the world find themselves in places that have been stripped of sovereign care. Leshem is committed to defining these spaces and providing a more intimate understanding of this urgent political reality.</p><p>Based on nearly a decade of research in some of the world’s most challenging conflict zones, <em>Edges of Care</em> offers a profound account of abandoned lives and lands, and how they endure and sometimes thrive once left to fend for themselves. Leshem interrogates no man’s land as a site of radical uncaring: abandoned by a sovereign power in a relinquishment of responsibility for the space or anyone inside it. To understand the ramifications of such uncaring, Leshem takes readers through a diverse series of abandoned places, including areas in Palestine, Syria, Colombia, Sudan, and Cyprus. He shows that no man’s land is not empty of life, but almost always inhabited and, in fact, often generative of new modes of being.</p><p>Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting scholar at the Buffett Institute for Global Affairs at Northwestern University. He is the host of the <a href="https://shows.acast.com/jerusalemunplugged">Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast</a> and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at <a href="mailto:robbymazza@gmail.com">robbymazza@gmail.com</a>. Blusky and IG: @robbyref Website: <a href="http://www.robertomazza.org/">www.robertomazza.org</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64670488" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f1a009ca-6c0f-4c05-92ab-ae2601df76ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f1a009ca-6c0f-4c05-92ab-ae2601df76ad&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Noam Leshem, &quot;Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man&apos;s Land&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“No man’s land” invokes stretches of barren landscape, twisted barbed wire, desolation, and the devastation of war. But this is not always the reality. According to Noam Leshem in Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man&apos;s Land (U Chicago Press, 2025), the term also reveals radical abandonment by the state. From the Northern Sahara to the Amazon rainforests, people around the world find themselves in places that have been stripped of sovereign care. Leshem is committed to defining these spaces and providing a more intimate understanding of this urgent political reality.
Based on nearly a decade of research in some of the world’s most challenging conflict zones, Edges of Care offers a profound account of abandoned lives and lands, and how they endure and sometimes thrive once left to fend for themselves. Leshem interrogates no man’s land as a site of radical uncaring: abandoned by a sovereign power in a relinquishment of responsibility for the space or anyone inside it. To understand the ramifications of such uncaring, Leshem takes readers through a diverse series of abandoned places, including areas in Palestine, Syria, Colombia, Sudan, and Cyprus. He shows that no man’s land is not empty of life, but almost always inhabited and, in fact, often generative of new modes of being.
Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting scholar at the Buffett Institute for Global Affairs at Northwestern University. He is the host of the Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at robbymazza@gmail.com. Blusky and IG: @robbyref Website: www.robertomazza.org
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“No man’s land” invokes stretches of barren landscape, twisted barbed wire, desolation, and the devastation of war. But this is not always the reality. According to Noam Leshem in Edges of Care: Living and Dying in No Man&apos;s Land (U Chicago Press, 2025), the term also reveals radical abandonment by the state. From the Northern Sahara to the Amazon rainforests, people around the world find themselves in places that have been stripped of sovereign care. Leshem is committed to defining these spaces and providing a more intimate understanding of this urgent political reality.
Based on nearly a decade of research in some of the world’s most challenging conflict zones, Edges of Care offers a profound account of abandoned lives and lands, and how they endure and sometimes thrive once left to fend for themselves. Leshem interrogates no man’s land as a site of radical uncaring: abandoned by a sovereign power in a relinquishment of responsibility for the space or anyone inside it. To understand the ramifications of such uncaring, Leshem takes readers through a diverse series of abandoned places, including areas in Palestine, Syria, Colombia, Sudan, and Cyprus. He shows that no man’s land is not empty of life, but almost always inhabited and, in fact, often generative of new modes of being.
Roberto Mazza is currently a visiting scholar at the Buffett Institute for Global Affairs at Northwestern University. He is the host of the Jerusalem Unplugged Podcast and to discuss and propose a book for interview can be reached at robbymazza@gmail.com. Blusky and IG: @robbyref Website: www.robertomazza.org
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>294</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5f8663a-ebac-11ef-85dd-73aff603f9d5</guid>
      <title>Omar Dahbour, &quot;Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Part of what makes the challenges that collectively are called the “environmental crisis” so difficult is that the vocabulary we deploy in thinking and discussing the issues emerged under social conditions that are far removed from our present. The familiar idiom of nation states, borders, jurisdiction, and so on seems inadequate for addressing a crisis that concerns global conditions. It’s plausible to think that a cogent response to the environmental crisis will require a reconstruction of the conceptual tools of social and political theory.</p><p>In his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032939018"><em>Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis</em></a> (Routledge 2024), <a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/omar-dahbour">Omar Dahbour</a> develops new understandings of the concepts of sovereignty, territory, peoplehood, and self-determination, all with a view toward building a case for the principle according to which peoples have a right to protect and maintain their natural environments.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of what makes the challenges that collectively are called the “environmental crisis” so difficult is that the vocabulary we deploy in thinking and discussing the issues emerged under social conditions that are far removed from our present. The familiar idiom of nation states, borders, jurisdiction, and so on seems inadequate for addressing a crisis that concerns global conditions. It’s plausible to think that a cogent response to the environmental crisis will require a reconstruction of the conceptual tools of social and political theory.</p><p>In his new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032939018"><em>Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis</em></a> (Routledge 2024), <a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/omar-dahbour">Omar Dahbour</a> develops new understandings of the concepts of sovereignty, territory, peoplehood, and self-determination, all with a view toward building a case for the principle according to which peoples have a right to protect and maintain their natural environments.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57054883" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8623a170-89ac-4260-96b9-975285ccd3d8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8623a170-89ac-4260-96b9-975285ccd3d8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Omar Dahbour, &quot;Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Part of what makes the challenges that collectively are called the “environmental crisis” so difficult is that the vocabulary we deploy in thinking and discussing the issues emerged under social conditions that are far removed from our present. The familiar idiom of nation states, borders, jurisdiction, and so on seems inadequate for addressing a crisis that concerns global conditions. It’s plausible to think that a cogent response to the environmental crisis will require a reconstruction of the conceptual tools of social and political theory.
In his new book, Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis (Routledge 2024), Omar Dahbour develops new understandings of the concepts of sovereignty, territory, peoplehood, and self-determination, all with a view toward building a case for the principle according to which peoples have a right to protect and maintain their natural environments.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Part of what makes the challenges that collectively are called the “environmental crisis” so difficult is that the vocabulary we deploy in thinking and discussing the issues emerged under social conditions that are far removed from our present. The familiar idiom of nation states, borders, jurisdiction, and so on seems inadequate for addressing a crisis that concerns global conditions. It’s plausible to think that a cogent response to the environmental crisis will require a reconstruction of the conceptual tools of social and political theory.
In his new book, Ecosovereignty: A Political Principle for the Environmental Crisis (Routledge 2024), Omar Dahbour develops new understandings of the concepts of sovereignty, territory, peoplehood, and self-determination, all with a view toward building a case for the principle according to which peoples have a right to protect and maintain their natural environments.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>366</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">848d9a64-f6a7-11ef-ab5e-b71d8bdbdf34</guid>
      <title>Ian G. Baird, &quot;Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia&quot; (U Wisconsin Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Before the creation of the European colonial states in the nineteenth century, Southeast Asia had hundreds of royal families, large and small. Today, only a small number survive. In his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780299350208"><em>Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia</em></a><em> </em>(U Wisconsin Press, 2024), Ian Baird uncovers the history of one of these royal lineages, the House of Champassak, located formerly in southern Laos. Dating back to the late seventeenth century, this royal lineage has survived enormous political changes in Laos and the surrounding region: including becoming a vassal of the Thai kingdom; French colonial rule; national independence; and the communist takeover of Laos in 1975. But despite not being a ‘national monarchy’, as Baird shows, for a long time the House of Champassak has exerted a special kind of sovereignty.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the creation of the European colonial states in the nineteenth century, Southeast Asia had hundreds of royal families, large and small. Today, only a small number survive. In his book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780299350208"><em>Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia</em></a><em> </em>(U Wisconsin Press, 2024), Ian Baird uncovers the history of one of these royal lineages, the House of Champassak, located formerly in southern Laos. Dating back to the late seventeenth century, this royal lineage has survived enormous political changes in Laos and the surrounding region: including becoming a vassal of the Thai kingdom; French colonial rule; national independence; and the communist takeover of Laos in 1975. But despite not being a ‘national monarchy’, as Baird shows, for a long time the House of Champassak has exerted a special kind of sovereignty.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40394542" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c937ffaf-44d5-454e-b9de-6362169c7f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c937ffaf-44d5-454e-b9de-6362169c7f68&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ian G. Baird, &quot;Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia&quot; (U Wisconsin Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Before the creation of the European colonial states in the nineteenth century, Southeast Asia had hundreds of royal families, large and small. Today, only a small number survive. In his book, Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia (U Wisconsin Press, 2024), Ian Baird uncovers the history of one of these royal lineages, the House of Champassak, located formerly in southern Laos. Dating back to the late seventeenth century, this royal lineage has survived enormous political changes in Laos and the surrounding region: including becoming a vassal of the Thai kingdom; French colonial rule; national independence; and the communist takeover of Laos in 1975. But despite not being a ‘national monarchy’, as Baird shows, for a long time the House of Champassak has exerted a special kind of sovereignty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Before the creation of the European colonial states in the nineteenth century, Southeast Asia had hundreds of royal families, large and small. Today, only a small number survive. In his book, Champassak Royalty and Sovereignty: Within and Between Nation-States in Mainland Southeast Asia (U Wisconsin Press, 2024), Ian Baird uncovers the history of one of these royal lineages, the House of Champassak, located formerly in southern Laos. Dating back to the late seventeenth century, this royal lineage has survived enormous political changes in Laos and the surrounding region: including becoming a vassal of the Thai kingdom; French colonial rule; national independence; and the communist takeover of Laos in 1975. But despite not being a ‘national monarchy’, as Baird shows, for a long time the House of Champassak has exerted a special kind of sovereignty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e2fad26-f46c-11ef-a480-63aa97e569bf</guid>
      <title>Timothy P. R. Weaver, &quot;Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Looking closely at New York City's political development since the 1970s, three "political orders"--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In <em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em>, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.</p><p>Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city's political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city's egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439925638"><em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em></a><em> </em>(Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city's liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking closely at New York City's political development since the 1970s, three "political orders"--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In <em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em>, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.</p><p>Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city's political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city's egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439925638"><em>Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City</em></a><em> </em>(Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city's liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27799642" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1527a5d2-699f-4fc4-a72a-a7f64bb66309/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1527a5d2-699f-4fc4-a72a-a7f64bb66309&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy P. R. Weaver, &quot;Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City&quot; (Temple UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Looking closely at New York City&apos;s political development since the 1970s, three &quot;political orders&quot;--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.
Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city&apos;s political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city&apos;s egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.
Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City (Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city&apos;s liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Looking closely at New York City&apos;s political development since the 1970s, three &quot;political orders&quot;--conservativism, neoliberalism, and egalitarianism--emerged. In Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City, Timothy Weaver argues that the intercurrent impact of these orders has created a constant battle for power.
Weaver brings these clashes to the fore by showing how New York City politics has been shaped by these conflicting orders. He examines the transformation of the city&apos;s political economy in the aftermath of the 1975 fiscal crisis through neoliberal real estate development and privatization, the conservative rise of law-and-order politics in the 1970s to 1990s, and the efforts of the city&apos;s egalitarians to respond to each of these shifts through social movements such as Occupy and Black Lives Matter.
Inequality, Crime, and Resistance in New York City (Temple UP, 2025) belies glib assumptions about the city&apos;s liberal character. Weaver reveals the metropolis not as a homogenous political whole, but as a site in which the victories and defeats of rival political forces change the terms of local citizenship for the millions of residents who call the city home.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3ec308a-f3bb-11ef-a824-fb5bbc2e67f4</guid>
      <title>Daniel Silverman, &quot;Seeing Is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Factual misinformation is spread in conflict zones around the world, often with dire consequences. But when is this misinformation actually believed, and when is it not? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009523585"><em>Seeing is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better</em> </a>(Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Daniel Silverman examines the appeal and limits of dangerous misinformation in war, and is the go-to text for understanding false beliefs and their impact in modern armed conflict. Dr. Silverman extends the burgeoning study of factual misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news in social and political life into a crucial new domain, while providing a powerful new argument about the limits of misinformation in high-stakes situations. Rich evidence from the US drone campaign in Pakistan, the counterinsurgency against ISIL in Iraq, and the Syrian civil war provide the backdrop for practical lessons in promoting peace, fighting wars, managing conflict, and countering misinformation more effectively.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Factual misinformation is spread in conflict zones around the world, often with dire consequences. But when is this misinformation actually believed, and when is it not? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009523585"><em>Seeing is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better</em> </a>(Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Daniel Silverman examines the appeal and limits of dangerous misinformation in war, and is the go-to text for understanding false beliefs and their impact in modern armed conflict. Dr. Silverman extends the burgeoning study of factual misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news in social and political life into a crucial new domain, while providing a powerful new argument about the limits of misinformation in high-stakes situations. Rich evidence from the US drone campaign in Pakistan, the counterinsurgency against ISIL in Iraq, and the Syrian civil war provide the backdrop for practical lessons in promoting peace, fighting wars, managing conflict, and countering misinformation more effectively.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39264075" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9b198c18-157c-4988-bd5c-bbec5e01faa9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9b198c18-157c-4988-bd5c-bbec5e01faa9&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Silverman, &quot;Seeing Is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Factual misinformation is spread in conflict zones around the world, often with dire consequences. But when is this misinformation actually believed, and when is it not? 
Seeing is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Daniel Silverman examines the appeal and limits of dangerous misinformation in war, and is the go-to text for understanding false beliefs and their impact in modern armed conflict. Dr. Silverman extends the burgeoning study of factual misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news in social and political life into a crucial new domain, while providing a powerful new argument about the limits of misinformation in high-stakes situations. Rich evidence from the US drone campaign in Pakistan, the counterinsurgency against ISIL in Iraq, and the Syrian civil war provide the backdrop for practical lessons in promoting peace, fighting wars, managing conflict, and countering misinformation more effectively.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Factual misinformation is spread in conflict zones around the world, often with dire consequences. But when is this misinformation actually believed, and when is it not? 
Seeing is Disbelieving: Why People Believe Misinformation in War, and When They Know Better (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Daniel Silverman examines the appeal and limits of dangerous misinformation in war, and is the go-to text for understanding false beliefs and their impact in modern armed conflict. Dr. Silverman extends the burgeoning study of factual misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news in social and political life into a crucial new domain, while providing a powerful new argument about the limits of misinformation in high-stakes situations. Rich evidence from the US drone campaign in Pakistan, the counterinsurgency against ISIL in Iraq, and the Syrian civil war provide the backdrop for practical lessons in promoting peace, fighting wars, managing conflict, and countering misinformation more effectively.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">842c5e48-f3b9-11ef-8889-637172e81fe2</guid>
      <title>Raheel Dhattiwala, &quot;Keeping the Peace: Spatial Differences in Hindu-Muslim Violence in Gujarat in 2002&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In times of extreme violence, what explains peace in some places? This book investigates geographic variation in Hindu-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002, an event witnessed closely by the author. Dhattiwala compares peaceful and violent towns, villages, and neighborhoods to study how political violence spreads. A combination of statistical and ethnographic methods unpack the mechanisms of crowd behavior, intergroup relations, and political incentives. She analyzes macro-level risk factors to provide a close understanding of the behavior of people who participated in the violence, were targeted by it and, often, compelled to carry on living alongside their perpetrators. <em>Keeping the Peace</em> systematically demonstrates the implicit political logic of the violence. Most of all, by moving up close to the people caught in the middle of violence, the author highlights the interplay between politics, the spatial environment, and the cognitive decision-making processes of individuals.</p><p> Raheel Dhattiwala is an independent social scientist based in India (D.Phil. in Sociology; Oxford University) and honorary member of the <a href="https://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/en/stipendiaten/dhattiwala.php">South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg</a> (formerly, Baden-Württemberg Fellow 2023-24).</p><p> <a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a> is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In times of extreme violence, what explains peace in some places? This book investigates geographic variation in Hindu-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002, an event witnessed closely by the author. Dhattiwala compares peaceful and violent towns, villages, and neighborhoods to study how political violence spreads. A combination of statistical and ethnographic methods unpack the mechanisms of crowd behavior, intergroup relations, and political incentives. She analyzes macro-level risk factors to provide a close understanding of the behavior of people who participated in the violence, were targeted by it and, often, compelled to carry on living alongside their perpetrators. <em>Keeping the Peace</em> systematically demonstrates the implicit political logic of the violence. Most of all, by moving up close to the people caught in the middle of violence, the author highlights the interplay between politics, the spatial environment, and the cognitive decision-making processes of individuals.</p><p> Raheel Dhattiwala is an independent social scientist based in India (D.Phil. in Sociology; Oxford University) and honorary member of the <a href="https://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/en/stipendiaten/dhattiwala.php">South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg</a> (formerly, Baden-Württemberg Fellow 2023-24).</p><p> <a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a> is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48705880" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b8befa29-d002-4243-8b25-e3ef7bd039ee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b8befa29-d002-4243-8b25-e3ef7bd039ee&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Raheel Dhattiwala, &quot;Keeping the Peace: Spatial Differences in Hindu-Muslim Violence in Gujarat in 2002&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In times of extreme violence, what explains peace in some places? This book investigates geographic variation in Hindu-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002, an event witnessed closely by the author. Dhattiwala compares peaceful and violent towns, villages, and neighborhoods to study how political violence spreads. A combination of statistical and ethnographic methods unpack the mechanisms of crowd behavior, intergroup relations, and political incentives. She analyzes macro-level risk factors to provide a close understanding of the behavior of people who participated in the violence, were targeted by it and, often, compelled to carry on living alongside their perpetrators. Keeping the Peace systematically demonstrates the implicit political logic of the violence. Most of all, by moving up close to the people caught in the middle of violence, the author highlights the interplay between politics, the spatial environment, and the cognitive decision-making processes of individuals.
 Raheel Dhattiwala is an independent social scientist based in India (D.Phil. in Sociology; Oxford University) and honorary member of the South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg (formerly, Baden-Württemberg Fellow 2023-24).
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In times of extreme violence, what explains peace in some places? This book investigates geographic variation in Hindu-Muslim violence in Gujarat in 2002, an event witnessed closely by the author. Dhattiwala compares peaceful and violent towns, villages, and neighborhoods to study how political violence spreads. A combination of statistical and ethnographic methods unpack the mechanisms of crowd behavior, intergroup relations, and political incentives. She analyzes macro-level risk factors to provide a close understanding of the behavior of people who participated in the violence, were targeted by it and, often, compelled to carry on living alongside their perpetrators. Keeping the Peace systematically demonstrates the implicit political logic of the violence. Most of all, by moving up close to the people caught in the middle of violence, the author highlights the interplay between politics, the spatial environment, and the cognitive decision-making processes of individuals.
 Raheel Dhattiwala is an independent social scientist based in India (D.Phil. in Sociology; Oxford University) and honorary member of the South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg (formerly, Baden-Württemberg Fellow 2023-24).
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>267</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df020476-f378-11ef-aaff-c72de18b8134</guid>
      <title>The Internet, Power, and the Deep State: Zeynep Tufekci on Technology and Democracy Today</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the second Trump administration reshapes the U.S. government and its role in the world, how do technology, media, and political power intersect? In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, host John Torpey speaks with Zeynep Tufekci—New York Times columnist, Princeton professor, and author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300234176"><em>Twitter and Tear Gas</em></a>—about the evolving relationship between social media platforms, political movements, and democracy. From the shifting role of the internet in global protests to Elon Musk’s interventions in European politics, Tufekci unpacks the historical patterns shaping today’s political landscape. The conversation also explores the erosion of public trust in institutions, the implications of a weakened federal government, and the risks of unchecked technological influence. Tune in for a deep dive into the forces reshaping democracy at home and abroad.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the second Trump administration reshapes the U.S. government and its role in the world, how do technology, media, and political power intersect? In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, host John Torpey speaks with Zeynep Tufekci—New York Times columnist, Princeton professor, and author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300234176"><em>Twitter and Tear Gas</em></a>—about the evolving relationship between social media platforms, political movements, and democracy. From the shifting role of the internet in global protests to Elon Musk’s interventions in European politics, Tufekci unpacks the historical patterns shaping today’s political landscape. The conversation also explores the erosion of public trust in institutions, the implications of a weakened federal government, and the risks of unchecked technological influence. Tune in for a deep dive into the forces reshaping democracy at home and abroad.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38970449" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/269eb4e5-3fb5-4a4f-9121-efda577a381c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=269eb4e5-3fb5-4a4f-9121-efda577a381c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>The Internet, Power, and the Deep State: Zeynep Tufekci on Technology and Democracy Today</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the second Trump administration reshapes the U.S. government and its role in the world, how do technology, media, and political power intersect? In this episode of International Horizons, host John Torpey speaks with Zeynep Tufekci—New York Times columnist, Princeton professor, and author of Twitter and Tear Gas—about the evolving relationship between social media platforms, political movements, and democracy. From the shifting role of the internet in global protests to Elon Musk’s interventions in European politics, Tufekci unpacks the historical patterns shaping today’s political landscape. The conversation also explores the erosion of public trust in institutions, the implications of a weakened federal government, and the risks of unchecked technological influence. Tune in for a deep dive into the forces reshaping democracy at home and abroad.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the second Trump administration reshapes the U.S. government and its role in the world, how do technology, media, and political power intersect? In this episode of International Horizons, host John Torpey speaks with Zeynep Tufekci—New York Times columnist, Princeton professor, and author of Twitter and Tear Gas—about the evolving relationship between social media platforms, political movements, and democracy. From the shifting role of the internet in global protests to Elon Musk’s interventions in European politics, Tufekci unpacks the historical patterns shaping today’s political landscape. The conversation also explores the erosion of public trust in institutions, the implications of a weakened federal government, and the risks of unchecked technological influence. Tune in for a deep dive into the forces reshaping democracy at home and abroad.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ce509898-f2e9-11ef-8658-1bd83c83706f</guid>
      <title>Philip A. Martin, &quot;Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779015"><em>Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), Dr. Philip A. Martin investigates a fundamental political challenge faced by post-conflict states: how to create obedient national militaries from the remnants of insurgent forces.</p><p>When civil wars end, non-state armed groups often integrate into post-conflict militaries. Yet rebel-military integration does not always happen smoothly. In some cases, former rebels cooperate with new leaders, forming powerful national armies that underpin postwar stability. In others, they resist the authority of new leaders, maintaining clandestine armed networks that disrupt centralized state-building.</p><p>Dr. Martin argues that how field commanders of non-state armed groups governed during the war explains this variation. Rebel commanders who build accountable governance systems gain strong social support from rebel-ruled communities, becoming locally embedded. Thanks to these community ties, which persist after the war, these embedded commanders have the leverage to push the central government for concessions, resist directives to disarm fighters, or even orchestrate coup d'états. Conversely, rebel commanders who governed coercively are less likely to sustain community ties. Without the ability to mobilize collective action after the war, these non-embedded commanders have stronger incentives to cooperate with new regime leaders.</p><p>Wielding in-depth evidence from Côte d'Ivoire and cases of rebel-military integration elsewhere, Martin shows that good governance during wartime can—ironically—lead to poor postwar state consolidation. Rather than preparing insurgents to be successful state builders, effective rebel governance can hinder post-conflict state-building. As costly peace operations come under increasing scrutiny, <em>Strong Commanders, Weak States</em> offers fresh guidance on how transitions to peace can better succeed.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501779015"><em>Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2025), Dr. Philip A. Martin investigates a fundamental political challenge faced by post-conflict states: how to create obedient national militaries from the remnants of insurgent forces.</p><p>When civil wars end, non-state armed groups often integrate into post-conflict militaries. Yet rebel-military integration does not always happen smoothly. In some cases, former rebels cooperate with new leaders, forming powerful national armies that underpin postwar stability. In others, they resist the authority of new leaders, maintaining clandestine armed networks that disrupt centralized state-building.</p><p>Dr. Martin argues that how field commanders of non-state armed groups governed during the war explains this variation. Rebel commanders who build accountable governance systems gain strong social support from rebel-ruled communities, becoming locally embedded. Thanks to these community ties, which persist after the war, these embedded commanders have the leverage to push the central government for concessions, resist directives to disarm fighters, or even orchestrate coup d'états. Conversely, rebel commanders who governed coercively are less likely to sustain community ties. Without the ability to mobilize collective action after the war, these non-embedded commanders have stronger incentives to cooperate with new regime leaders.</p><p>Wielding in-depth evidence from Côte d'Ivoire and cases of rebel-military integration elsewhere, Martin shows that good governance during wartime can—ironically—lead to poor postwar state consolidation. Rather than preparing insurgents to be successful state builders, effective rebel governance can hinder post-conflict state-building. As costly peace operations come under increasing scrutiny, <em>Strong Commanders, Weak States</em> offers fresh guidance on how transitions to peace can better succeed.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55952502" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/66acf818-3830-47af-90ea-a72afdd1f32f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=66acf818-3830-47af-90ea-a72afdd1f32f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip A. Martin, &quot;Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War (Cornell University Press, 2025), Dr. Philip A. Martin investigates a fundamental political challenge faced by post-conflict states: how to create obedient national militaries from the remnants of insurgent forces.
When civil wars end, non-state armed groups often integrate into post-conflict militaries. Yet rebel-military integration does not always happen smoothly. In some cases, former rebels cooperate with new leaders, forming powerful national armies that underpin postwar stability. In others, they resist the authority of new leaders, maintaining clandestine armed networks that disrupt centralized state-building.
Dr. Martin argues that how field commanders of non-state armed groups governed during the war explains this variation. Rebel commanders who build accountable governance systems gain strong social support from rebel-ruled communities, becoming locally embedded. Thanks to these community ties, which persist after the war, these embedded commanders have the leverage to push the central government for concessions, resist directives to disarm fighters, or even orchestrate coup d&apos;états. Conversely, rebel commanders who governed coercively are less likely to sustain community ties. Without the ability to mobilize collective action after the war, these non-embedded commanders have stronger incentives to cooperate with new regime leaders.
Wielding in-depth evidence from Côte d&apos;Ivoire and cases of rebel-military integration elsewhere, Martin shows that good governance during wartime can—ironically—lead to poor postwar state consolidation. Rather than preparing insurgents to be successful state builders, effective rebel governance can hinder post-conflict state-building. As costly peace operations come under increasing scrutiny, Strong Commanders, Weak States offers fresh guidance on how transitions to peace can better succeed.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Strong Commanders, Weak States: How Rebel Governance Shapes Military Integration after Civil War (Cornell University Press, 2025), Dr. Philip A. Martin investigates a fundamental political challenge faced by post-conflict states: how to create obedient national militaries from the remnants of insurgent forces.
When civil wars end, non-state armed groups often integrate into post-conflict militaries. Yet rebel-military integration does not always happen smoothly. In some cases, former rebels cooperate with new leaders, forming powerful national armies that underpin postwar stability. In others, they resist the authority of new leaders, maintaining clandestine armed networks that disrupt centralized state-building.
Dr. Martin argues that how field commanders of non-state armed groups governed during the war explains this variation. Rebel commanders who build accountable governance systems gain strong social support from rebel-ruled communities, becoming locally embedded. Thanks to these community ties, which persist after the war, these embedded commanders have the leverage to push the central government for concessions, resist directives to disarm fighters, or even orchestrate coup d&apos;états. Conversely, rebel commanders who governed coercively are less likely to sustain community ties. Without the ability to mobilize collective action after the war, these non-embedded commanders have stronger incentives to cooperate with new regime leaders.
Wielding in-depth evidence from Côte d&apos;Ivoire and cases of rebel-military integration elsewhere, Martin shows that good governance during wartime can—ironically—lead to poor postwar state consolidation. Rather than preparing insurgents to be successful state builders, effective rebel governance can hinder post-conflict state-building. As costly peace operations come under increasing scrutiny, Strong Commanders, Weak States offers fresh guidance on how transitions to peace can better succeed.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7afaeede-f14d-11ef-9215-7396be00b660</guid>
      <title>Eeva Luhtakallio et al., &quot;Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society&quot; (Bristol UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do young people participate in democratic societies? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529239324"><em>Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society</em></a> (Bristol UP, 2024) introduces the concept of ‘doing society’ as a new theory of political action. Focused on Finnish youth, it innovatively blends cutting-edge empirical research with agenda-setting theoretical development. Redefining political action, the authors expand beyond traditional public-sphere, scaling from formal to informal and unconventional modes of engaging. The book captures diverse engagement from memes to social movements, from participatory budgeting to street parties and from sleek politicians to detached people in the margins. In doing so, it provides a holistic view of the ways in which young people participate (or do not participate) in society, and their role in cultural change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do young people participate in democratic societies? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529239324"><em>Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society</em></a> (Bristol UP, 2024) introduces the concept of ‘doing society’ as a new theory of political action. Focused on Finnish youth, it innovatively blends cutting-edge empirical research with agenda-setting theoretical development. Redefining political action, the authors expand beyond traditional public-sphere, scaling from formal to informal and unconventional modes of engaging. The book captures diverse engagement from memes to social movements, from participatory budgeting to street parties and from sleek politicians to detached people in the margins. In doing so, it provides a holistic view of the ways in which young people participate (or do not participate) in society, and their role in cultural change.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49329175" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/8f2ed891-a9fd-4b71-a474-d456de7cbfe8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=8f2ed891-a9fd-4b71-a474-d456de7cbfe8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eeva Luhtakallio et al., &quot;Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society&quot; (Bristol UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do young people participate in democratic societies? Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society (Bristol UP, 2024) introduces the concept of ‘doing society’ as a new theory of political action. Focused on Finnish youth, it innovatively blends cutting-edge empirical research with agenda-setting theoretical development. Redefining political action, the authors expand beyond traditional public-sphere, scaling from formal to informal and unconventional modes of engaging. The book captures diverse engagement from memes to social movements, from participatory budgeting to street parties and from sleek politicians to detached people in the margins. In doing so, it provides a holistic view of the ways in which young people participate (or do not participate) in society, and their role in cultural change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do young people participate in democratic societies? Youth Participation and Democracy: Cultures of Doing Society (Bristol UP, 2024) introduces the concept of ‘doing society’ as a new theory of political action. Focused on Finnish youth, it innovatively blends cutting-edge empirical research with agenda-setting theoretical development. Redefining political action, the authors expand beyond traditional public-sphere, scaling from formal to informal and unconventional modes of engaging. The book captures diverse engagement from memes to social movements, from participatory budgeting to street parties and from sleek politicians to detached people in the margins. In doing so, it provides a holistic view of the ways in which young people participate (or do not participate) in society, and their role in cultural change.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>406</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8462ce8-f08e-11ef-b502-c3255da9b24a</guid>
      <title>Ting Guo, &quot;Religion, Secularism, and Love As a Political Discourse in Modern China&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is the meaning of love in modern Chinese politics? Why has 愛 ai (love) been a crucial political discourse for secular nationalism for generations of political leaders as a powerful instrument to the present day? <em>Religion, Secularism, and Love as a Political Discourse in Modern China </em>(Amsterdam University Press, 2025) offers the first systematic examination of the ways in which the notion of love has been introduced, adapted, and engineered as a political discourse for the building and rebuilding of a secular modern nation, all the while appropriating Confucianism, Christianity, popular religion, ghost stories, political religion, and their religious affects. The insights of this exploration expand not only the discussion of the role of emotions in the project of Chinese modernity, but also the study of affective governance and religious nationalisms around the world today.</p><p>Author <a href="https://www2.crs.cuhk.edu.hk/faculty-staff/teaching-faculty/guo-ting">Ting Guo</a> is Assistant Professor of Cultural and Religious Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong and book reviewer editor for the Journal of the American Academy of Religion. She co-hosts a podcast called<a href="https://shicha.buzzsprout.com/"> 時差 in-betweenness</a>.</p><p>The episode is hosted by Ailin Zhou, PhD student in Film &amp; Digital Media at University of California - Santa Cruz.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the meaning of love in modern Chinese politics? Why has 愛 ai (love) been a crucial political discourse for secular nationalism for generations of political leaders as a powerful instrument to the present day? <em>Religion, Secularism, and Love as a Political Discourse in Modern China </em>(Amsterdam University Press, 2025) offers the first systematic examination of the ways in which the notion of love has been introduced, adapted, and engineered as a political discourse for the building and rebuilding of a secular modern nation, all the while appropriating Confucianism, Christianity, popular religion, ghost stories, political religion, and their religious affects. The insights of this exploration expand not only the discussion of the role of emotions in the project of Chinese modernity, but also the study of affective governance and religious nationalisms around the world today.</p><p>Author <a href="https://www2.crs.cuhk.edu.hk/faculty-staff/teaching-faculty/guo-ting">Ting Guo</a> is Assistant Professor of Cultural and Religious Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong and book reviewer editor for the Journal of the American Academy of Religion. She co-hosts a podcast called<a href="https://shicha.buzzsprout.com/"> 時差 in-betweenness</a>.</p><p>The episode is hosted by Ailin Zhou, PhD student in Film &amp; Digital Media at University of California - Santa Cruz.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72364213" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/56496aac-f2f2-4d66-8659-3b613584bdc4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=56496aac-f2f2-4d66-8659-3b613584bdc4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ting Guo, &quot;Religion, Secularism, and Love As a Political Discourse in Modern China&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is the meaning of love in modern Chinese politics? Why has 愛 ai (love) been a crucial political discourse for secular nationalism for generations of political leaders as a powerful instrument to the present day? Religion, Secularism, and Love as a Political Discourse in Modern China (Amsterdam University Press, 2025) offers the first systematic examination of the ways in which the notion of love has been introduced, adapted, and engineered as a political discourse for the building and rebuilding of a secular modern nation, all the while appropriating Confucianism, Christianity, popular religion, ghost stories, political religion, and their religious affects. The insights of this exploration expand not only the discussion of the role of emotions in the project of Chinese modernity, but also the study of affective governance and religious nationalisms around the world today.
Author Ting Guo is Assistant Professor of Cultural and Religious Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong and book reviewer editor for the Journal of the American Academy of Religion. She co-hosts a podcast called 時差 in-betweenness.
The episode is hosted by Ailin Zhou, PhD student in Film &amp; Digital Media at University of California - Santa Cruz.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is the meaning of love in modern Chinese politics? Why has 愛 ai (love) been a crucial political discourse for secular nationalism for generations of political leaders as a powerful instrument to the present day? Religion, Secularism, and Love as a Political Discourse in Modern China (Amsterdam University Press, 2025) offers the first systematic examination of the ways in which the notion of love has been introduced, adapted, and engineered as a political discourse for the building and rebuilding of a secular modern nation, all the while appropriating Confucianism, Christianity, popular religion, ghost stories, political religion, and their religious affects. The insights of this exploration expand not only the discussion of the role of emotions in the project of Chinese modernity, but also the study of affective governance and religious nationalisms around the world today.
Author Ting Guo is Assistant Professor of Cultural and Religious Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong and book reviewer editor for the Journal of the American Academy of Religion. She co-hosts a podcast called 時差 in-betweenness.
The episode is hosted by Ailin Zhou, PhD student in Film &amp; Digital Media at University of California - Santa Cruz.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b0c330fa-f1f0-11ef-8deb-6f625bb88152</guid>
      <title>Aure Schrock on Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549455"><em>Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</em></a> (MIT Press, 2024)</p><p>Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549455"><em>Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</em></a> (MIT Press, 2024)</p><p>Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="84873638" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f721d6e5-2acb-461b-a673-b153324a740b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f721d6e5-2acb-461b-a673-b153324a740b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aure Schrock on Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America (MIT Press, 2024)
Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Aure Schrock, an interdisciplinary technology scholar and writing coach and editor at Indelible Voice, about their book, Politics Recoded: The Infrastructural Organizing of Code for America (MIT Press, 2024)
Politics Recoded examines the history and culture of Code for America, an organization that, as one of its leaders put it, aimed “to promote ‘civic hacking,’ and to bring 21st century technology to government.” The book describes how the organization has changed over time from a “tech-forward” vision rooted in techno-libertarianism to an organization that provides something like digital consulting services to governments. The pair also talk about Aure’s writing and editing company, the Indelible Voice, and what it’s like helping scholars refine their vision and voice in academic writing.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>91</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3d692ba-f128-11ef-9559-a76a27645586</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a> – and <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition">maps the opposition</a>. Her <em>unbelievable </em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg">Venn diagram</a> reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to <em>effectively </em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185">Dr. Christina Pagel </a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as <em>The Conversation </em>and her free Substack, <a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a> (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration </a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The <a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a> based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s </em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0">Transcript</a> or <a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a> <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a> <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a> – and <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition">maps the opposition</a>. Her <em>unbelievable </em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg">Venn diagram</a> reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to <em>effectively </em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185">Dr. Christina Pagel </a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as <em>The Conversation </em>and her free Substack, <a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a> (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, <a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration </a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The <a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a> based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s </em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0">Transcript</a> or <a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a> <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a> <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47023050" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/173635f5-9556-4b0f-b137-a635b02b1692/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=173635f5-9556-4b0f-b137-a635b02b1692&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">865222f4-f097-11ef-9308-13637d622b13</guid>
      <title>Marion Laurence, &quot;Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Impartiality is a guiding principle in United Nations peace operations that has helped legitimize multilateral intervention in dozens of armed conflicts around the world. In practice, it has long been associated with passive monitoring of cease-fires and peace agreements. In the twenty-first century, however, its meaning has been stretched to allow for a range of forceful, intrusive, and ideologically prescriptive practices, all in the name of building durable peace.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197747575"><em>Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Marion Laurence explains how these new ways of being "impartial" emerge, how they spread within and across missions, and how they become institutionalized across UN peace operations. Dr. Laurence argues that new peacekeeping practices are not only products of top-down pressures from member states or instructions from the UN Secretariat; they often emerge from tacit knowledge and unconscious decisions about how to follow orders or comply with social rules. By foregrounding the creativity and agency of the field staff who are responsible for translating mandates into action, Dr. Laurence shows that new definitions and practices of impartiality are products of contestation, learning, and the interplay between top-down pressures and bottom-up drivers of change in UN peace operations.</p><p>Drawing on original data gathered through extensive fieldwork, Dr. Laurence uses evidence from UN missions in Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and from UN headquarters in New York, to provide an innovative framework for studying authority and change in global governance. In doing so, <em>Intrusive Impartiality</em> sheds light on controversial changes in peacekeeping practice and yields valuable insights about the practical and ethical dilemmas that confront UN peacekeepers.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impartiality is a guiding principle in United Nations peace operations that has helped legitimize multilateral intervention in dozens of armed conflicts around the world. In practice, it has long been associated with passive monitoring of cease-fires and peace agreements. In the twenty-first century, however, its meaning has been stretched to allow for a range of forceful, intrusive, and ideologically prescriptive practices, all in the name of building durable peace.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197747575"><em>Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Marion Laurence explains how these new ways of being "impartial" emerge, how they spread within and across missions, and how they become institutionalized across UN peace operations. Dr. Laurence argues that new peacekeeping practices are not only products of top-down pressures from member states or instructions from the UN Secretariat; they often emerge from tacit knowledge and unconscious decisions about how to follow orders or comply with social rules. By foregrounding the creativity and agency of the field staff who are responsible for translating mandates into action, Dr. Laurence shows that new definitions and practices of impartiality are products of contestation, learning, and the interplay between top-down pressures and bottom-up drivers of change in UN peace operations.</p><p>Drawing on original data gathered through extensive fieldwork, Dr. Laurence uses evidence from UN missions in Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and from UN headquarters in New York, to provide an innovative framework for studying authority and change in global governance. In doing so, <em>Intrusive Impartiality</em> sheds light on controversial changes in peacekeeping practice and yields valuable insights about the practical and ethical dilemmas that confront UN peacekeepers.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43871738" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/93b1778a-fc37-4f95-8781-10b51859c78e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=93b1778a-fc37-4f95-8781-10b51859c78e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marion Laurence, &quot;Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Impartiality is a guiding principle in United Nations peace operations that has helped legitimize multilateral intervention in dozens of armed conflicts around the world. In practice, it has long been associated with passive monitoring of cease-fires and peace agreements. In the twenty-first century, however, its meaning has been stretched to allow for a range of forceful, intrusive, and ideologically prescriptive practices, all in the name of building durable peace.
In Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Marion Laurence explains how these new ways of being &quot;impartial&quot; emerge, how they spread within and across missions, and how they become institutionalized across UN peace operations. Dr. Laurence argues that new peacekeeping practices are not only products of top-down pressures from member states or instructions from the UN Secretariat; they often emerge from tacit knowledge and unconscious decisions about how to follow orders or comply with social rules. By foregrounding the creativity and agency of the field staff who are responsible for translating mandates into action, Dr. Laurence shows that new definitions and practices of impartiality are products of contestation, learning, and the interplay between top-down pressures and bottom-up drivers of change in UN peace operations.
Drawing on original data gathered through extensive fieldwork, Dr. Laurence uses evidence from UN missions in Sierra Leone, Côte d&apos;Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and from UN headquarters in New York, to provide an innovative framework for studying authority and change in global governance. In doing so, Intrusive Impartiality sheds light on controversial changes in peacekeeping practice and yields valuable insights about the practical and ethical dilemmas that confront UN peacekeepers.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Impartiality is a guiding principle in United Nations peace operations that has helped legitimize multilateral intervention in dozens of armed conflicts around the world. In practice, it has long been associated with passive monitoring of cease-fires and peace agreements. In the twenty-first century, however, its meaning has been stretched to allow for a range of forceful, intrusive, and ideologically prescriptive practices, all in the name of building durable peace.
In Intrusive Impartiality: Learning, Contestation, and Practice Change in United Nations Peace Operations (Oxford University Press, 2024), Dr. Marion Laurence explains how these new ways of being &quot;impartial&quot; emerge, how they spread within and across missions, and how they become institutionalized across UN peace operations. Dr. Laurence argues that new peacekeeping practices are not only products of top-down pressures from member states or instructions from the UN Secretariat; they often emerge from tacit knowledge and unconscious decisions about how to follow orders or comply with social rules. By foregrounding the creativity and agency of the field staff who are responsible for translating mandates into action, Dr. Laurence shows that new definitions and practices of impartiality are products of contestation, learning, and the interplay between top-down pressures and bottom-up drivers of change in UN peace operations.
Drawing on original data gathered through extensive fieldwork, Dr. Laurence uses evidence from UN missions in Sierra Leone, Côte d&apos;Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and from UN headquarters in New York, to provide an innovative framework for studying authority and change in global governance. In doing so, Intrusive Impartiality sheds light on controversial changes in peacekeeping practice and yields valuable insights about the practical and ethical dilemmas that confront UN peacekeepers.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">595ce0f0-f05a-11ef-bf51-9f2728838b59</guid>
      <title>TrumpWorld: Canada, South Africa, Germany, and the Global Far-Right</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, John Torpey talks with Heribert Adam, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, to unpack the global ripple effects of Donald Trump's return to power. From his startling proposal to make Canada the 51st state to his controversial foreign aid cuts targeting South Africa, Trump's policies are reshaping international dynamics. Meanwhile, Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance have stirred political tensions in Germany by supporting the far-right AfD party. How are these developments impacting global democracy, migration, and racial politics? Adam, a distinguished expert on South Africa and race relations, provides historical context and critical analysis on these pressing issues. Tune in for a deep dive into the international consequences of Trump’s second term.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, John Torpey talks with Heribert Adam, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, to unpack the global ripple effects of Donald Trump's return to power. From his startling proposal to make Canada the 51st state to his controversial foreign aid cuts targeting South Africa, Trump's policies are reshaping international dynamics. Meanwhile, Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance have stirred political tensions in Germany by supporting the far-right AfD party. How are these developments impacting global democracy, migration, and racial politics? Adam, a distinguished expert on South Africa and race relations, provides historical context and critical analysis on these pressing issues. Tune in for a deep dive into the international consequences of Trump’s second term.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33182913" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/129157ae-7092-4658-92f1-a61903e54020/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=129157ae-7092-4658-92f1-a61903e54020&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>TrumpWorld: Canada, South Africa, Germany, and the Global Far-Right</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, John Torpey talks with Heribert Adam, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, to unpack the global ripple effects of Donald Trump&apos;s return to power. From his startling proposal to make Canada the 51st state to his controversial foreign aid cuts targeting South Africa, Trump&apos;s policies are reshaping international dynamics. Meanwhile, Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance have stirred political tensions in Germany by supporting the far-right AfD party. How are these developments impacting global democracy, migration, and racial politics? Adam, a distinguished expert on South Africa and race relations, provides historical context and critical analysis on these pressing issues. Tune in for a deep dive into the international consequences of Trump’s second term.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, John Torpey talks with Heribert Adam, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, to unpack the global ripple effects of Donald Trump&apos;s return to power. From his startling proposal to make Canada the 51st state to his controversial foreign aid cuts targeting South Africa, Trump&apos;s policies are reshaping international dynamics. Meanwhile, Elon Musk and Vice President JD Vance have stirred political tensions in Germany by supporting the far-right AfD party. How are these developments impacting global democracy, migration, and racial politics? Adam, a distinguished expert on South Africa and race relations, provides historical context and critical analysis on these pressing issues. Tune in for a deep dive into the international consequences of Trump’s second term.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>160</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f70b467c-ee0f-11ef-b894-77677a37e92a</guid>
      <title>Violent Majorities 2.2: Subir Sinha on Hindutva as Long-Distance Ethnonationalism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Lori Allen and Ajantha Subramanian continue their second series on <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=violent+majorities">Violent Majorities</a>. Their previous episode featured <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/06/143-violent-majorities-2-1-peter-beinart-on-long-distance-israeli-ethnonationalism-la-as/">Peter Beinart on Zionism </a>as long-distance ethnonationalism; here they speak with<a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/subir-sinha"> Subir Sinha</a>, who teaches at SOAS University of London, comments on Indian and European media, and is a member of a<a href="https://www.leicesterinquiry.org/"> commission of inquiry</a> exploring the 2022 unrest between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester, UK.</p><p>The catalysts he identifies for the rise of Hindu nationalism (<em>Hindutva) </em>include the emergence of new middle classes after economic liberalization, the rise of Islamophobia after 9/11, the 2008 crisis in capitalism, and the spread of new communications technologies.</p><p>The trio discuss the growth of Hindutva in the US and UK since the 1990s and its further consolidation. Social media has been key to Modi’s brand of authoritarian populism, with simultaneous messaging across national borders producing a globally dispersed audience for Hindutva. Particularly useful to transnational political mobilizations has been the manufacture of wounded Hindu sentiments: a claim to victimhood that draws on the legitimizing language of religious minority rights in the US and UK.</p><p>They also note more hopeful signs: Dalit and other oppressed caste politics have begun to strengthen in the diaspora; the contradictions between lived Hinduism and Hindutva have become clearer; there are some demographic and structural barriers to Hindutva’s further growth in the UK and US.</p><p><strong>Subir’s Recallable Book </strong>is Kunal Purohit’s <a href="https://www.amazon.com/H-Pop-Secretive-World-Hindutva-Stars-ebook/dp/B0CKP9VB8T"><em>H-Pop:The Secretive World of Hindutva Pop Stars</em> </a>(Harper Collins India, 2023), which looks at the proliferation of Hindutva Pop, a genre of music that is made to go viral and whip up mob violence against religious minorities.</p><p>Mentioned in this episode:</p><ul>
<li>Subir Sinha, “<a href="https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/6739/2161">Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in Indi</a>a.” <em>International Journal of Communication</em> 11(2017), 4158–4180.</li>
<li>Subir Sinha, “‘Strong leaders’, authoritarian populism and Indian developmentalism: The Modi moment in historical context.” <em>Geoforum</em>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019</a>
</li>
<li>Subir Sinha, “<a href="https://www.india-seminar.com/2022/756/756-03%20SUBIR%20SINHA.htm">Modi's People and Populism's Imagined Communities.</a>” <em>Seminar</em>, 7 5 6 – A u g u s t 2022, pp.18-23.</li>
<li>Edward T. G. Anderson,<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Hindu-Nationalism-Indian-Diaspora-author/dp/1805260545"> <em>Hindu Nationalism in the Indian Diaspora: Transnational Politics and British Multiculturalism</em></a>. London: Hurst &amp; Co., 2023.</li>
<li>
<em>Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh</em> (RSS), or National Volunteer Corps, is the parent organization of the Sangh Parivar, or Hindu nationalist family of organizations. It espouses principles of Hindu unity and aims to transform India into a Hindu supremacist nation-state.</li>
<li>
<em>Vishwa Hindu Parishad</em> (<em>VHP</em>), or World Hindu Organization, is a branch of the Sangh Parivar. Its stated aims are to engage in social service work, construct Hindu temples, and defend Hindus.</li>
<li>On the anti-caste discrimination bill in the UK parliament, see David Mosse, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417519000392">Outside Caste? The Enclosure of Caste and Claims to Castelessness in India and the United Kingdom</a>
</li>
<li>The Ganesh Puja period is a 10-day festival that honors the Hindu god Ganesha, and usually takes place in late August or early September.</li>
<li>Diane M. Nelson, <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/a-finger-in-the-wound/paper"><em>A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala</em></a><em>.</em> Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.</li>
<li>Benedict Anderson, <em>Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism</em>. Verso; Revised edition, 2016.</li>
<li>Yohann Koshy, “What the unrest in Leicester revealed about Britain – and Modi’s India.” <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/08/unrest-leicester-muslim-hindu-revealed-britain-modi-india-2022"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, 8 February 2024.</li>
<li>Richard Manuel, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3684199.html"><em>Cassette Culture in North India: Popular Music and Technology in North India</em></a>. University of Chicago .Press; 2nd ed. Edition,1993.</li>
</ul><p>Listen and<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/subir-sinha-transcript.pdf"> Read</a> here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori Allen and Ajantha Subramanian continue their second series on <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/?s=violent+majorities">Violent Majorities</a>. Their previous episode featured <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2025/02/06/143-violent-majorities-2-1-peter-beinart-on-long-distance-israeli-ethnonationalism-la-as/">Peter Beinart on Zionism </a>as long-distance ethnonationalism; here they speak with<a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/subir-sinha"> Subir Sinha</a>, who teaches at SOAS University of London, comments on Indian and European media, and is a member of a<a href="https://www.leicesterinquiry.org/"> commission of inquiry</a> exploring the 2022 unrest between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester, UK.</p><p>The catalysts he identifies for the rise of Hindu nationalism (<em>Hindutva) </em>include the emergence of new middle classes after economic liberalization, the rise of Islamophobia after 9/11, the 2008 crisis in capitalism, and the spread of new communications technologies.</p><p>The trio discuss the growth of Hindutva in the US and UK since the 1990s and its further consolidation. Social media has been key to Modi’s brand of authoritarian populism, with simultaneous messaging across national borders producing a globally dispersed audience for Hindutva. Particularly useful to transnational political mobilizations has been the manufacture of wounded Hindu sentiments: a claim to victimhood that draws on the legitimizing language of religious minority rights in the US and UK.</p><p>They also note more hopeful signs: Dalit and other oppressed caste politics have begun to strengthen in the diaspora; the contradictions between lived Hinduism and Hindutva have become clearer; there are some demographic and structural barriers to Hindutva’s further growth in the UK and US.</p><p><strong>Subir’s Recallable Book </strong>is Kunal Purohit’s <a href="https://www.amazon.com/H-Pop-Secretive-World-Hindutva-Stars-ebook/dp/B0CKP9VB8T"><em>H-Pop:The Secretive World of Hindutva Pop Stars</em> </a>(Harper Collins India, 2023), which looks at the proliferation of Hindutva Pop, a genre of music that is made to go viral and whip up mob violence against religious minorities.</p><p>Mentioned in this episode:</p><ul>
<li>Subir Sinha, “<a href="https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/6739/2161">Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in Indi</a>a.” <em>International Journal of Communication</em> 11(2017), 4158–4180.</li>
<li>Subir Sinha, “‘Strong leaders’, authoritarian populism and Indian developmentalism: The Modi moment in historical context.” <em>Geoforum</em>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019</a>
</li>
<li>Subir Sinha, “<a href="https://www.india-seminar.com/2022/756/756-03%20SUBIR%20SINHA.htm">Modi's People and Populism's Imagined Communities.</a>” <em>Seminar</em>, 7 5 6 – A u g u s t 2022, pp.18-23.</li>
<li>Edward T. G. Anderson,<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Hindu-Nationalism-Indian-Diaspora-author/dp/1805260545"> <em>Hindu Nationalism in the Indian Diaspora: Transnational Politics and British Multiculturalism</em></a>. London: Hurst &amp; Co., 2023.</li>
<li>
<em>Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh</em> (RSS), or National Volunteer Corps, is the parent organization of the Sangh Parivar, or Hindu nationalist family of organizations. It espouses principles of Hindu unity and aims to transform India into a Hindu supremacist nation-state.</li>
<li>
<em>Vishwa Hindu Parishad</em> (<em>VHP</em>), or World Hindu Organization, is a branch of the Sangh Parivar. Its stated aims are to engage in social service work, construct Hindu temples, and defend Hindus.</li>
<li>On the anti-caste discrimination bill in the UK parliament, see David Mosse, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417519000392">Outside Caste? The Enclosure of Caste and Claims to Castelessness in India and the United Kingdom</a>
</li>
<li>The Ganesh Puja period is a 10-day festival that honors the Hindu god Ganesha, and usually takes place in late August or early September.</li>
<li>Diane M. Nelson, <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/a-finger-in-the-wound/paper"><em>A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala</em></a><em>.</em> Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.</li>
<li>Benedict Anderson, <em>Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism</em>. Verso; Revised edition, 2016.</li>
<li>Yohann Koshy, “What the unrest in Leicester revealed about Britain – and Modi’s India.” <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/08/unrest-leicester-muslim-hindu-revealed-britain-modi-india-2022"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, 8 February 2024.</li>
<li>Richard Manuel, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3684199.html"><em>Cassette Culture in North India: Popular Music and Technology in North India</em></a>. University of Chicago .Press; 2nd ed. Edition,1993.</li>
</ul><p>Listen and<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/subir-sinha-transcript.pdf"> Read</a> here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48830560" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ebec5c4c-52d6-4b48-8071-66af53d48283/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ebec5c4c-52d6-4b48-8071-66af53d48283&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Violent Majorities 2.2: Subir Sinha on Hindutva as Long-Distance Ethnonationalism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lori Allen and Ajantha Subramanian continue their second series on Violent Majorities. Their previous episode featured Peter Beinart on Zionism as long-distance ethnonationalism; here they speak with Subir Sinha, who teaches at SOAS University of London, comments on Indian and European media, and is a member of a commission of inquiry exploring the 2022 unrest between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester, UK.
The catalysts he identifies for the rise of Hindu nationalism (Hindutva) include the emergence of new middle classes after economic liberalization, the rise of Islamophobia after 9/11, the 2008 crisis in capitalism, and the spread of new communications technologies.
The trio discuss the growth of Hindutva in the US and UK since the 1990s and its further consolidation. Social media has been key to Modi’s brand of authoritarian populism, with simultaneous messaging across national borders producing a globally dispersed audience for Hindutva. Particularly useful to transnational political mobilizations has been the manufacture of wounded Hindu sentiments: a claim to victimhood that draws on the legitimizing language of religious minority rights in the US and UK.
They also note more hopeful signs: Dalit and other oppressed caste politics have begun to strengthen in the diaspora; the contradictions between lived Hinduism and Hindutva have become clearer; there are some demographic and structural barriers to Hindutva’s further growth in the UK and US.
Subir’s Recallable Book is Kunal Purohit’s H-Pop:The Secretive World of Hindutva Pop Stars (Harper Collins India, 2023), which looks at the proliferation of Hindutva Pop, a genre of music that is made to go viral and whip up mob violence against religious minorities.
Mentioned in this episode:

Subir Sinha, “Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India.” International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4158–4180.

Subir Sinha, “‘Strong leaders’, authoritarian populism and Indian developmentalism: The Modi moment in historical context.” Geoforum, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019


Subir Sinha, “Modi&apos;s People and Populism&apos;s Imagined Communities.” Seminar, 7 5 6 – A u g u s t 2022, pp.18-23.

Edward T. G. Anderson, Hindu Nationalism in the Indian Diaspora: Transnational Politics and British Multiculturalism. London: Hurst &amp; Co., 2023.


Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), or National Volunteer Corps, is the parent organization of the Sangh Parivar, or Hindu nationalist family of organizations. It espouses principles of Hindu unity and aims to transform India into a Hindu supremacist nation-state.


Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), or World Hindu Organization, is a branch of the Sangh Parivar. Its stated aims are to engage in social service work, construct Hindu temples, and defend Hindus.

On the anti-caste discrimination bill in the UK parliament, see David Mosse, Outside Caste? The Enclosure of Caste and Claims to Castelessness in India and the United Kingdom


The Ganesh Puja period is a 10-day festival that honors the Hindu god Ganesha, and usually takes place in late August or early September.

Diane M. Nelson, A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso; Revised edition, 2016.

Yohann Koshy, “What the unrest in Leicester revealed about Britain – and Modi’s India.” The Guardian, 8 February 2024.

Richard Manuel, Cassette Culture in North India: Popular Music and Technology in North India. University of Chicago .Press; 2nd ed. Edition,1993.

Listen and Read here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lori Allen and Ajantha Subramanian continue their second series on Violent Majorities. Their previous episode featured Peter Beinart on Zionism as long-distance ethnonationalism; here they speak with Subir Sinha, who teaches at SOAS University of London, comments on Indian and European media, and is a member of a commission of inquiry exploring the 2022 unrest between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester, UK.
The catalysts he identifies for the rise of Hindu nationalism (Hindutva) include the emergence of new middle classes after economic liberalization, the rise of Islamophobia after 9/11, the 2008 crisis in capitalism, and the spread of new communications technologies.
The trio discuss the growth of Hindutva in the US and UK since the 1990s and its further consolidation. Social media has been key to Modi’s brand of authoritarian populism, with simultaneous messaging across national borders producing a globally dispersed audience for Hindutva. Particularly useful to transnational political mobilizations has been the manufacture of wounded Hindu sentiments: a claim to victimhood that draws on the legitimizing language of religious minority rights in the US and UK.
They also note more hopeful signs: Dalit and other oppressed caste politics have begun to strengthen in the diaspora; the contradictions between lived Hinduism and Hindutva have become clearer; there are some demographic and structural barriers to Hindutva’s further growth in the UK and US.
Subir’s Recallable Book is Kunal Purohit’s H-Pop:The Secretive World of Hindutva Pop Stars (Harper Collins India, 2023), which looks at the proliferation of Hindutva Pop, a genre of music that is made to go viral and whip up mob violence against religious minorities.
Mentioned in this episode:

Subir Sinha, “Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India.” International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4158–4180.

Subir Sinha, “‘Strong leaders’, authoritarian populism and Indian developmentalism: The Modi moment in historical context.” Geoforum, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.019


Subir Sinha, “Modi&apos;s People and Populism&apos;s Imagined Communities.” Seminar, 7 5 6 – A u g u s t 2022, pp.18-23.

Edward T. G. Anderson, Hindu Nationalism in the Indian Diaspora: Transnational Politics and British Multiculturalism. London: Hurst &amp; Co., 2023.


Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), or National Volunteer Corps, is the parent organization of the Sangh Parivar, or Hindu nationalist family of organizations. It espouses principles of Hindu unity and aims to transform India into a Hindu supremacist nation-state.


Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), or World Hindu Organization, is a branch of the Sangh Parivar. Its stated aims are to engage in social service work, construct Hindu temples, and defend Hindus.

On the anti-caste discrimination bill in the UK parliament, see David Mosse, Outside Caste? The Enclosure of Caste and Claims to Castelessness in India and the United Kingdom


The Ganesh Puja period is a 10-day festival that honors the Hindu god Ganesha, and usually takes place in late August or early September.

Diane M. Nelson, A Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso; Revised edition, 2016.

Yohann Koshy, “What the unrest in Leicester revealed about Britain – and Modi’s India.” The Guardian, 8 February 2024.

Richard Manuel, Cassette Culture in North India: Popular Music and Technology in North India. University of Chicago .Press; 2nd ed. Edition,1993.

Listen and Read here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee28ef0c-edfe-11ef-952e-af42dd9877fd</guid>
      <title>Patrick Riordan, &quot;Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A deeply considered examination of the “common good” reconciling Catholic Social Thought with secular politics and philosophy.</p><p>The Second Vatican Council invites dialogue about the common good as the set of economic, political, legal, and cultural conditions for human flourishing, whether as individuals or as communities. However, some contemporary Catholic authors jeopardize this dialogue by polarizing liberalism and the common good, interpreting the commitment to individual liberty as incompatible with commitment to the common good.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647123697"><em>Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good </em></a>(Georgetown UP, 2023) clarifies the meaning of the common good through the three lenses of Aristotelian practical philosophy, twentieth-century Catholic Social Thought, and political liberalism. It makes the case that embracing the common good does not entail a rejection of liberalism, but that a commitment to liberal politics is compatible with faithful adherence to the Catholic tradition. The book argues that liberal political philosophy is not only compatible with Catholic Social Teaching but may also be the most appropriate framework for communicating the richness of the Church’s tradition today. Furthermore, accepting political liberalism can facilitate collaboration in political life between those who hold different worldviews and foster an enriched discussion of democracy, human rights, and religious liberty.</p><p>Students and scholars of Christian ethics and political philosophy will benefit from this response to the challenges of dialogue about the “common good” in the context of the resurgence of this topic.</p><p>Sam Young is a recent PhD graduate from Cardiff University, specialising in the theological history of European social Catholic movements active during the crisis years of the 1920s and 1930s.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A deeply considered examination of the “common good” reconciling Catholic Social Thought with secular politics and philosophy.</p><p>The Second Vatican Council invites dialogue about the common good as the set of economic, political, legal, and cultural conditions for human flourishing, whether as individuals or as communities. However, some contemporary Catholic authors jeopardize this dialogue by polarizing liberalism and the common good, interpreting the commitment to individual liberty as incompatible with commitment to the common good.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647123697"><em>Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good </em></a>(Georgetown UP, 2023) clarifies the meaning of the common good through the three lenses of Aristotelian practical philosophy, twentieth-century Catholic Social Thought, and political liberalism. It makes the case that embracing the common good does not entail a rejection of liberalism, but that a commitment to liberal politics is compatible with faithful adherence to the Catholic tradition. The book argues that liberal political philosophy is not only compatible with Catholic Social Teaching but may also be the most appropriate framework for communicating the richness of the Church’s tradition today. Furthermore, accepting political liberalism can facilitate collaboration in political life between those who hold different worldviews and foster an enriched discussion of democracy, human rights, and religious liberty.</p><p>Students and scholars of Christian ethics and political philosophy will benefit from this response to the challenges of dialogue about the “common good” in the context of the resurgence of this topic.</p><p>Sam Young is a recent PhD graduate from Cardiff University, specialising in the theological history of European social Catholic movements active during the crisis years of the 1920s and 1930s.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46922790" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/47d6437f-c7e4-4b69-ad03-bed4b0574a93/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=47d6437f-c7e4-4b69-ad03-bed4b0574a93&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Patrick Riordan, &quot;Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A deeply considered examination of the “common good” reconciling Catholic Social Thought with secular politics and philosophy.
The Second Vatican Council invites dialogue about the common good as the set of economic, political, legal, and cultural conditions for human flourishing, whether as individuals or as communities. However, some contemporary Catholic authors jeopardize this dialogue by polarizing liberalism and the common good, interpreting the commitment to individual liberty as incompatible with commitment to the common good.
Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good (Georgetown UP, 2023) clarifies the meaning of the common good through the three lenses of Aristotelian practical philosophy, twentieth-century Catholic Social Thought, and political liberalism. It makes the case that embracing the common good does not entail a rejection of liberalism, but that a commitment to liberal politics is compatible with faithful adherence to the Catholic tradition. The book argues that liberal political philosophy is not only compatible with Catholic Social Teaching but may also be the most appropriate framework for communicating the richness of the Church’s tradition today. Furthermore, accepting political liberalism can facilitate collaboration in political life between those who hold different worldviews and foster an enriched discussion of democracy, human rights, and religious liberty.
Students and scholars of Christian ethics and political philosophy will benefit from this response to the challenges of dialogue about the “common good” in the context of the resurgence of this topic.
Sam Young is a recent PhD graduate from Cardiff University, specialising in the theological history of European social Catholic movements active during the crisis years of the 1920s and 1930s.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A deeply considered examination of the “common good” reconciling Catholic Social Thought with secular politics and philosophy.
The Second Vatican Council invites dialogue about the common good as the set of economic, political, legal, and cultural conditions for human flourishing, whether as individuals or as communities. However, some contemporary Catholic authors jeopardize this dialogue by polarizing liberalism and the common good, interpreting the commitment to individual liberty as incompatible with commitment to the common good.
Human Dignity and Liberal Politics: Catholic Possibilities for the Common Good (Georgetown UP, 2023) clarifies the meaning of the common good through the three lenses of Aristotelian practical philosophy, twentieth-century Catholic Social Thought, and political liberalism. It makes the case that embracing the common good does not entail a rejection of liberalism, but that a commitment to liberal politics is compatible with faithful adherence to the Catholic tradition. The book argues that liberal political philosophy is not only compatible with Catholic Social Teaching but may also be the most appropriate framework for communicating the richness of the Church’s tradition today. Furthermore, accepting political liberalism can facilitate collaboration in political life between those who hold different worldviews and foster an enriched discussion of democracy, human rights, and religious liberty.
Students and scholars of Christian ethics and political philosophy will benefit from this response to the challenges of dialogue about the “common good” in the context of the resurgence of this topic.
Sam Young is a recent PhD graduate from Cardiff University, specialising in the theological history of European social Catholic movements active during the crisis years of the 1920s and 1930s.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e67a7094-ed65-11ef-809d-175d7c209775</guid>
      <title>Peter Wien, &quot;Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East&quot; (Routledge, 2017)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Arab nationalism has been one of the dominant ideologies in the Middle East and North Africa since the early twentieth century. However, a clear definition of Arab nationalism, even as a subject of scholarly inquiry, does not yet exist.</p><p>Peter Wien’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780415499385"><em>Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2017) sheds light on cultural expressions of Arab nationalism and the sometimes contradictory meanings attached to it in the process of identity formation in the modern world. It presents nationalism as an experienceable set of identity markers – in stories, visual culture, narratives of memory, and struggles with ideology, sometimes in culturally sophisticated forms, sometimes in utterly vulgar forms of expression. Utilizing various case studies, the present work transcends a conventional history that reduces nationalism in the Arab lands to a pattern of political rise and decline. It offers a glimpse at ways in which Arabs have constructed an identifiable shared national culture, and it critically dissects conceptions about Arab nationalism as an easily graspable secular and authoritarian ideology modeled on Western ideas and visions of modernity.</p><p>This book offers an entirely new portrayal of nationalism and a crucial update to the field, and as such, is indispensable reading for students, scholars and policymakers looking to gain a deeper understanding of nationalism in the Arab world.</p><p>Peter Wien is Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at the University of Maryland, College Park.</p><p>Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an educational staff.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arab nationalism has been one of the dominant ideologies in the Middle East and North Africa since the early twentieth century. However, a clear definition of Arab nationalism, even as a subject of scholarly inquiry, does not yet exist.</p><p>Peter Wien’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780415499385"><em>Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2017) sheds light on cultural expressions of Arab nationalism and the sometimes contradictory meanings attached to it in the process of identity formation in the modern world. It presents nationalism as an experienceable set of identity markers – in stories, visual culture, narratives of memory, and struggles with ideology, sometimes in culturally sophisticated forms, sometimes in utterly vulgar forms of expression. Utilizing various case studies, the present work transcends a conventional history that reduces nationalism in the Arab lands to a pattern of political rise and decline. It offers a glimpse at ways in which Arabs have constructed an identifiable shared national culture, and it critically dissects conceptions about Arab nationalism as an easily graspable secular and authoritarian ideology modeled on Western ideas and visions of modernity.</p><p>This book offers an entirely new portrayal of nationalism and a crucial update to the field, and as such, is indispensable reading for students, scholars and policymakers looking to gain a deeper understanding of nationalism in the Arab world.</p><p>Peter Wien is Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at the University of Maryland, College Park.</p><p>Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an educational staff.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41705236" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a13410fa-afcd-413d-866b-1c828fc6e408/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a13410fa-afcd-413d-866b-1c828fc6e408&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Wien, &quot;Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East&quot; (Routledge, 2017)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Arab nationalism has been one of the dominant ideologies in the Middle East and North Africa since the early twentieth century. However, a clear definition of Arab nationalism, even as a subject of scholarly inquiry, does not yet exist.
Peter Wien’s Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East (Routledge, 2017) sheds light on cultural expressions of Arab nationalism and the sometimes contradictory meanings attached to it in the process of identity formation in the modern world. It presents nationalism as an experienceable set of identity markers – in stories, visual culture, narratives of memory, and struggles with ideology, sometimes in culturally sophisticated forms, sometimes in utterly vulgar forms of expression. Utilizing various case studies, the present work transcends a conventional history that reduces nationalism in the Arab lands to a pattern of political rise and decline. It offers a glimpse at ways in which Arabs have constructed an identifiable shared national culture, and it critically dissects conceptions about Arab nationalism as an easily graspable secular and authoritarian ideology modeled on Western ideas and visions of modernity.
This book offers an entirely new portrayal of nationalism and a crucial update to the field, and as such, is indispensable reading for students, scholars and policymakers looking to gain a deeper understanding of nationalism in the Arab world.
Peter Wien is Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an educational staff.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Arab nationalism has been one of the dominant ideologies in the Middle East and North Africa since the early twentieth century. However, a clear definition of Arab nationalism, even as a subject of scholarly inquiry, does not yet exist.
Peter Wien’s Arab Nationalism: The Politics of History and Culture in the Modern Middle East (Routledge, 2017) sheds light on cultural expressions of Arab nationalism and the sometimes contradictory meanings attached to it in the process of identity formation in the modern world. It presents nationalism as an experienceable set of identity markers – in stories, visual culture, narratives of memory, and struggles with ideology, sometimes in culturally sophisticated forms, sometimes in utterly vulgar forms of expression. Utilizing various case studies, the present work transcends a conventional history that reduces nationalism in the Arab lands to a pattern of political rise and decline. It offers a glimpse at ways in which Arabs have constructed an identifiable shared national culture, and it critically dissects conceptions about Arab nationalism as an easily graspable secular and authoritarian ideology modeled on Western ideas and visions of modernity.
This book offers an entirely new portrayal of nationalism and a crucial update to the field, and as such, is indispensable reading for students, scholars and policymakers looking to gain a deeper understanding of nationalism in the Arab world.
Peter Wien is Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Saman Nasser holds an M.A. in World History from James Madison University, where he currently works as an educational staff.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>291</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aed48214-ec8f-11ef-9300-63afb3028895</guid>
      <title>Aidan McGarry, &quot;Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197778258">Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups</a> (Oxford UP, 2024), Aidan McGarry examines the agency of marginalised people, emphasizing the processes through which different communities around the world articulate their political voices. McGarry develops an innovative concept of political voice around three elements: autonomy, representation, and constitution. This conceptualization is illustrated through contemporary case studies of two persecuted and silenced groups: LGBTIQ activists in India and Roma mobilization in Europe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197778258">Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups</a> (Oxford UP, 2024), Aidan McGarry examines the agency of marginalised people, emphasizing the processes through which different communities around the world articulate their political voices. McGarry develops an innovative concept of political voice around three elements: autonomy, representation, and constitution. This conceptualization is illustrated through contemporary case studies of two persecuted and silenced groups: LGBTIQ activists in India and Roma mobilization in Europe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52662929" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1966e92f-500f-49e0-9a7d-557463a62a89/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1966e92f-500f-49e0-9a7d-557463a62a89&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Aidan McGarry, &quot;Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups (Oxford UP, 2024), Aidan McGarry examines the agency of marginalised people, emphasizing the processes through which different communities around the world articulate their political voices. McGarry develops an innovative concept of political voice around three elements: autonomy, representation, and constitution. This conceptualization is illustrated through contemporary case studies of two persecuted and silenced groups: LGBTIQ activists in India and Roma mobilization in Europe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Political Voice: Protest, Democracy, and Marginalised Groups (Oxford UP, 2024), Aidan McGarry examines the agency of marginalised people, emphasizing the processes through which different communities around the world articulate their political voices. McGarry develops an innovative concept of political voice around three elements: autonomy, representation, and constitution. This conceptualization is illustrated through contemporary case studies of two persecuted and silenced groups: LGBTIQ activists in India and Roma mobilization in Europe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>404</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ed7890e-ebbf-11ef-b86b-a3f44c6c4f8d</guid>
      <title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em> </em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of <em>political </em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. <em>The Private is Political </em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia">Professor Ray Brescia</a> is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including <em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession </em>(from NYU Press) and <em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions </em>(from Cornell UP)<em>. </em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em> “</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/">Shoshana Zuboff</a> on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em> </em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of <em>political </em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. <em>The Private is Political </em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia">Professor Ray Brescia</a> is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including <em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession </em>(from NYU Press) and <em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions </em>(from Cornell UP)<em>. </em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em> “</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/">Shoshana Zuboff</a> on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50922770" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1391531e-00e4-4679-8fa3-aa52494cfed7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1391531e-00e4-4679-8fa3-aa52494cfed7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:


Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism


Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG

Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:


Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism


Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG

Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>759</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fe46ad5c-e95d-11ef-82a8-c3a8e0456002</guid>
      <title>Kenneth Roth, &quot;Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments&quot; (Knopf, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For three decades, Kenneth Roth led <a href="http://www.hrw.org/">Human Rights Watch</a>, transforming it from a small advocacy group into one of the most influential human rights organizations in the world. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321"><em>Righting Wrongs</em>: <em>Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments</em></a><em> </em>(Knopf, 2025)<u>,</u> he offers a gripping inside account of the relentless fight against some of the world’s most abusive governments—from war crimes in Syria and Russia’s authoritarianism to China’s crackdown on dissent and the global erosion of democratic norms.</p><p>Part memoir, part strategic guide, and part call to action, <em>Righting Wrongs</em> reveals the behind-the-scenes battles to hold governments accountable, the difficult choices human rights activists must make, and the lessons learned from engaging with autocrats, diplomats, and international institutions. With keen insight, Roth shows how pressure and advocacy can curb abuses and spark change—even against the most powerful forces.</p><p>A must-read for anyone passionate about justice, democracy, and global affairs, <em>Righting Wrongs</em> is both an inspiring chronicle of courage and a crucial roadmap for the challenges ahead.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For three decades, Kenneth Roth led <a href="http://www.hrw.org/">Human Rights Watch</a>, transforming it from a small advocacy group into one of the most influential human rights organizations in the world. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593801321"><em>Righting Wrongs</em>: <em>Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments</em></a><em> </em>(Knopf, 2025)<u>,</u> he offers a gripping inside account of the relentless fight against some of the world’s most abusive governments—from war crimes in Syria and Russia’s authoritarianism to China’s crackdown on dissent and the global erosion of democratic norms.</p><p>Part memoir, part strategic guide, and part call to action, <em>Righting Wrongs</em> reveals the behind-the-scenes battles to hold governments accountable, the difficult choices human rights activists must make, and the lessons learned from engaging with autocrats, diplomats, and international institutions. With keen insight, Roth shows how pressure and advocacy can curb abuses and spark change—even against the most powerful forces.</p><p>A must-read for anyone passionate about justice, democracy, and global affairs, <em>Righting Wrongs</em> is both an inspiring chronicle of courage and a crucial roadmap for the challenges ahead.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65820995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/960cbdc3-ff24-4803-b0ab-de8a81a5fb16/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=960cbdc3-ff24-4803-b0ab-de8a81a5fb16&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kenneth Roth, &quot;Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments&quot; (Knopf, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For three decades, Kenneth Roth led Human Rights Watch, transforming it from a small advocacy group into one of the most influential human rights organizations in the world. In Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments (Knopf, 2025), he offers a gripping inside account of the relentless fight against some of the world’s most abusive governments—from war crimes in Syria and Russia’s authoritarianism to China’s crackdown on dissent and the global erosion of democratic norms.
Part memoir, part strategic guide, and part call to action, Righting Wrongs reveals the behind-the-scenes battles to hold governments accountable, the difficult choices human rights activists must make, and the lessons learned from engaging with autocrats, diplomats, and international institutions. With keen insight, Roth shows how pressure and advocacy can curb abuses and spark change—even against the most powerful forces.
A must-read for anyone passionate about justice, democracy, and global affairs, Righting Wrongs is both an inspiring chronicle of courage and a crucial roadmap for the challenges ahead.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For three decades, Kenneth Roth led Human Rights Watch, transforming it from a small advocacy group into one of the most influential human rights organizations in the world. In Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments (Knopf, 2025), he offers a gripping inside account of the relentless fight against some of the world’s most abusive governments—from war crimes in Syria and Russia’s authoritarianism to China’s crackdown on dissent and the global erosion of democratic norms.
Part memoir, part strategic guide, and part call to action, Righting Wrongs reveals the behind-the-scenes battles to hold governments accountable, the difficult choices human rights activists must make, and the lessons learned from engaging with autocrats, diplomats, and international institutions. With keen insight, Roth shows how pressure and advocacy can curb abuses and spark change—even against the most powerful forces.
A must-read for anyone passionate about justice, democracy, and global affairs, Righting Wrongs is both an inspiring chronicle of courage and a crucial roadmap for the challenges ahead.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e916d7fe-ea11-11ef-8441-53e263e070c5</guid>
      <title>Allison Rank et al., &quot;Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031551543"><em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. <em>Civic Pedagogies</em> focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.</p><p>This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. <em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em> has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031551543"><em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. <em>Civic Pedagogies</em> focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.</p><p>This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. <em>Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics</em> has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44271684" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3ae1652d-c102-46c6-bcd3-9ff2c2df1d71/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3ae1652d-c102-46c6-bcd3-9ff2c2df1d71&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Allison Rank et al., &quot;Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. Civic Pedagogies focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.
This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Lauren C. Bell, Allison Rank, and Carah Ong Whaley have a new edited volume, Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024). This book has four separate sections that guide the reader through different dimensions of teaching civic engagement and the many aspects of this important pedagogical capacity that often falls on the shoulders of political science faculty at universities and colleges in the United States. In our discussion we cover the idea of civic engagement itself as an approach that many of us integrate into our courses in a variety of ways. Civic Pedagogies focuses on this complex topic first through a number of chapters that dive into the theory behind civic engagement and how to think about this concept as a dimension of or the entirety of a college course. The next section of the book takes up a variety of different practical approaches to embedding civic learning into courses. The last two sections of the book explore the challenges and benefits of civically engaged pedagogies and, finally, assessment of civically engaged pedagogies.
This is a thorough and thoughtful book with an impressive array of contributing authors all thinking about not only the importance of civically engaged pedagogies, but also the unique dimensions of this kind of pedagogy. The three editors explain, in our conversation, different points of importances that were fleshed out by the many contributors and their thinking about how best to embed this vital component of education within a democracy. Civic Pedagogies: Teaching Civic Engagement in an Era of Divisive Politics has so many different perspectives that it provides a rich array of options for most educators who want or need to integrate civic pedagogies into their classrooms. In our discussion, we also explore the value of being able to engage on public topics and political questions in a civil manner—both in the classroom itself and then, as students move into their lives beyond college, as members of their communities.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>758</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">688ea49a-e8b3-11ef-a96e-c71462715631</guid>
      <title>Snigdhendu Bhattacharya, &quot;Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment&quot; (HarperCollins India, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From being a fringe political party in 2013 to sweeping nearly half of the state s forty-two Lok Sabha seats in 2019, the BJP has gained ground in West Bengal, aided partly by the RSS s exponential growth during Mamata Banerjee's chief ministerial tenure (2011 onwards). With a consistent and concerted criticism of the TMC, the saffron camp managed to create a strong wave of anti-incumbency. So much so that the BJP s prospects of forming the next government in Bengal in 2021 seemed to have brightened considerably, while the Left, which had ruled Bengal for over three decades, appears to have been reduced to a fringe political entity. However, the controversy over the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens, combined with Banerjee s course-correction drive, designed by strategist Prashant Kishor, indicate that she might yet script a turnaround, with Bengal turning into the laboratory of a unique political experiment. </p><p><a href="https://harpercollins.co.in/product/mission-bengal/"><em>Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment</em></a> (HarperCollins India, 2020) documents the BJP s extraordinary rise in the state and attempts to look at these developments in the historical context of Bengal from the rise of Hindu nationalism and Muslim separatism in the nineteenth century, the Partition and its fallout, the impact of developments in Bangladesh, the influence of leftist ideals on the psyche of the Bengali people, to the demographic changes in the state over the past few decades.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Snigdhendu Bhattacharya is a Kolkata-based journalist who has reported for different national media houses including the Hindustan Times, The Wire and Outlook. He has been writing on politics, security, history, socio-economic and cultural affairs since 2005. His book Lalgarh and the Legend of Kishanji: Tales from India’s Maoist Movement was published in 2016.</p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From being a fringe political party in 2013 to sweeping nearly half of the state s forty-two Lok Sabha seats in 2019, the BJP has gained ground in West Bengal, aided partly by the RSS s exponential growth during Mamata Banerjee's chief ministerial tenure (2011 onwards). With a consistent and concerted criticism of the TMC, the saffron camp managed to create a strong wave of anti-incumbency. So much so that the BJP s prospects of forming the next government in Bengal in 2021 seemed to have brightened considerably, while the Left, which had ruled Bengal for over three decades, appears to have been reduced to a fringe political entity. However, the controversy over the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens, combined with Banerjee s course-correction drive, designed by strategist Prashant Kishor, indicate that she might yet script a turnaround, with Bengal turning into the laboratory of a unique political experiment. </p><p><a href="https://harpercollins.co.in/product/mission-bengal/"><em>Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment</em></a> (HarperCollins India, 2020) documents the BJP s extraordinary rise in the state and attempts to look at these developments in the historical context of Bengal from the rise of Hindu nationalism and Muslim separatism in the nineteenth century, the Partition and its fallout, the impact of developments in Bangladesh, the influence of leftist ideals on the psyche of the Bengali people, to the demographic changes in the state over the past few decades.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Snigdhendu Bhattacharya is a Kolkata-based journalist who has reported for different national media houses including the Hindustan Times, The Wire and Outlook. He has been writing on politics, security, history, socio-economic and cultural affairs since 2005. His book Lalgarh and the Legend of Kishanji: Tales from India’s Maoist Movement was published in 2016.</p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58292635" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a82a33db-0012-44ce-b7fb-684af64c29cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a82a33db-0012-44ce-b7fb-684af64c29cc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Snigdhendu Bhattacharya, &quot;Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment&quot; (HarperCollins India, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From being a fringe political party in 2013 to sweeping nearly half of the state s forty-two Lok Sabha seats in 2019, the BJP has gained ground in West Bengal, aided partly by the RSS s exponential growth during Mamata Banerjee&apos;s chief ministerial tenure (2011 onwards). With a consistent and concerted criticism of the TMC, the saffron camp managed to create a strong wave of anti-incumbency. So much so that the BJP s prospects of forming the next government in Bengal in 2021 seemed to have brightened considerably, while the Left, which had ruled Bengal for over three decades, appears to have been reduced to a fringe political entity. However, the controversy over the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens, combined with Banerjee s course-correction drive, designed by strategist Prashant Kishor, indicate that she might yet script a turnaround, with Bengal turning into the laboratory of a unique political experiment. 
Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment (HarperCollins India, 2020) documents the BJP s extraordinary rise in the state and attempts to look at these developments in the historical context of Bengal from the rise of Hindu nationalism and Muslim separatism in the nineteenth century, the Partition and its fallout, the impact of developments in Bangladesh, the influence of leftist ideals on the psyche of the Bengali people, to the demographic changes in the state over the past few decades.
About the Author: 
Snigdhendu Bhattacharya is a Kolkata-based journalist who has reported for different national media houses including the Hindustan Times, The Wire and Outlook. He has been writing on politics, security, history, socio-economic and cultural affairs since 2005. His book Lalgarh and the Legend of Kishanji: Tales from India’s Maoist Movement was published in 2016.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From being a fringe political party in 2013 to sweeping nearly half of the state s forty-two Lok Sabha seats in 2019, the BJP has gained ground in West Bengal, aided partly by the RSS s exponential growth during Mamata Banerjee&apos;s chief ministerial tenure (2011 onwards). With a consistent and concerted criticism of the TMC, the saffron camp managed to create a strong wave of anti-incumbency. So much so that the BJP s prospects of forming the next government in Bengal in 2021 seemed to have brightened considerably, while the Left, which had ruled Bengal for over three decades, appears to have been reduced to a fringe political entity. However, the controversy over the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens, combined with Banerjee s course-correction drive, designed by strategist Prashant Kishor, indicate that she might yet script a turnaround, with Bengal turning into the laboratory of a unique political experiment. 
Mission Bengal: A Saffron Experiment (HarperCollins India, 2020) documents the BJP s extraordinary rise in the state and attempts to look at these developments in the historical context of Bengal from the rise of Hindu nationalism and Muslim separatism in the nineteenth century, the Partition and its fallout, the impact of developments in Bangladesh, the influence of leftist ideals on the psyche of the Bengali people, to the demographic changes in the state over the past few decades.
About the Author: 
Snigdhendu Bhattacharya is a Kolkata-based journalist who has reported for different national media houses including the Hindustan Times, The Wire and Outlook. He has been writing on politics, security, history, socio-economic and cultural affairs since 2005. His book Lalgarh and the Legend of Kishanji: Tales from India’s Maoist Movement was published in 2016.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies from the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>265</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">00ed2658-e8aa-11ef-96b7-9f9dff6bde02</guid>
      <title>Marie-France Fortin, &quot;The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>'The king can do no wrong' remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase's historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198886914"><em>The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from 'the king can do no wrong' to 'the crown can do no wrong' at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.</p><p>Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics', students', practitioners', and judges' understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'The king can do no wrong' remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase's historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198886914"><em>The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from 'the king can do no wrong' to 'the crown can do no wrong' at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.</p><p>Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics', students', practitioners', and judges' understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64798334" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/bd6fced1-c69b-4df1-b863-f7658439642a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=bd6fced1-c69b-4df1-b863-f7658439642a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Marie-France Fortin, &quot;The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&apos;The king can do no wrong&apos; remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase&apos;s historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.
In The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; to &apos;the crown can do no wrong&apos; at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.
Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics&apos;, students&apos;, practitioners&apos;, and judges&apos; understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&apos;The king can do no wrong&apos; remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase&apos;s historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.
In The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; to &apos;the crown can do no wrong&apos; at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.
Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics&apos;, students&apos;, practitioners&apos;, and judges&apos; understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>240</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">caaf5c86-e7bf-11ef-a6eb-7bce69836fd7</guid>
      <title>Patricia Owens, &quot;Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The academic field of international relations presents its own history as largely a project of elite white men. And yet women played a prominent role in the creation of this new cross-disciplinary field. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266442"><em>Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2025), Professor Patricia Owens shows that, since its beginnings in the early twentieth century, international relations relied on the intellectual labour of women and their expertise on such subjects as empire and colonial administration, anticolonial organising, non-Western powers, and international organisations. Indeed, women were among the leading international thinkers of the era, shaping the development of the field as scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals—and as heterosexual spouses and intimate same-sex partners.</p><p>Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, and weaving together personal, institutional, and intellectual narratives, Dr. Owens documents key moments and locations in the effort to forge international relations as a separate academic discipline in Britain. She finds that women’s ideas and influence were first marginalised and later devalued, ignored, and erased. Examining the roles played by some of the most important women thinkers in the field, including Margery Perham, Merze Tate, Eileen Power, Margaret Cleeve, Coral Bell, and Susan Strange, Dr. Owens traces the intellectual and institutional legacies of misogyny and racism. She argues that the creation of international relations was a highly gendered and racialised project that failed to understand plurality on a worldwide scale. Acknowledging this intellectual failure, and recovering the history of women in the field, points to possible sources for its renewal.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The academic field of international relations presents its own history as largely a project of elite white men. And yet women played a prominent role in the creation of this new cross-disciplinary field. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266442"><em>Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2025), Professor Patricia Owens shows that, since its beginnings in the early twentieth century, international relations relied on the intellectual labour of women and their expertise on such subjects as empire and colonial administration, anticolonial organising, non-Western powers, and international organisations. Indeed, women were among the leading international thinkers of the era, shaping the development of the field as scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals—and as heterosexual spouses and intimate same-sex partners.</p><p>Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, and weaving together personal, institutional, and intellectual narratives, Dr. Owens documents key moments and locations in the effort to forge international relations as a separate academic discipline in Britain. She finds that women’s ideas and influence were first marginalised and later devalued, ignored, and erased. Examining the roles played by some of the most important women thinkers in the field, including Margery Perham, Merze Tate, Eileen Power, Margaret Cleeve, Coral Bell, and Susan Strange, Dr. Owens traces the intellectual and institutional legacies of misogyny and racism. She argues that the creation of international relations was a highly gendered and racialised project that failed to understand plurality on a worldwide scale. Acknowledging this intellectual failure, and recovering the history of women in the field, points to possible sources for its renewal.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58552769" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fcead968-c2f9-425b-aeb3-84066ef6e0df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fcead968-c2f9-425b-aeb3-84066ef6e0df&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Patricia Owens, &quot;Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The academic field of international relations presents its own history as largely a project of elite white men. And yet women played a prominent role in the creation of this new cross-disciplinary field. In Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men (Princeton University Press, 2025), Professor Patricia Owens shows that, since its beginnings in the early twentieth century, international relations relied on the intellectual labour of women and their expertise on such subjects as empire and colonial administration, anticolonial organising, non-Western powers, and international organisations. Indeed, women were among the leading international thinkers of the era, shaping the development of the field as scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals—and as heterosexual spouses and intimate same-sex partners.
Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, and weaving together personal, institutional, and intellectual narratives, Dr. Owens documents key moments and locations in the effort to forge international relations as a separate academic discipline in Britain. She finds that women’s ideas and influence were first marginalised and later devalued, ignored, and erased. Examining the roles played by some of the most important women thinkers in the field, including Margery Perham, Merze Tate, Eileen Power, Margaret Cleeve, Coral Bell, and Susan Strange, Dr. Owens traces the intellectual and institutional legacies of misogyny and racism. She argues that the creation of international relations was a highly gendered and racialised project that failed to understand plurality on a worldwide scale. Acknowledging this intellectual failure, and recovering the history of women in the field, points to possible sources for its renewal.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The academic field of international relations presents its own history as largely a project of elite white men. And yet women played a prominent role in the creation of this new cross-disciplinary field. In Erased: A History of International Thought Without Men (Princeton University Press, 2025), Professor Patricia Owens shows that, since its beginnings in the early twentieth century, international relations relied on the intellectual labour of women and their expertise on such subjects as empire and colonial administration, anticolonial organising, non-Western powers, and international organisations. Indeed, women were among the leading international thinkers of the era, shaping the development of the field as scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals—and as heterosexual spouses and intimate same-sex partners.
Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, and weaving together personal, institutional, and intellectual narratives, Dr. Owens documents key moments and locations in the effort to forge international relations as a separate academic discipline in Britain. She finds that women’s ideas and influence were first marginalised and later devalued, ignored, and erased. Examining the roles played by some of the most important women thinkers in the field, including Margery Perham, Merze Tate, Eileen Power, Margaret Cleeve, Coral Bell, and Susan Strange, Dr. Owens traces the intellectual and institutional legacies of misogyny and racism. She argues that the creation of international relations was a highly gendered and racialised project that failed to understand plurality on a worldwide scale. Acknowledging this intellectual failure, and recovering the history of women in the field, points to possible sources for its renewal.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>239</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">760d888c-e18a-11ef-a7e7-9faa1761aa13</guid>
      <title>Sunila S. Kale and Christian Lee Novetzke, &quot;The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In Indian languages from Sanskrit to Marathi, yoga has an enormous range of meanings, though most often it refers to philosophy or methods to control the mind and body. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231220019">The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India</a> (Columbia UP, 2025) argues for a wider understanding, demonstrating that yoga has long expressed political thought and practice. The political idea of yoga names the tools of kings, poets, warriors, and revolutionaries. It encodes stratagems for going into battle and for the demands of governance. This idea suggests routes to self-rule even when faced with implacable obstacles, and it defines righteous action amid the grime and grief of politics and war.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYcwS2ePkMw">Surya Namaskar 1928 by Raja of Anundah.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Indian languages from Sanskrit to Marathi, yoga has an enormous range of meanings, though most often it refers to philosophy or methods to control the mind and body. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231220019">The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India</a> (Columbia UP, 2025) argues for a wider understanding, demonstrating that yoga has long expressed political thought and practice. The political idea of yoga names the tools of kings, poets, warriors, and revolutionaries. It encodes stratagems for going into battle and for the demands of governance. This idea suggests routes to self-rule even when faced with implacable obstacles, and it defines righteous action amid the grime and grief of politics and war.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYcwS2ePkMw">Surya Namaskar 1928 by Raja of Anundah.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47259856" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/649b1b5d-52e4-434f-a097-3affce90cff1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=649b1b5d-52e4-434f-a097-3affce90cff1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Sunila S. Kale and Christian Lee Novetzke, &quot;The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Indian languages from Sanskrit to Marathi, yoga has an enormous range of meanings, though most often it refers to philosophy or methods to control the mind and body. The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India (Columbia UP, 2025) argues for a wider understanding, demonstrating that yoga has long expressed political thought and practice. The political idea of yoga names the tools of kings, poets, warriors, and revolutionaries. It encodes stratagems for going into battle and for the demands of governance. This idea suggests routes to self-rule even when faced with implacable obstacles, and it defines righteous action amid the grime and grief of politics and war.
Surya Namaskar 1928 by Raja of Anundah.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Indian languages from Sanskrit to Marathi, yoga has an enormous range of meanings, though most often it refers to philosophy or methods to control the mind and body. The Yoga of Power: Political Thought and Practice in India (Columbia UP, 2025) argues for a wider understanding, demonstrating that yoga has long expressed political thought and practice. The political idea of yoga names the tools of kings, poets, warriors, and revolutionaries. It encodes stratagems for going into battle and for the demands of governance. This idea suggests routes to self-rule even when faced with implacable obstacles, and it defines righteous action amid the grime and grief of politics and war.
Surya Namaskar 1928 by Raja of Anundah.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>376</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">52936cc8-e7de-11ef-9038-17df65826791</guid>
      <title>Alpa Shah, &quot;The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India&quot; (OR Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781682195185">The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India</a> (OR Books, 2024) pulls back the curtain on Indian democracy to tell the remarkable and chilling story of the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 16 human rights defenders (the BK-16) – professors, lawyers, journalists, poets – have been imprisoned, without credible evidence and without trial, as Maoist terrorists.</p><p>Alpa Shah unravels how these alleged terrorists were charged with inciting violence at a year’s day commemoration in 2018, accused of waging a war against the Indian state, and plotting to kill the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. Expertly leading us through the case, Shah exposes some of the world’s most shocking revelations of cyber warfare research, which show not only hacking of emails and mobile phones of the BK-16, but also implantation of the electronic evidence that was used to incarcerate them. Through the life histories of the BK-16, Shah dives deep into the issues they fought for and tells the story of India’s three main minorities – Adivasi, Dalits and Muslims – and what the search for democracy entails for them.</p><p>Essential and urgent, <em>The Incarcerations</em> reveals how this case is a bellwether for the collapse of democracy in India, as for the first time in the nation’s history there is a multi-pronged, coordinated attack on key defenders of various pillars of democracy. In so doing, Shah shows that democracy today must be not only about protecting freedom of expression and democratic institutions, but also about supporting and safeguarding the social movements that question our global inequalities.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Alpa Shah is the Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford, with a Fellowship at All Souls College. She has written and presented for BBC Radio 4 Crossing Continents and From Our Own Correspondent. She is a twice-finalist for The Orwell Prize for Political Writing for her 2018 book <a href="https://alpashah.squarespace.com/nightmarch"><em>Nightmarch: Among India’s Revolutionary Guerrillas </em></a>and her 2024 book <a href="https://alpashah.squarespace.com/incarcerations"><em>The Incarcerations: BK-16 and the Search for Democracy in India.</em></a></p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781682195185">The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India</a> (OR Books, 2024) pulls back the curtain on Indian democracy to tell the remarkable and chilling story of the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 16 human rights defenders (the BK-16) – professors, lawyers, journalists, poets – have been imprisoned, without credible evidence and without trial, as Maoist terrorists.</p><p>Alpa Shah unravels how these alleged terrorists were charged with inciting violence at a year’s day commemoration in 2018, accused of waging a war against the Indian state, and plotting to kill the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. Expertly leading us through the case, Shah exposes some of the world’s most shocking revelations of cyber warfare research, which show not only hacking of emails and mobile phones of the BK-16, but also implantation of the electronic evidence that was used to incarcerate them. Through the life histories of the BK-16, Shah dives deep into the issues they fought for and tells the story of India’s three main minorities – Adivasi, Dalits and Muslims – and what the search for democracy entails for them.</p><p>Essential and urgent, <em>The Incarcerations</em> reveals how this case is a bellwether for the collapse of democracy in India, as for the first time in the nation’s history there is a multi-pronged, coordinated attack on key defenders of various pillars of democracy. In so doing, Shah shows that democracy today must be not only about protecting freedom of expression and democratic institutions, but also about supporting and safeguarding the social movements that question our global inequalities.</p><p>About the Author: </p><p>Alpa Shah is the Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford, with a Fellowship at All Souls College. She has written and presented for BBC Radio 4 Crossing Continents and From Our Own Correspondent. She is a twice-finalist for The Orwell Prize for Political Writing for her 2018 book <a href="https://alpashah.squarespace.com/nightmarch"><em>Nightmarch: Among India’s Revolutionary Guerrillas </em></a>and her 2024 book <a href="https://alpashah.squarespace.com/incarcerations"><em>The Incarcerations: BK-16 and the Search for Democracy in India.</em></a></p><p>About the Host: </p><p>Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35571064" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2c99b68b-4c0e-405f-9e69-14dab8888fd1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2c99b68b-4c0e-405f-9e69-14dab8888fd1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Alpa Shah, &quot;The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India&quot; (OR Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India (OR Books, 2024) pulls back the curtain on Indian democracy to tell the remarkable and chilling story of the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 16 human rights defenders (the BK-16) – professors, lawyers, journalists, poets – have been imprisoned, without credible evidence and without trial, as Maoist terrorists.
Alpa Shah unravels how these alleged terrorists were charged with inciting violence at a year’s day commemoration in 2018, accused of waging a war against the Indian state, and plotting to kill the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. Expertly leading us through the case, Shah exposes some of the world’s most shocking revelations of cyber warfare research, which show not only hacking of emails and mobile phones of the BK-16, but also implantation of the electronic evidence that was used to incarcerate them. Through the life histories of the BK-16, Shah dives deep into the issues they fought for and tells the story of India’s three main minorities – Adivasi, Dalits and Muslims – and what the search for democracy entails for them.
Essential and urgent, The Incarcerations reveals how this case is a bellwether for the collapse of democracy in India, as for the first time in the nation’s history there is a multi-pronged, coordinated attack on key defenders of various pillars of democracy. In so doing, Shah shows that democracy today must be not only about protecting freedom of expression and democratic institutions, but also about supporting and safeguarding the social movements that question our global inequalities.
About the Author: 
Alpa Shah is the Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford, with a Fellowship at All Souls College. She has written and presented for BBC Radio 4 Crossing Continents and From Our Own Correspondent. She is a twice-finalist for The Orwell Prize for Political Writing for her 2018 book Nightmarch: Among India’s Revolutionary Guerrillas and her 2024 book The Incarcerations: BK-16 and the Search for Democracy in India.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Incarcerations: Bk-16 and the Search for Democracy in India (OR Books, 2024) pulls back the curtain on Indian democracy to tell the remarkable and chilling story of the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 16 human rights defenders (the BK-16) – professors, lawyers, journalists, poets – have been imprisoned, without credible evidence and without trial, as Maoist terrorists.
Alpa Shah unravels how these alleged terrorists were charged with inciting violence at a year’s day commemoration in 2018, accused of waging a war against the Indian state, and plotting to kill the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. Expertly leading us through the case, Shah exposes some of the world’s most shocking revelations of cyber warfare research, which show not only hacking of emails and mobile phones of the BK-16, but also implantation of the electronic evidence that was used to incarcerate them. Through the life histories of the BK-16, Shah dives deep into the issues they fought for and tells the story of India’s three main minorities – Adivasi, Dalits and Muslims – and what the search for democracy entails for them.
Essential and urgent, The Incarcerations reveals how this case is a bellwether for the collapse of democracy in India, as for the first time in the nation’s history there is a multi-pronged, coordinated attack on key defenders of various pillars of democracy. In so doing, Shah shows that democracy today must be not only about protecting freedom of expression and democratic institutions, but also about supporting and safeguarding the social movements that question our global inequalities.
About the Author: 
Alpa Shah is the Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford, with a Fellowship at All Souls College. She has written and presented for BBC Radio 4 Crossing Continents and From Our Own Correspondent. She is a twice-finalist for The Orwell Prize for Political Writing for her 2018 book Nightmarch: Among India’s Revolutionary Guerrillas and her 2024 book The Incarcerations: BK-16 and the Search for Democracy in India.
About the Host: 
Stuti Roy has recently graduated with an MPhil in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>264</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3054aa32-e658-11ef-ace2-ffda007adcb1</guid>
      <title>Seungsook Moon, &quot;Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. <a href="https://pages.vassar.edu/seungsookmoon/publications/">Seungsook Moon</a>’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231211499"><em>Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism</em></a> was published by Columbia University Press in July 2024. She provides in-depth qualitative studies of three different types of organizations to show how civic organizations that emerged from the democratization movement with a conscious emphasis on social change have sought to address socioeconomic and political problems caused or aggravated by South Korea’s neoliberal transformation. Examining how “citizens’ organizations” in South Korea negotiate with the market and neoliberal governance, Seungsook Moon offers new ways to understand the intricate relationship between democracy and neoliberalism as modes of ruling.</p><p>Dr. Moon is a professor of sociology at Vassar College in New York. She is political and cultural sociologist, scholar of gender studies, and East Asianist specializing in South Korea. </p><p>Leslie Hickman is a student at the Literature Translation Institute of Korea. She has an MA in Korean Studies from Yonsei University and lives in Seoul, South Korea. You can follow her activities at <a href="https://twitter.com/AJuseyo">https://twitter.com/AJuseyo</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. <a href="https://pages.vassar.edu/seungsookmoon/publications/">Seungsook Moon</a>’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231211499"><em>Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism</em></a> was published by Columbia University Press in July 2024. She provides in-depth qualitative studies of three different types of organizations to show how civic organizations that emerged from the democratization movement with a conscious emphasis on social change have sought to address socioeconomic and political problems caused or aggravated by South Korea’s neoliberal transformation. Examining how “citizens’ organizations” in South Korea negotiate with the market and neoliberal governance, Seungsook Moon offers new ways to understand the intricate relationship between democracy and neoliberalism as modes of ruling.</p><p>Dr. Moon is a professor of sociology at Vassar College in New York. She is political and cultural sociologist, scholar of gender studies, and East Asianist specializing in South Korea. </p><p>Leslie Hickman is a student at the Literature Translation Institute of Korea. She has an MA in Korean Studies from Yonsei University and lives in Seoul, South Korea. You can follow her activities at <a href="https://twitter.com/AJuseyo">https://twitter.com/AJuseyo</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59336405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/03ac9c73-88e6-4930-a796-8abcb5e6f8cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=03ac9c73-88e6-4930-a796-8abcb5e6f8cc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Seungsook Moon, &quot;Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dr. Seungsook Moon’s Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism was published by Columbia University Press in July 2024. She provides in-depth qualitative studies of three different types of organizations to show how civic organizations that emerged from the democratization movement with a conscious emphasis on social change have sought to address socioeconomic and political problems caused or aggravated by South Korea’s neoliberal transformation. Examining how “citizens’ organizations” in South Korea negotiate with the market and neoliberal governance, Seungsook Moon offers new ways to understand the intricate relationship between democracy and neoliberalism as modes of ruling.
Dr. Moon is a professor of sociology at Vassar College in New York. She is political and cultural sociologist, scholar of gender studies, and East Asianist specializing in South Korea. 
Leslie Hickman is a student at the Literature Translation Institute of Korea. She has an MA in Korean Studies from Yonsei University and lives in Seoul, South Korea. You can follow her activities at https://twitter.com/AJuseyo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Seungsook Moon’s Civic Activism in South Korea: The Intertwining of Democracy and Neoliberalism was published by Columbia University Press in July 2024. She provides in-depth qualitative studies of three different types of organizations to show how civic organizations that emerged from the democratization movement with a conscious emphasis on social change have sought to address socioeconomic and political problems caused or aggravated by South Korea’s neoliberal transformation. Examining how “citizens’ organizations” in South Korea negotiate with the market and neoliberal governance, Seungsook Moon offers new ways to understand the intricate relationship between democracy and neoliberalism as modes of ruling.
Dr. Moon is a professor of sociology at Vassar College in New York. She is political and cultural sociologist, scholar of gender studies, and East Asianist specializing in South Korea. 
Leslie Hickman is a student at the Literature Translation Institute of Korea. She has an MA in Korean Studies from Yonsei University and lives in Seoul, South Korea. You can follow her activities at https://twitter.com/AJuseyo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10759ac2-e654-11ef-a601-5b8422191894</guid>
      <title>William Sweet, &quot;Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics&quot; (Peeters, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Recognized for his work on philosophy, religion and politics, Dr. Sweet talks at length about <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789042948969"><em>Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Peeters, 2023). This book provides essential context for understanding contemporary debates on religion and politics. The first theme examines the origins of liberal democracy in the western world and the role of religion in the development of democratic theory. The second theme deals with the place of religion and religious faith in contemporary democratic and post-democratic societies, but also with the situation of democracy and democratic values within religious traditions today. <em>Before and After Democracy</em> reviews the particular contributions of philosophy, social and political theory, theology and religious studies, and history to understanding their relation, and considers new directions in which reflection on this topic might be pursued. Listen to this podcast to find out more about this engaging book!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recognized for his work on philosophy, religion and politics, Dr. Sweet talks at length about <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789042948969"><em>Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics</em></a><em> </em>(Peeters, 2023). This book provides essential context for understanding contemporary debates on religion and politics. The first theme examines the origins of liberal democracy in the western world and the role of religion in the development of democratic theory. The second theme deals with the place of religion and religious faith in contemporary democratic and post-democratic societies, but also with the situation of democracy and democratic values within religious traditions today. <em>Before and After Democracy</em> reviews the particular contributions of philosophy, social and political theory, theology and religious studies, and history to understanding their relation, and considers new directions in which reflection on this topic might be pursued. Listen to this podcast to find out more about this engaging book!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64643778" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/516c8801-48b0-4f33-93c7-bd747f0e32dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=516c8801-48b0-4f33-93c7-bd747f0e32dc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>William Sweet, &quot;Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics&quot; (Peeters, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Recognized for his work on philosophy, religion and politics, Dr. Sweet talks at length about Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics (Peeters, 2023). This book provides essential context for understanding contemporary debates on religion and politics. The first theme examines the origins of liberal democracy in the western world and the role of religion in the development of democratic theory. The second theme deals with the place of religion and religious faith in contemporary democratic and post-democratic societies, but also with the situation of democracy and democratic values within religious traditions today. Before and After Democracy reviews the particular contributions of philosophy, social and political theory, theology and religious studies, and history to understanding their relation, and considers new directions in which reflection on this topic might be pursued. Listen to this podcast to find out more about this engaging book!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recognized for his work on philosophy, religion and politics, Dr. Sweet talks at length about Before and After Democracy: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics (Peeters, 2023). This book provides essential context for understanding contemporary debates on religion and politics. The first theme examines the origins of liberal democracy in the western world and the role of religion in the development of democratic theory. The second theme deals with the place of religion and religious faith in contemporary democratic and post-democratic societies, but also with the situation of democracy and democratic values within religious traditions today. Before and After Democracy reviews the particular contributions of philosophy, social and political theory, theology and religious studies, and history to understanding their relation, and considers new directions in which reflection on this topic might be pursued. Listen to this podcast to find out more about this engaging book!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>757</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">74c795b8-e63e-11ef-aaeb-d781cfe23597</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Davis Gibbons, &quot;The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501764851"><em>The Hegemon's Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime</em></a> (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.</p><p>Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.</p><p>Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.</p><p>The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon's Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.</p><p>Our guest is <a href="https://usm.maine.edu/directories/people/rebecca-gibbons/">Rebecca Gibbons</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501764851"><em>The Hegemon's Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime</em></a> (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.</p><p>Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.</p><p>Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.</p><p>The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon's Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.</p><p>Our guest is <a href="https://usm.maine.edu/directories/people/rebecca-gibbons/">Rebecca Gibbons</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47986099" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4b26d598-5b8b-45d0-92de-3cf6e96c2d4b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4b26d598-5b8b-45d0-92de-3cf6e96c2d4b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Davis Gibbons, &quot;The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.
Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.
Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.
The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.
Our guest is Rebecca Gibbons, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At a moment when the nuclear nonproliferation regime is under duress, Rebecca Davis Gibbons provides a trenchant analysis of the international system that has, for more than fifty years, controlled the spread of these catastrophic weapons. The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime (Cornell UP, 2022) details how that regime works and how, disastrously, it might falter.
Experts anticipated that all technologically capable states would build these powerful devices in the early nuclear age. That did not happen. Widespread development of nuclear arms did not occur, in large part, because a global nuclear nonproliferation regime was created. By the late 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had drafted the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Across decades, the regime has expanded, with more agreements and more nations participating. As a result, in 2022, only nine states possess nuclear weapons.
Why do most international states adhere to the nuclear nonproliferation regime? The answer lies, Gibbons asserts, in decades of painstaking efforts undertaken by the US government. As the most powerful state during the nuclear age, the United States had many tools with which to persuade other states to join or otherwise support nonproliferation agreements.
The waning of US global influence, Gibbons shows in The Hegemon&apos;s Tool Kit, is a key threat to the nonproliferation regime. So, too, is the deepening global divide over progress on nuclear disarmament. To date, the Chinese government is not taking significant steps to support the nuclear nonproliferation regime, and as a result, the regime may face a harmful leadership gap.
Our guest is Rebecca Gibbons, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern Maine.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023), winner of the 2025 ISA-ISSS best book award.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f2d6e0c-e634-11ef-bab3-b7dfc5bf4ecc</guid>
      <title>Michael Albertus, &quot;Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn&apos;t, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies&quot; (Basic Books, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For millennia, land has been a symbol of wealth and privilege. But the true power of land ownership is even greater than we might think. In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541604810"><em>Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn't, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies</em></a><em> </em>(Basic Books, 2025), political scientist Michael Albertus shows that who owns the land determines whether a society will be equal or unequal, whether it will develop or decline, and whether it will safeguard or sacrifice its environment.</p><p>Modern history has been defined by land reallocation on a massive scale. From the 1500s on, European colonial powers and new nation-states shifted indigenous lands into the hands of settlers. The 1900s brought new waves of land appropriation, from Soviet and Maoist collectivization to initiatives turning large estates over to family farmers. The shuffle continues today as governments vie for power and prosperity by choosing who should get land. Drawing on a career’s worth of original research and on-the-ground fieldwork, Albertus shows that choices about who owns the land have locked in poverty, sexism, racism, and climate crisis—and that what we do with the land today can change our collective fate.</p><p>Michael Albertus is professor of political science at the University of Chicago. The author of four previous books, his writing has appeared in the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Washington Post</em>, <em>Atlantic</em>, <em>Foreign Affairs</em>, and elsewhere. He lives in Chicago, Illinois.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For millennia, land has been a symbol of wealth and privilege. But the true power of land ownership is even greater than we might think. In<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541604810"><em>Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn't, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies</em></a><em> </em>(Basic Books, 2025), political scientist Michael Albertus shows that who owns the land determines whether a society will be equal or unequal, whether it will develop or decline, and whether it will safeguard or sacrifice its environment.</p><p>Modern history has been defined by land reallocation on a massive scale. From the 1500s on, European colonial powers and new nation-states shifted indigenous lands into the hands of settlers. The 1900s brought new waves of land appropriation, from Soviet and Maoist collectivization to initiatives turning large estates over to family farmers. The shuffle continues today as governments vie for power and prosperity by choosing who should get land. Drawing on a career’s worth of original research and on-the-ground fieldwork, Albertus shows that choices about who owns the land have locked in poverty, sexism, racism, and climate crisis—and that what we do with the land today can change our collective fate.</p><p>Michael Albertus is professor of political science at the University of Chicago. The author of four previous books, his writing has appeared in the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Washington Post</em>, <em>Atlantic</em>, <em>Foreign Affairs</em>, and elsewhere. He lives in Chicago, Illinois.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37622403" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/eacf8c18-03b2-4f8e-8fad-b0e61228a258/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=eacf8c18-03b2-4f8e-8fad-b0e61228a258&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Albertus, &quot;Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn&apos;t, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies&quot; (Basic Books, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For millennia, land has been a symbol of wealth and privilege. But the true power of land ownership is even greater than we might think. In Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn&apos;t, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies (Basic Books, 2025), political scientist Michael Albertus shows that who owns the land determines whether a society will be equal or unequal, whether it will develop or decline, and whether it will safeguard or sacrifice its environment.
Modern history has been defined by land reallocation on a massive scale. From the 1500s on, European colonial powers and new nation-states shifted indigenous lands into the hands of settlers. The 1900s brought new waves of land appropriation, from Soviet and Maoist collectivization to initiatives turning large estates over to family farmers. The shuffle continues today as governments vie for power and prosperity by choosing who should get land. Drawing on a career’s worth of original research and on-the-ground fieldwork, Albertus shows that choices about who owns the land have locked in poverty, sexism, racism, and climate crisis—and that what we do with the land today can change our collective fate.
Michael Albertus is professor of political science at the University of Chicago. The author of four previous books, his writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and elsewhere. He lives in Chicago, Illinois.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For millennia, land has been a symbol of wealth and privilege. But the true power of land ownership is even greater than we might think. In Land Power: Who Has It, Who Doesn&apos;t, and How That Determines the Fate of Societies (Basic Books, 2025), political scientist Michael Albertus shows that who owns the land determines whether a society will be equal or unequal, whether it will develop or decline, and whether it will safeguard or sacrifice its environment.
Modern history has been defined by land reallocation on a massive scale. From the 1500s on, European colonial powers and new nation-states shifted indigenous lands into the hands of settlers. The 1900s brought new waves of land appropriation, from Soviet and Maoist collectivization to initiatives turning large estates over to family farmers. The shuffle continues today as governments vie for power and prosperity by choosing who should get land. Drawing on a career’s worth of original research and on-the-ground fieldwork, Albertus shows that choices about who owns the land have locked in poverty, sexism, racism, and climate crisis—and that what we do with the land today can change our collective fate.
Michael Albertus is professor of political science at the University of Chicago. The author of four previous books, his writing has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and elsewhere. He lives in Chicago, Illinois.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>168</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">853337f4-e490-11ef-aad8-ff1f5a2f8989</guid>
      <title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60856000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b0ab083a-d46e-4319-812a-6b3d79e5ee35/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b0ab083a-d46e-4319-812a-6b3d79e5ee35&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41cd1588-e3ec-11ef-b857-335fe6747eb3</guid>
      <title>Richard Rorty, &quot;What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to Chris Voparil about <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691222905"><em>What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics</em></a> (Princeton UP, 2023), a book of Richard Rorty's writings he co-edited with W. P. Malecki.</p><p>Richard Rorty, one of the most influential intellectuals of recent decades, is perhaps best known today as the philosopher who, almost two decades before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, warned of the rise of a Trumpian strongman in America. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691222905"><em>What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2023) gathers nineteen of Rorty’s essays on American and global politics, including four previously unpublished and many lesser-known and hard-to-find pieces. In these provocative and compelling essays, Rorty confronts the critical challenges democracies face at home and abroad, including populism, growing economic inequality, and overpopulation and environmental devastation. In response, he offers optimistic and realistic ideas about how to address these crises. He outlines strategies for fostering social hope and building an inclusive global community of trust, and urges us to put our faith in trade unions, universities, bottom-up social campaigns, and bold political visions that thwart ideological pieties. Driven by Rorty’s sense of emergency about our collective future, What Can We Hope For? is filled with striking diagnoses of today’s political crises and creative proposals for solving them.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to Chris Voparil about <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691222905"><em>What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics</em></a> (Princeton UP, 2023), a book of Richard Rorty's writings he co-edited with W. P. Malecki.</p><p>Richard Rorty, one of the most influential intellectuals of recent decades, is perhaps best known today as the philosopher who, almost two decades before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, warned of the rise of a Trumpian strongman in America. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691222905"><em>What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2023) gathers nineteen of Rorty’s essays on American and global politics, including four previously unpublished and many lesser-known and hard-to-find pieces. In these provocative and compelling essays, Rorty confronts the critical challenges democracies face at home and abroad, including populism, growing economic inequality, and overpopulation and environmental devastation. In response, he offers optimistic and realistic ideas about how to address these crises. He outlines strategies for fostering social hope and building an inclusive global community of trust, and urges us to put our faith in trade unions, universities, bottom-up social campaigns, and bold political visions that thwart ideological pieties. Driven by Rorty’s sense of emergency about our collective future, What Can We Hope For? is filled with striking diagnoses of today’s political crises and creative proposals for solving them.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56257887" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a6e58482-93d8-4228-af79-02dd244b0724/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a6e58482-93d8-4228-af79-02dd244b0724&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard Rorty, &quot;What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Chris Voparil about What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics (Princeton UP, 2023), a book of Richard Rorty&apos;s writings he co-edited with W. P. Malecki.
Richard Rorty, one of the most influential intellectuals of recent decades, is perhaps best known today as the philosopher who, almost two decades before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, warned of the rise of a Trumpian strongman in America. What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics (Princeton University Press, 2023) gathers nineteen of Rorty’s essays on American and global politics, including four previously unpublished and many lesser-known and hard-to-find pieces. In these provocative and compelling essays, Rorty confronts the critical challenges democracies face at home and abroad, including populism, growing economic inequality, and overpopulation and environmental devastation. In response, he offers optimistic and realistic ideas about how to address these crises. He outlines strategies for fostering social hope and building an inclusive global community of trust, and urges us to put our faith in trade unions, universities, bottom-up social campaigns, and bold political visions that thwart ideological pieties. Driven by Rorty’s sense of emergency about our collective future, What Can We Hope For? is filled with striking diagnoses of today’s political crises and creative proposals for solving them.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Chris Voparil about What Can We Hope For?: Essays on Politics (Princeton UP, 2023), a book of Richard Rorty&apos;s writings he co-edited with W. P. Malecki.
Richard Rorty, one of the most influential intellectuals of recent decades, is perhaps best known today as the philosopher who, almost two decades before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, warned of the rise of a Trumpian strongman in America. What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics (Princeton University Press, 2023) gathers nineteen of Rorty’s essays on American and global politics, including four previously unpublished and many lesser-known and hard-to-find pieces. In these provocative and compelling essays, Rorty confronts the critical challenges democracies face at home and abroad, including populism, growing economic inequality, and overpopulation and environmental devastation. In response, he offers optimistic and realistic ideas about how to address these crises. He outlines strategies for fostering social hope and building an inclusive global community of trust, and urges us to put our faith in trade unions, universities, bottom-up social campaigns, and bold political visions that thwart ideological pieties. Driven by Rorty’s sense of emergency about our collective future, What Can We Hope For? is filled with striking diagnoses of today’s political crises and creative proposals for solving them.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>510</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e02a6116-e3d5-11ef-9e15-f748c884e301</guid>
      <title>Arvid J. Lukauskas and Yumiko Shimabukuro, &quot;Misery Beneath the Miracle in East Asia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501778742"><em>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2024) challenges prevailing views of the East Asian economic miracle. Existing scholarship has overlooked the severity, persistence, and harmful consequences of the social-welfare crises affecting the region. Dr. Arvid J. Lukauskas and Dr. Yumiko Shimabukuro fill this gap and put a major asterisk on East Asia's economic record.</p><p>Combining big-picture analysis, abundant data, a dynamic interdisciplinary framework, and powerful human stories, they shed light on the social ills that governments have failed to address adequately, including low wages, child abuse, elderly poverty, and substandard housing. One of the major forces behind the multidimensional welfare crises is the region's productivist welfare strategy, which prioritizes economic growth while abandoning a robust social safety net, leaving the most vulnerable segments of society largely unprotected.</p><p><em>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia</em> brings the region into debates over the dangers of seeking growth at all costs that are currently embroiling the United States and other advanced industrialized countries.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501778742"><em>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia</em></a> (Cornell University Press, 2024) challenges prevailing views of the East Asian economic miracle. Existing scholarship has overlooked the severity, persistence, and harmful consequences of the social-welfare crises affecting the region. Dr. Arvid J. Lukauskas and Dr. Yumiko Shimabukuro fill this gap and put a major asterisk on East Asia's economic record.</p><p>Combining big-picture analysis, abundant data, a dynamic interdisciplinary framework, and powerful human stories, they shed light on the social ills that governments have failed to address adequately, including low wages, child abuse, elderly poverty, and substandard housing. One of the major forces behind the multidimensional welfare crises is the region's productivist welfare strategy, which prioritizes economic growth while abandoning a robust social safety net, leaving the most vulnerable segments of society largely unprotected.</p><p><em>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia</em> brings the region into debates over the dangers of seeking growth at all costs that are currently embroiling the United States and other advanced industrialized countries.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65945877" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/854b698d-0048-4f70-91b6-ffc9a5c664b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=854b698d-0048-4f70-91b6-ffc9a5c664b8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arvid J. Lukauskas and Yumiko Shimabukuro, &quot;Misery Beneath the Miracle in East Asia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia (Cornell University Press, 2024) challenges prevailing views of the East Asian economic miracle. Existing scholarship has overlooked the severity, persistence, and harmful consequences of the social-welfare crises affecting the region. Dr. Arvid J. Lukauskas and Dr. Yumiko Shimabukuro fill this gap and put a major asterisk on East Asia&apos;s economic record.
Combining big-picture analysis, abundant data, a dynamic interdisciplinary framework, and powerful human stories, they shed light on the social ills that governments have failed to address adequately, including low wages, child abuse, elderly poverty, and substandard housing. One of the major forces behind the multidimensional welfare crises is the region&apos;s productivist welfare strategy, which prioritizes economic growth while abandoning a robust social safety net, leaving the most vulnerable segments of society largely unprotected.
Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia brings the region into debates over the dangers of seeking growth at all costs that are currently embroiling the United States and other advanced industrialized countries.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia (Cornell University Press, 2024) challenges prevailing views of the East Asian economic miracle. Existing scholarship has overlooked the severity, persistence, and harmful consequences of the social-welfare crises affecting the region. Dr. Arvid J. Lukauskas and Dr. Yumiko Shimabukuro fill this gap and put a major asterisk on East Asia&apos;s economic record.
Combining big-picture analysis, abundant data, a dynamic interdisciplinary framework, and powerful human stories, they shed light on the social ills that governments have failed to address adequately, including low wages, child abuse, elderly poverty, and substandard housing. One of the major forces behind the multidimensional welfare crises is the region&apos;s productivist welfare strategy, which prioritizes economic growth while abandoning a robust social safety net, leaving the most vulnerable segments of society largely unprotected.
Misery beneath the Miracle in East Asia brings the region into debates over the dangers of seeking growth at all costs that are currently embroiling the United States and other advanced industrialized countries.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>554</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d5eecb78-e3e5-11ef-b754-5f372b66587d</guid>
      <title>Zahi Zalloua, &quot;The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350422858"><em>The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment</em></a> (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause.</p><p>A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation.</p><p>Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350422858"><em>The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment</em></a> (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment's generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche's philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause.</p><p>A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment's generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation.</p><p>Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory's Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36729471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ed9c49e3-9e9c-402a-b255-fda9f568b16e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ed9c49e3-9e9c-402a-b255-fda9f568b16e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Zahi Zalloua, &quot;The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment&apos;s generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche&apos;s philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause.
A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment&apos;s generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation.
Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory&apos;s Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Politics of the Wretched: Race, Reason, and Ressentiment (Bloomsbury 2024) argues for ressentiment&apos;s generative negativity, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Inspired by Kant and Nietzsche&apos;s philosophy, Zalloua identifies two modes of deploying ressentiment – private and public use – by substituting ressentiment for reason. This reinterpretation argues for a public use of ressentiment, for the wretched to universalize their grievances, to see their antagonism as cutting across societies, and to turn personal trauma into a common cause.
A public use of ressentiment rails against the ideology of identity and victimhood and insists on ressentiment&apos;s generative negativity, its own rationality, prompting a shift from ressentiment as a personal expression of frustration to ressentiment as a collective “No”. Reframing ressentiment as a tool to oppose the evils of capitalism, anti-Blackness, and neocolonialism, it both alarms the liberal gatekeepers of the status quo and promises to energize the anti-racist Left in its ongoing struggles for universal justice and emancipation.
Zahi Zalloua is Cushing Eells Professor of Philosophy and Literature and a Professor of Indigeneity, Race, and Ethnicity Studies at Whitman College and Editor of The Comparatist. His most recent work includes Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause: Indigeneity, Blackness, and the Promise of Universality (2023), Being Posthuman: Ontologies of the Future (2021), Žižek on Race: Toward an Anti- Racist Future (2020), Theory&apos;s Autoimmunity: Skepticism, Literature, and Philosophy (2018), and Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question: Beyond the Jew and the Greek (2017).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>510</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df5e1960-e26f-11ef-9b79-6b3058d9d98d</guid>
      <title>Violent Majorities 2.1: Peter Beinart on Long-Distance Israeli Ethnonationalism (LA, AS)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political anthropologists <a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/ajantha-subramanian">Ajantha Subramanian</a> and <a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/lori-allen">Lori Allen</a> are back to continue RTB's <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/category/violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism/">Violent Majorities</a> series with a set of three episodes on long-distance ethno-nationalism. Today, they speak with Peter Beinart (an <a href="https://jewishcurrents.org/author/peter-beinart">editor at <em>Jewish Currents</em></a> and Professor of Journalism and Political Science at the City University of New York) about his just-released book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593803905"> <em>Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning </em></a>(Knopf, 2025). It aims to mobilize Jewish religious ethics and teachings to reach a Jewish-American audience shaped by Zionism. Beinart seeks to debunk myths that prevent many from realizing that the moral abominations committed against Palestinians are part of the Israeli settler-colonial-nation-state project.</p><p>Peter is haunted by the fact that some of the most ardent opposition to apartheid in his parents’ country of South Africa came from secular Jewish people, and is troubled by the nationalistic tendency of religiously observant Jews there in the apartheid era. The three also discuss questions of solidarity against and among authoritarians, Israel’s threat to international law, the dangers of minority alliances with majoritarian politics, campus politics, and the importance of seeing Gaza and Palestine as connected to us all.</p><p>Peter’s Recallable Book is <a href="https://ktav.com/products/accepting-the-yoke-of-heaven">Accepting the Yoke of Heaven</a>: Commentary on the Weekly Torah Portion, by Orthodox scientist, philosopher, and Judaica scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903-1994), who emphasized the idolatry of investing the state with anything more than a supportive role in Jewish life.</p><p>Mentioned in the Episode:</p><ul>
<li>119 Violent Majorities, Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism. <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/14/119-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-2-natasha-roth-rowland-with-lori-ajantha/">Episode 2: Natasha Roth-Rowland </a>with Ajantha and Lori</li>
<li>Aparna Gopalan, "<a href="https://jewishcurrents.org/the-hindu-nationalists-using-the-pro-israel-playbook">The Hindu Nationalists Using the Pro-Israel Playbook</a>," <em>Jewish Currents</em>.</li>
<li>Isabella Hammad, <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/463942/recognising-the-stranger-by-hammad-isabella/9781911717379"><em>Recognizing the Stranger: On Palestine and Narrative.</em></a>
</li>
<li>Martin Luther King,<a href="https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html"> Letter from a Birmingham Jail</a>.</li>
<li>Ta-Nehisi Coates, <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/463295/the-message-by-coates-ta-nehisi/9780241724187"><em>The Message</em></a>.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://peterbeinart.substack.com/podcast">The Beinart Notebook</a> podcast</li>
</ul><p>Listen and<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/143-beinart-transcript-rtb-1.25.pdf"> Read </a>Here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political anthropologists <a href="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/people/ajantha-subramanian">Ajantha Subramanian</a> and <a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/lori-allen">Lori Allen</a> are back to continue RTB's <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/category/violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism/">Violent Majorities</a> series with a set of three episodes on long-distance ethno-nationalism. Today, they speak with Peter Beinart (an <a href="https://jewishcurrents.org/author/peter-beinart">editor at <em>Jewish Currents</em></a> and Professor of Journalism and Political Science at the City University of New York) about his just-released book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593803905"> <em>Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning </em></a>(Knopf, 2025). It aims to mobilize Jewish religious ethics and teachings to reach a Jewish-American audience shaped by Zionism. Beinart seeks to debunk myths that prevent many from realizing that the moral abominations committed against Palestinians are part of the Israeli settler-colonial-nation-state project.</p><p>Peter is haunted by the fact that some of the most ardent opposition to apartheid in his parents’ country of South Africa came from secular Jewish people, and is troubled by the nationalistic tendency of religiously observant Jews there in the apartheid era. The three also discuss questions of solidarity against and among authoritarians, Israel’s threat to international law, the dangers of minority alliances with majoritarian politics, campus politics, and the importance of seeing Gaza and Palestine as connected to us all.</p><p>Peter’s Recallable Book is <a href="https://ktav.com/products/accepting-the-yoke-of-heaven">Accepting the Yoke of Heaven</a>: Commentary on the Weekly Torah Portion, by Orthodox scientist, philosopher, and Judaica scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903-1994), who emphasized the idolatry of investing the state with anything more than a supportive role in Jewish life.</p><p>Mentioned in the Episode:</p><ul>
<li>119 Violent Majorities, Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism. <a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2023/12/14/119-violent-majorities-indian-and-israeli-ethnonationalism-episode-2-natasha-roth-rowland-with-lori-ajantha/">Episode 2: Natasha Roth-Rowland </a>with Ajantha and Lori</li>
<li>Aparna Gopalan, "<a href="https://jewishcurrents.org/the-hindu-nationalists-using-the-pro-israel-playbook">The Hindu Nationalists Using the Pro-Israel Playbook</a>," <em>Jewish Currents</em>.</li>
<li>Isabella Hammad, <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/463942/recognising-the-stranger-by-hammad-isabella/9781911717379"><em>Recognizing the Stranger: On Palestine and Narrative.</em></a>
</li>
<li>Martin Luther King,<a href="https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html"> Letter from a Birmingham Jail</a>.</li>
<li>Ta-Nehisi Coates, <a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/463295/the-message-by-coates-ta-nehisi/9780241724187"><em>The Message</em></a>.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://peterbeinart.substack.com/podcast">The Beinart Notebook</a> podcast</li>
</ul><p>Listen and<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/143-beinart-transcript-rtb-1.25.pdf"> Read </a>Here.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49055614" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/b1b09cc7-4f73-423c-8be1-74884039b02e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=b1b09cc7-4f73-423c-8be1-74884039b02e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Violent Majorities 2.1: Peter Beinart on Long-Distance Israeli Ethnonationalism (LA, AS)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political anthropologists Ajantha Subramanian and Lori Allen are back to continue RTB&apos;s Violent Majorities series with a set of three episodes on long-distance ethno-nationalism. Today, they speak with Peter Beinart (an editor at Jewish Currents and Professor of Journalism and Political Science at the City University of New York) about his just-released book, Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning (Knopf, 2025). It aims to mobilize Jewish religious ethics and teachings to reach a Jewish-American audience shaped by Zionism. Beinart seeks to debunk myths that prevent many from realizing that the moral abominations committed against Palestinians are part of the Israeli settler-colonial-nation-state project.
Peter is haunted by the fact that some of the most ardent opposition to apartheid in his parents’ country of South Africa came from secular Jewish people, and is troubled by the nationalistic tendency of religiously observant Jews there in the apartheid era. The three also discuss questions of solidarity against and among authoritarians, Israel’s threat to international law, the dangers of minority alliances with majoritarian politics, campus politics, and the importance of seeing Gaza and Palestine as connected to us all.
Peter’s Recallable Book is Accepting the Yoke of Heaven: Commentary on the Weekly Torah Portion, by Orthodox scientist, philosopher, and Judaica scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903-1994), who emphasized the idolatry of investing the state with anything more than a supportive role in Jewish life.
Mentioned in the Episode:

119 Violent Majorities, Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism. Episode 2: Natasha Roth-Rowland with Ajantha and Lori

Aparna Gopalan, &quot;The Hindu Nationalists Using the Pro-Israel Playbook,&quot; Jewish Currents.

Isabella Hammad, Recognizing the Stranger: On Palestine and Narrative.


Martin Luther King, Letter from a Birmingham Jail.

Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Message.


The Beinart Notebook podcast

Listen and Read Here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political anthropologists Ajantha Subramanian and Lori Allen are back to continue RTB&apos;s Violent Majorities series with a set of three episodes on long-distance ethno-nationalism. Today, they speak with Peter Beinart (an editor at Jewish Currents and Professor of Journalism and Political Science at the City University of New York) about his just-released book, Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning (Knopf, 2025). It aims to mobilize Jewish religious ethics and teachings to reach a Jewish-American audience shaped by Zionism. Beinart seeks to debunk myths that prevent many from realizing that the moral abominations committed against Palestinians are part of the Israeli settler-colonial-nation-state project.
Peter is haunted by the fact that some of the most ardent opposition to apartheid in his parents’ country of South Africa came from secular Jewish people, and is troubled by the nationalistic tendency of religiously observant Jews there in the apartheid era. The three also discuss questions of solidarity against and among authoritarians, Israel’s threat to international law, the dangers of minority alliances with majoritarian politics, campus politics, and the importance of seeing Gaza and Palestine as connected to us all.
Peter’s Recallable Book is Accepting the Yoke of Heaven: Commentary on the Weekly Torah Portion, by Orthodox scientist, philosopher, and Judaica scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903-1994), who emphasized the idolatry of investing the state with anything more than a supportive role in Jewish life.
Mentioned in the Episode:

119 Violent Majorities, Indian and Israeli Ethnonationalism. Episode 2: Natasha Roth-Rowland with Ajantha and Lori

Aparna Gopalan, &quot;The Hindu Nationalists Using the Pro-Israel Playbook,&quot; Jewish Currents.

Isabella Hammad, Recognizing the Stranger: On Palestine and Narrative.


Martin Luther King, Letter from a Birmingham Jail.

Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Message.


The Beinart Notebook podcast

Listen and Read Here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">162cb902-e323-11ef-8937-1ff244619fd1</guid>
      <title>Davide Panagia, &quot;Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France&quot; (Fordham UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Davide Panagia (UCLA) has two new books out focusing on the broader themes and ideas of film, aesthetics, and political theory<a href="https://research.library.fordham.edu/politics/2/">. <em>Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France</em></a> (Fordham University Press) interrogates French history and educational traditions from the Revolution through the postwar period and analyzes the cultural, social, political, and educational parameters that created the space for the French postwar political thinkers. In <em>Sentimental Empiricism</em>, Panagia explores the many directions of critical thought by Jean Wahl, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilbert Simondon, Gilles Deleuze, and Michel Foucault and how these theorists were pushing against, in many ways, the teleological structure as defined by Aristotle two millennia ago. This contrast in thinking is the heart of the book, helping the reader to consider distinctions between the more fixed classical ideas and a contemporary consideration of dispositionality and revisability.</p><p>The research and broader historical sketch in <a href="https://research.library.fordham.edu/politics/2/"><em>Sentimental Empiricism</em></a> leads to the thrust of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780810147102"><em>Intermedialities: Political Theory and Cinematic Experience</em></a><em> </em>(Northwestern UP, 2024)<em>.</em> In <em>Intermedialities </em>(Northwestern UP, 2024), Panagia continues to explore this concept of the revisability of our understanding of the world, and turns the specific focus to film. Film itself, as a medium and as a conveyor of ideas, is rarely at the center of discussions of politics and power. And yet this is the exact place where humans (audiences) can see movement, which is what we are always observing around us to contribute to how we essentially make sense of the world.<a href="https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810147102/intermedialities/"> <em>Intermedialities</em></a> compels the intertwining of political theory and the theory of film, with encounters between contemporary aesthetic theorists like Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Miriam Hansen, and Jean-Luc Godard and more traditional modern thinkers like David Hume, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gilbert Simondon. <a href="https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810147102/intermedialities/"><em>Intermedialities</em></a> should be of particular interest to political theorists and political scientists since it posits the importance of understanding and thinking about the life and world around us and how we are all connected to taking in this life as movement. The medium of film, which provides us with concepts, images, imaginaries, and perceptions, contributes to so much of our memory and imagination, but is often dismissed as not “real” politics. Panagia and the theorists with whom he is thinking help to tease out the very political nature of the projection of moving images.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist Davide Panagia (UCLA) has two new books out focusing on the broader themes and ideas of film, aesthetics, and political theory<a href="https://research.library.fordham.edu/politics/2/">. <em>Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France</em></a> (Fordham University Press) interrogates French history and educational traditions from the Revolution through the postwar period and analyzes the cultural, social, political, and educational parameters that created the space for the French postwar political thinkers. In <em>Sentimental Empiricism</em>, Panagia explores the many directions of critical thought by Jean Wahl, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilbert Simondon, Gilles Deleuze, and Michel Foucault and how these theorists were pushing against, in many ways, the teleological structure as defined by Aristotle two millennia ago. This contrast in thinking is the heart of the book, helping the reader to consider distinctions between the more fixed classical ideas and a contemporary consideration of dispositionality and revisability.</p><p>The research and broader historical sketch in <a href="https://research.library.fordham.edu/politics/2/"><em>Sentimental Empiricism</em></a> leads to the thrust of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780810147102"><em>Intermedialities: Political Theory and Cinematic Experience</em></a><em> </em>(Northwestern UP, 2024)<em>.</em> In <em>Intermedialities </em>(Northwestern UP, 2024), Panagia continues to explore this concept of the revisability of our understanding of the world, and turns the specific focus to film. Film itself, as a medium and as a conveyor of ideas, is rarely at the center of discussions of politics and power. And yet this is the exact place where humans (audiences) can see movement, which is what we are always observing around us to contribute to how we essentially make sense of the world.<a href="https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810147102/intermedialities/"> <em>Intermedialities</em></a> compels the intertwining of political theory and the theory of film, with encounters between contemporary aesthetic theorists like Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Miriam Hansen, and Jean-Luc Godard and more traditional modern thinkers like David Hume, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gilbert Simondon. <a href="https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810147102/intermedialities/"><em>Intermedialities</em></a> should be of particular interest to political theorists and political scientists since it posits the importance of understanding and thinking about the life and world around us and how we are all connected to taking in this life as movement. The medium of film, which provides us with concepts, images, imaginaries, and perceptions, contributes to so much of our memory and imagination, but is often dismissed as not “real” politics. Panagia and the theorists with whom he is thinking help to tease out the very political nature of the projection of moving images.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0"> <em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj"> <em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55655381" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/602aadff-1323-4580-899b-febc32e2c576/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=602aadff-1323-4580-899b-febc32e2c576&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Davide Panagia, &quot;Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France&quot; (Fordham UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Theorist Davide Panagia (UCLA) has two new books out focusing on the broader themes and ideas of film, aesthetics, and political theory. Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France (Fordham University Press) interrogates French history and educational traditions from the Revolution through the postwar period and analyzes the cultural, social, political, and educational parameters that created the space for the French postwar political thinkers. In Sentimental Empiricism, Panagia explores the many directions of critical thought by Jean Wahl, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilbert Simondon, Gilles Deleuze, and Michel Foucault and how these theorists were pushing against, in many ways, the teleological structure as defined by Aristotle two millennia ago. This contrast in thinking is the heart of the book, helping the reader to consider distinctions between the more fixed classical ideas and a contemporary consideration of dispositionality and revisability.
The research and broader historical sketch in Sentimental Empiricism leads to the thrust of Intermedialities: Political Theory and Cinematic Experience (Northwestern UP, 2024). In Intermedialities (Northwestern UP, 2024), Panagia continues to explore this concept of the revisability of our understanding of the world, and turns the specific focus to film. Film itself, as a medium and as a conveyor of ideas, is rarely at the center of discussions of politics and power. And yet this is the exact place where humans (audiences) can see movement, which is what we are always observing around us to contribute to how we essentially make sense of the world. Intermedialities compels the intertwining of political theory and the theory of film, with encounters between contemporary aesthetic theorists like Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Miriam Hansen, and Jean-Luc Godard and more traditional modern thinkers like David Hume, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gilbert Simondon. Intermedialities should be of particular interest to political theorists and political scientists since it posits the importance of understanding and thinking about the life and world around us and how we are all connected to taking in this life as movement. The medium of film, which provides us with concepts, images, imaginaries, and perceptions, contributes to so much of our memory and imagination, but is often dismissed as not “real” politics. Panagia and the theorists with whom he is thinking help to tease out the very political nature of the projection of moving images.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Theorist Davide Panagia (UCLA) has two new books out focusing on the broader themes and ideas of film, aesthetics, and political theory. Sentimental Empiricism: Politics, Philosophy, and Criticism in Postwar France (Fordham University Press) interrogates French history and educational traditions from the Revolution through the postwar period and analyzes the cultural, social, political, and educational parameters that created the space for the French postwar political thinkers. In Sentimental Empiricism, Panagia explores the many directions of critical thought by Jean Wahl, Simone de Beauvoir, Gilbert Simondon, Gilles Deleuze, and Michel Foucault and how these theorists were pushing against, in many ways, the teleological structure as defined by Aristotle two millennia ago. This contrast in thinking is the heart of the book, helping the reader to consider distinctions between the more fixed classical ideas and a contemporary consideration of dispositionality and revisability.
The research and broader historical sketch in Sentimental Empiricism leads to the thrust of Intermedialities: Political Theory and Cinematic Experience (Northwestern UP, 2024). In Intermedialities (Northwestern UP, 2024), Panagia continues to explore this concept of the revisability of our understanding of the world, and turns the specific focus to film. Film itself, as a medium and as a conveyor of ideas, is rarely at the center of discussions of politics and power. And yet this is the exact place where humans (audiences) can see movement, which is what we are always observing around us to contribute to how we essentially make sense of the world. Intermedialities compels the intertwining of political theory and the theory of film, with encounters between contemporary aesthetic theorists like Stanley Cavell, Gilles Deleuze, Miriam Hansen, and Jean-Luc Godard and more traditional modern thinkers like David Hume, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gilbert Simondon. Intermedialities should be of particular interest to political theorists and political scientists since it posits the importance of understanding and thinking about the life and world around us and how we are all connected to taking in this life as movement. The medium of film, which provides us with concepts, images, imaginaries, and perceptions, contributes to so much of our memory and imagination, but is often dismissed as not “real” politics. Panagia and the theorists with whom he is thinking help to tease out the very political nature of the projection of moving images.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>756</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87a21d20-e274-11ef-bf37-1fa7e74beade</guid>
      <title>We Are Free to Change the World: A Conversation on Hannah Arendt with Lyndsay Stonebridge</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Lindsay Stonebridge, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593229736"><em>We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience</em></a><em> </em>(Hogarth, 2024) to explore the enduring relevance of Hannah Arendt’s thought. Stonebridge dives into Arendt’s remarkable ability to teach students how to think, not just what to think, and reflects on Arendt’s own intellectual journey—a mind in constant dialogue with itself. We discuss how Arendt’s conception of thinking serves as a powerful resistance to totalitarian ideologies, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement with the world. Stonebridge also unpacks Arendt’s belief in the necessity of <em>natality</em>—the idea that cultures open to new beginnings and the emergence of free individuals are essential for societal evolution. Central to Arendt’s vision of political community are the concepts of promises and forgiveness, which Stonebridge argues are not mere sentimental ideals but profound, deeply rooted principles with origins in Christian thought. Together, we examine how these ideas form the basis of a political community grounded in plurality, offering a timely framework for understanding freedom, responsibility, and the possibility of change in our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation that bridges philosophy, history, and the urgent questions of our time.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Lindsay Stonebridge, author of <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593229736"><em>We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience</em></a><em> </em>(Hogarth, 2024) to explore the enduring relevance of Hannah Arendt’s thought. Stonebridge dives into Arendt’s remarkable ability to teach students how to think, not just what to think, and reflects on Arendt’s own intellectual journey—a mind in constant dialogue with itself. We discuss how Arendt’s conception of thinking serves as a powerful resistance to totalitarian ideologies, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement with the world. Stonebridge also unpacks Arendt’s belief in the necessity of <em>natality</em>—the idea that cultures open to new beginnings and the emergence of free individuals are essential for societal evolution. Central to Arendt’s vision of political community are the concepts of promises and forgiveness, which Stonebridge argues are not mere sentimental ideals but profound, deeply rooted principles with origins in Christian thought. Together, we examine how these ideas form the basis of a political community grounded in plurality, offering a timely framework for understanding freedom, responsibility, and the possibility of change in our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation that bridges philosophy, history, and the urgent questions of our time.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43825595" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/2e3a0a37-60c7-4fae-bc92-11addb198879/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=2e3a0a37-60c7-4fae-bc92-11addb198879&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>We Are Free to Change the World: A Conversation on Hannah Arendt with Lyndsay Stonebridge</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Lindsay Stonebridge, author of We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience (Hogarth, 2024) to explore the enduring relevance of Hannah Arendt’s thought. Stonebridge dives into Arendt’s remarkable ability to teach students how to think, not just what to think, and reflects on Arendt’s own intellectual journey—a mind in constant dialogue with itself. We discuss how Arendt’s conception of thinking serves as a powerful resistance to totalitarian ideologies, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement with the world. Stonebridge also unpacks Arendt’s belief in the necessity of natality—the idea that cultures open to new beginnings and the emergence of free individuals are essential for societal evolution. Central to Arendt’s vision of political community are the concepts of promises and forgiveness, which Stonebridge argues are not mere sentimental ideals but profound, deeply rooted principles with origins in Christian thought. Together, we examine how these ideas form the basis of a political community grounded in plurality, offering a timely framework for understanding freedom, responsibility, and the possibility of change in our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation that bridges philosophy, history, and the urgent questions of our time.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Lindsay Stonebridge, author of We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience (Hogarth, 2024) to explore the enduring relevance of Hannah Arendt’s thought. Stonebridge dives into Arendt’s remarkable ability to teach students how to think, not just what to think, and reflects on Arendt’s own intellectual journey—a mind in constant dialogue with itself. We discuss how Arendt’s conception of thinking serves as a powerful resistance to totalitarian ideologies, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement with the world. Stonebridge also unpacks Arendt’s belief in the necessity of natality—the idea that cultures open to new beginnings and the emergence of free individuals are essential for societal evolution. Central to Arendt’s vision of political community are the concepts of promises and forgiveness, which Stonebridge argues are not mere sentimental ideals but profound, deeply rooted principles with origins in Christian thought. Together, we examine how these ideas form the basis of a political community grounded in plurality, offering a timely framework for understanding freedom, responsibility, and the possibility of change in our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation that bridges philosophy, history, and the urgent questions of our time.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba1c32f6-e17d-11ef-ad39-23dea76a81b5</guid>
      <title>Vittorio Bufacchi, &quot;Why Cicero Matters&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350376687"><em>Why Cicero Matters</em></a> (Bloomsbury, 2023) shows us how the Roman philosopher and statesman Marcus Tullius, better known as Cicero, can help realize a new political world. His impact on humanitarianism, the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of America is immense. Yet we give Julius Caesar all our attention. Why? What does this say about modern politics and political culture?</p><p>This book gives us Cicero as an antidote to the myth of the strong man of history. Reading Cicero's <em>On Duties</em> alongside two more introspective philosophical texts, <em>On Friendship</em> and <em>On Old Age</em>, we see how Cicero turned politics into a higher, intellectual form of art, believing in education, in culture and above all in the power of philosophy to instil morality. Cicero has reassuring words on the indispensable work philosophers make, and why the common good needs philosophy.</p><p>In an age when anti-intellectualism runs rampant, <em>Why Cicero Matters</em> introduces us to an ancient thinker who argues culture is, or ought to be, the foundation of any modern democracy, and books its building blocks.</p><p>Vittorio Bufacchi is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at University College Cork, Ireland. He works in moral and political philosophy. He is the author of Violence and Social Justice (2007); Social Injustice (2012); and Everything Must Change: Philosophical Lessons From Lockdown (2021).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350376687"><em>Why Cicero Matters</em></a> (Bloomsbury, 2023) shows us how the Roman philosopher and statesman Marcus Tullius, better known as Cicero, can help realize a new political world. His impact on humanitarianism, the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of America is immense. Yet we give Julius Caesar all our attention. Why? What does this say about modern politics and political culture?</p><p>This book gives us Cicero as an antidote to the myth of the strong man of history. Reading Cicero's <em>On Duties</em> alongside two more introspective philosophical texts, <em>On Friendship</em> and <em>On Old Age</em>, we see how Cicero turned politics into a higher, intellectual form of art, believing in education, in culture and above all in the power of philosophy to instil morality. Cicero has reassuring words on the indispensable work philosophers make, and why the common good needs philosophy.</p><p>In an age when anti-intellectualism runs rampant, <em>Why Cicero Matters</em> introduces us to an ancient thinker who argues culture is, or ought to be, the foundation of any modern democracy, and books its building blocks.</p><p>Vittorio Bufacchi is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at University College Cork, Ireland. He works in moral and political philosophy. He is the author of Violence and Social Justice (2007); Social Injustice (2012); and Everything Must Change: Philosophical Lessons From Lockdown (2021).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57615875" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d93b31e5-347e-4544-930e-96d85c197c7c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d93b31e5-347e-4544-930e-96d85c197c7c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Vittorio Bufacchi, &quot;Why Cicero Matters&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why Cicero Matters (Bloomsbury, 2023) shows us how the Roman philosopher and statesman Marcus Tullius, better known as Cicero, can help realize a new political world. His impact on humanitarianism, the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of America is immense. Yet we give Julius Caesar all our attention. Why? What does this say about modern politics and political culture?
This book gives us Cicero as an antidote to the myth of the strong man of history. Reading Cicero&apos;s On Duties alongside two more introspective philosophical texts, On Friendship and On Old Age, we see how Cicero turned politics into a higher, intellectual form of art, believing in education, in culture and above all in the power of philosophy to instil morality. Cicero has reassuring words on the indispensable work philosophers make, and why the common good needs philosophy.
In an age when anti-intellectualism runs rampant, Why Cicero Matters introduces us to an ancient thinker who argues culture is, or ought to be, the foundation of any modern democracy, and books its building blocks.
Vittorio Bufacchi is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at University College Cork, Ireland. He works in moral and political philosophy. He is the author of Violence and Social Justice (2007); Social Injustice (2012); and Everything Must Change: Philosophical Lessons From Lockdown (2021).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why Cicero Matters (Bloomsbury, 2023) shows us how the Roman philosopher and statesman Marcus Tullius, better known as Cicero, can help realize a new political world. His impact on humanitarianism, the Enlightenment and the Founding Fathers of America is immense. Yet we give Julius Caesar all our attention. Why? What does this say about modern politics and political culture?
This book gives us Cicero as an antidote to the myth of the strong man of history. Reading Cicero&apos;s On Duties alongside two more introspective philosophical texts, On Friendship and On Old Age, we see how Cicero turned politics into a higher, intellectual form of art, believing in education, in culture and above all in the power of philosophy to instil morality. Cicero has reassuring words on the indispensable work philosophers make, and why the common good needs philosophy.
In an age when anti-intellectualism runs rampant, Why Cicero Matters introduces us to an ancient thinker who argues culture is, or ought to be, the foundation of any modern democracy, and books its building blocks.
Vittorio Bufacchi is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at University College Cork, Ireland. He works in moral and political philosophy. He is the author of Violence and Social Justice (2007); Social Injustice (2012); and Everything Must Change: Philosophical Lessons From Lockdown (2021).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7496da2-e0d0-11ef-8370-1707e8c892a6</guid>
      <title>Trump’s Second Term and Europe: Nationalism, NATO, and the Future of Transatlantic Relations</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29262973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/697a20d2-e473-4078-a336-42fdbc88410a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=697a20d2-e473-4078-a336-42fdbc88410a&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump’s Second Term and Europe: Nationalism, NATO, and the Future of Transatlantic Relations</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Nathalie Tocci, director of the Institute of International Affairs in Rome, about the implications of Donald Trump’s second administration for Europe. The discussion explores how Trump’s approach to foreign policy—characterized by protectionism, nationalism, and disdain for multilateralism—affects European politics, particularly in relation to NATO, trade, and the far-right’s growing influence. Prof. Tocci highlights how Trump’s return emboldens nationalist movements across the continent, especially in countries like Italy, where leaders such as Giorgia Meloni now feel freer to express their ideological stances. The conversation also examines the evolving European response to Trump, from initial panic to a mix of wishful thinking and cautious strategizing, particularly regarding the future of NATO and the war in Ukraine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1fdbcef0-e0c8-11ef-8190-c749e0d0e499</guid>
      <title>Patricia A. Roos, &quot;Surviving Alex: A Mother&apos;s Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2015, Patricia Roos’s twenty-five-year-old son Alex died of a heroin overdose. Turning her grief into action, Roos, a professor of sociology at Rutgers University, began to research the social factors and institutional failures that contributed to his death. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978837027"><em>Surviving Alex: A Mother's Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction</em></a><em> </em>(Rutgers UP, 2024) tells her moving story—and argues for a more compassionate and effective approach to addiction treatment.</p><p>Weaving together a personal narrative and a sociological perspective, S<em>urviving Alex</em> describes how people become addicted. She highlights the toll that addiction took on Alex and all members of a family. Drawing from interviews with Alex’s friends, family members, therapists, teachers, and police officers—as well as files from his stays in hospitals, rehab facilities, and jails—Roos paints a compelling portrait of a young man whose life veered between happiness, anxiety, success, and despair. The book is part memoir, part sociological case study, and part policy proposal because it provides a strong challenge to extant treatment and policy options. As she explores how a punitive system failed her son, Dr. Roos calls for a <em>community of action</em> that would improve care for substance users and reduce addiction, realigning public health policy to address the overdose crisis.</p><p>Dr. PATRICIA ROOS is a Professor emerita of sociology at Rutgers University. Among her many publications are the books <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/job-queues-gender-queues-explaining-women-s-inroads-into-male-occupations-barbara-reskin/7336145?ean=9780877227441&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations</em></a> (coauthored with Barbara Reskin) from Temple University Press and <a href="https://sociology.rutgers.edu/research/faculty-bookshelf/faculty-bookshelf-list/849-gender-work-a-comparative-analysis-of-industrial-societies">Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies</a> from University of Albany Press. After her son's death, Dr. Roos realigned her research and advocacy interests to explore mental health and substance use disorders, turning her grief into activism.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>David Herzberg’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/white-market-drugs-big-pharma-and-the-hidden-history-of-addiction-in-america-david-herzberg/14487101?ean=9780226731889&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>White Market Drugs: Big Pharma and the Hidden History of Addiction in America</em></a> from University of Chicago Press.</li>
<li>Pat Roos on Hunter Biden, <a href="https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2024/07/02/hunter-biden-addiction-joe-jill-continue-to-show-compassion/74233475007/">Hunter Biden addiction: Joe, Jill continue to show compassion</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2015, Patricia Roos’s twenty-five-year-old son Alex died of a heroin overdose. Turning her grief into action, Roos, a professor of sociology at Rutgers University, began to research the social factors and institutional failures that contributed to his death. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978837027"><em>Surviving Alex: A Mother's Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction</em></a><em> </em>(Rutgers UP, 2024) tells her moving story—and argues for a more compassionate and effective approach to addiction treatment.</p><p>Weaving together a personal narrative and a sociological perspective, S<em>urviving Alex</em> describes how people become addicted. She highlights the toll that addiction took on Alex and all members of a family. Drawing from interviews with Alex’s friends, family members, therapists, teachers, and police officers—as well as files from his stays in hospitals, rehab facilities, and jails—Roos paints a compelling portrait of a young man whose life veered between happiness, anxiety, success, and despair. The book is part memoir, part sociological case study, and part policy proposal because it provides a strong challenge to extant treatment and policy options. As she explores how a punitive system failed her son, Dr. Roos calls for a <em>community of action</em> that would improve care for substance users and reduce addiction, realigning public health policy to address the overdose crisis.</p><p>Dr. PATRICIA ROOS is a Professor emerita of sociology at Rutgers University. Among her many publications are the books <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/job-queues-gender-queues-explaining-women-s-inroads-into-male-occupations-barbara-reskin/7336145?ean=9780877227441&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations</em></a> (coauthored with Barbara Reskin) from Temple University Press and <a href="https://sociology.rutgers.edu/research/faculty-bookshelf/faculty-bookshelf-list/849-gender-work-a-comparative-analysis-of-industrial-societies">Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies</a> from University of Albany Press. After her son's death, Dr. Roos realigned her research and advocacy interests to explore mental health and substance use disorders, turning her grief into activism.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>David Herzberg’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/white-market-drugs-big-pharma-and-the-hidden-history-of-addiction-in-america-david-herzberg/14487101?ean=9780226731889&amp;next=t&amp;next=t"><em>White Market Drugs: Big Pharma and the Hidden History of Addiction in America</em></a> from University of Chicago Press.</li>
<li>Pat Roos on Hunter Biden, <a href="https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2024/07/02/hunter-biden-addiction-joe-jill-continue-to-show-compassion/74233475007/">Hunter Biden addiction: Joe, Jill continue to show compassion</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65726903" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/838413a7-7edb-4a57-8ae8-581192539c3e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=838413a7-7edb-4a57-8ae8-581192539c3e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Patricia A. Roos, &quot;Surviving Alex: A Mother&apos;s Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2015, Patricia Roos’s twenty-five-year-old son Alex died of a heroin overdose. Turning her grief into action, Roos, a professor of sociology at Rutgers University, began to research the social factors and institutional failures that contributed to his death. Surviving Alex: A Mother&apos;s Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction (Rutgers UP, 2024) tells her moving story—and argues for a more compassionate and effective approach to addiction treatment.
Weaving together a personal narrative and a sociological perspective, Surviving Alex describes how people become addicted. She highlights the toll that addiction took on Alex and all members of a family. Drawing from interviews with Alex’s friends, family members, therapists, teachers, and police officers—as well as files from his stays in hospitals, rehab facilities, and jails—Roos paints a compelling portrait of a young man whose life veered between happiness, anxiety, success, and despair. The book is part memoir, part sociological case study, and part policy proposal because it provides a strong challenge to extant treatment and policy options. As she explores how a punitive system failed her son, Dr. Roos calls for a community of action that would improve care for substance users and reduce addiction, realigning public health policy to address the overdose crisis.
Dr. PATRICIA ROOS is a Professor emerita of sociology at Rutgers University. Among her many publications are the books Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women&apos;s Inroads into Male Occupations (coauthored with Barbara Reskin) from Temple University Press and Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies from University of Albany Press. After her son&apos;s death, Dr. Roos realigned her research and advocacy interests to explore mental health and substance use disorders, turning her grief into activism.
Mentioned:

David Herzberg’s White Market Drugs: Big Pharma and the Hidden History of Addiction in America from University of Chicago Press.

Pat Roos on Hunter Biden, Hunter Biden addiction: Joe, Jill continue to show compassion



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2015, Patricia Roos’s twenty-five-year-old son Alex died of a heroin overdose. Turning her grief into action, Roos, a professor of sociology at Rutgers University, began to research the social factors and institutional failures that contributed to his death. Surviving Alex: A Mother&apos;s Story of Love, Loss, and Addiction (Rutgers UP, 2024) tells her moving story—and argues for a more compassionate and effective approach to addiction treatment.
Weaving together a personal narrative and a sociological perspective, Surviving Alex describes how people become addicted. She highlights the toll that addiction took on Alex and all members of a family. Drawing from interviews with Alex’s friends, family members, therapists, teachers, and police officers—as well as files from his stays in hospitals, rehab facilities, and jails—Roos paints a compelling portrait of a young man whose life veered between happiness, anxiety, success, and despair. The book is part memoir, part sociological case study, and part policy proposal because it provides a strong challenge to extant treatment and policy options. As she explores how a punitive system failed her son, Dr. Roos calls for a community of action that would improve care for substance users and reduce addiction, realigning public health policy to address the overdose crisis.
Dr. PATRICIA ROOS is a Professor emerita of sociology at Rutgers University. Among her many publications are the books Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women&apos;s Inroads into Male Occupations (coauthored with Barbara Reskin) from Temple University Press and Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies from University of Albany Press. After her son&apos;s death, Dr. Roos realigned her research and advocacy interests to explore mental health and substance use disorders, turning her grief into activism.
Mentioned:

David Herzberg’s White Market Drugs: Big Pharma and the Hidden History of Addiction in America from University of Chicago Press.

Pat Roos on Hunter Biden, Hunter Biden addiction: Joe, Jill continue to show compassion



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>755</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e40032c-dff1-11ef-ac16-0b2813827421</guid>
      <title>Moritz Mihatsch and Michael Mulligan, &quot;Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice&quot; (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111446561"><em>Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice</em></a> (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025) explores practical manifestations of sovereignty from antiquity to the Anthropocene. Taking a global-history perspective and centring Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, it destabilises overly neat theoretical notions of the concept. <em>Shifting Sovereignties</em> shows that, in practice, sovereignty is far from absolute, perpetual, indivisible, or supreme; rather it is fuzzy, compromised, fragmented, and layered. From these observations, the authors derive a historical conceptualisation which makes change and contingency core aspects of the understanding of sovereignty. Rather than understanding sovereignty as a characteristic of individual states, Mihatsch and Mulligan propose the notion of “sovereignty regimes”: frameworks of legitimation enforced through mutual recognition. These regimes are created and managed by more or less institutionalised structures which embody what the authors call “system sovereignty.” Sovereignty regimes and system sovereignty are, like sovereignty itself, continuously changing and contingent. This process of change forms the core of the book. <em>Shifting Sovereignties</em> thus contributes a practical, historical perspective on a concept which is foundational in political science, international relations, and international law.</p><p>If purchased from <a href="https://www.degruyter.com/">De Gruyter</a>, you can get the book with a 30% discount for €41.96 / £38.15 / $46.19 by ordering with discount code DGBSS30</p><p>Moritz Mihatsch is Assistant Professor in World History at the University of Cambridge. Michael R. Mulligan is an Assistant Professor in Law at the Euro University of Bahrain. The book has a X/Twitter page, @ShiftingSovs.</p><p>Benjamin Goh (@BenGohsToSchool) is an independent scholar and humanities educator in Singapore. He holds a MPhil in World History from the University of Cambridge, and a B.A. (Hons.) in History from Yale-NUS College. He is a historian of education, and has published on the <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/history-of-education-quarterly/article/glocal-history-of-postindependence-singapores-first-sex-education-curriculum-19661973/250FF5317F55F2F5AC6BF8593EF479AD">history of sex education in Singapore</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111446561"><em>Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice</em></a> (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025) explores practical manifestations of sovereignty from antiquity to the Anthropocene. Taking a global-history perspective and centring Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, it destabilises overly neat theoretical notions of the concept. <em>Shifting Sovereignties</em> shows that, in practice, sovereignty is far from absolute, perpetual, indivisible, or supreme; rather it is fuzzy, compromised, fragmented, and layered. From these observations, the authors derive a historical conceptualisation which makes change and contingency core aspects of the understanding of sovereignty. Rather than understanding sovereignty as a characteristic of individual states, Mihatsch and Mulligan propose the notion of “sovereignty regimes”: frameworks of legitimation enforced through mutual recognition. These regimes are created and managed by more or less institutionalised structures which embody what the authors call “system sovereignty.” Sovereignty regimes and system sovereignty are, like sovereignty itself, continuously changing and contingent. This process of change forms the core of the book. <em>Shifting Sovereignties</em> thus contributes a practical, historical perspective on a concept which is foundational in political science, international relations, and international law.</p><p>If purchased from <a href="https://www.degruyter.com/">De Gruyter</a>, you can get the book with a 30% discount for €41.96 / £38.15 / $46.19 by ordering with discount code DGBSS30</p><p>Moritz Mihatsch is Assistant Professor in World History at the University of Cambridge. Michael R. Mulligan is an Assistant Professor in Law at the Euro University of Bahrain. The book has a X/Twitter page, @ShiftingSovs.</p><p>Benjamin Goh (@BenGohsToSchool) is an independent scholar and humanities educator in Singapore. He holds a MPhil in World History from the University of Cambridge, and a B.A. (Hons.) in History from Yale-NUS College. He is a historian of education, and has published on the <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/history-of-education-quarterly/article/glocal-history-of-postindependence-singapores-first-sex-education-curriculum-19661973/250FF5317F55F2F5AC6BF8593EF479AD">history of sex education in Singapore</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59732478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/d9451833-99a6-4992-ae74-683cf9dc4572/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=d9451833-99a6-4992-ae74-683cf9dc4572&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Moritz Mihatsch and Michael Mulligan, &quot;Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice&quot; (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025) explores practical manifestations of sovereignty from antiquity to the Anthropocene. Taking a global-history perspective and centring Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, it destabilises overly neat theoretical notions of the concept. Shifting Sovereignties shows that, in practice, sovereignty is far from absolute, perpetual, indivisible, or supreme; rather it is fuzzy, compromised, fragmented, and layered. From these observations, the authors derive a historical conceptualisation which makes change and contingency core aspects of the understanding of sovereignty. Rather than understanding sovereignty as a characteristic of individual states, Mihatsch and Mulligan propose the notion of “sovereignty regimes”: frameworks of legitimation enforced through mutual recognition. These regimes are created and managed by more or less institutionalised structures which embody what the authors call “system sovereignty.” Sovereignty regimes and system sovereignty are, like sovereignty itself, continuously changing and contingent. This process of change forms the core of the book. Shifting Sovereignties thus contributes a practical, historical perspective on a concept which is foundational in political science, international relations, and international law.
If purchased from De Gruyter, you can get the book with a 30% discount for €41.96 / £38.15 / $46.19 by ordering with discount code DGBSS30
Moritz Mihatsch is Assistant Professor in World History at the University of Cambridge. Michael R. Mulligan is an Assistant Professor in Law at the Euro University of Bahrain. The book has a X/Twitter page, @ShiftingSovs.
Benjamin Goh (@BenGohsToSchool) is an independent scholar and humanities educator in Singapore. He holds a MPhil in World History from the University of Cambridge, and a B.A. (Hons.) in History from Yale-NUS College. He is a historian of education, and has published on the history of sex education in Singapore.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shifting Sovereignties: A Global History of a Concept in Practice (de Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2025) explores practical manifestations of sovereignty from antiquity to the Anthropocene. Taking a global-history perspective and centring Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, it destabilises overly neat theoretical notions of the concept. Shifting Sovereignties shows that, in practice, sovereignty is far from absolute, perpetual, indivisible, or supreme; rather it is fuzzy, compromised, fragmented, and layered. From these observations, the authors derive a historical conceptualisation which makes change and contingency core aspects of the understanding of sovereignty. Rather than understanding sovereignty as a characteristic of individual states, Mihatsch and Mulligan propose the notion of “sovereignty regimes”: frameworks of legitimation enforced through mutual recognition. These regimes are created and managed by more or less institutionalised structures which embody what the authors call “system sovereignty.” Sovereignty regimes and system sovereignty are, like sovereignty itself, continuously changing and contingent. This process of change forms the core of the book. Shifting Sovereignties thus contributes a practical, historical perspective on a concept which is foundational in political science, international relations, and international law.
If purchased from De Gruyter, you can get the book with a 30% discount for €41.96 / £38.15 / $46.19 by ordering with discount code DGBSS30
Moritz Mihatsch is Assistant Professor in World History at the University of Cambridge. Michael R. Mulligan is an Assistant Professor in Law at the Euro University of Bahrain. The book has a X/Twitter page, @ShiftingSovs.
Benjamin Goh (@BenGohsToSchool) is an independent scholar and humanities educator in Singapore. He holds a MPhil in World History from the University of Cambridge, and a B.A. (Hons.) in History from Yale-NUS College. He is a historian of education, and has published on the history of sex education in Singapore.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1540</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41938152-dfdb-11ef-bb56-87ca1b756b78</guid>
      <title>Adam Chapnick, &quot;Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The definitive history of Canadian foreign policy since the 1930s, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197653715"><em>Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024) examines how successive prime ministers have promoted Canada's national interests in a world that has grown increasingly complex and interconnected. Eleven case studies focus on environmental reform, Indigenous peoples, trade, hostage diplomacy, and wartime strategy illustrate the breadth of issues that shape Canada's global realm. In this lively interview, Asa McKercher offers explains the structure of the book, its main take-way and how Canada has positioned itself in the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definitive history of Canadian foreign policy since the 1930s, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197653715"><em>Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024) examines how successive prime ministers have promoted Canada's national interests in a world that has grown increasingly complex and interconnected. Eleven case studies focus on environmental reform, Indigenous peoples, trade, hostage diplomacy, and wartime strategy illustrate the breadth of issues that shape Canada's global realm. In this lively interview, Asa McKercher offers explains the structure of the book, its main take-way and how Canada has positioned itself in the world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51510313" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1ac3178d-7155-44b6-9ff7-19b1c36e1dcf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1ac3178d-7155-44b6-9ff7-19b1c36e1dcf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam Chapnick, &quot;Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The definitive history of Canadian foreign policy since the 1930s, Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2024) examines how successive prime ministers have promoted Canada&apos;s national interests in a world that has grown increasingly complex and interconnected. Eleven case studies focus on environmental reform, Indigenous peoples, trade, hostage diplomacy, and wartime strategy illustrate the breadth of issues that shape Canada&apos;s global realm. In this lively interview, Asa McKercher offers explains the structure of the book, its main take-way and how Canada has positioned itself in the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The definitive history of Canadian foreign policy since the 1930s, Canada First, Not Canada Alone: A History of Canadian Foreign Policy (Oxford UP, 2024) examines how successive prime ministers have promoted Canada&apos;s national interests in a world that has grown increasingly complex and interconnected. Eleven case studies focus on environmental reform, Indigenous peoples, trade, hostage diplomacy, and wartime strategy illustrate the breadth of issues that shape Canada&apos;s global realm. In this lively interview, Asa McKercher offers explains the structure of the book, its main take-way and how Canada has positioned itself in the world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">21dc6118-dc06-11ef-9aa8-6386eedb42a8</guid>
      <title>Philip Rathgeb, &quot;How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866332"><em>How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right's core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.</p><p>The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.</p><p>Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.</p><p>Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866332"><em>How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right's core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.</p><p>The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.</p><p>Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.</p><p>Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>. </em><a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50879015" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e11dbd86-492c-4b55-8364-b8bf05cb9da7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e11dbd86-492c-4b55-8364-b8bf05cb9da7&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Rathgeb, &quot;How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right&apos;s core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.
The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.
Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.
Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Radical right parties are no longer political challengers on the fringes of party systems; they have become part of the political mainstream across the Western world. How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Oxford UP, 2024) shows how they have used their political power to reform economic and social policies in Continental Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, and the USA. In doing so, it argues that the radical right&apos;s core ideology of nativism and authoritarianism informs their socio-economic policy preferences. However, diverse welfare state contexts mediate their socio-economic policy impacts along regime-specific lines, leading to variations of trade protectionism, economic nationalism, traditional familialism, labour market dualism, and welfare chauvinism.
The radical right has used the diverse policy instruments available within their political-economic arrangements to protect threatened labour market insiders and male breadwinners from decline, while creating a racialized and gendered precariat at the same time. This socio-economic agenda of selective status protection restores horizontal inequalities in terms of gender and ethnicity, without addressing vertical inequalities between the rich and the poor.
Combining insights from comparative politics, party politics, comparative political economy, and welfare state research, the book provides novel insights into how the radical right manufactures consent for authoritarian rule by taming the socially corrosive effects of globalised capitalism for key electoral groups, while aiming to exclude the rest from democratic participation.
Philip Rathgeb is an associate professor in Social Policy in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Konstanz. Philip holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences from the European University Institute (EUI) and held visiting positions at Harvard University, Lund University, University of Southern Denmark, and the EUI. His research interests are in comparative political economy and comparative politics, with a particular focus on welfare states, industrial relations, and party politics. His first book Strong Governments, Precarious Workers was published with Cornell University Press in 2018.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>508</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17f4e5a4-dbfb-11ef-8d87-b76ba5d24e35</guid>
      <title>Roland Erne et al., &quot;Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Year 2008 marked the introduction of a new economic governance regime in the European Union (EU) in response to the global financial crisis. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009054362"><em>Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2024), authored by leading scholars in the field and also available open access, uses a approach to capture the EU formulation of prescriptions and their uneven deployment across member states (Germany, Italy, Ireland, Romania), policy areas (employment relations, public services), and sectors (transport, water, and healthcare). The regime led to a much more vertical mode of EU integration, and its commodification agenda unleashed a plethora of union and social-movement protests, including transnationally. Listen to this engaging interview with the leading author, Prof. Roland Erne, to find out what inspired this book, how the team worked together, and which conclusions they arrived at.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Year 2008 marked the introduction of a new economic governance regime in the European Union (EU) in response to the global financial crisis. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009054362"><em>Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2024), authored by leading scholars in the field and also available open access, uses a approach to capture the EU formulation of prescriptions and their uneven deployment across member states (Germany, Italy, Ireland, Romania), policy areas (employment relations, public services), and sectors (transport, water, and healthcare). The regime led to a much more vertical mode of EU integration, and its commodification agenda unleashed a plethora of union and social-movement protests, including transnationally. Listen to this engaging interview with the leading author, Prof. Roland Erne, to find out what inspired this book, how the team worked together, and which conclusions they arrived at.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54332763" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3267e624-3758-4d5f-9067-7a31680eb750/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3267e624-3758-4d5f-9067-7a31680eb750&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Roland Erne et al., &quot;Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Year 2008 marked the introduction of a new economic governance regime in the European Union (EU) in response to the global financial crisis. Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency (Cambridge UP, 2024), authored by leading scholars in the field and also available open access, uses a approach to capture the EU formulation of prescriptions and their uneven deployment across member states (Germany, Italy, Ireland, Romania), policy areas (employment relations, public services), and sectors (transport, water, and healthcare). The regime led to a much more vertical mode of EU integration, and its commodification agenda unleashed a plethora of union and social-movement protests, including transnationally. Listen to this engaging interview with the leading author, Prof. Roland Erne, to find out what inspired this book, how the team worked together, and which conclusions they arrived at.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Year 2008 marked the introduction of a new economic governance regime in the European Union (EU) in response to the global financial crisis. Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency (Cambridge UP, 2024), authored by leading scholars in the field and also available open access, uses a approach to capture the EU formulation of prescriptions and their uneven deployment across member states (Germany, Italy, Ireland, Romania), policy areas (employment relations, public services), and sectors (transport, water, and healthcare). The regime led to a much more vertical mode of EU integration, and its commodification agenda unleashed a plethora of union and social-movement protests, including transnationally. Listen to this engaging interview with the leading author, Prof. Roland Erne, to find out what inspired this book, how the team worked together, and which conclusions they arrived at.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">326ae91a-db42-11ef-8db2-e71045a323d8</guid>
      <title>Talking Thai Politics: Chanintorn Pensute, The Cost of Politics in Thailand</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How much does it cost to become an MP in Thailand? Is entering parliamentary politics prohibitively expensive for ordinary people? Has the rise of the Move Forward Party (now the People’s Party) changed the landscape as regards candidate selection and campaign finance? Or do well-connected members of local political dynasties still exert a dominant role in determining who enters parliament?</p><p>In this podcast, Chanintorn Pensute, an associate professor in the Faculty of Political Science at Chiang Mai University, talks about a fascinating report she recently co-authored (with Pailin Phujeenaphan, an associate professor and Dean at the same Faculty) for the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, entitled <a href="https://youthdemocracycohort.com/stories/what-is-the-cost-of-running-for-politics-in-thailand/"><em>The Cost of Politics in Thailand.</em></a></p><p>Chanintorn Pensute works mainly on electoral politics in Thailand, and gained her PhD from the University of Leeds. Her articles have appeared in <em>Contemporary Southeast Asia</em> and other journals.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics </em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics</em> <a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/">Website</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much does it cost to become an MP in Thailand? Is entering parliamentary politics prohibitively expensive for ordinary people? Has the rise of the Move Forward Party (now the People’s Party) changed the landscape as regards candidate selection and campaign finance? Or do well-connected members of local political dynasties still exert a dominant role in determining who enters parliament?</p><p>In this podcast, Chanintorn Pensute, an associate professor in the Faculty of Political Science at Chiang Mai University, talks about a fascinating report she recently co-authored (with Pailin Phujeenaphan, an associate professor and Dean at the same Faculty) for the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, entitled <a href="https://youthdemocracycohort.com/stories/what-is-the-cost-of-running-for-politics-in-thailand/"><em>The Cost of Politics in Thailand.</em></a></p><p>Chanintorn Pensute works mainly on electoral politics in Thailand, and gained her PhD from the University of Leeds. Her articles have appeared in <em>Contemporary Southeast Asia</em> and other journals.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics </em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics</em> <a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/">Website</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30212796" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/a754e004-49fd-4581-add7-e2efd1b05682/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=a754e004-49fd-4581-add7-e2efd1b05682&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking Thai Politics: Chanintorn Pensute, The Cost of Politics in Thailand</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How much does it cost to become an MP in Thailand? Is entering parliamentary politics prohibitively expensive for ordinary people? Has the rise of the Move Forward Party (now the People’s Party) changed the landscape as regards candidate selection and campaign finance? Or do well-connected members of local political dynasties still exert a dominant role in determining who enters parliament?
In this podcast, Chanintorn Pensute, an associate professor in the Faculty of Political Science at Chiang Mai University, talks about a fascinating report she recently co-authored (with Pailin Phujeenaphan, an associate professor and Dean at the same Faculty) for the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, entitled The Cost of Politics in Thailand.
Chanintorn Pensute works mainly on electoral politics in Thailand, and gained her PhD from the University of Leeds. Her articles have appeared in Contemporary Southeast Asia and other journals.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Talking Thai Politics Website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How much does it cost to become an MP in Thailand? Is entering parliamentary politics prohibitively expensive for ordinary people? Has the rise of the Move Forward Party (now the People’s Party) changed the landscape as regards candidate selection and campaign finance? Or do well-connected members of local political dynasties still exert a dominant role in determining who enters parliament?
In this podcast, Chanintorn Pensute, an associate professor in the Faculty of Political Science at Chiang Mai University, talks about a fascinating report she recently co-authored (with Pailin Phujeenaphan, an associate professor and Dean at the same Faculty) for the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, entitled The Cost of Politics in Thailand.
Chanintorn Pensute works mainly on electoral politics in Thailand, and gained her PhD from the University of Leeds. Her articles have appeared in Contemporary Southeast Asia and other journals.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Talking Thai Politics Website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f0a95a44-d9b5-11ef-b135-9311c322e9a0</guid>
      <title>Shimon Shetreet, &quot;Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_University_of_Jerusalem">Hebrew University</a> and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004535084"><em>Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy</em>.</a> Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.</p><p>Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_University_of_Jerusalem">Hebrew University</a> and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004535084"><em>Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy</em>.</a> Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.</p><p>Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44749850" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/04d1489a-18e9-463e-b8ee-f209d4ea6506/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=04d1489a-18e9-463e-b8ee-f209d4ea6506&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Shimon Shetreet, &quot;Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy. Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.
Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy. Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.
Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8e6f4ec-d8e3-11ef-be99-7324855ae12d</guid>
      <title>Michael Sonenscher, &quot;After Kant: The Romans, the Germans, and the Moderns in the History of Political Thought&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this wide-ranging work, Michael Sonenscher traces the origins of modern political thought and ideologies to a question, raised by Immanuel Kant, about what is involved in comparing individual human lives to the whole of human history. How can we compare them, or understand the results of the comparison? Kant’s question injected a new, future-oriented dimension into existing discussions of prevailing norms, challenging their orientation toward the past. This reversal made Kant’s question a bridge between three successive sets of arguments: between the supporters of the ancients and moderns, the classics and romantics, and the Romans and the Germans. Sonenscher argues that the genealogy of modern political ideologies—from liberalism to nationalism to communism—can be connected to the resulting discussions of time, history, and values, mainly in France but also in Germany, Switzerland, and Britain, in the period straddling the French and Industrial revolutions.</p><p><br /></p><p>What is the genuinely human content of human history? Everything begins somewhere—democracy with the Greeks, or the idea of a <em>res publica</em> with the Romans—but these local arrangements have become vectors of values that are, apparently, universal. The intellectual upheaval that Sonenscher describes involved a struggle to close the gap, highlighted by Kant, between individual lives and human history. <em>After Kant</em> is an examination of that struggle’s enduring impact on the history and the historiography of political thought.</p><p><strong>Michael Sonenscher</strong> is a fellow of King’s College at the University of Cambridge. His many books include <em>Before the Deluge</em> (Princeton), <em>Sans-Culottes</em> (Princeton), and <em>Jean-Jacques Rousseau</em>.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this wide-ranging work, Michael Sonenscher traces the origins of modern political thought and ideologies to a question, raised by Immanuel Kant, about what is involved in comparing individual human lives to the whole of human history. How can we compare them, or understand the results of the comparison? Kant’s question injected a new, future-oriented dimension into existing discussions of prevailing norms, challenging their orientation toward the past. This reversal made Kant’s question a bridge between three successive sets of arguments: between the supporters of the ancients and moderns, the classics and romantics, and the Romans and the Germans. Sonenscher argues that the genealogy of modern political ideologies—from liberalism to nationalism to communism—can be connected to the resulting discussions of time, history, and values, mainly in France but also in Germany, Switzerland, and Britain, in the period straddling the French and Industrial revolutions.</p><p><br /></p><p>What is the genuinely human content of human history? Everything begins somewhere—democracy with the Greeks, or the idea of a <em>res publica</em> with the Romans—but these local arrangements have become vectors of values that are, apparently, universal. The intellectual upheaval that Sonenscher describes involved a struggle to close the gap, highlighted by Kant, between individual lives and human history. <em>After Kant</em> is an examination of that struggle’s enduring impact on the history and the historiography of political thought.</p><p><strong>Michael Sonenscher</strong> is a fellow of King’s College at the University of Cambridge. His many books include <em>Before the Deluge</em> (Princeton), <em>Sans-Culottes</em> (Princeton), and <em>Jean-Jacques Rousseau</em>.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60127736" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/12b15282-8813-4fc0-99b6-a1f9b43811b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=12b15282-8813-4fc0-99b6-a1f9b43811b4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Sonenscher, &quot;After Kant: The Romans, the Germans, and the Moderns in the History of Political Thought&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this wide-ranging work, Michael Sonenscher traces the origins of modern political thought and ideologies to a question, raised by Immanuel Kant, about what is involved in comparing individual human lives to the whole of human history. How can we compare them, or understand the results of the comparison? Kant’s question injected a new, future-oriented dimension into existing discussions of prevailing norms, challenging their orientation toward the past. This reversal made Kant’s question a bridge between three successive sets of arguments: between the supporters of the ancients and moderns, the classics and romantics, and the Romans and the Germans. Sonenscher argues that the genealogy of modern political ideologies—from liberalism to nationalism to communism—can be connected to the resulting discussions of time, history, and values, mainly in France but also in Germany, Switzerland, and Britain, in the period straddling the French and Industrial revolutions.

What is the genuinely human content of human history? Everything begins somewhere—democracy with the Greeks, or the idea of a res publica with the Romans—but these local arrangements have become vectors of values that are, apparently, universal. The intellectual upheaval that Sonenscher describes involved a struggle to close the gap, highlighted by Kant, between individual lives and human history. After Kant is an examination of that struggle’s enduring impact on the history and the historiography of political thought.
Michael Sonenscher is a fellow of King’s College at the University of Cambridge. His many books include Before the Deluge (Princeton), Sans-Culottes (Princeton), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this wide-ranging work, Michael Sonenscher traces the origins of modern political thought and ideologies to a question, raised by Immanuel Kant, about what is involved in comparing individual human lives to the whole of human history. How can we compare them, or understand the results of the comparison? Kant’s question injected a new, future-oriented dimension into existing discussions of prevailing norms, challenging their orientation toward the past. This reversal made Kant’s question a bridge between three successive sets of arguments: between the supporters of the ancients and moderns, the classics and romantics, and the Romans and the Germans. Sonenscher argues that the genealogy of modern political ideologies—from liberalism to nationalism to communism—can be connected to the resulting discussions of time, history, and values, mainly in France but also in Germany, Switzerland, and Britain, in the period straddling the French and Industrial revolutions.

What is the genuinely human content of human history? Everything begins somewhere—democracy with the Greeks, or the idea of a res publica with the Romans—but these local arrangements have become vectors of values that are, apparently, universal. The intellectual upheaval that Sonenscher describes involved a struggle to close the gap, highlighted by Kant, between individual lives and human history. After Kant is an examination of that struggle’s enduring impact on the history and the historiography of political thought.
Michael Sonenscher is a fellow of King’s College at the University of Cambridge. His many books include Before the Deluge (Princeton), Sans-Culottes (Princeton), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>234</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f73606d8-d81a-11ef-a9cf-5706b35fd273</guid>
      <title>Avinash Paliwal, &quot;India&apos;s Near East: A New History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After student protests toppled Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina last year, New Delhi and Dhaka have been at odds. Indian politicians complain about Hindus being mistreated in the Muslim-majority country; Bangladesh’s interim government fears that Hasina may launch a bid to return to power from India.</p><p>It’s the latest development in what’s become an extremely complicated environment in what Avinash Paliwal calls “India’s Near East”: India, Bangladesh (or East Pakistan before the 1970s), and Myanmar (or Burma before the 1980s). As Avinash explains his book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197794692"><em>India's Near East: A New History</em></a><em> </em>(Hurst: 2024), successive Indian leaders tried to get a handle on international tensions and ethnic conflict—and with a major external threat in China looming in the distance.</p><p>Avinash Paliwal is Reader in International Relations at SOAS University of London, specialising in South Asian strategic affairs. A former journalist and foreign affairs analyst, he is also the author of <em>My Enemy's Enemy: India in Afghanistan from the Soviet Invasion to the U.S. Withdrawal</em> (Hurst: 2017)</p><p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/indias-near-east-a-new-history-by-avinash-paliwal/"><em>India’s Near East</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After student protests toppled Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina last year, New Delhi and Dhaka have been at odds. Indian politicians complain about Hindus being mistreated in the Muslim-majority country; Bangladesh’s interim government fears that Hasina may launch a bid to return to power from India.</p><p>It’s the latest development in what’s become an extremely complicated environment in what Avinash Paliwal calls “India’s Near East”: India, Bangladesh (or East Pakistan before the 1970s), and Myanmar (or Burma before the 1980s). As Avinash explains his book <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197794692"><em>India's Near East: A New History</em></a><em> </em>(Hurst: 2024), successive Indian leaders tried to get a handle on international tensions and ethnic conflict—and with a major external threat in China looming in the distance.</p><p>Avinash Paliwal is Reader in International Relations at SOAS University of London, specialising in South Asian strategic affairs. A former journalist and foreign affairs analyst, he is also the author of <em>My Enemy's Enemy: India in Afghanistan from the Soviet Invasion to the U.S. Withdrawal</em> (Hurst: 2017)</p><p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/"> <em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>, including its review of </em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/indias-near-east-a-new-history-by-avinash-paliwal/"><em>India’s Near East</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia"> <em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en"><em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41631297" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/914f01f2-8e08-4778-8d20-545c56230d48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=914f01f2-8e08-4778-8d20-545c56230d48&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Avinash Paliwal, &quot;India&apos;s Near East: A New History&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After student protests toppled Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina last year, New Delhi and Dhaka have been at odds. Indian politicians complain about Hindus being mistreated in the Muslim-majority country; Bangladesh’s interim government fears that Hasina may launch a bid to return to power from India.
It’s the latest development in what’s become an extremely complicated environment in what Avinash Paliwal calls “India’s Near East”: India, Bangladesh (or East Pakistan before the 1970s), and Myanmar (or Burma before the 1980s). As Avinash explains his book India&apos;s Near East: A New History (Hurst: 2024), successive Indian leaders tried to get a handle on international tensions and ethnic conflict—and with a major external threat in China looming in the distance.
Avinash Paliwal is Reader in International Relations at SOAS University of London, specialising in South Asian strategic affairs. A former journalist and foreign affairs analyst, he is also the author of My Enemy&apos;s Enemy: India in Afghanistan from the Soviet Invasion to the U.S. Withdrawal (Hurst: 2017)
You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of India’s Near East. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.
Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at@nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After student protests toppled Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina last year, New Delhi and Dhaka have been at odds. Indian politicians complain about Hindus being mistreated in the Muslim-majority country; Bangladesh’s interim government fears that Hasina may launch a bid to return to power from India.
It’s the latest development in what’s become an extremely complicated environment in what Avinash Paliwal calls “India’s Near East”: India, Bangladesh (or East Pakistan before the 1970s), and Myanmar (or Burma before the 1980s). As Avinash explains his book India&apos;s Near East: A New History (Hurst: 2024), successive Indian leaders tried to get a handle on international tensions and ethnic conflict—and with a major external threat in China looming in the distance.
Avinash Paliwal is Reader in International Relations at SOAS University of London, specialising in South Asian strategic affairs. A former journalist and foreign affairs analyst, he is also the author of My Enemy&apos;s Enemy: India in Afghanistan from the Soviet Invasion to the U.S. Withdrawal (Hurst: 2017)
You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books, including its review of India’s Near East. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.
Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at@nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">607522ea-d5c4-11ef-8c07-7fc6efad5d12</guid>
      <title>Truth Matters: A Conversation with Robert P. George and Cornel West</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between <em>Robert P. George</em> and <em>Cornel West</em>, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work <em>Truth Matters</em>, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.</p><p>In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of <em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between <em>Robert P. George</em> and <em>Cornel West</em>, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work <em>Truth Matters</em>, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.</p><p>In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44799126" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ce8f0b5c-7098-49a9-8bae-c9d7acd6ffa2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ce8f0b5c-7098-49a9-8bae-c9d7acd6ffa2&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Truth Matters: A Conversation with Robert P. George and Cornel West</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between Robert P. George and Cornel West, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work Truth Matters, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.
In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we are privileged to join a profound conversation between Robert P. George and Cornel West, two towering figures in political philosophy and social thought. Their discussion, based on their collaborative work Truth Matters, models what robust intellectual engagement and civil discourse can look like, especially when addressing issues that divide Americans today.
In this thought-provoking episode, George and West explore the concept of truth and its centrality to our personal and collective lives. They tackle critical questions surrounding truth’s role in the public square, and how we, as a society, can navigate the growing challenges to free expression and intellectual inquiry.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5bca5a26-d362-11ef-a093-63e91636dd91</guid>
      <title>Christina L. Davis, &quot;Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Member selection is one of the defining elements of social organization, imposing categories on who we are and what we do. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691247793"><em>Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2023) shows how international organizations are like social clubs, ones in which institutional rules and informal practices enable states to favor friends while excluding rivals.</p><p>Where race or socioeconomic status may be a basis for discrimination by social clubs, geopolitical alignment determines who gets into the room to make the rules of global governance. Christina Davis brings together a wealth of data on membership provisions for more than three hundred organizations to reveal the prevalence of club-style selection on the world stage. States join organizations to deepen their association with a particular group of states—most often their allies—and for the gains from policy coordination. Even organizations that claim to be universal, to target narrow issues, or to cover geographic regions use club-style admission criteria. Davis demonstrates that when it comes to the most important decision of cooperation—who belongs to the club and who doesn’t—geopolitical alignment can matter more than the merits or policies of potential members.</p><p>With illuminating case studies ranging from nineteenth-century Japan to contemporary Palestine and Taiwan, <em>Discriminatory Clubs</em> sheds light on how, for global and regional organizations such as the WTO and the EU, alliance ties and shared foreign-policy positions form the basis of cooperation.</p><p><strong>Christina L. Davis</strong> is the Edwin O. Reischauer Professor of Japanese Politics in the Department of Government at Harvard University. She is the author of <em>Why Adjudicate?</em> and <em>Food Fights over Free Trade</em> (both Princeton).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Member selection is one of the defining elements of social organization, imposing categories on who we are and what we do. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691247793"><em>Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2023) shows how international organizations are like social clubs, ones in which institutional rules and informal practices enable states to favor friends while excluding rivals.</p><p>Where race or socioeconomic status may be a basis for discrimination by social clubs, geopolitical alignment determines who gets into the room to make the rules of global governance. Christina Davis brings together a wealth of data on membership provisions for more than three hundred organizations to reveal the prevalence of club-style selection on the world stage. States join organizations to deepen their association with a particular group of states—most often their allies—and for the gains from policy coordination. Even organizations that claim to be universal, to target narrow issues, or to cover geographic regions use club-style admission criteria. Davis demonstrates that when it comes to the most important decision of cooperation—who belongs to the club and who doesn’t—geopolitical alignment can matter more than the merits or policies of potential members.</p><p>With illuminating case studies ranging from nineteenth-century Japan to contemporary Palestine and Taiwan, <em>Discriminatory Clubs</em> sheds light on how, for global and regional organizations such as the WTO and the EU, alliance ties and shared foreign-policy positions form the basis of cooperation.</p><p><strong>Christina L. Davis</strong> is the Edwin O. Reischauer Professor of Japanese Politics in the Department of Government at Harvard University. She is the author of <em>Why Adjudicate?</em> and <em>Food Fights over Free Trade</em> (both Princeton).</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40821876" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/ca7a05e3-cea6-432c-bfb4-bbd5a438000b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=ca7a05e3-cea6-432c-bfb4-bbd5a438000b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Christina L. Davis, &quot;Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Member selection is one of the defining elements of social organization, imposing categories on who we are and what we do. Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations (Princeton UP, 2023) shows how international organizations are like social clubs, ones in which institutional rules and informal practices enable states to favor friends while excluding rivals.
Where race or socioeconomic status may be a basis for discrimination by social clubs, geopolitical alignment determines who gets into the room to make the rules of global governance. Christina Davis brings together a wealth of data on membership provisions for more than three hundred organizations to reveal the prevalence of club-style selection on the world stage. States join organizations to deepen their association with a particular group of states—most often their allies—and for the gains from policy coordination. Even organizations that claim to be universal, to target narrow issues, or to cover geographic regions use club-style admission criteria. Davis demonstrates that when it comes to the most important decision of cooperation—who belongs to the club and who doesn’t—geopolitical alignment can matter more than the merits or policies of potential members.
With illuminating case studies ranging from nineteenth-century Japan to contemporary Palestine and Taiwan, Discriminatory Clubs sheds light on how, for global and regional organizations such as the WTO and the EU, alliance ties and shared foreign-policy positions form the basis of cooperation.
Christina L. Davis is the Edwin O. Reischauer Professor of Japanese Politics in the Department of Government at Harvard University. She is the author of Why Adjudicate? and Food Fights over Free Trade (both Princeton).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Member selection is one of the defining elements of social organization, imposing categories on who we are and what we do. Discriminatory Clubs: The Geopolitics of International Organizations (Princeton UP, 2023) shows how international organizations are like social clubs, ones in which institutional rules and informal practices enable states to favor friends while excluding rivals.
Where race or socioeconomic status may be a basis for discrimination by social clubs, geopolitical alignment determines who gets into the room to make the rules of global governance. Christina Davis brings together a wealth of data on membership provisions for more than three hundred organizations to reveal the prevalence of club-style selection on the world stage. States join organizations to deepen their association with a particular group of states—most often their allies—and for the gains from policy coordination. Even organizations that claim to be universal, to target narrow issues, or to cover geographic regions use club-style admission criteria. Davis demonstrates that when it comes to the most important decision of cooperation—who belongs to the club and who doesn’t—geopolitical alignment can matter more than the merits or policies of potential members.
With illuminating case studies ranging from nineteenth-century Japan to contemporary Palestine and Taiwan, Discriminatory Clubs sheds light on how, for global and regional organizations such as the WTO and the EU, alliance ties and shared foreign-policy positions form the basis of cooperation.
Christina L. Davis is the Edwin O. Reischauer Professor of Japanese Politics in the Department of Government at Harvard University. She is the author of Why Adjudicate? and Food Fights over Free Trade (both Princeton).
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">838c4d34-d291-11ef-a124-878fa91aaf3a</guid>
      <title>Congressional Deliberation: A Conversation with Kevin J. Burns and Jordan T. Cash</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, <a href="https://hackettpublishing.com/congressional-deliberation"><em>Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, <a href="https://hackettpublishing.com/congressional-deliberation"><em>Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a> is the podcast of Princeton <a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52463152" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9e24d944-23c6-4fa5-a9d3-15bed69e42a6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9e24d944-23c6-4fa5-a9d3-15bed69e42a6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Congressional Deliberation: A Conversation with Kevin J. Burns and Jordan T. Cash</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023 ﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we sit down with Professors Jordan T. Cash and Kevin J. Burns to discuss their recently published book, Congressional Deliberation: Major Debates, Speeches, and Writings, 1774–2023 ﻿(Hackett, 2024). Drawing on a wide array of primary sources, the book offers a deep dive into key historical debates and turning points in U.S. congressional history. We explored how the dynamics of deliberation in the House and Senate have shaped fundamental issues like war powers, impeachment, civil rights, and legislative leadership. With their expertise in American political thought, constitutionalism, and the history of political institutions, Professors Cash and Burns provide a rich, scholarly perspective on the role of Congress in the development of the American political system. Whether you’re a student of history or simply curious about the workings of the U.S. government, this conversation offers valuable insights into the continuing evolution of congressional deliberation.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>441</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e5ac1032-d113-11ef-b4f4-5b2a7b99ae07</guid>
      <title>Arthur Bradley, &quot;Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231217347"><em>Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy</em></a> (Columbia University Press, 2024) explores the relationship between theater and sovereignty in modern political theory, philosophy, and performance. Author <a href="https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/english-literature-and-creative-writing/people/arthur-bradley">Arthur Bradley</a> considers the theatricality of power—its forms, dramas, and iconography—and examines sovereignty’s modes of appearance: thrones, insignia, regalia, ritual, ceremony, spectacle, marvels, fictions, and phantasmagoria. He weaves together political theory and literature, reading figures such as Plato, Aristotle, Montaigne, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Schmitt, Benjamin, Derrida, and Agamben alongside writers including Shakespeare, Cervantes, Schiller, Melville, Valéry, Kafka, Ionesco, and Genet.</p><p>Arthur Bradley is professor of comparative literature at Lancaster University. His most recent book is <em>Unbearable Life: A Genealogy of Political Erasure</em> (Columbia, 2019).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231217347"><em>Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy</em></a> (Columbia University Press, 2024) explores the relationship between theater and sovereignty in modern political theory, philosophy, and performance. Author <a href="https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/english-literature-and-creative-writing/people/arthur-bradley">Arthur Bradley</a> considers the theatricality of power—its forms, dramas, and iconography—and examines sovereignty’s modes of appearance: thrones, insignia, regalia, ritual, ceremony, spectacle, marvels, fictions, and phantasmagoria. He weaves together political theory and literature, reading figures such as Plato, Aristotle, Montaigne, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Schmitt, Benjamin, Derrida, and Agamben alongside writers including Shakespeare, Cervantes, Schiller, Melville, Valéry, Kafka, Ionesco, and Genet.</p><p>Arthur Bradley is professor of comparative literature at Lancaster University. His most recent book is <em>Unbearable Life: A Genealogy of Political Erasure</em> (Columbia, 2019).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53534843" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/aaa70722-a18b-43b8-8698-4038700aa2a3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=aaa70722-a18b-43b8-8698-4038700aa2a3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Arthur Bradley, &quot;Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy (Columbia University Press, 2024) explores the relationship between theater and sovereignty in modern political theory, philosophy, and performance. Author Arthur Bradley considers the theatricality of power—its forms, dramas, and iconography—and examines sovereignty’s modes of appearance: thrones, insignia, regalia, ritual, ceremony, spectacle, marvels, fictions, and phantasmagoria. He weaves together political theory and literature, reading figures such as Plato, Aristotle, Montaigne, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Schmitt, Benjamin, Derrida, and Agamben alongside writers including Shakespeare, Cervantes, Schiller, Melville, Valéry, Kafka, Ionesco, and Genet.
Arthur Bradley is professor of comparative literature at Lancaster University. His most recent book is Unbearable Life: A Genealogy of Political Erasure (Columbia, 2019).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Staging Sovereignty: Theory, Theater, Thaumaturgy (Columbia University Press, 2024) explores the relationship between theater and sovereignty in modern political theory, philosophy, and performance. Author Arthur Bradley considers the theatricality of power—its forms, dramas, and iconography—and examines sovereignty’s modes of appearance: thrones, insignia, regalia, ritual, ceremony, spectacle, marvels, fictions, and phantasmagoria. He weaves together political theory and literature, reading figures such as Plato, Aristotle, Montaigne, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Schmitt, Benjamin, Derrida, and Agamben alongside writers including Shakespeare, Cervantes, Schiller, Melville, Valéry, Kafka, Ionesco, and Genet.
Arthur Bradley is professor of comparative literature at Lancaster University. His most recent book is Unbearable Life: A Genealogy of Political Erasure (Columbia, 2019).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>507</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">04a72356-d03c-11ef-a8c6-7fc6a6527790</guid>
      <title>Bernard J. Dobski, &quot;Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity&quot; (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist B.J. (Bernard J.) Dobski has a new book focusing on Mark Twain’s final published novel, <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc</em>. As Dobski notes in his work and in our conversation, this is one of the more obscure texts by Twain, but Twain considered it his best work. Dobski’s book is a close reading of Twain’s Joan of Arc and an analysis of how this particular work, focusing on Joan of Arc’s life through the narration of Sieur Louis De Conte (Joan’s childhood friend and her secretary during her military undertakings), is part of Twain’s larger efforts to understand the turn towards modernity, and all that entails.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031657184"> <em>Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity</em></a> is part of series at Palgrave/MacMillan focusing on recovering political philosophy, and this book fits into that series particularly well.</p><p>Mark Twain had a lifelong fascination with Joan of Arc. Twain’s Joan serves, in the novel, as a kind of path out of the Middle Ages, and, in this way, is being positioned as a Machiavellian “princess”— embodying a political science more effectively than can the Church at the time. Dobski’s interpretation explores the ways in which Joan of Arc, according to Twain, refounded and reformed France, taking many of Machiavelli’s teachings into account. Another dimension of Twain’s Joan of Arc is seen in context of the “historical maid” Joan of Arc and how both renderings are positioning a woman serving in a man’s role. Dobski explains the controversy over Joan’s attire—wearing men’s clothing as a woman, which was one of the charges brought against her—and how these laws were designed to foreground the Church’s teaching on modesty and decency and a means to regulate sexual ethics. This also reflects the maleness of Christ, which is not incidental to preserving the moral teachings that are rooted in the distinction between the sexes. But Joan is very much a woman in a man’s world, and her success in the man’s world challenges the Church’s basis for these distinctions between female and male. Many of these entanglements are the focus of Twain’s novel, and thus of Dobski’s analysis of <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc</em>.</p><p>Ultimately, <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity</em> digs into overarching and universal concerns, including the theological-philosophical conundrum, the claim of divine right by monarchs, and how to live a good life. B.J. Dobski skillfully follows Twain’s curvy path through Joan of Arc’s life and reputation to unpack Twain’s own thinking about these perennial questions.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Theorist B.J. (Bernard J.) Dobski has a new book focusing on Mark Twain’s final published novel, <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc</em>. As Dobski notes in his work and in our conversation, this is one of the more obscure texts by Twain, but Twain considered it his best work. Dobski’s book is a close reading of Twain’s Joan of Arc and an analysis of how this particular work, focusing on Joan of Arc’s life through the narration of Sieur Louis De Conte (Joan’s childhood friend and her secretary during her military undertakings), is part of Twain’s larger efforts to understand the turn towards modernity, and all that entails.<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031657184"> <em>Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity</em></a> is part of series at Palgrave/MacMillan focusing on recovering political philosophy, and this book fits into that series particularly well.</p><p>Mark Twain had a lifelong fascination with Joan of Arc. Twain’s Joan serves, in the novel, as a kind of path out of the Middle Ages, and, in this way, is being positioned as a Machiavellian “princess”— embodying a political science more effectively than can the Church at the time. Dobski’s interpretation explores the ways in which Joan of Arc, according to Twain, refounded and reformed France, taking many of Machiavelli’s teachings into account. Another dimension of Twain’s Joan of Arc is seen in context of the “historical maid” Joan of Arc and how both renderings are positioning a woman serving in a man’s role. Dobski explains the controversy over Joan’s attire—wearing men’s clothing as a woman, which was one of the charges brought against her—and how these laws were designed to foreground the Church’s teaching on modesty and decency and a means to regulate sexual ethics. This also reflects the maleness of Christ, which is not incidental to preserving the moral teachings that are rooted in the distinction between the sexes. But Joan is very much a woman in a man’s world, and her success in the man’s world challenges the Church’s basis for these distinctions between female and male. Many of these entanglements are the focus of Twain’s novel, and thus of Dobski’s analysis of <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc</em>.</p><p>Ultimately, <em>Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity</em> digs into overarching and universal concerns, including the theological-philosophical conundrum, the claim of divine right by monarchs, and how to live a good life. B.J. Dobski skillfully follows Twain’s curvy path through Joan of Arc’s life and reputation to unpack Twain’s own thinking about these perennial questions.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em> is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em> channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of </em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em> (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, </em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em> (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached </em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47248153" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/61b1756f-870c-49ce-8382-cb46ffcfb966/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=61b1756f-870c-49ce-8382-cb46ffcfb966&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Bernard J. Dobski, &quot;Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity&quot; (Palgrave MacMillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Theorist B.J. (Bernard J.) Dobski has a new book focusing on Mark Twain’s final published novel, Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc. As Dobski notes in his work and in our conversation, this is one of the more obscure texts by Twain, but Twain considered it his best work. Dobski’s book is a close reading of Twain’s Joan of Arc and an analysis of how this particular work, focusing on Joan of Arc’s life through the narration of Sieur Louis De Conte (Joan’s childhood friend and her secretary during her military undertakings), is part of Twain’s larger efforts to understand the turn towards modernity, and all that entails. Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity is part of series at Palgrave/MacMillan focusing on recovering political philosophy, and this book fits into that series particularly well.
Mark Twain had a lifelong fascination with Joan of Arc. Twain’s Joan serves, in the novel, as a kind of path out of the Middle Ages, and, in this way, is being positioned as a Machiavellian “princess”— embodying a political science more effectively than can the Church at the time. Dobski’s interpretation explores the ways in which Joan of Arc, according to Twain, refounded and reformed France, taking many of Machiavelli’s teachings into account. Another dimension of Twain’s Joan of Arc is seen in context of the “historical maid” Joan of Arc and how both renderings are positioning a woman serving in a man’s role. Dobski explains the controversy over Joan’s attire—wearing men’s clothing as a woman, which was one of the charges brought against her—and how these laws were designed to foreground the Church’s teaching on modesty and decency and a means to regulate sexual ethics. This also reflects the maleness of Christ, which is not incidental to preserving the moral teachings that are rooted in the distinction between the sexes. But Joan is very much a woman in a man’s world, and her success in the man’s world challenges the Church’s basis for these distinctions between female and male. Many of these entanglements are the focus of Twain’s novel, and thus of Dobski’s analysis of Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc.
Ultimately, Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity digs into overarching and universal concerns, including the theological-philosophical conundrum, the claim of divine right by monarchs, and how to live a good life. B.J. Dobski skillfully follows Twain’s curvy path through Joan of Arc’s life and reputation to unpack Twain’s own thinking about these perennial questions.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Theorist B.J. (Bernard J.) Dobski has a new book focusing on Mark Twain’s final published novel, Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc. As Dobski notes in his work and in our conversation, this is one of the more obscure texts by Twain, but Twain considered it his best work. Dobski’s book is a close reading of Twain’s Joan of Arc and an analysis of how this particular work, focusing on Joan of Arc’s life through the narration of Sieur Louis De Conte (Joan’s childhood friend and her secretary during her military undertakings), is part of Twain’s larger efforts to understand the turn towards modernity, and all that entails. Mark Twain’s Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity is part of series at Palgrave/MacMillan focusing on recovering political philosophy, and this book fits into that series particularly well.
Mark Twain had a lifelong fascination with Joan of Arc. Twain’s Joan serves, in the novel, as a kind of path out of the Middle Ages, and, in this way, is being positioned as a Machiavellian “princess”— embodying a political science more effectively than can the Church at the time. Dobski’s interpretation explores the ways in which Joan of Arc, according to Twain, refounded and reformed France, taking many of Machiavelli’s teachings into account. Another dimension of Twain’s Joan of Arc is seen in context of the “historical maid” Joan of Arc and how both renderings are positioning a woman serving in a man’s role. Dobski explains the controversy over Joan’s attire—wearing men’s clothing as a woman, which was one of the charges brought against her—and how these laws were designed to foreground the Church’s teaching on modesty and decency and a means to regulate sexual ethics. This also reflects the maleness of Christ, which is not incidental to preserving the moral teachings that are rooted in the distinction between the sexes. But Joan is very much a woman in a man’s world, and her success in the man’s world challenges the Church’s basis for these distinctions between female and male. Many of these entanglements are the focus of Twain’s novel, and thus of Dobski’s analysis of Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc.
Ultimately, Personal Reflections of Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity digs into overarching and universal concerns, including the theological-philosophical conundrum, the claim of divine right by monarchs, and how to live a good life. B.J. Dobski skillfully follows Twain’s curvy path through Joan of Arc’s life and reputation to unpack Twain’s own thinking about these perennial questions.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>754</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b8513dde-cf82-11ef-8a04-d3fad67e2261</guid>
      <title>Matthew McManus, &quot;The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032647234"><em>The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism</em> </a>(Routledge, 2024), McManus presents a comprehensive guide to the liberal socialist tradition, stretching from Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine through John Stuart Mill to Irving Howe, John Rawls, and Charles Mills.</p><p>Providing a comprehensive critical genealogy of liberal socialism from a sympathetic but critical standpoint, McManus traces its core to the Revolutionary period that catalyzed major divisions in liberal political theory to the French Revolution that saw the emergence of writers like Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine who argued that liberal principles could only be inadequately instantiated in a society with high levels of material and social inequality to John Stuart Mill, the first major thinker who declared himself a liberal and a socialist and who made major contributions to both traditions through his efforts to synthesize and conciliate them. McManus argues for liberal socialism as a political theory which could truly secure equality and liberty for all.</p><p>An essential book on the tradition of liberal socialism for students, researchers, and scholars of political science and humanities.</p><p>Matthew McManus is a lecturer in Political Science at the University of Michigan, USA. He is the author of <em>The Political Right and Equality</em> (Routledge) and <em>A Critical Legal Examination of Liberalism and Liberal Rights</em> among other books.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032647234"><em>The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism</em> </a>(Routledge, 2024), McManus presents a comprehensive guide to the liberal socialist tradition, stretching from Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine through John Stuart Mill to Irving Howe, John Rawls, and Charles Mills.</p><p>Providing a comprehensive critical genealogy of liberal socialism from a sympathetic but critical standpoint, McManus traces its core to the Revolutionary period that catalyzed major divisions in liberal political theory to the French Revolution that saw the emergence of writers like Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine who argued that liberal principles could only be inadequately instantiated in a society with high levels of material and social inequality to John Stuart Mill, the first major thinker who declared himself a liberal and a socialist and who made major contributions to both traditions through his efforts to synthesize and conciliate them. McManus argues for liberal socialism as a political theory which could truly secure equality and liberty for all.</p><p>An essential book on the tradition of liberal socialism for students, researchers, and scholars of political science and humanities.</p><p>Matthew McManus is a lecturer in Political Science at the University of Michigan, USA. He is the author of <em>The Political Right and Equality</em> (Routledge) and <em>A Critical Legal Examination of Liberalism and Liberal Rights</em> among other books.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="81513526" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/e6415948-eaee-4c2d-b1bb-81396b07ad44/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=e6415948-eaee-4c2d-b1bb-81396b07ad44&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew McManus, &quot;The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:24:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism (Routledge, 2024), McManus presents a comprehensive guide to the liberal socialist tradition, stretching from Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine through John Stuart Mill to Irving Howe, John Rawls, and Charles Mills.
Providing a comprehensive critical genealogy of liberal socialism from a sympathetic but critical standpoint, McManus traces its core to the Revolutionary period that catalyzed major divisions in liberal political theory to the French Revolution that saw the emergence of writers like Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine who argued that liberal principles could only be inadequately instantiated in a society with high levels of material and social inequality to John Stuart Mill, the first major thinker who declared himself a liberal and a socialist and who made major contributions to both traditions through his efforts to synthesize and conciliate them. McManus argues for liberal socialism as a political theory which could truly secure equality and liberty for all.
An essential book on the tradition of liberal socialism for students, researchers, and scholars of political science and humanities.
Matthew McManus is a lecturer in Political Science at the University of Michigan, USA. He is the author of The Political Right and Equality (Routledge) and A Critical Legal Examination of Liberalism and Liberal Rights among other books.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism (Routledge, 2024), McManus presents a comprehensive guide to the liberal socialist tradition, stretching from Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine through John Stuart Mill to Irving Howe, John Rawls, and Charles Mills.
Providing a comprehensive critical genealogy of liberal socialism from a sympathetic but critical standpoint, McManus traces its core to the Revolutionary period that catalyzed major divisions in liberal political theory to the French Revolution that saw the emergence of writers like Mary Wollstonecraft and Thomas Paine who argued that liberal principles could only be inadequately instantiated in a society with high levels of material and social inequality to John Stuart Mill, the first major thinker who declared himself a liberal and a socialist and who made major contributions to both traditions through his efforts to synthesize and conciliate them. McManus argues for liberal socialism as a political theory which could truly secure equality and liberty for all.
An essential book on the tradition of liberal socialism for students, researchers, and scholars of political science and humanities.
Matthew McManus is a lecturer in Political Science at the University of Michigan, USA. He is the author of The Political Right and Equality (Routledge) and A Critical Legal Examination of Liberalism and Liberal Rights among other books.

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>506</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7a115fe-cd44-11ef-9aaf-93dea850eb0a</guid>
      <title>Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti, &quot;Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859310"><em>Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti's approach builds on John Rawls's treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to 'contain' unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.</p><p><strong>Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192859310"><em>Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti's approach builds on John Rawls's treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to 'contain' unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.</p><p><strong>Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory</strong></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59159122" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/6dbe9f83-db49-4ccc-a6db-9187a297f6fe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=6dbe9f83-db49-4ccc-a6db-9187a297f6fe&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti, &quot;Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views ﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti&apos;s approach builds on John Rawls&apos;s treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to &apos;contain&apos; unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.
Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How should broadly liberal democratic societies stop illiberal and antidemocratic views from gaining influence while honouring liberal democratic values? This question has become particularly pressing after the recent successes of right-wing populist leaders and parties across Europe, in the US, and beyond. Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views ﻿(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Alasia Nuti and Gabriele Badano develops a normative account of liberal democratic self-defence that denounces the failures of real-world societies without excusing those supporting illiberal and antidemocratic political actors. This account is innovative in focusing not only on the role of the state but also on the duties of nonstate actors including citizens, partisans, and municipalities. Consequently, it also addresses cases where the central government has at least been partly captured by illiberal and antidemocratic agents. Gabriele Badano and Alasia Nuti&apos;s approach builds on John Rawls&apos;s treatment of political liberalism and his awareness of the need to &apos;contain&apos; unreasonable views, that is, views denying that society should treat every person as free and equal through a mutually acceptable system of social cooperation where pluralism is to be expected. The authors offer original solutions to vexed problems within political liberalism by putting forward a new account of the relation between ideal and non-ideal theory, explaining why it is justifiable to exclude unreasonable persons from the constituency of public reason, and showing that the strictures of public reason do not apply to those suffering from severe injustice. In doing so, the book further politicizes political liberalism and turns it into a framework that can insightfully respond to the challenges of real politics.
Alasia Nuti is senior Lecturer in Political Theory at the University of York. Her work is situated at the intersection of analytical political theory, critical theory, gender studies and critical race theory
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>437</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bbdd4910-cc86-11ef-b492-072a18576813</guid>
      <title>David Lyon, &quot;Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Surveillance is everywhere today, generating data about our purchasing, political, and personal preferences. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198796848">Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction</a> (Oxford University Press, 2024) shows how surveillance makes people visible and affects their lives, considers the technologies involved and how it grew to its present size and prevalence, and explores the pressing ethical questions surrounding it.</p><p>David Lyon is former Director of the Surveillance Studies Centre and Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Law, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.</p><p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surveillance is everywhere today, generating data about our purchasing, political, and personal preferences. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198796848">Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction</a> (Oxford University Press, 2024) shows how surveillance makes people visible and affects their lives, considers the technologies involved and how it grew to its present size and prevalence, and explores the pressing ethical questions surrounding it.</p><p>David Lyon is former Director of the Surveillance Studies Centre and Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Law, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.</p><p>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55618359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/0886c7c4-9ae5-410c-8d94-b211940983ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=0886c7c4-9ae5-410c-8d94-b211940983ae&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Lyon, &quot;Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Surveillance is everywhere today, generating data about our purchasing, political, and personal preferences. Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2024) shows how surveillance makes people visible and affects their lives, considers the technologies involved and how it grew to its present size and prevalence, and explores the pressing ethical questions surrounding it.
David Lyon is former Director of the Surveillance Studies Centre and Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Law, Queen&apos;s University, Kingston, Ontario.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Surveillance is everywhere today, generating data about our purchasing, political, and personal preferences. Surveillance: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2024) shows how surveillance makes people visible and affects their lives, considers the technologies involved and how it grew to its present size and prevalence, and explores the pressing ethical questions surrounding it.
David Lyon is former Director of the Surveillance Studies Centre and Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Law, Queen&apos;s University, Kingston, Ontario.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16640226-cb91-11ef-a21b-fb8ca93b07ed</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Meiches, &quot;The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517905826/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide</em></a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),<a href="https://directory.tacoma.uw.edu/employee/bmeiches"><em>Benjamin Meiches</em></a> takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as <em>genealogy</em>, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517905826/?tag=newbooinhis-20"><em>The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide</em></a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),<a href="https://directory.tacoma.uw.edu/employee/bmeiches"><em>Benjamin Meiches</em></a> takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as <em>genealogy</em>, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53445829" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c284a18b-c2e9-4492-830c-8101675d8bd0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c284a18b-c2e9-4492-830c-8101675d8bd0&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Meiches, &quot;The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),Benjamin Meiches takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as genealogy, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),Benjamin Meiches takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as genealogy, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2976ef8e-cb75-11ef-ba64-6bc530eb0958</guid>
      <title>Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, &quot;Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108495639"><em>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108495639"><em>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy</em></a> (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.</p><p><em>Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="80455642" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/15954e46-970d-49df-aba5-5f6a7e5446b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=15954e46-970d-49df-aba5-5f6a7e5446b8&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard, &quot;Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:23:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights: Contesting Morality in US Foreign Policy (Cambridge UP, 2020) traces the role of human rights concerns in US foreign policy during the 1980s, focusing on the struggle among the Reagan administration and members of Congress. It demonstrates how congressional pressure led the administration to reconsider its approach to human rights and craft a conservative human rights policy centered on democracy promotion and anti-communism - a decision which would have profound implications for American attention to human rights. Based on extensive archival research and interviews, Rasmus Sinding Søndergaard combines a comprehensive overview of human rights in American foreign relations with in-depth case studies of how human rights shaped US foreign policy toward Soviet Jewry, South African apartheid, and Nicaragua. Tracing the motivations behind human rights activism, this book demonstrates how liberals, moderates, and conservatives selectively invoked human rights to further their agendas, ultimately contributing to the establishment of human rights as a core moral language in US foreign policy.
Grant Golub is a PhD candidate in U.S. and international history at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). His research examines the politics of American grand strategy during World War II. Follow him on Twitter @ghgolub.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc1dd51a-c9f8-11ef-9ff0-331d540bd4d6</guid>
      <title>Todd McGowan, &quot;Universality and Identity Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.</p><p>This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231197700"><em>Universality and Identity Politics</em></a> (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.</p><p>Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are <em>The Impossible David Lynch</em> (2007), <em>Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets</em> (2016), and <em>Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution</em> (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/why-theory/id1299863834">Why Theory podcast</a>, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.</p><p>This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231197700"><em>Universality and Identity Politics</em></a> (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.</p><p>Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are <em>The Impossible David Lynch</em> (2007), <em>Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets</em> (2016), and <em>Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution</em> (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/why-theory/id1299863834">Why Theory podcast</a>, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58511640" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/880210f7-c88b-490a-a4cb-df780bdad183/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=880210f7-c88b-490a-a4cb-df780bdad183&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Todd McGowan, &quot;Universality and Identity Politics&quot; (Columbia UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.
This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, Universality and Identity Politics (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.
Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are The Impossible David Lynch (2007), Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets (2016), and Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the Why Theory podcast, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The great political ideas and movements of the modern world were founded on a promise of universal emancipation. But in recent decades, much of the Left has grown suspicious of such aspirations. Critics see the invocation of universality as a form of domination or a way of speaking for others, and have come to favor a politics of particularism—often derided as “identity politics.” Others, both centrists and conservatives, associate universalism with twentieth-century totalitarianism and hold that it is bound to lead to catastrophe.
This book develops a new conception of universality that helps us rethink political thought and action. Todd McGowan argues that universals such as equality and freedom are not imposed on us. They emerge from our shared experience of their absence and our struggle to attain them. McGowan reconsiders the history of Nazism and Stalinism and reclaims the universalism of movements fighting racism, sexism, and homophobia. He demonstrates that the divide between Right and Left comes down to particularity versus universality. Despite the accusation of identity politics directed against leftists, every emancipatory political project is fundamentally a universal one—and the real proponents of identity politics are the right wing. Through a wide range of examples in contemporary politics, film, and history, Universality and Identity Politics (Columbia UP, 2020) offers an antidote to the impasses of identity and an inspiring vision of twenty-first-century collective struggle.
Todd McGowan is professor of film studies at the University of Vermont. His previous Columbia University Press books are The Impossible David Lynch (2007), Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets (2016), and Emancipation After Hegel: Achieving a Contradictory Revolution (2019). He is the coeditor of the Diaeresis series at Northwestern University Press with Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. He is also cohost of the Why Theory podcast, which brings continental philosophy and psychoanalytic theory together to examine cultural phenomena.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>287</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5aefa26-c3b7-11ef-9f72-fbcbc24622ba</guid>
      <title>Michael Fuerstein, &quot;Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Various kind of philosophical considerations have been offered in favor of democracy. By some accounts, democracy realizes some intrinsic value, such as equality or collective autonomy. According to other views, democracy’s value is more <em>instrumental</em>: it tends to <em>produce </em>or <em>promote </em>certain social goods like stability, prosperity, and peace. However, a longstanding alternative tradition locates democracy’s value in its capacity to make social and moral <em>progress</em>. Here, the idea isn’t so much that democracy produces an already-identified social good, but rather that democracy fosters a kind of social and moral <em>discovery</em>.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197784280"><em>Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2024), <a href="https://www.stolaf.edu/profile/fuerstei">Michael Fuerstein</a> draws on normative and empirical considerations in proposing a systematic account of democracy’s capacity to foster progress.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various kind of philosophical considerations have been offered in favor of democracy. By some accounts, democracy realizes some intrinsic value, such as equality or collective autonomy. According to other views, democracy’s value is more <em>instrumental</em>: it tends to <em>produce </em>or <em>promote </em>certain social goods like stability, prosperity, and peace. However, a longstanding alternative tradition locates democracy’s value in its capacity to make social and moral <em>progress</em>. Here, the idea isn’t so much that democracy produces an already-identified social good, but rather that democracy fosters a kind of social and moral <em>discovery</em>.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197784280"><em>Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2024), <a href="https://www.stolaf.edu/profile/fuerstei">Michael Fuerstein</a> draws on normative and empirical considerations in proposing a systematic account of democracy’s capacity to foster progress.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59879871" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/238be9cc-3d23-4d55-82f4-b4bfb5ad717b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=238be9cc-3d23-4d55-82f4-b4bfb5ad717b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Fuerstein, &quot;Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Various kind of philosophical considerations have been offered in favor of democracy. By some accounts, democracy realizes some intrinsic value, such as equality or collective autonomy. According to other views, democracy’s value is more instrumental: it tends to produce or promote certain social goods like stability, prosperity, and peace. However, a longstanding alternative tradition locates democracy’s value in its capacity to make social and moral progress. Here, the idea isn’t so much that democracy produces an already-identified social good, but rather that democracy fosters a kind of social and moral discovery.
In Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress (Oxford UP, 2024), Michael Fuerstein draws on normative and empirical considerations in proposing a systematic account of democracy’s capacity to foster progress.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Various kind of philosophical considerations have been offered in favor of democracy. By some accounts, democracy realizes some intrinsic value, such as equality or collective autonomy. According to other views, democracy’s value is more instrumental: it tends to produce or promote certain social goods like stability, prosperity, and peace. However, a longstanding alternative tradition locates democracy’s value in its capacity to make social and moral progress. Here, the idea isn’t so much that democracy produces an already-identified social good, but rather that democracy fosters a kind of social and moral discovery.
In Experiments in Living Together: How Democracy Drives Social Progress (Oxford UP, 2024), Michael Fuerstein draws on normative and empirical considerations in proposing a systematic account of democracy’s capacity to foster progress.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>362</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3d37440-c3cc-11ef-99f9-17f3cb17ae6a</guid>
      <title>Eric Storm, &quot;Nationalism: A World History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The current rise of nationalism across the globe is a reminder that we are not, after all, living in a borderless world of virtual connectivity. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233093"><em>Nationalism: A World History</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2024), historian Eric Storm sheds light on contemporary nationalist movements by exploring the global evolution of nationalism, beginning with the rise of the nation-state in the eighteenth century through the revival of nationalist ideas in the present day. Storm traces the emergence of the unitary nation-state--which brought citizenship rights to some while excluding a multitude of "others"--and the pervasive spread of nationalist ideas through politics and culture.</p><p>Storm shows how nationalism influences the arts and humanities, mapping its dissemination through newspapers, television, and social media. Sports and tourism, too, have helped fashion a world of discrete nations, each with its own character, heroes, and highlights. Nationalism saturates the physical environment, not only in the form of national museums and patriotic statues but also in efforts to preserve cultural heritage, create national parks, invent ethnic dishes and beverages, promote traditional building practices, and cultivate native plants. Nationalism has even been used for selling cars, furniture, and fashion.</p><p>By tracing these tendencies across countries, Storm shows that nationalism's watershed moments were global. He argues that the rise of new nation-states was largely determined by shifts in the international context, that the relationships between nation-states and their citizens largely developed according to global patterns, and that worldwide intellectual trends influenced the nationalization of both culture and environment. Over the centuries, nationalism has transformed both geopolitics and the everyday life of ordinary people.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current rise of nationalism across the globe is a reminder that we are not, after all, living in a borderless world of virtual connectivity. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691233093"><em>Nationalism: A World History</em></a><em> </em>(Princeton UP, 2024), historian Eric Storm sheds light on contemporary nationalist movements by exploring the global evolution of nationalism, beginning with the rise of the nation-state in the eighteenth century through the revival of nationalist ideas in the present day. Storm traces the emergence of the unitary nation-state--which brought citizenship rights to some while excluding a multitude of "others"--and the pervasive spread of nationalist ideas through politics and culture.</p><p>Storm shows how nationalism influences the arts and humanities, mapping its dissemination through newspapers, television, and social media. Sports and tourism, too, have helped fashion a world of discrete nations, each with its own character, heroes, and highlights. Nationalism saturates the physical environment, not only in the form of national museums and patriotic statues but also in efforts to preserve cultural heritage, create national parks, invent ethnic dishes and beverages, promote traditional building practices, and cultivate native plants. Nationalism has even been used for selling cars, furniture, and fashion.</p><p>By tracing these tendencies across countries, Storm shows that nationalism's watershed moments were global. He argues that the rise of new nation-states was largely determined by shifts in the international context, that the relationships between nation-states and their citizens largely developed according to global patterns, and that worldwide intellectual trends influenced the nationalization of both culture and environment. Over the centuries, nationalism has transformed both geopolitics and the everyday life of ordinary people.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46981639" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/05a4c9ae-614d-4e75-b0ff-db11dee04799/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=05a4c9ae-614d-4e75-b0ff-db11dee04799&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric Storm, &quot;Nationalism: A World History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The current rise of nationalism across the globe is a reminder that we are not, after all, living in a borderless world of virtual connectivity. In Nationalism: A World History (Princeton UP, 2024), historian Eric Storm sheds light on contemporary nationalist movements by exploring the global evolution of nationalism, beginning with the rise of the nation-state in the eighteenth century through the revival of nationalist ideas in the present day. Storm traces the emergence of the unitary nation-state--which brought citizenship rights to some while excluding a multitude of &quot;others&quot;--and the pervasive spread of nationalist ideas through politics and culture.
Storm shows how nationalism influences the arts and humanities, mapping its dissemination through newspapers, television, and social media. Sports and tourism, too, have helped fashion a world of discrete nations, each with its own character, heroes, and highlights. Nationalism saturates the physical environment, not only in the form of national museums and patriotic statues but also in efforts to preserve cultural heritage, create national parks, invent ethnic dishes and beverages, promote traditional building practices, and cultivate native plants. Nationalism has even been used for selling cars, furniture, and fashion.
By tracing these tendencies across countries, Storm shows that nationalism&apos;s watershed moments were global. He argues that the rise of new nation-states was largely determined by shifts in the international context, that the relationships between nation-states and their citizens largely developed according to global patterns, and that worldwide intellectual trends influenced the nationalization of both culture and environment. Over the centuries, nationalism has transformed both geopolitics and the everyday life of ordinary people.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The current rise of nationalism across the globe is a reminder that we are not, after all, living in a borderless world of virtual connectivity. In Nationalism: A World History (Princeton UP, 2024), historian Eric Storm sheds light on contemporary nationalist movements by exploring the global evolution of nationalism, beginning with the rise of the nation-state in the eighteenth century through the revival of nationalist ideas in the present day. Storm traces the emergence of the unitary nation-state--which brought citizenship rights to some while excluding a multitude of &quot;others&quot;--and the pervasive spread of nationalist ideas through politics and culture.
Storm shows how nationalism influences the arts and humanities, mapping its dissemination through newspapers, television, and social media. Sports and tourism, too, have helped fashion a world of discrete nations, each with its own character, heroes, and highlights. Nationalism saturates the physical environment, not only in the form of national museums and patriotic statues but also in efforts to preserve cultural heritage, create national parks, invent ethnic dishes and beverages, promote traditional building practices, and cultivate native plants. Nationalism has even been used for selling cars, furniture, and fashion.
By tracing these tendencies across countries, Storm shows that nationalism&apos;s watershed moments were global. He argues that the rise of new nation-states was largely determined by shifts in the international context, that the relationships between nation-states and their citizens largely developed according to global patterns, and that worldwide intellectual trends influenced the nationalization of both culture and environment. Over the centuries, nationalism has transformed both geopolitics and the everyday life of ordinary people.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3aa1f38c-c556-11ef-9f34-6f4262c185dd</guid>
      <title>Mike Madrid, &quot;The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties' notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.</p><p>Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668015261"><em>The Latino Century: How America's Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?</p><p>By answering these questions, <em>The Latino Century</em> explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties' notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.</p><p>Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668015261"><em>The Latino Century: How America's Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy</em></a><em> </em>(Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?</p><p>By answering these questions, <em>The Latino Century</em> explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60560103" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/40d4d2cf-0460-4f0b-b82c-7f767e2339cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=40d4d2cf-0460-4f0b-b82c-7f767e2339cc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mike Madrid, &quot;The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties&apos; notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.
Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy (Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?
By answering these questions, The Latino Century explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2020, Latinos became the second largest ethnic voting group in the country. They make up the largest plurality of residents in the most populous states in the union, as well as the fastest segment of the most important swing states in the US Electoral College. Fitting neither the stereotype of the aggrieved minority voter nor the traditional assimilating immigrant group, Latinos are challenging both political parties&apos; notions of race, religious beliefs, economic success, and the American dream. Given their exploding numbers—and their growing ability to determine the fate of local, state, and national elections—you’d think the two major political parties would understand Latino voters. After all, their emergence on the national scene is not a new phenomenon. But they still don’t.
Republicans, not because of their best efforts but rather despite them, are just beginning to see a movement of Latinos toward the GOP. Democrats, for the moment, still win a commanding share of the Latino vote, but that share is dwindling fast. Now, in The Latino Century: How America&apos;s Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy (Simon and Schuster, 2024), veteran political consultant Mike Madrid uses thirty years of research and campaign experience at some of the highest levels on both sides of the aisle to address what might be the most critical questions of our time: Will the rise of Latino voters continue to foment the hyper-partisan and explosive tribalism of our age or will they usher in a new pluralism that advances the arc of social progress? How and why are both political parties so uniquely unprepared for the coming wave of Latino votes? And what must each party do to win those votes?
By answering these questions, The Latino Century explores the true meaning of America at a time of rapid cultural change, the founding principles of self-government and individual responsibility, and one man’s journey through a political party that has turned itself inside out.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">893c7718-c206-11ef-ba5c-1b4094ba24d9</guid>
      <title>Mukulika Banerjee, &quot;Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197601877"><em>Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2021) by Dr. Mukulika Banerjee offers a groundbreaking rethinking of democracy, moving beyond its institutional frameworks to focus on its lived, everyday dimensions. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the villages of Madanpur and Chishti in India, the book examines how agrarian communities cultivate democratic values—solidarity, reciprocity, and ethical citizenship—through practices embedded in their daily lives. Dr. Banerjee challenges conventional notions of democracy as confined to elections and state institutions, instead presenting it as a process deeply rooted in cultural-social practices and values. She highlights how rural communities, through cooperation in agriculture, rituals, festivals, and even moments of conflict and repair, create and sustain the democratic spirit. In doing so, the book underscores the resilience of these practices, even as procedural democracy faces erosion under broader political and economic pressures. At its core, <em>Cultivating Democracy</em> compels us to reimagine democracy not as an abstract ideal but as a lived and ongoing project shaped by the rhythms of everyday life. Through its rich ethnographic detail and theoretical insight, the book offers profound lessons on the fragility and strength of democracy, making it both a deeply scholarly and urgently relevant work.</p><p><a href="https://x.com/angryplasticgod">Rounak Bose</a> is a doctoral student in History at the University of Delaware. His research explores the intersections of caste, religiosities, performances, sacred geographies, and the state, as informing/informed by colonial and postcolonial mobilities and circulatory regimes across South Asia and Indian Ocean networks. Besides these specific research interests, his disciplinary interests revolve across anthropology, linguistics, literature, and the digital humanities. When not reading or writing in the university library, Rounak can be found running along Newark's trails and petting the canines he meets along the way.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197601877"><em>Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2021) by Dr. Mukulika Banerjee offers a groundbreaking rethinking of democracy, moving beyond its institutional frameworks to focus on its lived, everyday dimensions. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the villages of Madanpur and Chishti in India, the book examines how agrarian communities cultivate democratic values—solidarity, reciprocity, and ethical citizenship—through practices embedded in their daily lives. Dr. Banerjee challenges conventional notions of democracy as confined to elections and state institutions, instead presenting it as a process deeply rooted in cultural-social practices and values. She highlights how rural communities, through cooperation in agriculture, rituals, festivals, and even moments of conflict and repair, create and sustain the democratic spirit. In doing so, the book underscores the resilience of these practices, even as procedural democracy faces erosion under broader political and economic pressures. At its core, <em>Cultivating Democracy</em> compels us to reimagine democracy not as an abstract ideal but as a lived and ongoing project shaped by the rhythms of everyday life. Through its rich ethnographic detail and theoretical insight, the book offers profound lessons on the fragility and strength of democracy, making it both a deeply scholarly and urgently relevant work.</p><p><a href="https://x.com/angryplasticgod">Rounak Bose</a> is a doctoral student in History at the University of Delaware. His research explores the intersections of caste, religiosities, performances, sacred geographies, and the state, as informing/informed by colonial and postcolonial mobilities and circulatory regimes across South Asia and Indian Ocean networks. Besides these specific research interests, his disciplinary interests revolve across anthropology, linguistics, literature, and the digital humanities. When not reading or writing in the university library, Rounak can be found running along Newark's trails and petting the canines he meets along the way.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57534564" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/41a10404-c577-4d69-a1ef-2ac64e7ac9cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=41a10404-c577-4d69-a1ef-2ac64e7ac9cd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Mukulika Banerjee, &quot;Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India (Oxford UP, 2021) by Dr. Mukulika Banerjee offers a groundbreaking rethinking of democracy, moving beyond its institutional frameworks to focus on its lived, everyday dimensions. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the villages of Madanpur and Chishti in India, the book examines how agrarian communities cultivate democratic values—solidarity, reciprocity, and ethical citizenship—through practices embedded in their daily lives. Dr. Banerjee challenges conventional notions of democracy as confined to elections and state institutions, instead presenting it as a process deeply rooted in cultural-social practices and values. She highlights how rural communities, through cooperation in agriculture, rituals, festivals, and even moments of conflict and repair, create and sustain the democratic spirit. In doing so, the book underscores the resilience of these practices, even as procedural democracy faces erosion under broader political and economic pressures. At its core, Cultivating Democracy compels us to reimagine democracy not as an abstract ideal but as a lived and ongoing project shaped by the rhythms of everyday life. Through its rich ethnographic detail and theoretical insight, the book offers profound lessons on the fragility and strength of democracy, making it both a deeply scholarly and urgently relevant work.
Rounak Bose is a doctoral student in History at the University of Delaware. His research explores the intersections of caste, religiosities, performances, sacred geographies, and the state, as informing/informed by colonial and postcolonial mobilities and circulatory regimes across South Asia and Indian Ocean networks. Besides these specific research interests, his disciplinary interests revolve across anthropology, linguistics, literature, and the digital humanities. When not reading or writing in the university library, Rounak can be found running along Newark&apos;s trails and petting the canines he meets along the way.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cultivating Democracy: Politics and Citizenship in Agrarian India (Oxford UP, 2021) by Dr. Mukulika Banerjee offers a groundbreaking rethinking of democracy, moving beyond its institutional frameworks to focus on its lived, everyday dimensions. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the villages of Madanpur and Chishti in India, the book examines how agrarian communities cultivate democratic values—solidarity, reciprocity, and ethical citizenship—through practices embedded in their daily lives. Dr. Banerjee challenges conventional notions of democracy as confined to elections and state institutions, instead presenting it as a process deeply rooted in cultural-social practices and values. She highlights how rural communities, through cooperation in agriculture, rituals, festivals, and even moments of conflict and repair, create and sustain the democratic spirit. In doing so, the book underscores the resilience of these practices, even as procedural democracy faces erosion under broader political and economic pressures. At its core, Cultivating Democracy compels us to reimagine democracy not as an abstract ideal but as a lived and ongoing project shaped by the rhythms of everyday life. Through its rich ethnographic detail and theoretical insight, the book offers profound lessons on the fragility and strength of democracy, making it both a deeply scholarly and urgently relevant work.
Rounak Bose is a doctoral student in History at the University of Delaware. His research explores the intersections of caste, religiosities, performances, sacred geographies, and the state, as informing/informed by colonial and postcolonial mobilities and circulatory regimes across South Asia and Indian Ocean networks. Besides these specific research interests, his disciplinary interests revolve across anthropology, linguistics, literature, and the digital humanities. When not reading or writing in the university library, Rounak can be found running along Newark&apos;s trails and petting the canines he meets along the way.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>339</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e908cd18-c08f-11ef-a0da-9f232876bc5b</guid>
      <title>China and the Indo-Pacific: Policies and Global Implications</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has the Indo-Pacific become the pre-eminent theatre of global geo-strategic and geo-economic competition? What is the interest and role of different actors such as China, Russia, the US, the EU and NATO in the region? How are small island developing states such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, and Vanuatu affected by challenges in the new security environment?</p><p>In this episode, Professor <a href="https://www.ace.lu.se/marina-svensson">Marina Svensson</a> talks to Professor <a href="https://profiles.canterbury.ac.nz/Anne-Marie-Brady">Anne-Marie Brady</a> about her research on China’s strategic thinking and economic and political influence in the Indo-Pacific, with a particular focus on the small island states. The need for collaboration among like-minded partners in the region and other actors such as the EU is also addressed. This episode was produced and edited by Lisa Sihvonen and Tabita Rosendal.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.canterbury.ac.nz/Anne-Marie-Brady">Anne-Marie Brady</a> is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Professor Brady is a specialist on Chinese politics, polar politics, China-Pacific politics, and New Zealand foreign policy. She is founding and executive editor of <em>The Polar Journal</em>. She has published ten books and over fifty academic papers and also written op eds for the <em>New York Times, The Guardian, The Australian, Sydney Morning Herald, The Financial Times</em>, among others.</p><p><strong>Further readings:</strong></p><p>Anne-Marie Brady’s work on the indo-pacific:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia">https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/">https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/">https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/">https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/</a></li>
<li>The EU strategy: <a href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en</a>
</li>
<li>On NATO strategy: <a href="https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations">https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations</a>
</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>This podcast was produced as part of EUVIP: <a href="https://www.euvip-project.com/">The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region</a>, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).</p><p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p><ul>
<li>· Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
<li>· Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
<li>· Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
<li>· Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
<li>· Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
<li>· Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has the Indo-Pacific become the pre-eminent theatre of global geo-strategic and geo-economic competition? What is the interest and role of different actors such as China, Russia, the US, the EU and NATO in the region? How are small island developing states such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, and Vanuatu affected by challenges in the new security environment?</p><p>In this episode, Professor <a href="https://www.ace.lu.se/marina-svensson">Marina Svensson</a> talks to Professor <a href="https://profiles.canterbury.ac.nz/Anne-Marie-Brady">Anne-Marie Brady</a> about her research on China’s strategic thinking and economic and political influence in the Indo-Pacific, with a particular focus on the small island states. The need for collaboration among like-minded partners in the region and other actors such as the EU is also addressed. This episode was produced and edited by Lisa Sihvonen and Tabita Rosendal.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.canterbury.ac.nz/Anne-Marie-Brady">Anne-Marie Brady</a> is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Professor Brady is a specialist on Chinese politics, polar politics, China-Pacific politics, and New Zealand foreign policy. She is founding and executive editor of <em>The Polar Journal</em>. She has published ten books and over fifty academic papers and also written op eds for the <em>New York Times, The Guardian, The Australian, Sydney Morning Herald, The Financial Times</em>, among others.</p><p><strong>Further readings:</strong></p><p>Anne-Marie Brady’s work on the indo-pacific:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia">https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/">https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/">https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/">https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/</a></li>
<li>The EU strategy: <a href="https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en">https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en</a>
</li>
<li>On NATO strategy: <a href="https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations">https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations</a>
</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>This podcast was produced as part of EUVIP: <a href="https://www.euvip-project.com/">The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region</a>, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).</p><p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p><ul>
<li>· Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
<li>· Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
<li>· Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
<li>· Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
<li>· Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
<li>· Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28634113" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/012d7d03-6d3a-4a53-9960-807cf1bd4438/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=012d7d03-6d3a-4a53-9960-807cf1bd4438&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>China and the Indo-Pacific: Policies and Global Implications</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why has the Indo-Pacific become the pre-eminent theatre of global geo-strategic and geo-economic competition? What is the interest and role of different actors such as China, Russia, the US, the EU and NATO in the region? How are small island developing states such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, and Vanuatu affected by challenges in the new security environment?
In this episode, Professor Marina Svensson talks to Professor Anne-Marie Brady about her research on China’s strategic thinking and economic and political influence in the Indo-Pacific, with a particular focus on the small island states. The need for collaboration among like-minded partners in the region and other actors such as the EU is also addressed. This episode was produced and edited by Lisa Sihvonen and Tabita Rosendal.
Anne-Marie Brady is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Professor Brady is a specialist on Chinese politics, polar politics, China-Pacific politics, and New Zealand foreign policy. She is founding and executive editor of The Polar Journal. She has published ten books and over fifty academic papers and also written op eds for the New York Times, The Guardian, The Australian, Sydney Morning Herald, The Financial Times, among others.
Further readings:
Anne-Marie Brady’s work on the indo-pacific:

https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia

https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/

The EU strategy: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en


On NATO strategy: https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations



This podcast was produced as part of EUVIP: The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:

· Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)

· Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)

· Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

· Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)

· Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)

· Norwegian Network for Asian Studies


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why has the Indo-Pacific become the pre-eminent theatre of global geo-strategic and geo-economic competition? What is the interest and role of different actors such as China, Russia, the US, the EU and NATO in the region? How are small island developing states such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, and Vanuatu affected by challenges in the new security environment?
In this episode, Professor Marina Svensson talks to Professor Anne-Marie Brady about her research on China’s strategic thinking and economic and political influence in the Indo-Pacific, with a particular focus on the small island states. The need for collaboration among like-minded partners in the region and other actors such as the EU is also addressed. This episode was produced and edited by Lisa Sihvonen and Tabita Rosendal.
Anne-Marie Brady is a professor of political science and international relations at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Professor Brady is a specialist on Chinese politics, polar politics, China-Pacific politics, and New Zealand foreign policy. She is founding and executive editor of The Polar Journal. She has published ten books and over fifty academic papers and also written op eds for the New York Times, The Guardian, The Australian, Sydney Morning Herald, The Financial Times, among others.
Further readings:
Anne-Marie Brady’s work on the indo-pacific:

https://www.aspi.org.au/report/when-china-knocks-door-new-caledonia

https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/facing-up-to-chinas-hybrid-warfare-in-the-pacific/

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/new-caledonia-crisis-a-turning-point-in-pacific-security/

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/china-in-the-pacific-from-friendship-to-strategically-placed-ports-and-airfields/

The EU strategy: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-indo-pacific-strategy_en


On NATO strategy: https://www.cfr.org/blog/natos-indo-pacific-aspirations



This podcast was produced as part of EUVIP: The EU in the Volatile Indo-Pacific Region, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe coordination and support action 10107906 (HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03).
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:

· Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)

· Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)

· Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)

· Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)

· Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)

· Norwegian Network for Asian Studies


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c6b8292-c07f-11ef-877e-cb516c7bd8fb</guid>
      <title>Enze Han, &quot;The Ripple Effect: China&apos;s Complex Presence in Southeast Asia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many studies of China's relations with and influence on Southeast Asia tend to focus on how Beijing has used its power asymmetry to achieve regional influence. Yet, scholars and pundits often fail to appreciate the complexity of the contemporary Chinese state and society, and just how fragmented, decentralized, and internationalized China is today.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197696590"><em>The Ripple Effect: China's Complex Presence in Southeast Asia</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024), Enze Han argues that a focus on the Chinese state alone is not sufficient for a comprehensive understanding of China's influence in Southeast Asia. Instead, we must look beyond the Chinese state, to non-state actors from China, such as private businesses and Chinese migrants. These actors affect people's perception of China in a variety of ways, and they often have wide-ranging as well as long-lasting effects on bilateral relations. Looking beyond the Chinese state's intentional influence reveals many situations that result in unanticipated changes in Southeast Asia. Han proposes that to understand this increasingly globalized China, we need more conceptual flexibility regarding which Chinese actors are important to China's relations, and how they wield this influence, whether intentional or not.</p><p><em>The Ripple Effect</em> makes the case that to understand China's relationship with Southeast Asia, it is necessary to move beyond a narrow fixation on the Chinese state by scrutinizing the ordinary manifestations of China's presence in the region and recognizing the multifaceted web of actors and their effects on the dynamics between the two regions.</p><p><a href="https://ppa.hku.hk/f/enzehan">Enze Han</a> is an associate professor of politics at the University of Hong Kong. He works on the international relations of East Asia, Southeast Asian politics and China-Southeast Asia relations. This is his third single-authored book from Oxford University Press.</p><p>Enze is in conversation with Duncan McCargo, President's Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University and one of the hosts on New Books in Southeast Asian Studies. Duncan's recent co-authored article on the relationship between Thai politics and attitudes to China, mentioned during the podcast, may be found <a href="https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article-abstract/64/5/877/203036/All-About-China-Mis-Reading-Domestic-Politics">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many studies of China's relations with and influence on Southeast Asia tend to focus on how Beijing has used its power asymmetry to achieve regional influence. Yet, scholars and pundits often fail to appreciate the complexity of the contemporary Chinese state and society, and just how fragmented, decentralized, and internationalized China is today.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197696590"><em>The Ripple Effect: China's Complex Presence in Southeast Asia</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024), Enze Han argues that a focus on the Chinese state alone is not sufficient for a comprehensive understanding of China's influence in Southeast Asia. Instead, we must look beyond the Chinese state, to non-state actors from China, such as private businesses and Chinese migrants. These actors affect people's perception of China in a variety of ways, and they often have wide-ranging as well as long-lasting effects on bilateral relations. Looking beyond the Chinese state's intentional influence reveals many situations that result in unanticipated changes in Southeast Asia. Han proposes that to understand this increasingly globalized China, we need more conceptual flexibility regarding which Chinese actors are important to China's relations, and how they wield this influence, whether intentional or not.</p><p><em>The Ripple Effect</em> makes the case that to understand China's relationship with Southeast Asia, it is necessary to move beyond a narrow fixation on the Chinese state by scrutinizing the ordinary manifestations of China's presence in the region and recognizing the multifaceted web of actors and their effects on the dynamics between the two regions.</p><p><a href="https://ppa.hku.hk/f/enzehan">Enze Han</a> is an associate professor of politics at the University of Hong Kong. He works on the international relations of East Asia, Southeast Asian politics and China-Southeast Asia relations. This is his third single-authored book from Oxford University Press.</p><p>Enze is in conversation with Duncan McCargo, President's Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University and one of the hosts on New Books in Southeast Asian Studies. Duncan's recent co-authored article on the relationship between Thai politics and attitudes to China, mentioned during the podcast, may be found <a href="https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article-abstract/64/5/877/203036/All-About-China-Mis-Reading-Domestic-Politics">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25740283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/de83a6ca-eace-4519-88ce-2c5dd3e488d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=de83a6ca-eace-4519-88ce-2c5dd3e488d3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Enze Han, &quot;The Ripple Effect: China&apos;s Complex Presence in Southeast Asia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many studies of China&apos;s relations with and influence on Southeast Asia tend to focus on how Beijing has used its power asymmetry to achieve regional influence. Yet, scholars and pundits often fail to appreciate the complexity of the contemporary Chinese state and society, and just how fragmented, decentralized, and internationalized China is today.
In The Ripple Effect: China&apos;s Complex Presence in Southeast Asia (Oxford UP, 2024), Enze Han argues that a focus on the Chinese state alone is not sufficient for a comprehensive understanding of China&apos;s influence in Southeast Asia. Instead, we must look beyond the Chinese state, to non-state actors from China, such as private businesses and Chinese migrants. These actors affect people&apos;s perception of China in a variety of ways, and they often have wide-ranging as well as long-lasting effects on bilateral relations. Looking beyond the Chinese state&apos;s intentional influence reveals many situations that result in unanticipated changes in Southeast Asia. Han proposes that to understand this increasingly globalized China, we need more conceptual flexibility regarding which Chinese actors are important to China&apos;s relations, and how they wield this influence, whether intentional or not.
The Ripple Effect makes the case that to understand China&apos;s relationship with Southeast Asia, it is necessary to move beyond a narrow fixation on the Chinese state by scrutinizing the ordinary manifestations of China&apos;s presence in the region and recognizing the multifaceted web of actors and their effects on the dynamics between the two regions.
Enze Han is an associate professor of politics at the University of Hong Kong. He works on the international relations of East Asia, Southeast Asian politics and China-Southeast Asia relations. This is his third single-authored book from Oxford University Press.
Enze is in conversation with Duncan McCargo, President&apos;s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University and one of the hosts on New Books in Southeast Asian Studies. Duncan&apos;s recent co-authored article on the relationship between Thai politics and attitudes to China, mentioned during the podcast, may be found here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many studies of China&apos;s relations with and influence on Southeast Asia tend to focus on how Beijing has used its power asymmetry to achieve regional influence. Yet, scholars and pundits often fail to appreciate the complexity of the contemporary Chinese state and society, and just how fragmented, decentralized, and internationalized China is today.
In The Ripple Effect: China&apos;s Complex Presence in Southeast Asia (Oxford UP, 2024), Enze Han argues that a focus on the Chinese state alone is not sufficient for a comprehensive understanding of China&apos;s influence in Southeast Asia. Instead, we must look beyond the Chinese state, to non-state actors from China, such as private businesses and Chinese migrants. These actors affect people&apos;s perception of China in a variety of ways, and they often have wide-ranging as well as long-lasting effects on bilateral relations. Looking beyond the Chinese state&apos;s intentional influence reveals many situations that result in unanticipated changes in Southeast Asia. Han proposes that to understand this increasingly globalized China, we need more conceptual flexibility regarding which Chinese actors are important to China&apos;s relations, and how they wield this influence, whether intentional or not.
The Ripple Effect makes the case that to understand China&apos;s relationship with Southeast Asia, it is necessary to move beyond a narrow fixation on the Chinese state by scrutinizing the ordinary manifestations of China&apos;s presence in the region and recognizing the multifaceted web of actors and their effects on the dynamics between the two regions.
Enze Han is an associate professor of politics at the University of Hong Kong. He works on the international relations of East Asia, Southeast Asian politics and China-Southeast Asia relations. This is his third single-authored book from Oxford University Press.
Enze is in conversation with Duncan McCargo, President&apos;s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University and one of the hosts on New Books in Southeast Asian Studies. Duncan&apos;s recent co-authored article on the relationship between Thai politics and attitudes to China, mentioned during the podcast, may be found here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>153</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3b0bfddc-c078-11ef-a5df-6f7f86b3c5b1</guid>
      <title>Leah Downey, &quot;Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.</p><p>The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691244433"><em>Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters </em></a>(Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.</p><p>Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.</p><p>The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691244433"><em>Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters </em></a>(Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.</p><p>Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36815051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/dc102a5d-1001-4080-940f-fc91747eb9bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=dc102a5d-1001-4080-940f-fc91747eb9bf&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Leah Downey, &quot;Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.
The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. 
In Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters (Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.
Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.
The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials. 
In Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters (Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.
Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2053a264-bfd4-11ef-838c-87d265dabde8</guid>
      <title>Amélie Barras, &quot;Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503610590"><em>Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations</em></a><em> </em>(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Amélie Barras explores why and how Christian nongovernmental organizations conduct human rights work at the United Nations. The book interrogates the idea that the secular and the religious are distinct categories, and more specifically that human rights, understood as secular, can be neatly distinguished from religion. It argues that Christianity is deeply entangled in the texture of the United Nations and shapes the methods and areas of work of Christian NGOs.</p><p>To capture these entanglements, Dr. Barras analyzes—through interviews, ethnography, and document and archive analysis—the everyday human rights work of Christian NGOs at the United Nations Human Rights Council. She documents how these NGOs are involved in a constant work of double translation: they translate their human rights work into a religious language to make it relevant to their on-the-ground membership, but they also reframe the concerns of their membership in human rights terms to make them audible to UN actors. <em>Faith in Rights</em> is a crucial new evaluation of how religion informs Christian nongovernmental organizations' understandings of human rights and their methods of work, as well as how being engaged in human rights work influences these organizations' own religious identity and practice.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503610590"><em>Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations</em></a><em> </em>(Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Amélie Barras explores why and how Christian nongovernmental organizations conduct human rights work at the United Nations. The book interrogates the idea that the secular and the religious are distinct categories, and more specifically that human rights, understood as secular, can be neatly distinguished from religion. It argues that Christianity is deeply entangled in the texture of the United Nations and shapes the methods and areas of work of Christian NGOs.</p><p>To capture these entanglements, Dr. Barras analyzes—through interviews, ethnography, and document and archive analysis—the everyday human rights work of Christian NGOs at the United Nations Human Rights Council. She documents how these NGOs are involved in a constant work of double translation: they translate their human rights work into a religious language to make it relevant to their on-the-ground membership, but they also reframe the concerns of their membership in human rights terms to make them audible to UN actors. <em>Faith in Rights</em> is a crucial new evaluation of how religion informs Christian nongovernmental organizations' understandings of human rights and their methods of work, as well as how being engaged in human rights work influences these organizations' own religious identity and practice.</p><p><br /></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51861753" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/fc64da0b-4087-4e5f-8140-2ad957968a46/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=fc64da0b-4087-4e5f-8140-2ad957968a46&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amélie Barras, &quot;Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Amélie Barras explores why and how Christian nongovernmental organizations conduct human rights work at the United Nations. The book interrogates the idea that the secular and the religious are distinct categories, and more specifically that human rights, understood as secular, can be neatly distinguished from religion. It argues that Christianity is deeply entangled in the texture of the United Nations and shapes the methods and areas of work of Christian NGOs.
To capture these entanglements, Dr. Barras analyzes—through interviews, ethnography, and document and archive analysis—the everyday human rights work of Christian NGOs at the United Nations Human Rights Council. She documents how these NGOs are involved in a constant work of double translation: they translate their human rights work into a religious language to make it relevant to their on-the-ground membership, but they also reframe the concerns of their membership in human rights terms to make them audible to UN actors. Faith in Rights is a crucial new evaluation of how religion informs Christian nongovernmental organizations&apos; understandings of human rights and their methods of work, as well as how being engaged in human rights work influences these organizations&apos; own religious identity and practice.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Faith in Rights: Christian-Inspired NGOs at Work in the United Nations (Stanford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Amélie Barras explores why and how Christian nongovernmental organizations conduct human rights work at the United Nations. The book interrogates the idea that the secular and the religious are distinct categories, and more specifically that human rights, understood as secular, can be neatly distinguished from religion. It argues that Christianity is deeply entangled in the texture of the United Nations and shapes the methods and areas of work of Christian NGOs.
To capture these entanglements, Dr. Barras analyzes—through interviews, ethnography, and document and archive analysis—the everyday human rights work of Christian NGOs at the United Nations Human Rights Council. She documents how these NGOs are involved in a constant work of double translation: they translate their human rights work into a religious language to make it relevant to their on-the-ground membership, but they also reframe the concerns of their membership in human rights terms to make them audible to UN actors. Faith in Rights is a crucial new evaluation of how religion informs Christian nongovernmental organizations&apos; understandings of human rights and their methods of work, as well as how being engaged in human rights work influences these organizations&apos; own religious identity and practice.

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>290</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e477fda2-b4c1-11ef-9630-175cb97fba26</guid>
      <title>Josh Spodek, &quot;Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems&quot; (Amplify, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Josh Spodek disconnected his Manhattan apartment from the electric grid in May 2022. Over time, he has reduced his consumption and contribution to landfill. His new book argues that sustainability is not a sacrifice but an upgrade that can bring joy and increased quality of life. The book traces his journey to live more sustainably in a Manhattan apartment but also offers an argument about politics. He asks what narratives are <em>already</em> available to frame environmental degradation deploying a wide range of sources from John Locke to indigenous thinkers. Spodek, doubtful about governments or corporations leading on the environment, favors bottom up change focused on the actions and leadership of individuals. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798891380691"><em>Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems </em></a>(Amplify, 2025) explores the importance of culture and habit. How did the United States and other nations adopt polluting and passive habits? What can be done to reverse these cultural norms? The solutions range from a WWII level mobilization to a Constitutional Amendment.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuaspodek">Josh Spodek</a> earned a PhD in Physics and an MBA in entrepreneurial leadership from Columbia University. He is a four-time TEDx speaker author (<em>Initiative</em> and <em>Leadership Step by Step</em>), and leadership coach. He hosts the <em>This Sustainable Life</em> podcast. He has been an Adjunct Professor at New York University. A 2024 recent <em>New York Times</em> article highlights his life changes in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/05/nyregion/joshua-spodek-eco-influencer.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Xk4.4tmO.EwXZEmY4sa0F&amp;smid=em-share">Who Says You Can’t Live Off the Grid in Manhattan?</a></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>NOAA’s interactive <a href="https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/">sea level rise map</a>. NOAA is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</li>
<li>Eric Williams’s <a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469663685/capitalism-and-slavery-third-edition/"><em>Capitalism &amp; Slavery</em></a> (3rd edition, University of North Carolina Press, 1994)</li>
<li>Works of <a href="https://stevenpinker.com/publications/books">Steven Pinker</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://joshuaspodek.com/">Spodek Method</a></li>
<li>Susan’s research on <a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1057/pol.2010.28">Locke’s Enough and as Good</a> from <em>Perspectives on Politics</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh Spodek disconnected his Manhattan apartment from the electric grid in May 2022. Over time, he has reduced his consumption and contribution to landfill. His new book argues that sustainability is not a sacrifice but an upgrade that can bring joy and increased quality of life. The book traces his journey to live more sustainably in a Manhattan apartment but also offers an argument about politics. He asks what narratives are <em>already</em> available to frame environmental degradation deploying a wide range of sources from John Locke to indigenous thinkers. Spodek, doubtful about governments or corporations leading on the environment, favors bottom up change focused on the actions and leadership of individuals. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798891380691"><em>Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems </em></a>(Amplify, 2025) explores the importance of culture and habit. How did the United States and other nations adopt polluting and passive habits? What can be done to reverse these cultural norms? The solutions range from a WWII level mobilization to a Constitutional Amendment.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuaspodek">Josh Spodek</a> earned a PhD in Physics and an MBA in entrepreneurial leadership from Columbia University. He is a four-time TEDx speaker author (<em>Initiative</em> and <em>Leadership Step by Step</em>), and leadership coach. He hosts the <em>This Sustainable Life</em> podcast. He has been an Adjunct Professor at New York University. A 2024 recent <em>New York Times</em> article highlights his life changes in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/05/nyregion/joshua-spodek-eco-influencer.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Xk4.4tmO.EwXZEmY4sa0F&amp;smid=em-share">Who Says You Can’t Live Off the Grid in Manhattan?</a></p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>NOAA’s interactive <a href="https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/">sea level rise map</a>. NOAA is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</li>
<li>Eric Williams’s <a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469663685/capitalism-and-slavery-third-edition/"><em>Capitalism &amp; Slavery</em></a> (3rd edition, University of North Carolina Press, 1994)</li>
<li>Works of <a href="https://stevenpinker.com/publications/books">Steven Pinker</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://joshuaspodek.com/">Spodek Method</a></li>
<li>Susan’s research on <a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1057/pol.2010.28">Locke’s Enough and as Good</a> from <em>Perspectives on Politics</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55925450" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/83ad21a0-42d0-40bf-84c1-22a8fee0eaaa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=83ad21a0-42d0-40bf-84c1-22a8fee0eaaa&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Josh Spodek, &quot;Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems&quot; (Amplify, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Josh Spodek disconnected his Manhattan apartment from the electric grid in May 2022. Over time, he has reduced his consumption and contribution to landfill. His new book argues that sustainability is not a sacrifice but an upgrade that can bring joy and increased quality of life. The book traces his journey to live more sustainably in a Manhattan apartment but also offers an argument about politics. He asks what narratives are already available to frame environmental degradation deploying a wide range of sources from John Locke to indigenous thinkers. Spodek, doubtful about governments or corporations leading on the environment, favors bottom up change focused on the actions and leadership of individuals. Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems (Amplify, 2025) explores the importance of culture and habit. How did the United States and other nations adopt polluting and passive habits? What can be done to reverse these cultural norms? The solutions range from a WWII level mobilization to a Constitutional Amendment.
Dr. Josh Spodek earned a PhD in Physics and an MBA in entrepreneurial leadership from Columbia University. He is a four-time TEDx speaker author (Initiative and Leadership Step by Step), and leadership coach. He hosts the This Sustainable Life podcast. He has been an Adjunct Professor at New York University. A 2024 recent New York Times article highlights his life changes in Who Says You Can’t Live Off the Grid in Manhattan?
Mentioned:

NOAA’s interactive sea level rise map. NOAA is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Eric Williams’s Capitalism &amp; Slavery (3rd edition, University of North Carolina Press, 1994)

Works of Steven Pinker


Spodek Method

Susan’s research on Locke’s Enough and as Good from Perspectives on Politics



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Josh Spodek disconnected his Manhattan apartment from the electric grid in May 2022. Over time, he has reduced his consumption and contribution to landfill. His new book argues that sustainability is not a sacrifice but an upgrade that can bring joy and increased quality of life. The book traces his journey to live more sustainably in a Manhattan apartment but also offers an argument about politics. He asks what narratives are already available to frame environmental degradation deploying a wide range of sources from John Locke to indigenous thinkers. Spodek, doubtful about governments or corporations leading on the environment, favors bottom up change focused on the actions and leadership of individuals. Sustainability Simplified: The Definitive Guide to Solving All (Yes, All) Our Environmental Problems (Amplify, 2025) explores the importance of culture and habit. How did the United States and other nations adopt polluting and passive habits? What can be done to reverse these cultural norms? The solutions range from a WWII level mobilization to a Constitutional Amendment.
Dr. Josh Spodek earned a PhD in Physics and an MBA in entrepreneurial leadership from Columbia University. He is a four-time TEDx speaker author (Initiative and Leadership Step by Step), and leadership coach. He hosts the This Sustainable Life podcast. He has been an Adjunct Professor at New York University. A 2024 recent New York Times article highlights his life changes in Who Says You Can’t Live Off the Grid in Manhattan?
Mentioned:

NOAA’s interactive sea level rise map. NOAA is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Eric Williams’s Capitalism &amp; Slavery (3rd edition, University of North Carolina Press, 1994)

Works of Steven Pinker


Spodek Method

Susan’s research on Locke’s Enough and as Good from Perspectives on Politics



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>752</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf07c53a-bef1-11ef-976d-6f41af77726f</guid>
      <title>Nick Couldry, &quot;The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can&apos;t?&quot; (Polity, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is human solidarity achievable in a world dominated by continuous digital connectivity and commercially managed platforms? And what if it’s not? Professor <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/people/academic-staff/nick-couldry">Nick Couldry</a> explores these urgent questions in his latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509554737"><em>The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can’t?</em></a> (Polity, 2024), as discussed in a recent interview with the New Books Network.</p><p>In a conversation with <a href="https://www.kau.se/en/researchers/joanne-kuai">Joanne Kuai</a>, Couldry reflects on how society has ceded critical decisions to Big Tech, enabling these companies to construct what he calls our "space of the world"—the artificial environment of social media platforms that now shapes much of our social existence. He argues this delegation of power was reckless, with far-reaching and damaging social consequences.</p><p>While the harmful effects on social life, youth mental health, and political solidarity are widely recognized, Couldry emphasizes a deeper issue that has been overlooked: humanity’s decision to allow businesses to define and exploit this shared digital space for profit. In doing so, we disregarded centuries of political thought on the conditions required for healthy and non-violent politics. This oversight has jeopardized a vital resource in the era of the climate crisis: solidarity.</p><p>In <em>The Space of the World</em>, the first book in his trilogy <em>Humanising the Future</em>, Couldry proposes a transformative vision for redesigning digital spaces to foster, rather than erode, solidarity and community. He stresses that caring for our shared digital space is no longer optional—it is an urgent task that must be tackled collectively.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.nickcouldry.org/">Nick Couldry</a> is Professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory in the Department of Media and Communications at LSE. As a sociologist of media and culture, he approaches media and communications from the perspective of the symbolic power that has been historically concentrated in media institutions. He is interested in how media and communications institutions and infrastructures contribute to various types of order (social, political, cultural, economic, ethical). His work has drawn on, and contributed to, social, spatial, democratic and cultural theory, anthropology, and media and communications ethics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is human solidarity achievable in a world dominated by continuous digital connectivity and commercially managed platforms? And what if it’s not? Professor <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/people/academic-staff/nick-couldry">Nick Couldry</a> explores these urgent questions in his latest book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509554737"><em>The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can’t?</em></a> (Polity, 2024), as discussed in a recent interview with the New Books Network.</p><p>In a conversation with <a href="https://www.kau.se/en/researchers/joanne-kuai">Joanne Kuai</a>, Couldry reflects on how society has ceded critical decisions to Big Tech, enabling these companies to construct what he calls our "space of the world"—the artificial environment of social media platforms that now shapes much of our social existence. He argues this delegation of power was reckless, with far-reaching and damaging social consequences.</p><p>While the harmful effects on social life, youth mental health, and political solidarity are widely recognized, Couldry emphasizes a deeper issue that has been overlooked: humanity’s decision to allow businesses to define and exploit this shared digital space for profit. In doing so, we disregarded centuries of political thought on the conditions required for healthy and non-violent politics. This oversight has jeopardized a vital resource in the era of the climate crisis: solidarity.</p><p>In <em>The Space of the World</em>, the first book in his trilogy <em>Humanising the Future</em>, Couldry proposes a transformative vision for redesigning digital spaces to foster, rather than erode, solidarity and community. He stresses that caring for our shared digital space is no longer optional—it is an urgent task that must be tackled collectively.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.nickcouldry.org/">Nick Couldry</a> is Professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory in the Department of Media and Communications at LSE. As a sociologist of media and culture, he approaches media and communications from the perspective of the symbolic power that has been historically concentrated in media institutions. He is interested in how media and communications institutions and infrastructures contribute to various types of order (social, political, cultural, economic, ethical). His work has drawn on, and contributed to, social, spatial, democratic and cultural theory, anthropology, and media and communications ethics.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32279370" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c8cd3cfd-957e-491a-92b0-188f7dc1c89c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c8cd3cfd-957e-491a-92b0-188f7dc1c89c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nick Couldry, &quot;The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can&apos;t?&quot; (Polity, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is human solidarity achievable in a world dominated by continuous digital connectivity and commercially managed platforms? And what if it’s not? Professor Nick Couldry explores these urgent questions in his latest book, The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can’t? (Polity, 2024), as discussed in a recent interview with the New Books Network.
In a conversation with Joanne Kuai, Couldry reflects on how society has ceded critical decisions to Big Tech, enabling these companies to construct what he calls our &quot;space of the world&quot;—the artificial environment of social media platforms that now shapes much of our social existence. He argues this delegation of power was reckless, with far-reaching and damaging social consequences.
While the harmful effects on social life, youth mental health, and political solidarity are widely recognized, Couldry emphasizes a deeper issue that has been overlooked: humanity’s decision to allow businesses to define and exploit this shared digital space for profit. In doing so, we disregarded centuries of political thought on the conditions required for healthy and non-violent politics. This oversight has jeopardized a vital resource in the era of the climate crisis: solidarity.
In The Space of the World, the first book in his trilogy Humanising the Future, Couldry proposes a transformative vision for redesigning digital spaces to foster, rather than erode, solidarity and community. He stresses that caring for our shared digital space is no longer optional—it is an urgent task that must be tackled collectively.

Nick Couldry is Professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory in the Department of Media and Communications at LSE. As a sociologist of media and culture, he approaches media and communications from the perspective of the symbolic power that has been historically concentrated in media institutions. He is interested in how media and communications institutions and infrastructures contribute to various types of order (social, political, cultural, economic, ethical). His work has drawn on, and contributed to, social, spatial, democratic and cultural theory, anthropology, and media and communications ethics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is human solidarity achievable in a world dominated by continuous digital connectivity and commercially managed platforms? And what if it’s not? Professor Nick Couldry explores these urgent questions in his latest book, The Space of the World: Can Human Solidarity Survive Social Media and What If It Can’t? (Polity, 2024), as discussed in a recent interview with the New Books Network.
In a conversation with Joanne Kuai, Couldry reflects on how society has ceded critical decisions to Big Tech, enabling these companies to construct what he calls our &quot;space of the world&quot;—the artificial environment of social media platforms that now shapes much of our social existence. He argues this delegation of power was reckless, with far-reaching and damaging social consequences.
While the harmful effects on social life, youth mental health, and political solidarity are widely recognized, Couldry emphasizes a deeper issue that has been overlooked: humanity’s decision to allow businesses to define and exploit this shared digital space for profit. In doing so, we disregarded centuries of political thought on the conditions required for healthy and non-violent politics. This oversight has jeopardized a vital resource in the era of the climate crisis: solidarity.
In The Space of the World, the first book in his trilogy Humanising the Future, Couldry proposes a transformative vision for redesigning digital spaces to foster, rather than erode, solidarity and community. He stresses that caring for our shared digital space is no longer optional—it is an urgent task that must be tackled collectively.

Nick Couldry is Professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory in the Department of Media and Communications at LSE. As a sociologist of media and culture, he approaches media and communications from the perspective of the symbolic power that has been historically concentrated in media institutions. He is interested in how media and communications institutions and infrastructures contribute to various types of order (social, political, cultural, economic, ethical). His work has drawn on, and contributed to, social, spatial, democratic and cultural theory, anthropology, and media and communications ethics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2565edfc-bfb6-11ef-836f-8b1afb608dab</guid>
      <title>Transatlantic Tensions: Trump’s Return and Europe’s Far-Right Resurgence</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews journalist Mattia Ferraresi about the implications of a potential second Trump presidency for European politics. Ferraresi discusses how Trump’s rhetoric and policies, including his stance on NATO and trade, might influence transatlantic relations. The conversation explores the rise of far-right nationalism in Europe, with a focus on Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s alignment with Trump and her emerging role as a key intermediary between the U.S. and the EU. Ferraresi also examines the growing power of far-right parties across Europe, their ideological networks, and their influence on EU policies. The episode concludes with an analysis of Trump’s trade policies and their potential impact on both Europe and his domestic base, raising critical questions about the direction of U.S.-EU relations in a shifting global landscape.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>International Horizons</em>, RBI director John Torpey interviews journalist Mattia Ferraresi about the implications of a potential second Trump presidency for European politics. Ferraresi discusses how Trump’s rhetoric and policies, including his stance on NATO and trade, might influence transatlantic relations. The conversation explores the rise of far-right nationalism in Europe, with a focus on Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s alignment with Trump and her emerging role as a key intermediary between the U.S. and the EU. Ferraresi also examines the growing power of far-right parties across Europe, their ideological networks, and their influence on EU policies. The episode concludes with an analysis of Trump’s trade policies and their potential impact on both Europe and his domestic base, raising critical questions about the direction of U.S.-EU relations in a shifting global landscape.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33899381" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/859bcfff-396c-441d-a850-d281c537e794/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=859bcfff-396c-441d-a850-d281c537e794&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Transatlantic Tensions: Trump’s Return and Europe’s Far-Right Resurgence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews journalist Mattia Ferraresi about the implications of a potential second Trump presidency for European politics. Ferraresi discusses how Trump’s rhetoric and policies, including his stance on NATO and trade, might influence transatlantic relations. The conversation explores the rise of far-right nationalism in Europe, with a focus on Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s alignment with Trump and her emerging role as a key intermediary between the U.S. and the EU. Ferraresi also examines the growing power of far-right parties across Europe, their ideological networks, and their influence on EU policies. The episode concludes with an analysis of Trump’s trade policies and their potential impact on both Europe and his domestic base, raising critical questions about the direction of U.S.-EU relations in a shifting global landscape.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews journalist Mattia Ferraresi about the implications of a potential second Trump presidency for European politics. Ferraresi discusses how Trump’s rhetoric and policies, including his stance on NATO and trade, might influence transatlantic relations. The conversation explores the rise of far-right nationalism in Europe, with a focus on Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s alignment with Trump and her emerging role as a key intermediary between the U.S. and the EU. Ferraresi also examines the growing power of far-right parties across Europe, their ideological networks, and their influence on EU policies. The episode concludes with an analysis of Trump’s trade policies and their potential impact on both Europe and his domestic base, raising critical questions about the direction of U.S.-EU relations in a shifting global landscape.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a19bd6c-bd48-11ef-85c3-771c3c884271</guid>
      <title>Melissa Johnston, &quot;Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the two decades since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security, peacebuilding interventions around the globe have increasingly incorporated gender perspectives. These initiatives have used both development programs and gender mainstreaming to advance women's empowerment, with the aim of making peacebuilding more effective as well as building more stable societies and efficient economies. This goal has been manifested in a wide range of programs and projects-or "gender interventions"—including economic empowerment measures, gender quotas, gender-responsive budgeting, and legal reforms. Yet, the results have been uneven, provoking a sizable debate among scholars and practitioners seeking to explain the shortcomings and improve the outcomes.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197637999"><em>Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melissa Johnston explains why gender interventions often fail to help those who most need them, using the case of Timor-Leste, a country subjected to high levels of peacebuilding and gender interventions between 1999 and 2017. Looking at three types of gender interventions—gender-responsive budgeting, the law against domestic violence, and microfinance initiatives—Dr. Johnston argues that these reforms have produced mixed results because they reinscribe entrenched class and gender hierarchies in their implementation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the two decades since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security, peacebuilding interventions around the globe have increasingly incorporated gender perspectives. These initiatives have used both development programs and gender mainstreaming to advance women's empowerment, with the aim of making peacebuilding more effective as well as building more stable societies and efficient economies. This goal has been manifested in a wide range of programs and projects-or "gender interventions"—including economic empowerment measures, gender quotas, gender-responsive budgeting, and legal reforms. Yet, the results have been uneven, provoking a sizable debate among scholars and practitioners seeking to explain the shortcomings and improve the outcomes.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197637999"><em>Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melissa Johnston explains why gender interventions often fail to help those who most need them, using the case of Timor-Leste, a country subjected to high levels of peacebuilding and gender interventions between 1999 and 2017. Looking at three types of gender interventions—gender-responsive budgeting, the law against domestic violence, and microfinance initiatives—Dr. Johnston argues that these reforms have produced mixed results because they reinscribe entrenched class and gender hierarchies in their implementation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53813252" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/323be1e8-d99d-41f4-948e-d63197ad2f1b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=323be1e8-d99d-41f4-948e-d63197ad2f1b&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa Johnston, &quot;Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the two decades since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security, peacebuilding interventions around the globe have increasingly incorporated gender perspectives. These initiatives have used both development programs and gender mainstreaming to advance women&apos;s empowerment, with the aim of making peacebuilding more effective as well as building more stable societies and efficient economies. This goal has been manifested in a wide range of programs and projects-or &quot;gender interventions&quot;—including economic empowerment measures, gender quotas, gender-responsive budgeting, and legal reforms. Yet, the results have been uneven, provoking a sizable debate among scholars and practitioners seeking to explain the shortcomings and improve the outcomes.
In Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melissa Johnston explains why gender interventions often fail to help those who most need them, using the case of Timor-Leste, a country subjected to high levels of peacebuilding and gender interventions between 1999 and 2017. Looking at three types of gender interventions—gender-responsive budgeting, the law against domestic violence, and microfinance initiatives—Dr. Johnston argues that these reforms have produced mixed results because they reinscribe entrenched class and gender hierarchies in their implementation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the two decades since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security, peacebuilding interventions around the globe have increasingly incorporated gender perspectives. These initiatives have used both development programs and gender mainstreaming to advance women&apos;s empowerment, with the aim of making peacebuilding more effective as well as building more stable societies and efficient economies. This goal has been manifested in a wide range of programs and projects-or &quot;gender interventions&quot;—including economic empowerment measures, gender quotas, gender-responsive budgeting, and legal reforms. Yet, the results have been uneven, provoking a sizable debate among scholars and practitioners seeking to explain the shortcomings and improve the outcomes.
In Building Peace, Rebuilding Patriarchy: The Failure of Gender Interventions in Timor-Leste (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melissa Johnston explains why gender interventions often fail to help those who most need them, using the case of Timor-Leste, a country subjected to high levels of peacebuilding and gender interventions between 1999 and 2017. Looking at three types of gender interventions—gender-responsive budgeting, the law against domestic violence, and microfinance initiatives—Dr. Johnston argues that these reforms have produced mixed results because they reinscribe entrenched class and gender hierarchies in their implementation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>247</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">491f0c00-bd7d-11ef-b67e-47e375445a6a</guid>
      <title>Kevin D. Pham, &quot;The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770276"><em>The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024)<em>, </em>Kevin D. Pham introduces Vietnamese political thought to debates in political theory, showing how Vietnamese thinkers challenge Western conventional wisdom. He traces an intergenerational debate among six influential figures in colonial Vietnam. These figures had competing visions for how the Vietnamese should respond to French colonial domination, what the Vietnamese should do with their traditions given the influx of political and social ideas from the West, and how they should harness feelings of national shame to construct national dignity. Their answers offer surprising lessons for how we in the West can enhance our understanding of decolonization, shame, dignity, and cross-cultural engagement.</p><p>Kevin D. Pham is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. He explores the history of political thought, particularly how thinkers outside "the West" have conceptualized democracy and anticolonialism, and how they challenge and enhance the field of political theory. He has special interests in Vietnam. His articles have been published in journals such as <em>Theory &amp; Event, Philosophy and Global Affairs, European Journal of Political Theory, The Review of Politics, Polity, New Political Science, The European Legacy,</em> and <em>Montaigne Studies</em>. He is the author of <em>The Architects</em> <em>of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization </em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). He co-hosts a podcast about Vietnamese intellectual history called Nam Phong Dialogues. Kevin can be reached at k.d.pham@uva.nl. His website is here: <a href="http://www.kevindoanpham.com/">www.kevindoanpham.com</a>.</p><p><em>Camellia (Linh) Pham is a PhD student in Comparative Literature at Harvard. Her research explores modern Vietnamese literature, literary translation across French, Vietnamese, English, and Chinese, and the literary history of French Indochina. She can be reached at </em><a href="mailto:cpham@g.harvard.edu"><em>cpham@g.harvard.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197770276"><em>The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization</em></a> (Oxford UP, 2024)<em>, </em>Kevin D. Pham introduces Vietnamese political thought to debates in political theory, showing how Vietnamese thinkers challenge Western conventional wisdom. He traces an intergenerational debate among six influential figures in colonial Vietnam. These figures had competing visions for how the Vietnamese should respond to French colonial domination, what the Vietnamese should do with their traditions given the influx of political and social ideas from the West, and how they should harness feelings of national shame to construct national dignity. Their answers offer surprising lessons for how we in the West can enhance our understanding of decolonization, shame, dignity, and cross-cultural engagement.</p><p>Kevin D. Pham is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. He explores the history of political thought, particularly how thinkers outside "the West" have conceptualized democracy and anticolonialism, and how they challenge and enhance the field of political theory. He has special interests in Vietnam. His articles have been published in journals such as <em>Theory &amp; Event, Philosophy and Global Affairs, European Journal of Political Theory, The Review of Politics, Polity, New Political Science, The European Legacy,</em> and <em>Montaigne Studies</em>. He is the author of <em>The Architects</em> <em>of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization </em>(Oxford University Press, 2024). He co-hosts a podcast about Vietnamese intellectual history called Nam Phong Dialogues. Kevin can be reached at k.d.pham@uva.nl. His website is here: <a href="http://www.kevindoanpham.com/">www.kevindoanpham.com</a>.</p><p><em>Camellia (Linh) Pham is a PhD student in Comparative Literature at Harvard. Her research explores modern Vietnamese literature, literary translation across French, Vietnamese, English, and Chinese, and the literary history of French Indochina. She can be reached at </em><a href="mailto:cpham@g.harvard.edu"><em>cpham@g.harvard.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60753710" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9976f604-3510-4096-8e7a-777a99df6ab6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9976f604-3510-4096-8e7a-777a99df6ab6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin D. Pham, &quot;The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization (Oxford UP, 2024), Kevin D. Pham introduces Vietnamese political thought to debates in political theory, showing how Vietnamese thinkers challenge Western conventional wisdom. He traces an intergenerational debate among six influential figures in colonial Vietnam. These figures had competing visions for how the Vietnamese should respond to French colonial domination, what the Vietnamese should do with their traditions given the influx of political and social ideas from the West, and how they should harness feelings of national shame to construct national dignity. Their answers offer surprising lessons for how we in the West can enhance our understanding of decolonization, shame, dignity, and cross-cultural engagement.
Kevin D. Pham is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. He explores the history of political thought, particularly how thinkers outside &quot;the West&quot; have conceptualized democracy and anticolonialism, and how they challenge and enhance the field of political theory. He has special interests in Vietnam. His articles have been published in journals such as Theory &amp; Event, Philosophy and Global Affairs, European Journal of Political Theory, The Review of Politics, Polity, New Political Science, The European Legacy, and Montaigne Studies. He is the author of The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization (Oxford University Press, 2024). He co-hosts a podcast about Vietnamese intellectual history called Nam Phong Dialogues. Kevin can be reached at k.d.pham@uva.nl. His website is here: www.kevindoanpham.com.
Camellia (Linh) Pham is a PhD student in Comparative Literature at Harvard. Her research explores modern Vietnamese literature, literary translation across French, Vietnamese, English, and Chinese, and the literary history of French Indochina. She can be reached at cpham@g.harvard.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization (Oxford UP, 2024), Kevin D. Pham introduces Vietnamese political thought to debates in political theory, showing how Vietnamese thinkers challenge Western conventional wisdom. He traces an intergenerational debate among six influential figures in colonial Vietnam. These figures had competing visions for how the Vietnamese should respond to French colonial domination, what the Vietnamese should do with their traditions given the influx of political and social ideas from the West, and how they should harness feelings of national shame to construct national dignity. Their answers offer surprising lessons for how we in the West can enhance our understanding of decolonization, shame, dignity, and cross-cultural engagement.
Kevin D. Pham is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. He explores the history of political thought, particularly how thinkers outside &quot;the West&quot; have conceptualized democracy and anticolonialism, and how they challenge and enhance the field of political theory. He has special interests in Vietnam. His articles have been published in journals such as Theory &amp; Event, Philosophy and Global Affairs, European Journal of Political Theory, The Review of Politics, Polity, New Political Science, The European Legacy, and Montaigne Studies. He is the author of The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization (Oxford University Press, 2024). He co-hosts a podcast about Vietnamese intellectual history called Nam Phong Dialogues. Kevin can be reached at k.d.pham@uva.nl. His website is here: www.kevindoanpham.com.
Camellia (Linh) Pham is a PhD student in Comparative Literature at Harvard. Her research explores modern Vietnamese literature, literary translation across French, Vietnamese, English, and Chinese, and the literary history of French Indochina. She can be reached at cpham@g.harvard.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>753</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9804656-bb0d-11ef-9d1a-33ecf6204fcd</guid>
      <title>Leila Ullrich, &quot;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198870258"><em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, <em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court</em> illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.</p><p>Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford's Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? </p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198870258"><em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, <em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court</em> illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.</p><p>Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford's Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56217349" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/af589872-e988-4156-9919-2d076932c346/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=af589872-e988-4156-9919-2d076932c346&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Leila Ullrich, &quot;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? 
Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.
Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? 
Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.
Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e41a4bc-ba53-11ef-b138-bb448248aa40</guid>
      <title>Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler, &quot;Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America's Constitution and today's nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836430"><em>Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era</em></a> (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today's challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation's stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today's polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors' earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America's political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America's unusual Constitutional design.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America's Constitution and today's nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. </p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836430"><em>Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era</em></a> (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today's challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation's stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today's polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors' earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America's political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America's unusual Constitutional design.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30694939" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c729f9d6-9ccc-4ef6-bfde-d0040a300c85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c729f9d6-9ccc-4ef6-bfde-d0040a300c85&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler, &quot;Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America&apos;s Constitution and today&apos;s nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. 
In Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today&apos;s challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation&apos;s stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today&apos;s polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors&apos; earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America&apos;s political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America&apos;s unusual Constitutional design.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American democracy is in trouble. At the heart of the contemporary crisis is a mismatch between America&apos;s Constitution and today&apos;s nationalized, partisan politics. Although American political institutions remain federated and fragmented, the ground beneath them has moved, with the national subsuming and transforming the local. 
In Partisan Nation: The Dangerous New Logic of American Politics in a Nationalized Era (U Chicago Press, 2024), political scientists Paul Pierson and Eric Schickler bring today&apos;s challenges into new perspective. Attentive to the different coalitions, interests, and incentives that define the Democratic and Republican parties, they show how contemporary polarization emerged in a rapidly nationalizing country and how it differs from polarization in past eras. In earlier periods, three key features of the political landscape-state parties, interest groups, and media-varied locally and reinforced the nation&apos;s stark regional diversity. They created openings for new policy demands and factional divisions that disrupted party lines. But this began to change in the 1960s as the two parties assumed clearer ideological identities and the power of the national government expanded, raising the stakes of conflict. Together with technological and economic change, these developments have reconfigured state parties, interest groups, and media in self-reinforcing ways. Now thoroughly integrated into a single political order and tightly coupled with partisanship, they no longer militate against polarization. Instead, they accelerate it. Precisely because today&apos;s polarization is different, it is self-perpetuating and, indeed, intensifying. With the precision and acuity characteristic of both authors&apos; earlier work, Pierson and Schickler explain what these developments mean for American governance and democracy. They show that America&apos;s political system is distinctively, and acutely, vulnerable to an authoritarian movement emerging in the contemporary Republican Party, which has both the motive and the means to exploit America&apos;s unusual Constitutional design.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>199</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f32fdf32-ba33-11ef-ab4a-0f4db400b585</guid>
      <title>Yaacov Yadgar, &quot;To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In one of the first books to ask head-on what it means for Israel to be a Jewish state, Yaacov Yadgar delves into what the designation "Jewish" amounts to in the context of the sovereign nation-state, and what it means for the politics of the state to be identified as Jewish. The volume interrogates the tension between the notion of Israel as a Jewish state--one whose very character is informed by Judaism--and the notion of Israel as a "state of the Jews," with the sole criterion the maintenance of a demographically Jewish majority, whatever the character of that majority's Jewishness might or might not be.</p><p>The volume also examines Zionism's relationship to Judaism. It provocatively questions whether the Christian notion of supersessionism, the idea that the Christian Church has superseded the nation of Israel in God's eyes and that Christians are now the true People of God, may now be applied to Zionism, with Zionism understood by some to have taken over the place of traditional Judaism, rendering the actual Jewish religion superfluous.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832408"><em>To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism</em></a><em> </em>(NYU Press, 2024) deeply informs the democratic crisis in Israel, discussing whether Jewish laws put into effect by the state or political moves made to ensure a Jewish majority can be seen as undermining democracy. In our current era, with nationalism resurging, <em>To Be a Jewish State</em> urges a critical re-assessment of the very meaning of modern Jewish identity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the first books to ask head-on what it means for Israel to be a Jewish state, Yaacov Yadgar delves into what the designation "Jewish" amounts to in the context of the sovereign nation-state, and what it means for the politics of the state to be identified as Jewish. The volume interrogates the tension between the notion of Israel as a Jewish state--one whose very character is informed by Judaism--and the notion of Israel as a "state of the Jews," with the sole criterion the maintenance of a demographically Jewish majority, whatever the character of that majority's Jewishness might or might not be.</p><p>The volume also examines Zionism's relationship to Judaism. It provocatively questions whether the Christian notion of supersessionism, the idea that the Christian Church has superseded the nation of Israel in God's eyes and that Christians are now the true People of God, may now be applied to Zionism, with Zionism understood by some to have taken over the place of traditional Judaism, rendering the actual Jewish religion superfluous.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832408"><em>To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism</em></a><em> </em>(NYU Press, 2024) deeply informs the democratic crisis in Israel, discussing whether Jewish laws put into effect by the state or political moves made to ensure a Jewish majority can be seen as undermining democracy. In our current era, with nationalism resurging, <em>To Be a Jewish State</em> urges a critical re-assessment of the very meaning of modern Jewish identity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52180717" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/06dc2a55-a28f-4a3f-8b36-715bfc9695f1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=06dc2a55-a28f-4a3f-8b36-715bfc9695f1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Yaacov Yadgar, &quot;To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In one of the first books to ask head-on what it means for Israel to be a Jewish state, Yaacov Yadgar delves into what the designation &quot;Jewish&quot; amounts to in the context of the sovereign nation-state, and what it means for the politics of the state to be identified as Jewish. The volume interrogates the tension between the notion of Israel as a Jewish state--one whose very character is informed by Judaism--and the notion of Israel as a &quot;state of the Jews,&quot; with the sole criterion the maintenance of a demographically Jewish majority, whatever the character of that majority&apos;s Jewishness might or might not be.
The volume also examines Zionism&apos;s relationship to Judaism. It provocatively questions whether the Christian notion of supersessionism, the idea that the Christian Church has superseded the nation of Israel in God&apos;s eyes and that Christians are now the true People of God, may now be applied to Zionism, with Zionism understood by some to have taken over the place of traditional Judaism, rendering the actual Jewish religion superfluous.
To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism (NYU Press, 2024) deeply informs the democratic crisis in Israel, discussing whether Jewish laws put into effect by the state or political moves made to ensure a Jewish majority can be seen as undermining democracy. In our current era, with nationalism resurging, To Be a Jewish State urges a critical re-assessment of the very meaning of modern Jewish identity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In one of the first books to ask head-on what it means for Israel to be a Jewish state, Yaacov Yadgar delves into what the designation &quot;Jewish&quot; amounts to in the context of the sovereign nation-state, and what it means for the politics of the state to be identified as Jewish. The volume interrogates the tension between the notion of Israel as a Jewish state--one whose very character is informed by Judaism--and the notion of Israel as a &quot;state of the Jews,&quot; with the sole criterion the maintenance of a demographically Jewish majority, whatever the character of that majority&apos;s Jewishness might or might not be.
The volume also examines Zionism&apos;s relationship to Judaism. It provocatively questions whether the Christian notion of supersessionism, the idea that the Christian Church has superseded the nation of Israel in God&apos;s eyes and that Christians are now the true People of God, may now be applied to Zionism, with Zionism understood by some to have taken over the place of traditional Judaism, rendering the actual Jewish religion superfluous.
To Be a Jewish State: Zionism as the New Judaism (NYU Press, 2024) deeply informs the democratic crisis in Israel, discussing whether Jewish laws put into effect by the state or political moves made to ensure a Jewish majority can be seen as undermining democracy. In our current era, with nationalism resurging, To Be a Jewish State urges a critical re-assessment of the very meaning of modern Jewish identity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2020d5c4-b808-11ef-9ade-7bb7fa509b36</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Violence, Consent, and Coercion in American Football</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the press focused on what the press repeatedly characterized as an “ugly” fight between American college football players that broke out after the University of Michigan beat The Ohio State. But another story received less attention. Medrick Burnett Jr., a 20 year old from Southern California was playing his first season as a linebacker with Alabama A&amp;M University when he sustained a head injury during the annual Magic City Classic against in-state rivals Alabama State University on Oct. 26. A month later, Burnett died. Today’s <em>Postscript </em>features two prominent scholars of sports raising questions about the hypocrisy of blaming players for a fight yet downplaying the death caused by playing by the rules. This remarkable conversation includes an unpacking of the “consent” to physical, psychological, and economic impacts, insight into the Foucauldian elements of discipline, punishment, and surveillance, and concrete reform suggestions for all people who watch football and/or work at universities. This nuanced conversation is for those who love or loathe football as a college sport.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/arts-fr-sociology/kalmanlamb-nathan.html">Nathan Kalman-Lamb</a> (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of New Brunswick and Dr. <a href="https://www.kings.uwo.ca/academics/faculty-info/member-profile/?doaction=getProfile&amp;id=dsilva28">Derek Silva</a> (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology and Criminology at King’s University College at Western University. They are co-authors of <a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469683461/the-end-of-college-football/"><em>The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game</em></a> published by UNC Press in 2024 – and their public-facing scholarship appears in outlets such as <em>The Guardian</em> and the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>. They are the co-hosts (with Johanna Mellis) of <a href="https://theendofsport.podbean.com/"><em>The End of Sport</em></a> podcast.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>“<a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-hypocrisy-shaming-college-football-110039368.html">The hypocrisy of shaming college football player brawls</a>,” Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, <em>LATimes</em>
</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/dec/05/a-players-foreseeable-death-raises-existential-questions-for-college-football">A player’s foreseeable death raises existential questions for college football</a>,”Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, <em>The Guardian</em>
</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.apr.org/news/2024-11-30/alabama-a-m-football-player-dies-a-month-after-suffering-a-head-injury-in-a-game">Alabama A&amp;M football player dies a month after suffering a head injury in a game</a>,” Pat Duggins, Alabama Public Radio</li>
<li>Paul Knepper’s New Books Network interview with Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva on their 2024 book, “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-college-football#entry:333363@1:url">The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game</a><u>”</u>
</li>
<li>Dr. Jill A. Fisher’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/medical-research-for-hire-the-political-economy-of-pharmaceutical-clinical-trials-jill-a-fisher/12303820?ean=9780813544106">Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials</a> (Rutgers University Press 2008)</li>
<li>Dr. Erin Hatton’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/coerced-work-under-threat-of-punishment-erin-hatton/13709430?ean=9780520305410"><em>Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment</em></a> (University of California Press, 2020)</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>On the University of Missouri football team’s successful threat to strike if the university president didn't resign see </p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/11/11/u-missouri-football-boycott-demonstrates-economic-power-athletes">The Power of a Football Boycott</a>,” Jake New, <em>Inside Higher Education</em>,</li>
<li><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-forgotten-history-of-head-injuries-in-sports">The Forgotten History of Head Injuries in Sports:</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-forgotten-history-of-head-injuries-in-sports"><em>Stephen Casper, a medical historian, argues that the danger of C.T.E. used to be widely acknowledged. How did we unlearn what we once knew</em></a><em>? </em>Ingfei Chen, <em>The New Yorker</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the press focused on what the press repeatedly characterized as an “ugly” fight between American college football players that broke out after the University of Michigan beat The Ohio State. But another story received less attention. Medrick Burnett Jr., a 20 year old from Southern California was playing his first season as a linebacker with Alabama A&amp;M University when he sustained a head injury during the annual Magic City Classic against in-state rivals Alabama State University on Oct. 26. A month later, Burnett died. Today’s <em>Postscript </em>features two prominent scholars of sports raising questions about the hypocrisy of blaming players for a fight yet downplaying the death caused by playing by the rules. This remarkable conversation includes an unpacking of the “consent” to physical, psychological, and economic impacts, insight into the Foucauldian elements of discipline, punishment, and surveillance, and concrete reform suggestions for all people who watch football and/or work at universities. This nuanced conversation is for those who love or loathe football as a college sport.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/arts-fr-sociology/kalmanlamb-nathan.html">Nathan Kalman-Lamb</a> (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of New Brunswick and Dr. <a href="https://www.kings.uwo.ca/academics/faculty-info/member-profile/?doaction=getProfile&amp;id=dsilva28">Derek Silva</a> (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology and Criminology at King’s University College at Western University. They are co-authors of <a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469683461/the-end-of-college-football/"><em>The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game</em></a> published by UNC Press in 2024 – and their public-facing scholarship appears in outlets such as <em>The Guardian</em> and the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>. They are the co-hosts (with Johanna Mellis) of <a href="https://theendofsport.podbean.com/"><em>The End of Sport</em></a> podcast.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>“<a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-hypocrisy-shaming-college-football-110039368.html">The hypocrisy of shaming college football player brawls</a>,” Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, <em>LATimes</em>
</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/dec/05/a-players-foreseeable-death-raises-existential-questions-for-college-football">A player’s foreseeable death raises existential questions for college football</a>,”Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, <em>The Guardian</em>
</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.apr.org/news/2024-11-30/alabama-a-m-football-player-dies-a-month-after-suffering-a-head-injury-in-a-game">Alabama A&amp;M football player dies a month after suffering a head injury in a game</a>,” Pat Duggins, Alabama Public Radio</li>
<li>Paul Knepper’s New Books Network interview with Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva on their 2024 book, “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-end-of-college-football#entry:333363@1:url">The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game</a><u>”</u>
</li>
<li>Dr. Jill A. Fisher’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/medical-research-for-hire-the-political-economy-of-pharmaceutical-clinical-trials-jill-a-fisher/12303820?ean=9780813544106">Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials</a> (Rutgers University Press 2008)</li>
<li>Dr. Erin Hatton’s <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/coerced-work-under-threat-of-punishment-erin-hatton/13709430?ean=9780520305410"><em>Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment</em></a> (University of California Press, 2020)</li>
</ul><p><br /></p><p>On the University of Missouri football team’s successful threat to strike if the university president didn't resign see </p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/11/11/u-missouri-football-boycott-demonstrates-economic-power-athletes">The Power of a Football Boycott</a>,” Jake New, <em>Inside Higher Education</em>,</li>
<li><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-forgotten-history-of-head-injuries-in-sports">The Forgotten History of Head Injuries in Sports:</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-forgotten-history-of-head-injuries-in-sports"><em>Stephen Casper, a medical historian, argues that the danger of C.T.E. used to be widely acknowledged. How did we unlearn what we once knew</em></a><em>? </em>Ingfei Chen, <em>The New Yorker</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69785262" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/88572ad8-ccb4-4128-b9e8-b05a1416258c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=88572ad8-ccb4-4128-b9e8-b05a1416258c&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Violence, Consent, and Coercion in American Football</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Last week, the press focused on what the press repeatedly characterized as an “ugly” fight between American college football players that broke out after the University of Michigan beat The Ohio State. But another story received less attention. Medrick Burnett Jr., a 20 year old from Southern California was playing his first season as a linebacker with Alabama A&amp;M University when he sustained a head injury during the annual Magic City Classic against in-state rivals Alabama State University on Oct. 26. A month later, Burnett died. Today’s Postscript features two prominent scholars of sports raising questions about the hypocrisy of blaming players for a fight yet downplaying the death caused by playing by the rules. This remarkable conversation includes an unpacking of the “consent” to physical, psychological, and economic impacts, insight into the Foucauldian elements of discipline, punishment, and surveillance, and concrete reform suggestions for all people who watch football and/or work at universities. This nuanced conversation is for those who love or loathe football as a college sport.
Dr. Nathan Kalman-Lamb (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of New Brunswick and Dr. Derek Silva (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology and Criminology at King’s University College at Western University. They are co-authors of The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game published by UNC Press in 2024 – and their public-facing scholarship appears in outlets such as The Guardian and the Los Angeles Times. They are the co-hosts (with Johanna Mellis) of The End of Sport podcast.
Mentioned:

“The hypocrisy of shaming college football player brawls,” Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, LATimes


“A player’s foreseeable death raises existential questions for college football,”Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, The Guardian


“Alabama A&amp;M football player dies a month after suffering a head injury in a game,” Pat Duggins, Alabama Public Radio

Paul Knepper’s New Books Network interview with Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva on their 2024 book, “The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game”


Dr. Jill A. Fisher’s Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials (Rutgers University Press 2008)

Dr. Erin Hatton’s Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment (University of California Press, 2020)


On the University of Missouri football team’s successful threat to strike if the university president didn&apos;t resign see 

&quot;The Power of a Football Boycott,” Jake New, Inside Higher Education,

The Forgotten History of Head Injuries in Sports:


Stephen Casper, a medical historian, argues that the danger of C.T.E. used to be widely acknowledged. How did we unlearn what we once knew? Ingfei Chen, The New Yorker



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Last week, the press focused on what the press repeatedly characterized as an “ugly” fight between American college football players that broke out after the University of Michigan beat The Ohio State. But another story received less attention. Medrick Burnett Jr., a 20 year old from Southern California was playing his first season as a linebacker with Alabama A&amp;M University when he sustained a head injury during the annual Magic City Classic against in-state rivals Alabama State University on Oct. 26. A month later, Burnett died. Today’s Postscript features two prominent scholars of sports raising questions about the hypocrisy of blaming players for a fight yet downplaying the death caused by playing by the rules. This remarkable conversation includes an unpacking of the “consent” to physical, psychological, and economic impacts, insight into the Foucauldian elements of discipline, punishment, and surveillance, and concrete reform suggestions for all people who watch football and/or work at universities. This nuanced conversation is for those who love or loathe football as a college sport.
Dr. Nathan Kalman-Lamb (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of New Brunswick and Dr. Derek Silva (he/him) is Associate Professor of Sociology and Criminology at King’s University College at Western University. They are co-authors of The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game published by UNC Press in 2024 – and their public-facing scholarship appears in outlets such as The Guardian and the Los Angeles Times. They are the co-hosts (with Johanna Mellis) of The End of Sport podcast.
Mentioned:

“The hypocrisy of shaming college football player brawls,” Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, LATimes


“A player’s foreseeable death raises existential questions for college football,”Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva, The Guardian


“Alabama A&amp;M football player dies a month after suffering a head injury in a game,” Pat Duggins, Alabama Public Radio

Paul Knepper’s New Books Network interview with Nathan Kalman-Lamb and Derek Silva on their 2024 book, “The End of College Football: On the Human Cost of an All-American Game”


Dr. Jill A. Fisher’s Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials (Rutgers University Press 2008)

Dr. Erin Hatton’s Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment (University of California Press, 2020)


On the University of Missouri football team’s successful threat to strike if the university president didn&apos;t resign see 

&quot;The Power of a Football Boycott,” Jake New, Inside Higher Education,

The Forgotten History of Head Injuries in Sports:


Stephen Casper, a medical historian, argues that the danger of C.T.E. used to be widely acknowledged. How did we unlearn what we once knew? Ingfei Chen, The New Yorker



Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6194448-b8c8-11ef-bf71-ffae0adaff1f</guid>
      <title>Robert Danisch, &quot;Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666961942/Rhetorical-Democracy-How-Communication-Shapes-Political-Culture"><em>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture</em></a> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.</p><p>Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of <em>Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism </em>as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast <em>Now We’re Talking</em> that focuses on communication skills.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666961942/Rhetorical-Democracy-How-Communication-Shapes-Political-Culture"><em>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture</em></a> (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.</p><p>Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of <em>Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism </em>as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast <em>Now We’re Talking</em> that focuses on communication skills.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52304681" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/614b4ee8-5511-4f5b-bda4-8ed7cba9e5d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=614b4ee8-5511-4f5b-bda4-8ed7cba9e5d4&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Danisch, &quot;Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.
Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast Now We’re Talking that focuses on communication skills.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rhetorical Democracy: How Communication Shapes Political Culture (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024) offers an explanation and diagnosis of the current state of American democracy rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. Robert Danisch analyzes the characteristics of communication systems and communication practices that inhibit or enhance democratic life. In doing so, this book provides a detailed explanation of the ways in which the communication systems and practices that constitute democratic life are currently fostering polarization and how they might be made to foster cooperation. Scholars of communication, rhetorical studies, political science, and media studies will find this book of particular interest.
Robert Danisch is Professor of Communication Arts at the University of Waterloo whose research interests include rhetorical theory, persuasion, and public communication in democratic societies. He is the author of Pragmatism, Democracy and the Necessity of Rhetoric, Building a Rhetorical Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism as well as journal articles and several co-authored books. He is also the host of the podcast Now We’re Talking that focuses on communication skills.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">85e6d818-b89e-11ef-9715-9b1c6d1c4e09</guid>
      <title>How to Tackle Political Violence</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/rachel-kleinfeld?lang=en">Rachel Kleinfeld</a> is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.</p><p>This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-prevent-political-violence/">How to Prevent Political Violence</a>” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.</p><p><a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/people/rachel-kleinfeld?lang=en">Rachel Kleinfeld</a> is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.</p><p>This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-prevent-political-violence/">How to Prevent Political Violence</a>” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.</p><p>Dr <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cheeseman-nic.aspx">Nic Cheeseman</a> is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.</p><p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx">the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation</a> (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30830318" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c0c14034-5655-4ae0-8ae8-2891a7bf58cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c0c14034-5655-4ae0-8ae8-2891a7bf58cb&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>How to Tackle Political Violence</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.
Rachel Kleinfeld is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.
This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “How to Prevent Political Violence” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the United States, France, and Germany, political violence has been rising. This is particularly troubling as we lack compelling explanations for why this is happening, and effective responses to stop it. A powerful new argument from Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca suggests that the problem is not just emotive political polarization. Extreme political parties, irresponsible leaders and democratic disillusionment also play key roles, and are eating away at the heart of our political systems. Join Nic Cheeseman as he talks to Rachel Kleinfeld about the five strategies that can reduce political violence, the distinctive approach that has to be taken in polarised democracies, and why more aggressive forms of protest against populist and anti-system movements may only make matters worse.
Rachel Kleinfeld is a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program. Her influential work on troubled democracies facing problems such as polarized populations, violence, corruption, and poor governance bridges the United States and international cases. In addition to her research and analysis, Kleinfeld is known for in actively seeking practical solutions to today’s problems. To that end, she serves as a trustee of the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, and States United for Democracy and on the advisory board of Protect Democracy. She is a senior advisor to the Democracy Funders Network and is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises.
This episode is based on Rachel Kleinfeld and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca’s article titled “How to Prevent Political Violence” that was published in the October 2024 issues of the Journal of Democracy.
Dr Nic Cheeseman is the Professor of Democracy and International Development at the University of Birmingham and Founding Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Join us to better understand the factors that promote and undermine democratic government around the world and follow us on Twitter at @CEDAR_Bham!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3157a0ac-b7f4-11ef-a2b1-1b4746ad8337</guid>
      <title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866"><em>Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em> </em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking <em>Evicted</em>, <em>Unjust Debts</em> is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866"><em>Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em> </em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking <em>Evicted</em>, <em>Unjust Debts</em> is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43281209" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/f997acba-c841-4ef2-9bbf-9a04dcd5051f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=f997acba-c841-4ef2-9bbf-9a04dcd5051f&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a639c894-b28d-11ef-a99c-6fb245e1c88b</guid>
      <title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, <em>Congress</em> claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a> (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how <em>all </em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a> is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, <a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a> (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s <a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758"><em>The Law of Nations</em> </a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a> (Princeton 2013)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, <em>Congress</em> claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a> (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how <em>all </em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr. <a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a> is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, <a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a> (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s <a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758"><em>The Law of Nations</em> </a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a> (Princeton 2013)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50837995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/4d981f55-64b6-44f7-8671-a74dfba2e1ba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=4d981f55-64b6-44f7-8671-a74dfba2e1ba&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>752</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9710297c-b4bc-11ef-8e32-e73b604e0fe9</guid>
      <title>Nissim Mannathukkaren, &quot;Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032003061"><em>Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala</em></a> (Routledge, 2024) engages with a range of factors that shapes the trajectory of Hindu nationalism in Kerala, the southern state of India. Until recently, Kerala was considered a socio-political exception which had no room for Hindu nationalism. This book questions such Panglossian prognosis and shows the need to map the ideological and political growth of Hindu nationalism which has been downplayed in the academic discourse as temporary aberrations. The introduction to the book places Kerala in the context of South India. Arguing that Hindutva is a real force which needs to be contended within theoretical and empirical terms, the chapters in this book examine Hindu nationalism in Kerala in relation to themes such as history, caste, culture, post-truth, ideology, gender, politics, and the Indian national space. Considering the rise of Hindu nationalism in the recent years, this pioneering book will be of interest to a students and academics studying Politics, in particular Nationalism, Asian Politics and Religion and Politics and South Asian Studies.</p><p><a href="https://www.dal.ca/faculty/arts/ids/faculty-staff/our-faculty/nissim-mannathukkaren.html">Professor Mannathukkaren’s</a> main research interests are focused on left/communist movements, development and democracy, modernity, the politics of popular culture (esp., the politics of mass cultural forms like the media, cinema and sport), and Marxist and postcolonial theories. The thrust of his research has been to develop a theoretical and empirical critique of postcolonial theory and postmodern thought. At the same time, he has argued for a dialogue with postmodern-inspired frameworks of knowledge and to creatively integrate them to overcome the serious deficiencies of many modernist understandings of human social reality (which have translated into arrogant and teleological assumptions).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032003061"><em>Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala</em></a> (Routledge, 2024) engages with a range of factors that shapes the trajectory of Hindu nationalism in Kerala, the southern state of India. Until recently, Kerala was considered a socio-political exception which had no room for Hindu nationalism. This book questions such Panglossian prognosis and shows the need to map the ideological and political growth of Hindu nationalism which has been downplayed in the academic discourse as temporary aberrations. The introduction to the book places Kerala in the context of South India. Arguing that Hindutva is a real force which needs to be contended within theoretical and empirical terms, the chapters in this book examine Hindu nationalism in Kerala in relation to themes such as history, caste, culture, post-truth, ideology, gender, politics, and the Indian national space. Considering the rise of Hindu nationalism in the recent years, this pioneering book will be of interest to a students and academics studying Politics, in particular Nationalism, Asian Politics and Religion and Politics and South Asian Studies.</p><p><a href="https://www.dal.ca/faculty/arts/ids/faculty-staff/our-faculty/nissim-mannathukkaren.html">Professor Mannathukkaren’s</a> main research interests are focused on left/communist movements, development and democracy, modernity, the politics of popular culture (esp., the politics of mass cultural forms like the media, cinema and sport), and Marxist and postcolonial theories. The thrust of his research has been to develop a theoretical and empirical critique of postcolonial theory and postmodern thought. At the same time, he has argued for a dialogue with postmodern-inspired frameworks of knowledge and to creatively integrate them to overcome the serious deficiencies of many modernist understandings of human social reality (which have translated into arrogant and teleological assumptions).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45409852" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/92516e07-a4d0-4990-be69-5383335a09d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=92516e07-a4d0-4990-be69-5383335a09d6&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Nissim Mannathukkaren, &quot;Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala (Routledge, 2024) engages with a range of factors that shapes the trajectory of Hindu nationalism in Kerala, the southern state of India. Until recently, Kerala was considered a socio-political exception which had no room for Hindu nationalism. This book questions such Panglossian prognosis and shows the need to map the ideological and political growth of Hindu nationalism which has been downplayed in the academic discourse as temporary aberrations. The introduction to the book places Kerala in the context of South India. Arguing that Hindutva is a real force which needs to be contended within theoretical and empirical terms, the chapters in this book examine Hindu nationalism in Kerala in relation to themes such as history, caste, culture, post-truth, ideology, gender, politics, and the Indian national space. Considering the rise of Hindu nationalism in the recent years, this pioneering book will be of interest to a students and academics studying Politics, in particular Nationalism, Asian Politics and Religion and Politics and South Asian Studies.
Professor Mannathukkaren’s main research interests are focused on left/communist movements, development and democracy, modernity, the politics of popular culture (esp., the politics of mass cultural forms like the media, cinema and sport), and Marxist and postcolonial theories. The thrust of his research has been to develop a theoretical and empirical critique of postcolonial theory and postmodern thought. At the same time, he has argued for a dialogue with postmodern-inspired frameworks of knowledge and to creatively integrate them to overcome the serious deficiencies of many modernist understandings of human social reality (which have translated into arrogant and teleological assumptions).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Hindu Nationalism in South India: The Rise of Saffron in Kerala (Routledge, 2024) engages with a range of factors that shapes the trajectory of Hindu nationalism in Kerala, the southern state of India. Until recently, Kerala was considered a socio-political exception which had no room for Hindu nationalism. This book questions such Panglossian prognosis and shows the need to map the ideological and political growth of Hindu nationalism which has been downplayed in the academic discourse as temporary aberrations. The introduction to the book places Kerala in the context of South India. Arguing that Hindutva is a real force which needs to be contended within theoretical and empirical terms, the chapters in this book examine Hindu nationalism in Kerala in relation to themes such as history, caste, culture, post-truth, ideology, gender, politics, and the Indian national space. Considering the rise of Hindu nationalism in the recent years, this pioneering book will be of interest to a students and academics studying Politics, in particular Nationalism, Asian Politics and Religion and Politics and South Asian Studies.
Professor Mannathukkaren’s main research interests are focused on left/communist movements, development and democracy, modernity, the politics of popular culture (esp., the politics of mass cultural forms like the media, cinema and sport), and Marxist and postcolonial theories. The thrust of his research has been to develop a theoretical and empirical critique of postcolonial theory and postmodern thought. At the same time, he has argued for a dialogue with postmodern-inspired frameworks of knowledge and to creatively integrate them to overcome the serious deficiencies of many modernist understandings of human social reality (which have translated into arrogant and teleological assumptions).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>252</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fca48cb4-b418-11ef-80ce-2363149d3915</guid>
      <title>Tristan A. Volpe, &quot;Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last seven decades, some states successfully leveraged the threat of acquiring atomic weapons to compel concessions from superpowers. For many others, however, this coercive gambit failed to work. When does nuclear latency--the technical capacity to build the bomb--enable states to pursue effective coercion?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197669532"> <em>Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Tristan A. Volpe argues that having greater capacity to build weaponry doesn't translate to greater coercive advantage. Volpe finds that there is a trade-off between threatening proliferation and promising nuclear restraint. States need just enough bomb-making capacity to threaten proliferation but not so much that it becomes too difficult for them to offer nonproliferation assurances. The boundaries of this sweet spot align with the capacity to produce the fissile material at the heart of an atomic weapon.</p><p>To test this argument, Volpe includes comparative case studies of four countries that leveraged latency against superpowers: Japan, West Germany, North Korea, and Iran.</p><p>Volpe identifies a generalizable mechanism--the threat-assurance trade-off--that explains why more power often makes compellence less likely to work.</p><p>Volpe proposes a framework that illuminates how technology shapes broader bargaining dynamics and helps to refine policy options for inhibiting the spread of nuclear weapons. As nuclear technology continues to cast a shadow over the global landscape,<em> Leveraging Latency systematically assesses</em> its coercive utility.</p><p>Our guest today is <a href="https://tristanvolpe.com/">Tristan Volpe,</a> an Assistant Professor in the Defense Analysis Department at the Naval Postgraduate School and a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last seven decades, some states successfully leveraged the threat of acquiring atomic weapons to compel concessions from superpowers. For many others, however, this coercive gambit failed to work. When does nuclear latency--the technical capacity to build the bomb--enable states to pursue effective coercion?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197669532"> <em>Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology</em></a><em> </em>(Oxford UP, 2023), Tristan A. Volpe argues that having greater capacity to build weaponry doesn't translate to greater coercive advantage. Volpe finds that there is a trade-off between threatening proliferation and promising nuclear restraint. States need just enough bomb-making capacity to threaten proliferation but not so much that it becomes too difficult for them to offer nonproliferation assurances. The boundaries of this sweet spot align with the capacity to produce the fissile material at the heart of an atomic weapon.</p><p>To test this argument, Volpe includes comparative case studies of four countries that leveraged latency against superpowers: Japan, West Germany, North Korea, and Iran.</p><p>Volpe identifies a generalizable mechanism--the threat-assurance trade-off--that explains why more power often makes compellence less likely to work.</p><p>Volpe proposes a framework that illuminates how technology shapes broader bargaining dynamics and helps to refine policy options for inhibiting the spread of nuclear weapons. As nuclear technology continues to cast a shadow over the global landscape,<em> Leveraging Latency systematically assesses</em> its coercive utility.</p><p>Our guest today is <a href="https://tristanvolpe.com/">Tristan Volpe,</a> an Assistant Professor in the Defense Analysis Department at the Naval Postgraduate School and a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p><p>Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61763170" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/3c01fada-6064-42f5-abe3-b740b59cb26e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=3c01fada-6064-42f5-abe3-b740b59cb26e&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Tristan A. Volpe, &quot;Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last seven decades, some states successfully leveraged the threat of acquiring atomic weapons to compel concessions from superpowers. For many others, however, this coercive gambit failed to work. When does nuclear latency--the technical capacity to build the bomb--enable states to pursue effective coercion?
In Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology (Oxford UP, 2023), Tristan A. Volpe argues that having greater capacity to build weaponry doesn&apos;t translate to greater coercive advantage. Volpe finds that there is a trade-off between threatening proliferation and promising nuclear restraint. States need just enough bomb-making capacity to threaten proliferation but not so much that it becomes too difficult for them to offer nonproliferation assurances. The boundaries of this sweet spot align with the capacity to produce the fissile material at the heart of an atomic weapon.
To test this argument, Volpe includes comparative case studies of four countries that leveraged latency against superpowers: Japan, West Germany, North Korea, and Iran.
Volpe identifies a generalizable mechanism--the threat-assurance trade-off--that explains why more power often makes compellence less likely to work.
Volpe proposes a framework that illuminates how technology shapes broader bargaining dynamics and helps to refine policy options for inhibiting the spread of nuclear weapons. As nuclear technology continues to cast a shadow over the global landscape, Leveraging Latency systematically assesses its coercive utility.
Our guest today is Tristan Volpe, an Assistant Professor in the Defense Analysis Department at the Naval Postgraduate School and a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last seven decades, some states successfully leveraged the threat of acquiring atomic weapons to compel concessions from superpowers. For many others, however, this coercive gambit failed to work. When does nuclear latency--the technical capacity to build the bomb--enable states to pursue effective coercion?
In Leveraging Latency: How the Weak Compel the Strong with Nuclear Technology (Oxford UP, 2023), Tristan A. Volpe argues that having greater capacity to build weaponry doesn&apos;t translate to greater coercive advantage. Volpe finds that there is a trade-off between threatening proliferation and promising nuclear restraint. States need just enough bomb-making capacity to threaten proliferation but not so much that it becomes too difficult for them to offer nonproliferation assurances. The boundaries of this sweet spot align with the capacity to produce the fissile material at the heart of an atomic weapon.
To test this argument, Volpe includes comparative case studies of four countries that leveraged latency against superpowers: Japan, West Germany, North Korea, and Iran.
Volpe identifies a generalizable mechanism--the threat-assurance trade-off--that explains why more power often makes compellence less likely to work.
Volpe proposes a framework that illuminates how technology shapes broader bargaining dynamics and helps to refine policy options for inhibiting the spread of nuclear weapons. As nuclear technology continues to cast a shadow over the global landscape, Leveraging Latency systematically assesses its coercive utility.
Our guest today is Tristan Volpe, an Assistant Professor in the Defense Analysis Department at the Naval Postgraduate School and a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95077a76-b49f-11ef-b85d-3bd7c07c14b0</guid>
      <title>David Cowan, &quot;Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2009&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The inter-war period (1918–1939) is still remembered as a period of mass deprivation – the 'hungry thirties'. But how did this impression emerge? Thousands of conversations about life in the inter-war period – between parents and children around the dinner table; among workmates at the pub – shaped these understandings. In turn, these fed into popular politics. Stories about the embryonic welfare system in the early-twentieth century informed how people felt towards the National Health Service; memories of the Great Depression shaped arguments about state intervention in the economy.</p><p>Challenging accounts of widespread political disengagement in the twentieth century, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009340281"><em>Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2000</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. David Cowan shows how re-telling family stories about the inter-war period offered ordinary people an accessible way of engaging in politics. Drawing on six local case studies across Scotland and England, this book explains how stories about the inter-war working-class experience in industrial areas came to appear commonplace nationwide.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inter-war period (1918–1939) is still remembered as a period of mass deprivation – the 'hungry thirties'. But how did this impression emerge? Thousands of conversations about life in the inter-war period – between parents and children around the dinner table; among workmates at the pub – shaped these understandings. In turn, these fed into popular politics. Stories about the embryonic welfare system in the early-twentieth century informed how people felt towards the National Health Service; memories of the Great Depression shaped arguments about state intervention in the economy.</p><p>Challenging accounts of widespread political disengagement in the twentieth century, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009340281"><em>Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2000</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. David Cowan shows how re-telling family stories about the inter-war period offered ordinary people an accessible way of engaging in politics. Drawing on six local case studies across Scotland and England, this book explains how stories about the inter-war working-class experience in industrial areas came to appear commonplace nationwide.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46165969" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/72df7853-f38a-4ccc-814c-0f900f712ca3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=72df7853-f38a-4ccc-814c-0f900f712ca3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>David Cowan, &quot;Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2009&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The inter-war period (1918–1939) is still remembered as a period of mass deprivation – the &apos;hungry thirties&apos;. But how did this impression emerge? Thousands of conversations about life in the inter-war period – between parents and children around the dinner table; among workmates at the pub – shaped these understandings. In turn, these fed into popular politics. Stories about the embryonic welfare system in the early-twentieth century informed how people felt towards the National Health Service; memories of the Great Depression shaped arguments about state intervention in the economy.
Challenging accounts of widespread political disengagement in the twentieth century, Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2000 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. David Cowan shows how re-telling family stories about the inter-war period offered ordinary people an accessible way of engaging in politics. Drawing on six local case studies across Scotland and England, this book explains how stories about the inter-war working-class experience in industrial areas came to appear commonplace nationwide.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The inter-war period (1918–1939) is still remembered as a period of mass deprivation – the &apos;hungry thirties&apos;. But how did this impression emerge? Thousands of conversations about life in the inter-war period – between parents and children around the dinner table; among workmates at the pub – shaped these understandings. In turn, these fed into popular politics. Stories about the embryonic welfare system in the early-twentieth century informed how people felt towards the National Health Service; memories of the Great Depression shaped arguments about state intervention in the economy.
Challenging accounts of widespread political disengagement in the twentieth century, Politics of the Past: Inter-war Memories and the Making of British Popular Politics, 1939–2000 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. David Cowan shows how re-telling family stories about the inter-war period offered ordinary people an accessible way of engaging in politics. Drawing on six local case studies across Scotland and England, this book explains how stories about the inter-war working-class experience in industrial areas came to appear commonplace nationwide.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1517</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">707ee70e-b4a2-11ef-851e-43d0d0ea090a</guid>
      <title>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, &quot;Did It Happen Here?: Perspectives on Fascism and America&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324074397"><em>Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America</em></a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. <em>Did it Happen Here? </em>presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. <em>Did It Happen Here? </em>is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”</p><p>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324074397"><em>Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America</em></a><em> </em>(W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. <em>Did it Happen Here? </em>presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. <em>Did It Happen Here? </em>is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”</p><p>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50137018" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/70a9c0b5-d43e-4a6e-b39b-859c5ca025e3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=70a9c0b5-d43e-4a6e-b39b-859c5ca025e3&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins, &quot;Did It Happen Here?: Perspectives on Fascism and America&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America (W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. Did it Happen Here? presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. Did It Happen Here? is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins about the new, edited volume, Did It Happen Here? Perspectives on Fascism and America (W.W. Norton, 2024). Danny is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University and the steward of a fantastic interview series in The Nation magazine. Did it Happen Here? presents a snapshot of the fascism debate being waged on American campuses, in magazines, and on social media. The most recent iteration of the fascism debate began, as with many debates about the state of American politics, with the election of Donald Trump. Since his first term in 2016, speculation about the true nature of Trumpism has generated countless think-pieces and books. Did It Happen Here? is the definitive summary of the major scholarly views on whether fascism has come to America. As Danny puts it, “the fascism debate is Rorschach test for understanding what is truly ailing American society.”
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins is Assistant Professor in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>197</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d70c874a-b30f-11ef-8ecf-57b3244bc967</guid>
      <title>Talking Thai Politics: Pornchai Witayalerdpan – What’s Up with the Thai Senate?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How exactly were Thailand’s new slate of 200 Senators selected? What is it like to be an independent member of the Senate, when the chamber is now dominated by members closely associated with one of the government parties? Now that the Thai senate plays no role in selecting the prime minister, is it anything more than a talking-shop? What is the atmosphere like inside Thailand’s contentious upper house?</p><p>In this episode, senator Pornchai Witayalerdpan discusses the extraordinary process by which he and the 199 other new senators were selected in July 2024. He also explains how a small group of independent-minded senators are trying to promote democratic agendas, despite being consistently outvoted by the conservative majority.</p><p>Here is a link to the BBC Thai article mentioned by Pornchai in the interview, which provides some critical analysis on how the majority ‘blue group’ of senators dominated key votes in their first parliamentary session: <a href="https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro">https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro</a></p><p>Independent Thai senator<strong> Pornchai Wiyayalerdpan</strong> is a former simultaneous interpreter, who did graduate work in international relations and political science at Waseda University in Japan.</p><p><strong>Duncan McCargo</strong> is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics </em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p>Website: <a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/">https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly were Thailand’s new slate of 200 Senators selected? What is it like to be an independent member of the Senate, when the chamber is now dominated by members closely associated with one of the government parties? Now that the Thai senate plays no role in selecting the prime minister, is it anything more than a talking-shop? What is the atmosphere like inside Thailand’s contentious upper house?</p><p>In this episode, senator Pornchai Witayalerdpan discusses the extraordinary process by which he and the 199 other new senators were selected in July 2024. He also explains how a small group of independent-minded senators are trying to promote democratic agendas, despite being consistently outvoted by the conservative majority.</p><p>Here is a link to the BBC Thai article mentioned by Pornchai in the interview, which provides some critical analysis on how the majority ‘blue group’ of senators dominated key votes in their first parliamentary session: <a href="https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro">https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro</a></p><p>Independent Thai senator<strong> Pornchai Wiyayalerdpan</strong> is a former simultaneous interpreter, who did graduate work in international relations and political science at Waseda University in Japan.</p><p><strong>Duncan McCargo</strong> is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p><em>Talking Thai Politics </em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p>Website: <a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/">https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30063834" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/add16aff-422c-4c61-bc4d-bb1b7d3763cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=add16aff-422c-4c61-bc4d-bb1b7d3763cc&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking Thai Politics: Pornchai Witayalerdpan – What’s Up with the Thai Senate?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How exactly were Thailand’s new slate of 200 Senators selected? What is it like to be an independent member of the Senate, when the chamber is now dominated by members closely associated with one of the government parties? Now that the Thai senate plays no role in selecting the prime minister, is it anything more than a talking-shop? What is the atmosphere like inside Thailand’s contentious upper house?
In this episode, senator Pornchai Witayalerdpan discusses the extraordinary process by which he and the 199 other new senators were selected in July 2024. He also explains how a small group of independent-minded senators are trying to promote democratic agendas, despite being consistently outvoted by the conservative majority.
Here is a link to the BBC Thai article mentioned by Pornchai in the interview, which provides some critical analysis on how the majority ‘blue group’ of senators dominated key votes in their first parliamentary session: https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro
Independent Thai senator Pornchai Wiyayalerdpan is a former simultaneous interpreter, who did graduate work in international relations and political science at Waseda University in Japan.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Website: https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How exactly were Thailand’s new slate of 200 Senators selected? What is it like to be an independent member of the Senate, when the chamber is now dominated by members closely associated with one of the government parties? Now that the Thai senate plays no role in selecting the prime minister, is it anything more than a talking-shop? What is the atmosphere like inside Thailand’s contentious upper house?
In this episode, senator Pornchai Witayalerdpan discusses the extraordinary process by which he and the 199 other new senators were selected in July 2024. He also explains how a small group of independent-minded senators are trying to promote democratic agendas, despite being consistently outvoted by the conservative majority.
Here is a link to the BBC Thai article mentioned by Pornchai in the interview, which provides some critical analysis on how the majority ‘blue group’ of senators dominated key votes in their first parliamentary session: https://www.bbc.com/thai/articles/cy4nkvx99kro
Independent Thai senator Pornchai Wiyayalerdpan is a former simultaneous interpreter, who did graduate work in international relations and political science at Waseda University in Japan.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Website: https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c438dee4-b0f7-11ef-9c6a-6b39acc73b4b</guid>
      <title>Larry Alan Busk, &quot;The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What really separates emancipatory thinking from its opposite? The prevailing Left defines itself against neoliberalism, conservative traditionalism, and fascism as a matter of course. The philosophical differences, however, may be more apparent than real. </p><p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666929638/The-Right-Wing-Mirror-of-Critical-Theory-Studies-of-Schmitt-Oakeshott-Hayek-Strauss-and-Rand"><em>The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand</em></a> (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023) argues that dominant trends in critical and radical theory inadvertently reproduce the cardinal tenets of the twentieth century’s most influential right-wing philosophers. It finds the rejection of foundationalism, rationalism, economic planning, and vanguardism mirrored in the work of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, and Strauss. If it is to be more than merely an inverted image of the Right, critical theory must reevaluate its relationship to what Julius Nyerere once called “deliberate design” in politics. In the era of anthropogenic climate change, a substantial—not merely nominal—departure from right-wing talking points is all the more necessary and momentous.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really separates emancipatory thinking from its opposite? The prevailing Left defines itself against neoliberalism, conservative traditionalism, and fascism as a matter of course. The philosophical differences, however, may be more apparent than real. </p><p><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781666929638/The-Right-Wing-Mirror-of-Critical-Theory-Studies-of-Schmitt-Oakeshott-Hayek-Strauss-and-Rand"><em>The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand</em></a> (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023) argues that dominant trends in critical and radical theory inadvertently reproduce the cardinal tenets of the twentieth century’s most influential right-wing philosophers. It finds the rejection of foundationalism, rationalism, economic planning, and vanguardism mirrored in the work of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, and Strauss. If it is to be more than merely an inverted image of the Right, critical theory must reevaluate its relationship to what Julius Nyerere once called “deliberate design” in politics. In the era of anthropogenic climate change, a substantial—not merely nominal—departure from right-wing talking points is all the more necessary and momentous.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64596813" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/78784d20-d665-4b9f-b944-0219d938c056/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=78784d20-d665-4b9f-b944-0219d938c056&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Larry Alan Busk, &quot;The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What really separates emancipatory thinking from its opposite? The prevailing Left defines itself against neoliberalism, conservative traditionalism, and fascism as a matter of course. The philosophical differences, however, may be more apparent than real. 
The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023) argues that dominant trends in critical and radical theory inadvertently reproduce the cardinal tenets of the twentieth century’s most influential right-wing philosophers. It finds the rejection of foundationalism, rationalism, economic planning, and vanguardism mirrored in the work of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, and Strauss. If it is to be more than merely an inverted image of the Right, critical theory must reevaluate its relationship to what Julius Nyerere once called “deliberate design” in politics. In the era of anthropogenic climate change, a substantial—not merely nominal—departure from right-wing talking points is all the more necessary and momentous.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What really separates emancipatory thinking from its opposite? The prevailing Left defines itself against neoliberalism, conservative traditionalism, and fascism as a matter of course. The philosophical differences, however, may be more apparent than real. 
The Right-Wing Mirror of Critical Theory: Studies of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, Strauss, and Rand (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023) argues that dominant trends in critical and radical theory inadvertently reproduce the cardinal tenets of the twentieth century’s most influential right-wing philosophers. It finds the rejection of foundationalism, rationalism, economic planning, and vanguardism mirrored in the work of Schmitt, Oakeshott, Hayek, and Strauss. If it is to be more than merely an inverted image of the Right, critical theory must reevaluate its relationship to what Julius Nyerere once called “deliberate design” in politics. In the era of anthropogenic climate change, a substantial—not merely nominal—departure from right-wing talking points is all the more necessary and momentous.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>497</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">799924ee-b335-11ef-b585-1f3b8548102f</guid>
      <title>Stanislava P. Mladenova, &quot;When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil-Military Engagement in Fragile States&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Non-governmental organisations and militaries are notorious for their difficult relationship. The military is mostly understood through the prism of its lethality, and NGOs are perceived as idealistic do-gooders, ready to save the world. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538187722"><em>When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil Military Engagement in Fragile States</em></a> (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) Dr. Stanislava P. Mladenova traces the changing character of interaction between both of these entities. She argues that the boundaries which once separated their functions are fading.</p><p>Fragile, ungoverned, and insecure spaces need both of what these actors can provide. As a result, they have drawn closer together, and have everything at their disposal for a collaborative, efficient, and productive civil-military partnership, which is contrary to what many observers and leaders in the conflict and development space have long believed. Dr. Mladenova makes a convincing case that it is high time both sets of actors put aside their differences, bringing to light a fast-changing landscape of vicious poverty, insecurity, and climate change, where the conventional way of doing business will become the exception, not the rule.</p><p>Use the code RLFANDF30 for a 30% discount if you buy via the publisher!</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-governmental organisations and militaries are notorious for their difficult relationship. The military is mostly understood through the prism of its lethality, and NGOs are perceived as idealistic do-gooders, ready to save the world. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538187722"><em>When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil Military Engagement in Fragile States</em></a> (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) Dr. Stanislava P. Mladenova traces the changing character of interaction between both of these entities. She argues that the boundaries which once separated their functions are fading.</p><p>Fragile, ungoverned, and insecure spaces need both of what these actors can provide. As a result, they have drawn closer together, and have everything at their disposal for a collaborative, efficient, and productive civil-military partnership, which is contrary to what many observers and leaders in the conflict and development space have long believed. Dr. Mladenova makes a convincing case that it is high time both sets of actors put aside their differences, bringing to light a fast-changing landscape of vicious poverty, insecurity, and climate change, where the conventional way of doing business will become the exception, not the rule.</p><p>Use the code RLFANDF30 for a 30% discount if you buy via the publisher!</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/"><em> new book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45970894" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/1afc777f-863e-4f79-a051-0fc7bf382e91/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=1afc777f-863e-4f79-a051-0fc7bf382e91&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Stanislava P. Mladenova, &quot;When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil-Military Engagement in Fragile States&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Non-governmental organisations and militaries are notorious for their difficult relationship. The military is mostly understood through the prism of its lethality, and NGOs are perceived as idealistic do-gooders, ready to save the world. In When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil Military Engagement in Fragile States (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) Dr. Stanislava P. Mladenova traces the changing character of interaction between both of these entities. She argues that the boundaries which once separated their functions are fading.
Fragile, ungoverned, and insecure spaces need both of what these actors can provide. As a result, they have drawn closer together, and have everything at their disposal for a collaborative, efficient, and productive civil-military partnership, which is contrary to what many observers and leaders in the conflict and development space have long believed. Dr. Mladenova makes a convincing case that it is high time both sets of actors put aside their differences, bringing to light a fast-changing landscape of vicious poverty, insecurity, and climate change, where the conventional way of doing business will become the exception, not the rule.
Use the code RLFANDF30 for a 30% discount if you buy via the publisher!
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Non-governmental organisations and militaries are notorious for their difficult relationship. The military is mostly understood through the prism of its lethality, and NGOs are perceived as idealistic do-gooders, ready to save the world. In When Rambo Meets the Red Cross: Civil Military Engagement in Fragile States (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) Dr. Stanislava P. Mladenova traces the changing character of interaction between both of these entities. She argues that the boundaries which once separated their functions are fading.
Fragile, ungoverned, and insecure spaces need both of what these actors can provide. As a result, they have drawn closer together, and have everything at their disposal for a collaborative, efficient, and productive civil-military partnership, which is contrary to what many observers and leaders in the conflict and development space have long believed. Dr. Mladenova makes a convincing case that it is high time both sets of actors put aside their differences, bringing to light a fast-changing landscape of vicious poverty, insecurity, and climate change, where the conventional way of doing business will become the exception, not the rule.
Use the code RLFANDF30 for a 30% discount if you buy via the publisher!
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">37577990-b1a1-11ef-93ae-4395b9fd36b3</guid>
      <title>Geneviève Rousselière, &quot;Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The French have long self-identified as champions of universal emancipation, yet the republicanism they adopted has often been faulted for being exclusionary – of women, foreigners, and religious and ethnic minorities. Can republicanism be an attractive alternative to liberalism, communism, and communitarianism, or is it fundamentally flawed?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009477277"><em>Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the development of republicanism from an older elitist theory of freedom into an inclusive theory of emancipation during the French Revolution. It uncovers the theoretical innovations of Rousseau and of revolutionaries such as Sieyès, Robespierre, Condorcet, and Grouchy. We learn how they struggled to adapt republicanism to the new circumstances of a large and diverse France, full of poor and dependent individuals with little education or experience of freedom. Analysing the argumentative logic that led republicans to justify the exclusion of many, this book renews the republican tradition and connects it with the enduring issues of colonialism, immigration, slavery, poverty and gender.</p><p>Geneviève Rousselière is a Franco-American political theorist. She is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Duke University. She is the co-editor of <em>Republicanism and the Future of Democracy</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2019).</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French have long self-identified as champions of universal emancipation, yet the republicanism they adopted has often been faulted for being exclusionary – of women, foreigners, and religious and ethnic minorities. Can republicanism be an attractive alternative to liberalism, communism, and communitarianism, or is it fundamentally flawed?</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009477277"><em>Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France</em></a><em> </em>(Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the development of republicanism from an older elitist theory of freedom into an inclusive theory of emancipation during the French Revolution. It uncovers the theoretical innovations of Rousseau and of revolutionaries such as Sieyès, Robespierre, Condorcet, and Grouchy. We learn how they struggled to adapt republicanism to the new circumstances of a large and diverse France, full of poor and dependent individuals with little education or experience of freedom. Analysing the argumentative logic that led republicans to justify the exclusion of many, this book renews the republican tradition and connects it with the enduring issues of colonialism, immigration, slavery, poverty and gender.</p><p>Geneviève Rousselière is a Franco-American political theorist. She is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Duke University. She is the co-editor of <em>Republicanism and the Future of Democracy</em> (Cambridge University Press, 2019).</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48589631" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/c87446d4-adee-423e-9e5e-dd879a9d14d1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=c87446d4-adee-423e-9e5e-dd879a9d14d1&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Geneviève Rousselière, &quot;Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The French have long self-identified as champions of universal emancipation, yet the republicanism they adopted has often been faulted for being exclusionary – of women, foreigners, and religious and ethnic minorities. Can republicanism be an attractive alternative to liberalism, communism, and communitarianism, or is it fundamentally flawed?
Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France (Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the development of republicanism from an older elitist theory of freedom into an inclusive theory of emancipation during the French Revolution. It uncovers the theoretical innovations of Rousseau and of revolutionaries such as Sieyès, Robespierre, Condorcet, and Grouchy. We learn how they struggled to adapt republicanism to the new circumstances of a large and diverse France, full of poor and dependent individuals with little education or experience of freedom. Analysing the argumentative logic that led republicans to justify the exclusion of many, this book renews the republican tradition and connects it with the enduring issues of colonialism, immigration, slavery, poverty and gender.
Geneviève Rousselière is a Franco-American political theorist. She is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Duke University. She is the co-editor of Republicanism and the Future of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The French have long self-identified as champions of universal emancipation, yet the republicanism they adopted has often been faulted for being exclusionary – of women, foreigners, and religious and ethnic minorities. Can republicanism be an attractive alternative to liberalism, communism, and communitarianism, or is it fundamentally flawed?
Sharing Freedom: Republicanism and Exclusion in Revolutionary France (Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the development of republicanism from an older elitist theory of freedom into an inclusive theory of emancipation during the French Revolution. It uncovers the theoretical innovations of Rousseau and of revolutionaries such as Sieyès, Robespierre, Condorcet, and Grouchy. We learn how they struggled to adapt republicanism to the new circumstances of a large and diverse France, full of poor and dependent individuals with little education or experience of freedom. Analysing the argumentative logic that led republicans to justify the exclusion of many, this book renews the republican tradition and connects it with the enduring issues of colonialism, immigration, slavery, poverty and gender.
Geneviève Rousselière is a Franco-American political theorist. She is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Duke University. She is the co-editor of Republicanism and the Future of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f06beb4-ac28-11ef-bdec-070acdfe7b68</guid>
      <title>Corey Brettschneider, &quot;The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006275"><em>The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</em> </a>(W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.</p><p>Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of "We the People." He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.</p><p>Dr. <a href="http://www.coreybrettschneider.com/">Corey Brettschneider</a> is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include <em>The Oath of Office </em>(W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Politico</em>, and the <em>Washington Post</em>. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Online access to the <a href="https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/white-house-tapes">Nixon tapes from Nixon Library</a></p><p>Princeton Library archive on <a href="https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog?cr-f=Princeton+University.&amp;f%5Bcollection_sim%5D%5B%5D=Notes+of+George+L.+Denny+on+Woodrow+Wilson+Lectures%2C+1899-1900&amp;format=html&amp;per_page=50&amp;sort=date_sort+desc&amp;su-f=Princeton&amp;view=list">Woodrow Wilson lectures</a></p><p>Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/richard-m-gergel-unexampled-courage-sarah-crichton-books-2019/"><em>Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge</em></a></p><p>Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of <em>Politico</em>, <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/08/presidents-brettschneider-book-qa-00166620">“I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” </a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006275"><em>The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It</em> </a>(W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.</p><p>Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of "We the People." He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.</p><p>Dr. <a href="http://www.coreybrettschneider.com/">Corey Brettschneider</a> is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include <em>The Oath of Office </em>(W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Politico</em>, and the <em>Washington Post</em>. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Online access to the <a href="https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/white-house-tapes">Nixon tapes from Nixon Library</a></p><p>Princeton Library archive on <a href="https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog?cr-f=Princeton+University.&amp;f%5Bcollection_sim%5D%5B%5D=Notes+of+George+L.+Denny+on+Woodrow+Wilson+Lectures%2C+1899-1900&amp;format=html&amp;per_page=50&amp;sort=date_sort+desc&amp;su-f=Princeton&amp;view=list">Woodrow Wilson lectures</a></p><p>Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/richard-m-gergel-unexampled-courage-sarah-crichton-books-2019/"><em>Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge</em></a></p><p>Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of <em>Politico</em>, <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/08/presidents-brettschneider-book-qa-00166620">“I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” </a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64849253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/76f4a34d-8506-4175-abab-0ec396582607/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=76f4a34d-8506-4175-abab-0ec396582607&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Corey Brettschneider, &quot;The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It (W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.
Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of &quot;We the People.&quot; He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.
Dr. Corey Brettschneider is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include The Oath of Office (W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the New York Times, Politico, and the Washington Post. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Online access to the Nixon tapes from Nixon Library
Princeton Library archive on Woodrow Wilson lectures
Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge
Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of Politico, “I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2024, people around the world focus on an American president who calls for the imprisonment of critics, spreads the culture of white supremacy, and upends the law to commit crimes with impunity. Is Trump the first authoritarian to threaten American constitution democracy? Corey Brettschneider’s new book, The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It (W.W. Norton, 2024) argues that the United States has had previous authoritarian presidents who similarly threatened core democratic and rule of law values – and each was challenged by non-elected leaders Brettschneider terms “democratic constitutional constituencies.” John Adams waged war on the national press of the early republic, overseeing numerous prosecutions of his critics. In the lead-up to the Civil War, James Buchanan colluded with the Supreme Court to deny constitutional personhood to African Americans. A decade later, Andrew Johnson urged violence against his political opponents as he sought to guarantee a white supremacist republic after the Civil War. In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson modernized, popularized, and nationalized Jim Crow laws. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon committed criminal acts that flowed from his corrupt ideas about presidential power.
Using an impressive combination of primary documents, secondary sources, and new interviews, Brettschneider highlights how freedom to dissent, equal citizenship, and rule of law are central to democratic norms and the role that citizens play in pressuring subsequent reform-minded presidents to realize the promise of &quot;We the People.&quot; He documents how Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, Sadie Alexander, Daniel Ellsberg, and others we cannot easily name fought back against presidential abuses of power.
Dr. Corey Brettschneider is professor of Political Science at Brown University. His researches and teaches at the intersection of constitutional law and politics. His scholarly works include The Oath of Office (W.W. Norton, 2018) and he writes for outlets like the New York Times, Politico, and the Washington Post. I’m delighted to welcome him to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Online access to the Nixon tapes from Nixon Library
Princeton Library archive on Woodrow Wilson lectures
Susan’s NBN interview with Judge Richard Gergel on Unexampled Courage: The Blinding of Sgt. Isaac Woodard and the Awakening of President Harry S. Truman and Judge
Corey’s interview with Michael Kruse of Politico, “I’d Rather Have 10 Ken Starrs Than One Donald Trump” 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>751</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">291812d0-af4f-11ef-ad75-9b28299d2e72</guid>
      <title>Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, &quot;The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?</p><p>As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.</p><p>In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226684277"><em>The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today</em></a> (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.</p><p><strong>Amy J. Binder</strong> is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of <em>Contentious Curricula</em> and coauthor of <em>Becoming Right.</em></p><p><strong>Jeffrey L. Kidder</strong> is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of <em>Parkour and the City</em> and <em>Urban Flow</em></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?</p><p>As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.</p><p>In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226684277"><em>The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today</em></a> (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.</p><p><strong>Amy J. Binder</strong> is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of <em>Contentious Curricula</em> and coauthor of <em>Becoming Right.</em></p><p><strong>Jeffrey L. Kidder</strong> is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of <em>Parkour and the City</em> and <em>Urban Flow</em></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">Morteza Hajizadeh</a> is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos">YouTube channel</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/TalkArtCulture">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63308306" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314/episodes/9f67ebcb-8688-46b5-b0c4-f5b9c23623cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=7743b695-b4cd-4c21-acde-c1a69915e314&amp;awEpisodeId=9f67ebcb-8688-46b5-b0c4-f5b9c23623cd&amp;feed=6sq2TaYn"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder, &quot;The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?
As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.
In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.
Amy J. Binder is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of Contentious Curricula and coauthor of Becoming Right.
Jeffrey L. Kidder is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of Parkour and the City and Urban Flow

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The past six years have been marked by a contentious political atmosphere that has touched every arena of public life, including higher education. Though most college campuses are considered ideologically progressive, how can it be that the right has been so successful in mobilizing young people even in these environments?
As Amy J. Binder and Jeffrey L. Kidder show in this surprising analysis of the relationship between political activism on college campuses and the broader US political landscape, while liberal students often outnumber conservatives on college campuses, liberal campus organizing remains removed from national institutions that effectively engage students after graduation. And though they are usually in the minority, conservative student groups have strong ties to national right-leaning organizations, which provide funds and expertise, as well as job opportunities and avenues for involvement after graduation. Though the left is more prominent on campus, the right has built a much more effective system for mobilizing ongoing engagement. What’s more, the conservative college ecosystem has worked to increase the number of political provocations on campus and lower the public’s trust in higher education.
In analyzing collegiate activism from the left, right, and center, The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today (U Chicago Press, 2022) shows exactly how politically engaged college students are channeled into two distinct forms of mobilization and why that has profound consequences for the future of American politics.
Amy J. Binder is professor of sociology at John Hopkins University. She is the author of Contentious Curricula and coauthor of Becoming Right.
Jeffrey L. Kidder is professor of sociology at Northern Illinois University. He is the author of Parkour and the City and Urban Flow

Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>