<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/6mI7AJ8T" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>Entitled</title>
    <description>Rights matter, but conversations about rights can be polarizing, confusing and frustrating. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg have traveled the world getting into the weeds of global human rights debates. On Entitled, they use that expertise to explore the stories and thorny questions around why rights matter and what’s the matter with rights. Entitled is produced with the support of University of Chicago Law School and Yale Law School, and is part of the award winning University of Chicago Podcast Network.</description>
    <copyright>UCPN</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://entitledpodcast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>Rights matter, but conversations about rights can be polarizing, confusing and frustrating. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg have traveled the world getting into the weeds of global human rights debates. On Entitled, they use that expertise to explore the stories and thorny questions around why rights matter and what’s the matter with rights. Entitled is produced with the support of University of Chicago Law School and Yale Law School, and is part of the award winning University of Chicago Podcast Network.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2e7c76ad-7ecc-479b-8749-f0cb2f4f2dc5/a0f788fa-ab20-4d1b-bf9f-329efc2644f7/3000x3000/cover-art-1-3000x3000.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/6mI7AJ8T</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:keywords>law school, international, legal podcast, legal, human rights, tom ginsburg, university of chicago podcast network, claudi flores, entitled, government, international rights, law, ucpn, law podcast, law rights, lawyers, rights, university of chicago, university of chicago law school</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>hodappm@uchicago.edu</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Government"/>
    <itunes:category text="News">
      <itunes:category text="Politics"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
      <itunes:category text="Documentary"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">03ff1549-ec93-4aec-859f-03bb6900a7ce</guid>
      <title>Inside The Fight for Freedom with Myanmar&apos;s ​UN Ambassador</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Ambassador Kyaw Moe Tun, who has served as the Representative of Myanmar to the United Nations since October 2020. Despite the February 2021 military coup, he remains in his position, representing the interests of the democratic government and opposing the military junta at the UN. He has survived threats and has been challenged by the junta, but the UN has continued to recognize him as the representative.</p>
<p>As Myanmar continues to face political upheaval and widespread displacement following the coup, Ambassador Tun offers a firsthand perspective on the country’s ongoing crisis and its implications for the global human rights landscape. We explore the challenges of representing a nation in turmoil, the role of international institutions in responding to democratic backsliding, and what accountability can—and should—look like on the world stage.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/inside-the-fight-for-freedom-with-myanmars-un-ambassador-VOqNgU2N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Ambassador Kyaw Moe Tun, who has served as the Representative of Myanmar to the United Nations since October 2020. Despite the February 2021 military coup, he remains in his position, representing the interests of the democratic government and opposing the military junta at the UN. He has survived threats and has been challenged by the junta, but the UN has continued to recognize him as the representative.</p>
<p>As Myanmar continues to face political upheaval and widespread displacement following the coup, Ambassador Tun offers a firsthand perspective on the country’s ongoing crisis and its implications for the global human rights landscape. We explore the challenges of representing a nation in turmoil, the role of international institutions in responding to democratic backsliding, and what accountability can—and should—look like on the world stage.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37990732" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/05d9ab88-fb45-4e61-9b73-745c2a2c6e8c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=05d9ab88-fb45-4e61-9b73-745c2a2c6e8c&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Inside The Fight for Freedom with Myanmar&apos;s ​UN Ambassador</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Ambassador Kyaw Moe Tun, who has served as the Representative of Myanmar to the United Nations since October 2020. Despite the February 2021 military coup, he remains in his position, representing the interests of the democratic government and opposing the military junta at the UN. He has survived threats and has been challenged by the junta, but the UN has continued to recognize him as the representative.

As Myanmar continues to face political upheaval and widespread displacement following the coup, Ambassador Tun offers a firsthand perspective on the country’s ongoing crisis and its implications for the global human rights landscape. We explore the challenges of representing a nation in turmoil, the role of international institutions in responding to democratic backsliding, and what accountability can—and should—look like on the world stage.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Ambassador Kyaw Moe Tun, who has served as the Representative of Myanmar to the United Nations since October 2020. Despite the February 2021 military coup, he remains in his position, representing the interests of the democratic government and opposing the military junta at the UN. He has survived threats and has been challenged by the junta, but the UN has continued to recognize him as the representative.

As Myanmar continues to face political upheaval and widespread displacement following the coup, Ambassador Tun offers a firsthand perspective on the country’s ongoing crisis and its implications for the global human rights landscape. We explore the challenges of representing a nation in turmoil, the role of international institutions in responding to democratic backsliding, and what accountability can—and should—look like on the world stage.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>junta, democratic backsliding, un ambassador, myanmar, ambassador kyaw moe tun, military coup</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b5face0-799d-4bc1-bc9b-325631fcc823</guid>
      <title>Human Rights Under Pressure: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Kenneth Roth, the longtime former executive director of Human Rights Watch and one of the world’s most prominent advocates for international human rights. Over nearly three decades leading Human Rights Watch, Roth helped shape the global human rights movement, documenting abuses, pressuring governments, and elevating the role of international law in holding leaders accountable.</p>
<p>In this conversation, he reflects on how the human rights landscape has evolved—from the optimism of the post–Cold War era to today’s more complex environment marked by rising authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, and geopolitical competition. Flores and Ginsburg ask Roth how human rights advocates can remain effective when powerful states challenge international norms and institutions. They discuss the role of documentation and public pressure in exposing abuses, the growing influence of authoritarian governments on the global stage, and the ways civil society can still drive accountability even in hostile political climates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/human-rights-under-pressure-a-conversation-with-kenneth-roth-q8Lw2Ctq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Kenneth Roth, the longtime former executive director of Human Rights Watch and one of the world’s most prominent advocates for international human rights. Over nearly three decades leading Human Rights Watch, Roth helped shape the global human rights movement, documenting abuses, pressuring governments, and elevating the role of international law in holding leaders accountable.</p>
<p>In this conversation, he reflects on how the human rights landscape has evolved—from the optimism of the post–Cold War era to today’s more complex environment marked by rising authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, and geopolitical competition. Flores and Ginsburg ask Roth how human rights advocates can remain effective when powerful states challenge international norms and institutions. They discuss the role of documentation and public pressure in exposing abuses, the growing influence of authoritarian governments on the global stage, and the ways civil society can still drive accountability even in hostile political climates.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39367356" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/809bc46c-2f1c-4546-955e-09be1242c950/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=809bc46c-2f1c-4546-955e-09be1242c950&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Human Rights Under Pressure: A Conversation with Kenneth Roth</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Kenneth Roth, the longtime former executive director of Human Rights Watch and one of the world’s most prominent advocates for international human rights. Over nearly three decades leading Human Rights Watch, Roth helped shape the global human rights movement, documenting abuses, pressuring governments, and elevating the role of international law in holding leaders accountable. 

In this conversation, he reflects on how the human rights landscape has evolved—from the optimism of the post–Cold War era to today’s more complex environment marked by rising authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, and geopolitical competition. Flores and Ginsburg ask Roth how human rights advocates can remain effective when powerful states challenge international norms and institutions. They discuss the role of documentation and public pressure in exposing abuses, the growing influence of authoritarian governments on the global stage, and the ways civil society can still drive accountability even in hostile political climates.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode of Entitled, we sit down with Kenneth Roth, the longtime former executive director of Human Rights Watch and one of the world’s most prominent advocates for international human rights. Over nearly three decades leading Human Rights Watch, Roth helped shape the global human rights movement, documenting abuses, pressuring governments, and elevating the role of international law in holding leaders accountable. 

In this conversation, he reflects on how the human rights landscape has evolved—from the optimism of the post–Cold War era to today’s more complex environment marked by rising authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, and geopolitical competition. Flores and Ginsburg ask Roth how human rights advocates can remain effective when powerful states challenge international norms and institutions. They discuss the role of documentation and public pressure in exposing abuses, the growing influence of authoritarian governments on the global stage, and the ways civil society can still drive accountability even in hostile political climates.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>kenneth roth, human rights watch, human rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">591727cb-9aff-4158-9bd7-6fcb450db0cc</guid>
      <title>The Student Movement that Pushed for Change in Bangladesh</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of Entitled, Tom and Claudia talk with human rights advocate Rafia Khondoker  about the state of women’s rights and democratic freedoms in Bangladesh. Last week, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party secured a landslide victory in the first national election since the 2024 uprising, approving a referendum on major constitutional reforms—the "July Charter"—seeking to strengthen judiciary independence, safeguard democracy and increase women's participation in politics.</p><p>Drawing on her legal training and on-the-ground experience, Khondoker unpacks the gap between constitutional promises and lived realities. She explains how formal legal protections can coexist with systemic barriers—political pressure, social norms, and institutional weaknesses—that limit meaningful access to justice for women and marginalized communities.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/the-student-movement-that-pushed-for-change-in-bangladesh-Axll1dxi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this episode of Entitled, Tom and Claudia talk with human rights advocate Rafia Khondoker  about the state of women’s rights and democratic freedoms in Bangladesh. Last week, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party secured a landslide victory in the first national election since the 2024 uprising, approving a referendum on major constitutional reforms—the "July Charter"—seeking to strengthen judiciary independence, safeguard democracy and increase women's participation in politics.</p><p>Drawing on her legal training and on-the-ground experience, Khondoker unpacks the gap between constitutional promises and lived realities. She explains how formal legal protections can coexist with systemic barriers—political pressure, social norms, and institutional weaknesses—that limit meaningful access to justice for women and marginalized communities.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40757291" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/789de68f-d6b0-4139-83a5-104278fde539/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=789de68f-d6b0-4139-83a5-104278fde539&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>The Student Movement that Pushed for Change in Bangladesh</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On this episode of Entitled, Tom and Claudia talk with human rights advocate Rafia Khondoker  about the state of women’s rights and democratic freedoms in Bangladesh. Last week, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party secured a landslide victory in the first national election since the 2024 uprising, approving a referendum on major constitutional reforms—the &quot;July Charter&quot;—seeking to strengthen judiciary independence, safeguard democracy and increase women&apos;s participation in politics.

Drawing on her legal training and on-the-ground experience, Khondoker unpacks the gap between constitutional promises and lived realities. She explains how formal legal protections can coexist with systemic barriers—political pressure, social norms, and institutional weaknesses—that limit meaningful access to justice for women and marginalized communities.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On this episode of Entitled, Tom and Claudia talk with human rights advocate Rafia Khondoker  about the state of women’s rights and democratic freedoms in Bangladesh. Last week, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party secured a landslide victory in the first national election since the 2024 uprising, approving a referendum on major constitutional reforms—the &quot;July Charter&quot;—seeking to strengthen judiciary independence, safeguard democracy and increase women&apos;s participation in politics.

Drawing on her legal training and on-the-ground experience, Khondoker unpacks the gap between constitutional promises and lived realities. She explains how formal legal protections can coexist with systemic barriers—political pressure, social norms, and institutional weaknesses—that limit meaningful access to justice for women and marginalized communities.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>bangladesh, democratic freedom, womens rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7248a958-43e9-410a-a8bb-614745a23a2f</guid>
      <title>From Prison to Exile: Leopoldo López and the Fight for Venezuela</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Entitled, we speak with Leopoldo López about authoritarianism, resistance, and the future of Venezuela. Recorded before the U.S. intervention, the conversation centers on López’s long opposition to the Maduro regime—through political organizing, imprisonment, exile, and international advocacy.</p><p>Following the interview, Tom and Claudia reflect on developments since the conversation was recorded, turning to the U.S. intervention and its implications for sovereignty, legitimacy, and democratic change in Venezuela.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2026 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/from-prison-to-exile-leopoldo-lopez-and-the-fight-for-venezuela-Lfs3hWvg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Entitled, we speak with Leopoldo López about authoritarianism, resistance, and the future of Venezuela. Recorded before the U.S. intervention, the conversation centers on López’s long opposition to the Maduro regime—through political organizing, imprisonment, exile, and international advocacy.</p><p>Following the interview, Tom and Claudia reflect on developments since the conversation was recorded, turning to the U.S. intervention and its implications for sovereignty, legitimacy, and democratic change in Venezuela.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50166945" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/6b3c4aad-ff3f-4fac-8c0b-cb63210fc39d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=6b3c4aad-ff3f-4fac-8c0b-cb63210fc39d&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>From Prison to Exile: Leopoldo López and the Fight for Venezuela</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Entitled, we speak with Leopoldo López about authoritarianism, resistance, and the future of Venezuela. Recorded before the U.S. intervention, the conversation centers on López’s long opposition to the Maduro regime—through political organizing, imprisonment, exile, and international advocacy.

Following the interview, Tom and Claudia reflect on developments since the conversation was recorded, turning to the U.S. intervention and its implications for sovereignty, legitimacy, and democratic change in Venezuela.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Entitled, we speak with Leopoldo López about authoritarianism, resistance, and the future of Venezuela. Recorded before the U.S. intervention, the conversation centers on López’s long opposition to the Maduro regime—through political organizing, imprisonment, exile, and international advocacy.

Following the interview, Tom and Claudia reflect on developments since the conversation was recorded, turning to the U.S. intervention and its implications for sovereignty, legitimacy, and democratic change in Venezuela.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c010575e-88ed-4330-8163-d0f470765980</guid>
      <title>Pakistan’s Supreme Court Under Strain: A Judge Resigns Amid Constitutional Attacks and Rising Authoritarianism</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We speak to Mansoor Ali Shah, who served as the Senior Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until just last month. Shah is one of two judges who resigned after parliament passed a constitutional amendment that curbed its remit and will no longer allow the Supreme Court to hear constitutional cases. The judges say the reform “stands as a grave assault on the constitution”.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/pakistans-supreme-court-under-strain-a-judge-resigns-amid-constitutional-attacks-and-rising-authoritarianism-39thuvyz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We speak to Mansoor Ali Shah, who served as the Senior Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until just last month. Shah is one of two judges who resigned after parliament passed a constitutional amendment that curbed its remit and will no longer allow the Supreme Court to hear constitutional cases. The judges say the reform “stands as a grave assault on the constitution”.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44835440" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/357e2a28-9915-45bc-a457-1bb683d18005/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=357e2a28-9915-45bc-a457-1bb683d18005&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Pakistan’s Supreme Court Under Strain: A Judge Resigns Amid Constitutional Attacks and Rising Authoritarianism</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We speak to Mansoor Ali Shah, who served as the Senior Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until just last month. Shah is one of two judges who resigned after parliament passed a constitutional amendment that curbed its remit and will no longer allow the Supreme Court to hear constitutional cases. The judges say the reform “stands as a grave assault on the constitution”.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We speak to Mansoor Ali Shah, who served as the Senior Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan until just last month. Shah is one of two judges who resigned after parliament passed a constitutional amendment that curbed its remit and will no longer allow the Supreme Court to hear constitutional cases. The judges say the reform “stands as a grave assault on the constitution”.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56383473-a671-4f07-b2d8-e1bca6614b32</guid>
      <title>Who&apos;s Afraid of Gender: Entitled Podcast Live</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why has gender—once a term of analysis and identity—become one of the most explosive political flashpoints of our time? From the halls of the United Nations to state legislatures across the United States, debates over gender and sexuality now shape elections, social movements, and international alliances.</p><p>In this live episode of the "Entitled" podcast, hosts Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg sit down with Graeme Reid, U.N. Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, and Emily Bazelon, staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and senior research fellow at Yale Law School, to explore how gender has become a global battleground. Together, they’ll unpack the forces driving the backlash — from the rise of nationalist and religious movements to the politics of fear and control — and examine why gender has become a defining priority of the Trump administration and its international allies. Join us for a timely, provocative conversation about the past, present, and future of the global gender wars — and what’s really at stake when societies decide who gets to define gender itself.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/whos-afraid-of-gender-entitled-podcast-live-_Sy4vioZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has gender—once a term of analysis and identity—become one of the most explosive political flashpoints of our time? From the halls of the United Nations to state legislatures across the United States, debates over gender and sexuality now shape elections, social movements, and international alliances.</p><p>In this live episode of the "Entitled" podcast, hosts Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg sit down with Graeme Reid, U.N. Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, and Emily Bazelon, staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and senior research fellow at Yale Law School, to explore how gender has become a global battleground. Together, they’ll unpack the forces driving the backlash — from the rise of nationalist and religious movements to the politics of fear and control — and examine why gender has become a defining priority of the Trump administration and its international allies. Join us for a timely, provocative conversation about the past, present, and future of the global gender wars — and what’s really at stake when societies decide who gets to define gender itself.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53837144" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/057d4386-1b38-40db-997b-5866b4a77399/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=057d4386-1b38-40db-997b-5866b4a77399&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Who&apos;s Afraid of Gender: Entitled Podcast Live</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why has gender—once a term of analysis and identity—become one of the most explosive political flashpoints of our time? From the halls of the United Nations to state legislatures across the United States, debates over gender and sexuality now shape elections, social movements, and international alliances.

In this live episode of the &quot;Entitled&quot; podcast, hosts Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg sit down with Graeme Reid, U.N. Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, and Emily Bazelon, staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and senior research fellow at Yale Law School, to explore how gender has become a global battleground. Together, they’ll unpack the forces driving the backlash — from the rise of nationalist and religious movements to the politics of fear and control — and examine why gender has become a defining priority of the Trump administration and its international allies. Join us for a timely, provocative conversation about the past, present, and future of the global gender wars — and what’s really at stake when societies decide who gets to define gender itself.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why has gender—once a term of analysis and identity—become one of the most explosive political flashpoints of our time? From the halls of the United Nations to state legislatures across the United States, debates over gender and sexuality now shape elections, social movements, and international alliances.

In this live episode of the &quot;Entitled&quot; podcast, hosts Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg sit down with Graeme Reid, U.N. Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, and Emily Bazelon, staff writer for The New York Times Magazine and senior research fellow at Yale Law School, to explore how gender has become a global battleground. Together, they’ll unpack the forces driving the backlash — from the rise of nationalist and religious movements to the politics of fear and control — and examine why gender has become a defining priority of the Trump administration and its international allies. Join us for a timely, provocative conversation about the past, present, and future of the global gender wars — and what’s really at stake when societies decide who gets to define gender itself.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, emily bazelon, gender and sexuality, graeme reid, entitled podcast, gender, claudia flores, yale law school</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">778ba75c-facc-4ad7-8b88-e59208cc5d8f</guid>
      <title>Silencing the Special Procedures: Sanctions and the UN Human Rights System</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This year, the US government has issued sanctions on a number of experts from the UN to the International Criminal Court for speaking out about human rights in Gaza. President Donald Trump authorized<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/usa-sanctions-against-international-criminal-court-betray-international-justice-system__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!7tZ2AN8nrMKmZHzT0fHZEFNDdfXCctWgxJYLAGy1VzdwnrgjTZ5Fe8ARInJq5dNx5Wm9yDGZuSpCUMt_UxA9fL36CzZyBw$" target="_blank"> sanctions on the International Criminal Court</a> (ICC) and its Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan with the goal of stopping the ICC from undertaking its independent mandate. <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/02/united-states-un-experts-condemn-sanctions-against-icc__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!7tZ2AN8nrMKmZHzT0fHZEFNDdfXCctWgxJYLAGy1VzdwnrgjTZ5Fe8ARInJq5dNx5Wm9yDGZuSpCUMt_UxA9fL2k4TuHAQ$" target="_blank">UN experts strongly condemned the move</a>, calling it “an attack on global rule of law."</p><p>In this episode of Entitled, we discuss how sanctions are being used and abused by the Trump administration, and how other UN members are responding to the sanctioning of their colleagues for speaking out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/silencing-the-special-procedures-sanctions-and-the-un-human-rights-system-5ca4dfzi-n62v3aWh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, the US government has issued sanctions on a number of experts from the UN to the International Criminal Court for speaking out about human rights in Gaza. President Donald Trump authorized<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/usa-sanctions-against-international-criminal-court-betray-international-justice-system__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!7tZ2AN8nrMKmZHzT0fHZEFNDdfXCctWgxJYLAGy1VzdwnrgjTZ5Fe8ARInJq5dNx5Wm9yDGZuSpCUMt_UxA9fL36CzZyBw$" target="_blank"> sanctions on the International Criminal Court</a> (ICC) and its Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan with the goal of stopping the ICC from undertaking its independent mandate. <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/02/united-states-un-experts-condemn-sanctions-against-icc__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!7tZ2AN8nrMKmZHzT0fHZEFNDdfXCctWgxJYLAGy1VzdwnrgjTZ5Fe8ARInJq5dNx5Wm9yDGZuSpCUMt_UxA9fL2k4TuHAQ$" target="_blank">UN experts strongly condemned the move</a>, calling it “an attack on global rule of law."</p><p>In this episode of Entitled, we discuss how sanctions are being used and abused by the Trump administration, and how other UN members are responding to the sanctioning of their colleagues for speaking out.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27787047" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/2a8ce6e7-f287-4297-a3d6-0fde3d68ba8e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=2a8ce6e7-f287-4297-a3d6-0fde3d68ba8e&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Silencing the Special Procedures: Sanctions and the UN Human Rights System</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This year, the US government has issued sanctions on a number of experts from the UN to the International Criminal Court for speaking out about human rights in Gaza. President Donald Trump authorized sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan with the goal of stopping the ICC from undertaking its independent mandate. UN experts strongly condemned the move, calling it “an attack on global rule of law.&quot;

In this episode of Entitled, we discuss how sanctions are being used and abused by the Trump administration, and how other UN members are responding to the sanctioning of their colleagues for speaking out.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This year, the US government has issued sanctions on a number of experts from the UN to the International Criminal Court for speaking out about human rights in Gaza. President Donald Trump authorized sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan with the goal of stopping the ICC from undertaking its independent mandate. UN experts strongly condemned the move, calling it “an attack on global rule of law.&quot;

In this episode of Entitled, we discuss how sanctions are being used and abused by the Trump administration, and how other UN members are responding to the sanctioning of their colleagues for speaking out.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, un human rights, sanctions, un sanctions, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a895d4e-e0a4-47be-ac46-4e538e72ec52</guid>
      <title>Is It Time To Rethink The Binary In Sports?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When South African runner Caster Semenya dominated international competitions, sports authorities demanded she prove she was “really” a woman. The rules they created—targeting women with intersex traits or naturally higher testosterone—have since reshaped the future of women’s sports.</p><p>In this episode of <i>Entitled</i>, we unpack the controversial regulations of World Athletics, the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling, and the wider human rights questions at stake. Are these policies about fairness—or about enforcing outdated ideas of gender?</p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/is-it-time-to-rethink-the-binary-in-sports-VhD8sU29</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When South African runner Caster Semenya dominated international competitions, sports authorities demanded she prove she was “really” a woman. The rules they created—targeting women with intersex traits or naturally higher testosterone—have since reshaped the future of women’s sports.</p><p>In this episode of <i>Entitled</i>, we unpack the controversial regulations of World Athletics, the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling, and the wider human rights questions at stake. Are these policies about fairness—or about enforcing outdated ideas of gender?</p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38477851" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/657305fe-fce4-4a87-96fd-19ef84d9d457/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=657305fe-fce4-4a87-96fd-19ef84d9d457&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Is It Time To Rethink The Binary In Sports?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When South African runner Caster Semenya dominated international competitions, sports authorities demanded she prove she was “really” a woman. The rules they created—targeting women with intersex traits or naturally higher testosterone—have since reshaped the future of women’s sports.

In this episode of Entitled, we unpack the controversial regulations of World Athletics, the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling, and the wider human rights questions at stake. Are these policies about fairness—or about enforcing outdated ideas of gender?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When South African runner Caster Semenya dominated international competitions, sports authorities demanded she prove she was “really” a woman. The rules they created—targeting women with intersex traits or naturally higher testosterone—have since reshaped the future of women’s sports.

In this episode of Entitled, we unpack the controversial regulations of World Athletics, the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling, and the wider human rights questions at stake. Are these policies about fairness—or about enforcing outdated ideas of gender?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>transgender athletes, olympic eligibility, fairness in competition, castor semenya, discrimination in athletics, sports and politics, gender in sports, intersex athletes, human rights, women in sports</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c7a741f6-d603-4572-970c-278905015f32</guid>
      <title>What If Kings Are Good for Democracy?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What does it mean when people start calling Donald Trump a king? And why are some political theorists — on both the right and left — exploring the possibility of leaving democracy behind? All this debate got co-host Tom Ginsburg thinking about an argument he’s been turning over in his head for years: could constitutional monarchy actually be the best form of government?</p><p>Is it possible that constitutional monarchy actually<i>strengthens</i>democracy? Do monarchs serve as symbols of national unity that modern republics are missing? And is America’s obsession with political dynasties — the Obamas, the Bushes, the Kennedys — actually more monarchical than we’d like to admit?</p><p>This wide-ranging conversation takes us from Thailand to the United Kingdom, from the founding ideals of the U.S. Constitution to the rise of populist leaders. Along the way, Tom and Claudia debate whether democracy is still holding strong — or if we’re inching toward something more authoritarian.</p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/what-if-kings-are-good-for-democracy-WUUcGepH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What does it mean when people start calling Donald Trump a king? And why are some political theorists — on both the right and left — exploring the possibility of leaving democracy behind? All this debate got co-host Tom Ginsburg thinking about an argument he’s been turning over in his head for years: could constitutional monarchy actually be the best form of government?</p><p>Is it possible that constitutional monarchy actually<i>strengthens</i>democracy? Do monarchs serve as symbols of national unity that modern republics are missing? And is America’s obsession with political dynasties — the Obamas, the Bushes, the Kennedys — actually more monarchical than we’d like to admit?</p><p>This wide-ranging conversation takes us from Thailand to the United Kingdom, from the founding ideals of the U.S. Constitution to the rise of populist leaders. Along the way, Tom and Claudia debate whether democracy is still holding strong — or if we’re inching toward something more authoritarian.</p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34303021" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/e4ca0c31-1dfe-42f7-9afc-110b222c7b85/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=e4ca0c31-1dfe-42f7-9afc-110b222c7b85&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>What If Kings Are Good for Democracy?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean when people start calling Donald Trump a king? And why are some political theorists — on both the right and left — exploring the possibility of leaving democracy behind? All this debate got co-host Tom Ginsburg thinking about an argument he’s been turning over in his head for years: could constitutional monarchy actually be the best form of government?

Is it possible that constitutional monarchy actually strengthens democracy? Do monarchs serve as symbols of national unity that modern republics are missing? And is America’s obsession with political dynasties — the Obamas, the Bushes, the Kennedys — actually more monarchical than we’d like to admit?

This wide-ranging conversation takes us from Thailand to the United Kingdom, from the founding ideals of the U.S. Constitution to the rise of populist leaders. Along the way, Tom and Claudia debate whether democracy is still holding strong — or if we’re inching toward something more authoritarian.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean when people start calling Donald Trump a king? And why are some political theorists — on both the right and left — exploring the possibility of leaving democracy behind? All this debate got co-host Tom Ginsburg thinking about an argument he’s been turning over in his head for years: could constitutional monarchy actually be the best form of government?

Is it possible that constitutional monarchy actually strengthens democracy? Do monarchs serve as symbols of national unity that modern republics are missing? And is America’s obsession with political dynasties — the Obamas, the Bushes, the Kennedys — actually more monarchical than we’d like to admit?

This wide-ranging conversation takes us from Thailand to the United Kingdom, from the founding ideals of the U.S. Constitution to the rise of populist leaders. Along the way, Tom and Claudia debate whether democracy is still holding strong — or if we’re inching toward something more authoritarian.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, does america need a king?, no kings day, how monarchies prevent populism, constitutional monarchy, executive power trump, is trump a king?, political theory, king vs president, curtis yarvin, democracy limitations, democratic systems comparison, monarchies explained, american monarchy debate, democracy vs monarchy, presidential power, donald trump monarchy, republican governance, royal family symbolism, monarchies better than democracy?, monarchy and populism, university of chicago podcast, hyper presidentialism, why democracy fails, trump king controversy, constitutional monarchy benefits, can monarchies save democracy?, populism politics, ginsburg monarchy theory, british royal family, political dynasties america, trump monarchy memes, constitutional law, us political dynasties, dictatorship in america, political populism, absolute monarchy, democracy in crisis, trump monarchy meme, international human rights, are monarchies outdated?, authoritarianism usa, what is no kings day?</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">82b0ce99-3407-4ad6-a831-1b9a336bb184</guid>
      <title>Why Mahmoud Khalil&apos;s Lawyer Is Losing Faith In The Justice System</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As student protests over Gaza sweep college campuses, one case is testing the limits of free speech and immigration law in America. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and lawful permanent resident, was arrested by ICE without a warrant and sent to a remote detention center in Louisiana—allegedly for his political advocacy.</p><p>In this episode, we sit down with Khalil's lawyer Baher Azmy, who is also the Legal Director of the Center of Constitutional Rights, to unpack the disturbing legal maneuver behind Khalil’s detention: a rarely used immigration clause that gives the Secretary of State near-total discretion to deport individuals deemed a “foreign policy risk.” What does this case reveal about the future of dissent and academic freedom?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/why-mahmoud-khalils-lawyer-is-losing-faith-in-the-justice-system-TcQ6SiXK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As student protests over Gaza sweep college campuses, one case is testing the limits of free speech and immigration law in America. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and lawful permanent resident, was arrested by ICE without a warrant and sent to a remote detention center in Louisiana—allegedly for his political advocacy.</p><p>In this episode, we sit down with Khalil's lawyer Baher Azmy, who is also the Legal Director of the Center of Constitutional Rights, to unpack the disturbing legal maneuver behind Khalil’s detention: a rarely used immigration clause that gives the Secretary of State near-total discretion to deport individuals deemed a “foreign policy risk.” What does this case reveal about the future of dissent and academic freedom?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45364806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/f769ce09-1555-4c3a-bfd0-5b8b79646b92/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=f769ce09-1555-4c3a-bfd0-5b8b79646b92&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Why Mahmoud Khalil&apos;s Lawyer Is Losing Faith In The Justice System</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As student protests over Gaza sweep college campuses, one case is testing the limits of free speech and immigration law in America. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and lawful permanent resident, was arrested by ICE without a warrant and sent to a remote detention center in Louisiana—allegedly for his political advocacy.

In this episode, we sit down with Khalil&apos;s lawyer Baher Azmy, who is also the Legal Director of the Center of Constitutional Rights, to unpack the disturbing legal maneuver behind Khalil’s detention: a rarely used immigration clause that gives the Secretary of State near-total discretion to deport individuals deemed a “foreign policy risk.” What does this case reveal about the future of dissent and academic freedom?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As student protests over Gaza sweep college campuses, one case is testing the limits of free speech and immigration law in America. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and lawful permanent resident, was arrested by ICE without a warrant and sent to a remote detention center in Louisiana—allegedly for his political advocacy.

In this episode, we sit down with Khalil&apos;s lawyer Baher Azmy, who is also the Legal Director of the Center of Constitutional Rights, to unpack the disturbing legal maneuver behind Khalil’s detention: a rarely used immigration clause that gives the Secretary of State near-total discretion to deport individuals deemed a “foreign policy risk.” What does this case reveal about the future of dissent and academic freedom?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>student deportations, ice and student surveillance, genocide and free speech, due process rights, free speech on campus, authoritarianism in the u.s., ccr (center for constitutional rights), mahmoud khalil case, legal permanent residents (lpr), immigration law, baher azmy, first amendment, immigration courts, civil liberties, insurrection act, trump-era repression tactics, wartime powers in immigration, palestine protest crackdown, campus speech controversies, mike waltz un, academic freedom, columbia university protests, deportation without warrant, targeting of palestinian activists, human rights law, gaza war, legal advocacy for protesters, trump immigration policies, movement lawyering, ice raids, protest suppression, foreign policy bar, speech-based immigration detention, constitutional law, civil rights crackdown, habeas corpus, mahmoud khalil, un ambassador nomination, zionism vs free speech</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6fe3da66-4d26-4401-8401-7f7fdb0575f2</guid>
      <title>Are We Witnessing The End of The Postwar Order?, with Former President of the U.N. Dennis Francis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when the country that helped design the international human rights system starts to dismantle it?</p><p>In this episode, we speak with the former president of the U.N. General Assembly, Ambassador Dennis Francis, about the growing threats to global cooperation and human rights—from authoritarian drift, to shrinking U.S. commitments, to rising fears inside the U.N. system itself. </p><p>Is this the end of the liberal international order? And if so, what comes next?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/are-we-witnessing-the-end-of-the-postwar-order-with-former-president-of-the-un-dennis-francis-a8gO7fmZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when the country that helped design the international human rights system starts to dismantle it?</p><p>In this episode, we speak with the former president of the U.N. General Assembly, Ambassador Dennis Francis, about the growing threats to global cooperation and human rights—from authoritarian drift, to shrinking U.S. commitments, to rising fears inside the U.N. system itself. </p><p>Is this the end of the liberal international order? And if so, what comes next?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32965275" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/be87be60-df8e-44bb-8d99-b3fc5ac23e9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=be87be60-df8e-44bb-8d99-b3fc5ac23e9b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Are We Witnessing The End of The Postwar Order?, with Former President of the U.N. Dennis Francis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when the country that helped design the international human rights system starts to dismantle it?
In this episode, we speak with the former president of the U.N. General Assembly, Ambassador Dennis Francis, about the growing threats to global cooperation and human rights—from authoritarian drift, to shrinking U.S. commitments, to rising fears inside the U.N. system itself. 
Is this the end of the liberal international order? And if so, what comes next?
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when the country that helped design the international human rights system starts to dismantle it?
In this episode, we speak with the former president of the U.N. General Assembly, Ambassador Dennis Francis, about the growing threats to global cooperation and human rights—from authoritarian drift, to shrinking U.S. commitments, to rising fears inside the U.N. system itself. 
Is this the end of the liberal international order? And if so, what comes next?
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>global order, global south, sustainable development goals, international community, global stability, multilateralism vs nationalism, us isolationism, geopolitics, civil society advocacy, united nations, political polarization, trump administration, humanitarian issues, university of chicago law school, international relations, us-un relations, right to protest, rights under threat, peace and security, asylum seekers, western powers, women&apos;s rights, global governance, global human rights crisis, united nations headquarters, gender equality, global conflict, un general assembly, us foreign policy, united states, ambassador dennis francis, sovereignty vs global cooperation, human rights advocacy, diplomatic relations, diplomacy and dialogue, human rights, democracy in crisis, international cooperation, donald trump, international law, yale law school</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8052cab4-c6a8-4375-ae74-b49b2d1f4e6b</guid>
      <title>Trump And Human Rights: Take One</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when the government turns the law into a weapon? In these first few months of the second Trump administration human rights advocates, legal scholars, and university leaders are warning of a political landscape where funding is slashed, free speech is chilled, and legal institutions are bent to serve those in power. From defunding human rights initiatives to threatening universities and using the justice system for political retribution, many say the future of democracy is on the line.</p><p>In this episode, we explore the growing fear—and defiance—among those on the frontlines. Can universities withstand political pressure? Will the rule of law hold against efforts to consolidate power? What does the future of human rights look like in this new environment, and can it adapt, change and survive?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/trump-and-human-rights-take-one-eBnBD15P</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when the government turns the law into a weapon? In these first few months of the second Trump administration human rights advocates, legal scholars, and university leaders are warning of a political landscape where funding is slashed, free speech is chilled, and legal institutions are bent to serve those in power. From defunding human rights initiatives to threatening universities and using the justice system for political retribution, many say the future of democracy is on the line.</p><p>In this episode, we explore the growing fear—and defiance—among those on the frontlines. Can universities withstand political pressure? Will the rule of law hold against efforts to consolidate power? What does the future of human rights look like in this new environment, and can it adapt, change and survive?</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31450734" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/a42286a7-86e5-41c3-bfdf-a5ac8cf8b158/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=a42286a7-86e5-41c3-bfdf-a5ac8cf8b158&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump And Human Rights: Take One</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when the government turns the law into a weapon? In these first few months of the second Trump administration human rights advocates, legal scholars, and university leaders are warning of a political landscape where funding is slashed, free speech is chilled, and legal institutions are bent to serve those in power. From defunding human rights initiatives to threatening universities and using the justice system for political retribution, many say the future of democracy is on the line.

In this episode, we explore the growing fear—and defiance—among those on the frontlines. Can universities withstand political pressure? Will the rule of law hold against efforts to consolidate power? What does the future of human rights look like in this new environment, and can it adapt, change and survive?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when the government turns the law into a weapon? In these first few months of the second Trump administration human rights advocates, legal scholars, and university leaders are warning of a political landscape where funding is slashed, free speech is chilled, and legal institutions are bent to serve those in power. From defunding human rights initiatives to threatening universities and using the justice system for political retribution, many say the future of democracy is on the line.

In this episode, we explore the growing fear—and defiance—among those on the frontlines. Can universities withstand political pressure? Will the rule of law hold against efforts to consolidate power? What does the future of human rights look like in this new environment, and can it adapt, change and survive?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>usaid, education funding cuts, judicial independence, federalism, constitutional crisis, free speech, usaid funding freeze, trump administration, electoral politics, dei, affirmative action, students for fair admissions case, democracy under threat, cultural backlash, ai governance, civil liberties, university compliance, cultural revolution, political resistance, civil society, academic censorship, authoritarianism, academic freedom, federal funding, human dignity, political intimidation, freedom of expression, judicial crisis, populism, higher education crisis, societal polarization, political repression, university politics, anti-semitism definition, human rights, trump executive orders, government overreach, rule of law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17bb2e1c-4a4e-4172-b255-9c5bca898325</guid>
      <title>Is Bitcoin Good For Human Rights?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This week, our co-hosts Professors Tom Ginsburg and Claudia Flores discuss bitcoin, the cryptocurrency soaring in both popularity and value. In the last month, the price of a single bitcoin has risen from around $70,000 to almost $100,000. Its cultural impact is immense, yet confusing and controversial. Those who associate bitcoin with MAGA conservatives and get-rich-quick day traders might be surprised to learn that some see it as a tool to protect human rights. <br /> </p><p>Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, is optimistic about the revolutionary power of bitcoin to enable resistance and challenge global structures of economic inequality. In this episode, we hear from him on how bitcoin is uniquely positioned to support global human rights efforts. </p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/is-bitcoin-good-for-human-rights-UmbLqsyX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This week, our co-hosts Professors Tom Ginsburg and Claudia Flores discuss bitcoin, the cryptocurrency soaring in both popularity and value. In the last month, the price of a single bitcoin has risen from around $70,000 to almost $100,000. Its cultural impact is immense, yet confusing and controversial. Those who associate bitcoin with MAGA conservatives and get-rich-quick day traders might be surprised to learn that some see it as a tool to protect human rights. <br /> </p><p>Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, is optimistic about the revolutionary power of bitcoin to enable resistance and challenge global structures of economic inequality. In this episode, we hear from him on how bitcoin is uniquely positioned to support global human rights efforts. </p></blockquote><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45142769" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/11c46cb8-d353-4571-9305-80da47607639/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=11c46cb8-d353-4571-9305-80da47607639&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Bitcoin Good For Human Rights?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This week, our co-hosts Professors Tom Ginsburg and Claudia Flores discuss bitcoin, the cryptocurrency soaring in both popularity and value. In the last month, the price of a single bitcoin has risen from around $70,000 to almost $100,000. Its cultural impact is immense, yet confusing and controversial. Those who associate bitcoin with MAGA conservatives and get-rich-quick day traders might be surprised to learn that some see it as a tool to protect human rights. 

Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, is optimistic about the revolutionary power of bitcoin to enable resistance and challenge global structures of economic inequality. In this episode, we hear from him on how bitcoin is uniquely positioned to support global human rights efforts. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This week, our co-hosts Professors Tom Ginsburg and Claudia Flores discuss bitcoin, the cryptocurrency soaring in both popularity and value. In the last month, the price of a single bitcoin has risen from around $70,000 to almost $100,000. Its cultural impact is immense, yet confusing and controversial. Those who associate bitcoin with MAGA conservatives and get-rich-quick day traders might be surprised to learn that some see it as a tool to protect human rights. 

Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, is optimistic about the revolutionary power of bitcoin to enable resistance and challenge global structures of economic inequality. In this episode, we hear from him on how bitcoin is uniquely positioned to support global human rights efforts. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, human rights foundation, bitcoin, cryptocurrency, entitled, crypto, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6095cccd-b433-4474-8b32-4facab9d864f</guid>
      <title>Inside the UN: Unpacking the Role of Human Rights Experts</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>United Nations special experts have a crucial role in upholding international human rights law. These independent specialists hold mandates to report and advise on different areas within human rights as special rapporteurs, independent experts, or members of working groups. But how exactly do these appointments work, and what are the responsibilities, capabilities, and on-the-ground impacts of these experts? </p><p>In this episode, we hear from our very own co-host, Professor Claudia Flores, member of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls and Professor Fionnuala ni Aolain, former UN special rapporteur on counter-terrorism. Professors Flores and ni Aolain describe their work as UN mandate holders and how they address the most pressing issues in their areas of expertise. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/inside-the-un-unpacking-the-role-of-human-rights-experts-6neUQvZA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United Nations special experts have a crucial role in upholding international human rights law. These independent specialists hold mandates to report and advise on different areas within human rights as special rapporteurs, independent experts, or members of working groups. But how exactly do these appointments work, and what are the responsibilities, capabilities, and on-the-ground impacts of these experts? </p><p>In this episode, we hear from our very own co-host, Professor Claudia Flores, member of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls and Professor Fionnuala ni Aolain, former UN special rapporteur on counter-terrorism. Professors Flores and ni Aolain describe their work as UN mandate holders and how they address the most pressing issues in their areas of expertise. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38147951" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/00ec1434-56a4-450c-9448-01b94806bd69/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=00ec1434-56a4-450c-9448-01b94806bd69&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Inside the UN: Unpacking the Role of Human Rights Experts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>United Nations special experts have a crucial role in upholding international human rights law. These independent specialists hold mandates to report and advise on different areas within human rights as special rapporteurs, independent experts, or members of working groups. But how exactly do these appointments work, and what are the responsibilities, capabilities, and on-the-ground impacts of these experts? 

In this episode, we hear from our very own co-host, Professor Claudia Flores, member of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls and Professor Fionnuala ni Aolain, former UN special rapporteur on counter-terrorism. Professors Flores and ni Aolain describe their work as UN mandate holders and how they address the most pressing issues in their areas of expertise. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>United Nations special experts have a crucial role in upholding international human rights law. These independent specialists hold mandates to report and advise on different areas within human rights as special rapporteurs, independent experts, or members of working groups. But how exactly do these appointments work, and what are the responsibilities, capabilities, and on-the-ground impacts of these experts? 

In this episode, we hear from our very own co-host, Professor Claudia Flores, member of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls and Professor Fionnuala ni Aolain, former UN special rapporteur on counter-terrorism. Professors Flores and ni Aolain describe their work as UN mandate holders and how they address the most pressing issues in their areas of expertise. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, rights of women, international human rights law, fionnuala ni aolain, uchicago, counter-terrorism, yale, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, united nations, womens rights, terrorism, law podcast, uchicago podcast network, lawyers, yale university podcast, yale university, law, united nations podcast, entitled podcast, rights podcast, women&apos;s rights, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, lawyers podcast, special rapporteur, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, international human rights, claudia flores, un</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d01704a2-14a2-4a40-a882-071743b6d0bc</guid>
      <title>The Future of Justice: What’s Next for Israel/Gaza in International Law?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since our last episode on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, we wanted to do an update on where international law currently stands in the conflict. This year, the conflict has triggered several legal cases at international courts, including at the International Court of Justice, which has accused Israel of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.</p><p>In this episode, we speak with Aslı Ü. Bâli, a Professor of Law at Yale University who teaches international law and human rights in the Middle East, and Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on The Occupied Palestinian Territories.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Oct 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/the-future-of-justice-whats-next-for-israel-gaza-in-international-law-BFPpf8pS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since our last episode on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, we wanted to do an update on where international law currently stands in the conflict. This year, the conflict has triggered several legal cases at international courts, including at the International Court of Justice, which has accused Israel of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.</p><p>In this episode, we speak with Aslı Ü. Bâli, a Professor of Law at Yale University who teaches international law and human rights in the Middle East, and Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on The Occupied Palestinian Territories.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47776395" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/ca5f4218-cc41-41eb-a850-462465f97071/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=ca5f4218-cc41-41eb-a850-462465f97071&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of Justice: What’s Next for Israel/Gaza in International Law?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since our last episode on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, we wanted to do an update on where international law currently stands in the conflict. This year, the conflict has triggered several legal cases at international courts, including at the International Court of Justice, which has accused Israel of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
 
In this episode, we speak with Aslı Ü. Bâli, a Professor of Law at Yale University who teaches international law and human rights in the Middle East, and Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on The Occupied Palestinian Territories.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since our last episode on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, we wanted to do an update on where international law currently stands in the conflict. This year, the conflict has triggered several legal cases at international courts, including at the International Court of Justice, which has accused Israel of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
 
In this episode, we speak with Aslı Ü. Bâli, a Professor of Law at Yale University who teaches international law and human rights in the Middle East, and Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on The Occupied Palestinian Territories.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>yale law, united nations special rapporteur, uchicago podcast, international rights, uchicago, yale, aslı ü. bâli, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, international courts, united nations, middle east, law podcast, law, entitled podcast, rights podcast, international court of justice, francesca albanese, university of chicago podcast, yale podcast, international law podcast, entitled, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, gaza, israel and palestine, human rights, israel, lawyer, international law, palestine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ebe3e920-2f17-4d26-828b-ecd5cc23c67c</guid>
      <title>Is There A Place For Natural Law In Today&apos;s World?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We've all heard about different kinds of laws...but there is a higher order law that often gets overlooked—it's called Natural Law. The idea behind Natural Law is that all humans are born with an innate understanding of what's right and what's wrong, and that laws should be based on morality. In today's world, where there is no shortage of international wars, authoritarian leaders, human rights violations, and more, where and how can Natural Law be applied? </p><p>On this episode, we speak with <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://law.nd.edu/directory/mary-ellen-oconnell/__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!724wg73V7Gr0x8zTHuQRocjjn9SHux6hLPpeBsHc7aqc-lCJRu-RfHymdwX9E51J6fxs8eEa1UG24kCPnG9iK34VoHItyQ$">Mary Ellen O'Connell</a>, Professor of Law at Notre Dame and an expert on international law. O'Connell has been studying Natural Law over her career, and gives a justification for how it could be applied in scenarios from the Russia vs. Ukraine war, international human rights, and more. </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/is-there-a-place-for-natural-law-in-todays-world-Y3KT1XXV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've all heard about different kinds of laws...but there is a higher order law that often gets overlooked—it's called Natural Law. The idea behind Natural Law is that all humans are born with an innate understanding of what's right and what's wrong, and that laws should be based on morality. In today's world, where there is no shortage of international wars, authoritarian leaders, human rights violations, and more, where and how can Natural Law be applied? </p><p>On this episode, we speak with <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://law.nd.edu/directory/mary-ellen-oconnell/__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!724wg73V7Gr0x8zTHuQRocjjn9SHux6hLPpeBsHc7aqc-lCJRu-RfHymdwX9E51J6fxs8eEa1UG24kCPnG9iK34VoHItyQ$">Mary Ellen O'Connell</a>, Professor of Law at Notre Dame and an expert on international law. O'Connell has been studying Natural Law over her career, and gives a justification for how it could be applied in scenarios from the Russia vs. Ukraine war, international human rights, and more. </p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41538561" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/21b36243-609a-4fd4-98b8-0a15a3c8efa3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=21b36243-609a-4fd4-98b8-0a15a3c8efa3&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Is There A Place For Natural Law In Today&apos;s World?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We&apos;ve all heard about different kinds of laws...but there is a higher order law that often gets overlooked—it&apos;s called Natural Law. The idea behind Natural Law is that all humans are born with an innate understanding of what&apos;s right and what&apos;s wrong, and that laws should be based on morality. In today&apos;s world, where there is no shortage of international wars, authoritarian leaders, human rights violations, and more, where and how can Natural Law be applied? 

On this episode, we speak with Mary Ellen O&apos;Connell, Professor of Law at Notre Dame and an expert on international law. O&apos;Connell has been studying Natural Law over her career, and gives a justification for how it could be applied in scenarios from the Russia vs. Ukraine war, international human rights, and more. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We&apos;ve all heard about different kinds of laws...but there is a higher order law that often gets overlooked—it&apos;s called Natural Law. The idea behind Natural Law is that all humans are born with an innate understanding of what&apos;s right and what&apos;s wrong, and that laws should be based on morality. In today&apos;s world, where there is no shortage of international wars, authoritarian leaders, human rights violations, and more, where and how can Natural Law be applied? 

On this episode, we speak with Mary Ellen O&apos;Connell, Professor of Law at Notre Dame and an expert on international law. O&apos;Connell has been studying Natural Law over her career, and gives a justification for how it could be applied in scenarios from the Russia vs. Ukraine war, international human rights, and more. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>ukraine, yale, natural law, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, notre dame, russia, law podcast, lawyers, law, entitled podcast, mary ellen o&apos;connell, entitled, lawyer podcast, lawyers podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, gaza, human rights, international human rights, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f405d316-1c36-4441-bee0-0ca5c0a19b3d</guid>
      <title>Can Law Govern War? Gaza, Israel and Beyond</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to discussion about the conflict in Gaza, there is an endless parade of commentators on both sides telling us what is right or wrong, legitimate or illegal, a crime or a justified attack, but in all that debate and discussion the actual international laws of war often get pushed to the sidelines. </p><p>We’re planning to do a series of episodes on this conflict in the coming     weeks, but we wanted to start by getting a baseline understand on the laws of war with an international expert.</p><p>Oona Hathaway is a professor of international law and a member of the Advisory Committee on International Law at the United States Department of State since 2005. For decades, she’s been exploring the complicated legal questions that are coming to the forefront since October 7th which makes her the perfect guest for this episode.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/can-law-govern-war-gaza-israel-and-beyond-yPnRaZ6y</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to discussion about the conflict in Gaza, there is an endless parade of commentators on both sides telling us what is right or wrong, legitimate or illegal, a crime or a justified attack, but in all that debate and discussion the actual international laws of war often get pushed to the sidelines. </p><p>We’re planning to do a series of episodes on this conflict in the coming     weeks, but we wanted to start by getting a baseline understand on the laws of war with an international expert.</p><p>Oona Hathaway is a professor of international law and a member of the Advisory Committee on International Law at the United States Department of State since 2005. For decades, she’s been exploring the complicated legal questions that are coming to the forefront since October 7th which makes her the perfect guest for this episode.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46129181" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/02816e01-244c-4104-a235-b545cbf11ed6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=02816e01-244c-4104-a235-b545cbf11ed6&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Can Law Govern War? Gaza, Israel and Beyond</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When it comes to discussion about the conflict in Gaza, there is an endless parade of commentators on both sides telling us what is right or wrong, legitimate or illegal, a crime or a justified attack, but in all that debate and discussion the actual international laws of war often get pushed to the sidelines. 

We’re planning to do a series of episodes on this conflict in the coming     weeks, but we wanted to start by getting a baseline understand on the laws of war with an international expert.

Oona Hathaway is a professor of international law and a member of the Advisory Committee on International Law at the United States Department of State since 2005. For decades, she’s been exploring the complicated legal questions that are coming to the forefront since October 7th which makes her the perfect guest for this episode.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When it comes to discussion about the conflict in Gaza, there is an endless parade of commentators on both sides telling us what is right or wrong, legitimate or illegal, a crime or a justified attack, but in all that debate and discussion the actual international laws of war often get pushed to the sidelines. 

We’re planning to do a series of episodes on this conflict in the coming     weeks, but we wanted to start by getting a baseline understand on the laws of war with an international expert.

Oona Hathaway is a professor of international law and a member of the Advisory Committee on International Law at the United States Department of State since 2005. For decades, she’s been exploring the complicated legal questions that are coming to the forefront since October 7th which makes her the perfect guest for this episode.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>october 7th, conflict, yale, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, oona hathaway, law podcast, law of war, laws of war, law, palestinian, war, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, gaza, human rights, international human rights, israel, lawyer, international law, palestine</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bba44904-6e73-462e-b23a-39ef69721d6e</guid>
      <title>Is Gender Apartheid A Thing?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The word apartheid gets used in many different contexts to indicate the severity of crimes across the globe. But its use is controversial because the word has a very specific definition in international law. Even more controversial is the concept of expanding the term to include gender.</p><p>If there is one place on earth where it could be argued that a gender apartheid designation is needed its Afghanistan. Since the US withdrawal from the country, the Taliban have instituted a brutal repression of women. But is it gender apartheid?</p><p>What would it mean for us to create this designation and assign it to Afghanistan? Does cultural relativism throw a legitimate wrench into this argument or does that take the concept too far?</p><p>We discuss all these questions on this episode with Mohammad “Musa” Mahmodi, a Research Fellow in Law at the Schell Center for International Human Rights at Yale, Zahra Motamedi, an Associate Research Fellow at Yale, and Karima Bennoune, the Lewis M. Simes Professor of Law at the University of Michigan and author of “Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here”.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 May 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/is-gender-apartheid-a-thing-ysa5C9bf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word apartheid gets used in many different contexts to indicate the severity of crimes across the globe. But its use is controversial because the word has a very specific definition in international law. Even more controversial is the concept of expanding the term to include gender.</p><p>If there is one place on earth where it could be argued that a gender apartheid designation is needed its Afghanistan. Since the US withdrawal from the country, the Taliban have instituted a brutal repression of women. But is it gender apartheid?</p><p>What would it mean for us to create this designation and assign it to Afghanistan? Does cultural relativism throw a legitimate wrench into this argument or does that take the concept too far?</p><p>We discuss all these questions on this episode with Mohammad “Musa” Mahmodi, a Research Fellow in Law at the Schell Center for International Human Rights at Yale, Zahra Motamedi, an Associate Research Fellow at Yale, and Karima Bennoune, the Lewis M. Simes Professor of Law at the University of Michigan and author of “Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here”.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47140356" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/25c00968-574a-48c6-8a5a-c141b1d9ab3a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=25c00968-574a-48c6-8a5a-c141b1d9ab3a&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Is Gender Apartheid A Thing?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The word apartheid gets used in many different contexts to indicate the severity of crimes across the globe. But its use is controversial because the word has a very specific definition in international law. Even more controversial is the concept of expanding the term to include gender.
 
If there is one place on earth where it could be argued that a gender apartheid designation is needed its Afghanistan. Since the US withdrawal from the country, the Taliban have instituted a brutal repression of women. But is it gender apartheid?
 
What would it mean for us to create this designation and assign it to Afghanistan? Does cultural relativism throw a legitimate wrench into this argument or does that take the concept too far?
 
We discuss all these questions on this episode with Mohammad “Musa” Mahmodi, a Research Fellow in Law at the Schell Center for International Human Rights at Yale, Zahra Motamedi, an Associate Research Fellow at Yale, and Karima Bennoune, the Lewis M. Simes Professor of Law at the University of Michigan and author of “Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here”.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The word apartheid gets used in many different contexts to indicate the severity of crimes across the globe. But its use is controversial because the word has a very specific definition in international law. Even more controversial is the concept of expanding the term to include gender.
 
If there is one place on earth where it could be argued that a gender apartheid designation is needed its Afghanistan. Since the US withdrawal from the country, the Taliban have instituted a brutal repression of women. But is it gender apartheid?
 
What would it mean for us to create this designation and assign it to Afghanistan? Does cultural relativism throw a legitimate wrench into this argument or does that take the concept too far?
 
We discuss all these questions on this episode with Mohammad “Musa” Mahmodi, a Research Fellow in Law at the Schell Center for International Human Rights at Yale, Zahra Motamedi, an Associate Research Fellow at Yale, and Karima Bennoune, the Lewis M. Simes Professor of Law at the University of Michigan and author of “Your Fatwa Does Not Apply Here”.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, yale, afghanistan, law podcast, gender apartheid, apartheid, yale university, cultural relativism, law, entitled, lawyer podcast, human rights podcast, human rights, international human rights, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">73b3a3d6-1a26-420f-a53f-763d8cbd4d69</guid>
      <title>Is The Right to Read Under Threat?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, book bans have swept the nation. According to PEN America, more than 4,000 books have been banned in some capacity in public schools since July 2021. Books that discuss topics like racial justice or have characters that identify as LGBTQ+ are just some of the examples that have received widespread attention. While book bans are not a new phenomenon, parents rights groups have accelerated their attacks on what books can be put on school's shelves, leaving a bigger question up for debate: Who should decide what books are available, and moreover, who has the right to read certain books?</p><p>The American Library Association has been helping to support libraries as democratic institutions for decades by providing resources to librarians about what books to select based on the information needs of the communities to which they serve. In this episode, we speak with Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom and Director of the Freedom to Read Foundation. Caldwell-Stone discusses why book bans have increased in recent years, and why she says the right to read needs to be protected.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/is-the-right-to-read-under-threat-gw8Hy5la</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, book bans have swept the nation. According to PEN America, more than 4,000 books have been banned in some capacity in public schools since July 2021. Books that discuss topics like racial justice or have characters that identify as LGBTQ+ are just some of the examples that have received widespread attention. While book bans are not a new phenomenon, parents rights groups have accelerated their attacks on what books can be put on school's shelves, leaving a bigger question up for debate: Who should decide what books are available, and moreover, who has the right to read certain books?</p><p>The American Library Association has been helping to support libraries as democratic institutions for decades by providing resources to librarians about what books to select based on the information needs of the communities to which they serve. In this episode, we speak with Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Director of the American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom and Director of the Freedom to Read Foundation. Caldwell-Stone discusses why book bans have increased in recent years, and why she says the right to read needs to be protected.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38671397" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/9092c3f7-b24d-43f1-a12a-474abcc8e058/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=9092c3f7-b24d-43f1-a12a-474abcc8e058&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Is The Right to Read Under Threat?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In recent years, book bans have swept the nation. According to PEN America, more than 4,000 books have been banned in some capacity in public schools since July 2021. Books that discuss topics like racial justice or have characters that identify as LGBTQ+ are just some of the examples that have received widespread attention. While book bans are not a new phenomenon, parents rights groups have accelerated their attacks on what books can be put on school&apos;s shelves, leaving a bigger question up for debate: Who should decide what books are available, and moreover, who has the right to read certain books?

The American Library Assocation has been helping to support libraries as democratic institutions for decades by providing resources to librarians about what books to select based on the information needs of the communities to which they serve. In this episode, we speak with Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Director of the American Library Association&apos;s Office for Intellectual Freedom and Director of the Freedom to Read Foundation. Caldwell-Stone discusses why book bans have increased in recent years, and why she says the right to read needs to be protected.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent years, book bans have swept the nation. According to PEN America, more than 4,000 books have been banned in some capacity in public schools since July 2021. Books that discuss topics like racial justice or have characters that identify as LGBTQ+ are just some of the examples that have received widespread attention. While book bans are not a new phenomenon, parents rights groups have accelerated their attacks on what books can be put on school&apos;s shelves, leaving a bigger question up for debate: Who should decide what books are available, and moreover, who has the right to read certain books?

The American Library Assocation has been helping to support libraries as democratic institutions for decades by providing resources to librarians about what books to select based on the information needs of the communities to which they serve. In this episode, we speak with Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Director of the American Library Association&apos;s Office for Intellectual Freedom and Director of the Freedom to Read Foundation. Caldwell-Stone discusses why book bans have increased in recent years, and why she says the right to read needs to be protected.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, right to read, the american library association, law podcast, law, entitled podcast, library science, deborah caldwell-stone, rights podcast, book banning, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, libraries, human rights podcast, book bans, human rights, claudia flores, lawyer, librarians</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed921077-bb24-435a-b095-2c831607bbe0</guid>
      <title>Do We Have The Right to Lie?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As kids, we all heard someone tell us that it's wrong to lie...but as we grew older, we realized that people lie all the time. Politicians, presidents, and even executives at corporations tell lies—big and small. As citizens, there are obvious exceptions where lying is wrong, for instance; perjury, lying on your employment application, or lying to get a bank loan. But do we have a right to lie? And if so, what are the boundaries?</p><p>On this episode, we speak with UCLA Professor of Philosophy and Law Seana Shiffrin and George Washington University Professor of Law Catherine Ross. They discuss both the philosophical arguments against lying and the legal arguments against notorious lies made by President Trump and former Congressman George Santos.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/do-we-have-the-right-to-lie-UmaMguVK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As kids, we all heard someone tell us that it's wrong to lie...but as we grew older, we realized that people lie all the time. Politicians, presidents, and even executives at corporations tell lies—big and small. As citizens, there are obvious exceptions where lying is wrong, for instance; perjury, lying on your employment application, or lying to get a bank loan. But do we have a right to lie? And if so, what are the boundaries?</p><p>On this episode, we speak with UCLA Professor of Philosophy and Law Seana Shiffrin and George Washington University Professor of Law Catherine Ross. They discuss both the philosophical arguments against lying and the legal arguments against notorious lies made by President Trump and former Congressman George Santos.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37221241" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/cf4ffd45-9f66-4682-b429-1690c4093529/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=cf4ffd45-9f66-4682-b429-1690c4093529&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Do We Have The Right to Lie?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As kids, we all heard someone tell us that it&apos;s wrong to lie...but as we grew older, we realized that people lie all the time. Politicians, presidents, and even executives at corporations tell lies—big and small. As citizens, there are obvious exceptions where lying is wrong, for instance; perjury, lying on your employment application, or lying to get a bank loan. But do we have a right to lie? And if so, what are the boundaries?

On this episode, we speak with UCLA Professor of Philosophy and Law Seana Shiffrin and George Washington University Professor of Law Catherine Ross. They discuss both the philosophical arguments against lying and the legal arguments against notorious lies made by President Trump and former Congressman George Santos.
</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As kids, we all heard someone tell us that it&apos;s wrong to lie...but as we grew older, we realized that people lie all the time. Politicians, presidents, and even executives at corporations tell lies—big and small. As citizens, there are obvious exceptions where lying is wrong, for instance; perjury, lying on your employment application, or lying to get a bank loan. But do we have a right to lie? And if so, what are the boundaries?

On this episode, we speak with UCLA Professor of Philosophy and Law Seana Shiffrin and George Washington University Professor of Law Catherine Ross. They discuss both the philosophical arguments against lying and the legal arguments against notorious lies made by President Trump and former Congressman George Santos.
</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, george washington university, legal podcast, yale, trump, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, catherine ross, lies, law podcast, government podcast, seana shiffrin, government, legal, law, george santos, entitled podcast, university of chicago podcast, lying, entitled, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, international human rights, ucla, claudia flores, donald trump</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b9b3e4c-fe07-4a8a-afaa-7689236e9da4</guid>
      <title>LIVE: Free Expression &amp; Social Media</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We’re doing something special for this month’s episode. In October of 2023, we hosted a live recording here at the University of Chicago. Tom Ginsburg was joined on stage by renowned scholar Genevie Laikier to have a conversation about free speech on social media. In other words, it was very relevant to our current season about the right to free expression.</p><p>We’re going to share that recording with you this month. We hope you enjoy, and thanks to everyone who listened to our podcast this year.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/live-free-expression-social-media-Xe0X3DuB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re doing something special for this month’s episode. In October of 2023, we hosted a live recording here at the University of Chicago. Tom Ginsburg was joined on stage by renowned scholar Genevie Laikier to have a conversation about free speech on social media. In other words, it was very relevant to our current season about the right to free expression.</p><p>We’re going to share that recording with you this month. We hope you enjoy, and thanks to everyone who listened to our podcast this year.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42924653" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/784cf1bc-df3f-422e-8b5e-c39300c7435b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=784cf1bc-df3f-422e-8b5e-c39300c7435b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>LIVE: Free Expression &amp; Social Media</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We’re doing something special for this month’s episode. In October of 2023, we hosted a live recording here at the University of Chicago. Tom Ginsburg was joined on stage by renowned scholar Genevie Laikier to have a conversation about free speech on social media. In other words, it was very relevant to our current season about the right to free expression.

We’re going to share that recording with you this month. We hope you enjoy and thanks to everyone who listened to our podcast this year.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We’re doing something special for this month’s episode. In October of 2023, we hosted a live recording here at the University of Chicago. Tom Ginsburg was joined on stage by renowned scholar Genevie Laikier to have a conversation about free speech on social media. In other words, it was very relevant to our current season about the right to free expression.

We’re going to share that recording with you this month. We hope you enjoy and thanks to everyone who listened to our podcast this year.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, linkedin, twitter, university of chicago podcast network, free speech, ucpn, free expression, law podcast, social media, lawyers, law, entitled podcast, facebook, rights podcast, entitled, rights, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, genevie laikier, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4240a94-9d26-4449-9b50-903a90462874</guid>
      <title>S3E3: The Complicated Right To Protest</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Some might say one of the most important ways we exercise the right to free expression is through protests. And we’ve certainly seen groups all over the world using that right in the last few years, from the George Floyd protests in the U.S. to democratic marches in Hong Kong to demonstrations in Chile, Venezuela, Iran and Peru.</p><p>On the surface this right may seem straightforward, but there are many thorny questions to grapple with: when does a protest become a violent violation of other rights, what does it mean to protest in the age of surveillance, does the content of the protest matter for it to be protected? On this episode, we speak with Jameel Jaffer, Adjunct Professor of Law and Journalism and Executive Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.</p><p><br /> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Dec 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s3e3-a-world-of-protest-o9vn1CIB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some might say one of the most important ways we exercise the right to free expression is through protests. And we’ve certainly seen groups all over the world using that right in the last few years, from the George Floyd protests in the U.S. to democratic marches in Hong Kong to demonstrations in Chile, Venezuela, Iran and Peru.</p><p>On the surface this right may seem straightforward, but there are many thorny questions to grapple with: when does a protest become a violent violation of other rights, what does it mean to protest in the age of surveillance, does the content of the protest matter for it to be protected? On this episode, we speak with Jameel Jaffer, Adjunct Professor of Law and Journalism and Executive Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.</p><p><br /> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44783396" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/e87c14e2-4060-4be9-a2cb-7c4f26baad5b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=e87c14e2-4060-4be9-a2cb-7c4f26baad5b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S3E3: The Complicated Right To Protest</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Some might say one of the most important ways we exercise the right to free expression is through protests. And we’ve certainly seen groups all over the world using that right in the last few years, from the George Floyd protests in the U.S. to democratic marches in Hong Kong to demonstrations in Chile, Venezuela, Iran and Peru.
 
On the surface this right may seem straightforward, but there are many thorny questions to grapple with: when does a protest become a violent violation of other rights, what does it mean to protest in the age of surveillance, does the content of the protest matter for it to be protected? On this episode, we speak with Jameel Jaffer, Adjunct Professor of Law and Journalism and Executive Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Some might say one of the most important ways we exercise the right to free expression is through protests. And we’ve certainly seen groups all over the world using that right in the last few years, from the George Floyd protests in the U.S. to democratic marches in Hong Kong to demonstrations in Chile, Venezuela, Iran and Peru.
 
On the surface this right may seem straightforward, but there are many thorny questions to grapple with: when does a protest become a violent violation of other rights, what does it mean to protest in the age of surveillance, does the content of the protest matter for it to be protected? On this episode, we speak with Jameel Jaffer, Adjunct Professor of Law and Journalism and Executive Director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">948543b6-05b4-42bf-8a8b-f53f0b801af9</guid>
      <title>S3E2: Sticks and Stones: The Problem of Hate Speech</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We all know the phrase: “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” But is that actually true? Recent research in psychology has shown that words can cause a plethora of different harms. Should this make us re-think our approach to hate speech?</p><p>In the US we’ve been hesitant to regulate hate speech, while other countries have been incredibly stringent. Which approach is right, and why? And, how do we even define what hate speech is anyway?</p><p>To get some answers we sit down with Yale Professor Robert Post and Laura Beth Nielsen the Chair of the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/stick-and-stones-the-problem-of-hate-speech-ebD69pK5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the phrase: “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” But is that actually true? Recent research in psychology has shown that words can cause a plethora of different harms. Should this make us re-think our approach to hate speech?</p><p>In the US we’ve been hesitant to regulate hate speech, while other countries have been incredibly stringent. Which approach is right, and why? And, how do we even define what hate speech is anyway?</p><p>To get some answers we sit down with Yale Professor Robert Post and Laura Beth Nielsen the Chair of the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University.</p><p> </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50095240" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/49d852ce-05a9-4958-991c-e2f09cad33b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=49d852ce-05a9-4958-991c-e2f09cad33b8&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S3E2: Sticks and Stones: The Problem of Hate Speech</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We all know the phrase: “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” But is that actually true? Recent research in psychology has shown that words can cause a plethora of different harms. Should this make us re-think our approach to hate speech?
 
In the US we’ve been hesitant to regulate hate speech, while other countries have been incredibly stringent. Which approach is right, and why? And, how do we even define what hate speech is anyway?
 
To get some answers we sit down with Yale Professor Robert Post and Laura Beth Nielsen the Chair of the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We all know the phrase: “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” But is that actually true? Recent research in psychology has shown that words can cause a plethora of different harms. Should this make us re-think our approach to hate speech?
 
In the US we’ve been hesitant to regulate hate speech, while other countries have been incredibly stringent. Which approach is right, and why? And, how do we even define what hate speech is anyway?
 
To get some answers we sit down with Yale Professor Robert Post and Laura Beth Nielsen the Chair of the Department of Sociology at Northwestern University.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, yale, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, law podcast, government podcast, lawyers, government, law, entitled podcast, hate speech, rights podcast, yale podcast, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, northwestern university, human rights, claudia flores, psychology</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">01b32049-f43d-45a7-9a9a-3f81555ccf19</guid>
      <title>S3E1: How Free Is Free Speech On Campus?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On the third season of Entitled, we're circling back to the first fundamental right: the freedom of speech. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg begin this season by peeling back the curtains of how this right is currently playing out at universities across the country. In recent years, there have been tensions — and intense clashes — around speakers invited to campus, what professors are allowed to say in the classroom, and what subject matter should even be allowed to be taught. Now, with many of these cases making their way to the courts, is free speech at universities entering a dangerous new era?</p><p>In this episode, they speak with Robert Post, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School; and Ben Wizner, Director of the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the ACLU; and Komi Frey, Director of Faculty Outreach at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s3e1-how-free-is-free-speech-on-campus-ouSTBE0u</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the third season of Entitled, we're circling back to the first fundamental right: the freedom of speech. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg begin this season by peeling back the curtains of how this right is currently playing out at universities across the country. In recent years, there have been tensions — and intense clashes — around speakers invited to campus, what professors are allowed to say in the classroom, and what subject matter should even be allowed to be taught. Now, with many of these cases making their way to the courts, is free speech at universities entering a dangerous new era?</p><p>In this episode, they speak with Robert Post, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School; and Ben Wizner, Director of the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the ACLU; and Komi Frey, Director of Faculty Outreach at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58667055" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/6139f1dd-165a-42b7-ba12-74c87101fb53/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=6139f1dd-165a-42b7-ba12-74c87101fb53&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S3E1: How Free Is Free Speech On Campus?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On the third season of Entitled, we&apos;re circling back to the first fundamental right: the freedom of speech. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg begin this season by peeling back the curtains of how this right is currently playing out at universities across the country. In recent years, there have been tensions — and intense clashes — around speakers invited to campus, what professors are allowed to say in the classroom, and what subject matter should even be allowed to be taught. Now, with many of these cases making their way to the courts, is free speech at universities entering a dangerous new era?

In this episode, they speak with Robert Post, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School; and Ben Wizner, Director of the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the ACLU; and Komi Frey, Director of Faculty Outreach at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On the third season of Entitled, we&apos;re circling back to the first fundamental right: the freedom of speech. Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg begin this season by peeling back the curtains of how this right is currently playing out at universities across the country. In recent years, there have been tensions — and intense clashes — around speakers invited to campus, what professors are allowed to say in the classroom, and what subject matter should even be allowed to be taught. Now, with many of these cases making their way to the courts, is free speech at universities entering a dangerous new era?

In this episode, they speak with Robert Post, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School; and Ben Wizner, Director of the Speech, Privacy and Technology Project at the ACLU; and Komi Frey, Director of Faculty Outreach at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>universities, tom ginsburg, robert post, free speech podcast, university of chicago podcast network, free speech, free expression, law podcast, law, fire, entitled podcast, ben wizner, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, yale podcast, komi frey, entitled, rights, aclu, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, university podcast, human rights, claudia flores, lawyer, college, yale law school</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40292f50-b533-44d3-9e5a-c6cf9f8243ec</guid>
      <title>Ibram X. Kendi On Policy Over Platitudes: Building an Anti-Racist World</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On our last season, we focused entirely on the idea of equality from an international perspective. But when it comes to domestic questions of equality, or equity, they often focus on an important and specific topic: race. And one of the leading voices in that conversation is Dr. Ibram X. Kendi.</p><p>Kendi is most famous for his 2019 book "How To Be An Anti-racist". The book argues that the opposite of racism isn’t “not racist” but anti-racist. Meaning, rather than just being neutrally against racism you actively try to remove the inequality generated by racism and racism itself from society. This year he released a graphic novel version of his earlier history of slavery which is called "Stamped from the Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America"</p><p>Although we missed out on having Kendi on last season we thought, with the recent Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, that this was the perfect time to talk with him about how his views intersect with human rights, international law, the concept of the University and his thoughts on the recent case.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Sep 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/ibram-x-kendi-on-policy-over-platitudes-building-an-anti-racist-world-p__p9HMR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On our last season, we focused entirely on the idea of equality from an international perspective. But when it comes to domestic questions of equality, or equity, they often focus on an important and specific topic: race. And one of the leading voices in that conversation is Dr. Ibram X. Kendi.</p><p>Kendi is most famous for his 2019 book "How To Be An Anti-racist". The book argues that the opposite of racism isn’t “not racist” but anti-racist. Meaning, rather than just being neutrally against racism you actively try to remove the inequality generated by racism and racism itself from society. This year he released a graphic novel version of his earlier history of slavery which is called "Stamped from the Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America"</p><p>Although we missed out on having Kendi on last season we thought, with the recent Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, that this was the perfect time to talk with him about how his views intersect with human rights, international law, the concept of the University and his thoughts on the recent case.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39462134" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/bd5dc681-622f-47b4-8cea-ef4ac8e7df6b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=bd5dc681-622f-47b4-8cea-ef4ac8e7df6b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Ibram X. Kendi On Policy Over Platitudes: Building an Anti-Racist World</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On our last season, we focused entirely on the idea of equality from an international perspective. But when it comes to domestic questions of equality, or equity, they often focus on an important and specific topic: race. And one of the leading voices in that conversation is Dr. Ibram X. Kendi.

Kendi is most famous for his 2019 book &quot;How To Be An Anti-racist&quot;. The book argues that the opposite of racism isn’t “not racist” but anti-racist. Meaning, rather than just being neutrally against racism you actively try to remove the inequality generated by racism and racism itself from society. This year he released a graphic novel version of his earlier history of slavery which is called &quot;Stamped from the Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America&quot;

Although we missed out on having Kendi on last season we thought, with the recent Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, that this was the perfect time to talk with him about how his views intersect with human rights, international law, the concept of the University and his thoughts on the recent case.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On our last season, we focused entirely on the idea of equality from an international perspective. But when it comes to domestic questions of equality, or equity, they often focus on an important and specific topic: race. And one of the leading voices in that conversation is Dr. Ibram X. Kendi.

Kendi is most famous for his 2019 book &quot;How To Be An Anti-racist&quot;. The book argues that the opposite of racism isn’t “not racist” but anti-racist. Meaning, rather than just being neutrally against racism you actively try to remove the inequality generated by racism and racism itself from society. This year he released a graphic novel version of his earlier history of slavery which is called &quot;Stamped from the Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America&quot;

Although we missed out on having Kendi on last season we thought, with the recent Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, that this was the perfect time to talk with him about how his views intersect with human rights, international law, the concept of the University and his thoughts on the recent case.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, uchicago podcast, antiracist, uchicago, university of chicago podcast network, racism, supreme court, race, affirmative action, anti-racist, law podcast, equality, uchicago podcast network, ibram x kendi, lawyers, law, ibram x. kendi, university of chicago podcast, entitled, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, how to be an anti-racist, human rights, inequality, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9153320b-38b0-4ff1-8574-683c35554e66</guid>
      <title>The Moving Target Of Abortion Rights</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in decades, the future of abortion rights in the US is uncertain. With the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, The Supreme Court has forced Americans to reconsider and fight for a new vision of a right to abortion should be.</p><p>But it’s important to remember that debates about abortion don’t end at our borders. The end of Roe will have global ramifications for how other countries think about abortion rights but, as the US re-enters this international debate, are their lessons we can learn from how other countries have constituted, or failed to constitute, a right to abortion?</p><p>To find some answers we spoke with Julie Suk, a Professor of Law at Fordham University, Catalina Martinez Coral, Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Paola Bergallo, Professor of Law at the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/the-moving-target-of-abortion-rights-161u9u1z</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in decades, the future of abortion rights in the US is uncertain. With the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, The Supreme Court has forced Americans to reconsider and fight for a new vision of a right to abortion should be.</p><p>But it’s important to remember that debates about abortion don’t end at our borders. The end of Roe will have global ramifications for how other countries think about abortion rights but, as the US re-enters this international debate, are their lessons we can learn from how other countries have constituted, or failed to constitute, a right to abortion?</p><p>To find some answers we spoke with Julie Suk, a Professor of Law at Fordham University, Catalina Martinez Coral, Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Paola Bergallo, Professor of Law at the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53475215" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/cf844824-566d-4554-b712-5ec1237aefb2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=cf844824-566d-4554-b712-5ec1237aefb2&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>The Moving Target Of Abortion Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For the first time in decades, the future of abortion rights in the US is uncertain. With the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, The Supreme Court has forced Americans to reconsider and fight for a new vision of a right to abortion should be.

But it’s important to remember that debates about abortion don’t end at our borders. The end of Roe will have global ramifications for how other countries think about abortion rights but, as the US re-enters this international debate, are their lessons we can learn from how other countries have constituted, or failed to constitute, a right to abortion?

To find some answers we spoke with Julie Suk, a Professor of Law at Fordham University, Catalina Martinez Coral, Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Paola Bergallo, Professor of Law at the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For the first time in decades, the future of abortion rights in the US is uncertain. With the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022, The Supreme Court has forced Americans to reconsider and fight for a new vision of a right to abortion should be.

But it’s important to remember that debates about abortion don’t end at our borders. The end of Roe will have global ramifications for how other countries think about abortion rights but, as the US re-enters this international debate, are their lessons we can learn from how other countries have constituted, or failed to constitute, a right to abortion?

To find some answers we spoke with Julie Suk, a Professor of Law at Fordham University, Catalina Martinez Coral, Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights, and Paola Bergallo, Professor of Law at the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, abortion, uchicago podcast, dobbs, uchicago, public policy, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, political, abortion rights, university of chicago law school, international abortion rights, law podcast, policy, government, political podcast, law, policy podcast, entitled podcast, global abortion rights, politics podcast, rights podcast, public policy podcast, university of chicago podcast, politics, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, international human rights, roe, claudia flores, lawyer, roe v wade</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e900922f-b41c-4939-8caa-dff2f60663f2</guid>
      <title>Will &quot;Personalized Laws&quot; Make Us More Equal?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a world with personalized laws, each person would be subject to different legal rules and their own personally-tailored laws. For example, if you're a good driver, you could be rewarded for that good behavior with less stringent laws. Through this idea, and the acceleration of AI, technology could be used to comprehend our data from various places to create laws individual to us. These are some of the ideas that Omri Ben-Shahar writes about in his book, <i>Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People.</i></p><p>In this episode, we speak to Omri Ben-Shahar about the questions and concerns that personalized law presents, and how it could be used in the future. Ben-Shahar is professor of law at the University of Chicago, and Director of the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/will-personalized-laws-make-us-more-equal-b9RmkkSj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a world with personalized laws, each person would be subject to different legal rules and their own personally-tailored laws. For example, if you're a good driver, you could be rewarded for that good behavior with less stringent laws. Through this idea, and the acceleration of AI, technology could be used to comprehend our data from various places to create laws individual to us. These are some of the ideas that Omri Ben-Shahar writes about in his book, <i>Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People.</i></p><p>In this episode, we speak to Omri Ben-Shahar about the questions and concerns that personalized law presents, and how it could be used in the future. Ben-Shahar is professor of law at the University of Chicago, and Director of the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. </p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43602392" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/508732a1-8789-4b89-84ef-f455113dd093/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=508732a1-8789-4b89-84ef-f455113dd093&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>Will &quot;Personalized Laws&quot; Make Us More Equal?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a world with personalized laws, each person would be subject to different legal rules and their own personally-tailored laws. For example, if you&apos;re a good driver, you could be rewarded for that good behavior with less stringent laws. Through this idea, and the acceleration of AI, technology could be used to comprehend our data from various places to create laws individual to us. These are some of the ideas that Omri Ben-Shahar writes about in his book, Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People.

In this episode, we speak to Omri Ben-Shahar about the questions and concerns that personalized law presents, and how it could be used in the future. Ben-Shahar is professor of law at the University of Chicago, and Director of the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a world with personalized laws, each person would be subject to different legal rules and their own personally-tailored laws. For example, if you&apos;re a good driver, you could be rewarded for that good behavior with less stringent laws. Through this idea, and the acceleration of AI, technology could be used to comprehend our data from various places to create laws individual to us. These are some of the ideas that Omri Ben-Shahar writes about in his book, Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People.

In this episode, we speak to Omri Ben-Shahar about the questions and concerns that personalized law presents, and how it could be used in the future. Ben-Shahar is professor of law at the University of Chicago, and Director of the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, personalized law, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, omri ben-shahar, law podcast, policy, government podcast, lawyers, government, law, artificial intelligence, policy podcast, entitled podcast, ai, university of chicago podcast, entitled, lawyer podcast, lawyers podcast, university of chicago, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">287d3957-2e55-4d37-9d52-3d77d36b70c0</guid>
      <title>A Roof Over Our Heads: Rights Or Real Estate?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[More than half a million people are currently homeless in the United States. It's a crisis that extends beyond California and is trending upwards in other states, too. Most jurisdictions in the US have no right to shelter, and the right to have a home at all is not a guarantee. But just across the border, Canada recognizes the right to adequate housing as a fundamental human right affirmed in international law. In this episode, we speak with Canadian lawyer Leilani Farha, the former Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, about how we ended up with a homelessness crisis and what remedies should look like. Leilani is also Global Director of The Shift, a housing initiative. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s25e2-a-roof-over-our-heads-rights-or-real-estate-ZX9PGX0Y</link>
      <enclosure length="36339183" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/00847126-45cb-443f-b74d-e58020c5a632/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=00847126-45cb-443f-b74d-e58020c5a632&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>A Roof Over Our Heads: Rights Or Real Estate?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>More than half a million people are currently homeless in the United States. It&apos;s a crisis that extends beyond California and is trending upwards in other states, too. Most jurisdictions in the US have no right to shelter, and the right to have a home at all is not a guarantee. But just across the border, Canada recognizes the right to adequate housing as a fundamental human right affirmed in international law. In this episode, we speak with Canadian lawyer Leilani Farha, the former Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, about how we ended up with a homelessness crisis and what remedies should look like. Leilani is also Global Director of The Shift, a housing initiative.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>More than half a million people are currently homeless in the United States. It&apos;s a crisis that extends beyond California and is trending upwards in other states, too. Most jurisdictions in the US have no right to shelter, and the right to have a home at all is not a guarantee. But just across the border, Canada recognizes the right to adequate housing as a fundamental human right affirmed in international law. In this episode, we speak with Canadian lawyer Leilani Farha, the former Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, about how we ended up with a homelessness crisis and what remedies should look like. Leilani is also Global Director of The Shift, a housing initiative.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, homeless, legal podcast, university of chicago podcast network, law podcast, lawyers, legal, law, homelessness, entitled podcast, housing, university of chicago podcast, a right to housing, entitled, rights, leilani farha, university of chicago, human rights, claudia flores, lawyer, international law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b07f84fd-ba1d-4d6f-9bb3-063395464887</guid>
      <title>From Pets To Zoos, Should Animals Have Rights, Too?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Animals suffer at the hands of humans every day. Not just in factory farms, but also in our homes, where pets don’t receive enough attention or exercise, and in our oceans, where humans disrupt their habitats and ecosystems. To what extent should animals have rights? In this special episode, we speak to world-leading philosopher Martha Nussbaum, professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, and author of <i>Justice for Animals</i>. Nussbaum expands her theory into why politics and law should redirect our ethical responsibilities towards animals.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s25-from-pets-to-zoos-should-animals-have-rights-too-zLGyfQDy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Animals suffer at the hands of humans every day. Not just in factory farms, but also in our homes, where pets don’t receive enough attention or exercise, and in our oceans, where humans disrupt their habitats and ecosystems. To what extent should animals have rights? In this special episode, we speak to world-leading philosopher Martha Nussbaum, professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, and author of <i>Justice for Animals</i>. Nussbaum expands her theory into why politics and law should redirect our ethical responsibilities towards animals.</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37362431" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/8c138f0f-5b09-407f-8440-861e533721b5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=8c138f0f-5b09-407f-8440-861e533721b5&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>From Pets To Zoos, Should Animals Have Rights, Too?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Animals suffer at the hands of humans every day. Not just in factory farms, but also in our homes, where pets don’t receive enough attention or exercise, and in our oceans, where humans disrupt their habitats and ecosystems. To what extent should animals have rights? In this special episode, we speak to world-leading philosopher Martha Nussbaum, professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, and author of Justice for Animals. Nussbaum expands her theory into why politics and law should redirect our ethical responsibilities towards animals.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Animals suffer at the hands of humans every day. Not just in factory farms, but also in our homes, where pets don’t receive enough attention or exercise, and in our oceans, where humans disrupt their habitats and ecosystems. To what extent should animals have rights? In this special episode, we speak to world-leading philosopher Martha Nussbaum, professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, and author of Justice for Animals. Nussbaum expands her theory into why politics and law should redirect our ethical responsibilities towards animals.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>animal rights, yale podcast network, yale, university of chicago podcast network, philosophy podcast, animals, law podcast, martha nussbaum, lawyers, law, entitled podcast, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, law school podcast, yale podcast, entitled, rights, philosophy, lawyer podcast, lawyers podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, law school, human rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1edb083-596f-4cb0-bc56-2d3bfccd7499</guid>
      <title>S2E8: Robots &amp; Rights: Dystopian or Deserving?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence is all around us—it listens to us, even watches us, and waits for our daily demands. From Alexa to Siri, to Sophia, the social humanoid robot, AIs want to be our companions (at least, the companies who build them want us to think so). However, some people fear that the more sentient AIs become, the more they will have to be treated with basic rights. Do AIs deserve rights? And if they do, what would those rights entail?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia imagine a not-so-distant future where AIs have rights, what those rights could look like, and whether or not this would play out like a dystopian sci-fi novel. They get a myriad of perspectives from Andrew Stout, a robot software engineer; Agnes Callard, a philosopher at the University of Chicago; Aziz Huq, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago; and Alex Hanna, Director of Research at the Distributed A.I. Research Institute.  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e8-robots-rights-dystopian-or-deserving-gMHts_d_</link>
      <enclosure length="42937569" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/bba22680-5aec-44e2-8575-3b5e954fb52b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=bba22680-5aec-44e2-8575-3b5e954fb52b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E8: Robots &amp; Rights: Dystopian or Deserving?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Artificial intelligence is all around us—it listens to us, even watches us, and waits for our daily demands. From Alexa to Siri, to Sophia, the social humanoid robot, AIs want to be our companions (at least, the companies who build them want us to think so). However, some people fear that the more sentient AIs become, the more they will have to be treated with basic rights. Do AIs deserve rights? And if they do, what would those rights entail?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia imagine a not-so-distant future where AIs have rights, what those rights could look like, and whether or not this would play out like a dystopian sci-fi novel. They get a myriad of perspectives from Andrew Stout, a robot software engineer; Agnes Callard, a philosopher at the University of Chicago; Aziz Huq, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago; and Alex Hanna, Director of Research at the Distributed A.I. Research Institute. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Artificial intelligence is all around us—it listens to us, even watches us, and waits for our daily demands. From Alexa to Siri, to Sophia, the social humanoid robot, AIs want to be our companions (at least, the companies who build them want us to think so). However, some people fear that the more sentient AIs become, the more they will have to be treated with basic rights. Do AIs deserve rights? And if they do, what would those rights entail?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia imagine a not-so-distant future where AIs have rights, what those rights could look like, and whether or not this would play out like a dystopian sci-fi novel. They get a myriad of perspectives from Andrew Stout, a robot software engineer; Agnes Callard, a philosopher at the University of Chicago; Aziz Huq, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Chicago; and Alex Hanna, Director of Research at the Distributed A.I. Research Institute. </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>alex hanna, tom ginsburg, aziz huq, a.i., yale, university of chicago podcast network, tech podcast, ucpn, algorithms, law podcast, lawyers, technology, law, artificial intelligence, entitled podcast, ai, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, yale podcast, tech, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, technology podcast, human rights, andrew stout, claudia flores, agnes callard</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3269eb99-5d39-4efa-8875-e61463375c4c</guid>
      <title>S2E7: Are Equal Opportunities Possible In Our Ableist World?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Sixty-one million adults in the United States live with a disability — that's one in four adults, a staggering number when you consider how widespread ableism is. In a society that largely operates without adequate infrastructure, accommodations, and services for disabled people, what does the right to equal opportunity look like?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia explore this question through the perspectives of three disabled individuals. Michael Stein is the executive director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Elsa Sjunneson is a deafblind disability rights activist and science fiction writer, and Stephen Hallett is the Project Manager of the East Asia Disability Rights Project. Together, they help paint a picture of what it would really mean to take the rights of those with disabilities seriously. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e7-are-equal-opportunities-possible-in-our-ableist-world-JntNMgQU</link>
      <enclosure length="34874002" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/bd5d8f83-94c0-44e0-94bf-d41d68c743c7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=bd5d8f83-94c0-44e0-94bf-d41d68c743c7&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E7: Are Equal Opportunities Possible In Our Ableist World?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sixty-one million adults in the United States live with a disability — that&apos;s one in four adults, a staggering number when you consider how widespread ableism is. In a society that largely operates without adequate infrastructure, accommodations, and services for disabled people, what does the right to equal opportunity look like?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia explore this question through the perspectives of three disabled individuals. Michael Stein is the executive director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Elsa Sjunneson is a deafblind disability rights activist and science fiction writer, and Stephen Hallett is the Project Manager of the East Asia Disability Rights Project. Together, they help paint a picture of what it would really mean to take the rights of those with disabilities seriously.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sixty-one million adults in the United States live with a disability — that&apos;s one in four adults, a staggering number when you consider how widespread ableism is. In a society that largely operates without adequate infrastructure, accommodations, and services for disabled people, what does the right to equal opportunity look like?
 
In this episode, Tom and Claudia explore this question through the perspectives of three disabled individuals. Michael Stein is the executive director of the Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Elsa Sjunneson is a deafblind disability rights activist and science fiction writer, and Stephen Hallett is the Project Manager of the East Asia Disability Rights Project. Together, they help paint a picture of what it would really mean to take the rights of those with disabilities seriously.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>china rights, tom ginsburg, disability podcast, yale, university of chicago podcast network, elsa sjunneson, law podcast, lawyers, law, entitled podcast, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, china, entitled, harvard law school project on disability, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores, michael stein, lawyer, east asia disability rights project, disability, yale law school</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">805e13e9-9b88-48b7-941e-bb9f467b9767</guid>
      <title>S2E6: Global Inequality: How Should Countries Share Their Wealth?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[While borders have the ability to divide countries both politically and socially, wealth drives an even bigger wedge between us. How do we make sense of the fact that the wealthiest country in the world, the United States, borders one of the poorest countries: Mexico? Despite efforts to mitigate this, global wealth inequality still appears to be growing. According to the World Inequality Report, the poorest half of the global population owns just 2% of the total global wealth.
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn some of the ways we could fix global wealth inequality. They speak with one of the world’s leading economists focused on inequality, Branko Milanović; University of Chicago economics and political science professor James Robinson; and Rebekah Smith, executive director of Labor Mobility Partnerships. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e6-how-should-countries-share-their-wealth-hhpPd9T5</link>
      <enclosure length="35905824" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/bdc302d2-c550-4ac2-81ac-0f38461eea5c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=bdc302d2-c550-4ac2-81ac-0f38461eea5c&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E6: Global Inequality: How Should Countries Share Their Wealth?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While borders have the ability to divide countries both politically and socially, wealth drives an even bigger wedge between us. How do we make sense of the fact that the wealthiest country in the world, the United States, borders one of the poorest countries: Mexico? Despite efforts to mitigate this, global wealth inequality still appears to be growing. According to the World Inequality Report, the poorest half of the global population owns just 2% of the total global wealth.
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn some of the ways we could fix global wealth inequality. They speak with one of the world’s leading economists focused on inequality, Branko Milanović; University of Chicago economics and political science professor James Robinson; and Rebekah Smith, executive director of Labor Mobility Partnerships.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While borders have the ability to divide countries both politically and socially, wealth drives an even bigger wedge between us. How do we make sense of the fact that the wealthiest country in the world, the United States, borders one of the poorest countries: Mexico? Despite efforts to mitigate this, global wealth inequality still appears to be growing. According to the World Inequality Report, the poorest half of the global population owns just 2% of the total global wealth.
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn some of the ways we could fix global wealth inequality. They speak with one of the world’s leading economists focused on inequality, Branko Milanović; University of Chicago economics and political science professor James Robinson; and Rebekah Smith, executive director of Labor Mobility Partnerships.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>econ podcast, james robinson, economics, econ, international wealth, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, global wealth, law podcast, branko milanović, wealth podcast, law, rights podcast, rebekah smith, wealth, university of chicago podcast, wealth inequality, economics podcast, entitled, rights, university of chicago, human rights podcast, law school, human rights, inequality</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dccd4090-1c19-4167-80f8-dfa4e6167817</guid>
      <title>S2E5: Quotas: Band-aid or Magic Bullet?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Fixing discrimination isn't as easy as putting anti-discrimination laws on the books. But, there is a tool that can at least chip away at the effects of discrimination: quotas. Over 130 countries have adopted gender quotas…and around one-quarter of the world uses some form of affirmative action programs. So, do quotas actually work at creating more diverse and equitable societies?

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn how quotas are working—or not working—around the world. They speak with Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu, senior adviser for democracy and inclusion at International IDEA; Tarunabh Khaitan, professor of Public Law and Legal Theroy at the University of Oxford; and Jessie Majome, former member of the National Assembly of Zimbabwe. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e5-quotas-band-aid-or-magic-bullet-C2yVeyj_</link>
      <enclosure length="47456126" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/63d7d9cd-5c2a-4287-85f4-4d69f7127c4b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=63d7d9cd-5c2a-4287-85f4-4d69f7127c4b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E5: Quotas: Band-aid or Magic Bullet?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fixing discrimination isn&apos;t as easy as putting anti-discrimination laws on the books. But, there is a tool that can at least chip away at the effects of discrimination: quotas. Over 130 countries have adopted gender quotas…and around one-quarter of the world uses some form of affirmative action programs. So, do quotas actually work at creating more diverse and equitable societies?

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn how quotas are working—or not working—around the world. They speak with Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu, senior adviser for democracy and inclusion at International IDEA; Tarunabh Khaitan, professor of Public Law and Legal Theroy at the University of Oxford; and Jessie Majome, former member of the National Assembly of Zimbabwe.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fixing discrimination isn&apos;t as easy as putting anti-discrimination laws on the books. But, there is a tool that can at least chip away at the effects of discrimination: quotas. Over 130 countries have adopted gender quotas…and around one-quarter of the world uses some form of affirmative action programs. So, do quotas actually work at creating more diverse and equitable societies?

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom learn how quotas are working—or not working—around the world. They speak with Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu, senior adviser for democracy and inclusion at International IDEA; Tarunabh Khaitan, professor of Public Law and Legal Theroy at the University of Oxford; and Jessie Majome, former member of the National Assembly of Zimbabwe.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>quotas, tom ginsburg, equity podcast, equality podcast, tarunabh khaitan, discrimination, rumbidzai kandawasvika-nhundu, university of chicago podcast network, jessie majome, ucpn, education podcast, university of chicago law school, democracy podcast, law podcast, equality, government podcast, government, law, discrimination podcast, entitled podcast, society &amp; culture, university of chicago podcast, international law podcast, educational podcast, entitled, society and culture, university of chicago, equity, education, claudia flores, democracy, international law</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d64bb9e7-7877-481a-8a83-ef27ec91f094</guid>
      <title>S2E4: The Equity/Equality Equation</title>
      <description><![CDATA[There are two words that sound pretty similar, but they're not synonyms: equality and equity. While equality means that everybody should be given the same resources or opportunities, equity recognizes that we live in an unequal system, so we need to allocate more resources and opportunities to people without equal access. So, what does it really mean to live in an equitable society?
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom zoom out on what equity practices look like around the globe, and zoom in, to see if they're working in the US. They speak with Dian Shah, a constitutional law professor at the National University of Singapore; Cathy Cohen, a renowned political scientist at the University of Chicago; and South African anti-apartheid hero Albie Sachs. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e4-the-equity-equality-equation-wjr1UUyl</link>
      <enclosure length="44622781" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/adf8ff7c-063a-42d1-b7a9-0775c06af39e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=adf8ff7c-063a-42d1-b7a9-0775c06af39e&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E4: The Equity/Equality Equation</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There are two words that sound pretty similar, but they&apos;re not synonyms: equality and equity. While equality means that everybody should be given the same resources or opportunities, equity recognizes that we live in an unequal system, so we need to allocate more resources and opportunities to people without equal access. So, what does it really mean to live in an equitable society?
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom zoom out on what equity practices look like around the globe, and zoom in, to see if they&apos;re working in the US. They speak with Dian Shah, a constitutional law professor at the National University of Singapore; Cathy Cohen, a renowned political scientist at the University of Chicago; and South African anti-apartheid hero Albie Sachs.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There are two words that sound pretty similar, but they&apos;re not synonyms: equality and equity. While equality means that everybody should be given the same resources or opportunities, equity recognizes that we live in an unequal system, so we need to allocate more resources and opportunities to people without equal access. So, what does it really mean to live in an equitable society?
 
In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom zoom out on what equity practices look like around the globe, and zoom in, to see if they&apos;re working in the US. They speak with Dian Shah, a constitutional law professor at the National University of Singapore; Cathy Cohen, a renowned political scientist at the University of Chicago; and South African anti-apartheid hero Albie Sachs.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, equity podcast, equality podcast, racial equity podcast, public policy, albie sachs, yale, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, racial equity, race podcast, race, dian shah, law podcast, equality, policy, government podcast, yale university podcast, yale university, government, law, policy podcast, rights podcast, public policy podcast, university of chicago podcast, international law podcast, entitled, rights, equity, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores, cathy cohen, international law, international rights podcast</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0221321a-5ae8-4b53-9157-5ac2bbfba454</guid>
      <title>S2E3: Constitutionalizing Equality: Why Chile Wants A New Constitution</title>
      <description><![CDATA[After years of community protests, and months of legal work, Chile finalized a draft of a brand new constitution this summer. Chileans will vote to pass or reject this constitution in a few days. 

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom head to Santiago, Chile! We hear their conversations with local Chileans, from musicians and taxi drivers to the lawyers who helped draft this new constitution, like Ricardo Montero Allende and Isabel Aninat, and Mapuche linguist and Indigenous rights activist Elisa Loncón Antileo. We find out why Chileans want a new constitution and what it would mean for equality in Chile. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e3-constitutionalizing-equality-why-chile-wants-a-new-constitution-K5M0wvhh</link>
      <enclosure length="34492208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/69ec8344-eff8-417c-8f41-40c50cbd56da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=69ec8344-eff8-417c-8f41-40c50cbd56da&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E3: Constitutionalizing Equality: Why Chile Wants A New Constitution</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After years of community protests, and months of legal work, Chile finalized a draft of a brand new constitution this summer. Chileans will vote to pass or reject this constitution in a few days. 

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom head to Santiago, Chile! We hear their conversations with local Chileans, from musicians and taxi drivers to the lawyers who helped draft this new constitution, like Ricardo Montero Allende and Isabel Aninat, and Mapuche linguist and Indigenous rights activist Elisa Loncón Antileo. We find out why Chileans want a new constitution and what it would mean for equality in Chile.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After years of community protests, and months of legal work, Chile finalized a draft of a brand new constitution this summer. Chileans will vote to pass or reject this constitution in a few days. 

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom head to Santiago, Chile! We hear their conversations with local Chileans, from musicians and taxi drivers to the lawyers who helped draft this new constitution, like Ricardo Montero Allende and Isabel Aninat, and Mapuche linguist and Indigenous rights activist Elisa Loncón Antileo. We find out why Chileans want a new constitution and what it would mean for equality in Chile.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>international podcast, tom ginsburg, women, yale, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, women&apos;s rights podcast, political, law podcast, government podcast, lawyers, government, political podcast, law, entitled podcast, constitution writing, chile, politics podcast, rights podcast, indigenous rights, women&apos;s rights, university of chicago podcast, yale podcast, chile constitution, chilean constitution, international, politics, indigenous, entitled, rights, university of chicago, human rights podcast, education, human rights, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10321ff4-4270-49e2-836f-043eb75f8643</guid>
      <title>S2E2: What Comes First: Socio-Economic or Civil and Political Equality?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Would you put a price tag on your rights? If you had to choose between your socio-economic rights or your freedom to peacefully protest, what would you choose? It’s a question that might get a lot of mixed responses, but some might argue you can’t have one without the other.

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom discuss these two groups of rights: socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. They take a deeper look at the United States with Margaret Huang, president and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center, about why the US has had a hard time increasing socio-economic equality. Lastly, they speak with Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU’s Human Rights Program, about why we need to think about human rights more holistically. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e2-what-comes-first-socio-economic-or-civil-and-political-equality-rTcNXPrP</link>
      <enclosure length="34631784" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/d2cc68e6-d409-4497-b0c1-852b735f9ba9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=d2cc68e6-d409-4497-b0c1-852b735f9ba9&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E2: What Comes First: Socio-Economic or Civil and Political Equality?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Would you put a price tag on your rights? If you had to choose between your socio-economic rights or your freedom to peacefully protest, what would you choose? It’s a question that might get a lot of mixed responses, but some might argue you can’t have one without the other.

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom discuss these two groups of rights: socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. They take a deeper look at the United States with Margaret Huang, president and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center, about why the US has had a hard time increasing socio-economic equality. Lastly, they speak with Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU’s Human Rights Program, about why we need to think about human rights more holistically.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Would you put a price tag on your rights? If you had to choose between your socio-economic rights or your freedom to peacefully protest, what would you choose? It’s a question that might get a lot of mixed responses, but some might argue you can’t have one without the other.

In this episode of Entitled, Claudia and Tom discuss these two groups of rights: socio-economic rights and civil and political rights. They take a deeper look at the United States with Margaret Huang, president and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center, about why the US has had a hard time increasing socio-economic equality. Lastly, they speak with Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU’s Human Rights Program, about why we need to think about human rights more holistically.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, margaret huang, jamil dakwar, law podcast, government podcast, government, law, entitled podcast, southern poverty law center, rights podcast, entitled, rights, aclu, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56d78ffa-9f31-4522-93d8-0ad9cc7c3d72</guid>
      <title>S2E1: What Is Equality Anyway?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg kick off the second season of Entitled — and this time, they’re focusing on one human right (and not just any right) — the right to equality. In the first episode, they explore what equality means in different contexts and to different people. Is it possible or even preferrable for every person to be equal in every way? When do we want equality? How do we get it? And what do we mean when we ask for it?
 
This episode they speak with human rights historian and law professor Sam Moyn; public philosophy professor Elizabeth Anderson; and philosopher and professor of law and ethics Martha Nussbaum. Join the conversation this season as they try to unravel the complexity of equality and what “being equal” really means. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/s2e1-what-is-equality-anyway-ARYPC5Xm</link>
      <enclosure length="35884090" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/05a60a1b-7ca5-40ec-b267-b0f0c201f09f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=05a60a1b-7ca5-40ec-b267-b0f0c201f09f&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S2E1: What Is Equality Anyway?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg kick off the second season of Entitled — and this time, they’re focusing on one human right (and not just any right) — the right to equality. In the first episode, they explore what equality means in different contexts and to different people. Is it possible or even preferrable for every person to be equal in every way? When do we want equality? How do we get it? And what do we mean when we ask for it?
 
This episode they speak with human rights historian and law professor Sam Moyn; public philosophy professor Elizabeth Anderson; and philosopher and professor of law and ethics Martha Nussbaum. Join the conversation this season as they try to unravel the complexity of equality and what “being equal” really means.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg kick off the second season of Entitled — and this time, they’re focusing on one human right (and not just any right) — the right to equality. In the first episode, they explore what equality means in different contexts and to different people. Is it possible or even preferrable for every person to be equal in every way? When do we want equality? How do we get it? And what do we mean when we ask for it?
 
This episode they speak with human rights historian and law professor Sam Moyn; public philosophy professor Elizabeth Anderson; and philosopher and professor of law and ethics Martha Nussbaum. Join the conversation this season as they try to unravel the complexity of equality and what “being equal” really means.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, equality podcast, sam moyn, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, ethics, political, law podcast, equality, martha nussbaum, government podcast, government, political podcast, law, entitled podcast, elizabeth anderson, politics podcast, rights podcast, university of chicago podcast, politics, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, ethics podcast, human rights, claudia flores, lawyer</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f5bba10-302c-49f4-a32b-6e828df3e5b4</guid>
      <title>S1E6: The River Knows Where to Go</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The rights of nature are enshrined in a number of constitutions around the world, and there is a growing movement to extend rights to nature as it faces increasing threats. The extension of rights to nature prompts fundamental questions about the nature, enforcement and evolution of rights. Does nature have rights, or do they belong only to humans? Are the rights of nature human rights in disguise? Is the extension of legal rights to nature enough to ensure its protection?
 
In the final episode of Season 1 of Entitled, University of Chicago Law Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg talk to Frank Tumusiime, Coordinator and Senior Research Fellow at Advocates for Natural Resources and Development (ANARDE) and Aaron Mills, Assistant Professor at McGill University Faculty of Law and Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Constitutionalism and Philosophy. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Oct 2021 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/6-the-river-knows-where-to-go-lBzjNZdl</link>
      <enclosure length="30981011" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/cfaa6fed-af0e-46c4-848b-a460173c2de7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=cfaa6fed-af0e-46c4-848b-a460173c2de7&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E6: The River Knows Where to Go</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The rights of nature are enshrined in a number of constitutions around the world, and there is a growing movement to extend rights to nature as it faces increasing threats. The extension of rights to nature prompts fundamental questions about the nature, enforcement and evolution of rights. Does nature have rights, or do they belong only to humans? Are the rights of nature human rights in disguise? Is the extension of legal rights to nature enough to ensure its protection?
 
In the final episode of Season 1 of Entitled, University of Chicago Law Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg talk to Frank Tumusiime, Coordinator and Senior Research Fellow at Advocates for Natural Resources and Development (ANARDE) and Aaron Mills, Assistant Professor at McGill University Faculty of Law and Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Constitutionalism and Philosophy.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The rights of nature are enshrined in a number of constitutions around the world, and there is a growing movement to extend rights to nature as it faces increasing threats. The extension of rights to nature prompts fundamental questions about the nature, enforcement and evolution of rights. Does nature have rights, or do they belong only to humans? Are the rights of nature human rights in disguise? Is the extension of legal rights to nature enough to ensure its protection?
 
In the final episode of Season 1 of Entitled, University of Chicago Law Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg talk to Frank Tumusiime, Coordinator and Senior Research Fellow at Advocates for Natural Resources and Development (ANARDE) and Aaron Mills, Assistant Professor at McGill University Faculty of Law and Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Constitutionalism and Philosophy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, nature podcast, uchicago, university of chicago podcast network, environmental, ucpn, university of chicago law school, law podcast, government podcast, government, political podcast, law, rights podcast, politics, entitled, rights, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores, environmental podcast, nature</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54d0112d-40c4-4476-89fb-e0f645dc34bb</guid>
      <title>S1E5: Who’s Womb Is it Anyway?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Today, medical advances make it possible for a woman to have a baby on behalf of someone else. This has given many people – including many in the LGBTQI community – the exciting possibility of founding a family of their own. But this incredible medical technology raises new questions about rights: how far do reproductive rights go? How do you establish the rights of a parent or citizenship? Who has a right to found a family?  
 
In this episode of Entitled, we explore reproduction and bodily autonomy in a changing world. We talk to Kasumi Nakagawa, an expert on surrogacy in Cambodia, and Kate Gilmore, former deputy director of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/5-whos-womb-is-it-anyway-3moxwB67</link>
      <enclosure length="31633865" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/a7c194ed-c1d8-496f-9404-9c9f1c87ea4c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=a7c194ed-c1d8-496f-9404-9c9f1c87ea4c&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E5: Who’s Womb Is it Anyway?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today, medical advances make it possible for a woman to have a baby on behalf of someone else. This has given many people – including many in the LGBTQI community – the exciting possibility of founding a family of their own. But this incredible medical technology raises new questions about rights: how far do reproductive rights go? How do you establish the rights of a parent or citizenship? Who has a right to found a family?  
 
In this episode of Entitled, we explore reproduction and bodily autonomy in a changing world. We talk to Kasumi Nakagawa, an expert on surrogacy in Cambodia, and Kate Gilmore, former deputy director of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today, medical advances make it possible for a woman to have a baby on behalf of someone else. This has given many people – including many in the LGBTQI community – the exciting possibility of founding a family of their own. But this incredible medical technology raises new questions about rights: how far do reproductive rights go? How do you establish the rights of a parent or citizenship? Who has a right to found a family?  
 
In this episode of Entitled, we explore reproduction and bodily autonomy in a changing world. We talk to Kasumi Nakagawa, an expert on surrogacy in Cambodia, and Kate Gilmore, former deputy director of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32628165-c751-4a1a-87b5-5305ec232aeb</guid>
      <title>S1E4: That “Just-in-Case” Gun</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The right to bear arms is an American touchstone, found in very few other countries.  Many think it should not be a right at all, and the debate over it is highly polarized. This episode broadens the lens to show how other countries handle guns, and suggests ways to cut through the charged discussion here at home. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/4-that-just-in-case-gun-drWQ3PnF</link>
      <enclosure length="31187057" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/e6adce2f-9c3a-48fc-86f6-a9020a53901b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=e6adce2f-9c3a-48fc-86f6-a9020a53901b&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E4: That “Just-in-Case” Gun</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The right to bear arms is an American touchstone, found in very few other countries.  Many think it should not be a right at all, and the debate over it is highly polarized. This episode broadens the lens to show how other countries handle guns, and suggests ways to cut through the charged discussion here at home.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The right to bear arms is an American touchstone, found in very few other countries.  Many think it should not be a right at all, and the debate over it is highly polarized. This episode broadens the lens to show how other countries handle guns, and suggests ways to cut through the charged discussion here at home.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, law podcast, government podcast, lawyers, government, law, entitled podcast, rights podcast, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, guns, human rights, gun rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d15872d3-b122-4100-ad95-a76f2045dfca</guid>
      <title>S1E3.5: Are All Afghanistan&apos;s Women Potential Refugees?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The collapse of the Afghan government has raised grave concerns for the future of the country, particularly for women. Exit is not a generally available option, but should it be? On this episode, we continue our conversation about migration, and the limits of the current human rights system for protecting the rights of women. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/35-are-all-afghanistans-women-potential-refugees-gFuTbeWg</link>
      <enclosure length="36213310" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/8697096c-8c9d-4d9c-aa98-b35fa8d34a50/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=8697096c-8c9d-4d9c-aa98-b35fa8d34a50&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E3.5: Are All Afghanistan&apos;s Women Potential Refugees?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The collapse of the Afghan government has raised grave concerns for the future of the country, particularly for women. Exit is not a generally available option, but should it be? On this episode, we continue our conversation about migration, and the limits of the current human rights system for protecting the rights of women.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The collapse of the Afghan government has raised grave concerns for the future of the country, particularly for women. Exit is not a generally available option, but should it be? On this episode, we continue our conversation about migration, and the limits of the current human rights system for protecting the rights of women.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, rights of women, legal podcast, entited, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, political, university of chicago law school, asylum, afghanistan, law podcast, government podcast, government, legal, political podcast, law, refugees, politics podcast, politics, rights, university of chicago, human rights podcast, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dc594bf7-2213-4052-a61b-c4e18f024975</guid>
      <title>S1E3: Rights at the Border</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The right to seek and enjoy asylum has never been more important than in today’s global landscape. At the same time, countries have never been more committed to finding increasingly creative ways to avoid having to take in refugees. Today on Entitled, we discuss the right to asylum and what our rights are at the border of another country. We know the movement of distressed migrants at sea and nations’ borders is the cause for a lot of human tragedy. Are borders necessary – can we conceive of them in a different way? What duties should nations have to assist these migrants?
 
Joining Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg this week are Nina Kerkebane, an Algerian asylee and an entering graduate student at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy; Ayelet Shachar, author of The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality; Maya Elzinga-Soumah, Senior Legal Associate with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Aruba and Curaçao; and Itamar Mann, Director of the Global Legal Action Network and a Senior Lecturer at the University of Haifa Faculty of Law.   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/rights-at-the-border-B7bB2rNo</link>
      <enclosure length="33845368" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/2c177bbb-7664-488a-b18d-006b241354cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=2c177bbb-7664-488a-b18d-006b241354cc&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E3: Rights at the Border</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The right to seek and enjoy asylum has never been more important than in today’s global landscape. At the same time, countries have never been more committed to finding increasingly creative ways to avoid having to take in refugees. Today on Entitled, we discuss the right to asylum and what our rights are at the border of another country. We know the movement of distressed migrants at sea and nations’ borders is the cause for a lot of human tragedy. Are borders necessary – can we conceive of them in a different way? What duties should nations have to assist these migrants?
 
Joining Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg this week are Nina Kerkebane, an Algerian asylee and an entering graduate student at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy; Ayelet Shachar, author of The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality; Maya Elzinga-Soumah, Senior Legal Associate with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Aruba and Curaçao; and Itamar Mann, Director of the Global Legal Action Network and a Senior Lecturer at the University of Haifa Faculty of Law.  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The right to seek and enjoy asylum has never been more important than in today’s global landscape. At the same time, countries have never been more committed to finding increasingly creative ways to avoid having to take in refugees. Today on Entitled, we discuss the right to asylum and what our rights are at the border of another country. We know the movement of distressed migrants at sea and nations’ borders is the cause for a lot of human tragedy. Are borders necessary – can we conceive of them in a different way? What duties should nations have to assist these migrants?
 
Joining Professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg this week are Nina Kerkebane, an Algerian asylee and an entering graduate student at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy; Ayelet Shachar, author of The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality; Maya Elzinga-Soumah, Senior Legal Associate with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Aruba and Curaçao; and Itamar Mann, Director of the Global Legal Action Network and a Senior Lecturer at the University of Haifa Faculty of Law.  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, uchicago, refugee podcast, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, political, university of chicago law school, asylum, law podcast, government podcast, lawyers, government, political podcast, law, entitled podcast, refugees, politics podcast, refugee crisis, politics, entitled, rights, university of chicago, human rights, migration, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">189b99d9-4b26-414b-8d45-fb24145a377c</guid>
      <title>S1E2: Better Off Said</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Free speech is one of those all important rights but one whose scope changes over time. Today, it is more likely to take place behind a screen rather than in the town square. What does the right to speak freely really look like when we are speaking in likes, comment bubbles and Tiktok videos?

In this episode of Entitled, we explore freedom of speech, how and whether we still have it. We talk to Vietnamese pop star, MaiKhoi, an Artist Protection Fund fellow in residence at the University of Pittsburgh, who went from being dubbed the Vietnamese “Lady Gaga” to an exiled free speech activist, and to David Kaye, a UN expert on freedom of opinion and expression. Who’s protecting the right to free speech now that companies like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram control the spaces where speech takes place? Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2021 20:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/2-better-off-said-qBZjF7Ux</link>
      <enclosure length="35374527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/3317337a-a670-4c34-aaac-86763142fbcc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=3317337a-a670-4c34-aaac-86763142fbcc&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E2: Better Off Said</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Free speech is one of those all important rights but one whose scope changes over time. Today, it is more likely to take place behind a screen rather than in the town square. What does the right to speak freely really look like when we are speaking in likes, comment bubbles and Tiktok videos?

In this episode of Entitled, we explore freedom of speech, how and whether we still have it. We talk to Vietnamese pop star, MaiKhoi, an Artist Protection Fund fellow in residence at the University of Pittsburgh, who went from being dubbed the Vietnamese “Lady Gaga” to an exiled free speech activist, and to David Kaye, a UN expert on freedom of opinion and expression. Who’s protecting the right to free speech now that companies like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram control the spaces where speech takes place?</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Free speech is one of those all important rights but one whose scope changes over time. Today, it is more likely to take place behind a screen rather than in the town square. What does the right to speak freely really look like when we are speaking in likes, comment bubbles and Tiktok videos?

In this episode of Entitled, we explore freedom of speech, how and whether we still have it. We talk to Vietnamese pop star, MaiKhoi, an Artist Protection Fund fellow in residence at the University of Pittsburgh, who went from being dubbed the Vietnamese “Lady Gaga” to an exiled free speech activist, and to David Kaye, a UN expert on freedom of opinion and expression. Who’s protecting the right to free speech now that companies like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram control the spaces where speech takes place?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>david kaye, tom ginsburg, uchicago, instagram, twitter, university of chicago podcast network, free speech, ucpn, united nations, law podcast, social media, government podcast, vietnam, government, law, facebook, entitled, rights, speech, university of chicago, maikhoi, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f554751-0f84-4a01-b6b7-6d6069650dde</guid>
      <title>S1E1: What&apos;s The Matter With Rights?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg have traveled the world getting into the weeds of global human rights debates. On this first episode of Entitled, they begin their journey of exploring the stories and thorny questions around why rights matter and what’s the matter with rights. 

Joining them are professor of ethics and legal philosophy at Oxford University, John Tasioulas; constitution building expert Zaid Al-Ali; and Columbia law professor Jamal Greene, author of "How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights is Tearing America Apart." 

Join the discussion on how we might begin to better understand the role of rights in our diverse and yet increasingly connected world. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com
for information about our collection and use of personal data for
advertising.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>hodappm@uchicago.edu (University of Chicago Podcast Network)</author>
      <link>https://entitledpodcast.com/episodes/1-why-rights-matter-and-whats-the-matter-with-rights-ohy7m5ml</link>
      <enclosure length="37933682" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://afp-920658-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc/episodes/30c754f8-cf87-477e-80a9-47b75ba0db86/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=4269e1e1-1d30-4b3e-8e91-20f1c8fa71fc&amp;awEpisodeId=30c754f8-cf87-477e-80a9-47b75ba0db86&amp;feed=6mI7AJ8T"/>
      <itunes:title>S1E1: What&apos;s The Matter With Rights?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>University of Chicago Podcast Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg have traveled the world getting into the weeds of global human rights debates. On this first episode of Entitled, they begin their journey of exploring the stories and thorny questions around why rights matter and what’s the matter with rights. 

Joining them are professor of ethics and legal philosophy at Oxford University, John Tasioulas; constitution building expert Zaid Al-Ali; and Columbia law professor Jamal Greene, author of &quot;How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights is Tearing America Apart.&quot; 

Join the discussion on how we might begin to better understand the role of rights in our diverse and yet increasingly connected world.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lawyers and law professors Claudia Flores and Tom Ginsburg have traveled the world getting into the weeds of global human rights debates. On this first episode of Entitled, they begin their journey of exploring the stories and thorny questions around why rights matter and what’s the matter with rights. 

Joining them are professor of ethics and legal philosophy at Oxford University, John Tasioulas; constitution building expert Zaid Al-Ali; and Columbia law professor Jamal Greene, author of &quot;How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights is Tearing America Apart.&quot; 

Join the discussion on how we might begin to better understand the role of rights in our diverse and yet increasingly connected world.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:keywords>tom ginsburg, jamal greene, uchicago, university of chicago podcast network, ucpn, university of chicago law school, law podcast, government podcast, lawyers, government, law, entitled podcast, john tasioulas, entitled, rights, lawyer podcast, university of chicago, human rights podcast, zaid al-ali, human rights, claudia flores</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>