We start by examining the film’s central conflict: what happens when emotional intimacy becomes more threatening than physical infidelity? As Dr. Bill Hartford, played by Tom Cruise, spirals after his wife Alice (Nicole Kidman) admits to a sexual fantasy, we discuss how jealousy, insecurity, and ego drive the narrative forward.

From there, we dive into the film’s infamous secret society sequence and what it represents. Is it simply shocking imagery, or a deeper commentary on elite power structures, wealth, and access? We debate how relevant these themes feel today, especially in light of modern conversations about the ultra-wealthy and hidden networks of influence.

We also explore Kubrick’s signature ambiguity. Throughout the episode, we unpack theories around symbolism—like the recurring Christmas imagery, masks, and dreamlike cinematography—and how they reinforce the film’s core idea: that reality and illusion are constantly overlapping.

Another key discussion centers on emotional vs. physical cheating. We reflect on how the film suggests that imagined desire can be just as destructive as real-world actions. Through personal perspectives and relationship insights, we connect Kubrick’s themes to real-life experiences, making the conversation both analytical and relatable.

We also touch on Kubrick’s directing style, his use of psychological pressure on actors, and how that may contribute to the film’s intense performances. Plus, we highlight behind-the-scenes details, including how the film was shot in London to replicate New York and how Kubrick’s attention to detail creates a surreal, almost dreamlike atmosphere.

Ultimately, we ask: what is Eyes Wide Shut really about? Is it a warning about desire? A critique of social structures? Or simply a mirror reflecting our deepest, most uncomfortable truths?

This is a deep, unfiltered discussion about one of the most polarizing and thought-provoking films ever made.

We unpack how the film uses this unique premise to examine real-world issues like mental health, grief, and emotional isolation. From the start, we’re struck by how universal the film feels—despite its specific cultural setting—highlighting that loneliness is something we all experience, no matter where we are.

As we go deeper, we explore the ethical dilemmas at the heart of the story. Is it healing to temporarily fill emotional voids, or does it ultimately cause more harm? The film doesn’t give easy answers, and that’s what makes it so compelling. We talk about the blurred lines between performance and reality, especially as Fraser’s character begins forming genuine bonds with the people he’s hired to “pretend” with.

One of the most powerful aspects we highlight is the theme of found family. What starts as transactional relationships evolves into something real, showing how connection can grow in even the most unconventional circumstances.

We also spend time discussing key emotional moments, including the relationship with the young girl Mia, the moral weight of deception, and how unresolved grief and personal trauma shape the characters’ choices. These moments hit hard becaa relationshipuse they feel honest—and because they force us to ask ourselves what we would do in similar situations.

Beyond the story, we give major props to the film’s direction, cinematography, and tone. The movie balances heartbreak with warmth, never feeling manipulative, and instead earns its emotional beats through sincerity and grounded performances.

As always, we bring our own experiences into the conversation, opening up about vulnerability, friendship, and why having honest conversations about mental health matters. This episode becomes more than just a movie review—it turns into a reflection on connection, honesty, and the importance of showing up for each other.

If you’re into character-driven dramas, Brendan Fraser’s recent work, or films that tackle real emotional issues in a meaningful way, this is a discussion you don’t want to miss.

👉 Be sure to like, comment, and subscribe to stay updated on future episodes!

We start by analyzing Van Damme’s performance, highlighting how he delivers genuinely powerful acting in select moments—particularly in emotionally vulnerable scenes—while struggling to maintain that same level throughout the film. As we discuss, there are flashes where he feels like a “legitimate actor,” followed by moments that feel flat or even amateurish . This “hot and cold” performance becomes a central theme of our conversation.

From there, we explore the film itself—its unstructured storytelling, nonlinear narrative, and meta commentary on Van Damme’s real life. While we appreciate the ambition of blending fiction with autobiography, we ultimately debate whether the film succeeds emotionally. For some of us, it feels like two different movies competing with each other: a grounded personal story and a disconnected crime narrative .

We also discuss how audience expectations shape our experience. When you see a Jean-Claude Van Damme movie, you expect action, splits, and high kicks—but JCVD subverts that, offering very little action and instead focusing on introspection. That mismatch creates tension between what we want and what the film is trying to do.

Another key topic is acting philosophy. We debate whether great acting is about transformation (think method actors) or simply playing variations of yourself. This leads to a broader discussion about actors like Van Damme who may excel within a specific range but struggle outside of it.

We kick things off by exploring Guy’s unique career path, from engineering and Air Force service to working behind the scenes in live entertainment production. His journey highlights how creative problem-solving and execution—not perfection—are often the real keys to success in both art and life. 

From there, we dive into his work with major events like the Saturn Awards and Palm Springs Comic Con, unpacking what it takes to manage fans, talent, and massive crowds. Guy shares insights into building fan experiences, including the challenges of balancing diehard fandom with celebrity-driven hype.

We also get into Comic-Con culture, debating the value of Hall H versus smaller panels, and why some of the best experiences happen off the main stage. The conversation highlights how fandom has evolved—and how community remains at the center of it all.

Along the way, we swap stories about movies, TV, and pop culture—from deep cuts like Max Headroom to blockbuster discussions and “movies we’ve never seen.” We also touch on Hollywood trends like legacy sequels and what keeps audiences coming back. 

Guy also reflects on his early ambitions in the space program, including how the Challenger disaster reshaped his career trajectory—a powerful reminder of how unpredictable life paths can be.

Ultimately, this episode is about creativity, connection, and the passion that fuels both fandom and storytelling. Whether you’re into movies, Comic-Con culture, or behind-the-scenes Hollywood insights, this conversation is packed with humor, perspective, and unforgettable stories.

We explore standout performances in the Best Actor and Actress categories, including the buzz around Michael B. Jordan’s win and Jesse Buckley’s powerful performance. Along the way, we highlight notable snubs—like Jesse Plemons—and reflect on how the Academy continues to reward both emerging talent and long-overdue industry veterans.

Our conversation also examines key technical categories like cinematography, editing, production design, and costume design, unpacking what separates a good film from an Oscar-winning one. As editors and filmmakers, we offer insight into how elements like pacing, visual storytelling, and seamless cuts influence award decisions.

We also tackle bigger-picture conversations surrounding the Oscars, including:

The Academy’s evolving approach to diversity and representation

The tension between artistic merit vs. industry politics

Whether the Oscars reward “lightning in a bottle” moments or long-term careers

The growing divide between audience favorites and Academy picks

From passionate defenses of films like Sinners to critiques of surprise winners, we give our honest, unfiltered reactions to one of Hollywood’s biggest nights.

Whether you’re a casual movie fan or a hardcore cinephile, this episode is your go-to breakdown of the 2026 Oscars, packed with insight, humor, and hot takes.

We discuss standout performances, especially from Ewan McGregor as Mark Renton, and how his character’s journey reflects the push and pull between self-destruction and personal growth. From the film’s shocking and surreal imagery to its dark comedic moments, we analyze why Trainspotting still feels raw, disturbing, and relevant decades later.

We also break down some of the film’s most iconic scenes, including its use of practical effects and low-budget filmmaking techniques that enhance its realism. We compare its style and impact to films like Requiem for a Dream, highlighting how both movies portray addiction without glamorizing it.

Beyond the surface, we explore deeper themes like dopamine chasing, the cycle of addiction, and the struggle to break away from toxic environments. We reflect on how Trainspotting portrays relapse, personal accountability, and the difficulty of choosing a “normal” life over chaos.

Finally, we talk about the film’s cultural legacy, its influence on indie cinema, and why its bold, unfiltered storytelling still resonates today. Whether you’re revisiting the film or watching it for the first time, this discussion uncovers what makes Trainspotting one of the most unforgettable films of its era.

We start by discussing one of the most historic changes to the Academy Awards this year: the introduction of the Best Casting category, a long-awaited recognition for casting directors and the ensembles that define a film. We debate how this new award might influence other categories like Best Director or Best Picture and whether it will simply mirror acting nominations or recognize true ensemble achievements.

oscars-2026

From there, we analyze standout films across multiple Oscar categories. One of the biggest talking points is the dominance of Sinners, which broke nomination records with an astonishing sixteen nominations. We explore whether its technical achievements — particularly in cinematography — could carry it to multiple wins on Oscar night.

oscars-2026

The discussion also dives into the visual artistry of this year’s nominees, including the gothic world-building of Frankenstein, the period authenticity of Hamnet, and the natural-light cinematography of Train Dreams, which was reportedly filmed almost entirely using available daylight. We talk about how these technical decisions shape storytelling and how the Academy historically rewards craftsmanship in categories like Cinematography, Production Design, and Costume Design.

oscars-2026

As filmmakers and editors ourselves, we also spend time discussing film editing and storytelling structure, including how massive productions like F1 combine real racing footage with visual effects to build a coherent narrative. It’s a reminder that editing isn’t just technical — it’s the invisible craft that determines the rhythm and emotion of a movie.

Of course, no Oscar conversation would be complete without addressing the Academy’s complicated relationship with genre films. We talk about why horror, science fiction, and comedy are often overlooked during awards season, even when they push filmmaking forward. From The Substance to Nosferatu, we debate whether the Academy is slowly becoming more open to genre storytelling — or if prestige drama still reigns supreme.

Along the way we also debate performances, controversial casting decisions, and which films we personally think deserve recognition. From bold cinematography choices to the politics of Oscar campaigning, this episode covers the full landscape of modern awards season and what it says about Hollywood today.

If you’re an Oscar fan, filmmaker, or movie lover, this is the ultimate 2026 Oscars preview — full of predictions, debates, and plenty of film nerd rabbit holes.

We explore whether Marty is truly an antihero in the vein of Walter White or Tony Soprano, or if he’s simply a product of generational trauma, hustle culture, and survival instincts. Is he narcissistic? Is he misunderstood? Or is he just trying to escape a life of being used and degraded by older authority figures?

We unpack the film’s themes of ambition, exploitation, masculinity, and the cost of greatness. We debate the pivotal match-fixing offer from the Kevin O’Leary character, the emotional weight of Rachel’s storyline, and whether Marty earns his ultimate triumph. We also talk about the film’s stylized tone, its modern energy clashing with a 1950s setting, and how the ending lands differently depending on how you view Marty’s journey.

Performance-wise, we highlight surprising turns from Tyler, The Creator, whose acting chops impressed us beyond his Loiter Squad days, and Odessa Zion, who delivers one of the film’s most emotionally grounded performances. We also touch on the stunt casting, the layered supporting characters, and how Marty Supreme compares spiritually to Safdie’s earlier work like Uncut Gems.

Ultimately, we ask the big questions:

• Is Marty Supreme a sports movie about ping pong, or a character study about ego and survival?
• Does ambition inevitably corrupt?
• And what would our 10-year-old selves think about the lives we’re living now?

We share our final ratings, reflect on the relatability of Marty’s highs and lows, and examine whether the film’s emotional payoff feels earned or script-driven.

If you’re searching for a Marty Supreme review, Marty Supreme ending explained, or an in-depth film analysis of this 2025 Oscar contender, this episode has you covered.

We explore how this new take stacks up against the previous Fantastic Four films—including the early 2000s version starring Jessica Alba and the 2015 reboot—and whether this 2025 iteration feels like a true fresh start for the MCU’s Phase 6.

What We Discuss in This Episode:

Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards — Is he the right choice for Mister Fantastic?

Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and the rest of the new cast

Ralph Ineson’s menacing take on Galactus

Julia Garner as Silver Surfer

The 1960s retro-futuristic aesthetic

Marvel’s ongoing multiverse strategy

How this connects to Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars

Whether the MCU’s humor is undercutting emotional stakes

We also debate how Marvel handles comedy compared to filmmakers like James Gunn, whose work on Guardians of the Galaxy struck a better balance between trauma, humor, and character depth.

The Big Questions We Tackle:

Has the MCU become too reliant on multiverse storytelling?

Does Fantastic Four: First Steps feel watered down for younger audiences?

Are the emotional stakes high enough?

Does Marvel gloss over deeper character trauma from the comics?

Is this better than the Chris Evans-era Fantastic Four?

Could this version hold up long term within the MCU?

We also compare it to DC’s recent success with Superman and talk about whether Marvel is finally regaining momentum after a rocky post-Endgame era.

Our Verdict

We agree this is likely the best Fantastic Four movie yet, but we debate whether that bar was set too low. While we appreciate the streamlined origin story, strong performances, and standalone accessibility, we question whether the script pulls its punches emotionally.

Is this a true “first step” toward Marvel’s comeback — or just another decent entry in an increasingly crowded franchise machine?

We break it all down.

We kick things off by talking about why this movie was chosen, how del Toro’s name alone carries massive expectations, and how genre films—especially gothic horror—are still treated unfairly by major awards shows. We break down the film’s long list of Oscar nominations and debate whether genre movies can ever truly compete in “prestige” categories.

From there, we get into the heart of the movie:
the monster.

We all agree that Jacob Elordi’s performance as the creature is the emotional backbone of the film. Even buried under makeup and speaking very little, his physical acting, expressions, and vulnerability make him the most compelling character on screen. We talk about how this version finally centers the monster’s pain, loneliness, and need for acceptance—something that hits surprisingly close to home.

We also unpack:

The gothic horror tone and how it leans into classic literature

The stunning production design, sets, costumes, and lighting

Whether the movie is “too long” or perfectly paced

If Frankenstein would’ve worked better as a limited series

How del Toro’s auteur vision clashes with mass-audience expectations

Why streaming changed how people experienced this film

Amber brings up the anxiety-inducing tower set piece (yes, that hole), and we all agree that the architecture alone deserves an award. Chris argues that the movie’s length made him want even more character development, while Alex defends del Toro’s artistic intent and reminds us that “too long” is subjective—especially in the world of gothic storytelling.

We also compare this adaptation to Mary Shelley’s original novel, including the cut third act involving the Bride of Frankenstein, and discuss what it means that del Toro chose not to include it. That leads to a broader conversation about adaptation, faithfulness, and creative freedom.

Finally, we wrap with rapid-fire takes on the strongest and weakest characters, how the film balances horror with drama, and why—even with flaws—this Frankenstein stands as one of the most visually striking and emotionally resonant monster films in years.

We start with a spoiler-light overview of the premise:
After their extremist nemesis resurfaces 16 years later, a group of former revolutionaries reunite to rescue the daughter of one of their own—only to realize that the past is far from buried.

From there, we ask the big question:
Can “One Battle After Another” actually win Best Picture?

With ten films competing—including Sinners, Hamnet, Marty Supreme, Train Dreams, and Begonia—we debate whether the Academy is spreading the love too thin, or quietly signaling which film will be the “safe” winner.

The First Act: A Masterclass or Too Much, Too Fast?

We spend a lot of time on the explosive opening act set in an internment camp, where we meet Leo and Teyana Taylor as revolutionaries fighting against a militarized white supremacist faction led by Sean Penn’s chilling “Lockjaw.”
Some of us call it a screenwriting masterclass—a bold, in-media-res plunge into character, motivation, and chaos. Others feel it’s intentionally rushed, designed to shock us into the story rather than let us live in it.

Politics, Relevance, and Timing

We wrestle with the idea that this film arrived at the exact wrong—or right—moment. The movie’s themes of extremism, surveillance, rebellion, and generational trauma feel ripped straight from today’s headlines.
Is it art imitating life… or life imitating art?

Chase Infinity: The Next Breakout Star

We also spotlight Chase Infinity’s performance as the daughter caught between revolution and survival. The visual parallels between her and her mother—especially the machine gun imagery—become one of the film’s most powerful generational echoes.

Who Should Win the Oscar?

Opinions clash:

Some of us think Sinners will sweep the night.

Others believe Hamnet is the Academy’s “safe” choice.

A few of us argue that One Battle After Another is too bold to ignore—and might win because of the political climate, not in spite of it.

And yes… we also go on a few wild tangents about:

The Patriots conspiracy theory

Bad Bunny, Green Day, and the Super Bowl

Desert Hot Springs, colonics, and cults

And why Timothée Chalamet might need to calm down 😅

It’s chaotic, it’s hilarious, and it’s one of our most passionate film debates yet.

We talk about why this film stood out as such a bold experiment in visual storytelling, from its decision to shoot at a dog’s eye level to its near-total absence of human facial closeups. The perspective shift forces us to experience fear, confusion, and loss in a completely different way—and we debate whether the movie would even work without this creative choice.

Our conversation digs into the film’s layered themes:

Is the “monster” a literal supernatural entity—or a metaphor for disease and generational trauma?

Is the house cursed, or is it a symbol of inherited pain?

Can animals sense things we can’t—whether that’s illness, danger, or something beyond logic?

We also explore how Good Boy connects to other atmospheric horror films, the power of non-verbal storytelling, and why this movie feels more like a “vibes” experience than a traditional narrative. The discussion branches into topics like paranormal belief, emotional isolation, community, and how fear hits harder when an innocent animal is at the center of the story.

Finally, we talk about what makes Indy such a compelling “lead,” why this movie feels deeply human despite barely showing human faces, and how Good Boy uses horror as a lens for grief, loyalty, and letting go.

Chosen by special returning guest Chris (MilkmanAmerica), Train Dreams is described as “a thinking movie and a feeling movie” that challenges the idea of what it means for a film to be entertaining . Rather than focusing on traditional plot, the movie observes the quiet, often brutal life of a logger during the early 20th century as America undergoes massive industrial change.

We talk about how the film feels intentionally “plotless” and why the narration is essential to grounding us in Robert’s internal life . With minimal dialogue and a slow, meditative pace, the movie asks us to sit with grief, silence, and memory instead of chasing spectacle.

Key Topics We Cover

Existential themes and the fragility of life

The devastating loss of Robert’s wife and daughter in the cabin fire

William H. Macy as the “Gandalf” archetype and why his death is so symbolic

The brutal realities of the railroad era and racial violence against Chinese workers

Whether Joel Edgerton “carries” a film the way Leonardo DiCaprio does

The meaning behind the sudden, shocking death of Apostle Frank

Why the movie feels like a meditation on grief rather than a traditional story

We also explore how Train Dreams reflects the dangers of the industrial revolution, showing a world without safety nets, HR, or even basic sanitation. Life is cheap, work is deadly, and survival is never guaranteed.

The Music & Nick Cave Connection

The score by Bryce Dessner and the original song by Nick Cave are subtle but emotionally devastating. Alex connects Cave’s real-life losses to the emotional weight of the film, arguing that grief is not just a theme—it’s the soul of Train Dreams .

Final Take

This episode is part film breakdown, part philosophy session, part chaos—and that’s exactly why we love it. Train Dreams may not be for everyone, but it’s a movie that lingers long after the credits roll.

We break down the film’s central premise: two conspiracy-obsessed men kidnap a powerful tech CEO, convinced she’s an alien sent to destroy Earth. What sounds absurd at first becomes increasingly plausible as the film unfolds. Jesse Plemons delivers a chilling performance as Teddy, a man whose grief, abuse, and ideological freefall lead him to radical certainty. Emma Stone is pitch-perfect as a hyper-controlled CEO whose emotional detachment blurs the line between capitalist overlord and extraterrestrial invader.

We spend a lot of time wrestling with the film’s biggest question: at what point did we believe she really was an alien? From disturbing electroshock scenes set to pop music, to superhuman physical moments, to the horrifying calm with which violence is absorbed, Bugonia constantly shifts our certainty. Lanthimos weaponizes tone—jumping from dark comedy to outright dread—to keep us off balance.

The episode also explores the film’s deeper themes, including:

How conspiracy thinking often grows out of real trauma

The overlap between tech CEOs and “inhuman” behavior

The symbolism of bees, control, and resource extraction

Power dynamics between captor and captive

Why making the conspiracy true is the film’s most unsettling choice

We also discuss the film’s shocking supporting turns, including Stavros Halkias as a cop whose presence introduces another layer of moral rot, and how childhood abuse, corporate negligence, and ideological extremism all feed into the story’s bleak worldview.

By the end, we agree on one thing: Bugonia isn’t just asking whether aliens walk among us—it’s asking whether unchecked power has already made monsters of us all.

We talk through the film’s central premise: a young woman institutionalized by her abusive stepfather escapes into elaborate fantasy worlds as a coping mechanism. From there, we debate one of the movie’s biggest questions: are these action sequences alternate dimensions, metaphorical fantasies, or a theatrical abstraction meant to challenge the audience? The ambiguity becomes a key point of discussion, especially as we unpack how the film frames reality, performance, and agency.

A major focus of the episode is the idea that Sucker Punch may itself be a “sucker punch” to the audience, presenting itself as glossy, male-gaze-driven action while quietly subverting expectations with themes pulled straight from Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey. We explore the theory that Baby Doll functions as a guardian angel or fragmented self for Sweet Pea, and how sacrifice, refusal of the call, and transformation play into the film’s controversial ending.

We also spend time discussing female empowerment versus exploitation, pushing back on surface-level critiques that dismiss the movie outright. Is Snyder objectifying his characters, or is the film commenting on how women reclaim power within systems designed to control them? We don’t fully agree, but that tension is exactly what makes the conversation compelling.

The episode also dives into Snyder’s visual style, comparing it to video game cutscenes, music videos, and heightened fantasy aesthetics. While we’re critical of the script in places, we all agree that Snyder knows how to compose striking images, and that Sucker Punch never looks bad, even when it frustrates.

We highlight standout performances from Emily Browning, Abby Cornish, Jenna Malone, Vanessa Hudgens, Jamie Chung, Oscar Isaac, Carla Gugino, and even a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it Jon Hamm appearance. We also talk about Browning’s surprisingly restrained performance and her decision to step away from major franchise stardom.

Music plays a huge role in this episode as well. We break down the significance of Björk’s “Army of Me” and “Where Is My Mind?”, discussing how the soundtrack reinforces the film’s themes of agency, motivation, and internal conflict. The music isn’t just aesthetic, it’s narrative.

Ultimately, this episode isn’t about declaring Sucker Punch a hidden masterpiece or a total failure. It’s about wrestling with a movie that sparks debate, invites multiple interpretations, and refuses to fit neatly into one box. Whether you love it, hate it, or are just confused by it, Sucker Punch gives us plenty to talk about, and we do.

We start by talking about the film’s loose, meandering structure and how it operates more like a hangout movie than a traditional narrative. Rather than building toward constant plot escalation, the movie asks us to live alongside Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth as they drift through late-1960s Los Angeles. For some of us, that vibe is intoxicating; for others, it can feel indulgent and self-satisfied.

We spend a lot of time on Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance as Rick Dalton, breaking down how his insecurity, desperation, and occasional self-awareness make him one of Tarantino’s most human characters. His fear of irrelevance hits especially hard in a story obsessed with the end of an era. We contrast that with Brad Pitt’s Cliff Booth, cool, capable, and intentionally opaque, and debate whether the character is aspirational, troubling, or both.

Margot Robbie’s Sharon Tate becomes a major point of discussion as well. We examine Tarantino’s choice to portray her more as a presence than a fully fleshed-out character, and whether that approach feels respectful, reductive, or somewhere in between. Her scenes embody the film’s nostalgia but also raise questions about agency and perspective.

Naturally, we dig into Tarantino’s revisionist history and the insane third act. We talk about why rewriting real-world violence into cathartic fantasy has become such a defining feature of his later career, and whether Once Upon a Time in Hollywood earns that ending emotionally and thematically.

By the end, we land in a complicated place. We admire the craft, performances, and atmosphere, even as we wrestle with the film’s pacing, indulgence, and tonal choices. It’s a movie we don’t entirely love, but one we can’t stop thinking about, which might be the most Tarantino outcome possible.

We talk about how Left-Handed Girl uses the idea of left-handedness as both a literal and symbolic device, touching on cultural superstition, childhood imagination, and the way shame and fear can be passed down through generations. The character of I-Jing becomes a fascinating lens for how kids internalize adult anxieties, sometimes in playful ways, sometimes in destructive ones.

Visually, we break down how the film was shot largely on an iPhone, and why it never feels like a gimmick. Instead, the vibrant colors, natural lighting, and fluid camera movement make Taipei feel alive. The night markets, streets, and small apartments aren’t just settings—they’re characters. We discuss how limited resources, small crews, and real locations actually enhance the authenticity of the film rather than holding it back.

We also share insights from the San Diego Asian Film Festival, where the film screened and where Shih-Ching Tsou participated in a Q&A, including the revelation that Left-Handed Girl had been in development for nearly two decades. That long gestation shows in the confidence of the storytelling and the emotional precision of the performances—especially from the young lead, who delivers one of the most natural child performances we’ve seen in recent years.

Throughout the episode, we reflect on why films like Left-Handed Girl are so inspiring for independent filmmakers, how Sean Baker’s influence can be felt without overpowering Tsou’s voice, and why this quiet, observational drama lingers long after the credits roll. If you’re interested in Asian cinema, indie filmmaking, or character-driven storytelling, this is one we highly recommend.

Join our Discord!

We talk about watching Gremlins through fresh eyes, especially for those of us who only remembered scattered images from childhood like Gizmo in the toy car, the bar scene, or Stripe causing chaos. Rewatching it now, we explore how the film functions as both a holiday movie and a subversive horror film, complete with genuinely dark moments hiding under its family-friendly reputation.

The conversation digs into practical effects and puppetry, praising how the gremlins’ physical presence gives the movie a texture that modern CGI often can’t replicate. We also highlight how the green blood, exaggerated violence, and cartoon logic allowed the film to push boundaries while still landing a PG rating.

We examine the film’s Reagan-era themes, including American consumerism, corporate greed, and authority figures who are hilariously useless when things go wrong. That naturally leads us into a candid discussion about the movie’s problematic racial elements, particularly how Eastern mysticism and warnings are ignored and what that says about Western arrogance baked into the story.

We also connect Gremlins to its cinematic lineage, including Chris Columbus’s original script, Steven Spielberg’s producer influence, Jerry Goldsmith’s iconic score, and how the film echoes earlier gremlin myths, The Twilight Zone, and even Bugs Bunny cartoons.

Of course, we can’t avoid some of the movie’s most infamous moments, including Phoebe Cates’ wildly dark monologue, the bar scene chaos, and the sheer audacity of calling this a Christmas movie. We wrap things up with final ratings, thoughts on rewatchability, and whether Gremlins still works for new generations, including whether it’s safe or insane to show it to kids.

Whether you’re a lifelong fan or watching it for the first time, Gremlins proves that holiday movies don’t have to be wholesome to be unforgettable.

We kick things off by reflecting on the sheer volume of movies released this year and why this episode exists in the first place: there’s simply too much great cinema to cover everything in depth. That leads us into a broader conversation about what we’re excited to see next year, including upcoming releases, returning franchises, and how modern studios are increasingly blurring the line between filmmaking and corporate branding.

One of the central discussions revolves around Eddington, a deeply polarizing film set during the early days of the pandemic. We break down Joaquin Phoenix’s unsettling performance as a small-town sheriff, Pedro Pascal’s role as a politically charged mayor, and how the film layers social unrest, tribal land jurisdiction, and media spectacle into a story that’s intentionally uncomfortable. While not all of us landed in the same place on the movie, the conversation highlights how messy, challenging films can still be worth engaging with.

From there, we pivot into a nostalgic but revealing discussion about Ghost World and the evolution of color in cinema. We talk about how films from the late ’90s and early 2000s embraced bold, vibrant color palettes—even when the characters themselves were cynical or emotionally detached—and how modern movies and TV shows often favor muted, gray color grading. This sparks a broader conversation about “millennial gray,” production design, and how visual storytelling subtly affects how we emotionally experience films.

One of the biggest moments of the episode comes when we talk about watching Jaws for the first time. We dig into why Steven Spielberg’s 1975 classic still works so well today, how its themes of political denial and public safety feel eerily modern, and why its restraint—especially the limited use of the shark—makes it more terrifying than many contemporary horror films. We also unpack its massive cultural influence, from John Williams’ iconic score to references that continue popping up in movies, TV shows, and pop culture decades later.

Throughout the episode, we weave in personal anecdotes, side tangents, and genuine laughs—whether we’re talking about movie theaters, live concert screenings, classic directors, or the slow realization that we’re all getting older. We wrap things up by thanking listeners for sticking with us, shouting out new followers, and reflecting on the fact that the podcast has now been running for over five years.

This episode is less about rankings and more about celebrating why we love movies in the first place—how they linger, how they change with time, and how watching them together makes the experience even better.

We also explore the theme of secrets and how both central characters are hiding major parts of their lives from each other. Lucy Liu’s character is carrying a significant secret about her health, while her son struggles silently with symptoms he does not fully understand. We discuss how these unspoken truths build emotional walls between them and how the film uses these barriers to highlight the importance of communication in relationships.

Throughout the conversation, we look at how the lack of openness intensifies their struggles and how their journey reflects real-world challenges around mental health, trust, and vulnerability. We share our takeaways on why empathy and understanding are essential when dealing with mental health issues and how better communication could have changed the trajectory of their story.

If you’re interested in mental health representation in film, the psychology of sound design, or character-driven storytelling, this episode provides a thoughtful, engaging, and insightful breakdown of how the movie tackles schizophrenia, secrets, and emotional connection.

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

• Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)
• Justn - @GhostNerd88
• Alex - @dailydares
• Donnie - @_donnieappleseed
• Arnold - @arniecallego

We start by discussing why we chose this film, connecting it to the San Diego Asian Film Festival and the new work from co-director Shi Qing Su. From there, we sink our teeth into the movie's simple yet powerful plot: an undocumented Chinese immigrant, Ming, must pay back a smuggling debt by the end of a single, grueling day working as a deliveryman in New York City.

Our conversation covers the signature Sean Baker filmmaking style—the gritty, guerrilla-style, cinema verité approach that makes you feel the rain-soaked streets and claustrophobic apartments of New York. We talk about how the city itself becomes a character, a relentless force that Ming must battle against.

We delve deep into the film's themes, including:

The immigrant struggle in America and the immense pressure to provide for a family left behind.

The brutal reality of the service industry and the often-unseen hustle of delivery workers.

The powerful social realism that makes the story feel less like fiction and more like a documentary.

The stark contrast between life pre- and post-smartphones, and how technology has changed the nature of this kind of work.

We share our personal connections to the film's themes, from our own experiences in the food service industry to financial hustles that echo Ming's desperate race against the clock. We also highlight the incredible collaboration between Sean Baker and Shi Qing Su, noting her crucial role and continued influence in his later works like Tangerine, The Florida Project, and Red Rocket.

Tune in for our full Letterboxd-style reviews, Arnold's official "Snooze-a-Meter" rating, and a heartfelt discussion on why this micro-budget film remains so impactful and relevant today. This is a must-listen for fans of independent cinema, social realist films, and anyone who wants to understand the roots of Sean Baker's filmography.

One of the biggest talking points for us is the look of the film. Coogler and cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw shot Sinners on IMAX and Ultra Panavision 65 millimeter film, which blew us away when we realized it. We dig into how the film uses the widest lenses available and leans into those massive Delta landscapes and intimate church and juke joint sequences. We talk about how switching formats subtly prepares the viewer for what is coming next, and how even if you are not actively watching for those choices, they hit you on a subconscious level.

Music became one of our favorite parts of the discussion. Sinners is soaked in it, from blues to jazz to gospel to spoken word. We get into how the film treats music as identity, history, and survival. There is a whole section of the movie that shows the evolution of Black music across generations, and we all thought it was one of the most magical scenes in the film. We also loved the casting of Saul Williams as the preacher father. Several of us were huge fans of his slam poetry work, so seeing him here sparked a whole tangent about spoken word, performance, and even a side journey into Stomp and Blue Man Group.

We also spend a lot of time talking about character work, especially Michael B. Jordan playing twin brothers Smoke and Stack. We talk about their dynamic, how we wanted more time with them, and how Jordan brings effortless charisma to both roles. We also get into Sammie, played by newcomer Miles Caton in his first major film role, and how his performance stands out. That leads us into a conversation about the Cyclops guitar he uses and how it becomes a symbolic object in the story.

A major theme we explore is the film’s metaphor around vampirism, culture, and exploitation. The idea of vampires as soul suckers of Black culture really hits us, and we talk about how making the vampire villains Irish adds another layer because of their own history with discrimination. We also debate whether the vampires are truly evil or simply another community seeking survival. That leads into a deeper talk about freedom, equality, and how the film frames immortality as another form of bondage. Alex brings up how becoming a vampire might prevent you from moving on and seeing the loved ones waiting for you on the other side, which ties directly into Smoke’s story and the film’s emotional core.

We also discuss the film’s religious elements. Donnie brings up the preacher’s warning about blues being devil music and how the real message is tied more to the environment and associations than the music itself. We talk about how Sinners uses scripture, temptation, and spiritual symbolism to highlight cultural pressure and manipulation.

A big part of our conversation focuses on awards chances, Oscar snubs, and how prestige shapes the fate of movies like this. We compare Sinners to other genre films that got ignored and talk about how award shows miss the mark on horror and culturally rich stories.

As always, we have plenty of tangents, jokes, and off the rails moments. We talk about vinyl collections, VHS tapes, Comic Con merch flips, pyramid schemes, and even what music we all put on when we are setting a mood. There are a lot of laughs, a few chaotic moments from the live chat, and a whole lot of love for the movie.

By the end, we give our ratings. Several of us landed in the four to five star range. Adrian gives his detailed review, calling the film stylish, well acted, thematically rich, and respectful of its material even if the pacing is a little top heavy. We all agreed that Sinners swings big and lands more often than not.

If you love movies with big ideas, stacked performances, and conversations that go from deep analysis to absolute nonsense, this is a good one.

Join our Discord
Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more at www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
  TikTok
  Facebook
  Twitch
  Instagram

Follow us across all social media
Adrian - @b00tz2big / b00ks2big on TikTok
Justn - @GhostNerd88
Alex - @dailydares
Donnie - @_donnieappleseed
Arnold - @arniecallego

The conversation kicks off with the technical challenges of streaming and the hype surrounding Weapons before moving into a detailed breakdown of the film’s themes. Parental fear emerges as a central thread, underscoring how the movie weaponizes emotional vulnerability. The hosts also examine the subversion of traditional villain archetypes, the film’s haunting visual aesthetic, and how its nonlinear storytelling and multiple POVs enhance its emotional impact.

Symbolism plays a major role in Weapons—from the imagery of the assault rifle to the recurring triangle motif—inviting multiple interpretations and deeper readings of fear, control, and morality. The hosts discuss how these symbols connect to broader cultural and psychological ideas, including the Mandela Effect, collective memory, and how real-world trauma influences art.

The discussion expands to include the evolution of horror filmmaking and how Weapons fits into the genre’s current trajectory of innovation. Touching on moments of humor, surreal tension, and emotional intensity, the hosts reflect on how Weapons balances horror with humanity. They also explore how childhood trauma and societal anxieties shape the film’s characters and story arcs, creating a narrative that’s as unsettling as it is thought-provoking.

By the end of the episode, the hosts share their final thoughts and ratings—debating the film’s effectiveness, its place among recent horror masterpieces, and the lingering questions it leaves behind. Weapons is more than just another horror flick—it’s a dark mirror held up to modern fears, and this episode unpacks every loaded frame.

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

We break down The Crow beat by beat, analyzing its visual storytelling, miniature cityscapes, and how the movie captures loss and vengeance through poetic, comic-book noir. We also discuss the original comic by James O’Barr and the deep emotional pain that inspired it.

From the eerie coincidence of Hollywood once pitching The Crow as a Michael Jackson musical, to the movie’s groundbreaking soundtrack featuring Nine Inch Nails and The Cure, we unpack the cultural legacy that keeps fans returning again and again.

Of course, we take time to remember Brandon Lee — celebrating his legacy, his artistry, and the profound impact his passing had on both the production and the entire film industry.

Whether you’ve seen The Crow once or a hundred times, this episode will remind you why it still resonates with audiences who “can’t rain all the time.”

Listen now wherever you get your podcasts and join the conversation.

#TheCrow #BrandonLee #CultClassic #FilmPodcast #MovieDiscussion

Join our Discord!

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs a,nd more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

The crew riffs on cultural and historical details, like how Nazi soldiers were reportedly on meth and obsessed with the occult, and joke about how trippy warfare might’ve looked if acid and glow sticks were involved. Adrian connects the film’s tone to video games like Castle Wolfenstein, while Arnold and Alex take the conversation into some hilarious and bizarre territory about Filipino and Mexican superstitions, the idea of immortality, and what it would mean to live forever. We even manage to tie that back to the themes of Overlord and how it questions the morality of power, science, and human experimentation.

Between all the banter, we bring real insight to the film’s themes—how Boyce evolves from a scared soldier into a leader, how Ford’s sacrifice seals the story’s moral weight, and how the lack of overt racial commentary actually makes Boyce’s heroism even stronger. We talk about the deeper implications of war horror, the human cost behind “super soldier” fantasies, and how Overlord could easily be reimagined as a series or expanded universe.

By the end, we unwind into our usual post-show chaos, shouting out our Twitch and TikTok audience, joking about “National Nut Day,” and teasing what’s coming next. We close by reflecting on how Overlord deserves more love as a clever, brutal, and surprisingly emotional war-horror gem that never got its due.

Join our Discord!

https://discord.gg/E8qTHwGf

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

* YouTube

* TikTok 

* Facebook

* Twitch

#Overlord #NeverSeenItPodcast #HorrorMovies #WW2Horror #FilmDiscussion #ChuckleHut #MoviePodcast #WyattRussell #PracticalEffects #HalloweenMovies

We talk about Guile’s free-flowing writing process — how he lets ideas come organically without over-structuring too early — and how that spontaneity led to the film’s bold tone and surprising emotional beats. A Halloween Feast doesn’t just deliver laughs and scares; it lands with a twist that reframes the characters’ relationships in a way that sticks with you long after the credits roll.

One of the most fascinating parts of our conversation was hearing about how Guile balanced acting and directing at the same time. He opens up about the mental juggling act of switching between performer and filmmaker, and how having a strong assistant director made all the difference on set. We also dig into the realities of indie filmmaking — tight budgets, limited time, and the resourcefulness it takes to pull off something ambitious with minimal means.

Guile shares his thoughts on audience reactions and how screenings, especially at festivals, can be the truest test of a film’s success. He reminds us that filmmaking doesn’t stop once you call “cut.” There’s an entire journey in marketing and distribution, and he’s refreshingly candid about the challenges of getting an independent film out into the world. His story with Breaking Glass Pictures and O2 Play shows just how much persistence and smart strategy it takes to find your audience.

For aspiring filmmakers, this episode is full of insight. Guile emphasizes that the most important thing you can do is to write — get your ideas down, even if they’re messy, and don’t wait for perfection. He encourages young creators to take risks, trust their instincts, and use whatever resources they have to make something authentic.

We loved talking to Guile not just about A Halloween Feast as a movie, but as a creative journey — one built on passion, collaboration, and a fearless sense of humor in the face of chaos. Whether you’re into indie horror, absurd comedy, or just the behind-the-scenes grind of filmmaking, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.

🎧 Listen now and don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more deep dives into the art (and madness) of independent cinema.

Join our Discord!

https://discord.gg/E8qTHwGf

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com,

In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we dive deep into how the movie world keeps evolving and what that means for fans, creators, and casual viewers alike. 🎬 From streaming platforms changing the way we watch to the explosion of remakes, adaptations, and fan casting, we explore how modern cinema continues to reinvent itself.,,

We’re joined by special guest Chris aka MilkManAmerica, who works with Arnold and brings his own brand of humor (and a few ghost stories 👻) straight from their office. Together with Alex, the crew swaps stories from recent Halloween haunt events, breaks down the current state of conventions like Comic-Con, and reflects on the surprising rise of Pedro Pascal as one of Hollywood’s most beloved stars.

Throughout the episode, we look at how storytelling and direction shape the soul of a film, and how social media can completely change how audiences perceive a movie. There’s plenty of laughter, pop culture analysis, and even a few predictions about where the industry is heading next—from indie studios making waves to anime culture taking center stage at conventions.

Whether you’re a casual moviegoer or a die-hard film buff, this episode is packed with insights, behind-the-scenes banter, and the kind of thoughtful but funny discussion that makes The Never Seen It Podcast a go-to for film and pop culture fans alike.

🎧 Listen now on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts and don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more movie talk, pop culture, and chaos!

Episode Takeaways:

• The podcast serves as a platform for casual movie discussions.
• Fan casting can be a fun way to engage with films.
• Remakes and adaptations dominate the current film landscape.
• Streaming services have changed how audiences consume movies.
• Anticipated films often reflect current societal themes.
• Directors play a crucial role in shaping the narrative of films.
• Social media influences public perception of movies.
• Storytelling remains a vital aspect of filmmaking.
• The future of cinema may lean towards streaming and digital releases.
• Engaging with films can lead to deeper discussions about art and culture.
• Live shows create unique dynamics and audience engagement.
• Pedro Pascal's rise in media reflects a late-blooming career.
• Halloween haunt events offer thrilling experiences worth documenting.
• The state of Comic-Con is shifting with fewer big studio promotions.
• Ghost stories can add a fun twist to office life.
• Conventions are evolving, focusing more on art and comics.
• Smaller studios are gaining traction at conventions.
• Anime culture is becoming increasingly prominent at events.
• The future of conventions may lean towards more intimate experiences.
• Networking and collaboration are key in the podcasting world.

Chosen by Alex, the film sparks a lively discussion about Araki’s place in ‘90s indie cinema alongside Tarantino, Kevin Smith, and Spike Jonze. The crew dives into the director’s signature chaos: neon-drenched lighting, exaggerated violence, and surreal comedy that somehow distills a simple story about three lost kids searching for meaning.

They talk about the film’s queer undercurrents—Araki calling it his “heterosexual movie,” while still exploring fluidity, repression, and the politics of identity. Adrian draws parallels to modern filmmakers like Marlon Wayans and Jordan Peele, while Alex compares Araki’s visual flair to modern absurdist films like Boys Go to Jupiter.

Justin breaks down the movie’s striking use of lighting and color gels—reds, greens, and purples that make every frame look like a fever dream. Arnold reflects on how The Doom Generation feels like Natural Born Killers with way more sex and chaos, while Donnie praises the raw, DIY energy and gives it a solid 4.5/5 on Letterboxd.

The crew wraps by asking: could a movie this horny, this violent, this unapologetically weird ever get made today? Maybe not—and that’s exactly why it still matters.

Join our Discord!

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)discuss the film’s queer undercurrents—Araki referring to it as , such as

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs, and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

* YouTube

* TikTok 

* Facebook

* Twitch

The hosts reflect on the power of soundtracks—how orchestral scores elevate cinematic storytelling, how 90s alternative music defined an era, and how hearing a single song can instantly transport us back to a memory or moment. From cult classics like The Doom Generation to mainstream blockbusters, they break down the way music enhances narrative impact while also considering cultural representation in film soundscapes.

The conversation then shifts to another universal connector: food. Drawing from personal stories and cultural reflections, the hosts unpack how cooking and eating are just as rich in symbolism and creativity as film and music. They highlight how Asian cuisines like ramen and sushi have become staples in American culture, contrast this with the lack of Filipino food representation in mainstream film, and celebrate the nourishing history of soul food. The hosts also explore food’s chemistry, the visual appeal of dishes, and the way meals bring communities together.

Tying the two threads together, the episode emphasizes how both music and food create shared experiences that are emotional, cultural, and deeply personal. Whether it’s a favorite movie soundtrack, a dish passed down through generations, or the simple joy of sharing a meal, these art forms remind us of the beauty in connection.

Tune in for laughter, nostalgia, and plenty of food-for-thought as the hosts mix personal anecdotes, film analysis, and culinary reflections into one flavorful conversation.

Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/DwehCn5K 

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs, and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch

Join us as we unpack the complex relationships between three estranged brothers on a train journey across India. Along the way, we explore the film’s symbolism, its subtle humor, and how Anderson balances whimsy with weighty themes of loss, healing, and reconciliation. From the short film Hotel Chevalier to the perfectly curated soundtrack, we break down how cinematic techniques, music, and storytelling elevate the film’s emotional journey.

Throughout the episode, we share personal reflections on grief, sibling dynamics, and family communication, bringing our own experiences into the conversation. We also reflect on Wes Anderson’s evolving style, Bill Murray’s fleeting but symbolic cameo, and why rewatching this film reveals new details every time.

This episode was recorded live—with some delightful technical difficulties, stretches of banter, and audience engagement thrown in—making it one of our most personal and dynamic discussions yet.

 Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/DwehCn5K 

Follow us on across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

We talk about:

Cultural impact: How Akira helped bring anime to the West and influenced everything from Kanye’s Stronger video to Jordan Peele’s Nope.

Cyberpunk & body horror: Where it sits alongside Blade Runner, Neuromancer, and David Cronenberg’s grotesque transformations.

Themes: Post–World War II trauma, political corruption, religious zealotry, youth rebellion, and the dangers of unchecked power.

Behind-the-scenes trivia: The massive budget, its detailed hand-drawn animation, why the ending feels ambiguous, and how the manga was still unfinished when the film premiered.

Personal takes: Which scenes blew us away, which parts left us confused, and the moments that made us laugh unexpectedly.

From the iconic motorcycle slide to debates about the ambiguous ending, this episode digs into why Akira is still a five-out-of-five masterpiece for so many fans. Whether you’ve seen it once or a dozen times, it’s a film that rewards repeat viewing—and one that continues to shape pop culture decades later.

So grab your red pill jacket, fire up that bike, and join us as we explore the chaos, beauty, and brilliance of Akira. Impact: How Akira Helped Bring Anime to the West and Influenced Everything from Kanye’s 'Stronger' Video to Jordan Peele’s 'Nope'

Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/DwehCn5K 

Follow us on across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

We explore how Wright’s signature direction and fast-paced editing style create a comic book aesthetic that feels alive on screen. From the explosive fight scenes—choreographed like musical numbers—to the playful pop culture references and Smashing Pumpkins needle drops, Scott Pilgrim balances spectacle with heart.

The conversation highlights Scott’s journey of self-respect and personal growth, while also looking at the dynamic role of Ramona Flowers and the eccentric “Evil Exes.” We also reflect on the ensemble cast—many of whom went on to become A-list stars, including Chris Evans, Brie Larson, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead—and discuss the cultural legacy of the film more than a decade later.

Other highlights include the film’s Comic-Con marketing push, the way nostalgia and guilty pleasures influence audience reception, and how fight choreography and music fuse to elevate the narrative. We share favorite moments, fun behind-the-scenes theories, and debate how Scott Pilgrim might be reimagined in today’s Hollywood landscape.

If you’re a fan of Edgar Wright, comic book adaptations, or just love a good cult classic film discussion, this is an episode you don’t want to miss.

Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/DwehCn5K 

Follow us on across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

👉 Tune in for film analysis, character breakdowns, and a celebration of one of the most rewatchable movies of the 2010s.

Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/DwehCn5K 

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

Takeaways

• Chronicle offers a unique take on the superhero genre.
• The film's found footage style enhances its realism.
• Character arcs are central to the film's narrative.
• Andrew's transformation reflects the consequences of power.
• The film was ahead of its time in its themes.
• Josh Trank's direction showcased potential but faced challenges later.
• The alien object serves as a catalyst for character development.
• The film's success was unexpected given its budget.
• Michael B. Jordan's performance was a standout.
• The film's ending parallels classic superhero tropes. The alien crystal's origin is left to the viewer's imagination.
• The film's grounded approach to powers enhances the connection between characters.
• Modern superhero movies often skip detailed origin stories.
• Superhero fatigue may stem from poor storytelling rather than the genre itself.
• Chronicle explores the consequences of teenage power and responsibility.
• The found footage style can work in genres beyond horror.
• Character flaws are relatable and reflect real teenage experiences.
• The film's reception highlights its impact and originality in a saturated market.
• The importance of character development in storytelling is emphasized.
• The film serves as a cautionary tale about identity and authenticity.

Chapters

00:00Introduction to Chronicle and the Podcast

00:05NEWCHAPTER

01:22Choosing Chronicle: A Unique Superhero Perspective

03:50Chronicle's Timeliness and Cultural Impact

05:06Initial Impressions and Reactions to Chronicle

08:05Character Development and Themes of Power

11:27Josh Trank's Direction and Career Trajectory

15:03Box Office Success and Industry Context

16:37The Possibility of a Sequel and Creative Control

20:48Max Landis and Hollywood Dynamics

23:32The Legacy of Chronicle and Its Director

26:26Character Dynamics and Philosophical Undertones

29:26Found Footage Technique: Pros and Cons

34:37Teenage Tropes and Storytelling

35:46The Mysterious Alien Object and Its Implications

39:08Superhero Mythology and Modern Storytelling

43:43Final Thoughts and Movie Reception

51:19Movie Review and Character Development

53:19Final Thoughts and Ratings

55:02Themes of Identity and Authenticity

58:29The Impact of Cringe Culture

01:02:42Lessons from Teenage Experiences

01:05:04Parental Guidance and Self-Worth

01:06:01The Role of Powers in Teen Life

01:11:13Marketing and Legacy of Found Footage Films

We cover everything from:

Leeloo’s look: why Milla Jovovich’s orange-haired, bandage-suited heroine remains an icon of sci-fi fashion.

Comedy done right: how the film’s visual humor and surreal tone outclass modern superhero quip-fests.

Futuristic promises we never got: where are our flying cars, pneumatic tubes, and Jetsons-style upgrades?

Casting surprises: from Bruce Willis and Gary Oldman to Chris Tucker’s unforgettable Ruby Rhod—and even a cameo connection to Björk’s ex, Tricky.

Behind-the-scenes magic: miniature cityscapes, Jean-Paul Gaultier’s legendary costumes, and the made-up language Jovovich helped create.

Villain talk: why Zorg never actually meets Korben Dallas, and what that says about evil as an abstract, political force.

Themes of love and power: Leeloo’s role as more than a love interest, Zorg’s greed as a metaphor for corporate corruption, and the parallels to other “stone-seeking” villains like Thanos and Doctor Doom.

Of course, we veer off into personal stories (Comic-Con antics, wild Coachella parties, and kettle-corn-induced sugar crashes) because that’s what we do. Whether you’re a die-hard fan or a first-time watcher, this episode is packed with laughs, insights, and a reminder of why The Fifth Element remains unlike anything else.

Follow us across all social media platforms @neverseenitpodcast. 

Justin kicks things off by appreciating some of the gorgeous landscape shots that bring the Old West to life, but he quickly admits some sequences felt oddly cheap. Adrian has gripes of his own, pointing out how the score feels like a knock-off Hans Zimmer soundtrack and how the costumes look suspiciously like they were pulled straight off the racks at a western-themed Anthropology store. Amber, meanwhile, didn’t mince words: the movie felt like a slog to her, dragging out scenes without much payoff.

Even Alex, who usually digs deep into the thematic and artistic elements of movies, admits he just couldn’t muster much interest in the story. That says a lot. Arnold, on the other hand, pulls out his signature “z-rating” or snooze-o-meter review, and surprisingly, he stayed awake more than expected.

The crew also dives into the off-screen controversies surrounding Horizon. Adrian brings up reports of a lawsuit involving Kevin Costner’s alleged predatory behavior toward a male cast member, plus the shocking fact that the production skipped hiring an intimacy coordinator, something that has become standard in modern filmmaking.

And then there’s the elephant in the room: the length. At just over three hours, Justin jokes that the whole thing feels like one really long first act. The entire table is stunned to learn that Costner not only intends this to be the first of four parts but that the sequel might not even make it to release given the film’s disastrous box office performance.

Is Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1 a misunderstood epic or a misguided vanity project? You’ll have to listen to find out where the gang ultimately lands. Saddle up for this episode, because even if the film was a slog, the conversation sure isn’t.

In this deep-dive postmortem episode, we go far beyond the surface-level coverage. We take you inside the convention center and beyond, from the first badge scan to the final, exhausted shuffle out the doors — dragging swag bags, sore feet, and overloaded brains along the way. We’re covering:

Our boots-on-the-ground perspective from packed panels, buzzing parties, and immersive pop-up experiences that ranged from jaw-dropping to head-scratching.

The biggest reveals and surprise announcements, including the ones that genuinely blew our minds… and the ones that left us wondering, “That’s it?”

Exclusive merch madness — the drops that had fans camping out at ungodly hours, the ridiculous price tags, and the rare treasures worth the wait.

Cosplay highs and lows — from screen-accurate perfection that deserved its own Hall H slot to the endearingly questionable “bless their heart” attempts.

Celebrity encounters, both magical and awkward, plus the art of surviving the human traffic jams of the autograph lines and photo ops.

How SDCC 2025 stacks up to past years, from the overall hype to crowd control, accessibility, and whether the con is still living up to its legendary status.

Behind-the-scenes moments you won’t see in the official highlight reels — the small, strange, and hilarious interactions that make SDCC an experience like no other.

Whether you were in San Diego soaking in the madness, watching the livestreams from your couch, or simply living vicariously through memes and hashtags, this is the unfiltered, brutally honest, and occasionally ridiculous recap you didn’t know you needed. We’ll laugh at the absurdities, gripe about the gripes, and maybe even get a little sentimental about why Comic-Con continues to hold such a special place in the pop culture calendar.

So grab your lanyard, slip into your most comfortable walking shoes, pack a portable charger, and maybe keep a travel-sized deodorant handy — we’re taking you right back into the thick of SDCC 2025. Let’s relive the madness together.

We talk artistic process, meme aesthetics, internet chaos, and why Kyle’s approach to sound and humor stands out in a noisy world.

👉 Like what you hear? Don’t forget to like, follow, and drop us a comment!
And definitely check out Kyle’s work on Instagram: @selfies_food_and_pets

For Arnold, it's a first watch, and that fresh perspective kicks off hilarious tangents about mistaken identities, the film's nihilist philosophy, and the true meaning behind bowling alleys, flying rugs, and rogue coffee cans full of ashes. Is The Big Lebowski a story about nothing, or a deceptively complex tale about character, chaos, and finding peace in absurdity?

We debate whether “The Dude” is a passive protagonist or a chill philosopher, examine Sam Elliott’s cowboy as a possible manifestation of the Dude’s subconscious, and dive into deep-cut fan theories about schizophrenia, symbolism, and Coen Brothers meta-commentary.

Of course, we also get personal: White Russians, late-night pie binges, VHS memories, and how John Goodman’s unforgettable Walter might be the Redditor we all secretly fear. With meme culture breakdowns, behind-the-scenes trivia, and shoutouts to Grand Theft Auto V, Ghost Story, American Pie, and even True Romance, this episode is an eclectic celebration of all things Lebowski.

Whether you're a diehard fan or new to the film, this episode will have you laughing, thinking, and probably craving a Sprouts apple pie or a drink from The Jesus. So pour yourself a White Russian, kick back, and press play — because the Dude abides, and so do we.

We kick things off with some cheeky boba banter 🥭 and quickly veer into a breakdown of the latest dino-disaster, Jurassic World: Rebirth 🦖🔥. Is it terrible? Kind of. But is it the best terrible one yet? Possibly. The guys roast the franchise's refusal to evolve and pitch their own wild reboot ideas—including a post-apocalyptic dinosaur society twist that sounds... suspiciously brilliant 🧬👀.

Then it's off to the heart of geekdom: San Diego Comic-Con 💥🌴. Longtime attendee Alex spills the beans on immersive “activations” (yes, that’s a thing), merch madness, three-hour waits for FX photo ops, and near-death by boba dehydration 😅🧢. We hear behind-the-scenes stories of Scott Pilgrim parties 🎸, elevator awkwardness with Aubrey Plaza & Michael Cera 🚪, and the good, bad, and cringe of celebrity encounters. Plus: thoughts on the return of indie creators and why Funko Pop might be going the way of the landfill 🗑️🧸.

Also discussed:
🎮 The fall of E3 and rise of indie game devs
🎥 James Gunn’s Superman and why we desperately need fun superhero movies again
🎭 Media literacy, hot takes, and the gang’s beef with military propaganda
💬 Fact-check corner, where we confront our sins (looking at you, Saving Private Ryan)

This episode is one part Comic-Con hype, one part Hollywood cynicism, and one part friendship-powered podcast chaos 🎤👾💚. If you’ve ever waited in line for a con exclusive or had a parasocial crisis about pop culture, this one’s for you.

We go deep into the film’s commentary on bodily autonomy, the relentless pressure on women to stay young, and how Hollywood tosses aside aging actresses like they’re past their expiration date. The Substance doesn’t hold back — and neither do we.

We also spotlight the film’s powerhouse director, Coralie Fargeat, and talk about why she’s absolutely one to watch. This is feminist horror with bite — stylish, savage, and seriously unforgettable.

🎧 Hit play and stick around for Kyle’s thoughts on the movie, the music, and all the weird in-between.

👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and follow — it helps keep the pod alive and weird, just how we like it.

Let me know if you'd like a shortened version for Spotify or Apple Podcasts listings!

Set in 1944 Spain, the story follows young Ofelia, sent to live with her ruthless stepfather, Captain Vidal — a man so terrifying, he makes the actual monsters look kind. At night, Ofelia meets a fairy and an ancient faun who tells her she’s a lost princess — if she can survive three brutal, otherworldly tasks.

We break down Del Toro’s unmatched ability to build these grim, mythic worlds, his cooler, grown-up-Tim-Burton energy, and why this story still hits so hard. We also dig into some incredible behind-the-scenes trivia:

📓 Del Toro lost his notebook of years worth of sketches and ideas for the film in the back of a cab — and was miraculously reunited with it.
📽️ He gave up his entire salary to make sure the film got made the way he envisioned.
🧛‍♂️ Stephen King squirmed next to him during the Pale Man scene, and Del Toro said it felt like winning an Oscar.
📝 Oh, and Del Toro personally wrote the English subtitles — he doesn’t trust anyone else with his words anymore.

🎧 Hit play to hear why Pan’s Labyrinth is still one of the most powerful dark fantasy films ever made — and how sometimes the scariest monsters are the ones that wear a uniform.

👉 Don’t forget to like, follow, and share the podcast — it really helps us out and keeps the stories flowing!

#PansLabyrinth #GuillermoDelToro #NeverSeenItPodcast #DarkFantasy #SpanishCinema #MoviePodcast #TimBurtonVibes #FilmDiscussion #CultCinema #FairyTaleForAdults #CreepyMovies #FantasyFilm #Ofelia #CaptainVidal #ThePaleMan #SupportIndiePods #CinemaLovers

In true Lynch fashion, this one’s a full-on fever dream: fragmented timelines, identity blurring, eerie rabbits, haunted Hollywood lots, and more emotional dread than you can shake a handheld digital camcorder at. We unpack the film’s lo-fi, almost ghostly aesthetic and how it heightens the surreal, nightmarish mood of the story.

We dive into the heavy themes of abuse, domestic violence, and trauma that bubble beneath the surface. Though even that feels like an understatement, because some parts are so abstract and experimental, they’re almost beyond analysis. Even the cast didn’t fully know what they were filming at times... and that somehow makes it even more Lynchian.

Oh, and we couldn’t talk about Inland Empire without mentioning David Lynch standing in downtown Hollywood with a cow and a sign campaigning for Laura Dern’s Oscar nom. Iconic.

🎧 Give it a listen, and let us know what you think this movie is about (we’re genuinely curious).

👉 Don’t forget to like, comment, and follow the show — it really helps us out and keeps the weird conversations flowing.

In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we’re diving deep into Didi, a coming-of-age film that hit us all right in the feels. On the surface, it’s a story about a teenage boy navigating identity, family, and growing pains—but underneath, it’s a beautifully layered film packed with cultural nuance, millennial nostalgia, and that bittersweet ache of growing up.

We talk about how Didi felt painfully real—not just for Alex, who shares a similar Asian/Filipino background and found so many personal moments reflected on screen—but for all of us who remember what it felt like to be outsiders trying to figure ourselves out. Adrian opens up about those awkward teen years, and how much he related to Didi’s quiet frustrations and social missteps.

Of course, we also go full nostalgia mode: remember MySpace bulletins? Early YouTube skate videos? Lo-fi miniDV cam aesthetics? We wax poetic about that strange, transitional time—the late 90s/early 00s—when the internet was still finding itself and so were we.

This one’s heartfelt, reflective, and full of laughs. Whether or not you’ve seen Didi, we think you’ll find something to connect with here.

🎧 Listen now and check out more at neverseenitpodcast.com
And don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and share the pod with a friend who still remembers their MySpace top 8.

As we discuss the film's epic shootouts, memorable one-liners, and dramatic tension, we also take a moment to reflect on the recent passing of Val Kilmer. His performance as the sickly but sharp-tongued Doc Holliday remains one of his most iconic roles—delivering one of cinema’s most quoted lines: “I’ll be your huckleberry.” From his sly delivery to his complex portrayal of friendship and mortality, Kilmer’s presence in Tombstone elevated the film into legendary status.

Whether you're a longtime fan of Westerns or someone who, like one of us, had never seen Tombstone until now, this episode is for you. We talk about Wyatt Earp’s mythos, the film’s production history, and how Tombstone stacks up against other Western classics. Plus, we unpack the lasting cultural impact of the film and why Val Kilmer’s performance continues to resonate with audiences.

Don’t miss this tribute to both a classic film and a truly one-of-a-kind actor. Stream now on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen—and be sure to follow us @NeverSeenItPod for more episodes, film discussions, and behind-the-scenes content.

The rest of the crew isn’t so convinced. Alex admits they had to pause multiple times just to get through it, calling the experience "emotionally exhausting." Arnold agrees, saying the ending left him deeply unsettled—not in a thought-provoking way, but in a "why did I just watch that?" way. Adrian, ever the dark humorist, chimes in with an unexpected take: "There were moments so over-the-top that I laughed, but I’m still not sure if the movie wanted me to laugh or if it was just so insane that it looped back around to funny."

As the debate continues, the group wrestles with whether A Serbian Film is a daring provocation with something to say or just an endurance test in shock value. One thing’s for sure—no one walked away unaffected.

Arnold kicks things off with a nostalgic trip down memory lane, reminiscing about his days as a young lad getting high with his buddies in the park behind his house—painting a perfect picture of how Up in Smoke hit home for an entire generation. Justin chimes in with how every time this film popped up on TV, it practically lit a bowl for him—proof of its timeless pull for weed-loving viewers.

We also touch on the scrappy origins of the film’s production. With a low budget and lots of hustle, Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong performed standup gigs to raise money for the movie—true DIY pioneers blazing their own trail (pun intended).

Adrian brings a sharp lens to the conversation, highlighting the underlying social commentary—particularly the class contrast between Tommy Chong’s character, a privileged burnout, and Cheech Marin’s street-savvy Pedro. He breaks down a memorable scene where Cheech freaks out, thinking the cops are busting down the door for drugs—only to chill out when he realizes it's “la migra.” Adrian draws a direct line to today’s ICE raids, adding timely relevance to a joke that was funny then, and eerily familiar now.

We also recap the film’s plot: Anthony “Man” Stoner, an unemployed, pot-smoking slacker and wannabe drummer, runs away from his strict parents and crosses paths with Pedro de Pacas. The two become fast friends (thanks, weed), get arrested for possession, but are let go on a technicality. From there, it’s a series of wild, weed-fueled misadventures that culminate in a chaotic rock contest performance featuring their anthem, “Earache My Eye.”

Whether you're lighting up or just vibing along, this episode is a love letter to the film that proved getting high and getting laughs could go hand in hand—and maybe even sneak in some social insight along the way.

Oh, and Arnold’s got a magic watch? Yeah, that’s a thing now.

Join us for a fun, off-the-rails chat about movies, nostalgia, and whatever else pops into our brains. It’s The Never Seen It Podcast—and you’ve never heard us like this before!

In this episode, we take a deep dive into Her (2013), Spike Jonze’s poignant sci-fi romance about love, technology, and human connection. Joaquin Phoenix delivers a heartbreaking performance as Theodore, a lonely writer who unexpectedly falls for his A.I. operating system, voiced by Scarlett Johansson. As we explore the film’s themes of isolation, intimacy, and the ever-blurring line between human and artificial intelligence, we also examine its fascinating real-world connections—particularly its parallels to Lost in Translation (2003), directed by Sofia Coppola.

Coppola and Jonze, once married, each created deeply personal films that seem to echo their relationship. Lost in Translation tells the story of an emotionally distant marriage, while Her presents a man struggling with the aftermath of love lost. Both films share a melancholic tone, exploring loneliness in vast, modern cities—Tokyo in Coppola’s film, a near-future Los Angeles in Jonze’s. And then there’s the intriguing casting choice: Scarlett Johansson, who stars in Her as the A.I. Samantha, was also the leading actress in Lost in Translation, further tying these two films together in a way that feels almost poetic.

Join us as we break down the emotional depth, visual beauty, and philosophical questions posed by Her, while also unpacking how Jonze and Coppola used cinema to reflect on relationships, personal growth, and the loneliness of modern love.

Episode Description:
In this episode of The Never Seen It Podcast, we dive into Sofia Coppola’s dreamy and melancholic masterpiece, Lost in Translation (2003). Starring the legendary Bill Murray and a young Scarlett Johansson, this film explores the quiet connections between a fading movie star and a lonely newlywed in the neon-lit heart of Tokyo.

Join us as we break down the film’s themes of isolation, cultural displacement, and unexpected companionship, all wrapped in Coppola’s signature visual storytelling. We’ll discuss why this film continues to resonate, the meaning behind its enigmatic ending, and why Murray and Johansson’s chemistry remains unforgettable.

🎧 Tune in for insights, hot takes, and our favorite moments from this modern classic!

🔹 Follow & Subscribe for more deep dives into films you should’ve seen by now!
📩 Got a movie suggestion? Let us know in the comments or DM us!

#LostInTranslation #BillMurray #ScarlettJohansson #SofiaCoppola #MoviePodcast #FilmDiscussion #NeverSeenItPodcast

Get ready for a wild ride as we dive into the 1985 classic, The Goonies! 🎬 This week’s episode is packed with laughs, chaos, and some seriously questionable childhood memories. We revisit the iconic film and, well… things took some unexpected turns.

What’s on the agenda?

🔪 Justin opens up about a traumatic (but mostly fine) childhood experience involving his mom and a spinning ceiling fan. You won’t believe what happened, but we promise it’s a must-hear story. Who knew childhood could be so… dangerous? 😱 Read more about The Goonies.

🌶️ Meanwhile, Arnold shares the spicy tale of his time marinating meat in the Garlic Capital of the World, Gilroy, California. It’s hotter than you think, and definitely not your typical marinade story. Ever wondered what it's like to cook up something with a little extra kick? Let’s just say you’ll never look at a BBQ the same way again! 🔥 Check out Gilroy’s famous garlic festival here.

💃 And, in true Arnold fashion, we’re already plotting a nationwide tour for his two signature dance moves. The first is the “shovel” 🪦 (yes, you read that right) and the second, the rollercoaster 🎢 (hold on tight!). Get ready to hit the floor with moves so iconic, they’ll have you questioning everything you thought you knew about rhythm. Learn more about dance culture here.

💎 Oh, and we can’t forget the accidental innuendo moments involving Mouth, some jewels, and, of course, Mama Fratelli. We definitely didn’t mean to go there… but, let’s be real, it’s all part of the fun. We’re sorry (but also, not sorry at all). 🤭 Check out the Goonies cast and characters here.

From laughs to chaos, this episode is overflowing with good vibes, hilarious tangents, and the kind of banter you’ll need to hear to believe. Don’t miss it—hit play now and join the fun! 🎙️

For more in-depth reviews and other fun, movie stuff check out our website: www.neverseenitpodcast.com

*In a Violent Nature* introduces an instantly iconic new horror villain with chilling intensity, delivering a blend of suspense, supernatural terror, and wild landscapes that feels fresh yet classic. To help us break down the film’s scares, symbolism, and blood-soaked twists, we’re joined by special guest Donnie Appleseed, who brings his own insight and horror fandom to the table

This Halloween episode is perfect for fans of horror movies, supernatural thrillers, and suspenseful monster tales. *In a Violent Nature* offers a haunting storyline, unforgettable creature design, and eerie forest settings that will stay with you long after the credits roll. Whether you're drawn to mysterious curses, terrifying undead villains, or a fresh twist on classic horror, this episode has everything horror lovers crave. Don’t miss our in-depth review and discussion  as we unpack what makes *In a Violent Nature* the latest must-watch film in horror cinema!

Follow us on all of our social media by checking out our Linktree

Joining us for this episode is our favorite Star Wars fan, David Glanzer, Chief Strategist and Spokesperson for Comic-Con International.

Watch the Star Wars: Return of the Jedi Trailer

The Godfather is jam-packed with Italian music, language, food, and culture, intermixed with scenes of graphic violence that plagued these criminal families over the decades. While much of the story development centers around this life of violent crime, the one theme ever-present throughout the film, is that of family. So, fire up a pot of marinara while you dip your bread into this installment of the Never Seen It Podcast.

This film introduces one of the horror genre's most iconic villains, Pinhead or "Lead Cenobite" as the character is credited.

The group discusses fashion in the S&M scene, why the dubbing is so bad, and the missed opportunity of Butterball being the horror icon rather than Pinhead.

• Adrian on letterboxd.
• Arnold on letterboxd.
• Alex on letterboxd.
• Anthony on letterboxd.
• Justin on letterboxd.

• Adrian on letterboxd.
• Arnold on letterboxd.
• Alex on letterboxd.
• Anthony on letterboxd.
• Justin on letterboxd.

But is it a good movie? Between Madonna's horrible, off-key singing (no wonder she was paid so little) and the seemingly endless sequence of montages, who's to say if this movie is any good? Critics at the time didn't think so, and what had the potential to be a cult-hit, ala Batman, has quickly become nothing more than a footnote in movie history, much like Beatty's career. 

When he's not making mediocre projects or forgetting how to read, Beatty enjoys spending time with his cat Sparkles and catching up on tv shows like My Three Sons and Say Yes to the Dress. You can watch more of Beatty's films on late-night paid programming channels, and you can catch more of Madonna's music in the discount bin at your local thrift store. 

Follow us on twitter and check out our website for more movie reviews.

Follow us on Spotify and  iTunes to be notified when our latest episodes become available.

Be sure to leave us a rating and review on Apple iTunes. You can follow the show on twitter, instagram and Facebook.

We'd love to hear your movie suggestions. Please reach out to us here. 

• Adrian on letterboxd.
•  Arnold on letterboxd. 
• Alex on letterboxd.
•  Anthony on letterboxd. 
• Justin on letterboxd. 

Anti drug commercials here: